On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:27:42AM +, James Griffin wrote:
I think vi(1) - not vim - would be a great tool for him to
learn. A real hardcore UNIX editor,
ed(1)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:05:55PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Richard Toohey
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
That last sentence - sounds exactly like what I need - so I try
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:18:41PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
OpenBSD's form of sed requires you to output to a new file and
mv that back to original.
.. or one could use ed, or perl, to change a file in place.
-wb
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 02:59:12PM +0100, roberth wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:25:35 -0600
Orestes Leal R. l...@cubacatering.avianet.cu wrote:
Otto, this is not 4.8 it's 4.3, so this is a error now and not a
warning, what I must changte in the comnand line to make it work with
4.8?
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:42:51PM +0200, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:35:01PM +0800, Aaron Lewis wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
echo %A3 | sed 's/(%[0-9A-Z]{2})//g'
I'd like %A3 like string to be removed , what's wrong with
Perhaps every section of the FAQ begin with an exhortation
to read the entire FAQ.
I am flabbergasted that someone who runs a 'production' box
would put themeselves in this position.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:15:42PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Drawing shit with the mouse. Not typing stuff with the keybored.
Recently I saw a British geometer (currently in Norway)
saying (on the categories mailing list) that he was quite
happy with Jarnal.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:43:13PM -0400, Douglas Maus wrote:
When using mail, some header fields are not shown based on
/etc/mail.rc: ignore headers (system)
and
~/.mailrc: ignore headers (user)
Even if a user removes the 'ignore' lines from his/her ~/.mailrc
the system /etc/mail.rc
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:31:14AM +0200, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote:
Sorry, but you guys from OpenBSD have proved that you can trust
the skills of **some** developers
viz., precisely those developers that are telling you to not trust
the virtualization hype/crap. So, why not trust those
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:00:14PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
...
Really? then why do you use scrotwm?
Because it kicks the balls out of every other wm.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 17:08 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:43:01PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Since your reply implicitly replaced making with designing,
that shouldn't prove to much of a stretch.
My reply explicitly emphasizes the difficulty in designing software
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
I'm not a nvidia fanboy, but I've found the need to clarify what nvidia
actually does for open source community.
You mean, what nvidia does to close parts of unprincipled
projects that like to call themselves 'open
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:34:45AM -0400, Daniel Malament wrote:
On 10/22/2009 2:41 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
There used to be a message before the install script wiped out
filesystems with newfs, listing the partitions and asking if you were
sure. Was this removed, or did I somehow miss
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:54:20PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
William Boshuck wrote:
The man page is typically excellent, so you can learn
au besoin on the fly.
May I also suggest the FAQ article written by tmux author Nicholas
Marriott?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq7.html#tmux
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 07:22:27AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:00:28PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
Funny, I always disliked CTRL-A being taken by screen, since it was
so handy to go back to the beginning of the command line in ksh.
But then, I make a lot
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:45:41PM -0400, John Cosimano wrote:
--- Brad Tilley [Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 01:16:23PM -0400]: ---
de-installed screen(1) and will start using tmux(1), as it's in base.
thanks for the effort of doing that---screen was always among the very
first packages i
Is setting a password on the new package hierarchy and including
the password with the CD feasible or desired?
This kind of thread makes me want to chew my teeth.
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 01:26:56PM -0400, Rod Dorman wrote:
On Saturday, October 3, 2009, 02:13:51, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Have you thought this through, at all?
Nope, not at all.
You might find the list rather unreceptive to the
whistling that results when you unplug both ears.
It was
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:47:27PM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 19:58:40 Mr Man wrote:
Hi,
I have a presentation coming up, and I would like to use my OpenBSD laptop
for it. What is the recommended application for a slides driven
presentation?
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:51:16PM +0800, Jennifer Ma wrote:
hi all,
i am new to openbsd and screen and ksh ...
my question is how to use screen(from package) to load ksh with
$HOME/.profile loaded(like a full login shell), so my alias can work
again.
You can use 'ksh -l' or -/bin/ksh
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:16:25AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:03:27PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
I am wondering if I wanted to edit something before the installation
then what can I use to edit files? I was told that vi is almost always
available on any Unix system,
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:49:45AM -0400, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:16:25AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 07:03:27PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
I am wondering if I wanted to edit
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:23:56AM -0800, new_guy wrote:
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
Why do you maintain stable by issuing security patches for it if you
don't care if anybody installs them (by not telling them about the
patches through one of the designated channels)? Don't you want
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:21:22AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 13.11.2008 at 08:55:04 -0500, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So get on the developer's case when they don't send out notifications.
All this chatter now isn't going to change anything when the next
errata
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 10:09:08PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
You're right Theo, but isn't better an answer like: RTFC ? Just 4 char.
There is no point in telling people who can't read the code, to go
read the code. It won't change a thing. They really will keep coming
back to misc
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:05:19PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
I would assume you're referring to uvm_loadav in uvm_meter.c? That's where
I'm looking. I was hoping for a little English to help me with my
understanding, but maybe I'm just not clever enough.
Likely this is not the real
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:57:31AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Sorry, this does seem ok in 4.3. (An example in
the FAQ uses a relative path, and that's what I've
always done.)
It only seems ok in 4.3 *if you ignore
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:59:29PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:39:20AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:28:54AM -0700, Michael wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:40:12AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
...
cd /mnt
# /usr/mdec/installboot -v boot /mnt/biosboot wd0
It should not be
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:31:04AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 13:36:22 Nov 01, Chris Kuethe wrote:
As long as your filesystems are still readable, you can use a more
comfortable tool:
mount /dev/wd0a /mnt
mount /dev/wd0d /mnt/var
mount /dev/wd0e /mnt/usr
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 08:33:44PM +0100, soko.tica wrote:
Hello list,
I did manage to scr... err, mess up partitioning scheme through
disklabel, so I've booted from floppy, mounted partitions to /tmp/a/,
tmp/d/, /tmp/e/, but when I attempt to edit etc/fstab by ed I get:
#chmod 766
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:37:12PM -0400, Heimdall Imbert wrote:
I understand what you mean.
No, it seems from your response that you do not.
The mailing lists are at best secondary sources, for
particular and possibly unusual difficulties that you
cannot resolve by reading the primary
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:31:14PM -0400, Heimdall Imbert wrote:
Hahaha, I wanted to say the same thing but figured that this wouldn't be an
appropriate venue for a discussion of this nature. But since someone else
brought it up, I figure I might as well add my two cents. I currently run
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 05:54:12PM -0700, new_guy wrote:
I know. Longest uptime is silly, macho, pointless stuff... but I ran across
an old SunOS 2.6 box that had been up for 387 days. It had been hacked. The
only reason it was not an open mail relay is that /var was full. So, I
thought to
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Denis Doroshenko wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neko wrote:
this is the future. people use multiple os on their machine
That's actually the past... multibooting seemed way more popular ten years
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 02:22:01PM -0500, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to use the mail(1) p command. According to the help that is
printed out when running the program, it seems that the p command should
pipe the message out to LPR and print it. However, it just prints the
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 10:58:19AM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
I've considered putting together a short article on Undeadly describing
this technique based on my own efforts porting security/hatchet, but I
wasn't sure if there would be any interest.
I would be interested in reading the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy wrote (to tedu@):
Out of curiosity, what happens when you install X but
answer no to the question about intending to RUN X?
... It would install all the C crap and not put startx
in rc, in
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:06:23PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the
next version be 3.1?
That might converge in some sense. If the end is to be something
like license.template, then we're talking about GPL version theta,
where
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:42:15PM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
I always do my homework,
Is the following mindless word-drool about 'put startx into rc'
an example of how you do your homework?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:30:02AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Tony Abernethy
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 02:25:55AM +0200, Gabri Mate wrote:
Hey There List,
I've made an /altroot partition, exactly the same size as my /, and it
is also mounted. I've put ROOTBACKUP=1 in root's crontab, but my /
partition doesn't get dumped on /altroot at the daily cron's run.
See item 2.
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 05:32:28PM +0200, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
Steve Shockley schrieb:
Had a royal PITA the other day when I misspelled softdep in the
/usr line in fstab, and didn't know how to use ed.
No prob w/o ed :) You can just cat /etc/fstab | grep -v usr
/etc/fstab.new
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 08:46:16PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[Quoting Richard Daemon]
I'm not sure how else to ask this, but are we allowed to take some of
the OpenBSD artwork such as the blowfish wireframe pictures and specs,
get some stickers, t-shirts or other custom media developed
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:32:53PM +0200, Lars Noodin wrote:
If one has to identify a specific license (or licenses) for OpenBSD
documentation, which is/are recommended?
Is there a generic BSD-Documenation License anymore?
I wasn't able to spot anything in either the OpenBSD FAQ or the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 02:41:27PM -0400, William Boshuck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:32:53PM +0200, Lars Noodin wrote:
If one has to identify a specific license (or licenses) for OpenBSD
documentation, which is/are recommended?
Is there a generic BSD-Documenation License anymore
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:16:13AM +0100, Siegbert Marschall wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2008 22:12:05 you wrote:
...
Got any more _freebsd_ success stories for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
No. But I will be shutting down a ten year old
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 07:24:41AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 09:42:17 Feb 28, Steve Shockley wrote:
Recipes don't teach you how to cook.
I can second this ...
In spite of my making mistakes and experimentation
I still cannot be sure how my dish will end up tasting.
One
I have seen the following sort of remarks a couple of
times this past week, yet I haven't seen them corrected.
Nick Holland is such an excellent writer that, as often
as not, you don't need to look at the sample code to
follow his advice. That's not relevant in this case,
except insofar as I
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:11:32AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... why don't you and rest of the team, led by Theo take a
concious decision to stop downloads?
OpenBSD is introduced (e.g., on the main web page) by three,
adjectives. It might be worthwhile to grasp the first of
those before
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 10:16:08AM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
... I've NEVER got any of the code for FREE,
Yes, you did. The code is free. The CDs are not.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:22:24PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
That's the second - and last - explaining from my side. I want to
add, that such (over)reaction of several persons is very
disappointing to me.
there once was a Pole
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:01:07PM +, Janke Knolli wrote:
Hi, my first post here. I just installed OpenBSD 4.2 from the official
CD's on a Sun Ultra 5 270Mhz 128MB RAM with mouse, keyboard (5C) and a
ordinary vga monitor. All smooth and good.
Then there's the problem:
Reading
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:31:24AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I find it impolite that you partially removed my questions and only
responded to some of them. I asked you if you please could respond to
all paragraphs.
People raise many issues in these messages. My idea of
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 01:37:46AM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:21:14 -0500
Eliah Kagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(There are also multiple useful,
mutually-inconsistent formal systems in both fields.)
Provably so?
Yes. For example, in intuitionistic
Hi Richard,
have you looked at Laver's work on elementary
embeddings of ranks and left distributive operations?
(Bourbaki swerve: Large cardinals ahead.)
It is from the early 90's. I think that the main
paper was published in the Advances, or the Annals.
Patrick Dehornoy (a name you might know
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:14:59PM -0500, Richard Salmon wrote:
IMO, a big part of the problem here is that when you say recommend in
this context what you actually mean appears (based on the discussion
here) to be something that most people would express as not
deliberately
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users installing
non free software if it is what they want. The FAQ is where this needs to
be documented for users to get their job done faster.
If you don't mind
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:28:24PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
I represent neither FSF nor OpenBSD. I probably represent the
community which listens to the propagandas put across by both but
wants to fight back against false marketing and for the right things
TM.
Great. The first step is
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:39:17PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 11:20 PM, William Boshuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:58:47PM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote:
On another hand we are not GNU/GPL and we don't mind our users
installing
non free
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 05:53:40PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
... you distribute non-free software.
It has been pointed out on numerous occasions that
this is a false statement.
No, I am a victim
Only because you elect to remain uninformed.
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:24:03PM -0800, Jon wrote:
Not doing any thing strange.. just want to create a binary (foobar)
and create a package so I can add it.** Why I want to do that is
not the question. I know I can tar the install location with +CONTENT
and +DESC etc.. and get done with
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 09:30:36PM -0800, Jon wrote:
hi
how to create a sha256 value for file in openbsd ?
See the -a option to cksum(1).
or
Type apropos sha256 at the prompt, pick something that
looks promising (e.g., SHA256_Init) and open its man page.
Don't get dejected if the first thing
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:48:13PM +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:05:37PM -0500, Stuart VanZee wrote:
Wow... it is incredibly telling that you chose a game, a pretty
obscure one at that as far as I can tell, to base your argument on.
The world will fall
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 07:12:50PM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
On 12:06:02 Dec 25, Pieter Verberne wrote:
I just checked out the 'wl=72' stuff in vi. Works exactly like 'tw' in
vim. I then did an fmt in the end. The result looks much better
of course. But there is a problem. The
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:21:44PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
2) If supporting non-free software is bad,
What I object to is referring people to non-free software as something
to install. Supporting is a broader term, and includes various
different practices. I don't object
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 04:36:31PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
...
Remember all the people who accused me of lying because at some time
I described the presence of these recipes as the ports system
includes non-free software?
Actually, in the quote from the interview you refer first to
the
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 08:01:53AM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:11:16AM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
...
All of that is called free speech. The right of OpenBSD to be
mean, The right to spray views you do not like or people you think are
idiots with
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 05:24:48PM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Ray Percival wrote:
[quoting and excerpt from Theo's log message in (e.g.):
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/Attic/ipf.rules]
...
But software which OpenBSD uses and redistributes must be free to all
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:49:19PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
I should more precisely have said that the OpenBSD ports system
includes instructions for fetching, building and installing specific
non-free programs.
Yes, that would be the truth. What you did say,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:52:11AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
system includes non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
(William Boshuck replied:)
Strictly speaking, no. If you unpack ports.tar.gz
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:47:00PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
... I was also told that OpenBSD's ports system includes
non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
[William Boshuck replied:]
Strictly speaking
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
system includes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:57PM -0500, Piet Slaghekke wrote:
Thanks Serge,
When I do: while read uid; do userdel $uid; done userlist.txt
I get:
while: Expression Syntax.
The foregoing command was written in Bourne shell syntax. The
error message you report suggests that you are using
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:02:32AM +0100, Linus Swdlas wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:25:29 +0100, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ${var##string} part is ksh or bash specific, see Parameter Expansion
in the bash man page if you're using bash.
I see your #! line says /bin/sh but to my
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:43:42AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 09:57:56PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
... you can use rg in /etc/printcap.
IIRC, LRNng also lets you make it easy so that, for example, if you have
1000 users in 100 work groups, with 100 work group
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 08:46:19PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
...
And this is the big difference between lpd and LPRng. With LPRng you
can specify who can use what of those printers even if all the
originators are on the same box. I think that lpd just lets you specify
what boxes can
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 12:16:50PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:49:03AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Surely they are too busy whining at us for lists, to actually search
for the lists.
I'll say it again more clearly -- all of you whiners just plain suck.
Who
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 12:01:46PM +0100, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:23:53AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
...
We've got a PR database with bugs in it, and we NEVER get fixes from
outsiders. That's not news to anyone, if they actually wanted to do
Maybe the outsiders
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 06:16:59PM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
...
a while ago (Nov, 2006), someone asked what webmail solutions people
recommended. People suggested:
...
of all of these, only openwebmail does not rely on PHP, which I deeply
mistrust. Does anyone know of any others that
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:19:39AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:54:10PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You seem uneducated about how powerless someone is
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:15:15PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Decreasing CD sales means the margins have to be adjusted. More of
you are relying on our FTP services, and also donating less.
When I started using OpenBSD I was middle-aged and largely
computer illiterate (I have never had a
On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:35:27PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
... As both NetBSD and OpenBSD are using the same tools to
manage ports/packages,
I don't think this is true. OpenBSD doesn't use pkgsrc,
and the pkg_ tools on OpenBSD have been very seriously
(and wonderfully) rewritten by
84 matches
Mail list logo
