...and crushes the customer before he can file a complaint.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> And then the door opens from within and the parcel falls over...
>
> On 12 Aug 2016 05:05, "Rick Womer" wrote:
>
>> "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we
And then the door opens from within and the parcel falls over...
On 12 Aug 2016 05:05, "Rick Womer" wrote:
> "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and
> tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them."
>
> (K-5, DA 50-200)
>
> Rick
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discus
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18273241
Sorry about that!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 8/11/2016 8:04 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>>
>> "Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and
>> tripod yesterday. I can't
On 8/11/2016 8:04 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
"Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and
tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them."
(K-5, DA 50-200)
Rick
The link is very discreet as well
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mail
"Mr. Smith? I'm showing that we delivered your 400-1200 zoom lens and
tripod yesterday. I can't imagine what happened to them."
(K-5, DA 50-200)
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Jan 2016, at 20:15, Rick Womer wrote:
>>>
>>> Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:
>>>
>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>>>
>>> Rick
>>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
&
> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>>
>> Rick
>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
>> wrote:
>>> Delivery to the following recipient
;
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
> wrote:
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>
>> col...@brendemuehl.net
>>
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it
Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:
The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
wrote:
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Davis, Jack"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:17:31 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification
Thanks, Bob!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October
Thanks, Bob!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification
No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9
- Original Message -
From: "Davis, Jack"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:03:49 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification
Thanks, Stan.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Halpin, Stan"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October
No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Anyone else receiving such notices?
>
> Jack
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mail Delivery System"
> To: "Davis, Jack
Thanks, Stan.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Halpin, Stan"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:59:03 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification
I haven’t seen it…
On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Anyone else receiving
I haven’t seen it…
On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Anyone else receiving such notices?
>
> Jack
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mail Delivery System"
> To: "Davis, Jack"
> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:4
Anyone else receiving such notices?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Mail Delivery System"
To: "Davis, Jack"
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
Subject: Delivery status notification
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
I was pointed to this gallery of folks delivering things on their bikes.
Interestingly, none of them seem to be riding fixies.
http://shanghaiist.com/2011/09/27/gallery_totems_by_alain_delorme.php
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
How about "The Bronx Zoo," by Sparky Lyle? Sparky is actually the
manager of the minor league team that plays in this park:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=13514684 . He is as colorful
as ever.
Dan
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:36 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Steven Desjardins
>
>> I
From: Steven Desjardins
It always amazes me that pitchers actually have to ice their arm after
a normal outing to help them heal quicker for their next slot in the
rotation. On an oddly connected tangent, have you read "The Strange
Case of Siddharta Finch" by George Plimpton?
I've read "Ball
Thanks, Jack. Sorry about your injury.
Dan
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Painful reminder of my rotator cuff surgery!
>
> Well timed, Dan.
>
> Jack ;)
>
> --- On Thu, 6/23/11, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> From: Daniel J. Matyola
>&g
strain on one's arm.
>>
>> Thanks for looking, Ken.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>> Ouch! Looks like it hurts.
>>>
>>> Kenneth Waller
>>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com
Painful reminder of my rotator cuff surgery!
Well timed, Dan.
Jack ;)
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Subject: PESO: The Delivery
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, June 23, 2011, 12:35 PM
> http://blogs
ry.com/kennethwaller
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
>>
>> Subject: PESO: The Delivery
>>
>>
>>>
>>> http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=105
>>>
rom: "Daniel J. Matyola"
>
> Subject: PESO: The Delivery
>
>
>>
>> http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=105
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
>>
>> --
>> Dan Matyola
>> http://www.pentaxphoto
Ouch! Looks like it hurts.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: PESO: The Delivery
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=105
Comments ar
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=105
Comments are welcome.
--
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pl
he results have been excellent.
I thought the rendering on Bill's dog pic was superb, BTW.
Paul
On Jul 12, 2009, at 10:20 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Desjardins, Steve"
Subject: RE: K-7 set-up on delivery
This has me curious. Are the JPEGs any
- Original Message -
From: "Desjardins, Steve"
Subject: RE: K-7 set-up on delivery
This has me curious. Are the JPEGs any better on the K7 than the K10D/20D?
I do my snapshots in JPEG and I turn the sharpness up a notch.
That picture of my dog you just commented on
: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K-7 set-up on delivery
Hi Bob -
My K7 arrived from B&H yesterday. I hadn't noticed, but it is set up like yours
- Contrast and Sharpness up a notch.I did some macro work with the camera and
A* 200 macro lens today - fabulous camera!
- MCC
-
Saturday, July 11, 2009 12:15:23 AM
Subject: K-7 set-up on delivery
I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'.
The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch.
Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7?
Is this Pentax's reaction to bein
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:53 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably won't.
But Kenny boy says we should.:-)
Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images?
Interested in your
Dave,
I shot a handful of jpegs in the kitchen (incandscent light at sunset).
They were quite snappy and colorful, even a bit blue near the window light.
At jpeg quality 3, the jpegs were 6-7meg. At highest quality (4) they
were 8-9 meg.
In the morning I got better light and shot RAW+ (DGN's +JP
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:53 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
>
>
> Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably won't.
But Kenny boy says we should.:-)
>
>> Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images?
Interested in your take on your jpegs Bob, i usually shot
On Jul 11, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'.
The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch.
Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7?
Yes, that's how mine arrived. Haven't shot any jpegs yet and probably
I have noticed that my K-7 was set-up not 'zeroed out'.
The image quality on Contrast and Sharpness was 'up' one notch.
Is this the case for others of you with a new K-7?
Is this Pentax's reaction to being accused of 'soft' images?
Doing shooting and reading, but nothing like Bill R. or Paul S.
It
Had to look at this one a couple of times.
It looks like you have managed to make the delivery guy look slow, and
the world around look like they are the ones in motion.
Good job.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:12 AM, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://tinyurl.c
Now that's more like the Knarf I know !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Fruit Delivery, Kensington Market
> http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4
>
> http://bp3.blogge
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:15 -0400, "frank theriault"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4
>>
>> http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg
>>
>> C
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:15 -0400, "frank theriault"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4
>
> http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg
>
> Comments welcome.
Very Theriaultian
Perhaps he's moving quicker than it se
http://tinyurl.com/5gb5y4
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SIchPWI14XI/Cs0/ZV-q32Zjyko/s1600-h/july_23_08+002.jpg
Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
What's really frustrating is when it says 'out for delivery' all day,
and then switches to 'failed delivery - nobody home'.
Especially when you have been watching for it all day!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Micah B. Kleit"
Subject: Re: Is there anything more distracting than "Out for Delivery"?
> It beats DHL;
A friend of mine works for DHL.
Apparently, it is an acronym for Driver Hopelessly Lost.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax
It beats DHL; their way of describing the status of a package makes no
sense. Out for Delivery may be frustrating, but at least it's clear.
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse
> than a blessi
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Robinson" <
Subject: Is there anything more distracting than "Out for Delivery"?
> Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse
> than a blessing. I keep refreshing that page waiting for
Sometimes I think that the online tracking for UPS is more of a curse
than a blessing. I keep refreshing that page waiting for my box to
arrive... as if hitting F5 over and over will make the thing show up
sooner.
"A watched pot never boils" is hopefully not "A watched UPS truck
never arr
Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery
>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:45:26 -0600
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Boris Liberman"
>Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery
>
>
> >I do envy you, Mister
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman"
Subject: Re: Peso: Sedan Delivery
>I do envy you, Mister Robb ;-). I like old cars. They seem to have
> character unlike modern boxes.
I'll make a point of hunting them this year.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-D
I do envy you, Mister Robb ;-). I like old cars. They seem to have
character unlike modern boxes.
Boris
On 4/26/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regina has a very good climate for preserving automobiles, and it is not
> uncommon during the warm months to see restored or customized vi
Regina has a very good climate for preserving automobiles, and it is not
uncommon during the warm months to see restored or customized vintage cars
on the street.
A couple of days ago, I spotted this gem.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/deliveryvan.html
Technical:
K10/ 70mm f/2.4
The Nikon people went through the same thing with the D200(me
included) dates pushed back etc, etc,
I'm sure it will be a good camera. Internal or external VR, you guys
will love it.
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I rechecked my order. Still showing deliv
I rechecked my order. Still showing delivery date of 12-5 to 12-19,
shipping date as indicated below. However, I did order very early.
Paul
On Nov 3, 2006, at 9:40 PM, Perry Pellechia wrote:
> I just looked at Amazon. They now claim the RELEASE Date is
> January 15.
>
> On 1
I just looked at Amazon. They now claim the RELEASE Date is January 15.
On 11/3/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amazon tells me that my K10D is now scheduled to ship between
> December 1 and December 10.
> Paul
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.n
I placed my order September 15. My original shipping date was October
15 to 25th. I bet you'll get an update soon.
Paul
On Nov 3, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
> When did you place your order?
>
> I placed mine two days ago. My status page at Amazon says shipping Nov
> 9- Nov 16.
>
> But
When did you place your order?
I placed mine two days ago. My status page at Amazon says shipping Nov
9- Nov 16.
But their K10D page says the camera will be released on January 15th...
It's all a bit confusing...
j
On 11/3/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amazon tells me that my
Amazon tells me that my K10D is now scheduled to ship between
December 1 and December 10.
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/3/06, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, I see, Italian ethnic jokes are allowed on this list...
>
> Bob
>
>
Did I miss something here? I looked at all the posts, and didn't see
anything remotely offensive.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Carti
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:16:23AM +, mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006/02/03 Fri AM 05:55:44 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages
> >
> >
>
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Bob Shell wrote:
On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:55 AM, John Francis wrote:
It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account
that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the
original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address.
This is a failure commonly
On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:55 AM, John Francis wrote:
It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account
that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the
original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address.
This is a failure commonly found in poorly written mail system
>
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/02/03 Fri AM 05:55:44 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages
>
>
> It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account
> that incorrectly reports delivery failur
It's somebody subscribed to the list from an account
that incorrectly reports delivery failures to the
original submitter, not to the 'envelope from' address.
This is a failure commonly found in poorly written mail systems.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages
Thanks for the tip, Bill. I love the way you evil geniuses think.
If this was the first time he caused this
William Robb
Yes, a couple times.
Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted
> in my
> receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following
> (as cut &
> pasted) from the e-mail:
>
> [EM
http://www.job-net.it/pg/offerta.job-net?14767
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob Shell
> Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going
> to them???
Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going
to them???
Bob
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 2, 2006 6:50:02 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
This is an automatically generated Delivery
Thanks for the tip, Bill. I love the way you evil geniuses think.
On 2/2/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C"
> Subject: Delivery Failure Messages
>
>
> > So far both messages I have sent to the
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Re: Delivery Failure Messages
Having received a few I finally just blocked the domain.
My way is being more fun..
William Robb
t; From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted
in my
> > receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as
cut &
> > pasted) from the e-mail:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've gotten them too. I thought maybe I had a virus but McAfee didn't find
anything.
-- Original message --
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my
> rec
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Delivery Failure Messages
So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in
my receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as
cut & pasted) from the e-mail:
I just set a
So far both messages I have sent to the PDML today have also resulted in my
receiving a Delivery Failure e-mail notification for the following (as cut &
pasted) from the e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The sending address was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else receiving something similar?
T
Bob W wrote:
> [ from Knarf ]
> > Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their
> > hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the
> > 50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC
> > (I was only a kid then).
> No - you must be thinking of Victrola...
you're both off
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now
Mr. Owens, are you suggesting that it would be
> Antonio's fault? My
> good man, I'm sure you don't really mean that.
> Norm
Norm,
You sarcastic bastard. Do you have to turn everything
into a "for or against" scenario?
Why don't you just unsu
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
You're damn right Antonio! What does vitriol mean?
> Norm
Norm,
Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their
hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the
50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC
(I was only a kid then).
HTH,
This is amazing. I've suddenly become a member of the OTEMAILBROWSERBYE
mailing list without even subscribing. How can they do that?
Tom C.
Amazing! I said nothing against anyone. I expressed an opinion, and
then stated that Doug and the others who manage the list and the PUG
deserve our gratitude. Where was the "vitriol" in my post? Why do you
question my honesty? You may be the most highly sensitive and
argumentative person I ha
Amazing! I said nothing against anyone. I expressed an opinion, and
then stated that Doug and the others who manage the list and the PUG
deserve our gratitude. Where was the "vitriol" in my post? Why do you
question my honesty? You may be the most highly sensitive and
argumentative person
Well Rob, when you are debating a subject you normally have a different
opinion to some other folks, so I dont really see how "integration"
would be relevant.
As to empathy, tolerance and compromise, it is very hard to feel any of
those when you are the subject of an ongoing torrent of abuse an
On 8 Jul 2004 at 10:24, Norm Baugher wrote:
> You're damn right Antonio! What does vitriol mean?
It's empathy, tolerance, compromise and integration that he doesn't understand
:-(
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail
In my humble opinion, this list is tops in service compared to others I
participate in. I second Dan's comments without reservation.
Otis Wright.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I, for one, have had no problems with this list, although there have
been problems from time to time on other lists to whic
any thought to the idea that
maybe
the problem is at your end?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Antonio Aparicio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT:
Non-Micro
ED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: OT: Email delivery problems with the PDML(was OT: Non-Microsoft
browsers are most secure choice)
> Hi Doug,
>
> Well I have been using the internet since Telnet and IRC, some 20 years
> ago and all I can say is that there is someth
Hi Doug,
Well I have been using the internet since Telnet and IRC, some 20 years
ago and all I can say is that there is something wrong with this list.
Emails are clearly not getting through. I am not the only one to
experience this. Instead of berating me for raising the issue, or
blaming me f
Graywolf wrote:
> Boy am I glad I am out of the work force. Did I ever mention
> the time I got a bad work review, so I just quit trying to do
> my job. Just came in, sat there, and was friendly to
> everyone. Ignored the job description completely. Did no
> actual work. They told me how much
Keith Whaley wrote:
> When something is done incorrectly, and there's only two ways
> to do it, right and wrong, there IS a wrong way.
> Now, it's up to the "boss" or supervisor or parent, or
> whomever, to soft pedal the word and insist that it be done correctly.
>
> I think you're trying to a
When something is done incorrectly, and there's only two ways to do it,
right and wrong, there IS a wrong way.
Now, it's up to the "boss" or supervisor or parent, or whomever, to soft
pedal the word and insist that it be done correctly.
I think you're trying to avoid instilling in students of an
Malcolm Smith wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
Well, Malcolm, you're right. The culture of "I just want
this off my desk"
should change. Problem, it's not so easy a fix as one might
think. With the advent of computers, receptionists must now
be much more than a pretty face to smile at th
frank theriault wrote:
> Well, Malcolm, you're right. The culture of "I just want
> this off my desk"
> should change. Problem, it's not so easy a fix as one might
> think. With the advent of computers, receptionists must now
> be much more than a pretty face to smile at the business men
>
say
it's
gone - it needs to be delivered and the customer will think of both the
supplier and the deliverer. Of course it depends on the value of the items
being sent - think of the threads here about choices of delivery from
camera
stores on high value items - but if you are sending some
's~ when the almighty dollar means something.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL
net "mail order" shopping business,
which I believe will generate a big chunk of change for the delivery
services. The problem, for the consumer, is that the courier companies are
probably going to offer good deals to large mail order companies to be their
exclusive shipper. Since the al
ys".
>
> John
>
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 07:12:31 +0100, Malcolm Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > William Robb wrote:
> >
> >> They have decided that it is more profitable to screw up and lose the
> >> delivery. Their insurance co
aler of a camera for example, choice in how we pay
and as the customer, why shouldn't the person paying have the choice of
delivery?
Malcolm
ght extra fee. That probably came about because
their customer service manager was active on the rec.photo groups, so heard a
lot of complaints that would never have gotten to him otherwise.
--
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Why should any delivery company change it's performance figures if the
send
You hit that nail on the head, Frank.
frank theriault wrote:
And, to be honest with you (as someone who works in the business), I can
tell you that the average receptionist or mailroom staffer really
doesn't care if the package gets delivered. They care if the package
gets off their desk. Ri
company delivers 'whatever to wherever', should be in the business
of aiming for 100% success, not by nature of being at the top of the list of
agents to call.
> If such businesses have to think, "Hmmm... Is this an in
> town or out of town delivery? Do I call UPS or th
insurance premiums through lesser risk of
claiming, i.e. the 2nd excess policy only picking up claims from say GBP1
million to GBP3 million and so on.
How this package works to a parcel delivery company for continual lower
level claims (although you would require the cover in the event of the loss
o
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: OT:Parcel delivery.
> Insurance isn't free. Their insurance only covers the replacement
cost
> because they are paying a premium. The premium is based on claims
> experience, and it will cover not j
think that "insurance pays".
John
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 07:12:31 +0100, Malcolm Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William Robb wrote:
They have decided that it is more profitable to screw up and lose the
delivery. Their insurance coughs up the replacement cost, and in all
likelyho
William Robb wrote:
> They have decided that it is more profitable to screw up and lose the
> delivery. Their insurance coughs up the replacement cost, and in all
> likelyhood they will "deliver" the replacement.
> It's called profiting from ones mistakes, and t
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
