Title: RE: AMI
Hi Heinz
Thanks for the info, this helps alot.
Magendran Govender
-Original Message-
From: Heinz Klein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 August 2004 06:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMI
Hello.
The text below can be found in the AMI support pack
Hello.
The text below can be found in the AMI support pack (MA0F) page. Based on that
and on another reply I had from Hursley we are recommending our customers to
move away from the AMI.
Heinz Klein
OLTP Tecnologia Solucoes Ltda.
Sao Paulo/SP - Brasil
AMI, and currently in the process of dealing with them
(with lost of frustration). The problem seems to
happen for sending messages over about 500K.
Yesterday, it took over an hour to put a 1.8 MB
message, and the process was still hanging as it did
not get the confirmation (I think it is the return
Heinz,
We had all sorts of problems running AMI under WAS 3.5 ranging from lockups
to coredumps...worked with support for weeks but got the run around between
the WAS and MQ support teams...we finally gave up and rewrote our app using
the base mq java classes. The best answer we got
Hello everyone.
We have a customer using the AMI (yes we - and they - know AMI is 'out' but they
need time to adjust) for file transfer operations.
The applications have been running quite well, but lately they created a new
version that runs over the Web. The Java/AMI code on the server side runs
,
Platfrom: W2000/MQ 5.3/AMI.
I don't know yet what rc our PeopleSOft developers
(they are not at our company) getting, but they are
saying that they are unable to put a message longer
than 500K. I have checked the xmit queue and the
channel, and they both are set to well over 500K. I
also checked
Peter, I do know all that. Thanks for your response
anyway. I had checked all of the settings including
max len on queue manager, DLQ, channel, xmit queue...
The AMI manual does not say anything about max msg len
specific to AMI. All this had led me to believing that
the max msg len limit of WMQI
But this particular group that I am dealing with
has always blamed MQ when something unexpected
occured, in the past.
What? You've got other groups that *don't* blame MQ? Can I be their
support tech? :-)
-- T.Rob
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the
Hi All,
Platfrom: W2000/MQ 5.3/AMI.
I don't know yet what rc our PeopleSOft developers
(they are not at our company) getting, but they are
saying that they are unable to put a message longer
than 500K. I have checked the xmit queue and the
channel, and they both are set to well over 500K. I
There is nothing in the AMI manual specifying a Maximum Message Length, not
have I ever heard of one. I would assume it is 100 MEG, or at worst, 4 MEG.
I doubt they would pick some strange # like 500K and not document it.
Did you check the Queue Manager's Max Message Length setting? If the app
Queue manager QM1 is on W2K (with WMQ 5.3). The queue
manager is not a default queue manager on the machine.
I downloaded the MA0F supportpack and installed it (I
have never used AMI before) I was able to run the
sample program amtsosnd.
I now would like to test my own policy and service.
So
Hi all,
I asked the question below a couple days ago.
Now it appears that the Persistent attribute must be Yes for the queue
or in the POLICY to make AMHBACK work.
Any hints on this?
BTW. AMI TRACE shows MQPMO_SYNCPOINT also if the Persistent attribute is
No. However AMHBACK does not work
Hi all
I have a problem with AMI AMHBACK COBOL call in OS/390 Batch environment
using batch stub AMTBS10.
I have a simple program with AMI calls:
AMHINIT
AMHSNMS
AMHBACK
AMHTERM
The POLICY used contains Syncpoint-setting.
It seems that AMHBACK call does not backout the message written
Blush - you did say you had configured syncpoint ...
Sorry
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
I am currently running AMI 1.3.2 and MQSeries 5.2.
In debug, the following code always produces a Dynamic Memory Overrun of 44
bytes.
AmSessionFactory* pAMFactory = new AmSessionFactory();
delete pAMFactory;
Has anyone experienced this or has this been addressed on the list
Jim,
I was not able to attend the last Tech Conference. What was the reason
given for elimination of the
AMI? Did they hint to adding any of the function, like Send/Receive
file, to current MQI?
Jim Ford wrote:
Doesn't the SQL solution require AMI? At the recent conference IBM
made it clear
Technically, they didn't say AMI was definitely gone. Just that it is no
longer included in the base MQ product for OS/390. Now OS/390 MQ users (like
distributed users have been for a while) will have to download it separately
as a support Pac.
I guess you could infer it is on its way out if IBM
I wasn't at the Tech Conference either. My guess for a reason for dropping
the AMI though is because hardly anyone was using it.
- Bruce
Giordano
Thomas Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED
As I recall, the speaker simply said that AMI just didn't catch on
like they thought it would.
Thomas Dunlap
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T.ATT.NET cc:
Sent
Title: RE: AMI elimination (was MQ and DB2 stored procedures)
Any date or time period given as to when IBM will drop support for the AMI?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMI
Interesting statistic - 2 out of 300+ using the AMI.
But I bet if they'd asked how many had spent a whole
bunch of time and effort developing and supporting
their own MQI wrapper the number would have been
significantly higher. Discuss.
mqm
--- Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Bobbee,
That's great news regarding your next contract. Have a cold one for me!
John Dawson
-Original Message-
From: Robert Broderick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: AMI
Thanks everyone
Nope
Stefn
From: Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMI
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:46:13 -0500
Is AMI functionality a seperate install from the base MQ set
bobbee
**
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom
of this message.
**
:
Yes
:
Yes, it is a SupportPac:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/ts/mqseries/txppacs/ma0f.html
--- Robert Broderick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is AMI functionality a seperate install from the base MQ set
bobbee
_
Add photos
]
Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMI
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:43:13 -0500
it isnt on zOS, it is on the others...
Scott
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Sievert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 4:59 PM
**
Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom
of this message.
**
:
Well, to be totally accurate, the AMI Admin Tool
I has been announced at the TM conference that AMI will be removed from the
base z/OS WMQ product in a future release and be available by support pac only.
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sievert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks everyone for the reply. Here is the scoop!!!
Project Girl comes to me today and asks if we need (or how)to install AMI on
the server. I search my 'between the ears' data banks and surmise that I
have no index entry pointing to a mention of an AMI install. I proceed to
think (a little
Hi All,
I need help in implementing publisher/subscriber model with MQI.
The scenario is, The Client will be posting message using
publisher/subscriber model with AMI (in WINDOWS system). On the other hand
my server application picks up the messages using MQI (in Open VMS Alpha
System), process
: MQ+AMI and Visual Studio .NET
Hello,
I am using MQ Client on Windows 98/XP with AMI for C++ in a project.
Recently I began to move my development environment from Visual Studio 6
to
Visual Studio .NET.
Are there versions of MQ+AMI available for .NET ? I need the MQ
environment
Guy,
Are there versions of MQ+AMI available for .NET ? I need
the MQ environment (DLLs and other stuff) to be built on .NET
so that my application and MQ+AMI use the same runtime environment.
Can't help you with AMI, but you might find this interesting ==
http://www.kolban.com/mq/DotNET
Hi,
Here's info for non-AMI related C# MS.NET stuff. (Note: I do NOT see a bright
future for AMI - JMS yes, AMI no.)
There are 2 ways of programming C# for use with MQ.
- Use Neil Kolban's MQ.NET and associated .NET assembly
- Use the ActiveX component MQAX200
The downloads / sample C# code
Hi Everyone:
Few weeks ago, I have posted a problem regarding running a
PUB/SUB application in Solaris 8. I have figured out the problem. The problems
arise when I try to link the program with AMI library and XERCES XML Library. But
the confusion parts are:
1)
Why the same program
What is the performance hit when you use the AMI?
Very small, some, really bad?
Francois van der Merwe
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
]
Subject: AMI and performance
What is the performance hit when you use the AMI?
Very small, some, really bad?
Francois van der Merwe
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh
Scott Gray wrote:
We have had several significant problems with AMI on hp and despite
severity
1 PMRs (one still open - PMR 49815 branch 487 in case anyone is
listening),
support is either poor or non-existent. I cant imagine there are more
than
a small handful of developers actually supporting
and also to
Christopher Frank and Scott Gray for their (mixed!) comments. The 'Category
3' classification, which I had not checked, certainly indicates that
support should be forthcoming from IBM. As we are also looking at the DB2
XML Extender MQ functions, reliability and currency of the AMI
Tony,
We are considering using the DB2_MQ Functions, in a small
project initially. This facility is dependent on the AMI
which can be downloaded for various platforms as a Supportpac;
in fact it is currently #3 in Supportpac popularity. However
the fact that it is a Supportpac causes me some
Tony,
We have had several significant problems with AMI on hp and despite severity
1 PMRs (one still open - PMR 49815 branch 487 in case anyone is listening),
support is either poor or non-existent. I cant imagine there are more than
a small handful of developers actually supporting AMI
Looking at the reference for app messaging interface java api, I see no way
to programatically check the backout count of the AmMessage object. Can
anyone confirm whether backout count is an available attribute via the AMI?
Thanks,
Rob Quigley
Perot Systems Corp.
Instructions for managing your
BDY.RTF
Description: RTF file
Dear Friends:
We have downloaded Application Messaging Interface (AMI) Support Pacs from
IBM website. We have successfully installed this AMI support on Win NT, Win
2000, Win Xp operating system.
However, while trying to install AMI on a Windows 95 system, the setup
program gives a SEVERE
43 matches
Mail list logo
