No one responding? Sounds like a deja vu. That's sad!
Normally, it's Jesse Kuhnert who is responsible for T4 related issues. But
unfortunately he's left Tapestry. You may do so too. I wish you best of
luck.
Yours friendly,
Rob
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Henrik Schlanbusch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joachim,
Great tool but who cares here on the list? I should say you made a bad
decision by choosing Tapestry. Tapestry users are fading and you could tell
that yourself by looking at the traffic here on the list. If you had done it
for say GWT or Wicket, you would have received tons of feedbacks
one-and-only agenda, to waste people's time. If I want the answer,
> I'll get it right here, from people that actually know their stuff :)
>
> heh,heh
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Adam,
> >
> > Would y
they have no more problems
> > than when they started using Struts back in the day. Mostly they're not
> > problems of T5, but of understanding how to properly use the new
> framework
> > given their old habits and assumptions. And they all agree that the
> > learning curve
e the nouse to find out where Rob Smeets
> lives?
> I want to go round to his house and rough this little troll up a bit.
>
> 2008/5/2 Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I don't mean to cause any depression or controversy but I saw t
Howard,
You're bundling an AOP into T5 core- a mere webframework? This is insane.
Howard, Webframework is simple and it seems you keep on over-engineering
something this simple. Well, when are you going to bundle a CORBA
implementation?
This guy is always coming up with an excuse not to release T5
Hi guys,
I don't mean to cause any depression or controversy but I saw this research
results and thought you might want to know. Because this makes me worry
about the future of Tapestry.
According to the research, Tapestry users declined drastically by 45% for
the first time in 3 years. I was very
Thanks, Toby for your interest. Many other Tapestry users have also
responded via direct mail and things are looking good. But we need more
responses. For those reading who haven't yet responded, do so because this
is a great opportunity to work with a very innovative and forward looking
Webframewo
Hi,
At the company where I'm working for, I've been recently assigned the task
to lead a team in re-writing an
existing Tapestry 4 application. We are to do this with another webframework
and to be politically correct I'm not going to mention which webframework.
We're loking for 2 Tapestry develop
le to me) is reading and would one
day reply to you. Or maybe he/she is just laughing at your naivety,
childishness and ignorance.
Yours friendly,
Rob
PS:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Chris Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Rob Smeets wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
- This entire situation is probably a lie. If not, validate it.
> Provide links to the project company, and personally email me a
> technical contact that I can privately consult and verify.
>
> http://www.nabble.com/Newbie-Tapestry-p15893688.html
> "I googled and also learnt th
t; > >
> > > Rob your English is by no question admirable but you drove quite
> > > to far. I like all those Tapestry folks - special thanks to the core
> > > team and Howard from me. Thanks to their affords Web-Development
> > > Is fun again.
>
Hi guys,
I've been sitting in my nice and soft chair, this time with a chilled beer
in my right hand, reading and enjoying this thread with really big LOLs. And
I noticed also there is a page on the Tapestry 5 wiki devoted to my name. I
have no problem with that at all. People who come across this
imes.
> >
> > (sorry if you've felt ignored, I tend to delete your private emails
> > when I see who the sender is without reading them - as you have
> > nothing interesting to offer)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Rob Sm
reading them - as you have
> nothing interesting to offer)
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And please allow me to also mention that, not only are high profile
> Tapestry
> > users abandoning Tapestry, high profile site
>
>
> In fact, if I was doing the code again, module classes would not have
> instance methods, only static methods.
Please, please help. Howard, take your hands off that code, ok. You'll break
our current code base. You may do it in Tapestry 6. Because, again that
would be it's own beast- as usu
y is Jesse Kuhnert not participating anymore in the forum? Is he
going to be the next to deflect?
Yours friendly,
Rob
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howard,
>
> Please stop throwing a dark blanket on me condemning me. Why not pick on
> t
>
> > I, on the opposite, just hope someone would 'accidentally' pass over
> him on
> > a 16-wheeler. I'd do it myself, except I have no truck driving license,
> and
> > I won't happen to pass near Utrecht anytime soon :)
> >
> >
> > Wha
And especially, Howard himself recently participates in the answering of
questions. Thanks to the stiff competition out there in the webframework
space that has triggered this. His ego went too high and I'm glad he is
finally humbling himself. It's rather unfortunate he got awaken only after
Tapest
ith Tapestry beyond a Hello World
> application... oh, never mind, that's too easy a target.
>
> FYI, .02 cent = $0.0002
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Rob Smeets [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 8:06 AM
Guys, stop the exagerations. Gmail, one of the best Internet application
ever written still has a beta status. Unlike Tapestry, Gmail has had the
beta status for years and would therefore trust it more than Tapestry which
I personally won't do anything serious with it beyond a little bit more
adva
But there is an unofficial announcement at http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/
.
I'm impatiently waiting for an official announcement at theserverside.com,
at least if Howard dares.
Rob
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Francois Armand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Angelo Chen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
>
Of course with T5.0.6- even within different versions of T5 there is no
backward compatibility. What a pity!
Rob
2008/4/8 Ted Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Good to hear!
> With T5.0.6 or T5.0.11?
>
> 2008/4/8, Natia Gdzelishvili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I've made new project and add my classes an
When I see these kinds of issues, all what I do is lean back in my nice,
soft and comfortable chair and LOL!!! Welcome to the harsh reality world of
Tapestry! Imagine when Tapestry 6 comes out- you'll shed bloody tears :-)
Cheers,
Rob
2008/4/8 Natia Gdzelishvili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> i change v
Hi Andy,
Be wise and dig around the Internet to find answers to your questions and
don't turn to this list since they won't offer you a non-biased answers. For
a starter go to theserverside.com where recently a discussion was held on
Tapestry. The link is:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread
Howard,
I have 2 favorite adjectives about Tapestry 5: Over-engineerd and Volatile!!
Best wishes,
Rob
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Fun" is one of my favorite adjectives for Tapestry.
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Josh Canfield <[EMAIL
And is calling someone a Troll not an insult? You guys have been doing the
insults. I haven't insulted anyone but I'm only pointing out the facts.
Best wishes,
Rob Smeets
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you keep claiming your opinio
I hope the men whose names you mentioned being me are reading and could
respond. I'm Rob Smeets and take full responsibility of all what I write. So
hold me responsible. Are you afraid of me or something? You'll be more
productive facing what I write point by point and respond. Instead
eserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=48743
Best wishes,
Rob
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TROLL
>
> go away
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Go g
Hi,
Go grab Wicket of GWT. It's better documented and questions like what you
asked won't refer you to source code but to a well documented examples.
Above all the users of those lists are far, far more friendly.
Rob
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:27 PM, osamuo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> How lon
Guys,
I hoped you would rally behind me and offer some ideas to counterfight my
colleagues. Rather you are calling me names. I am very dissapointed and hope
you will all one day grow up. I thought the Tapestry community have nice
people. You have proved to be very arrogant and bad tempered. I hope
Hi All,
Tomorrow is our last day of debate at my work about which framework to
choose for our upcoming huge project.
Its seems Wicket is winning the race for it's innovativeness, finess and
excellent support, they claim, unfortunately. Most on my team members are
concerned about the radically inco
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Gabriel Landais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Rob Smeets a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Rob
>
> Don't feed the troll
>
> Gabriel
>
> --
Hi,
I am a newbie in Tapestry. Our organization is going to build a large scale
web application in 3 months time and me together with 2 other developers
have been asked to research and come up with a good web framework to use.
I suggested Tapestry but almost all the developers on our team rejected
34 matches
Mail list logo
