Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 5 released

2011-03-22 Thread David Holman
I believe that the discussion of the contents of a specific CCIE lab is a
violation of NDA.

My apologies if this is inaccurate.

On Mar 22, 2011 12:17 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.com wrote:
 what do you mean by AAR, MVA, CAC changed
 did they suddenly create new product, CALL MANAGER FROM FUTURE VERSION
 2011?


 if you know how to configure AAR, MVA, CAC they do not change!!

 from what I understand, you've done 9 labs, and you mean that the tasks
have
 changed.
 but if you know how to configure all these technologies you should have no
 problem with a new task, that has different wording.

 do not panic people... technology is not changing, it's all same old. so
 anyone who knows his stuff, should be able to do it.

 My 2 cents...


 P.S. Cisco has not announced any new blueprints yet, and they normally
 announce it looong time before they change it.



 On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM, ccievoice ccievoicel...@rediffmail.com
wrote:

 Guys,

 Lab 5 released guys i have no words to say!!

 It was my 9 attempt and again i got fucX

 Just to inform there was lot of things which i got it never seen in life
:)

 SIP Trunk , AAR , MVA , CAC all changed

 IPCC page was one full page, SIP trunk troubleshooting was full one page

 I got so depressed that i left the lab like that

 ): ): ): ): ): ): ): ):


 
http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle
?
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 59, Issue 208

2011-01-24 Thread David Parrish


Dave Parrish - Orange Business Services - +1 651 485 2789 - Sent from my 
Samsung Epic™ 4G

ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
   ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
   ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: CallManager and CUE - Ports not registering (ccieid1ot)
   2. Re: Configuration examples (Jon 1992)
   3. RE?:  VIA zone when no Zone prefix is configured!
  (Friderich Claude)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:46:17 -0600
From: ccieid1ot ccieid...@gmail.com
To: Justin Brady jbr...@tsginc.biz
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CallManager and CUE - Ports not
   registering
Message-ID:
   AANLkTi=0j_tknn1r47+45jkkskd8uunkaewptefam...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Can your cue ping ccm and vice versa?

duy
ccie #27737 voice

tmobile g2
On Jan 23, 2011 4:06 PM, Justin Brady jbr...@tsginc.biz wrote:
 All,

 I've tried to integrate CUE with CM on 2 different pods now and I'm
getting the same problem The Jtapi ports just aren't registering. Below is
the CUE config and some output. My CUE works beautifully when in SRST mode
(call-manager-fallback and CMEasSRST). MWI does too.

 For my callmanager piece, I am 100% certain the username/password of the
application user matches up between the CM and CUE. It has the CTI ports and
CTI Route Point associated with the user and it's in the Standard CTI
enabled group
 I have tried all combination of things on the cti route point and ports. I
started with just extensions in the none partition all the way up to
filling out partitions, DP's, CSS's, etc etc and nothing works.
 I have followed the Cisco doc and the IPExpert proctor guides on several
different labs to a T and it still won't work.

 FYI, I am ONLY registering it to the Subscriber because I am using EZVPN
and I want my BR2 site to only register with the Sub so I can stop the CM
service and test SRST. However, on my previous attempt, I had both the Pub
and Sub in there with the same problem.

 Other things I have tried after scouring the web and OSL's archives:

 n Removing the ccn configs manually, re-adding them and reloading

 n Reloading at least 5 times for other various reasons

 n Changing the app user ID from cue to cuejtapi

 n Changing the password from cisco to 12345 on the account

 n Clicked on verify on the CUE GUI and got successful on web and jtapi
login

 What on earth am I missing (or am I running into some kind of bug)? I have
had this work before, but not the last 2 times I've tried.

 CUE# show ccn subsystem jtapi
 Cisco Call Manager: 10.10.210.11
 CCM JTAPI Username: cuejtapi
 CCM JTAPI Password: * --This is cisco
 Call Control Group 1 CTI ports: 3601,3602
 Call Control Group 1 MWI port:
 CSS for redirects from route points: ccm-default
 CSS for redirects from CTI ports: redirecting-party

 CUE# show ccn status ccm-manager

 JTAPI Subsystem is not registered with any Call Manager



 CONFIGURATION
 I've removed what I think are the irrelevant parts of the configs so if
you see something missing, please point it out.
 hostname CUE

 ip domain-name cue.com

 username sitecphone3 create
 username sitecphone2 create
 username sitecphone1 create
 username admin create

 username sitecphone3 phonenumber 3003
 username sitecphone2 phonenumber 3002
 username sitecphone1 phonenumber 3001

 ccn application ciscomwiapplication aa
 description ciscomwiapplication
 enabled
 maxsessions 6
 script setmwi.aef
 parameter CallControlGroupID 0
 parameter strMWI_OFF_DN 8001
 parameter strMWI_ON_DN 8000
 end application

 ccn application msgnotification aa
 description msgnotification
 enabled
 maxsessions 6
 script msgnotify.aef
 parameter logoutUri 
http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/mbxLogout.jsp;
 parameter DelayBeforeSendDTMF 1
 end application

 ccn application voicemail aa
 description voicemail
 enabled
 maxsessions 6
 script voicebrowser.aef
 parameter logoutUri 
http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/mbxLogout.jsp;
 parameter uri http://localhost/voicemail/vxmlscripts/login.vxml;
 end application

 ccn engine
 end engine

 ccn subsystem jtapi
 ctiport 3601 3602
 ccm-manager address 10.10.210.11
 ccm-manager credentials hidden
kqp8kECeSyAj1Zqu00cTvQ4E0vzCD5YHSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmPSd8ZZNgd+Y9J3xlk2B35j0nfGWTYHfmP
 end subsystem

 ccn subsystem sip
 gateway address 10.10.202.1
 mwi sip unsolicited
 end 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A - Unable to establish call from HQ phone to 3...@ipxcme

2010-11-30 Thread David Lee
SIP messages for the call flow look ok.

I notice that SIP dial rules only work from SIP phones.  (Only wasted 1-2
hours trying to dial that from an SCCP phone once. :))  If you are using an
IP COMM and X-Lite, the behavior may be unpredictable.



On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Lab 4A - Unable to establish call from HQ phone   to
  3...@ipxcme (Rafay Aslam)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:12:18 -0500
 From: Rafay Aslam rafayc...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A - Unable to establish call from HQ
phone   to 3...@ipxcme
 Message-ID:

 aanlkti=k5ro2an+5pozbmkne4pbkvjgpvx39z9euq...@mail.gmail.comk5ro2an%2b5pozbmkne4pbkvjgpvx39z9euq...@mail.gmail.com
 
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hi
 I am dialing from HQ Phone DN 5002 to 3...@ipxcme.com , it rings BR2 DN
 3005
 but when I answer the call, call drops on DN 3005, but my HQ Phone DN 5002
 ie IP Communicator thinks call is up.

 My DN 3005 Phone is Cisco 7941 Phone, Lab have 3...@ipxcme which is my
 X-Lite Phone, I had same issue with X-Lite Phone, so I thought its my
 X-lite
 phone so I change it to 3...@ipxcme.com ,

 I am able to make call from X-Lite ie DN 3006 to DN 3005 ie 7941 no issue,
 which means my SIP to SIP calling is working.



 BR2-RTR#
 Nov 30 18:04:49.567: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Received:
 INVITE sip:3...@ipxcme.com:5060 SIP/2.0
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:04:49 GMT
 Call-Info: sip:10.10.210.11:5060
 ;method=NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=500
 Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER,
 SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
 From: sip:5...@10.10.210.11 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 sip%253a5...@10.10.210.11
 ;tag=b6b454b4-a965-439d-9a33-1b943c1898f6-46628184
 Allow-Events: presence, kpml
 P-Asserted-Identity: sip:5...@10.10.210.11 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 sip%253a5...@10.10.210.11
 Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces
 Supported: Geolocation
 Min-SE:  1800
 Remote-Party-ID: sip:5...@10.10.210.11 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 sip%253a5...@10.10.210.11
 ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
 Content-Length: 0
 User-Agent: Cisco-CUCM7.1
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1 
 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1sip%253a3...@10.10.202.1
 
 Contact: sip:5...@10.10.210.11:5060;transport=tcp
 Expires: 180
 Call-ID: 5118bc00-cf513cc1-2f-bd20...@10.10.210.11
 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.210.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bK481c3cabef
 CSeq: 101 INVITE
 Session-Expires:  1800
 Max-Forwards: 69

 Nov 30 18:04:49.591: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Sent:
 INVITE sip:3...@10.10.202.50:5060 SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK231323
 Remote-Party-ID: sip:5...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a5...@10.10.202.1 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.202.1 sip%253a5...@10.10.202.1
 ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
 From: sip:5...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a5...@10.10.202.1 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.202.1 sip%253a5...@10.10.202.1;tag=917E24-F69
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.50 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.50 
 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.50 sip%253a3...@10.10.202.50
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:04:49 GMT
 Call-ID: 2840961f-fbe311df-8077a5bd-fa6b6...@10.10.202.1
 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
 Min-SE:  1800
 Cisco-Guid: 675161318-4225962463-2154931645-4201342136
 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
 Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE,
 NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
 CSeq: 101 INVITE
 Timestamp: 1291140289
 Contact: sip:5...@10.10.202.1:5060
 Expires: 180
 Allow-Events: telephone-event
 Max-Forwards: 68
 Session-Expires:  1800
 Content-Length: 0

 Nov 30 18:04:49.591: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Sent:
 SIP/2.0 100 Trying
 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.210.11:5060;branch=z9hG4bK481c3cabef
 From: sip:5...@10.10.210.11 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 
 sip%3a5...@10.10.210.11 sip%253a5...@10.10.210.11
 ;tag=b6b454b4-a965-439d-9a33-1b943c1898f6-46628184
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1 
 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1sip%253a3...@10.10.202.1
 
 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 18:04:49 GMT
 Call-ID: 5118bc00-cf513cc1-2f-bd20...@10.10.210.11
 CSeq: 101 INVITE
 Allow-Events: telephone-event
 Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
 Content-Length: 0

 Nov 30 18:04:49.607: 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] No audio on Calls from CUCM to CME SIP phone using CUBE

2010-11-29 Thread David A
Hi All,

I have the CUBE setup on the HQ GW

CUCM to CUBE = SIP
CUME to CME = h323

Codec is g729 across.


Calls work fine to the CME sccp phone. However calls from CUCM to SIP
CME phone has no audio. Below are my configs.

 HQ Config 

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 h323
  emptycapability
  h225 connect-passthru
  h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru
 sip
  bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0
  bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0
!
!
dial-peer voice 4000 voip
 destination-pattern 4...
 session target ipv4:10.10.202.1
 incoming called-number [23]...
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
!
dial-peer voice 2300 voip
 destination-pattern [23]...
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:10.137.151.26
 incoming called-number 4...
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
!

*** CME Config ***

voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 sip
  bind control source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
  bind media source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
  registrar server
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 15
 max-pool 5
 load 7965 SIP45.8-4-4S
 timezone 21
 create profile sync 0206597300406331
 ntp-server 10.137.151.250 mode directedbroadcast
!
voice register dn  1
 number 4002
 name Site C Phone 2
!
voice register pool  1
 id mac 0024.C40B.13DC
 type 7965
 number 1 dn 1
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
!

I enable SIP EO with MTP and still the same result. Hope you guys can
see something I am missing.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE does not hear DTMF from CME SIP Phone

2010-11-21 Thread David Lee
Hi Miron,

My PL session is over now, but I'll definitely try again and post my
finding.  It's weird because I've done CME SIP phone many times, and never
had this problem.  The CUE DTMF method is what I was looking for, so thank
you for letting me know how to check the configuration if it.

-Dave

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi David,

 I assume you did create profile?

 Regarding CUE support for RFC2833 - some people reported it works:
  *
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg12589.html
  *
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg19366.html

 I had exactly the same issue today in the lab and I was able to resolve it
 this way.
 I never did it, but you might want to check dtmf relay configuration on CUE
 itself:


 cue(config)# ccn subsystem sip
 cue(config-sip)#
 cue(config-sip)# ?
   dtmf-relaySIP dtmf relay methods
   end   Leave subsystem configuration mode
   exit  Exit configuration mode
   gateway   SIP Server used for initiating calls
   mwi   message waiting indicator
   noDelete configuration command
   default   Use default value
   protocol  SIP Protocol configuration for interworking with IOS
 images
   transfer-mode SIP call transfer method
   cr
 cue(config-sip)# dtmf-relay ?
   info  info message
   rtp-nte   RFC 2833
   sip-notifysip-notify
   sub-notifysubscribe notify



 regards
 kobel



 On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 02:27, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Miron,

 Thanks for your suggestion, but no joy...  Even changed phones, but it
 still didn't work...

 voice register pool  2
  id mac 001A.2F75.2336

  type 7961
  number 1 dn 2
  dialplan 1
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify
  username 3006 password cisco
  description 32143006
  codec g711ulaw
 !

 dial-peer voice 3600 voip
  destination-pattern 3600
  session protocol sipv2
  session target ipv4:10.10.202.2
  incoming called-number 399[89]
  dtmf-relay sip-notify rtp-nte
  codec g711ulaw
  no vad
 !

 I never heard that you had to add the rtp-nte to the SIP dial-peer to CUE,
 since CUE only uses sip-notify...

 Thanks,

 -Dave


 On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 configure dial-peer to cue and voice register pools with dtmf-relay
 sip-notify rtp-nte, create profile  restart phones. Should work fine.

 regards
 kobel

  On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 00:50, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello,

 I was wondering if someone can suggest what may be the problem with my
 CME SIP phone or CUE setup.  The SCCP can access the CUE mailbox just fine.
 MWI also works.  (Outcall + SIP Notify for the SIP phone.)  But when I call
 CUE from the CME SIP Phone, CUE does not recognize any DTMF signals.  I do
 see CCSIP NOTIFY messages when I press a key...

 I already did several create profile, reset, even restarted the router
 and CUE module.  I think my config is right...  But I may be missing
 something really stupid...


 Here are some configs and debugs for reference...

 I pressed 1 on the SIP phone that resulted in below
 BR2-RTR#
 Nov 21 04:43:54.203: //-1//SIP/Msg/sipDisplayBinaryData:
  Sending: Binary Message Body
 Nov 21 04:43:54.203: Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
 00 00 07 D0
 Nov 21 04:43:54.207: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Sent:
 NOTIFY sip:3...@10.10.202.2:5060 SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
 From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
 ;tag=238694-1F
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
 Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
 Max-Forwards: 70
 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:43:54 GMT
 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
 Event: telephone-event
 Subscription-State: active
 Contact: sip:10.10.202.1:5060
 Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
 Content-Length: 4

 .P
 Nov 21 04:43:54.219: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Received:

 BR2-RTR#SIP/2.0 200 Ok
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
 From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
 ;tag=238694-1F
 Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
 Content-Length: 0
 Allow-Events: refer
 Allow-Events: telephone-event
 Allow-Events: message-summary



 BR2-RTR#sh run | be voice serv
 voice service voip
  allow-connections h323 to h323
  allow-connections h323 to sip
  allow-connections sip to h323
  allow-connections sip to sip
  sip
   bind control source-interface Vlan400
   bind media source-interface Vlan400
   registrar server
 !
 !
 !


 BR2-RTR#
 BR2-RTR#sh run | be dial-p
 dial-peer voice 3600 voip
  destination-pattern 3600
  session protocol sipv2
  session target ipv4:10.10.202.2
  incoming called-number 399[89]
  dtmf

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE does not hear DTMF from CME SIP Phone

2010-11-20 Thread David Lee
Hello,

I was wondering if someone can suggest what may be the problem with my CME
SIP phone or CUE setup.  The SCCP can access the CUE mailbox just fine.  MWI
also works.  (Outcall + SIP Notify for the SIP phone.)  But when I call CUE
from the CME SIP Phone, CUE does not recognize any DTMF signals.  I do see
CCSIP NOTIFY messages when I press a key...

I already did several create profile, reset, even restarted the router and
CUE module.  I think my config is right...  But I may be missing something
really stupid...


Here are some configs and debugs for reference...

I pressed 1 on the SIP phone that resulted in below
BR2-RTR#
Nov 21 04:43:54.203: //-1//SIP/Msg/sipDisplayBinaryData:
 Sending: Binary Message Body
Nov 21 04:43:54.203: Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
00 00 07 D0
Nov 21 04:43:54.207: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Sent:
NOTIFY sip:3...@10.10.202.2:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
;tag=238694-1F
To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
Max-Forwards: 70
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:43:54 GMT
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Event: telephone-event
Subscription-State: active
Contact: sip:10.10.202.1:5060
Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
Content-Length: 4

.P
Nov 21 04:43:54.219: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:

BR2-RTR#SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
;tag=238694-1F
Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
Content-Length: 0
Allow-Events: refer
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Allow-Events: message-summary



BR2-RTR#sh run | be voice serv
voice service voip
 allow-connections h323 to h323
 allow-connections h323 to sip
 allow-connections sip to h323
 allow-connections sip to sip
 sip
  bind control source-interface Vlan400
  bind media source-interface Vlan400
  registrar server
!
!
!


BR2-RTR#
BR2-RTR#sh run | be dial-p
dial-peer voice 3600 voip
 destination-pattern 3600
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2
 incoming called-number 399[89]
 dtmf-relay sip-notify
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!

BR2-RTR#sh run | be voice register
voice register global
 mode cme
 source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
 max-dn 2
 max-pool 2
 authenticate register
 timezone 13
 time-format 24
 date-format D/M/Y
 voicemail 3600
 tftp-path flash:
 create profile sync 712964732422
 ntp-server 10.10.100.2 mode unicast
!
!
voice register dn  2
 number 3006
 call-forward b2bua busy 3600
 call-forward b2bua noan 3600 timeout 12
 name br2 phn 4
 mwi

voice register pool  2
 id mac 0017.95D0.231B
 type 7961
 number 1 dn 2
 dialplan 1
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 32143006
 codec g711ulaw
!



Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE does not hear DTMF from CME SIP Phone

2010-11-20 Thread David Lee
Hi Miron,

Thanks for your suggestion, but no joy...  Even changed phones, but it still
didn't work...

voice register pool  2
 id mac 001A.2F75.2336
 type 7961
 number 1 dn 2
 dialplan 1
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify
 username 3006 password cisco
 description 32143006
 codec g711ulaw
!

dial-peer voice 3600 voip
 destination-pattern 3600
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2
 incoming called-number 399[89]
 dtmf-relay sip-notify rtp-nte
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad
!

I never heard that you had to add the rtp-nte to the SIP dial-peer to CUE,
since CUE only uses sip-notify...

Thanks,

-Dave

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 configure dial-peer to cue and voice register pools with dtmf-relay
 sip-notify rtp-nte, create profile  restart phones. Should work fine.

 regards
 kobel

 On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 00:50, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I was wondering if someone can suggest what may be the problem with my CME
 SIP phone or CUE setup.  The SCCP can access the CUE mailbox just fine.  MWI
 also works.  (Outcall + SIP Notify for the SIP phone.)  But when I call CUE
 from the CME SIP Phone, CUE does not recognize any DTMF signals.  I do see
 CCSIP NOTIFY messages when I press a key...

 I already did several create profile, reset, even restarted the router and
 CUE module.  I think my config is right...  But I may be missing something
 really stupid...


 Here are some configs and debugs for reference...

 I pressed 1 on the SIP phone that resulted in below
 BR2-RTR#
 Nov 21 04:43:54.203: //-1//SIP/Msg/sipDisplayBinaryData:
  Sending: Binary Message Body
 Nov 21 04:43:54.203: Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
 00 00 07 D0
 Nov 21 04:43:54.207: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Sent:
 NOTIFY sip:3...@10.10.202.2:5060 SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
 From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
 ;tag=238694-1F
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
 Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
 Max-Forwards: 70
 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 04:43:54 GMT
 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
 Event: telephone-event
 Subscription-State: active
 Contact: sip:10.10.202.1:5060
 Content-Type: audio/telephone-event
 Content-Length: 4

 .P
 Nov 21 04:43:54.219: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
 Received:

 BR2-RTR#SIP/2.0 200 Ok
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK90189F
 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.2 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.2;tag=cued2c62451
 From: br2 phn 4 sip:3...@10.10.202.1 sip%3a3...@10.10.202.1
 ;tag=238694-1F
 Call-ID: c2ca34c0-f46011df-810da94a-d18d3...@10.10.202.1
 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY
 Content-Length: 0
 Allow-Events: refer
 Allow-Events: telephone-event
 Allow-Events: message-summary



 BR2-RTR#sh run | be voice serv
 voice service voip
  allow-connections h323 to h323
  allow-connections h323 to sip
  allow-connections sip to h323
  allow-connections sip to sip
  sip
   bind control source-interface Vlan400
   bind media source-interface Vlan400
   registrar server
 !
 !
 !


 BR2-RTR#
 BR2-RTR#sh run | be dial-p
 dial-peer voice 3600 voip
  destination-pattern 3600
  session protocol sipv2
  session target ipv4:10.10.202.2
  incoming called-number 399[89]
  dtmf-relay sip-notify
  codec g711ulaw
  no vad
 !

 BR2-RTR#sh run | be voice register
 voice register global
  mode cme
  source-address 10.10.202.1 port 5060
  max-dn 2
  max-pool 2
  authenticate register
  timezone 13
  time-format 24
  date-format D/M/Y
  voicemail 3600
  tftp-path flash:
  create profile sync 712964732422
  ntp-server 10.10.100.2 mode unicast
 !
 !
 voice register dn  2
  number 3006
  call-forward b2bua busy 3600
  call-forward b2bua noan 3600 timeout 12
  name br2 phn 4
  mwi

 voice register pool  2
  id mac 0017.95D0.231B
  type 7961
  number 1 dn 2
  dialplan 1
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify
  username 3006 password cisco
  description 32143006
  codec g711ulaw
 !



 Thanks,

 -Dave

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 73

2010-11-14 Thread David Lee
Hi Steve,

I am working on the same thing.  Assuming RSVP that it was working before
WAN MLP was configured, please check a couple of things:

1) the ip rsvp bandwidth XYZ is configured under interface virtual-template

2) the IOS version of your routers.

#2 was the reason why mine was not working.  My HQ was using 12.4.15T, when
all other routers are 12.4.20T.  After spending 4 hours looking at this, I
noticed the IOS discrepency, and upgraded the HQ router and it worked right
away...





 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:54:12 -0500
 From: Stern, Larry larry.st...@nuvt.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP RSVP
 Message-ID:
7a9cd5557b56734d9e44c62bd440454d04577...@ny01em02.nuvt.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1


 Hi all

 I going crazy trying to figure out this issue. I use a Hardware VPN to
 connect to PL
 with 7960 and 7961 phones. I am doing LAB 10A part 10.1 RSVP call agent.

 I have BR1 to HQ set to Manadtory under the Locations in CUCM and have all
 the DP settings and MRG and MRGL's as per the PG guide. My HQ and BR1
 routers have ip rsvp bandwidth set to 80K on interface serial 0/0/1.0.1 on
 both Routers and my software MTP's are registered. But when I make one call
 between HQ and BR1 or vice versa, I get not enough bandwidth. My max
 sessions software is set for 4 on my router dspfarm MTP profile on both
 sides. If I remove the mandatory RSVP setting on the locations in CUCM, I
 can make the call no problem. Has anyone run into a similar issue?

 After getting frustrated I dumped the final config's into the routers and
 have the same issue.

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP

2010-11-13 Thread David A
Hi All,

I was doing a scenario where in I have HQ gateway setup as a CUBE.

HQ = MGCP - phones in CUCM - 5002 - Region HQ with 729 to CUBE
BR2 = CME - SCCP Phones
CUBE trunk - Region g729 with all

I am doing Early Offer on the CUBE with inbount and outbound faststart
and it works fine

My intial undersanding is that mtp is needed on HQ gateway with
g729. Call works fine and both phones use g729.

I however configured a transcoder with g711 and 729 and replaced the
mtp. Call works fine however in this case HQ phone uses g711 and CME
uses g729 and I see 2 sessions on transcoder.

All dialpeers are g729 (default voip)

Can someone please help me understand why the codec used on HQ is g711
in case of transcoder and g729 incase of MTP?

Thanks in advance

DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP

2010-11-13 Thread David A
Thanks Randall and Mann

I tested this and works just like you guys explained.

 I agree Randall that the call drops when using g729 on the
transcoder. Thanks a lot for the insight :)  I think I would use mtp
for CUBE rather than a transcoder since the call is g729 across.

Thanks Again
DA

On 11/13/10, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.com wrote:
 David

 If my understanding is right, MTPs also have a DP that they can be
 associated to ( I don't have a UCM in-front of me now). So I believe
 you have your MTP in the HQ Region which is talking G729 to the CUBE
 Trunk Region. And so with MTP its a G729 Call.

 But with XCoder, which doesn't happen to have any DP, you seem to have
 it support both G711  G729 Codecs. UCM will always prefer a higher
 quality Codec between 2 Endpoints, and so G711 is rightly being
 negotiated between HQ  XCoder. But the other side is CME whose
 incoming Dial Peer must be hardcoded to G729  so your XCoder is
 converting the media stream to G729 for that feed.

 I hope this makes sense.

 Good day.
 Mann

 On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:30 PM,
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com wrote:
 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
        ccie_vo...@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
        ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP (David A)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:36:48 -0500
 From: David A david.a...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE Early Offer - Transcoder vs MTP
 Message-ID:
        aanlktin79qdfszb8fvwt8fczdcdwq9ecm0gjbnz+a...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 Hi All,

 I was doing a scenario where in I have HQ gateway setup as a CUBE.

 HQ = MGCP - phones in CUCM - 5002 - Region HQ with 729 to CUBE
 BR2 = CME - SCCP Phones
 CUBE trunk - Region g729 with all

 I am doing Early Offer on the CUBE with inbount and outbound faststart
 and it works fine

 My intial undersanding is that mtp is needed on HQ gateway with
 g729. Call works fine and both phones use g729.

 I however configured a transcoder with g711 and 729 and replaced the
 mtp. Call works fine however in this case HQ phone uses g711 and CME
 uses g729 and I see 2 sessions on transcoder.

 All dialpeers are g729 (default voip)

 Can someone please help me understand why the codec used on HQ is g711
 in case of transcoder and g729 incase of MTP?

 Thanks in advance

 DA


 --

 ___
 CCIE_Voice mailing list
 CCIE_Voice@onlinestudylist.com
 http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice


 End of CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 57, Issue 67
 **


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

2010-11-10 Thread David A
Hi Tamer,

I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to
configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity
Connection

Thanks,
DA

On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
 Tamer,

 try dialing the pilot point directly.
 for example dial 5600 (VM pilot)
 Do you get the unity prompt or not ?
 then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings.
 make sure the phone uses the VM profile.

 also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens.
 the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone.

 regards, Ron


 Hi Tamer,

 Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View
 Access on Unity Connection


 Thanks,
 DA

 On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote:
 David,
 Yes it should works.
 Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and check
 what is
 your default voicemail profile.

 Tamer,

 -Original Message-
 From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
 [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David A
 Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

 Hi All,

 The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto
 Voicemail system via the services button on phone.

 This works fine for CUE access.

 Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is it
 possible?


 Thanks,
 DA
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

2010-11-10 Thread David A
Thanks Roger,

I followed the document. When I test the url

http://x.x.x.x/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad

with my unity connection ip addr. I get an error -NOT Found. Do I need
a seperate license?

Thanks for the help.

DA

On 11/10/10, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello David,

 I think this might help you accomplish your goal:

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Tamer,

 I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to
 configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity
 Connection

 Thanks,
 DA

 On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
  Tamer,
 
  try dialing the pilot point directly.
  for example dial 5600 (VM pilot)
  Do you get the unity prompt or not ?
  then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings.
  make sure the phone uses the VM profile.
 
  also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens.
  the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone.
 
  regards, Ron
 
 
  Hi Tamer,
 
  Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View
  Access on Unity Connection
 
 
  Thanks,
  DA
 
  On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote:
  David,
  Yes it should works.
  Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and check
  what is
  your default voicemail profile.
 
  Tamer,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David A
  Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the
  phone
 
  Hi All,
 
  The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto
  Voicemail system via the services button on phone.
 
  This works fine for CUE access.
 
  Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is it
  possible?
 
 
  Thanks,
  DA
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
  please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

2010-11-10 Thread David A
Just found the release notes for visual voicemail and it says Unity
Connection 7.1. I guess it wont be  on the test then. Wonder why IPX
workbook is not clear.

Thanks,
DA

On 11/10/10, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks Roger,

 I followed the document. When I test the url

 http://x.x.x.x/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad

 with my unity connection ip addr. I get an error -NOT Found. Do I need
 a seperate license?

 Thanks for the help.

 DA

 On 11/10/10, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hello David,

 I think this might help you accomplish your goal:

 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Tamer,

 I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to
 configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity
 Connection

 Thanks,
 DA

 On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
  Tamer,
 
  try dialing the pilot point directly.
  for example dial 5600 (VM pilot)
  Do you get the unity prompt or not ?
  then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings.
  make sure the phone uses the VM profile.
 
  also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens.
  the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone.
 
  regards, Ron
 
 
  Hi Tamer,
 
  Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View
  Access on Unity Connection
 
 
  Thanks,
  DA
 
  On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote:
  David,
  Yes it should works.
  Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and check
  what is
  your default voicemail profile.
 
  Tamer,
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
  [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David A
  Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the
  phone
 
  Hi All,
 
  The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto
  Voicemail system via the services button on phone.
 
  This works fine for CUE access.
 
  Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is
  it
  possible?
 
 
  Thanks,
  DA
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
  please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

2010-11-10 Thread David A
Hi Roger,

I tried MIDLet and I get this error

Add failed. [25189] Vendor is required for Java MIDlet service.

Can you confirm it would work with version 7.0.1 on both cucm ana unity.

Thanks,
DA

On 11/10/10, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com wrote:
 David,

 Is the Service Category * setup as Java MIDLet or XML Service?

 Regards,
 Roger Carpio.

 On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:26 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks Roger,

 I followed the document. When I test the url

 http://x.x.x.x/midlets/VisualVoicemail/VisualVoicemail.jad

 with my unity connection ip addr. I get an error -NOT Found. Do I need
 a seperate license?

 Thanks for the help.

 DA

 On 11/10/10, Roger Carpio roger.car...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello David,
 
  I think this might help you accomplish your goal:
 
 
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cupa/visual_voicemail/7.0/english/install/guide/install_phones.html#wp1056189
 
  Regards,
  Roger Carpio.
 
  On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi Tamer,
 
  I am able to access voicemail using messages button. I was trying to
  configure the services button similar to CUE voiceview but on Unity
  Connection
 
  Thanks,
  DA
 
  On 11/10/10, rsmail...@solcon.nl rsmail...@solcon.nl wrote:
   Tamer,
  
   try dialing the pilot point directly.
   for example dial 5600 (VM pilot)
   Do you get the unity prompt or not ?
   then check the VM pilot and VM profile settings.
   make sure the phone uses the VM profile.
  
   also if you press the voicemail button, and nothing happens.
   the service doesn't exist or no VM profile configured for that phone.
  
   regards, Ron
  
  
   Hi Tamer,
  
   Any idea what the service url is to configure on CUCM for Voice View
   Access on Unity Connection
  
  
   Thanks,
   DA
  
   On 11/10/10, Tamer Ismail tih...@gmail.com wrote:
   David,
   Yes it should works.
   Check if you have voicemail service in phone services tab, and
   check
   what is
   your default voicemail profile.
  
   Tamer,
  
   -Original Message-
   From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
   [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David
 A
   Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM
   To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
   Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the
   phone
  
   Hi All,
  
   The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto
   Voicemail system via the services button on phone.
  
   This works fine for CUE access.
  
   Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is
 it
   possible?
  
  
   Thanks,
   DA
   ___
   For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
   please
   visit www.ipexpert.com
  
  
   ___
   For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
  please
   visit www.ipexpert.com
  
  
  
  
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab10 Q 4.6 - Access VM from the phone

2010-11-09 Thread David A
Hi All,

The question requires that all VM users should be able to log onto
Voicemail system via the services button on phone.

This works fine for CUE access.

Can it be done on the Unity Connection. I couldnt find anything. Is it possible?


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab 9 3.7 - GK 4 digit calls

2010-11-08 Thread David A
Hi All,

Configuration works for the requirement. However I need to make
4-digit calls to HQ from BR2. I have been trying to get this to work.
Here is my config

BR2

dial-peer voice 5 voip
 destination-pattern 5...
 session target ras
 tech-prefix 1212

On HQ

gatekeeper
 zone local US lab.com 10.10.110.1
 zone local SP lab.com
 zone prefix US 212* gw-priority 10 HQ-GW
 zone prefix US 212* gw-priority 9 SITEB-GW
 zone prefix SP 34*
 gw-type-prefix 2#* default-technology
 gw-type-prefix 617* hopoff US gw ipaddr 10.10.110.2 1720
 bandwidth interzone zone US 32
 no shutdown
 endpoint resource-threshold
 endpoint max-calls h323id HQ-GW 1

dial-peer voice 5000 voip
 incoming called-number 212
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

Here is the debug of the GK

Nov  8 23:01:47.235: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
Nov  8 23:01:47.235: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4A56ADB0,crv=0x2C, answerCall=0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239: ////GK/gk_rassrv_sep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
Nov  8 23:01:47.239: //FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_dns_query: No
Name servers
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (12125002) Matched
tech-prefix 1
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_get_addrinfo: (12125002) Matched
zone prefix 212 and remainder 5002
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to
check the source side, src_zonep=0x4A526330
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is SP, and z_invianamelen=0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to
check the destination side, dst_zonep=0x4A4EF860
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone
is US, and z_outvianamelen=0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
////GK/gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: ARQ
non-std ingress network = 1
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone=
US, remote zone= SP, call direction= 0, eptype= 67650 be_entry= 0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns
proxied = 0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239: //FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_gw_select_px:
Source and destination endpoints in different local zones
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone=
SP, remote zone= US, call direction= 1, eptype= 67650 be_entry= 0
Nov  8 23:01:47.239:
//FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns
proxied = 0
Nov  8 23:01:47.255: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
Nov  8 23:01:47.255: ////GK/gk_rassrv_arq:
arqp=0x4A5337D0,crv=0x13, answerCall=1
Nov  8 23:01:47.255: //FE8B4B338117/FE8B4B338119/GK/gk_rassrv_dep_arq:
ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
Nov  8 23:01:47.315: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
Nov  8 23:01:47.319: ////GK/gk_process:
QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup


Can anyone help?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab6 QOS Configuration

2010-11-07 Thread David A
Hi Natan,

If the question does not specify anything then what overhead type and
how many bytes do we use.

Thanks for replying.

DA

On 11/7/10, natan 2me natan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi. For the calculation of MLP I would always use 13 and for FRF.12 7
 bytes.  I as well used go with 10 for MLP, this is kind of an AVG between
 QOS and CM SRND..  But, we should go with QOS. Correct me people if I am
 wrong.

 thanks, Natan

 On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 1:35 AM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 In Vol2 Lab6 we are require to do LLQ between HQ and BR2. No CRTP and
 the link is 1024k

 From the solution - priority bandwidth = 224 for 8 calls.

 So FR overhead used is 10 bytes

 10 + 40(IP/UDP) + 20 (g729 sample) = 70 * 8 = 560 * 50 pps = 28000 = 28k

 8 calls = 8 * 28 = 224k

 From SRND - FR overhead is 4 bytes.

 Why is the solution using 10 byte L2 overhead. Can anyone help me
 undestand.

 Thanks,
 DA
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] background images - the quickest way?

2010-11-07 Thread David A
Hi All,

Is there a TFTP server on the student desktop in the real lab to tftp
files to CME?

Thanks,
DA

On 11/7/10, Francisco . ondmount...@hotmail.com wrote:

 You should have access to cisco documentation in the lab.

 https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/certifications/ccie_voice/lab_exam?tab=overview

 Lab Environment
 The Cisco documentation CD is available in the lab room, but the exam
 assumes knowledge of the more common protocols and technologies. As of March
 2006, the documentation can only be navigated using the index; the search
 function has been disabled. No outside reference materials are permitted in
 the lab room. You must report any suspected equipment issues to the proctor
 during the exam; adjustments cannot be made once the exam is over.






 From: findko...@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:21:18 +0100
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] background images - the quickest way?

 Hi,

 I was wondering if there is any quicker way (other then memorizing the
 xml...) to get the information necessary to configure background images on
 7900 phones?

 I currently search for this document to get the xml, but it takes some
 precious time:
 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/7975G_7971g-ge_7970g_7965g_7945g/8_0/english/administration/guide/7970cst.html

 any other tips?

 regards
 kobel

 ___ For more information
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab7 - MVA calling

2010-11-06 Thread David A
Hi All,

I have done this scenario a few times and whenever I remove the phone
partition (pt-phones) from the CSS (css-snr) of the RDP, my calls from
MVA (pressing 1) simply fail.

Because of the requirement of E164 Calling Number on 5002/1002 I am
translating  to e164 ANI and it works fine for that step. But if I
add pt-phones to css-snr the MVA works but I see a 4-digit ANI on
1002/5002.

Has anyone got this working for both requirements. For me its either
one that works not both.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MWI for Unity Connection Broadcast Messages

2010-11-06 Thread David A
Hi All,

Is there a way to get MWI for Broadcast messages on Unity Connection?
. I could not get it to work.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab6 QOS Configuration

2010-11-05 Thread David A
Hi All,

In Vol2 Lab6 we are require to do LLQ between HQ and BR2. No CRTP and
the link is 1024k

From the solution - priority bandwidth = 224 for 8 calls.

So FR overhead used is 10 bytes

10 + 40(IP/UDP) + 20 (g729 sample) = 70 * 8 = 560 * 50 pps = 28000 = 28k

8 calls = 8 * 28 = 224k

From SRND - FR overhead is 4 bytes.

Why is the solution using 10 byte L2 overhead. Can anyone help me undestand.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW Qos configuration

2010-11-02 Thread David A
Hi All,

On the ESW modules on Br1 and Br2, is it possible to configure any
switch QOS. The solution guide to labs is not very explanatory. I
would really appreciate some help as I am confused.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab3 Qos - HQ and BR1 - Not enough bandwidth

2010-11-02 Thread David A
Hi All,

Without QOS RSVP worked fine. After I enabled MLP LFI between HQ and
BR1 I cannot make calls from HQ to BR1 and vice versa. I get Not
Enough Bandwidth on the phones. The RSVP configuration is normal and
worked before I added WAN QOS.I have reloaded the gateways.

 When I remove the RSVP location on the CUCM it works fine. Here are my configs

HQ===

class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
 match ip dscp ef
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
 match ip dscp cs3
 match ip dscp af31
!
!
policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
priority 61
   compress header ip rtp
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
bandwidth 16
 class class-default
fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay traffic-shaping
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
 ip rsvp bandwidth 112
!
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 bandwidth 384
 ip pim dense-mode
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201 ppp Virtual-Template200
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  auto qos voip trust fr-atm
 ip rsvp bandwidth 112
 ip rsvp signalling dscp 46
!
interface Virtual-Template200
 bandwidth 384
 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink interleave
 ppp multilink fragment delay 10
 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust
!
map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
 frame-relay cir 364800
 frame-relay bc 3648
 frame-relay be 0
 frame-relay mincir 364800
!


BR1

class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-UnTrust
 match access-group name AutoQoS-VoIP-Control
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-UnTrust
 match protocol rtp audio
 match access-group name AutoQoS-VoIP-RTCP
!
!
policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-UnTrust
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-UnTrust
  set dscp ef
priority 61
   compress header ip rtp
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-UnTrust
  set dscp af31
bandwidth 16
 class class-default
fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/0/0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay traffic-shaping
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
 ip rsvp bandwidth 112
!
interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 bandwidth 384
 ip pim dense-mode
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 101 ppp Virtual-Template200
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-101
  auto qos voip fr-atm
 ip rsvp bandwidth 112
 ip rsvp signalling dscp 46
!
!
interface Virtual-Template200
 bandwidth 384
 ip address 10.10.111.2 255.255.255.0
 ppp multilink
 ppp multilink interleave
 ppp multilink fragment delay 10
 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-UnTrust
!
!
ip access-list extended AutoQoS-VoIP-Control
 permit tcp any any eq 1720
 permit tcp any any range 11000 11999
 permit udp any any eq 2427
 permit tcp any any eq 2428
 permit tcp any any range 2000 2002
 permit udp any any eq 1719
 permit udp any any eq 5060
ip access-list extended AutoQoS-VoIP-RTCP
 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
!
!
map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-101
 frame-relay cir 364800
 frame-relay bc 3648
 frame-relay be 0
 frame-relay mincir 364800
!

Kindly help.


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One way audio issue on BR1 after applying autoqos on HQ

2010-11-01 Thread David A
Hi Daniel,

The one way audio issue is resolved when I remove the service policy
off the interface, so I feel it is the QOS thats breaking it and not a
routing issue.

I definitely agree that manual QOS configuration is the way to go but
my strategy is to do QOS upfront and issues like this shake my
confidence in QOS.

I am a bit worried that this might happen to me in the lab.

Thanks,
DA

On 11/1/10, Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi David.

 Are you sure your one way audio is not caused by routing issues?
 Anyway if you are sure the problem is auto-qos just reload the router.

 To answer the question regarding what you may be doing wrong, I would say
 you are running auto-qos.  Do not run it.  If you can't live without it,
 then apply it with the serial interfaces in shutdown, this way it will never
 screw with the IOS internal order of operations.

 Cheers



 On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:31 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 I am configuring autoqos as below between HQ and BR1 - 1536k link.
 After applying the config  on HQ I do not receive any audio on the
 phone from any WAN device ie HQ and BR2.

 Here is my config

 HQ

 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
  match ip dscp ef
 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
  match ip dscp cs3
  match ip dscp af31
 !


 policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
bandwidth percent 5
  class class-default
fair-queue

 interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
  bandwidth 1536
  ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  auto qos voip trust

 map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  frame-relay cir 1459200
  frame-relay bc 14592
  frame-relay be 0
  frame-relay mincir 1459200
  service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb



 Same config is on BR1

 What am I doing wrong.

 Thanks,
  DA
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One way audio issue on BR1 after applying autoqos on HQ

2010-11-01 Thread David A
Hi Miron,

Yes I have the compression header ip rtp on the rtp class-maps on both.


Do you think it has anything to do with trust and not having a bad
configuration on the switch.

Thanks,
DA

On 11/1/10, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
 hi, check if you have crtp enabled on the remote side.

 regards

 --
 Sent from my mobile device.

 On 1 Nov 2010 01:44, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 I am configuring autoqos as below between HQ and BR1 - 1536k link.
 After applying the config  on HQ I do not receive any audio on the
 phone from any WAN device ie HQ and BR2.

 Here is my config

 HQ

 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
  match ip dscp ef
 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
  match ip dscp cs3
  match ip dscp af31
 !


 policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
bandwidth percent 5
  class class-default
fair-queue

 interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
  bandwidth 1536
  ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  auto qos voip trust

 map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  frame-relay cir 1459200
  frame-relay bc 14592
  frame-relay be 0
  frame-relay mincir 1459200
  service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb



 Same config is on BR1

 What am I doing wrong.

 Thanks,
  DA
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] One way audio issue on BR1 after applying autoqos on HQ

2010-11-01 Thread David A
I meant bad config on the switch.

On 11/1/10, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Miron,

 Yes I have the compression header ip rtp on the rtp class-maps on both.


 Do you think it has anything to do with trust and not having a bad
 configuration on the switch.

 Thanks,
 DA

 On 11/1/10, Miron Kobelski findko...@gmail.com wrote:
 hi, check if you have crtp enabled on the remote side.

 regards

 --
 Sent from my mobile device.

 On 1 Nov 2010 01:44, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 I am configuring autoqos as below between HQ and BR1 - 1536k link.
 After applying the config  on HQ I do not receive any audio on the
 phone from any WAN device ie HQ and BR2.

 Here is my config

 HQ

 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
  match ip dscp ef
 class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
  match ip dscp cs3
  match ip dscp af31
 !


 policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
  class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
bandwidth percent 5
  class class-default
fair-queue

 interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
  bandwidth 1536
  ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0
  snmp trap link-status
  frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  auto qos voip trust

 map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  frame-relay cir 1459200
  frame-relay bc 14592
  frame-relay be 0
  frame-relay mincir 1459200
  service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb



 Same config is on BR1

 What am I doing wrong.

 Thanks,
  DA
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] One way audio issue on BR1 after applying autoqos on HQ

2010-10-31 Thread David A
Hi All,

I am configuring autoqos as below between HQ and BR1 - 1536k link.
After applying the config  on HQ I do not receive any audio on the
phone from any WAN device ie HQ and BR2.

Here is my config

HQ

class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
 match ip dscp ef
class-map match-any AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
 match ip dscp cs3
 match ip dscp af31
!


policy-map AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-RTP-Trust
priority percent 33
   compress header ip rtp
 class AutoQoS-VoIP-Control-Trust
bandwidth percent 5
 class class-default
fair-queue

interface Serial0/0/0.1 point-to-point
 bandwidth 1536
 ip address 10.10.111.1 255.255.255.0
 snmp trap link-status
 frame-relay interface-dlci 201
  class AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
  auto qos voip trust

map-class frame-relay AutoQoS-FR-Se0/0/0-201
 frame-relay cir 1459200
 frame-relay bc 14592
 frame-relay be 0
 frame-relay mincir 1459200
 service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-Trust-siteb



Same config is on BR1

What am I doing wrong.

Thanks,
 DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

2010-10-28 Thread David A
Hi Waleed,



The question says - Users hqph2 and br1ph2 (mailbox users) press the
Messages button and then press # to go get opening greeting. FROM THERE they
should be able to dial extensions which do not have a mailbox on unity ie
5001,1001 etc.

Is that what you are trying to do ? Its not for users who dont have a
mailbox



I have done this and it works everytime.



Thanks,

DA







2010/10/28 Waleed Elhadidy walid...@hotmail.com

 I already done that. Did you do it from user phone with mailbox ? It only
 works with users with no mailbox. Did anyone answer task 4.4 in lab 7 volume
 2 ? Any one can assist me to solve this task. Clear steps will be more
 accurate. Please see my problem below:


 Connection between cucm and unity connection is sip trunk. All CSSs of
 trunk contain partitions of phones. The issue is not with transferring.
 Users with no mailbox can be transferred to any number they dial during
 opening greeting, so problem is not with transferring. The problem is with
 users who have mailboxes. When I press the message button and login, I can't
 dial any number during the greeting. It says invalid entry. It only allows
 the predefined options of the greeting to choose from (eg. 1 for new
 messages, 2 to send messages,etc).

 Thanks in advance

 Regards,

 Waleed


 --
 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:43:09 +0800
 From: vcc...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

 Under Restriction Table  Default System Transfer  Uncheck the Blocked
 checkbox for pattern *

 It works for me

 ___ For more information
 regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
 www.ipexpert.com

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CBarge in SRST not working

2010-10-26 Thread David A
Hi All,

Was trying to configure CBarge in SRST with autoprovision none. I
did go thru all the previous threads but it didnt help. I am using
7975 phones

Config -

===

telephony-service
 sdspfarm units 2
 sdspfarm tag 1 sitec-xcoder
 sdspfarm tag 2 sitec-conf
 conference hardware
 srst mode auto-provision none
 srst ephone template 1
 srst dn template 1
 srst dn line-mode dual-octo
 max-ephones 5
 max-dn 15 preference 5
 ip source-address 10.10.202.1 port 2000
 timeouts interdigit 5
 mwi relay
 max-conferences 8 gain -6
 moh music-on-hold.au
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.10.202.1 10.10.110.3
 transfer-system full-consult
 create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Oct 26 2010 15:06:35
!
!
ephone-template  1
 softkeys remote-in-use  CBarge Newcall
 softkeys idle  Newcall Redial Cfwdall
!
!
ephone-dn  14  octo-line
 number 3020 no-reg primary
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 5
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone-dn  15  octo-line
 number 3030 no-reg primary
 conference ad-hoc
 preference 1
 no huntstop
!
!
ephone  1
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none
!
!
!
ephone  2
 privacy off
 device-security-mode none
!

=

DSP resources are registered when in SRST

I get dialtone when I press the button. The cbarge keys flash and thats it.


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Limiting Max MOH streams

2010-10-25 Thread David A
Hi All,

I would like to know if it is possible to limit the number of MOH stremas in
HQ location. MOH to HQ is g711.

I do see the Max Half Duplex Streams in the MOHserver.



 Any ideas?



Thanks,

DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab9 - No audio when calling CME phone and CFNA to CUE

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi All,

I have the CUE integrated with SiteC CME and calls from HQ/B over
GK. Transcoder configued on SiteC for calls to CUE from WAN. When I call
3600 (CUE VM pilot) directly from HQ or SiteB phone I can get the CUE
prompt. However when I call 3002 and let it roll over to VM there is no
audio on the phone. I can see the transcoder invoked on the call and if I
hold long enough I get a blank voicemail.

The bandwidth setting on GK is 32k for max 2 calls from zone HQ to all
remotes.


Any idea why I dont get audio on rolling over to VM?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE Voice View Express

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi All,

I added the following two commands to the telephony service to enable
voiceview. I am able to login and see the greetings/messages. However cannot
play them back. Geta 404.

url services http://10.10.202.2/voiceview/common/login.do
 url authentication http://10.10.202.1/CCMCIP/authenticate.asp

Do I need to add anything else?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phone - call-forward all to VM

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi All,

I was working on a scenario where I need a number 1003 on a SIP CME
call-forward all to voicemail.

I created a voice register dn with number 1003 and call-forwaded to 1600 the
voicemail pilot.

When I dial this number I get fastbusy and debug shows no dial-peer with
1003 and there is no dial-peer with 1003 in show dial-peer voice summ.

What am I missing?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phone - call-forward all to VM

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi Daniel,

I can reach Unity Connection (not a CUE) when I dial 1600 and from the
messages button. Also CFNA from 1002 (CME SIP ext) works fine.

Now I added a hunt group 1000


voice hunt-group 1 parallel
 final 1003
 list 1001,1002
 timeout 12
 pilot 1000

the final dest is 1003 with foll

voice register dn  3
 number 1003
 call-forward b2bua all 1600
 call-forward b2bua mailbox 1000
 mwi
I do not see 1003 as a dial peer

#sh dial-peer v summary
dial-peer hunt 0
 ADPRE PASS
OUT
TAGTYPE  MIN  OPER PREFIXDEST-PATTERN  FER THRU SESS-TARGET
STAT PORT
1  pots  up   up0
down
911pots  up   up 9110
up   0/1/0:23
9011   pots  up   up   011   9011T  0
up   0/1/0:23
2  pots  up   up0
down 0/1/0:23
1212   pots  up   up 1212T  0
up   0/1/0:23
3000   voip  up   up 3...   0  syst ras
5000   voip  up   up 5...   0  syst
ipv4:10.137.151.249
1600   voip  up   up 1600   0  syst
ipv4:10.137.151.27
1000   voip  up   up 1000   0  syst loopback:rtp
40001  voip  up   up 1001   0  syst ipv4:
10.10.201.51:50
40002  voip  up   up 1002   0  syst ipv4:
10.10.201.50:50



So when I call to 1003 I  get fastbusy.  Since there is no dial-peer it
would never work. I am not sure how to make the dial-peer show up without
assigning the ext to a phone.

Thanks,
DA



On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.comwrote:

 what does debug ccsip messages show you?

 If you ring from CME to CUE does it work?

 Can you provide a bit more info?

 Cheers

   On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:11 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi All,

 I was working on a scenario where I need a number 1003 on a SIP CME
 call-forward all to voicemail.

 I created a voice register dn with number 1003 and call-forwaded to 1600
 the voicemail pilot.

 When I dial this number I get fastbusy and debug shows no dial-peer with
 1003 and there is no dial-peer with 1003 in show dial-peer voice summ.

 What am I missing?

 Thanks,
 DA


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME SIP phone - call-forward all to VM

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi Randal,

I get your point. With this config how do I get an MWI for 1003 show up on
mailbox 1002?

Thanks,
DA

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:

 What is the purpose of doing it a SIP CME dn ?

 For what you want, would be better just a regular SIP dial peer with a
 translation rule that adds in the redirecting number:
 voice translation-rule 1
  rule 1 // /1003/
 voice translation-rule 2
  rule 1 /1003/ /1600/

 voice translation-profile anythingulike
  translate redirected-called 1
  translate called 2

 dial-peer 1003
  destination-pattern 1003
  translation-profile out anything
  session target ipv4:yourunity
  session protocol sipv2
  etc

 Not sure if it is the most optimum, but I believe you will get what you
 want.

 Cheers.


 On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Daniel,

 I can reach Unity Connection (not a CUE) when I dial 1600 and from the
 messages button. Also CFNA from 1002 (CME SIP ext) works fine.

 Now I added a hunt group 1000


 voice hunt-group 1 parallel
  final 1003
  list 1001,1002
  timeout 12
  pilot 1000

 the final dest is 1003 with foll

 voice register dn  3
  number 1003
  call-forward b2bua all 1600
  call-forward b2bua mailbox 1000
  mwi
 I do not see 1003 as a dial peer

 #sh dial-peer v summary
 dial-peer hunt 0
  ADPRE PASS
 OUT
 TAGTYPE  MIN  OPER PREFIXDEST-PATTERN  FER THRU SESS-TARGET
 STAT PORT
 1  pots  up   up0
 down
 911pots  up   up 9110
 up   0/1/0:23
 9011   pots  up   up   011   9011T  0
 up   0/1/0:23
 2  pots  up   up0
 down 0/1/0:23
 1212   pots  up   up 1212T  0
 up   0/1/0:23
 3000   voip  up   up 3...   0  syst ras
 5000   voip  up   up 5...   0  syst
 ipv4:10.137.151.249
 1600   voip  up   up 1600   0  syst
 ipv4:10.137.151.27
 1000   voip  up   up 1000   0  syst loopback:rtp
 40001  voip  up   up 1001   0  syst ipv4:
 10.10.201.51:50
 40002  voip  up   up 1002   0  syst ipv4:
 10.10.201.50:50



 So when I call to 1003 I  get fastbusy.  Since there is no dial-peer it
 would never work. I am not sure how to make the dial-peer show up without
 assigning the ext to a phone.

 Thanks,
 DA



 On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Daniel Berlinski 
 dberlin...@gmail.comwrote:

 what does debug ccsip messages show you?

 If you ring from CME to CUE does it work?

 Can you provide a bit more info?

 Cheers

   On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:11 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi All,

 I was working on a scenario where I need a number 1003 on a SIP CME
 call-forward all to voicemail.

 I created a voice register dn with number 1003 and call-forwaded to 1600
 the voicemail pilot.

 When I dial this number I get fastbusy and debug shows no dial-peer with
 1003 and there is no dial-peer with 1003 in show dial-peer voice summ.

 What am I missing?

 Thanks,
 DA


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com




 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com




 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
 CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab9 B-ACD

2010-10-18 Thread David A
Hi All,

I configured as below however after calling when I press 0 or 1 I go to the
3100 huntgroup. I never get the AA on 3500 even though I have param aa-hunt0
3500. I can reach 3100 and 3500 when dialing directly. What am I missing?

dial-peer voice 3000 voip
 service aa
 destination-pattern 3000
 session target ipv4:10.10.110.3
 incoming called-number 3000
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 codec g711ulaw
 no vad

application
 service app-b-acd
  param number-of-hunt-grps 2
  param aa-hunt0 3500
  param aa-hunt1 3100
  param queue-len 15
  param queue-manager-debugs 1
!
 service app-b-acd-aa
  paramspace english index 1
  paramspace english language en
  paramspace english location flash:bacdprompts/
  param service-name app-b-acd
  param handoff-string app-b-acd-aa
  param aa-pilot 3000
  param welcome-prompt _bacd_welcome.au

  param number-of-hunt-grps 2
  param second-greeting-time 60
  param call-retry-timer 15
  param max-time-call-retry 120
  param max-time-vm-retry 2
  param voice-mail 3600
!


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab7 cue aar

2010-10-17 Thread David A
Hi Roger,

I have the EPNM on the CTI ports set to the CTI-RP/VM pilot ie 3600 and EPMN
is 02077353600. I have no idea why the call doesnt pass thru to the gateway.

Thanks,
DA




2010/10/17 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se

  You need to set the EPNM on the CTI ports to point to the number of the
 CTI RP for CUE. This is since the call can not go directly to the CTI ports,
 it has to first be sent to the CTI RP, then on to the CTI port.

 Sincerely

  *Roger Källberg*
 CCIE #26199 (Voice)
 Consultant
 Cygate AB
  --
 *Från:* David A [david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Skickat:* den 16 oktober 2010 19:18
 *Till:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Ämne:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab7 cue aar

Hi all,


 I always get a busy when I configure AAR for cue and dial from HQ or SiteB.


 I have aar group on all the phones and lines. cue external mask is same as
 the sietc phones. cti ports and cti rp have aar css and aar group. I do not
 see the call go out of any of the gateways.

 Anyone face similar issues.


 Thanks,
 DA

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab7 Cbarge issue

2010-10-16 Thread David A
Hi,

When PSTN mobile number of 3002 calls into HQ aand I press the Cbarge using
single button barge on 3002 I hear a fast busy and confernce fails. However
when I remove the location bandwidth on sitec it works fine.

Location - SiteC is 48k
Location - SiteB is 48k
Location - HQ is unlimited


Region - g729 betweenn HQ and remote branches and 711 intrasite.

Conference bridge is configured on SiteC-GW and is registerd to CUCM in DP
SiteC and Location Hub_None.

*** When I change the location BW to unlimited on SiteC I am able to barge
in. Here I see that codec on the SiteC phone to conference bridge is g711
since it is in the same region.

Any idea why my calls fail when location BW is 48? Intrasite calls should
not be subject to CAC right?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab7 cue aar

2010-10-16 Thread David A
Hi all,


I always get a busy when I configure AAR for cue and dial from HQ or SiteB.

I have aar group on all the phones and lines. cue external mask is same as
the sietc phones. cti ports and cti rp have aar css and aar group. I do not
see the call go out of any of the gateways.

Anyone face similar issues.


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab6 4.2 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-13 Thread David A
I already have g722 disabled. The solution works with a transcoder on CME
but I wonder if it is the correct solution.

Thanks,
DA

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Ayman_labib ayman_la...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Had the same problem with my lab.  I had to disable G722 on cucm

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Oct 12, 2010, at 10:56 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi All,
 
  I have configurd the gk as required and have the appropriate dial-peers
 configured on CME.  Here is the setup
 
  CUCM - HQ region - 711 intra and 729 with B
  B region - 711 intra and 729 HQ
 
  CME - Both phones are SIP and g711
 
  gk-trunk is in HQ Device pool with MTP required checked and Wait for
 far end h245  checked
 
 
  Foll dial-peer for incoming on CME
 
  dial-peer voice 3 voip
   translation-profile incoming from-gk
   session target ras
   incoming called-number .
   dtmf-relay h245-signal h245-alphanumeric
   no vad
 
  I added a transcoder on CME for SiteB phones calling CME and it works,
 transcoder is invoked at CME since SiteB  is using g729 with HQ region (gk
 in HQ) and calling CME g711 only phone.
 
  PROBLEM - When I call from HQ phone to CME phone I see the codec on HQ
 phone as g729 and on CME as g711 and transcoder invoked. WHY? since both
 gk-trunk and HQ phones are in HQ DP and g711 intra and CME phone is g711.
 (my guess was the dial-peer is g729)
 
  Now if I add a voice-class codec on the incoming dial peer on CME it
 works but SiteB to CME calls fails and even adding a transcoder on SiteB GW
 and Sitapplying it to the gk-trunk does not help.
 
  I am not sure why this is happening. Can anyone please help.
 
 
  Thanks,
  DA
 
 
 
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab6 4.2 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-12 Thread David A
Hi All,

I have configurd the gk as required and have the appropriate dial-peers
configured on CME.  Here is the setup

CUCM - HQ region - 711 intra and 729 with B
B region - 711 intra and 729 HQ

CME - Both phones are SIP and g711

gk-trunk is in HQ Device pool with MTP required checked and Wait for far
end h245  checked


Foll dial-peer for incoming on CME

dial-peer voice 3 voip
 translation-profile incoming from-gk
 session target ras
 incoming called-number .
 dtmf-relay h245-signal h245-alphanumeric
 no vad

 I added a transcoder on CME for SiteB phones calling CME and it works,
transcoder is invoked at CME since SiteB  is using g729 with HQ region (gk
in HQ) and calling CME g711 only phone.

PROBLEM - When I call from HQ phone to CME phone I see the codec on HQ phone
as g729 and on CME as g711 and transcoder invoked. WHY? since both gk-trunk
and HQ phones are in HQ DP and g711 intra and CME phone is g711. (my guess
was the dial-peer is g729)

Now if I add a voice-class codec on the incoming dial peer on CME it works
but SiteB to CME calls fails and even adding a transcoder on SiteB GW and
Sitapplying it to the gk-trunk does not help.

I am not sure why this is happening. Can anyone please help.


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab5 ANI manipulation (no manipulation in route pattern or route list)

2010-10-10 Thread David A
Hi,

I am doing the Vol2 Lab5 Dial Plan. For emg,local, ld and international the
ANI requested is different TYPE everytime and we are instructed not to use
route pattern or route list.

So if I create a Calling Party Transformation for 4XXX out of HQ gateway and
mark it as TYPE Subscriber for Local Call it will do it for all 5XXX phones
that call out of the HQ gateway. How can I modify this for International
calls to TYPE International with the same incoming ani 4XXX.

How is it possibe to have different ANI TYPE for same calling number (not
using rp or rl) ?


Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cannot route call through GK

2010-10-09 Thread David Lee
Never mind.  Just checked, and the CM-A cannot ping CM-C, but CM-C can ping
CM-A.  That's why calls from CM-A cannot reach CM-C, but works vise versa.

Thanks,

-Dave


On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:18 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Call Forward Unregistered (Mark Holloway)
   2. Vouchers for sale (Mike Hurley)
   3. Re: UCCX Prompt (Arun Kumar)
   4. RES:  Call Forward Unregistered (Marcelo Alexandria)
   5. Cannot route call through GK (David Lee)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:14:37 -0700
 From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call Forward Unregistered
 Message-ID: 37d5f523-5ae4-4bdd-bce2-7efc062d6...@markholloway.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 I have had it working before, but it's odd because sometimes when I reset
 the lab rack I can get it work and other times it does not work the way I
 want.  I'm trying to figure out if I keep overlooking something.


 On Oct 8, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:

  I do not want to modify 5XXX. I want to modify 3XXX (the DN that is
 invoking CFUR) which is the Redirecting number.
 
 
  On Oct 8, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Prashant Patel wrote:
 
  Hi Mark,
 
  The easiest way is to use calling party Transformation on the outbound
 gateway.
 
  For example - 5002 calling 3002 out of local gateway. create a pt and
 assign it to a css. Assign css to the gateway calling party transformation
 css and uncheck use dp box. Now create a calling party transformation for
 5XXX in the pt and modify the ANI to use extenal mask.
 
  This will modify the ANI from 5xxx to external mask everytime the 5xxx
 makes a call out of that gateway.
 
  HTH
  Prashant
 
  On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 wrote:
  I'm trying to get my CFUR to work so it shows the External Mask in the
 For and By part of the call presentation but instead I am only getting it to
 show the 4 digit extension.  For example, lets say HQ 5001 calls BR1 3001
 (3001 is unregistered and has CFUR set in CUCM to dial out the PSTN because
 that site is in SRST mode).  The presentation on the BR1 phones is Forwarded
 HqPh1 5001, For 3001 By 3001.  Instead of 3001 I want to display the
 External Mask.  Does anyone know the proper way to do this?
 
  Thanks,
  Mark
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101008/4c20c440/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 20:26:00 -0400
 From: Mike Hurley mhur...@annese.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vouchers for sale
 Message-ID:
cb659fef50324640b503095da13fa9f401d33...@comm02.annese.local
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 CCIE #27139!   Was lucky enough to pass it on my first try!



 I now have some vouchers left over...anyone looking for extra rack
 time??   We can work something out via paypal.



 -Mike

 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101008/2cefcf54/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 06:11:29 +0530
 From: Arun Kumar a...@linux.net.in
 To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Prompt
 Message-ID:
aanlktimsfzpq=y-sbdbk212tb0whtebn5unyrr8d-...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 under SNU directory in UCCX folder.

 On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 wrote:

  Does anyone know if/what UCCX wav file says Please try again later
 
  Thanks,
  Mark
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cannot route call through GK

2010-10-08 Thread David Lee
Hello,

Can anyone offer some suggestion on what might be the cause for the
gatekeeper call routing I'm having?  Thx.  /D



I have a GK with 3 UCM H225 trunks on it.  (i.e. CM-A 2XXX, CM-B 7XXX, and
CM-C 8XXX.)

CM-C can call CM-B and CM-A
CM-B can call CM-C and CM-A
CM-A can call CM-B, but cannot call CM-C.

Essentially, I cannot call from ext 2xxx to 8xxx, but I am able to dial from
7xxx to 8xxx.


This is the gatekeeper config

gatekeeper
 zone local CM-B DBCMYZFVOIP.COM 10.25.208.14
 zone local CM-C DBCMYZFVOIP.COM
 zone local CM-B DBCMYZFVOIP.COM
 zone local CM-A DBCMYZFVOIP.COM
 zone subnet CM-B 10.25.208.10/32 enable
 zone subnet CM-B 10.25.208.11/32 enable
 zone subnet CM-C 10.25.224.151/32 enable
 zone subnet CM-C 10.25.224.152/32 enable
 no zone subnet CM-C 10.25.208.0/21 enable
 zone prefix CM-A 2...
 zone prefix CM-B 73..
 zone prefix CM-C 8...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 bandwidth interzone zone CM-C 2000
 bandwidth interzone zone CM-A 64
 no shutdown


This is the main 10.  It seems that a technology GW is selected...

YZF-SC3-COM1-3-GK-01#
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x45CD67C8, crv=0x1A3,
answerCall=0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_dns_query: No Name servers
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (8916) Tech-prefix match failed.
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (8916) Matched zone prefix 8 and
remainder 916
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the source
side, src_zonep=0x470A1D50
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is CM-A, and
z_invianamelen=0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the
destination side, dst_zonep=0x470A1890
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is CM-C, and
z_outvianamelen=0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix

*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found

*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= CM-C, remote
zone= CM-A, call direction= 0, eptype= 2050 be_entry= 0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_gw_select_px: Source and destination endpoints in
different local zones
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: local zone= CM-A, remote
zone= CM-C, call direction= 1, eptype= 2050 be_entry= 0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: gk_zone_get_proxy_usage: returns proxied = 0
*Oct  9 04:06:09.752: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Technology GW selected

*Oct  9 04:06:12.268: gk_process: got a TIMER event

*Oct  9 04:06:12.268: gk_handle_timers

*Oct  9 04:06:12.268: gk_handle_timers: managed timer expired 0x45962220
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-06 Thread David A
Hi Mann,

This worked after I changed the default interregion codec setting associated
with the bug and it works without the voice-class codec on the outbound dial
peer and I can see the transcoder invoked on all calls to the g711u CME SIP
phone. I did spend a lot of time on this and thanks to all who replied.

Thanks,
DA



On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Mann Chaddha mann.chad...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi David

 I reckon that by providing Voice Class Codec at the Outbound DP on
 CME, you have allowed the call to proceed with G711 to the GK.
 Ideally, if the Inbound DP (SIP Voice Pool in this case) and the
 Outbound DP (DP to HQ/BR1) have been hard-coded to different codec
 values, they should invoke a local XCoder. In your case, that doesn't
 happen as your outbound DP has a Voice Class Codec assigned to it.

 Why don't you hard-code the Outbound DP with G729  Inbound DP with
 G711 and then test the same?

 HTH
 Mann
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 QOS 6.2 - What autoqos to use

2010-10-06 Thread David A
Hi All,

The Qos requirement says - HQ and BR2 - Configure LFI and an appropriate
queuing method. Also appropriate Serialisation Delay.

-- I think I need to configure LFI (not MLP) with  auto qos voip trust and
the L2 overhead would be 9 bytes (so 9 + 2 + 20 = 31*8 = 248 *50 = 12400 =
12.4k per call)


Can some confirm this. I am confused.

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-05 Thread David A
Thanks Roger. I will try the workaround.

2010/10/5 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se

  Region will overwrite the default, so to work around the fix for the
 bug you need to specify the codec to G711 to be used within the region local
 to the phone/VGW/and so on.

 Sincerely

  *Roger Källberg*
 CCIE #26199 (Voice)
 Consultant
 Cygate AB
  --
 *Från:* Stutz, Bernhard [st...@pandacom.de]
 *Skickat:* den 5 oktober 2010 16:09
 *Till:* Roger Källberg; David A; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Ämne:* AW: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

If you are changing the IntraAudioRegionDefault to G.729 you will fix
 that but you will then break the requirement to have G.711 for intra
 region calls. isn't it?
 Or will in this case the Region Setting overwrite the default setting?

 cheers,
 Bernhard

 --
 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von Roger
 Källberg
 *Gesendet:* Di 05.10.2010 14:21
 *An:* David A; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

  Your hitting bug CSCsl74701. This is a well known bug that you should be
 really familiar with. There are many posts on the OSL about this and also
 Matthew Barry has an excellent post on his blog about this. See this url,
 http://ciscovoiceguru.com/382/cscsl74701-bug-details/

 Sincerely

  *Roger Källberg*
 CCIE #26199 (Voice)
 Consultant
 Cygate AB
  --
 *Från:* David A [david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Skickat:* den 4 oktober 2010 22:43
 *Till:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Ämne:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

  Hi All,

 I am doing the Vol2 Lab2 GK scenario and running into a couple of issues.

 issue 1 - Call from CME SCCP phone to CUCM phones is using 128kbps. When I
 check the codec used on the call on both phones it says g729. The gk-tunk is
 in DP GK with region g729 to everyone.

 2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
 Total number of active calls = 1.
  GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
  
 LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
 25-49659   21  128(Kbps) --- should be
 16kbps as per the requirement
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
src EP: SiteC-GW  3003
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1002
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   33447


 issue 2 - Call from CUCM to CME SIP phone(g711)  works fine and invokes the
 transcoder and i see a 16kbps GK call. However when I call from CME SIP
 phone to any CUCM phone, CUCM phone rings and I can answer it. However it
 drops after a few seconds and I see no transcoder being used. Here are my
 configs

 Site C -

 voice register pool  1
  id mac 0025.4593.0368
  type 7975
  number 1 dn 1
  number 2 dn 2
  template 1
  description 32143002
  codec g711ulaw

 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  incoming called-number .
  tech-prefix 1#
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...$
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 !

 Any clues?

 Thanks,
 DA

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-05 Thread David A
Hi Bernhard,

The outboud call from the CME SIP phone is using the dial-peer

dial-peer voice 15 voip
 destination-pattern [15]...$
 voice-class codec 1
 session target ras
 incoming called-number .
 tech-prefix 1#
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
When I place a call I get this

3845-CME-SiteC#show call active voice compact
 callID  A/O FAX Tsec Codec   typePeer Address   IP
Rip:udp
Total call-legs: 2
   290 ANS T4 g711ulawVOIPP3002
10.10.202.54:25500
   291 ORG T4 g729r8 pre- VOIPP1#1001  0.0.0.0:0

The other end is the GK and call ends on the SiteB phone. I dont think I
need a dial-peer on the GK to route to CUCM as it is done through the GK
trunk.
 I can answer the call and see it on GK

2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
Total number of active calls = 1.
 GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
 
LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
51-29194   7   16(Kbps)
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   src EP: SiteC-GW  3002
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1001
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   32796
But after answering there is no audio and call drops after a few seconds.


Thanks,
DA




On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Hi,



 You are probably hitting the 0 dial-peer. Make sure you have a inbound
 dial-peer on the other end.

 Have a look which dial-peers you are using:



 sh call active voice compact

 or

 sh call active voice brief



 hth,

 Bernhard



 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *CCIE Voice GMAIL
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. Oktober 2010 23:24
 *An:* 'osl osl'
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls



 For the first issue, if you add the CME router as an H323 gateway in CUCM
 the correct bandwidth will show.  Make sure that the CSS includes the
 partition that contains the phones.






 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* Monday, October 04, 2010 1:43 PM
 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls



 Hi All,



 I am doing the Vol2 Lab2 GK scenario and running into a couple of issues.



 issue 1 - Call from CME SCCP phone to CUCM phones is using 128kbps. When I
 check the codec used on the call on both phones it says g729. The gk-tunk is
 in DP GK with region g729 to everyone.



 2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
 Total number of active calls = 1.
  GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
  
 LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
 25-49659   21  128(Kbps) --- should be
 16kbps as per the requirement
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
src EP: SiteC-GW  3003
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1002
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   33447





 issue 2 - Call from CUCM to CME SIP phone(g711)  works fine and invokes the
 transcoder and i see a 16kbps GK call. However when I call from CME SIP
 phone to any CUCM phone, CUCM phone rings and I can answer it. However it
 drops after a few seconds and I see no transcoder being used. Here are my
 configs



 Site C -



 voice register pool  1
  id mac 0025.4593.0368
  type 7975
  number 1 dn 1
  number 2 dn 2
  template 1
  description 32143002
  codec g711ulaw



 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  incoming called-number .
  tech-prefix 1#
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...$
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 !



 Any clues?



 Thanks,

 DA

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-05 Thread David A
Hi Bernhard,

I added an MTP and a Transcoder on HQ. Added these to all mrgls. Checked the
MTP required box and inbound faststart. When I answer the call it just
disconnects.
I still see the call on the GK with 16kbps coming in.

Thanks,
DA




On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Hi David,

 Do you have MTP on the gk trunk enabled and inbound faststart?
 You need to use  the IOS MTP as the CUCM MTP doesn't support G.729

 hth,
 Bernhard

 --
 *Von:* David A [mailto:david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Gesendet:* Di 05.10.2010 17:42
 *An:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* CCIE Voice GMAIL; osl osl

 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

   Hi Bernhard,

 The outboud call from the CME SIP phone is using the dial-peer

 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  voice-class codec 1
  session target ras
  incoming called-number .
  tech-prefix 1#
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
 When I place a call I get this

 3845-CME-SiteC#show call active voice compact
  callID  A/O FAX Tsec Codec   typePeer Address   IP
 Rip:udp
 Total call-legs: 2
290 ANS T4 g711ulawVOIPP3002
 10.10.202.54:25500
291 ORG T4 g729r8 pre- VOIPP1#1001
 0.0.0.0:0

 The other end is the GK and call ends on the SiteB phone. I dont think I
 need a dial-peer on the GK to route to CUCM as it is done through the GK
 trunk.
  I can answer the call and see it on GK

 2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
 Total number of active calls = 1.
  GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
  
 LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
 51-29194   7   16(Kbps)
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
src EP: SiteC-GW  3002
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1001
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   32796
 But after answering there is no audio and call drops after a few seconds.


 Thanks,
 DA




 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Hi,



 You are probably hitting the 0 dial-peer. Make sure you have a inbound
 dial-peer on the other end.

 Have a look which dial-peers you are using:



 sh call active voice compact

 or

 sh call active voice brief



 hth,

 Bernhard



 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *CCIE Voice GMAIL
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. Oktober 2010 23:24
 *An:* 'osl osl'
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls



 For the first issue, if you add the CME router as an H323 gateway in CUCM
 the correct bandwidth will show.  Make sure that the CSS includes the
 partition that contains the phones.






 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* Monday, October 04, 2010 1:43 PM
 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls



 Hi All,



 I am doing the Vol2 Lab2 GK scenario and running into a couple of issues.



 issue 1 - Call from CME SCCP phone to CUCM phones is using 128kbps. When I
 check the codec used on the call on both phones it says g729. The gk-tunk is
 in DP GK with region g729 to everyone.



 2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
 Total number of active calls = 1.
  GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
  
 LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
 25-49659   21  128(Kbps) --- should
 be 16kbps as per the requirement
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
src EP: SiteC-GW  3003
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1002
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   33447





 issue 2 - Call from CUCM to CME SIP phone(g711)  works fine and invokes
 the transcoder and i see a 16kbps GK call. However when I call from CME SIP
 phone to any CUCM phone, CUCM phone rings and I can answer it. However it
 drops after a few seconds and I see no transcoder being used. Here are my
 configs



 Site C -



 voice register pool  1
  id mac 0025.4593.0368
  type 7975
  number 1 dn 1
  number 2 dn 2
  template 1
  description 32143002
  codec g711ulaw



 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  incoming called-number .
  tech-prefix 1#
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-05 Thread David A
yep its registered but never invoked when calling the GK from the CME SIP
phone. It is invoked when a call comes into the CME phone from CUCM and I
can see it in sh sccp conn. I am using a 7975 phone as the SIP phone on
CME.

Thanks,
DA




On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Are you sure that your transcoder on cme is been registered?
 show sdspfarm units will show you that.

 as far as i know you don't need any special command on the voice
 register global to have the dspfarm resources beeing invoked.

 hth,
 Bernhard

 --
  *Von:* David A [mailto:david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Gesendet:* Di 05.10.2010 21:08

 *An:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* CCIE Voice GMAIL; osl osl
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

   Yes Bernhard, When I change the codec on the voice register pool to g729
 (default) it works fine. But I have a transcoder configured on the CME on
 telephony service which should be invoked if needed. The voice-class codec
 is already on the outgoing dialpeer towards gk but still it does not invoke
 a transcoder. I am not sure but do I need any special command on the voice
 register global to invoke the transcoder?

 Thanks,
 DA

 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  hm sounds like an codec issue...
 you have g711ulaw hardcoded at your cme sip phone. try to use there the
 voice class codec aswell or if this doesn't help add a transcoder at cme
 site aswell.
 or try to use hardcoded g729 on the sip phone pool
 don't forget to do always create prof and reset at voice register global
 after a change

 hth,
 Bernhard

 --
  *Von:* David A [mailto:david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Gesendet:* Di 05.10.2010 18:16

 *An:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* CCIE Voice GMAIL; osl osl
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

   Hi Bernhard,

 I added an MTP and a Transcoder on HQ. Added these to all mrgls. Checked
 the MTP required box and inbound faststart. When I answer the call it just
 disconnects.
 I still see the call on the GK with 16kbps coming in.

 Thanks,
 DA




 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

  Hi David,

 Do you have MTP on the gk trunk enabled and inbound faststart?
 You need to use  the IOS MTP as the CUCM MTP doesn't support G.729

 hth,
 Bernhard

 --
 *Von:* David A [mailto:david.a...@gmail.com]
 *Gesendet:* Di 05.10.2010 17:42
 *An:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* CCIE Voice GMAIL; osl osl

 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

   Hi Bernhard,

 The outboud call from the CME SIP phone is using the dial-peer

 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  voice-class codec 1
  session target ras
  incoming called-number .
  tech-prefix 1#
  dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
 When I place a call I get this

 3845-CME-SiteC#show call active voice compact
  callID  A/O FAX Tsec Codec   typePeer Address   IP
 Rip:udp
 Total call-legs: 2
290 ANS T4 g711ulawVOIPP3002
 10.10.202.54:25500
291 ORG T4 g729r8 pre- VOIPP1#1001
 0.0.0.0:0

 The other end is the GK and call ends on the SiteB phone. I dont think I
 need a dial-peer on the GK to route to CUCM as it is done through the GK
 trunk.
  I can answer the call and see it on GK

 2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
 Total number of active calls = 1.
  GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
  
 LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
 51-29194   7   16(Kbps)
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
src EP: SiteC-GW  3002
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
  Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1001
CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   32796
 But after answering there is no audio and call drops after a few seconds.


 Thanks,
 DA




 On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

  Hi,



 You are probably hitting the 0 dial-peer. Make sure you have a inbound
 dial-peer on the other end.

 Have a look which dial-peers you are using:



 sh call active voice compact

 or

 sh call active voice brief



 hth,

 Bernhard



 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *Im Auftrag von *CCIE Voice
 GMAIL
 *Gesendet:* Montag, 4. Oktober 2010 23:24
 *An:* 'osl osl'
 *Betreff:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls



 For the first issue, if you add the CME router as an H323 gateway in
 CUCM the correct bandwidth will show.  Make sure that the CSS includes the
 partition that contains the phones.






 *From:* ccie_voice-boun

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab2 5.1 - 4digit GK calls

2010-10-04 Thread David A
Hi All,

I am doing the Vol2 Lab2 GK scenario and running into a couple of issues.

issue 1 - Call from CME SCCP phone to CUCM phones is using 128kbps. When I
check the codec used on the call on both phones it says g729. The gk-tunk is
in DP GK with region g729 to everyone.

2811-HQ-GW#sh gatekeeper call
Total number of active calls = 1.
 GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
 
LocalCallIDAge(secs)   BW
25-49659   21  128(Kbps) --- should be
16kbps as per the requirement
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   src EP: SiteC-GW  3003
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   10.10.110.3 1720  10.10.110.3 58555
 Endpt(s): Alias E.164Addr
   dst EP: gk-trunk_21#1002
   CallSignalAddr  Port  RASSignalAddr   Port
   10.137.151.26   1720  10.137.151.26   33447


issue 2 - Call from CUCM to CME SIP phone(g711)  works fine and invokes the
transcoder and i see a 16kbps GK call. However when I call from CME SIP
phone to any CUCM phone, CUCM phone rings and I can answer it. However it
drops after a few seconds and I see no transcoder being used. Here are my
configs

Site C -

voice register pool  1
 id mac 0025.4593.0368
 type 7975
 number 1 dn 1
 number 2 dn 2
 template 1
 description 32143002
 codec g711ulaw

!
dial-peer voice 15 voip
 destination-pattern [15]...$
 session target ras
 incoming called-number .
 tech-prefix 1#
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric rtp-nte
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
 incoming called-number 3...$
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
!

Any clues?

Thanks,
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Hi,

I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
supplementary services

Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with hold/resume
while testing.

 I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling SiteC
(CME) phones. CME phones are able to hold/resume fine. Voice calls work fine
to and from all sccp/sip phones.

Here is my config

On CUCM gk trunk I have the Inbound Fast Start checked
- On HQ-GW I have transcoders
- On SIteC-GW I have transcoders foe SIP g711 phone
- No mrgls on and device pools and all CUCM media resources are available.


Configs -

HQ-GW

interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-GW
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
 incoming called-number 3...
!
dial-peer voice 3001 voip
 destination-pattern 3...
 session target ras
 codec g711ulaw
!
!
gateway
!
!
!
gatekeeper
 zone local UCM lab.com 10.10.110.1
 zone local UCME lab.com outvia CUBE
 zone local CUBE lab.com
 zone prefix UCM 1...
 zone prefix UCME 3...
 zone prefix UCM 5...
 gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
 no shutdown



SiteC-GW

interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
 description *** VOICE VLAN 400 ***
 encapsulation dot1Q 400
 ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
 ip helper-address 10.10.201.1
 h323-gateway voip interface
 h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
 h323-gateway voip h323-id SiteC-GW
 h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
!
!
dial-peer voice 15 voip
 destination-pattern [15]...$
 session target ras
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-alphanumeric
!
dial-peer voice 3000 voip
 incoming called-number 3...$
 dtmf-relay rtp-nte
 codec g711ulaw

Any ideas what I am missing.


Thanks
DA
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Thanks Bernhard for replying

I added a software mtp and registered to CUCM in GK DP.  Added it to a
gk-mrgl and then the mrgl to the GK device pool. The behaviour is still the
same. The hold/resume fails on calls from CUCM to CME and works other way
around.

Thanks,
DA

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de wrote:

  Hi,

 you need MTP + MRGL on the GK Trunk to get suplementary services working.

 cheers,
 Bernhard

 --
 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von David A
 *Gesendet:* So 03.10.2010 16:14
 *An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls




 Hi,

 I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
 supplementary services

 Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with hold/resume
 while testing.

  I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling SiteC
 (CME) phones. CME phones are able to hold/resume fine. Voice calls work fine
 to and from all sccp/sip phones.

 Here is my config

 On CUCM gk trunk I have the Inbound Fast Start checked
 - On HQ-GW I have transcoders
 - On SIteC-GW I have transcoders foe SIP g711 phone
 - No mrgls on and device pools and all CUCM media resources are available.


 Configs -

 HQ-GW

 interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-GW
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...
 !
 dial-peer voice 3001 voip
  destination-pattern 3...
  session target ras
  codec g711ulaw
 !
 !
 gateway
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
  zone local UCM lab.com 10.10.110.1
  zone local UCME lab.com outvia CUBE
  zone local CUBE lab.com
  zone prefix UCM 1...
  zone prefix UCME 3...
  zone prefix UCM 5...
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown



 SiteC-GW

 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
  description *** VOICE VLAN 400 ***
  encapsulation dot1Q 400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
  ip helper-address 10.10.201.1
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id SiteC-GW
  h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 !
 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-alphanumeric
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...$
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
  codec g711ulaw

 Any ideas what I am missing.


 Thanks
 DA


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Hi Ryan,

Thanks.

When I check MTP Required on the GK trunk
1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM fails
2 - Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM works

When I uncheck it
1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM works
2- Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM fails


Also when i check the MTP box and do sh sccp conn on hq-gw I do not see
any mtp being used or any MTP on the CUCM Pub Sub in RTMT.

I am confused.

Thanks,
DA



On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.ca wrote:

  Have you checked “Media Termination Point Required” on the GK Trunk?



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* October-03-10 10:17 AM
 *To:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls



 Thanks Bernhard for replying



 I added a software mtp and registered to CUCM in GK DP.  Added it to a
 gk-mrgl and then the mrgl to the GK device pool. The behaviour is still the
 same. The hold/resume fails on calls from CUCM to CME and works other way
 around.



 Thanks,

 DA

 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

 Hi,



 you need MTP + MRGL on the GK Trunk to get suplementary services working.



 cheers,

 Bernhard


  --

 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von David A
 *Gesendet:* So 03.10.2010 16:14
 *An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls





 Hi,



 I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
 supplementary services



 Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with hold/resume
 while testing.



  I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling SiteC
 (CME) phones. CME phones are able to hold/resume fine. Voice calls work fine
 to and from all sccp/sip phones.



 Here is my config



 On CUCM gk trunk I have the Inbound Fast Start checked

 - On HQ-GW I have transcoders

 - On SIteC-GW I have transcoders foe SIP g711 phone

 - No mrgls on and device pools and all CUCM media resources are available.





 Configs -



 HQ-GW



 interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-GW
 !

 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...
 !
 dial-peer voice 3001 voip
  destination-pattern 3...
  session target ras
  codec g711ulaw
 !
 !
 gateway
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
  zone local UCM lab.com 10.10.110.1
  zone local UCME lab.com outvia CUBE
  zone local CUBE lab.com
  zone prefix UCM 1...
  zone prefix UCME 3...
  zone prefix UCM 5...
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown







 SiteC-GW



 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
  description *** VOICE VLAN 400 ***
  encapsulation dot1Q 400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
  ip helper-address 10.10.201.1
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id SiteC-GW
  h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 !

 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-alphanumeric
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...$
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
  codec g711ulaw



 Any ideas what I am missing.





 Thanks

 DA





___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Hi Randall,

I added these commands but did not help.

Thanks George but the outbound faststart doesnt help either. I tried using
both g729 abd g711ulaw.

One more thing I noticed is that from a CUCM SCCP phone to a CME SCCP phone
I cannot even press the Hold key. Its being ignored.


Thanks,
DA

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:

 Try adding on the CUBE and the CME:
 voice service voip
   h323
 emptycapability
 h225 connect-passthru
 h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

 Cheers.


 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:36 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Enable outbound fast-start as well.

 Cheers,

   On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:27 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi Ryan,

 Thanks.

 When I check MTP Required on the GK trunk
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM fails
 2 - Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM works

 When I uncheck it
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM works
 2- Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM fails


 Also when i check the MTP box and do sh sccp conn on hq-gw I do not see
 any mtp being used or any MTP on the CUCM Pub Sub in RTMT.

 I am confused.

 Thanks,
 DA



 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.ca wrote:

  Have you checked “Media Termination Point Required” on the GK Trunk?



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* October-03-10 10:17 AM
 *To:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls



 Thanks Bernhard for replying



 I added a software mtp and registered to CUCM in GK DP.  Added it to a
 gk-mrgl and then the mrgl to the GK device pool. The behaviour is still the
 same. The hold/resume fails on calls from CUCM to CME and works other way
 around.



 Thanks,

 DA

 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

 Hi,



 you need MTP + MRGL on the GK Trunk to get suplementary services
 working.



 cheers,

 Bernhard


  --

 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von David A
 *Gesendet:* So 03.10.2010 16:14
 *An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls





 Hi,



 I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
 supplementary services



 Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with
 hold/resume while testing.



  I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling
 SiteC (CME) phones. CME phones are able to hold/resume fine. Voice calls
 work fine to and from all sccp/sip phones.



 Here is my config



 On CUCM gk trunk I have the Inbound Fast Start checked

 - On HQ-GW I have transcoders

 - On SIteC-GW I have transcoders foe SIP g711 phone

 - No mrgls on and device pools and all CUCM media resources are
 available.





 Configs -



 HQ-GW



 interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-GW
 !

 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...
 !
 dial-peer voice 3001 voip
  destination-pattern 3...
  session target ras
  codec g711ulaw
 !
 !
 gateway
 !
 !
 !
 gatekeeper
  zone local UCM lab.com 10.10.110.1
  zone local UCME lab.com outvia CUBE
  zone local CUBE lab.com
  zone prefix UCM 1...
  zone prefix UCME 3...
  zone prefix UCM 5...
  gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology
  no shutdown







 SiteC-GW



 interface GigabitEthernet0/0.400
  description *** VOICE VLAN 400 ***
  encapsulation dot1Q 400
  ip address 10.10.202.1 255.255.255.0
  ip helper-address 10.10.201.1
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id UCME ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id SiteC-GW
  h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 1#
 !

 !
 dial-peer voice 15 voip
  destination-pattern [15]...$
  session target ras
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte h245-alphanumeric
 !
 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3...$
  dtmf-relay rtp-nte
  codec g711ulaw



 Any ideas what I am missing.





 Thanks

 DA







 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com




 --
 Randall da ill Saborio
 CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Hi Randall,

Seem to have made some progress after unchecking the MTP required box. Setup
is as follows


On gk-trunk - unchecked mtp req
  - enabled inbound faststart
  - unchecked outbound faststart

On hq-gw and cme-gw added the foll

voice service voip
  h323
emptycapability
h225 connect-passthru
h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

After this I can hold/resume from any CUCM phone to CME SCCP Phone. No MTP
was being used on either hardware or CUCM from RTMT.

Unresolved - When a CME SIP (g711u) phone calls a CUCM phone and either one
puts callon hold, the call dies. I do not see any receive packets on the CME
phone. On the CUCM phone I see both send/recv packets.

Since CME phone is g711, transcoding is done on the CUBE. Also I have g729
software mtp on the hq-gw availabe to CUCM phones and GK trunk. I configured
g711u mtp on CME hoping it would work but does not.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
DA
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:

 David,
 I hear you, it seems it could be getting worse. I believe it may be needed
 to undo some things that you have done and then start fresh with the
 testing.

 I can't point out exactly why it is not failing, but I can tell one thing
 for sure:
 If you cannot use the hold key, it means you configured the MTP required on
 the trunk, but CUCM is unable to allocate one MTP resource, due to MRGL
 configuration or capability matching due to codecs.

 Better to uncheck the MTP required as I believe shouldn't be a requirement
 for your scenario. Or perhaps, configure an IOS MTP with codec G729 and make
 sure it is assigned to the trunk MRGL.

 Regards.


 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Randall,

 I added these commands but did not help.

 Thanks George but the outbound faststart doesnt help either. I tried using
 both g729 abd g711ulaw.

 One more thing I noticed is that from a CUCM SCCP phone to a CME SCCP
 phone I cannot even press the Hold key. Its being ignored.


 Thanks,
 DA

   On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.comwrote:

 Try adding on the CUBE and the CME:
 voice service voip
   h323
 emptycapability
 h225 connect-passthru
 h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

 Cheers.


 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:36 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Enable outbound fast-start as well.

 Cheers,

   On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:27 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi Ryan,

 Thanks.

 When I check MTP Required on the GK trunk
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM fails
 2 - Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM works

 When I uncheck it
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM works
 2- Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM fails


 Also when i check the MTP box and do sh sccp conn on hq-gw I do not
 see any mtp being used or any MTP on the CUCM Pub Sub in RTMT.

 I am confused.

 Thanks,
 DA



 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.cawrote:

  Have you checked “Media Termination Point Required” on the GK Trunk?



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* October-03-10 10:17 AM
 *To:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit
 calls



 Thanks Bernhard for replying



 I added a software mtp and registered to CUCM in GK DP.  Added it to a
 gk-mrgl and then the mrgl to the GK device pool. The behaviour is still 
 the
 same. The hold/resume fails on calls from CUCM to CME and works other way
 around.



 Thanks,

 DA

 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

 Hi,



 you need MTP + MRGL on the GK Trunk to get suplementary services
 working.



 cheers,

 Bernhard


  --

 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von David A
 *Gesendet:* So 03.10.2010 16:14
 *An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls





 Hi,



 I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
 supplementary services



 Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with
 hold/resume while testing.



  I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling
 SiteC (CME) phones. CME phones are able to hold/resume fine. Voice calls
 work fine to and from all sccp/sip phones.



 Here is my config



 On CUCM gk trunk I have the Inbound Fast Start checked

 - On HQ-GW I have transcoders

 - On SIteC-GW I have transcoders foe SIP g711 phone

 - No mrgls on and device pools and all CUCM media resources are
 available.





 Configs -



 HQ-GW



 interface Loopback0
  ip address 10.10.110.1 255.255.255.255
  h323-gateway voip interface
  h323-gateway voip id CUBE ipaddr 10.10.110.1 1719
  h323-gateway voip h323-id HQ-GW
 !

 dial-peer voice 3000 voip
  incoming called-number 3

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2 4.3 GK 4digit calls

2010-10-03 Thread David A
Hi Wesley,

Its unchecked. If checked calls cannot be answere on UCM phone and I hear
ringback even after answering the CME phone.

Thanks,
DA

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Wesley Ducote wesduc...@yahoo.com wrote:

  have you adjusted the wait for h-245 capabilities box?  i had some issues
 w/ that one before.

  --
 *From:* David A david.a...@gmail.com
 *To:* Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com

 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Sent:* Sun, October 3, 2010 5:41:08 PM

 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls

 Hi Randall,

 Seem to have made some progress after unchecking the MTP required
 box. Setup is as follows


 On gk-trunk - unchecked mtp req
   - enabled inbound faststart
   - unchecked outbound faststart

 On hq-gw and cme-gw added the foll

 voice service voip
   h323
 emptycapability
 h225 connect-passthru
 h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

 After this I can hold/resume from any CUCM phone to CME SCCP Phone. No MTP
 was being used on either hardware or CUCM from RTMT.

 Unresolved - When a CME SIP (g711u) phone calls a CUCM phone and either one
 puts callon hold, the call dies. I do not see any receive packets on the CME
 phone. On the CUCM phone I see both send/recv packets.

 Since CME phone is g711, transcoding is done on the CUBE. Also I have g729
 software mtp on the hq-gw availabe to CUCM phones and GK trunk. I configured
 g711u mtp on CME hoping it would work but does not.

 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 DA
 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.com wrote:

 David,
 I hear you, it seems it could be getting worse. I believe it may be needed
 to undo some things that you have done and then start fresh with the
 testing.

 I can't point out exactly why it is not failing, but I can tell one thing
 for sure:
 If you cannot use the hold key, it means you configured the MTP required
 on the trunk, but CUCM is unable to allocate one MTP resource, due to MRGL
 configuration or capability matching due to codecs.

 Better to uncheck the MTP required as I believe shouldn't be a requirement
 for your scenario. Or perhaps, configure an IOS MTP with codec G729 and make
 sure it is assigned to the trunk MRGL.

 Regards.


 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Randall,

 I added these commands but did not help.

 Thanks George but the outbound faststart doesnt help either. I tried
 using both g729 abd g711ulaw.

 One more thing I noticed is that from a CUCM SCCP phone to a CME SCCP
 phone I cannot even press the Hold key. Its being ignored.


 Thanks,
 DA

   On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Randall Saborio ill2...@gmail.comwrote:

 Try adding on the CUBE and the CME:
 voice service voip
   h323
 emptycapability
 h225 connect-passthru
 h245 passthru tcsnonstd-passthru

 Cheers.


 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:36 PM, George Goglidze gogli...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 Enable outbound fast-start as well.

 Cheers,

   On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:27 PM, David A david.a...@gmail.comwrote:

   Hi Ryan,

 Thanks.

 When I check MTP Required on the GK trunk
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM fails
 2 - Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM works

 When I uncheck it
 1 - Call from CME to CUCM - Hold on CUCM works
 2- Call from CUCM to CME - Hold on CUCM fails


 Also when i check the MTP box and do sh sccp conn on hq-gw I do not
 see any mtp being used or any MTP on the CUCM Pub Sub in RTMT.

 I am confused.

 Thanks,
 DA



 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Schwab schwab...@shaw.cawrote:

  Have you checked “Media Termination Point Required” on the GK
 Trunk?



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David A
 *Sent:* October-03-10 10:17 AM
 *To:* Stutz, Bernhard
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit
 calls



 Thanks Bernhard for replying



 I added a software mtp and registered to CUCM in GK DP.  Added it to
 a gk-mrgl and then the mrgl to the GK device pool. The behaviour is 
 still
 the same. The hold/resume fails on calls from CUCM to CME and works 
 other
 way around.



 Thanks,

 DA

 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 wrote:

 Hi,



 you need MTP + MRGL on the GK Trunk to get suplementary services
 working.



 cheers,

 Bernhard


  --

 *Von:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com im Auftrag von David A
 *Gesendet:* So 03.10.2010 16:14
 *An:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Betreff:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1 - 4.2  4.3 GK 4digit calls





 Hi,



 I was doing the Vol2 Lab1 GK scenario and it has a requirement for
 supplementary services



 Configured the lab as required but discovered a few issues with
 hold/resume while testing.



  I am unable to hold/resume from HQ/Siteb (CUCM) phones when calling
 SiteC (CME) phones

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)`

2010-10-03 Thread David Lee
Hey Mark,

Check the MRGL of the voice gateway.  The phone where you press hold --
from this phone is the source determined.  But the MOH is taken from the
MRGL configured on the holdee, in this case the VG.

Thanks,

-Dave

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:08 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)` (Mark Holloway)
   2. Re: MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)` (Prashant Patel)
   3. Re: MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)` (James Key)
   4. Re: MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)` (Mark Holloway)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 17:17:44 -0700
 From: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 To: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)`
 Message-ID: 85912468-288c-4ecc-9e9e-f9d9d22a3...@markholloway.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 I thought I had this figured out but I'm slipping up somewhere.  Could use
 some help. :)

 I'm configuring multicast moh at BR1 using G.711 and streaming from BR1
 router flash.  BR1 is an H323 gateway.

 call-manager-fallback
 max-dn 24
 max-ephones 2
 ip source address 10.20.30.254  this is the voice vlan default gateway
 moh music-on-hold.au  piano music file in flash
 multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route voice vlan ip = 192.168.65.254
 loop0 ip = 192.1.65.254

 ip multicast-routing is enabled
 ip pim dense mode is configured on voice vlan interface and loop0 interface

 cucm  moh audio source and PUB are configured for multicast routing (1
 hop) and assigned to mrg br1_mcast_moh which is assigned to mrgl br1 which
 is assigned to br1 device pool

 I have a device pool 'MoH' that has a region 'MoH' and is assigned G711 to
 all other regions.  This region is assign to device pool MoH, and device
 pool MoH is assign to the MoH servers.


 When HQ calls BR1 and HQ presses hold, the BR1 phone hears piano music.

 When PSTN calls BR1 and BR1 presses hold, PSTN hears beep beep beep

 r2# debug ephone moh
 EPHONE music-on-hold debugging is enabled
 Oct  4 00:09:50.794: MoH route If Vlan302 ETHERNET 192.168.65.254 via ARP
 Oct  4 00:09:50.794: MoH route If Loopback0 46 192.1.65.254 via
 192.1.65.254



 r2#debug ccm-m music-on-hold all
 Call Manager music-on-hold all debugging is on
 r2#
 Oct  4 00:16:08.156: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID -1
 Oct  4 00:16:08.156: moh_process_ccb: dstadr 192.168.65.30, callid -1, port
 21836,
codec 16, moh_en 0, moh_addr 0.0.0.0
 Oct  4 00:16:08.160: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID -1
 Oct  4 00:16:08.160: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID -1
 Oct  4 00:16:08.164: moh_process_ccb: dstadr 192.168.65.30, callid 11, port
 21836,
codec 16, moh_en 0, moh_addr 0.0.0.0
 Oct  4 00:16:08.164: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID 11
 Oct  4 00:16:08.180: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:0 is now
 connected to 911 N/A
 Oct  4 00:16:08.180: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:0 is now
 connected to 911 N/A
 Oct  4 00:16:09.028: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID 11
 Oct  4 00:16:09.028: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID 11
 Oct  4 00:16:09.032: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID 11
 Oct  4 00:16:17.264: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface Serial0/0/0:0
  disconnected from 911 , call lasted 9 seconds
 Oct  4 00:16:17.268: moh_update_rtp: callID 12 dstCallID 11


 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20101003/e5357589/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:20:43 -0400
 From: Prashant Patel prashantpatel...@gmail.com
 To: Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com
 Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MoH SRST (Stream from Flash)`
 Message-ID:
aanlktin8bnyo+gmirh09kooo2=rvet90x=nw6g+x=...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hi Mark,

 Try adding tftp-server flash:music-on-hold.au

 Also reload may help :)

 Thanks,
 Prashant



 On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Mark Holloway m...@markholloway.com wrote:

  I thought I had this figured out but I'm slipping up somewhere.  Could
 use
  some help. :)
 
  I'm configuring multicast moh at BR1 using G.711 and streaming from BR1
  router flash.  BR1 is an H323 gateway.
 
  call-manager-fallback
  max-dn 24
  max-ephones 2
  ip source address 10.20.30.254  this 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on

2010-09-30 Thread David Lee
Hello,

I can't remember the proper behavior, so if would be great if someone can
confirm for me.  I've configured Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on, but I
still need to log the agent in with credentials/extension the FIRST TIME.
 Afterwards, the agent can login without entering the credential again.  Is
that the right behavior, or should agent single button sign-on work from the
first time?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on

2010-09-30 Thread David Lee
Hi Alex,

Thanks for replying.  I think there is a misunderstanding.

The Single Button Sign-on I was talking about is IP Phone Agent.  After I
configure it, and press the services button, I still have to sign the agent
on.  The credentials I enter on the  phone are the ones I put under the
service subscription.

Anyways, it does not seem to work.  (It worked before cuz I never logged the
agent out. :) )  I gotta do some troubleshooting...

-Dave


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Alex Golovin agolo...@force3.com wrote:

  Dave,

 Users must configure their credentials on the ccmuser page under the phone
 services. So pressing the single sign button would authenticate and log them
 in.

 Hope it helped.

 Alex



 *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
 ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David Lee
 *Sent:* Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:56 PM
 *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button
 Sign-on



 Hello,



 I can't remember the proper behavior, so if would be great if someone can
 confirm for me.  I've configured Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on, but I
 still need to log the agent in with credentials/extension the FIRST TIME.
  Afterwards, the agent can login without entering the credential again.  Is
 that the right behavior, or should agent single button sign-on work from the
 first time?



 Thanks,



 -Dave



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] After Hour block patterns

2010-09-20 Thread David Lee
This is what I think it should be:

REQUIREMENT is to block international calls for this hours
Monday - Friday, 7pm-7am --- My interpretation is to allow 7am to 7pm
inclusive
Sat 7am-1pm --- My interpretation is to allow 7am to 1pm inclusive
Sunday all day --- block all day

Sunday 12:00 to 06:59 -- Blocking Sunday noon 12pm to Monday 06:59 to allow
calling at 07:00am

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Monday 19:01 to 06:59 -- Blocking from 19:01 to next day 06:59

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Tuesday 19:01 to 06:59 -- Blocking from 19:01 to next day 06:59

etc

(Allow 7am to 7pm)
Friday 1901 to 06:59  -- Blocking from 19:01 to Sat 06:59

(Allow 7am to 1300 1pm)
Sat 13:01 to 12:00 -- Blocking from Sat 1300 hours to Sunday noon 12pm.
 I'm thinking that you can enter any ending time here as long as you pick it
up on the Sunday block time.




On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:00 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Hotels in Columbus (Amp)
   2. Why set Called party type? (Peterson Gomes)
   3. Re: Why set Called party type? (Stutz, Bernhard)
   4. After Hour block patterns (Pithog Oil)
   5. Re: phone is not taking IP from DHCP server (Peterson Gomes)
   6. Re: phone is not taking IP from DHCP server (Daniel Berlinski)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 14:35:54 -0400
 From: Amp amccar...@cciequest.com
 To: Tyson Scott tyson.sc...@advtechracks.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, mthompson...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus
 Message-ID: 20100919143554.y38605haw4ws4...@www.cciequest.com
 Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp=Yes;
format=flowed

 Hey Tyson,
 Will that discount code be in effect before the boot camp starts next week?

 Amp
 Quoting Tyson Scott tyson.sc...@advtechracks.com:

  I recommend the Fairfield Inn and suites on worthington rd.  We are in
  the process of negotiations with them.  Will have a discount code soon
  with them.  You cannot walk across the overpass but extended stay does
  offer shuttle service.
 
  Regards,
 
  Tyson Scott
  CCIE # 13513 (RS, Security, SP)
  Managing Partner/Technical Instructor - IPexpert Inc.
  tsc...@ipexpert.com
 
 
 
 
  - Reply message -
  From: Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com
  Date: Sun, Sep 19, 2010 11:38 am
  Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Hotels in Columbus
  To: Amp amccar...@cciequest.com
  Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
 
  And be careful, due to the number of hotels I'm a small area, lots of
  car break ins
 
  Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
 
  On Sep 19, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Amp amccar...@cciequest.com wrote:
 
  Hey Gang,
  Can anyone tell me if the Extended Stay Deluxe - Polaris is in
  walking distance to the IPexpert training facility?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Amp
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
  please visit www.ipexpert.com
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
  please visit www.ipexpert.com
 





 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:18:04 -0300
 From: Peterson Gomes pgcristo...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?
 Message-ID:
aanlktinrgkbupcb6fmwu0tkf_owryht_x=2jmiw0g...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hello guys

 Somebody known why and what are advantages with called party type?
 Here in Brazil in ALL my solutions I never set the called party type ALL
 calls works fine. This is a particular configuration in North American or
 Europe?

 Thanks

 Peterson
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100919/16513d42/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:56:53 +0200
 From: Stutz, Bernhard st...@pandacom.de
 To: Peterson Gomes pgcristo...@gmail.com,
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Why set Called party type?
 Message-ID:
8eb8e7054d698544b600adf5ef068fdb04db6...@ffmpdcexch1.pandacom.de
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

 Hi Peterson,



 Some providers in Europe requesting this for billing purposes.

 Also it doesn't matter if it used in 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Another dumb after-hours block question

2010-09-18 Thread David Lee
Hello,

Question in Vol 2 Lab 9 asks for international dialing to be blocked on
these days:

Monday - Friday, 7pm-7am
All weekend, except Sat 7am-1pm

The solution has the following

 after-hours day Sun 12:00 07:00
 after-hours day Mon 19:00 06:59
 after-hours day Tue 19:00 06:59
 after-hours day Wed 19:00 06:59
 after-hours day Thu 19:00 06:59
 after-hours day Fri 19:00 06:59
 after-hours day Sat 13:00 12:00

A couple of questions:

1. If the syntax is 24-hour clock, then is Sat's schedule indicating Sat
1300 hours to Sunday 1200 hours (noon)?

Let's say we only want to block Sat 1300 hours and allow all day on Sat,
then would the syntax be after-hours day Sat 13:00 23:59?

2. Again for Sunday, should the block time be extended through 06:59 as the
other weekdays if we want to allow dialing of international to start at 7am?
 Otherwise, International cannot begin until 701am on Monday?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Phone URL IP Address

2010-09-10 Thread Carhart, David
I always point it at the Pub.  I use this logic the Pub is the least busy of my 
servers since my subs are doing most of the work when it comes to handling the 
phone reg and calls.
I hope this helps


David Carhart
dcarh...@lvbrands.com
P: 919-990-3636
C:919-413-8266



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] How device pool affect media resources?

2010-09-08 Thread David Lee
Hi Ki Wi,

The MRGL assigned to a DP is used by the device that is in the DP.
 Therefore, your observation is accurate.  SIP trunk in HQ DP will use the
transcoder in the MRGL in the HQ DP.  If the MRGL of the HQ DP does not have
transcoder, then the SIP trunk does not have access to a transcoder.

As for MoH working, it's probably because your MOH servers are not in any
MRG, thus they are in the null MRG, which is accessible by anyone looking
for MOH.

Thanks,

-Dave


On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:49 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. How device pool affect media resources? (Ki Wi)
   2. Re: Gatekeeper call routing between BR2 CME and BR1 H323
  gateway (Tam Nhu)
   3. Re: Fast busy when calling from PSTN to BR1 phone..
  (chase mergenthal)
   4. Re: Fast busy when calling from PSTN to BR1 phone..
  (Wilson Bolanos)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:18:37 +0800
 From: Ki Wi kiwi.vo...@gmail.com
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How device pool affect media resources?
 Message-ID:
aanlktinz=vogmq7ho2hv5fsp-slaptqitda2wuo6f...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 I'm currently doing V1 Lab 5C where Q5.2 requires a transcoder.

 If i placed the transcoder in DP_HQ while i purposely put the SIP trunk
 into
 another DP (such as DP_BR1), it fails to be triggered.
 However, If i placed *both the SIP trunk and the transcoder are in the same
 DP, it works. *
 **
 *  *All my DP contains the same MGRL* *

 Now, i'm wondering this rule only applies to transcoder or all the other
 media resources? From what i see, MOH don't seems to have this limitation.
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100908/e50da6e9/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 07:20:42 -0500
 From: Tam Nhu tamnhu...@gmail.com
 To: Vik Malhi vma...@ipexpert.com
 Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper call routing between BR2
CME and BR1 H323 gateway
 Message-ID:

 aanlkti=ml2oji6jbqa3=mirejb70p6tbcm1=wvbyy...@mail.gmail.comwvbyyt%...@mail.gmail.com
 
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hi Vik,

 Thank you for your input.  I saved my configurations for this lab, and have
 been working on the +dialing lab 10, so let me revert back to this lab
 tonight and try your suggestions.  I remembered I did unchecked the
 Outbound
 Fast Start at one point during troubleshooting, but it did not make any
 improvements.  I will try again tonight and reply back with results as soon
 as I can.

 Thanks,
 TN.
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 /archives/ccie_voice/attachments/20100908/9141e65f/attachment-0001.html

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 09:24:27 -0500
 From: chase mergenthal cm3_...@hotmail.com
 To: vma...@ipexpert.com, ccie voice ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fast busy when calling from PSTN to
BR1 phone..
 Message-ID: snt125-w194ad0c09aea2a90c63d86d6...@phx.gbl
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


 It says TEI_ASSIGNED; I think i have the config correct in call manager
 and on the GW.

 BR1-RTR#sho isdn status
 Global ISDN Switchtype = primary-ni

 %Q.931 is backhauled to CCM MANAGER 0x0003 on DSL 0. Layer 3 output may not
 apply

 ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-ni
L2 Protocol = Q.921 0x  L3 Protocol(s) = CCM MANAGER 0x0003
Layer 1 Status:
ACTIVE
Layer 2 Status:
TEI = 0, Ces = 1, SAPI = 0, State = TEI_ASSIGNED
Layer 3 Status:
0 Active Layer 3 Call(s)
Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0
The Free Channel Mask:  0x8007
Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 2
Total Allocated ISDN CCBs = 0
 BR1-RTR#


 Parts of config:

  interface Serial0/0/0:23
  no ip address
  encapsulation hdlc
  isdn switch-type primary-ni
  isdn incoming-voice voice
  isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
  no cdp enable

 controller T1 0/0/0
  framing esf
  linecode b8zs
  pri-group timeslots 1-3,24 service mgcp

 ccm-manager switchback immediate
 ccm-manager redundant-host 10.10.210.10
 ccm-manager mgcp
 ccm-manager music-on-hold

 mgcp
 

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Docs available during the lab

2010-08-31 Thread Carhart, David
Does anyone no where I can get a list of the docs that you are provided for the 
voice lab?

Thanks

David Carhart
dcarh...@lvbrands.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Docs available during the lab

2010-08-31 Thread Carhart, David
Thanks
Also the video products from IPexpert are a great help with my lab prep. keep 
up the good work.


On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Amy Ryan wrote:

 David, 
 
 Based on the voice techtorial offered at Cisco Live this year, below is what
 was identified.
 
 -Unity Connection Administration Guide
 -QOS SRND
 -CUCME Administration Guide
 -CUCM SRND
 -UCCX SRND
 
 And you will have access to the cisco product/technology support page.
 
 HTH, 
 Amy
 
 
 
 ---
 Amy Ryan – CCIE #24677 (Voice)
 Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
 Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com
 Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
 http://www.ipexpert.com/chat
 eFax: +1.810.454.0130
 
 IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
 Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
 CCIE (RS, Voice, Wireless, Security  Service Provider) certification(s)
 with training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
 Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
 www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities  and our
 public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/
 
 
 
 From: Carhart, David dcarh...@lvbrands.com
 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:33:40 -0400
 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Docs available during the lab
 
 Does anyone no where I can get a list of the docs that you are provided for
 the voice lab?
 
 Thanks
 
 David Carhart
 dcarh...@lvbrands.com
 
 
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 

David Carhart
dcarh...@lvbrands.com
P: 919-990-3636
C:919-413-8266



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28, 1600 hours EST)

2010-08-28 Thread David Lee
It's not working for me?  Anyone else affected?  Any PL support online?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs.com is not loading (Aug 28, 1600 hours EST)

2010-08-28 Thread David Lee
It's back up now.  Many thanks to Andrew Shipton.

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 4:04 PM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

 It's not working for me?  Anyone else affected?  Any PL support online?

 Thanks,

 -Dave


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service URLs

2010-08-21 Thread David Lee
Hi Daniel,

Not sure if this is what you are looking for.  Table 1.2 of the Enterprise
QoS SRND has the Payload size of various CODECs.  The paragraph right after
this table has the Layer2 overheads.

Thanks,

-Dave



Message: 4
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:45:42 +1200
From: Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.com
To: Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service URLs
Message-ID:
   aanlktikpj6_w=4ueaen1=+kmw2joqbqhc_rkzov4d...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Guys,

I'm preparing for situations with different requirements for codecs usage
over the WAN and priority queue sizing.

I'm using page 134 od CUCM SRND for locating the formulas for calculating
voice payload size and packets per second values for supporting me with
potential questions involving codecs such as g723, g726, g728, etc.  I use
this page alongside with QOS SRND page 33 for L2 overhaeads.

Part of the formula for calculating the codec payload size in bytes is the
codec rate. I'm not able to find a document (searchable in the exam) with
the different codec rates.

What do you guys use?

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can anyone access www.proctorlabs.com ???

2010-08-14 Thread David Lee
Hello,

Just wondering if it's just me.  I'm trying from 2 different PCs and cannot
access the webpage...

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can anyone access www.proctorlabs.com ???

2010-08-14 Thread David Lee
Does anyone remember the access server IP?  The EZVPN is working, but the
infrastructure is blank, so nothing is accessible...

Tyson - not sure if you have some way to get hold of Proctor Labs support...


Thanks.

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.comwrote:

 No... I'm having the same issue.

 On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hello,
  Just wondering if it's just me.  I'm trying from 2 different PCs and
 cannot
  access the webpage...
  Thanks,
  -Dave
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can anyone access www.proctorlabs.com ???

2010-08-14 Thread David Lee
I just got connected now.

-Dave

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Scott Newberry sc...@meganandscott.comwrote:

 FYI, got an email from Viking. Looking into it.

 Sent from my mobile phone.  Please excuse my brevity and any spelling
 errors.

 On Aug 14, 2010 9:42 AM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:
  Does anyone remember the access server IP? The EZVPN is working, but the
  infrastructure is blank, so nothing is accessible...
 
  Tyson - not sure if you have some way to get hold of Proctor Labs
 support...
 
 
  Thanks.
 
  On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Brian Valentine bkvalent...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  No... I'm having the same issue.
 
  On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:35 AM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hello,
   Just wondering if it's just me. I'm trying from 2 different PCs and
  cannot
   access the webpage...
   Thanks,
   -Dave
  
   ___
   For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
   visit www.ipexpert.com
  
  
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unable to reload the CUE license file

2010-08-14 Thread David Lee
Hello,

I got the error Online install/download is not allowed due to insufficient
FLASH capacity when attempting to update the CUE license file.  I tried to
do a software reinstall via bootflash, thinking that it would clear the
flash, but the error still remained.

Can anyone advise what else can be done in this case?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ATA in SRST

2010-07-17 Thread David Lee
Hello,

I was wondering if anyone has experienced ATA's not registering to the SRST
router during fallback...  They are on the same DP as the phones, and the
phones register, but no registration on the ATAs...

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on globalized dial plan

2010-07-13 Thread David Lee
Hello,

This is a question for a real implementation for all experts (and us
wannabes :) ).

The PSTN dial plan is 10-digit for local and 11-digits for North American
LD.  However, neighboring cities have the same area code.  So for example,
(905) ABC-1234 is a local call, and (905) XYZ-6789 could be rejected because
it is a long distance call, requiring the country code (1).

From this site (www.localcallingguide.com), I can determine which NXX (the 3
digits prefix after the area code) are local to the area.  So I can brute
force config which RP I strip +1, and which I only strip the +.  I was just
wondering if there is a more elegant way...

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1, 4.2 Supplementary services

2010-06-26 Thread David Lee
Hello,

I am at a lost.  I got most of this section working.  I can resume a call if
the hold was initiated by an UCM phone or the CME SCCP phone.  However, I
cannot resume if the hold was initiated by the CME SIP phone.   Any one have
ideas what can be looked at to troubleshoot?  (Software MTP is configured
and active during the call.  Codecs are also right.)

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1, 4.2 Supplementary services

2010-06-26 Thread David Lee
Let me clarify.  I am using IOS Software MTP, not the UCM software MTP.



On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com wrote:

 You will need a hardware mtp (i.e dsp / ios sw ) not the one provided by
 ucm

 Sent from my phone

 On Jun 26, 2010, at 18:47, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello,
 
  I am at a lost.  I got most of this section working.  I can resume a call
 if the hold was initiated by an UCM phone or the CME SCCP phone.  However, I
 cannot resume if the hold was initiated by the CME SIP phone.   Any one have
 ideas what can be looked at to troubleshoot?  (Software MTP is configured
 and active during the call.  Codecs are also right.)
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Dave
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1, 4.2 Supplementary services

2010-06-26 Thread David Lee
Hi Daniel,

With your helpful post, consultative transfer works now. :)

The hold/resume still DOES NOT WORK when initiated from the BR2 SIP
phone...  Weird.

Thanks,

-Dave



On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.comwrote:

 David please check the link below
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com/msg17219.html

 These were the troubleshooting  I completed  with the help of other members
 of this list to get it working.  I got it working by using IOS software MTP,
 adding some h323 commands under the CUBE, and unchecking wait for
 capabilities exchange from the h225 controlled trunk

 Cheers


 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 12:18 PM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

 Let me clarify.  I am using IOS Software MTP, not the UCM software MTP.




 On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Pavan pav.c...@gmail.com wrote:

 You will need a hardware mtp (i.e dsp / ios sw ) not the one provided by
 ucm

 Sent from my phone

 On Jun 26, 2010, at 18:47, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hello,
 
  I am at a lost.  I got most of this section working.  I can resume a
 call if the hold was initiated by an UCM phone or the CME SCCP phone.
  However, I cannot resume if the hold was initiated by the CME SIP phone.
 Any one have ideas what can be looked at to troubleshoot?  (Software MTP is
 configured and active during the call.  Codecs are also right.)
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Dave
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please visit www.ipexpert.com



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol2 Lab1, 4.2 Supplementary services

2010-06-26 Thread David Lee
I only have IOS Software MTP MRG in the MRGL.  It is engaged.

HQ-RTR#sh sccp conn
sess_idconn_idstype mode codec   ripaddr rport sport

33555465   33554541   mtp   sendrecv g729192.168.10.13   20536 17736
33555465   33554540   mtp   sendrecv g72910.10.112.2 17962 19012




On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Daniel Berlinski dberlin...@gmail.comwrote:

 Sorry, forgot to mentionto make sure your ios software MTP MRG is on top of
 the Hardware IOS xcoder to ensure you are invoking it first choice
 On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:47 AM, David Lee d16...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I am at a lost.  I got most of this section working.  I can resume a call
 if the hold was initiated by an UCM phone or the CME SCCP phone.  However, I
 cannot resume if the hold was initiated by the CME SIP phone.   Any one have
 ideas what can be looked at to troubleshoot?  (Software MTP is configured
 and active during the call.  Codecs are also right.)

 Thanks,

 -Dave



 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco.com link

2010-06-17 Thread David Lee
A thread-jack / follow up question regarding the cisco.com link: do people
know if the Configuration Examples and Tech notes are accessible during the
exam?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] translation rule

2010-05-21 Thread David Holman
I keep this link handy for voice translation questions:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a0080325e8e.shtml

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Wael Agina waelag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear Ashar,

   The ^$ is catching null, which could be used to catch calls from unkown.
 example usage, drop any calls from PSTN that has ANI of unkown type.
 On H323 you could use following rule to do this

 voice translation-rule 1
  rule 1 reject /^$/

 voice translation-profile Drop-Unknown
   translate calling 1

 dial-peer voice 1 pots
 direct-inward-dial
 incom called .
 *call-block translation-profile incoming Drop-Unknown*

 For you example may be it i setting unknown ANI to be 42000 for example,
 bu not sure, need to be tested.

 Regards,
 Wael Agina

 On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.comwrote:

  Hi,

 I know I may sound stupid to some but I really want to know the purpose of
 ^$ in a translation rule for e.g:

 voice translation-rule 100
  rule 1 /^$/ /42000/
 !


 ^$ is null...what does it mean? what is a null number?

 Ash

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com




 --

 Thanks and Best Regards,
 Wael Agina

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab5A -- RL/RG question

2010-04-10 Thread David Lee
Hello,

Lab 5A, step 5.8 specifies the creation of a RL, with the SIP trunk to HQ-GW
as primary RG, and BR1 RTR MGCP GW as secondary RG.  According to the PG,
once the voice-ports on HQ-RTR are shut, calls should go to BR1 RTR.  (I
know the call won't succeed because the called number would be different.)
 However, I don't see the call coming to BR1 RTR at all from debug isdn
q931!  The DNA says that the BR1 RG is selected.

Can anyone shed any light on this?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab5A -- RL/RG question

2010-04-10 Thread David Lee
Hi Ash,

I don't think the call is even making it to BR1 RTR...  According to DNA,
the BR1 RG is an option.  If the RL only has BR1 RG, the call works.  When
the RL contains both HQ RG and BR1 RG, and the voiceports on HQ RTR are
shut, the call does not go to BR1 RG.

Is there away to see what digits (if any) are sent to an MGCP gateway?
 There is no result on debug isdn q931...

Thanks

-Dave


On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote:

  Are you talking about the National dialing backup from HQ router? I don't
 know much what's in the proctor guide but this is how you gonna do it.

 Just make pattern 91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX  PreDot and insert a route List
 with HQ-GW first and BR1-GW as second choice. At HQ-GW RL details, prefix
 91, NANP preDot..set other ANI requirements if it has been asked. At Br1-GW,
 prefix 1, NANP etc and it should work.

 Ash



 On 10/04/2010 22:57, David Lee wrote:

 Hello,

  Lab 5A, step 5.8 specifies the creation of a RL, with the SIP trunk to
 HQ-GW as primary RG, and BR1 RTR MGCP GW as secondary RG.  According to the
 PG, once the voice-ports on HQ-RTR are shut, calls should go to BR1 RTR.  (I
 know the call won't succeed because the called number would be different.)
  However, I don't see the call coming to BR1 RTR at all from debug isdn
 q931!  The DNA says that the BR1 RG is selected.

  Can anyone shed any light on this?

  Thanks,

  -Dave


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com



 --
 Thanks,
 Ashar Siddiqui


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab5A -- RL/RG question

2010-04-10 Thread David Lee
Thanks, Ash.

The problem was not with the dial-plan, but with the CM Service Parameter
Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag.  Once set to False (default is
True), it goes to the next RG in the RL.

That only took 3 hours. :)  Sad thing is I was burned on something like this
6 months ago on a project, and I couldn't remember exactly which parameter
TAC told me to change...

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote:

  David,

 You sure you are sending the correct digits to BR1-RTR as required by Br1
 PSTN?
 What Pattern you are using and what changes you are making at RL details
 (if any).
 I think you are doing something wrong at RL.



 On 11/04/2010 00:46, David Lee wrote:

 Hi Ash,

  I don't think the call is even making it to BR1 RTR...  According to DNA,
 the BR1 RG is an option.  If the RL only has BR1 RG, the call works.  When
 the RL contains both HQ RG and BR1 RG, and the voiceports on HQ RTR are
 shut, the call does not go to BR1 RG.

  Is there away to see what digits (if any) are sent to an MGCP gateway?
  There is no result on debug isdn q931...

  Thanks

  -Dave


  On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.comwrote:

 Are you talking about the National dialing backup from HQ router? I don't
 know much what's in the proctor guide but this is how you gonna do it.

 Just make pattern 91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XX  PreDot and insert a route List
 with HQ-GW first and BR1-GW as second choice. At HQ-GW RL details, prefix
 91, NANP preDot..set other ANI requirements if it has been asked. At Br1-GW,
 prefix 1, NANP etc and it should work.

 Ash



 On 10/04/2010 22:57, David Lee wrote:

  Hello,

  Lab 5A, step 5.8 specifies the creation of a RL, with the SIP trunk to
 HQ-GW as primary RG, and BR1 RTR MGCP GW as secondary RG.  According to the
 PG, once the voice-ports on HQ-RTR are shut, calls should go to BR1 RTR.  (I
 know the call won't succeed because the called number would be different.)
  However, I don't see the call coming to BR1 RTR at all from debug isdn
 q931!  The DNA says that the BR1 RG is selected.

  Can anyone shed any light on this?

  Thanks,

  -Dave


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com



 --
 Thanks,
 Ashar Siddiqui




 --
 Thanks,
 Ashar Siddiqui


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ben Ng's poll - Should the Unity Connection Remote Port Status Monitor be offerred as a tool in the CCIE Voice lab?

2010-04-01 Thread David Lee
TAC recently showed me this tool, and I find it having a nicer interface
than RTMT for what it does.  Anyways, I asked on the CCIE Voice Study Group
at the Cisco Learning Network, and Ben opened it up to a vote.  He'll
consider having it installed on Candidate PCs if there are 100 yes votes.

Link to the thread:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/message/59281#59281

Link to poll:
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/poll.jspa?poll=1094



On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:41 AM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.comwrote:

 Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

 You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Priority Queue on UCCX 5.0.2 (Otto Sanchez)
   2. Re: What Documentation is Accessible in Lab (Ohamien Uhakheme)
   3. Re: Bandwidth Per Call (Angel Perez)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:58:22 -0430
 From: Otto Sanchez o...@ipexpert.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Priority Queue on UCCX 5.0.2
 To: Cristobal Priego cristobalpri...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Message-ID:
u2wbe6b39441004010428l2aa3ae75w3d49fb1ff251e...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 Hi Cris,

 Please take a look to the following docs:


 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_5_0/programming/script_devp/gs_with_scripts/crs501gs.pdf
 Cisco CRS Scripting and Development Series: Volume 1, Getting Started with
 Scripts 5.0(1) , Chapter 17, shows an example on how to set up the set
 priotity step


 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_5_0/programming/script_devp/editor_step_ref/crs501sr.pdf
 Cisco CRS Scripting and Development Series: Volume 2, Editor Step Reference
 5.0(1) , show the set priority step properties

 Also make sure you are not using standard licenses with your uccx
 deployment,


 On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Cristobal Priego 
 cristobalpri...@gmail.com
  wrote:

  Hello all,
 
  I'd like to know if you have any documentation or if you could point me
 on
  the proper track. I'd like to set up a priority queue on my script. I'm
  using the priority step, but it doesn't seem to be working properly. how
 do
  i do it
 
  thanks
 
  Cris
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 


 --
 Regards,

 Otto Sanchez
 CCIE #25592 (Voice)
 Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
 URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100401/0d726931/attachment-0001.htm

 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 07:40:18 -0400
 From: Ohamien Uhakheme oham...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What Documentation is Accessible in
Lab
 To: Mike Brooks 2xcci...@gmail.com
 Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 Message-ID:
u2n64cae69e1004010440uaa5a7093sb2b286643014...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

 What about during the OEQs?  Do we have access to anything during that
 time?

 Ohamien

 On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mike Brooks 2xcci...@gmail.com wrote:

  According to Ben Ng:
 
  We have four SRND documents ready to be opened, also you have the online
  Cisco document page.
  1. UC 7 SRND
  2. CUCME 7 SRND
  3. UCCX 7 SRND
  4. Enterprise QoS SRND 3.3
 
  I think thats it.
 
  Mike
 
 
  On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Bryan Brooks ccieiwi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Hi Everyone,
 
  I was curious if someone could provide a list of documentation that is
  available when sitting the lab.  I want to become familiar with the
  documentation just in case I need to find something.  I tried searching
 the
  archive but was not successful.  Thanks in advance for any info
 provided.
 
  Thanks
  Bryan Brooks
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
 please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
 
  ___
  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
  visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL:
 http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100401/af462e57/attachment-0001.htm

 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC DIABLED

2010-03-05 Thread David


-Original Message-
From: Steve Sarrick ssarr...@drsllc.net
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 7:52 AM
To: J Hogan j.jho...@gmail.com; Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUPC DIABLED



[The entire original message is not included]___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] New Workbook Lab Access

2010-02-08 Thread David Wagner
Have all the of the new labs been posted online? I am only able to see
Volume 2 labs 1 - 4 when I login.

TIA
Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST on BR2 not working

2010-02-08 Thread David Wagner
Did you check your SRST reference in CUCM?

Dave

On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:08 PM, vccie2010 wrote:

 Hi
  
 My BR2 site phones don't fall back to SRST.
  
 call-manager-fallback
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  ip source-address fa voice subinterface port 2000
  max-ephones 10
  max-dn 5 dual-line
  voicemail 3600 call-forward pattern .T
  call-forward busy 3600
  call-forward noan 3600 timeout 10
  mwi relay
 sip-ua
  mwi-server ipv4:cue IP addr  expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
 unoslicited
  
 Am I missing anythign here pls...
  
 -ak
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST on BR2 not working

2010-02-08 Thread David Wagner
Do you have

Application
Global
Service alternate default 

In the config ?

Dave
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, vccie2010 wrote:

 Dave,
  
 Here is the SRST related config, do you need the comlete GW configs pls...
  
 call-manager-fallback
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  ip source-address fa voice subinterface port 2000
  max-ephones 10
  max-dn 5 dual-line
  voicemail 3600 call-forward pattern .T
  call-forward busy 3600
  call-forward noan 3600 timeout 10
  mwi relay
 sip-ua
  mwi-server ipv4:cue IP addr  expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
 unoslicited
  
 -ak
 
 On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi
  
 My BR2 site phones don't fall back to SRST.
  
 call-manager-fallback
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  ip source-address fa voice subinterface port 2000
  max-ephones 10
  max-dn 5 dual-line
  voicemail 3600 call-forward pattern .T
  call-forward busy 3600
  call-forward noan 3600 timeout 10
  mwi relay
 sip-ua
  mwi-server ipv4:cue IP addr  expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
 unoslicited
  
 Am I missing anythign here pls...
  
 -ak
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST on BR2 not working

2010-02-08 Thread David Wagner
Can you post the whole config?

I asume you can ping the source interface you are using from the phones subnet?

Dave
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:43 PM, vccie2010 wrote:

 yes pls...I do have that.
  
 
 
  
 On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:40 PM, David Wagner unifiedd...@gmail.com wrote:
 Do you have
 
 Application
 Global
 Service alternate default 
 
 In the config ?
 
 Dave
 On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:34 PM, vccie2010 wrote:
 
 Dave,
  
 Here is the SRST related config, do you need the comlete GW configs pls...
  
 call-manager-fallback
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  ip source-address fa voice subinterface port 2000
  max-ephones 10
  max-dn 5 dual-line
  voicemail 3600 call-forward pattern .T
  call-forward busy 3600
  call-forward noan 3600 timeout 10
  mwi relay
 sip-ua
  mwi-server ipv4:cue IP addr  expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
 unoslicited
  
 -ak
 
 On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:08 PM, vccie2010 vccie2...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi
  
 My BR2 site phones don't fall back to SRST.
  
 call-manager-fallback
  max-conferences 8 gain -6
  transfer-system full-consult
  ip source-address fa voice subinterface port 2000
  max-ephones 10
  max-dn 5 dual-line
  voicemail 3600 call-forward pattern .T
  call-forward busy 3600
  call-forward noan 3600 timeout 10
  mwi relay
 sip-ua
  mwi-server ipv4:cue IP addr  expires 3600 port 5060 transport udp 
 unoslicited
  
 Am I missing anythign here pls...
  
 -ak
 
 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
 visit www.ipexpert.com
 
 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 47, Issue 117

2010-01-24 Thread David Wagner
Alex,

I think we are using the same method and yes it works well. The biggest
thing to is understand is the using of translations patterns to set the ANI
because with SLRGs it does not function as xpected if done using a route
pattern or the Route list Detail.

Basic flow looks like this

Phone --  Translation Pattern (Set ANI strip 9 prepend +) -- Route
Pattern(Strip +) -- Route List -- Route Group or SLRG -- Gateway (Calling
or Called Transform Here for PSTN Requirements) -- PSTN

Dave

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Alex Hannah alex.han...@gmail.com wrote:

 Stephen,

 If you want to see best practices for the global dialplan, I would
 pull up the CUCM SRND.  Under the Call Routing section for the 7.x
 and 7.1 srnd there is a new features section where they have a graph
 of the global dialplan where it breaks down partitions, Css, Xlations,
 and Xforms.  Also, see if you can get the advanced dialplan preso from
 Networkers 2009.

 Having played with global dialing and taking the voice lab recently
 here is the basic layout that I use which works very well.

 Create a global partition which has all E.164 numbers in it.  Also, if
 you have to do any TEHO you can expand your patterns to include the
 pattern with area code and a seperate RL other than Stand Local.
 Example,  \+.! Points to SLRL and \+1212.! which points to a NYC RL
 containing NYC RG first then SLRL second.

 Every site will have a device partition which xlates user dialable
 numbers into their global representations.  Set ANI here!  Also I
 create a US partition which houses all Intl and LD patterns that get
 xlated to their global representations.

 Each phones device css has the site specific pt first, then US pt,
 then Global pt last.

 This will route all global numbers to the right GWY, but you need to
 use called party xforms on the GWY or DP where the GWY is in order to
 step the global number down to PSTN requirements.  This will let you
 change DNIS and called type/plan.

 Hope that helps...

 Alex

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 24, 2010, at 4:11 PM, ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
  wrote:

  Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
 ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 
  To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
  or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
 
  You can reach the person managing the list at
 ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
 
  When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
  than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...
 
 
  Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: Proper Way to Build Your Dial Plan (Stephen Greszczyszyn)
2. Re: Lab 12A - UCCX custom script (Roger K?llberg)
3. fair-queue when configuring FRF.12 (sean hurricane)
4. SNR and call apperance (LAB 4 Q 3.1) (sean hurricane)
5. CUPS Registration issue (sean hurricane)
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 1
  Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:26:42 +
  From: Stephen Greszczyszyn sgres...@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proper Way to Build Your Dial Plan
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Message-ID:
 71601cd61001241126j3d4727d3nc35c060731013...@mail.gmail.com
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
  David,
 
  Thanks for bringing up this topic, as I have been struggling with the
  same question while working through Vol1 Lab5.  I have seen different
  posts or videos about using one route pattern which points to the
  Standard Local Route Group, and then using various translation
  patterns.  Should the single E164 route pattern be \+.! and we strip
  the + and route only digits, or should we set the route pattern to
  be \+! and route the number with the prefixed +?  Or does it really
  matter which way we do it?
 
  I went through the routing lab fairly well, and got most of the
  results even though I did things quite differently than in the Proctor
  Guide.  I set up the single route group and did most of my
  manipulations using a combination of translation patterns,
  transformation patterns, or route lists.  I'm just not sure that I'm
  setting things up in a way that is non-scalable in real-life networks
  or in way that is hazardous to passing the exam :)
 
  Maybe Vik or Otto can give us some guidance on what is the best way
  to organize the dialplan?
 
 
  --
 
  Message: 2
  Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:27:47 +0100
  From: Roger K?llberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se
  Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 12A - UCCX custom script
  To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
  Message-ID:
 79fa99add19eda4c9880d26d736e50ef2cf7fa4...@ex2-sth.domain.root
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
 
  No one that has any thought about this?
 
  Roger K?llberg
  Unified Communication Consultant
  Cygate AB
 
 
  From: Roger K?llberg

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proper Way to Build Your Dial Plan

2010-01-23 Thread David Wagner
Hello List,

What is the proper way to build a call route in cucm 7. As you all know
there is many ways to accomplish this task. I fully understand SLRGs and
they work great for basic calling but once you throw some redundancy and
TEHO into the mix things get funky really quick. I think I have found the
best way to use them is with a translation pattern to match the pattern and
set the external phone number mask if needed along with plan and type. then
prefix a + and send it along to a route pattern of \+.! which will route it
out the SLRG, And this works.

OK now for TEHO say you have a need to route All 212 calls from a Chicago
Phone out the NY gate way. Translation + Route Pattern to get the number to
a new Route list with 2 route groups 1st CHI-RG 2nd NY-RG. Is this ok or
would you want to use 1sr NY 2nd SLRG. Both will work but with the slrg you
will need to use CALLING / Called Transformations to get the numbering
right.


TIA
Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling Number Transformation Behavior

2010-01-23 Thread David Wagner
I am trying to transform a DN on my egress gateway (MGCP PRI) I have used DP
transform CSS unchecked and a hard coded CSS of HQ_Xform which has access to
H!_Xform_PT for both calling and called transformation CSS. I have a calling
number transformation mask of 1XXX which is set to use external phone number
mask and then mask it done to 7 digits using XXX. It does not work
unless i hard code the transformation pattern to 1001 (Or another DN) then
it works fine. I have rebooted the cluster and deleted and re-added the
pattern a few times no go unless hard coded exact match.

Anyone else see this?


TIA
Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ASA 5505 EZVPN configuration for Proctor Lab

2009-10-23 Thread David Lee
Hello,

Does anyone have an ASA 5505 configuration for remotely accessing Proctor
Labs?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP COR

2009-09-11 Thread David Thomas

I have two questions on SIP cor.

1) Can someone explain the corlist tag in the voice register pool command? I am 
not understanding the logic and why the tag is needed.

2) It looks like cor is applied to the phone and not the dn does that mean 
there is not way to restrict on a per line appearance basis?

Thanks

cd

_
Bing brings you health info from trusted sources.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=pet+allergyform=MHEINApubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TXT_MHEINA_Health_Health_PetAllergy_1x1___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco-phone vs. cisco-softphone QoS

2009-07-14 Thread David Simes
Regarding these two Catalyst commands:

auto qos voip cisco-phone
auto qos voip cisco-softphone

Does the Catalyst use CDP to detect softphones (IP Communicator or Personal
Communicator) or is CDP only used on hardphones?  Second, how should a
switchport be configured if you need autoqos for a hardphone or a softphone
on the same port depending on what gets plugged in?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco-phone vs. cisco-softphone QoS

2009-07-14 Thread David Simes
Not sure if this hit the mail server so I'll try again


Regarding these two Catalyst commands:

auto qos voip cisco-phone
auto qos voip cisco-softphone

Does the switch use CDP to detect softphones (IP Communicator or Personal
Communicator) or is CDP only used on hardphones?  Second, how should a
switchport be configured if you need autoqos for a hardphone or a softphone
on the same port depending on what gets plugged in?  The administrative
overhead of having to manage port settings (autoqos hardphone vs. softphone)
would be a real pain in dynamic environment where people move around a lot.







-- 


Regards,

David Simes
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com


[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Just testing

2009-06-22 Thread David Menkel
Test

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

2009-05-28 Thread David Corbeil

Ok but with 
number 3100 (GDN)
label Support 1
call-forward noan VM timeout 12

you break down the requirement of you doesn't able to change the phone facing

Because you see in System message 2:Callforward VM instead of Your current 
options


And with the solution with 2 DN (Sergio solution), when MWI hit the first DN 
it's will not send another MWI for the second line

Thanks

David
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of 
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:55 AM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 39, Issue 135

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: GDM configuration with notification on2   phones
  (Sergio Polizer)
   2. Re: GDM configuration with notification on 2  phones (Cyrus)
   3. Re: GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones
  (Sergio Polizer)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:23:15 -0300
From: Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
2   phones
To: cristian.rade...@crescendo.ro, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID: bay114-w34d69ec43d74da26374557cb...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252


Hi, If you could associate a Label for the secondary lines,  a possible 
solution could be:

Face Requirement:Phone 1

Line1 : 3001

Line2 : Support 1Phone 2


Line1 : 3002


Line2 : Support 2

ephone-dn 1
number 3001

ephone-dn 2
number 3002

ephone-dn 3
number 3101

ephone-dn 4

number 3102

ephone-dn 5

number 3100 (GDN)
label Support 1
call-forward noan VM timeout 12

ephone-dn 6

number 3100 (GDN)

label Support 2
call-forward noan VM timeout 12

ephone 1
button 1:2 2o5,3

ephone 2

button 1:2 2o5,4


In this case, both line will ring together. I don't know if it will break any 
other requirement like ring line 1 and after ring line 2, etc.

From: cristian.rade...@crescendo.ro
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:22:16 +0300
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2
phones























 

I think this is not possible. With ?secondary
number? or ?overlay? it will not work.

 









From:
ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of David Corbeil

Sent: 27 May, 2009 8:42 PM

To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM
configuration with notification on 2 phones



 

Hi,

 

I want to know if it?s possible to have the voicemail
letter on the second line of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

 

Example:

 

Phone 1

Line1 : 3001

Line2 : 3101

 

Phone 2

Line1 : 3002

Line2 : 3102

 

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when
a message is left on GDM I need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.

Can?t have line 3

Can?t modify the look of the phone

 

It?s possible? If yes, how ?

 

Thanks

David Corbeil 

Consultant en
technologie | Technology Consultant 

Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333 

Membre de
l??quipe TELUS 


 


_
Descubra todas as novidades do novo Internet Explorer 8
http://brasil.microsoft.com.br/IE8/mergulhe/?utm_source=MSN%3BHotmailutm_medium=Taglineutm_campaign=IE8
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20090528/8b57e9bb/attachment-0001.htm
 

--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:43:17 +1000
From: Cyrus cyrus@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on
2   phones
To: Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Message-ID:
44f481eb0905280643t3b6b97a5q64ee82bb71042...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252

I guess it should be ,

ephone-dn 6
number 3100 (GDN)
label Support 2
call-forward all VM

Sine u call GDM directly or u call other numbers then if they have
noan set then they would forward to GDM (3100)

Just my thoughts here though! :)

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Sergio Polizer spoli...@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hi, If you could associate a Label for the secondary lines,? a possible
 solution could be:

 Face Requirement:

 Phone 1

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] GDM configuration with notification on 2 phones

2009-05-27 Thread David Corbeil
Hi,

I want to know if it's possible to have the voicemail letter on the second line 
of 2 phones without changing the phone facing.

Example:

Phone 1
Line1 : 3001
Line2 : 3101

Phone 2
Line1 : 3002
Line2 : 3102

Each line need to be access to GDM mailbox, and when a message is left on GDM I 
need to have VM Letter on both Line2 Phone.
Can't have line 3
Can't modify the look of the phone

It's possible? If yes, how ?

Thanks

David Corbeil
Consultant en technologie | Technology Consultant
Tel. 514-798-4206 | Fax. 514-748-5333
Membre de l'équipe TELUS



  1   2   >