RE: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Talking of Discogs and searches, I've used a search now for some time that
Guy Thackeray tipped me off about (ta) after I asked on here ('cos I was too
stupid to read the how to search bit in their help); searching for a track
by entering

track:part of track title you are looking for

this was a super valuable tool for me.  Pity it seems to have stopped
working then?  Or is it just me doing something stupid? (this time I have
read the help).


 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Michael.Elliot-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 25 April 2008 01:30
 
 yes, but at least the extra bits (mix CDs and such) are related in some
 way
 to the artist
 you're not going to get unrelated Derrick Emerson records when looking
 up
 all the Derrick May stuff for sale
 
 if you look up the label Chicago acid house label Underground
 and then check all the records supposedly for sale you'll notice that
 there's a ton of completely unrelated labels are thrown into the mix
 
 you get:
 Underground Resistance
 Urban Underground UK
 Underground Construction
 Underground Quality
 Underground, Inc.
 Glasgow Underground
 etc.
 
 and you can't use the word Underground as a filter because it won't
 filter out any of these
 
 there's no way to separate the wheat from the chaff
 
 MEK
 
 Jeffrey Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008
 06:04:28
 PM:
 
  Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by
  an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and
  compilations his or her tracks have appeared on.  It
  is super annoying.  I really don't look for comps...
 
  The Marketplace certainly could use some changes.  But
  all in all, it is pretty good.  Much better than eBay.
   The most annoying thing for me is the fact that
  hardly any of the new releases that I want are for
  sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault.
 
  Carry on
 
  Jeff
 
 
  --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
   Has it always been configured this way...?
  
   I went to look at a particular record label
   From the main entry of the entire discography I went
   to see what records of
   that label were for sale
  
   I get a list of records containing not only that
   label but *every* label
   that contains the name of the label I'm interested
   in
  
   I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs
   is?) - I'm jumping from
   the specific label to the marketplace and I only
   want to see the label I'm
   interested in
  
   for example:
   go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping
   area to see what Cheap
   label records are available
   you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the
   one you only want to
   look at
  
   Cheap Knob Gags
   Cheap Thrills
   Cheap Date Records



(313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

Has it always been configured this way...?

I went to look at a particular record label
From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of
that label were for sale

I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label
that contains the name of the label I'm interested in

I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from
the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm
interested in

for example:
go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap
label records are available
you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to
look at

Cheap Knob Gags
Cheap Thrills
Cheap Date Records

it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that
might be a common word

it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy
;-)
MEK



Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Frank Glazer
you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the filters
at the top of the page, right?

there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word
common word titles.  relax, take a deep breath, and use all the
resources available to you.  :)

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Has it always been configured this way...?

  I went to look at a particular record label
  From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of
  that label were for sale

  I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label
  that contains the name of the label I'm interested in

  I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from
  the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm
  interested in

  for example:
  go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap
  label records are available
  you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to
  look at

  Cheap Knob Gags
  Cheap Thrills
  Cheap Date Records

  it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that
  might be a common word

  it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy
  ;-)
  MEK





-- 
peace,

frank

dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com


Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Frank Glazer
hmmm.  yeah i see what you mean.  i can't remember if it's always been
like this or if it's something new/broken.  still, if you know the
artist you're looking for why not just search that way?

On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:20 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 yeah, however you can't sort using more than one

  so - the label I'm looking up:  Factory
  results in a list containing all labels with the word factory in it
  so I hit sort by -label, then I can then find all the Factory records
  about 4 pages in (grrr)
  however, now that I've found them I want to sort, within the Factory
  records discog starting on page 4, by price/artist/seller/etc.

  and it reshuffles everything

  I can't use the word Factory as filter because it won't filter out
  anything

  I'm using the letters FAC and FACT as a filter and have gotten almost
  the result I'm after
  still, I'd like to have both FAC and FACT viewable at the same time so I
  can see everything at once
  for some reason if I use FAC as a filter it drops out all the FACT records
  - it's the T at the end that filters them out

  it's like discogs is playing a game of 3 Card Monty - LOL

  MEK




  Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:05:38 PM:



   you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the filters
   at the top of the page, right?
  
   there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word
   common word titles.  relax, take a deep breath, and use all the
   resources available to you.  :)
  
   On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
   
 Has it always been configured this way...?
   
 I went to look at a particular record label
 From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what
  records of
 that label were for sale
   
 I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every*
  label
 that contains the name of the label I'm interested in
   
 I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping
  from
 the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label
  I'm
 interested in
   
 for example:
 go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what
  Cheap
 label records are available
 you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want
  to
 look at
   
 Cheap Knob Gags
 Cheap Thrills
 Cheap Date Records
   
 it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label
  that
 might be a common word
   
 it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy
 ;-)
 MEK
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   peace,
  
   frank
  
   dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com





-- 
peace,

frank

dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com


Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
because I'm not looking for one specific artist

MEK

Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:24:05 PM:

 hmmm.  yeah i see what you mean.  i can't remember if it's always been
 like this or if it's something new/broken.  still, if you know the
 artist you're looking for why not just search that way?

 On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:20 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  yeah, however you can't sort using more than one
 
   so - the label I'm looking up:  Factory
   results in a list containing all labels with the word factory in it
   so I hit sort by -label, then I can then find all the Factory
records
   about 4 pages in (grrr)
   however, now that I've found them I want to sort, within the Factory
   records discog starting on page 4, by price/artist/seller/etc.
 
   and it reshuffles everything
 
   I can't use the word Factory as filter because it won't filter out
   anything
 
   I'm using the letters FAC and FACT as a filter and have gotten
almost
   the result I'm after
   still, I'd like to have both FAC and FACT viewable at the same time so
I
   can see everything at once
   for some reason if I use FAC as a filter it drops out all the FACT
records
   - it's the T at the end that filters them out
 
   it's like discogs is playing a game of 3 Card Monty - LOL
 
   MEK
 
 
 
 
   Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:05:38 PM:
 
 
 
you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the
filters
at the top of the page, right?
   
there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word
common word titles.  relax, take a deep breath, and use all the
resources available to you.  :)
   
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM,  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   wrote:

  Has it always been configured this way...?

  I went to look at a particular record label
  From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what
   records of
  that label were for sale

  I get a list of records containing not only that label but
*every*
   label
  that contains the name of the label I'm interested in

  I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm
jumping
   from
  the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to seethe
label
   I'm
  interested in

  for example:
  go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see
what
   Cheap
  label records are available
  you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one youonly
want
   to
  look at

  Cheap Knob Gags
  Cheap Thrills
  Cheap Date Records

  it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled
label
   that
  might be a common word

  it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy
  ;-)
  MEK


   
   
   
--
peace,
   
frank
   
dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
 
 



 --
 peace,

 frank

 dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com



Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Jeffrey Richards
Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by
an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and
compilations his or her tracks have appeared on.  It
is super annoying.  I really don't look for comps...

The Marketplace certainly could use some changes.  But
all in all, it is pretty good.  Much better than eBay.
 The most annoying thing for me is the fact that
hardly any of the new releases that I want are for
sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault.

Carry on

Jeff


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Has it always been configured this way...?
 
 I went to look at a particular record label
 From the main entry of the entire discography I went
 to see what records of
 that label were for sale
 
 I get a list of records containing not only that
 label but *every* label
 that contains the name of the label I'm interested
 in
 
 I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs
 is?) - I'm jumping from
 the specific label to the marketplace and I only
 want to see the label I'm
 interested in
 
 for example:
 go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping
 area to see what Cheap
 label records are available
 you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the
 one you only want to
 look at
 
 Cheap Knob Gags
 Cheap Thrills
 Cheap Date Records
 
 it's really annoying if you're looking for a one
 word titled label that
 might be a common word
 
 it's these little annoyances that make me want to
 destroy
 ;-)
 MEK
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization

2008-04-24 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
yes, but at least the extra bits (mix CDs and such) are related in some way
to the artist
you're not going to get unrelated Derrick Emerson records when looking up
all the Derrick May stuff for sale

if you look up the label Chicago acid house label Underground
and then check all the records supposedly for sale you'll notice that
there's a ton of completely unrelated labels are thrown into the mix

you get:
Underground Resistance
Urban Underground UK
Underground Construction
Underground Quality
Underground, Inc.
Glasgow Underground
etc.

and you can't use the word Underground as a filter because it won't
filter out any of these

there's no way to separate the wheat from the chaff

MEK

Jeffrey Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 06:04:28
PM:

 Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by
 an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and
 compilations his or her tracks have appeared on.  It
 is super annoying.  I really don't look for comps...

 The Marketplace certainly could use some changes.  But
 all in all, it is pretty good.  Much better than eBay.
  The most annoying thing for me is the fact that
 hardly any of the new releases that I want are for
 sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault.

 Carry on

 Jeff


 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  Has it always been configured this way...?
 
  I went to look at a particular record label
  From the main entry of the entire discography I went
  to see what records of
  that label were for sale
 
  I get a list of records containing not only that
  label but *every* label
  that contains the name of the label I'm interested
  in
 
  I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs
  is?) - I'm jumping from
  the specific label to the marketplace and I only
  want to see the label I'm
  interested in
 
  for example:
  go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping
  area to see what Cheap
  label records are available
  you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the
  one you only want to
  look at
 
  Cheap Knob Gags
  Cheap Thrills
  Cheap Date Records
 
  it's really annoying if you're looking for a one
  word titled label that
  might be a common word
 
  it's these little annoyances that make me want to
  destroy
  ;-)
  MEK
 
 







 Be a better friend, newshound, and
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.
 com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ



(313) discogs

2005-09-03 Thread Simon Vrebos
Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to www.discogs.com???

GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain???

I'm scared. 


Re: (313) discogs

2005-09-03 Thread Joost P
This domain name expired on 12/31/69... Well, I guess they had it 
coming. At some point, as a hosting provider, you just have to say no 
more.



On 3 Sep, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Simon Vrebos wrote:

Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to 
www.discogs.com???


GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain???

I'm scared.





Re: (313) discogs

2005-09-03 Thread theREALmxyzptlk

Joost P wrote:

This domain name expired on 12/31/69... Well, I guess they had it 
coming. At some point, as a hosting provider, you just have to say no 
more.



On 3 Sep, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Simon Vrebos wrote:


Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to www.discogs.com???

GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain???

I'm scared.






Check again.

jeff



Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!

2005-08-04 Thread /0
i dont suppose we can take the hourly-discogs-connectivity thread offlist, 
could we?


thx for understanding

- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!







spoke too soon - can't get past the home page

ahhh!

MEK





Michael.Elliot-Kn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To
08/03/05 09:18 AM 313@hyperreal.org
   cc

  Subject
  Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up
  ?!














now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane

MEK



Michael.Elliot-Kn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To
08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org
   cc

  Subject
  Re: (313) discogs down














Getting this:

Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher

Traceback (most recent call last):

 File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
181, in Dispatch
   module = import_module(module_name, _req)

 File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
335, in import_module
   module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d)

 File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ?
   import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages

 File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ?
   sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root,
h.getValue('indexfile', '')))

error: Index file error



anyone here know what's going on?
MEK







(313) discogs down

2005-08-03 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




again?

wtf!?

MEK



Re: (313) discogs down

2005-08-03 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Getting this:

Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
181, in Dispatch
module = import_module(module_name, _req)

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
335, in import_module
module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d)

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ?
import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ?
sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root,
h.getValue('indexfile', '')))

error: Index file error



anyone here know what's going on?
MEK



RE: (313) discogs down

2005-08-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not that d*mn python from our local library again!
Always hanging out with the Apaches, smoking early editions of Burroughs and
smashing up people's servers.
Someone ring the python handler!



Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!

2005-08-03 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane

MEK


   
 Michael.Elliot-Kn 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
To 
 08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) discogs down  
   
   
   
   
   
   








Getting this:

Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
181, in Dispatch
module = import_module(module_name, _req)

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
335, in import_module
module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d)

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ?
import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ?
sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root,
h.getValue('indexfile', '')))

error: Index file error



anyone here know what's going on?
MEK





Re: (313) discogs down

2005-08-03 Thread robin


you been at the hoegaardens over lunch again francis?

:)

robin...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Not that d*mn python from our local library again!
Always hanging out with the Apaches, smoking early editions of Burroughs and
smashing up people's servers.
Someone ring the python handler!



Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!

2005-08-03 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




spoke too soon - can't get past the home page

ahhh!

MEK




   
 Michael.Elliot-Kn 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
To 
 08/03/05 09:18 AM 313@hyperreal.org   
cc 
   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up   
   ?!  
   
   
   
   
   
   








now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane

MEK



 Michael.Elliot-Kn
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
 08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org
cc

   Subject
   Re: (313) discogs down














Getting this:

Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher

Traceback (most recent call last):

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
181, in Dispatch
module = import_module(module_name, _req)

  File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line
335, in import_module
module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d)

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ?
import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages

  File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ?
sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root,
h.getValue('indexfile', '')))

error: Index file error



anyone here know what's going on?
MEK







RE: (313) discogs?

2005-07-05 Thread James_Bucknell
maybe  you're just calling up cached pages that are on your computer.
trying doing the same thing while off line.
james
www.jbucknell.com




   
 Odeluga, Ken
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ones.com  To 
   Simon Hindle  
 04/07/05 07:18 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
   313@hyperreal.org 
cc 
   
   Subject 
   RE: (313) discogs?  
   
   
   
   
   
   




I noticed that using voodoo science - *and only if you're using Safari*
- you can access the site despite it being to all intents and purposes
down. Try this: go to your bookmark or Google or whatever. When your
browser starts to hang, cancel the operation (click on the 'X' in the
menu bar) and it should load.

It worked for me at the weekend.

I'm not a protocol egg-head so I dunno the mechanics of how/why/ it
works but it did.

k

Ken Odeluga
Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk
Dow Jones Newswires
10 Fleet Place
Limeburner Lane
LONDON EC4M 7QN

020 7842 9297

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Simon Hindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 July 2005 01:44
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July:

 Dear Discogs User,

As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday.
We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that
ended
with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system
admin's.
Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and
running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com
site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site
running
again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some
time to complete.

As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered
and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure
we don't experience an outage such as this again.

We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out
a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another
Discogs
user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try
and help.

Yours Sincerely
Nik | Discogs Community Manager

 Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm 
- Original Message -
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

 i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and
 the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.

That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to
pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server
rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because
they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet.

Tristan
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phonopsia.co.uk





ForwardSourceID:NT0002007E



(313) Discogs? Slowdowns?

2005-07-05 Thread Thorin Teague
Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone 
else?


Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?


Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?

2005-07-05 Thread robin


yeah slow to the point of non-access from here (uk) thorin

robin...


Thorin Teague wrote:
Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone 
else?


Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?


Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?

2005-07-05 Thread Sakari Karipuro

Thorin Teague wrote on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 about following:


Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else?


it just time-outs for me, although traceroute seems fine..

sakke


RE: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?

2005-07-05 Thread Odeluga, Ken


It's working for me here. We're on some sort of broadband, though
nothing fancy I think.

-Original Message-
From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 05 July 2005 12:45
To: Thorin Teague
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?


yeah slow to the point of non-access from here (uk) thorin

robin...


Thorin Teague wrote:
 Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me.
Anyone 
 else?
 
 Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?



Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?

2005-07-05 Thread matt kane's brain

At 07:34 AM 7/5/2005, Thorin Teague wrote:

Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else?

Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?


they're running with only one web server out of however many they have. the 
following text is from help.discogs.com which is sort of alive.



As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday. We 
experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended 
with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's. 
Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and 
running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com site 
has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running 
again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some time 
to complete.


As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered and 
will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure we don't 
experience an outage such as this again.


We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out a 
solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs 
user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try and help.


Yours Sincerely

Nik | Discogs Community Manager

p.s. may I suggest that now is a good time to pick thru the help section 
here, and maybe add some style descriptions or (for the mod's and editors) 
see if anything in the guidelines could be better written or need added to. 
Cheers!



--
/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)
matt kane's brain
podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk



Re: (313) discogs?

2005-07-04 Thread Simon Hindle
From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July:

 Dear Discogs User,

As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday.
We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended
with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's.
Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and
running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com
site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running
again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some
time to complete.

As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered
and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure
we don't experience an outage such as this again.

We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out
a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs
user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try
and help.

Yours Sincerely
Nik | Discogs Community Manager 

 Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm 
- Original Message - 
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

 i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and 
 the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.

That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so 
the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything 
more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on 
my discogs toolbar idea yet. 

Tristan
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.phonopsia.co.uk 





RE: (313) discogs?

2005-07-04 Thread Odeluga, Ken
I noticed that using voodoo science - *and only if you're using Safari*
- you can access the site despite it being to all intents and purposes
down. Try this: go to your bookmark or Google or whatever. When your
browser starts to hang, cancel the operation (click on the 'X' in the
menu bar) and it should load.

It worked for me at the weekend.

I'm not a protocol egg-head so I dunno the mechanics of how/why/ it
works but it did.

k

Ken Odeluga
Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk
Dow Jones Newswires
10 Fleet Place
Limeburner Lane
LONDON EC4M 7QN

020 7842 9297

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Simon Hindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 04 July 2005 01:44
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July:

 Dear Discogs User,

As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday.
We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that
ended
with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system
admin's.
Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and
running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com
site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site
running
again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some
time to complete.

As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered
and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure
we don't experience an outage such as this again.

We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out
a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another
Discogs
user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try
and help.

Yours Sincerely
Nik | Discogs Community Manager 

 Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm 
- Original Message - 
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

 i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and 
 the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.

That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to
pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server
rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because
they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet. 

Tristan
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.phonopsia.co.uk 






Re: (313) discogs?

2005-07-01 Thread Garrett McGrath

it would be very very bad if that site is gone

On Jun 30, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:


-- Original Message --
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]



i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection
database hosted there!



my collection database is in my head!

;)

but seriously, it kills me not having it online. seriously, its
worth the entire price of internet service just to have discogs. i
cant even remember what its like not having such an invaluable
resource at my fingertips. all i know is that since its been down
ive tried visiting it about 20 different times at least. i use
that site more than anything online aside from my email.

if there was a best website of all time award, discogs would get
my vote.

tom


andythepooh.com









RE: (313) discogs?

2005-07-01 Thread Odeluga, Ken
The forums were that fervent, I'd guess this is more likely a scheduled
or unforeseen outage rather than a going of kaput - I think there would
have been some mutterings beforehand. Jeez, that place is as
hyper-sensitive as any market I know of!

Ken Odeluga
Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk
Dow Jones Newswires
10 Fleet Place
Limeburner Lane
LONDON EC4M 7QN

020 7842 9297

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 30 June 2005 17:41
To: matt kane's brain
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; TOKOMAK
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?





Either way it sucks -

now I have no idea what records I have or want ;)

seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk
I appreciated the links to record label websites

MEK


 

 matt kane's

 brain

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To 
   TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED],

 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org

 
cc 
 

 
Subject 
   Re: (313) discogs?

 

 

 

 

 

 





Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at
internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK
(cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are:
1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different
facility.
Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's
servers

back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently.
2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.

At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote:

same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?

--
/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)
matt kane's brain
podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk






Re: (313) discogs?

2005-07-01 Thread Tristan Watkins
- Original Message - 
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?

 i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and 
 the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.

That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so 
the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything 
more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on 
my discogs toolbar idea yet. 

Tristan
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phonopsia.co.uk




Re: (313) discogs?

2005-07-01 Thread therealmxyzptlk
It's pretty amazing how much I have come to lean on Discogs.
You never notice things until they're not there...

  jeff


 - Original Message - 
  i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and 
  the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.
 
 That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so 
 the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than 
 anything 
 more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up 
 on 
 my discogs toolbar idea yet. 
 


Re: (313) discogs? B.D./A.D.

2005-07-01 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




anyone recall life B.D. (before discogs)?

what did we do?  It's apparent that discogs has affected our shopping -
anyone have any clue how record labels have been affected by the presence
of discogs?

MEK


   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 omcast.net
To 
 07/01/05 06:52 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
cc 
   313@hyperreal.org   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) discogs?  
   
   
   
   
   
   




It's pretty amazing how much I have come to lean on Discogs.
You never notice things until they're not there...

  jeff


 - Original Message -
  i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and
  the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.

 That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to
pings, so
 the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than
anything
 more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me
up on
 my discogs toolbar idea yet.





Re: (313) discogs? B.D./A.D.

2005-07-01 Thread Edward George
maybe without discogs i'll stop spending my dinner money on ebay.

anyone have any clue how record labels have been affected by the presence
of discogs?

Dunno, but i bet a huge amount of soulseek searches are influenced by
discogs searches. wonder what their search stats have been like in
this period.


(313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread Wojciech
Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of 
days?




Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread z66



yeh!! and i found myself really missing it.. oh g0d, bring it back!


///Z




Wojciech wrote:

Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of days?







Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread TOKOMAK

same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?



Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread matt kane's brain
Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at 
internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK 
(cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are:
1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. 
Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers 
back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently.

2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.

At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote:


same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?


--
/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)
matt kane's brain
podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk



Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Either way it sucks -

now I have no idea what records I have or want ;)

seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk
I appreciated the links to record label websites

MEK


   
 matt kane's  
 brain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]To 
   TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org 
cc 
   
   Subject 
   Re: (313) discogs?  
   
   
   
   
   
   




Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at
internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK
(cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are:
1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility.
Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers

back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently.
2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.

At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote:

same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?

--
/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)
matt kane's brain
podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk





RE: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread Lee Herrington

you might be able to get away with using that internet archive site for
label info.

lrh


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:41 PM
To: matt kane's brain
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; TOKOMAK
Subject: Re: (313) discogs?





Either way it sucks -

now I have no idea what records I have or want ;)

seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk
I appreciated the links to record label websites

MEK



 matt kane's
 brain
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]To
   TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org
cc

   Subject
   Re: (313) discogs?










Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at
internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK
(cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are:
1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility.
Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers

back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently.
2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.

At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote:

same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?

--
/* Halley */ (Halley's comment.)
matt kane's brain
podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk






Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread robin


i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and 
the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho.


i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection 
database hosted there!


robin...

On 30 Jun 2005, at 17:35, matt kane's brain wrote:

Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois 
at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock 
are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are:
1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different 
facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped 
everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my 
favorite sites recently.

2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.




Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
-- Original Message --
From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection 
database hosted there!

my collection database is in my head!

;) 

but seriously, it kills me not having it online. seriously, its
worth the entire price of internet service just to have discogs. i
cant even remember what its like not having such an invaluable
resource at my fingertips. all i know is that since its been down
ive tried visiting it about 20 different times at least. i use
that site more than anything online aside from my email. 

if there was a best website of all time award, discogs would get
my vote. 

tom 


andythepooh.com


 
   


RE: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread Pryor, Ryan N
glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there!

Why is that? I routinely use the save collection to Excel option on
the My Discogs page whenever I add something new to my collection.
Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection
saved in Excel.


Re: (313) discogs?

2005-06-30 Thread robin

glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there!

Why is that? I routinely use the save collection to Excel option on
the My Discogs page whenever I add something new to my collection.
Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection
saved in Excel.



yeah fair enough...Excel tho euww

:)

robin...



Re: (313) Discogs Mods

2005-01-20 Thread James_Bucknell




a mod? well, 20 or more years ago i used to ride a scooter, wore fred perry
shirts, suede shoes and sported a flat top - it was the fashion of the day
(actually, it was the fashion of the 60s being repeated). and i still think
going underground is a brilliant song... but i always thought of myself
more as a rudeboy than a mod.
why are you asking martin? do you want to rumble with some skinheads or go
on a scooter run?
james
www.jbucknell.com



   
 Martin Dust 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 com   To 
   313@hyperreal.org 
 19/01/05 02:53 PM  cc 
   
   Subject 
   (313) Discogs Mods  
   
   
   
   
   
   




Anyone on here a mod?


ForwardSourceID:NT0001819E



(313) Discogs Mods

2005-01-19 Thread Martin Dust

Anyone on here a mod?



RE: (313) discogs

2005-01-08 Thread Anton Banks \(313\)
On that note, I wish Sonic Groove left their music database up. That site
was a great reference as well.

Anton
www.antonbanks.com

-Original Message-
From: jason kenjar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:44 PM
To: matt kane's brain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Aidan O'Doherty; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: (313) discogs


Though it might be slow, and I think OVERLY picky about what is
submitted. Its still such a great help and I dare not bite the hand
that feeds me at this point in time.


On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 11:53 AM, matt kane's brain wrote:

 Well, why doesn't somebody make an update to discogs then? it only
 takes about a month for the update to take effect :)

 At 12:51 PM 1/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was at work when I posted that and didn't have my vinyl with me so I
 looked on discogs.  Looks discogs has it screwed up again. I was
 pretty
 sure before looking that Q was on the 2x12 as well as the extra 7.

 --
 unsigned short int to_yer_mama;
 matt kane's brain
 http://www.hydrogenproject.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk






(313) discogs

2005-01-07 Thread jason kenjar
Though it might be slow, and I think OVERLY picky about what is 
submitted. Its still such a great help and I dare not bite the hand 
that feeds me at this point in time.



On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 11:53 AM, matt kane's brain wrote:

Well, why doesn't somebody make an update to discogs then? it only 
takes about a month for the update to take effect :)


At 12:51 PM 1/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I was at work when I posted that and didn't have my vinyl with me so I
looked on discogs.  Looks discogs has it screwed up again. I was 
pretty

sure before looking that Q was on the 2x12 as well as the extra 7.


--
unsigned short int to_yer_mama;
matt kane's brain
http://www.hydrogenproject.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk





(313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine

2004-12-29 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now
entering MP3s of releases.

At the risk of sounding like a Luddite - what the f*ck?!
check this out

http://www.discogs.com/release/346967

there's nothing different about it - except it's now MP3 format
I don't see any reason for adding the MP3 file unless it is a MP3 only
release.
This is going to get out-of-hand pretty soon with everyone adding MP3
entries to artist discogs - the lists are going to get longer than a 313
Moodyman thread.


MEK






Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine

2004-12-29 Thread Sakari Karipuro

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 about following:


Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now
entering MP3s of releases.


Yes, they've been welcome for a long time; but they only accept official 
releases. And Tresor has been releasing it's backcatalogue in mp3 
lately. You can find some net labels that release mp3|ogg there also.



sakke
--
System error?:: Success
props to mozilla.org


Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine

2004-12-29 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight




they only accept official releases.

ah, thank god for that.




   
 Sakari Karipuro   
 sakari.karipuro@ 
 kotiposti.net To 
   313 313@hyperreal.org 
 12/29/2004 12:04   cc 
 PM
   Subject 
   Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and  
   Morphine
   
   
   
   
   
   




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 about following:

 Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now
 entering MP3s of releases.

Yes, they've been welcome for a long time; but they only accept official
releases. And Tresor has been releasing it's backcatalogue in mp3
lately. You can find some net labels that release mp3|ogg there also.


sakke
--
System error?:: Success
props to mozilla.org




(313) Discogs...

2003-03-26 Thread Langsman, Marc

Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for
music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even
vaguely complete :/

Cheers,
Marc


Re: (313) Discogs...

2003-03-26 Thread Sakari Karipuro
Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following:

 Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for
 music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even
 vaguely complete :/

discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's 
kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0 
days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong 
information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to 
take care of validating releases and so on..)

sakke
--
Timing must be perfect now.  Two-timing must be better than perfect.


Re: (313) Discogs... - and some London spam : )

2003-03-26 Thread Anya Stang
http://ad.techno.org
Not 100% updated but what they have is pretty accurate.

I just read that Curtis Jones aka Cajmere aka Green Velvet
is playing at The End/London on Easter Sunday. : )

Anya

 From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed 26/Mar/2003 10:14 GMT
 To: 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) Discogs...
 
 Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following:
 
  Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for
  music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even
  vaguely complete :/
 
 discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's 
 kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0 
 days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong 
 information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to 
 take care of validating releases and so on..)
 
 sakke
 --
 Timing must be perfect now.  Two-timing must be better than perfect.

__
Join Freeserve http://www.freeserve.com/time/

Winner of the 2003 Internet Service Providers' Association awards for Best 
Unmetered ISP and Best Consumer Application.




RE: (313) Discogs..

2003-03-26 Thread Alex Bates
another good site is http://tarzan.spoox.org

very accurate and quite complete, however it is only really for old hardcore
and jungle it is very good though.

ab

-Original Message-
From: Anya Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:52 PM
To: 313
Subject: Re: (313) Discogs... - and some London spam : )


http://ad.techno.org
Not 100% updated but what they have is pretty accurate.

I just read that Curtis Jones aka Cajmere aka Green Velvet
is playing at The End/London on Easter Sunday. : )

Anya

 From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed 26/Mar/2003 10:14 GMT
 To: 313 313@hyperreal.org
 Subject: Re: (313) Discogs...

 Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following:

  Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for
  music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be
even
  vaguely complete :/

 discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's
 kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0
 days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong
 information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to
 take care of validating releases and so on..)

 sakke
 --
 Timing must be perfect now.  Two-timing must be better than perfect.

__
Join Freeserve http://www.freeserve.com/time/

Winner of the 2003 Internet Service Providers' Association awards for Best
Unmetered ISP and Best Consumer Application.



---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003



Re: (313) Discogs...

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Lees

Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/

To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php


Langsman, Marc wrote:

Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for
music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even
vaguely complete :/

Cheers,
Marc


--
Mike



Re: (313) Discogs...

2003-03-26 Thread Sakari Karipuro
Michael Lees wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following:

 Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/
 
 To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php

isn't that just another cddb clone - and has only cd's?


sakke
--
Timing must be perfect now.  Two-timing must be better than perfect.


Re: (313) Discogs...

2003-03-26 Thread Michael Lees



Sakari Karipuro wrote:

Michael Lees wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following:



Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/

To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php



isn't that just another cddb clone - and has only cd's?



True, is a cddb clone. One I use for vinyl (not complete but often has 
what I'm looking for and worth a mention) http://www.kompaktkiste.de/


--Mike