Should be:
I'd check your file path. I also seem to recall that for some you need to
have it in the root of your website or have an absolute path to the image.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
Microsoft FrontPage MVP
http://wiserways.com
-Original Message-
From: Ho
Code in the page is like classic asp. While code behind is in a separate
page and linked to the page via an asp @page declaration:
<%@ Page Language="vb" Codebehind="week21a.aspx.vb"
Inherits="testdeploy2.WebForm2"%>
In theory it makes code reuse easier. Difficult to work with unless you are
usi
Robert,
Here's what I use
Have you double-checked that your href is pointing to the right place?
Also have you created the icon using specific icon builder software like
Icon Forge? You're likely to run into problems otherwise.
John.
- Original Message -
From: "Hoenig, Robert" <[EMAI
I'm trying to change the IE shortcut icon and using
Also tried
That doesn't seem to be working. I've cleared the cache and still nothing.
Thank you
Robert
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Well, one significant problem in Konquerer 3.1.4. The navigation list loads but then becomes obscured. The links change from words to a symbol which looks like stacked equilaeral triangles turned on edge. Other than that, the page looks fine.
And you're right, Stephen, the we
Hoenig, Robert wrote:
Does anyone know the difference between "Code in pages" and "Code behind
pages"?? This would be in reference to an ASP.Net programming job.
Google:
http://www.4guysfromrolla.com/webtech/100500-1.shtml
And I believe it's referred to as "Code-Behind" by most and "Evil" by
Well, one significant problem in Konquerer 3.1.4. The navigation list loads but
then becomes obscured. The links change from words to a symbol which looks like
stacked equilaeral triangles turned on edge. Other than that, the page looks
fine.
And you're right, Stephen, the web interface is nic
Does anyone know the difference between "Code in pages" and "Code behind
pages"?? This would be in reference to an ASP.Net programming job.
Thank you
Robert
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Oooh! I like the new interface :) And you can get an RSS feed too??
Well, it's not well formed, but I can still pull it up in FeedDemon :)
Snifty! Any way we could we get a link put on WDVL to this?
I believe it's in the works to have it added
At 02:15 PM 12/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Oh good you were listening!
heh heh. Only with half an ear. It's lucky I saw it. If you guys need
anything at all (pertaining to the list ), please don't hesitate to
contact me directly.
Thanks,
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Linda Cole [mailto
Oh good you were listening!
-Original Message-
From: Linda Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Drew:
>Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based
>interface fo
Linda Cole wrote:
Drew:
Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based
interface
for the list, I'll have to shoot the reply to the gmail box if that's ok?
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Oooh! I like the new interface :) And you can get an RSS feed too??
Wel
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
No you can't imagine that! Nobody is that depraved. This is a sustained,
decades long, group effort rooted in ever compounding bad decisions.
Oh, sure I can! I've developed along side too many MicroSoftHeads to
not be able to imagine it. Glad you're not having to suffer tha
Drew:
Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based interface
for the list, I'll have to shoot the reply to the gmail box if that's ok?
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Thanks,
Linda
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
LOL @ "agency custom image of xp"... My last work place had custom versions
of IE 5.5 that were installed as part
Should look about the same as the report I gave you on Safari. It is based
on Konqueror.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
Microsoft FrontPage MVP
http://wiserways.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
>
> Looks good and all, validates
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
I am on mandrake at home, at work it's an agency custom image of xp. That
may sound innocent but it should make you shudder to the roots of your soul.
If you can wait about 2 hours I'll let you know how it looks on Konqueror.
Sure! It's not really a biggie, but I am interested.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
>
> Looks good and all, validates as transitional, but line 33 is:
>
>
>
> align="center?
Oh lord. No telli
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Looks good and all, validates as transitional, but line 33 is:
align="center?
Oh lord. No telling, really. I guess old habits die hard. I've fixed
that
Say Drew, you're on *nix right? Is that what you tested on? Using
Konqueror? Something else? Display's okay?
/
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Was wondering if I could get a few folks to mosey by:
http://lf.mechavox.com/
And let me know if they encounter any display quirks. This
FWIW, I don't use the image replacement techniques either since plain text
alt tags especially when combined with structural mark-up so the alt gets
the proper heading mark-up without images is best in most circumstances.
Nice to have options though if needed due to special circumstances.
As far
Ross Clutterbuck wrote:
Good Job Stephen!
Thanks Ross! Means a lot coming from the Master of the Universe and all :)
Re your image replacement for the title - exactly which "flavour" are
you using? I don't think I've seen one which uses an empty . My
personal preference is styling the with the
Cheryl
I'm not a big fan of image replacement anyway but since we can do so much
with web design/development these days (Microsoft browsers permitting of
course) but also have so many different aspects to consider 9 times in 10 I
move more towards keeping things accessible and don't bother with
Using display: none defeats the purpose if accessibility is your concern.
That's the Fahrner technique see: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
They see the same thing you report when css is on and images off. You need
to position it off page with a negative (or really high) margin. Might check
I agree with you, Ross. CSS is so much cleaner and easier. I made the
jump from tables to CSS (with the help of TopStyle Pro) and I haven't
looked back.
Kudos to Stephen for doing it right.
Will
Professional Graphics Artist
Certified Web Designer (BCIP)
Stewart and Company
--
www.stewartandco
Good Job Stephen!
Re your image replacement for the title - exactly which "flavour" are you
using? I don't think I've seen one which uses an empty . My personal
preference is styling the with the background image and relevant sizes
and then nesting a inside that . That nested is then
styled
26 matches
Mail list logo
