On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:25 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks all for the quick feedback. I'm fixing these issues and should
have a RC3a sometime today for review.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:25 AM, ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Comments inline ...
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:43 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks all for the quick feedback. I'm
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, i see that we have various places where we can plug in
validation
monitoring. Some of the ones that i found are in the
ReallySmallRuntimeBuilder as shown below:
public static CompositeBuilder
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent all morning reviewing this and its looking pretty good but i've
just hit this NoClassDefFoundError when running the calculator sample with
mvn from an empty local mvn repository:
Running
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've spent all morning reviewing this and its looking pretty good but
i've
just hit this NoClassDefFoundError when running the calculator sample
I'm +1 on this. Comments in line
Simon.
- Continue with SCA 1.x maintenance releases based on the current SCA
1.2 branch. This would be a more stable codebase, and we should avoid
big changes that could brake backward compatibility here.
I propose that we create the branch for 1.x
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Haibo Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am a newbie to Apache Tuscany. I come to Tuscany for two reasons:
(1) Tuscany is very easy to use and extremely flexible (I have
been working with BPEL based service composition for 4 years, it was
so
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We may need to branch the documentation also. Normally I would suggest
that
we ask for a new space but as our documentation
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll do a speech in Florence about SCA and Python next 11th May. If
someone it's interested
here http://www.pycon.it/pycon2/schedule.
Ciao,
Giorgio.
---
Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(WsComponentImpl.java:348)
at com.ibm.ws.util.ThreadPool$Worker.run(ThreadPool.java:1487)
regards
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, i see that we have various places where
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Nishant Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi All,
Is anybody has faced this error before...?
I m using Tuscany 1.2-incubating RC3
java.lang.SecurityException: class
com.sun.xml.bind.DatatypeConverterImpl's signer information does not
match
signer
the difference in
exceptions..
Also, dont you think that with the error that you got should throw an
exception with schema validation, rather than just a warning?
Hasan
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With 1.2 almost out the door how about starting to think about our next
release...
We've had several discussions in the past about restructuring and cleaning
up the distributions, build, and SPIs etc, is this the time to do
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Antollini, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to run the tutorial but I get the following error when
executing the tutorial/web-services/catalogs.composite from Eclipse:
Apr 8, 2008 9:46:54 AM
Was going to start separate threads for each item related to those but do
think its helpful to keep a thread going with a high level summary like
this.
...ant
+1 If we keep this thread going with the high level shopping list and spin
of threads for the detail we have a chance of
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:03 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:47 PM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on versioning SCA docs
Assuming two versions of SCA Java, I can see
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am on revision 634808. The ContributionServiceImpl has changed since
then,
and with the one that i have, it would lead through
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName).
If a matching method is not found,it will throw NoSuchMethodException.
Thanks,
Wang Feng
On 2008-04-10,ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Wang Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 throw an exception.
The scenario like this class.getMethod(methodName
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of
trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on
, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out
Hi
A few clarifications in line.
Simon
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yang Lei wrote:
Hello,
I have the following usage scenarios that I currently use
EmbeddedSCADomain's ContributionService to accomplish. When I look at
the new set
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Ramkumar for looking into these concurrent issues.
Before we jump into a solution/fix, I suggest that we step back and agree
on whether the Tuscany core and extensions should be bootstrapped
sequentially or
Hi Hasan
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I dont think using an underlying tuscany jdk logger would be useful to
plugins as they may not want to log, rather show it somewhere else such as
console etc.
Agreed. Thinking about this some more
Hi Mike
Some comments in line
Simon
Folks,
It is right to be concerned over the interface matching, but let's not
lose sight of the context here.
In general, there are two scenarios to consider:
a) the reference is to a service which is defined within the SCA domain
and SCA
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Dan Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws, when I use wsdl2java
with this wsdl I get the following exception:
IWAB0399E Error in generating Java
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:22 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current distribution build copies the binary artifacts to the
target-last-successful folder which takes about 130Meg. I'm guessing
this is
something
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lou Amodeo wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references target=
attribute
as a first class attribute on its associated bindings model object.
This request is based on a requirement to
to have started recently with
1.2.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using binding.ws
I uncommented the lines in this code
protected Port createPort(Definition definition, Binding binding,
Service service) throws WSDLException {
Port port = definition.createPort();
port.setBinding(binding);
configurePort(definition, port, binding);
/*
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I uncommented the lines in this code
protected Port createPort(Definition definition, Binding binding,
Service service) throws WSDLException {
Port port = definition.createPort();
port.setBinding
to have started recently with
1.2.
Cheers,
Dave.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating
?
- Luciano
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One comment inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Whilst fixing a bug[1] I wanted to log an error message. I've realised
that
I'm not clear on Tuscany's policy on how this should be done.
I've had a look through the developer guides [2] and [3] (we have more
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Hasan
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I dont think using an underlying tuscany jdk logger would be useful to
plugins as they may not want to log, rather show
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For map/hadoop if you need a part time mentor till 30 June, ask me. After
that time I'll travel around Spain all summer.
--
Ciao,
Giorgio.
---
Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Luciano
I've just signed
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:27 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For map/hadoop if you need a part time mentor till 30 June, ask me
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Whilst fixing a bug[1] I wanted to log an error message. I've realised
that
I'm not clear
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments inline.
Simon Laws wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 5:36 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lou Amodeo wrote:
This is a request to propogate the value of a references
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WIth the changes to how the Incubator release artifacts get distributed
via
mirrors now I understood we were supposed to have our website download
pages
use a script accessing the mirrors. Looking back at the SCA 1.1
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:31 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review
I've been trying to catch up where we are with class loading after the
flurry of mails and wiki entries a few months ago, for example, [1]-[6].
I've started summarizing for my own benefit [7] but hope that I can turn
this into some documentation at some point when we get the code sorted. I
don't
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am on revision 634808
the -Djava.endorsed.dir=a folder containing our JAXB jars to
override the JAXB from JDK 6.
We need to add this to our FAQ or release note.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:38 AM
To: tuscany-dev
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC and Incubator PMC have voted for Wang Feng to become a
Tuscany committer.
Congratulations and welcome Wang Feng!
...ant
Congratulations and welcome, Wang Feng.
Glad to have you on
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Wed Apr 16 10:31:00 2008
New Revision: 648763
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648763view=rev
Log:
Fix for TUSCANY-2069
Modified:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm looking to fix this issue now
I'm testing a fix and about to commit.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Simon Laws [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2008 09:42
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Mike
Some comments in line
Simon
Folks,
It is right to be concerned over the interface matching, but let's not
lose sight of the context here.
In general, there are two scenarios to consider
use ResourceBundle for
validation
messages as well. I dont think this is being done today.
regards
Hasan
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Simon Laws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning msg when adding remote
bindings
to services with interfaces not marked as remotable, by which the data
transformation might get messed up.
From the current implementation, I
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Ramkumar,
Welcome to Tuscany! Yes, this is a good simple start. Please go ahead
and
create a JIRA for this. Also would like to see you discuss the
alternatives
you have in mind for this.
Thanks
- Venkat
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
We should have an api for plugins to provide a resource bundle. This api
probably needs to be on the monitor or somewhere, i am
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think your use case is valid. Can you please open a JIRA and attach your
test case there? I can investigate.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Yang Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Simon's emphases on the point of view. I understand
Tuscany may prefer one solution over the other. However from
extensibility perspective, there need some extension points to enable
Tuscany adapters to overwrite
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
I'd like to rename the CTS svn project to SDO-CTS Please let me know
if anyone have issues here, otherwise I want to do this on the next
couple days.
+1
--
Jean-Sebastien
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon
I opened JIRA 2255 and attached a patch for the new testcases.
Hasan
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Yang Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Simon's emphases on the point of view. I understand
Tuscany may prefer one solution over the other. However from
extensibility perspective
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Mario Antollini (JIRA)
tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
Multiplicity for heterogeneous bindings not working
---
Key: TUSCANY-2259
URL:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On April 1, I checked out a file from SVN. Its version keywords
were not expanded in my local copy. Yesterday I checked out the
same file and the version keywords were expanded. This caused my
attempt to apply a patch
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Yang Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Simon's emphases
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/18/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
TUSCANY 1881, talks about throwing a warning
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:08 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to close TUSCANY-2145 as working as designed in a few days
unless
someone says otherwise.
I still get the feeling that there is actually no way for
o.a.t.s.host.imbedded.impl.DefaultSCADomain to find any new
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:08 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to close TUSCANY-2145 as working as designed in a few days
unless
someone says otherwise.
I still get the feeling that there is actually
Hi Ram
snip
In case of JSON-RPC binding (our original scenario), when the interface is
not defined @Remotable the runtime just ignores the data transformation
between the binding without throwing any exception.
In you test do you have binding.jsonrpc on reference and service sides? If
and attached a patch for the new testcases.
Hasan
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2261
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.2
Environment: WinXP SP2, IBM JDK 1.5
Reporter: Simon Laws
Assignee: Ramkumar Ramalingam
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I opened JIRA 2260 and attached a second batch of validation test cases.
regards
Hasan
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Hasan
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:32 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds ok to me.
...ant
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Yee-Kang Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks, Scott, Ant. I think both could work. Perhaps we can start with
getComponentContext(String componentURI) and
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Antollini, Mario [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello!,
I just read the great news...
This is a great opportunity for me! Thanks for all your confidence and
support.
This all means interesting challenges in the future which I will be glad
to face...
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Nishant Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I m using Tuscany1.2 RC4, I have one service which was getting a
simplebean
as parameter. If i pass null instead of that bean i m getting following
error.
I m using SCA client
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Ant,
Thanks for the pointer to the earlier discussion. I can empathise
with the problems Rajini was trying to address by having
itest/osgi-tuscany built regularly and automatically. As for the
sca-api, yes we
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Nishant Joshi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Simon,
I have open a JIRA...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2275
here please note that i m passing array of bean and getting error... for
only simple Bean its work fine
so service like
- Mike Edwards edwardsmj at apache dot org
- Paul Fremantle pzf at apache dot org
- Pete Robbins robbinspg at apache dot org
- Raymond Feng rfeng at apache dot org
- Simon Laws slaws at apache dot org
- Simon Nash nash at apache dot org
- Venkata Krishnan svkrish at apache dot
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
scabooz wrote:
Hi Folks,
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/25/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Hasan Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Simon
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would be difficult to plug it in
-
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support doesn't use this evolving node
implementation
just yet. I don't imagine it would
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:49 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bring this comment to the dev list:
The tuscany web app support
snip
Cool thats really helpful. Ok so if we can have a Tomcat TuscanyHost (i.e.
an extension of org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost not related to the
Tuscany host stuff) that will get its addChild method called for each
webapp and we can get a File to the root of the webbapp so call
I've just committed a load balancing demo I've had knocking around for a bit
[1]. It balances HTTP based service calls across tomcat servers configured
with an SCA enabled webapp. It's a work in progress and there are a couple
of points I need some help with
1 - There are currently manual
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
However this all fell apart as the
balancer webapp is based on HTTP redirects and Axis2 doesn't handle
them.
Had this worked I had a completely
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:05 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:00 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:52 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:25 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For now, I recommend you to use mvn clean install -fn to continue. And
also please open a JIRA to report the problem you are seeing so that we can
track and fix it.
Thanks,
Raymond
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/08, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My 2c:
+1 to promote OSGi to a first class Tuscany runtime environment
+1 for an OSGi continuum build (thinking about a build profile that'll
run
(and
4 if things keep breaking :-( ). I'd be concerned if we didn't get to
2, and as part of 13, we need to make sure these are regularly tested
under osgi.
2008/5/1 Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Rajini Sivaram
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Wojtek Janiszewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For now, I recommend you to use mvn clean install -fn to continue.
And
also please open a JIRA to report
for specific
targets of references with multiplicity=1..n.
See the mailing list for details:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03024.html
A quote from Simon Laws' answer:
The OASIS TC has proposed a solution to this issue (
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-9) but this isn't part
exceptions that are thrown.
--
Thanks Regards,
Ramkumar Ramalingam
On 4/29/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Ramkumar R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/25/08, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Depending where you actually catch the exception you should be able to
continue on and process the next artifact.
Hmmm, the idea with monitors is to allow the processing code to report
While Subversion has been down I've made a start upgrading the user guide to
make it a little more coherent and bring it up to date a little. Big changes
so far are that I've moved the command line walk through out into a separate
guide and I've started replacing some out of date material in the
I've just updated and built from scratch and, with a top level build got
INFO: Loading composite:
http://localhost:9990/composite-resolved/composite:stor
e-client;http://store;store-client
Unhandled exception
Type=Segmentation error vmState=0x
J9Generic_Signal_Number=0004
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Adriano Crestani
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I will try to summarize the modifications I've done on SCA to run on
Android
so far.
As I aforementioned, most dynamic instantiations were being done on
host-embedded module. However, there was another modules
from
a warning to error, etc.
regard
Hasan
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Depending where you actually catch the exception you should be able to
continue on and process the next artifact.
Hmmm, the idea
1201 - 1300 of 1885 matches
Mail list logo
