Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
> I didn't want to be rude, I'll only had in mind that there was a new > team forming around Log4cxx and I simply really don't know if there > are any official binaries out there. :-) Not rude at all! I will put a little time into updating project files and perhaps post them on github or somewher

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 21:11 schrieben Sie: > Ha, that's right, isn't it. I didn't want to be rude, I'll only had in mind that there was a new team forming around Log4cxx and I simply really don't know if there are any official binaries out there. :-) > I do rec

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
> Does the project provide some?! ;-) The only thing I can see are > source releases. Ha, that's right, isn't it. > Ant is capable of generating projects, although I didn't ever test > myself, or the old releases contain some which could be used as > templates. AFAIR we didn't add or rename file

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 20:17 schrieben Sie: > Sounds like ant won't work for me.  How are the release binaries > built for the various operating systems? Does the project provide some?! ;-) The only thing I can see are source releases. > I can give Maverick a shot

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
1) Creating static libraries makes things easier for me. However, not a great sign that the test is failing. 2) The mentioned path (dynamic install path on OS X) needs to be changed all together. 3) This makes ant a poor/non option for my purposes Sounds like ant won't work for me. How are the r

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Mittwoch, 2. Juli 2014 um 19:04 schrieben Sie: > 1 - Despite the command line options it will not build a static library.   > I've tried  >       -Denable-shared=no -Denable-static=yes >       -Denable-static=yes >   both times it just makes a dylib It looks to me

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-02 Thread Lucas Vickers
Hello, I've tried using ant, and we're making progress but there are still some issues. This is all currently on OS X. 1 - Despite the command line options it will not build a static library. I've tried -Denable-shared=no -Denable-static=yes -Denable-static=yes both times it just

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 21:27 schrieben Sie: > I am attaching the output from both commands, any guidance is > appreciated.  Right now I'm building on OS X, next windows. autogen.out already contains some errors, but I have no idea if those are important. They sounds

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Lucas Vickers
I have previously built from random xcode and visual studio projects found online, and updated code copied into the folders. I'm trying to do this the proper way now. ./autogen.sh ./configure this does not leave me with any viable make or project files (that I can tell). the final output from con

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 18:36 schrieben Sie: > https://github.com/apache/log4cxx/tree/trunk This is not the official repo, use the following: http://logging.apache.org/log4cxx/source-repository.html Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Lucas Vickers
I see some benefits to making a very light server that can keep basic statistic, but yes I do see the ease in just reusing an smtp server. Anyway I will take a look at the most recent code https://github.com/apache/log4cxx/tree/trunk has the last commit 11 months ago, can you just confirm this is

Re: Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Lucas Vickers, am Dienstag, 1. Juli 2014 um 18:12 schrieben Sie: > What I'm trying to do now is create a way to alert myself when > there are error level logs.  I know I can use the smtp appender but > I don't love this because the credentials are stored locally.  I > like the idea of se

Socket appender improvements

2014-07-01 Thread Lucas Vickers
Hi All, Log4cxx has been working well for me locally, specifically due to the fact that it can be compiled in 32 and 64 bits. What I'm trying to do now is create a way to alert myself when there are error level logs. I know I can use the smtp appender but I don't love this because the credential