On Thursday 18 December 2003 08:10 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
TS I have gotten rid of some large files in /var/log, /tmp is empty and I
TS still have my 5.9G of / used up. Until I can track down where the
TS excessively large file(s) is/are, I wanted to 'reallocate' some of my
TS /home
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 09:19:21AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Thursday 18 December 2003 08:10 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
TS I have gotten rid of some large files in /var/log, /tmp is empty and I
TS still have my 5.9G of / used up. Until I can track down where the
TS excessively large
On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
Er...this was from a shell. X is irrelevant... :-)
TS A while back I made a checkinstall rpm for dutree, a du visualization
TS tool. It's pretty nifty. Screenshot:
TS
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
Er...this was from a shell. X is irrelevant... :-)
Right, which is why I prefaced my response with
This
On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
TS On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS
TS TS This won't help you since you can't get into X, but ...
TS
TS Er...this was from a shell. X is
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:47:28AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
TS On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS
TS TS This won't help you since you
On Friday 19 December 2003 03:11 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
TS No prob--I figured it was just a misunderstanding--same happens to me.
TS Heck, most folks don't understand anything I say anyway! (I have the
TS unique ability not only to be uncomfortable in social settings but
TS online as well!
On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 03:47 am, many eyes noted that Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2003 11:18 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:14:06AM -0500, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
TS On Friday 19 December 2003 09:28 am, Todd Slater wrote:
TS
TS TS This won't help you
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
start backup yesterday and saw one of the messages
Trey Sizemore wrote:
Lee Wiggers wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
start backup yesterday and saw one
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0]
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 11:19:59 +0200
robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to
start backup yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot
up say something tothe
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0] expecting [2]
I haven't done anything new to the setup or
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0] expecting [2]
I
you can check the free space of youre partitions with
the df conmmand
so you can have an idea if there is a space problem
Cdrack.
--- Trey Sizemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago.
Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages
Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front of the machine now):
No room on / [0]
Trey Sizemore wrote:
SNIP
It says that root (/) is full, and the iso images were in /home/trey
so doesn't that count against root or am I having a conceptual error
here. When I get back I'll try to isolate where the space hogs are
using df and du again. I think it was the du command that
SNIP
It says that root (/) is full, and the iso images were in /home/trey
so doesn't that count against root or am I having a conceptual error
here. When I get back I'll try to isolate where the space hogs are
using df and du again. I think it was the du command that showed file
sizes but
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 08:35 am, Derek Jennings wrote:
On Tuesday 16 Dec 2003 4:24 pm, Trey Sizemore wrote:
Computer was working like a champ a few days ago. Tried to start back
up yesterday and saw one of the messages during boot up say something to
the effect of (sorry not in front
The file /usr/share/doc/msec-0.38/security.txt describes the security
features for each level. Levels 4 and 5 disable direct root login.
Disabling direct root login means that somebody has to guess two
passwords to enter as root.
raffaele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:32 pm, Adolfo A. Bello B. wrote:
I just installed 9.1 with security set to Higher.
When booting to runlevel 3 I can not login as root, always receiving a
login incorrect message. However, I can login as a regular/normal user
and then su to root without problem.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 05:30:44PM -0400, Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:32 pm, Adolfo A. Bello B. wrote:
I just installed 9.1 with security set to Higher.
When booting to runlevel 3 I can not login as root, always receiving a
login incorrect message. However, I can
or even http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/docs/msec.php:
Direct root Login is disabled for Level 4 and 5
raffaele
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2002 12:27, et wrote:
On Friday 07 June 2002 06:21 pm, you wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:46:13 -0700
Bill Winegarden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/06/2002,
The following message was beamed across the Internet:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:46:13 -0700
Bill Winegarden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I rarely ask questions for others but this one has me stumped. My
colleague running LM8.2 has a default (for his hardware)
Hi,
I rarely ask questions for
others but this one has me stumped. My colleague running LM8.2 has a default
(for his hardware) configuration. He created one user. Then, he went to the
security configuration utility and set it to "high". Now he can't get in the gui
login as root. His user
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:46:13 -0700
Bill Winegarden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I rarely ask questions for others but this one has me stumped. My
colleague running LM8.2 has a default (for his hardware)
configuration. He created one user. Then, he went to the security
Well if you set 'High Security' you should not be surprised if the security is
'high'. Logging in as root is dangerous... therefore it is not permitted.
If you do not like it, then reduce the security level to something more lax or
tune the security options as decribed here
On Friday 07 June 2002 06:21 pm, you wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:46:13 -0700
Bill Winegarden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I rarely ask questions for others but this one has me stumped. My
colleague running LM8.2 has a default (for his hardware)
configuration. He created
Hi,
I installed the single Network Firewall on my network but I can't login from
my other computer. I can ping the other computer from the firewall though. I
have entered the https://192.168.0.1:8443 in a browser but then I can't
login and get only a time out error.
Does someone know what
I've got it fixed now. I forgot the / at the end of the adress.
From: Wayne Bornall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Can't login the SNF
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 15:23:06 +
Hi,
I installed the single Network Firewall on my network but I
this working. Any
other suggestions?
Thanks,
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Gerald Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't login to SunOS from Mandrake via telnet
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 08:36 pm, you wrote
Thanks for your reply, but I am still not able to get this working. Any
other suggestions?
Thanks,
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Gerald Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Can't login to SunOS from Mandrake via
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 08:36 pm, you wrote:
Hello all,
I have Mandrake 8.1 on my laptop and am trying to telnet to a SunOS box. I
have tried all the terminals and am having the following problem:
I type: telnet IP of server here and press Enter
I get:
SunOS 5.6
login:
After the
Hello all,
I have Mandrake 8.1 on my laptop and am trying to telnet to a SunOS box. I
have tried all the terminals and am having the following problem:
I type: telnet IP of server here and press Enter
I get:
SunOS 5.6
login:
After the login I type my username and press Enter, but the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:00 PM
Subject: [newbie] can't login
Hi,
I did a ctrl - alt - backspace to get out of a running session. Now
when
I try to get back in to my user account I get the following crash
notifications
Hi,
I did a ctrl - alt - backspace to get out of a running session. Now when
I try to get back in to my user account I get the following crash
notifications.
nspluginscan
ksplash
ksmserver
After the third crash notification, I get kicked back out to the login
screen. KDE will not start.
If
On Thu, 03 Feb 2000, Randall Randall wrote:
Okay, got another issue, now. :)
I'm trying to install a system without X,
and have to go through and delete packages
manually, in "expert" mode. It claims to
be installing all the dependencies (including
things I don't really want (like X
Okay, got another issue, now. :)
I'm trying to install a system without X,
and have to go through and delete packages
manually, in "expert" mode. It claims to
be installing all the dependencies (including
things I don't really want (like X libraries)
but apparently MUST have. Every time I
Check to see if there is nothing special in your /root/.bashrc or other scripts
executed when you log in.
Maybe there is something that disconnects you in these scripts.
Randall Randall wrote :
Okay, got another issue, now. :)
I'm trying to install a system without X,
and have to go through
flupke wrote:
Check to see if there is nothing special in your /root/.bashrc or other scripts
executed when you log in.
Maybe there is something that disconnects you in these scripts.
Well, I know what it looks like to login to a
disabled account, and THAT should just drop you
back to a
On Fri, 29 Feb 2036, Wayne Wallace wrote:
I can't login to an account I have been using. I was surfing along and
started to experience strange problems I figured i would logout and come back
in. I can't get back in as that user it goes right back the the login screen.
I can use root. Any
I tried to upgrade to October Gnome but needed to update PAM also. I
installed pam-o.68-8.i386.rpm but now I get an error "su: module not
found"
and can't login.
How to fix?
I originally had Mandrake 6 on the box, but upgraded most stuff as it came out.
-Brent
42 matches
Mail list logo
