Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

management. Kelvin. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28403.html On 29/02/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany > SDO for Java > > The distribution files are a

Re: [VOTE] Release SDO Java version 1.1-incubating (release candidate 2)

Sorry, in my recent post I gave the wrong link for the general thread -- it should have been http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16971.html Kelvin. On 18/03/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when

Re: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1725) XSD2JavaGenerator has a problem with associations navigable from both sides

se is > there. > > Regards, > > > Miro Kandic > (408) 525-2596 > > > -Original Message- > From: Kelvin Goodson (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:03 AM > To: Miro Kandic (mkandic) > Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited:

Re: Keeping up with the dev list and the flood of JIRA messages

I find the RSS feed facility for customised JIRA queries a very helpful way of keeping up with JIRAs. It gives much more control than a mail filter does. I still get the notifications in my inbox, but when I want to get a quick overview of recent activity the RSS feed is preferable. If you have

Re: Alias Name Support in Tuscany SDO

I traced back the origins of the commented out line [1], and it was introduced in commented out form (in a different file). That would tend to suggest that it was there as a reminder of the right thing to do one other infrastructure was in place, rather than being commented out because it wasn't

Re: [VOTE] SDO 1.1 rc3 release

+1 Looks good to me. Thanks very much for doing this Ant. Kelvin. On 26/03/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1 release RC3 artifacts at > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc3/< > http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/s

Re: [VOTE] Venkat for Tuscany Committer

- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: Process and content for next release?

't think we would be doing a Web-app distribution; instead there would be a web-app maven plugin to package a war with a suitably configured war inside it. See 7) for that. >> 6) Sample applications >>Technology sample framework (subject of another mail) >> BigBank application if ready 7) Tools Web-app maven plugin 9/4 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: SDO Question . . . .Type definitions for complexTypes defined by schema definition within xml file

Thanks for you thoughts, corrections and insights :-) Robbie -- * * * Charlie * * * Check out some pics of little Charlie at http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/ * * * Addresss * * * 1914 Overland Drive Chapel Hill NC 27517 * * * Number * * * 919-225-1553 -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

new committer startup tasks

administration steps yet to do here to give extended JIRA privileges and the like? -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: new committer startup tasks

ands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: new committer startup tasks

bs. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: Any more comments? was: Release name

il: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-153) ChangeSummary on root data object not supported

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

[SDO (language neutral issue?)] referencing sdo model types in xsds

es - more generally implement classes that don't match the maven filename rule for test cases, which mimic the merging behaviour of the maven test case run, and then use this when running test cases outside of maven. what do you think? -- Best Regards Kelvin Goodson

IRC chat today?

Are we having an IRC chat today? This may be a subject that doesn't have wide enough interest to make it suitable for the IRC chat, but I'd like to pin down some more detail on what I need to do to put SDO into to the M2 release. Regards, Kelvin.

IRC chat log (1st hour)

Here's a log of the first hour of yesterday's chat. I had to leave at the end of the formal meeting time, so I'm not sure if it went on any longer. If so, and someone else has the log then please append it. Most of the chat was discussion about the process for the M2 release. [11/09/2006 15:51]

Java SDO M2 release documentation

I volunteered on the IRC chat the other day to handle the creation of a Java SDO release to go with the SCA release before ApacheCon. One thing we need to think about is any documentation that needs to be created / updated. Off the top of my head as a starting list we would need to update the we

Re: Potential Java SDO Codegen Problem

Fuhwei, I've been encountering a similar problem using dynamic data objects, and although I haven't yet fully absorbed the detail of your problem in the generated space I thought I'd sharethe solution to my problem, as I think it may have a bearing on yours. My problem was that in order to g

Re: Where are we with release content?

I've been away doing other things for a few days so I haven't been able to concentrate on the SDO Java release, but now I intend to make it my top priority. My inclination is to get to the point of having a release candidate soon, and with a fair wind I would hope that would be by the end of th

Re: Where are we with release content?

ll the links from the apache doc or that the apache doc lacks detail as it is in draft form. I'll try to keep notes of what I do for future ref. Regards, Kelvin. On 20/09/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: I've been away doing other things for a few days so I haven&

Re: Where are we with release content?

In trying to follow the release management draft guidelines at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html I have a few questions. 1) for a source distribution the guidelines say "Check for version control

Re: Where are we with release content?

at the svn free book was talking about links to folders only, which could be an issue. I'll play some more later. Regards, Kelvin. On 21/09/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sep 21, 2006, at 6:57 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > In trying to follow the release management dr

Re: Comment on SDO overview from Tuscany site

Yang, Geoff Winn and I have been working on a paper that's due to go out soon, and here's a relevant chunk that may be of help ... SDO provides flexible data structures that allow data to be organized as graphs of objects (called data objects) that are composed of properties. Properties can be

Re: Where are we with release content?

a linux box with svn:add on a symbolic link I'd be very grateful. Regards, Kelvin. On 21/09/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy, Thanks for this. Im in butterfly mode at the moment, flitting from work to non-work items, so I haven't had time to address all your c

Java SDO RC1 distribution files available

I have posted a set of files as release candidate 1 of Java SDO at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/ I'm sure there will be some issues with them. One thing I have run out of time to figure out is how to get a short signature file using gpg, so the .asc files are rather big. If anyone wa

Re: Java SDO RC1 distribution files available -- RC1a now posted

I need to revisit some steps to recors the important points, but I'll keep improving it as this process goes on. Regards, Kelvin. On 22/09/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have posted a set of files as release candidate 1 of Java SDO at http://people.apache.org

IRC chat discussion topics

Are there enough of you interested in discussing the mechanics and detail of the process to closing of the Java M2 release on IRC today? Here's a list of things I'd like to discuss either on IRC or the mailing list. If they get discussed on IRC I'll post a summary of what gets resolved later. A

SDO M2 branch created

I have made a branch for SDO at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-java-M2/which I thought it might be worth drawing your attention to, since it might be helpful that we had a common approach across the projects. I think we are going to want separate branches per proje

IRC chat log 25th Sept 2006

Tuscany Chat Log 15:30 GMT 25th Sept 2006 The chat was about the java M2 release status cr22rc>hello are we IRC chatting ? -->|slaws ([EMAIL PROTECTED]/ibm/x-8179a0da76b0912c) has joined #tuscany hi, i posted a couple of potential topics 10 minutes ago, but they may be more sui

Re: [VOTE] Ignacio Silva-Lepe for Tuscany Committer

+1 from me On 26/09/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to nominate Ignacio as a committer. He has done a great deal of work adding non-blocking support into the Java SCA runtime and is active in the community through things such as list discussions. Here's my +1. Jim

Re: Comment on SDO overview from Tuscany site

Hi Yang, thanks for that. A few comments ... - i agree with Luciano that we are trying to get too much on the overview page - it would be nice to take more control of the layout, particularly so that the single lines of text associated with images are clearly associated with those images and ma

Re: Comment on SDO overview from Tuscany site

, I guess its possible that this approach might address my concern about the value(s) class too, in that we could add a few get*(*) methods to the DataObject's compartment, but that might become messy. Cheers, Kelvin. On 27/09/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Yang, th

Re: Java SDO Question - Should automatically add new root element during serialization or not?

Hi Fuhwei, sorry to take so long to get this, but I needed to experiment. I've been adapting XSDHelperTestCase to see what we have, and I think that with the current state of the implementation for your scenario a regeneration of the XSD after a save would not help in being able to load the s

Re: Looking for a place to post DAS M2 RC1

Hi Luciano, I'm happy to put it alongside SDO at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson Regards, Kelvin. On 30/09/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All I have DAS M2 RC1 ready, and would like to see where I can post it for review ? How would I go about posting it for rev

Re: SDO M2 branch created

Jeremy On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:09 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > I have made a branch for SDO at > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sdo-java- > M2/which > I thought it might be worth drawing your attention to, since it might > be helpful that we had a common ap

Re: SDO M2 branch created

this stuff on the wiki nad plan to sanitize it into a release policy Jeremy pointed out http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html as a good style for such a doc, as having a good balance of what, why and how. I think that's a fair summary of the chat, thanks Jeremy. On 01/10/06, kelv

Re: SDO distribution - include maven plugin?

ok, thanks Jeremy, mea culpa Kelvin. On 01/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I noticed that the sdo distribution includes the maven plugin. I don't think that's really needed as normally this would be downloaded by maven from a pluginRepository rather that taken from some other di

renaming java/spec/sdo Java API folder -- similar required for DAS/SCA?

FYI, particularly for DAS and SCA release managers I have a further issue with cutting a source distribution for sdo that I think DAS and SCA will have seen or will see. The issue arises because of these factors - We keep spec and impl projects separate - The "top level" SDO folder in spec is na

Re: spec/sdo API version issue

I have removed the offending APIs from the sdo-java-M2 branch Regards, Kelvin On 02/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 2, 2006, at 1:42 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote: > I don't see this as a big deal, but if others feel strongly that it is > bad, then we can take the two offens

maven expertise required for samples inclusion

I just sent this posting to the maven user list, but we may have the expertise to answer it in house. Can anyone help please? Hello, I'm new to configuring maven, and I am trying to create a release for a project. The project includes a number of modules, one of which contains sample source

Re: maven expertise required for samples inclusion

.ExecuteSamples On 03/10/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just sent this posting to the maven user list, but we may have the expertise to answer it in house. Can anyone help please? Hello, I'm new to configuring maven, and I am

Re: [VOTE] Release parent pom and buildtools for M2

I'd like to vote on this, and have spent 15 mins perusing all the files. I saw that you have addressed Dan's point on signatures. To be honest I don't have sufficient experience in this area to make criticism. I wonder if there are others feeling the same way, and hence the slowness on this vo

Re: Build structure, was vote on parent pom

Hi Jeremy, My question on the VOTE thread was not /why/ we are voting, but rather would it be possible to help me equip myself to be in a position to vote. I was aking for some help to understand the content of what we are voting on. It seems the vote currently has the 3 +1s necessary, and n

Re: Sdo sample distribution

Thanks for that Robbie, I'll take a look and I would hope that I can fix up the issues you raise too. Regards, Kelvin. On 04/10/06, Robbie Minshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I attached a working draft for a patch to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-656 that creates a sdo sampl

Re: Build structure, was vote on parent pom

anyone had any questions, and I've offered to reply to specific questions here. What more do you want? On Oct 4, 2006, at 11:45 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > My question on the VOTE thread was not /why/ we are voting, but > rather > would it be possible to help

Re: Introduction - Willian Yabusame Maja

Welcome William, I'll be very happy to help with SDO questions. Regards, Kelvin. On 05/10/06, Willian Yabusame Maja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Tuscany Community! I'm from Brazil, and i'm studing Computer Science in UFMT (University of Mato Grosso). Luciano Resende told me about this p

SDO for Java M2 RC2 posted

I have made available an RC2 release candidate for SDO for Java at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC2/ The main differences from RC1a are Tuscany JIRAs 115 and 755 are fixed The source distribution has been split (re-split) into specification and implementation archives after d

Re: Error running SDO for Java M2 RC2 samples

t org.apache.tuscany.sdo.impl.DataObjectImpl.set( DataObjectImpl.java:103) at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.specExampleSection.AccessingDataObjectsViaPropertyIndex.main (AccessingDataObjectsViaPropertyIndex.java:206) at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.ExecuteSamples.main( ExecuteSamples.java:143) GoodBye Simon kelvin goods

Re: SDO for Java M2 RC2 posted

s this documentation. Simon kelvin goodson wrote: > I have made available an RC2 release candidate for SDO for Java at > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC2/ > > The main differences from RC1a are > > Tuscany JIRAs 115 and 755 are fixed > The source distribut

Re: Strawman of revised SDO distribution

I'll take a peek, thanks Jeremy On 06/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On IRC Kelvin mentioned possibly re-jigging the SDO distribution format to include the assembly phase in the parent pom. The idea was that would make it easier to aggregate things like JavaDoc across the mod

Re: Strawman of revised SDO distribution

Jeremy, that looks like a great improvement, thanks. After the full build I see a binary distro containing a javadoc folder as a peer of the lib folder, and it has merged javadoc for the all of the implementation projects. (I need to resolve the fact that there is a sample-sdo folder in there,

Re: [RESULT] Release parent pom and buildtools for M2

It was not my intention to force a rethink. All I asked for, at a time when the vote was going slowly, was some assistance in understanding the technical detail of the artifacts in order that I might further the voting process. As I understood the procedure, the vote could be carried by n +1s

Re: [RESULT] Release parent pom and buildtools for M2

"Here Here" to Venkat's words of support, and FWIW, in the same spirit of trusting those who have gone before, here's my +1. Regards, Kelvin. On 07/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jeremy, My abstinence is only due to me not possessing enough knowledge not only of what

Re: Strawman of revised SDO distribution

st included the sample source (which sounded like what Simon was suggesting). For that matter, you could also to that to package the javadoc separately. -- Jeremy On Oct 6, 2006, at 11:48 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > Jeremy, > > that looks like a great improvement, thanks. After the fu

Re: Voting

Jeremy with a week or so more maven experience under my belt, and having revisited the parent and buildtools pom files I feel I am now sufficiently well informed on the maven technical side to +1 a vote if it were to be reinitiated. Best Regards, Kelvin. On 08/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PRO

Re: M2 Release Items - Status Updates

Vankat, thanks for putting this together. I have updated the SDO status ... http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/M2TasksSDO Regards, Kelvin. On 10/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Everybody, If you had taken a look at the IRC log that Raymond posted ( http://

SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

As the Java M2 release is imminent it occured to me that it would be really useful if there are users out there who are putting our code through its paces that you may be developing samples/tests which could usefully be contributed back to the Tuscany project and make it more robust. If you are i

Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available

I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/ This tries to take into account the comments that the sample distribution does not need to be stand alone, and that javadoc should be shipped with the binary and sample distributions. I ha

Re: Weak wiki-fu

Here's what seems to be everything you could ever want to know about linking on the moinmoin wiki implementation. http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/HelpOnLinking?highlight=%28%5EHelp.%2A%29 Cheers, Kelvin. On 11/10/06, Kevin Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am having some trouble setting up

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

Tom, Welcome to Tuscany! that's great! Thanks for offering to get involved. How should we proceed? I'd be most happy to assist you to integrate what you have to offer. We currently have a small collection of tests using the junit framework (see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscan

Re: [VOTE] Release parent pom and buildtools (take 2)

I have tested these artifacts against the SDO branch and all was fine, so here's my +1 Regards, Kelvin. On 12/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: New version of the build artifacts that other Tuscany modules depend on. For each there are links to the tag (as a separate source dist

Re: Old style header still in use?

will do -- Kelvin On 13/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had a memory of seeing one of these recently so I grepped for something indicative in SDO and DAS and came up with: $ grep -rli --exclude="*.svn-base" licensors sdo das sdo/distribution/src/main/assembly/sdo.xml sdo/impl/

Re: Error running sample in Java SDO M2 RC3

ain (UsingXPath.java:140) at org.apache.tuscany.samples.sdo.ExecuteSamples.main( ExecuteSamples.java:123) GoodBye Simon kelvin goodson wrote: > I have put a new release candidate for SDO Java up at > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC3/ > > This tries t

Re: Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available

ocs/org/apache/tuscany/samples/sdo/specExampleSection/package.html change "specification, exceptions" to "specification; exceptions" download link for the SDO 2.01 specs currently points to the IBM web site and should be changed to point to the osoa.org site in output from

Re: Java SDO M2 relesae candidate 3 available

that, but currently my fix for your catch is to put a note at the top of CHANGES.txt to explain its purpose and direct the user of a new release to look at the RELEASE_NOTES.txt file. Regards , Kelvin. On 13/10/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for all these good catches, w

Re: Old style header still in use?

I have done the SDO part of this, but didn't want to meddle with das at this time. Regards, Kelvin. On 13/10/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: will do -- Kelvin On 13/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had a memory of seeing one of thes

SDO Java RC4 available

Following the helpful comments of Simon and Jeremy I have produced a further cut of SDO for Java at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC4/ This one has made the switch away from SNAPSHOT version names, has all the documentation and header fixes that have been suggested following t

KEYS file contents

Can anyone help me 1) get the correct format for my gpg KEYS file and 2) confirm that I can just append it to the file at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/KEYS Currently when I export the key with "gpg --armor --export" I get -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG

Re: Eclipse projects

Further to this, you''l find that the eclipse projects base the locations of jars that they depend on a variable called M2_REPO, but that variable is not set. So you'll either need to set this variable and use maven to install these dependencies into your maven repository, or you will need redi

mvn deploy, passwords and signing

I'm currently trying to deploy and sign the sdo artifatcs to the remote maven repository. I have 2 issues. 1) I have put a stanza in my settings.xml for maven to give my username and password for the server, but maven still requires me to enter my password multiple times in clear text for each d

[VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2: The release candidate is available at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ (It is identical to RC4 except for a tiny typo fix in the BUILDING.txt file for the implemen

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

iscussion of implementing an abstraction layer that would allow Tuscany and RW to exchange tests to exercise the respective products. We also have C++ unit tests (cxxTest Framework) that we use to exercise HydraSDO. Sounds like this would be a separate JIRA all together? Thanks, Bryan Luoma

IRC Chat Log 16th October 2006

Here's the IRC chat log from monday. It started with a focus on the SDO and DAS releases and there were some useful tips from jboynes on the final steps in the process wrt releasing, in particular with regards to signing artifacts, keys, initiating PPMC votes for subprojects, and releasing binary

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

ch other with bin/src/samples all ending up in the right place? ...ant On 10/17/06, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2: > The release candidate is available at > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

Actually, reading Ant's note again and my reply, a minor corection --- I had a separate samples distribution in RC2, but it had its binary dependencies included. The result of the discussion following that release candidate is what we have now. Regards, Kelvin. On 18/10/06, kelvin go

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

to do this but -1. -- Jeremy On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:35 AM, kelvin goodson wrote: > Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2: > The release candidate is available at > http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/ people.apache.org/%7Ekelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5/> > (I

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

. I think this problem has arisen because I cut and pasted from my previous emal and appended an "a", so I will attempt to include the link here once again, but as a 1st generation cut and paste. http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ Regards, Kelvin. On 19/10/0

Re: DAS Java M2 RC4a -- ** URL Correction **

Correction -- The new DAS release candidate is at ... http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/das_java/RC4a/ Regards, Kelvin. On 20/10/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The DAS Java M2 Release Candidate 4a is available at : http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/das_java/R

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

O. Sounds like this would be a separate JIRA all together? Thanks, Bryan Luoma -Original Message- From: kelvin goodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:46 AM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples Tom, Welcome

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

I seem to have inadvertantly disenfranchised myself ;-) here's my +1 On 17/10/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2: The release candidate is available at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_jav

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany C++ Milestone 2 (candidate 3)

+1 from me On 19/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi everyone, I have posted an updated 3rd candidate for the milestone 2 C++ release here: http://people.apache.org/~ajborley/cpp-1.0-incubator-M2-RC3a/ This release candidate adds a missing build file in the Windows distros, fix

Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SDO Milestone 2

facts in the sample source distro this is a risk free and easily verified step. Regards, Kelvin. On 17/10/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please vote to approve the release SDO Java Milestone 2: The release candidate is available at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/s

Re: SDO RC5a Review

Venkat, the problems you are having with building are due to the fact that the machine people.apache.org is still down. These issues should be fixed when it comes up. Regards, Kelvin. On 25/10/06, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Kelvin, Sorry could not get to this any earlier

Re: SDO RC5a Review

d I go overboard ? :) - Venkat On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Venkat, > the problems you are having with building are due to the fact that the > machine people.apache.org is still down. These issues should be fixed > when > it comes up. >

Re: SDO RC5a Review

Rick, yes the source distro should include the samples, since you should be able to rebuild all distros from the source distro. So the source distros give instructions on how to be able to rebuild the binary and samples distro from the source distros. The site/apidocs is not a brilliant name f

Re: SDO RC5a Review

Hi Venkat  thanks for these catches.  I've looked at them all in detail,  and indeed there is a small amount of redundant text in the notices file,  but the licenses file contain the appropriate licenses.  I plan to fix this in the trunk, and let the release stand,  unless anyone demands otherwise.

Re: [VOTE] Luciano Resende for committer

+1 On 26/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like to nominate Luciano as a committer on Tuscany. He has been helping with DAS for several months, recently managing the release of M2 (which is no mean feat when done through patches). He has been active on the mailing list an

Re: DAS M2 latest Release Candidates lost, was : Re: Repo content on people.a.o

Hi Luciano, No, I'm sorry I don't have the RC4a archives any more, sorry. I'm on vacation at the mo, so if I'm a bit unresposive that's why. If you can repost that would be great. Regards, Kelvin. On 26/10/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As mentioned by Jeremy, we have lost th

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

e has also been discussion of implementing an abstraction layer that would allow Tuscany and RW to exchange tests to exercise the respective products. We also have C++ unit tests (cxxTest Framework) that we use to exercise HydraSDO. Sounds like this would be a separate JIRA all together? Thanks,

Re: Rebuilding the repo and revoting

I have begun to do this. On 27/10/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure about re-uploading old artifacts to the repos as Maven adds metadata during the "deploy" step that I don't know how to recreate. I'm going to rebuild all the tagged artifacts for M2 and re-deploy them t

Re: Rebuilding the repo and revoting

I have redeployed and resigned all the artifacts listed above except for the das artifact by rebuilding from the tags. I will do the das artifacts when I get a distro refresh from Luciano. Regards, Kelvin. On 27/10/06, Jeremy Boynes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure about re-uploading

Re: Bumping version for trunk

+1 for SDO On 30/10/06, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I talked to Jeremy and I'll take over this task. There will be two items: 1) Update pom/parent/pom.xml to be a newer version as "2-incubator-SNAPSHOT" to reflect two changes made in the file: a) Add http://ws.zones.apac

clarification request on ASF license and sandboxes

Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been attached to a JIRA without granting ASF license? Regards, Kelvin.

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

ing into the other questions/concerns and will be addressed shortly. Thanks, Bryan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kelvin goodson Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:22 PM To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Bryan Luoma Subject: Re: SD

just checking my change to STATUS file

I'm almost 100% certain that it was Jeremy's intent to move the CCLA issues from pending to resolved in the project STATUS file, but I'm going to point out my update here ... http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/STATUS?view=diff&r1=469870&r2=469871&pathrev=469871 just to make sure I'm n

Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples

rkable solution? Thanks, Andy. -----Original Message- From: kelvin goodson [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 November 2006 10:05 To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: SDO Java: Getting Involved -- Tests/Samples Andy, that's great thanks. This begs the question of how we proceed

Re: [VOTE] Release DAS Java M2 RC4b

+1 On 01/11/06, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Everyone Please vote to approve DAS Java Milestone 2 distributions. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours. At least three +1 votes are required, and only the votes from Tuscany committees are binding. If the majority of a

Re: clarification request on ASF license and sandboxes

der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say no, we need to have rights to the code to put it in SVN. Why can't > they just reattach it and tick the box properly? > > ...ant > > On 11/1/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Can any

Re: Is Apache Tuscany compatible with J2EE1.4

SDO M2 requires Java 1.4.2 and has one value add feature which requires Java 5 (Interface2JavaGenerator). You can delete this file if you are building a distribution from source with 1.4.2. Regards, Kelvin. On 25/10/06, Kiran Kumar Rangaswamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dear all, Is Apache Tu

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >