Re: Best way to filter HTML
On Sunday, 26 May 2013 21:47:48 UTC-3, Rich Siegel wrote: ... Or possibly Markup - Preview in - New Text Window I'd never noticed this possibility before, so I opened a file and tried it out. Sure enough, it does indeed strip (most of) the HTML. I'm sure I'll find a use for it occasionally. I have an observation about how the command handles links as well as named entities. In my test... *a href=index.htmlTitle page/a / * became *Title page index.html / * ... and... *nbsp;* or *copy;* became � I suppose there are limits to what can be done, but I thought these bits were odd. Obviously the link is being parsed, so wouldn't it make sense to drop it if all code is being removed? Also, I would have expected named entities to be recognized. Rob -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.
Re: Best way to filter HTML
On Monday, 27 May 2013 11:57:15 UTC-3, LuKreme wrote: On 27 May 2013, at 05:58 , RobS rstev...@accesscable.net javascript: wrote: In my test... a href=index.htmlTitle page/a / became Title page index.html / This seems intentional and like the right behavior to me. If I am previewing in a text window, I am very likely to want the links. In fact, I can't think of a case where I would *not* want the links. I can. :-) If I were using this command to get the content out of an old page of HTML to repurpose it, it's extremely likely I wouldn't want the links. But that's just me, and my workflow. It's easy enough to get rid of the links after this command does its thing. ... and... nbsp; or copy; became � That seems like a mistake. WHat is the encoding default for your text window? Western (Mac OS Roman), which is a setting I can't recall ever changing, so it's probably the default from a long way back. (I've used BBE since dinosaurs roamed the Earth.) Rob -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.
Something to keep in mind...
... when you're irritated about feature changes in the latest BBEdit. Workflow http://xkcd.com/1172/ Rob -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Double Click
They know about it, or at least they know about my similar problem with my MS Mouse, which also won't double-click in BBE 10.5. (Also, I can't single-click into the Live Search field. Can you do that?) I gave the devs feedback about this during the 10.5 beta phase. They replied... We've made some extensive but necessary architectural changes in BBEdit 10.5, and these changes have exposed a bug in the mouse drivers that fortunately didn't affect prior versions of BBEdit. The catch is that because we *must* make these architectural changes, there is correspondingly no way to avoid the bug, as the mechanics involved with event handling don't allow it. They also tested a Logitech mouse with the same results. I'm therefore remaining at 10.1.2 until some sort of fix is available, wherever that fix comes from. Rob -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
BBEdit text document as a Finder Kind
Hi, In my local web site folders, the .html files sort into two separate groups when sorted by Kind in Finder. One group's Kind is BBEdit text document, the other's is Text file. Making and saving a change in a Text file changes nothing. But making and saving a change in a BBEdit text document immediately causes that file's Kind to change to Text file. Is this normal? Is it settable in a Prefs setting in BBEdit? I would greatly prefer to get them all to sort as one Kind (and Apple doesn't offer sorting by extension.) Can the Kind be changed in a batch by scripting, or by clever terminal commands, or by a third party utility? Thanks for any hints you can offer. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: BBEdit text document as a Finder Kind
I should have added... Mac OS X v10.6.8 BBEdit v10.1.2 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Shortcut key for browser of choice
Not a shortcut key, but... Open the file in BBEdit for editing. Open the same file in your browser. When you have changes in the file, Save in BBE and then Refresh in the browser. But did you know you can change what the shortcut keys do in BBEdit and can add more of them? Go into PrefsMenus ShortcutsMarkup menu and see what you can accomplish there. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: less syntax
I'd love to believe, really I would. But I used to believe in XHTML and before that, the tooth fairy. If the things that LESS provides -- which look delightful, I should say -- are valuable to enough people, they'll end up in CSS eventually. (Yes, I guess I still believe in the tooth fairy.) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Balance Commands?
On Wednesday, 21 September 2011 23:48:20 UTC-3, ja...@amug.org wrote: Works as described on a new BBEdit document but not on an anonymous html document. The BBEdit Manual says in so many words that balance only works in new BBEdit documents. I'm wondering how to make it work in old, non-BBEdit documents. I've been using BBE so long I can't find any non-BBE files to try it on. But yes, it certainly works on files from unknown sources -- I just tried it on a copy of the code of this very Google Groups page. But that, of course, was after I saved a copy in BBE. I wonder if that would work in your case? Choose Save As... and see if the Balance works. (And while you're at it, change the file to a workable docType.) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Balance Commands?
Er, um, ah ... . I don't know what to say, so I'll ask instead: 1. What in particular are you trying to do with the Balance command? 2. Is it working but not doing what you expected? 3. Is the HTML code clean? (Does it validate?) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Constrain text width in Lion full screen
A text editor with a ruler across the top would do the trick, allowing you to set the left margin and right margin wherever you wanted. Such a text editor is more commonly called a word processor. ;-) Please don't make BBEdit a word processor. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
grep help needed for spaces in mailto links
Hello, I need to turn all instances of ... *“mailto:someone@site**.ca**?subject=Hello John” ... into ... **“mailto:**someone**@**site**.ca**?subject=Hello%20John”* Basically, find any mailto link with a subject, and then find any space in that subject and replace it with %20. I need to do this across a large site with many nested directories. There are (I counted) 733 mailto links with a subject. As usual, my grepping skills are lacking, probably because I only need some new tweak every couple of years or so. Thanks, as always, Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: grep help needed for spaces in mailto links
Ignore me. I recalled that that site had only ever used two different subjects in the mailto links. So I used plain old multi-file search and replace on them. Job done. When brains fail, use brute force. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Incorrect Icons after BBEdit 10.0 Upgrade
On Monday, 1 August 2011 00:48:56 UTC-3, gollywop wrote: I do wonder if it has anything to do with the new Mac OSX 10.6.8 supplemental update. I made this update and have since upgraded two applications: TexShop and BBEdit. Both of them now produce generic document icons. Is it possible this is an Apple problem with this new update? I saw the problem before doing the 10.6.8 supp. update, as well as after. It *is* possible to get one file at a time to show its BBE icon, but only one at a time. Have you noticed that BBEdit is not in the list of available applications in the file Get Info window? That is, it's preselected as the default for the usual file types, but is not in the drop-down list of apps. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: BBEDIT WordPress question
I can't see that that would be a BBEdit issue. Surely there's a setting in Wordpress doing this? Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Project window editor
Clearly, clicking into windows of various types has changed -- presumably with the change to Cocoa. In my case I have been in the habit, when I wanted to munge some text, of copying the text from wherever it is, bringing BBE to the front, doing Command-N and then Command-V and then proceeding to munge. Now I sit there for a few seconds wondering why the text isn't appearing before I recall that I have to click once in the new BBE window to get its attention before the Paste will work. I suppose I will get used to this, in the same sense I'd get used to having one less finger -- reluctantly but thoroughly. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Project window editor
Should have done so, of course ... have done so now. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: BBEdit 10 Head-Scratchers
On Thursday, 28 July 2011 15:17:15 UTC-3, LuKreme wrote: Now, if I could keep the file list from being open, that would be nice. From the Unityscript thread... defaults write com.barebones.bbedit AutoShowFileList -*bool* NO Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: UnityScript Support and other Feature Requests
Thank you Rich -- that is exactly what I wanted. My demo days are over; I'll be buying the upgrade now. (Not that those two thoughts are connected in any way, of course. ;-) ) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: UnityScript Support and other Feature Requests
On Sunday, 24 July 2011 15:26:18 UTC-3, Steve Kalkwarf wrote: On Jul 24, 2011, at 2:05 PM, RobS wrote: If you mean the file list which insists on popping up on the left of the editing window whenever you have more than one file open, I'd just like it to go away and stay away, by a pref setting, of course. Tbas would be fine if they'd also stay away until Prefed. Look in the preferences, under Open documents into the front window when possible Steve Hi Steve, I'm not sure what you mean there. There is no sub-pref or other detail below that pref setting. If you mean to de-select that pref, no thanks -- I *do*want multiple docs to appear in one window. I just don't want the file list to appear beside that window. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: 10.0 makes things more difficult for me.
On Sunday, 24 July 2011 02:19:39 UTC-3, Chris Ryan wrote: Can no longer re-edit a tag using Command-Option-M (I don't remember the name of the command as I have not looked in the menu for many years). That got me too, until I found it, now under Command-M. Adding an image via the new markup panel is very cumbersome: (a) apparently no keyboard shortcut to invoke a file chooser dialog; (b) no way to resize the file chooser dialog when it's at the bottom of the screen--Apple's fault perhaps but would not have been an issue in the old BBEdit edit link dialog; (c) no size tags once a file is selected; (d) apparently enforced alt text, inserted even if I delete it. I tend to use reusable chunks of code a lot. I have one for images, all wrapped in nested divs so I can style the image and its caption. Assign a keyboard shortcut to a Clipping containing such a thing and you're good to go. Just drag the image into the spot left for it. Something like this... div class=whatever div class=img--drag your img in here--/div div class=captionxxx/div /div The Paragraph… command seems broken, as it seems dumb and only wraps the entire selection in paragraph tags. This is what the next command in the Block Elements submenu, Paragraph, is for, no? When I select text and make a paragraph out of it (using the Paragraph… command), the whole paragraph, including tags, used to be selected. Now only the original text is selected, necessitating a manual Select Paragraph to do another operation (I often add a blockquote). Yes, I see that with the Paragraph... command. But I usually input text which contains things like curly quotes, which need to be translated, so for years I've been using the Translate command (Command-Option-T.) It does all the things I need to do to the text, and it gives me paragraphs in chunks (defined by empty lines.) HTH Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: UnityScript Support and other Feature Requests
On Sunday, 24 July 2011 11:28:47 UTC-3, marty wrote: Also, please make BBEdit stop scrolling to the right all of the time. Being able to toggle vertical scrolling off only allowing it to scroll when the cursor is on a long line would be great. Yes, please. And, it would be great to see support for MacOS 10.7 Lion's document versioning built in. Eeeek! No, please, unless it's a pref which is off by default. That's one of the scariest features I've ever seen in a UI. (Check the discussions on Apple's forums for some of the problems.) And, tabs would be nice as an alternative to the BBEdit document list. If you mean the file list which insists on popping up on the left of the editing window whenever you have more than one file open, I'd just like it to go away and stay away, by a pref setting, of course. Tbas would be fine if they'd also stay away until Prefed. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Preferences window
I too, at first, thought this was annoying, because I was clicking all the headings to see what the window did. But when I stopped doing that silly thing and instead started to actually look at the preferences instead of the preferences *window*, I suddenly stopped caring about the window size change. To me it's irrelevant when I'm actually using the prefs. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Annoying window problem
Thanks Rich. I just knew it was there somewhere. ;-) Now a suggestion for the next major revision of my favourite editor: put all the hidden prefs into a Preferences pane called Formerly Hidden Prefs. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Annoying window problem
Thanks Steve. That works much better than the Apple help viewer. Great tip! Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Annoying window problem
Hi, I had a need to pick through a complex poem to edit small changes. I opened the old version and the new version (without any HTML code) in two windows, then chose Compare Two Front Documents from the Search menu. They immediately jumped into their usual positions, with the two docs left and right and the diffs window full width below them. But I wanted to work on a third window containing the full web page while viewing the differences, to make it much easier to find them mixed in with the code. So I opened the web page in a third window and arranged everything to fit. This worked fine until I selected the second line in the diffs window. Whsh! The two docs and the diffs window were back where they started and my third window was invisible behind them. !?! When I arrange windows I want the program -- *any* program, including BBEdit -- to leave them where I put them. Period. Programs should never reach out and rearrange windows. It's obnoxious and intrusive and a whole lot of other words I don't feel like typing at the moment. I don't suppose there's a hidden pref that will tell BBE to stop doing this? Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Attaching a CSS style sheet to a new HTML doc.
Absolutely! I was confused by the relative looseness of English. Relative to a file in a particular folder, the paths I gave would be absolutely correct while actually being relative paths as defined in the regs. I suppose the only absolutely absolute path would be the full URL of the css file which, as I understand it, would not be a good thing to do for something as oft requested as a css file. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Attaching a CSS style sheet to a new HTML doc.
On Mar 12, 9:19 pm, Kendall Conrad angelw...@gmail.com wrote: Absolute is based on the root of the web site. The below assumes you have a folder named css at the top level of your site. link rel=stylesheet href=/css/style.css / That would only be true if there was just one layer in the site. The OP may need to reference it absolutely as link rel=stylesheet href=../../css/style.css /, or even link rel=stylesheet href=../../../css/style.css /, depending on how deep the folders go. (I manage a large complex site which uses just this method. It's easy to maintain.) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Column size in tables
In order to get the various suggestions you've received working properly you're going to have to fix some errors. When I check the page at http://artpepper.net I get 111 errors and several warnings. In particular you have some errors in the head material of the page which will throw off browsers in various unpredictable ways. Bandage up the code and you'll find it easier to proceed. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bbedit
Re: Saved window state frustration
A new Normalize Options command is available on the Edit menu. Can this be done to a folder of files? Please? Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Thanks!
To the good folks at Barebones, I just wanted to tell you how much I'm enjoying the new Live Search bar. I often need to find places to work within a document, but I also need to use the search and replace dialog for more powerful and useful things that I want to retain for a while during a work session. Using the Live Search bar for lcoating myself is extremely handy. And I just discovered that, if I split the window pane in order to do some cut and paste without losing my place, the live Search will restrict itself to just the current pane. Delightful! Thank you for such an excellent product. And now, about that iPad I'll be getting soon. ... ;-) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: BBEdit for iPad?
While I too would be extremely interested in BBEdit Lite for iPad, there is, in fact, such an editor already available. It's available at the app store for $3.99 and includes all the features people have mentioned above as being sufficient. It's called Editor for iPad. I haven't tested it because I don't have an iPad yet. But soon, ... soon. That price -- $3.99 -- is enough to give pause to any developer. Dare we ask Barebones to create BBEL for iPad and then sell it for less than ten bucks? I know I wouldn't want to be within a stones throw if I were suggesting it to them. :-] Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: Live Search (option to make permanent?)
On May 13, 9:36 pm, Rich Siegel sie...@barebones.com wrote: Try this in the terminal: defaults write com.barebones.bbedit Editor:AlwaysOpenQuickFind -bool YES and then make a new window. And it works for existing windows too! (I do a lot of work in existing files.) Thank you Rich and the always excellent Barebones crew. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: OT - Recommendations for a C-compiler?
Thanks for the tip about Boost, Steve. And don't worry, I won't be attaching a beautiful glossy interface to my code. ;-) (I wish.) I've just been looking at some samples of the sort of code that models astrophysical events. Some of it seems to be in C and some in C++. I've read that some of it actually runs in purpose-built machines with hard-wired sub-routines in custom chip sets, simply as a way to speed up computations over huge data sets and huge time scales. Sounds like I'll be having way too much fun once I start the courses in Sept. (I like to arrive prepared.) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: OT - Recommendations for a C-compiler?
Thanks Rich. Kind of what I expected. I used to have a developer's account and I have xcode around here somewhere, but I never used it and didn't stay current. I'll renew my acquaintance. (I can feel my head hurting already.) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Fix Implicitly Closed Tags script needeed for XHTML
Hi, I come to beg... I used to use the old (came with BBE 6) Fix Implicitly Closed Tags script alot. Doing poetry on-line, I often have to use spans to indent lines, and poetry being poetry, there is no predictability to it, so I need to manually paste in the span at the start of the line. To avoid having to go over the poem again manually pasting in the /span part of the tag set, I used to run the script. Sahzaam! Closed tags. But, the script says right in its comments that it doesn't work with XHTML. I can't see from reading the script why it doesn't. Certainly the syntax warnings it requires work fine. Does anyone know how to modify the script to work with XHTML? Rob (running BBEdit 9.3.1) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: Fix Implicitly Closed Tags script needeed for XHTML
Thanks for the suggestion Carlton. I had a quick look at Tidy and its selectable options under Markup Tidy ... but I saw nothing there that would just close tags. I'm fussy about how my code is laid out so I've never used Tidy except in extremis. Will it work on just the selected text? If so, what options do I need to chose for it to only close tags? Perhaps a simpler approach... Can someone suggest a grep that will select all text on one line which follows an opening span tag (see example below) and which precedes a closing tag which is not a span? Example... pFirst linebr / another linebr / another linebr / another linebr / last line./p That's what I always start with. Then I add some spans manually... pFirst linebr / another linebr / span class=ind2another linebr / another linebr / span class=ind2last line./p ...and I need to close the spans. That's simpler and more limited in scope (always a good thing) than the close tags script I used to use -- though it had its charms. ;-) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: Fix Implicitly Closed Tags script needeed for XHTML
To complete my example, and to clarify the confusion, I want the closing span to always be just in front of the tag -- be it br / or /p -- at the end of each line. So this is the desired result... pFirst linebr / another linebr / span class=ind2another line/spanbr / another linebr / span class=ind2last line./span/p I can see it would be difficult to make a general purpose script, but remember, the old script did work fine; it just doesn't work for XHTML docs. But as I mention in my second post above, a grep would do what I need just as well. But my brain doesn't seem to be able to grasp grep. So can someone tell me the grep to select all the text after an opening span tag and before the tag at the end of that line? With that in hand I can probably put it into a copy of a working script that will iterate through the selection. I used to be able to script, a bit. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or reply to this email with the words REMOVE ME as the subject.
Re: iPad
It's interesting to note that the iWork apps in the iPad can read in Microsoft Office files as well as iWorks for OS X files, but can output only iWorks files or PDFs. It seems as if connecting to the Mac is done through Bluetooth or via a WI-FI network, like an iPhone would do. I can't recall seeing anything about a hardware connection. I would be VERY interested in a simplified (if necessary) BBEdit for the iPad. I rarely do anything but web work, so those are the parts of BBE I need, but I'll forgive others for muddying the waters with their needs. ;-) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: Multiple File search in BBEdit and TexTWrangler
Searching...If I click Stop nothing happens Folder is around 15 MB, each file no bigger than 1 MB I aften perform a similar task here on a folder of about 174 MB size, with files that are all less than 1 MB in size. With no problems at all, and total search times on the order of several seconds. If I use Windows Notepad++, even Windows file| text earch it finds the text but not this one? Not sure what you mean here. Is a particular bit of text in one or more files not being found? details for me: Mac os X 10.6.2 iMac Intel Core 2 Duo BBEdit 9.3.1 Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: can Get Info be made to ignore HTML code?
On Dec 18, 8:55 am, Johan Solve inbox...@solve.se wrote: Copy from the preview window and paste inte a new text window and get info. Thanks Johan. Even faster to select Preview In New Text Window. :-) Results so far... a raw XHTML file - 86,008 words (it's a big one!) Preview in text window - 60,815 copy/paste from web browser - 60,546 Word Count Plus plug-in - 59,922 I've no idea why those last two are so different, but that's not BBE's fault. Thanks all, Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: can Get Info be made to ignore HTML code?
Thanks Dave and Charlie. I'll look into scripting that over the holidays, and if I get it right, I'll post it here for others. But I solved the client's request in the short term by first trying out Word Count Plus, a plug-in for Firefox. It seemed to work well so I suggested the client install it. They did and are happy to click it whenever they wonder how many words they have on a page. It's manual on a page by page basis, but the good thing is, they're doing it, not me. ;-) Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: a better auto completion? :)
On Dec 2, 8:01 pm, Alex Satrapa gr...@goldweb.com.au wrote: As an example of the p tag, simply do this in BBEdit: 1) In preferences - Editing: General, set Show text completions to be After a delay in typing 2) Select File-New-HTML Document 3) In the document, start typing p_class 4) press TAB 5) Marvel at how you now have a complete paragraph block with class attribute, and can easily tab between the fields! Marveling at the possibility of doing that I carefully followed your instructions, with this result ... p_class ... followed by a Tab character. In other words, nothing magiccal happened. Perhaps there are other settings required to make this work? Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: Compare Two Front Documents bringing up wrong documents
On Dec 2, 11:54 pm, Mark Fitzgerald m...@metropixel.net wrote: If I have two text windows open, with multiple documents in each, and I choose Compare Two Front Documents, I no longer get the frontmost document in each of the two windows. ... When I try that I get the top-most two documents in one window being compared, not the top one from each window. Since I've never worked with more than one window (at least, not since BBE allowed multiple docs in one window) I can't comment on what should be the expected or best behaviour. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: a better auto completion? :)
BBedit 9.3 Command-d brings up the Open File By Name dialog. Complete is set to F5 in Prefs. When I do that I get No completions available. I rarely make changes to the commandkey equivalents, so I suspect the results I mention above are the defaults. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: a better auto completion? :)
On Dec 3, 1:46 pm, Rich Siegel sie...@barebones.com wrote: The subsystem that makes that decision looks at the existing contents of your various Application Support/BBEdit/ subfolders, and if they line up, the subfolder gets updated. So if your Clippings have been modified, it'll skip the update. Computers being computers, they'd be very useful at a task such as updating. ;-) For example, the update software could not just enquire as to whether or not changes were made in one of the Clippings sub-folders and then come to a full stop if any are found. Rather it could drill down to the file level and update the sub-folders on a file by file basis, adding any new folders as required. It might even pop up a useful comment to the affect that it found a file which it would love to update but I had modified it and what would I like to do. BBEdit users are the most likely kind of users to modify things like the Clippings folder. I would guess that the majority of users did not get the current Clippings folder because their old one contained modified files. The installer should at least make an effort to notify them of that during the update. Rob -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group.
Re: How to indicate NEW content in a timely manner?
Thanks to all for this. Looks like Ronald's and Brian's ideas combined will do the trick. Rob P.S. Sorry to have bothered the BBEdit list about this. I would have put it in the Web list but it's so that I assumed my question would just sit there unanswered. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to indicate NEW content in a timely manner?
Sorry, I was so close to the problem that I forgot to explain a salient point. It's not the page that is new; it's items within the page. So indicating that the page has been updated would not help since it's always being updated. See, for example... http://www.jottings.ca/john/voices/reservoir1.html There are about 35 NEW indicators within the page, indicating that certain poems have been added recently. But some of them are not very recent and the NEW indicator should be removed. I was hoping for some sort of parameter that could be added to the span that would help me automagically remove old ones from time to time. Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the BBEdit Talk discussion group on Google Groups. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
a little grep help please
Hi, As usual, grep beyond the most basic defeats me. I must suffer from dysgrepia. I use the following little thing to add BR tags to the end of lines I've selected... Find: \r Replace: br /\r ...with Selected text only checked. Even I can do that. ;-) I use this for poems where I define stanzas using P tags and blank lines. Which means I end up selecting the first to second-last lines of each stanza, click the Find dialog to bring it to front, click Replace all, click the main window, select another stanza, etc. It would be extremely helpful if I could select the entire poem, top to bottom and do this replace once. But of course, doing that with my current pattern means I end up having to delete extraneous BR tags. So to my question... How can the Find/Replace pattern be improved so it skips over blank lines and any line ending in /p? Thanks for any help you can offer. Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: BBEdit 9.2.1 (2527) pre-release
On May 17, 1:36 pm, Bee 200...@calcentral.com wrote: + all versions of BBEdit are closed + moved my BBEdit871 preferences + open BBEdit 9.2.1 (2527) pre-release + new preferences are created + enter a Find string + enter a Replace string + tap return to do the Find (the find dialog goes away) + tap the default keyboard shortcut for Replace (command+=) + open the Find dialog with command+F + in the Recent drop down Grep: add Replace: (nothing) I can duplicate this result using the above steps in BBE 9.2 (2526) running in OS X v10.4.11 on an intel iMac. In fact, when I selected the Recent drop-down to check, I noticed that the majority of the listings said Replace: (nothing), which means (because I usually search using Command-E, Command-Option-E and Command-= without ever seeing the dialog) that this is happening with some regularity. I couldn't recall anything that would be helpful in deducing why a few of the Recent listings did include the replace string while most did not. Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Files Not Always Saving
On Mar 31, 1:30 am, Harold Tessmann III mac...@umich.edu wrote: ... If you update a site more than once or twice, you need some sort of version control system... If I may jump in here, I'm curious about this. I had always understood that version control systems were just that, ways of controlling which version of a file is worked on and saved in a multi-user environment. Why would a single author need such a system? (I'm not being argumentative -- I just don't want to miss out on a good thing, if it is a good thing for me.) I manage several sites, some quite large, and simply use my own filing system locally to manage what I work on, FTPing the results to the server as and when needed. I use Transmit to do the FTP tasks. Maybe that makes it easier to manage, though I'm not sure, since I've never used BBEdit's built-in abilities for that, and so can't compare. Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Files Not Always Saving
On Mar 31, 12:13 pm, G. T. Stresen-Reuter tedmaster...@gmail.com wrote: ... The command I use the most, though, is Compare Revisions..., which allows me to see the differences between the current and prior versions of a file... I find that to be endlessly useful. Now THAT I could find very useful indeed. I work on a couple of sites (more to come) which use an eCommerce engine (Zen Cart, written in PHP and mySQL). I can see myself first uploading a default set of files to a new site, and then uploading my changed set. (I always do the changes locally with the cart running in MAMP). So if Subversion (or another) can give me an easy compare between that default set and the current set, that would be very valuable. I can, of course, do that file by file in BBEdit, but Zen Cart has hundreds of files in many dozens of folders and sub-folders, so some sort of an all-at-once compare to a known working version would be very nice. Thanks for the tip, Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Can I choose which clipboard type to paste?
While you're in Word, why not save the Word document as an HTML file, then open the saved HTML file in BBEdit? Have you ever looked at the result of doing that? It's a minefield of garbage code, which has to be carefully cleaned up before you can use it in your site -- if, that is, you want clean code which validates. If not, then Word's HTML will do, I guess. Rob --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups BBEdit Talk group. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or confirmed) problem with the software, please email to supp...@barebones.com rather than posting to the group. -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I've often wondered...
...and now I need to know. (And being a good boy scout, I did search
the Manual and the Help too.)
In the Get Info dialog, for an XHTML document, what is counted as
words? Take this code fragment for example...
div class=img-lock
a href=art/j-some.html onclick=popup('art/j-some.html'); return
false;
img src=imgs/j-some-sm.jpg alt=Some Picture Here, 1950
width=94 height=140 / /a br /
i Some Picture Here /i , 1950
/div
How many words? Just the 4 that are visible when the page is rendered
in a browser? Or would it be 8, including the alt tag's contents? Or
more?
Chars and lines will be everything in the code, I suppose. And I'm
guessing paginate is also counting the pages including code, not any
possible rendered version. So it's just words I'm unclear about.
Rob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups BBEdit Talk group.
To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bbedit?hl=en
If you have a specific feature request or would like to report a suspected (or
confirmed) problem with the software, please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rather than posting to the group.
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
