(313) Richie's hair was (313) Richie Hawtin in Toronto June 30

2003-07-06 Thread LR T
Saw Richie last night in Baltimore.  I had heard that he was growing out his 
hair but OH MY GOD, I didn't expect a full head of hair cut in a sort of 
geeky 1960's clean cut boy next door style.


This was the first time I have seen him playing a set that wasn't an all out 
heavy banging till your head and chest hurt. Much more minimal and almost 
quiet, more of a head nodding than dancing set.





From: Garrett McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Erin Berg (WPL) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: '313@hyperreal.org' 313@hyperreal.org,   
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Re: FW: (313) Richie Hawtin in Toronto June 30
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 15:34:59 -0700

_not_ _his_ _party_.  i've seen him at megarave events where there were 
giant inflatable animals hanging from the ceiling.  he played some candy 
rave thing in texas last year where there were carnival rides.  seriously.


as to whether he can veto these things: no.  being who he is he'll probably 
have some degree of influence, but he's a contractor in these 
circumstances, not the guy in charge.


maybe the fact that the control series of parties -- which originated in 
detroit, were 100% his events, and therefore completely under his creative 
control -- has morphed into a portable performance technique with the same 
name is what's tripping you up.  don't expect to see a 'richie' party just 
because he's there, unless it's been put on by Minus.  and more than 
likely, is taking place in detroit.


On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 12:06  PM, Erin Berg (WPL) wrote:


Ha


_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Re: (313) john rocca

2003-07-06 Thread RAW2019
They used to carry the 'after midnight' too
with a KDJ release btw

but you're right, no super labels beside the 'after midnight' releases

RAW


- Original Message -
From: Klaas-Jan Jongsma [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RAW2019 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Wibo Lammerts [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: (313) john rocca


He was used to do something with thai kickboxing or something like
that, as soon as he opened the shop he was talking about setting up a
studio over in Thailand. Actually i can't be that bothered that he
stopped doing Outland records and Spiritual records, their last
releases were horrible, of course they did release some really
brilliant stuff on it as well. Personally i really like the Basic
Bastard records from mr. Voorn and the Rachmad Records stuff. Oh and
the Naomi Daniel/In-ner zone one of course. Derrick released 2 records
on Spiritual, the Incogdo one which is nice and a less interesting one
with the dutch dj Marcello but i forgot the name of that record

kj


 Well Wibo ...
 mr Hoovers had some troubles ...
 which I won't discuss here ;)

 and yes those were exciting times.
 I wished he had stayed here .. I met him just before he left for
 thailand
 We clicked musically but he had to leave
 He had a studio set up there and asked me to do some enginering for him
 but i hadn't much experience and cancelled it ... grr

 I don't know anything about him being a former a boxing trainer
 he was bold so maybe ...


 RAW


 - Original Message -
 From: Wibo Lammerts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'RAW2019' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:23 AM
 Subject: RE: (313) john rocca


 Pieter Hoovers...

 Now THAT'S a name I haven't heard in ages. In the mid nineties Outland
 was
 probably the best shop in Amsterdam. That was about the same time that
 Remy,
 Marcello and Dimitri ruled the clubs and parties around here. Exciting
 times.

 And after that, Hoovers just disappeared. Back to Thailand they say.
 Wasn't
 he a boxing-trainer or something?

 W

 np: Cinematic Orchestra Man With A Movie Camera
 =
 I Remember House when House Music was
 Soul Music and R'n'B, before House was
 Disco, be-before House was Disco.

  Blaze I Remember House
 =


 -Original Message-
 From: RAW2019 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: donderdag 3 juli 2003 20:53
 To: 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) john rocca



 I donĀ“t know if the outland was owned by dj dimirti.. but dimitri did
 some
 really great sets in those days.

 Cheers,
 Maarten


 Outland was owned by Pieter who now has a studio in thailand !
 The Amsterdam connection  involved Dimitri as well
 even more that Derrick shows in the interview

 anyway I also didn't know this 12 was produced by Carl and Derrick
 The Piano tracks with eq-ing rules
 have too dig that one up
 it'll brings back some nice memories for shure

 RAW










(313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread J. T.
YUCK! i checked it in realaudio before ordering and assumed it went 
somewhere that the clip wasnt long enough to tell me but no...beautiful 
cover artwork, lame lame music. sappy, bland jazz touches that make marian 
mcpartland seem wild. and production in general just goes nowhere. amp's 
voice is generic. someone said the vocals to lovewar were really 
intelligent and cool, uhhh what vocals? the word love ? or the scatty 
stuff??..freakin is so syruppy and generic it makes me cringe...i am 
really bewildered what you guys are hearing in this stuff that you think is 
so great...the jan mix is just 2 minutes of filler...i am a fan of kdj and i 
do like rb and jazz, but this stuff is WEAK. i'd heard the other amp's in 
mp3 and didnt like much either but thought maybe this one got it 
together...nope! shoulda known better, but had to buy one to be sure i 
guess.
gr!! haha. with all the hype i thought maybe there should be one 
disagreeing viewpoint, i wish it had come before i put down my $ on it...
anybody wanna trade something for it? pref in usaplease take this junk 
off my hands! i'm sure i'm really selling it well hahah


jt

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread J. T.

ha !!
that was me raving about that record!!!
I guess I owe you a $$ or two


haha! no it was a lot more people than just you...


I like it!! I think it's better that alot of house stuff I hear - dunno,
can't explain, I just like it.


yuck. it's limp stuff. of course there's loads of bad house but...damn. i 
like the stick-y beat in lovewar at first, but it doesnt go anywhere! 
except to add this weak nowhere elevator jazz stuff...and amp's voice is 
generic as hell which turns me off even more..maybe if the lyrics/voice was 
something special it would make up for the music going nowhere..i'll listen 
to it again, but geez i almost dont want to



I wouldn't buy anything else of his - this is one of the strongest. Did you
get the ampdog knight thing?


no...i dont think i ever heard that one in mp3/digital either..more 
direct/less easy-listening jazz?



you sure you want that Moodymann LP??


yea! :) you know i got it on cd already right? but my roommate has it on 
vinyl and i like it a lot better that way...without the hazy blending 
together of the tracks. even then tho i dont see that it's much comparable 
to the ampit actually goes somewhere. i'm not totally into the jazzy kdj 
stuff either but its got a lot more soul and energy in it and is not nearly 
so wishy-washy and generic. a little bit, but there's something subtly 
different...


oh well taster's choice and all that :)
jt

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)

2003-07-06 Thread Cyclone Wehner
Ministry Australia's July ed is carrying a really nice introductory article
on Detroit Techno by sometime Cabaret Voltaire member Stephen Mallinder (now
based in Perth).
The new Jockey Slut - with The Neptunes on the cover - has a bonus CD with a
Rob Hood track (Upon A Millennial Moment) and Carl Craig's remix of Francois
De Roubaix. Nice!

--
From: Michael Lees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 9:36 PM



 Magazines like NME and Mojo aren't just getting readers from older
 ex-dance-music people, though, I don't think - rock music as a whole is
 being pushed by the majors as the hot new thing and so I wouldn't
 underestimate the amount of 17 or 18-year-olds who are buying them, and
 who probably see electronic/dance music as a bit of an old person's
 thing! (I have certain opinions on this whole rock-renaissance thing
 too, which I won't bother to share with this list ;)


 Completely, if you look at kids (in the UK anyhow) between the ages
 13-16 how many are wearing linkin park, sum 41 etc. t-shirts?

 I think for kids in the UK there are two broad categories you fall into
 at the moment. Either you're an RB, Hip Hop, Garage kid or you're a
 rocker (Marilyn Manson, linkin park etc.) There just isn't any room for
 dance music at the moment.

 Even when the sales of the music magazines (mixmag,ministry in
 particular) were high, I'd say the majority of people buying them were
 interested in trance. They were also bought by people I'd class as not
 really 'interested' in dance music more into the scence drugs 'n all.

 I can't remember which mag it was (ministry I think) but around 98-99
 the front cover was a picture of a pill and the magazine was pretty much
 all about drugs. This shows the supposed music magazines we more
 fashion/style mags.

 Some magazines are okay for night listings and record reviews but
 generally the interviews and articles are of no interest.

 --
 Mike

 


Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

yuck. it's limp stuff. of course there's loads of bad house
but...damn. i 
like the stick-y beat in lovewar at first, but it doesnt go
anywhere! 
except to add this weak nowhere elevator jazz stuff...and amp's
voice is 
generic as hell which turns me off even more..maybe if the
lyrics/voice was 
something special it would make up for the music going
nowhere..i'll listen 
to it again, but geez i almost dont want to

i just dont know what to say about this description of love and
war. IMO nothing is generic about anything about it. perhaps the
old quote he used in the lyrics is a little familiar, but i think
that was the point. 

no...i dont think i ever heard that one in mp3/digital either..more 
direct/less easy-listening jazz?

you sound like this one friend of mine who doesnt like anything
that doesnt have a very straightforward beat to it. personally i
like more variety in my beats. 

yea! :) you know i got it on cd already right? but my
roommate has it on 
vinyl and i like it a lot better that way...without the hazy
blending 
together of the tracks. even then tho i dont see that it's much
comparable 
to the ampit actually goes somewhere. i'm not totally into
the jazzy kdj 
stuff either but its got a lot more soul and energy in it and is
not nearly 
so wishy-washy and generic. a little bit, but there's something
subtly 
different...

i really dont see how any of this music is generic. but you know
amp fiddler plays keys on at least one and probably more tracks on
that album. 

really i dont know what to say. i have both amp fiddler 12s in my
box, the amp dog knights, the detroit experiment LP with amp on
it, and the moodymann tracks with amp on them, and theyre probably
most of the best new tracks i have. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)

2003-07-06 Thread Cyclone Wehner
I think specialised lists are not typical of the wider fanbase for dance 
music, that's why the lifestyle element came into the media. I didn't like
it either but realistically for people who are into the scene, not just the
music as such, maybe that was appropriate?
Also, I value this list but it's different to a magazine - it's more
informal and more interactive than a magazine but the info is less detailed.
You don't get artist interviews, for example.
It depends on what info you're after too.


--
From: Robert Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Churchill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 2:18 AM


 I think the net and lists like this one have taken over as the source for
 information on dance music.
 The mags did not realise this and thought they had to include more and more
 lifestyle articles at the expense of record reviews and their sales
 slumped even further, hence the crisis.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM
 To: Tom Churchill
 Cc: 313; Cyclone Wehner
 Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)




 In contrast, rock titles, such as New Musical Express and Kerrang!, and
 magazines aimed at older music fans, such as Mojo and Uncut, have enjoyed
 circulation increases.

 I think there is your answer. The clubbers are growing up and are getting
 tired of the same old dance music - or at least the way it's presented. I
 wonder how XLR8R, URB, and other US mags are doing? There still seems to be
 a lot of kids still learning and listening to dance music in the US as
 opposed to the UK? correct me if I'm wrong please.

 MEK




   Tom Churchill

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:   Cyclone Wehner

   rdings.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313
 313@hyperreal.org

   07/03/03 02:43 AMcc:

Subject:  Re: (313) Muzik
 (was 7 Magazine)






 Yeah, that's a surprise.
 Wonder why?
 What's the talk?

 Full story:

 http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,988334,00.html

 Cheers,

 Tom








#

 Note:

 Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
 represent
 those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
 This email
 and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of
the
 individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
 email in
 error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thank You.


#

 


(313) NYC tonight: Clark Warner, DJ Olive, Lawrence English

2003-07-06 Thread bryan

Sunday July 6

Undercity 

This week: 
7 - MercY_KillaH
8 - Sheldon Drake
9 - Object (aka Lawrence English | Quatermass, Room 40 | Australia) 
10 - DJ Olive (the Agriculture | NYC) LIVE
11 - Clark Warner (M_nus | Windsor, Canada) 

Visuals: Viduo

Halcyon 7p-2am 
227 Smith Street (Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn) 
(718)260-9299 
http://www.halcyonline.com 
all ages, free 


Big week for Undercity!  Our friend Lawrence English is in town!
He runs the most excellent Room 40 records in Australia.  He has 
collaborated with DJ Olive, Scanner, David Toop and many others, 
and did a nice ambient remix of Nettle for the Agriculture.
DJ Olive plays every thursday at Subtonic when he's not busy 
touring the world (at this point i think he's spending more 
time on the road than in nyc).  Tonight he's going to play a live
ambient set.  Can't recommend his set highly enough.
Also, Clark Warner of M_nus Records is also confirmed.  He held down
the back room at Arc last night very well.




Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread J. T.

i just dont know what to say about this description of love and
war. IMO nothing is generic about anything about it. perhaps the
old quote he used in the lyrics is a little familiar, but i think
that was the point.


what lyrics?? i heard lovv and some scatting..?? quote? guess i need 
to listen again...? but i just dont even like his voice or his 
delivery..syruppy, too smooth not enough real feeling..to my ears! it's a 
subtle thing.



i really dont see how any of this music is generic. but you know
amp fiddler plays keys on at least one and probably more tracks on
that album.


if its fresh to you then great. not generic? well, i have heard thousands 
and thousands of jazz records. i sell them for a living. so maybe it's 
unfortunate but i dont hear anything but limp playing/ideas, heard it 1000 
times before kinda stuff, as far as the jazz elements go. as far as his 
voice i hear a alot of rb classic vocalists distilled into something 
generic. its not amps fault his voice sounds the way it does but it doesnt 
grab me at all. i gotta say i am not very enthusiastic about the jazzy kdj 
stuff either, but usually it comes together better, progresses, etc etc so 
that it doesnt bug me and hits me better. it's a subtle thing. sometimes 
playing/singing this kind of cheese gets by with me, other times it makes me 
cringe and run to pick up the needle..



box, the amp dog knights, the detroit experiment LP with amp on


a lot of the jazz on detroit experiment falls flat as well imo! sorry. i 
know at least a few people on here who are into jazz agree with me..
i much prefer russ gabriel's recent stuff. if he hooked up with a nice rb 
vocalist i think it could be in the same area as amp but blow him out of the 
water.


if i wasnt extremely disappointed with it i wouldnt have said anything...

jt

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

what lyrics?? i heard lovv and some scatting..?? quote?
guess i need 
to listen again...?

the if you stand for nothing, youll fall for anything bit. its
certainly not a straight up vocal track.

but i just dont even like his voice or his 
delivery..syruppy, too smooth not enough real feeling..to my
ears! it's a 
subtle thing.

perhaps im biased after seeing him live, but trust me, he's got
much real feeling when he performs, and i think also on his records. 

if its fresh to you then great. 

im not calling it fresh, but its definitely distinctive. i could
pick an amp track out of a lineup easily. its definitely not generic. 

not generic? well, i have heard thousands 
and thousands of jazz records. i sell them for a living. so maybe
it's 
unfortunate but i dont hear anything but limp playing/ideas,
heard it 1000 
times before kinda stuff, as far as the jazz elements go.

im also pretty unsure why this has to do with jazz. amp played
with george clinton for like a decade. he makes funky music. there
might be some jazziness to it, but he wasnt trying to make a jazz
record. 

a lot of the jazz on detroit experiment falls flat as well imo!
sorry. i 
know at least a few people on here who are into jazz agree with me..

the detroit experiment certainly wasnt meant to be a jazz record
either though! obviously the inclusion of jazz players gives it a
good dose of jazzy flavor, but theres also a good dose of hiphop,
techno, and funk in there, which is why its the detroit
experiment and not the detroit jazz record. i love me some
jazz, im certainly not a purist of any genre, but i think the DE
lp is really quality, and their performance at movement was
absolutely fantastic. 

i much prefer russ gabriel's recent stuff. if he hooked up with a
nice rb 
vocalist i think it could be in the same area as amp but blow him
out of the 
water.

i think theyre definitely 2 different fish: russ's stuff is
definitely leaning more towards jazz than amp's stuff is. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)

2003-07-06 Thread ryan burns


is this the 10 inch that came out the other day???



From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]



and Carl Craig's remix of Francois
De Roubaix. Nice!



_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)

2003-07-06 Thread Cyclone Wehner
There's a 12 inch with some other mixes on it, like one from Luke Vibert, I
think, that's also highlighted in the JS, this is just one cut off it on the
CD.
There's also a review of a new Dave Angel EP in JS, wondered what was up
with him.
See, you can get useful info from mags. ;)


--
From: ryan burns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 7:19 AM



 is this the 10 inch that came out the other day???


From: Cyclone Wehner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

and Carl Craig's remix of Francois
De Roubaix. Nice!


 _
 Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
 http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
 


Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread ryan burns


J.T's so superficial  J.T's so superficial  J.T's so superficial
YEAH


ryan


From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]


YUCK! i checked it in realaudio before ordering and assumed it went 
somewhere that the clip wasnt long enough to tell me but no...beautiful 
cover artwork, lame lame music. sappy, bland jazz touches that make marian 
mcpartland seem wild. and production in general just goes nowhere. amp's 
voice is generic. someone said the vocals to lovewar were really 
intelligent and cool, uhhh what vocals? the word love ? or the scatty 
stuff??..freakin is so syruppy and generic it makes me cringe...i am 
really bewildered what you guys are hearing in this stuff that you think is 
so great...the jan mix is just 2 minutes of filler...i am a fan of kdj and 
i do like rb and jazz, but this stuff is WEAK. i'd heard the other amp's 
in mp3 and didnt like much either but thought maybe this one got it 
together...nope! shoulda known better, but had to buy one to be sure i 
guess.
gr!! haha. with all the hype i thought maybe there should be one 
disagreeing viewpoint, i wish it had come before i put down my $ on it...
anybody wanna trade something for it? pref in usaplease take this junk 
off my hands! i'm sure i'm really selling it well hahah


jt

_
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail




Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread J. T.

the if you stand for nothing, youll fall for anything bit. its
certainly not a straight up vocal track.


ahh yeah i didnt hear that...i wasnt payign that much attention i guess


im not calling it fresh, but its definitely distinctive. i could
pick an amp track out of a lineup easily. its definitely not generic.


no - you like it. i wouldnt say its definitely not generic! because it is to 
me...call me picky, whatever...



im also pretty unsure why this has to do with jazz. amp played


because it's jazzy. i dont think its that hard to figure out. i'm not saying 
it has to be in 5/8 time or anything.



with george clinton for like a decade. he makes funky music. there
might be some jazziness to it, but he wasnt trying to make a jazz
record.


i do like the basslines..but i wouldnt call this stuff funky 
exactly..obviously this stuff is not straight up jazz...like...duh :P



the detroit experiment certainly wasnt meant to be a jazz record
either though! obviously the inclusion of jazz players gives it a
good dose of jazzy flavor, but theres also a good dose of hiphop,
techno, and funk in there, which is why its the detroit
experiment and not the detroit jazz record. i love me some


man you deserved to be slapped with a fish for that...come on!! gimme a 
freakin break. jazz stopped having to be all trumpets and odd time 
signatures 40 years ago. does nitpicking over genre name really have any 
point?



lp is really quality, and their performance at movement was
absolutely fantastic.


i didnt make it to movement...i would've dug it live i'm sure, but live 
music is easier to like. i dig some music i'd otherwise be way more critical 
of when i see it live.



i think theyre definitely 2 different fish: russ's stuff is
definitely leaning more towards jazz than amp's stuff is.


true, but...its just taste i guess, the elements i pick up on in amp seem 
wishywashy and artificial like msg to me. whatever. im not trying to get 
personal, it justa int my thing..at allis that OK?? thank you!!


jt

_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail




Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: J. T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

no - you like it. i wouldnt say its definitely not generic!
because it is to 
me...call me picky, whatever...

generic to me implies that the music has no character, that it
could be being played by anybody. check any boyband knockoffs of
nsync and backstreet boys or any of the pearl jam knockoffs for
what id classify as generic. 

because it's jazzy. i dont think its that hard to figure out. i'm
not saying 
it has to be in 5/8 time or anything.

jazzy /= jazz. even still, i dont see it as jazzy at all really. 

i do like the basslines..but i wouldnt call this stuff funky 
exactly..obviously this stuff is not straight up jazz...like...duh :P

im just saying, holding it up to jazz records to compare it just
doesnt make sense. obviously its not going to hold up. but thats
because it wasnt the intention for the record to be a jazz record. 

man you deserved to be slapped with a fish for that...come on!!
gimme a 
freakin break. jazz stopped having to be all trumpets and odd time 
signatures 40 years ago. does nitpicking over genre name really
have any 
point?

youre comparing apples and oranges. im not going to compare
pharoah sanders to kenny g because thyere not even the same thing,
though they might both be called jazz by different people. im
not arguing genre names, im arguing the essence of the performance. 

i didnt make it to movement...i would've dug it live i'm sure,
but live 
music is easier to like. i dig some music i'd otherwise be way
more critical 
of when i see it live.

im usually similarly critical, whether its live or recorded. 

true, but...its just taste i guess, the elements i pick up on in
amp seem 
wishywashy and artificial like msg to me. whatever. im not trying
to get 
personal, it justa int my thing..at allis that OK?? thank you!!

thats fine, but calling something thats distinctive generic and
comparing a non-jazz record to jazz records just dont make proper
musical criticism to me. i hate autechre, but im not going to call
them generic or compare them to jazz even though im sure they were
influenced by it

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread David Powers
Yeah, I agree completely with JT's comments, as a long time jazz player
and fan I notice that some of the jazzier things seem more hype to
others on this list than to myself, and I think maybe it's because my
background and jazz makes me a little harder to impress with releases
that go in that directions.  It's so easy to sound like noodly lounge
music in this genre!!!  Haven't heard the new amp fiddler record so I
can't comment on that specifically.  But, well I'll just keep my opinion
on his cover of Too High to myself.  ;)

--Dave

-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

i just dont know what to say about this description of love and
war. IMO nothing is generic about anything about it. perhaps the
old quote he used in the lyrics is a little familiar, but i think
that was the point.

what lyrics?? i heard lovv and some scatting..?? quote? guess i
need 
to listen again...? but i just dont even like his voice or his 
delivery..syruppy, too smooth not enough real feeling..to my ears! it's
a 
subtle thing.

i really dont see how any of this music is generic. but you know
amp fiddler plays keys on at least one and probably more tracks on
that album.

if its fresh to you then great. not generic? well, i have heard
thousands 
and thousands of jazz records. i sell them for a living. so maybe it's 
unfortunate but i dont hear anything but limp playing/ideas, heard it
1000 
times before kinda stuff, as far as the jazz elements go. as far as his 
voice i hear a alot of rb classic vocalists distilled into something 
generic. its not amps fault his voice sounds the way it does but it
doesnt 
grab me at all. i gotta say i am not very enthusiastic about the jazzy
kdj 
stuff either, but usually it comes together better, progresses, etc etc
so 
that it doesnt bug me and hits me better. it's a subtle thing. sometimes

playing/singing this kind of cheese gets by with me, other times it
makes me 
cringe and run to pick up the needle..

box, the amp dog knights, the detroit experiment LP with amp on

a lot of the jazz on detroit experiment falls flat as well imo! sorry. i

know at least a few people on here who are into jazz agree with me..
i much prefer russ gabriel's recent stuff. if he hooked up with a nice
rb 
vocalist i think it could be in the same area as amp but blow him out of
the 
water.

if i wasnt extremely disappointed with it i wouldnt have said
anything...

jt

_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963




RE: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

2003-07-06 Thread Matthew MacQueen
JT, it's so simple...  You're wrong.  JUST KIDDING!!  If everyone liked
the same stuff the world would be as boring as a 7 hour John Aquaviva DJ
set... ok whatever but you know what I mean.  ;)

Disclaimer: this is not an attempt to get you to like it (a pointless
exercise to anyone for any reason) but more of the reasons why I see
merit in this .. and others of his records. 

I like Amp Fiddler because it's not techno or house but it has the
elements of detroit sound that I like to hear in other music I listen
to.  It's funny you use jazz as a reference cause that's the last thing
I would have likened it too.  I like the songwriting.  I would classify
it as 'rb' or 'soul' before I would think of it as jazz, but wherever
you come from is how you relate and describe things so whatever, that's
pretty moot point anyway.  I also know very little about jazz compared
to most, so maybe I don't have the same distaste as a more typical jazz
head might. 

I also think when you take a mouthful of something and spit it out
immediately (judging from your reaction that seemed to be the case?) You
might have written it off wholesale without looking a little further.  I
like Freakin, reminds me of a cut you'd hear coming out of someone's
trunk at a BBQ in the summer, recalls a Fatback or SOS Band vibe almost.


I like the lyrics to love and war... didn't hear any scat myself.

The keys playing I find interesting, moreso than the rhythms... the
piano keys in 'love and war' I think are great and moody.  Did you
listen to the electronic synth parts in freakin' ?  Crazy analogue
sounds and squiggles and synth farts, etc. It's just a fresh little
summer jammy jam, I don't see anything generic in it.. the solo is nuts!
Or if nothing else, fun and groovin.. not a whole lot else to think for
me.  I agree the KDJ version was a bit of a let-down.. if you want
better examples of that check the Mahogani or KDJ collaborations (DOH -
too late you bought this one!)  ;)

Maybe the expectations where too weird but I also don't think that much
about it, I liked the grooves, a summertime kind of sound and the man
has a lot of talent on the keys and I like the sound of his voice myself
too. 

The beats I think could be better compared to other elements of his
productions, but we'll see what happens in the future...   Maybe Amp
just needs some $tinkworx beats to liven it up!!

PS - I love Detroit Experiment as one of the whole greater than the sum
of the parts thing, each track is a little different and the crazy
influences do come out individually AND collectively (to me).  Midnight
at Twenty Grand!!   

It seems to be the trendy thing now with a lot of techno heads to
dislike where Carl is going on the jazz collective tip and I'm not havin
it... music needs to expand, the detroit sound is way to wide to stay
pegged in a single genre.  I'm glad people are going for it.  

Peace,
Matt MacQueen

PS - Speaking of... Now I gotta go drive to Dusty Groove and pick up the
new Dwele LP:

From DustyGroove.com - 
sparkling debut from Detroit's Dwele -- a sweet vocalist in the Donny
Hathaway tradition, but with a tight, beat heavy soul sound that glides
between 70s soul jazz, mellowed-out Jay Dee synth hop groove, and the
natural soul vibe ?uestlove brings to his productions! We first caught
wind of Dwele on Slum Village's Tainted single, and that's a good
indication of the sound you'll find on the debut. Mellow, trippy keys
and sound washes drench the album from beginning-to-end, with Dwele's
often deeply layered vocals weighing the bright, modern groove aspects
of the sound with a rich sense of soul history. There's a slight 70s
soul jazz vibe, too, in spots -- a sophisticated studio groove with
bright bass and some sunny, soulfully strummed electric guitar. Dwele
finds some truly nice middle ground between the natural soul scene,
modern groove, and the mellower beats and grooves of the best Detroit
hip hop of recent years -- a scene that Dwele indeed was a player in
before finding his soul muse. Great stuff -- similar enough to some of
his contemporaries -- but still wholly unique in Dwele's embrace of a
bright, sunny, polished sound that still manages to maintain naturally
soulful grit and grease! The title track is a classic -- crackly,
thumping beats, sweetly chiming keys, and capital M Moody vocals -- and
many others are nearly as strong! Includes Hold On, Find A Way, Day
At A Time, Kick Out Of You, Sho Ya Right, Lady Mahogany, Money
Don't Mean A Thing, and more. 10 tracks on the LP.


-Original Message-
From: J. T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 4:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) amp fiddler lovewar

the if you stand for nothing, youll fall for anything bit. its
certainly not a straight up vocal track.

ahh yeah i didnt hear that...i wasnt payign that much attention i guess

im not calling it fresh, but its definitely distinctive. i could
pick an amp track out of a lineup