Can I have a copy of the wrapper you created?
-Original Message-
From: Liron Newman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:59:12 AM
I noticed two major problems with XAV (I've notified the author but
received no response):
1. munpack that comes with it doesn't supp
I noticed two major problems with XAV (I've notified the author but
received no response):
1. munpack that comes with it doesn't support long filenames, so you
could say XAV would never work unless you do something with it, like I
did (I wrapped it with a batchfile that converts the filenames, e
Please see the Mail archive thread I wrote on this.
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg07104.html
It shows how to use CMD file language to stript the first 4 chars and work
with the rest.
Also see
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06213.html
For the history behind it.
I was also strugeling with xav. In between I have it running well with
F-prot, AVG and mcafee(not at the same time).
Run Xmail in debugmode and look for the returncode, give the paramers to
let your av software make a report and see what files they are checking.
Dick Spork
At 23:04 30-01-2004, y
I agree, you should only implement these sort of hooks on the header.
But would you call the filter at the end of the header, or after each line?
Rob :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Schneider
> Sent: Monday, February 02,
Hello everybody,
I'm thinking of filtering spam with comparing MAIL FROM:<> with the
From: message header. It's just a thought now, can anyone give comments
and/or links about it?
It's a bit off-topic so please answer me directly and not to the whole list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Greg, The #Hex number is some sort of session id, I think.
It sure is odd, I tested here and found that with incorrect user and/or
password, I did NOT get an entry in the log, only "REQ"/"AUTH" for
successful commands.
I tried editing the ctrl.ipmap.tab but found that the error returned was
quite
El Lun 02 Feb 2004 20:42, Tracy escribi=F3:
> At 18:37 2/2/2004, Tracy wrote:
> >At 17:12 2/2/2004, Gustavo Galvan wrote:
> > >Ok, accepting email from only authorized MX is, by now, a crazy idea
> > > because the biggers free email servers do not use them.
> >
> >Well, you know, that's interesting
At 18:37 2/2/2004, Tracy wrote:
>At 17:12 2/2/2004, Gustavo Galvan wrote:
> >Ok, accepting email from only authorized MX is, by now, a crazy idea because
> >the biggers free email servers do not use them.
>
>Well, you know, that's interesting. I do MX checks on RHS of MAIL FROM for
>all mail receiv
At 17:12 2/2/2004, Gustavo Galvan wrote:
>Ok, accepting email from only authorized MX is, by now, a crazy idea because
>the biggers free email servers do not use them.
Well, you know, that's interesting. I do MX checks on RHS of MAIL FROM for
all mail received, and I still seem to receive mail fr
qq{sðVÕ9ò\êâì©>ÁØ¢¸ÐG¬ä]^¸t¯Ú½W%¾ðÓL«g&ºÄ
"Pvið}ðûÙ§ü/w-½
U0|F¿|q|cx¿{æK1»¼]
%WßÌtÜ1Ö¾PÉÄS8EüÑdx
õPAS2ɧcøW«E*Z8^Ì·yÌv¦EZ*
Ù4öŨ§Ñä?ëãàPCwÆ¡hÕè¹Ý
¦|{zWâ¸çHÕöÑKÚ°ip½m'91]ÐòÃç§kQÍÆq
VëvÁ>N0"®¿zt4øKBÏb{¶ìÔ$§GªJUm«*à¾EB#öµÔ3bs`gQCþÏù½.AL»vV
ëY¥0é7Ùî
¦£×âº~Ñ
Ok, accepting email from only authorized MX is, by now, a crazy idea beca=
use=20
the biggers free email servers do not use them.
What about a combined host DNS check ?
Example:
* sender with ip 10.10.10.10 connect to mailserver
* MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* is 10.10.10.10 a valid MX for bogus.n
My pop3sync has stopped delivering messages to xmail from my ISP.
After looking in the pop3links.tab it all seems ok, there are also no
special messages in the smtp logs.
When I have a look with a sniffer on the line I saw that pop did a retr
command and get the information, but not followed by a
I appologize for my ignorance. I am new to xmail. I kind of thought
the error ment bad login information, but what I can tell I was
suppling the correct information.
I have reinstalled/setup the whole thing agin. I did not touch
anything other than add the registry entries and add a user to
At 14:31 2/2/2004, Liron Newman wrote:
> >>Personally, I'd like to be able to tell the server to reject (At SMTP
> >>level) all messages from non-existant domains, and I don't know about
> >>rejecting messages from addresses that don't exist...
> >>
> >I agree that checking MX and/or A for RHS MAIL
Tracy wrote:
>>Personally, I'd like to be able to tell the server to reject (At SMTP
>>level) all messages from non-existant domains, and I don't know about
>>rejecting messages from addresses that don't exist...
>>
>>
>I agree that checking MX and/or A for RHS MAIL FROM is a good idea. (I
>ac
At 14:15 2/2/2004, Liron Newman wrote:
>I think that this indeed should be integrated into the MTA.. The server
>should check and see if the domain exists and if it does, if the sender
>exists..
>
>RFC 2505 thinks like me..
>
>2.9. Verify "MAIL From:"
>
>The MTA SHOULD be able to perform a simp
Gustavo Galvan wrote:
>Hi Davide, what do you think about to incorporate a new variable in server.tab
>to check if sender email addrees exists ?
>I'm rewrited a PHP script to do this (is attached) to probe and view the
>process.
>
>
>
I think that this indeed should be integrated into the MTA.
I didn't know about attachment in the list. If anybody wants the files ju=
st=20
tellme and I'll send you.=20
If anybody want to see online: http://hector.bibliocad.net/tools/email_ts=
t.php=20
(it will here few days)
Gustavo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
t
> Maybe I'm in this Biz too long to believe in miracles introduced by new
> technologies. There are major flaws in that proposal (link below) too.
> First to mention our LRW. Does he really have to build a VPN tunnel to his
> homeLAN just to be able to send mail ?
The LRW would use SMTP AUTH to se
Hi Davide, what do you think about to incorporate a new variable in server.tab
to check if sender email addrees exists ?
I'm rewrited a PHP script to do this (is attached) to probe and view the
process.
Gustavo
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/x-tgz
-- Fil
Hello,
i would like to known the number of process XMail used for POP and the number of
process XMail used for SMTP.
Thank you
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a m
Davide !
Is there any chance to see this option (max senders) available at =
domain
level and user level in respective .tab files in future 2.x ?=20
Just an idea for fine control ...
Francis
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoy=E9 : lundi 2 f=E9vri
yeah I know that now... but before you said it was a command line parameter
I thought it would be in the server.tab as an option.
- Original Message -
From: "Sönke Ruempler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:22 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Max send
> new i saw it somewhere was looking in server.tab and at the docs for
> server.tab.
???
It's a command line parameter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a messag
new i saw it somewhere was looking in server.tab and at the docs for
server.tab.
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Sönke Ruempler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Max send
> > Is there a option anywhere in xmail
> Is there a option anywhere in xmail to limit the number of outgoing
> recipients when a user sends a message and fowards it to many people.
http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
-Sr maxrcpts
Set the maximu number of recipients for a single SMTP message (default 100).
-
To unsubscrib
Is there a option anywhere in xmail to limit the number of outgoing recipients when a
user sends a message and fowards it to many people.
In other words some where to set a limit so that none of your local users can send out
going spam.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
>
>
>
>>Actually, I think SPF is a superset of both RMX and DMP.
>>http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf.02.9.4.txt
>>
>>I personally like the simplicity of RMX, but any of the three solutions will
>>cut down noticably on spam.
>
OK .. this is true for checking the data part. Under the aspect of =
decoding
mime mails, it isn't a trivial thing at all.
But Hooks for the envelope lines and the start of data would be=20
comparable easy to implement and very valuable for future script =
extensions.
--Harald
> -Urspr=FCng
> I have configured a XMAIL 1.17. But everyday I can see lots of
> frozen message on it. I have deny all the smtp relay. how can I avoid
> these frozen messages?
http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server.tab_variables
[RemoveSpoolErrors]
Indicate if mail has to be removed or stored in 'froz'
I add this functionality to xmail myself and it does not inordinately =
impair
performance if 1) other changes are made to xmail to improve its =
intrinsic
performance, 2) the checks are aborted on messages that are long and 3)
binary messages are correctly identified and not handled by the filter
Hi, All:
I have configured a XMAIL 1.17. But everyday I can see lots of frozen
message on it. I have deny all the smtp relay. how can I avoid these frozen
messages?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general hel
And for a lot of legitimate senders, too. MTA hosts are responsible for
inbound mail, but MUAs are completely at liberty to send email directly =
to
recipient MTAs - and, in fact, most modern ones that are full-featured =
do
just that.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
Thanks Davide.
Ciao.
Sergio C.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inviato: venerd=EC 30 gennaio 2004 19.42
A: Xmailserver (E-mail)
Oggetto: [xmail] Re: Helo parameter problem
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Sergio Casagrande wrote:
> Hello all,
>=20
> I had this ser
It's not only bandwidth saving. It's mainly the ability to react with =
custom
SMTP responses generated by a script on protocol level. It would also be =
possible
to add customized SMTP command processing etc ...
--Harald
> -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[
That's the point!
Furthermore a scripter could implement bandwidth throttling by counting incoming SMTP
connections during a certain timeframe.
Exceeding connections could get a 'try again later' result code. Such hooks would make
things flexible to the max.
--Harald
> But online AV filtering
You wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Harald Schneider wrote:
>
> > is there a chance to see SMTP dialog filter hooks in the next release?
> >
> > Hooks after each SMTP command and after each data line would be a nice
> > thing, e.g.:
> >
> > So a script could also do anti spam and anti virus check
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:03:52PM -0600, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> > > Don't see that IP in there do you Fails the test Not good.
> >
> > I agree. De-queued.
> >
Ah ! great to hear that ! Imagine a 'Linux road warrior' (LRW for short)
pluging into the Net far from home, but using his e-Ma
39 matches
Mail list logo
