Look at db.use_result() and db.store_result() here :
http://www.birgerblixt.com/doc/packages/python-mysql/MySQLdb-2.html#ss2.
2
Best Regards
Mathias FATENE
Hope that helps
*This not an official mysql support answer
-Original Message-
From: Smelly Socks
Hi,
I've been running a innodbdatabase for a while, and it works nice,
however, I've noticed that it have grown beyound the specifications in
the my.cnf file. I did define autoextend so its not very strange,
however, I was wondering, how far can it grow, and is it a bad idea to
just let it
Hallo,
I would like to know whether there are any other languages supported by MySQL
apart from SQL.
e.g. MsAccess provides VB for aplications. Does MySQL support any such lower
level language?
Regards
Pamela
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To
Hi,
using mysql 4.0.24 I'm stuck with a problem importing a CSV-file converting the
date in the CSV from MM/DD/ to a mysql table..
I'm trying:
LOAD DATA INFILE '/tmp/mydata.csv'
INTO TABLE mytable
FIELDSTERMINATED BY ','OPTIONALLY ENCLOSED BY ''
(recordType,
From: Ochungo, Pamela (ILRI)
I would like to know whether there are any other languages supported by
MySQL apart from SQL.
e.g. MsAccess provides VB for aplications. Does MySQL support any such
lower level language?
MySQL is a database management system (DBMS), a so called backend system. MS
using mysql 4.0.24 I'm stuck with a problem importing a CSV-file
converting the date in the CSV from MM/DD/ to a mysql table..
I'm trying:
LOAD DATA INFILE '/tmp/mydata.csv'
INTO TABLE mytable
FIELDSTERMINATED BY ','OPTIONALLY ENCLOSED BY ''
(recordType,
On 4/25/05, Ochungo, Pamela (ILRI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I would like to know whether there are any other languages supported by MySQL
apart from SQL.
e.g. MsAccess provides VB for aplications. Does MySQL support any such lower
level language?
I believe you are asking about so
Hello.
Searching in the archives says you could get worse performance, because
of extending during transactions:
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/180037
http://lists.mysql.com/mysql/170946
Eric Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've been running a innodbdatabase for a while,
If my englsih is so bad, i'll try to explain and stop this thread now.
That's not what was being said.
I'm not teaching, i'm answering questions. If someone wants to read
docs, he (she) doesn't ask a question on the list. So if i answer, i
answer the question, just the question.
You want
Gleb Paharenko wrote:
Hello.
Searching in the archives says you could get worse performance, because
of extending during transactions:
Yes, read a few of those, but how about the fix for this, will the data
rearrange itself automatically when I specify more files?
//Eric
--
MySQL General Mailing
Unfortunately no response from the list anymore :-(
Can we ever get rid of the autoexpanding ibdata file without completely
rebuilding the databases?
Regards, Jigal.
- Original Message -
From: Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005
Yes ten years and forgot mysql certified.
I can offer i-am-a-dummy to you if you lack.
I've never imagined find so bad people on the list. But i'll write to
the moderator to see who is on.
But i'm pleased to help people wihout naz mentality than yours.
Best Regards
Mathias
Mathias
There are no *bad* people on this list - different point of view, yes.
Participating on this and other lists requires give AND take - taking
advice as well as giving it... Participating is always going to be a
two way process so just accept it, and if you can't - unsubscribe.
Hope this
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/silent-column-changes.html
mentions that Columns that are part of a PRIMARY KEY are made NOT NULL even
if not declared that way.
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY is a unique KEY where all key columns must be
[snip]
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/silent-column-changes.html
mentions that Columns that are part of a PRIMARY KEY are made NOT NULL
even
if not declared that way.
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY is a unique KEY where all key columns must
The manual is your friend. See this link:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/features.html.
Rhino
- Original Message -
From: Ochungo, Pamela (ILRI) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:20 AM
Subject: Database languages supported by MySQL
Hallo,
I
Eamon Daly wrote:
Easy enough. Get the numeric part via CONVERT, then get the
rest of the string from the length of the numeric part, plus
one:
SELECT
tag,
@num := CONVERT(tag, SIGNED) AS num_part,
SUBSTRING(tag, LENGTH(@num) + 1) AS rest_of_string from tags;
++--++
Not every DBMS...
MSSQL:
Create Unique Index
Microsoft(r) SQL Server(tm) checks for duplicate values when the index
is created (if data already exists) and checks each time data is added
with an INSERT or UPDATE statement. If duplicate key values exist, the
CREATE INDEX statement is canceled and
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/silent-column-changes.html
mentions that Columns that are part of a PRIMARY KEY are made NOT NULL
even
if not declared that way.
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY is a unique KEY where all key columns must
From: Jay Blanchard
Since NULL is the absence of a value and PRIMARY keys must have a value
a NULL column cannot be included as a portion of a PRIMARY key. AFAIK
this is the case with every RDBMS out there. Asking the development team
might get you a more informative response.
There is a
I have been trying to run an fairly large INSERT into an
empty table joining two other tables now for several weeks and have not been
able to get the query to run to completion even when sub-seting the data into smaller
ranges.
I have tried this at MySQL releases 4.1.8a and 4.1.10a
On 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/silent-column-changes.html
mentions that Columns that are part of a PRIMARY KEY are made NOT NULL even
if not declared that way.
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY is a
At 08:49 AM 4/26/05, Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/silent-column-changes.html
mentions that Columns that are part of a PRIMARY KEY are made NOT NULL
even
if not declared that way.
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY
Jigal,
- Alkuperinen viesti -
Lhettj: Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Kopio: Gleb Paharenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Heikki Tuuri
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lhetetty: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 2:09 PM
Aihe: Fw: modifying InnoDB storage
Unfortunately no response
Hello,
I have a big problem, I only want to check if it's the minute 45
currently.
I want to make a virtual SELECT without tables:
mysql SELECT MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) WHERE
MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) = 45;
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the
manual that
Ed,
UNIQUE indexes (which you quote) and PRIMARY KEYS are similar but are NOT
the same thing. Both types of keys guard against duplication of values for
the tuple defining the index. However, PRIMARY KEYs hold special
significance in that many RDBMS storage engines will use the PK to
uniquely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 26/04/2005 14:46:37:
Hello,
I have a big problem, I only want to check if it's the minute 45
currently.
I want to make a virtual SELECT without tables:
mysql SELECT MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) WHERE
MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) = 45;
ERROR 1064 (42000):
From: Martijn Tonies
Ehm... it might be me - but what sense does it make to have a NULL
in a PK?
If you need this, then your primary key probably isn't a primary key.
Care to explain why and how you're designing your database?
Martijn,
The table contains an variable number of integer
At 15:20 +0200 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
From: Jay Blanchard
Since NULL is the absence of a value and PRIMARY keys must have a value
a NULL column cannot be included as a portion of a PRIMARY key. AFAIK
this is the case with every RDBMS out there. Asking the development team
might get
Hello,
what type of privileges need to be assigned and/or changed when upgrading form
MySQL 4.0.24 to 4.1.10 in order to allow users use of the mysqldump utility.
Users where allowed to use the mysqldump to backup their databases and worked
fine with 4.0.24, till the upgrade to 4.1.10 which no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 09:46:37 AM:
Hello,
I have a big problem, I only want to check if it's the minute 45
currently.
I want to make a virtual SELECT without tables:
mysql SELECT MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) WHERE
MINUTE(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP()) = 45;
ERROR 1064 (42000):
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Martijn Tonies
Ehm... it might be me - but what sense does it make to have a NULL
in a PK?
If you need this, then your primary key probably isn't a primary key.
Care to explain why and how you're designing your
From: Paul DuBois
Hi Paul,
A primary key absolutely forbids duplicate values.
Indexes created with the UNIQUE keyword do not allow duplicates, except
for the special case that multiple NULL values are allowed.
I realise that it may (and is) defined in such a way, but it still does not
Not every DBMS...
MSSQL:
Create Unique Index
Microsoft(r) SQL Server(tm) checks for duplicate values when the index
is created (if data already exists) and checks each time data is added
with an INSERT or UPDATE statement. If duplicate key values exist, the
CREATE INDEX statement is
From: Harald Fuchs
id INT(11) - accountID
name VARCHAR(32) - parameter name
value INT(11) - parameter value
Other tables contain string, datetime, etc. parameters.
Since most searches are made for a value (or range) of one or more
parameters, a usable primary key is:
name-value-id
On 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/create-table.html tells me that A
PRIMARY KEY is a unique KEY where all key columns must be defined as NOT
NULL. If they are not explicitly declared as NOT NULL, MySQL declares them
so implicitly (and
I must assume you have all the proper indexes setup and your
configuration variables are fairly optimal.
First, I would run just the select part with an explain in front of it
to see what MySQL is trying to do. I've had MySQL run a query for an
inordinate amount of time on a fairly small data
A primary key absolutely forbids duplicate values.
Indexes created with the UNIQUE keyword do not allow duplicates, except
for the special case that multiple NULL values are allowed.
I realise that it may (and is) defined in such a way, but it still does
not
explain *why* part of a
From: Jochem van Dieten
Why is this?
Because the SQL standard says so.
A true observation, but still no explanation or reason why ;-P
MySQL doesn't follow the standard in every situation, so that's not an
excuse... (no offense!)
There must be a good reason other than because our ancestors
At 16:25 +0200 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
From: Paul DuBois
Hi Paul,
A primary key absolutely forbids duplicate values.
Indexes created with the UNIQUE keyword do not allow duplicates, except
for the special case that multiple NULL values are allowed.
I realise that it may (and is)
Good point. I assumed that number meant a real number. This
should work for leading zeroes:
SELECT
tag,
@num := CONVERT(tag, SIGNED) AS cast_num,
SUBSTRING(tag, 1, LOCATE(@num, tag) + LENGTH(@num) - 1) AS num_part,
SUBSTRING(tag, LOCATE(@num, tag) + LENGTH(@num)) AS txt_part
FROM tags;
From: Dawid Kuroczko
It can't have anything to do with the 'uniqueness' of the data, since I
can
have a lot of 'zero'-values in the column, as long as the combination of
columns in the PRIMARY key results in unique values.
Because it is a PRIMARY KEY. I mean phrase 'PRIMARY KEY' means a
From: Paul DuBois
I realise that it may (and is) defined in such a way, but it still does
not
explain *why* part of a PRIMARY key might not be NULL. If the combination
of
parts in the PRIMARY key is such that it can uniquely identify a record
it
would be sufficient for a primary key IMHO. It
At 16:47 +0200 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
From: Dawid Kuroczko
It can't have anything to do with the 'uniqueness' of the data, since I
can
have a lot of 'zero'-values in the column, as long as the combination of
columns in the PRIMARY key results in unique values.
Because it is a
It can't have anything to do with the 'uniqueness' of the data, since
I
can
have a lot of 'zero'-values in the column, as long as the combination
of
columns in the PRIMARY key results in unique values.
Because it is a PRIMARY KEY. I mean phrase 'PRIMARY KEY' means a key
with
Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 10:35:06 AM:
From: Harald Fuchs
id INT(11) - accountID
name VARCHAR(32) - parameter name
value INT(11) - parameter value
Other tables contain string, datetime, etc. parameters.
Since most searches are made for a value
At 16:56 +0200 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
From: Paul DuBois
I realise that it may (and is) defined in such a way, but it still does
not
explain *why* part of a PRIMARY key might not be NULL. If the combination
of
parts in the PRIMARY key is such that it can uniquely identify a record
it
Jigal,
create table YourTable
(
id INT(11),
name VARCHAR(32),
value INT(11),
PRIMARY KEY(id,name,value)
)
let's assume that PRIMARY KEY works like you want (accept NULLs)
and we have a row in your table: (id,name,value) = (1,NULL,12)
Then you insert a new row:
insert into YourTable
From: Paul DuBois
I would understand it if it would mean that the key as a whole could not
be
NULL, but the restriction that each column that is part of a PRIMARY KEY
must have the NOT NULL constraint is not logical.
Sure it is. If any part could be NULL, then it could contain duplicate
Jigal,
I would define the key as: parameter_name-value-account_id.
InnoDB is very fast if you use the primary key and a lot slower
if you use secudary key(s), so queries can get considerably faster
if you use a primary key.
One reason the PK is faster is that the engine needn't handle
[snip]
The same is true for any other value... Now that the columns have a NOT
NULL
constraint the records that previously contained NULL now hold '0'.
x y
x 0
x z
x 0
Now, how do you uniquely identify the 2nd and 4th rows?
[/snip]
The database would have thrown an error when you tried to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jigal van Hemert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Harald Fuchs
id INT(11) - accountID
name VARCHAR(32) - parameter name
value INT(11) - parameter value
Other tables contain string, datetime, etc. parameters.
Since most searches are made for a value (or
I would understand it if it would mean that the key as a whole could
not
be
NULL, but the restriction that each column that is part of a PRIMARY
KEY
must have the NOT NULL constraint is not logical.
Sure it is. If any part could be NULL, then it could contain duplicate
NULL values,
On 4/26/05, Jigal van Hemert wrote:
From: Jochem van Dieten
Why is this?
Because the SQL standard says so.
A true observation, but still no explanation or reason why ;-P
I consider it a good enough explanation of why MySQL doesn't allow it.
As to why the SQL standard doesn't allow it:
Hello.
According to this:
If your last data file was defined with the keyword autoextend, the
procedure to edit my.cnf must take into account the size to which the
last data file has grown. You have to look at the size of the data file, round
the size downward to the closest multiple of
Hello.
I don't think so. As I've understood InnoDB doesn't do it. See:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/innodb-file-space.html
Eric Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gleb Paharenko wrote:
Hello.
Searching in the archives says you could get worse performance, because
of
I am wanting to
display a random page from my site, But I have over 12,000 articles right now
and we add over 150 per day. What I wound up doing was a Virtual DOS
attack on my own server because the 40 mb db was being loaded to many
times.
I have tons of memory
and a Dell Dual Xeon 2.8
[snip]
I am wanting to display a random page from my site, But I have over
12,000 articles right now and we add over 150 per day. What I wound up
doing was a Virtual DOS attack on my own server because the 40 mb db was
being loaded to many times.
I have tons of memory and a Dell Dual Xeon 2.8
How about using the rand() function built into
MySQL? You could use it to generate a random number, then find the row whose
primary key equals that random number, then do a single-row select on that
row.
Rhino
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mysql
I have four different activities. Each has its own set of data that
I want to save. So, I made four different tables to hold the saved
data. Each record also has 'keywords' field (essentially this is the
only field that all tables have in common.)
Later on, I want to search all the keywords
I would like to select several rows from one table
and insert them into another nearly identical table
using Perl/DBI:
my @array = $q-param(); # HTML checkboxes
foreach my $element (@array) {
my $sql = select col2, col3, col4 from table1
where col1 = ?;
my $sth =
Hi all,
The trick i can see if the string start with '0' is to make it starting with a
positive number.
FOr example if my string is '0123FOO' :
set @a='0123FOO';
set @b=substring(0+concat('0',@a),-length(0+concat('0',@a))+1);
select @b,replace(@a,@b,'');
Mathias
Selon gerald_clark [EMAIL
Description:
Running mysql_install_db generates an error. As follows:
bash-3.00# scripts/mysql_install_db --user=mysql
Installing all prepared tables
Illegal Instruction - core dumped
Installation of system tables failed!
Examine the logs in ./data for more
sorry Chris again,
i mean in what they speak about. i try help if i can, just that.
:o)
Mathias
Selon Chris Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mathias
There are no *bad* people on this list - different point of view, yes.
Participating on this and other lists requires give AND take - taking
advice
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
Hi,
we have the problem, that queries generated by JBoss or our code which
runns under JBoss will be not cached by MySQL. The same query sendet from
an external application or MySQLFront will be cached by the same
I just did the oposite :o)
set @a='0123FOO';
set @b=substring(0+concat('9',@a),-length(0+concat('9',@a))+1);
select @b,replace(@a,@b,'');
have to concat a positive number !!!
Selon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
The trick i can see if the string start with '0' is to make it starting with
a
Martin, Shawn, you are correct. An oversight on my part...this is why I
still follow this list, I am always able to learn something and never
cease to be humbled.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: Martijn Tonies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:01 AM
To: emierzwa;
james tu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 12:06:34 PM:
I have four different activities. Each has its own set of data that
I want to save. So, I made four different tables to hold the saved
data. Each record also has 'keywords' field (essentially this is the
only field that all
Francesc Guaschwrote:
Gleb Paharenko wrote:
I thought it was OS related, and the mysql version was
not the problem. So I tweaked the limit of bash and linux.
In addition I don't want to loose the deb dependency.
Is there something else I can try before ?
I'm having the same problem, and
I tried that and maybe I'm doing something wrong but...
-I have to select the same number of columns...for each UNION
-And each of the records from the union fall under the same column
headings as the first SELECT...
I even tried to define column aliases..
SELECT `running` as `running_blah`...
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Fagyal Csongor wrote:
Hi,
I am new to replication so excuse me if my question is stupid.
The manual recommends that a nice scenario to take advantage of
replication in MySQL is to send all updating queries to the master
server, and reading from the slave. I would like
If you posted your actual table structures (SHOW CREATE TABLE xx\G) I
think I could be more helpful. Right now I am just shooting in the dark.
Shawn Green
Database Administrator
Unimin Corporation - Spruce Pine
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 02:15:49 PM:
I tried that and
Thanks for that I implemented to my Random code. Same problem that select *
portion is just a nightmare. Remember I selecting 38mb of data when I do
that.
What I want to do is jump to a Valid random row. Now If I didn't delete
content often that would be easy grab the last autoincremented
Gunmuse,
SELECT from firebase_content LAST_INSERT_ID()
In that cmd, 'from ...' ain't right.
I didn't understand either what's wrong with ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1.
Also check the Perl manual for how to retrieve a single value.
PB
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that I implemented to my
What I had to do was do this for my navigation db and not my content db. My
server can easily handle lots of calls to a 4mb table then tell it to fetch
the content once that has been achieved.
The reason I bringing this up is this seems to be a patched way of doing
this.
If I have 40,000 items
This difference between using a 40 mb table and 4mb table with the same
traffic was a 70 server load versus a .9 server load. So it was the amount
of data that I was selecting that was choking this feature.
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that I implemented to my Random code. Same
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 11:26 AM
Subject: Efficient select/insert
I would like to select several rows from one table
and insert them into another nearly identical table
using Perl/DBI:
my @array
Jonathan Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 12:26:20
PM:
I would like to select several rows from one table
and insert them into another nearly identical table
using Perl/DBI:
my @array = $q-param(); # HTML checkboxes
foreach my $element (@array) {
my $sql = select col2,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Efficient select/insert
Jonathan Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/26/2005 12:26:20
PM:
I would like to select several rows
I haven't created real project tables yet.
But here are the test ones that I'm experimenting with.
CREATE TABLE east (
id int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment,
keywords varchar(255) default NULL,
east_1 varchar(255) default NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (id)
) ;
CREATE TABLE north (
north_id int(11) NOT
Why don't you generate a random integer in your code and select for an
article? If there is no article there, do it again. Even if you have
to call it 50 times it may be faster than doing a full scan on the
table.
It may not work so well if there are lots of gaps in your autoincrement.
In perl
Hi,
The following query runs fine in recent versions of mysql 4.1x etc
delete from t2 using tbl_User as t1,tbl_UserTopic as t2 where
(t1.txtemail='[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
and (t1.intID = t2.intID);
But not in 3.23.47 I can't find any reference in the manuals to why this might
be.
Is there any
Mathias
Thanks for your help, I really appreciated it. And I was just wondering if
MySQL has another statment (besides show create table) that only displays
the foreign key, but I see that only with the show create table MyTable
could get this.
Greetings
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mikel -
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:22:46 +0100, wrote:
Hi,
The following query runs fine in recent versions of mysql 4.1x etc
delete from t2 using tbl_User as t1,tbl_UserTopic as t2 where
(t1.txtemail='[EMAIL PROTECTED]')
and (t1.intID = t2.intID);
But not in 3.23.47 I can't find any reference in the
i use this mail first .
(B
(Bi have a problem in under sql program:
(B
(B
(BUPDATE
(BNGLDENHDT
(BSET
(BEDT_HUK_FLG = :EDT_HUK_FLG
(BWHERE
(B KAI_CDE = :KAI_CDE
(B AND EDT_NUM = (SELECT MAX(EDT_NUM)
(B FROM NGLDENHDT
(B
(Bi use this mail first .
(B
(Bi have a problem in under sql program:
(B
(B
(BUPDATE
(BNGLDENHDT
(BSET
(BEDT_HUK_FLG = :EDT_HUK_FLG
(BWHERE
(B KAI_CDE = :KAI_CDE
(B AND EDT_NUM = (SELECT MAX(EDT_NUM)
(B FROM NGLDENHDT
(B
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/update.html
(B
(BSee the last line on the page. You cannot, in the most current stable
(Bversion of MySQL, SELECT from the table you are trying to UPDATE.
(B
(BJ.R.
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: $B2+9bJv(B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent:
87 matches
Mail list logo
