Check your JIRA issue - Jacopo has answered and this is not how official Apache
releases are done. You will need to change your documentation - at least until
the project distributes a different type of zip for this release than the
official Apache release.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jun 25, 2010, at
Here are those same two methods that I got from the download
-- NOTE I see no "// @Override"
// - TemporalExpressionVisitor Implementation - //
public void visit(Difference expr) {
VisitorState newState = new VisitorState();
newState.isIntersection = this.state.isI
They might, but I would start working towards upgrading to the new release
candidate sometime soon.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On May 14, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Patrick wrote:
> WIll tomahawk work with ofbiz 9.04
Feel free to leave Ruth's references in the book sections and not on every
email where someone's asking a question. Ruth, you already have your URL in
your signature - I think what might drive people to your site is to help them
instead of just taking them off of the mailing list to go check ou
It's not - we just have to get the information out and make it a priority. I
suspect that anyone using this stuff in production is having the same problem.
IMO, what we need to have happen is for the ASF to give more of us access so
that we can get more of the information out there to more peo
The compatibility is much less of a concern between the providers add-on and
the project - the problem will come early and often between two components -
that was what I was alluding to.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:22 PM, ScottA wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> I would think that it would have t
I like the idea of having a place for people to be able to download third party
software like many other projects have - but I'm still not sure how it would
work here. People have always been worried about compatibility between the
components and making it more difficult for people to actually
Thanks Len.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 31, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Len Shein wrote:
> Purity products - www.purityProducts.com
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruppert [mailto:tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:23 PM
> To: user@ofbiz.apa
Thanks Steve!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Steve wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Tim Ruppert
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All, as we're doing changes to the home page of OFBiz, I'd like to solicit
>>> people to provide links to
://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/archive/snapshots/
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
nde
>
> Amicon Tech
> http://www.amicontech.com
>
>
>
>
> On 24/03/10 5:31 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> Is there really no one else out there who's using OFBiz and would like to
>> help push this section of the site forward? Cheers,
>> Ruppert
>>
ww.myofbiz.com
> Thanks much!
> Ruth
>
> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> All, as we're doing changes to the home page of OFBiz, I'd like to solicit
>> people to provide links to:
>>
>> 1. Websites you've created that are running on Apache OFBiz
>> 2. Prod
I think that would be the case BJ - but keep doing it!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:29 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> I really would like to contribute to ofbiz.
> my problem over the years has been the trunk moves to fast to do valid
> testing. by that I mean that once code is touched it mus
nice day.
>
> Regards,
> Hans
>
> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 08:52 -0600, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> Seems interesting Hans - wished it had been in OFBiz, but much like the
>> OpenTaps stuff that is not licensed under apache and none of us can
>> technically work on
Seems interesting Hans - wished it had been in OFBiz, but much like the
OpenTaps stuff that is not licensed under apache and none of us can technically
work on - please have your discussions off list about your new components that
you are building outside of OFBiz.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22, 2
gt; Refer:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
>
> I think it would be good if we put this section below "OFBiz Website
> Repository and Access (for committers)" heading.
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010
h version to use to make a patch with or
> how I should classify the JIRA. I took a quick look and I can't find any
> examples of how to do this. Could you point me in the right direction?
> TIA
> Ruth
>
> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> I do think this is news Ruth. Please m
r.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Anil:
>
> Don't know about Mike's blog.
>
> I didn't post it. It is not my blog. Puneesh Lamba approached
I think those are reasonable numbers - but I might up the memory on the trunk
server to a full gig whenever you get a chance.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 21, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> The same than before the move. We have 2560MB for both instances. I only
> changed
.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
In commit r924312, we have followed David's precedent and removed all HotWax
Media links on the home page of OFBiz - mean to help ensure that the project is
focused on the community and not the providers. Here is a link to a new JIRA
task that I am looking to commit along these lines - later to
+1 - another thing to add to this list would be the ability to roll back an
upgrade or data load so that if issues are found that we can get back, in the
system, directly to where we started. Normally we do this with a staging
upgrade first and a db backup second, but having something like this
ogether to make this happen - and it will only get there if
all of the corporate entities out there begin to or continue to support the
community by donating a ton of time into documentation, mailing list responses,
enhanced applications. Thanks again Nick - this is great stuff.
Cheers,
Rupp
Then I'll stop from posting it up there :) - thanks David - read thru it, but
didn't look at the date ...
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 1, 2010, at 1:05 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> I agree it's a great article and a nice bit of history, but it is over 5
> years old.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2
I'll post this to the OFBiz website straight away.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:51 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2004/06/01/ofbiz.html
> Maybe bring it int
at the moment to commit myself on this task :/
>> I will try this weekend though... Also BJ made a proposition (not the
>> svn one I mean)...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Tim Ruppert"
>> I won't contribute to going back to what we were providi
tomorrow and wanted to learn something about ofbiz. But if
> I
> could not find the information and videos I couldn't do it. Boring holidays
> ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> Tim Ruppert hotwaxmedia.com> writes:
>
>>
>> There is no reason to s
I'm posting the PDFs now. When there's a place to move all of the bigfiles
things - I will be happy to post those as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:56 PM, goranjan wrote:
>
> BJ,
>
> I think Tim is asking for the actual files (PDFs and videos) to be put on
> the infrastructure.
st to clear the air and set the record straight: What I was asking for was
> a clear and unambiguous statement from the project concerning what is meant
> by "stable release" so that non-committers can choose for themselves which
> release and/or trunk version they wish to get
Thanks BJ - having the real information is always helpful
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:47 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> If one follows the dev and commits, you will see that patches that fixed
> bugs in trunk were, when plausible, back ported to 9.04
> Also bugs fixes were put in 9.04 all you
Many, many committers continually add bug fixes to releases - check the commit
logs. I can't speak for everyone, but I think that many of us are sitting here
waiting for a new release so that this can become more of the process that
people are pushing - including trying to encourage people to u
Btw, just to chime in - it's a helluva lot easier to train someone to follow
best practices and write higher quality code in mini lang than it is to do the
same in Java. I'm a Java programmer first and foremost, but I love the fact
that OFBiz provides minilang as an option - it increases effici
There is no reason to start hosting files outside of the ASF infra - that's why
we made the move right? If someone will get me a list of files they want
posted somewhere, I'm sure we can make it happen
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 20, 2010, at 12:02 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> David:
> are you sti
th to trunk I guess (for the moment it's not an option anyway)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Tim Ruppert"
>> Where should the redirect go for http://demo.ofbiz.org? The redirect that's
>> in place does demo.ofbiz.or
Where should the redirect go for http://demo.ofbiz.org? The redirect that's in
place does demo.ofbiz.org/* -> ofbiz-vm.apache.org/$1 - but that obviously
means that it would simply go to ofbiz-vm.apache.org - which has no app. What
would likely be the best thing to do would be to change ofbiz-
to pdf documents in different
> platforms
>
> thanks,
> Babu.
>
>
>
>
> From: Tim Ruppert
> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 9:47:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Data Model Diagrams (was Re: Key data mode
Anytime my friend - anytime.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> I just checked it out, and it looks good.
>
> Thanks again Tim.
>
> -David
>
>
&
Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:16 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> Cool, sounds great.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>
>> Yeah - I think putting them into SVN woul
; broken as of this AM. Are those coming over too?
>
> On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:03 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> HotWax would love to donate these and the time that went into them from
>> David Jones, John Maw and Laurian Escalanti. It's a great set of
>> information
where, or maybe it would be better to start with that (in the
> ofbiz/site directory would probably be best).
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>
>> HotWax would love to donate these and the time that went into them from
>
es.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:31 PM, David E Jones wrote:
> If people are interested in making diagrams there is some stuff build into
> OFBiz to export "eomodeld" files. That particular
vention is suppose to be
> consistent or if this was a one time glitch? That was my motivation for
> asking the question.
>
> Not trying to "point fingers". Honest.
>
> Regards,
> Ruth
>
> Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> I think we can simply go back to the same reasons th
I think we can simply go back to the same reasons that the files aren't
perfectly provided by the ASF yet ... there were problems in the migration of
services that have not been rectified yet. It was certainly there just fine on
the old server just fine.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:2
t; that no one in their "right" (or "left") mind
>>>>> > would bother to spend too much time trying to decipher. Worst case: A
>>>>> > prospective user leaves the site (with a slight hint suggesting that
>>>>> > maybe the code is as d
through this a while back (maybe a
> few months ago) and the answer was: "the site is targeted at project
> committers". I left that discussion with the impression that was the last
> word. Are you saying that you might be open to discussing this again?
> Regards,
> Ruth
Yes they do ... :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 5, 2010, at 5:18 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>
> Plenty of PMC members, committers, and contributors still manage to do just
> that...
>
> -David
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>
>> Y
been through this already. Several times over.
>>>
>>> All I can say at this point is, no one is minding the store. I just don't
>>> get it: You guys spend hours agonizing over how and where to put spaces in
>>> Java files, yet you can't see the most obvious fla
You're definitely right about that :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 5, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Actually, I take that back. If I'm part of the committer's group, I won't be
> able to "whine" and "troll" from the comfort of my desktop anymore.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptogra
s over.
>
> All I can say at this point is, no one is minding the store. I just don't get
> it: You guys spend hours agonizing over how and where to put spaces in Java
> files, yet you can't see the most obvious flaws in how OFBiz does business.
>
> Oh well...
&
Ruth, I'm sure there's some good that could come out of your message - so
against my general nature of responding to this type of attitude, I'm going to
try and help you phrase this in a way that will help us help infra to try to
meet what you're looking for. Here's what I see when I go to the
This will be fixed sometime tonite - please take a look here to get what you're
looking for:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Craig Gilbert
r everyone who's helping to
make this stuff happen.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi BJ,
>
> As Tim explained Contegix will not support us anymore.
Please let me know what you would like me to do here?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 31, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> But knowing hat the apache environment isn't ready yet?
>
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Ruppert wrote:
>> I'll be happy to get thes
ill
remain in place for a bit - but kong term this will go away since it's
not official.
If my understanding is incorrect on any of these points let me know.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:21 PM,
No - but there has been discussion around ServiceMix and ActiveMQ in the past
(and maybe others).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 30, 2010, at 12:04 PM, natxo cabre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First of all, I am a
Wink's a really nice program - good to see it put to such good use.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> Thanks. I'll contact Anders directly.
&
infrastruct...@apache.org - one of the many other tools at our disposal -
especially for these types of things.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Tim:
> Who would
I'm sure we could extract some numbers out of Apache to find out some
information about it - but since this is moving to an ASF server, the right
thing would be for us to be talking about how we'd achieve this going forward
if it's a requirement. There are tons of spikes - but since this is ava
If it's not desirable to have it there, maybe a permalink icon where you could
get it would be acceptable?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> It would be usefu
Heidi, just make sure that you do indeed send your patch in if you've found an
error and fixed one - otherwise, you'll get to answer the more painful question
the hard way of whether upgrading OFBiz is in your future :) (just so it's
clear - if you wanted to update OFBiz, but your fix didn't mak
bsite running on the itself!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 22, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> We have now committed an updated ofbiz website which runs under the
> ofbiz system
>
> This website can b
There is also a Crowd integration which does more than just authentication that
you could check out as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> http://cwiki.apache.
other option would be to move the olddocs to ASF infra as well - if
anyone wants to make that happen I can get an export ready. I've sent a
request to priv...@ofbiz.apache.org, but have not heard back - I'll ping again.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hot
Yeah - we just maintain separate patches / patch directories for any mods that
we have specific for a particular server and it works out just the same.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Christopher
Looks like it's right here - it's in a personal space and those were not
migrated:
http://olddocs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=5969
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:18 P
In theory, that's the way we manage multiple environments as well. In practice
it's slightly different.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Christopher Snow wrote:
> With grails each en
I'm guessing three instances - and in response - ours are all completely
separate - mostly for staging and testing - although we have shared servers at
Contegix that run many on the same server in production as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.c
Yes - for sure - we run well over 10 simultaneously. You just need to update
your configuration files to be specific about ports and domain names and you
should be good to go.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009
This is complete.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:27 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
yup, thanks.
appreciate you effort
:D
Tim Ruppert sent the following on 12/2/2009 8:23 AM:
I will yet another redirect that
I will yet another redirect that will go from http://docs.ofbiz.org to http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
- but that should be it. The redirect in question below works
perfectly.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2
Thanks for all of your help Sam - much appreciated.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hi Jacques
I was helping Tim out getting the wiki redirect sorted with Contegix
- I just
http://olddocs.ofbiz.org is available now for people to migrate
personal space information or look for other content. It will remain
available for a few weeks before we shut it down and archive it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f
Someone needs to figure out what happened to that page - it should've
mapped perfectly with the new redirect.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
here is one of my pages fro
ws those mappings
already - please just let me know and I'll get them up there ASAP.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 29, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hey Guys - just wondering if you guys had thou
be a great way to prototype the integration and
to give OFBiz another feature that I'm sure many people are looking for.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks
nd how it might be used so that that decision can be made.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 25, 2009, at 12:38 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
I think Tim is right in sayi
Seems like an interesting feature to add to the system for sure -
probably another special purpose app, eh?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
All,
Funny that you ask
Awesome - great news Erwan and looking forward to it.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 23, 2009, at 1:30 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 23/11/2009 05:51, Tim Ruppert a écrit :
This seems like a great improvement
Ask them to up it on the server - we've got more memory room I
believe
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 22, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Could it be a lack of space? (we run in only 256MB...)
This seems like a great improvement Erwan - is this something that
will be making it's way into OFBiz proper or something you guys are
working on just in the derivative? No stress, just wondering as it
seems like it has great potential.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
The downtime will actually begin tonite and over the weekend as we do
stepped upgrades. Thanks for your patience
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone
Yeah Sam, we've got an in-depth amazon integration we've been working
on with another client for a while now. Amazon is definitely a beast,
so we'll get with you and let you know what pieces will match your
requirements and we can go from there.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppe
Anytime gents - anytime.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:49 AM, David E Jones wrote:
Yes, thanks for your work on that Tim... both now and previously.
-David
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Jacques
Just wanted to let everyone know that you may experience some downtime
or issues as we're going thru this - please bear with us.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Ok - I'll start the process now and will let you know when its good to
go. I think we should upgrade our JIRA first - then move it to Apache.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:39 PM, David E
inline
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 15, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Tim Ruppert"
Use the tinyURLs then - they never change.
tinyURLs in Jira ? How to ?
tinyURLs in Confluence - that's what was being said was moved ...
Also, as I've been asking foreve
Use the tinyURLs then - they never change. Also, as I've been asking
forever - shall we upgrade Confluence to prepare for the move to Apache?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 15, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jacques Le Roux" >
To:
Sent: Sunday, Novem
ood luck to everyone there and sorry that I missed most of you -
looking forward to the next one.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
David, sorry to hear that you're not com
I might miss you, but please come by when you get here.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Tim:
I arrive tomorrow (Thursday) late afternoon.
Look forward to meeting you
I had a Bruno Souza sighting today - looking forward to seeing more of
you here when you arrive. Ruth, David, I'm sure you are coming since
you're speaking - when will you arrive?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
If there's anyone here in Oakland for ApacheCon US 2009, please stop
by the HotWax Media booth. Last year was so swamped OFBiz people - it
was a bit of a bummer not to see all of those familiar faces at the
committers get together last night.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax
Looking forward to seeing the new integrations!
Cheers,
Ruppert
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK, it was not clear to me, thanks
If it's done the same way other gateways are implement I can't see
any issue using httpcomponents-client-4.0, and yes it shoul
efore
(that's right inline stylind and tables don't break) that I can't even
put it to words. We'll keep fixing the issues as they come up and
will take this project to the next level.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Tim:
Please s
it's time we all learn to use it and fix it up.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
Sorry to says that it's not the case with my 1680x1050 on Windows XP
wi
ection.
I was testing this in Firefox and Safari on a MAC and am pleased with
the rendering as long as you're viewing it with a viewport of over
about 1190 (basically any 13" Macbook).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.659
I think it's "Is Immediately Fulfilled"
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 25, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Hemanth Kumar Kanamarlapudi wrote:
Hi BJ and Tim,
Thanks for your information on order processing.
If I
It's a setting on the product store - but remember, in many cases it's
not legal to take the money until you are actually shipping / packing
the product - so the auto capture is often something businesses decide
not to do.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax
Ok - great - thanks Scott - I'm sure the other Scott will thank you.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
It actually never made it back into the trunk, the differences
betwee
I hope this thread helps Scott.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
Begin forwarded message:
From: Scott Gray
Date: June 5, 2009 5:12:47 AM MDT
To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clearing credit card data after capture
er the flag off the top of my head - but I know that it was
around June of this year.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Scott. wrote:
Hello all,
We are very close to finalizing our method
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
