ng to push the fix to 2.29.1 but dropped the ball on this.
Very sorry.
Thunderbird thread:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=2866229
It's OK. It happens. Can we get it in .2 at least? :(
If there is a .2 for this SeaMonkey version, yes.
~Justi
ould have helped
in the case where we didn't notice independently.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
l delayed).
I thank you for your continued interest, and hope to have more to share
"soon".
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
admit I'm not working on it, my efforts are in the
Build/Release of SeaMonkey primarily. And while my time in fixing stuff
and getting this working there does impact our ability to release an
official Linux64, I'm not the same human likely to work on fixing Sync.
So I wouldn'
bout the bookmark backup issue. Can you please provide a
pointer so we can try and make sure the fixes are in 2.30 if possible?
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
like SM2.61 will be my version for long time.
-Stan
Do you know of bugs for these issues?
I at least did skim the bugs that had patches [and fixed on trunk code]
and looked for any that were safe to take in this release, and I don't
recall seeing eith
to us still needing to catchup infra wise, you'll notice
no 2.30 Beta is out yet, much to my dismay (We're hung up on windows
issues atm)
So I'm trying not to change too much of our release process while we
devote time to fixing the broken, rather t
Do you have a langpack installed and this is the result of using a langpack?
Did you get this from your package manager/distro or from us?
~Justin Wood (Callek)
On 9/11/2014 10:36 AM, Francois LE COAT wrote:
Hi,
Today Kubuntu 14.04 updated SeaMonkey from 2.26.1 to 2.29, but starting
"
E
On 8/21/2014 6:27 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote, On 21/08/2014 18:07:
Hey Everyone!
- This release will NOT have any l10n changes since our 2.26.1 release
(well, it has new english strings, but no translations). This is
primarily because we wanted to test our overall build
the 2.29 release and 2.30b1.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
On 8/21/2014 12:07 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hey Everyone!
So I wanted to update you on the state of things.
- There will be no 2.28 release, the efforts to do so would only get in
the way of timing for 2.29 and at this point its
hough the latter will still be of a
big help.
- There will be a 2.29 Beta 2.
- About a week after we ship beta 2, we hope to have a 2.29 final out.
- 2.30 should be able to ship with automated linux64 updates and l10n!
Any questions, reply or see me in irc.m.o/ #s
Just an update everyone,
The physical machines are in place and "good" I'm working on getting the
buildbot (automation) up to snuff with :ewong's help to make use of this.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
On 7/16/2014 9:07 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Hey Everyone,
Again I&#
6.1&os=win&lang=en-US
(Windows)
https://download.mozilla.org/?product=seamonkey-2.26.1&os=linux&lang=en-US
(Linux)
https://download.mozilla.org/?product=seamonkey-2.26.1&os=osx&lang=en-US
(Mac OS X)
Thank You!
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
For the record, I couldn't have said this better myself.
(I probably have attempted to many times in the past though)
Thank you MCBastos.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
SeaMonkey Council Member
SeaMonkey Release Engineer
On 7/18/2014 1:39 AM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/07/2014
goes well, I'm expecting to have a final release, based on the
current Firefox release out no later than 2-weeks after Firefox is shipped.
And if everything does go well, we can have yet another new beta after that.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
is look and feel. Again thats probably a large chunk of work
that I'm not personally doing, so I wouldn't worry just based on my
personal support for said changes.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
SeaMonkey Council Member
SeaMonkey Release Engineer
Mozilla Corporation Release Engineer
ry much for your time!
>
> Roger
>
We do not.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
EE wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>> Hey Everyone!
>>
>> So, I will be in brussles as of Oct 2, planning to be a tourist for a
>> bit. And since most of you will be arriving on Oct 3 sometime, I'm
>> hoping to gather us all for dinner outside of the of
r the cost
of this, but I can't promise just yet)
Please reply to me directly if you are going to brussles for the summit
and would like to attend this gathering of SeaMonkey people. Also
welcome is any of you who are going to be in Brussles on the 3rd.
~Just
king as a ridealong, of which is extremely minor and not worth the
effort on our end to do a respin for, we'll take its fix in the next
version of SeaMonkey)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.o
Ant wrote:
On 7/4/2013 8:50 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
...
I should note that while we do build this officially, we do *NOT*
officially "support" it.
Primarily because we don't have any forms of testing/saneness checking
of these buids at this time.
We also do not h
at least the last 4 years) been listed on our
downloads page of our website under the contrib section as well (so you
don't need to go through ftp directly)
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonke
(Firefox 23) is planned to be released within a
week of July 2'nd, with the final 2.20 release happening in tune with
Firefox 23.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Would it be possible to post a message at least weekly in
>> mozilla.support.seamonkey regarding the current status of efforts to
>> resume development of SeaMonkey versions? It is been over a week since
>> I ha
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>> David E. Ross wrote:
>>> Would it be possible to post a message at least weekly in
>>> mozilla.support.seamonkey regarding the current status of efforts to
>>> resume development of SeaMonkey versions?
fixup time for our *free* time since we all
have day jobs.
It pains us to have this type of delay in getting any new version (beta
or otherwise) out to you, but I will send more information along when we
have things to share about progress.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_
Iacopo Benesperi wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) ha scritto:
>> In order to meet our own quality and stability requirements we are NOT
>> releasing SeaMonkey 2.18.
>
> Are you going to at least release a compressed file with the sources? Or
> are they affected by this proble
system and its data, once that
is complete we will go forth with a new BETA based on the SeaMonkey 2.19
train, and we expect to release SeaMonkey 2.19 on time, on June 25′th.
We thank you for your understanding.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support
omputer.
Though your UA seems to claim you're on Win7 64-bit, (with a 32-bit build)
If that is accurate I suggest you manually download and install our
current version, I cannot begin to guess what about you setup is causing
you to have update problems.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
elease
in aproximately 24 hours.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ou should not need to worry about that.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
probably fine on a lazy-upgrade to
2.16.2 (the cases I know of were VERY obvious errors)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Rufus wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>> Hey Guys.
>>
>> Following along with our traditional security updates, 2.16.1 is now out
>> to correct a severe security vulnerability.
>>
>> You should be able to grab it from our website
>> http://www.seam
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> On 3/8/13 10:48 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>>> Hey Guys.
>>>
>>> Following along with our traditional security updates, 2.16.1 is now out
>>> to correct a severe security vulnerability.
>>&
Hey Guys.
Following along with our traditional security updates, 2.16.1 is now out
to correct a severe security vulnerability.
You should be able to grab it from our website
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ or directly form the app's
check-for-updates.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
[sorry fo
ot;windows" section of
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.15/#issues
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
er developer
base, I do not see any signs of us stopping releases on the horizon.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Ant wrote:
>>>
>>>> <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.15/changes >
>>>
>>> Here's what I got when I tried Help | Check for
ote]
>
sounds like you probably had a bit of packet loss, or someone was trying
to intercept your file transmission (e.g. even a internet provider
saying your bill was late, or something)
Try again. -- or manually install it
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
__
ithin the next 12 hours,
most likely the early side of that.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
es the hotpatching used by our update system
to break
Also since each LOCALE/VERSION is different it adds up in terms of human
effort to even do that.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
http
s from them.
See my earlier posts in this newsgroup about it.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
s being offered to you. Mozilla is the
hosting provider, but be warned that nothing on our site is tested for
https, nothing in the hosting is explicitly providing https:// so if it
works, it works by accident.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-s
as, you can set
app.update.log;true and then you'll see all the details in your error
console when you attempt an update.
The reason for those substitutions is so that we can give you the proper
update, including a smaller update for some builds/versions, etc.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Rich Gray wrote:
>> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>>> we have no
>>> sane way to detect the presence of Norton and delay JUST those updates.
>>
>> Does the user get notified by Semantic of the quarantined files?
>
*cough* well
Rich Gray wrote:
> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>> we have no
>> sane way to detect the presence of Norton and delay JUST those updates.
>
> Does the user get notified by Semantic of the quarantined files?
Depending on NAV settings
> Can the SM installer detect that not
nd I decided to just register/subscribe
rather than fight and try to remove/switch] it is a bad situation to
have to be in, but I feel this is a decision I need community input on,
rather than decided that some subset of our users will have to suffer
due to a larger companies issues.
--
~Justin Wood
e docs, but I'm focusing on Authenticode/Windows signing right now --
one hurdle at a time]
- No hard ETA on any of it yet.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Ant wrote:
> On 12/1/2012 9:00 PM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
>
>> Not afaict, I suspect it is a combination of how big they are (user
>> wise) compared to us, and the fact that they have signed
>> binaries/installers. Symantec probably whitelists the whole MoCo
>&
Ant wrote:
> On 12/1/2012 4:48 AM PT, Justin Wood (Callek) typed:
>
>> Symantec again, they changed their internal process on us, and our
>> builds themselves were ready late thursday, while I was hoping that
>> Symantec would get back to me with a "we have whiteliste
we might as well
put updates out for the OS's we know are fine, rather than wait a whole
weekend for symantec in order for our Linux Users to get updates.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Ant wrote:
>> but no internal updates yet.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Symantec again, they changed their internal process on us, and our
> builds themselves were ready late thursday, while I was hoping that
> Symantec would get back to me with a &
ty so you know there should be no worry about
using 2.14 even without 2.14.1 in the meantime.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
es "on the wire"
so to speak as of this weekend. I will let this newsgroup know when I do.
It is still an entirely manual process for these updates, so bear with us.
Thank You,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ould not get an offer to update to a SeaMonkey version
beyond 2.13.x from any OSX 10.5 version, no matter what your update
settings are.
Thank you again,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https:
the wild
(that we know of yet), so I felt safe in the wait for Norton here.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
there are some other changes that will roll
in with this, all of them equally beneficial [if not equally visible]
I don't have a concrete ETA on the release yet, but I can say it will be
out within the week.
Thanks,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
> Jim wrote:
>> I just installed this release. During the install, I received a Norton
>> Antivirus alert that Suspicious.Cloud.7.F was detected and it "fixed it"
>> (like fixing a cat maybe :) ).
>>
>> Anyway, accord
r newer[est] releases, since
we go through "bouncer" (Which goes through CDN and/or Mozilla's Mirror
Network to find not only a fast mirror, but one close to you) while
ftp.m.o is (primarily?) served from CA, USA.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_
are available
to try and prevent this issue]
I'll reach out to my contact on monday to try and determine what happened.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
, keith_w typed:
>
>> ...why does it's release date say 2001? Certainly that's in error?
>>
>> I just downloaded it, replacing my previous v. 2.12.1, on suggestion from
>> SM.
Hrm where do you see 2001, so that I can track down and fix?
http://ww
p by step on how to change.
>
> All the best.
>
Install a full-install of the final release and it will change to be
final releases only. Should be able to just overwrite your 2.13 beta
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
ting to 2.12.1 to
fix many issues, including security issues.
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Philip Chee wrote:
We decided not
to implement those key combinations because we didn't think many
octopuses used SeaMonkey.
More specifically, we try to stay away from Octopuses, they eat
seamonkeys. And spray our composer documents with digital ink.
--
~Justin Wood (C
wild.
Is that true, or did the newest version of JAVA come with my upgrade
to SM 2.12.1 (done a few days ago) ?
If you need Java, yes you need to update, if you don't need Java, I
instead recommend you just disable it.
SeaMonkey does not ship Java Updates.
--
~Justin Wood (C
getting a 24 MB update, that is *surely* not normal.
There is a bug on file at Bug 790167
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Ant wrote:
On 9/10/2012 12:24 PM PT, Ant typed:
It won't let me upgrade today so far: http://i.imgur.com/y5JIu.gif and
http://i.imgur.com/zVTLP.gif ... I wonder if it is just me (looks like
it based in this newsgroup so far). Is there an update log somewhere for
me to check? Also, what was fixe
4" variety??
We have, a few times, manually created Linux x64 based updates, but it
is a very time consuming and manual process. We do plan to start
creating those again in the future, but it is not on our immediate plate.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
te to 2.12 so that I don't
have to do a complete download of SM 2.12.1 if it eventuates!!
FWIW, there will be a 2.12.1, but I also plan to manually generate
partials from 2.11 to make everyones life easier. (it is only should
something go wrong which would delay our release in which I might not
ll at this, I just figured I'd update people,
since the Norton issue spawned a recent thread here.
My experience with it is not too surprising, though annoying. I posted
primarily as a "benefit to others" and an explicit mention that I am
working to try and fix this up for the futur
ils of my explicit files/the Norton warning follow:
~Justin Wood (Callek)
Category: Norton Community Watch
Date & Time,Risk,Activity,Status,Recommended Action,Date
Updated,Submitted By,Description,Submission Details
2012-09-02 0:00:35,Info,Sample Submission:
Suspicious.Cloud.7.F,Pending,
solution than what I outlined in my e-mail.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
for linux64 is on our TODO list, however.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
strator/techie relative.
You should end up with a completely working SeaMonkey, at no fault of
the SeaMonkey team.
[1] -
https://www.virustotal.com/file/c3fb29b25db93dbcc508a916e78e443c00a5b2405417ea43962b53fe62fdd115/analysis/
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
Kevin Mc Auley wrote:
... does this mean SM has a fax now???
Likely its a scam/spam. No SM Does not have any fax support (in our
official version)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
Saul Luiga wrote:
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2mU6USTBRE]Who's fat? SeaMonkey
!!![/url]
"I'm not fat I'm big boned" ~ SeaMonkey
(When talking about how its bones are made up of the innards of Firefox
and Thunderbird)
Ant wrote:
>
> Now if Mozilla can fix the minor and sometimes annoying issues that I
> mentioned recently. :P
We're working on improving many issues, without also regressing many things.
Stay Tuned. (Let this be a lesson to people here that its much better to
upgrade than stick with old versions
didn't catch this...
Automatic updates should be live! (Edmund even activated them himself)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ce a month or so, unless it is from one of the few expected e-mail
places I signed it up for. :-) (and I know some others do it that way)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.m
fix the issue described there *appear* to be
fixed, but it still adds up, and stuff may have changed between all that
(I'm no Internals/Memory expert).
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.
lpful. Videos on firefox are not
> working either.
>
>
I recommend you verify that your version of Flash is up to date, and
that you either don't have FlashBlock installed, or that it is not
blocking YouTube.
PluginCheck -- http://www.mozilla.com/pluginc
ere, or if you don't feel like you can
identify "odd" there, feel free to post its contents to list (warning:
if you do so its a privacy leak -- slightly -- since it shows hostnames
which use memory)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
t profile selection :/
Yes, 2.0.14 and 2.10.1 use the same code to determine "default" profile,
so if you change it in one it affects both.
A workaround could be to set your shortcut to use -P on
its command line, and that will force it to launch with the desired profile.
--
~Jus
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Anything more specific/questions will be hashed out over the coming
weeks with the relevant stakeholders and the community. I would direct
everyone who cares to take conversation on that side of things there,
and discuss.
For those who
cuss ad-nausea.
Let me repeat, -- at this time we have no plans to change the release
cycle/process of SeaMonkey, and we do still intend to ship with
Mail&News as we do today.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
can see if we can reproduce and work on a fix.
This amount of caged trollism is unacceptable and I ask that you state
facts rather than goading remarks.
Thank You,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek), Release Engineer
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-
n the next week!
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
rly !
**
Choose a file:
Show File Location
Due to Bug 713747 which was a *conscious* security change.
--
~Justin Wood (Cal
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Anyway, disabling [NVIDIA's] FXAA globally solved the issue for me. YMMV.
I'm working to see if we can get this issue fixed upstream.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
NoOp wrote:
On 06/10/2012 08:29 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
NoOp wrote:
The bug
<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736811>
has been updated today.
I can *easily* replicate in Thunderbird 13 as well. 6 machines, 4
distros, 4 linux desktops (GNOME 2, GNOME3, KDE, ICWM,
can get a
better idea of what is wrong, specifically!
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
for these crashes?
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
w through on my part.
I endeavor to never make a mistake of this magnitude again.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
e file, even if you uncheck the option, will
update to what was already fully downloaded on next start.
I do consider this a bug, and will try to fit into my time fixing it.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonk
Rufus wrote:
> clis...@charter.net wrote:
>> On May 6, 6:02 pm, Rufus wrote:
>>> Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
>>>> Rufus wrote:
>>>>> Looks like the link for "See if your plugins are up to date" has gone
>>>>> 404 with SM 2.9
ting for a thursday (maybe earlier if I'm
lucky) release.
I am sure you all would support a sane release process/engineer rather
than anything we would rush.
Sorry for the delay everyone,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
su
meone from
MoCo should be on top of this issue no later than monday.
Thank You for reporting it.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
channel users this time.
I hope to have 2.10 Beta out *no later* than Sunday. At which point you
should have your update.
Thanks,
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
to hit "Ok"/"Yes" on startup. This would also
avoid the need for that windows dialog in the first place (in most
common situations). To do this needs at least part of the #1 solution at
present in order to protect against security issues.
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_
htest on how to fix it :/ (MailNews side frontend
code is as foreign to me as building a functional warp drive from scratch)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/l
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
