Dera - give the troubleshooting techniques provided here a try:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/AnalysisParalysis
Provide us with a more detailed example of a sentence of text you
indexed and how you are searching (using QueryParser, I presume) and we
can likely offer more assistance.
On Oct 13, 2004, at 3:14 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I was Curious to Know the Difference between ParallelMultiSearcher and
MultiSearcher ,
1) Is the working internal functionality of these are same or
different .
They are different internally. Externally they should return identical
results and n
Chris - I suspect something else in your application is getting in the
way. Try to simplify and eliminate the servlet, or use a tool like
Luke to see what is truly in the index and what truly is being
returned. Lucene indexes what you tell it (perhaps your analyzer is
manipulating things?), a
Is this the proper forum to discuss WebLucene? Perhaps this discussion
should be moved to the WebLucene e-mail list?
Erik
On Oct 11, 2004, at 6:37 AM, Sumathi wrote:
I have overcome the problem with tomcat also. and the demo is
working fine
. I tried using a sample xml (Sample.xml) wi
I found this interesting:
http://www.guuui.com/posting.php?id=1585
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pardon the mild advertising interruption - I'm giving a 3 hour tutorial
on Lucene at ApacheCon next month. Time is running out for meeting the
pre-registration numbers, so I'm encouraging folks that are already
going to ApacheCon but have not registered yet to please do so. And if
you are und
On Oct 5, 2004, at 4:29 PM, Patel, Viral wrote:
Does anyone know how can I iterate through entire index and display
all of the "records" without typing anything in the query?
You can use the IndexReader API to navigate the index and walk through
all of the documents.
Erik
---
On Oct 4, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Chris Fraschetti wrote:
absoultely, limiting the user's query is no problem here. I've
currently implemented the lucene javascript to catcha lot of user
quries that could cause issues.. blank queries, ? or * at the
beginning of query, etc etc... but I couldn't think of a
On Sep 28, 2004, at 9:46 PM, Daly, Pete wrote:
I am new to lucene, and trying to perform a sorted query on a list of
people's names. Lucene seem unable to properly sort on the name field
of my
indexed documents. If I sort by the other (shorter) fields, it seems
to
work fine. The name sort seem
On Sep 29, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Bryan Dotzour wrote:
3. Certainly some of you on this list are using Lucene in a web-app
environment. Can anyone list some best practices on managing
reading/writing/searching a Lucene index in that context?
Beyond the advice already given on this thread, since you sa
On Sep 27, 2004, at 6:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in doing sorting in Lucene. Is there a FAQ or an
article that
will show me how to do this? I already have my indexing and searching
working.
From IndexSearcher, use search(Query,Sort) method (or other variants
that take a
On Sep 25, 2004, at 5:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Sep 24, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Fred Toth wrote:
I'm trying to understand what's going on with the query parser
and keyword fields.
It's a confusing situation, for sure.
I've got a large subset of my documents which are "p
On Sep 24, 2004, at 12:26 PM, Fred Toth wrote:
I'm trying to understand what's going on with the query parser
and keyword fields.
It's a confusing situation, for sure.
I've got a large subset of my documents which are "publications".
So as to be able to query these, I've got this in the indexer:
do
As for alternative HTML parsers, there are a few notable ones:
NekoHTML - Nutch uses it
JTidy - My Ant task in the sandbox uses it
and HTMLParser
All of the above are surely far more battle-tested in production than
Lucene's demo parser, and I'd be surprised if they did not correctly
handle Unic
On Sep 23, 2004, at 6:00 PM, Greg Langmead wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Do you need highlights from all fields? If so, then you can use:
TextFragment[] getBestTextFragments(TokenStream, ...);
with a TokenStream for each field, then select the highest scoring
fragments across all fields. Would th
If you obtained the 1.4.1 source distribution, then you're fine and
its simply an issue with the properties. We keep the properties set to
the _next_ version of Lucene (or as a beta/rc version label) to avoid
the CVS HEAD codebase from building as a release label when it is very
likely not th
On Sep 23, 2004, at 11:00 AM, Ulrich Mayring wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Look at AnalysisDemo referred to here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/AnalysisParalysis
Keep in mind that phrase queries do not support wildcards - they are
analyzed and any wildcard characters are likely stripped
The boost is not thrown away, but rather combined with the length
normalization factor during indexing. So while your actual boost value
is not stored directly in the index, it is taken into consideration for
scoring appropriately.
Erik
On Sep 23, 2004, at 8:17 AM, Bastian Grimm [Eastb
On Sep 23, 2004, at 5:49 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Ulrich Mayring writes:
Will do, thank you very much. However, how do I get at the analyzed
form
of my terms?
Instanciate the analyzer, create a token stream feeding your input,
loop over the tokens, output the results.
Look at AnalysisDemo referred
Sorting is done however you specify, by field, with secondary fields
specified, by document id, by score/relevance, or even by a custom
implementation to sort by something else (in Lucene in Action we
provide an implementation that sorts by two-dimensional distance from a
given location, wh
Sorting is done however you specify, by field, with secondary fields
specified, by document id, by score/relevance, or even by a custom
implementation to sort by something else (in Lucene in Action we
provide an implementation that sorts by two-dimensional distance from a
given location, wh
Actually what William should use is the new Sort facility to order
results by a field. Doing this with a Similarity would be much
trickier. Look at the IndexSearcher.sort() methods which take a Sort
and follow the Javadocs from there. Let us know if you have any
questions on sorting.
It
If it is unindexed, then you cannot query on it, so you do not have a
choice. The other option is to use a field that is indexed, not
tokenized, and not stored (you have to use new Field(...) to accomplish
that) if you don't want to store the field data.
Erik
On Sep 21, 2004, at 5:54 P
The best first approach is to simply re-query every time the user goes
to a new page, keeping around the query in some for or another (perhaps
the expression if you're using QueryParser) and the page number.
If that is fast enough, then you're done! :)
If it is not, then you could consider cach
On Sep 15, 2004, at 1:45 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
Hi
Erik , Doug , Otis
This is general forum - no need to address individuals.
1) Is a there a PHP version of Lucene Implemantation avaliable , If so
Where
?
Using the Java version of Lucene from PHP is my recommendation. There
is not a PHP versio
On Sep 15, 2004, at 1:45 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
Hi
Erik , Doug , Otis
This is general forum - no need to address individuals.
1) Is a there a PHP version of Lucene Implemantation avaliable , If so
Where
?
Using the Java version of Lucene from PHP is my recommendation. There
is not a PHP versio
I hope u get the situation. :{
With regards
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 7:37 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: ANT +BUILD + LUCENE
I'
Perhaps we should @deprecate the contributions page like we did with
the Powered By page, and migrate it to the wiki?
Erik
On Sep 13, 2004, at 6:50 PM, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Friday 10 September 2004 15:48, Chas Emerick wrote:
PDFTextStream should be added to the 'Document Converters' sec
I'm not following what you want very clearly, but there is an
task in Lucene's Sandbox.
Please post what you are trying, and I'd be happy to help once I see
the details.
Erik
On Sep 12, 2004, at 4:44 PM, Karthik N S wrote:
Hi
Guys
Apologies..
The Task for me is to build the Ind
Interesting!
http://kasparov.skife.org/blog/2004/09/13#lucene-graphs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have way too much confusing code there for me to try to take in,
but surely the situation is AnalysisParalysis:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/AnalysisParalysis
Try to narrow down things to a very simple example for posting allowing
others to very quickly and clearly see your
On Sep 8, 2004, at 6:26 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
I want to discuss a little problem, lucene doesn't support *Term like
queries.
First of all, this is untrue. WildcardQuery itself most definitely
supports wildcards at the beginning.
I would like to use "*schreiben".
The dilemma you've encountere
Could you create a simple piece of code (using a RAMDirectory) that
demonstrates this issue?
Erik
On Sep 8, 2004, at 12:35 AM, Minh Kama Yie wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry I should clarify my last point.
The search() would return no hits, but the explain() using the
apparently invalid docId return
On Sep 7, 2004, at 3:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to Lucene. Can anyone guide me from where i can download free
Lucene book.
Free?!
http://www.manning.com/hatcher2 is the book Otis and I have spent the
last year laboring on. It has been a long hard effort that is about to
come to fru
The "Keyword"-ness of a field is only at indexing time, and not
something known about at query time.
You need to use a different analyzer for that field. Check out posts
on KeywordAnalyzer and PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper - this combination is
the secret :)
Erik
On Sep 3, 2004, at 9:55 AM
You need to use a recent version of Ant - version 1.6.x.
Erik
On Sep 1, 2004, at 5:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to use Ant to build Lucene within Eclipse, or
rather trying to. I've went to external tools and created a
lucenebuild.xml entry. Under location I have the build.
On Aug 31, 2004, at 6:10 PM, Jan Agermose wrote:
Im having some troble using Lucene - but is the .NET port. Should I
ask questions about the different analyzers and tokenizers on this
mailinglist or one some other?
This list is primarily for the Java version of Lucene, but I suspect
the behavior
Thanks for reporting this. We actually know. Lucene 1.4.1 was not
released "properly", and it is going to require someone to do so.
I've done the last two releases, but have been swamped lately. If no
one beats me to it, I'll hopefully get around to this in the near
future.
Erik
On
You should consider using the Ant task in the Sandbox
(contributions/ant directory). You'll need to write a custom document
handler implementation to handle PDF's and any other types you like.
The built-in handler does text and HTML files, but is pluggable.
The task uses Ant's filesets to determ
That is correct... fuzzy searches are only on a per-term basis.
If what you meant, though, was a phrase query ("full" near "name") you
have to add an explicit slop factor like "full name"~5
Erik
On Aug 25, 2004, at 2:19 AM, Stephane James Vaucher wrote:
From: http://jakarta.apache.org/lu
On Aug 23, 2004, at 11:36 AM, Stephane James Vaucher wrote:
Should this property be changed in the next major release of lucene to
org.apache...disableLuceneLocks?
Yes, that makes sense to put an org.apache.lucene prefix. If that is
the case, it should be changed to "disableLocks" - no point in
On Aug 23, 2004, at 10:48 AM, Stephane James Vaucher wrote:
I haven't used it, and I'm a little confused from the code:
/** ...
* If the system property 'disableLuceneLocks' has the String value
of
* "true", lock creation will be disabled.
*/
public final class FSDirectory extends Directory {
On Aug 20, 2004, at 6:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're currently in lucene 1.2... haven't moved to 1.3 yet.
Skip 1.3 and go straight to 1.4.1 :)
Upgrade - why not?
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
Have you considered using the built-in QueryFilter for this? Why
isn't it sufficient for your needs?
Erik
On Aug 20, 2004, at 6:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys!
I was hoping someone here could help me out with a custom filter.
We have an index of emails and do some searches on t
On Aug 20, 2004, at 12:36 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I don't understand this. StandardTokenizer.java hasn't changed since
last year.
I have packaged Lucene such that 'ant javacc' is called at package
build time. I now see the problem - 'import java.io.*;' has been
removed from StandardTokenizer.
On Aug 20, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
Hi Otis,
I'm asking, because it looks like your compiler is not finding Reader
and IOException classes, both of which are in java.io.* package, which
I see imported in StandardTokenizer.java as 'import java.io.*;'.
In my copy of StandardTokeniz
On Aug 20, 2004, at 7:54 AM, Rupinder Singh Mazara wrote:
hi erik
thanks for the warning and the code.
Let me re-phrase the question,
i have a index generated by lucene, i need to have the search
capabilty
to have a high availabilty. What solutions would be the most optimal
I'm guessing from y
What would be the best way? Use Lucene outside of EJB. It's quite
silly to make such a decision "purely due to a policy decision" when
the technicalities of it show that it is an unwise decision.
You're going to navigate Hits through a session bean? And as you said,
the EJB spec says not to
The index order is the "secondary" sort order. You can change this by
using the new sorting facility if desired.
Erik
On Aug 18, 2004, at 2:24 PM, Ching-Pei Hsing wrote:
Hi,
What is the order returned by Lucene when the scores for two result
documents are exactly the same? I know this ra
it didn't come across that way before.
Erik
T
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 2:00 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: AnalyZer HELP Please
Thanks for doing the legwork. My favorite example is "to
rom it test"
- 0 matches for this exact phrase
- i.e. stoplist NOT used for any words in a phrase query
Tate
p.s. Um... did you say that was a rhetorical question? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August
The details of the segments file (and all the others) is freely
available here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/fileformats.html
Also, there is Java code in Lucene, of course, that manipulates the
segments file which could be leveraged (although probably package
scoped and not eas
e Do (WWGD)? category does Google remove stop words? I'll
leave that as a rhetorical question for now :)
Erik
Thx
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 7:35 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: AnalyZe
On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
I did as Erik replied in his mail ,
and searched for the complete word "\"New Year\"" ,
but the QueryParser Still returns me hit for "Year" Only.
[ The Analyzer I use has 555 English Stop words with "new" present
in it ]
No wonder!
That's whe
On Aug 17, 2004, at 9:23 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
So when I did a quick run on Analyzer process and
found that it was splitting the Word
"New Year" = [New] [Year]
Am I doing some thing wrong in here
No... this is what this analyzer does. QueryParser does the same
thing. The difference
"New Year" = [New] [Year]
Am I doing some thing wrong in here
Thx in advance.
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 6:18 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: AnalyZer HELP Please
This is what analyzers do
This is what analyzers do. I don't know of any analyzer that deals
with quotes in the way you're requesting, by keeping the contents
together as a complete token. You'll have to write your own variant
that does this.
QueryParser, however, uses quotes to denote a phrase query, and will
query
What Analyzer is being used? If it is removing stop words, what is the
stop word list?
Erik
On Aug 17, 2004, at 1:56 AM, Leos Literak wrote:
One user reported, that if he searches http AND halt,
the search fails. This can be found in logs:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
at
On Aug 14, 2004, at 7:10 AM, lingaraju wrote:
How to highlight the search word
See Highlighter here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/lucene-sandbox/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
On Aug 13, 2004, at 4:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A ranged query that covers the full range does the same thing.
Of course it is also inefficient with term generation: myField[a TO z]
Note that this won't work if you have more than 1024 matching terms,
which is a quite likely scenario. The s
You have to re-index. Updating is not currently possible, at least not
without really low-level hacks.
Erik
On Aug 13, 2004, at 8:23 AM, Demetrio Zenti wrote:
I apologise if it's a stupid question...
I index Document objects having 2 fields:
- 1° representing file name. It's code is
Query.toString() is your friend! As well as troubleshooting without
QueryParser in the picture too.
But, Daniel to the rescue :)
Erik
On Aug 12, 2004, at 5:06 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
My guess would be 'something in the QueryParser', but I don't know for
sure. Erik will know he's
I suggest you aggregate all the text you want searchable into a single
field during indexing. Then search that field at query time instead.
The alternative is to build up a (potentially huge) BooleanQuery using
that string for each field. The MultiFieldQueryParser can do this, but
its not pre
My Tapestry and Lucene talks have been accepted for the upcoming OSCOM
conference in Zurich.
http://www.oscom.org/events/oscom4/
I look forward to meeting some of the European Apache contingency!
Erik
-
To unsubsc
On Aug 4, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
I can't get negative boosts to work with QueryParser. Is it possible
to do so?
Closer inspection on the parsing:
TOKEN : {
)+ ( "." (<_NUM_CHAR>)+ )? > : DEFAULT
}
where
<#_NUM_CHAR: ["0"-"9"] >
So, no, negative boosts don't appear possible w
On Aug 4, 2004, at 7:19 AM, Terry Steichen wrote:
I can't get negative boosts to work with QueryParser. Is it possible
to do so?
More details please.
- What exact query expression did you use?
- Did you get an error? If so, what was it?
- What does Query.toString() output?
Erik
---
se of permissions. Maybe you're using a
different version of Lucene between the command-line and your web
application?
Erik
On Aug 4, 2004, at 3:14 AM, Christiaan Fluit wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Where did you get 'i'? Keep in mind that using Hits.doc(n) intends
'n&#x
Where did you get 'i'? Keep in mind that using Hits.doc(n) intends
'n' to be a document *id*, not the iteration through the Hits
collection. This is a very common mistake, and I'm guessing one you've
made here.
Erik
On Aug 3, 2004, at 7:49 PM, xuemei li wrote:
Thank you for your repl
On Aug 1, 2004, at 10:25 PM, John Adam wrote:
Is there a way to get most significant words of a document if i give a
document number.
Have a look at the term vector support new in v1.4. For a document
number and field name, you get terms and frequencies:
TermFreqVector vector =
rea
On Jul 30, 2004, at 7:01 AM, Lucene wrote:
I was wondering is there is a way to do proximity searches with phrases
eg "very good" NEAR "sometimes".
Any help on this would be welcome.
You can do this with the new SpanQuery family in v1.4. The example you
gave would consist of a SpanTermQuery for "
That'd be a pretty quick progress bar in the searches I've seen
10ms would be barely a blink of an eye.
Perhaps we should discuss why your searches are slow enough to warrant
a progress bar. But a HitCollector might be the right hook you're
looking for.
Erik
On Jul 28, 2004, at 10
On Jul 27, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Hetan Shah wrote:
Works for me.
Here is what I am striving to achieve.
phraseString = request.getParameter("phrase");
if (phraseString.length() > 0){
phraseQueryString = "\""+phraseString+("\"");
phraseQuery = true;
queryString = phraseQueryStr
On Jul 27, 2004, at 5:15 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
There is no API for that.
Yeah there is! :)
IndexReader.lastModified()
I borrowed that from LIMO's .jsp page, by the way.
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Let's turn it around could you send us your code that is not
working?
Lucene's test cases show PhraseQuery in action, and working.
Erik
On Jul 26, 2004, at 4:11 PM, Hetan Shah wrote:
Hello,
Can someone on the mailing list send me a copy of sample code of how
to implement the phrase q
On Jul 21, 2004, at 11:40 AM, Anson Lau wrote:
Is there any benefit to set the boost during indexing rather than set
it
during query?
It allows setting each document differently. For example,
TheServerSide is using field-level boosts at index time to control
ordering by date, such that newer ar
On Jul 21, 2004, at 11:19 AM, Ian McDonnell wrote:
No sorry i didnt mean that i was trying to extract the jars at all.
I meant the extraction of the original lucene source bundle. I have
been developing in java for going on 5 years now, but am relatively
new to Web Apps. I have some experience
n i try to compile any of the source
it just throws numerous errors. I've got the classpath set to
web-inf/classes.
Have i extraced it to the wrong directory?
--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 21, 2004, at 8:10 AM, Ian McDonnell wrote:
Is the package information and
On Jul 21, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Anson Lau wrote:
Apply boost factor to fields when you do a lucene search.
Or... set the boost on the Field during indexing.
Erik
Anson
-Original Message-
From: John Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:07 AM
To: [EMAIL
On Jul 21, 2004, at 8:10 AM, Ian McDonnell wrote:
Is the package information and import paths ready to deploy on Tomcat
server. I tried extracting lucene on the server, but when i compile
files, it just throws numerous no class definition errors and errors
relating to the package.
Huh? Lucene c
Interestingly (and ironically) enough, the project I'm currently
working on requires full-text searching of Word and PDF resumes. SQL
Server is already the required database as well, so we are leveraging
the full-text indexing capabilities it has. There is a special trick
to drop a BLOB into
On Jul 21, 2004, at 6:59 AM, Stepan Mik wrote:
It is possible to retrieve tokens offsets (Token.startOffset(),
Token.endOffset()) later when document is found and returned in hit
collection?
No offsets are not stored in the index. In fact, the only place
they are currently used is with the Hi
On Jul 20, 2004, at 2:10 PM, John Wang wrote:
I have already provided my opinion on this one - I think it would be
fine to allow Token to be public. I'll let others respond to the
additional requests you've made.
Great, what processes need to be in place before this gets in the code
base?
You're
On Jul 20, 2004, at 12:12 PM, John Wang wrote:
There are few things I want to do to be able to customize lucene:
[...]
3) to be able to customize analyzers to add more information to the
Token while doing tokenization.
I have already provided my opinion on this one - I think it would be
fine
On Jul 20, 2004, at 10:07 AM, Ian McDonnell wrote:
As for indexing data from mysql - there have been lots of discussions
of that recently, so check the archives. Basically you read the data,
and index it with Lucene's API. And you are responsible for keeping
it >in sync.
The problem i am having
possible?
Of course. But you'll have to code it. It's only a few lines of code
to index a "document" into a Lucene index, but it is up to you to code
those into the appropriate spot in your system (most likely right where
you insert into mysql).
Erik
Ian
---
On Jul 20, 2004, at 8:44 AM, Ian McDonnell wrote:
Can Lucenes indexer be used to store info in fields in a mysql db?
I'm not quite clear on your question. You want to store a Lucene index
(aka Directory) within mysql?
Or, you want to index data from your existing mysql database into a
Lucene in
On Jul 20, 2004, at 1:27 AM, Aphinyanaphongs, Yindalon wrote:
I gather from reading the documentation that the scores for each
document hit are computed at query time. I have an application that,
due to the complexity of the function, cannot compute scores at query
time. Would it be possible f
On Jul 15, 2004, at 10:02 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Joel Shellman writes:
What do I need to do so that wildcard searching will work on this? I
am
using the same analyzer for indexing and searching (otherwise the
first
search wouldn't work either).
Check what query is produced (query.toString(...))
Guys...
Apologies
Let me be more Specific regarding the last mail
I would like to get all Hits returned with score = 1.0 ONLY using
Query Parser .
What are my Options.
with regards
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 4:
Kathik,
I have a really hard time following your questions, otherwise I'd chime
in on them more often. Your meaning is not often clear.
In the case of normalizing the score to 1.0 or less - this is precisely
what Hits does for you. I'm not sure what you mean by "BEFORE" doing
QueryParser - a
In this situation, you may want to investigate implementing a custom
Filter which is user-specific and constrains the search space to only
the rows a specific user is allowed to search.
Erik
On Jul 15, 2004, at 3:04 AM, Sergiu Gordea wrote:
Hi again,
I'm thinking to get the list of IDs
On Jul 14, 2004, at 10:19 PM, Jones G wrote:
I have an index with multiple fields. Right now I am using
MultiFieldQueryParser to search the fields. This means that if the
same term occurs in multiple fields, it will be weighed accordingly.
Is there any way to treat all the fields in question as
, what is that.
Mats
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. juli 2004 01:29
Til: Lucene Users List
Emne: Re: lucene sort error - there are more terms than documents in
field
On Jul 13, 2004, at 7:10 PM, MATL (Mats Lindberg) wrote:
Hello.
I am
On Jul 13, 2004, at 7:10 PM, MATL (Mats Lindberg) wrote:
Hello.
I am using:
import org.apache.lucene.search.Sort
when searching an index, but for some reasons, in some indexes i get
this error:
caught a class java.lang.RuntimeException
with message: there are more terms than documents in field
d
Look at the Term Highlighter here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/docs/lucene-sandbox/
On Jul 13, 2004, at 2:32 PM, Hetan Shah wrote:
I think I have not explained my question correctly. What is happening
is when I show the result on a page the text below the link as shown
below.
Test
On Jul 13, 2004, at 12:51 AM, John Wang wrote:
Hi:
On the same thought, how about the org.apache.lucene.analysis.Token
class. Can we make it non-final?
I searched for uses of the Token constructors and I'm currently of the
opinion that it is ok for Token to be made non-final. Any reasons not
On Jul 7, 2004, at 6:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to do a PhraseQuery with Wildcards?
No.
This very question came up a few days ago. Look at PhrasePrefixQuery -
although this will be a bit of effort to expand the terms matching the
wildcarded term.
I'd like to
search for
On Jul 7, 2004, at 3:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you recommend an analyzer that doesn't discard '*' or '/'?
WhitespaceAnalyzer :)
Check the wiki AnalysisParalysis page also.
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:44 PM, Alex Aw Seat Kiong wrote:
How to use QueryParser to query to get the index summary info, like?
QueryParser is not the appropriate place to get the information you
want. Use IndexReader instead.
a. Last and first index document?
reader.document(0) and reader.document(r
On Jul 6, 2004, at 2:53 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Karthik N S writes:
Can SomeBody Tell me Where Can I find Latest copy of
"StopAnalyzer.java"
which can be used with Lucene1_4-final,
On Lucene-Sandbox I am not able to Find it.
[ My Company Prohibits me from using CVS ]
There is no lucene 1.4 fina
301 - 400 of 959 matches
Mail list logo
