Object "a MutableBuffer" does not understand message
"CASELESSPOS"
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data wi
check that fix.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 6:07 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I see you figured this out already. Was it really necessary to set the
> _DEBUG and _RELEASE flags? I suspect the top level version would be
> sufficient.
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Sun
difference is causing the compiler to crash in the current
build.
There are other differences in the flags, but I'm not sure if they are
important or not.
I'll see if I can figure out how to change to /MTd from the current /MDd.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Rick McGu
Okay, yeah I discovered the temp files. Unfortunately during the build the
files get deleted to fast to look at them.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Shoot, I stand corrected. It appears nmake writes all of the options to a
> temp file an
Thanks Rick.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> If you want to see what are getting used for the compile and links, you
> can specify "nmake VERBOSE=1", and it will display all of the commands that
> nmake is issuing. This allows y
, you have to at least build the NSIS installer for that to work. If
things aren't right, when the external API libraries are built, the header
files won't be found.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open Sou
This sounds pretty good.
I confess it is not something that I have desired, but I can think of uses
for it if it was available.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> This is something I've been thinking about for some time, and we even have
>
sed. I thought it was going to work by issuing
CPack after issuing nmake to build the binaries.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your
I've gotten confused on the status of packaging on Windows.
To create the NSIS package are we using CPack, going to use CPack but it
isn't ready yet, or ... ?
Thanks.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open
Okay, thanks Rick.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Rick McGuire
wrote:
> Ok, I think rxregexp should be fixed now. There was a typo in the target
> dependencies that prevented it using the .rc and .def file on the link.
> The .def file was the kiss of death that
problem is ...
You can see something is wrong by right clicking on rxregexp.dll and
selecting properties. Some of the properties are not filled in, like they
are for some of the other DLLs, like rxsock.dll for instance.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
&g
I'll look up how it works later.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I'm guessing there might need to be some adjustments made in the build
> suite for locating information in out-of-source builds. For example, I'm
> sure the pr
Jon,
I'm okay with adding the sample. Note that the rest of Rick's advice is
pertinent.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Rick McGuire
wrote:
> Jon,
>
> You'll need to get Rony's permission, but I'm ok with that. Note that we
> gener
I say go for it. Whatever you think is useful, go ahead and do it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rick McGuire
wrote:
> I've been going through the samples and modernizing some of these samples.
> One of the samples, factor.rex, demonstrates some features that
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Rick McGuire
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Spotted a couple of things about the how the NSIS script is currently
>&
ing for the value "x86_64". One of
> these probably has to change...which one?
>
It should be x86_64. A change I didn't notice in the new build process.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big
Jon,
You don't need to be overly concerned with this, in my opinion.
The ooRexx code base builds on both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows and will
continue to build that way as long as your current machines are still
running.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wo
d up, if I recall correctly.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ide
Rick,
Okay.
The configure_file() command looks promising. That's what I was trying to
do yesterday by using a NSIS.template.in file that was a copy of our old
oorexx.nsi file and just have variables for the /D options. But, it didn't
work at all.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Jun 9,
Okay, I've added the cpack.nsi file.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> I screwed that up. Give me a few minutes to fix it up.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> Ye
I screwed that up. Give me a few minutes to fix it up.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> Yes, I should have. I'll do that now.
>
> --
> Mark Miesfeld
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Rick McGuire
> wrote:
>
>&g
Yes, I should have. I'll do that now.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Mark,
>
> did you need to checkin the cpack.nsi file with this commit?
>
> Rick
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
> Date: Su
rrent
script and copying the files from platform/windows/install to the directory
that NSIS.template.in is copied to.
I'm not sure if that is what you are thinking of, or not.
I'll play around with that and see if I can get it to work.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Rick
.
I know Rick has put in a lot of time on a CPack generated NSIS script.
But, I think there is still a lot of time that needs to be spent on it.
I'm in favor of just sticking with our current script.
--
Mark Miesfeld
ts that generate the lists of installed files.
>
That's the one part of a NSIS install that is probably the same for any
package and so is probably what the CMake people would concentrate on.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
nd on if oodialog.exe is started as a separate process
or created as a child process. Which I don't remember off the top of my
head.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testi
ooDialog program. So,
rexx.exe, rexxhide.exe, rexxpaws.exe and oodialog.exe need the manifest.
With the common controls dependency part I posted.
--
Mark Miesfeld
>
> Rick
>
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> I
ooDialog.dll.
So, if we can't get CMake to add the common controls part to the manifest
it generates, then I'll have to add the custom step. I won't be back at
home until after Memorial day. I'll work on it then if you haven't already
come up with something.
--
Mark Miesfe
Hi David,
Well, it looks like being slow works our pretty well. It seems this is
fixed. ;-)
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, David Ashley wrote:
> Mark -
>
> If you get some time please look at the CMake for a deb output install
> file. Currently, it does not
Hi Rick,
It must be something CPack is doing. You'll have to use the regular
install and then unzip the long string version over the top of it, I guess.
On May 17, 2014 3:27 PM, "Rick McGuire" wrote:
Mark,
Made my first attempt at generating an NSIS install using CMake, and it
failed terribly
Sounds like a reasonable project. I'd say go for the single file to start
with.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I've not liked the lack of dependency management in the makefiles used for
> building Windows for quite a while. David spen
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Walter Pachl
wrote:
> SOLVED:
> ...
>
> Reading helps :-)
>
That's what I keep telling you. ;-)
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
___
Walter,
A good use of your skills. I commend you on your work. But, I can't over
any help.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Walter Pachl
wrote:
> Rxm
>5 March 2014
>
>
>
> The distribution of ooRexx cont
I haven't even tried to build it on Windows yet. Two of my systems died in
the same week, and I've been constrained for time.
I just glanced at it and it looks like it needs a nMake make file.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Is this
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Michael Lueck
wrote:
> Greetings Mark,
>
> Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> > You should submit it to Comodo AV/FW as a false positive.
>
>
> After I sent my email I discovered on the right-click menu a way to do
> exactly that, and have done so.
Michael,
You should submit it to Comodo AV/FW as a false positive.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Michael Lueck
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> FYI...
>
> I updated our Windows machines to v4.2.0 yesterday. This morning I am
> seeing that Comodo AV/FW does not ap
graph saying to see all packages released by the
ooRexx project go to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/
and browse the folders
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 8:37 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> All -
>
> The download page on the main ooRexx web site is gettin
Hi Jon,
I was going to try to do a Windows build tomorrow if I have time. If I do
build the Windows library I'll let you know. Then it will be easy. ;-)
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
> OK. I just
Jon,
It is probably a Linux build of the library. We would need a Windows build
of the library.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Do you need to do any setup to run the tests?
> This
Hi David,
Good work on this.
I'm still out of town. I'll try to test on Windows this weekend, but I
just might not have enough time.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 9:24 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> All -
>
> I think I am done with the initial development for s
The Open Object Rexx Project is happy to announce the official release of
oRexx 4.2.0. The installation packages are now available on SourceForge at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.2.0/
ooRexx 4.2.0 is an enhancement and bug fix release. The first new feature
release in s
Thanks David,
I'll send out an announcement notice this evening and make the folder
visible.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:20 PM, David Ashley wrote:
> Mark, Rick -
>
> I uploaded the following
>
> - all the *nix install files
> - all the docs
>
> Th
uble of installing the Windows
debugging tools along with the ooRexx debug build.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Co
Okay.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:18 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> Mark -
>
> Go ahead and shoot for Saturday. I will do the Linux builds on Sunday
> (my Saturday is busy).
>
> David Ashley
>
> On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 06:42 -0800, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
time
doing the Windows builds after this Saturday for 2 weeks.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:07 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> All -
>
> How close are we to the release? All the issues I care about are
> resolved. Are there any left?
s in automatically when a
crash happens on the system.
Looking up some details on windbg, reminded me that the debug build may not
be helpful without the .pdb files that are produced during the compile?
--
Mark Miesfeld
-
have a VC++ debugger installed, and if so is it
the "Express" version?
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Mike Cowlishaw wrote:
>
>
> I'm not sure what the requirements for the *ix platforms would be, and
> I'm pretty sure we really don't want
Won't that break backwards compatibility for any one using select() that
doesn't read this list?
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:05 PM, David Ashley wrote:
> All -
>
> Is anyone out there actually using the select() function from the rxsock
> function package
hes. But, if the user was
motivated enough, he could try running the program under the debugger and
waiting for the crash. He should be able to copy and paste the stack
trace, even if he didn't know how to use the debugger.
I'll put debug versions of the 4.2.0
attributes. Then in a method, if one of the args
is a .Point object, I just get the CSelf struct and get the x an y
attribute values directly from that.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:20 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> I am in the middle of writing the new IPv6 sockets API and
A quick announcement that the ooTest-4.2.0-snapshot06 package has been
updated and is now available for download from SourceForge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexxunit/4.2.0.Snapshot.06/?
This snapshot represents the current state of the test suite used to test
ooRexx 4.2.0.
binding the socket to an address. This
> option is zero by default on all OSs except Windows and BSD.
>
My one suggestion is to do this internally, don't make the user do it.
Just document that the default is 0, period. Then if a Windows user wants
to change the default through setsoc
t supported both
IPv4 and IPv6.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Android apps run on BlackBerry 10
Introducing the new BlackBerry 10.2.1 Runtime for Android apps.
Now with support for Jelly Bean, Bluetooth, Mapview and more.
Get your
install it, users that
didn't want IPv6 could just stick with rxsock.
I'm in favor of that, but since David is pushing this, I'm perfectly fine
with whatever he wants to do.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Android apps r
se that you will need to make. If you want and
need IPv6, then you will need to use the software that supplies it. If you
don't want it, then you will be able to use ooRexx, but you won't have IPv6.
--
Mark Miesfeld
A quick announcement that an ooTest-4.2.0-snapshot06 package is now
available for download from SourcForge:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexxunit/4.2.0.Snapshot.06/
This snapshot represents the current state of the test suite used to test
ooRexx 4.2.0.
There has been a lot of
7;t have any access to a test environment.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.d
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Perry Werneck wrote:
> Is the source code available for download?
>
It is always available through svn check out. A source code tar or zip
file is not currently on SourceForge. for release candidate 2. We'll add
one in a day or two.
--
Ma
The Open Object Rexx Project is happy to announce a release candidate for
oRexx 4.2.0. The installation packages are available on SourceForge at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.2.0%20%28release%20candidate%202%29/
A small number of bugs were discovered in the first releas
. Not later than this evening.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable
security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key
security issues and trends. Ski
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:25 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> I usually take one of the overnight builds and make them release
> candidates. So just say "go" and I can be ready the next day.
>
Go. After tonight's build. I think Rick is
lease
> candidates.
>
I have a release candidate 2 folder on SourceForge. We should rebuild all
packages and put them there. Then I'll announce RC 2 and delete the older
folder.
I'm a little busy now, let's shot for getting everythin
.pdf file, but I guess I
didn't. It seems to me the explanation in the installer is sufficient.
But, you can open a doc bug for that and I'll add it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw net
t we should.
I can put a new Windows builds on SourceForge tonight. I'll create a new
folder release candidate 2. We can move the release from this weekend to
the next, releasing on 2/10 instead of 2/3. If that fits D
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:16 AM, David Ashley wrote:
> I think the major feedback from the release candidate has about stopped
> so I want to propose that we release 4.2.0 this coming Monday, Feb 3.
> That will give us the weekend to put the release together.
>
>
That sounds good
Here is Symantec's reply to the submission of
ooRexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe, saying yes it was a false positive.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-- Forwarded message --
From: Symantec FP Incident Response
Date: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 7:01 PM
Subject: [No Reply] False Positive Submi
Mark Miesfeld
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Oliver Sims <
> oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Just downloaded oorexx-4.2.0.windows.x86_32.exe to my XP machine. At
>> end of download, Norton a
ualms about the file to submit it on their own.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:50 AM
Subject: [No Reply] False Positive submission (3415563)
To: miesf...@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting Symantec.
Your submission has been received and
Here is the submission report for 3393192. I couldn't find it at first or
I would have forwarded if first.
As you can see here, the file I submitted had a different file name. Which
is why I think their "correction" may have been file name based.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-- Fo
This is the reply I got from Norton when I submitted the first beta file to
them. As you can see they affirm it is a false positive and say they
corrected it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-- Forwarded message --
From: Symantec FP Incident Response
Date: Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:50 PM
27;t know what to do about it.
I believe it is actually coming from NSIS. The other thing you can do is
turn Norton off, run the installation, then turn Norton back on and have it
scan the installation directory. I believe it will report the
ecimalFormat
keditMacros
mod_oorexx
ooRexxShell
ZabrodskyAAT
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Deve
The Open Object Rexx Project is happy to announce a release candidate for
ooRexx 4.2.0. The installation packages are available on SourceForge at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.2.0%20%28release%20candidate%29/
ooRexx 4.2.0 is an enhancement and bug fix release. The first
ator and giving out directions on hot to get them. I think you should.
Maybe we can get SourceForge to fix or enhance the "Download Snapshot" so
that it works the way I would intuitively expect it to work.
--
Mark Miesfeld
-
idate and put the Windows builds in it. Then when David
has time, he can add the Linux builds to it and I'll announce the release
candidate is available.
--
Mark Miesfeld
> Rick
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
ll the packages on
SourceForge and call them the release candidate. Then give it 10 days or 2
weeks and if no bugs are opened, do the release.
Or ... ?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise
make your utilities easily available to
ooRexx users, and you should go for it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud Fo
ation, and version. If
the ooRexx version is less than 4.1.0, or if there is no installed ooRexx,
the installer will abort with a message explaining the problem. Otherwise
the installer will replace the current ooDialog with ooDialog 4.2.3.
--
Mark Miesfeld for the ooRexx Develo
g.rexx since google retired
> google reader.
>
> Is it still going? If so, does anyone have a url that can go in here?
>
It is still going, although there are not as many posts as several years
ago.
This is the bookmark I use:
https://groups.google.com/foru
-US/Publican/3.2/html/Users_Guide/chap-Users_Guide-Frequently_Asked_Questions.html#idp10662944
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't h
David,
This is what causes the build to fail:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
One suggested fix is a flag to increase the heap space. But as I said, I
could never get it to work. And, I don't remember the flag right now.
--
Mark Miesfeld
he memory allocation for the virtual machine? I don't know
much about virtual machines either. Can you temporarily up the memory and
then decrease it?
Supposedly, Publican 3.0 and later eased the problem somewhat, so I was
surprised to see it on the build machine.
--
Mark Miesfeld
&
Trunk. p/oorexx/code-0/test/trunk
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenu
Rick,
Reading your previous post I was going to reply that, on Windows, there is
a reference count and MSDN says the library won't be unloaded until the
count goes to 0.
But, it looks like you've already seen that. ;-)
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Rick McGu
Installation packages for ooDialog 4.2.3, final release candidate, are now
available on SourceForge at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/ooDialog/4.2.3%20%28release%20canidate%29/
The ooDialog 4.2.3 release is a routine update, providing some incremental
improvements and a few bug fi
Okay thanks Rick.
I knew from experimenting a couple of months ago that the then current doc
source wouldn't build under newer versions of Publican. That's why I
suspected I would have problems unless I upgraded my Publican version.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:4
HI David,
I see you made some changes to the doc source for a newer version of
Publican.
I'll need to update my build environment to? What version of Publican are
you using?
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly trouble
like / do.
We have more options here. For instance:
2 chkBx Show Open Object Rexx 4.2.0 Releases Notes (or Read Me file.)
3 hypLnk How to Get Started if You are New to Open Object Rexx
Where #3 is specifically designed for the newbie
--
Mark
te a new web page designed to be shown here.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affe
It is
updated for this release, whether it is useful is probably a subjective
opinion.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of
ss tclass
::method testmethod public
expose fld1 fld2
fld1 = "abcdef"
fld2 = "123456789ZZZ"
::method testExposeAndLocal
expose fld1 fld2
.local~fld1 = fld1
.local~fld2 = fld2
::requires ooDialog.cls
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
tem that is the limiting factor, not a particular
processor or other hardware.
I suggest this:
Any hardware capable of running a supported Windows operating systems is
sufficient.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot p
Definitely a big improvement.
There is still the problem that Publican doesn't produce a decent index
section. You can't go to the
F's without scrolling through all the pages starting at "%"
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:50 AM, David Ashley wrote:
>
The underlined link can open whatever is decided on, or be left out.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how applica
agree?
I think I agree if I have followed this correctly. I think you set this
flag, but then when the file is actually created, if the user's umask
doesn't have the other flag set, then the file is not created with the
other bit set.
es
at all. ooSQLite is a complete package. There is nothing an ooRexx users
needs to install, or do, to use ooSQLite.
It is what I choose to do.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your
not comfortable asking questions on the developer's list and I'd
like to encourage them to ask questions.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations
nd I doubt that I will finish it before we want to release 4.2.0.
In addition, I'm not sure how to integrate it into the unix-like build.
I'm sure I can figure it out, or get David to help me. But, it is one
more task that needs to be done.
So, for now I was not thinking to add it to
Well good.
Seem counter-intuitive at first glance. I'm glad you read the docs.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> If I'm reading the docs for umask correctly, the right fix is the easy
> fix. If we set the other bits on, the process um
to manually intervene to share a file with others than manually intervene
to not share a file with others.
--
Mark Miesfeld
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have
1 - 100 of 1904 matches
Mail list logo
