Re: CF MX
If you're a part of the beta program, this question would probably be better answered in the beta forums. Just a thought. Dave. - Original Message - From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 07:22 PM Subject: CF MX > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow people to test > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for profit just > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or point me to an > address to inquire? > > Thanks, > > Neil > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX
Dave, I can't seem to find them Could you direct me to them... Neil - Original Message - From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:52 PM Subject: Re: CF MX > If you're a part of the beta program, this question would probably be better > answered in the beta forums. > > Just a thought. > > Dave. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 07:22 PM > Subject: CF MX > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow people to test > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for profit just > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or point me to an > > address to inquire? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil > > > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX
Neil, You must be on the beta team to access the beta forums. Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign http://www.quilldesign.com SiteDirector v2.0 - Commerce Builder > Dave, > I can't seem to find them Could you direct me to them... > > Neil > > - Original Message - > From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:52 PM > Subject: Re: CF MX > > > > If you're a part of the beta program, this question would probably be > better > > answered in the beta forums. > > > > Just a thought. > > > > Dave. > > > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 07:22 PM > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow people to test > > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for profit > just > > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or point me to > an > > > address to inquire? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX
Yes I am part of the beta program however me emails do not reference the forums.. NM I think I figured it out. Neil - Original Message - From: "Paul Giesenhagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:23 PM Subject: Re: CF MX > Neil, > > You must be on the beta team to access the beta forums. > > Paul Giesenhagen > QuillDesign > http://www.quilldesign.com > SiteDirector v2.0 - Commerce Builder > > > > > Dave, > > I can't seem to find them Could you direct me to them... > > > > Neil > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:52 PM > > Subject: Re: CF MX > > > > > > > If you're a part of the beta program, this question would probably be > > better > > > answered in the beta forums. > > > > > > Just a thought. > > > > > > Dave. > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 07:22 PM > > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow people to > test > > > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for profit > > just > > > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or point me to > > an > > > > address to inquire? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
Hi Neil, I would stave off setting a box up for other people to test, unless they are also on the Beta and are covered by NDA. AFAIK, the NDA covers you and is not scalable to testers. Also, placing Neo Beta on a 'live' server for testing is a big no no and would not go down well with the MACR Legal Dept well not unless you wanted a cease and desist letter :-) My adive to you, remove any and all external installs/testers and you will be OK... this is a crucial time for MM (and indeed any software company in a beta cycle) and jeopardising a cycle can be a disater. Thanks Neil Team Macromedia Spectra http://www.macromedia.com/go/team __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
Without a doubt, this is a no-no. === Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -Original Message- > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > people to test > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > profit just > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > point me to an > address to inquire? > > Thanks, > > Neil > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. If you do this, how would anyone know? Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for you... How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, but.. ) At 08:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Without a doubt, this is a no-no. > >=== >Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Yahoo IM : morpheus > >"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > > people to test > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > > profit just > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > > point me to an > > address to inquire? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil > > > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
by dumping the server variables - that's how. -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. If you do this, how would anyone know? Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for you... How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, but.. ) At 08:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Without a doubt, this is a no-no. > >=== >Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Yahoo IM : morpheus > >"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > > people to test > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > > profit just > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > > point me to an > > address to inquire? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil > > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX
Jeff, It doesn't matter if no one knows. Its a breach of the NDA/Licence. If you get caught you'll get your wrist slapped. If you don't cease and desist you'll get a get a good legal kicking Why risk getting caught, getting a slapping and losing any goodwill that being a beta tester has built up between you and MM? Schrodinger's Cat - Original Message - From: "Jeffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: CF MX > At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. > If you do this, how would anyone know? > Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for > you... > How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software > being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( > Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, > but.. ) > > At 08:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Without a doubt, this is a no-no. > > > >=== > >Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > > > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Yahoo IM : morpheus > > > >"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > > > people to test > > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > > > profit just > > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > > > point me to an > > > address to inquire? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
Being a beta tester myself, I consider it a privilege. I am going to do what MM asks, and what I agreed to do when I signed up. Getting to play with Betas and influencing changes to the final product is fun. I want to continue doing this as well, so if you ask me, I would say don't do it. -Original Message- From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:17 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX Jeff, It doesn't matter if no one knows. Its a breach of the NDA/Licence. If you get caught you'll get your wrist slapped. If you don't cease and desist you'll get a get a good legal kicking Why risk getting caught, getting a slapping and losing any goodwill that being a beta tester has built up between you and MM? Schrodinger's Cat - Original Message - From: "Jeffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: CF MX > At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. > If you do this, how would anyone know? > Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for > you... > How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software > being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( > Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, > but.. ) > > At 08:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Without a doubt, this is a no-no. > > > >=== > >Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > > > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Yahoo IM : morpheus > > > >"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > > > people to test > > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > > > profit just > > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > > > point me to an > > > address to inquire? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Neil > > > > > > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
I think the question isn't whether or not you would get caught, but whether or not you have the integrity to abide by the NDA. There's also nothing stopping you from burning copies and selling them on eBay or from publishing a beta to a warez group or file sharing network. If someone doesn't plan on abiding by the agreement, they shouldn't make it. For the record Jeff, I am in no way calling your integrity into question with this message. :) Just my 2 cents. -Cameron -Original Message- From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. If you do this, how would anyone know? Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for you... How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, but.. ) At 08:20 AM 4/18/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Without a doubt, this is a no-no. > >=== >Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia > >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Yahoo IM : morpheus > >"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:22 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > Anyone know if I could setup a test box for Neo and allow > > people to test > > pages on it? I know the NDA is pretty thick but it isn't for > > profit just > > for testing. Maybe a MM employee could shed some light or > > point me to an > > address to inquire? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Neil > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
> At the risk of sounding like a Devil's advocate. > If you do this, how would anyone know? > Set up a box with software X, and ask people to browse it to test it for >you... > How are those people ( or anyone else ) going to know if the software >being run is ColdFusion 4, 4.5, MX, or some other technology altogether? ( >Well, if it were some other technology the extension might give it away, >but.. ) > At last check www.yourserver.com/CFIDE/administrator/index.cfm is still the generic way to get to the CF Admin, and most people don't change that. So just pull up that page on a site and the version number is right in your face. Although I will say this -- if you read section 1.2 of the NDA, it actually discusses what Neil's asking. It actually looks as though there's a bit of leeway. I'd read that and then explicitly send an e-mail to a Macromedia Beta program employee and clarify what it means. Their e-mails are all over the Beta forums. Regards, Dave. _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
That information is NDA at this point. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Ediets.com > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > 954.360.9022 X159 > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
How so? Anyone can download MX and run their own benchmarks. --- Billy Cravens -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX That information is NDA at this point. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Ediets.com > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > 954.360.9022 X159 > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
the current build is not completly optimized for performance yet, so i would wait until the final version before doing any serious performance testing. mike chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:28 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX > > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to > get them to upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find > a page that shows the performance stats compared to older > versions any ideas? > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
Jump over to the Neo forums on the beta site - Libby English of Macromedia : "You can now discuss all aspects of the new CF release..." --- Billy Cravens -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX That information is NDA at this point. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Ediets.com > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > 954.360.9022 X159 > __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
It is a preview release that is not feature complete or performance tuned. Any benchmark based on a preview release would be silly at best. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:43 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX > > How so? Anyone can download MX and run their own benchmarks. > > --- > Billy Cravens > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX > > That information is NDA at this point. > > -Matt > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CF MX > > > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to > > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the > > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > Senior Database Developer > > Ediets.com > > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX
it's not done yet, so I'd think performance testing at this stage would be irrelevant Bryan Stevenson VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. t. 250.920.8830 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Macromedia Associate Partner www.macromedia.com - Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group Founder & Director www.cfug-vancouverisland.com - Original Message - From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM Subject: CF MX > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to upgrade from >CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Ediets.com > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > 954.360.9022 X159 > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX
Yeah, but not covered by NDA ;) --- Billy Cravens -Original Message- From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF MX It is a preview release that is not feature complete or performance tuned. Any benchmark based on a preview release would be silly at best. -Matt > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:43 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX > > How so? Anyone can download MX and run their own benchmarks. > > --- > Billy Cravens > > -Original Message- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX > > That information is NDA at this point. > > -Matt > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: CF MX > > > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get them to > > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page that shows the > > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > Senior Database Developer > > Ediets.com > > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX Mail
You might want to look at iMS-SE. iMS-SE is a high-performance mail sending engine for ColdFusion that has several advanced features and does not require the use of an external email server. Regards, -- Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com - 631-737-4668 x101 inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server >>> Find out how iMS Stacks up to the competition: >http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm - Original Message - From: "gfxlabs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:22 PM Subject: CF MX Mail > I need to build an app that will use CF to send about 250 e-mail > messages every other day. The messages will be all text, no attachments. > > Does CFMX perform better than CF5 in regards to CFMAIL? Or is it just > about the same. > > If it does not perform well can someone suggest a third party package I > can use to do the e-mail function. > > thanks. > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX Mail
I noticed fusion mail doesn't work under MX. Comes up with a error under the install folder: Variable DOMAINSFOLDER is undefined. The error occurred in C:\CFusionMX\wwwroot\fusionmail\install\msaccess\index.cfm: line 47 45 : ENTRY="TemplateDirectory" TYPE="string" Variable="DomainsFolder"> 46 : Enter the Destination Folder of your server templates:(NOTE: This folder must already exist on your server) 47 : Copy server templates 48 : 49 : -Original Message- From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:36 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX Mail You might want to look at iMS-SE. iMS-SE is a high-performance mail sending engine for ColdFusion that has several advanced features and does not require the use of an external email server. Regards, -- Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com - 631-737-4668 x101 inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server >>> Find out how iMS Stacks up to the competition: http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm - Original Message - From: "gfxlabs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:22 PM Subject: CF MX Mail > I need to build an app that will use CF to send about 250 e-mail > messages every other day. The messages will be all text, no attachments. > > Does CFMX perform better than CF5 in regards to CFMAIL? Or is it just > about the same. > > If it does not perform well can someone suggest a third party package I > can use to do the e-mail function. > > thanks. > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX Mail
The FusionMail installer relies on CFREGISTRY - do you have that disabled? Regards, Howie - Original Message - From: <"Tilbrook>; > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:11 PM Subject: RE: CF MX Mail > I noticed fusion mail doesn't work under MX. Comes up with a error under the > install folder: > > Variable DOMAINSFOLDER is undefined. > > The error occurred in > C:\CFusionMX\wwwroot\fusionmail\install\msaccess\index.cfm: line 47 > > 45 : ENTRY="TemplateDirectory" TYPE="string" Variable="DomainsFolder"> > 46 : Enter the Destination Folder of your server templates: COLOR="29415a">(NOTE: This folder must already exist on your > server) > 47 : value="#DomainsFolder#"> type="checkbox" checked="checked"> Copy server templates > 48 : > 49 : > > > > -Original Message- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 11 February 2003 11:36 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF MX Mail > > > You might want to look at iMS-SE. iMS-SE is a high-performance mail sending > engine for ColdFusion that has several > advanced features and does not require the use of an external email server. > > Regards, > > -- > Howie Hamlin - inFusion Project Manager > On-Line Data Solutions, Inc. - www.CoolFusion.com - 631-737-4668 x101 > inFusion Mail Server (iMS) - The Award-winning, Intelligent Mail Server > >>> Find out how iMS Stacks up to the competition: > http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm > > - Original Message - > From: "gfxlabs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 7:22 PM > Subject: CF MX Mail > > > > I need to build an app that will use CF to send about 250 e-mail > > messages every other day. The messages will be all text, no attachments. > > > > Does CFMX perform better than CF5 in regards to CFMAIL? Or is it just > > about the same. > > > > If it does not perform well can someone suggest a third party package I > > can use to do the e-mail function. > > > > thanks. > > > > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: cf mx install
you can leave them on just fine, you must only make sure to shut down the cf application service. tony -Original Message- From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf mx install Should you shut down the ms-sql and/or iis services during a cfmx install? Or is it better to leave them on so cf can find them during install? t/ Matt ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
RE: cf mx install
I did an add/remove programs on cfmx after shutting down the three mx services. Clean boot and then install. Thanks for the help, Matt -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cf mx install you can leave them on just fine, you must only make sure to shut down the cf application service. tony -Original Message- From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf mx install Should you shut down the ms-sql and/or iis services during a cfmx install? Or is it better to leave them on so cf can find them during install? t/ Matt ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
RE: cf mx install
very good. later. tw -Original Message- From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:40 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cf mx install I did an add/remove programs on cfmx after shutting down the three mx services. Clean boot and then install. Thanks for the help, Matt -Original Message- From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: cf mx install you can leave them on just fine, you must only make sure to shut down the cf application service. tony -Original Message- From: Matthew P. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf mx install Should you shut down the ms-sql and/or iis services during a cfmx install? Or is it better to leave them on so cf can find them during install? t/ Matt ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Re: CF MX cfobject
David,
One big question -- CFMX or CF5 (or 4.5)?
CFMX uses the jIntegra Java-COM bridge which is doesn't like poorly written
COM objects (objects that work just fine in ASP). And it doesn't like some
perfectly fine COM objects :) Tough job running COM under Java.
If you're using ColdFusion 5, one question is do you have a multi-processor
server? I've had a devil of a time with some COM objects under ColdFusion
(and ASP for that matter) when moving from single to dual/quad processor
machines. Something about threading and the threading model chosen for the
COM object. Been a long time since I did COM so I'll leave the details for
someone else.
When I've had similar COM problems before, I've gone as far as getting debug
builds from the vendor -- usually we're talking source code change. But then
again, maybe it just needs regsrv32 and a reboot :)
I'd try it on another server/machine before I wasted a lot of time with
anything else.
Regards,
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David D Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: CF MX cfobject
> I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion. Works
> fine in asp.
>
> In ASP file
> 'Create ID3Edit object & set reg-code to "READONLY"
> Set objID3 = server.CreateObject("ID3Edit.ID3Tag")
>
>
> In cold fusion mx file
>
>
>
> I get:
>
> An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
> The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x800401f7 -
> Some error in application program.
>
> The error occurred in D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\Default\test.cfm: line 34
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX cfobject
Thanks, I am running CF MX.
So I guess, either I go back to CF 5.0 or I start using asp for this
project.
Someone else on the list has suggested using a cfc they are working
with. I will try that.
David
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX cfobject
David,
One big question -- CFMX or CF5 (or 4.5)?
CFMX uses the jIntegra Java-COM bridge which is doesn't like poorly
written
COM objects (objects that work just fine in ASP). And it doesn't like
some
perfectly fine COM objects :) Tough job running COM under Java.
If you're using ColdFusion 5, one question is do you have a
multi-processor
server? I've had a devil of a time with some COM objects under
ColdFusion
(and ASP for that matter) when moving from single to dual/quad processor
machines. Something about threading and the threading model chosen for
the
COM object. Been a long time since I did COM so I'll leave the details
for
someone else.
When I've had similar COM problems before, I've gone as far as getting
debug
builds from the vendor -- usually we're talking source code change. But
then
again, maybe it just needs regsrv32 and a reboot :)
I'd try it on another server/machine before I wasted a lot of time with
anything else.
Regards,
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David D Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:10 PM
Subject: CF MX cfobject
> I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion.
Works
> fine in asp.
>
> In ASP file
> 'Create ID3Edit object & set reg-code to "READONLY"
> Set objID3 = server.CreateObject("ID3Edit.ID3Tag")
>
>
> In cold fusion mx file
>
>
>
> I get:
>
> An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
> The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x800401f7
-
> Some error in application program.
>
> The error occurred in D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\Default\test.cfm: line 34
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX cfobject
You could use the Java Native Interface and create some wrapper classes that
you could instantiate in CFMX.
- Original Message -
From: "David D Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: CF MX cfobject
> Thanks, I am running CF MX.
>
> So I guess, either I go back to CF 5.0 or I start using asp for this
> project.
>
> Someone else on the list has suggested using a cfc they are working
> with. I will try that.
>
> David
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:16 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF MX cfobject
>
> David,
>
> One big question -- CFMX or CF5 (or 4.5)?
>
> CFMX uses the jIntegra Java-COM bridge which is doesn't like poorly
> written
> COM objects (objects that work just fine in ASP). And it doesn't like
> some
> perfectly fine COM objects :) Tough job running COM under Java.
>
> If you're using ColdFusion 5, one question is do you have a
> multi-processor
> server? I've had a devil of a time with some COM objects under
> ColdFusion
> (and ASP for that matter) when moving from single to dual/quad processor
> machines. Something about threading and the threading model chosen for
> the
> COM object. Been a long time since I did COM so I'll leave the details
> for
> someone else.
>
> When I've had similar COM problems before, I've gone as far as getting
> debug
> builds from the vendor -- usually we're talking source code change. But
> then
> again, maybe it just needs regsrv32 and a reboot :)
>
> I'd try it on another server/machine before I wasted a lot of time with
> anything else.
>
> Regards,
>
> John Paul Ashenfelter
> CTO/Transitionpoint
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Original Message -
> From: "David D Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:10 PM
> Subject: CF MX cfobject
>
>
> > I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion.
> Works
> > fine in asp.
> >
> > In ASP file
> > 'Create ID3Edit object & set reg-code to "READONLY"
> > Set objID3 = server.CreateObject("ID3Edit.ID3Tag")
> >
> >
> > In cold fusion mx file
> >
> > action="CREATE">
> >
> > I get:
> >
> > An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
> > The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x800401f7
> -
> > Some error in application program.
> >
> > The error occurred in D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\Default\test.cfm: line 34
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX cfobject
What does the COM object due? Perhaps there is a Java alternative that
would work much better in CFMX.
Make sure you've installed UR2.
At 06:10 PM 1/8/2003, you wrote:
>I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion. Works
>fine in asp.
>
>In ASP file
>'Create ID3Edit object & set reg-code to "READONLY"
>Set objID3 = server.CreateObject("ID3Edit.ID3Tag")
>
>
>In cold fusion mx file
>
>
>
>I get:
>
>An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
>The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x800401f7 -
>Some error in application program.
>
>The error occurred in D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\Default\test.cfm: line 34
>
>
>Any suggestions?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX cfobject
David,
I had the same problems when I upgraded to MX. I was using CFXid3 or
something like that, and it was using a COM object. The object for one
reason or the other wouldn't always load, and when it did, it wasn't
reliable. Sometimes locking up my treads.
So I moved everything over to a java class, and have had a lot of
success. I'll send you the CFC this weekend, I need to strip it down and
take out all of my internal stuff, like updating my database, and
loading directories. (specific to my application)
Adam Wayne Lehman
Web Systems Developer
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: David D Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX cfobject
I am having trouble getting this object to work via cold fusion. Works
fine in asp.
In ASP file
'Create ID3Edit object & set reg-code to "READONLY"
Set objID3 = server.CreateObject("ID3Edit.ID3Tag")
In cold fusion mx file
I get:
An exception occurred when instantiating a Com object.
The cause of this exception was that: AutomationException: 0x800401f7 -
Some error in application program.
The error occurred in D:\Inetpub\wwwroot\Default\test.cfm: line 34
Any suggestions?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
Unsubscribe:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
> Is anyone aware of any issues with running CFMX Server > on a box that already has BEA WebLogic server. The servers > will not be interacting with each other, rather just > coexisting on the same machine. Any issues with the CF > install? Any input would be greatly appreciated. You shouldn't have any problems, except for the possibility that you can't configure an individual virtual web server or virtual directory to service both simultaneously. For example, if you're using Apache as the front-end for WebLogic, you might have one virtual web server (using the VirtualHost directive) for WebLogic, and another for CF MX. You might want to take a look at CF MX for WebLogic, when it comes out; it's a JSP killer in my opinion. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
> You might want to take a look at CF MX for WebLogic, when it comes out; > it's > a JSP killer in my opinion. > I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. It certainly isn't a downloadable option for those of us participating in the CFMX J2EE beta program. -Matt __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. It's going to come out later this year. "Optimized versions of ColdFusion MX for Macromedia JRun, IBM WebSphere Application Server, and Sun ONE Application Server are expected to ship in the third calendar quarter of 2002. ColdFusion MX for BEA WebLogic Server is expected to ship later this year." from http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2002/coldfusion_mx_announce.ht ml _ Pete Freitag CTO, CFDEV.COM ColdFusion Tags, Products, and Free Resources http://www.cfdev.com/ __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
>>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. Will be end of summer - September, I think. -Craig __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
In other words, Macromedia still hasn't worked out a deal with Bea and thus hasn't announced the product. There is a difference between expecting a product and announcing one. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Pete Freitag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:51 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > > >I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. > > It's going to come out later this year. > > "Optimized versions of ColdFusion MX for Macromedia JRun, IBM WebSphere > Application Server, and Sun ONE Application Server are expected to ship in > the third calendar quarter of 2002. ColdFusion MX for BEA WebLogic Server > is > expected to ship later this year." > from > http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/proom/pr/2002/coldfusion_mx_announc e. > ht > ml > > _ > Pete Freitag > CTO, CFDEV.COM > ColdFusion Tags, Products, and Free Resources > http://www.cfdev.com/ > > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
That's speculation, not an announcement. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:00 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > > >>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. > > Will be end of summer - September, I think. > > -Craig > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
> I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. It > certainly isn't a downloadable option for those of us > participating in the CFMX J2EE beta program. No, from what I've heard it'll be released in the "second round", so to speak. Of course, it may never come out at all, for all I know; I was simply stating my expectations. I expect it to come out sometime, thus my recommendation to look at it "when it comes out". Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX & WebLogic
Macromedia has stuck BEA Weblogic on every single MX press release with an expected ship date of "later this year". I do hope they aren't speculating about their own products. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 12:01:23 PM, you wrote: ML> That's speculation, not an announcement. ML> Matt Liotta ML> President & CEO ML> Montara Software, Inc. ML> http://www.montarasoftware.com/ ML> V: 415-577-8070 ML> F: 415-341-8906 ML> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -Original Message- >> From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:00 AM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic >> >> >>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. >> >> Will be end of summer - September, I think. >> >> -Craig __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX & WebLogic
Companies do it all the time. Again, that is the difference between an expectation and an announcement. Macromedia expects to ship CFMX for WebLogic in a certain time frame, but there is no hard/guaranteed date. When there is, Macromedia will announce the product. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:32 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF MX & WebLogic > > Macromedia has stuck BEA Weblogic on every single MX press > release with an expected ship date of "later this year". > > I do hope they aren't speculating about their own products. > > -- > jon > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 12:01:23 PM, you wrote: > ML> That's speculation, not an announcement. > > ML> Matt Liotta > ML> President & CEO > ML> Montara Software, Inc. > ML> http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > ML> V: 415-577-8070 > ML> F: 415-341-8906 > ML> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:00 AM > >> To: CF-Talk > >> Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > >> > >> >>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. > >> > >> Will be end of summer - September, I think. > >> > >> -Craig > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX Debugging
Yeah, switch it to 'classic' debugging.. and apply a patch that Sean Corfield suggested in order to make sure that all the variables are on it's own line: I have a .zip file of it on my server: http://blog.web-rat.com/archives/15.html ~Todd On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, chris.alvarado wrote: > This is my one and only gripe thus far with CF MX, and maybe someone > knows a way to fix it. > > I am not liking the floating debugging window, nor do I like it docked > to the left of the page. > > Is there a way to get debugging info to show up at the bottom of the > page like it used to with CF 5 and down? > > Thanks, > > -chris.alvarado > [ application developer ] > 4 Guys Interactive, Inc. > http://www.4guys.com > > -- I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. > And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect > it. -- Jack Handy > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Debugging
Sure, it's a setting in CF Admin in the Debug screen, set it to "classic" instead of "dockable". --- Ben -Original Message- From: chris.alvarado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 9:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF MX Debugging This is my one and only gripe thus far with CF MX, and maybe someone knows a way to fix it. I am not liking the floating debugging window, nor do I like it docked to the left of the page. Is there a way to get debugging info to show up at the bottom of the page like it used to with CF 5 and down? Thanks, -chris.alvarado [ application developer ] 4 Guys Interactive, Inc. http://www.4guys.com -- I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it. -- Jack Handy __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX Debugging
You need to get into the Administrator and change the debugging setting to "classic" instead of "Dockable". At 08:20 AM 7/29/2002 -0500, you wrote: >This is my one and only gripe thus far with CF MX, and maybe someone >knows a way to fix it. > >I am not liking the floating debugging window, nor do I like it docked >to the left of the page. > >Is there a way to get debugging info to show up at the bottom of the >page like it used to with CF 5 and down? > >Thanks, > >-chris.alvarado >[ application developer ] >4 Guys Interactive, Inc. >http://www.4guys.com > >-- I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. >And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect >it. -- Jack Handy > > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Books
We're all working on them frantically. Mine will start rolling out in June. -Original Message- From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF MX Books Since Ben and Ray are here today, when can we expect the books? jon __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Books
Soon. :> === Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > -Original Message- > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:37 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX Books > > > Since Ben and Ray are here today, when can we expect the books? > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Books
At the risk of blatant self-promotion.. My new book will be out sometime in June also (ColdFusion MX: The Complete Reference). Unlike many of the other books, which are just being updated, this one was written from scratch with CFMX in mind. I have a few contributors on various topics including Simon Horwith, Chris Cortes, and Chris Graves. Michael Dinowitz is doing the tech editing. Keep watch on this forum during the next few months when I will start begging people to buy it so I can pay my mortgage. (Kidding, honest). -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! Weird E-mail problems Use use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] as backup AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 -- My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com -- Will I be on the streets tomorrow, Will I have to beg and Borrow Will I have to go back to the job I left behind? __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Books
I wasn't sure if I could comment on that. Thanks Jeff. At 03:27 PM 4/29/02, you wrote: > At the risk of blatant self-promotion.. > My new book will be out sometime in June also (ColdFusion MX: The >Complete Reference). > > Unlike many of the other books, which are just being updated, this one >was written from scratch with CFMX in mind. I have a few contributors on >various topics including Simon Horwith, Chris Cortes, and Chris >Graves. Michael Dinowitz is doing the tech editing. > > Keep watch on this forum during the next few months when I will start >begging people to buy it so I can pay my mortgage. (Kidding, honest). > > >-- >Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Need a Web Developer? Contact me! >Weird E-mail problems Use use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] as backup >AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 >-- >My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com >My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com >-- >Will I be on the streets tomorrow, Will I have to beg and Borrow >Will I have to go back to the job I left behind? > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX Books
Bold post, Jeff. Good Fortune, Richard Walters, Webmaster, Davita Laboratory Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (800) 604-5227 x 3525 >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/29/02 03:27PM >>> At the risk of blatant self-promotion.. My new book will be out sometime in June also (ColdFusion MX: The Complete Reference). Unlike many of the other books, which are just being updated, this one was written from scratch with CFMX in mind. I have a few contributors on various topics including Simon Horwith, Chris Cortes, and Chris Graves. Michael Dinowitz is doing the tech editing. Keep watch on this forum during the next few months when I will start begging people to buy it so I can pay my mortgage. (Kidding, honest). -- Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Need a Web Developer? Contact me! Weird E-mail problems Use use mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] as backup AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 -- My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com -- Will I be on the streets tomorrow, Will I have to beg and Borrow Will I have to go back to the job I left behind? __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX CFGRAPH
Cfgraph was deprecated in favor of cfchart in MX _ From: Nick Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:30 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF MX CFGRAPH Developed some graphing (Line graphs) on CF 5.0 and it worked. When I uploaded to a ColdFusion MX server, at Intermedia.net, things changed quite a lot. Graph is all over the place and the title doesn't show. My guess is that the CFGRAPH tag is different for MX. Can anyone explain the differences or where I can find info online for the MX CFGRAPH tag. Thanks, Nick _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: CF MX Connector
You have to recompile the connector to eliminate that error. The connector source is included in the ColdFusion installation. >From a (slightly old) CFMX Connector FAQ: Where is the Apache connector source located and how can I compile my own Apache EAPI connector? For ColdFusion MX, the code and compile instructions are included in cf_root/runtime/lib/wsconfig.jar in the /connectors/src/ApacheModule.zip file. See ApacheBuildInstructions.txt in the ApacheModule.zip. See also: http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?data=""> 6B7406437B04BBF 76B7406437B04BBF> http://www.cfdev.com/apache/apache2cfmx.cfm -Steve _ From: Richard Wigfall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 8:39 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF MX Connector I am running CF MX 6.1 on a RedHat AS2.1 server and Apache 1.3.27. When ColdFusion starts, the following warning message appears: [warn] Loaded DSO /opt/coldfusionmx/runtime/lib/wsconfig/l/mod_jrun.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI) Can anyone tell me how to fix this, and where I can find the fix? Thank you for your time. _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: CF MX Connector
Hello Steve, Thank you for your help, however, I received a syntax error in the httpd.conf file when restarting Apache with the recompiled connector: (Cannot load ...mod_jrun.so into server... Undefined symbol: removePathParms) Any ideas where I went wrong, the new recompiled mod_jrun.so was about 20kb smaller than the original file. Thank you for your time. Richard >You have to recompile the connector to eliminate that error. The connector >source is included in the ColdFusion installation. > >From a (slightly old) CFMX Connector FAQ: >Where is the Apache connector source located and how can I compile my own >Apache EAPI connector? >For ColdFusion MX, the code and compile instructions are included in >cf_root/runtime/lib/wsconfig.jar in the /connectors/src/ApacheModule.zip >file. See ApacheBuildInstructions.txt in the ApacheModule.zip. > >See also: >http://www.talkingtree.com/blog/index.cfm?data=""> >6B7406437B04BBF > >76B7406437B04BBF> >http://www.cfdev.com/apache/apache2cfmx.cfm > > >-Steve > > > > > _ > >From: Richard Wigfall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 8:39 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: CF MX Connector > > >I am running CF MX 6.1 on a RedHat AS2.1 server and Apache 1.3.27. When >ColdFusion starts, the following warning message appears: >[warn] Loaded DSO /opt/coldfusionmx/runtime/lib/wsconfig/l/mod_jrun.so uses >plain Apache 1.3 API, this module might crash under EAPI! (please recompile >it with -DEAPI) >Can anyone tell me how to fix this, and where I can find the fix? >Thank you for your time. > _ [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
RE: CF MX Problem
> I am wondering if there could be some difference between the > way CF MX and CF MX 6.1 function that could be preventing the > creating of PDF documents? It will take some doing to get the > actual CF server install disk (which appears to be my only > way to upgrade to CF MX 6.1) and I would rather avoid the > hassle if I do not have to go through it. Yes, I believe that CFMX 6.1 comes with a newer version of JIntegra, which is the COM library used by CFMX. I wouldn't be surprised if some things no longer work correctly, although I don't know about ActivePDF specifically. In addition, there may conceivably be some permissions issues, although I suspect this isn't your problem. Perhaps, though, the previous install of CFMX 6.0 ran as a user with rights to those COM objects, and CFMX 6.1 is running as a different user. It would probably also be useful to find exactly where the error occurs. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: CF MX Problem
It would simplify troubleshooting if you run the 6.1 updater. It's free right? Then you could compare the 2 instances of CF a little better. Greg - Original Message - From: Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:41:09 -0400 Subject: RE: CF MX Problem To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am wondering if there could be some difference between the > way CF MX and CF MX 6.1 function that could be preventing the > creating of PDF documents? It will take some doing to get the > actual CF server install disk (which appears to be my only > way to upgrade to CF MX 6.1) and I would rather avoid the > hassle if I do not have to go through it. Yes, I believe that CFMX 6.1 comes with a newer version of JIntegra, which is the COM library used by CFMX. I wouldn't be surprised if some things no longer work correctly, although I don't know about ActivePDF specifically. In addition, there may conceivably be some permissions issues, although I suspect this isn't your problem. Perhaps, though, the previous install of CFMX 6.0 ran as a user with rights to those COM objects, and CFMX 6.1 is running as a different user. It would probably also be useful to find exactly where the error occurs. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ phone: 202-797-5496 fax: 202-797-5444 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username. David - Original Message - From: "David Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:07 AM Subject: CF MX Enterprise Security > I have two different passwords for cfadmin pages and RDS. But I would like > to limit the drives and folders that a user can see when they log in with > rds based on login name. > > For example: > > user A logs in with DW MX or Home Site and needs access to Folder A on drive > A. I don't want them to have access or even see the drives B,C,etc or other > folders then folder A on drive A. > > I have looked at sandbox security, but I don't think it gives me what I > want. From what I can tell it limits what a application can do running in X > folder, not what X users can see or have access to via RDS. > > David > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX Enterprise Security
You can't do it in CFMX. With CF4 or CF5 you could create a security context for studio users (RDS), but not in MX (b) ~~ Stephenie Hamilton Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional CFXHosting -Original Message- From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username. David - Original Message - From: "David Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:07 AM Subject: CF MX Enterprise Security > I have two different passwords for cfadmin pages and RDS. But I would like > to limit the drives and folders that a user can see when they log in > with rds based on login name. > > For example: > > user A logs in with DW MX or Home Site and needs access to Folder A on drive > A. I don't want them to have access or even see the drives B,C,etc or other > folders then folder A on drive A. > > I have looked at sandbox security, but I don't think it gives me what > I want. From what I can tell it limits what a application can do > running in X > folder, not what X users can see or have access to via RDS. > > David > > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
David Brown wrote: > Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home > Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox > security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in > via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username. You can't assign permissions based on username. The only way you can limit access is by running CF MX with the credetials of some account that doesn't have permissions to all of the system, but that would still only allow permissions on a per server basis, not a per user basis. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time. Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at? David - Original Message - From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:21 PM Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security > David Brown wrote: > > Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders in DW MX or Home > > Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have enabled sandbox > > security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when login in > > via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username. > > You can't assign permissions based on username. The only way you can > limit access is by running CF MX with the credetials of some account > that doesn't have permissions to all of the system, but that would still > only allow permissions on a per server basis, not a per user basis. > > Jochem > > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
David Brown wrote: > Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time. > Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at? Tossing out RDS security (or maybe just RDS completely), but providing a free developers edition instead seems a reasonable solution to me. Jochem ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
Re: CF MX Enterprise Security
On Thursday 13 Feb 2003 14:18 pm, David Brown wrote: > Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time. > Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at? This is why M don't suggest you enable RDS in production. -- Tom C The Good Lord is subtle, but never malicious- Einstein ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX Enterprise Security
well...you can setup a drive share and have your users map to it. This will 'sandbox' them to a particular directory and no where else. I setup all my boxen like this. Works better with VSS also. You can also use FTP. Doug >-Original Message- >From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:19 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security > > >Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that SUCKS big time. >Sometimes I have to ask where is Macromedia brain at? > >David > > >- Original Message - >From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:21 PM >Subject: Re: CF MX Enterprise Security > > >> David Brown wrote: >> > Could someone tell me how to limit what drives and folders >in DW MX or >Home >> > Site connecting to a CF MX Enterprise server. I have >enabled sandbox >> > security, but it does not seem to limit what drives a user see when >login in >> > via RDS. I don't see a way to assign security based on username. >> >> You can't assign permissions based on username. The only way you can >> limit access is by running CF MX with the credetials of some account >> that doesn't have permissions to all of the system, but that >would still >> only allow permissions on a per server basis, not a per user basis. >> >> Jochem >> >> > ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX Enterprise Security
> Well, thank you both for responding. In a word that > SUCKS big time. Sometimes I have to ask where is > Macromedia brain at? I think it's worth remembering that Macromedia, like any other company, has finite resources available. Previous versions of CF used SiteMinder, a third-party product that didn't integrate all that well with CF in many respects. CFMX did away with that, and replaced it with working sandbox security functionality. So, we gained some things and lost others. If enough people complain via the wishform, Macromedia will probably expend resources to add that functionality, though. If you're not using RDS to browse databases, but just to edit files, you might consider using WebDAV, which is provided by your web server, to edit files. Unfortunately, Dreamweaver MX doesn't currently support WebDAV through HTTPS, apparently, but if you don't need that, it's a relatively easy solution to implement. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
RE: CF MX / FB3 / Security
Mike, You could try Kitty Cat Permissions, available at http://www.kittycatonline.com/is/where/you/are/at/index.cfm/fuseaction/showa rticle/article_id/13 At a recent UKCFUG meeting I have heard of a project which is going to be taken open source which allows site's to be 'skinned' and drop in new sites to inherit the security model - no further new's as yet though. Incidently, if you're using fb3 to put it simply you could change your app structure to look like: Root Root/loginlogout Root/secure Root/secure/main And then in your root/secure fbx_settings test for the existance of your session variable else return them to login/logout. Any circuit/pages beneath root/secure would then have to pass the test of the session var existing in order to proceed, HTH, John. > -Original Message- > From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 11 July 2002 13:47 > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF MX / FB3 / Security > > > Anyone have any suggestions for a security framework that > fits nicely into the FB3 framework? What I have is a need to > keep unauthorized users from even entering into the contents > of the site. I thought that the site structure would look > something like this: > > root > root/loginlogout > root/main > > My thinking is that I can reuse the loginlogout circuit in > other applications possibly. In addition, in the main circuit > I can check for a session var and if its not defined kick the > user back out to the loginlogout circuit.. The rest of the > app would fall under main, so this check would cover the > contents that I want to protect. > > What are peoples thoughts on this? Anyone have any > suggestions or alternate ways of laying this out? > > Thanks, > > Michael Tangorre > > > This email contains MillenniuM Information > Systems, LLC. privileged information. > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: RE: CF MX & WebLogic
Christ almighty, Matt, yes, we get it. My God, you're so anal about having to be right. Ok, here's your damn lollipop. - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:39 am Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > Companies do it all the time. Again, that is the difference > between an > expectation and an announcement. Macromedia expects to ship CFMX for > WebLogic in a certain time frame, but there is no hard/guaranteed > date.When there is, Macromedia will announce the product. > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > V: 415-577-8070 > F: 415-341-8906 > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:32 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF MX & WebLogic > > > > Macromedia has stuck BEA Weblogic on every single MX press > > release with an expected ship date of "later this year". > > > > I do hope they aren't speculating about their own products. > > > > -- > > jon > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 12:01:23 PM, you wrote: > > ML> That's speculation, not an announcement. > > > > ML> Matt Liotta > > ML> President & CEO > > ML> Montara Software, Inc. > > ML> http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > ML> V: 415-577-8070 > > ML> F: 415-341-8906 > > ML> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:00 AM > > >> To: CF-Talk > > >> Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > > >> > > >> >>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. > > >> > > >> Will be end of summer - September, I think. > > >> > > >> -Craig > > > > > __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: RE: CF MX & WebLogic
Looks like Matt is bothering everybody with his silly remarks... MATT... do you get it yet? Joe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:46 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: CF MX & WebLogic Christ almighty, Matt, yes, we get it. My God, you're so anal about having to be right. Ok, here's your damn lollipop. - Original Message - From: Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 10:39 am Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > Companies do it all the time. Again, that is the difference > between an > expectation and an announcement. Macromedia expects to ship CFMX for > WebLogic in a certain time frame, but there is no hard/guaranteed > date.When there is, Macromedia will announce the product. > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > V: 415-577-8070 > F: 415-341-8906 > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:32 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF MX & WebLogic > > > > Macromedia has stuck BEA Weblogic on every single MX press > > release with an expected ship date of "later this year". > > > > I do hope they aren't speculating about their own products. > > > > -- > > jon > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Wednesday, July 24, 2002, 12:01:23 PM, you wrote: > > ML> That's speculation, not an announcement. > > > > ML> Matt Liotta > > ML> President & CEO > > ML> Montara Software, Inc. > > ML> http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > > ML> V: 415-577-8070 > > ML> F: 415-341-8906 > > ML> P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Craig Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:00 AM > > >> To: CF-Talk > > >> Subject: RE: CF MX & WebLogic > > >> > > >> >>I don't believe CFMX for WebLogic has been announced. > > >> > > >> Will be end of summer - September, I think. > > >> > > >> -Craig > > > > > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
On my dev server, it takes 1232 ms for a 29k file.
My devserver is CFMX / WinNT/ 800 Cellaron w/ 128 megs
At 09:16 PM 30/07/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
>of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
>at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>
>CF MX CF 4.5
>trusted cache no trusted cache
>no debugging debugging
>Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
>1820 ms 150 ms
>
>Jochem
>
>
>
>// Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
>request.File = "";
>
>CRLF = chr(10);
>CurrentPosition = 72;
>
>
>
>
>
>temp = ToBase64(temp);
>if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
> temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
>
>
>request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
>while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> }
>WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
>
>
>
>
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
21k IIS log file
CF MX
P3 500
No Trusted Cache
1172 ms
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX performance issue
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX CF 4.5
trusted cache no trusted cache
no debugging debugging
Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
1820 ms 150 ms
Jochem
// Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
request.File = "";
CRLF = chr(10);
CurrentPosition = 72;
temp = ToBase64(temp);
if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
}
WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
I hit refresh and got 611 ms
Refresh again 1302 ms
Ditto 601 ms
Ditto 601 ms
Ditto 1362 ms
What is up with that?
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX performance issue
21k IIS log file
CF MX
P3 500
No Trusted Cache
1172 ms
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX performance issue
Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
CF MX CF 4.5
trusted cache no trusted cache
no debugging debugging
Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
1820 ms 150 ms
Jochem
// Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
request.File = "";
CRLF = chr(10);
CurrentPosition = 72;
temp = ToBase64(temp);
if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
}
WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and 800ms
(regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with
512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file.
I don't expect trusted cache to make much difference on one small template
like this BTW.
> while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> }
I guess this is one of those cases where a specific CF function (insert)
is slower in Java...
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Are you keeping a list Sean?
At 12:41 PM 30/07/02 -0700, you wrote:
>On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
> > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
> > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>
>I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and 800ms
>(regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with
>512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file.
>
>I don't expect trusted cache to make much difference on one small template
>like this BTW.
>
> > while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> > temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> > CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> > }
>
>I guess this is one of those cases where a specific CF function (insert)
>is slower in Java...
>
>"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
>-- Margaret Atwood
>
>
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
Enter a bug.
Ok, yeah, that was cheap.
Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy"
> -Original Message-
> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 4:02 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue
>
> Are you keeping a list Sean?
>
> At 12:41 PM 30/07/02 -0700, you wrote:
> >On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> > > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
> > > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit
> disturbing
> > > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
> >
> >I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and
> 800ms
> >(regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with
> >512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file.
> >
> >I don't expect trusted cache to make much difference on one small
> template
> >like this BTW.
> >
> > > while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> > > temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> > > CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> > > }
> >
> >I guess this is one of those cases where a specific CF function (insert)
> >is slower in Java...
> >
> >"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> >-- Margaret Atwood
> >
> >
>
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
CFMX OSX PPC G4 800 MHz 512 Meg RAM
Lots of other stuff running concurrently (IE, BBEdit, Mail Client,
Sherlock, OpenBase db server)
All standard (Default) Linux install ported to Mac -- no non-default
admin settings
291-321 ms on 25K file
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Brook Davies wrote:
> On my dev server, it takes 1232 ms for a 29k file.
> My devserver is CFMX / WinNT/ 800 Cellaron w/ 128 megs
>
>
>
>
> At 09:16 PM 30/07/02 +0200, you wrote:
>> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
>> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
>> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>>
>> CF MX CF 4.5
>> trusted cache no trusted cache
>> no debugging debugging
>> Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
>> 1820 ms 150 ms
>>
>> Jochem
>>
>>
>>
>> // Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
>> request.File = "";
>>
>> CRLF = chr(10);
>> CurrentPosition = 72;
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> temp = ToBase64(temp);
>> if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
>> temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
>>
>>
>> request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
>> while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
>> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
>> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
>> }
>> WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
same setup 2089-2741 with a 53K file (an O'Reilly article html file)
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:49 PM, Dick Applebaum wrote:
> CFMX OSX PPC G4 800 MHz 512 Meg RAM
>
> Lots of other stuff running concurrently (IE, BBEdit, Mail Client,
> Sherlock, OpenBase db server)
>
> All standard (Default) Linux install ported to Mac -- no non-default
> admin settings
>
> 291-321 ms on 25K file
>
>
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:43 PM, Brook Davies wrote:
>
>> On my dev server, it takes 1232 ms for a 29k file.
>> My devserver is CFMX / WinNT/ 800 Cellaron w/ 128 megs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 09:16 PM 30/07/02 +0200, you wrote:
>>> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
>>> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit
>>> disturbing
>>> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>>>
>>> CF MX CF 4.5
>>> trusted cache no trusted cache
>>> no debugging debugging
>>> Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
>>> 1820 ms 150 ms
>>>
>>> Jochem
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> // Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
>>> request.File = "";
>>>
>>> CRLF = chr(10);
>>> CurrentPosition = 72;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> temp = ToBase64(temp);
>>> if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
>>> temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
>>>
>>>
>>> request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
>>> while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
>>> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
>>> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
>>> }
>>> WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Sean
I don't understand why yours is so much slower than mine -- maybe we
need a consistent file to work with
Dick
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:41 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:16 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
>> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
>> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>
> I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and
> 800ms
> (regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with
> 512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file.
>
> I don't expect trusted cache to make much difference on one small
> template
> like this BTW.
>
>> while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
>> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
>> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
>> }
>
> I guess this is one of those cases where a specific CF function (insert)
> is slower in Java...
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
CF 4.5 p 500 128MB RAM no trusted cache debugging off 540 ms > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code). > > CF MX CF 4.5 > trusted cache no trusted cache > no debugging debugging > Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz > 1820 ms 150 ms > > 21k IIS log file > CF MX > P3 500 > No Trusted Cache > 1172 ms __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0 File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb) Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat) Results: 1) 1000 2) 1076 3) 1078 Dave Deeds Idaho Power Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
21k IIS log file CF 4.5.1 300MHz Celeron Debugging on 531-541 ms 21k IIS log file (same file as above) CF MX P3 500 No Trusted Cache 1172 ms -Original Message- From: Joseph Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:14 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue CF 4.5 p 500 128MB RAM no trusted cache debugging off 540 ms > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code). > > CF MX CF 4.5 > trusted cache no trusted cache > no debugging debugging > Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz > 1820 ms 150 ms > > 21k IIS log file > CF MX > P3 500 > No Trusted Cache > 1172 ms __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac 277-299 did not close browser -- just reloaded page But now we have a consistent file. Dick On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Deeds, Dave wrote: > Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0 > > File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb) > > Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat) > > Results: > 1) 1000 > 2) 1076 > 3) 1078 > > Dave Deeds > Idaho Power Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:02 , Brook Davies wrote: > Are you keeping a list Sean? Not my job :) >> I don't have anything but CFMX installed but I get between 570ms and >> 800ms >> (regardless of the trusted cache setting) on an 800MHz PowerMac G4 (with >> 512Mb RAM) loading a 28k file. I picked a different file (23k) and it took around 300ms every time. Interesting that a file only slightly bigger took about twice the time. Hmm, I tried a 93k file and it took around 13,000ms. O(n^2). Not entirely surprising given the algorithm (it has to move ~n characters ~n times). "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
I need to go run some errands -- can't wait to get back, though-- this has been a interesting and pleasant diversion Dick On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:27 PM, Dick Applebaum wrote: > Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac > > 277-299 > > did not close browser -- just reloaded page > > But now we have a consistent file. > > Dick > > > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Deeds, Dave wrote: > >> Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0 >> >> File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb) >> >> Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat) >> >> Results: >> 1) 1000 >> 2) 1076 >> 3) 1078 >> >> Dave Deeds >> Idaho Power Company >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> > __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
CF 4.5 p 500 128MB RAM no trusted cache debugging off 540 ms > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code). > > CF MX CF 4.5 > trusted cache no trusted cache > no debugging debugging > Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz > 1820 ms 150 ms > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
I should really get some work done today, but this is too entertaining. Tags-pt318.html CF 4.5.1 300MHz Celeron Debugging on 711 ms - 722 ms Tags-pt318.html CF MX P3 500 Debugging on No Trusted Cache 1512 ms - 1532 ms -Original Message- From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 3:28 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue Same test on 800 MHz G4 Mac 277-299 did not close browser -- just reloaded page But now we have a consistent file. Dick On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Deeds, Dave wrote: > Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0 > > File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb) > > Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat) > > Results: > 1) 1000 > 2) 1076 > 3) 1078 > > Dave Deeds > Idaho Power Company > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Hmmm, that server loaded? I just tested a 2x 1Ghz P3 512MB Wink SP2 CFMX, nothing running on it. Same file and it is pretty consistent at 437ms after first run. I recopied Jochem's code to make sure I didn't change it. The results stay the same. -- Jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 4:15:10 PM, you wrote: DD> Setup is quad pentium3 xenon, win2k sp-2, 2gb ram, IIS 5.0 DD> File is Tags-pt318.html (from CFML_Reference, 24kb) DD> Ran page three times, (close browser, open, run page, repeat) DD> Results: DD> 1) 1000 DD> 2) 1076 DD> 3) 1078 __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Jochem van Dieten wrote: > Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version > of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing > at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code). To be absolutely sure I installed CF 5 on the same machine as CF MX is running. Next I ran the test with 3 files of different sizes. The files are available online [1] for anybody who wants to try this himself, but since they are Base64 encoded the actual content shouldn't matter. Average over multiple runs (CPU at 100% all the time): CF 5MX 9 KB 40 50 24 KB 240 3300 84 KB6700 13 Apparently size does matter. I'll enter it in the bug form :( Jochem http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file0.tst http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file1.tst http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file2.tst __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
On 800MHZ G4 CFMX i got 9 KB 27-41 24 KB 708-1347 84 KB 60111-60780 Are you guys running the browser, etc on the same box (I am) or just measuring a box running CFMX JRun and a Web Server? On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 02:10 PM, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > Jochem van Dieten wrote: >> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version >> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing >> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code). > > To be absolutely sure I installed CF 5 on the same machine as CF MX is > running. Next I ran the test with 3 files of different sizes. The files > are available online [1] for anybody who wants to try this himself, but > since they are Base64 encoded the actual content shouldn't matter. > > Average over multiple runs (CPU at 100% all the time): > CF 5MX > 9 KB 40 50 > 24 KB 240 3300 > 84 KB6700 13 > > Apparently size does matter. I'll enter it in the bug form :( > > Jochem > > http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file0.tst > http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file1.tst > http://spike.oli.tudelft.nl/jochemd/reg_test/file2.tst > > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
Hmm, not sure if anyone else tried this, but I wrote a quick Java class that
uses the FileInputStream class to read a file. I read a 126 meg file that
took about 700ms using CFFILE in CF5, but took around 2000ms using the
class I wrote.
Win 2K Pro, Athlon XP 1800+, 512 megs RAM, 40 gigs HD space. JDK 1.3.1_01
If anyone else wants to try:
Java class:
import java.io.*;
public class FileLoader {
FileInputStream fileInputStream;
byte[] fileStream = new byte[1];
int fileLength;
public FileLoader(String fileName) {
try {
fileInputStream = new FileInputStream("e:\\" + fileName);
fileLength = fileInputStream.available();
while (fileInputStream.available() > 0) {
fileInputStream.read(fileStream);
}
} catch(Exception e) {
System.out.println("An Error Occured.");
}
}
public int getFileLength() {
return fileLength;
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
FileLoader fileLoader = new FileLoader("dot net sdk.exe");
System.out.println(fileLoader.getFileLength());
}
}
CF Code:
#len(test)#, #loopTime#
#test2#, #loopTime#
> -Original Message-
> From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:17 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF MX performance issue
>
>
> Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
> of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
> at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>
> CF MX CF 4.5
> trusted cache no trusted cache
> no debugging debugging
> Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
> 1820 ms 150 ms
>
> Jochem
>
>
>
> // Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
> request.File = "";
>
> CRLF = chr(10);
> CurrentPosition = 72;
>
>
>
>
>
> temp = ToBase64(temp);
> if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
> temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
>
>
> request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
> while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> }
> WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
>
>
>
>
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
Was the page encoding the same for both? I would suspect that putting
on the CFMX page would speed it up.
Cheers
>-Original Message-
>From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 1:17 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: CF MX performance issue
>
>
>Could somebody who has CF MX on the same machine as some older version
>of CF test the script below for me? I find the results a bit disturbing
>at first sight (but maybe you see something wrong with the code).
>
>CF MX CF 4.5
>trusted cache no trusted cache
>no debugging debugging
>Duron 800 dual Athlon 1.2 GHz
>1820 ms 150 ms
>
>Jochem
>
>
>
>// Put in the location of some document of about 25 KB.
>request.File = "";
>
>CRLF = chr(10);
>CurrentPosition = 72;
>
>
>
>
>temp = ToBase64(temp);
>if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
> temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
>
>
>request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
>while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
> temp = Insert(CRLF,temp,CurrentPosition);
> CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72 + Len(CRLF);
> }
>WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
>
>
>
>
__
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm using 1.4 for its "improved" i18n stuff) & if any patches were applied to either version. patched cfmx no cache, debugging on jre 1.4 win2k sp2 dual pIII 1gb ram 85kb frontpage produced tag fest 6103-6740ms (20 runs) patched cf5 no cache, debugging on winnt4 sp6 dual pII 128mb ram 85kb frontpage produced tag fest 7003-8120ms (20 runs) __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX performance issue
I noticed on my Dev box... when you open server docs... http://127.0.0.1/cfdocs/dochome.htm Does this have anything to do with the JRE... Docs say Note: The search dialog works with the J2SE 1.4.0 JRE, J2SE 1.3.1_02 JRE, and J2SE1.3.1_03 JRE, and with the corresponding SDKs When i installed the latest J2SE...docs ran faster.. but system slowed.. Any Ideas? Joe -Original Message- From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:47 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX performance issue just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm using 1.4 for its "improved" i18n stuff) & if any patches were applied to either version. patched cfmx no cache, debugging on jre 1.4 win2k sp2 dual pIII 1gb ram 85kb frontpage produced tag fest 6103-6740ms (20 runs) patched cf5 no cache, debugging on winnt4 sp6 dual pII 128mb ram 85kb frontpage produced tag fest 7003-8120ms (20 runs) __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Joe Eugene wrote: > I noticed on my Dev box... when you open server docs... > http://127.0.0.1/cfdocs/dochome.htm > Does this have anything to do with the JRE... Docs say > Note: The search dialog works with the J2SE 1.4.0 JRE, J2SE 1.3.1_02 JRE, > and J2SE1.3.1_03 JRE, and with the corresponding SDKs > When i installed the latest J2SE...docs ran faster.. but system slowed.. > Any Ideas? I replaced search.cfm with an empty page. This is the only page that uses java, and it downloads a whopping 3 Mb file each time you access the darn thing. Jesse __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
mark brinkworth wrote: > Was the page encoding the same for both? I would suspect that putting > > > > on the CFMX page would speed it up. Makes a difference of maybe a few percent (in the wrong way actually), while we're talking a performance degradation of a factor 20. So not significant. Jochem __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Paul Hastings wrote: > just to toss in another monkey wrench, might useful to note JRE version (i'm > using 1.4 for its "improved" i18n stuff) & if any patches were applied to > either version. Was running: JVM Details Java Version 1.3.1_03 Java VendorSun Microsystems Inc. Retried with: JVM Details Java Version 1.4.0_01 Java VendorSun Microsystems Inc. No patches applied. The numbers: CF 5MX JRE 1.3MX JRE 1.4 9 KB405060 24 KB 240 3300 7000 84 KB 670013174000 Jochem __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
> CF 5MX JRE 1.3MX JRE 1.4 > 9 KB405060 > 24 KB 240 3300 7000 > 84 KB 670013174000 ah that would explain my "sucky" numbers for cfmx. ah, let them eat i18n cake ;-) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 24/7/2545 __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX performance issue
Jochem van Dieten wrote:
>
[..]
Code to wrap lines using a loop and Insert() was significantly slower on
CF MX as CF 5. Complete thread can be found in the archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=messages&threadid=14563&forumid=4
[..]
> The numbers:
> CF 5MX JRE 1.3MX JRE 1.4
> 9 KB405060
> 24 KB 240 3300 7000
> 84 KB 670013174000
I rewrote the code to use an array instead of a raw string. Basically
chop up the string in 72 byte substrings, put those in an array and use
ArrayToList() to put it all together again using Chr(10) as delimiter
(code below).
The new numbers with MX JRE 1.3 (no patches):
Old code New code
9 KB 500
24 KB 3300 10
84 KB 13 50
I didn't feel the need to test other JRE's anymore :)
On a similar note, I have seen a performance increase of a factor 90 by
replacing ListDeleteAt() by a UDF that converts the list to an array,
deletes an item and converts the array back to a list (1100 item list).
I think every best practice for CF MX should include a note to avoid
string/list manipulation for anything but the smallest string/list.
Jochem
--
New code (mind the wrap):
request.File = "";
CRLF = chr(10);
CurrentPosition = 1;
tempArray = ArrayNew(1);
temp = ToBase64(temp);
if (Len(temp) MOD 4 IS "1")
temp = RemoveChars(temp, Len(temp) - 1, 1);
request.StartTime = GetTickCount();
while (CurrentPosition LTE Len(temp)) {
ArrayAppend(tempArray, Mid(temp, currentposition, Min(72,Len(temp) -
currentposition + 1)));
CurrentPosition = CurrentPosition + 72;
}
temp = ArrayToList(tempArray,CRLF);
WriteOutput(GetTickCount() - request.StartTime & " ms");
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX CFGRAPH -- Hmmm?
Sandy, Thanks for the info and CFCHART has some improved features, but how do you label the X-Axis of a "line chart"? I am using both CFCHART and CFCHARTSERIES and tried CFCHARTDATA, but CFCHARTDATA creates errors The best I can tell is that the itemColumn attribute of CFCHART would be the thing to label the X-Axis, but the itemColumn attribute seems to be a dead dude. I can put a variable or constant in there and it has no effect. Any clues? Nick At 08:27 PM 2/3/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Cfgraph was deprecated in favor of cfchart in MX > > _ > >From: Nick Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:30 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: CF MX CFGRAPH > > >Developed some graphing (Line graphs) on CF 5.0 and it worked. When I >uploaded to a ColdFusion MX server, at Intermedia.net, things changed quite >a lot. Graph is all over the place and the title doesn't show. My guess is >that the CFGRAPH tag is different for MX. > >Can anyone explain the differences or where I can find info online for the >MX CFGRAPH tag. > >Thanks, > >Nick > _ > > > [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
RE: CF MX in production?
before you do that, I would hope that you have put a copy of your website(s) on a test server with CFMX and ran some test. Remember that there are some depreciated tags, cfhttp screwup (mentioned earlier on the list), and other concerns that you might want take a look at. I would't just jump and upgrade a production server. Anthony Petruzzi Webmaster 954-321-4703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sheriff.org -Original Message- From: chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:07 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF MX in production? Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under real loads? Any problems so far? We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. Thanks NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education __ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX in production?
Wow.. going into production with CFMX next week... hmm Have you tested your code in Dev environment..with CFMX, apparently there is a lot of code.. Code validator doesnt catch.. you might want to test for a week or 2 before going to production with it. Joe - Original Message - From: "chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: CF MX in production? > Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under real > loads? > > Any problems so far? > > We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > > Thanks > > > > NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX in production?
Code checks out great on the development servers. Everything runs fine. That i why im asking about production servers and taking the load... Anyone make the big jump yet? At 10:16 AM 5/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Wow.. going into production with CFMX next week... hmm >Have you tested your code in Dev environment..with CFMX, apparently >there is a lot of code.. Code validator doesnt catch.. >you might want to test for a week or 2 before going to production >with it. > >Joe > >- Original Message - >From: "chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:06 AM >Subject: CF MX in production? > > > > Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under >real > > loads? > > > > Any problems so far? > > > > We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX in production?
Look everybody! a guinea pig! Just kidding Chad. Well sort of. Either way, do keep us posted on any issues. DRE -Original Message- From: chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF MX in production? Code checks out great on the development servers. Everything runs fine. That i why im asking about production servers and taking the load... Anyone make the big jump yet? At 10:16 AM 5/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Wow.. going into production with CFMX next week... hmm >Have you tested your code in Dev environment..with CFMX, apparently >there is a lot of code.. Code validator doesnt catch.. >you might want to test for a week or 2 before going to production >with it. > >Joe > >- Original Message - >From: "chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:06 AM >Subject: CF MX in production? > > > > Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under >real > > loads? > > > > Any problems so far? > > > > We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > > > __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
Re: CF MX in production?
The second I get a non-trial copy, I'll have it up on HoF and it'll be running the lists. At 10:06 AM 5/30/02, you wrote: >Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under real >loads? > >Any problems so far? > >We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > >Thanks > > > >NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > __ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX in production?
Hey! Somebody else jump first! :) I wonder if Macromedia has implemented CF MX on any production servers? At 09:10 AM 5/30/2002 -0600, you wrote: >Look everybody! a guinea pig! > >Just kidding Chad. Well sort of. Either way, do keep us posted on any >issues. DRE > >-Original Message- >From: chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:28 AM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: CF MX in production? > > >Code checks out great on the development servers. Everything runs fine. > >That i why im asking about production servers and taking the >load... Anyone make the big jump yet? > > > >At 10:16 AM 5/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >Wow.. going into production with CFMX next week... hmm > >Have you tested your code in Dev environment..with CFMX, apparently > >there is a lot of code.. Code validator doesnt catch.. > >you might want to test for a week or 2 before going to production > >with it. > > > >Joe > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:06 AM > >Subject: CF MX in production? > > > > > > > Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under > >real > > > loads? > > > > > > Any problems so far? > > > > > > We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > > > > > > > __ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
RE: CF MX in production?
I know the beta box that they were hosting all the beta stuff was CFMX. On Thu, 30 May 2002, chad wrote: > Hey! > > Somebody else jump first! :) > > I wonder if Macromedia has implemented CF MX on any production servers? > > > At 09:10 AM 5/30/2002 -0600, you wrote: > >Look everybody! a guinea pig! > > > >Just kidding Chad. Well sort of. Either way, do keep us posted on any > >issues. DRE > > > >-Original Message- > >From: chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:28 AM > >To: CF-Talk > >Subject: Re: CF MX in production? > > > > > >Code checks out great on the development servers. Everything runs fine. > > > >That i why im asking about production servers and taking the > >load... Anyone make the big jump yet? > > > > > > > >At 10:16 AM 5/30/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > >Wow.. going into production with CFMX next week... hmm > > >Have you tested your code in Dev environment..with CFMX, apparently > > >there is a lot of code.. Code validator doesnt catch.. > > >you might want to test for a week or 2 before going to production > > >with it. > > > > > >Joe > > > > > >- Original Message - > > >From: "chad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:06 AM > > >Subject: CF MX in production? > > > > > > > > > > Just wondering if anyone is using MX in a production environment under > > >real > > > > loads? > > > > > > > > Any problems so far? > > > > > > > > We are getting ready to upgrade two of our production servers next week. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NTMail K12 - the Mail Server for Education > > > > > > > > > > > > __ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
