Re: executing shell scripts
Another basic thing to double-check is the filename. It should be
cloud.php in your case.
/Martin
On Oct 7, 2:54 am, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, it is in ~/vendors/shells
On Oct 6, 1:41 pm, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it in ~/vendors or ~/vendors/shells ?
On Oct 6, 7:30 pm, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to create my first shell script. The shell script is in /
vendors and when I run, I get this:
class CloudShell extends Shell {
var $uses = array('Item');
function main() {
$this-out(test\n);
}
}Error: Class CloudShell could not be loaded
What am I missing? Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Getting global variables from Database in cakePHP
Maybe something like this would help you: http://dsi.vozibrale.com/articles/view/simple-db-based-configuration-for-cakephp-apps There is also a working (and slightly improved) example in my CMS project (same site). Hope that helps! On Oct 7, 6:58 am, Jipson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thank you Jitka and mark. I tried with jitka's solution but,as a new developer to cakephp I couldn't obtain the solutions. I searched the tutorials also but I didn't got it.Can you please explain it with some examples please Thanks, Jipson. On Oct 6, 8:09 pm, jitka (poLK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, you can - load necessary settings from db when you need them - load all settings once and use Configure::store() (also called from afterSave callback of this model), Configure::load() (called from bootstrap) and then Configure::read() where necessary - same approach as 2nd one, but with Cache::write()/read() --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: more problems with RC3 and tests
I am sure the docs do not contain the recent changes yet.
My Model-tests work with fixtures. Here is a mini-example. Maybe you
can see some detail that you have done differently.
in phone.test.php
App::import('Model', 'Phone');
class PhoneTest extends Phone {
var $name = 'PhoneTest';
var $useDbConfig = 'test_suite';
}
class PhoneTestCase extends CakeTestCase {
var $fixtures = array( 'app.phone_test' );
function testStorage() {
$this-PhoneTest = new PhoneTest();
$all = $this-PhoneTest-findAll();
$this-assertEqual(4, count($all));
}
}
ideas:
I have changed useDbConfig = test to test_suite
I have added app. to my fixtures for identification.
Your should maybe use the callbacks startCase(), endCase(),
startTest(), endTest() to make a shared connection to the database.
hope it helps
/Martin
On Oct 7, 11:56 am, Christof Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that I fixed the connection problems with fixtures I have another
problem. All my tests which uses fixtures show this error:
Unexpected PHP error [Trying to get property of non-object] severity
[E_NOTICE] in [.../cake/libs/class_registry.php line 295]
.../tests/cases/models/product.test.php - ProductTestCase - start
This is triggered by the start method, which looks like this:
function start() {
parent::start();
$this-Product = new TestProductModel ();
}
Has the way to do this changed? I am still doing it as the documentation
shows.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP RC3 - The RC of Triumph!
Like I said, Just a thought. On Oct 7, 6:03 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: its not a 'poll' problem. Cake uses tests and include them so people can contribute tests , adding another obstacle for them (downloading testsuite etc) is not good. Why the tests are a problem for you ? can't you rm them if you dont need them ? i can't see where is the problem. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:45 AM, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought. You should run a poll of Cake developers (those who develop with Cake, not core developers) and see how many people use these extra parts. Can't hurt to know which extras are the most popular. On Oct 6, 4:18 pm, Yodiaditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm agree with you nate. Actually, i never using testing cause don't know how to use it. But, in another cases, testing is needed not only for test your sweet cake before product it. But also give us test the cake for bugs... On 10/7/08, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. Anyway, as far as the wasted bandwidth argument, I have to say that seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to verify the absence of) bugs. On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last year that I know it's in good spirit. Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. Thomas On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: more problems with RC3 and tests
Same problem here. The problem is that not only the documentation is suggesting this test case layout, but also bake when generating test case files (I think). rgds --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
Hi Michael,
thanks for looking at this problem. I know it works when calling $html-
css() from the view (see side notes in original post) but my problem
is it doesn't when calling $html-css() or $javascript-link from an
element (/views/elements/menu.ctp for instance).
Thanks,
Marc
On Oct 6, 6:45 pm, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc,
I'm using RC3.
In my view I'm calling $html-css() with array() as the third
parameter instead of null. The LINK) is correctly located in the
head section.
Michael
On Oct 6, 2:41 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for taking the time. t least now I know I'm not alone! ;-)
On Oct 6, 3:38 pm, hydra12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops! You're right. Sorry. I can't get it to work either.
On Oct 6, 2:00 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input.
I beg to differ though, the manual says:
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/96/Layouts
When using $html-css() or $javascript-link() in view files, specify
'false' for the 'in-line' argument to place the html source in
$scripts_for_layout. (See API for more details on usage).
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/206/Inserting-Well-Formatted-elements
css(mixed $path, string $rel = null, array $htmlAttributes, boolean
$inline = true)
Creates a link(s) to a CSS style-sheet. If $inline is set to false,
the link tags are added to the $scripts_for_layout variable which you
can print inside the head tag of the document.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_html_helper.html
HtmlHelper::css($path, $rel = null, $htmlAttributes = array(), $inline
= true)
Creates a link element for CSS stylesheets.
Parameters:
mixed $path The name of a CSS style sheet in /app/webroot/css,
or an array containing names of CSS stylesheets in that directory.
string $rel Rel attribute. Defaults to stylesheet.
array $htmlAttributes Array of HTML attributes.
boolean $inline If set to false, the generated tag
appears in
the head tag of the layout.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_javascript_helper.html
JavascriptHelper::link( $url, $inline = true)
Returns a JavaScript include tag (SCRIPT element). If the filename is
prefixed with /, the path will be relative to the base path of your
application. Otherwise, the path will be relative to your JavaScript
path, usually webroot/js.
Parameters:
mixed $url String URL to JavaScript file, or an array of URLs.
boolean $inline If true, the script tag will be
printed
inline, otherwise it will be printed in the head, using
$scripts_for_layout
On top of which, when looking at the actual HtmlHelper::css method,
the last few lines read like this:
if ($inline) {
return $out;
} else {
$view = ClassRegistry::getObject('view');
$view-addScript($out);
}
Other Side note:
Using the JavascriptHelper::link method yields the same result, ie the
method calls don't generate the HTML to include an external JS file.
Thanks,
Marc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Error: RedirectController could not be found.
It doesn't seem like the errors listed are the actual problem. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Discussion on listed-websites-on-custom-google-search-engine-for-cakephp
Only search in the CakePHP.org domain (api, tests,book,trac) http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=010821733709469541955:xmlzkbwlgaq --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Scaffold in RC3
Hello there, Recently I upgrade my cake lib to 1.2 rc3, then I can visit the pages which don't exist exactly but in scaffold name array like 'index', 'edit' and so on. For example in 1.2 rc2, if you visit http://mysite.com/users/ or http://mysite.com/users/index, you will get an error message with 404 not found. But in rc3, you can see the page which generate by scaffold. Does anyone has met the same with me? Thank you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
tree and translate behaviours (same model), delete problem
Hello all, Currently i am using cakephp 1.2 RC 3, i have no problems with using both behaviours it transaltes it correctly, but when i trying to delete parent tree node it also delete child's it is ok, the problem is translate behaviour only deletes parent node in i18n table and leaves all childs. How can i solve this issue ? thank you --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: integrate paypal
Hi i got how to get the values using REQUEST use 'requesthandler' in component using this component we can get the value from url values for example u want to get a value http://www.example.com?val=100 In ur controller add requesthandler componter then user $_REQUEST['val'] its work On Sep 20, 5:52 pm, Adam Royle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see why $_REQUEST shouldn't work as normal... but cake automatically puts these vars into: $this-params['form']; // from $_POST or $this-params['url']; // from $_GET Hope that helps. Adam On Sep 19, 11:18 pm, json [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am new to here I want to help how tointegrateapaypalin cake php i dont know how tointegrateit normally i willintegratepaypalusing html code then i will get value from notify file using $_REQUEST['payment_status']=completed if completed received i will update my database but in cake php REQUEST method is not work any idea please send. thanks json --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Easy to implement global search
Hi, After trying to find the best way to have a global search function, I decided to implement the following solution ... and it works brilliantly. Create a search table: CREATE TABLE `search` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `model` varchar(300) default NULL, `rel_id` int(11) default NULL, `name` varchar(300) default NULL, `description` text, `active` int(1) default '1', `modified` datetime NOT NULL, `created` datetime NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`), FULLTEXT KEY `search_index` (`name`,`description`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM; The model points the the table, ie news, and the rel_id to the id, ie. news.id For each table you want to search, setup a 3 MYSQL triggers ie. INSERT TRIGGER: DELIMITER $$ CREATE TRIGGER `News Insert to Search` AFTER INSERT ON `news` FOR EACH ROW BEGIN INSERT INTO `search` SET `model` = 'News', `active` = New.active, `name` = NEW.name, `description` = NEW.body, `rel_id` = NEW.id; END; $$ DELIMITER ; UPDATE TRIGGER: DELIMITER $$ CREATE TRIGGER `News Update to Search` AFTER UPDATE ON `news` FOR EACH ROW BEGIN DELETE FROM `search` WHERE `model` = 'News' AND `rel_id` = OLD.id; INSERT INTO `search` SET `model` = 'News', `name` = NEW.name, `description` = NEW.body, `rel_id` = NEW.id, `active` = New.active; END; $$ DELIMITER ; DELETE TRIGGER: DELIMITER $$ CREATE TRIGGER `News Delete to Search` AFTER DELETE ON `news` FOR EACH ROW BEGIN DELETE FROM `search` WHERE `model` = 'News' AND `rel_id` = OLD.id; END; $$ DELIMITER ; The trigger will be executed as soon as you add a new news story, or update a news story or delete a news story. So when you run a global search, you simply search through the search table, with one query ... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Auth and parseExtensions
I'm creating an app which logs in via a REST-service, and therefore i
think i need to turn off the automation of Auth, so that when i call
Auth-login() it doesn't call any other action, just checks the user
against the db and adds it to the session, or will i have to do this
manually (check against db and add to session) then?
Also, are there any known interference between Auth and
Router::parseExtensions() ? Because when action users/login.json is
called, it looks for views/users/login.ctp and not views/users/json/
login.ctp.
I have looked at this ticket: https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/3914 so
i have $components = array('Auth', 'RequestHandler');
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: fixture var $import not working on 1.2.RC3 anymore.
This has been fixed in the latest SVN, seems there was a conflict with
the changes in ClassRegistry::init(). Anyways, a quick fix if you
don't want to upgrade the a nightly for the next while is to specify a
connection on all your fixtures.
-Mark
On Oct 6, 4:41 pm, Defranco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 6, 5:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had that. Thought the problem was all me. I am still a bit fuzzy on
a lot of the testing stuff.
Try this:
var $import = array('model' = 'Foo', 'connection' = 'default');
I noticed that one of the examples in the Cookbook had a 'connection'
property set. I have had to add this to each of my fixtures to make
them work again.
/Martin
Hi Martin,
It worked!
Thanks for your help!
kind regards
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Form returned by ajax response
My index tables have a form below the heading to allow users to filter
data. When using ajax pagination the form disappears after the first
request. Normal pagination works fine. The form does show up in the
html returned by ajax but it almost seems as if its getting rendered
off the screen. I have even tried standard and ajax forms for the
filtering. Snippet of my pagination, heading and filter form ($columns
is an array of key-value pairs for the fields to display):
tr
?php if($this-params['action'] == 'index'): ?
?php $paginator-
options(array('update'='centerColumn','indicator' = 'loading'));?
?php foreach($columns as $column): ?
th
?php
if(array_key_exists('sort',$paginator-params['named'])){
if($paginator-params['named']['sort'] ==
$column['field']){
echo $paginator-sort($column['title'],
$column['field'],array('class'=$paginator-sortDir()));
}
else{
echo $paginator-sort($column['title'],
$column['field']);
}
}
else{
echo $paginator-sort($column['title'],
$column['field']);
}
?
/th
?php endforeach; ?
?php else: ?
?php foreach($columns as $column): ?
th?php echo $column['title'];?/th
?php endforeach; ?
?php endif; ?
th class=actionsActions/th
/tr
tr
?php //echo $form-create(null, array('action'='/index')); ?
?php echo $ajax-form('/
index','post',array('update'='centerColumn','indicator' =
'loading')); ?
?php foreach($columns as $column): ?
td style=text-align:center;margin:0;padding:0;width:auto;
?php echo $form-
input($column['field'],array('div'=false,'label'=''));?
/td
?php endforeach; ?
td class=actions
?php echo $form-
end(array('label'='filter','id'='filter_submit','style'='display:none;'));?
/td
/tr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP RC3 - The RC of Triumph!
As for not knowing how to use the tests, you should really correct that ;) Unit Testing will make your life easier in the long run. -Mark On Oct 7, 8:47 am, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like I said, Just a thought. On Oct 7, 6:03 am, Marcin Domanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: its not a 'poll' problem. Cake uses tests and include them so people can contribute tests , adding another obstacle for them (downloading testsuite etc) is not good. Why the tests are a problem for you ? can't you rm them if you dont need them ? i can't see where is the problem. -- Marcin Domanskihttp://kabturek.info On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:45 AM, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought. You should run a poll of Cake developers (those who develop with Cake, not core developers) and see how many people use these extra parts. Can't hurt to know which extras are the most popular. On Oct 6, 4:18 pm, Yodiaditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm agree with you nate. Actually, i never using testing cause don't know how to use it. But, in another cases, testing is needed not only for test your sweet cake before product it. But also give us test the cake for bugs... On 10/7/08, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. Anyway, as far as the wasted bandwidth argument, I have to say that seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to verify the absence of) bugs. On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last year that I know it's in good spirit. Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. Thomas On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Which MVC is right for our corp?
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/58ea010f930fab6c/fdff3040db8f9cf6 On Oct 7, 7:18 am, Dr. Tarique Sani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:42 AM, mrconfused [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is cake flexible in allow only reads to occur from db A and writes only to db B ? Yes. I know that in the model layer, we can specify useDBConfig flag but not sure how to work out the above case of it writing to db B and read only from db A Use the beforeSave, beforeDelete and beforeFind callbacks in your app_model to switch the DB It is trivial to code it ;) Tarique -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
Hi all,
still haven't found a solution for this. Does anyone know whom I might
contact to know if this is a bug or expected behavior, ie using $html-
css() within elements doesn't work the same as in views? Should I
submit this to the bug tracker?
Thanks for helping a new baker.
Marc
On Oct 7, 8:50 am, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
thanks for looking at this problem. I know it works when calling $html-css()
from the view (see side notes in original post) but my problem
is it doesn't when calling $html-css() or $javascript-link from an
element (/views/elements/menu.ctp for instance).
Thanks,
Marc
On Oct 6, 6:45 pm, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc,
I'm using RC3.
In my view I'm calling $html-css() with array() as the third
parameter instead of null. The LINK) is correctly located in the
head section.
Michael
On Oct 6, 2:41 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for taking the time. t least now I know I'm not alone! ;-)
On Oct 6, 3:38 pm, hydra12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops! You're right. Sorry. I can't get it to work either.
On Oct 6, 2:00 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input.
I beg to differ though, the manual says:
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/96/Layouts
When using $html-css() or $javascript-link() in view files, specify
'false' for the 'in-line' argument to place the html source in
$scripts_for_layout. (See API for more details on usage).
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/206/Inserting-Well-Formatted-elements
css(mixed $path, string $rel = null, array $htmlAttributes, boolean
$inline = true)
Creates a link(s) to a CSS style-sheet. If $inline is set to false,
the link tags are added to the $scripts_for_layout variable which you
can print inside the head tag of the document.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_html_helper.html
HtmlHelper::css($path, $rel = null, $htmlAttributes = array(),
$inline = true)
Creates a link element for CSS stylesheets.
Parameters:
mixed $path The name of a CSS style sheet in
/app/webroot/css,
or an array containing names of CSS stylesheets in that directory.
string $rel Rel attribute. Defaults to stylesheet.
array $htmlAttributes Array of HTML attributes.
boolean $inline If set to false, the generated tag
appears in
the head tag of the layout.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_javascript_helper.html
JavascriptHelper::link( $url, $inline = true)
Returns a JavaScript include tag (SCRIPT element). If the filename is
prefixed with /, the path will be relative to the base path of your
application. Otherwise, the path will be relative to your JavaScript
path, usually webroot/js.
Parameters:
mixed $url String URL to JavaScript file, or an array of
URLs.
boolean $inline If true, the script tag will be
printed
inline, otherwise it will be printed in the head, using
$scripts_for_layout
On top of which, when looking at the actual HtmlHelper::css method,
the last few lines read like this:
if ($inline) {
return $out;
} else {
$view = ClassRegistry::getObject('view');
$view-addScript($out);
}
Other Side note:
Using the JavascriptHelper::link method yields the same result, ie the
method calls don't generate the HTML to include an external JS file.
Thanks,
Marc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model imports inexistent class Behavior
Report ticket.
On Oct 7, 10:07 am, kAtremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
In cake/libs/model/model.php:
App::import('Core', array('ClassRegistry', 'Overloadable', 'Validation',
'Behavior', 'ConnectionManager', 'Set', 'String'));
I guess 'Behavior' shouldn't be there since I coundn't find such class
anywhere in Cake libs, only ModelBehavior is there.
Simple pr() after !class_exists() in App::import() shows that import()
tries to load this class several dozens times a page on a moderate-size
project!
--
kAtremer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: more problems with RC3 and tests
I found the changeset which introduced the problem anyway:
https://trac.cakephp.org/changeset/7596#file6
if (is_a($model, $class) || $model-alias == $class) {
$duplicate = $model;
}
Remove the || $model-alias == $class and the warnings are gone. Is
this maybe supposed to be: $model-alias == $class ?
2008/10/7 Defranco [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Same problem here.
The problem is that not only the documentation is suggesting this test
case layout, but also bake when generating test case files (I think).
rgds
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP RC3 - The RC of Triumph!
its not a 'poll' problem. Cake uses tests and include them so people can contribute tests , adding another obstacle for them (downloading testsuite etc) is not good. Why the tests are a problem for you ? can't you rm them if you dont need them ? i can't see where is the problem. -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:45 AM, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought. You should run a poll of Cake developers (those who develop with Cake, not core developers) and see how many people use these extra parts. Can't hurt to know which extras are the most popular. On Oct 6, 4:18 pm, Yodiaditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm agree with you nate. Actually, i never using testing cause don't know how to use it. But, in another cases, testing is needed not only for test your sweet cake before product it. But also give us test the cake for bugs... On 10/7/08, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. Anyway, as far as the wasted bandwidth argument, I have to say that seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to verify the absence of) bugs. On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last year that I know it's in good spirit. Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. Thomas On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How to do a migration? Database schemas are driving me mad.
Hi, I am about to go grey-haired from trying to migrate our database schema. How on earth can this be done without screwing it all up royally? A part from tedious, manual creation of many many alter statements, what do you use? How do you do it? That is the short question... ...here is the longer explaining rant: The problem is character sets and collations. They can be ignored for smaller, english applications but are a necessity for larger and especially non-english language applications. Typical affected parts of my data: Any character-field used as a keyword or as a unique index. Things of that sort MUST bave the correct collation to work. Any list of names that should be sorted. Names of files, folders, people... whatever. Without the correct collation a portion of the data will be sorted the wrong way. Any texts that should be searchable. The wrong collation means the search feature will find too many or too few results in some cases. So what's the problem? Cake's schema support ignores these thing completely. (which is better than partial support IMHO) mysqldiff.org and most reasonably priced software I have tried for creating diffs or migrations have only partial support. Ignoring field- level settings while altering table-level defaults... but keeping all settings when creating new tables. MySQL (at least v5) applies the current default table-level settings to any field without its own specification. Which makes the support of the software I have tried even more treacherous to use. They will implement a new table default but that will have no effect on any existing field. All this makes for a high-risk situation where a migration is almost more likely to cause problems than not. Leaving character set and collation out will write the current defaults (of a higher level) to the created table or field. That means that the only level where a migration tool absolutely must support this is on the fields. Any change to anything else will have no effect at all on existing fields or tables... I have found no software that support this. :) My problem is finding a way of modifying my schema this once so that the next time I can use an automated diff or migration. Martin - feeling screwier than sql --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: executing shell scripts
I am using cloud.php as the filename. And just to be safe, I changed to var
$uses = array(); in case there was a problem with my model. Am I executing
the shell properly?
cd ~/cake/console
./cake cloud
class CloudShell extends Shell {
var $uses = array();
function main() {
$this-out(test\n);
}
}Error: Class CloudShell could not be loaded
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another basic thing to double-check is the filename. It should be
cloud.php in your case.
/Martin
On Oct 7, 2:54 am, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, it is in ~/vendors/shells
On Oct 6, 1:41 pm, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it in ~/vendors or ~/vendors/shells ?
On Oct 6, 7:30 pm, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to create my first shell script. The shell script is in /
vendors and when I run, I get this:
class CloudShell extends Shell {
var $uses = array('Item');
function main() {
$this-out(test\n);
}
}Error: Class CloudShell could not be loaded
What am I missing? Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model imports inexistent class Behavior
OK. It will take some time to get used to the testing, so anybody more
familiar with the process and methodics is welcome to pick up the bug
and report.
majna wrote:
Report ticket.
On Oct 7, 10:07 am, kAtremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In cake/libs/model/model.php:
App::import('Core', array('ClassRegistry', 'Overloadable', 'Validation',
'Behavior', 'ConnectionManager', 'Set', 'String'));
I guess 'Behavior' shouldn't be there since I coundn't find such class
anywhere in Cake libs, only ModelBehavior is there.
Simple pr() after !class_exists() in App::import() shows that import()
tries to load this class several dozens times a page on a moderate-size
project!
--
kAtremer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
view caching and progressive enhancement/ajax
Hi guys, It took me a while to work out why my conventional links were returning ajax style, layout-less pages! - I have a page (in views/pages/) that has tabs, each of these tabs causes a page refresh - I use JQuery to hijack the links to make them ajax, so Cake returns the view without the layout - Other pages of the site link directly to specific tabs So, If the request that triggers a view cache refresh happens to be an ajax one, then the cache doesn't include the layout. That means that my conventional direct links to these pages will returned the cached, ajax optimised versions!!! Is there an elegant way to deal with this? Cheers! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Cakephp Sort() ignore the id parametre passed befor
hi, i need help (i think i'm not using the sort() methode
correctly!!!)
this is my code:
CONTROLLER
function salaryhome($id = null)
{
//...
$this-set('demands', $this-
paginate('Absence',array('Absence.user_id'=$id)));
//...
}
VIEW
//...
th?php echo $paginator-sort('Demand's Date','date');?/th
th?php echo $paginator-sort('Absence
Type','absencetype_id');?
//...
here you see i'm filtring my request by user_id get from the URL, so
if i try to reorder my table by clicking on any
table header (ex: the 'Absence Type') i loose the filtring and all
data.
have any idea to solve this???,,
thanks a lot
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
loose params in sort() methode
hi, everyone;
i've used a condition in the Paginate like so;
$this-set('demands', $this-
paginate('Absence',array('Absence.user_id'=$id)));
and the $id is gat as parametre in the action. If i execute the code
for the fist time it worked perfectly, but if i click on the header of
the table (which is sortable) i loose all data and filtring.
thanks ahead.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP RC3 - The RC of Triumph!
I use the core test for many things. As examples of how to write my own test when I'm starting a new piece of functionality. As examples of how a class/function in the core could/should be used. Can't tell you how many times this has helped. I run the Core test at least once for each new project to verify the structure is setup correctly. You guys keep asking for some core examples, they've been there all the time, learn to use and write test. It will increase your global understanding of the core. I've learned a lot of techniques and of new features just by watching the breadth of the test cases increase. Don't separate them from the core this makes no sense, I'll separate it when I deploy a live site. LunarDraco Morgan Cook On Oct 6, 12:36 pm, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. Anyway, as far as the wasted bandwidth argument, I have to say that seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to verify the absence of) bugs. On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last year that I know it's in good spirit. Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. Thomas On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Model imports inexistent class Behavior
Hello.
In cake/libs/model/model.php:
App::import('Core', array('ClassRegistry', 'Overloadable', 'Validation',
'Behavior', 'ConnectionManager', 'Set', 'String'));
I guess 'Behavior' shouldn't be there since I coundn't find such class
anywhere in Cake libs, only ModelBehavior is there.
Simple pr() after !class_exists() in App::import() shows that import()
tries to load this class several dozens times a page on a moderate-size
project!
--
kAtremer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: admin routing in rc3
I have no trouble using the default routing:
Configure::write('Routing.admin', 'admin');
On Oct 6, 9:47 am, . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i just upgraded to rc3 (from rc2), why does the admin routing break? i have
a :1 at the end of the urls...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Promlems with Fixtures using $import in RC3
Yes, the connection seems to be the problem. I also saw this in
another thread, which did the trick.
var $import = array('model' = 'Foo', 'connection' = 'default');
2008/10/3 mark_story [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There were a number of problems with fixture importing in RC2, which
were corrected. Perhaps one of these corrections broke your tests?.
For examples on fixture use check the fixture test. You can also try
specifying which connection you want to use so connection = default
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
more problems with RC3 and tests
Now that I fixed the connection problems with fixtures I have another
problem. All my tests which uses fixtures show this error:
Unexpected PHP error [Trying to get property of non-object] severity
[E_NOTICE] in [.../cake/libs/class_registry.php line 295]
.../tests/cases/models/product.test.php - ProductTestCase - start
This is triggered by the start method, which looks like this:
function start() {
parent::start();
$this-Product = new TestProductModel ();
}
Has the way to do this changed? I am still doing it as the documentation shows.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How we can impliment shipping method calculator and payment options in cakephp
Hi All, I searched in Google and cake tutorial to find how we can integrate ups shipping calculator and payment methods like pay pal, authorize.net but I couldn't find a solution. any one please help me. Thanks, Jipson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Discussion on listed-websites-on-custom-google-search-engine-for-cakephp
Would be nice to have some refinements so that the links to sites as API, Book, tests, etc are easily accessable. Look at refinements in the CSE control panel. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Another HABTM issue : row with same Id getting over-written
Ok, so the root where all this non-unique stuff occurs seems to be
in dbo_source.php, line 841:
if ($type == 'hasAndBelongsToMany') {
$uniqueIds = $merge = array();
foreach($fetch as $j = $data) {
if (
(isset($data[$with]) $data[$with][$foreignKey] ===
$row[$model-alias][$model-primaryKey])
(!in_array($data[$with][$joinKeys[1]], $uniqueIds))
) {
$uniqueIds[] =
$data[$with][$joinKeys[1]];
if
($habtmFieldsCount = 2) {
unset($data[$with]);
}
$merge[] =
$data;
}
}
if (empty($merge)
!isset($row[$association])) {
$row[$association] =
$merge;
} else {
$this-__mergeAssociation($resultSet[$i], $merge, $association,
$type);
}
}
Fair enough ... but why?? So this kills any possibility of showing
duplicates, that might be good, but shouldn't it bring back
everything, thus revealing any possibility of screwiness in app code?
Since it's a HABTM relationship, shouldn't the whole has and belongs
to many retrieve all that it has and belongs to?
There's obviously something I'm missing and confused about ...
unfortunately no comments in code to shed light.
(Note: to recap, I've got a user HABTM webpage_types in users-
webpage_types with extra fields where a user could multiple of the
same webpage_type)
On Oct 6, 1:41 pm, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, moving to the solution nachopitt suggested works ... however,
because of this, for saving, I have to use `saveAll()` instead of
`save()` ... which works; however, for the User model, there's also
another HABTM which doesn't work for `saveAll()` ... doh!!
Best solution?
On Oct 6, 11:03 am, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the table looks more like this:
user_id | web_page_type_id | url
---
7 | 6 | firstdomain.com
7 | 6 | second.com
So the two are unique, but I see what you're saying.
I did originally have it setup in such a way that it wasn't a typical
join table (as nachopitt suggested); however, was running into
problems with saving in one fell swoop and wanted to give the HABTM
save setup a try (as described everywhere).
Might have to go back to the previous method.
On Oct 4, 7:33 am, nachopitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, teknoid has a point. Your relation/association is not supposed
to work in that way. Normally, in a non CakePHP enviroment, a
joinTable has the 2 foreign keys and they set as the primary key
column. You don´t have the id column that CakePHP expects to have
and then the foreign keys... thats why the uniqueness of the
records.
Personally i would change the schema of you database for something
like
users
web_pages (holding the url, title, etc)
web_page_types (holding the name of the webpage type)
And the associations
user hasMany webpages
webpage belongsTo user
webpage belongsTo webpageType
On Oct 3, 6:37 pm, teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goes to show I should read more carefully :)
I guess the title of the post made me jump the gun...
You say an user has 2 of the same webpage_type
Does it mean that in your join table you have something like: ?
user_id | web_page_type_id
-
7 | 6
7 | 6
On Oct 3, 6:27 pm, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, assuming the Docs are correct (and I understand it properly),
that should only apply to updates (If true (default value) cake will
first delete existing relationship records in the foreign keys table
before inserting new ones, when updating a record. So existing
associations need to be passed again when updating).
However, in my circumstance, I'm just retrieving information ...
Debug SQL shows the (as expected) query
Re: Getting global variables from Database in cakePHP
Thank you all.Thanks a lot. Dr. Hannibal Lecter's suggestion helped me. Now my problem is solved. Once again thank you all. On Oct 7, 1:06 pm, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe something like this would help you: http://dsi.vozibrale.com/articles/view/simple-db-based-configuration-... There is also a working (and slightly improved) example in my CMS project (same site). Hope that helps! On Oct 7, 6:58 am, Jipson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thank you Jitka and mark. I tried with jitka's solution but,as a new developer to cakephp I couldn't obtain the solutions. I searched the tutorials also but I didn't got it.Can you please explain it with some examples please Thanks, Jipson. On Oct 6, 8:09 pm, jitka (poLK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, you can - load necessary settings from db when you need them - load all settings once and use Configure::store() (also called from afterSave callback of this model), Configure::load() (called from bootstrap) and then Configure::read() where necessary - same approach as 2nd one, but with Cache::write()/read() --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: reduction in db queries + view pagination
Look into Containable and determine if you could work with a lower
level of recursion. Perhaps you could make use of unbindModel to
remove associations you don't need. Off topic a bit, but worth noting,
your nested in-line ternary conditionals are just absurd. Some
developer down the road is going to despise you if you leave those in.
Also. !empty($var) will do the work of isset($var) and $var != '', in
one swoop.
On Oct 6, 3:36 pm, wmshay06 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a customer using what was supposed to be a production system
based upon cakephp 1.1.18 - which really isn't. That aside there are
very signficiant issues that need urgent resolution, whcih we just
can't find a way to solve readily.
1. the number of db queries is absolutley astounding - example
constructing a left hand submenu and overview display of roughly 20-25
table rows of data leads (with about 10 elements in each row) to
roughly 49000+ queries. This appears to be 'contructed' using a few
findAll queries. There has got to be a better way - and faster.
2. In some portion of the system there is a need to display a large
list of items - some approachign 1500+ long. This obviously begs for
pagination - but for the life of me the various examples I've found
don't really seem to work for what needs to be done.
For reference the main view code at issue looks like this:
$this-set('curtickets',
$this-Ticket-findAll((isset($this-params['url']['num'])
$this-params['url']['num'] != '' ? ($this-
params['url']['num2'] != '' ? ticket_number = '{$this-params['url']
['num']}' AND ticket_number = '{$this-params['url']['num2']}' AND
: ticket_number = '{$this-params['url']['num']}' AND ) : '').
($type ? type = '{$type}' AND : '').($sub ? subcontractor_id =
'{$sub}' AND : '') . Ticket.job_id = '{$this-params['job_id']}'));
$subs =
$this-Ticket-Job-JobSubCombination-findAll(JobSubCombination.job_id =
{$this-
params['job_id']},'Subcontractor.id, Subcontractor.legal_name');
$sublist = array();
foreach ($subs as $s) {
$sublist[$s['Subcontractor']['id']] =
$s['Subcontractor']
['legal_name'];
}
$this-set('sublist', $sublist);
$this-set('typelist', $this-typelist);
$this-set('chosentype', $type);
$this-set('chosensub', $sub);
Open to thoughts...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: loose params in sort() methode
http://book.cakephp.org/view/166/Pagination-in-Views
See all the way at the bottom about passing the parameters to the
paginator.
On Oct 7, 10:08 am, Elmaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, everyone;
i've used a condition in the Paginate like so;
$this-set('demands', $this-
paginate('Absence',array('Absence.user_id'=$id)));
and the $id is gat as parametre in the action. If i execute the code
for the fist time it worked perfectly, but if i click on the header of
the table (which is sortable) i loose all data and filtring.
thanks ahead.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Release: CakePHP RC3 - The RC of Triumph!
Hi Thomas, As Marcin said, it isn't really a matter of anyone's opinion, other than that of the core team. We actively encourage test-driven development, and we actively encourage people to contribute to the framework, particularly in the form of test cases. Therefore, we include the tests. Generally speaking (and directed at no one in particular), I really don't see the point of getting all worked up over stuff like this. Disk space is measured in the dozens or hundreds of gigabytes, and bandwidth is measured in the dozens or hundreds of megabits per second. Does having fewer files in a tarball somehow just make people feel better for no rational reason? On Oct 7, 12:45 am, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a thought. You should run a poll of Cake developers (those who develop with Cake, not core developers) and see how many people use these extra parts. Can't hurt to know which extras are the most popular. On Oct 6, 4:18 pm, Yodiaditya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm agree with you nate. Actually, i never using testing cause don't know how to use it. But, in another cases, testing is needed not only for test your sweet cake before product it. But also give us test the cake for bugs... On 10/7/08, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The tweet was just me venting my frustration over an unrelated issue, I happened to think the timeliness was funny though. Anyway, as far as the wasted bandwidth argument, I have to say that seems a bit silly. Even the largest of the packages weighs in at less than 1.2mb. Anyway, the tests are included for lots of reasons, not the least of which being that it helps us as core developers, but also the fact that it promotes visibility of testing within the community, as well as the ability for people to verify (or more commonly to verify the absence of) bugs. On Oct 6, 2:05 pm, 703designs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ah, that makes sense. I'm pretty sure that Nate's suggestion was uncalled for, but he's helped me enough with Cake stuff over the last year that I know it's in good spirit. Here's a question: Why are the tests included? Why not make them a separate download? I mean, yes, if they're distributed together, you know for sure that the test match the framework package. But you guys are certainly wasting bandwidth on the test files. Thomas On Oct 6, 1:56 pm, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Test cases account for at least two thirds of the overall package size. In my opinion, thats a good thing. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model imports inexistent class Behavior
On Oct 7, 4:51 pm, kAtremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. It will take some time to get used to the testing, so anybody more familiar with the process and methodics is welcome to pick up the bug and report. What kind of pass-the-buck cop out logic is that... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Ajax Form complete = not working with functions
not sure of your problem... but try to put the java function BEFORE
the ajax calling and give it a try. Javascripts always mess with me in
this kind of way... maybe it helps you.
script type='javascript'
function testCall() { alert('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');}
/script
?
echo $ajax-form('addComment', 'post', array(
'model' = 'Comment',
'url' = array('controller' = 'comments', 'action' ='add'),
'update' = 'pureGenius',
'complete' = 'testCall();'));
?
..
On Oct 6, 3:55 pm, Chez17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The complete option works fine if I put the javascript directly into
the array. However if I try to put it in a function in the array it
doesn't work. Take the following example:
?
echo $ajax-form('addComment', 'post', array(
'model' = 'Comment',
'url' = array('controller' = 'comments', 'action' ='add'),
'update' = 'pureGenius',
'complete' = 'testCall();'));
?
script type='javascript'
function testCall()
{
alert('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');}
/script
If I put the alert in the ajax array, it works fine. Doesn't work as
it stands. Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[que] same element in different controllers
Hi!
I have a Category controller that uses the TreeHelper and the Tree
behaviour
I also have an element for this controller that constructs a css menu.
These are the contents of the element:
echo $tree-generate($menu, array('type' = 'ul', 'id'='suckertree1',
'element'='menulink', 'model'='Category'));
The element is called from the views for the Category controller and
the tree menu is constructed.
How can I use the same element for another action of a different
controller, so that I will present the same menu in different parts of
the site?
Thanks,
Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Non-Test Fixtures
Is there anyway to package a non-test fixture that can be executed by CakePHP 1.2? I know how to do it for fixtures in unit testing, but I thought it might be cool to use something like that to load some dummy data into my app. I'm sure there are a number of ways to tackle this issue. Anyone doing something similar and doesn't mind sharing? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
Me again,
so I think I figured some of it out.
It seems like the call to render the default.ctp doesn't defer the
output of the header until the end of all other element rendering.
Hence, if echo $scripts_for_layout is processed before in-page element
(inside the page's body), which are output using echo $this-
element(...) then they're not found in the header.
If you echo $scripts_for_layout later on, let's say after your
element() call, then it does contain the link tags that the elements
added. So I guess the it works but not as expected.
My question now is:
Was I right to expect that the echo $scripts_for_layout would be
delayed until all sub-elements are rendered?
Should I submit this as a bug/confusion/whatever?
Marc
On Oct 7, 10:33 am, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
still haven't found a solution for this. Does anyone know whom I might
contact to know if this is a bug or expected behavior, ie using $html-css()
within elements doesn't work the same as in views? Should I
submit this to the bug tracker?
Thanks for helping a new baker.
Marc
On Oct 7, 8:50 am, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
thanks for looking at this problem. I know it works when calling
$html-css() from the view (see side notes in original post) but my problem
is it doesn't when calling $html-css() or $javascript-link from an
element (/views/elements/menu.ctp for instance).
Thanks,
Marc
On Oct 6, 6:45 pm, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marc,
I'm using RC3.
In my view I'm calling $html-css() with array() as the third
parameter instead of null. The LINK) is correctly located in the
head section.
Michael
On Oct 6, 2:41 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for taking the time. t least now I know I'm not alone! ;-)
On Oct 6, 3:38 pm, hydra12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops! You're right. Sorry. I can't get it to work either.
On Oct 6, 2:00 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your input.
I beg to differ though, the manual says:
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/96/Layouts
When using $html-css() or $javascript-link() in view files,
specify
'false' for the 'in-line' argument to place the html source in
$scripts_for_layout. (See API for more details on usage).
http://manual.cakephp.org/view/206/Inserting-Well-Formatted-elements
css(mixed $path, string $rel = null, array $htmlAttributes, boolean
$inline = true)
Creates a link(s) to a CSS style-sheet. If $inline is set to false,
the link tags are added to the $scripts_for_layout variable which
you
can print inside the head tag of the document.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_html_helper.html
HtmlHelper::css($path, $rel = null, $htmlAttributes = array(),
$inline = true)
Creates a link element for CSS stylesheets.
Parameters:
mixed $path The name of a CSS style sheet in
/app/webroot/css,
or an array containing names of CSS stylesheets in that directory.
string $rel Rel attribute. Defaults to stylesheet.
array $htmlAttributes Array of HTML attributes.
boolean $inline If set to false, the generated tag
appears in
the head tag of the layout.
http://api.cakephp.org/class_javascript_helper.html
JavascriptHelper::link( $url, $inline = true)
Returns a JavaScript include tag (SCRIPT element). If the filename
is
prefixed with /, the path will be relative to the base path of
your
application. Otherwise, the path will be relative to your JavaScript
path, usually webroot/js.
Parameters:
mixed $url String URL to JavaScript file, or an array of
URLs.
boolean $inline If true, the script tag will be
printed
inline, otherwise it will be printed in the head, using
$scripts_for_layout
On top of which, when looking at the actual HtmlHelper::css method,
the last few lines read like this:
if ($inline) {
return $out;
} else {
$view = ClassRegistry::getObject('view');
$view-addScript($out);
}
Other Side note:
Using the JavascriptHelper::link method yields the same result, ie
the
method calls don't generate the HTML to include an external JS file.
Thanks,
Marc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
On Oct 7, 7:57 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Me again, so I think I figured some of it out. It seems like the call to render the default.ctp doesn't defer the output of the header until the end of all other element rendering. Hence, if echo $scripts_for_layout is processed before in-page element (inside the page's body), which are output using echo $this- element(...) then they're not found in the header. If you echo $scripts_for_layout later on, let's say after your element() call, then it does contain the link tags that the elements added. So I guess the it works but not as expected. My question now is: Was I right to expect that the echo $scripts_for_layout would be delayed until all sub-elements are rendered? $scripts_for_layout is not a marker, when you echo it in the layout you echo what it contains . If you are calling your element from the layout, then no, that's not going to and isn't expected to work: anything it does wrt this variable won't have any effect - it's contents have already been constructed. hth, AD --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Another HABTM issue : row with same Id getting over-written
Ok, so I can kind of understand the use of `$foreignKey` as something
to compare on, but that still doesn't explain why we're limiting to
unique Ids.
Quite frustrating without an explanation.
On Oct 7, 2:28 am, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so the root where all this non-unique stuff occurs seems to be
in dbo_source.php, line 841:
if ($type == 'hasAndBelongsToMany') {
$uniqueIds = $merge = array();
foreach($fetch as $j =
$data) {
if (
(isset($data[$with]) $data[$with][$foreignKey] ===
$row[$model-alias][$model-primaryKey])
(!in_array($data[$with][$joinKeys[1]], $uniqueIds))
) {
$uniqueIds[]
= $data[$with][$joinKeys[1]];
if
($habtmFieldsCount = 2) {
unset($data[$with]);
}
$merge[] =
$data;
}
}
if (empty($merge)
!isset($row[$association])) {
$row[$association] =
$merge;
} else {
$this-__mergeAssociation($resultSet[$i], $merge, $association,
$type);
}
}
Fair enough ... but why?? So this kills any possibility of showing
duplicates, that might be good, but shouldn't it bring back
everything, thus revealing any possibility of screwiness in app code?
Since it's a HABTM relationship, shouldn't the whole has and belongs
to many retrieve all that it has and belongs to?
There's obviously something I'm missing and confused about ...
unfortunately no comments in code to shed light.
(Note: to recap, I've got a user HABTM webpage_types in users-
webpage_types with extra fields where a user could multiple of the
same webpage_type)
On Oct 6, 1:41 pm, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, moving to the solution nachopitt suggested works ... however,
because of this, for saving, I have to use `saveAll()` instead of
`save()` ... which works; however, for the User model, there's also
another HABTM which doesn't work for `saveAll()` ... doh!!
Best solution?
On Oct 6, 11:03 am, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the table looks more like this:
user_id | web_page_type_id | url
---
7 | 6 | firstdomain.com
7 | 6 | second.com
So the two are unique, but I see what you're saying.
I did originally have it setup in such a way that it wasn't a typical
join table (as nachopitt suggested); however, was running into
problems with saving in one fell swoop and wanted to give the HABTM
save setup a try (as described everywhere).
Might have to go back to the previous method.
On Oct 4, 7:33 am, nachopitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, teknoid has a point. Your relation/association is not supposed
to work in that way. Normally, in a non CakePHP enviroment, a
joinTable has the 2 foreign keys and they set as the primary key
column. You don´t have the id column that CakePHP expects to have
and then the foreign keys... thats why the uniqueness of the
records.
Personally i would change the schema of you database for something
like
users
web_pages (holding the url, title, etc)
web_page_types (holding the name of the webpage type)
And the associations
user hasMany webpages
webpage belongsTo user
webpage belongsTo webpageType
On Oct 3, 6:37 pm, teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goes to show I should read more carefully :)
I guess the title of the post made me jump the gun...
You say an user has 2 of the same webpage_type
Does it mean that in your join table you have something like: ?
user_id | web_page_type_id
-
7 | 6
7 | 6
On Oct 3, 6:27 pm, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, assuming the Docs are correct (and I understand it properly),
that should only apply to updates (If true (default
Ajax Login using Jquery and Auth component
Hi, I am new to cakephp. I have no idea how to use ajax login using Jquery and Auth. It would be great for me if anybody tell me any tutorial or steps to do this. Thanks a lot you!! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Resolved - How to deploy cake on home.pl shared hosting
Hi there, Might be applicable also for other hosting companies maybe... The problem was described by me here: http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/d4fc8f8bfcb2bf6d/fb02bb3a89ce5cfb?lnk=gstq=please+help#fb02bb3a89ce5cfb The fix is to add the php.ini file in / dir containing: include_path = .:/app/..:/app And that's all, your Dispatcher should now be found and it's high time you go to optimization :-) Hope that saves someone from painful debugging. Applied to RC2, didn't install RC3 yet. Regards, Piotr --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Share the webroot folder ( multiple app folders )
Hi guys I've seen the wildflower cms posted recently on the site, and it dit one thing that i have been trying to do for a long time with cake: have a seperate app folder ( named wildflower in this case ), and let it connect to the webroot folder in the normal app folder. When i was in spain I was trying to make a cms, but since i couldn't figure out how this was done I had to abandon the idea and build in a cms using admin routing. So my questions are: 1- how to i make a seperate app folder connect to the main app folders' webroot? 2- how to i redirect /admin to this other app folder? I've been searching the docs, googling, and even after a month I still haven'th found it. Maybe the info I need doesn't exist, or else I've been looking in the wrong way all the time. Can somebody point me in the right direction? Best regards Gregory --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Resolved - How to deploy cake on home.pl shared hosting
Forgot to mention, leave app/webroot/index.php alone, I mean use the one from tar, zip, whatever. The ini solution is far cleaner then messing around with index.php. Regards, Piotr --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
Thanks for clarifying this.
On a side note, there's something fishy about the fact that the
following doesn't yield what I expected:
In the head tag section of default.ctp:
?php $html-css(array('general'), null, null, false); ?
?php echo $scripts_for_layout ?
The output doesn't contain the Link tag.
Could it be because the render method is run statically
(View::_render) when rendering templates? See view.php ~line 370
Marc
On Oct 7, 2:25 pm, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 7, 7:57 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me again,
so I think I figured some of it out.
It seems like the call to render the default.ctp doesn't defer the
output of the header until the end of all other element rendering.
Hence, if echo $scripts_for_layout is processed before in-page element
(inside the page's body), which are output using echo $this-
element(...) then they're not found in the header.
If you echo $scripts_for_layout later on, let's say after your
element() call, then it does contain the link tags that the elements
added. So I guess the it works but not as expected.
My question now is:
Was I right to expect that the echo $scripts_for_layout would be
delayed until all sub-elements are rendered?
$scripts_for_layout is not a marker, when you echo it in the layout
you echo what it contains . If you are calling your element from the
layout, then no, that's not going to and isn't expected to work:
anything it does wrt this variable won't have any effect - it's
contents have already been constructed.
hth,
AD
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Share the webroot folder ( multiple app folders )
Have you looked at the advanced install options in the documentation? http://book.cakephp.org/view/35/Advanced-Installation You can define where the webroot folder, the app folder, and the cake folder are. On Oct 7, 2:15 pm, Shackadoodl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys I've seen the wildflower cms posted recently on the site, and it dit one thing that i have been trying to do for a long time with cake: have a seperate app folder ( named wildflower in this case ), and let it connect to the webroot folder in the normal app folder. When i was in spain I was trying to make a cms, but since i couldn't figure out how this was done I had to abandon the idea and build in a cms using admin routing. So my questions are: 1- how to i make a seperate app folder connect to the main app folders' webroot? 2- how to i redirect /admin to this other app folder? I've been searching the docs, googling, and even after a month I still haven'th found it. Maybe the info I need doesn't exist, or else I've been looking in the wrong way all the time. Can somebody point me in the right direction? Best regards Gregory --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Helpers specific to certain themes
Hello. Question: If using themes to control layouts, views etc. is there a way of calling a helper specifically for that theme's view without naming it in the controller? For example, my theme may need to use a helper that all other themes, or indeed the default view, don't require. I'm also trying to make my themes plugin-able, i.e. so that you can add them to the application without changing other parts of the code, such as the controller. Any tips? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Ajax Form complete = not working with functions
I figured it out! It took a couple of days, but here it is. I am not
expert but here is what did it for me. For some reason, it doesn't
work when you put the javascript on the page itself. It won't
recognize the functions. But if you put it in an external file, it can
see it. I don't know why, but it works. The solutions is to create an
external .js file and link to it in your layout. Thanks for your time
CG.
On Oct 7, 12:50 pm, CG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure of your problem... but try to put the java function BEFORE
the ajax calling and give it a try. Javascripts always mess with me in
this kind of way... maybe it helps you.
script type='javascript'
function testCall() { alert('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');}
/script
?
echo $ajax-form('addComment', 'post', array(
'model' = 'Comment',
'url' = array('controller' = 'comments', 'action' ='add'),
'update' = 'pureGenius',
'complete' = 'testCall();'));
?
..
On Oct 6, 3:55 pm, Chez17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The complete option works fine if I put the javascript directly into
the array. However if I try to put it in a function in the array it
doesn't work. Take the following example:
?
echo $ajax-form('addComment', 'post', array(
'model' = 'Comment',
'url' = array('controller' = 'comments', 'action' ='add'),
'update' = 'pureGenius',
'complete' = 'testCall();'));
?
script type='javascript'
function testCall()
{
alert('[EMAIL PROTECTED]');}
/script
If I put the alert in the ajax array, it works fine. Doesn't work as
it stands. Any ideas?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Bi-directional HABTM edits getting deleted.
Setup: Categories HABTM Tags ... and consequently Tags HABTM Categories .. join table: categories_tags. I've got the forms setup working for both ways: Categories has a list of Tags; and Tags has a list of Categories. Unfortunately, since the way to update one or the other is to do a complete DELETE on the corresponding foreign key, then add anything that's new. So if I go and create a Category and select a bunch of Tags ... then I go into one of the Tags and edit something in there, it wipes 'em all and adds 'em (as expected), but information is lost. Now, if I add an `id` on the `categories_tags` table, then everything that needs to be is retained; however, since it's still doing a DELETE then INSERT, my `id` goes up every time I do save an edit ... thus possibly resulting in a really high `id`. So I guess there's no way around it. doh!! (This is mostly an info blurb for any other newbies who are confused). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Trouble with the HtmlHelper and $scripts_for_layout
On Oct 7, 10:02 pm, Marc Campeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for clarifying this.
On a side note, there's something fishy about the fact that the
following doesn't yield what I expected:
In the head tag section of default.ctp:
?php $html-css(array('general'), null, null, false); ?
?php echo $scripts_for_layout ?
Think about when in terms of processing order $scripts_for_layout is
calculated.
In what way is that result surprising, and in what way is it be
logical to do that.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Share the webroot folder ( multiple app folders )
Yes, but how can i tell in the normal app that when i go to /admin that it redirects to the other app folder? On Oct 7, 10:11 pm, hydra12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you looked at the advanced install options in the documentation? http://book.cakephp.org/view/35/Advanced-Installation You can define where the webroot folder, the app folder, and the cake folder are. On Oct 7, 2:15 pm, Shackadoodl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys I've seen the wildflower cms posted recently on the site, and it dit one thing that i have been trying to do for a long time with cake: have a seperate app folder ( named wildflower in this case ), and let it connect to the webroot folder in the normal app folder. When i was in spain I was trying to make a cms, but since i couldn't figure out how this was done I had to abandon the idea and build in a cms using admin routing. So my questions are: 1- how to i make a seperate app folder connect to the main app folders' webroot? 2- how to i redirect /admin to this other app folder? I've been searching the docs, googling, and even after a month I still haven'th found it. Maybe the info I need doesn't exist, or else I've been looking in the wrong way all the time. Can somebody point me in the right direction? Best regards Gregory --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Share the webroot folder ( multiple app folders )
Yes, i looked into that, but it still doesn't delve in how i can let the admin from the first app be rerouted to the other app. eg when i use /admin for the normal app folder i want to be redirected to the admin. is this possible? On Oct 7, 10:11 pm, hydra12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you looked at the advanced install options in the documentation? http://book.cakephp.org/view/35/Advanced-Installation You can define where the webroot folder, the app folder, and the cake folder are. On Oct 7, 2:15 pm, Shackadoodl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys I've seen the wildflower cms posted recently on the site, and it dit one thing that i have been trying to do for a long time with cake: have a seperate app folder ( named wildflower in this case ), and let it connect to the webroot folder in the normal app folder. When i was in spain I was trying to make a cms, but since i couldn't figure out how this was done I had to abandon the idea and build in a cms using admin routing. So my questions are: 1- how to i make a seperate app folder connect to the main app folders' webroot? 2- how to i redirect /admin to this other app folder? I've been searching the docs, googling, and even after a month I still haven'th found it. Maybe the info I need doesn't exist, or else I've been looking in the wrong way all the time. Can somebody point me in the right direction? Best regards Gregory --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Cake php Controller Structure
I am trying to make an action that involves using several models for example: There is a ticket and an order. I want to create a controller that creates a ticket then it creates an order for that ticket. Should i create a new controller for this action or should the action be included in the tickets_controller.php file or the orders_controller.php What is the conventional way to creating custom controller actions that do tasks that involve several models. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Multiple table conditions HABTM
Okay,
Whenever I have a hasOne or belongsTo association, those models are
included in the query whenever I do a find('all');
But, when I have any other type of association, find('all' only
generates a query with the model I'm searching.
This keeps me from filtering by fields in the related models.
ex:
$funnypeople = $this-Individual-find('all', array('conditions' =
array('Personality.type' = 3)));
This example works find if a person only has one Personality Type.
But what about this.
$racecardrivers = $this-Individual-find('all', array('conditions' =
array('Vehicle.type' = 2)));
The problem here is a person could own multiple vehicles, so belongsTo
hasOne don't work here.
I would need hasMany or hasAndBelongsToMany, which makes those model
inaccessible using find.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Difference between modified and updated?
I'm wondering what is the difference between the two automagic model fields modified and updated? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Model imports inexistent class Behavior
Hate to burst the ticket bubble. But if after App::import('Core',
'Behavior'); the ModelBehavior class from model/behavior.php doesn't
exist, then something is broken. But seeing as how all the core tests
are passing, and the syntax is the same everywhere, I think you might
have a dud. But I love being wrong, and this wouldn't be the first
time ;)
-Mark
On Oct 7, 12:39 pm, AD7six [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 7, 4:51 pm, kAtremer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. It will take some time to get used to the testing, so anybody more
familiar with the process and methodics is welcome to pick up the bug
and report.
What kind of pass-the-buck cop out logic is that...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: same element in different controllers
You could use cakePHP elements (http://book.cakephp.org/view/97/ Elements) this are small view helpers. It is also possible to pass parameters to this elements, in your case I think: $menu. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Helpers specific to certain themes
App::import('View', 'Theme');
class AdvancedThemeView extends ThemeView {
function __construct($controller) {
parent::__construct($controller);
switch ($this-theme) {
...
$this-helpers[] = ...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Helpers specific to certain themes
Thanks. That helps. I was thinking along those lines and I've got
something closer to what I want.
With this code, however, the helper file still needs to be in the
generic helpers folder. What I'd ideally like is a way to read the
helpers from the current theme and include them... something like:
$HLFolder = new Folder();
$HLFolder-cd(APP.'plugins'.DS.'cms'.DS.'views'.DS.'themed'.DS.
$this-theme.DS.'helpers');
$HelpersList = $HLFolder-read();
foreach($HelpersList[1] as $Helper) {
$this-helpers[ucfirst(substr($Helper, 0, -4))]
= array('search'
= array(APP.'plugins'.DS.'cms'.DS.'views'.DS.'themed'.DS.$this-
theme.DS.'helpers'), 'file' = $Helper);
}
But I've figured out that the $options variable on in the
_loadHelpers function in the View class doesn't work in this way.
Is there a way of specifying a particular directory to load the helper
from?
I also tried in my foreach loop:
App::import('Helpers', $Helper, true,
array(APP.'plugins'.DS.'cms'.DS.'views'.DS.'themed'.DS.$this-
theme.DS.'helpers'), $Helper);
But I think this doesn't work because it's loading this helper before
it's got around to loading the helpers in general.
Any more tips?
On Oct 7, 11:27 pm, jitka (poLK) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
App::import('View', 'Theme');
class AdvancedThemeView extends ThemeView {
function __construct($controller) {
parent::__construct($controller);
switch ($this-theme) {
...
$this-helpers[] = ...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Difference between modified and updated?
No difference, I believe they are equivalent. Re: Firebird DB. Use 'modified' because using 'updated' always seems to break the SQL. In fact I'll make a ticket on trac about this because it has been like this for ages. On Oct 7, 10:15 pm, powtac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering what is the difference between the two automagic model fields modified and updated? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is there ANY way to insert page-specific code in to $scripts_for_layout??
To me it seems that you've shut down the best option (creating a
separate CSS file)... why not create one?
On the other hand you could try something like that in the layout:
if(isset($additional_css)) { echo $additional_css; }
in the view:
$this-set('additional_css', 'style //your css code /style');
On Oct 7, 5:48 pm, BrendonKoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some page-specific code (CSS in this case) that I would like to
use on a form. This code will *not* be used anywhere else in my
application, and if replicated, only portions of it will be. I'd
rather not have to create separate CSS files to use this. I looked at
$html-css() and $html-style() without success. Is there another
method to input *whatever* code I'd like directly in to
$scripts_for_layout?
The specific code I need to insert can be found at the following
pastebin address:http://pastebin.com/m28c87fd2
I do plan on reusing the layout I created for this, for other forms,
but the CSS is specific to this individual form (a recreation of a
paper form, and must retain the same look for legal reasons).
Although I could use $html-css for two of the three CSS sections (I'd
prefer not to however), that specific class method is not made to
handle IE conditional CSS statements for insertion. Has anyone come
up with any solutions to this in their own projects, or have any ideas
on a possible solution?
Note: The linked CSS file has not yet been converted for use within
Cake, but that's not the issue here.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
Is the field in the data array? Cake also has a white list of fields param you can (and should) pass to save(). On Oct 7, 7:00 pm, R. Davila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a table with a timestamp field which is managed by MySQL. This is the definition of the field: `fieldname` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP When a new record is inserted, MySQL fills in the default value for the field. When the record is updated, MySQL updates the field value accordingly. I need to tell CakePHPnot to include that fieldin the inserts and updates, otherwise MySQL does not assign the values it should. The timestamp field is just an example since the behavior I'm looking for would be needed for any computed field in the table. Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How do you make line breaks appear in views?
Okay, I know I sound like a complete n00b right now, and that's fine because I am. I've really only made applications for myself so far so putting in br / tags is no problem... but now that I'm trying to make something for other people to use how to I make it so that when they hit enter it will automatically put in a br / tag for me? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
I'm passing $this-data to the save() function.
The controller is the default made by cake bake which includes the
following in the add() function:
function add() {
if (!empty ($this-data)) {
$this-Status-create();
if ($this-Status-save($this-data)) {
...
If I take a field param out of the $this-data array, will it be
excluded from the insert or update?
teknoid wrote:
Is the field in the data array?
Cake also has a white list of fields param you can (and should) pass
to save().
On Oct 7, 7:00 pm, R. Davila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with a timestamp field which is managed by MySQL.
This is the definition of the field:
`fieldname` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
When a new record is inserted, MySQL fills in the default value for the
field.
When the record is updated, MySQL updates the field value accordingly.
I need to tell CakePHPnot to include that fieldin the inserts and updates,
otherwise MySQL does not assign the values it should.
The timestamp field is just an example since the behavior I'm looking for
would be needed for any computed field in the table.
Thanks in advance
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1713 - Release Date: 10/7/2008
6:40 PM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
The answer was to pass an array of field names to save().
save($this-data, true, array('field_a', 'field_b'));
That way field_c is excluded from the save.
Thanks!
teknoid wrote:
Is the field in the data array?
Cake also has a white list of fields param you can (and should) pass
to save().
On Oct 7, 7:00 pm, R. Davila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with a timestamp field which is managed by MySQL.
This is the definition of the field:
`fieldname` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
When a new record is inserted, MySQL fills in the default value for the
field.
When the record is updated, MySQL updates the field value accordingly.
I need to tell CakePHPnot to include that fieldin the inserts and updates,
otherwise MySQL does not assign the values it should.
The timestamp field is just an example since the behavior I'm looking for
would be needed for any computed field in the table.
Thanks in advance
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1713 - Release Date: 10/7/2008
6:40 PM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Session id appearing in plugin view links but not main app view links
Hi all ... have an odd issue with link urls using 1.2 RC2. I have a simple cms that handles the pages for the site and a plugin that handle simple news. All was fine on the original server ie links/ urls appeared as they should ie http://www.domain.com/some/path/to/page. I've since moved the site to a subdomain of the final domain where it will be permanently located ie dev.domain.com. Accessing the site in the new location works as it should for the main pages ... links to other pages/areas of the site appear fine. The issue I have noticed is that when within the section of the site that is controlled by the plugin News all links within and even to other pages have the session id appended to them ie http://www.domain.com/some/path/to/page?CAKEPHP=a7513b07a498aabd167b68039bc82e84 or http://www.domain.com/news/view/some-slug?CAKEPHP=a7513b07a498aabd167b68039bc82e84. Clicking any of these links works as it should ie functionally no issues ... really just a aesthetic one when within News ... would really like consistency. I'm using standard $html-link(); everywhere within the plugin and within the main app. I've dug through the api but can't seem to find anything that I can understand or that leads me to how the session id gets appended. Can anyone shed any light or have some ideas as to where I should be looking for a solution? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
Hi, I have a table with a timestamp field which is managed by MySQL. This is the definition of the field: `fieldname` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP When a new record is inserted, MySQL fills in the default value for the field. When the record is updated, MySQL updates the field value accordingly. I need to tell CakePHP not to include that field in the inserts and updates, otherwise MySQL does not assign the values it should. The timestamp field is just an example since the behavior I'm looking for would be needed for any computed field in the table. Thanks in advance --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do you make line breaks appear in views?
http://jp2.php.net/nl2br Or use pre or CSS white-space: pre. On 8 Oct 2008, at 08:33, Cody Sortore wrote: Okay, I know I sound like a complete n00b right now, and that's fine because I am. I've really only made applications for myself so far so putting in br / tags is no problem... but now that I'm trying to make something for other people to use how to I make it so that when they hit enter it will automatically put in a br / tag for me? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake php Controller Structure
Think of the controllers/actions as pages on your website. If it makes sense to do everything on one page (i.e. in one action) than do that. Just because models and controllers of the same name are automatically linked doesn't mean you shouldn't or can't use other models as well. On 8 Oct 2008, at 05:53, Ahmed wrote: I am trying to make an action that involves using several models for example: There is a ticket and an order. I want to create a controller that creates a ticket then it creates an order for that ticket. Should i create a new controller for this action or should the action be included in the tickets_controller.php file or the orders_controller.php What is the conventional way to creating custom controller actions that do tasks that involve several models. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Email Validation after registration
okay, I already did the user registration, but now, I want the user to validate the email address the user is registered with. The user will be sent an email for the validation link. now my concern here is that link to my cakephp web app will be accessible for a limited time only. because of that, the registered user pending email validation has to resend that email validation link. I have some ideas, but I just want to know from the community what is best to do this. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Cake php Controller Structure
This could help: http://teknoid.wordpress.com/2008/08/01/practical-use-of-saveall-part-1-working-with-multiple-models/ I've also added a shortened version of this in the manual On Oct 7, 4:53 pm, Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to make an action that involves using several models for example: There is a ticket and an order. I want to create a controller that creates a ticket then it creates an order for that ticket. Should i create a new controller for this action or should the action be included in the tickets_controller.php file or the orders_controller.php What is the conventional way to creating custom controller actions that do tasks that involve several models. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
While this works fine, and makes your app more secure... the real
question is why are you passing fields that do not need saving to the
controller? or why do you even have them in the form?
On Oct 7, 7:50 pm, R. Davila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer was to pass an array of field names to save().
save($this-data, true, array('field_a', 'field_b'));
That way field_c is excluded from the save.
Thanks!
teknoid wrote:
Is the field in the data array?
Cake also has a white list of fields param you can (and should) pass
to save().
On Oct 7, 7:00 pm, R. Davila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a table with a timestamp field which is managed by MySQL.
This is the definition of the field:
`fieldname` timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
When a new record is inserted, MySQL fills in the default value for the
field.
When the record is updated, MySQL updates the field value accordingly.
I need to tell CakePHPnot to include that fieldin the inserts and updates,
otherwise MySQL does not assign the values it should.
The timestamp field is just an example since the behavior I'm looking for
would be needed for any computed field in the table.
Thanks in advance
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1713 - Release Date: 10/7/2008
6:40 PM
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is there ANY way to insert page-specific code in to $scripts_for_layout??
Ah, teknoid... I've seen that solution before, albeit with different
variable names, but that would be the exact solution I was looking
for. Thanks.
The reason I don't want to create separate CSS files (usually the best
solution) is two-fold.
1. I can't think of a way to apply IE conditional styling with Cake's
built in $html-css() method unless I create a layout specifically for
this purpose - but without the additional variable in the layout that
you suggested, I probably wouldn't have figured out how to do that
properly anyway.
2. I'd rather not have multiple stylesheets specific to a single web
address on the server - that can add up rather quickly. I foresee
administration wanting other forms recreated on the web, and with just
30 forms, that approximately 90 CSS files unrelated to core CSS styles
for regular layout.
I've used the default.ctp layout supplied by Cake's core so often to
recreate functionality, I completely forgot I could add my own
variables to it, and that they would be accessible from my views.
Thanks again.
On Oct 7, 7:02 pm, teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me it seems that you've shut down the best option (creating a
separate CSS file)... why not create one?
On the other hand you could try something like that in the layout:
if(isset($additional_css)) { echo $additional_css; }
in the view:
$this-set('additional_css', 'style //your css code /style');
On Oct 7, 5:48 pm, BrendonKoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some page-specific code (CSS in this case) that I would like to
use on a form. This code will *not* be used anywhere else in my
application, and if replicated, only portions of it will be. I'd
rather not have to create separate CSS files to use this. I looked at
$html-css() and $html-style() without success. Is there another
method to input *whatever* code I'd like directly in to
$scripts_for_layout?
The specific code I need to insert can be found at the following
pastebin address:http://pastebin.com/m28c87fd2
I do plan on reusing the layout I created for this, for other forms,
but the CSS is specific to this individual form (a recreation of a
paper form, and must retain the same look for legal reasons).
Although I could use $html-css for two of the three CSS sections (I'd
prefer not to however), that specific class method is not made to
handle IE conditional CSS statements for insertion. Has anyone come
up with any solutions to this in their own projects, or have any ideas
on a possible solution?
Note: The linked CSS file has not yet been converted for use within
Cake, but that's not the issue here.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Is there ANY way to insert page-specific code in to $scripts_for_layout??
I'm using the HeadHelper to do exactly what you want to do.
http://rossoft.wordpress.com/2006/03/28/register-head-tags-from-helpers-2/
On 8 Oct 2008, at 11:16, BrendonKoz wrote:
Ah, teknoid... I've seen that solution before, albeit with different
variable names, but that would be the exact solution I was looking
for. Thanks.
The reason I don't want to create separate CSS files (usually the best
solution) is two-fold.
1. I can't think of a way to apply IE conditional styling with Cake's
built in $html-css() method unless I create a layout specifically for
this purpose - but without the additional variable in the layout that
you suggested, I probably wouldn't have figured out how to do that
properly anyway.
2. I'd rather not have multiple stylesheets specific to a single web
address on the server - that can add up rather quickly. I foresee
administration wanting other forms recreated on the web, and with just
30 forms, that approximately 90 CSS files unrelated to core CSS styles
for regular layout.
I've used the default.ctp layout supplied by Cake's core so often to
recreate functionality, I completely forgot I could add my own
variables to it, and that they would be accessible from my views.
Thanks again.
On Oct 7, 7:02 pm, teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To me it seems that you've shut down the best option (creating a
separate CSS file)... why not create one?
On the other hand you could try something like that in the layout:
if(isset($additional_css)) { echo $additional_css; }
in the view:
$this-set('additional_css', 'style //your css code /style');
On Oct 7, 5:48 pm, BrendonKoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have some page-specific code (CSS in this case) that I would
like to
use on a form. This code will *not* be used anywhere else in my
application, and if replicated, only portions of it will be. I'd
rather not have to create separate CSS files to use this. I
looked at
$html-css() and $html-style() without success. Is there another
method to input *whatever* code I'd like directly in to
$scripts_for_layout?
The specific code I need to insert can be found at the following
pastebin address:http://pastebin.com/m28c87fd2
I do plan on reusing the layout I created for this, for other forms,
but the CSS is specific to this individual form (a recreation of a
paper form, and must retain the same look for legal reasons).
Although I could use $html-css for two of the three CSS sections
(I'd
prefer not to however), that specific class method is not made to
handle IE conditional CSS statements for insertion. Has anyone come
up with any solutions to this in their own projects, or have any
ideas
on a possible solution?
Note: The linked CSS file has not yet been converted for use within
Cake, but that's not the issue here.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Scaffold in RC3
sorry, I found that I used the old version dispather.php. And now is OK On Oct 7, 8:40 pm, Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello there, Recently I upgrade my cake lib to 1.2rc3, then I can visit the pages which don't exist exactly but inscaffoldname array like 'index', 'edit' and so on. For example in 1.2 rc2, if you visithttp://mysite.com/users/orhttp://mysite.com/users/index, you will get an error message with 404 not found. But inrc3, you can see the page which generate byscaffold. Does anyone has met the same with me? Thank you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do you make line breaks appear in views?
Via PHP code, you could also process the data through PHP's nl2br() function, which inserts br / tags prior to the newline (the newline is not removed). Hopefully you're already processing and filtering the user data anyway. On Oct 7, 7:33 pm, Cody Sortore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I know I sound like a complete n00b right now, and that's fine because I am. I've really only made applications for myself so far so putting in br / tags is no problem... but now that I'm trying to make something for other people to use how to I make it so that when they hit enter it will automatically put in a br / tag for me? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Email Validation after registration
Store a timestamp with the token that you send to have your user validate their email address. If the user validates their email address after the expiry indicated by the timestamp... well do whatever you want with that, and delete the associated token from the database. Routinely remove expired tokens from database through some functionality, most likely a cron job or a manual task that an administrator can run once in a while. -J. On Oct 7, 9:04 pm, phpcurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: okay, I already did the user registration, but now, I want the user to validate the email address the user is registered with. The user will be sent an email for the validation link. now my concern here is that link to my cakephp web app will be accessible for a limited time only. because of that, the registered user pending email validation has to resend that email validation link. I have some ideas, but I just want to know from the community what is best to do this. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Bi-directional HABTM edits getting deleted.
What''s the problem with 'really high id' values? Do you not have enough of 4 294 967 294 integers? If so, you can always use UUIDs, which are, in most respects, inexhaustible, since you'll run into far greater problems before you start worrying about UUID collisions (like the entropic death of the universe). -J. On Oct 7, 4:28 pm, Brenton B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Setup: Categories HABTM Tags ... and consequently Tags HABTM Categories .. join table: categories_tags. I've got the forms setup working for both ways: Categories has a list of Tags; and Tags has a list of Categories. Unfortunately, since the way to update one or the other is to do a complete DELETE on the corresponding foreign key, then add anything that's new. So if I go and create a Category and select a bunch of Tags ... then I go into one of the Tags and edit something in there, it wipes 'em all and adds 'em (as expected), but information is lost. Now, if I add an `id` on the `categories_tags` table, then everything that needs to be is retained; however, since it's still doing a DELETE then INSERT, my `id` goes up every time I do save an edit ... thus possibly resulting in a really high `id`. So I guess there's no way around it. doh!! (This is mostly an info blurb for any other newbies who are confused). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encryption/Decryption of data
Simple solution: Generate a pseudo-random string of characters (or let him choose his own passphrase), and use this as a salt to encrypt your data before saving to your database. The passphrase must then be used to retrieve any information from the database. Of course, all of this is completely useless if you don't use SSL for the entire request/response process. -J. On Oct 7, 3:50 am, titang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to encrypt/decrypt data in my application regarding the following requirements: - The data will be decrypted by many users. - I dont want to keep the secret password for decrypting the data of each users in my application. Does someone have any idea about how can I do this ? And if there is something already implemented for the cakephp framework? There is something pretty good, it is the gnupg project.http://www.gnupg.org/ I did my first test by command line on Linux, and it seems really good. 1. First i have to generate one public key per users (from an uid and a passphrase). 2. Then i encrypt the data and specify which users can access the data (by specifying the uid). 3. And the authorized users can decrypt the data with their own passphrase An extension gnupg is available for php. What about a cakephp behavior using this extension? I think it could be very useful. Any suggestions or helps are welcome ! Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: more problems with RC3 and tests
On Oct 7, 6:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure the docs do not contain the recent changes yet.
My Model-tests work with fixtures. Here is a mini-example. Maybe you
can see some detail that you have done differently.
in phone.test.php
App::import('Model', 'Phone');
class PhoneTest extends Phone {
var $name = 'PhoneTest';
var $useDbConfig = 'test_suite';
}
class PhoneTestCase extends CakeTestCase {
var $fixtures = array( 'app.phone_test' );
function testStorage() {
$this-PhoneTest = new PhoneTest();
$all = $this-PhoneTest-findAll();
$this-assertEqual(4, count($all));
}
}
Actually, you can now instantiate your test models using
ClassRegistry::init('NameOfModel'); no need to riddle your tests with
fake Model classes, whose only purpose is to link model associations
and use a different database configuration. Your complete code snippet
above can be reduced to:
class PhoneTestCase extends CakeTestCase {
var $fixtures = array( 'app.phone_test' );
function testStorage() {
$this-PhoneTest = ClassRegistry::init('PhoneTest');
$all = $this-PhoneTest-findAll();
$this-assertEqual(4, count($all));
}
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: 2 column layout for $form-input() ?
Here is a small example of a view file which shows one text box and 2
horizontal pull down menus in a form in a single horizontal line
div
?php echo $form-create('DataForm' );?
fieldset
legend?php __('Add Stuff');?/legend
?php
echo div id=div5;
echo $form-input('numberone' , array('label' = false ,
'type'='text','size' = '7',
'maxlength'='7' , 'div' = '' , 'error' = false));
echo $form-input('dropdown1' , array('label' = false, 'div' =
'' , 'options' = array(
'option1' ='option1',
'option2' ='option2',
'option3' ='option3',
'option4' ='option4',
)));
echo $form-input('dropdown2' , array('label' = false , 'div'
=
'', 'options' = array(
'option1' ='option1',
'option2' ='option2',
'option3' ='option3',
'option4' ='option4') ));
echo /div;
?
/fieldset
?php
echo $form-error('numberone');
echo $form-error('dropdown1');
echo $form-error('dropdown2');
echo $form-end('Send');
?
/div
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encryption/Decryption of data
It sounds good, but what about if the data must be accessible by many users. For example I want to let 2 users to access the same datas with their own passphrase... Is there a simple way to do that ? Titang On Oct 8, 11:03 am, Joel Perras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simple solution: Generate a pseudo-random string of characters (or let him choose his own passphrase), and use this as a salt to encrypt your data before saving to your database. The passphrase must then be used to retrieve any information from the database. Of course, all of this is completely useless if you don't use SSL for the entire request/response process. -J. On Oct 7, 3:50 am, titang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to encrypt/decrypt data in my application regarding the following requirements: - The data will be decrypted by many users. - I dont want to keep the secret password for decrypting the data of each users in my application. Does someone have any idea about how can I do this ? And if there is something already implemented for the cakephp framework? There is something pretty good, it is the gnupg project.http://www.gnupg.org/ I did my first test by command line on Linux, and it seems really good. 1. First i have to generate one public key per users (from an uid and a passphrase). 2. Then i encrypt the data and specify which users can access the data (by specifying the uid). 3. And the authorized users can decrypt the data with their own passphrase An extension gnupg is available for php. What about a cakephp behavior using this extension? I think it could be very useful. Any suggestions or helps are welcome ! Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encryption/Decryption of data
I'm very interested in this topic. I have an application that by it's nature shares objects between multiple participants, each object having different participants. Since those objects contain sensitive data, I was looking into ways to encrypt those, so that not even the database admin could see the content. With traditional encryption schemes this is very difficult to realize though, as there's always only one key that can decrypt the data (would be pointless otherwise). That means for every object a user is participating in you'd need to store an additional key with the user's data, which is pointless. I haven't yet, in my limited research, found a meaningful way to encrypt data in a way that allows it to be decrypted with any one of multiple keys (i.e. the user's password). But I'm no cryptographer by any means. Are public/private keys a way to do this? Chrs, Dav On 8 Oct 2008, at 12:37, titang wrote: It sounds good, but what about if the data must be accessible by many users. For example I want to let 2 users to access the same datas with their own passphrase... Is there a simple way to do that ? Titang On Oct 8, 11:03 am, Joel Perras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simple solution: Generate a pseudo-random string of characters (or let him choose his own passphrase), and use this as a salt to encrypt your data before saving to your database. The passphrase must then be used to retrieve any information from the database. Of course, all of this is completely useless if you don't use SSL for the entire request/response process. -J. On Oct 7, 3:50 am, titang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to encrypt/decrypt data in my application regarding the following requirements: - The data will be decrypted by many users. - I dont want to keep the secret password for decrypting the data of each users in my application. Does someone have any idea about how can I do this ? And if there is something already implemented for the cakephp framework? There is something pretty good, it is the gnupg project.http://www.gnupg.org/ I did my first test by command line on Linux, and it seems really good. 1. First i have to generate one public key per users (from an uid and a passphrase). 2. Then i encrypt the data and specify which users can access the data (by specifying the uid). 3. And the authorized users can decrypt the data with their own passphrase An extension gnupg is available for php. What about a cakephp behavior using this extension? I think it could be very useful. Any suggestions or helps are welcome ! Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: more problems with RC3 and tests
err, change that to ClassRegistry::init('Phone'), assuming Phone is
the model you are attempting to test.
-J.
On Oct 7, 11:11 pm, Joel Perras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 7, 6:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure the docs do not contain the recent changes yet.
My Model-tests work with fixtures. Here is a mini-example. Maybe you
can see some detail that you have done differently.
in phone.test.php
App::import('Model', 'Phone');
class PhoneTest extends Phone {
var $name = 'PhoneTest';
var $useDbConfig = 'test_suite';
}
class PhoneTestCase extends CakeTestCase {
var $fixtures = array( 'app.phone_test' );
function testStorage() {
$this-PhoneTest = new PhoneTest();
$all = $this-PhoneTest-findAll();
$this-assertEqual(4, count($all));
}
}
Actually, you can now instantiate your test models using
ClassRegistry::init('NameOfModel'); no need to riddle your tests with
fake Model classes, whose only purpose is to link model associations
and use a different database configuration. Your complete code snippet
above can be reduced to:
class PhoneTestCase extends CakeTestCase {
var $fixtures = array( 'app.phone_test' );
function testStorage() {
$this-PhoneTest = ClassRegistry::init('PhoneTest');
$all = $this-PhoneTest-findAll();
$this-assertEqual(4, count($all));
}
}
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How to exclude a field from inserts and updates
Maybe you're not passing those fileds but someone else. It's quiete easy to inject new fields in a form. Cheers 2008/10/7 teknoid [EMAIL PROTECTED]: While this works fine, and makes your app more secure... the real question is why are you passing fields that do not need saving to the controller? or why do you even have them in the form? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Encryption/Decryption of data
Hi! Here are some of my ideas for that problem: - public key encryption (Algorithms: RSA, ElGamal, ...) read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography You should combine those algorithms with traditional cryptography (i.e. AES) - called hybrid cryptography - secret sharing (Algorithm: Shamir, ...) read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_sharing , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir's_Secret_Sharing Idea: Just save your data more than once for every user but with its own (public) key. This mail is short because I am short in time at the moment. Anyway I hope this helps. -- Bernhard J. M. Grün 2008/10/8 David C. Zentgraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm very interested in this topic. I have an application that by it's nature shares objects between multiple participants, each object having different participants. Since those objects contain sensitive data, I was looking into ways to encrypt those, so that not even the database admin could see the content. With traditional encryption schemes this is very difficult to realize though, as there's always only one key that can decrypt the data (would be pointless otherwise). That means for every object a user is participating in you'd need to store an additional key with the user's data, which is pointless. I haven't yet, in my limited research, found a meaningful way to encrypt data in a way that allows it to be decrypted with any one of multiple keys (i.e. the user's password). But I'm no cryptographer by any means. Are public/private keys a way to do this? Chrs, Dav On 8 Oct 2008, at 12:37, titang wrote: It sounds good, but what about if the data must be accessible by many users. For example I want to let 2 users to access the same datas with their own passphrase... Is there a simple way to do that ? Titang On Oct 8, 11:03 am, Joel Perras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simple solution: Generate a pseudo-random string of characters (or let him choose his own passphrase), and use this as a salt to encrypt your data before saving to your database. The passphrase must then be used to retrieve any information from the database. Of course, all of this is completely useless if you don't use SSL for the entire request/response process. -J. On Oct 7, 3:50 am, titang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I would like to encrypt/decrypt data in my application regarding the following requirements: - The data will be decrypted by many users. - I dont want to keep the secret password for decrypting the data of each users in my application. Does someone have any idea about how can I do this ? And if there is something already implemented for the cakephp framework? There is something pretty good, it is the gnupg project. http://www.gnupg.org/ I did my first test by command line on Linux, and it seems really good. 1. First i have to generate one public key per users (from an uid and a passphrase). 2. Then i encrypt the data and specify which users can access the data (by specifying the uid). 3. And the authorized users can decrypt the data with their own passphrase An extension gnupg is available for php. What about a cakephp behavior using this extension? I think it could be very useful. Any suggestions or helps are welcome ! Thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: How do you make line breaks appear in views?
Thanks, I like the nl2br solution. When you say processing and filtering you do mean like data validation in the model right? If so yes... if you're talking about something else... uh probably not. Well I do have some $paginate restrictions in the controller (including a function that only displays approved comments). On Oct 7, 9:20 pm, BrendonKoz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Via PHP code, you could also process the data through PHP's nl2br() function, which inserts br / tags prior to the newline (the newline is not removed). Hopefully you're already processing and filtering the user data anyway. On Oct 7, 7:33 pm, Cody Sortore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I know I sound like a complete n00b right now, and that's fine because I am. I've really only made applications for myself so far so putting in br / tags is no problem... but now that I'm trying to make something for other people to use how to I make it so that when they hit enter it will automatically put in a br / tag for me? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
