[OSL | CCIE_Voice] help configure vg202 with sccp router side

[A Tommy]

*Dear All,*

*can anyone help me configure vg202 with sccp in router side
*

**

*i've already try to configuring with MGCP but i want to try with sccp.
*


Thanks before

Regards,
Tommy
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7960 to SIP Upload failure

[Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA]

Thanks, Michael, that was exactly the problem.

I simply overlooked the load command (always good to have another set of
eyes looking at the problem)

I was unsure of the alias commands, whether they were needed or not

Thanks again

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
Mobile:  (915)727-4222
reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil


-Original Message-
From: Michael Ciarfello [mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:02 PM
To: Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: 7960 to SIP Upload failure

HI there and welcome,

Where is your load 7960 command on voice register global to specify what
firmware file to use?
I think you also need the alias commands on each of your sip firmware
tftp-server commands.

tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.loads alias
p0s3-8-12-00.loads etc for the rest.

because the firmware files are in a folder on the flash, the alias
command "removes" the folder information.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Girard, Jeffrey
COL MIL USA [jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7960 to SIP Upload failure

I have a 2811 due in next week, but I was trying to continue to study as
best as I could using my old routers

2621XM with 256MB RAM and only 48 MB flash.  Loaded with 12.4(9)T7 IOS
and 4.1.0.2 CME load - that's the most up to date configuration I could
load with only 48 MB flash

I was trying to upgrade my 7960s to SIP.

I followed the instructions in the Appendix, and the first part of the
debug tftp capture was fine.  Then, after the Finished SIPDefault line,
my router goes in a different direction.

TFTP Debug capture as well as pertinent show run portions are below:

Sep 24 23:24:27.504: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv Sep 24
23:24:27.528: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml Sep 24
23:24:27.552: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf Sep 24 23:24:27.552:
TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 0, size
1055 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.568: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 141 Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Looking for
SIPDefault.cnf Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIPDefault.cnf,
fd 0, size 1648 for process 141 Sep 24 23:24:27.620: TFTP: Finished
flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, time 00:00:00 for process 141 Sep 24
23:24:37.268: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv Sep 24
23:24:37.336: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml Sep 24
23:24:37.420: TFTP: Looking for XMLDefault.cnf.xml Sep 24 23:24:37.424:
TFTP: Opened system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, fd 0, size 1525 for process
141 Sep 24 23:24:37.436: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml,
time 00:00:00 for process 141 Sep 24 23:25:07.606: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM:
25: Name=SEP001201E98F21
Load=8.0(9.0) Last=Initialized



voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 3
 max-pool 3
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0004522062452539
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
!
voice register dn  3
 number 3007
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 001B.D52C.9A55
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 max registrations 24
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 001B.0CDB.CE24
 type 7960
 max registrations 24
!
voice register pool  3
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 3
 max registrations 24
!


tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sbn
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.sbn
!


I have been a lurker on the list for a while and know that others have
had issues upgrading.  I went back through the archives but could not
find any other threads that seemed to match.

Hopefully someone can help - really don't want to lose a week of good
study time

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
Mobile:  (915)727-4222
reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7960 to SIP Upload failure

[Michael Ciarfello]

HI there and welcome,

Where is your load 7960 command on voice register global to specify what 
firmware file to use?
I think you also need the alias commands on each of your sip firmware 
tftp-server commands.

tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.loads alias p0s3-8-12-00.loads
etc for the rest.

because the firmware files are in a folder on the flash, the alias command 
"removes" the folder information.


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL 
USA [jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:58 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7960 to SIP Upload failure

I have a 2811 due in next week, but I was trying to continue to study as
best as I could using my old routers

2621XM with 256MB RAM and only 48 MB flash.  Loaded with 12.4(9)T7 IOS
and 4.1.0.2 CME load - that's the most up to date configuration I could
load with only 48 MB flash

I was trying to upgrade my 7960s to SIP.

I followed the instructions in the Appendix, and the first part of the
debug tftp capture was fine.  Then, after the Finished SIPDefault line,
my router goes in a different direction.

TFTP Debug capture as well as pertinent show run portions are below:

Sep 24 23:24:27.504: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 24 23:24:27.528: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:27.552: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 24 23:24:27.552: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 0, size
1055 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.568: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Looking for SIPDefault.cnf
Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, fd 0, size 1648
for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.620: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, time 00:00:00
for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:37.268: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 24 23:24:37.336: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:37.420: TFTP: Looking for XMLDefault.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:37.424: TFTP: Opened system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, fd 0,
size 1525 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:37.436: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, time
00:00:00 for process 141
Sep 24 23:25:07.606: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 25: Name=SEP001201E98F21
Load=8.0(9.0) Last=Initialized



voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 3
 max-pool 3
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0004522062452539
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
!
voice register dn  3
 number 3007
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 001B.D52C.9A55
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 max registrations 24
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 001B.0CDB.CE24
 type 7960
 max registrations 24
!
voice register pool  3
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 3
 max registrations 24
!


tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sbn
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.sbn
!


I have been a lurker on the list for a while and know that others have
had issues upgrading.  I went back through the archives but could not
find any other threads that seemed to match.

Hopefully someone can help - really don't want to lose a week of good
study time

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
Mobile:  (915)727-4222
reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 7960 to SIP Upload failure

[Girard, Jeffrey COL MIL USA]

I have a 2811 due in next week, but I was trying to continue to study as
best as I could using my old routers

2621XM with 256MB RAM and only 48 MB flash.  Loaded with 12.4(9)T7 IOS
and 4.1.0.2 CME load - that's the most up to date configuration I could
load with only 48 MB flash

I was trying to upgrade my 7960s to SIP.

I followed the instructions in the Appendix, and the first part of the
debug tftp capture was fine.  Then, after the Finished SIPDefault line,
my router goes in a different direction.

TFTP Debug capture as well as pertinent show run portions are below:

Sep 24 23:24:27.504: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 24 23:24:27.528: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:27.552: TFTP: Looking for SIP001201E98F21.cnf
Sep 24 23:24:27.552: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, fd 0, size
1055 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.568: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIP001201E98F21.cnf, time
00:00:00 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Looking for SIPDefault.cnf
Sep 24 23:24:27.608: TFTP: Opened flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, fd 0, size 1648
for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:27.620: TFTP: Finished flash:/SIPDefault.cnf, time 00:00:00
for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:37.268: TFTP: Looking for CTLSEP001201E98F21.tlv
Sep 24 23:24:37.336: TFTP: Looking for SEP001201E98F21.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:37.420: TFTP: Looking for XMLDefault.cnf.xml
Sep 24 23:24:37.424: TFTP: Opened system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, fd 0,
size 1525 for process 141
Sep 24 23:24:37.436: TFTP: Finished system:/its/XMLDefault.cnf.xml, time
00:00:00 for process 141
Sep 24 23:25:07.606: %IPPHONE-6-REG_ALARM: 25: Name=SEP001201E98F21
Load=8.0(9.0) Last=Initialized



voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 3
 max-pool 3
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 0004522062452539
!
voice register dn  1
 number 3005
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
!
voice register dn  3
 number 3007
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 001B.D52C.9A55
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 1
 max registrations 24
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 description 3214-3005
 codec g711ulaw
!
voice register pool  2
 id mac 001B.0CDB.CE24
 type 7960
 max registrations 24
!
voice register pool  3
 id mac 0012.01E9.8F21
 type 7960
 number 1 dn 3
 max registrations 24
!   


tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/P00308000400.sbn
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.loads
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p0s3-8-12-00.sb2
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.bin
tftp-server flash:phone/7940-7960/p003-8-12-00.sbn
!


I have been a lurker on the list for a while and know that others have
had issues upgrading.  I went back through the archives but could not
find any other threads that seemed to match.

Hopefully someone can help - really don't want to lose a week of good
study time

Jeff

---
Jeffrey T. Girard ("Jeff")
COL, 53
Future Forces Integration Directorate (FFID), Deputy - Networks
office:  (915)568-1240  DSN 978
Mobile:  (915)727-4222
reply to:  jeffrey.gir...@us.army.mil


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

[Michael Ciarfello]

lol.  Is that pod licensed?

System Settings -> Licenses -? Related Links (view license usage)
VPIM Networking delivery locations allowed (LicVPIMIsLicensed):   Yes or No

From: ABIOLA ADEFILA [adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 8:08 PM
To: Michael Ciarfello; OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

Hello Michael,
Am using proctorlab



On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Michael Ciarfello 
mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>> wrote:
You are not licensed for VPIM.  Unfortunately, it's about $700 - $1000.I 
would strongly urge you not to get this grey market at a GREAT price.  You 
still have to type the PAK in the Cisco license server.  Hate to have that come 
back - "Already registered" or not found, etc.

So Proctorlabs, etc would be the way to go to practice that.

You can try the Cisco demo licenses.  Last time I checked a couple months ago, 
they were not including a VPIM license.  Here is the text: T

he demo configuration is: 25 Voice Mail users w/ 8 ports, 25 InBox users, 25 
IMAP client access users, 25 advanced feature users, two ports text to speech, 
two ports voice recognition

System Settings -> Licenses -? Related Links (view license usage)
VPIM Networking delivery locations allowed (LicVPIMIsLicensed):   Yes or No

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA 
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:52 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

Hello,
Am trying to configure the VPIM Location onthe unity, after inputing and 
clicking save i get the message below


The requested operation would result in a license violation.

Unable to create VPIM Location

Does anyone have an idea?
Regards


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

[ABIOLA ADEFILA]

Hello Michael,
Am using proctorlab



On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Michael Ciarfello
wrote:

>  You are not licensed for VPIM.  Unfortunately, it's about $700 -
> $1000.I would strongly urge you not to get this grey market at a GREAT
> price.  You still have to type the PAK in the Cisco license server.  Hate to
> have that come back - "Already registered" or not found, etc.
>
> So Proctorlabs, etc would be the way to go to practice that.
>
> You can try the Cisco demo licenses.  Last time I checked a couple months
> ago, they were not including a VPIM license.  Here is the text: T
>
> he demo configuration is: 25 Voice Mail users w/ 8 ports, 25 InBox users,
> 25 IMAP client access users, 25 advanced feature users, two ports text to
> speech, two ports voice recognition
>
> System Settings -> Licenses -? Related Links (view license usage)
> VPIM Networking delivery locations allowed (LicVPIMIsLicensed):   Yes or No
>  --
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA [
> adefilabi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:52 PM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration
>
>Hello,
> Am trying to configure the VPIM Location onthe unity, after inputing and
> clicking save i get the message below
>
>
>   The requested operation would result in a license violation.
>  Unable to create VPIM Location
>
> Does anyone have an idea?
> Regards
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

[Michael Ciarfello]

You are not licensed for VPIM.  Unfortunately, it's about $700 - $1000.I 
would strongly urge you not to get this grey market at a GREAT price.  You 
still have to type the PAK in the Cisco license server.  Hate to have that come 
back - "Already registered" or not found, etc.

So Proctorlabs, etc would be the way to go to practice that.

You can try the Cisco demo licenses.  Last time I checked a couple months ago, 
they were not including a VPIM license.  Here is the text: T

he demo configuration is: 25 Voice Mail users w/ 8 ports, 25 InBox users, 25 
IMAP client access users, 25 advanced feature users, two ports text to speech, 
two ports voice recognition

System Settings -> Licenses -? Related Links (view license usage)
VPIM Networking delivery locations allowed (LicVPIMIsLicensed):   Yes or No

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of ABIOLA ADEFILA 
[adefilabi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:52 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

Hello,
Am trying to configure the VPIM Location onthe unity, after inputing and 
clicking save i get the message below


The requested operation would result in a license violation.

Unable to create VPIM Location

Does anyone have an idea?
Regards

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM Location configuration

[ABIOLA ADEFILA]

Hello,
Am trying to configure the VPIM Location onthe unity, after inputing and
clicking save i get the message below


  The requested operation would result in a license violation.
 Unable to create VPIM Location

Does anyone have an idea?
Regards
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume2 Lab1 Q4.2 and 4.3 (Gatekeeper)

[Michael Ciarfello]

Did the suggestions below help you?
I would hate to have to do this during a test, but try:

1. Configure G711 end-end.  See if you can get that to work and with Supp 
Services.
2. Them move on and Configure G729.

Always uncheck Wait H245.
Usually "playing" with MTP, xcoder(s) and fast start gives success.

I admin I have to do a little more work to see why each of these settings work, 
when to use it and what it does.  Xcoder: obvious.  Fast Start, I think becasue 
SIP is giving early offer when H323 slow start does not.  Haven't a guess for 
MTP in this scenario.


From: Aamir Panjwani [aamir.panjw...@ivision.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:11 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume2 Lab1 Q4.2 and 4.3 (Gatekeeper)

I am running into same problem calling from CCM to CME (SIP or SCCP) and 
calling from CME SIP to CCM (SIP or SCCP).

They ring, but hang up when answer…

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, 14 September 2009 2:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume2 Lab1 Q4.2 and 4.3 (Gatekeeper)

I can't seem to get these questions configured correctly as the PG suggests.  
Anyone get it to work?

In Q4.2, supplimental services doesn't work unless I add an MTP in.  Since you 
want G729, I had to add a g729 SW MTP in the HQ IOS and register it to CCM.  
That works.  But then calls from CCME SIP to CCM (SIP or SCCP) don't work 
properly.  CCME SCCP to CCM SCCP or SIP work with supp services.

Forgetting about supplimental services and putting the config back the way the 
PG has, the BR2 SIP phone can't call the HQ SCCP or SIP Phone.  They ring, but 
hang up when answer.

Thanks

__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
__
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Jeff Garvas]

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Wayne Lawson wrote:

> He's being yanked. It's incredible - does this idiot really think the list
> believes him?!  Pretty annoying...
>
>
I have to commend him.  I just want to pass once and he seems to pass every
other week.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

[Nara Shikamaru]

I think that was addressed earlier in this thread, there was a conversation
about a ISR's pps capacity and how it relates to the PRIs that can be
terminated to it.  Right now, looks like the the 3 qty 2811 routers will
have 2 PRIs each, but there's a strong chance that we're going to upgrade to
a stronger ISR model anyhow since we're doing plain vanilla and need to
provision for a worst case scenario.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Hardesty, Scott wrote:

>
>
> Another consideration is the calls per second for each gateway.  Just
> because you can terminate 4 PRI circuits on a single ISR that does not mean
> that it is non-blocking.  I installed a call center solution a few years
> back using 2821 router w/ 3 xT1 connections in each.  The inbound call
> volume crashed the routers because of the CPU interrupts from the ISDN
> signaling.  We ended up moving to 3845 routers to terminate the 3xT1
> connections to support the call volume.  For standard office environments
> this should not be an issue but be careful if you are working at a location
> that has HIGH call volumes.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Hardesty | Solutions Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked
> Solutions*
>
> *7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 |
> sharde...@presidio.com*
>
> *D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | www.presidio.com*
>
> **
>
>
>
>   --
>
>   *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *shikamaru
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:45 AM
> *To:* groganhockey
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?
>
>
>
> Haha, I can do better than that!  I've downloaded it!  ;)
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, groganhockey 
> wrote:
>
> I'm just glad I can finally contribute *something* to these discussions! :)
>
> FYI, cisco has moved the doc in the past, so make sure you remember the
> title in case it moves again.
>
> mike
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, shikamaru  wrote:
>
> MUCH respect, Mike.  This is the perfect document for this kind of
> question.  Thank you.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, mike deal  wrote:
>
> I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf
>
> mike
>
>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru 
> wrote:
>
>   I had no idea there was a PRI limit.  I was thinking, potentially, I may
> need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3
> 2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three.  Plenty of ports
> between them.
>
>
>
> I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this kind of
> scenario, but then if it couldn't I don't think Cisco would allow for 4 PRIs
> to be terminated to it.  I'll ask my AM tomorrow.  Thanks, Michael.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello 
> wrote:
>
> Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of PRIs (not
> physical, more CPU / resource load wise.)  I would work with your Cisco AM
> to have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.
>
>
>
> I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a
> third-party testing report (Mircom maybe.) that had like max 4 PRIs on a
> 2811.  My number might be off, but there was a limit.  That's why I would
> suggest working with your Cisco AM--they should be able to help with those
> numbers.
>
>
>
> If you are a partner, the PDI helpdesk should be able to help.  If not,
> then that's what the AM will help you with. Not sure if TAC would assist
> with these design questions, but you can always try.
>  --
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
> shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM
>
>
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?
>
>
>
> Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question about a
> real world scenario.  I'm preparing to increase the size of our VoIP network
> and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our remote sites
> will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the ISRs are only
> being used to terminate PRIs and will not be used to route data VLAN
> traffic. This being the case, are there caveats to using 2811 routers with 8
> VWIC ports? I don't really know what to expect by way of offnet traffic, but
> have had success with the 2811 line and am wondering if I can repurpose for
> the new network and not have too much to worry about.
>
> Also, I am planning on configuring some hardware conferencing but I have no
> idea yet how popular it will be, no transcoding is planned as our sites are
> currently all on G711.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
> __

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

[Hardesty, Scott]

Another consideration is the calls per second for each gateway.  Just because 
you can terminate 4 PRI circuits on a single ISR that does not mean that it is 
non-blocking.  I installed a call center solution a few years back using 2821 
router w/ 3 xT1 connections in each.  The inbound call volume crashed the 
routers because of the CPU interrupts from the ISDN signaling.  We ended up 
moving to 3845 routers to terminate the 3xT1 connections to support the call 
volume.  For standard office environments this should not be an issue but be 
careful if you are working at a location that has HIGH call volumes.




Scott Hardesty | Solutions Engineer | MidAtlantic | Presidio Networked Solutions

7601 Ora Glen Drive, Suite 100, Greenbelt, MD  20770 | 
sharde...@presidio.com

D: 301.313.2041 | C: 443.789.1219 | www.presidio.com



[http://www.presidio.com/images/presidio_logo.gif]


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of shikamaru
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:45 AM
To: groganhockey
Cc: OSL Group
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

Haha, I can do better than that!  I've downloaded it!  ;)
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, groganhockey 
mailto:groganhoc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm just glad I can finally contribute *something* to these discussions! :)

FYI, cisco has moved the doc in the past, so make sure you remember the title 
in case it moves again.

mike


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, shikamaru 
mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com>> wrote:
MUCH respect, Mike.  This is the perfect document for this kind of question.  
Thank you.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, mike deal 
mailto:groganhoc...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf

mike

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru 
mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com>> wrote:
I had no idea there was a PRI limit.  I was thinking, potentially, I may need 
to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3 2811 for 
redundancy and spread the span against all three.  Plenty of ports between them.

I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this kind of scenario, 
but then if it couldn't I don't think Cisco would allow for 4 PRIs to be 
terminated to it.  I'll ask my AM tomorrow.  Thanks, Michael.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello 
mailto:mciarfe...@iplogic.com>> wrote:
Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of PRIs (not 
physical, more CPU / resource load wise.)  I would work with your Cisco AM to 
have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.

I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a third-party 
testing report (Mircom maybe.) that had like max 4 PRIs on a 2811.  My number 
might be off, but there was a limit.  That's why I would suggest working with 
your Cisco AM--they should be able to help with those numbers.

If you are a partner, the PDI helpdesk should be able to help.  If not, then 
that's what the AM will help you with. Not sure if TAC would assist with these 
design questions, but you can always try.

From: 
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com]
 On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru 
[shikam...@kagadis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM

To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question about a 
real world scenario.  I'm preparing to increase the size of our VoIP network 
and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our remote sites 
will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the ISRs are only 
being used to terminate PRIs and will not be used to route data VLAN traffic. 
This being the case, are there caveats to using 2811 routers with 8 VWIC ports? 
I don't really know what to expect by way of offnet traffic, but have had 
success with the 2811 line and am wondering if I can repurpose for the new 
network and not have too much to worry about.

Also, I am planning on configuring some hardware conferencing but I have no 
idea yet how popular it will be, no transcoding is planned as our sites are 
currently all on G711.




--
-Shikamaru



--
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com




--
-Shikamaru


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com



--
-Shika

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Thomas Koch]

Thank you..

 

Thomas J Koch
Owner/Consultant
Digitones, LLC
Cell: 630-808-4910
E-mail: digito...@comcast.net

  _  

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Wayne Lawson
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Mike Thompson
Cc: 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

He's being yanked. It's incredible - does this idiot really think the list
believes him?!  Pretty annoying...

Regards,

 

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244

Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.  

Mailto:   wlaw...@ipexpert.com

Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

 

:: Message sent from iPhone. 


On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:56 PM, "Mike Thompson"  wrote:

And the douche bags strike again.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice master
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:53 PM
To:   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

Hi,
 
Thanks to everyone who has helped me to archieve the same.
 
I am so so so happy to get this ID, struggled from last 1 year.
 
Made 2 attempts on ver 2 but unsuccessful.
 
I have practise on proctorlabs.com, NLI workbook to learn the technology
which i do not know.
 
And at last the masters of voice ccie-voice-labs(dot)com they are really the
best. 
Heads off 2 them labs was same. 
 
I was trying to workout more on GK, SIP but after seeing thier lab there was
nothing much but yes call routing was difficult but i have done some
practise so thats fine.
 
It was a good experience. Now i will run behind CCIE wireless.
 
Thks once again to everyone.
 
THks 


  _  


MSN Battles We pitch one stalwart against the other and give you the power.
Who will you vote for? Share   photos while you
chat with Windows Live Messenger.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit   www.ipexpert.com

<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Wayne Lawson]

He's being yanked. It's incredible - does this idiot really think the  
list believes him?!  Pretty annoying...


Regards,

Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564

:: Message sent from iPhone.

On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:56 PM, "Mike Thompson"   
wrote:



And the douche bags strike again…



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice master

Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:53 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed



Hi,

Thanks to everyone who has helped me to archieve the same.

I am so so so happy to get this ID, struggled from last 1 year.

Made 2 attempts on ver 2 but unsuccessful.

I have practise on proctorlabs.com, NLI workbook to learn the  
technology which i do not know.


And at last the masters of voice ccie-voice-labs(dot)com they are  
really the best.

Heads off 2 them labs was same.

I was trying to workout more on GK, SIP but after seeing thier lab  
there was nothing much but yes call routing was difficult but i have  
done some practise so thats fine.


It was a good experience. Now i will run behind CCIE wireless.

Thks once again to everyone.

THks

MSN Battles We pitch one stalwart against the other and give you the  
power. Who will you vote for? Share photos while you chat with  
Windows Live Messenger.


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[Mike Thompson]

And the douche bags strike again.

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of voice master
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:53 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

 

Hi,
 
Thanks to everyone who has helped me to archieve the same.
 
I am so so so happy to get this ID, struggled from last 1 year.
 
Made 2 attempts on ver 2 but unsuccessful.
 
I have practise on proctorlabs.com, NLI workbook to learn the technology
which i do not know.
 
And at last the masters of voice ccie-voice-labs(dot)com they are really the
best. 
Heads off 2 them labs was same. 
 
I was trying to workout more on GK, SIP but after seeing thier lab there was
nothing much but yes call routing was difficult but i have done some
practise so thats fine.
 
It was a good experience. Now i will run behind CCIE wireless.
 
Thks once again to everyone.
 
THks 

  _  

MSN Battles We pitch one stalwart against the other and give you the power.
Who will you vote for? Share   photos while you
chat with Windows Live Messenger.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ver 3 passed

[voice master]

Hi,
 
Thanks to everyone who has helped me to archieve the same.
 
I am so so so happy to get this ID, struggled from last 1 year.
 
Made 2 attempts on ver 2 but unsuccessful.
 
I have practise on proctorlabs.com, NLI workbook to learn the technology which 
i do not know.
 
And at last the masters of voice ccie-voice-labs(dot)com they are really the 
best. 
Heads off 2 them labs was same. 
 
I was trying to workout more on GK, SIP but after seeing thier lab there was 
nothing much but yes call routing was difficult but i have done some practise 
so thats fine.
 
It was a good experience. Now i will run behind CCIE wireless.
 
Thks once again to everyone.
 
THks 
  
_
Stay updated! Add Facebook, LinkedIn, MySpace & Hi5  friends to your Windows 
Live network instantly. Add Now!
http://profile.live.com/webactivities/?mkt=en-in___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

[shikamaru]

Haha, I can do better than that!  I've downloaded it!  ;)

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, groganhockey wrote:

> I'm just glad I can finally contribute *something* to these discussions! :)
>
> FYI, cisco has moved the doc in the past, so make sure you remember the
> title in case it moves again.
>
> mike
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, shikamaru  wrote:
>
>> MUCH respect, Mike.  This is the perfect document for this kind of
>> question.  Thank you.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, mike deal wrote:
>>
>>> I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
>>>
>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf
>>>
>>> mike
>>>
>>>
>>>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru >> > wrote:
>>>
   I had no idea there was a PRI limit.  I was thinking, potentially, I
 may need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 
 3
 2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three.  Plenty of ports
 between them.

 I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this kind of
 scenario, but then if it couldn't I don't think Cisco would allow for 4 
 PRIs
 to be terminated to it.  I'll ask my AM tomorrow.  Thanks, Michael.

   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
 mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:

>  Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of
> PRIs (not physical, more CPU / resource load wise.)  I would work with 
> your
> Cisco AM to have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.
>
> I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a
> third-party testing report (Mircom maybe.) that had like max 4 PRIs on a
> 2811.  My number might be off, but there was a limit.  That's why I would
> suggest working with your Cisco AM--they should be able to help with those
> numbers.
>
> If you are a partner, the PDI helpdesk should be able to help.  If not,
> then that's what the AM will help you with. Not sure if TAC would assist
> with these design questions, but you can always try.
>  --
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
> shikam...@kagadis.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM
> *To:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?
>
>   Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question
> about a real world scenario.  I'm preparing to increase the size of our 
> VoIP
> network and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our
> remote sites will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and 
> the
> ISRs are only being used to terminate PRIs and will not be used to route
> data VLAN traffic. This being the case, are there caveats to using 2811
> routers with 8 VWIC ports? I don't really know what to expect by way of
> offnet traffic, but have had success with the 2811 line and am wondering 
> if
> I can repurpose for the new network and not have too much to worry about.
>
> Also, I am planning on configuring some hardware conferencing but I
> have no idea yet how popular it will be, no transcoding is planned as our
> sites are currently all on G711.
>
>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>



 --
 -Shikamaru

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

[groganhockey]

I'm just glad I can finally contribute *something* to these discussions! :)

FYI, cisco has moved the doc in the past, so make sure you remember the
title in case it moves again.

mike


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, shikamaru  wrote:

> MUCH respect, Mike.  This is the perfect document for this kind of
> question.  Thank you.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, mike deal  wrote:
>
>> I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>   I had no idea there was a PRI limit.  I was thinking, potentially, I
>>> may need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3
>>> 2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three.  Plenty of ports
>>> between them.
>>>
>>> I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this kind of
>>> scenario, but then if it couldn't I don't think Cisco would allow for 4 PRIs
>>> to be terminated to it.  I'll ask my AM tomorrow.  Thanks, Michael.
>>>
>>>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
>>> mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:
>>>
  Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of PRIs
 (not physical, more CPU / resource load wise.)  I would work with your 
 Cisco
 AM to have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.

 I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a
 third-party testing report (Mircom maybe.) that had like max 4 PRIs on a
 2811.  My number might be off, but there was a limit.  That's why I would
 suggest working with your Cisco AM--they should be able to help with those
 numbers.

 If you are a partner, the PDI helpdesk should be able to help.  If not,
 then that's what the AM will help you with. Not sure if TAC would assist
 with these design questions, but you can always try.
  --
 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
 shikam...@kagadis.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM
 *To:* OSL Group
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

   Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question
 about a real world scenario.  I'm preparing to increase the size of our 
 VoIP
 network and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our
 remote sites will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the
 ISRs are only being used to terminate PRIs and will not be used to route
 data VLAN traffic. This being the case, are there caveats to using 2811
 routers with 8 VWIC ports? I don't really know what to expect by way of
 offnet traffic, but have had success with the 2811 line and am wondering if
 I can repurpose for the new network and not have too much to worry about.

 Also, I am planning on configuring some hardware conferencing but I have
 no idea yet how popular it will be, no transcoding is planned as our sites
 are currently all on G711.




 --
 -Shikamaru

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Shikamaru
>>>
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Shikamaru
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?

[shikamaru]

MUCH respect, Mike.  This is the perfect document for this kind of
question.  Thank you.

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:29 PM, mike deal  wrote:

> I've used this document in the past for sizing purposes:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps259/product_data_sheet0900aecd8057f2e0.pdf
>
> mike
>
>
>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Nara Shikamaru 
> wrote:
>
>>   I had no idea there was a PRI limit.  I was thinking, potentially, I
>> may need to terminate 8 PRIs on a 2811 but in truth I'm planning on having 3
>> 2811 for redundancy and spread the span against all three.  Plenty of ports
>> between them.
>>
>> I guess my question was also whether the 2811 can handle this kind of
>> scenario, but then if it couldn't I don't think Cisco would allow for 4 PRIs
>> to be terminated to it.  I'll ask my AM tomorrow.  Thanks, Michael.
>>
>>   On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael Ciarfello <
>> mciarfe...@iplogic.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Each ISR router is supposed to only be able to handle X number of PRIs
>>> (not physical, more CPU / resource load wise.)  I would work with your Cisco
>>> AM to have them help you detemine what the limits and loading are.
>>>
>>> I can't find what documents discussed it. I know I came across a
>>> third-party testing report (Mircom maybe.) that had like max 4 PRIs on a
>>> 2811.  My number might be off, but there was a limit.  That's why I would
>>> suggest working with your Cisco AM--they should be able to help with those
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> If you are a partner, the PDI helpdesk should be able to help.  If not,
>>> then that's what the AM will help you with. Not sure if TAC would assist
>>> with these design questions, but you can always try.
>>>  --
>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [
>>> shikam...@kagadis.com]
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:01 PM
>>> *To:* OSL Group
>>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Choosing the right ISR?
>>>
>>>   Okay, my question is not really out of the modules, just a question
>>> about a real world scenario.  I'm preparing to increase the size of our VoIP
>>> network and am aware of the principle differences between the ISRs. Our
>>> remote sites will have subscribers, so SRST is not really an issue, and the
>>> ISRs are only being used to terminate PRIs and will not be used to route
>>> data VLAN traffic. This being the case, are there caveats to using 2811
>>> routers with 8 VWIC ports? I don't really know what to expect by way of
>>> offnet traffic, but have had success with the 2811 line and am wondering if
>>> I can repurpose for the new network and not have too much to worry about.
>>>
>>> Also, I am planning on configuring some hardware conferencing but I have
>>> no idea yet how popular it will be, no transcoding is planned as our sites
>>> are currently all on G711.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -Shikamaru
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Shikamaru
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>


-- 
-Shikamaru
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab score report

[Kevin Damisch]

When you take a voice lab, the proctor grades it either the same day or next 
day at the same site using the seat you sat in and does test calls.  On my 
first voice attempt, I got my results the next day around 2:00pm.  On my second 
attempt, I got my results at 2:00am, which was only 9 hours after I completed 
the lab.

Thanks,
Kevin

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Brian Valentine 
[bkvalent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:26 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab score report

All,

I believe that for the R&S labs, they are graded by proctors at another 
location, and therefore, another time-zone.  So, sometime around midnight after 
I took my exam, I got the results from my R&S lab attempt last year.

I have not attempted my voice lab yet.  It is scheduled for a few months out.  
But I have a question.  Are the voice labs graded the same way?  For those of 
you who have taken the voice lab before, how long was it until you got your 
score? The next business day?

I suspect remote proctors are not able to grade voice labs since the person 
grading would probably need to pick up a handset and make test calls to grade 
the dialplan.

Thanks for your feedback.

Brian



This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable 
law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and 
delete or destroy all copies and the original document.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab score report

[Brian Valentine]

All,

 

I believe that for the R&S labs, they are graded by proctors at another
location, and therefore, another time-zone.  So, sometime around midnight
after I took my exam, I got the results from my R&S lab attempt last year.

 

I have not attempted my voice lab yet.  It is scheduled for a few months
out.  But I have a question.  Are the voice labs graded the same way?  For
those of you who have taken the voice lab before, how long was it until you
got your score? The next business day? 

 

I suspect remote proctors are not able to grade voice labs since the person
grading would probably need to pick up a handset and make test calls to
grade the dialplan. 

 

Thanks for your feedback.  

 

Brian

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Aamir Panjwani]

It seems to happen when you have QOS setup on one of the PVC's.  remove
all the QOS config and try again

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cisco Dave
Sent: Thursday, 24 September 2009 6:13 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

 

When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site
bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The
integration itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and
it is very slooow, pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.
 
Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?
Since there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this
type of behavior.
 
Thanks,
cd



Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail(r). See how.
 


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Setup - Bandwidth Hog?

[Cisco Dave]

When setting up CUE and integrating it with CallManager my remote site 
bandwidth is choked.  Dial tone on my phones if very slow.  The integration 
itself seems to timeout.  It takes me several attempts and it is very slooow, 
pings timeout or are 2 to 3 seconds.

 

Anyone having the same issue or any thought on getting around this?  Since 
there is nothing else on the network I really did not expect this type of 
behavior.

 

Thanks,

cd
  
_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] + Dialing support on CUCM7.X

[Cisco Dave]

Here is one off the blog by Vik

http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/2009/09/10/what-every-ccie-voice-candidate-should-know-about-dialing/

 

Here is the SRND Reference - The dial Plan section covers it.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/dialplan.html

 

I would be interested if there is more into on this please join in.

 

Thanks,

cd


 


Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:03:11 +0800
From: moorthypa...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] + Dialing support on CUCM7.X

Dear All

I am looking for the good Cisco document for the  +Dialing support in the 
cucm7.X

Can please send me the link,  

Regards
Pandi
  
_
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume2 Lab1 Q4.2 and 4.3 (Gatekeeper)

[Aamir Panjwani]

I am running into same problem calling from CCM to CME (SIP or SCCP) and
calling from CME SIP to CCM (SIP or SCCP).

 

They ring, but hang up when answer...

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Ciarfello
Sent: Monday, 14 September 2009 2:59 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume2 Lab1 Q4.2 and 4.3 (Gatekeeper)

 

I can't seem to get these questions configured correctly as the PG
suggests.  Anyone get it to work?

 

In Q4.2, supplimental services doesn't work unless I add an MTP in.
Since you want G729, I had to add a g729 SW MTP in the HQ IOS and
register it to CCM.  That works.  But then calls from CCME SIP to CCM
(SIP or SCCP) don't work properly.  CCME SCCP to CCM SCCP or SIP work
with supp services.

 

Forgetting about supplimental services and putting the config back the
way the PG has, the BR2 SIP phone can't call the HQ SCCP or SIP Phone.
They ring, but hang up when answer.

 

Thanks


__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
_
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com