Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Solved.

L PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 12:21 PM Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Since no-one has said anything about an error in the struts-examples app here, then I assume it's something in your setup that you or your colleagues have done. Did you do anything during

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

Message - From: "Samyukta Akunuru" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,j

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,jasper-runtime.jar) -Original Message- From: Stev

RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

Did you add the jasper compiler jars (jasper.jar, jasper-compiler.jar,jasper-runtime.jar) -Original Message- From: Steve Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 5:24 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I had sent a

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

I had sent a previous message to this list with a complete error listing, but I'll clarify. I downloaded and installed a new installation of Tomcat 5.0.18. I then downloaded and installed a new installation of struts 1.1, copying the documentation and example application war files into Tomcat's Web

Re: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

On 02/10/2004 07:38 PM Steve Hill wrote: Is anyone here successfully using Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I am getting "java.lang.IllegalStateException: zip file closed errors" with any struts-using code and am wondering if this is a bug and I should go back to an earlier version of one or the other.

RE: Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18?

> Is anyone here successfully using Struts 1.1 on Tomcat 5.0.18? I am. > "java.lang.IllegalStateException: zip file closed errors" with any I seem to recall getting this error when I had a corrupted jar in the lib. I'm not positive though. Dave

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

TilesPlugIn" when the > >> correct className is org.apache.struts.tiles.SecureTilesPlugin. > >> > >> There is some inconsistancy in the docs found at > >> http://struts.ditlinger.com/ that specify the wrong class name to use. > >> The good people that au

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

and will probably update the docs. Easy fix if I had of received a ClassNotFoundException, strange that no error resulted. All the best, Greg -Original Message- From: Greg Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

ext are aware and will probably update the docs. Easy fix if I had of received a ClassNotFoundException, strange that no error resulted. All the best, Greg -Original Message- From: Greg Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

he best, Greg > -Original Message- > From: Greg Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 > > Marino, > > Hmm, I didn't know what all those

RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

s [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 9:57 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 > > Marino, > > Hmm, I didn’t know what all those plugin's were for thanks for the > explanation but I configure the

RE: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marino A. Jonsson > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 6:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11 > > Moreover, the StrutsTilesPlugin overloads the > initRequestProcessorClass(ModuleConfig config) of the TilesPlugin a

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

Moreover, the StrutsTilesPlugin overloads the initRequestProcessorClass(ModuleConfig config) of the TilesPlugin and sets the processorClass attribute of the controller to SecureTilesRequestProcessor ... so there's no need to specify the controller explicitly. cheers, Marinó "Marino A. Jonsson" <[

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

That makes sense ... SecureTilesPlugin actually extends TilesPlugin so you're trying to initialize the same plugin twice ;) cheers, Marinó "Greg Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, I am having difficulty integrating the sslext11 plug-in with Struts 1.1 using

Re: Struts 1.1, Tiles and sslext11

Hi Greg, I'm using the same setup as you, except I use the straight org.apache.struts.action.SecurePlugIn and it works. Haven't seen that exception before. Adam On 01/19/2004 09:06 PM Greg Hess wrote: Hi All, I am having difficulty integrating the sslext11 plug-in with Struts 1.1 using Til

Re: Struts 1.1 and iPlanet iws 6.05

You should upgrade to 6.1 if you can. It uses Tomcat under the covers. All will work fine once you do that. James - Original Message - From: "Fowler, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:22 PM Subject: Struts 1.1 and iPlanet iws

RE: struts 1.1 validation of indexed properties

Look here for an example: http://home.earthlink.net/~dwinterfeldt/revision.html update 9/25/2001. Works like a champ. -- Voytek Jarnot Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari? > -Original Message- > From: Andreas Wuest [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: struts 1.1 validation problem / question

Hi Andreas, i think the best way is to write your own validate() method in your action form. There you can easily check the value of the userAction attribute and depending on that the other attributes. example: public ActionErrors validate(ActionMapping mapping, HttpServletRequest request) { A

Re: struts 1.1 validation problem / question

Hi Victor, thanks for you reply. the lookupdispatchaction does not really solve my problem, since handling the different actions is not the problem. the problems is the validation of the input fields for the different action. i need different validations depending on the value of the userAction

Re: struts 1.1 validation problem / question

Oi Andre, Tries to verify the LookupDispatchAction class, this class allows to manage diverse actions in simple Action and in this way you can better manage its validations with the Validator. Good code. Victor Amano Izawa __

Re: struts 1.1 and multiple applications

Scott Tiger wrote: We have one struts application working on a weblogic server 5.1 service pack 13. I have put all the struts and apache libraries(struts.jar and commo**.jar, xerces.jar etc ) in the server class path. They are not in the web-inf/lib directory. This is not a supported configura

Re: struts 1.1 question

--- Adam Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? > I'm > using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with > actions. Keep in mind that it's as simple as: to front JSPs with *.do actions. The benefits far outwei

RE: struts 1.1 question

x27;t scared but if you were in the middle of the forest and night started falling... You'd start fronting those darn JSPs :-) -Original Message- From: Adam Levine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: struts 1.1 question

RE: Struts 1.1 Modules and application resources

While I haven't tried it yet. Have you looked into writing a custom MessageResourcesConfig or PropertyMessageResourcesFactory? You can easily pass one into your config http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/configuration.html#resources_conf ig >From there you can implement your own MessageResou

Re: struts 1.1 question

Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. From: e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject:

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

+1 Steve Raeburn wrote: Take a look at Hibernate , I found the documentation to be much better than OJB and it was much easier get productive quickly. Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

ruts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases? > > > meanwhile 2 steps done. > > I gave ojb a try, but as I was fascinated by the white paper, I got > disappointed from the implementation and the support. > > So I stay w

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Thank you all: that's been very helpful. Graham > If you need a connection in your servlet layer then defining a data > source in web xml is a more reliable alternative. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jndi-datasource- > examples-howto.html > > What ted was saying was tha

Re: Struts 1.1 Modules and application resources

I had the same problem in my project. Originally we employed option #1, but eventually found that to be unmanageable. I would warn you that option #2 does not work with all struts components, because some of them (the validator if I recall correctly) look only at the default resource bundle for t

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

meanwhile 2 steps done. I gave ojb a try, but as I was fascinated by the white paper, I got disappointed from the implementation and the support. So I stay with ibatis db-layer, stable a very well documented. The support is very fast and profund, so what do I need soap bubbles. cheers and bye

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Reinhard wrote: Thanks Erik, Ted already gave a very short advice, but with your words, the sun is shining again ;-) Erik wrote: The DataSource management system used in your container. Tomcat for instance, has its own place to specify this Ok, I declared my datasources in server.xml (I'm

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Ted wrote: > If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* > using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing > three years ago, but, at this point, has outlived its usefulness in most > environments. I'm a bit upset. Any advice on what better to use?

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

If you need a connection in your servlet layer then defining a data source in web xml is a more reliable alternative. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jndi-datasource- examples-howto.html What ted was saying was that ideally you shouldn't be doing this (including my suggestion

RE: struts 1.1 question

A good starting point for all you antidisestablishmentarianist that don't want to front your JSPs might be the use of the ForwardAction and global-forwards. That just forwards to a view page without writing a new class. This way, when you are ready to do the right thing, you can change some of

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Ted, are you talking about not using org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory ? Reinhard wrote: Ted wrote: If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing three years ago, but, at this point, has

RE: struts 1.1 question

MAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: struts 1.1 question Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 17:02:13 -0400 A good starting point for all you antidisestablishmentarianist that don't want to front your JSPs might be the use of the ForwardAction and g

RE: struts 1.1 question

Yup. It really isn't so bad. A lot of pages of what? You need a lot of pages even without Struts if your site has a lot of content. You don't have any extra JSP pages because of it but it makes you Struts config file a little longer than if you didn't have to map all your JSPs. But then that

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Thanks Erik, Ted already gave a very short advice, but with your words, the sun is shining again ;-) Erik wrote: > The DataSource management system used in your container. Tomcat for > instance, has its own place to specify this Ok, I declared my datasources in server.xml (I'm using tomcat 5).

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Reinhard wrote: Ted wrote: If you are starting from scratch, then I would strongly recommend *not* using the datasource manager. The datasource manager was a Good Thing three years ago, but, at this point, has outlived its usefulness in most environments. I'm a bit upset. Any advice on what b

Re: struts 1.1 question

From the article at link below Direct Requests to JSPs To take the full advantage of sub-application support, Struts 1.1 stipulates the requirement that all requests must flow through the controller servlet, i.e. the ActionServlet. Effectively, this means all JSPs must be fronted by Action

Re: struts 1.1 question

Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 16:56:54 -0400 From the article at link below Direct Requests to JSPs To take the full advantage of sub-application support, Struts 1.1 stipulates the requirement that all requests mus

Re: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

Graham Stark wrote: > Could someone explain all this to me? Obviously, I can configure > connection pools manually outside of the Struts framework, but I > assume there are advantages in doing so in a Struts-centric way if > you can, andthe DBCP implementation looks quite nice, if I could only >

RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases?

ROTECTED]> Sent: 08/14/03 01:04 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Struts 1.1: what's the preferred way to use databases? > > Take a look at Hibernate <http://hibernate.bluemars.net/>, I found the documentation to be much better than OJB and

RE: struts 1.1 question

Can you attach a form bean to an action defined as such? Brad Handy > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:53 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question > > --- Adam Lev

RE: struts 1.1 question

ge- > > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 4:53 PM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question > > > > --- Adam Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Where exactly did you

RE: struts 1.1 question

August 11, 2003 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: struts 1.1 question Where exactly did you read that all jsps must be fronted by actions? I'm using 1.1, and assuredly have NOT (nor will I) front them all with actions. From: e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts U

Re: struts 1.1 question

In fact, you have to front JSPs only if you're using modules, because requests have to go through struts controller to know which module they belong. If you're not planning to use modules, I think you can keep your struts-config file the way it is. And as tiles and modules are independant, the

RE: struts 1.1 question

I guess it just seems like extra work that doesn't yield obvious benefits, not unlike having to do all those getters/setters in 1.0, but I guess if I had to choose between the two, I'd choose this. I guess I'm also partial to the familiar file extensions like .jsp..do never did it for me, th

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

he errors. YPL -Original Message- From: Cindy.Gramann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 4:23 PM To: struts-user Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 We're using Xerces 1.2. Also, we ran into classloader problems with commons logging when runn

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

work through an admin for all my changes. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 Thks for the info Cindy, I'm trying to chec

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

let me and give me permission to the directory). BTW, which xml parser are you using? YPL -Original Message- From: Cindy.Gramann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 11:00 AM To: struts-user Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390 I've bee

RE: Struts 1.1 in Websphere 4.01 on plugin with OS/390

I've been able to get Struts working with the Websphere 4.01 plugin on z/OS (recently upgraded from OS/390). We are using JSP 1.1 and Servlet 2.2. The only changes that I needed to make after running the Struts example .war file through wartowebapp were to extract the dtd's under org.apache.struts.

Re: Struts 1.1 and Tiles

I feel you need to specify the tiles processor in the struts-config. Please add the following line in your struts-config.xml file Siva Oliver Reflé wrote: > Hi fellows, > At the moment I am working on tiles. But I have a big problem to get this > stuff running. It seems that the Tiles plugin

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

Hello Siva We can use as a nested element to . This was working fine with Struts 1.0.2. The problem arised while I'm migrating to Struts 1.1 What I dont know is that whether we can use such a nested element with Struts 1.1 ?? You have any such info. Vinit Siva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear Vi

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

Dear Vinit, I feel the set-property should be used with DynaActionForm. and the set property will be meaningless with your own action form. please make sure why you are using this set-property here. Siva Vinit Sharma wrote: > Hello > I'm using the DTD version as provided by Struts site for St

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

Hello I'm using the DTD version as provided by Struts site for Struts 1.1. It is as follows: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/struts-config_1_1.dtd";> Is there anything wrong with that?? Vinit Siva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dea rVinit, Please use the propert dtd version corresponds to 1.1 (

Re: Struts 1.1 migration

Dea rVinit, Please use the propert dtd version corresponds to 1.1 (you can specify the dtd available in SUN site.) I feel the peoblem is because of improper dtd reference.. Siva Vinit Sharma wrote: > Hello > I'm migrating from Struts 1.0 to Struts 1.1. My old struts-config.xml file does not >

Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

depends="required,date"> datePatternStrict dd-MM- - -Original Message- From: Guillaume Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 22, 2003 3:50 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date

RE: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

sers Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war I don't understand want you mean validation.xml (not validator.xml) is include in the package struts-validator.war Please, verify that the date field is valid only if you enter a date lik

Re: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

I don't understand want you mean validation.xml (not validator.xml) is include in the package struts-validator.war Please, verify that the date field is valid only if you enter a date like 'dd-MM-' (22-07-2002). I think that there is a bug with the i18n validator because the date is on

RE: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war

Not enough info. Please post your date validation in validator.xml. -Original Message- From: Guillaume Cormier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: July 21, 2003 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Struts 1.1 Final - Validate Date field in struts-validator.war I am not able to valid

Re: Struts 1.1 prepareStatement woes

Dear Joel, You are using some struts API in your class which was implementes (not abstract) in RC2 and become abstract in 1.1 final release. AbstractMethodError will happen only in these scenario. Siva Joel Hainley wrote: > I have been trying to get this working for a few hours and am going to

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

On Friday 11 July 2003 14:51, Ted Husted wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > > Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If > > you need it for MS Word, that's not going to happen any time soon. > > It's all in XML, so something that can do XML to PDF and be called from > Ant

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

Hello Ted, If it can become part of the build process.. it will be great.. and highly appreciated. -Shalab At 02:51 PM 7/11/2003 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: James Mitchell wrote: Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If you need it for MS Word, that's not going to ha

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

James Mitchell wrote: Something is in the works for PDF, but I'm not sure of the status. If you need it for MS Word, that's not going to happen any time soon. It's all in XML, so something that can do XML to PDF and be called from Ant could be made part of the build process. -Ted. -- Ted Huste

Re: Struts 1.1 Doc question

On Friday 11 July 2003 14:40, Goel Shalab wrote: > Hello Everyone > > I was wondering if there was a way for downloading the HTML as a package > for User and Developer Guides for Struts 1.1. Yes, the binary comes with struts-documentation.war, which is the complete documentation that used for the

Re: Struts 1.1 - struts-config_1_1.dtd not found

I've seen it, still looking for solution. I get the error when trying to move my web app to the service providers server. Same app works fine with my tomcat 4.1.x & Struts 1.1b2. I checked struts.jar and there is struts-config_1_1.dtd. Ville > Did any one face this problem before? I'm tryin

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

ered environment if all servlet context attributes are must be serializable? -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:29 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Ob

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Erik Price wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 18:14:57 -0400 > From: Erik Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

Hohlen, John C wrote: Craig: I added a comment to the Bugzilla report with a link to the thread. Thanks for the idea. Do you or anyone else know if WebLogic 6.1 requires that servlet context attributes to be serializable? How can I figure that out? Not trying to be sarcastic at all, but

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

July 10, 2003 2:29 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Hohlen, John C wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:04:31 -0500 > From: "Hohlen, John C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Hohlen, John C wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:04:31 -0500 > From: "Hohlen, John C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMA

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:34 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Gra

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > > > > My personal opinion is that app servers which require ServletContext > > attributes to be Serializable are broken, because the servlet spec only > > requires this for *session* attributes. That being said, we probably > > need > > to address this

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable > > > > --- "Hohlen, John C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

le objects. David > > Thanks, > > JOHN > > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:47 AM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializab

RE: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

ssage- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:47 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable --- "Hohlen, John C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm encountering a &q

Re: Struts 1.1 Bug? "PlugIn" Objects Not Serializable

--- "Hohlen, John C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm encountering a "serialization" error due to Plug-In objects, in my > case, the "org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn" not being > serializable. An array of plug-ins are stored in "application" scope in > the "ActionServlet.initModulePl

RE: Struts 1.1 Api

http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/index.html Panchasheel -Original Message- From: Jagannayakam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 9:06 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: Struts 1.1 Api Hi , >From where can I get struts 1.1 API Regards, Jag

Re: Struts 1.1 Api

If you've a struts-documentation.war file in your distribution then install on your container and look at that or http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/index.html On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 02:05 PM, Jagannayakam wrote: Hi , From where can I get struts 1.1 API Regards, Jagan. --

RE: struts 1.1 tutorial

Try http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/resources/tutorials.html José. -Original Message- From: Jagannayakam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 10:37 AM To: Struts Users Mailing List (E-mail) Subject: struts 1.1 tutorial Is there any struts1.1 based tutorial . Regards

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

Have we seen your web.xml and struts-config.xml file yet? > -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:01 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem > > Could you post the co

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

03 1:52 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem > > > My initial guess was not because of the bean:write. But then I found out > the error only happens when I use the bean:write for a long type. > > I checked the log file and the only mess

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

My initial guess was not because of the bean:write. But then I found out the error only happens when I use the bean:write for a long type. I checked the log file and the only message there are the same as listed on the page. I am sure that it's the bean:write problem or has something to do with t

RE: Struts 1.1 bean:write problem

Works for me with both Long and long properties. The exception message doesn't seem to be anything to do with this. Often it's a sympton that the ActionServlet has not initialised properly. Check your logs for other error messages that may have prevented ActionServlet from loading. Steve > -

RE: Struts 1.1 RC1 - Error while invoking struts-validator web app in Tomcat 3.2.4

Hi Oswin, I had downloaded the latest nightly build at that point of time. In future, you will have better chance of getting reply from struts-user list instead of sending emails to individually. Reddy > -Original Message- > From: Oswin Ondarza [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, J

Re: Struts 1.1 on z/OS with WebSphere Application Server 4.0

Markus Holzem wrote: Does anyone have experiences with Struts running on an IBM mainframe? I'm particularly interested in WebSphere 4.0 (z/OS, *not* z/Linux). I've tried to find anything in the archive, but I only found references on WebSphere running on Wintel, Linux or Solaris. Since WebSphere o

Re: Struts 1.1

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Graham Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 01:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week. After that, people will have a chance to test their apps with it and we'll incorporate any show stopping bug fixes. Struts

RE: Struts 1.1

able upload.jar? Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of David Graham > Sent: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 01:39 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 > > > Struts RC 2 should be coming out this week.

RE: Struts 1.1

rgely because it's not > a *minor* upgrade from 1.0, but a biggy. There probably should have been > lots of little 1.x releases. But there weren't and here we are. > > Finally, to answer your question. I believe the only outstanding issue is a > dependency on the commons f

Re: struts 1.1 rc with tomcat 4?

On 02/06/2003 14:07 Kristine Weissbarth wrote: hi, I'm relatively new at struts and I'm currently working with 1.0.2 version. But as I want to make use of the easier validation coming with the newer versions (1.1 rc) I would like to update. My problem is that every time when I installed the newer

RE: Struts 1.1

The release hasn't been made because there is a *known* outstanding issue. If that issues affects you then you should either not use the latest version or find a work-around. The beautiful thing is that you know what the issue is and you get to make an *informed* choice. > Now it seems that Struts

RE: Struts 1.1

3 00:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.1 >Meanwhile, most of the Struts committers are using the Release Candidate in >production. We do trust it in our own companies. I am using Struts 1.1 RC1 in production with no problems. The 1.1 release problems are well known and this dis

Re: Struts 1.1

Meanwhile, most of the Struts committers are using the Release Candidate in production. We do trust it in our own companies. I am using Struts 1.1 RC1 in production with no problems. The 1.1 release problems are well known and this discussion has been rehashed over and over again. We can only

Re: Struts 1.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, my question was, why do they think the code isn't good enough for a release? Now it seems that Struts 1.1 is ready, some other component isn't ready. If that's the case, can that component be removed, then added in a 1.2 release? If it's another jar, it's extreme

RE: Struts 1.1

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 2 June 2003 22:44 To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 OK, let's look at it another way. If Struts 1.1 is ready for prime time, why don't the authors trust it en

RE: Struts 1.1

ere probably should have been > lots of little 1.x releases. But there weren't and here we are. > > Finally, to answer your question. I believe the only outstanding issue is a > dependency on the commons fileupload component that is nearly ready and that > the Struts release is

Re: Struts 1.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our company has a policy of not using software that hasn't had a final release, therefore we've been stuck with Struts 1.0. The key problem is that we have the same policy =:0) The final release of Struts 1.1. can only have external dependencies on other final releases.

  1   2   3   >