After that "poke holes in the story" post here, I won't be partaking.
Martin (usually doesn't revel in being difficult...)
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Tue, 12 May 2009 06:47:3
s.com, Augustus Augustus wrote:
>
> Martin,
> Â
> when u going? i need 2 see it again, so i will tag along with u.
> Â
> Fate.
>
> --- On Tue, 5/12/09, Martin Baxter wrote:
>
>
> From: Martin Baxter
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *S
Martin,
when u going? i need 2 see it again, so i will tag along with u.
Fate.
--- On Tue, 5/12/09, Martin Baxter wrote:
From: Martin Baxter
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 8:01 AM
To
>
>
>
>
>
> -----[ Received Mail Content ]--
>
> Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
> Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -
>
> From : "B. Smith"
>
> To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
>
>
> Well I
beauty. One guy I
> know even called it "channeling DeForrest Kelley".
>
> Spoil one thing for me, though. Does Urban-as-McCoy say The Line?
>
>
>
>
>
> -----[ Received Mail Content ]--
>
> Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *S
The Line?
-[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:13:27 -
From : "B. Smith"
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Well I'm late to the party but I have to say that I really, really,
Meta,
Just let me know who you want to bring it to your door, and I'll have Gabrielle
hand it off.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 18:57:48 -
From : "Meta"
Martin,
I'll take it if you don't want it, especially wrapped in those C-notes. You
can, of course keep Gabrielle, my flow don't go THAT way.:)
Meta
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Martin Baxter" wrote:
>
> Not even if you were to buy me the Special Edition DVD when it came out,
> wrapped
Well I'm late to the party but I have to say that I really, really, really
enjoyed the new movie. It was definitely a good time at the movies and it
delivered in a big way. The people in the theater actually applauded at the end
the movie.
I think all of the main actors did really well in thei
Nonononononono... I called first.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 17:01:11 -
From : "ravenadal"
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Okay, Martin, I was with you all the way
Okay, Martin, I was with you all the way up to the Gabrielle Union in the "old
school" Uhura uniform comment but, to paraphrase Ozzie Osbourne, you have just
taken a ride on the bloody crazy train!
(Uh, gentlemen, that Gabrielle Union home delivery of the DVD IS something I
might be interested
Forgive the implication, Exalted List Goddess -- ne'er shall this one stray.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : RE: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 16:16:46 -0700
From : "Tracey de Morsella"
To :
You a
Marian, I've heard that the notion you posit has been discussed at the highest
levels. No word on whether it happens in reality or not.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 23:22:46 -
Ah. Too busy staring at Seven's Two Little Friends...
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Mon, 11 May 2009 01:01:20 -0400
From :
To :
Maybe they were too busy watching to see if Janeway and Seven was
Maybe they were too busy watching to see if Janeway and Seven was going to
break it again.
--Lavender
--
From: "sincere1906"
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:36 AM
To:
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
> Okay. Gett
Damn. You just made some red matter suck my brain into a black hole... those
are alot of conundrums unleashed by this timeline/alternate reality change. I
hadn't thought of any of those, and now there must be hundreds of others. Alot
of Trek geeks are out of a job, and we've entered an ultimate
Some elegant chess playing there. You are thinking 10 moves ahead!
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Daryle Lockhart wrote:
>
> Yeah see, once Spock spilled the trans-warp equation, I knew he
> was going to be a problem. He proved to BE said problem by having a
> conversation with himse
Yeah see, once Spock spilled the trans-warp equation, I knew he
was going to be a problem. He proved to BE said problem by having a
conversation with himself.
To be specific, everything we know in Star Trek, as of now, did not
happen. Because Nero went back in time and destroyed the Kel
Wasn't Tom Baker briefly married to Lalla Ward (one of the Romanas)?
Yeah...1980 to 1982 according to Wiki.
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "Tracey de Morsella" wrote:
>
> Don't forget that she ended up dating Tennant who played her dad. That
> kinda made it worse for me
>
>
>
> From: s
With all of the discussion of alternative timestreams here
Are people thinking that future movies might try to mingle the two alternative
Star Trek histories? I certainly hope not. (Mr. Shatner might yet talk
himself into the new Trek!)
If this is the new history, I hope they go forward
il Content ]--
Subject : [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 21:03:28 -
>From : "sincere1906"
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
But this is scifinoir...where we can get into convulted arguments about
everything from individuality and consciousness in the
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
I was a near instance Picard fan, mainly because he was the total opposite
of Kirk. If Kirk had been killed at anytime during TOS, I'd
have leaped for joy.:) I really didn't like him until the movies appeared.
Watching
:46 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
I have seen the movie and I loved it. My feelings about this
non-issue is the same as yours. I just will not be drawn into a
convoluted argument about Trek loyalties.
Meta
--- In scifinoir2
joy and gripe. Griping can be fun
>
>
>
> From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Justin Mohareb
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOI
int Chocolates:
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
> > > Dare to take The Oath in this fantasy series:
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Martin Baxter > > > wrote:
&
sincere1906
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 1:41 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
ROTFL. Man just the image of Picard in that scene has me laughing. But
recall that Picard's Ahab-like obstinance had to be tempered by Alfree
Woodard... "You
Tracey, you should change your post-name to that.
Truth in advertising, after all... ;-D
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : RE: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 11:45:00 -0700
From : "Tracey de Morsella"
To :
sin, I had a hit off the whisper-stream a few months back, that a crossover
with the original Trek timeline was a possible go.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 20:32:20 -
From : "sincer
. It's saved my life, and the lives of
three other people. It also tried to save me from making a disastrous bet on
the Iggles in SB XV. I trust it.)
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2
ject : [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 21:03:28 -
From : "sincere1906"
To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
But this is scifinoir...where we can get into convulted arguments about
everything from individuality and consciousness in the Borg to w
fun
>
>
>
> From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Justin Mohareb
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
>
>
&g
For me it indeed 'felt' like Trek. I guess its a case of YMMV.
Meta
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "sincere1906" wrote:
>
> GW,
>
> You've hit the proverbial nail on the head. It was a good movie, I enjoyed
> much of it, but it didn't *feel* like Trek. And when some people hear my
> co
nt Chocolates:
> > > http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
> > > Dare to take The Oath in this fantasy series:
> > > http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Martin Baxt
half Of Justin Mohareb
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not goi
GW,
You've hit the proverbial nail on the head. It was a good movie, I enjoyed much
of it, but it didn't *feel* like Trek. And when some people hear my complaints
they think I'm trying to be a "purist" or that I don't like the
timeline/alternate reality change. And that's not it at all. I'm not
ries:
> > http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Martin Baxter > > wrote:
> > That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own
> > words.
> >
> > "If you
ROTFL. Man just the image of Picard in that scene has me laughing. But recall
that Picard's Ahab-like obstinance had to be tempered by Alfree Woodard... "You
broke your little ships." See the movie, please, if only so I can find a
like-minded person who likes Trek's vision and principles to grip
Daryle,
Those are some great points! True indeed, how many times has the timeline been
altered already with flagrant offenders like Kirk (old Kirk)? And, one more
time, what about those Temporal Authorities that exist in the far future that
attempt to assure the timeline remains generally intac
GW,
The Galactica Syndrome... I like that! :)
I should state, I really *like* what was done with the new Galactica. That was
a true rebooting that borrowed elements of the original and came up with
something fresh and new. And I might argue that BSG's changes were appreciated
by people like me
Mother's day wishes
-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ravenadal
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:00 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Tracey! I was just thinkin
; Tracey
>
>
>
> From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Adrianne Brennan
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:16 AM
> To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
>
>
>
>
separate enjoy and gripe. Griping can be fun
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Justin Mohareb
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:46 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot
10, 2009 8:46 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Yeah, but a lot of people have decided that, sight unseen, they're not going
to like this film.
I, personally, don't have the time or energy to debate or cajole o
, May 10, 2009 7:16 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
And yet, me and many others who ARE Trek fans--heck, been a Trekkie all of
my life--*loved* the movie!
~ "Where love and magic meet" ~
http://www.adriannebrennan.com
_oath
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Martin Baxter
wrote:
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own
words.
"If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie."
-[ Received Mail Content ]----------
Subject : [scifinoir2]
a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own
words.
"If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie."
-[ Received Mail Content ]------
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17
Sun, 5/10/09, Martin Baxter wrote:
From: Martin Baxter
Subject: [RE][scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 7:55 AM
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return t
;
> "If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie."
>
>
>
>
>
> -[ Received Mail Content ]--
>
> Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
>
> Date : Sun, 10 May 2009 08:36:17 -
>
> From : "since
Great commentary! Pleasure to have you back in our universe, Black
Galactus(you should have sent your (black) herald to prepare us for your long
awaited uncloaking)!
~rave!
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, "sincere1906" wrote:
>
> Okay it's 4am, I saw the new Trek movie about 8 hours ago an
Well, I caught two of the ads that you mentioned and I did shake my head. I
liked it better when we didn't have ads embedded within our movies but those
are the times that we live in.
** spoilers ***
It disturbed me that it two genocides to reboot this franchise, but I accepted
the changes
That, sir, is a DAMN good point. But then, I return to Abrams' own words.
"If you're a Star Trek fan, you won't like this movie."
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : [scifinoir2] Re: New Trek- My take *SPOILERS*
Date : Sun, 10 May 2
Okay. Getting real Trek geek here...
SPOILERS!
SPOILERS!
SPOILSRS!
Where are the Temporal Authorities? In a Deep Space 9 episode, we got to see
guys from the future who monitor time. I figure they must be able to remain
unaltered outside the timeline. Shouldn't some alarm (or however they're
52 matches
Mail list logo
