[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE

[Chevy]

I'm setting up CUBE in my home lab.  For some reason my dial-peers are not
being matched by any number.  For example I have defined a dial-p for my CME
router for 1000 extensions with the destination pattern of 1...  If I do a
show dialplan number 1001 it gives me no match and also no match when I do a
debug voip dialpeer.  Even with a destination-p of 1001 on the dialpeer I
get the same result.  Anyone run into something similar or have any
theories?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES: IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[Shrini]

Thanks Marcelo et al...

On 1/26/2011 12:19 PM, Marcelo Alexandria wrote:


Hi Shrini..it´s a good question... in my 3 attempt´s I was used 
the .254 address.No problem with this , I got 100% in this section.


*De:*ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Em nome de *Shrini

*Enviada em:* quarta-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2011 15:54
*Para:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
*Assunto:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

Greetings:

If I need phones to be assigned only specific range of IPs , say from 
10.10.202.100 to 10.10.202.150 in a /24 network


ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.1 10.21.20.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.151 10.21.20.*255*

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipaddr/command/reference/ip1_i1g.html#wp1080002

I have seen that some use the end address as 10.10.202.254 because 
10.21.20.255 is broadcast address.


But according to above document if we do not specify there is a 
possibility that 10.21.20.255 will be assigned, and happened with me 
couple of times.


Experts opinion requested.

Regards
Shrini

Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 9.0.872 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3404 - Data de 
Lançamento: 01/26/11 05:34:00


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on the same port

[matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com]

If you set "mls qos trust cos" then CoS markings will be preserved; however, 
any DSCP marking will be written to 0.

The same holds true for "mls qos trust dscp."  Any packet entering the switch 
with a CoS marking will be written to 0.

That is why you have cos-to-dscp and dscp-to-cos mappings.  This allows the 
packet to essentially become a "blank slate," delete L2/L3 QoS values, and 
remap them.

 

Matthew Berry, CCIE #26721

Email: matt...@ciscovoiceguru.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/CiscoVoiceGuru
Blog: http://ciscovoiceguru.com

On Jan 26, 2011, at 2:57 PM, Miron Kobelski wrote:

> Now I'm not sure any longer ;)
> 
> when you have on a switch port:
> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
> mls qos trust cos
> 
> the COS sent by phone is trusted, PC COS markings are trusted or not 
> depending on "switchport priority extend" command.
> But I have no idea how it behaves when DSCP markings are conditionally 
> trusted, as "switchport priority extends' seem to work only with COS.
> 
> Any ideas? It's late here, I will try to read some docs about this tommorow.
> 
> regards
> kobel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:46, Friderich Claude  wrote:
> OK
> 
> So you mean that with mls qos trust dscp, all traffic form pc port is going 
> to be marked to dscp 0 and should be a better solution for a rogue device 
> behind the phone … correct me if I’m wrong …
> 
> Regards
> 
> Claude.
> 
>  
> Claude Friderich
> 
> PreSales Support
> 
> 
> 
> NETCORE PSF S.A.
> 
> 49 rue du Baerendall
> 
> B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
> 
> Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
> 
> Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
> 
> GSM: 621 303 616
> 
> E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[Bill Lake]

Hello,

I believe the issue you are seeing is based on two issues.  One is
that 10.x.x.x is a class A network. The normal netmask for this is
255.0.0.0 and that means anything in the 10.x.x.x network is active
except 10.0.0.0 and 10.255.255.255.  So in that or any situation where
the netmask is not 255.255.255.0 you have to be sure that 255 is not
assigned.

Or perhaps this is a flaw due to the class and the IOS DHCP server.
If anyone else knows more please chip in.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on the same port

[Steve Denney (stdenney)]

To answer your second question - the Enterprise QoS SRND is here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/QoS-SRND-Book.html

 

AFAIK it’s not accessible via the support URL available to you in the lab 
(http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html) – which is why they give you 
a pdf copy on the candidate desktop.

 

cheers, sd

 

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Miron Kobelski
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:07 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on 
the same port

 

Hello,

I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally trust 
DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:

mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust dscp

But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same 
switch port.
In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:

At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a trust 
statement (such as mls qos 
trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input statement 
applied to given port at 
the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset, one or 
the other statement may be 
removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed; consult 
the latest Catalyst 
2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation

PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I was 
unable to find anything on this in the archive.

BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?

regards
kobel



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.

[Matteo B .]

OK, thanks to all!!
cheers
Matteo

From: bart...@hotmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:22:23 +
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.








Hello People...

 

next Friday i'm going to sit for the lab...( cross your finger!! )

On the confirmation email there is a note that say i've to bring with me my VUE 
ID.

On my profile on vue web site there is no mention of a VUE ID. On my written 
score report there is a Candidate ID, that is the one i use to log in into the 
ccie site, is this the id i have to bring with me? otherwise where i can find 
this VUE ID?

 

cheers

 

Matteo

 

 
  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on the same port

[Miron Kobelski]

Now I'm not sure any longer ;)

when you have on a switch port:
mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust cos

the COS sent by phone is trusted, PC COS markings are trusted or not
depending on "switchport priority extend" command.
But I have no idea how it behaves when DSCP markings are conditionally
trusted, as "switchport priority extends' seem to work only with COS.

Any ideas? It's late here, I will try to read some docs about this tommorow.

regards
kobel




On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:46, Friderich Claude wrote:

>  OK
>
> So you mean that with mls qos trust dscp, all traffic form pc port is going
> to be marked to dscp 0 and should be a better solution for a rogue device
> behind the phone … correct me if I’m wrong …
>
> Regards
>
> Claude.
>
>
>
> *Claude Friderich*
>
> *PreSales Support*
>
> *[image: ccvp_voice_sm]***
>
> *NETCORE PSF S.A.***
>
> 49 rue du Baerendall
>
> B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
>
> Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
>
> Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
>
> GSM: 621 303 616
>
> E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on the same port

[Miron Kobelski]

But giving it a second thought... If you have "mls qos trust device
cisco-phone" on the same port there is a chance it could work as you expect.
But I'd believe it, if I saw this in cisco docs :)


On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:31, Miron Kobelski  wrote:

> With your configuration you would trust ANY dscp marking received from the
> IP phone port. No matter if it was sent by cisco ip phone or a rogue PC
> behind it.
> You loose the benefit of conditional trust boundary... I suspect that these
> tasks are contradictory.
>
> regards
> kobel
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:28, Friderich Claude wrote:
>
>>  Hello Miron,
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with you and the same remark in the attached file p.4
>>
>> You can use either one of these three methods. You cannot use more than
>> one method in a port. For example,
>>
>> you have configured the mls qos trust cos command on a port. When you
>> configure the port with the
>>
>> service−policy input  command, it removes the mls qos
>> trust cos command
>>
>> automatically.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we have to put the service-policy input  with the
>> following class-map in this policy-map
>>
>>
>>
>> policy-map myname
>>
>> class myname
>>
>> trust dscp
>>
>>
>>
>> and create the class before with a match ip dscp ef
>>
>>
>>
>> My opinion …. But remarks appreciated J
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Claude
>>
>>
>>
>> *Claude Friderich*
>>
>> *PreSales Support*
>>
>> *[image: ccvp_voice_sm]***
>>
>> *NETCORE PSF S.A.***
>>
>> 49 rue du Baerendall
>>
>> B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
>>
>> Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
>>
>> Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
>>
>> GSM: 621 303 616
>>
>> E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski
>> *Sent:* mercredi 26 janvier 2011 19:07
>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos
>> trustcommands on the same port
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
>> trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:
>>
>> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
>> mls qos trust dscp
>>
>> But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
>> switch port.
>> In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:
>>
>> At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a
>> trust statement (such as mls qos
>> trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
>> statement applied to given port at
>> the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset, one
>> or the other statement may be
>> removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed;
>> consult the latest Catalyst
>> 2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation
>>
>> PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I
>> was unable to find anything on this in the archive.
>>
>> BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?
>>
>> regards
>> kobel
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> This email was Anti Virus checked.
>>
>>
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trustcommands on the same port

[Miron Kobelski]

With your configuration you would trust ANY dscp marking received from the
IP phone port. No matter if it was sent by cisco ip phone or a rogue PC
behind it.
You loose the benefit of conditional trust boundary... I suspect that these
tasks are contradictory.

regards
kobel


On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:28, Friderich Claude wrote:

>  Hello Miron,
>
>
>
> I agree with you and the same remark in the attached file p.4
>
> You can use either one of these three methods. You cannot use more than one
> method in a port. For example,
>
> you have configured the mls qos trust cos command on a port. When you
> configure the port with the
>
> service−policy input  command, it removes the mls qos
> trust cos command
>
> automatically.
>
>
>
> I think we have to put the service-policy input  with the
> following class-map in this policy-map
>
>
>
> policy-map myname
>
> class myname
>
> trust dscp
>
>
>
> and create the class before with a match ip dscp ef
>
>
>
> My opinion …. But remarks appreciated J
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Claude
>
>
>
> *Claude Friderich*
>
> *PreSales Support*
>
> *[image: ccvp_voice_sm]***
>
> *NETCORE PSF S.A.***
>
> 49 rue du Baerendall
>
> B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
>
> Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
>
> Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
>
> GSM: 621 303 616
>
> E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski
> *Sent:* mercredi 26 janvier 2011 19:07
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos
> trustcommands on the same port
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
> trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:
>
> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
> mls qos trust dscp
>
> But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
> switch port.
> In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:
>
> At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a
> trust statement (such as mls qos
> trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
> statement applied to given port at
> the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset, one
> or the other statement may be
> removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed;
> consult the latest Catalyst
> 2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation
>
> PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I was
> unable to find anything on this in the archive.
>
> BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?
>
> regards
> kobel
>
>
>
> --
>
> This email was Anti Virus checked.
>
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES: IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[Marcelo Alexandria]

Hi Shrini..it´s a good question... in my 3 attempt´s I was used the .254
address.No problem with this , I got 100% in this section.

 

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de Shrini
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2011 15:54
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

 

Greetings:

If I need phones to be assigned only specific range of IPs , say from
10.10.202.100 to 10.10.202.150 in a /24 network

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.1 10.21.20.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.151 10.21.20.255

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipaddr/command/reference/ip1_i1g.ht
ml#wp1080002

I have seen that some use the end address as 10.10.202.254 because
10.21.20.255 is broadcast address.

But according to above document if we do not specify there is a possibility
that 10.21.20.255 will be assigned, and happened with me couple of times.

Experts opinion requested.

Regards
Shrini

Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 9.0.872 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3404 - Data de
Lançamento: 01/26/11 05:34:00

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES: VUE ID for the LAB.

[Marcelo Alexandria]

Bring with you your personal ID(passaport or another) , and a print of your
CCIE LAB confirmation e-mail. It´s enough!!

 

 

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de Matteo B.
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2011 15:22
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.

 

Hello People...
 
next Friday i'm going to sit for the lab...( cross your finger!! )
On the confirmation email there is a note that say i've to bring with me my
VUE ID.
On my profile on vue web site there is no mention of a VUE ID. On my written
score report there is a Candidate ID, that is the one i use to log in into
the ccie site, is this the id i have to bring with me? otherwise where i can
find this VUE ID?
 
cheers
 
Matteo
 
 

Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 9.0.872 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3404 - Data de
Lançamento: 01/26/11 05:34:00

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust commands on the same port

[Miron Kobelski]

I agree that QoS SRND should be available on desktop, but it bothers me that
I don't know how to find it on cisco.com...

On switch you configure service policy for ingress:
https://tools.cisco.com/Support/CLILookup/cltSearchAction.do?AT=gD&BM=t&CN=%22service-policy%22&IndexOptionId=All%20index%20OPtions&IndexId=Catalyst
 service-policy

Use the service-policy interface configuration command on the switch stack
or on a standalone switch to apply a policy map defined by the policy-map
command to the input of a port. Use the no form of this command to remove
the policy map and port association.

regards
kobel

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 20:32, ccieid1ot  wrote:

> Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't trusting the ports setting the ingress and
> service policy is setting on egress?
>
> duy
> ccie #27737 voice
>
> tmobile g2
> On Jan 26, 2011 1:21 PM, "Miron Kobelski"  wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
> > trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished
> with:
> >
> > mls qos trust device cisco-phone
> > mls qos trust dscp
> >
> > But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
> > switch port.
> > In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:
> >
> > At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a
> trust
> > statement (such as mls qos
> > trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
> > statement applied to given port at
> > the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset,
> one
> > or the other statement may be
> > removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed;
> consult
> > the latest Catalyst
> > 2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation
> >
> > PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I
> was
> > unable to find anything on this in the archive.
> >
> > BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?
> >
> > regards
> > kobel
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integration of CUE and CUCM : MWI ON/OFF

[Steffen Lehmann]

Hi,

you have to add the command:

se-172-22-132-253(config)# ccn subsystem sip
se-172-22-132-253(config-sip)# mwi sip outcall 

Cheers

Steffen 

 

Von: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] im Auftrag von Mritunjay Kumar 
[mjs...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Januar 2011 09:20
An: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Integration of CUE and CUCM : MWI ON/OFF

Hi All ,

i am able to integrate CUE and CUCM  and it is working as expected including 
MWI on/off.

but unable to figure out how to set " MWI ON/OFF  DN "  if  this is the 
requirement !

config on cue

ccn subsystem jtapi
 ctiport  
 ccm-manager address 14.160.108.10
 ccm-manager credentials hidden 
"G2Zv4Op2jjz5S/06Uc99p0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmP"
 end subsystem

ccn subsystem sip
 gateway address "14.160.115.200"
 mwi sip unsolicited  //  if phones  goes to SRST mode , MWI ON/OFF will work 
if unsolicited is configured
 end subsystem


cli
parameter "strMWI_OFF_DN" "8001"
 parameter "strMWI_ON_DN" "8000"

does not help.

MWI DN on CUCM is used with UC  not with cue which i verified by looking into 
traces.

Any suggestion ?

Regards,
Mritunjay









___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.

[Mark Holloway]

I only had to show my driver's license.  I took my first attempt in RTP and the 
second in San Jose.

On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Matteo B. wrote:

> Hello People...
>  
> next Friday i'm going to sit for the lab...( cross your finger!! )
> On the confirmation email there is a note that say i've to bring with me my 
> VUE ID.
> On my profile on vue web site there is no mention of a VUE ID. On my written 
> score report there is a Candidate ID, that is the one i use to log in into 
> the ccie site, is this the id i have to bring with me? otherwise where i can 
> find this VUE ID?
>  
> cheers
>  
> Matteo
>  
>  
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[Pulos, Greg]

Your example seems to make no sense since you talk about an IP range of one 
subnet, but then discuss excluding addresses from a completely different subnet.

Bottom line.if your IOS dhcp is handing out actual broadcast IDs as IP 
addys, then you have an IOS bug.

I would doubt this is the case though as I've never seen this in working with 
IOS for 20+ years.

If .255 was being handed out, then you are likely not using a 24 bit mask on 
your dhcp pool.

Also, I see no where in any cisco doc that states a properly configured 24 bit 
subnet in dhcp may "possibly hand out a broadcast address". it just can't 
happen if IOS is not buggy and the configuration of dhcp is correct.

greg


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Shrini
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:54 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

Greetings:

If I need phones to be assigned only specific range of IPs , say from 
10.10.202.100 to 10.10.202.150 in a /24 network

ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.1 10.21.20.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.151 10.21.20.255

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipaddr/command/reference/ip1_i1g.html#wp1080002

I have seen that some use the end address as 10.10.202.254 because 10.21.20.255 
is broadcast address.

But according to above document if we do not specify there is a possibility 
that 10.21.20.255 will be assigned, and happened with me couple of times.

Experts opinion requested.

Regards
Shrini
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Two RSVP reservations for a single iLBC call?

[Miron Kobelski]

Good point Claude... I had dspfarm profile configured with both ilbc AND
pass-through. When I removed ilbc and left only pass-through it started
behaving as expected...

I also noticed that with my original configuration I had following
connections set up on the router:

BO25-CE-CCIE#sh sccp con
sess_idconn_id  stype mode codec   sport rport ripaddr

33555485   33554593 mtp   sendrecv pass_th 19264 27890 10.225.101.69
33555485   33554592 mtp   inactive UNKNOWN 17928 0 UNKNOWN
33555485   33554591 mtp   sendrecv pass_th 17790 16406 10.30.101.254

However I have no idea how to explain it... Thanks anyway, I guess it's
something worth remembering.

regards
kobel

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 20:02, Friderich Claude wrote:

>  Hi Miron
>
>
>
>
>
> Very strange …
>
>
>
> Fot this lab, I had an issue with rsvp as well, but not the same pb. In the
> dspfarm configured as mtp,  I put the codec pass-through command line to
> have an ILBC negotiation. Without this command, g729 codec negotiation
> instead.
>
>
>
> But your negotiation iLBC seems to work
>
>
>
> Alerting  47.2 kbps, round up to 48k
>
> Connected should be 31.2 kbps for 1 call you have 31k…. fine
>
>
>
> Same results with debug ip rsvp signaling ??
>
>
>
>
>
> *Claude Friderich*
>
> *PreSales Support*
>
> *[image: ccvp_voice_sm]***
>
> *NETCORE PSF S.A.***
>
> 49 rue du Baerendall
>
> B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
>
> Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
>
> Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
>
> GSM: 621 303 616
>
> E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Miron Kobelski
> *Sent:* mardi 25 janvier 2011 21:20
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Two RSVP reservations for a single iLBC
> call?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on vol2 lab8. QoS task requiresRSVP locations based CAC between
> HQ and BR1.
> I configured it as usually, but I get strange results when I make a single
> call between the 2 sites:
>
> Before the call:
> RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0 has no installed reservations
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30 has no installed reservations
>
> In alerting phase:
> RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30
> BPSTo  FromProtoc DPort  Sport  Weight
> Conversation
> 76K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP17270  16410  6  266
> 48K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP18160  16524  9  265
>
> When connected:
> RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30
> BPSTo  FromProtoc DPort  Sport  Weight
> Conversation
> 76K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP17270  16410  6  266
> 31K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP18160  16524  14 265
>
> After disconnecting the call:
> RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0 has no installed reservations
> RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30 has no installed reservations
>
> I can't explain, why CUCM makes 2 reservation for single iLBC call. AFAIK,
> it should be 48K in alerting and 31K in connected states.
> But why do I get this 76K? I configured everything as usually: RSVP
> reservations are optional, traffic should be remarked to CS1 when no
> bandwidth is available.
> RSVP agents are invoked correctly...
>
> Any ideas?
>
> regards
> kobel
>
>
>
> --
>
> This email was Anti Virus checked.
>
>
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust commands on the same port

[ccieid1ot]

On your other question, the qos srnd is placed on the desktop.

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:32 PM, "ccieid1ot"  wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't trusting the ports setting the ingress and
> service policy is setting on egress?
>
> duy
> ccie #27737 voice
>
> tmobile g2
> On Jan 26, 2011 1:21 PM, "Miron Kobelski"  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
>> trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished
> with:
>>
>> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
>> mls qos trust dscp
>>
>> But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
>> switch port.
>> In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:
>>
>> At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a
> trust
>> statement (such as mls qos
>> trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
>> statement applied to given port at
>> the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset,
one
>> or the other statement may be
>> removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed;
> consult
>> the latest Catalyst
>> 2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation
>>
>> PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I
> was
>> unable to find anything on this in the archive.
>>
>> BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?
>>
>> regards
>> kobel
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[ccieid1ot]

Set it as .255 since it won't hurt.

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:21 PM, "Shrini"  wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> If I need phones to be assigned only specific range of IPs , say from
> 10.10.202.100 to 10.10.202.150 in a /24 network
>
> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.1 10.21.20.99
> ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.151 10.21.20.*255*
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipaddr/command/reference/ip1_i1g.html#wp1080002
>
> I have seen that some use the end address as 10.10.202.254 because
> 10.21.20.255 is broadcast address.
>
> But according to above document if we do not specify there is a
> possibility that 10.21.20.255 will be assigned, and happened with me
> couple of times.
>
> Experts opinion requested.
>
> Regards
> Shrini
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust commands on the same port

[ccieid1ot]

Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't trusting the ports setting the ingress and
service policy is setting on egress?

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:21 PM, "Miron Kobelski"  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
> trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished
with:
>
> mls qos trust device cisco-phone
> mls qos trust dscp
>
> But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
> switch port.
> In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:
>
> At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a
trust
> statement (such as mls qos
> trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
> statement applied to given port at
> the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset, one
> or the other statement may be
> removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed;
consult
> the latest Catalyst
> 2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation
>
> PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I
was
> unable to find anything on this in the archive.
>
> BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?
>
> regards
> kobel
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.

[ccieid1ot]

Just bring your govt assigned id, whether it be a DL or passport.

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 26, 2011 1:19 PM, "Matteo B."  wrote:
>
> Hello People...
>
> next Friday i'm going to sit for the lab...( cross your finger!! )
> On the confirmation email there is a note that say i've to bring with me
my VUE ID.
> On my profile on vue web site there is no mention of a VUE ID. On my
written score report there is a Candidate ID, that is the one i use to log
in into the ccie site, is this the id i have to bring with me? otherwise
where i can find this VUE ID?
>
> cheers
>
> Matteo
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Two RSVP reservations for a single iLBC call?

[Friderich Claude]

Hi Miron
 
 
Very strange …
 
Fot this lab, I had an issue with rsvp as well, but not the same pb. In the 
dspfarm configured as mtp,  I put the codec pass-through command line to have 
an ILBC negotiation. Without this command, g729 codec negotiation instead.
 
But your negotiation iLBC seems to work
 
Alerting  47.2 kbps, round up to 48k
Connected should be 31.2 kbps for 1 call you have 31k…. fine
 
Same results with debug ip rsvp signaling ??
 
 
Claude Friderich
PreSales Support
 
NETCORE PSF S.A.
49 rue du Baerendall
B.P.65 L-8201 Mamer
Téléphone: 31 33 80-407
Fax: 31 33 80 8-407
GSM: 621 303 616
E-mail: cfrider...@netcore.lu  
 
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Miron Kobelski
Sent: mardi 25 janvier 2011 21:20
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Two RSVP reservations for a single iLBC call?
 
Hello,

I'm working on vol2 lab8. QoS task requiresRSVP locations based CAC between HQ 
and BR1.
I configured it as usually, but I get strange results when I make a single call 
between the 2 sites:

Before the call:
RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed 
RSVP: Serial0/0/0 has no installed reservations
RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30 has no installed reservations

In alerting phase:
RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed 
RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30
BPSTo  FromProtoc DPort  Sport  Weight Conversation
76K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP17270  16410  6  266   
48K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP18160  16524  9  265   

When connected:
RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed 
RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30
BPSTo  FromProtoc DPort  Sport  Weight Conversation
76K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP17270  16410  6  266   
31K10.225.101.254  10.30.101.254   UDP18160  16524  14 265   

After disconnecting the call:
RS30-CCIE#sh ip rsvp installed 
RSVP: Serial0/0/0 has no installed reservations
RSVP: Serial0/0/0.30 has no installed reservations

I can't explain, why CUCM makes 2 reservation for single iLBC call. AFAIK, it 
should be 48K in alerting and 31K in connected states.
But why do I get this 76K? I configured everything as usually: RSVP 
reservations are optional, traffic should be remarked to CS1 when no bandwidth 
is available.
RSVP agents are invoked correctly... 

Any ideas?

regards
kobel
 
-- 
This email was Anti Virus checked. 
<>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Putty Connection manager

[Randall Crumm]

Hi,

I am running windows 7 and putty connection Manager. It was working, but
now I do not see the rack devices on the side. I have uninstalled and
reinstalled Connection Manager and downloaded a new DB.



Same as before. Any thoughts? My view connection manager is on.



Best Regards,



Randall Crumm

Voice and Video Architect

Global Networking & Telecom









1007 Gibraltar Drive

Milpitas, CA  95035



Direct +1 408.576.7344

VoIP .100.7344





Creating value that increases

customer competitiveness




 
Legal Disclaimer:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential. 
It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the 
intended recipient, you are on notice that any distribution of this message, in 
any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, 
please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this 
message

<><>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 QoS: service-policy + mls qos trust commands on the same port

[Miron Kobelski]

Hello,

I'm working on Vol2 Lab8 QoS section. Task 5.2 requires to conditionally
trust DSCP markings from the Cisco IP phone, which can be accomplished with:

mls qos trust device cisco-phone
mls qos trust dscp

But 5.3 requires policing and remarking using service-policy for the same
switch port.
In the Enterprise QoS SRND page 106 we have:

At the time of writing, the Catalyst 2970/3560/3750 does not support a trust
statement (such as mls qos
trust device cisco-phone) in conjunction with a service-policy input
statement applied to given port at
the same time. While this may be configurable, if the switch is reset, one
or the other statement may be
removed when the switch reloads. This limitation is to be addressed; consult
the latest Catalyst
2970/3560/3750 QoS documentation for updates on this limitation

PG's solution seems to ignore this fact. What's your opinion on this? I was
unable to find anything on this in the archive.

BTW, how can I find QoS SRND via cisco.com documentation portal?

regards
kobel
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP dhcp pool - back to basics

[Shrini]

Greetings:

If I need phones to be assigned only specific range of IPs , say from 
10.10.202.100 to 10.10.202.150 in a /24 network


ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.1 10.21.20.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.21.20.151 10.21.20.*255*

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/ipaddr/command/reference/ip1_i1g.html#wp1080002

I have seen that some use the end address as 10.10.202.254 because 
10.21.20.255 is broadcast address.


But according to above document if we do not specify there is a 
possibility that 10.21.20.255 will be assigned, and happened with me 
couple of times.


Experts opinion requested.

Regards
Shrini
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VUE ID for the LAB.

[Matteo B .]

Hello People...
 
next Friday i'm going to sit for the lab...( cross your finger!! )
On the confirmation email there is a note that say i've to bring with me my VUE 
ID.
On my profile on vue web site there is no mention of a VUE ID. On my written 
score report there is a Candidate ID, that is the one i use to log in into the 
ccie site, is this the id i have to bring with me? otherwise where i can find 
this VUE ID?
 
cheers
 
Matteo
 
  ___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Rack Rental Vouchers - $35 each

[Kent Noorda - Q]

All, 
 
I have 5 voice rack rental vouchers I will not be using.  I am selling for
$35 each.  
 
Let me know if you are interested. 
 
 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com