Chris Purves wrote:
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking Enve
jdow wrote:
Of course, if AOL gets away with this then they are not a common carrier
anymore. So they become responsible for their content. Sue them for any
bad content and throw their charges in their face as evidence that they
are not a carrier, they are a content service. Nail their sorry bac
I am not getting SPF_ hits for most messages that I expect should pass
SPF. On one message when I run through spamassassin with debug I see:
[5959] dbg: spf: checking HELO (helo=, ip=66.111.4.28)
[5959] dbg: spf: cannot get HELO, cannot use SPF
[5959] dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=, ip=66
From: "Chris Norman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very effective but
helps a lot.
Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA instead but
then stop short after readyin
On Friday 24 February 2006 20:11, jdow wrote:
>From: "jp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
>>> Vivek Khera wrote:
>>> >On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
>>> >>So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting
>>> >> forwarded
From: "jp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
>On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
>
>>So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting forwarded
>>mail through to AOL without being branded as a spammer?
>
> bounce? aheh? bounce to whom? if you bounce to the list, you'll be
> unsubscribed. if you bounce to the original sender, you'll get block
> listed, may be even bombed, hated, and your photos will be sent to fox
> news :).
>
i said discard/bounce ...
i bounce to people i consider friendly, to l
OpenMacNews a écrit :
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>>OpenMacNews wrote:
>>
>>>hi theo,
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
>question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
>
>i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
> > i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
> > posts at code-paste sites.
>
> I don't think we have a policy about it specifically. Generally speaking
> t
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:48:34PM -0600, Joel Gudknecht wrote:
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> to a whitelist.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin and sent a GTUBE email. It
> was still flagged. Is this normal, expected behavior?
Yes. Here's some thoughts:
You shouldn't try whitelisting your ow
Matt Kettler wrote:
> OpenMacNews wrote:
>> hi theo,
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
>>>
question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
Hi,
I've added my email address like:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to a whitelist.cf in /etc/mail/spamassassin and sent a GTUBE email. It
was still flagged. Is this normal, expected behavior?
Thanks,
Joel
OpenMacNews wrote:
> hi theo,
>
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
>>
>>> question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
>>>
>>> i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
>>> posts at code-paste sites.
hi theo,
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
>> question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
>>
>> i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
>> posts at code-paste sites.
>
> I don't think we have a policy abo
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:14:05PM -0800, OpenMacNews wrote:
> question: what's this list's policy for sending attachments to the list ?
>
> i'm noticing, e.g., *.pl scripts as attachments ... rather than links to
> posts at code-paste sites.
I don't think we have a policy about it specifically.
Title: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 12:25 PM
> To: 'SpamAssassin Users'
> Subject: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bret
IF your mails have that kind of subject too, yes, but is malformed:
header ICAB_FW2 Subject =~ /^Fw:\s\d{1,9}$/i
score ICAB_FW2 4
describe ICAB_FW2 IMAGE SPAM
("ICAB" is related to my work, feel free to change it)
Ruben.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry wasn't thinking, should this work?
header ICAB_FW2 Subject =~ /^Fw:\s\d{1,9}$/i score ICAB_FW2 1
score ICAB_FW2 4
describe ICAB_FW2 IMAGE SPAM
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin
So if I use postfix I'm SOL?
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 1:02 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: GIF stock spams
Hi Joel,
Well, I have spamassassin scoring as spam from 3.0 on, and until 14 gets
quar
> -Original Message-
> From: Bret Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:56 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
>
> > I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
> > please continue).
Hi Joel,
Well, I have spamassassin scoring as spam from 3.0 on, and until 14 gets
quarantined for review for messages not scoring BAYES_99. Almost 250.000
messages scoring over 14 with only 1 FP being rejected (and was quite an
unusual situation).
That kind of mails have all "Fw: 12345", fr
I get a ton of these. However, I've also got about 30 spamtrap addresses
aliased to my account. I also run my SA threshold at 7, so those two factors
probably account for a lot of the reason I get so many.
Anyway, the SARE stock rules help quite a bit, but I still see a fair number
of these t
* 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never
gets corrupted
Works like a charm :)
i've only dared goto a 3 however so far so good
>
> > * 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
>
> So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never
> gets corrupted
Works like a charm :)
Ruben
Hi Ruben,
Sorry to be such a nube, but can you tell me exactly what I need to do to
impliment what is working for you.
These damn image files are killing us.
Thanks,
Joey
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Cardenal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 11:45 AM
To:
I'm getting hammered by these as well, usually scoring below 2 points. I'm
running most of the standard SARE rules (including SARE_STOCKS). Any advice?
Bayes training has (so far) been ineffective.
-Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Chris Conn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, Februa
> * 6.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
So 6.0 point for your BAYES I hope your BAYES is well trained and never gets
corrupted
Maurice Lucas
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 17:44 +0100, Ruben Cardenal wrote:
> I catch them all, for example:
>
> X-Spam-Report:
> * 1.0
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Gene Heskett wrote:
> And exactly what, and where can I get this 'verp'? Many mailing lists
> I'm on could make good use of this feature.
If you run a mailing list, read the documentation for your program. If you
don't, ask the person who does run it to read the documentat
I catch them all, for example:
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0 ICAB_FW2 ICAB_FW2
* 1.1 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type=
entry
* 1.9 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of
words
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 6.0 B
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:42, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> > Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > > On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > >
Hello,
Has anyone written any rules to catch the following types of spam
http://nisk.creenet.com/~cconn/sa/
They consist of a few lines of text (sometimes), and a .gif attachment that
is in fact some penny stock being pushed.
Thanks in advance,
Chris
Title: RE: How easy is Spam Assassin really?
>
> Do you have to constantly tune your rules? How often do you
> need to do
> this for it to be effective?
>
> Some honest feedback and maybe a link or two would be helpful.
>
> Implementing SA on a win32 doesn't seem like it'd be too
> diffi
Dave Pooser wrote:
>> If you are seeing the AOL members addresses then I'd like to know
>> what you did to receive them, because you appear the only one is
>> several list I belong to that are discussing this very issue that is
>> seeing those addresses.
>
> I'd also like to get the AOL member's a
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:48:09PM -0500, JamesDR wrote:
> Vivek Khera wrote:
> >
> >On Feb 23, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Mike Jackson wrote:
> >
> >>So, I suppose the question is: How do you deal with getting forwarded
> >>mail through to AOL without being branded as a spammer?
> >
> >You stop forwarding
Im runnning SA using ALT-N Mdaemon for my mail and I dont have
any problems with it running on XP Professional
-Original Message-
From: Chris Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:26 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: How easy is Spam Assassin reall
> I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
> please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very
> effective but
> helps a lot.
>
> Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA
> instead but
> then stop short after readying about how it doesn't run as a
I host about 10 domains on a w2k server (when you're done mocking,
please continue). Currently, I use ASSP which isn't very effective but
helps a lot.
Occasionally, I'll get fed up and dig into implementing SA instead but
then stop short after readying about how it doesn't run as a service
we
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't seem to be getting any email from RD
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:25:02AM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2006 23:20, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:59:02PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>
> >> A snippet or 3 from a 'crontab -l' as root:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> 06 22 * * * /etc/init.d/as
On Friday 24 February 2006 09:06, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I don't seem to be getting any email from RDJ recently. Maybe
>> > > since the t
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 23 February 2006 22:45, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:36:19PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't seem to be getting any email from RDJ recently. Maybe
> > > since the time I switch this system from fetchmail to a mailfile,
> > >
Seems something has gone wonky with my SA install - From my cron logs it
seems that a rdj update happenned last night and then during the --lint
phase this was the output below - I am as far as i'm aware fully upto
date with my SA install and a cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin tells me
there i
Hi
Seems something has gone wonky with my SA install - From my cron logs it
seems that a rdj update happenned last night and then during the --lint
phase this was the output below - I am as far as i'm aware fully upto
date with my SA install and a cpan install Mail::SpamAssassin tells me
ther
From: "Jeff Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,Jdow,
I think you have misunderstood me.I'm not working for Netzero.In fact,our mail systems'
end-users numbers are more than a hundred million far away.We use SA as part of our
antispam mechanism. Certainly,it's not the original one written with Perl.W
44 matches
Mail list logo
