RE: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
Talking of Discogs and searches, I've used a search now for some time that Guy Thackeray tipped me off about (ta) after I asked on here ('cos I was too stupid to read the how to search bit in their help); searching for a track by entering track:part of track title you are looking for this was a super valuable tool for me. Pity it seems to have stopped working then? Or is it just me doing something stupid? (this time I have read the help). From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Michael.Elliot- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2008 01:30 yes, but at least the extra bits (mix CDs and such) are related in some way to the artist you're not going to get unrelated Derrick Emerson records when looking up all the Derrick May stuff for sale if you look up the label Chicago acid house label Underground and then check all the records supposedly for sale you'll notice that there's a ton of completely unrelated labels are thrown into the mix you get: Underground Resistance Urban Underground UK Underground Construction Underground Quality Underground, Inc. Glasgow Underground etc. and you can't use the word Underground as a filter because it won't filter out any of these there's no way to separate the wheat from the chaff MEK Jeffrey Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 06:04:28 PM: Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and compilations his or her tracks have appeared on. It is super annoying. I really don't look for comps... The Marketplace certainly could use some changes. But all in all, it is pretty good. Much better than eBay. The most annoying thing for me is the fact that hardly any of the new releases that I want are for sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault. Carry on Jeff --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records
(313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK
Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the filters at the top of the page, right? there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word common word titles. relax, take a deep breath, and use all the resources available to you. :) On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
hmmm. yeah i see what you mean. i can't remember if it's always been like this or if it's something new/broken. still, if you know the artist you're looking for why not just search that way? On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, however you can't sort using more than one so - the label I'm looking up: Factory results in a list containing all labels with the word factory in it so I hit sort by -label, then I can then find all the Factory records about 4 pages in (grrr) however, now that I've found them I want to sort, within the Factory records discog starting on page 4, by price/artist/seller/etc. and it reshuffles everything I can't use the word Factory as filter because it won't filter out anything I'm using the letters FAC and FACT as a filter and have gotten almost the result I'm after still, I'd like to have both FAC and FACT viewable at the same time so I can see everything at once for some reason if I use FAC as a filter it drops out all the FACT records - it's the T at the end that filters them out it's like discogs is playing a game of 3 Card Monty - LOL MEK Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:05:38 PM: you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the filters at the top of the page, right? there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word common word titles. relax, take a deep breath, and use all the resources available to you. :) On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
because I'm not looking for one specific artist MEK Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:24:05 PM: hmmm. yeah i see what you mean. i can't remember if it's always been like this or if it's something new/broken. still, if you know the artist you're looking for why not just search that way? On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah, however you can't sort using more than one so - the label I'm looking up: Factory results in a list containing all labels with the word factory in it so I hit sort by -label, then I can then find all the Factory records about 4 pages in (grrr) however, now that I've found them I want to sort, within the Factory records discog starting on page 4, by price/artist/seller/etc. and it reshuffles everything I can't use the word Factory as filter because it won't filter out anything I'm using the letters FAC and FACT as a filter and have gotten almost the result I'm after still, I'd like to have both FAC and FACT viewable at the same time so I can see everything at once for some reason if I use FAC as a filter it drops out all the FACT records - it's the T at the end that filters them out it's like discogs is playing a game of 3 Card Monty - LOL MEK Frank Glazer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 04:05:38 PM: you do realize you can then sort via label/year/etc. using the filters at the top of the page, right? there are admittedly not that many record labels that have one word common word titles. relax, take a deep breath, and use all the resources available to you. :) On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to seethe label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one youonly want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and compilations his or her tracks have appeared on. It is super annoying. I really don't look for comps... The Marketplace certainly could use some changes. But all in all, it is pretty good. Much better than eBay. The most annoying thing for me is the fact that hardly any of the new releases that I want are for sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault. Carry on Jeff --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Re: (313) Discogs marketplace disorganization
yes, but at least the extra bits (mix CDs and such) are related in some way to the artist you're not going to get unrelated Derrick Emerson records when looking up all the Derrick May stuff for sale if you look up the label Chicago acid house label Underground and then check all the records supposedly for sale you'll notice that there's a ton of completely unrelated labels are thrown into the mix you get: Underground Resistance Urban Underground UK Underground Construction Underground Quality Underground, Inc. Glasgow Underground etc. and you can't use the word Underground as a filter because it won't filter out any of these there's no way to separate the wheat from the chaff MEK Jeffrey Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2008 06:04:28 PM: Not only that...but if you want to look at releases by an artist, you will also get all the MIX CDs and compilations his or her tracks have appeared on. It is super annoying. I really don't look for comps... The Marketplace certainly could use some changes. But all in all, it is pretty good. Much better than eBay. The most annoying thing for me is the fact that hardly any of the new releases that I want are for sale in the US. Certainly that is not Discogs fault. Carry on Jeff --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has it always been configured this way...? I went to look at a particular record label From the main entry of the entire discography I went to see what records of that label were for sale I get a list of records containing not only that label but *every* label that contains the name of the label I'm interested in I'm not doing a keyword search (but maybe discogs is?) - I'm jumping from the specific label to the marketplace and I only want to see the label I'm interested in for example: go to the Cheap label - and click under the shopping area to see what Cheap label records are available you'll get the following labels *in addition to* the one you only want to look at Cheap Knob Gags Cheap Thrills Cheap Date Records it's really annoying if you're looking for a one word titled label that might be a common word it's these little annoyances that make me want to destroy ;-) MEK Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo. com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
(313) discogs
Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to www.discogs.com??? GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain??? I'm scared.
Re: (313) discogs
This domain name expired on 12/31/69... Well, I guess they had it coming. At some point, as a hosting provider, you just have to say no more. On 3 Sep, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Simon Vrebos wrote: Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to www.discogs.com??? GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain??? I'm scared.
Re: (313) discogs
Joost P wrote: This domain name expired on 12/31/69... Well, I guess they had it coming. At some point, as a hosting provider, you just have to say no more. On 3 Sep, 2005, at 2:29 PM, Simon Vrebos wrote: Does everyone get the same page as me when they go to www.discogs.com??? GoDaddy.com??? Expired domain??? I'm scared. Check again. jeff
Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!
i dont suppose we can take the hourly-discogs-connectivity thread offlist, could we? thx for understanding - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:21 AM Subject: Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?! spoke too soon - can't get past the home page ahhh! MEK Michael.Elliot-Kn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 08/03/05 09:18 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?! now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane MEK Michael.Elliot-Kn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs down Getting this: Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 181, in Dispatch module = import_module(module_name, _req) File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 335, in import_module module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d) File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ? import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ? sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root, h.getValue('indexfile', ''))) error: Index file error anyone here know what's going on? MEK
(313) discogs down
again? wtf!? MEK
Re: (313) discogs down
Getting this: Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 181, in Dispatch module = import_module(module_name, _req) File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 335, in import_module module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d) File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ? import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ? sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root, h.getValue('indexfile', ''))) error: Index file error anyone here know what's going on? MEK
RE: (313) discogs down
Not that d*mn python from our local library again! Always hanging out with the Apaches, smoking early editions of Burroughs and smashing up people's servers. Someone ring the python handler!
Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!
now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane MEK Michael.Elliot-Kn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs down Getting this: Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 181, in Dispatch module = import_module(module_name, _req) File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 335, in import_module module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d) File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ? import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ? sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root, h.getValue('indexfile', ''))) error: Index file error anyone here know what's going on? MEK
Re: (313) discogs down
you been at the hoegaardens over lunch again francis? :) robin... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that d*mn python from our local library again! Always hanging out with the Apaches, smoking early editions of Burroughs and smashing up people's servers. Someone ring the python handler!
Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?!
spoke too soon - can't get past the home page ahhh! MEK Michael.Elliot-Kn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 08/03/05 09:18 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs down/up/down/up ?! now it's back up - ker righst almighty this is going to drive me insane MEK Michael.Elliot-Kn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 08/03/05 09:10 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs down Getting this: Mod_python error: PythonHandler dpublisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 181, in Dispatch module = import_module(module_name, _req) File /usr/local/lib/python2.3/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 335, in import_module module = imp.load_module(mname, f, p, d) File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/dpublisher.py, line 26, in ? import pages, forumpages, statspages, adminpages, sellpages File /opt/webdocs/discogs_f/pages.py, line 1252, in ? sw = SwishE.new('%sdiscogsindex/%s' % (document_root, h.getValue('indexfile', ''))) error: Index file error anyone here know what's going on? MEK
RE: (313) discogs?
maybe you're just calling up cached pages that are on your computer. trying doing the same thing while off line. james www.jbucknell.com Odeluga, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] ones.com To Simon Hindle 04/07/05 07:18 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject RE: (313) discogs? I noticed that using voodoo science - *and only if you're using Safari* - you can access the site despite it being to all intents and purposes down. Try this: go to your bookmark or Google or whatever. When your browser starts to hang, cancel the operation (click on the 'X' in the menu bar) and it should load. It worked for me at the weekend. I'm not a protocol egg-head so I dunno the mechanics of how/why/ it works but it did. k Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simon Hindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2005 01:44 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) discogs? From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July: Dear Discogs User, As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday. We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's. Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some time to complete. As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure we don't experience an outage such as this again. We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try and help. Yours Sincerely Nik | Discogs Community Manager Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm - Original Message - From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM Subject: Re: (313) discogs? i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet. Tristan === [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phonopsia.co.uk ForwardSourceID:NT0002007E
(313) Discogs? Slowdowns?
Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else? Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?
Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?
yeah slow to the point of non-access from here (uk) thorin robin... Thorin Teague wrote: Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else? Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?
Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?
Thorin Teague wrote on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 about following: Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else? it just time-outs for me, although traceroute seems fine.. sakke
RE: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?
It's working for me here. We're on some sort of broadband, though nothing fancy I think. -Original Message- From: robin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2005 12:45 To: Thorin Teague Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns? yeah slow to the point of non-access from here (uk) thorin robin... Thorin Teague wrote: Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else? Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back?
Re: (313) Discogs? Slowdowns?
At 07:34 AM 7/5/2005, Thorin Teague wrote: Yes, discogs is back up, but running excruciatingly slow for me. Anyone else? Plus, am I crazy, or has the site design been rolled back? they're running with only one web server out of however many they have. the following text is from help.discogs.com which is sort of alive. As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday. We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's. Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some time to complete. As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure we don't experience an outage such as this again. We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try and help. Yours Sincerely Nik | Discogs Community Manager p.s. may I suggest that now is a good time to pick thru the help section here, and maybe add some style descriptions or (for the mod's and editors) see if anything in the guidelines could be better written or need added to. Cheers! -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July: Dear Discogs User, As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday. We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's. Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some time to complete. As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure we don't experience an outage such as this again. We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try and help. Yours Sincerely Nik | Discogs Community Manager Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm - Original Message - From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM Subject: Re: (313) discogs? i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet. Tristan === [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phonopsia.co.uk
RE: (313) discogs?
I noticed that using voodoo science - *and only if you're using Safari* - you can access the site despite it being to all intents and purposes down. Try this: go to your bookmark or Google or whatever. When your browser starts to hang, cancel the operation (click on the 'X' in the menu bar) and it should load. It worked for me at the weekend. I'm not a protocol egg-head so I dunno the mechanics of how/why/ it works but it did. k Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Simon Hindle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2005 01:44 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) discogs? From a weblog belonging to a discogs.com subscriber, dated 2 July: Dear Discogs User, As you will have noticed, Discogs has been offline now since yesterday. We experienced a cascade of problems with the servers yesterday that ended with the whole site inaccessible to everyone including the system admin's. Since then, we have been working hard on a solution to getting us up and running again. Thankfully, this server that hosts the help.discogs.com site has been revived, and this may allow us to get the whole site running again. However, this is an extremely technical job, and may take some time to complete. As sod's law dictates, we have four brand new servers already ordered and will be installing them by the middle of July. These should ensure we don't experience an outage such as this again. We apologize, and ask you all the be patent while we try and figure out a solution. In the meantime, if you need to contact me or another Discogs user with an urgent matter, please use the form below, and I will try and help. Yours Sincerely Nik | Discogs Community Manager Tristan Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/01/05 9:43 pm - Original Message - From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM Subject: Re: (313) discogs? i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet. Tristan === [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phonopsia.co.uk
Re: (313) discogs?
it would be very very bad if that site is gone On Jun 30, 2005, at 11:22 AM, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote: -- Original Message -- From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! my collection database is in my head! ;) but seriously, it kills me not having it online. seriously, its worth the entire price of internet service just to have discogs. i cant even remember what its like not having such an invaluable resource at my fingertips. all i know is that since its been down ive tried visiting it about 20 different times at least. i use that site more than anything online aside from my email. if there was a best website of all time award, discogs would get my vote. tom andythepooh.com
RE: (313) discogs?
The forums were that fervent, I'd guess this is more likely a scheduled or unforeseen outage rather than a going of kaput - I think there would have been some mutterings beforehand. Jeez, that place is as hyper-sensitive as any market I know of! Ken Odeluga Copy Editor, Markets - Market Talk Dow Jones Newswires 10 Fleet Place Limeburner Lane LONDON EC4M 7QN 020 7842 9297 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 June 2005 17:41 To: matt kane's brain Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; TOKOMAK Subject: Re: (313) discogs? Either way it sucks - now I have no idea what records I have or want ;) seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk I appreciated the links to record label websites MEK matt kane's brain [EMAIL PROTECTED] To TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED], 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs? Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
- Original Message - From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 313 Org 313@hyperreal.org Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:02 PM Subject: Re: (313) discogs? i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet. Tristan === [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phonopsia.co.uk
Re: (313) discogs?
It's pretty amazing how much I have come to lean on Discogs. You never notice things until they're not there... jeff - Original Message - i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet.
Re: (313) discogs? B.D./A.D.
anyone recall life B.D. (before discogs)? what did we do? It's apparent that discogs has affected our shopping - anyone have any clue how record labels have been affected by the presence of discogs? MEK [EMAIL PROTECTED] omcast.net To 07/01/05 06:52 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc 313@hyperreal.org Subject Re: (313) discogs? It's pretty amazing how much I have come to lean on Discogs. You never notice things until they're not there... jeff - Original Message - i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. That would make sense to me. www.discogs.com is still responding to pings, so the problem is most likely with the application or server rather than anything more sinister. Truth be told, I hacked them because they haven't taken me up on my discogs toolbar idea yet.
Re: (313) discogs? B.D./A.D.
maybe without discogs i'll stop spending my dinner money on ebay. anyone have any clue how record labels have been affected by the presence of discogs? Dunno, but i bet a huge amount of soulseek searches are influenced by discogs searches. wonder what their search stats have been like in this period.
(313) discogs?
Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of days?
Re: (313) discogs?
yeh!! and i found myself really missing it.. oh g0d, bring it back! ///Z Wojciech wrote: Has anyone else had trouble accessing discogs in the last couple of days?
Re: (313) discogs?
same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason?
Re: (313) discogs?
Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
Either way it sucks - now I have no idea what records I have or want ;) seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk I appreciated the links to record label websites MEK matt kane's brain [EMAIL PROTECTED]To TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED], 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs? Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
RE: (313) discogs?
you might be able to get away with using that internet archive site for label info. lrh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 12:41 PM To: matt kane's brain Cc: 313@hyperreal.org; TOKOMAK Subject: Re: (313) discogs? Either way it sucks - now I have no idea what records I have or want ;) seriously though - it will be a sad day if they have sunk I appreciated the links to record label websites MEK matt kane's brain [EMAIL PROTECTED]To TOKOMAK [EMAIL PROTECTED], 06/30/05 11:35 AM 313@hyperreal.org cc Subject Re: (313) discogs? Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist. At 11:25 AM 6/30/2005, TOKOMAK wrote: same with me, I really miss the site, does anyone the reason? -- /* Halley */ (Halley's comment.) matt kane's brain podcast | http://www.hydrogenproject.com | netradio | on-the-air [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
Re: (313) discogs?
i've seen it mentioned somewhere that the main guy is on holiday and the server's gone down. could be mis-information tho. i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! robin... On 30 Jun 2005, at 17:35, matt kane's brain wrote: Well, I can still look up the name, so it's not a DNS problem. Whois at internic shows everything in order. Other sites in their netblock are OK (cdbaby.com for example). My guesses are: 1.) Servers are off-line for a move of some sort to a different facility. Or the colocation place went out of business and shipped everyone's servers back to them. This has happened to a few of my favorite sites recently. 2.) Discogs didn't pay the bandwidth bill and now they don't exist.
Re: (313) discogs?
-- Original Message -- From: robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] i'm kinda lost without it. glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! my collection database is in my head! ;) but seriously, it kills me not having it online. seriously, its worth the entire price of internet service just to have discogs. i cant even remember what its like not having such an invaluable resource at my fingertips. all i know is that since its been down ive tried visiting it about 20 different times at least. i use that site more than anything online aside from my email. if there was a best website of all time award, discogs would get my vote. tom andythepooh.com
RE: (313) discogs?
glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! Why is that? I routinely use the save collection to Excel option on the My Discogs page whenever I add something new to my collection. Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection saved in Excel.
Re: (313) discogs?
glad i don't have my record collection database hosted there! Why is that? I routinely use the save collection to Excel option on the My Discogs page whenever I add something new to my collection. Discogs could disappear forever and I would still have my collection saved in Excel. yeah fair enough...Excel tho euww :) robin...
Re: (313) Discogs Mods
a mod? well, 20 or more years ago i used to ride a scooter, wore fred perry shirts, suede shoes and sported a flat top - it was the fashion of the day (actually, it was the fashion of the 60s being repeated). and i still think going underground is a brilliant song... but i always thought of myself more as a rudeboy than a mod. why are you asking martin? do you want to rumble with some skinheads or go on a scooter run? james www.jbucknell.com Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] com To 313@hyperreal.org 19/01/05 02:53 PM cc Subject (313) Discogs Mods Anyone on here a mod? ForwardSourceID:NT0001819E
(313) Discogs Mods
Anyone on here a mod?
RE: (313) discogs
On that note, I wish Sonic Groove left their music database up. That site was a great reference as well. Anton www.antonbanks.com -Original Message- From: jason kenjar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 1:44 PM To: matt kane's brain Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Aidan O'Doherty; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: (313) discogs Though it might be slow, and I think OVERLY picky about what is submitted. Its still such a great help and I dare not bite the hand that feeds me at this point in time. On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 11:53 AM, matt kane's brain wrote: Well, why doesn't somebody make an update to discogs then? it only takes about a month for the update to take effect :) At 12:51 PM 1/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was at work when I posted that and didn't have my vinyl with me so I looked on discogs. Looks discogs has it screwed up again. I was pretty sure before looking that Q was on the 2x12 as well as the extra 7. -- unsigned short int to_yer_mama; matt kane's brain http://www.hydrogenproject.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
(313) discogs
Though it might be slow, and I think OVERLY picky about what is submitted. Its still such a great help and I dare not bite the hand that feeds me at this point in time. On Friday, January 7, 2005, at 11:53 AM, matt kane's brain wrote: Well, why doesn't somebody make an update to discogs then? it only takes about a month for the update to take effect :) At 12:51 PM 1/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was at work when I posted that and didn't have my vinyl with me so I looked on discogs. Looks discogs has it screwed up again. I was pretty sure before looking that Q was on the 2x12 as well as the extra 7. -- unsigned short int to_yer_mama; matt kane's brain http://www.hydrogenproject.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] || AIM: mkbatwerk
(313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine
Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now entering MP3s of releases. At the risk of sounding like a Luddite - what the f*ck?! check this out http://www.discogs.com/release/346967 there's nothing different about it - except it's now MP3 format I don't see any reason for adding the MP3 file unless it is a MP3 only release. This is going to get out-of-hand pretty soon with everyone adding MP3 entries to artist discogs - the lists are going to get longer than a 313 Moodyman thread. MEK
Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 about following: Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now entering MP3s of releases. Yes, they've been welcome for a long time; but they only accept official releases. And Tresor has been releasing it's backcatalogue in mp3 lately. You can find some net labels that release mp3|ogg there also. sakke -- System error?:: Success props to mozilla.org
Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine
they only accept official releases. ah, thank god for that. Sakari Karipuro sakari.karipuro@ kotiposti.net To 313 313@hyperreal.org 12/29/2004 12:04 cc PM Subject Re: (313) Discogs on Crack and Morphine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 29 Dec 2004 about following: Just been adding more stuff to my discogs and saw that people are now entering MP3s of releases. Yes, they've been welcome for a long time; but they only accept official releases. And Tresor has been releasing it's backcatalogue in mp3 lately. You can find some net labels that release mp3|ogg there also. sakke -- System error?:: Success props to mozilla.org
(313) Discogs...
Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even vaguely complete :/ Cheers, Marc
Re: (313) Discogs...
Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following: Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even vaguely complete :/ discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0 days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to take care of validating releases and so on..) sakke -- Timing must be perfect now. Two-timing must be better than perfect.
Re: (313) Discogs... - and some London spam : )
http://ad.techno.org Not 100% updated but what they have is pretty accurate. I just read that Curtis Jones aka Cajmere aka Green Velvet is playing at The End/London on Easter Sunday. : ) Anya From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed 26/Mar/2003 10:14 GMT To: 313 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Discogs... Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following: Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even vaguely complete :/ discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0 days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to take care of validating releases and so on..) sakke -- Timing must be perfect now. Two-timing must be better than perfect. __ Join Freeserve http://www.freeserve.com/time/ Winner of the 2003 Internet Service Providers' Association awards for Best Unmetered ISP and Best Consumer Application.
RE: (313) Discogs..
another good site is http://tarzan.spoox.org very accurate and quite complete, however it is only really for old hardcore and jungle it is very good though. ab -Original Message- From: Anya Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 10:52 PM To: 313 Subject: Re: (313) Discogs... - and some London spam : ) http://ad.techno.org Not 100% updated but what they have is pretty accurate. I just read that Curtis Jones aka Cajmere aka Green Velvet is playing at The End/London on Easter Sunday. : ) Anya From: Sakari Karipuro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed 26/Mar/2003 10:14 GMT To: 313 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Discogs... Langsman, Marc wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following: Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even vaguely complete :/ discogs has plenty of information and even more mis-information; it's kinda almost ok but considering adding releases takes anything from 0 days to four weeks, it's pathetic. and supposedly updates/fixes of wrong information takes even longer. (yes there isn't enough moderators to take care of validating releases and so on..) sakke -- Timing must be perfect now. Two-timing must be better than perfect. __ Join Freeserve http://www.freeserve.com/time/ Winner of the 2003 Internet Service Providers' Association awards for Best Unmetered ISP and Best Consumer Application. --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 1/27/2003
Re: (313) Discogs...
Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/ To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php Langsman, Marc wrote: Does anyone know if theres a good imdb type equivalent for music/discographies .. Ive tried discogs.com but it doesn't seem to be even vaguely complete :/ Cheers, Marc -- Mike
Re: (313) Discogs...
Michael Lees wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following: Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/ To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php isn't that just another cddb clone - and has only cd's? sakke -- Timing must be perfect now. Two-timing must be better than perfect.
Re: (313) Discogs...
Sakari Karipuro wrote: Michael Lees wrote on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 about following: Try freedb, http://www.freedb.org/ To search ... http://www.freedb.org/freedb_search.php isn't that just another cddb clone - and has only cd's? True, is a cddb clone. One I use for vinyl (not complete but often has what I'm looking for and worth a mention) http://www.kompaktkiste.de/ --Mike