Re: [AMRadio] Need help identifying National part
Hi John, I checked my Radio Parts Master catalogue for 1964, as well as the catalogue sections of the 1948 & 1940 ARRL RADIO AMATEUR'S HANDBOOK --- nothing, nil, zilch, nada... I wonder if that part number is really a National number, per se...? Perhaps it's the part number of the MANUFACTURER who originally purchased the part for his OEM application... Hammond Manufacturing did the same thing with their transformers: they were custom made on occasion for a specific end user in quantity, with a unique part number affixed to the transformer that meant nothing, specifically, to Hammond itself, once the contract ran out (or at least I've been told as much by a Hammond engineer). Good luck, in any event...! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "John King" To: Sent: Friday, December 26, 2008 11:22 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Need help identifying National part > Have New Old Stock National part number SA1288. Appears to be a transformer with two spade bolts to bolt to chassis and has the National diamond emblem which has "NC" in the diamond. It is tar filled and has five black leads coming out of it. It is shaped like a LARGE IF can but has no adjusting screws or slots as it is completely enclosed. The dimensions are: > 4" H X 2 3/8" D X 1 15/16" W. It weighs about one pound. > > It is NEW and unused still in the National Box. > > Looks like a transformer of some sort such as an audio transformer from one of the "OLDER" National receivers that had considerable audio output for a receiver such as maybe a pair of 6V6 tubes or something of that nature. > > If you have the facilities to cross reference the part number, I would appreciate if if you would let me know what it is and which piece of National gear it was made for. > > Your help is appreciated. 73, John, K5PGW > > > > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to amradio-requ...@mailman.qth.net with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Re: 160 Propagation
Hi Thomas, Here's another neat site re. propagation, the grey line, etc. etc. etc., in case you haven't seen it: http://dx.qsl.net/propagation/propagation.html Enjoy! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "Thomas F. Giella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "am radio QTH" Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 8:33 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Re: 160 Propagation > Larry, > > F layer ionization has been unusually weak due to the winter season "and" > beginning of solar cycle 24, so close in propagation on 160 meters has poor > as a rare skip zone formed much like we see on 80 meters in winter time. > Last night the F layer critical frequency (foF2) was as low as 1775 kc. The > night before the foF2 dropped as low as 1675 kc and the night before that as > low as 1732 kc. > > You can track the foF2 at > http://www.ips.gov.au/Images/HF%20Systems/Asia/Ionospheric%20Map/WorldIMap.gif > and > http://digisonde.haystack.edu/cgi-bin/latest.exe . > > 73 & GUD DX, > Thomas F. Giella, KN4LF > Lakeland, FL, USA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > LF/MF/HF/VHF Frequency Radiowave Propagation Email Reflector: > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/kn4lf > KN4LF Daily Solar Space Weather & Geomagnetic Data Archive: > http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf5.htm > KN4LF Daily LF/MF/HF/6M Frequency Radiowave Propagation Forecast & Archive: > http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf6.htm > KN4LF 160 Meter Radio Propagation Theory Notes: > http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf8.htm > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.13/1828 - Release Date: 12/4/2008 8:05 AM __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Tower ID
Hi Jim, Those part numbers you quoted --- as well as the general shape of the tower --- sound an awful like parts of am old Delhi Antenna Towers-brand tower that I've had for some 27 years here...! Indeed, I use one to elevate my Hy-Gain TH3 Mk 3 yagi: 48', self-supporting, with a taper from wide at the base, to narrow at the very top. Each individual section is 8' long, too... The part numbers that I have on hand here are similar to those that you quoted, but slightly different: ex., the individual factory part numbers used in my 48-footer are DMX7 (bottom section), through to DMX2T (top). Your part numbers may well be indicative of new numbers assigned to Delhi products as a consequence of Wade Antennas purchasing the company awhile back. Both outfits were / are Canadian-based, here in southern Ontario. Click onto this website for more dope on Wade: http://www.westernequipment.com/Docs/DMXN%20Announcement.pdf I hope this helps! The old Delhi's were VERY rugged systems --- I couldn't be more pleased here with mine...and judging by what's on the Wade Antennas website, they're even better now... Good luck, Jim --- I hope this helps you... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "AM Radio Discussion List" Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:06 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Tower ID > I hope someone here can identify this tower. If you are familiar > with the Rohn BX series of towers, it is similar. The Rohn (now > manufactured by Thomas Shelby) has straight legs from the bottom of > each section to about 2 ft. from the top where it angles inward to > mate with the next section. > > This tower is not built like that. The metal and construction are > the same and the sizes are the same; however each of the legs are > straight from bottom to top. They reduce in size like the Rohn > version but they are angled inward from bottom to top. The Rohn > towers require 9/16" bolts in the bottom 2 sections whereas this > tower uses 1/2". > > Also the towers have a number stamped on the cross braces to > identify the section. The numbers on this tower is DBX-A-121 to > DBX-B-134. > > Does this mean anything to anyone? If you know the manufacturer or > have contact information for them, I would appreciate it. > > 73 > > Jim/W5JO > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] The Mother of all anti-AM FCC Proposals
On 7th October, Don wrote: "...Note the heading: "In the Matter of Deregulation of Part 97..." * Yowzers...!!! Isn't "...deregulation" the main cause of most of Wall Street's current woes...? Be afraid, kids --- be VERY afraid! Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Most active bands in summer for AM
On 19th July, Bob wrote: "...You do realize just how much you have dated yourself? :-) I miss true BC AM radio. Cousin Brucie, HOA, Dan Ingram on WABC. Jones beach... sigh..." * Hi Bob, Well, if I have dated myself, I wear it as a badge of honour...honestly! I know that each passing generation disparages the one succeeding it, but man-o-man, I have seen the future in the form of kids in our schools to-day, and I fear for it! I fear for my old age pension, I fear for any feeling of public spiritness, I fear for the human race. PERIOD. But I guess we have only ourselves to blame for making these self-centred inconsiderate loutish doltish privileged oafs the way they are... Anyway, back to radio... In these parts, the late 50's / early 60's meant CHUM AM from Toronto, on 1050-KHz. Those were the days of the weekly "CHUM Charts", Jungle Jay Nelson, Bob McAdory, Al Boliska, and a host of others personalities. I recall the early 60's laying in bed after lights out, hidden well under the covers, with my Sony pocket transistorized radio & ear plug, listening to the sounds of the British invasion! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Most active bands in summer for AM
On 19th July, Bob wrote: "...Still being fairly new what are the most active bands in the summer on AM?" * Hi Bob, Probably THE most active band 'round THESE parts on AM in the summer is "THE BEACH BOYS" (n'yuk-n'yuk-n'yuk!)...Hi Hi. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Fighting deed restrictions
Hi Guys, It just totally escapes me why a Ham would dole out $$$ for the BIGGEST investment in his life, i.e. a house, and then whine about existing covenants against antennas... Doesn't it make supreme sense to check things out first, BEFORE signing on the dotted line...? (HINT: think of the old "...never jump into an empty swimming pool / look before you leap" adage for comparative purposes). When we were house-hunting here 18 years ago I specifically told our real estate agent to watch for antenna restrictions / covenants: if there were any, we simply crossed that property off our list. Simple. Why buy your way into the heartache & disappointment of future, on-going "firefights" over your "right" to raise an antenna...? Why in your right mind would you want to raise the ire of your neighbours by becoming the target of blame for each & every blip on their TV screens / telephone static / loss of internet connection / ad nauseam...? Surely there must be enough suitable domiciles available for sale in the country that one's choices would NEVER have to be THAT limited...unless, of course, one is afflicted with some sort of a demented martyr's syndrome, or, one thrives on the anataganism of others, & upon personal chaos... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "D. Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:33 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Fighting deed restrictions > > From: "Ed Sieb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Up here in Canada, we call those "culos", "trou de cul". > > Same thing. > > Or in Italian, you tell 'em "Fa'n culo!" > > Something that might be worth a try would be to cross out the restrictive > language in the contract in permanent ink and initial in the margin next to > the stricken text, before signing it. Sometimes the seller of the property > or the real estate agent will be too eager to close the deal, and not notice > the modification, or he may simply not care as long as he is getting his > money out of the deal. Once it is registered at the courthouse in that > condition, the crossed out language is legally voided, too late to do > anything about it. > > I know of at least one case where the buyer of a property did that (although > it had nothing to do with amateur radio) and it worked. > > OTOH, I also have heard stories of where people had been living on a > property for decades without restrictions, and then new highly restricted > developments with HOA's popped up on all sides. The older property owner > was tricked into signing a form to join the HOA and accept its restrictions. > He thought he was signing an agreement to settle a road easement issue with > an adjoining property owner, but voluntary HOA membership was hidden in the > fine print. > > So even if you are a long-time property owner in a locality, be very careful > about any agreement you sign with neighbours regarding real estate issues. > > Don k4kyv > > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] [Fwd: Solar Storm Warning]
Hi Larry, Did you happen to notice the actual DATE of that announcement...? It was 3-10-2006, and NOT 2008. Someone had better mail Lou an up-to-date calendar! Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "Larry Szendrei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "AM Reflector" ; "Glowbugs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'PAWA list'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 8:05 AM Subject: [AMRadio] [Fwd: Solar Storm Warning] > I thought this would be of interest to enough of you to pass it along... > > 73, > -Larry/NE1S > > Original Message > Subject: Solar Storm Warning > Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 20:59:27 -0400 > From: Louis Vermond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Louis & Nancy Vermond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Hi! I thought you'd be interested in this story from NASA: This week > researchers announced that a storm is coming--the most intense solar > maximum in fifty years. In this story we explore the underpinnings of > the forecast and what it means for the years ahead. > http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/10mar_stormwarning.htm?friend > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio]Contests
Hi Pete, The ARRL 160-meter contest in December is a CW only event...I've operated in it, off & on, since about 1974-75, or so. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Peter Markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:22 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio]Contests > Although not an "AM only" type contest, we have: > ARRL Sweepstakes is phone > ARRL January VHF Sweepstakes is phone > ARRL International DX Contest is phone > ARRL June VHF QSO Party is phone > ARRL Field Day is phone > ARRL September VHF QSO Party is phone > ARRL November Sweepstakes is phone > ARRL 160 contest is phone > ARRL 10 Meter Contest is phone > > Note: Some of these are also mixed modes at the same time but AM is > phone. There is nothing stopping you from operating AM during any of > these contests. > There's also Heavy Metal night and the Classic Exchange where you can > operate AM. Electric Radio also sponsors Vintage Field Day. I see no > shortage of AM contest activity if one has the desire to participate. Of > course, it's always easier just to "poo poo" the ARRL and what it does or > doesn't embrace 100%. > > Pete, wa2cwa > http://www.manualman.com > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] "My ARRL, Right or Wrong...!!!"
On 24th April, Kim wrote: "...P.S.: You want some real fun? Organize an AM-only contest!" * Kim, It's odd that you should mention this point... Back in the early 90's, when I was still a stalwart ARRL member, I petitioned the League --- by way of letters mailed to both the Contest Advisory chairman, as well as to my regional representative on the committee --- to give consideration to incorporating AM phone in the annual "Straight Key Night" activity, as an adjunct to those Hams who either (A) were never fond of CW in the first place, or, (B) were physically unable to send code manually anymore due to age, physical disability, etc. I never received a response from ANYONE in the matter...however, some months later, there was a summary printed in QST of one of the regular general ARRL meetings which are held on a regular basis: the CAC had its input therein, alright...the notion of incorporating AM was laughingly referred in passing in it. Now, what was that you were saying again about bringing change from within...? Pretty tough nut to crack when the forces within don't listen...and no, it was NOT any "...real fun", either... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] ARRL classifieds kaput
Hi Bob, Write them via hardcopy snail mail, instead... It works better, in that it can't be simply deleted at the stroke of a key, & eventually it ends up on SOMEONE'S desk (I was once told this by a national health care insurer, who followed-up on my paper letter with a direct phone call to me. "Why didn't you just send us an e-mail...?" said she --- "The fact that you and I are actually SPEAKING to one another right now, in real time, speaks volumes about the effectiveness of written communication," said I). The American Radio Relay League, Inc., 225 Main Street, Newington, Connecticut 06111, U.S.A. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "RJ Mattson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:58 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL classifieds kaput > Charlie > Is there an ARRL e-mail address to voice a complaint to? > bob...w2ami x wn2ami 1962 > > - Original Message - > From: "charles L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:46 AM > Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL classifieds kaput > > > Maybe this is old news, but the ARRL is discontinuing its Radio Online > classifieds as of 4/30. .. > Charlie, W4MEC in NC > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
[AMRadio] "My ARRL, Right or Wrong...!!!"
Hi Paul et al, Yes, the argument that if you're "...not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem" simply does not wash with me, either... I honestly HAVE tried to engage the folks in Newington in the matter of League policy on several occasions, before ultimately letting my membership lapse --- and all I ever got back for my efforts was the proverbial "stonewall", or the usual "party line." The truth of the matter is, they have a pre-set course of action they're following, and that is that --- irregardless of what you, I, or others might think, or may advance forward which might be contrary to the "chosen route." To change direction in any way, based upon subsequent outside input, would be an admission of error on their part...and big organizations (be they governments, manufacturers, whatever) I've found, do NOT like to admit to having made mistakes. Yes, I accept the fact that there are no other replacements anywhere on the horizon to pick up on the good deeds that the ARRL has done --- and indeed, CONTINUES to do on behalf of Amateur radio, everywhere --- still, to sit back and to say & do NOTHING is wrong, too. I personally tried, failed, and ultimately decided to "vote" with my feet, by simply leaving...I could not accept the "...my country/League, right or wrong!" mantra that so many apparently have... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "VJB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 7:00 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Re: Getting on the Air - May 2008 QST > There's a difference in articles published in the > club's magazine, QST, when they're written by > subscribers compared to articles that are written by > club staff at the ARRL. > > The difference is that the articles carrying a staff > byline represent official League policy to some > degree. All other views are those of outsiders -- > those outside the political environment in Newington. > > So, regardless of the $65/page the club magazine might > pay for outside freelance articles about AM, vintage > gear, homebrewing, or the category we favor here on > this reflector, the value of that story does not carry > the same weight as the implied endorsement reflected > in an article on AM presented by a League staffer. > > That's just the way it is. And it's why you won't see > anything positive written by them, about AM. It's not > their prevailing mood to accommodate us. Ask me if you > need detailed proof. > > --Paul/VJB > > > > > > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Getting on the Air - May 2008 QST
Hi Mark, Well spoken... I once had to replace the MRF-422(?) RF power output transistors in my FT-980 here...for what I paid for these wonderful, low-voltage, SAFE solidstate devices, I could have purchased a LOT of 12BY7's & 6146's...! Some of these god-sent transistors cost more --- and are a LOT more rare --- than tubes to-day, especially the sand-derived active devices from earlier no-tube gear (have you priced direct-replacement germanium power transistors lately, as were employed in the multi-vibrator power supplies of 60's/70's mobile QRO equipment...?!). ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Mark K3MSB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:27 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Getting on the Air - May 2008 QST > "My first recommendation would be to only consider older vacuum tube > or hybrid gear (solid state receiver, tubes in part of the > transmitter) if you have experience working with vacuum tube > transmitters. It is too easy to destroy hard to get transmitting > tubes while you learn". > > One of the most common PA line ups of hybrid transmitters is a 12BY7A > driver and a pair of 6146 finals. Without searching hard, you can get > all 3 NOS at a fester for $12; less if you put some effort into it. > > 73 Mark K3MSB > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Getting on the Air - May 2008 QST
Hi Joe, I echo those sentiments here... QST ceased to be desirable (never-mind "collectable"!) when the geniuses in Connecticut decided to "gut" the magazine by publishing THE NATIONAL CONTEST JOURNAL, and QEX, right alongside it. What'd that do to QST...? It became a mere shadow of its former, great self, IMHO. Just what exactly is it anymore, anyway...? Little more than a touchy-feely-warm-and-fuzzy tome, that each month shows some new 8 year old seated in front of a synthesized transceiver, and page after page of ads. I get more out of ONE SINGLE "small-format" QST, than I do out of a whole half year's worth of them to-day... QST, R.I.P.! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ ** - Original Message - From: "Joseph Bento" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 12:32 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Getting on the Air - May 2008 QST > The "Getting On The Air" column by W1ZR. Vacuum tube based equipment > is far too dangerous to consider for a first rig, and building your > own equipment apparently isn't even a consideration any longer. If it > uses tubes, GASP! High Voltage! We can't have any of that! Also, > avoid gear older than 8 years, because you might not be able to get it > repaired. I hang my head in shame over what has happened to this once > great hobby where people were somewhat technically competent. Those > that lacked technical skills at least learned a bit of theory to at > least have a basic understanding of the operation of their equipment. > > At 44 years old, I'm a relative youngster in ham radio. I build and > restore vacuum tube equipment. I also play the guitar. The electric > guitar fraternity seems to embrace homebrewing far more than the > amateur community does today. Most good guitar amp designs are still > vacuum tube based, including modern designs. People regularly modify > their amps or build clone designs. Yes, high voltage. You learn the > proper precautions. Seems rather funny that a musician might be more > apt to work with electronics than a ham radio operator. > > Modern electronics is too complicated, tubes are too dangerous - it's > no wonder that electronics isn't even taught any longer throughout > most of the school system. > > I'm really beginning to question why I continue to support the ARRL. > At first when I saw the cover of this issue, I had thought there would > be all these neat projects from the Homebrewer's Challenge. Needless > to say, I was disappointed. I used to treasure QST. While I still > save all my issues, I'm beginning to wonder why. It certainly isn't > the technical journal it once was. > > 73, > Joe, N6DGY > Pleasant Grove, UT > > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor
Hi Guys, You'd think that with the "graying" of the Amateur Radio ranks, there'd be room enough to embrace any and EVERY devotee of the hobby, rather than try to cut them from the ranks... I know what I'm talking about: I just came home from what is supposed to be the BIGGEST Hamfest in Canada...by times I felt like I was attending some senior citizens' outing. Everyone --- with the exception of yours truly, of course (tongue pressed FIRMLY against cheek!) has aged, and there were VERY few "youngsters" hanging about the place... "United we stand..." correct? We're ALL Hams first, and AM'ers, homebrewers, WHATEVER, second. Why can't people see this and simply accept the hobby for the diverse thing that it is...? ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "JACK C. SHUTT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2008 3:58 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] The QST Doctor > Pete, > > I would say then...we need to exert pressure right back and do what is best for us and our interests. We do not need to succumb to the so-called wisdom of other "global " influences. We need to act like leaders and proponents of freedom of choice and diversity of interests within our hobby. We need to continue to enjoy our favorite mode (AM) and champion its use by any who wish to participate. At the same time, we should encourage clean operation and quality signals. > > A lot of this bandwidth conservation baloney is supposedly based on promotion of "superior" technology, when in fact, it is really selfish politically-motivated elitism. Like I said before, there is room for all of us to enjoy our favorite activity without forcing everyone to comply to bandwidth restrictions that clearly eliminate or severely restrict some modes. I'm sure that there are a large number of radio amateurs that do not agree with the misplaced agenda of the elitists who seem to feel that if it isn't the latest technology, it must be abolished. Gosh, if that were preferable...maybe we should all just revert to 100% CW for the ultimate in narrow band communications. It seems to me that when people are enjoying something, there always have to be counter forces that continually try to spoil it for them. Many, if not most of the complaints against AM are generated by persons who seem to delight in creating discourse and ruining other's enjoyment of the hobby. > Instead of trying to get alongthey want it all their way, or not at all. They crowd up close to AM QSOs and then complain about the bandwidth taken up by AM. They continually complain about splatter...when often they are creating more havoc themselves by overdriving "linear" amplifiers and exceeding the bandwidth of most properly operating AM transmitters. This just not acceptable! Just because these other interests are pushing for defined bandwidths for all modes, does not mean that we have to agree or knuckle under to their demands! > > 73, Jack, W9GT > > Peter Markavage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's actually very simple. Many International amateur organizations > within countries are discussing and/or pushing for defined bandwidths for > all communication modes. As more and more of these become the law of > their land, sooner or later, pressure will be exerted for our own > government to conform. It may take years, but the writing is written on > the wall. > > Pete, wa2cwa > http://www.manualman.com > > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 07:09:10 -0700 (PDT) "JACK C. SHUTT" > writes: > > Does anybody really understand why there is all of this obsession > > with band width? We recently had the phone band expanded, activity > > is noticeably down and these would-be bandwidth cops are still > > ranting about bandwidth conservation. Why don't they just do their > > own thing and leave us alone? There is plenty of room for everyone. > > > > 73, Jack, W9GT > > > > Warren Elly wrote: > > These are vile people...narrow minded, with the arrl agenda of > > forcing > > "their" ham radio down our throats... > > Warren W1GUD > > Lifelong AMer > > Lifetime Member ARRL Disenfranchised by League Policy > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://ma
Re: [AMRadio] carrier current transmissions
Hi Charles, Back some 33 years ago, my first full-time job after graduating from university was with a small hydro-electric components manufacturing firm in Toronto, called "Trench Electric." One of their specialty items was the manufacture of wave traps, used when coupling VLF RF signals into the multi-kilovolt high-tension power lines that traverse the country. Seems hydo companies used RF signal devices travelling directly through their "right of ways" to trigger remote control devices along their system...they even communicated orally (or at least, they USED to, back then) via SSB. Our company never manufactured the RF generating devices, just the wave traps. As I recall, the SSB generators were rated at around the 100-watts level. The idea was NOT to actually radiate from the HV lines, per se, but rather to travel directly on them, from point A to point B. I thought that was a marvelously original concept, until such time as I saw Hams pulling off more or less the exact same stunt, in specific WW2 era issues of QST magazine...Radio Amateurs pre-dated the Trench stuff by some 30+ years! Hi Hi. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "charles whitesmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:56 PM Subject: [AMRadio] carrier current transmissions > > Interesting info on Powerline transmissions by Utility companies,I was CE at Ole Miss college station WCBH in 60's using carrier currrent and we ran pair of 814's into coax which fed individual coupling units for each building feeding the 220 vac entrance line .The buildings leaked radiated signal which was adequate to receive on car radios all over campus.FCC engineers seemed to like our operation as never wrote us a ticket.We were on the air during the somewhat famous integration riots in which we had a sniper firing from a hide on our roof,and a French newsman asassinated just outside our doorsteps. > > I have often wondered if it would be feasible to utilize long HV electricic transmission lines as radiating horizontal "long wire" antennas for medium or even high power commercial AM band broadcasting.Must be experimental data on this somewhere. 73, C.W > > _ > Get in touch in an instant. Get Windows Live Messenger now. > http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_getintouch_042008__ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
[AMRadio] HC-6/U Crystals
Good Day All, I'm always on the prowl for HC-6/U crystals (HIGHER than 12.6-MHz) that I might be able to use to expand the SWL'ing capabilities of my Drake R-4 receiver here... I have many frequencies that are surplus to my needs, NOT ALL of them within Ham bands, as such. Perhaps you'd like to swap a few...? Let me know what you have for trading fodder, & what frequencies, specifically, you might be looking for... Many thanks, & vy ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Ice Storm
Hi Dave, "Ice" is those clear, hard, chunky cold things that float in your glass whenever you order-up a cocktail at your favourite drinking establishent... Oh yes, it's also something that the Phoenix Coyotes "skate" on (I'll explain later), but on a much larger scale. It's sort of a Canadian thing, in a LOT of ways... I hope this helps! :>) ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "David Hollander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ice Storm > What's Ice??? > > Dave N7RK Phoenix, Arizona > -- > *** > Dave N7RK Boatanchors Home Page: http://members.cox.net/n7rk > Phoenix, Arizona *DXCC Honor Roll**WAZ#22 - 75 Meter SSB* > > ex-XE2/N7RK, N7RK/ZB2, VK2ERK, ZM0AJN, WB6NRK, WN6IWX > > Boatanchor and Antique Radio Collector > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Wanted: Receiver - New England
Hi JT, This may not exactly fit the specifics of your needs or requirements, but for my money, one of THE best tube-type receivers (and it was designed & built near the zenith of the vacuum tube era) is the R-4 series from Drake... They are still readily available, AND at good prices --- especially the series preceding the "C" version (which apparently needs a lot of "after-market" hot-rodding anyway to make it really come alive, anyway) Now, if you want something without 160-meters --- but at HALF the price of an R-4 --- get yourself a decent Heathkit SB-301. Two caveats: if you want 160 with the R-4, you'll need a 12.6-MHz crystal...and if you want AM with the SB-301, you'll need an AM IF filter (the SB-310 wider unit preferred in this application). My $0.02 worth, anyway... Either way, you'll get a classic, hollow-state receiver, that is readily repairable by yourself, that's stable, sensitive, and flexible...AND it won't cost you an arm & a leg, either! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "JT Croteau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 10:16 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Wanted: Receiver - New England > I'm going to be looking for a receiver at the beginning of the month > (hate getting paid once/month) and wondering if anyone has anything > they'd be selling or have any leads on. > > I don't have a big list of requirements and can't afford a "museum > quality" R-390A or Super Pro but want to get on the air now that I > have a decent plate modulated TX and not sure if my simple regen I am > building will be up to snuff. I should probably save/wait for > NEAR-fest but I'd really like to get on the air. > > I'll have $350 to $400 to spend: > > * Primary use - HAM band AM reception primarily on 75 and 40 initially > - 160 down the road > > * Needs to work, something that needs a little TLC is fine but would > like it to work as soon as I bring it home. > > * Something located north of New York City so I can come pick it up. > I don't like driving south of NYC. > > * Nice audio, doesn't have to be the greatest quality but just > enjoyable listening and something I can feed into a nice speaker > system. > > * Something that would fit inside a 19" rack cabinet would be a big > plus but not a requirement. Desk space is getting sparse but I have > about 3' of unused space inside my rack where a RX could fit nicely. > > > Any ideas? Thanks guys. > > -- > JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx) > Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope tomonitor modulationonAM transmitter
Hi Geoff, It sure does pay to read "...the fine print", n'est ce pas...? Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Geoff/W5OMR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:18 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope tomonitor modulationonAM transmitter > Jim Wilhite wrote: > > To anyone considering an SB 610 or 614, keep in mind they must be > > constructed to match the IF frequency of the receiver to which they > > will be interfaced. > > Uh... > I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for > monitoring the 'transmitted' signal. > > > > > Some of them were built to work with the Heath receivers with the 3 > > meg IF and those that were built for 455 Kc. had the coils that would > > do so. > > > > If you find one for with the 3 Kc IF coils, > > kc? you said 3meg(sic). Which is it? > > > it won't work properly with a NC 300 or NC 183D for example. Heath > > packaged the coils for both with the units and the builder chose which > > he wanted. I doubt you will receive the coils that were not used > > during construction. Check them out before you find you have > > something that won't work with your receiver. > > > So... > I was under the impression that the 610 / 614 monitor scopes were for > monitoring the 'transmitted' signal. Since I wasn't sure, I went looking. > > > http://web.comhem.se/~u87540545/Heathkit/Products/pageSB610.htm > Heathkit SB-610 > The Heathkit SB-610 monitor scope is primarily designed for monitor the > RF-signals, on-the-air signals, from the local transmitter. It can also > be used to monitor received signals when connected to a receiver. > It monitors RF-envelop, RF-trapezoid and RTTY pattern. SB-610 has also a > built-in two-tone sinewave AF-oscillator for SSB-transmitter adjustment. > > The Monitor-Scope matches the SB-line. > > > > > -- > Driving your AM Rig without a scope, > is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV) > > -- > 73 = Best Regards, > -Geoff/W5OMR > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/ List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation onAM transmitter
Hi John, The SB-610 has been an absolutely invaluable aid here at my stations, in both the CW and voice modes (AM, as well as SSB)... All I do when monitoring 'phone transmissions here is to place the 'scope into a trapezoidal pattern. I adjust the vertical gain such that a carrier makes the line about 2/3 the height of the screen, or so, and the horizontal gain is set so that the modulated triangle is about as equilateral as it can be... When modulating 100%, the pattern should, indeed, be a full, equilateral triangle. One thing that I neglected to do until YEARS later was to pull the top RH knob out --- that's the one marked "CLAMP" --- whenever using the trapezoidal feature: by doing this, there is no image on the face of the scope until you key-up your transmitter. If you leave the knob "in" all the time, you'll eventually get a spot "burned" into the inside face of the CRT, like I did with mine here... The clamp feature keeps the point deflected off-screen into the RH side of the CRT --- as soon as you hit the transmit button on your rig, the line zips out from the right, to the centre of the tube, like magic...! Chalk one up on the importance of reading the instructions first, not later! Hi Hi. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ . I can't recall the name of the control because the scop - Original Message - From: "John King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:39 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope to monitor modulation onAM transmitter > Anyone experienced at using Heath SB 610 Monitor Scope > to monitor the modulation pattern of the outgoing > signal of an AM transmitter? > > I need to have session to discuss the application of > the SB 610 to that operation. > > Please email me directly for such a discussion. Your > assistance in understanding the application and > process will be greatly appreciated. Thanks and 73, > John, K5PGW > > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Hamcation Report
Hi Mark, OK, I'll bite...just where, exactly, was this Ham Radio Xanadu, anyway...?! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Mark Foltarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 8:23 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Hamcation Report > Group, > >There were a ton of good deals on rigs. Cheap ,older, HF rice boxes ( AM capable) for some truly bargin prices. > >The weather was a little on the cold side. > >I picked up another GPR 90. > >Bought and sold some WWII stuff. > >Had to get one of those 30 ft fiberglass pole kits for field day. > > Bought bits and pieces for several projects. > > Overall great weekend. > > > > de KA4JVY > > Mark > > > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] RG-6 Coax
Hi Guys, I use RG-6 cable here EXCLUSIVELY with my 160-meter 3-element phased triangular inverted "L" arrray --- the 135-degree phasing harnesses, the individual feeders, THE WORKS! ...AND I run a kilowatt input here, too. No problems thus far, and I honestly believe that at this low a frequency, I haven't even come close to what this cable is truly capable of handling. ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "Donald Sanders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 11:08 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RG-6 Coax > I use a 50 foot length from my 40 meter loop to the 50 > ohm coax and transmit 100 to 150 watts with out a problem. > > Healthfully yours, > Don W4BWS > - Original Message - > From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" > > Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RG-6 Coax > > > > You are correct but I wouldn't consider using it for transmitting on any > > radio with power more than about 25 watts. > > > > The original RG 6 was made well but today finding a consistent quality > > cable is almost impossible unless you buy the best US specified brand, > > which is almost as expensive as LMR type cable. > > > > Even then, you are taking a chance if you try to put much over 25 watts > > into it. > > > > Jim/W5JO > > > > > > > > >I believe it's in the neighborhoon of 72 ohms. Typical video cable. > > > > >> Does anyone know off hand the impedance of RG-6? I was given a > > >> hundred feet > > >> or so I'd like to use with my UHF antennas, but the cable guy didn't > > >> know > > >> the impedance. Google showed some specs, but I gave up before I got > > >> the > > >> impedance. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Rick/K5IAR > > > > __ > > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > > AMRadio mailing list > > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word unsubscribe in the message body. > > > > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] ER Magazine
Good Day All, My Elmer neither stood on two legs, nor took a single breath of life in the conventional sense --- and yet, "he" was as much alive and inspiring as any conventional Elmer...to me at any rate... Elmer here was my very first SW receiver: a beat-up, 3rd hand, $40.00 Hallicrafters S-77A, that I found through the want ads in one of my Dad's union newsletters. Looking back, it was surely a good thing that this receiver had the many shortcomings that it did, for these very deficiencies taught me all about improving the performance of things electronic, and made me appreciate the fine art of homebrewing --- or, perhaps more accurately, it put a "face" to that most noble of Amateur activities, i.e. "...tinkering and experimenting"... To whit: -Being an AC/DC receiver, its shocking (literally!) performance made me appreciate the outboard installation of an AC isolation transformer; -Its poor sensitivity on the higher bands forced me to build a regenerative pre-selector; -Its poor selectivity taught me about crystal lattice filters, and Q-multipliers (I installed a Heath QF-1), and passive audio filters (I built one using 88-mh. telephone toroids); -Its poor dial calibration inspired me to build a crystal calibrator, using one of those "$4.50 100-KHz crystals" that Jan Crystals used to sell back in the day; -Its poor stability on 20-, 15-, and 10-meters compelled me to build a crystal controlled down converter, and, On & on it went! In fact, the VERY FIRST working Ham station I ever saw was my own --- and with the singular exception of that receiver, the station was entirely homebrewed... It held sway at VE3CUI for some 12 years --- the transmitters may have come & gone in that time, but the old receiver remained in its well-earned central spot atop the operating position. In fact, it was not retired until 1983, when a brand new Yaesu FT-980 occupied its spot...but I still have the ol' lad, and fire it up from time to time, always amazed to re-discover the incredible quality of the audio emanating from it, and re-living the fuzzy warm memories that only come back to you when you greet a long-lost, old friend... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Re: P.S. - you get to run 1000W input on AM up here
Hi Guys, Canada is nothing BUT a nation of ex-pats as it is...! I know --- my parents were part of the great wave of immigration from Europe that swept into the country in the years after WW2. Have you ever heard of the expression "DP"...? Well, that was about as vile a name as the "n" word is to-day to Afro-Americans, only "DP" --- or, "Displaced Person" was the slangy name entrenched Canadians threw at everyone who was new to the country back then. It was NOT pretty. We were made to feel less-than-human by a large sector of the population, and one could practically feel the bias & prejudice in school, on job sites, etc. But enough of that... Hey all you Americans --- as long as you've got a passport, that's about all you'll ever need to come up here for a visit. Whenever we cross the border to visit our son in Maine, all we ever do --- both ways --- is simply show the guard our birth certificates & our passports, & we're home free (but I've also read somewhere that Americans, as a nation, have one of the LOWEST per capita ownership of passports of any country in the world --- maybe that's why a lot of you guys think our currency is the peso, and that we speak French in the province of Toronto...eh?). So get those documents ready, folks --- because if there really IS such a thing as global warming, there'll be hordes of you flocking north of the border not for the snow & back bacon, but for the temperate weather, and dry land...! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ ** - Original Message - From: "D. Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:37 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Re: P.S. - you get to run 1000W input on AM up here > > So how does Canada feel about ex-pats? I hear you need to > > have a job lined up, or at least be self-sufficient. Central > > heating, parkas, warm toques (?!) and gloves are great and all > > that but how good is the pizza and hot cocoa?? Inquiring minds > > wanna know. And so do I. And thanks. > > > > 73, Terry Bakowski KC9KEL > > Plus, Canada's Medicare covers people of all ages, not just the elderly. And > regarding the toques, one to keep you warm, and there is less paranoia about > the other variety than in USA. And Canadian ham bands have no subbands. > > But it has become much more difficult to get "landed immigrant" status (more > or less the equivalent of the US Green Card) than it was during the VietNam > era, when all you had to do was make your declaration at the border > crossing. > > And apparently it is now difficult to enter Canada even for a short visit. > My daughter's boyfriend had planned to take a camping trip to Thunder Bay > back during the summer. He drove several hundred miles from Nashville to > the border crossing, and they refused him entry because the computer showed > that he had been busted at age 19 for under-age drinking in Tennessee. What > was really so stupid about that was that it should have been a moot point > since 19 would have been legal drinking age in Canada, and when he tried to > enter the country, he was 24, well past the drinking age. Besides, what > does under-age drinking 5 years ago have to do with being a risk to Canada? > Makes me wonder if it would be worth travelling from distant reaches of the > US, if you could unexpectedly be refused entry because of some hassle you > might have forgotten all about. Most of us probably have something trivial > like that on our past record. > > There is a down side to the ham radio issue. Canada's regulations impose a > 6 kHz bandwidth limitation for AM. > But that is apparently taken about as seriously as the USA's p.e.p. > bullschzit. I have never heard of an AM'er on either side of the border > being cited for exceeding either one. And I hear Canadian AM'ers describe > their rigs in detail, with no mention of any measures taken to suppress the > highs. > > Don, k4kyv > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Best Heathkit AM Transmitter
Hi Guys, I agree 101% with all of the positive sentiments re. the Viking II --- it looks good, sounds great (with a minimum of fuss in the "mods" dept.), and is really quite easy to work on, IF you don't mind the weight...! Mine is the rather unique & rare Canadian version, built for the Royal Canadian Air Force 'way back when: it covers the entire SW spectruum, so there is no "band switch", as such --- just multiple frequency ranges, on all of the different switches. It is NOT the U.S. Civil Defence version, but a different animal in and of itself... ...Best of all, I picked it up a coupla years ago for the king's ranson of $60.00! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Geoff/W5OMR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:30 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Best Heathkit AM Transmitter > Donald Sanders wrote: > > I have to agree that the dial was a nuisance but I got it working well > > after a couple tries and over 5 years it worked well. The audio stage > > was a bit hard to get into after it is built and I modified it as I went to > > have better bandpass. I also had the SB-10 SSB adapter and used it > > with the Apache. > > Without the SB-10 I would also chose the DX100B. > > The VFO may not be built-in, but Viking II's, when working proper, are > kinda hard to beat. > > As with any rig, simply replace a few caps, make a couple of mods (PTT, > audio) and you've got a solid 100w performer. > > One could even change out the 6AU6's for a pair of 12AX7's, using the > first one as a Crystal Microphone equalizer, and inverse feed-back, the > 2nd for amplification, into a phase-inverter that would then connect up, > capacitively to the grids of the 807's to get around the weak link in > the audio chain, the audio-driver transformer. > > Yeah, I know the thread is about 'Heathkit' rigs, but one 100w > plate-modulated AM rig, is as good as the next 100w plate-modulated AM rig. > > Apache, DX-100, Viking I/II, any of the 32V series, B&W 5100, etc... > > -- > Driving your AM Rig without a scope, > is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV) > > -- > 73 = Best Regards, > -Geoff/W5OMR > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] USPS International Surface Petition
Good luck, Don...! All the wheeping, wailing, and gnashing of teeth in Canada when this took place here a coupla years ago accomplished absolutely zip, zilch, nada... That's why I'm effectively out of business now, and why eBay keeps coming up with Canadian promotions on a regular basis, to get us back in the groove... Not a chance, I'm afraid. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Don Merz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" ; "Milsurplus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:06 PM Subject: [AMRadio] USPS International Surface Petition > A petition movement has started to bring back international surface USPS service. See this link: > > http://www.PetitionOnline.com/USPSISM/ > > 73, Don Merz, N3RHT > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Contest signal reports
Hi Rick, Not to belabour the point, but a serious contestor just has no time for the proverbial "...old buzzard" transmission typical of AM operations...besides, he's just plain, NOT interested: he wants to maximize his QSO total, & final score. Period. He KNOWS he sounds good, when he's racked-up a big pile of QSOs at the end of the contest... Love it, or leave it, but that's just the nature of the beast, & a fact of life. There's still plenty of room (and time) for all modes & interests, though, and that's one of the appealing things about Amateur Radio, IMHO...it's like television: if you don't like what you see, flip the channel. If you're STILL dis-satisfied, simply hit the "off" switch, & do something else...right? ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "Rick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'" Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 11:11 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Contest signal reports > Bravo, Don! When I ask for a signal report I want honesty. How else will > we know how we sound? If I have a hum, click, chirp or anything else I want > to know about it. Unfortunately, I have peeved more than one contact by > giving honest reports. If they don't want to know the truth, they shouldn't > ask me. I think it's a courtesy to our fellow operators to be honest. > > 73, > Rick/K5IAR > > > I am not a quarmtester, but sometimes I will work a few stations, > particularly in daylight hours during a 160m cw qrmtest. The challenge is > to see what kind of signal might make it across unusual distances during the > > day, and I don't bother to keep score and usually not even a log. > > But I always give honest signal reports. To me, this business of > automatically giving everyone a 599 report is ridiculous, and defeats the > whole purpose. IMO, an operator who has to ask for several repeats to get > the essential information, and then gives a 599 report is a LID! > > And the same goes for the automatic "five-nines" on slopbucket. If they > want my contact, they will have to tolerate my carrier and a real signal > report. > > Don k4kyv > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Contest signal reports
Hi Don, You HAVE to be a dyed-in-the-wool contestor to really "...get" the whole notion, I s'pose...! In the final summation, individual signal reports mean zip / zero / nada, when you get upwards of 2-3+ QSOs per minute... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "D. Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 10:51 AM Subject: [AMRadio] Contest signal reports > I am not a quarmtester, but sometimes I will work a few stations, > particularly in daylight hours during a 160m cw qrmtest. The challenge is > to see what kind of signal might make it across unusual distances during the > day, and I don't bother to keep score and usually not even a log. > > But I always give honest signal reports. To me, this business of > automatically giving everyone a 599 report is ridiculous, and defeats the > whole purpose. IMO, an operator who has to ask for several repeats to get > the essential information, and then gives a 599 report is a LID! > > And the same goes for the automatic "five-nines" on slopbucket. If they > want my contact, they will have to tolerate my carrier and a real signal > report. > > Don k4kyv > ___ > > This message was typed using the DVORAK keyboard layout. > > http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/ > http://gigliwood.com/abcd/ > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
[AMRadio] "What's Wrong With Our Vintage Rceivers?" (Formerly: "AM Recivers")ver survey
"...Hey, now THERE'S a good spin on this thread: personal opinions re. what's wrong with "classic" rigs, per first-hand experience. If anyone wants me to start with my stable, I'd be more than happy to do so! Hi Hi" *** Oh what the heck, I'll start this thing off...it might even help to dispel a myth, or two, about some of these old boat anchors that we collectively may have been harbouring for far too long! Here goes: -RCA AR-88: FAR too heavy to lug around any place (100 pounds!), "guesstimate" frequency read-out, no bandspread as such, leaky filter chokes / bathtub capacitors, seemingly takes FOREVER to get from one end of a band to the other. -HALLICRAFTERS S-77A: AC / DC design can easily zap you, "guesstimate" frequency read-out, terrible images / poor stability / poor sensitivity above 14-MHz, barn door wide selectivity. -HEATHKIT SB-301: Does NOT include 160-meters, NEVER fool with that pinch roller dial (you'll either bust it, or otherwise never get it right again), seems to require re-alignment / touch-ups far more often than other receivers. I won't include the "one off" homebrew stuff that I have here, 'cause nobody would be interested anyway... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] receiver survey
Hi Barrie, What's your take on the SX-88 receiver...? They sure do look attractive enough, but man oh man, do they ever command the big bucks come re-sale time! Is it as good as the dollars it attracts, or is there some kind of mystique / aura surrounding that rig? I sure am curious... That SX-28A sounds like a FB classic, too --- its only drawback, from what I've heard, is the oddball impedance of the audio output transformer for 'phones, & lack of access to specific fixed capacitors because of the switching design of it (like trying to replace a spark plug in certain GM cars with air conditioning!) Hey, now THERE'S a good spin on this thread: personal opinions re. what's wrong with "classic" rigs, per first-hand experience. If anyone wants me to start with my stable, I'd be more than happy to do so! Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "Barrie Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] receiver survey > I still have a few nice AM receivers here. > > SX-28A Very nice. > SX-42 Nice > SX-62B Very, very nice > SX-73 Very, very nice > SX-88 Nice > SX-99 Average > > TW-1000 and several Trans-Oceanics and other portables from the 1940s and > 1950s. > > R-390Very, very nice > 75A4 Nice. > > Since I am no longer able to lug the heavy receivers around, it's likely > they will be for sale soon. Condition listed above. > > I'm open to realistic offers, before they go on that other place. > > 73, Barrie, W7ALW > > > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] receiver survey
Well, here's my $0.02 worth...! Receivers at VE3CUI - VE3XZ: - 1944 RCA AR-88LF (WITH an S-meter); -Late 60's/early 70's Heathkit SB-301 (WITH optional 6- and 2-meter converters); -Early 50's Hallicrafters S-77A; -Homebrewed 4-tube 1929-style regenerative (227's, 224A's, 245, et al); -Homebrewed modified "Mate For The Mighty Midget" (QST April 1966), and, -Homebrewed 12 tube 1929-style superheterodyne (224A's, 227's, 245's, etc.). ...And yes, they all work very FB, too...! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "John Lyles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 1:35 PM Subject: [AMRadio] receiver survey > Receivers at K5PRO > 75A3 with prod detector addition * > NC300 > EH Scott Marine special > JRC NRD5353/D ** > > > * needs fixin > ** my favorite for convenience of use but no tubes in it > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Can You Believe It? Johnson 500
Hi Guys, I can recall seeing one for sale in the want ads of the very first issue of ELECTRIC RADIO magazine here, going back some 17-plus years ago... "Asking price" was around $300.00 - $350.00...! What hath time wrought...?! Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ ** - Original Message - From: "ronnie.hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 3:56 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Can You Believe It? Johnson 500 > I'm surprised it didn't go for more. Given the rarity and the fact that they > were going for that much 5 years ago. > > If I had the money I would pay that for a Johnson 500 thats the real > truth of the matter. Some of us can afford to pay big bucks and some of us > can't. Those that can will pay whatever it takes. Nothing ever changes! > > W5SUM - Ronnie > __ > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Yes, well
Hi Todd, Yesterday I had the dubious pleasure(?) of visiting the "...big smoke" here that calls itself Toronto --- right in the bowels of the city, downtown... I don't know if it was accrued carelessness on the part of the big city delivery guy that my wife & I just happened to see, or something atypical of ALL courier / delivery folks...but we're waiting to drive around this big cube truck that's double-parked, back door hauled in full up position, with the guy standing inside, some 4-feet(?) above the street... He swings around with a large cadboard carton, waist height, then simply drops it to the asphalt at that height. Bombs away! I remarked to my wife that I hoped the containers never had anything like delicate bone china, etc. inside... Now, I realize that commercial carriers stipulate that anything & everything you ship with them is supposed to withstand a drop from a height of, what was it now, six feet...? But how realistic is that, and why don't these people go the extra distance and simply "...handle with care"...? Heaven knows they charge enough. When I worked for one of the Big 3 national automobile manufacturers, our contracts with the different carriers were VERY explicit & detailed as to just how much abuse our cars were allowed to be subjected to in transit. Why can't we, as individual consumers, expect the same...? It'd serve them all right to get the exclusive contract to deliver nitro glycerin for some chemiical outfit, wouldn't it...?! It'd be like the Darwin effect, a culling of the ranks --- only the kind & gentle would survive! :>) ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ *** - Original Message - From: "Todd, KA1KAQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:42 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Yes, well > It seemed like a good idea at the time, but my remarks made in haste > in response to other comments really don't belong in this conversation > or venue. Seeing Brian's post made me realize I wasn't any smarter for > responding in the manner I did. > > My apologies to the list. Getting a nice piece of iron or anything > else smashed, and seeing that it really was packed properly is enough > to ruin any AMer's day. The packaging looks bad because it had the > hell beat out of it. Double-walled cardboard compressed almost as thin > as paper. The box wasn't badly packed, it was poorly handled. Guess I > wasn't clear about that. > > ~ Todd, KA1KAQ > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] 810's
Hi Don, The original stuff is probably some latent carcinogenic concoction anyway, and best stayed away from (heck, what ISN'T a carcinogen anymore, anyway...?! Hi Hi). Back in "...ye olden golden daze", I seem to recall reading on the instruction label for Lepage's-brand epoxy glue that if one is to subject the stuff to high heat, it's best to use a TWO to one (as opposed to one to one) ratio / blend of epoxy resin to hardener. Either way, the stuff is practically indestructable, as you say... BTW, to secure loose tube bases to glass envelopes, I still stand by my method of "weeping" the watery kind of "crazy glue" along the seam of the base (where glass meets plastic). I know that some experts on the list claim such a fix will surely spell the demise of said tubes, but someone hasn't been telling my tubes that... As a result, I have dozens of them --- in storage, as well as in active duty --- that have been repaired this way, going back some 20 years now... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ * - Original Message - From: "D. Chester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] 810's > > www.cotronics.com/vo/cotr/index.htm > > Plenty of hi-temp adhesives to 4000F > > Thanks for the info. I bookmarked that one. > > I have used both JB Weld (the slow curing version) and plain "Two-ton > crystal clear" epoxy to glue plate and grid caps. > > I once had a 810 that I used in the modulator. I glued the plate cap with > regular crystal clear epoxy. It never let go, but the clear epoxy gradually > turned amberish and finally completely black and opaque, but the plate cap > stayed solidly attached. I think I rotated that tube out of service and > still have it amongst my spares. > > Does anyone know what the original adhesive used on tubes is? Everything > from small receiving tube bases and the plate caps on transmitting tubes > seems to be glued on with the same brownish cement that appears to contain > air bubbles. > > But given the very common problem of loose bases and caps, maybe the > original stuff wouldn't be the best choice for repair even if it were > available. > > Don k4kyv > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] New Book: The World of Ham Radio, 1901-1950
On 22nd August, Don wrote... "...One of the few exceptions to the above, but by far the most prominent, lies within the AM community, where genuine amateur radio lives on as both a technically oriented hobby and an art form." ** Well put, Don --- congratulations on crystallizing into print the very thoughts that I'm sure so many others harbour, too... I have often been of the opinion that AM'ers are unique in that, on the one hand, they are perhaps the epitome of appliance operatoring (albeit with appliances that are a half-century-plus in age!), and yet on the other hand, are fearless when it comes to delving into the very bowels of this same hardware in order to effect any & all repairs and improvements as may be necessary... I could probably count on the fingers of one hand all of the AM'ers that I know & have met who have never built at least an RF amplifier, or a transmatch, for daily useage in their stations. I s'pose it's all in keeping with the harsh reality that whenever a prized vintage rig breaks down, there is just nobody around to fix it anymore (unlike "Icom America", there simply is no "Boaanchors America --- and even if there was, can't you just imagine the shipping expenses?!). If necessity is, indeed, the mother of invention, then it serves also as inspiration to boldly go where few dare go to-day --- and isn't that really a good thing? I think so. I'm glad others agree... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] FW: Latest ARRL Big Push..! Spanish Tests..!!
Hi All, You know, whenever non-Ham friends ask me how it is that I'm able to understand other Hams in places as far-flung as Mongolia & Serbia, I tell them the truth: it's really quite simple, because we all speak the universal language of ENGLISH. It's no different, I tell them, than the world of commercial aviation: ENGLISH is the universal language used on ALL international communications between pilots & air traffic controllers...not Spanish, not French, not Cantonese, but ENGLISH. Yet, here in Canada, which is --- for better or worse --- officially a bi-lingual country (English & French), one can now see street signs and billboards in certain sections of the provincial capital city of Toronto that are written wholly in CHINESE. There is even a 100% Chinese AM radio station on the BC band... So guys, just go ahead & open the door a crack, and see how many more feet will force themselves in between it & the door frame... It's all merely an extension of that pervasive, incidious & non-sensical "...political correctness", I'm afraid... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Peter Markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2007 10:54 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] FW: Latest ARRL Big Push..! Spanish Tests..!! > You don't have to go far here in the U. S. to see impact. In many urban > areas, street signs are in Spanish and English; many department and > retail stores now have Spanish/English signs throughout their stores. In > some areas, schools, even at the elementary level, have dedicated Spanish > and English, "learn-the-language" type classes. Over the last several > years, Kenwood has printed Spanish and English versions of their > operating manuals. > > The Puerto Rico Amateur Radio League has been using Spanish language > question pools, which they developed, for the last several years with > great success. > > The world is getting smaller every day. > > Pete, wa2cwa > > On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 21:29:51 -0500 WE0H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Whew...squeaked by another crazy proposal... The FCC would have to > > write > > the rules in Spanish if they tested in that language. I myself am a > > > > proponent of 'if you live here, learn the language'. I wouldn't > > expect > > some foreign country to cater to English if I moved there. > > > > Mike > > WE0H > > > > Mike Sawyer wrote: > > > Pete said: > > > > > > Old, old, news! > > > See the FCC's response to the request by the Puerto Rico Amateur > > Radio > > > League: > > > http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-814A1.pdf > > > > > > > > > And ARRL Letter, dated March 2, 2007, half way down the page: > > > FCC Says No to Petition Calling for Exams in Languages other than > > > English: > > > http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/07/0302/ > > > > > > It wasn't even an ARRL Push, but it's still "good" fodder for > > some. > > > > > > Pete, wa2cwa > > > > > > - > > > Thanks Pete, > > > You know I'm no cheerleader for the (be)League(d) but I > > thought that > > > email by W0LPQ was a misunderstanding by what the FCC said. I > > remember > > > reading it in March which is bizarre since I don't frequent the > > ARRgghhL's > > > website nor the FCC's website all that often. Like you said, good > > fodder. > > > Mod-U-Lator, > > > Mike(y) > > > W3SLK > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] USPS Changes May 14
Hi Bry, FedEx may good for domestic shipments, i.e. U.S.A.-to-U.S.A., but for INTERNATIONAL deliveries --- like the U.S.A. to Canada --- FORGET it! Like all of the other "commercials", they have the very ODIOUS habit of charging us a MINIMUM $25.00 "...brokerage fee" on everything they might carry across the 49th parallel... ...And lest you think I'm merely whining, I've a VERY strong suspicion that said policy is reciprocal on shipments from us, to you... ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:20 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] USPS Changes May 14 > USPS has been going to hell in a handbasket for some time now. > > They just get worse and worse. > > I tell them they should bui;d another post office nerar us so we > won't have to CONSTANTLY wait in line for 30-35 minutes. > They ignore me. I would pay 50 cents for a stamp, but really they > are so messed up it is pathetic. > > Thank God for FEDEX! > > > As you know I ship a lot, so it is interesting to me > > the changes that USPS is putting in May 14. Rate > > increases on everything of course--that's standard. > > But their parcel post service is actually changing > > quite a bit. > > > > Foreign surface mail shipping has been eliminated. > > It's all air mail as of May 14th. That should really > > cut down on the number of boatanchors crossing the > > pond. > > > > Global priority mail is now limited to 3 ounces. That > > kills the best way to ship small parts, mics and > > accessories overseas inexpensively. > > > > Parcel Post--ALL packages now have to be measured and > > are charged more as size goes up--not just weight. > > That should certainly drive a lot of shiping into > > UPS/FedEx camp. > > > > There's many other small changes. If you ship a lot, > > you probably ought to visit USPS.COM and check it out. > > > > 73, Don Merz, N3RHT > > > > __ > > AMRadio mailing list > > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word unsubscribe in the message body. > > > > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] League pulls RM-11306
Hi Guys, Anyone who says that CW is extinct has been spending FAR too much time in front of the computer, & not enough time in front of the rig...! If CW is so dead & buried, then why is it that the bands are virtually overflowing with so many snappy fists on any major contest weekend...? If nothing else, CW is a very effective "lid filter"...besides, I find my time on CW to be relaxing & challenging, at the same time. We communicate orally during the course of our working days enough as it is --- it's a magical thing to be able to communicate through one's fingers... Besides, a mastery of CW is like mastery of a second language...and as the wise sage once said, "...A man who speaks just one single language is but half a man." ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 9:10 AM Subject: RE: [AMRadio] League pulls RM-11306 > > That came along because CW is really not a viable means of communication... > > AM and CW will survive for a LONG time yet - maybe as long as > the other modes. > > Don't count CW out yet! > > There was a recent contest held between sending a message via > morse code and sending a text message between two cell phones. > > The CW message came through FIRST! > > There is a video clip of the TV show on the web. It is QUITE > entertaining! It could be elightening if you think morse code is > dead. > > > > > > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Re: [ForSale-Swap] FS: SX-115, Boatanchor Test Gear, Teletype TU's, HP 8640B
I'll second that motion...! ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "A.R.S. - W5AMI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: [ForSale-Swap] FS: SX-115, Boatanchor Test Gear, Teletype TU's, HP 8640B > On 4/16/07, rbethman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Just MY $0.002 worth, BUT Don is a top drawer "Class Act"! > > > > I've dealt with him in some of his offers. Precisely as described, and > > he packs EXTREMELY well! > > > > I agree. Don has been like the AMRadio List online hamfest for a long > time. Always has interesting items at a bargain compared to most > other outlets. For the newer members of this list that don't know > Don, I assure you that you can't go wrong if you see something you > need he has listed. > > w5ami > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM
Hi Larry, I don't know what you've been reading or hearing about us there lately, but up here we manage to pay for everything ourselves...! NO NEED to confiscate the property of others to pay for health care at all --- NOT when you get taxed 33% of your income right off the bat before you even get paid, when your property taxes go up 8.3% per year, when half the money you spend on gas goes to the government, & two-thirds of the bottle of booze you buy to console yourself goes ditto...! Even the income tax refund we get back from the government at year's end gets taxed!!! It's enough to make a guy want to throw bags of tea into Lake Ontario...Hi Hi. ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "ne1s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:20 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > Brett gazdzinski writes: > > > I would move up there, you got free health care and so on, > > but its to cold for motorcycles! > > > > C'mon, Brett. I know you're too principled a guy to use the force of the > state to confiscate property from others in order to finance your own health > care ;>) > > Heard you calling CQ on 7290 yesterday, but was in the middle of lifting > weights, so didn't answer. There were a bunch of 2's and 3's calling CQ, > sometimes on top of one another, but all were apparently in each other's > skip zone. I was hearing them quite well up here in Maine, though. > > 73, > -Larry/NE1S > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word unsubscribe in the message body. __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] VJB Paul Reception Report
Hi Vince, Just spread the word around that CUBA banned incandescent light bulbs years ago, in favour of 100% fluorescents... Now, what self-respectin' folk would wanna follow the lead of a Godless Commie State like that, anyhoo...?! Hi Hi ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Vince Werber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] VJB Paul Reception Report > As a person that likes to work with tubes I plan to keep working with them > but be warned that there is at least one state in the U.S> that plans to > (or has) ban the Edison Light blub... tubes will follow and it all > because of the 'global warming' hysteria... There is also global warming > on Mars but did we have anything to do with that? > > Let's get real with real science... the sun is. in fact, getting warmer... > > End of comment. > > 73 > vince > ka1iic __ AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM
Note To Jim (W5JO)... Jim, everytime I try to e-mail you a direct response, it bounces back to me with an error message... Have you changed your address recently...? ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 11:02 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > Eddy I would like to see how you laid out the 135 degree > phased inverted L array. Please explain off line if you > wish. > > 73 Jim > W5JO > > > > > Hi Chuck, > > > > Many thanks for the FB note, & good words... > > > > Yes indeed, I'm still keeping the good folks at the Kester > > Solder Co. > > working two shifts! Hi Hi. I'm presently collecting what > > I'll need for a HB > > 4PR-1000A kilowatt linear amplifier dedicated to > > 160-meters, to complement > > my 3-element(!) 135-degree phased inerted "L" array for > > 1.8-MHz> > > ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:37 AM > > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat > > to AM > > > > > >> Well said Eddy.. > >> > >> Far too many in the USA are oblivious to the fact that > >> Government > >> (local, state and federal) and the politically correct > >> mouth-breathers > >> who support their actions are slowly consuming our > >> freedoms and > >> regulating everything to death. Ham radio is right in > >> that mix. > >> > >> BTW, are you still building those stunning rigs? > >> > >> 73 de W4MIL > >> Chuck > >> > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net > >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 9:10 AM > >> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat > >> to AM > >> > >> What the heck is going on with our neighbours south of > >> the 49th > >> Parallel...?! > >> > >> You've seemingly got a licensing body populated by > >> little-more than > >> did-interested, beaurocratic, career-oriented mandarins, > >> headed-up by > >> politically correct toadies of big money & big > >> bu$ine$$...your largest > >> lobby > >> group seems to be grossly ineffective of late in its > >> ability to grab > >> the ear > >> of the FCC to make it listen, because it's apparently too > >> distracted by > >> its > >> own agenda & internal empire building... > >> > >> I am NOT attempting to condemn you good folks, or put you > >> down, or set > >> up > >> our system here in Canada by comparison as some sort of a > >> ",,,beacon of > >> enlightenment" --- nothing like that at all! But > >> man-o-man, I do feel > >> for > >> you guys. > >> > >> It's like you're all alone in a cruel world that simply > >> continues to > >> change > >> for the worst. Obviously politics & Ham radio do NOT > >> mix...on ANY > >> level. I > >> only hope things might change for you guys soon, because > >> you certainly > >> do > >> deserve better than what you've been getting for the past > >> several years, > >> IMHO... > >> > >> ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ > >> > >> > >> > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" > >> > >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:51 AM > >> Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to > >> AM > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, Paul - excellent commentary from WA3VJB... > >> > > >> > The threat to operators of old tube AM and CW rigs is > >> > somewhat diminished. > >> > > >> > To expand and explain slightly - the part they DO want > >> > to keep... > >> > They now propose to destroy only ten meters, perhaps > >> > figuring > >> > that since there has been a long sunspot minimum, no > >> > one > >> > will be paying attention... > >> > > >> > http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/23/101/?nc=1 > >> > > >> > Wa3VJB wrote > >> > > >> > > The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in > >> > > Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to > >> > > impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the > >> > > various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters. > >> > > > >> > > In an email to the club's volunteer administrators, > >> > > Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected > >> > > staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming > >> > > opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past > >> > > several years. > >> > > > >> >
Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM
Hi Chuck, Many thanks for the FB note, & good words... Yes indeed, I'm still keeping the good folks at the Kester Solder Co. working two shifts! Hi Hi. I'm presently collecting what I'll need for a HB 4PR-1000A kilowatt linear amplifier dedicated to 160-meters, to complement my 3-element(!) 135-degree phased inerted "L" array for 1.8-MHz (yes, the dreaded Top Band CW DX bug has bitten me --- and HARD, too! I'm up to 108 countries worked there now, and climbing). I've retired as of last June, & the time has given me a lot of time to reflect upon things --- quite frankly, I don't like much of what I'm seeing around me, but who cares about the opinion of an "O.F." like me...? About all we can do anymore, it seems, is to try not to let that sort of stuff get under one's skin, & to carry on... It IS hard to do, though! ~73!~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 7:37 AM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > Well said Eddy.. > > Far too many in the USA are oblivious to the fact that Government > (local, state and federal) and the politically correct mouth-breathers > who support their actions are slowly consuming our freedoms and > regulating everything to death. Ham radio is right in that mix. > > BTW, are you still building those stunning rigs? > > 73 de W4MIL > Chuck > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 9:10 AM > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > > What the heck is going on with our neighbours south of the 49th > Parallel...?! > > You've seemingly got a licensing body populated by little-more than > did-interested, beaurocratic, career-oriented mandarins, headed-up by > politically correct toadies of big money & big bu$ine$$...your largest > lobby > group seems to be grossly ineffective of late in its ability to grab > the ear > of the FCC to make it listen, because it's apparently too distracted by > its > own agenda & internal empire building... > > I am NOT attempting to condemn you good folks, or put you down, or set > up > our system here in Canada by comparison as some sort of a ",,,beacon of > enlightenment" --- nothing like that at all! But man-o-man, I do feel > for > you guys. > > It's like you're all alone in a cruel world that simply continues to > change > for the worst. Obviously politics & Ham radio do NOT mix...on ANY > level. I > only hope things might change for you guys soon, because you certainly > do > deserve better than what you've been getting for the past several years, > IMHO... > > ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:51 AM > Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > > > > Thanks, Paul - excellent commentary from WA3VJB... > > > > The threat to operators of old tube AM and CW rigs is > > somewhat diminished. > > > > To expand and explain slightly - the part they DO want to keep... > > They now propose to destroy only ten meters, perhaps figuring > > that since there has been a long sunspot minimum, no one > > will be paying attention... > > > > http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/23/101/?nc=1 > > > > Wa3VJB wrote > > > > > The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in > > > Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to > > > impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the > > > various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters. > > > > > > In an email to the club's volunteer administrators, > > > Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected > > > staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming > > > opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past > > > several years. > > > > > > The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- it > > > would have imposed the first-ever, numerical > > > constraints on bandwidth without providing a means for > > > licensees to ensure compliance and ward off > > > unwarranted complaints from those who do not > > > participate in this mode and activity. > > > > > > The scheme would also have characterized AM as a > > > "footnote" that otherwise would not be in compliance > > > with their misguided system of bandwidth segregation. > > > > > > Sumner wrote, in part, > > > > > > Quote > > > Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of > > > emission remains
Re: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM
What the heck is going on with our neighbours south of the 49th Parallel...?! You've seemingly got a licensing body populated by little-more than did-interested, beaurocratic, career-oriented mandarins, headed-up by politically correct toadies of big money & big bu$ine$$...your largest lobby group seems to be grossly ineffective of late in its ability to grab the ear of the FCC to make it listen, because it's apparently too distracted by its own agenda & internal empire building... I am NOT attempting to condemn you good folks, or put you down, or set up our system here in Canada by comparison as some sort of a ",,,beacon of enlightenment" --- nothing like that at all! But man-o-man, I do feel for you guys. It's like you're all alone in a cruel world that simply continues to change for the worst. Obviously politics & Ham radio do NOT mix...on ANY level. I only hope things might change for you guys soon, because you certainly do deserve better than what you've been getting for the past several years, IMHO... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Bry Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service" Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 6:51 AM Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL changes: League dumps threat to AM > Thanks, Paul - excellent commentary from WA3VJB... > > The threat to operators of old tube AM and CW rigs is > somewhat diminished. > > To expand and explain slightly - the part they DO want to keep... > They now propose to destroy only ten meters, perhaps figuring > that since there has been a long sunspot minimum, no one > will be paying attention... > > http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2007/03/23/101/?nc=1 > > Wa3VJB wrote > > > The ARRL, a small, non-profit publishing company in > > Newington Connecticut, has abandoned a threat to > > impose a system of bandwidth segregation on the > > various modes and activities on HF below 10 meters. > > > > In an email to the club's volunteer administrators, > > Dave Sumner, the company's highest-paid, unelected > > staffer, seems to have acknowledged the overwhelming > > opposition arrayed against his group's plan the past > > several years. > > > > The threat to AM was specific and unquestionable -- it > > would have imposed the first-ever, numerical > > constraints on bandwidth without providing a means for > > licensees to ensure compliance and ward off > > unwarranted complaints from those who do not > > participate in this mode and activity. > > > > The scheme would also have characterized AM as a > > "footnote" that otherwise would not be in compliance > > with their misguided system of bandwidth segregation. > > > > Sumner wrote, in part, > > > > Quote > > Regulation by bandwidth rather than by mode of > > emission remains controversial below 28 MHz because of > > perceived potential impact on established operating > > patterns, so these proposals were removed from the > > list with one narrow exception. > > > > Those who subscribe to the ARRL can pursue the full > > text, which contains several insults and additional > > patronizing language to those of us who dared to > > question the scheme their group tried to slip through. > > > > Keywords: > > --And for the truly paranoid > > --don't know all the facts > > --making their complaints and threats > > --have other motives > > > > It is important to note that the club continues to try > > to sneak through the small, remaining portion of their > > scheme that opponents had not, until now, chosen to > > challenge. > > > > Fresh opposition remarks about the fraction the League > > continues to push are now being filed and accepted on > > the FCC's Electronic Comment Filing System. > > > > The latest challenges join the carefully considered, > > well-reasoned arguments that gave the ARRL a severe > > spanking and refuted that group's earlier threat to AM > > that they now have abandoned. > > > > This appears to be the system of feedback the group in > > Newington prefers. > > > > Paul/VJB > > > > > > > > > > Never miss an email again! > > Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. > > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ > > __ > > AMRadio mailing list > > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html > > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net > > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word unsubscribe in the message body. > > > > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html >
Re: [AMRadio] SS nice guy report
Hi Steve, I think that the big thing to keep in mind in discussions like this one here is the fact that --- by a VERY far & wide margin --- it is going to be the AM signal that is the easiest to tune in by a newcomer to SWL'ing, and NOT SSB...and most CERTAINLY not CW... When I first became interested in becoming a Ham in about 1969, or so, it was primarily because I was able to tune-in the AM'ers on 10- and 40-meters on my Hallicrafters S-77A at the time...and I distinctly do NOT recall hearing any belching, farting, or the use of the "F" word therein at all back then. It was readily available, though, on the 11-meter band... In fact, my initial enthusiasm to get a CB licence was effectively cooled because of such boorish behaviour on 27-MHz --- Hams had a LOT more "class" in my estimation, & were a group that I aspired to, and definitely wanted to become a part of. So, too, did a lot of ex-CB'ers, evidently, judging by the frat-boy / trailor park goings-on that one so often hears in the AM windows nowadays... Like it, or not, the "...tuneable" feature of the AM mode elevates a lot of louts to the status of Amateur Radio "goodwill ambassadors" for the public at large --- maybe that's why many of them behave the way they do, i.e. they have a (potentially) ready audience at their beck & call...? Well, it's not for me --- I refuse to listen to Howard Stern, too. No wonder I'm coming around to being a near 100% CW only operator again... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:09 PM Subject: Re: [AMRadio] SS nice guy report > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Hardly...I'm no prude by any stretch of the imagination, but if first > > impressions mean a lot, then there is certainly precious little to impress > > newbies with those examples of the "...gutter culture" that the AM > > communuity seems to continually wink at, or merely turns a blind eye > > toward... > > I expect AM operators (or CW ops, or SSB ops, or PACTOR enthusiasts, etc) to > be just a reflection of the society at large. Seems quite often when three or > more men are together this sort of stuff comes out. It is not surprising > that you hear it on the air. > > Steve WD8DAS > > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
Re: [AMRadio] Ranger... good news, bad news
Hi Guys, I haven't really been following this thread all that closely, but has any mention been made yet about the fact that the MAXIMUM amount of RF output carrier that one can safely extract from a linear amplifier tube in AM mode is equal to ONE HALF of the tube's plate dissipation...? Ex. an 813 has 125-watts of plate disipation --- in AM linear amplifier mode, that'd translate to just under 65-watts of AM CARRIER output. I used to run a pair of 813's in AM linear amplifier service for a total of 125-watts carrier output. A 'scope --- like a Heathkit SB-610 --- in trapezoidal mode is absolutely invaluable in setting up an amplifier this way... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Gary Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'" Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 8:20 PM Subject: FW: [AMRadio] Ranger... good news, bad news > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Schmidling > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:49 PM > To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Ranger... good news, bad news > > Gary Schafer wrote: > > >If you want to run 125 watts carrier out of the > > SB200 on AM that means you need to tune the amplifier up for 500 watts or > a > > little more output with the load and plate tune controls on the amp peaked > > for maximum output with a given amount of drive. > > Not sure I understand the why of this. I did all as you suggested but > found when I was done that the plate tuning of the amp was exactly the > same as if I tuned it originally with the 100w carrier. The dip was > exactly in the same place and the loading optimum is so broad that no > change could be noted. > > > > Watching the scope on the output of the amplifier should show the > modulation > > peak voltage double what the carrier voltage is on the scope. If it > doesn't > > you haven't tuned up properly. > > Interestingly, the only way I get the peak voltage to double is with the > ricebox. I can never seem to get more than about 50% increase with > modulation. > > js > > The peak envelope power of an AM signal increases by 4 times over the > carrier power with 100% modulation. > The linear amplifier must be tuned at the peak envelope power level or the > peaks will never reach full power, the amplifier will flat top and splatter > and you will not sound good. > > How much drive power did you have when tuning up the amp? > Were you using a rice box to tune the amp or the ranger? > > If you don't see the scope voltage double with modulation you haven't tuned > up right. If you adjust the scope to say 2 centimeters with carrier then the > modulation peaks should hit 4 centimeters. > > 73 > Gary K4FMX > > > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
Re: [AMRadio] Ranger VFO
Hi Rick, I had a 122 VFO with that same issue --- I simply bent a short piece of enamelled wire roughly into the shape of the clip, & placed into the fibre/bakelite extenion... It's still there, doing its thing... ~73~ Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ - Original Message - From: "Rick Brashear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 2:58 PM Subject: [AMRadio] Ranger VFO > I have a dandy problem that I hope someone can help with. I am in need > of the little spring clips that go on the bottom of the VFO tuning pegs > in a Ranger transmitter. I have the pegs, but the clips are gone. Has > anyone come up with a good solution to this? What else can I use? I > thought about just soldering a small piece of heavy wire across the > variable capacitors on the VFO and slipping the peg's slot over it. Any > ideas? > > Rick/K5IZ > > __ > AMRadio mailing list > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio > Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net __ AMRadio mailing list List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Partner Website: http://www.amfone.net Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
