[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! C'da, I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you (Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat). However, the piece of info which has been cited by Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress -- http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035) Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint ? The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After breaking on the southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the branch known as the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June 10, and it has settled over most of South Asia by late June, bringing cooler but more humid weather. The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote: The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Source of the website info is CIA WorldFact Book and Library of Congress -USA http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html Cheers umesh Chan Mahanta cmahanta at charter.net wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! *** That is very deep . And I am not going to go near a philosophical sounding sewage pit, where one could drown in BS. US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . *** Well, exact smachxact. How about an approximate one? Do you know that? If you don't, go look at the website I sent the URL of on day one in your climatological saga where you are running in place like a gerbil on a treadmill. I mean the site you called pathetic. BTW why was it pathetic? No nice pictures, only diagrams? Or did you not like the prose? Molecule of Oxygen ? What , have you been studying Chemistry too at Wiki U? Where does the O2 molecule appear from? Does monsoon rains split an H2O molecule to O2 and H also in Assam? That is a Nobel Prize winning discovery you just made U. Next only to the perpetual motion machine of yore. Now they can compress the monsoon freed O2 for industrial use and the H for pollution free automobiles, just by going to Assam and tapping the rainwater byproduct! I don't know what to do with you Umesh. Desi-pseudo-education has royally sd up your mind so much so that even a whole year at Harvard can't salvage it. OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. *** Allow me to help out here: It is quite simple. The moisture laden winds that go towards Assam but cannot unload the water does NOT happen at all. If it did go there it WOULD RAIN! Get it? What happens is that due to the changing weather patterns, global warming and what-have-you, the wind patterns CHANGE! The high and low pressure areas that generate the monsoon winds shift from their usual positions. The monsoon winds that would normally head from the Bay of Bengal towards the Brahmaputra valley do not go there at all. Instead they go north-westward and rain the heck out over Dilli and Rajasthan, combined with the monsoons that originate over the Arabian sea. It does NOT work like the tanker truck driver doubling back on its delivery route, like you understood from the pseudo-scientific account at Wiki U. I realize you did not have what it takes to understand these things. But you are not special here. Lot of people are not attuned to such
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! C'da, I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you (Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat). However, the piece of info which has been cited by Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress -- http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035) Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint ? The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After breaking on the southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the branch known as the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June 10, and it has settled over most of South Asia by late June, bringing cooler but more humid weather. The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote: The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Source of the website info is CIA WorldFact Book and Library of Congress -USA http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html Cheers umesh Chan Mahanta cmahanta at charter.net wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! *** That is very deep . And I am not going to go near a philosophical sounding sewage pit, where one could drown in BS. US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . *** Well, exact smachxact. How about an approximate one? Do you know that? If you don't, go look at the website I sent the URL of on day one in your climatological saga where you are running in place like a gerbil on a treadmill. I mean the site you called pathetic. BTW why was it pathetic? No nice pictures, only diagrams? Or did you not like the prose? Molecule of Oxygen ? What , have you been studying Chemistry too at Wiki U? Where does the O2 molecule appear from? Does monsoon rains split an H2O molecule to O2 and H also in Assam? That is a Nobel Prize winning discovery you just made U. Next only to the perpetual motion machine of yore. Now they can compress the monsoon freed O2 for industrial use and the H for pollution free automobiles, just by going to Assam and tapping the rainwater byproduct! I don't know what to do with you Umesh. Desi-pseudo-education has royally sd up your mind so much so that even a whole year at Harvard can't salvage it. OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. *** Allow me to help out here: It is quite simple. The moisture laden winds that go towards Assam but cannot unload the water does NOT happen at all. If it did go there it WOULD RAIN! Get it? What happens is that due to the changing weather patterns, global warming and what-have-you, the wind
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I do not think that I have enough knowledge to authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since my school education (Desi School education that is :-) ) agrees to what you mentioned. However, the concern here is the site from where this has been picked up. I find the following statements in that site --- 1) This Web site contains the online versions of books previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. 2) The Federal Research Division provides customized research and analytical services on domestic and international subjects to agencies of the United States Government, the District of Columbia, and authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery basis. If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- 1) Federal Research Division published garbage under a program sponsored by US Army 2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage and get it published by Federal Research Division 3) The agencies of US Government and Federal Contractors are fed with such garbage. Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! C'da, I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you (Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat). However, the piece of info which has been cited by Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress -- http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035) Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint ? The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After breaking on the southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the branch known as the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June 10, and it has settled over most of South Asia by late June, bringing cooler but more humid weather. The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote: The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Source of the website info is CIA WorldFact Book and Library of Congress -USA http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html Cheers umesh Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I
do not think that I have enough knowledge to
authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since
my school education (Desi School education that is :-)
So, that it must be it then, if you cannot JUDGE the value of
the information under contention.
It is about kandogyan--common sense.
) agrees to what you mentioned.
However, the concern here is the site from where this
has been picked up.
I find the following statements in that site ---
1) This Web site contains the online versions of books
previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the
Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress
under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program
sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army.
2) The Federal Research Division provides customized
research and analytical services on domestic and
international subjects to agencies of the United
States Government, the District of Columbia, and
authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery
basis.
If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may
be more garbage) , it implies that ---
1) Federal Research Division published garbage under
a program sponsored by US Army
2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage
and get it published by Federal Research Division
3) The agencies of US Government and Federal
Contractors are fed with such garbage.
Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary
of Congress does
not in any way, shape or form guarantee its
accuracy, veracity ,
usefulness or any such other quality.
It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library
you can get works
of genius as well as unadulterated garbage.
Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the
point?
About the issue involved does it need high
scientific training to
imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam
retraces its
steps because there was no one home to receive the
order? So it
returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli?
What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell
me?
At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
wrote:
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of
the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
C'da,
I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school
knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you
(Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat).
However, the piece of info which has been cited by
Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress --
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035)
Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO
scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some
ad
agency copywriter who probably graduated
from a desi school/college sporting the name of some
Christian saint ?
The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After
breaking on the
southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the
branch known as
the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June
10, and it has
settled over most of South Asia by late June,
bringing cooler but
more humid weather. The other branch, known as the
Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and
spreads over most
of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering
the barrier of
the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward
along the
Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the
two branches
merge as a single current bringing rains to the
remaining parts of
North India in July.
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote:
The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves
northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most
of Assam by the
first week of June. On encountering the barrier of
the Great
Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the
Indo-Gangetic
Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches
merge as a
single current bringing rains to the remaining parts
of North India
in July. Source of the website info is CIA
WorldFact Book and
Library of Congress -USA
http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html
Cheers
umesh
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's
updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
___
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
What I am wondering is how the US Federal Research Divisionmakes such mistake in first place. And then, the info have been there since 1995 (as mentioned in the site) which means that no one bothered to correct it if it is incorrect. Are these researchers dumber then Desi educated folks or lack kandogyan. and imagine the US govt agencies going ahead with input from such Researchers !! I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I do not think that I have enough knowledge to authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since my school education (Desi School education that is :-) So, that it must be it then, if you cannot JUDGE the value of the information under contention. It is about kandogyan--common sense. ) agrees to what you mentioned. However, the concern here is the site from where this has been picked up. I find the following statements in that site --- 1) This Web site contains the online versions of books previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. 2) The Federal Research Division provides customized research and analytical services on domestic and international subjects to agencies of the United States Government, the District of Columbia, and authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery basis. If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- 1) Federal Research Division published garbage under a program sponsored by US Army 2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage and get it published by Federal Research Division 3) The agencies of US Government and Federal Contractors are fed with such garbage. Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545433 ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may
be more garbage) , it implies that ---
There may very well be. Is that unthinkable?
But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the
COMPREHENSION of it.
I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who
reads and comprehends ordinary English)
that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there,
so it veers westwards
and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and
Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you
At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote:
I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I
do not think that I have enough knowledge to
authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since
my school education (Desi School education that is :-)
) agrees to what you mentioned.
However, the concern here is the site from where this
has been picked up.
I find the following statements in that site ---
1) This Web site contains the online versions of books
previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the
Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress
under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program
sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army.
2) The Federal Research Division provides customized
research and analytical services on domestic and
international subjects to agencies of the United
States Government, the District of Columbia, and
authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery
basis.
If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may
be more garbage) , it implies that ---
1) Federal Research Division published garbage under
a program sponsored by US Army
2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage
and get it published by Federal Research Division
3) The agencies of US Government and Federal
Contractors are fed with such garbage.
Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary
of Congress does
not in any way, shape or form guarantee its
accuracy, veracity ,
usefulness or any such other quality.
It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library
you can get works
of genius as well as unadulterated garbage.
Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the
point?
About the issue involved does it need high
scientific training to
imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam
retraces its
steps because there was no one home to receive the
order? So it
returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli?
What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell
me?
At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
wrote:
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of
the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
C'da,
I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school
knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you
(Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat).
However, the piece of info which has been cited by
Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress --
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035)
Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO
scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some
ad
agency copywriter who probably graduated
from a desi school/college sporting the name of some
Christian saint ?
The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After
breaking on the
southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the
branch known as
the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June
10, and it has
settled over most of South Asia by late June,
bringing cooler but
more humid weather. The other branch, known as the
Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and
spreads over most
of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering
the barrier of
the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward
along the
Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the
two branches
merge as a single current bringing rains to the
remaining parts of
North India in July.
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote:
The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves
northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most
of Assam by the
first week of June. On encountering the barrier of
the Great
Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the
Indo-Gangetic
Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches
merge as a
single current bringing rains to the remaining parts
of North India
in July. Source of the website info is CIA
WorldFact Book and
Library of Congress -USA
http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html
Cheers
umesh
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's
updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it
is the
COMPREHENSION of it.
I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply (
to anyone who
reads and comprehends ordinary English)
Hmmm a different argument then Yet another
PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated
garbage.
With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the
half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true --
1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific
OR
2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage
OR
3) Fed research materials are correct but we are
unable to comprehend it.
OR
All three above
If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there
may
be more garbage) , it implies that ---
There may very well be. Is that unthinkable?
But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it
is the
COMPREHENSION of it.
I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply (
to anyone who
reads and comprehends ordinary English)
that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop
its load there,
so it veers westwards
and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at
Dilli and
Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what
have you
At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
wrote:
I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I
do not think that I have enough knowledge to
authoratitively speak on this subject, more so,
since
my school education (Desi School education that is
:-)
) agrees to what you mentioned.
However, the concern here is the site from where
this
has been picked up.
I find the following statements in that site ---
1) This Web site contains the online versions of
books
previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the
Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress
under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program
sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army.
2) The Federal Research Division provides customized
research and analytical services on domestic and
international subjects to agencies of the United
States Government, the District of Columbia, and
authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery
basis.
If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may
be more garbage) , it implies that ---
1) Federal Research Division published garbage
under
a program sponsored by US Army
2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage
and get it published by Federal Research Division
3) The agencies of US Government and Federal
Contractors are fed with such garbage.
Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary
of Congress does
not in any way, shape or form guarantee its
accuracy, veracity ,
usefulness or any such other quality.
It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library
you can get works
of genius as well as unadulterated garbage.
Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the
point?
About the issue involved does it need high
scientific training to
imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam
retraces its
steps because there was no one home to receive the
order? So it
returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli?
What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell
me?
At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty
wrote:
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of
the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
C'da,
I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school
knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you
(Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat).
However, the piece of info which has been cited by
Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress --
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035)
Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO
scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some
ad
agency copywriter who probably graduated
from a desi school/college sporting the name of some
Christian saint ?
The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After
breaking on the
southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the
branch known as
the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June
10, and it has
settled over most of South Asia by late June,
bringing cooler but
more humid weather. The other branch, known as the
Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and
spreads over most
of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering
the barrier of
the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward
along the
Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter
the
two branches
merge as a single current bringing rains to the
remaining parts of
North India in July.
Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of
the
tanker truck
driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon
expertise on it, so be
it!
At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote:
The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal
monsoon, moves
northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over
most
of Assam by the
first week of June. On encountering the barrier of
the Great
Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I do not think that I have enough knowledge to authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since my school education (Desi School education that is :-) ) agrees to what you mentioned. However, the concern here is the site from where this has been picked up. I find the following statements in that site --- 1) This Web site contains the online versions of books previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. 2) The Federal Research Division provides customized research and analytical services on domestic and international subjects to agencies of the United States Government, the District of Columbia, and authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery basis. If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- 1) Federal Research Division published garbage under a program sponsored by US Army 2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage and get it published by Federal Research Division 3) The agencies of US Government and Federal Contractors are fed with such garbage. Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! C'da, I am not an expert in Monsoon and in fact my school knowledge had been like what is mentioned by you (Western Ghat and Eastern Ghat). However, the piece of info which has been cited by Umesh is Originally from Library of Congress -- http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+in0035) Shall we consider this as Yet another PSEUDO scientific account ??? Or perhaps LoC hired some ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint ? The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After breaking on the southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the branch known as the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June 10, and it has settled over most of South Asia by late June, bringing cooler but more humid weather. The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote: The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I do not think that I have enough knowledge to authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since my school education (Desi School education that is :-) ) agrees to what you mentioned. However, the concern here is the site from where this has been picked up. I find the following statements in that site --- 1) This Web site contains the online versions of books previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. 2) The Federal Research Division provides customized research and analytical services on domestic and international subjects to agencies of the United States Government, the District of Columbia, and authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery basis. If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- 1) Federal Research Division published garbage under a program sponsored by US Army 2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage and get it published by Federal Research Division 3) The agencies of US Government and Federal Contractors are fed with such garbage. Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you At 9:37 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: I have no arguments regarding the monsoon pattern. I do not think that I have enough knowledge to authoratitively speak on this subject, more so, since my school education (Desi School education that is :-) ) agrees to what you mentioned. However, the concern here is the site from where this has been picked up. I find the following statements in that site --- 1) This Web site contains the online versions of books previously published (1988-98) in hard copy by the Federal Research Division of the Library of Congress under the Country Studies/Area Handbook Program sponsored by the U.S. Department of the Army. 2) The Federal Research Division provides customized research and analytical services on domestic and international subjects to agencies of the United States Government, the District of Columbia, and authorized Federal contractors on a cost-recovery basis. If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- 1) Federal Research Division published garbage under a program sponsored by US Army 2) Any Tom, Dick Harry can write a piece of garbage and get it published by Federal Research Division 3) The agencies of US Government and Federal Contractors are fed with such garbage. Just because a document resides in the US LIbrary of Congress does not in any way, shape or form guarantee its accuracy, veracity , usefulness or any such other quality. It is like a storage vault, a library. In a library you can get works of genius as well as unadulterated garbage. Is that hard to imagine, that you would argue the point? About the issue involved does it need high scientific training to imagine that the SW Monsoons that travel to Assam retraces its steps because there was no one home to receive the order? So it returns to the west and go deliver it in Dilli? What kind of a moron would argue such a point, tell me? At 8:26 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
*** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/ ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- There may very well be. Is that unthinkable? But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) that the SW monsoons go to the NE but cannot drop its load there, so it veers westwards and trudging over the Gangetic plains unloads it at Dilli and Rajasthan instead; because of Global Warming or what have you Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/ ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that --- Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, wasn't it? Or was it something I concocted, putting words in UMesh's or your mouths ? Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were in response to whatever came from Umesh or yourself. The challenge for you is to prove to the world of assamnetters that I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order for you to be able to do that, you still will have to show that the main issue: Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed correct and therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, incorrect, malicious, subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, anti-Krishnendu or whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure up. That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) will feel vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will be a stiff dose of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't even make case of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be cool. I hate to see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self inflicted. At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? At 10:57 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: But the problem is NOT what the book may contain, it is the COMPREHENSION of it. I will bet a dollar that the report did not imply ( to anyone who reads and comprehends ordinary English) Hmmm a different argument then Yet another PSEUDO scientific account OR unadulterated garbage. With such rapid shift in arguments, we, the half-brained, dimwits are confused what is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above If the piece of info is garbage (indicates there may be more garbage) , it implies that ---
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
The issue is your twist and your blame everything on India which netters are aware of. It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to blame the content on Desi Education and then did an ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was provided by his Bidesi Experts Anyway, I do stand by all my comments The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely written piece You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, wasn't it? Or was it something I concocted, putting words in UMesh's or your mouths ? Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were in response to whatever came from Umesh or yourself. The challenge for you is to prove to the world of assamnetters that I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order for you to be able to do that, you still will have to show that the main issue: Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed correct and therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, incorrect, malicious, subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, anti-Krishnendu or whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure up. That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) will feel vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will be a stiff dose of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't even make case of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be cool. I hate to see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self inflicted. At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts wrote same piece like a Desi who graduated from a school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint Why don't you tell us which? Are you not upto it? Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? *** Do I sound like the one having a bad time here? I an actually enjoying it. It is a nice diversion from my nose to the grindstone. At 2:16 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The issue is your twist and your blame everything on India which netters are aware of. It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to blame the content on Desi Education and then did an ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was provided by his Bidesi Experts Anyway, I do stand by all my comments The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely written piece You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, wasn't it? Or was it something I concocted, putting words in UMesh's or your mouths ? Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were in response to whatever came from Umesh or yourself. The challenge for you is to prove to the world of assamnetters that I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order for you to be able to do that, you still will have to show that the main issue: Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed correct and therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, incorrect, malicious, subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, anti-Krishnendu or whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure up. That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) will feel vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will be a stiff dose of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't even make case of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be cool. I hate to see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self inflicted. At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above OR May be The Fed research experts graduated from a Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint My heart goes out for you. But if you don't agree with what I wrote you can pull the material together and present it to netters. Most of us understand ordinary English here. At 11:27 AM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: All three are your arguments so how can we, half-brained and what not folks figure out what you are trying to say ... it is too difficult to understand such high level moving arguments. I am yet to recover from shock how infalliable BiDesi experts
[Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Good that you do not have a heart burn . since you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor theng dekha pai You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? *** Do I sound like the one having a bad time here? I an actually enjoying it. It is a nice diversion from my nose to the grindstone. At 2:16 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The issue is your twist and your blame everything on India which netters are aware of. It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to blame the content on Desi Education and then did an ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was provided by his Bidesi Experts Anyway, I do stand by all my comments The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely written piece You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, wasn't it? Or was it something I concocted, putting words in UMesh's or your mouths ? Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were in response to whatever came from Umesh or yourself. The challenge for you is to prove to the world of assamnetters that I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order for you to be able to do that, you still will have to show that the main issue: Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed correct and therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, incorrect, malicious, subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, anti-Krishnendu or whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure up. That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) will feel vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will be a stiff dose of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't even make case of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be cool. I hate to see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self inflicted. At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials are correct but we are unable to comprehend it. OR All three above Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/ ___ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
At 3:06 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Good that you do not have a heart burn . since you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor theng dekha pai I know what you mean. That takes care of my problem. But what about yours? Have you been able to reconcile your conflicts and stress ? I ask because I am not sure if you had successfully concluded your mission. What is your feedback from your supporters? Enough to make it feel like the effort was worth it? At 3:06 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Good that you do not have a heart burn . since you were advising me, I just thought -- Churey Churor theng dekha pai You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? *** Do I sound like the one having a bad time here? I an actually enjoying it. It is a nice diversion from my nose to the grindstone. At 2:16 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The issue is your twist and your blame everything on India which netters are aware of. It has now been proved beyond doubt that CM tried to blame the content on Desi Education and then did an ABOUT TURN when pointed out that the Content was provided by his Bidesi Experts Anyway, I do stand by all my comments The tragedy is ... you yourself do not know which is your comment ... the Fed Researchers publish junk or the desi fellows cannot comprehend those finely written piece You can take a break and go buy some Pepcid or Tums if you are already out of stock or do you maintain a super jumbo stock at home ? The issue was what Umesh learned from Wiki U, wasn't it? Or was it something I concocted, putting words in UMesh's or your mouths ? Anyway, I do stand by all my comments , which were in response to whatever came from Umesh or yourself. The challenge for you is to prove to the world of assamnetters that I , CM was wrong on one or all counts. And in order for you to be able to do that, you still will have to show that the main issue: Umesh's understanding of what he read was indeed correct and therefore cm's comments were uncalled for, incorrect, malicious, subversive, anti-Indian, anti_ US, anti_Umesh, anti-Krishnendu or whatever other terms of endearment you can conjure up. That would then make me look bad, you ( and Umesh) will feel vindicated and redeem your honor. Otherwise it will be a stiff dose of Mylanta or Pepto Bismol tonight for sure. I won't even make case of how you will appear to your peers.That won't be cool. I hate to see my fellow netters in such pain, even though self inflicted. At 1:19 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: It has NOTHING to do whether Umesh's view of delivery truck doing about turn is correct . It is about YOUR about turn -- 1) YOU ascribed the Wiki info on some Desi 2) YOU mentioned that the site Umesh refered to is Yet another PSEUDO scientific account 3) When pointed out that is the same info as published by LoC, YOU said it is garbage 4) When pointed that it is published by Fed Research, YOU did an about turn --- the info is correct comprehension is wrong . then WHY not spell it out in first place and WHY ascribe the Wiki content on some hapless Desi ?? Huh ... thumping chest even when the twists and about turns are staring on yor face. If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? I have my own fan following but do not want to give you a heart burn. It is better not to go for a poll. When the results go against you, you will start calling it a farce (just the way some newspaper published a false report on PCG polls :-) ) And from reading the material you put forth, is it your considered opinion that Umesh's reading of it in line of the delivery truck doing an about turn was the correct conclusion ? If so what kind of support are you receiving from your fan-mail in assamnet? And if the fans are not responding , have you considered conducting a poll on it ? t 12:41 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: The material, including your various moving arguments, are already in this forum. Netters are very well aware how the arguments shifted ... not for the first time though Next time, before ascribing something on Desi School sporting the name of some Christian saint just check your backyard. May be the author of Wiki is one of your home grown expert researcher ! *** Unless you give them the material under contention how do you expect them to judge it? Sheeesh! At 12:01 PM -0700 10/18/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: Hope some enlightened netter who understand ordinary english can explain me which of your argument is true -- 1) The Fed Research site is PSEUDO scientific OR 2) Fed Research publishes unadulterated garbage OR 3) Fed research materials
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! *** That is very deep . And I am not going to go near a philosophical sounding sewage pit, where one could drown in BS. US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . *** Well, exact smachxact. How about an approximate one? Do you know that? If you don't, go look at the website I sent the URL of on day one in your climatological saga where you are running in place like a gerbil on a treadmill. I mean the site you called pathetic. BTW why was it pathetic? No nice pictures, only diagrams? Or did you not like the prose? Molecule of Oxygen ? What , have you been studying Chemistry too at Wiki U? Where does the O2 molecule appear from? Does monsoon rains split an H2O molecule to O2 and H also in Assam? That is a Nobel Prize winning discovery you just made U. Next only to the perpetual motion machine of yore. Now they can compress the monsoon freed O2 for industrial use and the H for pollution free automobiles, just by going to Assam and tapping the rainwater byproduct! I don't know what to do with you Umesh. Desi-pseudo-education has royally sd up your mind so much so that even a whole year at Harvard can't salvage it. OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. *** Allow me to help out here: It is quite simple. The moisture laden winds that go towards Assam but cannot unload the water does NOT happen at all. If it did go there it WOULD RAIN! Get it? What happens is that due to the changing weather patterns, global warming and what-have-you, the wind patterns CHANGE! The high and low pressure areas that generate the monsoon winds shift from their usual positions. The monsoon winds that would normally head from the Bay of Bengal towards the Brahmaputra valley do not go there at all. Instead they go north-westward and rain the heck out over Dilli and Rajasthan, combined with the monsoons that originate over the Arabian sea. It does NOT work like the tanker truck driver doubling back on its delivery route, like you understood from the pseudo-scientific account at Wiki U. I realize you did not have what it takes to understand these things. But you are not special here. Lot of people are not attuned to such things. It ain't no abject failure, nor is it a sin. Where you messed up was in attempting to set yourself us as someone who knows a lot about the monsoons, merely from the literal readings of an Wiki account written not by a scientifically trained person but perhaps by an ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint. I hope that helps, and hope you learned a lesson never to forget. At 8:36 PM -0700 10/16/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-da, ***Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western Ghats or the Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain patterns in Western and North Western India , that an ordinary high school kid ought to know like WE did about the Himalayas, the Garo and Khasi Hills and so forth? which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and then moves northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1. * Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They are date of arrival graphs. US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! ***Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!! US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. I would put two and two together (as did film-maker Ashsan-da Aziz of Assam invited by National Geographic Society of DC and Hollywood to show his geographic rich movie www.Sonam.net/tc ) - from the given map below --- someone less innovative would keep crying for more info. Umesh Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Source of the website info is CIA WorldFact Book and Library of Congress -USA http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html Cheers umesh Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! *** That is very deep . And I am not going to go near a philosophical sounding sewage pit, where one could drown in BS. US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . *** Well, exact smachxact. How about an approximate one? Do you know that? If you don't, go look at the website I sent the URL of on day one in your climatological saga where you are running in place like a gerbil on a treadmill. I mean the site you called pathetic. BTW why was it pathetic? No nice pictures, only diagrams? Or did you not like the prose? Molecule of Oxygen ? What , have you been studying Chemistry too at Wiki U? Where does the O2 molecule appear from? Does monsoon rains split an H2O molecule to O2 and H also in Assam? That is a Nobel Prize winning discovery you just made U. Next only to the perpetual motion machine of yore. Now they can compress the monsoon freed O2 for industrial use and the H for pollution free automobiles, just by going to Assam and tapping the rainwater byproduct! I don't know what to do with you Umesh. Desi-pseudo-education has royally sd up your mind so much so that even a whole year at Harvard can't salvage it. OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. *** Allow me to help out here: It is quite simple. The moisture laden winds that go towards Assam but cannot unload the water does NOT happen at all. If it did go there it WOULD RAIN! Get it? What happens is that due to the changing weather patterns, global warming and what-have-you, the wind patterns CHANGE! The high and low pressure areas that generate the monsoon winds shift from their usual positions. The monsoon winds that would normally head from the Bay of Bengal towards the Brahmaputra valley do not go there at all. Instead they go north-westward and rain the heck out over Dilli and Rajasthan, combined with the monsoons that originate over the Arabian sea. It does NOT work like the tanker truck driver doubling back on its delivery route, like you understood from the pseudo-scientific account at Wiki U. I realize you did not have what it takes to understand these things. But you are not special here. Lot of people are not attuned to such things. It ain't no abject failure, nor is it a sin. Where you messed up was in attempting to set yourself us as someone who knows a lot about the monsoons, merely from the literal readings of an Wiki account written not by a scientifically trained person but perhaps by an ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint. I hope that helps, and hope you learned a lesson never to forget. At 8:36 PM -0700 10/16/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-da, ***Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western Ghats or the Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain patterns in Western and North Western India , that an ordinary high school kid ought to know like WE did about the Himalayas, the Garo and Khasi Hills and so forth? which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and then moves northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1. * Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They are date of arrival graphs. US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! ***Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!! US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
The southwest monsoon occurs in two branches. After breaking on the southern part of the Peninsula in early June, the branch known as the Arabian Sea monsoon reaches Bombay around June 10, and it has settled over most of South Asia by late June, bringing cooler but more humid weather. The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Yet another PSEUDO scientific account, of the tanker truck driver. But if you want to stake your monsoon expertise on it, so be it! At 8:17 PM -0700 10/17/07, umesh sharma wrote: The other branch, known as the Bay of Bengal monsoon, moves northward in the Bay of Bengal and spreads over most of Assam by the first week of June. On encountering the barrier of the Great Himalayan Range, it is deflected westward along the Indo-Gangetic Plain toward New Delhi. Thereafter the two branches merge as a single current bringing rains to the remaining parts of North India in July. Source of the website info is CIA WorldFact Book and Library of Congress -USA http://www.photius.com/countries/india/climate/india_climate_climate.html Cheers umesh Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move from one place to the other one would arrive!! *** That is very deep . And I am not going to go near a philosophical sounding sewage pit, where one could drown in BS. US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left . *** Well, exact smachxact. How about an approximate one? Do you know that? If you don't, go look at the website I sent the URL of on day one in your climatological saga where you are running in place like a gerbil on a treadmill. I mean the site you called pathetic. BTW why was it pathetic? No nice pictures, only diagrams? Or did you not like the prose? Molecule of Oxygen ? What , have you been studying Chemistry too at Wiki U? Where does the O2 molecule appear from? Does monsoon rains split an H2O molecule to O2 and H also in Assam? That is a Nobel Prize winning discovery you just made U. Next only to the perpetual motion machine of yore. Now they can compress the monsoon freed O2 for industrial use and the H for pollution free automobiles, just by going to Assam and tapping the rainwater byproduct! I don't know what to do with you Umesh. Desi-pseudo-education has royally sd up your mind so much so that even a whole year at Harvard can't salvage it. OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. *** Allow me to help out here: It is quite simple. The moisture laden winds that go towards Assam but cannot unload the water does NOT happen at all. If it did go there it WOULD RAIN! Get it? What happens is that due to the changing weather patterns, global warming and what-have-you, the wind patterns CHANGE! The high and low pressure areas that generate the monsoon winds shift from their usual positions. The monsoon winds that would normally head from the Bay of Bengal towards the Brahmaputra valley do not go there at all. Instead they go north-westward and rain the heck out over Dilli and Rajasthan, combined with the monsoons that originate over the Arabian sea. It does NOT work like the tanker truck driver doubling back on its delivery route, like you understood from the pseudo-scientific account at Wiki U. I realize you did not have what it takes to understand these things. But you are not special here. Lot of people are not attuned to such things. It ain't no abject failure, nor is it a sin. Where you messed up was in attempting to set yourself us as someone who knows a lot about the monsoons, merely from the literal readings of an Wiki account written not by a scientifically trained person but perhaps by an ad agency copywriter who probably graduated from a desi school/college sporting the name of some Christian saint. I hope that helps, and hope you learned a lesson never to forget. At 8:36 PM -0700 10/16/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-da, ***Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
Hi C'da: How are you doing? You really sound like an irritated 'iskool-mastor' today who believes in tough-love when it comes to teach/treat his students. :) “In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree and humble like a blade of grass” Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:16:58 -0500To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fest - Sonam film maker At 8:35 PM -0700 10/15/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-daOK try this map: http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/southwestmonsoon.htm I did. It showed the DATES of monsoon's onset in various parts of India. Did this show the monsoon wind directions that would have validated your expert opinion on how the SW monsoons visiting Assam and the NE doubles back , unable to unload its moisture where intended; over to the Gangetic plains and on to finally unload it in Rajasthan and Delhi; like you learned from your long studies at the world renowned Wiki U ? Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western Ghats or the Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain patterns in Western and North Western India , that an ordinary high school kid ought to know like WE did about the Himalayas, the Garo and Khasi Hills and so forth? which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and then moves northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1. * Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They are date of arrival graphs. Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!! UmeshChan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As At 8:32 PM -0700 10/14/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-da, You can trust me on this one -- the weblink you sent me is really pathetic and half baked. Really? Awright! You are the expert, I am just a kharkhowa. So why don't you tell us what your conclusion is: Do you UMesh, a shining graduate of climatology/meteorology of Wiki U, therefore stand behind the notion , that those little tankers carrying monsoon moisture to Assam and the contiguous areas , finding no one in the receiving rooms, double back on their sales route down the Brahmaputra valley on to the Gangetic plains inhabited by poor Indians unable to pay for merchandise, go on to Delhi and Rajasthan to deliver their loads a month later? Is that what you learned? I know I won't get an answer to the question, but since you can't see what stared you on your face; the website I sent a link for, showed the monsoon wind patterns that generate from the Bay of Bengal and the Arabian sea. It also showed the high and low pressure points in the south Asian region that usually cause the monsoon wind patterns that are considered NORMAL. The Wiki account , more than likely was written by a desi non-scientist. You, read it literally, like fundamentalists reads their scriptures. The wind patterns that cause what cause rains in NE and the West ands North Indian regions are different, even though they overlap. And the URL of the Indian meteorological dept. that you sent triumphantly, does not tell anyone what the monsoon wind patterns are . It merely tells us when monsoon arrives in different parts of India. Some expert you are! Bay of Bengal Monsoon comes to NE first -drops a lot of rain and drags over the Indo-gangetic plain slowly --raeching Thar desert area (westernmost last -- having no moisture left -- so dry deserts-- Thats how all Indian media reports . Having grown in the said desert it is common knowledge how lucky NE India is to be first to receive the clouds fresh from the sea.Still you might like to see the detailed map of the Advance of Southwest Monsoon 2007 - if you scroll halfway down the webpage of http://www.imd.ernet.in/section/nhac/dynamic/endmonsoonreport2007.htmUmeshChan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As Look up: http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7o.html At 8:00 PM -0700 10/14/07, umesh sharma wrote: C-da,I may not be a knowall like you but I try to say what I have read somewhere. I read this in Indian textbooks and learnt from my father who has an interest in geography and has travelled all over the Himalays - NE portion to Western Himalayas . Do not ask me to go there and prove it all - neither can you- we say what we have read-- maybe what you read was taught only at IITs .http://www.nature.com/news/2006/061127/full/news061127-12.htmlclimat changehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MonsoonThe Bay of Bengal Branch of SW Monsoon flows over the Bay of Bengal heading towards North-Eastern India
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
You are right A .
VERY irritated :-)!
He keeps arguing , like another one of our friends here, even after
being shown what he is missing.
And then you all get mad at me for using strong words :-).
At 2:40 PM -0500 10/16/07, Alpana B. Sarangapani wrote:
Hi C'da:
How are you doing?
You really sound like an irritated 'iskool-mastor' today who
believes in tough-love when it comes to teach/treat his students.
:)
In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree
and humble like a blade of grass
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:16:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; assam@assamnet.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market-
Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fest - Sonam film maker
.ExternalClass blockquote, .ExternalClass dl, .ExternalClass ul,
.ExternalClass ol, .ExternalClass li
{padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;}
At 8:35 PM -0700 10/15/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da
OK try this map:
http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/southwestmonsoon.htm
I did. It showed the DATES of monsoon's onset in various parts of India.
Did this show the monsoon wind directions that would have validated
your expert opinion on how the SW monsoons visiting Assam and the
NE doubles back , unable to unload its moisture where intended; over
to the Gangetic plains and on to finally unload it in Rajasthan and
Delhi; like you
learned from your long studies at the world renowned Wiki U ?
Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds
carry water and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the
Western Ghats or the Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain
patterns in Western and North Western India , that an ordinary high
school kid ought to know like WE did about the Himalayas, the Garo
and Khasi Hills and so forth?
which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch
simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and
then moves northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1.
* Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They
are date of arrival graphs.
Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!!
Umesh
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As
At 8:32 PM -0700 10/14/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da,
You can trust me on this one -- the weblink you sent me is really
pathetic and half baked.
Really? Awright! You are the expert, I am just a kharkhowa.
So why don't you tell us what your conclusion is:
Do you UMesh, a shining graduate of climatology/meteorology
of Wiki U, therefore stand
behind the notion , that those little tankers carrying
monsoon moisture to Assam
and the contiguous areas , finding no one in the receiving
rooms, double back on their
sales route down the Brahmaputra valley on to the Gangetic
plains inhabited by
poor Indians unable to pay for merchandise, go on to Delhi
and Rajasthan to deliver their
loads a month later?
Is that what you learned?
I know I won't get an answer to the question, but since you can't
see what stared you on your face; the website I sent a link for,
showed the monsoon wind patterns that generate from the Bay of
Bengal and the Arabian sea. It also showed the high and low
pressure points in the south Asian region that usually cause the
monsoon wind patterns that are considered NORMAL.
The Wiki account , more than likely was written by a desi
non-scientist. You, read it literally, like fundamentalists reads
their scriptures.
The wind patterns that cause what cause rains in NE and the West
ands North Indian regions are different, even though they overlap.
And the URL of the Indian meteorological dept. that you sent
triumphantly, does not tell anyone what the monsoon wind patterns
are . It merely tells us when monsoon arrives in different parts
of India.
Some expert you are!
Bay of Bengal Monsoon comes to NE first -drops a lot of rain and
drags over the Indo-gangetic plain slowly --raeching Thar desert
area (westernmost last -- having no moisture left -- so dry
deserts-- Thats how all Indian media reports .
Having grown in the said desert it is common knowledge how lucky NE
India is to be first to receive the clouds fresh from the sea.
Still you might like to see the detailed map of the Advance of
Southwest Monsoon 2007 - if you scroll halfway down the webpage of
http://www.imd.ernet.in/section/nhac/dynamic/endmonsoonreport2007.htm
Umesh
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As
Look up:
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/7o.html
At 8:00 PM -0700 10/14/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da,
I may not be a knowall like you but I try to say what I have read
somewhere. I read this in Indian textbooks and
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer trade/ warming - Flood week fe
C-da,
***Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water
and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western Ghats or the
Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain patterns in Western and North Western
India , that an ordinary high school kid ought to know like WE did about the
Himalayas, the Garo and Khasi Hills and so forth?
which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch
simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and then moves
northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1.
* Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They are date
of arrival graphs. US: A reasonable person would assume that only when you move
from one place to the other one would arrive!!
***Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!!
US: OK we don't have exact wind pattern graphs showing how the wind behaves
after raining down on Guwahati - where does that molecule of oxygen go after
its has seen a drop of water drop down on the flooded Guwahati -- but is it
beyond imagination to see from the map ..I conclude that YOU only studied
about what happened when clouds entered Assam - but not AFTER they left .
OK tell me where does the rain-laden clouds go when the entire NE region
suffers drought - and western India -normally a desert has floods. I would put
two and two together (as did film-maker Ashsan-da Aziz of Assam invited by
National Geographic Society of DC and Hollywood to show his geographic rich
movie www.Sonam.net/tc ) - from the given map below --- someone less
innovative would keep crying for more info.
Umesh
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global
Warming -- Fish market- As You are right A .
VERY irritated :-)!
He keeps arguing , like another one of our friends here, even after being
shown what he is missing.
And then you all get mad at me for using strong words :-).
At 2:40 PM -0500 10/16/07, Alpana B. Sarangapani wrote:
Hi C'da:
How are you doing?
You really sound like an irritated 'iskool-mastor' today who believes in
tough-love when it comes to teach/treat his students.
:)
In order to make spiritual progress you must be patient like a tree and
humble like a blade of grass
-
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:16:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; assam@assamnet.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- Assam's queer
trade/ warming - Flood week fest - Sonam film maker
.ExternalClass blockquote, .ExternalClass dl, .ExternalClass ul,
.ExternalClass ol, .ExternalClass li {padding-top:0;padding-bottom:0;} At 8:35
PM -0700 10/15/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da
OK try this map:
http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/southwestmonsoon.htm
I did. It showed the DATES of monsoon's onset in various parts of India.
Did this show the monsoon wind directions that would have validated your
expert opinion on how the SW monsoons visiting Assam and the NE doubles back
, unable to unload its moisture where intended; over to the Gangetic plains and
on to finally unload it in Rajasthan and Delhi; like you learned from your long
studies at the world renowned Wiki U ?
Do you even know the basic mechanism of how these monsoon winds carry water
and why or where they unload them? Do you know how the Western Ghats or the
Aravalli ranges affect the monsoon rain patterns in Western and North Western
India , that an ordinary high school kid ought to know like WE did about the
Himalayas, the Garo and Khasi Hills and so forth?
which shows that on June 1 South West monsoon Bay of Bengal branch
simultaneously enter Kerala in the South and Imphal in NE India and then moves
northwest wards reaching Delhi bu July 1.
* Those are not monsoon wind patterns for crying out loud! They are date
of arrival graphs. Do you even read maps, graphs etc.? Sheeesh!!
Umesh
Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: [Assam] Monsoons and Global Warming -- Fish market- As
At 8:32 PM -0700 10/14/07, umesh sharma wrote:
C-da,
You can trust me on this one -- the weblink you sent me is really pathetic and
half baked.
Really? Awright! You are the expert, I am just a kharkhowa.
So why don't you tell us what your conclusion is:
Do you UMesh, a shining graduate of climatology/meteorology of Wiki U,
therefore stand
behind the notion , that those little tankers carrying monsoon
moisture to Assam
and the contiguous areas , finding no one in the receiving rooms,
double back on their
sales route down the Brahmaputra valley on to the Gangetic plains
inhabited by
poor Indians unable to pay for merchandise, go on to Delhi and
Rajasthan to deliver their
