(313) Shake
Interview with Shake here: http://www.junodownload.com/plus/2014/04/29/thats-american-an-interview-with-anthony-shake-shakir/
Re: (313) Shake!
I lol'd at this kent williams wrote: > Love the man, love the music, but we need to do a Kickstarter campaign to > hire him an assistant to manage his internet presence.
Re: (313) Shake!
IDK, I kind of dig getting Candy Crush and Bejeweled messages from him on Facebook. On Thursday, September 19, 2013, kent williams wrote: > Love the man, love the music, but we need to do a Kickstarter campaign to > hire him an assistant to manage his internet presence. >
Re: (313) Shake!
It's a sad day when I have to filter messages from Shake to the trash. Like I tripped and fell into an alternate dimension or something. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, kent williams wrote: > Love the man, love the music, but we need to do a Kickstarter campaign to > hire him an assistant to manage his internet presence. >
(313) Shake!
Love the man, love the music, but we need to do a Kickstarter campaign to hire him an assistant to manage his internet presence.
(313) Shake Interview
Interview with our very own Shake: http://www.littledetroit.net/feeds/anthony-shakir-vs-intruders m
Re: (313) Shake in SF
hahaha, SF seems to have it going on! Now I just need to get off my azz and get to some of these events ;) On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:46 PM, jeremy bispo wrote: > http://www.residentadvisor.net/event.aspx?244130 > > The weekend before in San Francisco. :) > > -- > Best, > Jeremy > > As You Like It > Founder & Executive Producer > skype: jeremybispo > i...@ayli-sf.com > www.ayli-sf.com > > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Michael Elliot-Knight > wrote: >> ga! >> >> that's the week *after* we get back from SF >> >> :-( >> >> MEK >> >> james.hurl...@utoronto.ca wrote on 05/11/2011 07:30:33 PM: >> >>> From: james.hurl...@utoronto.ca >>> To: 313@hyperreal.org >>> Date: 05/11/2011 07:31 PM >>> Subject: (313) Shake in SF >>> >>> Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of >>> us that are :) >>> >>> http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha >>> >>> Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse >>> FM-associated purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with >>> absolutely legendary Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who >>> admittedly can't remember ever playing in SF before, so we're going to >>> go ahead and call it his first SF appearance as well. >>> >> >> >> >> Disclaimer >> The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary >> and confidential information that is intended for the addressee(s) only. If >> you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this >> information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or vendors, any >> information contained in this e-mail or any attachments is subject to the >> terms and conditions in any governing contract. If you have received this >> e-mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e-mail. >> >
Re: (313) Shake in SF
http://www.residentadvisor.net/event.aspx?244130 The weekend before in San Francisco. :) -- Best, Jeremy As You Like It Founder & Executive Producer skype: jeremybispo i...@ayli-sf.com www.ayli-sf.com On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Michael Elliot-Knight wrote: > ga! > > that's the week *after* we get back from SF > > :-( > > MEK > > james.hurl...@utoronto.ca wrote on 05/11/2011 07:30:33 PM: > >> From: james.hurl...@utoronto.ca >> To: 313@hyperreal.org >> Date: 05/11/2011 07:31 PM >> Subject: (313) Shake in SF >> >> Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of >> us that are :) >> >> http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha >> >> Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse >> FM-associated purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with >> absolutely legendary Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who >> admittedly can't remember ever playing in SF before, so we're going to >> go ahead and call it his first SF appearance as well. >> > > > > Disclaimer > The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and > confidential information that is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, > copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information > is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or vendors, any information > contained in this e-mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and > conditions in any governing contract. If you have received this e-mail in > error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e-mail. >
Re: (313) Shake in SF
ga! that's the week *after* we get back from SF :-( MEK james.hurl...@utoronto.ca wrote on 05/11/2011 07:30:33 PM: > From: james.hurl...@utoronto.ca > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Date: 05/11/2011 07:31 PM > Subject: (313) Shake in SF > > Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of > us that are :) > > http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha > > Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse > FM-associated purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with > absolutely legendary Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who > admittedly can't remember ever playing in SF before, so we're going to > go ahead and call it his first SF appearance as well. > Disclaimer The information in this email and any attachments may contain proprietary and confidential information that is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. When addressed to our clients or vendors, any information contained in this e-mail or any attachments is subject to the terms and conditions in any governing contract. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete the e-mail.
Re: (313) Shake in SF
Dang, I'll be in the D. Here's a party I'm throwing with a few friends featuring Delano Smith's SF Debut next week: http://www.residentadvisor.net/event.aspx?254455 Joe On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:30 PM, wrote: > Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of us > that are :) > > http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha > > Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse FM-associated > purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with absolutely legendary > Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who admittedly can't remember > ever playing in SF before, so we're going to go ahead and call it his first > SF appearance as well. > >
Re: (313) Shake in SF
Looking forward to this! On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:30 PM, wrote: > Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of us > that are :) > > http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha > > Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse FM-associated > purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with absolutely legendary > Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who admittedly can't remember > ever playing in SF before, so we're going to go ahead and call it his first > SF appearance as well. > >
(313) Shake in SF
Good news for noCal folks not going to Detroit, bad news for those of us that are :) http://www.xlr8r.com/events/2011/05/icee-hot-creep-anthony-shake-sha Making his first ever SF appearance will be Hyperdub/Rinse FM-associated purveyor of dark UK funky Scratcha DVA along with absolutely legendary Detroit techno madman Anthony "Shake" Shakir, who admittedly can't remember ever playing in SF before, so we're going to go ahead and call it his first SF appearance as well.
RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ
This software often finds stuff that Malwarebytes doesn't, so is well worth checking out: http://www.superantispyware.com -Original Message- From: AntonBanks.com [mailto:web...@snet.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:27 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ For goodness sake, shouldn't someone at least point Shake in the right direction before banishing the guy? It's not like he wants his computer infected or is sending spam on purpose, right? I'm sure he could handle installing two programs himself. If he really can't, someone just has to install these two programs for him. Either way, it won't take more than 10-15 minutes to install these two. I've linked directly to the installers for both programs below. AVG Antivirus http://free.avg.com/us-en/download-free-antivirus Malwarebytes (note that software updates are done manually) http://malwarebytes-anti-malware.en.softonic.com/download#ptn=malwarebytes At risk of sounding like an endorsement, both programs do a surprisingly good job of protecting your computer from viruses considering that they are free. I gave up Norton years ago in favor of these two. They also don't bog my system down nearly as much as Norton did. 1) Download and install AVG and Malwarebytes 2) Uninstall whatever existing antivirus software he has on his machine now. 3) Run Malwarebytes and AVG scans Hope this helps him, -ant- -Original Message- From: jwan allen [mailto:jwan.al...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:07 PM To: kent williams Cc: Thor Teague; Odeluga, Ken; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) 313 hopefully a kind soul can do this over the memorial day weekend! On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, kent williams wrote: > Shake is aware of this problem. The problem -- I suspect -- is that > his e-mail machine is infected with a virus of some sort. > > Tony is a brilliant musician, not a computer technician. It would be > great if someone who actually lives in the Detroit area and is > acquainted with him would volunteer to check his machine and get > things fixed up. > > The reason I haven't yet blocked his address is that it would mean he > doesn't see 313 list e-mail, and I know he's interested in it. The > occasional spam message from his address is a price I'm willing to > pay. > > I'll e-mail sebastien and tell him to find a non-work e-mail address > to use for the list. If he doesn't respond I'll just unsub him. Cut > him some slack, though -- I bet this auto-responder stuff happens > outside his control. > -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3600 - Release Date: 04/27/11 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6076 (20110427) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6076 (20110427) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6076 (20110427) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Re: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ
I work in IT and will definitely vouch for Avira. The previous suggestion of Malwarebytes is also a very good one. shiva http://www.soundcloud.com/djshiva "Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing." - Arundhati Roy On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:40 PM, log...@cox.net wrote: > avg is bunk. > > Avira is where it's at! > > > -Original Message- > Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:27:23 am > To: 313@hyperreal.org > From: "AntonBanks.com" > Subject: RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ > > For goodness sake, shouldn't someone at least point Shake in the right > direction before banishing the guy? It's not like he wants his computer > infected or is sending spam on purpose, right? > > I'm sure he could handle installing two programs himself. If he really > can't, someone just has to install these two programs for him. Either way, > it won't take more than 10-15 minutes to install these two. I've linked > directly to the installers for both programs below. > > AVG Antivirus > http://free.avg.com/us-en/download-free-antivirus > > Malwarebytes (note that software updates are done manually) > http://malwarebytes-anti-malware.en.softonic.com/download#ptn=malwarebytes > > At risk of sounding like an endorsement, both programs do a surprisingly > good job of protecting your computer from viruses considering that they are > free. I gave up Norton years ago in favor of these two. They also don't bog > my system down nearly as much as Norton did. > > 1) Download and install AVG and Malwarebytes > 2) Uninstall whatever existing antivirus software he has on his machine now. > 3) Run Malwarebytes and AVG scans > > Hope this helps him, > > -ant- > > -Original Message- > From: jwan allen [mailto:jwan.al...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:07 PM > To: kent williams > Cc: Thor Teague; Odeluga, Ken; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) 313 > > > hopefully a kind soul can do this over the memorial day weekend! > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, kent williams > wrote: >> Shake is aware of this problem. The problem -- I suspect -- is that >> his e-mail machine is infected with a virus of some sort. >> >> Tony is a brilliant musician, not a computer technician. It would be >> great if someone who actually lives in the Detroit area and is >> acquainted with him would volunteer to check his machine and get >> things fixed up. >> >> The reason I haven't yet blocked his address is that it would mean he >> doesn't see 313 list e-mail, and I know he's interested in it. The >> occasional spam message from his address is a price I'm willing to >> pay. >> >> I'll e-mail sebastien and tell him to find a non-work e-mail address >> to use for the list. If he doesn't respond I'll just unsub him. Cut >> him some slack, though -- I bet this auto-responder stuff happens >> outside his control. >> > > > > -- > Technoir Audio > http://www.technoiraudio.com > "dealing with your imperfect world" > > - > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3600 - Release Date: 04/27/11 > > > >
RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ
avg is bunk. Avira is where it's at! -Original Message- Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:27:23 am To: 313@hyperreal.org From: "AntonBanks.com" Subject: RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ For goodness sake, shouldn't someone at least point Shake in the right direction before banishing the guy? It's not like he wants his computer infected or is sending spam on purpose, right? I'm sure he could handle installing two programs himself. If he really can't, someone just has to install these two programs for him. Either way, it won't take more than 10-15 minutes to install these two. I've linked directly to the installers for both programs below. AVG Antivirus http://free.avg.com/us-en/download-free-antivirus Malwarebytes (note that software updates are done manually) http://malwarebytes-anti-malware.en.softonic.com/download#ptn=malwarebytes At risk of sounding like an endorsement, both programs do a surprisingly good job of protecting your computer from viruses considering that they are free. I gave up Norton years ago in favor of these two. They also don't bog my system down nearly as much as Norton did. 1) Download and install AVG and Malwarebytes 2) Uninstall whatever existing antivirus software he has on his machine now. 3) Run Malwarebytes and AVG scans Hope this helps him, -ant- -Original Message- From: jwan allen [mailto:jwan.al...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:07 PM To: kent williams Cc: Thor Teague; Odeluga, Ken; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) 313 hopefully a kind soul can do this over the memorial day weekend! On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, kent williams wrote: > Shake is aware of this problem. The problem -- I suspect -- is that > his e-mail machine is infected with a virus of some sort. > > Tony is a brilliant musician, not a computer technician. It would be > great if someone who actually lives in the Detroit area and is > acquainted with him would volunteer to check his machine and get > things fixed up. > > The reason I haven't yet blocked his address is that it would mean he > doesn't see 313 list e-mail, and I know he's interested in it. The > occasional spam message from his address is a price I'm willing to > pay. > > I'll e-mail sebastien and tell him to find a non-work e-mail address > to use for the list. If he doesn't respond I'll just unsub him. Cut > him some slack, though -- I bet this auto-responder stuff happens > outside his control. > -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3600 - Release Date: 04/27/11
Re: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ
Chill. I don't think *anyone* wants to banish Anthony Shakir from the list. Well done for posting some constructive suggestions. Ken - Original Message - From: AntonBanks.com To: 313@hyperreal.org <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Wed Apr 27 19:27:23 2011 Subject: RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ For goodness sake, shouldn't someone at least point Shake in the right direction before banishing the guy? It's not like he wants his computer infected or is sending spam on purpose, right? I'm sure he could handle installing two programs himself. If he really can't, someone just has to install these two programs for him. Either way, it won't take more than 10-15 minutes to install these two. I've linked directly to the installers for both programs below. AVG Antivirus http://free.avg.com/us-en/download-free-antivirus Malwarebytes (note that software updates are done manually) http://malwarebytes-anti-malware.en.softonic.com/download#ptn=malwarebytes At risk of sounding like an endorsement, both programs do a surprisingly good job of protecting your computer from viruses considering that they are free. I gave up Norton years ago in favor of these two. They also don't bog my system down nearly as much as Norton did. 1) Download and install AVG and Malwarebytes 2) Uninstall whatever existing antivirus software he has on his machine now. 3) Run Malwarebytes and AVG scans Hope this helps him, -ant- -Original Message- From: jwan allen [mailto:jwan.al...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:07 PM To: kent williams Cc: Thor Teague; Odeluga, Ken; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) 313 hopefully a kind soul can do this over the memorial day weekend! On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, kent williams wrote: > Shake is aware of this problem. The problem -- I suspect -- is that > his e-mail machine is infected with a virus of some sort. > > Tony is a brilliant musician, not a computer technician. It would be > great if someone who actually lives in the Detroit area and is > acquainted with him would volunteer to check his machine and get > things fixed up. > > The reason I haven't yet blocked his address is that it would mean he > doesn't see 313 list e-mail, and I know he's interested in it. The > occasional spam message from his address is a price I'm willing to > pay. > > I'll e-mail sebastien and tell him to find a non-work e-mail address > to use for the list. If he doesn't respond I'll just unsub him. Cut > him some slack, though -- I bet this auto-responder stuff happens > outside his control. > -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3600 - Release Date: 04/27/11
RE: (313) 313 SHAKE- PLEASE READ
For goodness sake, shouldn't someone at least point Shake in the right direction before banishing the guy? It's not like he wants his computer infected or is sending spam on purpose, right? I'm sure he could handle installing two programs himself. If he really can't, someone just has to install these two programs for him. Either way, it won't take more than 10-15 minutes to install these two. I've linked directly to the installers for both programs below. AVG Antivirus http://free.avg.com/us-en/download-free-antivirus Malwarebytes (note that software updates are done manually) http://malwarebytes-anti-malware.en.softonic.com/download#ptn=malwarebytes At risk of sounding like an endorsement, both programs do a surprisingly good job of protecting your computer from viruses considering that they are free. I gave up Norton years ago in favor of these two. They also don't bog my system down nearly as much as Norton did. 1) Download and install AVG and Malwarebytes 2) Uninstall whatever existing antivirus software he has on his machine now. 3) Run Malwarebytes and AVG scans Hope this helps him, -ant- -Original Message- From: jwan allen [mailto:jwan.al...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 1:07 PM To: kent williams Cc: Thor Teague; Odeluga, Ken; Martin Dust; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) 313 hopefully a kind soul can do this over the memorial day weekend! On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, kent williams wrote: > Shake is aware of this problem. The problem -- I suspect -- is that > his e-mail machine is infected with a virus of some sort. > > Tony is a brilliant musician, not a computer technician. It would be > great if someone who actually lives in the Detroit area and is > acquainted with him would volunteer to check his machine and get > things fixed up. > > The reason I haven't yet blocked his address is that it would mean he > doesn't see 313 list e-mail, and I know he's interested in it. The > occasional spam message from his address is a price I'm willing to > pay. > > I'll e-mail sebastien and tell him to find a non-work e-mail address > to use for the list. If he doesn't respond I'll just unsub him. Cut > him some slack, though -- I bet this auto-responder stuff happens > outside his control. > -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3600 - Release Date: 04/27/11
(313) Shake and Kyle Hall
Neat little article: http://www.xlr8r.com/features/2010/03/detroit-state-mind-kyle-hall-lea Shake's new Frictional has also finally landed: http://www.rubadub.co.uk/?node_id=1.3&id=26566 robin...
(313) shake Urb interview, interview, free track
All Shake, all the damn time! http://www.urb.com/2010/02/12/anthony-shake-shakir-friction-at-its-best The track is "My Computer Is An Optimist" which is on Frictionalism http://www.urb.com/files/2010/02/2-07-My-Computer-Is-An-Original-1.mp3
(313) Shake in Detroit
Shake in Detroit Metro Times: http://metrotimes.com/culture/story.asp?id=14744 -- Denise Dalphond Ph.D. Candidate Department of Folklore & Ethnomusicology Indiana University http://denisedjsdetroit.blogspot.com/
Re: (313) Shake in Resident Advisor, Interviewd by Tom Cox
Great interview. Wish more had Shake's humbleness. Great that the retrospective is coming out; Rush Hour will certainly do a wonderful job with it and help Shake get more of the attention & respect he deserves. And, speaking of great, the Thought Processes EP on Frictional is great, too! :) Have a great weekend, everybody. Andrew "snowed in in Halifax NS Canada" Duke On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Martin Dust wrote: > Classic Shake > > "I'm here till I'm not here." > > Brilliant. > > m > > > On 15 Jan 2010, at 14:26, kent williams wrote: > >> http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1140 > > -- http://soundcloud.com/andrewdukecognitionaudio http://myspace.com/andrewduke
Re: (313) Shake in Resident Advisor, Interviewd by Tom Cox
Classic Shake "I'm here till I'm not here." Brilliant. m On 15 Jan 2010, at 14:26, kent williams wrote: > http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1140
(313) Shake in Resident Advisor, Interviewd by Tom Cox
http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1140
Re: (313) - Shake ID techfest 4eva!
Not sure - but I'm digging Shake's set. If anyone could id the track he plays at 56 mins I'd be terribly grateful. On 06/06/2009, at 2:13 PM, anth...@technoiraudio.com wrote: If anyone could tell me the song at 13:00 mins in on the charles webster set. I would 4ever be in that person's debt. Ant On Thu, June 4, 2009 8:02 pm, james.hurl...@utoronto.ca wrote: from a friend Sets from 2007. You should still be able to DL all of them... 05-26-2007 Anthony Shake Shakir http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-26-07-anthonyshakeshakir- realdetroitstage/download 05-26-2007 Butane http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-26-07-butane-beatport/download 05-26-2007 Charles Webster http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-26-07-charleswebster-mainstage/ download 05-26-2007 Delano Smith http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-26-07-delanosmith-mainstage/download 05-26-2007 DJ Seoul http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-26-07-djseoul-realdetroitstage/ download 05-26-2007 Gary Martin http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-26-07-garymartin-realdetroitstage/ download 05-26-2007 Guido Schneider http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-26-07-guidoschneider- beatportstage/download 05-26-2007 Jeff Greinke http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-26-07-jeffgreinke-beatport/download 05-26-2007 Kerri Chandler http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-26-07-kerrichandler-mainstage/ download 05-26-2007 King Britt http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-26-07-kingbritt-mainstage/download 05-26-2007 LoSoul http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-26-07-losoul-beatportstage/download 05-26-2007 Norm Talley http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-26-07-normtalley-realdetroitstage -1/download 05-26-2007 Norm Talley http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-26-07-normtalley-realdetroitstage/ download 05-26-2007 Octaveone http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-26-07-octaveone-realdetroitstage/ download 05-26-2007 Pier Bucci http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-26-07-pierbucci-beatport/download 05-26-2007 Pole http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-26-07-pole-beatportstage/download 05-26-2007 Scan 7 http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-26-07-scan7-realdetroitstage/ download 05-27-2007 Abeduque and Blake Baxter http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-27-07-abeduque-blakebaxter- realdetroitstage/download 05-27-2007 Angel Molina http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-27-07-angelmolina-pyramidstage/ download 05-27-2007 Audion and Ryan Elliott http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-27-07-audion-ryanelliott- realdetroitstage/download 05-27-2007 Baby Ford http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-27-07-babyford-pyramidstage/download 05-27-2007 Bad Boy Bill http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-27-07-badboybill-beatportstage/ download 05-27-2007 Brian Sanhaji http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-27-07-briansanhaji-mainstage/ download 05-27-2007 Christian Smith http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-27-07-christiansmith-mainstage/ download 05-27-2007 Evol Intent http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-28-07-evolintent-pyramidstage/ download 05-27-2007 Gui Boratto http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-27-07-guiboratto-pyramidstage/ download 05-27-2007 Heidi http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-27-07-heidi-beatport/download 05-27-2007 Kate Simko http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-27-07-katesimko-beatport/download 05-27-2007 Kenny Larkin http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-27-07-kennylarkin- realdetroitstage/download 05-27-2007 Lee Curtiss http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-27-07-leecurtiss-realdetroitstage/ download 05-27-2007 Mathew Jonson http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-27-07-mathewjonson-beatportstage/ download 05-27-2007 Milieu http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-27-07-milieu-mainstage/download 05-27-2007 Misstress Barbara http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-27-07-misstressbarbara- beatportstage/download 05-27-2007 Monolake http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-27-07-monolake-mainstage/download 05-27-2007 Pepo Lanzoni http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-27-07-pepolanzoni-pyramidstage/ download 05-27-2007 Robert Rich http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-27-07-robertrich-beatportstage/ download 05-27-2007 Ryan Crosson http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-27-07-ryancrosson-realdetroitstage/ download 05-27-2007 Seth Troxler http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/05-27-07-sethtroxler-realdetroitstage/ download 05-27-2007 Steve Bug http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-27-07-stevebug-beatportstage/download 05-28-2007 Alton Miller http://soundcloud.com/freebird/05-28-07-altonmiller-realdetroitstage/ download 05-28-2007 Chuck Daniels http://soundcloud.com/mixfunk/h05-28-07-chuckdaniels- realdetroitstage/download 05-28-2007 Gridlok http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-28-07-gridlok-pyramidstage/download 05-28-2007 Kevin Saunderson http://soundcloud.com/freakymix/05-28-07-kevinsaunderson- realdetroitstage/download 05-28-2007 Luciano http://soundcloud.com/mixalot/05-28-07-luciano-beatportstage/download 05-28-2007 Luciano http://soundcloud.com/mixology/05-28-07-luciano-beatport/download 05-28-2007 Matt C http://soundcloud.com/mix
RE: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
[Bemused smile] I agree 200% with Paul. Spoken like a true veteran vinyl stalker. -Original Message- From: Placid [mailto:pla...@acid-house.net] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:00 PM To: fran...@thatamazingthing Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records you can preorder it at rush hour thus transpiring it must be going to get a fullerrelease. p fran...@thatamazingthing wrote: > Ooops! Thought I'd checked there. Ta, that's great (even if I now > can't help checking that record I can't buy ;-). > > > >> From: gavin morrissey [mailto:gavinmorris...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 16 April 2009 17:32 >> >> you can check sound clips at rush hour >> >> http://www.rushhour.nl/store_detailed.php?item=48615 >> > > > -- Playing - 6th June - under_score w/ Rob Hall - 11th June - Sheffield - 27th June - NYC Downlow - Glastonbury Placid on the t'interweb - http://www.acid-house.net Vinyl for Sale - http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=placid Placid's Gigs and Gigography - http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=41658902688 Live on Future-music.co.uk every other Thursday - 8pm - 10pm
RE: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
SKAKE IS THE MAN!! At 12:47 PM 4/16/2009, you wrote: Ooops! Thought I'd checked there. Ta, that's great (even if I now can't help checking that record I can't buy ;-). > From: gavin morrissey [mailto:gavinmorris...@gmail.com] > Sent: 16 April 2009 17:32 > > you can check sound clips at rush hour > > http://www.rushhour.nl/store_detailed.php?item=48615 [] Cell Phone: (313) 492-1870 World Wide Web : www.puzzleboxrecords.com www.optic-universe.com Email : Puzzlebox Recordings Office puzzle...@optic-universe.com Puzzlebox Recordings Info i...@optic-universe.com Bookings Licensing : technosis...@optic-universe.com --
Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
you can preorder it at rush hour thus transpiring it must be going to get a fullerrelease. p fran...@thatamazingthing wrote: Ooops! Thought I'd checked there. Ta, that's great (even if I now can't help checking that record I can't buy ;-). From: gavin morrissey [mailto:gavinmorris...@gmail.com] Sent: 16 April 2009 17:32 you can check sound clips at rush hour http://www.rushhour.nl/store_detailed.php?item=48615 -- Playing - 6th June - under_score w/ Rob Hall - 11th June - Sheffield - 27th June - NYC Downlow - Glastonbury Placid on the t'interweb - http://www.acid-house.net Vinyl for Sale - http://www.discogs.com/sell/list?seller=placid Placid's Gigs and Gigography - http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?gid=41658902688 Live on Future-music.co.uk every other Thursday - 8pm - 10pm
Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
fran...@thatamazingthing wrote:
Andrew
Thanks for the help. I can see you've been rinsing this one with it appearing
in 8 shows! Unfortunately only one mix still appears
to be available (I presume the presence of a link indicates this) but I can't get that
one to go ("Object not found") either.
Apologies for directing you to a dead link, Francis. I just checked now
and see that show was
for February 4. I had taken the show itself off my server in order to
make way for a newer show,
but I forget to take the link off the show archive page. I'll get that
taken care of.
With all the renewed talk of this EP, I had already planned on playing a
track from it on this week's
show (which I'll likely mix tonight), and I'll still do so, along with
new material from Aux 88, The Black Dog,
Reade Truth on Planet E and lots more goodies (Kai Alce on Deep
Explorer, Florence
and/or Wladimir M. on Eevonext, Speedy J remixing Terrence Fixmer, Kai
Alce on
his NADTL imprint, and more).
Andrew
--
Andrew Duke In The Mix weekly mixshow (est. 1987), excl. DJ mixes, PAs,
interviews:
http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html
sound design and music content provider:
http://cognitionaudioworks.com/sounddesignandmusic.html
sound design, music, production, DJ courses:
http://andrew-duke.com/course.html
http://myspace.com/andrewduke
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1614666166
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Andrew+Duke
http://www.residentadvisor.net/dj-page.aspx?id=5947
Andrew Duke Cognition Audioworks
57 Hastings Drive Dartmouth NS Canada B2Y 2C7
RE: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
Ooops! Thought I'd checked there. Ta, that's great (even if I now can't help checking that record I can't buy ;-). > From: gavin morrissey [mailto:gavinmorris...@gmail.com] > Sent: 16 April 2009 17:32 > > you can check sound clips at rush hour > > http://www.rushhour.nl/store_detailed.php?item=48615
Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
you can check sound clips at rush hour
http://www.rushhour.nl/store_detailed.php?item=48615
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Beddow wrote:
>
> Morphine generally do generous/effectively unlimited pressings so this
> is a bit of a surprise. the 500 copies didn't show up anywhere I
> usually shop, either. A shame.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:14 PM, fran...@thatamazingthing
> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > Thanks for the help. I can see you've been rinsing this one with it
> > appearing in 8 shows! Unfortunately only one mix still appears
> > to be available (I presume the presence of a link indicates this) but I
> > can't get that one to go ("Object not found") either.
> >
> > But no worries as there are 2 alternatives for me:
> >
> > 1. The record is available at a shop - in which case I can check clips
> > there
> >
> > 2. It isn't - in which case I probably don't want to hear it as if I do
> > like it I will then get frustrated at not being able to get
> > it and it will join the list of records I want but missed. So transitory
> > has the nature of vinyl become, with people only daring to
> > do small runs, that things get on this list all to easily now. The list is
> > getting big and I find it healthier just to rip it up
> > and not spend daft amounts of time ferreting out things I might want but
> > missed at the time.
> >
> > As it is Shake was kind enough to drop me a line to say that it looks like
> > those copies weren't promos, the label only wanted to do
> > 500, they're gone and that looks like the end of it.
> >
> > The shame is I can totally understand a label doing small runs with
> > seemingly diminishing sales, they've got to keep viable (this
> > isn't meant to ignite a "is vinyl dead?" / "no, indie bands are selling
> > loads of 7s!" debate) but observing how things run at my
> > local shop it's obvious that it works 2 ways and all the limited runs are
> > part responsible for the diminution - sometimes they could
> > sell many times over what they get. I'll go in for a record and it's like
> > "no, you missed that one" when I am right on watching
> > their website for new stuff and live just round the corner.
> >
> > In times past when there wasn't such a through-put of material I reckon a
> > record could be shipped in, sit on the shelf for a while,
> > have people gradually hear it out and about and rate it / hear about how
> > good it was and then it would slowly get picked up - a
> > "sleeper". What chance of that now?
> >
> > Francis
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Andrew Duke [mailto:and...@andrew-duke.com]
> > > Sent: 15 April 2009 17:43
> > > To: 313@hyperreal.org
> > > Subject: Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
> > >
> > > fran...@thatamazingthing wrote:
> > > > This came out in Feb?
> > > >
> > > > I didn't hear about it, did I miss it on here?
> > > >
> > > > Somebody tell me about it - maybe including where there might be clips
> > > > and I can buy it from?
> > > >
> > > > Mr. Shakir?
> > > >
> > > Hi, Francis.
> > > Promos have been out for awhile, but it is not officially available till
> > > later this month.
> > > I've been playing the heck out of it on my mixshow (charted it, too)
> > > since I got the promo;
> > > just checked, and it is featured in some of the mixshows that are
> > > *still* available online here:
> > > http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html
> >
Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
Morphine generally do generous/effectively unlimited pressings so this
is a bit of a surprise. the 500 copies didn't show up anywhere I
usually shop, either. A shame.
Andrew
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 4:14 PM, fran...@thatamazingthing
wrote:
>
> Andrew
>
> Thanks for the help. I can see you've been rinsing this one with it
> appearing in 8 shows! Unfortunately only one mix still appears
> to be available (I presume the presence of a link indicates this) but I can't
> get that one to go ("Object not found") either.
>
> But no worries as there are 2 alternatives for me:
>
> 1. The record is available at a shop - in which case I can check clips there
>
> 2. It isn't - in which case I probably don't want to hear it as if I do like
> it I will then get frustrated at not being able to get
> it and it will join the list of records I want but missed. So transitory has
> the nature of vinyl become, with people only daring to
> do small runs, that things get on this list all to easily now. The list is
> getting big and I find it healthier just to rip it up
> and not spend daft amounts of time ferreting out things I might want but
> missed at the time.
>
> As it is Shake was kind enough to drop me a line to say that it looks like
> those copies weren't promos, the label only wanted to do
> 500, they're gone and that looks like the end of it.
>
> The shame is I can totally understand a label doing small runs with seemingly
> diminishing sales, they've got to keep viable (this
> isn't meant to ignite a "is vinyl dead?" / "no, indie bands are selling loads
> of 7s!" debate) but observing how things run at my
> local shop it's obvious that it works 2 ways and all the limited runs are
> part responsible for the diminution - sometimes they could
> sell many times over what they get. I'll go in for a record and it's like
> "no, you missed that one" when I am right on watching
> their website for new stuff and live just round the corner.
>
> In times past when there wasn't such a through-put of material I reckon a
> record could be shipped in, sit on the shelf for a while,
> have people gradually hear it out and about and rate it / hear about how good
> it was and then it would slowly get picked up - a
> "sleeper". What chance of that now?
>
> Francis
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrew Duke [mailto:and...@andrew-duke.com]
> > Sent: 15 April 2009 17:43
> > To: 313@hyperreal.org
> > Subject: Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
> >
> > fran...@thatamazingthing wrote:
> > > This came out in Feb?
> > >
> > > I didn't hear about it, did I miss it on here?
> > >
> > > Somebody tell me about it - maybe including where there might be clips
> > > and I can buy it from?
> > >
> > > Mr. Shakir?
> > >
> > Hi, Francis.
> > Promos have been out for awhile, but it is not officially available till
> > later this month.
> > I've been playing the heck out of it on my mixshow (charted it, too)
> > since I got the promo;
> > just checked, and it is featured in some of the mixshows that are
> > *still* available online here:
> > http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html
>
RE: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
Andrew
Thanks for the help. I can see you've been rinsing this one with it appearing
in 8 shows! Unfortunately only one mix still appears
to be available (I presume the presence of a link indicates this) but I can't
get that one to go ("Object not found") either.
But no worries as there are 2 alternatives for me:
1. The record is available at a shop - in which case I can check clips there
2. It isn't - in which case I probably don't want to hear it as if I do like
it I will then get frustrated at not being able to get
it and it will join the list of records I want but missed. So transitory has
the nature of vinyl become, with people only daring to
do small runs, that things get on this list all to easily now. The list is
getting big and I find it healthier just to rip it up
and not spend daft amounts of time ferreting out things I might want but missed
at the time.
As it is Shake was kind enough to drop me a line to say that it looks like
those copies weren't promos, the label only wanted to do
500, they're gone and that looks like the end of it.
The shame is I can totally understand a label doing small runs with seemingly
diminishing sales, they've got to keep viable (this
isn't meant to ignite a "is vinyl dead?" / "no, indie bands are selling loads
of 7s!" debate) but observing how things run at my
local shop it's obvious that it works 2 ways and all the limited runs are part
responsible for the diminution - sometimes they could
sell many times over what they get. I'll go in for a record and it's like "no,
you missed that one" when I am right on watching
their website for new stuff and live just round the corner.
In times past when there wasn't such a through-put of material I reckon a
record could be shipped in, sit on the shelf for a while,
have people gradually hear it out and about and rate it / hear about how good
it was and then it would slowly get picked up - a
"sleeper". What chance of that now?
Francis
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Duke [mailto:and...@andrew-duke.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2009 17:43
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
>
> fran...@thatamazingthing wrote:
> > This came out in Feb?
> >
> > I didn't hear about it, did I miss it on here?
> >
> > Somebody tell me about it - maybe including where there might be clips and
> > I can buy it from?
> >
> > Mr. Shakir?
> >
> Hi, Francis.
> Promos have been out for awhile, but it is not officially available till
> later this month.
> I've been playing the heck out of it on my mixshow (charted it, too)
> since I got the promo;
> just checked, and it is featured in some of the mixshows that are
> *still* available online here:
> http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html
Re: (313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
fran...@thatamazingthing wrote: This came out in Feb? I didn't hear about it, did I miss it on here? Somebody tell me about it - maybe including where there might be clips and I can buy it from? Mr. Shakir? Hi, Francis. Promos have been out for awhile, but it is not officially available till later this month. I've been playing the heck out of it on my mixshow (charted it, too) since I got the promo; just checked, and it is featured in some of the mixshows that are *still* available online here: http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html -- Andrew Duke In The Mix weekly mixshow (est. 1987), excl. DJ mixes, PAs, interviews: http://cognitionaudioworks.com/AndrewDukeInTheMix.html sound design and music content provider: http://cognitionaudioworks.com/sounddesignandmusic.html sound design, music, production, DJ courses: http://andrew-duke.com/course.html http://myspace.com/andrewduke http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1614666166 http://www.discogs.com/artist/Andrew+Duke http://www.residentadvisor.net/dj-page.aspx?id=5947 Andrew Duke Cognition Audioworks 57 Hastings Drive Dartmouth NS Canada B2Y 2C7
(313) Shake : Levitate Venice EP on Morphine Records
This came out in Feb? I didn't hear about it, did I miss it on here? Somebody tell me about it - maybe including where there might be clips and I can buy it from? Mr. Shakir?
(313) Shake, Todd Osborn, BMG and Chuck Hampton
They played this past Friday in Detroit. The whole night was fantastic! At the top of my list for nights out ever! Music was excellent, crowd was full (which is saying a lot in Detroit!), great night all around. I've written more on my blog if you're interested: www.denisedjsdetroit.blogspot.com And by the way, Shake, your set was awesome! I love going out to see you play...thank you! Todd, don't know if you read this list, but if you do...same! I was too sleepy to stick around for BMG's set and arrived at the end of Chuck Hampton's, so that's the only reason I don't have anything to say about that. Denise -- Denise Dalphond Ph.D. Candidate Department of Folklore & Ethnomusicology Indiana University www.denisedjsdetroit.blogspot.com
Re: (313) shake tracks
"Arise" is far-and-away my favorite Shake tune. So sexy. A On Wed, January 28, 2009 6:36 am, Wibo Lammerts wrote: > Shock Therapy > (http://www.discogs.com/Schematics-Shock-Therapy/release/39070) > > Arise (http://www.discogs.com/Shake--Waiting-For-Russell/release/48567) > > > > > 2009/1/28 : >> Sandblaster! (Soundblaster?) Best track everrr. >> Great fun to mix too :). >> Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device >
Re: (313) shake tracks
Shock Therapy (http://www.discogs.com/Schematics-Shock-Therapy/release/39070) Arise (http://www.discogs.com/Shake--Waiting-For-Russell/release/48567) 2009/1/28 : > Sandblaster! (Soundblaster?) Best track everrr. > Great fun to mix too :). > Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device
Re: (313) shake tracks
On 28 Jan 2009, at 11:29, chesterm...@googlemail.com wrote: Sandblaster! (Soundblaster?) Best track everrr. Great fun to mix too :). Yes! Actually I'd forgotten this as it's probably the only thing I don't have an original for (I have it on a compilation). Christiaan take note :) robin...
Re: (313) shake tracks
Sandblaster! (Soundblaster?) Best track everrr. Great fun to mix too :). Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
RE: (313) Shake interview up
I'm gonna jump in and say great interview Tom! I like that you kept the idiomatic way he speaks in there too; we can almost here the man speak. Errmmm, I haven't finished it because I'm busy here but will the second I get a chance. Excellent. Cheers, Ken -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 August 2007 19:19 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: (313) Shake interview up http://infinitestatemachine.com/ includes an mp3 clip from the forthcoming album! tom
Re: (313) Shake interview up
Good stuff Tom (and of course Shake). Look forward to the next part and more clips... robin... On 20 Aug 2007, at 19:18, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: http://infinitestatemachine.com/ includes an mp3 clip from the forthcoming album! tom
Re: (313) Shake interview up
Another great interview Tom, thanks. Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: http://infinitestatemachine.com/ includes an mp3 clip from the forthcoming album! tom
RE: (313) Shake interview up
Hot interview. It's cool to hear him speak about the last few years as a simple learning curve. And to hear the way things were with the jit/prep situation. Can't wait for the album. His-tory. K Mwnb Atl -Original Message- From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 2:19 PM To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: (313) Shake interview up http://infinitestatemachine.com/ includes an mp3 clip from the forthcoming album! tom
(313) Shake interview up
http://infinitestatemachine.com/ includes an mp3 clip from the forthcoming album! tom
Re: (313) Shake at the City Fest...
Fantastic performance Shake, Thanks! ..I'll second that. Great selections and tight as a drum. jeff
(313) Shake at the City Fest...
If any of you attended the Detroit City Fest, there was very nice performance by Liz Copeland who preceded an awesome set by Shake. It was great to hear Mike Banks' new track, UR-071, high tech realities, on a big system - I'm really glad he worked it in so nicely. I did have one question regarding the "Is it real" track.. I noticed that the bass line seemed the same as Shakes track "Simpatico" on Songs for My Mother. Was this a re-mix or was I just having an auditory hallucination? As usual, lots of great tracks put together tastefully - not a surprise... Fantastic performance Shake, Thanks! -terry
RE: (313) Shake
Yeah, I downloaded that - another excellent mix! Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: David Beattie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 June 2007 09:24 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake For those interested there appears to be a new Shake set on the site that Rob posted, its not letting me download right now (says im over my limit) so I cant coment on the set but im sure it will be worth your bandwidth ;-) http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-04-30_-_Anthony_Shakir_%40_Rote_Son ne_Club%2C_Munich Cheers BT --- robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fair point. You're right :) > > http://mixesdb.com > > robin... > > Robert Taylor wrote: > > The source site of that mix is well worth checking > out - there's > > hundreds of mixes! > > > # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
Re: (313) Shake
For those interested there appears to be a new Shake set on the site that Rob posted, its not letting me download right now (says im over my limit) so I cant coment on the set but im sure it will be worth your bandwidth ;-) http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-04-30_-_Anthony_Shakir_%40_Rote_Sonne_Club%2C_Munich Cheers BT --- robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fair point. You're right :) > > http://mixesdb.com > > robin... > > Robert Taylor wrote: > > The source site of that mix is well worth checking > out - there's > > hundreds of mixes! > > >
RE: (313) Shake
> -Original Message- > From: Minto George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 June 2007 19:16 > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) Shake > > First Shake set I ever caught was at the Black Nation Records > party with Mills and Surgeon. Claude Young and Shake killed > on that night! some of the most amazing mixing I ever heard > at a party. Was that the one on the 4th of July? I'm still kicking myself for missing that party. Was all set to go and backed out at the last minute. Tristan === http://www.phonopsia.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (313) Shake
First Shake set I ever caught was at the Black Nation Records party with Mills and Surgeon. Claude Young and Shake killed on that night! some of the most amazing mixing I ever heard at a party. And considering he lent some instruction to Claude Young before he made it on the global circuit, you gotta have some respect for this man. And his production and music is completely unique and a style all his own! down low music http://downlowmusic.org UPCOMING '07 Convextion dLVEXTCD Nebraska dLNEBLP NEW dL sister label VEXT
Re: (313) Shake
I'm sure Shake is listening, and that the reason he hasn't chimed in on this thread is out of a sense of modesty and tact. Naturally. Personally, I wonder if he's interested in getting into the whole mix MP3 game. At home I think he's very focused on creating his own music, and when I've seen him spin his sets are very much in the moment and specific to the setting and the people present. I've never seen him record his sets, so it may be one of those 'you had to be there' things. Oh yeah, what i mean is: if there any recordings knocking about then we'd love to hear them. I know a lot of DJs that don't record mixes. It's a slightly unnatural thing to do for some people. robin...
Re: (313) Shake
I'm sure Shake is listening, and that the reason he hasn't chimed in on this thread is out of a sense of modesty and tact. Personally, I wonder if he's interested in getting into the whole mix MP3 game. At home I think he's very focused on creating his own music, and when I've seen him spin his sets are very much in the moment and specific to the setting and the people present. I've never seen him record his sets, so it may be one of those 'you had to be there' things. On 6/7/07, robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well I listened to the mix I posted yesterday and it was awesome - > worthy of many repeat listens! Absolutely. Shame it isn't longer as he proper gets into the swing nearer the end. Shake, if you're tuned in, some of us are craving more online DJ mixes from you robin...
Re: (313) Shake
Well I listened to the mix I posted yesterday and it was awesome - worthy of many repeat listens! Absolutely. Shame it isn't longer as he proper gets into the swing nearer the end. Shake, if you're tuned in, some of us are craving more online DJ mixes from you robin...
RE: (313) Shake
Well I listened to the mix I posted yesterday and it was awesome - worthy of many repeat listens! Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: Odeluga, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 June 2007 07:40 To: Klaas-Jan Jongsma; 313 Mailinglist List Subject: RE: (313) Shake I don't think anyone is 'untouchable' myself. Still, it seems to be a minority of folk capable of finding something to gripe about, as is their right. I'm just glad for the music he's made which I can say; hand on heart, has enriched my life, and although I've never actually heard him DJ, people I respect (some of them extremely critical!) have consistently said they've enjoyed these sets - even after taking into account the fact that they may not always be technically 100% perfect. Ken On 6-jun-2007, at 2:50, /0 wrote: > anthony is a good man. the guy knows what a mixer is and how it > works, so if there were problems, it wasnt that he didn't know how to > use the mixer. > > sheesh, there are some untouchable kind personalities in this scene, > and he is one of them. I totally agree, Shake is The Untouchable ;) period # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
RE: (313) Shake
I don't think anyone is 'untouchable' myself. Still, it seems to be a minority of folk capable of finding something to gripe about, as is their right. I'm just glad for the music he's made which I can say; hand on heart, has enriched my life, and although I've never actually heard him DJ, people I respect (some of them extremely critical!) have consistently said they've enjoyed these sets - even after taking into account the fact that they may not always be technically 100% perfect. Ken On 6-jun-2007, at 2:50, /0 wrote: > anthony is a good man. the guy knows what a mixer is and how it > works, so if there were problems, it wasnt that he didn't know how > to use the mixer. > > sheesh, there are some untouchable kind personalities in this > scene, and he is one of them. I totally agree, Shake is The Untouchable ;) period
Re: (313) Shake
On 6-jun-2007, at 2:50, /0 wrote: anthony is a good man. the guy knows what a mixer is and how it works, so if there were problems, it wasnt that he didn't know how to use the mixer. sheesh, there are some untouchable kind personalities in this scene, and he is one of them. I totally agree, Shake is The Untouchable ;) period
RE: (313) Shake
there's a superb Juan Atkins @ Metroplex, Detroit, 1998 that I'd love to get a tracklist for. It's got some amazing tracks on it. -Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2007 09:59 To: Robert Taylor Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake Fair point. You're right :) http://mixesdb.com robin... Robert Taylor wrote: > The source site of that mix is well worth checking out - there's > hundreds of mixes! > For all the latest news and comment visit www.telegraph.co.uk. This message, its contents and any attachments to it are private, confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination of the whole or part of this message (without our prior written consent) is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Incoming and outgoing telephone calls to our offices may be monitored or recorded for training and quality control purposes and for confirming orders and information. Telegraph Media Group Limited is a limited liability company registered in England and Wales (company number 451593). Our registered office address is: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT.
Re: (313) Shake
Fair point. You're right :) http://mixesdb.com robin... Robert Taylor wrote: The source site of that mix is well worth checking out - there's hundreds of mixes!
RE: (313) Shake
The source site of that mix is well worth checking out - there's hundreds of mixes! Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2007 09:21 To: Robert Taylor Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake Nice one Rob. It was a proper pain to get that link working, this one might work better (it's not the real mp3 but it's a step away): http://rapidshare.com/files/35069865/Anthony__Shake__Shakir___FM4_La_Bou m_Deluxe_04.05.2007.mp3 robin... Robert Taylor wrote: > Just found this: > > http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-05-04_-_Anthony_%27Shake%27_Shaki > r_ > %40_La_Boum_Deluxe%2C_FM4 > > > Rob Taylor > VT Librarian > x8599 > Hatch Desk x1088 > VT Library Users' Guide > > -Original Message- > From: jurren baars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 June 2007 08:59 > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) Shake > > paul mouser wrote: >> is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? >> > i know of three mixes that were at one point available on the > interweb, none of these mixes - to my knowledge - are now still > available, unless you can find someone that has stored these mixes on his/her computer. > these mixes are: > > - a two hour mix from a black nation records party in kalamazoo (used > to be available on the black nation website) > - shake's mix at the first demf, approx an hour and a half (used to be > available on groovetech.com) > - recording from a party in paris, france: paradise massage (used to > be available on d-i-r-t-y.org or .net) > > i hope someone still has that bnr mix! > > _ > Live Search, for accurate results! http://www.live.nl > > ## > ### > Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation > unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or > entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thank You. > > Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 > # # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
RE: (313) Shake
Robert Taylor wrote: Just found this: http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-05-04_-_Anthony_%27Shake%27_Shakir_ %40_La_Boum_Deluxe%2C_FM4 great thanks! doing a google-search for "anthony shakir la boum deluxe" also provided me with links to downloads of another mix: anthony shakir at "rote sonne". _ Play online games with your friends with Messenger http://www.join.msn.com/messenger/overview
Re: (313) Shake
Nice one Rob. It was a proper pain to get that link working, this one might work better (it's not the real mp3 but it's a step away): http://rapidshare.com/files/35069865/Anthony__Shake__Shakir___FM4_La_Boum_Deluxe_04.05.2007.mp3 robin... Robert Taylor wrote: Just found this: http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-05-04_-_Anthony_%27Shake%27_Shakir_ %40_La_Boum_Deluxe%2C_FM4 Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: jurren baars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2007 08:59 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake paul mouser wrote: is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? i know of three mixes that were at one point available on the interweb, none of these mixes - to my knowledge - are now still available, unless you can find someone that has stored these mixes on his/her computer. these mixes are: - a two hour mix from a black nation records party in kalamazoo (used to be available on the black nation website) - shake's mix at the first demf, approx an hour and a half (used to be available on groovetech.com) - recording from a party in paris, france: paradise massage (used to be available on d-i-r-t-y.org or .net) i hope someone still has that bnr mix! _ Live Search, for accurate results! http://www.live.nl # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
Re: (313) Shake
Ohhh, hmmm, I bet it is possible get ahold of that Black Nation set... would be fun to hear that again! Still remember that party, seems like so much has changed since those days. I hadn't been going to techno events long when I attended that (listened to it long before I went to a party). ~David On 6/6/07, jurren baars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: paul mouser wrote: > >is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? > i know of three mixes that were at one point available on the interweb, none of these mixes - to my knowledge - are now still available, unless you can find someone that has stored these mixes on his/her computer. these mixes are: - a two hour mix from a black nation records party in kalamazoo (used to be available on the black nation website) - shake's mix at the first demf, approx an hour and a half (used to be available on groovetech.com) - recording from a party in paris, france: paradise massage (used to be available on d-i-r-t-y.org or .net) i hope someone still has that bnr mix! _ Live Search, for accurate results! http://www.live.nl
RE: (313) Shake
Just found this: http://mixesdb.com/db/index.php/2007-05-04_-_Anthony_%27Shake%27_Shakir_ %40_La_Boum_Deluxe%2C_FM4 Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: jurren baars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2007 08:59 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake paul mouser wrote: > >is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? > i know of three mixes that were at one point available on the interweb, none of these mixes - to my knowledge - are now still available, unless you can find someone that has stored these mixes on his/her computer. these mixes are: - a two hour mix from a black nation records party in kalamazoo (used to be available on the black nation website) - shake's mix at the first demf, approx an hour and a half (used to be available on groovetech.com) - recording from a party in paris, france: paradise massage (used to be available on d-i-r-t-y.org or .net) i hope someone still has that bnr mix! _ Live Search, for accurate results! http://www.live.nl # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
Re: (313) Shake
paul mouser wrote: is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? i know of three mixes that were at one point available on the interweb, none of these mixes - to my knowledge - are now still available, unless you can find someone that has stored these mixes on his/her computer. these mixes are: - a two hour mix from a black nation records party in kalamazoo (used to be available on the black nation website) - shake's mix at the first demf, approx an hour and a half (used to be available on groovetech.com) - recording from a party in paris, france: paradise massage (used to be available on d-i-r-t-y.org or .net) i hope someone still has that bnr mix! _ Live Search, for accurate results! http://www.live.nl
RE: (313) Shake
No way, Anchorman is wy better than Virgin ;) Rob Taylor VT Librarian x8599 Hatch Desk x1088 VT Library Users' Guide -Original Message- From: jwan allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 June 2007 17:23 To: 313-List Subject: Fwd: (313) Shake Wow, it's pretty early in the morning to read such asine comments and I haven't even read the AP wire yet. Before I begin, I have to take some responsibilty here, since I did provide certain treats that obviously clouded his thinking. That being said, lets debunk this myth of the same set. 1) The previous set couldn't have contained the new UR record since I jjust handed it to Shake 5 min before he played it (great record by the way everyone should go out and buy it, if you haven't already done so) and I haven't spoken to Doc brown lately. 2) I'm sure the records you recognized were in fact his own records that he was dropping, and as a fellow label co-owner, I hold no ill will against someone dropping their own sh!t, especially when it's fanf%ckingtastic. 3) Wow that's the first time i've heard someone complain about hearing classics, I'm speechless on that one. 4) As for the mixer I'll take the hit on that one as well. I realized that at times the low pass filter was pushed down on the right table and I didn't intervene. I'm sorry that I ruined your experience, my bad. But I noticed that everyone else was having the time of their lives, myself included. 5) As for finding the fantastic music he dropped boring, that's your loss. But then again I shouldn't expect that much from someone who enjoys Anchorman over the 40-year old virgin. For those readers who have no idea what I'm referring to, trust me when I say there's no comparison, the virgin crushes the Anchorman. Stay classy 313;) jw n 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at > his set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year > ago at an after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. > the only difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he > juggled phillips track last time. > and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good > the year before. boring this year. > And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize > yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked > confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. > Let the hating begin! > Anthony Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" # Note: Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This email and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank You. Channel 4, 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX. VAT no. GB 626475817 #
Re: Re: (313) Shake
anthony is a good man. the guy knows what a mixer is and how it works, so if there were problems, it wasnt that he didn't know how to use the mixer. sheesh, there are some untouchable kind personalities in this scene, and he is one of them. -Joe - Original Message - From: "Greg Earle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:35 PM Subject: Re: Re: (313) Shake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at an after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled phillips track last time. and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the year before. boring this year. And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. Let the hating begin! First of all, Shake is on this mailing list and posted fairly recently, if I'm not mistaken. Please be respectful to this man who has given us all so much to be happy for. Second, as Melody noted, several DJs had problems with that same mixer in the Real Detroit tent. I talked to Shake after the Claude Young after-party, since I cannot pass up a chance to talk to that man :D I started to say how much I liked his set at the festival, because I love how he mixes it up track selection-wise. Nobody sounds like him 'cos nobody thinks like him. He quickly corrected me and said that it wasn't that good, and of course the mixer issue came up. If I recall, he said good track selection wasn't good enough. To me, it's always interesting to see the difference in perspective from the performer to the punter - I heard several Well-Known DJs that I thought went over well grousing about their sets, whether it be the wind (on the Pyramid Stage) or the mixer or ... you name it. Glad I'm not a DJ! - Greg (who still can't believe Shake found B.E.F. in a bargain-bin record store in LA the day he played it)
Re: Re: (313) Shake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at an after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled phillips track last time. and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the year before. boring this year. And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. Let the hating begin! First of all, Shake is on this mailing list and posted fairly recently, if I'm not mistaken. Please be respectful to this man who has given us all so much to be happy for. Second, as Melody noted, several DJs had problems with that same mixer in the Real Detroit tent. I talked to Shake after the Claude Young after-party, since I cannot pass up a chance to talk to that man :D I started to say how much I liked his set at the festival, because I love how he mixes it up track selection-wise. Nobody sounds like him 'cos nobody thinks like him. He quickly corrected me and said that it wasn't that good, and of course the mixer issue came up. If I recall, he said good track selection wasn't good enough. To me, it's always interesting to see the difference in perspective from the performer to the punter - I heard several Well-Known DJs that I thought went over well grousing about their sets, whether it be the wind (on the Pyramid Stage) or the mixer or ... you name it. Glad I'm not a DJ! - Greg (who still can't believe Shake found B.E.F. in a bargain-bin record store in LA the day he played it)
Re: (313) Shake
I'll tell you what, one of the great moments of the festival was watching Shake waving his cane around in glee right behind Claude Young while Claude was revving it up during his set and making "I Feel Love" do things it has never done before :) fh - >I'm just mad as hell Shake didn't rock doubles of Shalamar, George >Benson or I-Level. > > >Had he done that, I think all of you would be licking the wheels of >his badmotorscooter with your tongues. Hell, you should be doing that >already. >
Re: (313) Shake EP
Yep, get a feeling was also released earlier on trackmode, you should hunt that one down as well. I've got that one myself. All 4 tracks(Well 3 tracks and a remix) are stellar I'm gonna have to track that down thenI thought I had most Shake records. robin...
Re: (313) Shake EP
jwan allen wrote: Yep, get a feeling was also released earlier on trackmode, you should hunt that one down as well. I've got that one myself. All 4 tracks(Well 3 tracks and a remix) are stellar Dave jw On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I have it. Great record. MEK "M Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2007 12:51:29 PM: > [woops I keep forgetting to send in plain txt] > > Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? > > http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 > > I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a > few people in Detroit! > > Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time > driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) > > > m
Re: (313) Shake EP
On 6/5/07, jwan allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yep, get a feeling was also released earlier on trackmode, you should hunt that one down as well. yeah that is the one: http://www.discogs.com/release/9908 superb EP, i commented on it there on discogs! tom
Re: (313) Shake
Ooh Tony and Jwan should start biting each other's flesh! Whoever wins gets to create a plaque declaring Shake's status as a DJ! On 6/5/07, theREALmxyzptlk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: jwan allen wrote: > Sarcasm from Greek σαρκασμός (sarkasmos), 'mockery, sarcasm' is > sneering, jesting, or mocking at a person, situation or thing. It actually breaks down into 'flesh-biting'. I was a Greek major in a former matriculation. ;-) jeff
Re: (313) Shake
jwan allen wrote: Sarcasm from Greek σαρκασμός (sarkasmos), 'mockery, sarcasm' is sneering, jesting, or mocking at a person, situation or thing. It actually breaks down into 'flesh-biting'. I was a Greek major in a former matriculation. ;-) jeff
Re: (313) Shake
thank you for the definition and the history of the word jw but i think the reality of what happend and what you said was to close to be sarcastic. If i am wrong and you were just saying "he musta been on some drugs to feel that way about the set" then i apologize for taking it personal. anthony On Tue, June 5, 2007 3:00 pm, jwan allen wrote: > Sarcasm from Greek ÏαÏκαÏμÏÏ (sarkasmos), 'mockery, sarcasm' is > sneering, jesting, or mocking at a person, situation or thing. It is > strongly associated with irony, with some definitions classifying it > as a type of verbal irony intended to insult or wound[1] â stating the > opposite of the intended meaning, e.g. using "that's fantastic" to > mean "that's awful". It is used mostly in a humorous manner, and is > expressed through vocal intonations such as over-emphasizing the > actual statement or particular words. Use of sarcasm is sometimes > viewed as an expression of concealed anger[2] or annoyance. > > > > On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, June 5, 2007 2:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > You guys are funny!! my last words on the subject: Whenever i see >> shake i >> > usually leave saying "wow, i need to buy new reocords" and that didn't >> > happen this year. >> > sorry if i had an opinion that was diffrent from everyone else. >> > >> > p.s. shake's set was on saturday jwan. You didn't give me any mind >> > altering substance till sunday. maybe you should lay off the drugs and >> > come back to sanity if you can't even remember waht day was what. >> > a >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, June 5, 2007 6:27 am, Nick Hardie wrote: >> >> I'll second that. >> >> >> >> FWIW I didn't make it to DEMF, but whenever I've seen Shake, he's >> >> never failed to impress me >> >> >> >> On 05/06/07, Fred Heutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> "please familarize yourself with the mixer" >> >>> >> >>> Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records >> >>> (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also >> >>> recognize checking the equipment with the previous user >> >>> rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. >> >>> >> >>> I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw >> >>> various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic >> >>> working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three >> >>> or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable >> >>> manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts >> >>> and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- >> >>> where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all >> >>> that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF >> >>> tent as the case may be). >> >>> >> >>> I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things >> >>> to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single >> >>> model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and >> >>> start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones >> >>> are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and >> >>> the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in >> >>> many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty >> >>> astonishing to see. >> >>> >> >>> Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but >> >>> give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost >> >>> always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system >> >>> yourself. >> >>> >> >>> fh >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Technoir Audio > http://www.technoiraudio.com > "dealing with your imperfect world" >
Re: (313) Shake
I understand. noted. On Tue, June 5, 2007 3:07 pm, Nick Hardie wrote: > Hi Anthony > > I wasn't saying you were wrong, just seconding the bit about cutting > people a bit of slack about the mixer! > > Nick > > On 05/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You guys are funny!! my last words on the subject: Whenever i see shake >> i >> usually leave saying "wow, i need to buy new reocords" and that didn't >> happen this year. >> sorry if i had an opinion that was diffrent from everyone else. >> >> p.s. shake's set was on saturday jwan. You didn't give me any mind >> altering substance till sunday. maybe you should lay off the drugs and >> come back to sanity if you can't even remember waht day was what. >> a >> >> >> >> On Tue, June 5, 2007 6:27 am, Nick Hardie wrote: >> > I'll second that. >> > >> > FWIW I didn't make it to DEMF, but whenever I've seen Shake, he's >> > never failed to impress me >> > >> > On 05/06/07, Fred Heutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> "please familarize yourself with the mixer" >> >> >> >> Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records >> >> (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also >> >> recognize checking the equipment with the previous user >> >> rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. >> >> >> >> I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw >> >> various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic >> >> working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three >> >> or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable >> >> manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts >> >> and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- >> >> where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all >> >> that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF >> >> tent as the case may be). >> >> >> >> I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things >> >> to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single >> >> model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and >> >> start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones >> >> are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and >> >> the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in >> >> many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty >> >> astonishing to see. >> >> >> >> Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but >> >> give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost >> >> always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system >> >> yourself. >> >> >> >> fh >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >
Re: (313) Shake
Sarcasm from Greek σαρκασμός (sarkasmos), 'mockery, sarcasm' is sneering, jesting, or mocking at a person, situation or thing. It is strongly associated with irony, with some definitions classifying it as a type of verbal irony intended to insult or wound[1] — stating the opposite of the intended meaning, e.g. using "that's fantastic" to mean "that's awful". It is used mostly in a humorous manner, and is expressed through vocal intonations such as over-emphasizing the actual statement or particular words. Use of sarcasm is sometimes viewed as an expression of concealed anger[2] or annoyance. On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, June 5, 2007 2:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You guys are funny!! my last words on the subject: Whenever i see shake i > usually leave saying "wow, i need to buy new reocords" and that didn't > happen this year. > sorry if i had an opinion that was diffrent from everyone else. > > p.s. shake's set was on saturday jwan. You didn't give me any mind > altering substance till sunday. maybe you should lay off the drugs and > come back to sanity if you can't even remember waht day was what. > a > > > > On Tue, June 5, 2007 6:27 am, Nick Hardie wrote: >> I'll second that. >> >> FWIW I didn't make it to DEMF, but whenever I've seen Shake, he's >> never failed to impress me >> >> On 05/06/07, Fred Heutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> "please familarize yourself with the mixer" >>> >>> Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records >>> (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also >>> recognize checking the equipment with the previous user >>> rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. >>> >>> I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw >>> various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic >>> working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three >>> or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable >>> manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts >>> and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- >>> where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all >>> that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF >>> tent as the case may be). >>> >>> I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things >>> to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single >>> model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and >>> start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones >>> are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and >>> the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in >>> many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty >>> astonishing to see. >>> >>> Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but >>> give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost >>> always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system >>> yourself. >>> >>> fh >>> >>> >> > > > -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world"
Re: (313) Shake
On Tue, June 5, 2007 2:55 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You guys are funny!! my last words on the subject: Whenever i see shake i > usually leave saying "wow, i need to buy new reocords" and that didn't > happen this year. > sorry if i had an opinion that was diffrent from everyone else. > > p.s. shake's set was on saturday jwan. You didn't give me any mind > altering substance till sunday. maybe you should lay off the drugs and > come back to sanity if you can't even remember waht day was what. > a > > > > On Tue, June 5, 2007 6:27 am, Nick Hardie wrote: >> I'll second that. >> >> FWIW I didn't make it to DEMF, but whenever I've seen Shake, he's >> never failed to impress me >> >> On 05/06/07, Fred Heutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> "please familarize yourself with the mixer" >>> >>> Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records >>> (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also >>> recognize checking the equipment with the previous user >>> rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. >>> >>> I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw >>> various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic >>> working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three >>> or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable >>> manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts >>> and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- >>> where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all >>> that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF >>> tent as the case may be). >>> >>> I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things >>> to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single >>> model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and >>> start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones >>> are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and >>> the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in >>> many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty >>> astonishing to see. >>> >>> Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but >>> give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost >>> always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system >>> yourself. >>> >>> fh >>> >>> >> > > >
(313) Shake at Cityfest July 7th Saturday 4:30pm
Here's the chance to see one of those sets in living color. http://www.newcenter.com/cityfest/2007/puredetroit.htm
Re: (313) Shake
ywah i do know that kell.. whats your point? I didn't say anything about his technique! On Tue, June 5, 2007 8:09 am, Kelly B. Delaney wrote: > re: trainwrecks > You know he has MS, right? > > On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his >> set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at >> an >> after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only >> difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled >> phillips track last time. >> and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good >> the >> year before. boring this year. >> And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself >> with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and >> should >> not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. >> Let the hating begin! >> Anthony >> >> >> >> On Sat, June 2, 2007 8:59 am, Ramon Crespo wrote: >> > I really enjoyed what I hearrd from Shake at the festival. I was only >> > there for 30-45 minutes , but i definitely see why you all praise >> > him. I danced danced !! :) >> > >> > We really need to try to have some sort of official meet up next >> > year. :( >> > >> > I did meet some cool folks from London @ Submerge though. It's >> > amazing how the europeans appreciate this so much than some of the >> > americans. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Ramon >> > >> > >> > On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Terry Hall wrote: >> > >> >> My pleasure, I also echo others comments about the festival - more >> >> fun than anything else - I'm still trying to catch up on sleep! >> >> >> >> -peace, T63 >> >> >> >> On May 30, 2007, at 10:54 PM, theREALmxyzptlk wrote: >> >> >> >>> Thanks for posting that. Likewise to Tom who said something >> >>> similar (maybe offlist). >> >>> I know you're lurking, Tony. >> >>> You do something beyond slick mechanics; it's a gift and it's yours. >> >>> >> >>> jeff >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Terry Hall wrote: >> Regarding Shake's performance - I think it just shows that >> really solid tracks and an extremely personable DJ are important >> performance skills. I was standing 2' from him and we were all >> having a great time. His irreverent style and ability to emanate >> a good vibe seemed more important to the performance than >> technical wizardy without feeling. That was my take-away, >> something I'm going to remember next time I start stressing over >> a missed transition that everyone will forget about the next >> day. Thank you Shake, someone who remembers how to party! >> -peace, T63 >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >
Re: (313) Shake
no, just because it was a year later does not make it boring. It was boring because the same songs were basicly played in the same order in which i heard them played the year before. WAs not was idiotech the track that sampled the police the kid sublime remix of drop it like it's hot. thom yorke's solo thing.. should i keep going. I don't have a great memory which is testament to why i was unimpressed by hearing the same set played worse then the year before is all. personally i love these songs. and i love shake. just didn't do it for me. also id like to know if anyone on the 313 saw his set @ oslo's the year before they might be able to attest as well. cause if you wern't there you have no idea what im talking about. a On Tue, June 5, 2007 9:44 am, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: > On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good >> the >> year before. boring this year. > > so a record is good in 2006 but bad in 2007? lord knows how many times > ive heard you play certain records. > >> And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself >> with the mixer you will be playing with. > > what do you do, go rent a mixer? if you dont have the mixer, you > figure it out when you show up. > >> Let the hating begin! > > as you can see, it already has. you say dumb things, dumb things get > said back to you. its that simple. > > tom >
Re: (313) Shake EP
Yep, get a feeling was also released earlier on trackmode, you should hunt that one down as well. jw On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I have it. Great record. MEK "M Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2007 12:51:29 PM: > [woops I keep forgetting to send in plain txt] > > Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? > > http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 > > I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a > few people in Detroit! > > Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time > driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) > > > m -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world"
Re: (313) Shake EP
Yes, I have it. Great record. MEK "M Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2007 12:51:29 PM: > [woops I keep forgetting to send in plain txt] > > Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? > > http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 > > I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a > few people in Detroit! > > Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time > driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) > > > m
Re: (313) Shake EP
First one got through & I haven't got that so stop rubbing it in ;-) On 05/06/07, M Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [woops I keep forgetting to send in plain txt] Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a few people in Detroit! Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) m
(313) Shake EP
[woops I keep forgetting to send in plain txt] Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a few people in Detroit! Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) m
(313) Shake EP...
Speaking of Shake, is there anyone else out there who owns this Shake EP? http://www.discogs.com/release/70511 I think I got a few "what on earth are you talking about" looks from a few people in Detroit! Hmm anyway, that Get A Feeling track is still one of my all time driving around on a sunny day in my car kinda song.. :) m
Re: (313) Shake
Well, from the reports I read all over the web, it seems most of the european-based djs were all dropping the same boring minimal schtrinimal tunes, so I guess Shake MUST have made a difference. And what's the problem with playing the same records again, if they're good? BTW, can anyone direct me to any recent Shake's sets? Antonio On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at an after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled phillips track last time. and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the year before. boring this year. And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. Let the hating begin! Anthony On Sat, Jun
Re: (313) Shake
There are hardly any! to my disappointment. I think I have one or 2 sitting on a HD somewhere, if I can find it I could make it available. On 6/5/07, paul mouser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? To be honest i have never heard any of his sets. Sounds like an amazing festival very jealous. Be great if we could get a techno sound system at notting hill carnival, i think it would go down well. Thats the problem with techno though the term itself is very misunderstood, but heh maybe its better that way. Always good to surprise people. Have been listening isolee's we are monster this week, fantastic production, could do with a few more albums like that... anyway enough of my rambling. Have good weeks 313ers cheers Paul On 31/05/07, Terry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Regarding Shake's performance - I think it just shows that really > solid tracks and an extremely personable DJ are important performance > skills. I was standing 2' from him and we were all having a great > time. His irreverent style and ability to emanate a good vibe seemed > more important to the performance than technical wizardy without > feeling. That was my take-away, something I'm going to remember next > time I start stressing over a missed transition that everyone will > forget about the next day. Thank you Shake, someone who remembers > how to party! > > -peace, T63 >
Re: (313) Shake
On 05/06/07, jwan allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow, it's pretty early in the morning to read such asine comments and I haven't even read the AP wire yet. There's a lot of praise too!!! For those readers who have no idea what I'm referring to, trust me when I say there's no comparison, the virgin crushes the Anchorman. You were doing so well too...
Fwd: (313) Shake
Wow, it's pretty early in the morning to read such asine comments and I haven't even read the AP wire yet. Before I begin, I have to take some responsibilty here, since I did provide certain treats that obviously clouded his thinking. That being said, lets debunk this myth of the same set. 1) The previous set couldn't have contained the new UR record since I jjust handed it to Shake 5 min before he played it (great record by the way everyone should go out and buy it, if you haven't already done so) and I haven't spoken to Doc brown lately. 2) I'm sure the records you recognized were in fact his own records that he was dropping, and as a fellow label co-owner, I hold no ill will against someone dropping their own sh!t, especially when it's fanf%ckingtastic. 3) Wow that's the first time i've heard someone complain about hearing classics, I'm speechless on that one. 4) As for the mixer I'll take the hit on that one as well. I realized that at times the low pass filter was pushed down on the right table and I didn't intervene. I'm sorry that I ruined your experience, my bad. But I noticed that everyone else was having the time of their lives, myself included. 5) As for finding the fantastic music he dropped boring, that's your loss. But then again I shouldn't expect that much from someone who enjoys Anchorman over the 40-year old virgin. For those readers who have no idea what I'm referring to, trust me when I say there's no comparison, the virgin crushes the Anchorman. Stay classy 313;) jw n 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at an after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled phillips track last time. and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the year before. boring this year. And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. Let the hating begin! Anthony Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world" -- Technoir Audio http://www.technoiraudio.com "dealing with your imperfect world"
Re: (313) Shake
is there any of shakes mixes online for streaming or free downloads? To be honest i have never heard any of his sets. Sounds like an amazing festival very jealous. Be great if we could get a techno sound system at notting hill carnival, i think it would go down well. Thats the problem with techno though the term itself is very misunderstood, but heh maybe its better that way. Always good to surprise people. Have been listening isolee's we are monster this week, fantastic production, could do with a few more albums like that... anyway enough of my rambling. Have good weeks 313ers cheers Paul On 31/05/07, Terry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Regarding Shake's performance - I think it just shows that really solid tracks and an extremely personable DJ are important performance skills. I was standing 2' from him and we were all having a great time. His irreverent style and ability to emanate a good vibe seemed more important to the performance than technical wizardy without feeling. That was my take-away, something I'm going to remember next time I start stressing over a missed transition that everyone will forget about the next day. Thank you Shake, someone who remembers how to party! -peace, T63
Re: (313) Shake
"Shake is the man" Shake is one of the few djs that really takes chances. His mixes are always on the verge of shoes in the dryer, but they are always exciting and usually unexpected and original. He's always been one of my faves and has been an inspiration to my style. David > Crikey > > As far as I'm concerned Shake is the man and I couldn't care less if > he crashed every 12, at least you'd know he was there. I have the > greatest respect for Shake and love his DJ sets because they are so > different from everyone else's. I'm not interested in perfection, > more the selection and this is where Shake is miles in front for me > and so refreshing. It's all about the music. > > m
Re: (313) Shake
On 6/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the year before. boring this year. so a record is good in 2006 but bad in 2007? lord knows how many times ive heard you play certain records. And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself with the mixer you will be playing with. what do you do, go rent a mixer? if you dont have the mixer, you figure it out when you show up. Let the hating begin! as you can see, it already has. you say dumb things, dumb things get said back to you. its that simple. tom
Re: (313) Shake
I'm just mad as hell Shake didn't rock doubles of Shalamar, George Benson or I-Level. Had he done that, I think all of you would be licking the wheels of his badmotorscooter with your tongues. Hell, you should be doing that already.
Re: (313) Shake
Every DJ i saw there had problems with that mixer so I don't think that's a fair comment. Shake had his cousin and a kid from the neighborhood come with him just to look after him, even help him get the records out of the bag, and they were, as I was, just really happy he even made it. He was so tired at the end he wanted to give up! I'm not saying his illness is an "excuse" for anything but Shake was fun and it doesn't really matter he played the same music. I mean, sometimes I hear a "similar" mix by dj after dj and that's ok if everything else is (crowd, atmosphere) works. I'll give an example - when Jeff was going through his big disco phase I swear I heard the most similar mix about 3 times and I enjoyed it everytime. I admit by the time I heard it the 3rd time I was recognising tracks but it was still GOOD. You need to drop the trainspotting and just chill and enjoy yourself. On 6/5/07, diana potts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going to chime in on this one because well... It's anyone's right to dislike/like a set.However, when it's Shake...for me at least, it's a different thing. Shake is a good person.He is a businessman but is always kind and at least straight forward. He has always been-always will be. I grew up seeing his sets, always with a smile and always willing to talk to people, shake their hand.I remember the first time I saw him with a cane and then when I saw him in a wheelchair.It was quite a visual to see his health go up and down. Like or dislike, considering Shake's role in even the existance of this like...I doubt you'll find many of the "old timers" to agree with you. However, I hope Shake isn't more of a dissapointment to you...but in the long run perhaps someone who is more of a role model in the music make or listen to. --- Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Crikey > > As far as I'm concerned Shake is the man and I > couldn't care less if > he crashed every 12, at least you'd know he was > there. I have the > greatest respect for Shake and love his DJ sets > because they are so > different from everyone else's. I'm not interested > in perfection, > more the selection and this is where Shake is miles > in front for me > and so refreshing. It's all about the music. > > m > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
Re: (313) Shake
I'm going to chime in on this one because well... It's anyone's right to dislike/like a set.However, when it's Shake...for me at least, it's a different thing. Shake is a good person.He is a businessman but is always kind and at least straight forward. He has always been-always will be. I grew up seeing his sets, always with a smile and always willing to talk to people, shake their hand.I remember the first time I saw him with a cane and then when I saw him in a wheelchair.It was quite a visual to see his health go up and down. Like or dislike, considering Shake's role in even the existance of this like...I doubt you'll find many of the "old timers" to agree with you. However, I hope Shake isn't more of a dissapointment to you...but in the long run perhaps someone who is more of a role model in the music make or listen to. --- Martin Dust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Crikey > > As far as I'm concerned Shake is the man and I > couldn't care less if > he crashed every 12, at least you'd know he was > there. I have the > greatest respect for Shake and love his DJ sets > because they are so > different from everyone else's. I'm not interested > in perfection, > more the selection and this is where Shake is miles > in front for me > and so refreshing. It's all about the music. > > m > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
Re: (313) Shake
Crikey As far as I'm concerned Shake is the man and I couldn't care less if he crashed every 12, at least you'd know he was there. I have the greatest respect for Shake and love his DJ sets because they are so different from everyone else's. I'm not interested in perfection, more the selection and this is where Shake is miles in front for me and so refreshing. It's all about the music. m
Re: (313) Shake
shake looked confused and should not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. Let the hating begin! Looks like it's already started. I'm wondering how you know he was confused and not frustrated by the well documented effects of MS on his motor skills. From where I was standing, it looked to me like he was bumming because of a few timing slips. jeff
Re: (313) Shake
I'll second that. FWIW I didn't make it to DEMF, but whenever I've seen Shake, he's never failed to impress me On 05/06/07, Fred Heutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "please familarize yourself with the mixer" Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also recognize checking the equipment with the previous user rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF tent as the case may be). I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty astonishing to see. Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system yourself. fh
Re: (313) Shake
"please familarize yourself with the mixer" Those who have bravely ventured forth to play records (or CDs or DATs or MP3s or whatever) to the public also recognize checking the equipment with the previous user rather than winging it as a sign of professionalism. I can't tell you how many times over the weekend I saw various big-name DJs explaining to each other the basic working of a particular mixer. In 1992, there were three or four basic mixer types (and only a handful of viable manufacturers). Now there are dozens of basic layouts and hundreds of variations. Sometimes even the basics -- where the cue volume is and how to set levels -- aren't all that easy to spot, especially in a dark room (or DEMF tent as the case may be). I also know that equipment suppliers have to juggle things to make it all work out -- nobody stocks only a single model (you'd have to throw out all your inventory and start over every year or two anyway, as the older ones are discontinued), and the explosion in mixer types and the excessive number of bells and whistles (literally, in many cases) compared to even a few years ago is pretty astonishing to see. Criticize the track selection and mixing all you want, but give the DJ some slack for the conditions that almost always apply anywhere you don't own the sound system yourself. fh
RE: (313) Shake
I personally don't see what it's intended to achieve, really. Still, I've got too many more pressing things to do to than indulge in some hatin'. (Fun as hatin' can be sometimes). Ken -Original Message- From: Aidan O'Doherty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 June 2007 10:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Shake that's the first criticism of shake, as a producer or a dj, that i've ever come across. you're a brave man. On 05/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Im one of Shake's biggest fans but even I could not enjoy myself at his > set. 1st of all i heard the same exact set played by him a year ago at an > after party at olslo's. no kidding it was the same for sure. the only > difffrence was instead of juggiling two copies of the pace he juggled > phillips track last time. > and i don't mind the trainwrecks if the songs are good. they were good the > year before. boring this year. > And if you are asked to play a major festival please familarize yourself > with the mixer you will be playing with. shake looked confused and should > not have tried playing with the onboard effects if he didn't know how. > Let the hating begin! > Anthony > > > > On Sat, June 2, 2007 8:59 am, Ramon Crespo wrote: > > I really enjoyed what I hearrd from Shake at the festival. I was only > > there for 30-45 minutes , but i definitely see why you all praise > > him. I danced danced !! :) > > > > We really need to try to have some sort of official meet up next > > year. :( > > > > I did meet some cool folks from London @ Submerge though. It's > > amazing how the europeans appreciate this so much than some of the > > americans. > > > > Regards, > > Ramon > > > > > > On Jun 1, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Terry Hall wrote: > > > >> My pleasure, I also echo others comments about the festival - more > >> fun than anything else - I'm still trying to catch up on sleep! > >> > >> -peace, T63 > >> > >> On May 30, 2007, at 10:54 PM, theREALmxyzptlk wrote: > >> > >>> Thanks for posting that. Likewise to Tom who said something > >>> similar (maybe offlist). > >>> I know you're lurking, Tony. > >>> You do something beyond slick mechanics; it's a gift and it's yours. > >>> > >>> jeff > >>> > >>> > >>> Terry Hall wrote: > >>>> Regarding Shake's performance - I think it just shows that > >>>> really solid tracks and an extremely personable DJ are important > >>>> performance skills. I was standing 2' from him and we were all > >>>> having a great time. His irreverent style and ability to emanate > >>>> a good vibe seemed more important to the performance than > >>>> technical wizardy without feeling. That was my take-away, > >>>> something I'm going to remember next time I start stressing over > >>>> a missed transition that everyone will forget about the next > >>>> day. Thank you Shake, someone who remembers how to party! > >>>> -peace, T63 > >> > > > > > > > >
