Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Charlie Griefer
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/ ?

On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site 
 and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?

 Michael Dinowitz
 President: House of Fusion
 http://www.houseoffusion.com
 Publisher: Fusion Authority
 http://www.fusionauthority.com
 Adobe Community Expert

 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253005
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Dave Carabetta
On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site 
 and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?


Not sure what URL you're trying, but this works fine for me (including
the links to each article):

http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/

Regards,
Dave.

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253009
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Not sure, but I know it was becoming subject to very low traffic and Spam
(something you do sterling job of keeping out!)









This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DL, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions. 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Sep 13 17:37:38 2006
Subject: CFDJ?

I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their site
and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?

Michael Dinowitz
President: House of Fusion
http://www.houseoffusion.com
Publisher: Fusion Authority
http://www.fusionauthority.com
Adobe Community Expert



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253006
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread James Holmes
Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.

On 9/14/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The site came up for me:

 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/

 On 9/14/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their 
  site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
 
  Michael Dinowitz
  President: House of Fusion
  http://www.houseoffusion.com
  Publisher: Fusion Authority
  http://www.fusionauthority.com
  Adobe Community Expert
 
  

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253010
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Crow T. Robot
They probably forgot to renew the domain name.  But good news, the JDJ
domain has been renewed for the next 150 years.

On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their
 site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?

 Michael Dinowitz
 President: House of Fusion
 http://www.houseoffusion.com
 Publisher: Fusion Authority
 http://www.fusionauthority.com
 Adobe Community Expert

 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253012
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


RE: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Munson, Jacob
I used to be on it (still am, at least I didn't unsubscribe), but no
messages have come through for months, maybe even a year.  I was curious
one day and sent a message to the list address, and I got a delivery
failure of some sort. 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:38 AM
 
 I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked 
 out their site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about 
 its status?

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1.



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253013
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Charlie Griefer
ooops...me too :\

On 9/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.

 On 9/14/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The site came up for me:
 
  http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/
 
  On 9/14/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their 
   site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
  
   Michael Dinowitz
   President: House of Fusion
   http://www.houseoffusion.com
   Publisher: Fusion Authority
   http://www.fusionauthority.com
   Adobe Community Expert
  
  

 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253017
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Dave Carabetta
On 9/13/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Oh sorry, the LIST. My fault for not reading properly.


Woops, me too!

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253016
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Matt Williams
This link works for me: http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/

Oops, you meant the list. I haven't seen that.
Michael probably spammed it so everyone would just switch to Fusion
Authority Quarterly.

(couldn't help it)...


On 9/13/06, Dave Carabetta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 9/13/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked out their 
  site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about its status?
 

 Not sure what URL you're trying, but this works fine for me (including
 the links to each article):

 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/

 Regards,
 Dave.

 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253022
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4


Re: CFDJ?

2006-09-13 Thread Yves Arsenault
As far as I know I'm still on the list as well

Haven't gotten a message in about forever.

Yves

On 9/13/06, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I used to be on it (still am, at least I didn't unsubscribe), but no
 messages have come through for months, maybe even a year.  I was curious
 one day and sent a message to the list address, and I got a delivery
 failure of some sort.

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:38 AM
 
  I was just asked if the CFDJ list was still around. I checked
  out their site and no dice. Anyone (Simon) have a clue about
  its status?

 This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
 and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
 distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any
 reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission
 in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in
 its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. A1.



 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253024
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: CFDJ

2006-07-18 Thread Jeff Small
Yeah, I get the Apache test page.

9:46 PM

-Original Message-
From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFDJ

This may just be me, but I can't access the CFDJ site.
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/. Has anyone else noticed this?




~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247007
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ

2006-07-18 Thread Tony
yes. i have.

On 7/18/06, B V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This may just be me, but I can't access the CFDJ site.
 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/. Has anyone else noticed this?


 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247008
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ

2006-07-18 Thread B V
Yeah, it's odd. Of all the things a website goes down for...

On 7/18/06, Jeff Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, I get the Apache test page.

 9:46 PM

 -Original Message-
 From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:39 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFDJ

 This may just be me, but I can't access the CFDJ site.
 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/. Has anyone else noticed this?




 

~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247009
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


RE: CFDJ

2006-07-18 Thread Eric Roberts
Maybe they should switch to Windows heheh *WEG*

Eric 

-Original Message-
From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 18 July 2006 20:54
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ

Yeah, it's odd. Of all the things a website goes down for...

On 7/18/06, Jeff Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yeah, I get the Apache test page.

 9:46 PM

 -Original Message-
 From: B V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:39 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFDJ

 This may just be me, but I can't access the CFDJ site.
 http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/. Has anyone else noticed this?




 



~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four 
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:4/messageid:247013
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4


Re: CFDJ Spell Check Article this Month

2004-02-06 Thread Darron J. Schall
Sorry, I didn't have time to actually write that portion of the code.The article itself was already longer than it should've been, so I just threw that out as an idea of where to go from here.

I think I would implement that by having a list of ignored words.The spell check engine reports back the location of the error in the string, so you can see if the word at that location is ignored.. if not, pop up a window and ask if they want to replace it with something.If they chose to ignore all then add it to the ignore words list.. and keep doing that as you loop through the list of spelling errors.

-d
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-12 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Friday 09 Jan 2004 16:16 pm, Dave Carabetta wrote:
 scp usage:

WinSCP provides a very nice GUI (either local/remote two pane, or single 
'remote') to SCP / SFTP for Windows.

-- 
Tom Chiverton 
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer

Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
Underwood Business Park
Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
Fax: +44 (0)1749 834901
web: www.bluefinger.com
Company Reg No: 4209395 Registered Office: 2 Temple Back East, Temple
Quay, BRISTOL. BS1 6EG.
*** This E-mail contains confidential information for the addressee
only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately. You should not use, disclose, distribute or copy this
communication if received in error. No binding contract will result from
this e-mail until such time as a written document is signed on behalf of
the company. BlueFinger Limited cannot accept responsibility for the
completeness or accuracy of this message as it has been transmitted over
public networks.***
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-09 Thread Simon Horwith
my apologies.I thought we were talking about the merits of CFDJ Content in
comparison to book content.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 January 2004 02:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

You might have missed an email or something. I wasn't comparing the
content at all. I was disagreeing with you suggesting that someone
should write for CFDJ. See my emails for why I believe writing CFML
content for an online publication would be better.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:41 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... you
 know,
 paper.There was no discussion of a comparison between the content in
 CFDJ
 and online resources before your post, nor should there be one
 now.Hell,
 if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML reference
 to
 the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be
 builder.com
 I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's
 online
 documentation, devnet, etc.I think the point was that CFDJ was being
 compared with books and periodicals in print.Some people stated that
 they
 didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription
 compared
 to the price of some of the books that are out there.I'm not sure
 what
 that has to do with websites?There are a lot of great resources out
 there.
 I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
 personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the
 magazine
 for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is much
 more
 worth the money.That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we were
 debating.Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that
 belongs on
 the CF Community list.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. Are
you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the
difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less
of a publication?

I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias
towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry,
 that
is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't
 say.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks
 that are
 written in CFML.In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore
 that
 I
 said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a
 discussion
 about
 whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is
 a
 CFML
 forum or not.What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
 builder.com is
 not a publication.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 Got any examples? :O)

Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have
 even
seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.

-Matt


 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-09 Thread Simon Horwith
I wouldn't consider builder.com more reputable... in fact most, not all,
websites are less reputable in my opnion.Anyone can create a site, where
as a publication in print requires more organization and support.I don't
know what their subscription numbers are, so I can't comment on that.I
think this thread should be moved to the Community list now.

~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 January 2004 02:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd
 love to
 see one from you.

When Sys-con starts compensating authors for content and is able to
actually find a significant number of real subscribers instead of lying
about their readership just to support ad sales then I might be
interested. In the mean time, I will continue to write for reputable
publishers.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-09 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Friday 09 Jan 2004 10:17 am, Simon Horwith wrote:
 websites are less reputable in my opnion.Anyone can create a site, where

But only some web sites will attract the 'names' in the community - either as 
writers, reviewers or just plain members. Those will be the reputable ones.

-- 
Tom Chiverton 
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer

Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
Underwood Business Park
Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
Tel: +44 (0)1749 834900
Fax: +44 (0)1749 834901
web: www.bluefinger.com
Company Reg No: 4209395 Registered Office: 2 Temple Back East, Temple
Quay, BRISTOL. BS1 6EG.
*** This E-mail contains confidential information for the addressee
only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately. You should not use, disclose, distribute or copy this
communication if received in error. No binding contract will result from
this e-mail until such time as a written document is signed on behalf of
the company. BlueFinger Limited cannot accept responsibility for the
completeness or accuracy of this message as it has been transmitted over
public networks.***
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Thanks Matt...I was starting to think that might be the problem.

BTWwhat did you mean by this line??:
Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF 
generation.

Did you mean other solutions?

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:17 PM
Subject: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

 Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've 
 got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working 
 on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 
 Std/Linuxany insight would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye 
 you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)

The errors you are getting can only come from malformed class files. I 
suggest you retry your download and/or get support for the author(s). 
Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF 
generation. Additionally, there are resources --such as myself-- that 
are available on a contract basis to take care of these sorts of things 
for you.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Another good point.The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll try again with binary forced

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

Oh yeah, possibly you were uploading the JAR/class files via FTP and 
didn't transfer them as binary if they work on Windows and not on 
Linux. Of course, if you are using FTP; stop right now and move over to 
SCP. You life will be easier and your machines will be more secure.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:

  Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've
  got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working
  on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1
  Std/Linuxany insight would be greatly appreciated...and 
 hey...mabye
  you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)
 
 The errors you are getting can only come from malformed class files. I
 suggest you retry your download and/or get support for the author(s).
 Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF
 generation. Additionally, there are resources --such as myself-- that
 are available on a contract basis to take care of these sorts of things
 for you.

 -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Liotta
 Did you mean other solutions?

I did mean other, sorry for the typo.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Liotta
 Another good point.  The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll 
 try again with binary forced

Again, I would check out SCP as it is much nicer for transferring files 
and more secure too.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Yeah I have Putty and use it for root level access (nice and secure)still learning my Linux commands...but scp is a command right?secure copy?

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

 Another good point.The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll 
 try again with binary forced

Again, I would check out SCP as it is much nicer for transferring files 
and more secure too.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Bryan Stevenson
ooo...hey...if you can fire me the command to grab an entire local dir and scp it up I'd be one happy camper ;-)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

 Another good point.The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll 
 try again with binary forced

Again, I would check out SCP as it is much nicer for transferring files 
and more secure too.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Liotta
SCP is secure copy or the cp command over SSH. Putty has a program 
named pscp or Putty SCP that will allow you to do SCP from the 
command-line on Windows. For example, transferring a file is as 
follows.

prompt pscp somefile.txt 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/username/somefile.txt

-Matt

On Jan 9, 2004, at 11:03 AM, Bryan Stevenson wrote:

 Yeah I have Putty and use it for root level access (nice and 
 secure)still learning my Linux commands...but scp is a command 
 right?  secure copy?

 Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
 VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
 Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
 t. 250.920.8830
 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 Macromedia Associate Partner
 www.macromedia.com
 -
 Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
 Founder  Director
 www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
   - Original Message -
   From: Matt Liotta
   To: CF-Talk
   Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:01 AM
   Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

    Another good point.  The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll
    try again with binary forced
   
   Again, I would check out SCP as it is much nicer for transferring 
 files
   and more secure too.

   -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Liotta
prompt pscp -r somedir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/username/somedir

-Matt

On Jan 9, 2004, at 11:04 AM, Bryan Stevenson wrote:

 ooo...hey...if you can fire me the command to grab an entire local dir 
 and scp it up I'd be one happy camper ;-)

 Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
 VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
 Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
 t. 250.920.8830
 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 Macromedia Associate Partner
 www.macromedia.com
 -
 Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
 Founder  Director
 www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
   - Original Message -
   From: Matt Liotta
   To: CF-Talk
   Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:01 AM
   Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

    Another good point.  The Secure FTP app was set to auto, but I'll
    try again with binary forced
   
   Again, I would check out SCP as it is much nicer for transferring 
 files
   and more secure too.

   -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Dave Carabetta
Yeah I have Putty and use it for root level access (nice and 
secure)still learning my Linux commands...but scp is a command right?
secure copy?


scp usage:

scp -v localfile.txt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:localfile.txt

You will then be prompted for a password and it will copy the file out there 
for you with the name localfile.txt. (The -v option is for verbose so that 
you can see exactly what's going on. Not necessary, but sometimes useful.)

If you're talking about directories, you should just be able to do

scp -vr localdir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:localdir

Note that the -r option makes it recursive such that sub-directories are 
copied out as well.

Regards,
Dave.
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-09 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Matt...you are da man...the binary option was the issue.Now all classes are recognized and the code works!!!

Many many many thanks ;-)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

Oh yeah, possibly you were uploading the JAR/class files via FTP and 
didn't transfer them as binary if they work on Windows and not on 
Linux. Of course, if you are using FTP; stop right now and move over to 
SCP. You life will be easier and your machines will be more secure.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:

  Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've
  got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working
  on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1
  Std/Linuxany insight would be greatly appreciated...and 
 hey...mabye
  you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)
 
 The errors you are getting can only come from malformed class files. I
 suggest you retry your download and/or get support for the author(s).
 Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF
 generation. Additionally, there are resources --such as myself-- that
 are available on a contract basis to take care of these sorts of things
 for you.

 -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-09 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
If I remember the number right in the last solicitation to advertise in SYS-CON that I got, the CFDJ numbers were something like 3,000 and the JDJ was something like 50,000 (Sorry if I'm off in specific number, but order of magnitude should be right). Hard to run a magazine and pay for content with ad revenue on a small circulation. Professional journals in the sciences handle this by having 4-digit subscription prices -- or by having the *writer* pay for publication (yeah -- you have to do the research, submit it for peer review, and then pay to have it published. standard part of most NSF grants)

I just wrote my first CFDJ article this week. I've written for O'Reilly, WebReview, searchDatabase.com for pay and its been fun, but it was also fun to write up something I had recently been playing with (Ant) and write it up in a ColdFusion context. Pay's only part of it -- professional recognition plays a role. I've written 4 books with two more coming out soon and none of them made close to my hourly rate :) But the contracts, training gigs, and speaking gigs partially made up for that. I've spoken at a number of conferences and there's rarely any money involved (and if there is, it's again, far less than what the preparation hours would pay if used for contracting). Most professions have this mix of paid activity and professional courtesy activity. It's good professionally to give back to the community, regardless of whether there's a direct payment (cash) or indirect (reputation, goodwill, business development).

That said, I'd write far more frequently if there was a token payment :) I've found that writing for online pubs that pay is second only to training as far as bang-for-the-buck goes. I only know one person who's made a significant amount from a book (nearly 6 figs from an official MS IE book). And you've got no time to consult if all you do is write :)

And none of this should be construed to be critical of Matt wanting to be paid for writing -- the contributions he makes to CF-Talk alone range from really useful to really fun. I'm guessing that Michael Dinowitz isn't paying for Matt's CF-Talk content 

Regards,

John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd 
 love to
 see one from you.

When Sys-con starts compensating authors for content and is able to 
actually find a significant number of real subscribers instead of lying 
about their readership just to support ad sales then I might be 
interested. In the mean time, I will continue to write for reputable 
publishers.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-09 Thread Matt Liotta
Just to be clear, I do make contributions without pay. Whether that be 
in the form of speaking at user groups and/or conferences or writing 
articles. However, I have never written for CFDJ and I don't see that 
changing anytime soon. If I am going to contribute for free content to 
the community then the community should at least be able to read it for 
free. As such, you will likely only find content from me at freely 
available sites.

-Matt

On Jan 9, 2004, at 4:17 PM, John Paul Ashenfelter wrote:

 If I remember the number right in the last solicitation to advertise 
 in SYS-CON that I got, the CFDJ numbers were something like 3,000 and 
 the JDJ was something like 50,000 (Sorry if I'm off in specific 
 number, but order of magnitude should be right). Hard to run a 
 magazine and pay for content with ad revenue on a small circulation. 
 Professional journals in the sciences handle this by having 4-digit 
 subscription prices -- or by having the *writer* pay for publication 
 (yeah -- you have to do the research, submit it for peer review, and 
 then pay to have it published. standard part of most NSF grants)

 I just wrote my first CFDJ article this week. I've written for 
 O'Reilly, WebReview, searchDatabase.com for pay and its been fun, but 
 it was also fun to write up something I had recently been playing with 
 (Ant) and write it up in a ColdFusion context. Pay's only part of it 
 -- professional recognition plays a role. I've written 4 books with 
 two more coming out soon and none of them made close to my hourly rate 
 :) But the contracts, training gigs, and speaking gigs partially made 
 up for that. I've spoken at a number of conferences and there's rarely 
 any money involved (and if there is, it's again, far less than what 
 the preparation hours would pay if used for contracting). Most 
 professions have this mix of paid activity and professional 
 courtesy activity. It's good professionally to give back to the 
 community, regardless of whether there's a direct payment (cash) or 
 indirect (reputation, goodwill, business development).

 That said, I'd write far more frequently if there was a token payment 
 :) I've found that writing for online pubs that pay is second only to 
 training as far as bang-for-the-buck goes. I only know one person 
 who's made a significant amount from a book (nearly 6 figs from an 
 official MS IE book). And you've got no time to consult if all you do 
 is write :)

 And none of this should be construed to be critical of Matt wanting to 
 be paid for writing -- the contributions he makes to CF-Talk alone 
 range from really useful to really fun. I'm guessing that Michael 
 Dinowitz isn't paying for Matt's CF-Talk content

 Regards,

 John Paul Ashenfelter
 CTO/Transitionpoint
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   - Original Message -
   From: Matt Liotta
   To: CF-Talk
   Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 9:14 PM
   Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

    I posted a link - why don't you write an article?  Personally, I'd
    love to
    see one from you.
   
   When Sys-con starts compensating authors for content and is able to
   actually find a significant number of real subscribers instead of 
 lying
   about their readership just to support ad sales then I might be
   interested. In the mean time, I will continue to write for reputable
   publishers.

   -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Peter Tilbrook
What a bunch of whingers!

And so soon in the New Year too!

Strewth! If you ppl are bitching about how much it cost consider us
overseas. It costs more than TWICE as much.

Please consider.

PS. I love CFDJ - Simons write-up on MAX2003 was the closest most of the
world would get to it and I will welcome him to MXDU 2004 with gratitude
just to thank him for the many books, articles, etc he has contributed for
all of us.

Peter Tilbrook
ColdFusion Applications Developer
ColdGen Internet Solutions
Manager, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group - http://www.actcfug.com
4/73 Tharwa Road
Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620
AUSTRALIA

Telephone: +61-2-6284-2727
Mobile: +61-0439-401-823
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

\¯\/¯/ |¯|)¯) /¯/\¯\ \¯\/¯/
/_/\_\ |_|)_) \_\/_/ /_/\_\ RULES
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Howard Fore
So the Design Pattern series was invaluable. How much time did that 
series save you to be able to work on extra projects? How much is your 
time worth per hour? I'd bet that over the course of the subscription 
year, the product of number of hours saved multiplied by your hourly 
rate is more than the cost of the subscription. And if properly 
applied, those techniques won't save you time and money just this year, 
but in the future as well.

That's how I justify it at least.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much of life is Dutch one-digit operations in which legions of big 
robust people crouch behind badly cracked dike systems attached by the 
thumbs their wide balloon-pantsed rumps up-ended to the northern sun 
while, back in town, little black-suspendered tulip magnates stride 
around. - Dutch, Kay Ryan

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 Your monthly column
 contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
 Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to 
 me).
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Kola Oyedeji
Not to mention that your subscription gives you access to the archives
which means for the price of a years subscription you actually are
getting more than a years worth of content ;-)

 
Kola

 
-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 
So the Design Pattern series was invaluable. How much time did that 
series save you to be able to work on extra projects? How much is your 
time worth per hour? I'd bet that over the course of the subscription 
year, the product of number of hours saved multiplied by your hourly 
rate is more than the cost of the subscription. And if properly 
applied, those techniques won't save you time and money just this year, 
but in the future as well.

That's how I justify it at least.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much of life is Dutch one-digit operations in which legions of big 
robust people crouch behind badly cracked dike systems attached by the 
thumbs their wide balloon-pantsed rumps up-ended to the northern sun 
while, back in town, little black-suspendered tulip magnates stride 
around. - Dutch, Kay Ryan

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 Your monthly column
 contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/),
and
 Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to 
 me).
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Christian Cantrell
On Thursday, January 8, 2004, at 01:26AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 ...and the price of the subscription is almost twice what Time 
 magazine costs me...
 The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think *maybe* half 
 actually
 had article content.

I'm not sure it's fair to compare CFDJ to Time.Because CFDJ is so 
specialized, it reaches a relatively limited audience, which means 
Sys-Con cannot charge nearly what a publication like Time can charge 
for advertising.Generally speaking, the more specialized a 
publication, the more expensive it is.

Christian
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Heald, Tim
If it ever actually gets to you.We haven't seen one in months.This isn't
the first time either, I have finally just just given up and won't be
resubscribing.

 
-- 
Timothy Heald 
Web Portfolio Manager 
Overseas Security Advisory Council 
U.S. Department of State 
571.345.2319 

The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Not to mention that your subscription gives you access to the archives
which means for the price of a years subscription you actually are
getting more than a years worth of content ;-)

Kola

-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

So the Design Pattern series was invaluable. How much time did that 
series save you to be able to work on extra projects? How much is your 
time worth per hour? I'd bet that over the course of the subscription 
year, the product of number of hours saved multiplied by your hourly 
rate is more than the cost of the subscription. And if properly 
applied, those techniques won't save you time and money just this year, 
but in the future as well.

That's how I justify it at least.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much of life is Dutch one-digit operations in which legions of big 
robust people crouch behind badly cracked dike systems attached by the 
thumbs their wide balloon-pantsed rumps up-ended to the northern sun 
while, back in town, little black-suspendered tulip magnates stride 
around. - Dutch, Kay Ryan

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 Your monthly column
 contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/),
and
 Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to 
 me).
_ 
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Samuel Neff
Dave,

Keep in mind that with the lower subscription rate mentioned earlier, and
especially with the low potential subscription rate (there are a lot less CF
users than there are people that can read Time magazine), sys-con is going
to get a lot less from advertising than magazines with a higher subscription
rate.They have a lot less to work with and I think they do a great job
with what they have.

Also remember that the authors are not paid for their articles, they are
voluntary contributions.With that being the case, there aren't too many
people that would do it on a regular basis.I've contributed a few
articles, but it's certainly not something I'd like to do more than a few
times a year since it does take a lot of time and that's time I can spend
doing other things (like earning money).

I'll agree that there is a lot more information available for free now than
there used to be, but you have to be careful about editorial quality and
even accuracy.The vast majority of blogs post small snippets and not full
articles like in a magazine, and many blogs post incorrect information.
With CFDJ, there is an assurance of some level of quality (not perfection,
but a certain level) due to the editorial review and CFDJ's review board.

My $0.02

Best regards,

Sam

--
Blog:http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I have to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. But for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I like to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if I ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Schuster, Steven
Also consider the Cold Fusion programming is not as widespread as say .NET
or some others. Whereas you can get literally hundreds of books on .NET,
JAVA etc CF has a few dozen. The audience has been pretty stable since back
in the late 90's and stayed that way.

 
** A side note ** 
Personally the reason I think MACR even originally bought Allaire was
because the Generator project they had sucked so bad and they needed a good
application engine that had great web functionality and would integrate into
Flash more readily. Well, Bingo! To boot they also get all of the loyal CF
developers who, for better or worse, will stick with the system because they
love it.

 
I remember back in the Team Allaire days when A. Guthrie (sp) sent out all
the stuff on the changes. Man how I long for the good ol' Allaire days

 
** End side note **

 
Well anyway, because of this you are not going to see a lot of people out
there getting these mags. Not to mention that lists like this plus others
provide free help as well. Generally I find that I need help with a very
specific item and more often than not the mags don't cover what I am
wanting. They do look nice on my rack at work though next to my other JAVA
and .NET mags.



Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101

Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590

_

From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 
Dave,

Keep in mind that with the lower subscription rate mentioned earlier, and
especially with the low potential subscription rate (there are a lot less CF
users than there are people that can read Time magazine), sys-con is going
to get a lot less from advertising than magazines with a higher subscription
rate.They have a lot less to work with and I think they do a great job
with what they have.

Also remember that the authors are not paid for their articles, they are
voluntary contributions.With that being the case, there aren't too many
people that would do it on a regular basis.I've contributed a few
articles, but it's certainly not something I'd like to do more than a few
times a year since it does take a lot of time and that's time I can spend
doing other things (like earning money).

I'll agree that there is a lot more information available for free now than
there used to be, but you have to be careful about editorial quality and
even accuracy.The vast majority of blogs post small snippets and not full
articles like in a magazine, and many blogs post incorrect information.
With CFDJ, there is an assurance of some level of quality (not perfection,
but a certain level) due to the editorial review and CFDJ's review board.

My $0.02

Best regards,

Sam

--
Blog:http://www.rewindlife.com http://www.rewindlife.com 
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
http://www.blinex.com/products/charting 
--

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I have to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. But for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I like to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if I ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk

RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Raymond Camden
 With CFDJ, there is an assurance of some level of quality 
 (not perfection, but a certain level) due to the editorial 
 review and CFDJ's review board.
 

And don't forget those darn good tech editors as well. ;)
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Schuster, Steven
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3899043/ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3899043/ 

 
Isn't this just too precious



Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101

Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590

_

From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 
Dave,

Keep in mind that with the lower subscription rate mentioned earlier, and
especially with the low potential subscription rate (there are a lot less CF
users than there are people that can read Time magazine), sys-con is going
to get a lot less from advertising than magazines with a higher subscription
rate.They have a lot less to work with and I think they do a great job
with what they have.

Also remember that the authors are not paid for their articles, they are
voluntary contributions.With that being the case, there aren't too many
people that would do it on a regular basis.I've contributed a few
articles, but it's certainly not something I'd like to do more than a few
times a year since it does take a lot of time and that's time I can spend
doing other things (like earning money).

I'll agree that there is a lot more information available for free now than
there used to be, but you have to be careful about editorial quality and
even accuracy.The vast majority of blogs post small snippets and not full
articles like in a magazine, and many blogs post incorrect information.
With CFDJ, there is an assurance of some level of quality (not perfection,
but a certain level) due to the editorial review and CFDJ's review board.

My $0.02

Best regards,

Sam

--
Blog:http://www.rewindlife.com http://www.rewindlife.com 
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
http://www.blinex.com/products/charting 
--

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 1:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I have to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. But for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I like to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if I ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.
_
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
I don't work for sys-con, but if you let me know about the subscription
problem I'll get to the bottom of it for you.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

If it ever actually gets to you.We haven't seen one in months.This
isn't
the first time either, I have finally just just given up and won't be
resubscribing.

--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319

The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail
is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Not to mention that your subscription gives you access to the archives
which means for the price of a years subscription you actually are
getting more than a years worth of content ;-)

Kola

-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

So the Design Pattern series was invaluable. How much time did that
series save you to be able to work on extra projects? How much is your
time worth per hour? I'd bet that over the course of the subscription
year, the product of number of hours saved multiplied by your hourly
rate is more than the cost of the subscription. And if properly
applied, those techniques won't save you time and money just this year,
but in the future as well.

That's how I justify it at least.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much of life is Dutch one-digit operations in which legions of big
robust people crouch behind badly cracked dike systems attached by the
thumbs their wide balloon-pantsed rumps up-ended to the northern sun
while, back in town, little black-suspendered tulip magnates stride
around. - Dutch, Kay Ryan

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 Your monthly column
 contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/),
and
 Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to
 me).
 _
 _
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
Thanks - glad to hear it ;)

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 07:36
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

What a bunch of whingers!

And so soon in the New Year too!

Strewth! If you ppl are bitching about how much it cost consider us
overseas. It costs more than TWICE as much.

Please consider.

PS. I love CFDJ - Simons write-up on MAX2003 was the closest most of the
world would get to it and I will welcome him to MXDU 2004 with gratitude
just to thank him for the many books, articles, etc he has contributed for
all of us.

Peter Tilbrook
ColdFusion Applications Developer
ColdGen Internet Solutions
Manager, ACT and Region ColdFusion Users Group - http://www.actcfug.com
4/73 Tharwa Road
Queanbeyan, NSW, 2620
AUSTRALIA

Telephone: +61-2-6284-2727
Mobile: +61-0439-401-823
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

\¯\/¯/ |¯|)¯) /¯/\¯\ \¯\/¯/
/_/\_\ |_|)_) \_\/_/ /_/\_\ RULES
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
I think your opinions are a bit strong, but I can relate with what you're
saying and believe me - no offense taken.Personally, I get more from the
CFDJ articles than I ever have or likely will from any of the ColdFusion
books on the market.I also think that if you're going to spend money on
something, why not on something that's kept up to date, right?
As for the quality of the content - here's a novel idea - do something about
it!!Why not help to make the content more what you think it should be by
writing an article rather than complaining aabout it?
Visit http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/writers.cfm for more info.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 06:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I have
to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. But
for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get
articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think
*maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I like
to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if I
ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.

- Original Message -
From: Simon Horwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 06:06 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is terrific
for
 what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many of the
 books in some ways.It costs a little more than most of the books on
the
 market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and community
 activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as opposed
to
 being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay


not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many people who don't care, because their company pays for it.
i'm
 not in that position, unfortunately.

- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I got an email from sys-con today, as probably a lot of folks here
did.
 Did the CFDJ subscription reach strike anyone else as surprising?

ColdFusion Developer's Journal:3,000 copies

Bummer.Good luck to 'em, though.

--
---
Matt Robertson,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--


 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Given that there are many more reputable publications that will 
compensate the author for CFML content says to me at least that a 
person's time would be better spent elsewhere. In fact, I strongly 
believe that many other publications that aren't specific to CFML have 
more CF readers anyway.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 I think your opinions are a bit strong, but I can relate with what 
 you're
 saying and believe me - no offense taken.  Personally, I get more from 
 the
 CFDJ articles than I ever have or likely will from any of the 
 ColdFusion
 books on the market.  I also think that if you're going to spend money 
 on
 something, why not on something that's kept up to date, right?
 As for the quality of the content - here's a novel idea - do something 
 about
 it!!  Why not help to make the content more what you think it should 
 be by
 writing an article rather than complaining aabout it?
 Visithttp://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/writers.cfmfor more info.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

   -Original Message-
   From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 08 January 2004 06:26
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

   Simon,

   With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I 
 have
 to
   say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. 
 But
 for
   $49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
   contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), 
 and
   Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to 
 me).
   But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get
 articles
   that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful 
 topics
   with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical 
 statements
   and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of 
 the
   subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by 
 the
   way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
   information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think
 *maybe*
   half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and 
 promos
   that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the 
 monthly
   issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
   announcements, etc.

   Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
   CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I 
 like
 to
   buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, 
 training,
   etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
   ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if 
 I
 ever
   needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me 
 started
   on their website...

   Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect 
 for
   everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are 
 people out
   there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
   especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the 
 bill, I
   think my opinion is pretty clear.

   Regards,
   Dave.

   - Original Message -
   From: Simon Horwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 06:06 PM
   Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

    I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is 
 terrific
   for
    what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many 
 of the
    books in some ways.  It costs a little more than most of the books 
 on
 the
    market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and 
 community
    activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as 
 opposed
 to
    being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.
   
    ~Simon
   
    Simon Horwith
    CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
    Member of Team Macromedia
    Macromedia Certified Instructor
    Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
    Certified Flash MX Developer
    CFDJList - List Administrator
   http://www.how2cf.com/
   
  -Original Message-
  From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
   
   
  not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.
   
  I know many people who don't care, because their company pays 
 for it.
   i'm
    not in that position, unfortunately.
   
    - Original Message -
    From: Matt Robertson
    To: CF-Talk
    Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
    Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't

RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Adrian Lynch
Got any examples? :O)

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 16:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Given that there are many more reputable publications that will 
compensate the author for CFML content says to me at least that a 
person's time would be better spent elsewhere. In fact, I strongly 
believe that many other publications that aren't specific to CFML have 
more CF readers anyway.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 I think your opinions are a bit strong, but I can relate with what 
 you're
 saying and believe me - no offense taken.Personally, I get more from 
 the
 CFDJ articles than I ever have or likely will from any of the 
 ColdFusion
 books on the market.I also think that if you're going to spend money 
 on
 something, why not on something that's kept up to date, right?
 As for the quality of the content - here's a novel idea - do something 
 about
 it!!Why not help to make the content more what you think it should 
 be by
 writing an article rather than complaining aabout it?
 Visithttp://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/writers.cfmfor more info.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/ http://www.how2cf.com/ 

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 06:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I 
 have
 to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. 
 But
 for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), 
 and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to 
 me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get
 articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful 
 topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical 
 statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of 
 the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by 
 the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think
 *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and 
 promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the 
 monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I 
 like
 to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, 
 training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if 
 I
 ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me 
 started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect 
 for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are 
 people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the 
 bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.

- Original Message -
From: Simon Horwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 06:06 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is 
 terrific
for
 what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many 
 of the
 books in some ways.It costs a little more than most of the books 
 on
 the
 market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and 
 community
 activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as 
 opposed
 to
 being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay


not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many people who don't care, because their company pays 
 for it.
i'm
 not in that position, unfortunately.

- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I got an email from sys-con today, as probably a lot of folks

Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
 Got any examples? :O)

Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have 
published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even 
seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Angel Stewart
Odd that you should mention them.

As in their web development section Coldfusion isn't listed as one of
their supported scripting languages. They have listed ASP,PHP,_javascript_
and others, but not CFML.

 
I've found one article on the CFLOGIN tag under the Architect heading.

 
What area of Builder.com has quite a bit of CFML related content?

 
-Gel

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have 
published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even 
seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF 
-8safe=offas_qdr=allq=+coldfusion+OR+cfml+site%3Abuilder.com.combtnG 
=Google+Search

Looks like a lot to me.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Angel Stewart wrote:

 Odd that you should mention them.

 As in their web development section Coldfusion isn't listed as one of
 their supported scripting languages. They have listed
 ASP,PHP,_javascript_
 and others, but not CFML.


 I've found one article on the CFLOGIN tag under the Architect heading.


 What area of Builder.com has quite a bit of CFML related content?


 -Gel

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
 published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
 seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.



 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Angel Stewart
Ah, there are a couple.

 
So odd CF isn't listed anywhere on their site navigation under web
development though.

 
I also find many of the articles to be quite light in comparison to
those found on CFDJ. 

 
-Gel

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

HYPERLINK
http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTFh
ttp://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF 
-8safe=offas_qdr=allq=+coldfusion+OR+cfml+site%3Abuilder.com.combtnG

=Google+Search

Looks like a lot to me.

-Matt



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
 I also find many of the articles to be quite light in comparison to
 those found on CFDJ.

Builder does tend to be light on the code side of things. If you are 
looking for more code heavy content then I would point you to other 
resources such as Macromedia, Evolt, or DevX. All of my non-editorial 
articles published at each of those respective sights are quite 
advanced or so I have been told.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
FYI - for any of you that have had subscription problems, I just recieved
this message from the CFDJ chief editor, Robert Diamond, who asked me to
pass it along:
if anyone's got a subscription problem, they can contact me @
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /201-802-3051, and I'll personally go choke whoever needs
to be choked to ensure a permanent solution to their problem. :-)

So there you have it.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

If it ever actually gets to you.We haven't seen one in months.This
isn't
the first time either, I have finally just just given up and won't be
resubscribing.

--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319

The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail
is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.

-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Not to mention that your subscription gives you access to the archives
which means for the price of a years subscription you actually are
getting more than a years worth of content ;-)

Kola

-Original Message-
From: Howard Fore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 13:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

So the Design Pattern series was invaluable. How much time did that
series save you to be able to work on extra projects? How much is your
time worth per hour? I'd bet that over the course of the subscription
year, the product of number of hours saved multiplied by your hourly
rate is more than the cost of the subscription. And if properly
applied, those techniques won't save you time and money just this year,
but in the future as well.

That's how I justify it at least.

--
Howard Fore, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Much of life is Dutch one-digit operations in which legions of big
robust people crouch behind badly cracked dike systems attached by the
thumbs their wide balloon-pantsed rumps up-ended to the northern sun
while, back in town, little black-suspendered tulip magnates stride
around. - Dutch, Kay Ryan

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:26 AM, Dave Carabetta wrote:

 Your monthly column
 contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/),
and
 Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to
 me).
 _
 _
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
I have no idea what you're talking about.Care to shed some insight as to
what mags you believe to be more reputable and that will also provide
readers with CFML content?

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 16:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Given that there are many more reputable publications that will
compensate the author for CFML content says to me at least that a
person's time would be better spent elsewhere. In fact, I strongly
believe that many other publications that aren't specific to CFML have
more CF readers anyway.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 11:14 AM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 I think your opinions are a bit strong, but I can relate with what
 you're
 saying and believe me - no offense taken.Personally, I get more from
 the
 CFDJ articles than I ever have or likely will from any of the
 ColdFusion
 books on the market.I also think that if you're going to spend money
 on
 something, why not on something that's kept up to date, right?
 As for the quality of the content - here's a novel idea - do something
 about
 it!!Why not help to make the content more what you think it should
 be by
 writing an article rather than complaining aabout it?
 Visithttp://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/writers.cfmfor more info.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 06:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I
 have
 to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ.
 But
 for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/),
 and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to
 me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get
 articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful
 topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical
 statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of
 the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by
 the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think
 *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and
 promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the
 monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I
 like
 to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines,
 training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if
 I
 ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me
 started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect
 for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are
 people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the
 bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.

- Original Message -
From: Simon Horwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 06:06 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is
 terrific
for
 what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many
 of the
 books in some ways.It costs a little more than most of the books
 on
 the
 market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and
 community
 activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as
 opposed
 to
 being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay


not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many

RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks that are
written in CFML.In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore that I
said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a discussion about
whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is a CFML
forum or not.What I welcome dialog about is the fact that builder.com is
not a publication.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 Got any examples? :O)

Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
the majority of those articles do little more than mention ColdFusion or
CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion developers.
That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you honestly
believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 18:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=lang_enie=UTF-8oe=UTF
-8safe=offas_qdr=allq=+coldfusion+OR+cfml+site%3Abuilder.com.combtnG
=Google+Search

Looks like a lot to me.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:31 PM, Angel Stewart wrote:

 Odd that you should mention them.

 As in their web development section Coldfusion isn't listed as one of
 their supported scripting languages. They have listed
 ASP,PHP,_javascript_
 and others, but not CFML.


 I've found one article on the CFLOGIN tag under the Architect heading.


 What area of Builder.com has quite a bit of CFML related content?


 -Gel

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
 published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
 seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.



 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/2003

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. Are 
you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the 
difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes 
content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less 
of a publication?

I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias 
towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry, that 
is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't say.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks 
 that are
 written in CFML.  In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore that 
 I
 said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a discussion 
 about
 whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is a 
 CFML
 forum or not.  What I welcome dialog about is the fact that 
 builder.com is
 not a publication.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

   -Original Message-
   From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

    Got any examples? :O)
   
   Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
   published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
   seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.

   -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
 the majority of those articles do little more than mention 
 ColdFusion or
 CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion developers.
 That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you honestly
 believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
 obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I 
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have better 
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was 
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types 
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a 
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt, etc. 
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality 
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors 
will consider writing for these online publications since that will 
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of a 
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF 
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... you know,
paper.There was no discussion of a comparison between the content in CFDJ
and online resources before your post, nor should there be one now.Hell,
if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML reference to
the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be builder.com
I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's online
documentation, devnet, etc.I think the point was that CFDJ was being
compared with books and periodicals in print.Some people stated that they
didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription compared
to the price of some of the books that are out there.I'm not sure what
that has to do with websites?There are a lot of great resources out there.
I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the magazine
for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is much more
worth the money.That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we were
debating.Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that belongs on
the CF Community list.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. Are
you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the
difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less
of a publication?

I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias
towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry, that
is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't say.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks
 that are
 written in CFML.In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore that
 I
 said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a discussion
 about
 whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is a
 CFML
 forum or not.What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
 builder.com is
 not a publication.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 Got any examples? :O)

Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.

-Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd love to
see one from you.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 the majority of those articles do little more than mention
 ColdFusion or
 CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion developers.
 That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you honestly
 believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
 obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have better
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt, etc.
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
will consider writing for these online publications since that will
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of a
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Bryan Stevenson
cf_sarcasm
sure am glad this CFDJ thread is overshadowing the technical issues today...it's very important you know
/cf_sarcasm

Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 Std/Linuxany insight would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)

TIA

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Simon Horwith 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd love to
see one from you.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 January 2004 23:37
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

  the majority of those articles do little more than mention
  ColdFusion or
  CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion developers.
  That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you honestly
  believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
  obviously haven't ever read the magazine.
 
 I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
 am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have better
 reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
 a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
 of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
 CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt, etc.
 I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
 standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
 will consider writing for these online publications since that will
 only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of a
 whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
 crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

 -Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
by the way Matt - I hope you know I'm not trying to give you a hard time -
just wanted to make it clear that we were talking about value for the
dollar - specifically comparing CFDJ to it's thicker skinned competitors
(books).I don't disagree with your opinions about online publishing.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... you
know,
paper.There was no discussion of a comparison between the content in
CFDJ
and online resources before your post, nor should there be one now.Hell,
if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML reference to
the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be builder.com
I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's online
documentation, devnet, etc.I think the point was that CFDJ was being
compared with books and periodicals in print.Some people stated that
they
didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription
compared
to the price of some of the books that are out there.I'm not sure what
that has to do with websites?There are a lot of great resources out
there.
I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the magazine
for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is much
more
worth the money.That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we were
debating.Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that belongs
on
the CF Community list.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. Are
 you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the
 difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
 content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less
 of a publication?

 I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias
 towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry, that
 is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't say.

 -Matt

 On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

  first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks
  that are
  written in CFML.In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore that
  I
  said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a discussion
  about
  whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is a
  CFML
  forum or not.What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
  builder.com is
  not a publication.
 
  ~Simon
 
  Simon Horwith
  CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
  Member of Team Macromedia
  Macromedia Certified Instructor
  Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
  Certified Flash MX Developer
  CFDJList - List Administrator
  http://www.how2cf.com/
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
 
  Got any examples? :O)
 
 Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
 published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have even
 seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.
 
 -Matt
 
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Simon Horwith
sorry, I haven't used iText, but if anyone wants to submit an article
proposal - go for it.

~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

cf_sarcasm
 sure am glad this CFDJ thread is overshadowing the technical issues
today...it's very important you know
/cf_sarcasm

Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've got a
hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working on Linux with
CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 Std/Linuxany insight
would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye you could all write an
article about it when you're done ;-)

TIA

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
 - Original Message -
 From: Simon Horwith
 To: CF-Talk
 Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:42 PM
 Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd love
to
 see one from you.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 the majority of those articles do little more than mention
 ColdFusion or
 CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion
developers.
 That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you
honestly
 believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
 obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have
better
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt,
etc.
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
will consider writing for these online publications since that will
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of
a
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Bryan Stevenson
LOL...nice ;-)

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Simon Horwith 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

sorry, I haven't used iText, but if anyone wants to submit an article
proposal - go for it.

~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 January 2004 23:50
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 cf_sarcasm
sure am glad this CFDJ thread is overshadowing the technical issues
today...it's very important you know
 /cf_sarcasm

 Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've got a
hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working on Linux with
CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 Std/Linuxany insight
would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye you could all write an
article about it when you're done ;-)

 TIA

 Cheers

 Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
 VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
 Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
 t. 250.920.8830
 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 Macromedia Associate Partner
 www.macromedia.com
 -
 Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
 Founder  Director
 www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Simon Horwith
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd love
to
see one from you.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 the majority of those articles do little more than mention
 ColdFusion or
 CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion
developers.
 That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you
honestly
 believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
 obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have
better
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt,
etc.
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
will consider writing for these online publications since that will
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of
a
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Bryan Stevenson
BTW this may not be iText specific.

I'm gettng a 500 internal server error truncated class file when trying to call any of the classes in the libraryno idea what might be causing it

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Simon Horwith 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 4:10 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

sorry, I haven't used iText, but if anyone wants to submit an article
proposal - go for it.

~Simon
Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

 -Original Message-
 From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 January 2004 23:50
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 cf_sarcasm
sure am glad this CFDJ thread is overshadowing the technical issues
today...it's very important you know
 /cf_sarcasm

 Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.I've got a
hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working on Linux with
CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 Std/Linuxany insight
would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye you could all write an
article about it when you're done ;-)

 TIA

 Cheers

 Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
 VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
 Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
 t. 250.920.8830
 e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -
 Macromedia Associate Partner
 www.macromedia.com
 -
 Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
 Founder  Director
 www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Simon Horwith
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I posted a link - why don't you write an article?Personally, I'd love
to
see one from you.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 January 2004 23:37
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 the majority of those articles do little more than mention
 ColdFusion or
 CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion
developers.
 That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you
honestly
 believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
 obviously haven't ever read the magazine.

I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have
better
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt,
etc.
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
will consider writing for these online publications since that will
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of
a
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Paul Hastings
 I'm gettng a 500 internal server error truncated class file when trying to
call any of the classes in the libraryno idea what might be causing it

have you tested the integrity of that jar? does that the exact same file
work under windows?
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Paul,

The jar works fine on Windows, but on Linux I couldn't get the classes in the jar to be found (no matter where I put the jar file and adjusted the jvm.config file to point at the jar file and rebooted).So on Linux I had to unpack the classes in the jar file to a directory and make a new classpath to point at that directory.That at least allowed the classes to be found, but caused this new issue.

As you can probably tell I'm a total Java newbie, so I have no idea how to check the integrity ofa jar file (or if unpacking it could have messed things up).

Apparently others (or at least Barney B.) have had issues with CFMX recognizing jar files (thus the workaround of unpacking).Barney said he had talked with someone at MM that had a way of getting the jar files recognized and would forward me the mail...but I'm still waiting on that.

So if you can solve any of the problems above, I'm all ears ;-)

TIA

Cheers

Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP  Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder  Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message - 
From: Paul Hastings 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I'm gettng a 500 internal server error truncated class file when trying to
call any of the classes in the libraryno idea what might be causing it

have you tested the integrity of that jar? does that the exact same file
work under windows?
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
You might have missed an email or something. I wasn't comparing the 
content at all. I was disagreeing with you suggesting that someone 
should write for CFDJ. See my emails for why I believe writing CFML 
content for an online publication would be better.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:41 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... you 
 know,
 paper.  There was no discussion of a comparison between the content in 
 CFDJ
 and online resources before your post, nor should there be one 
 now.  Hell,
 if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML reference 
 to
 the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be 
 builder.com
 I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's 
 online
 documentation, devnet, etc.  I think the point was that CFDJ was being
 compared with books and periodicals in print.  Some people stated that 
 they
 didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription 
 compared
 to the price of some of the books that are out there.  I'm not sure 
 what
 that has to do with websites?  There are a lot of great resources out 
 there.
 I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
 personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the 
 magazine
 for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is much 
 more
 worth the money.  That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we were
 debating.  Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that 
 belongs on
 the CF Community list.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

   -Original Message-
   From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

   Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. Are
   you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is the
   difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
   content available online in addition to print. Does that make it less
   of a publication?

   I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is bias
   towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry, 
 that
   is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't 
 say.

   -Matt

   On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

    first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're frameworks
    that are
    written in CFML.  In the interest of conserving bandwidth, ignore 
 that
    I
    said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a 
 discussion
    about
    whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II is 
 a
    CFML
    forum or not.  What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
    builder.com is
    not a publication.
   
    ~Simon
   
    Simon Horwith
    CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
    Member of Team Macromedia
    Macromedia Certified Instructor
    Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
    Certified Flash MX Developer
    CFDJList - List Administrator
   http://www.how2cf.com/
   
  -Original Message-
  From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
   
   Got any examples? :O)
  
  Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
  published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have 
 even
  seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.
   
  -Matt
   

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
 I posted a link - why don't you write an article?  Personally, I'd 
 love to
 see one from you.

When Sys-con starts compensating authors for content and is able to 
actually find a significant number of real subscribers instead of lying 
about their readership just to support ad sales then I might be 
interested. In the mean time, I will continue to write for reputable 
publishers.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
 Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.  I've 
 got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working 
 on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1 
 Std/Linux  any insight would be greatly appreciated...and hey...mabye 
 you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)

The errors you are getting can only come from malformed class files. I 
suggest you retry your download and/or get support for the author(s). 
Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF 
generation. Additionally, there are resources --such as myself-- that 
are available on a contract basis to take care of these sorts of things 
for you.

-Matt
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
And just so you know, I personally don't think the CFML books on the 
market are very good and I am even a contributing author to one. Of 
course my chapter rocks! ;)

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 6:49 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

 by the way Matt - I hope you know I'm not trying to give you a hard 
 time -
 just wanted to make it clear that we were talking about value for the
 dollar - specifically comparing CFDJ to it's thicker skinned 
 competitors
 (books).  I don't disagree with your opinions about online publishing.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

   -Original Message-
   From: Simon Horwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: 08 January 2004 23:41
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

   we were comparing CFDJ to other publications... things in print... 
 you
 know,
   paper.  There was no discussion of a comparison between the content 
 in
 CFDJ
   and online resources before your post, nor should there be one 
 now.  Hell,
   if you want to compare the content in CFDJ or any other CFML 
 reference to
   the content in one outstanding resource, why would it be 
 builder.com
   I'd say that builder.com doesn't even compare with macromedia.com's 
 online
   documentation, devnet, etc.  I think the point was that CFDJ was 
 being
   compared with books and periodicals in print.  Some people stated 
 that
 they
   didn't think that it was worth it's price for a year's subscription
 compared
   to the price of some of the books that are out there.  I'm not sure 
 what
   that has to do with websites?  There are a lot of great resources out
 there.
   I don't think CFDJ is the best CFML resource in the world, but I do
   personally think that what you get for the cost of receiving the 
 magazine
   for a year as opposed to one or two of the books on the market is 
 much
 more
   worth the money.  That's just me... and that's what (I thought) we 
 were
   debating.  Anyway - this is begining to sound like a thread that 
 belongs
 on
   the CF Community list.

   ~Simon

   Simon Horwith
   CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
   Member of Team Macromedia
   Macromedia Certified Instructor
   Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
   Certified Flash MX Developer
   CFDJList - List Administrator
   http://www.how2cf.com/

     -Original Message-
     From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
     Sent: 08 January 2004 23:29
     To: CF-Talk
     Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

     Where did you get this fact that Builder is not a publication. 
 Are
     you suggesting that Internet sites can't be publications? What is 
 the
     difference between an online magazine and offline one? CFDJ makes
     content available online in addition to print. Does that make it 
 less
     of a publication?

     I don't see any facts in your statement at all. What I do see is 
 bias
     towards to the online publication industry. And it is an industry, 
 that
     is growing, which the offline publishing industry certainly can't 
 say.

     -Matt

     On Jan 8, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Simon Horwith wrote:

      first of all, Fusebox and Mach II are not CFML - they're 
 frameworks
      that are
      written in CFML.  In the interest of conserving bandwidth, 
 ignore that
      I
      said that - I don't feel like getting into (nor will I) a 
 discussion
      about
      whether or not a forum that talks primaily about FB and MACH II 
 is a
      CFML
      forum or not.  What I welcome dialog about is the fact that
      builder.com is
      not a publication.
     
      ~Simon
     
      Simon Horwith
      CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
      Member of Team Macromedia
      Macromedia Certified Instructor
      Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
      Certified Flash MX Developer
      CFDJList - List Administrator
     http://www.how2cf.com/
     
        -Original Message-
        From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: 08 January 2004 18:19
        To: CF-Talk
        Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay
     
         Got any examples? :O)
        
        Of publications? Builder.com will pay for content and they have
        published quite a bit of CFML related content. In fact, I have 
 even
        seen articles related to Fusebox and Mach-II.
     
        -Matt
     

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: iText (was Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay)

2004-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta
Oh yeah, possibly you were uploading the JAR/class files via FTP and 
didn't transfer them as binary if they work on Windows and not on 
Linux. Of course, if you are using FTP; stop right now and move over to 
SCP. You life will be easier and your machines will be more secure.

-Matt

On Jan 8, 2004, at 9:17 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:

  Why don't you immensely bright opinionated people help us out.  I've
  got a hell of a problem with trying to get the iText library working
  on Linux with CFMX Standardplease see Re: iText.jar/CFMX 6.1
  Std/Linux  any insight would be greatly appreciated...and 
 hey...mabye
  you could all write an article about it when you're done ;-)
 
 The errors you are getting can only come from malformed class files. I
 suggest you retry your download and/or get support for the author(s).
 Be aware that there are only solutions besides iText for PDF
 generation. Additionally, there are resources --such as myself-- that
 are available on a contract basis to take care of these sorts of things
 for you.

 -Matt

 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-07 Thread Charlie Griefer
not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many people who don't care, because their company pays for it.i'm not in that position, unfortunately.

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Robertson 
To: CF-Talk 
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I got an email from sys-con today, as probably a lot of folks here did.Did the CFDJ subscription reach strike anyone else as surprising?

ColdFusion Developer's Journal:3,000 copies

Bummer.Good luck to 'em, though.

--
---
Matt Robertson,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-07 Thread Simon Horwith
I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is terrific for
what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many of the
books in some ways.It costs a little more than most of the books on the
market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and community
activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as opposed to
being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.

~Simon

Simon Horwith
CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
Member of Team Macromedia
Macromedia Certified Instructor
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Certified Flash MX Developer
CFDJList - List Administrator
http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many people who don't care, because their company pays for it.i'm
not in that position, unfortunately.

 - Original Message -
 From: Matt Robertson
 To: CF-Talk
 Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
 Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I got an email from sys-con today, as probably a lot of folks here did.
Did the CFDJ subscription reach strike anyone else as surprising?

 ColdFusion Developer's Journal:3,000 copies

 Bummer.Good luck to 'em, though.

 --
 ---
 Matt Robertson,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
 ---

 --
 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

2004-01-07 Thread Dave Carabetta
Simon,

With all due respect to both you and your valuable contributions, I have to
say that I entirely disagree. I used to have a subscription to CFDJ. But for
$49 USD/year, it's absolute bottom of the barrel. Your monthly column
contribution is useful (along with your papers on www.how2cf.com/), and
Brendan O'Hara's Design Patterns series was invaluable (at least, to me).
But the magazine overall really is a joke for what you get. You get articles
that just barely touch on what I really care about (I want useful topics
with meaty code samples as opposed to hello world theoretical statements
and the aggravating poorly written code snippets), and the price of the
subscription is almost twice what Time magazine costs me (and, oh by the
way, Time is a *weekly* publication with a helluva lot more relevant
information. The last issue of CFDJ was 52 pages. Of the 52, I think *maybe*
half actually had article content. The rest was advertisements and promos
that I could care less about. As for relevancy, by the time the monthly
issue comes out, most hot topics are outdated, such as hotfix
announcements, etc.

Honestly, between the numerous blogs at fullasagoog.com, and CF-Talk,
CFCDev, and some other mailing lists, CFDJ is a complete rip-off. I like to
buy virtually everything associated with CF (books, magazines, training,
etc.). But I have to say that, of all the resources out there for
ColdFusion, CFDJ is absolutely the last resource I would refer to if I ever
needed advice or direction on a particular issue. And don't get me started
on their website...

Please don't take this as a personal attack, as I have great respect for
everything you contribute to the CF community. But if there are people out
there wondering if it's worth taking the risk of subscribing to CFDJ,
especially when there aren't corporate pocketbooks to pick up the bill, I
think my opinion is pretty clear.

Regards,
Dave.

- Original Message - 
From: Simon Horwith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 06:06 PM
Subject: RE: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

 I didn't get the email, but for what it's worth I think CFDJ is terrific
for
 what you get - in fact it's a better buy for your money than many of the
 books in some ways.It costs a little more than most of the books on the
 market, but the topics vary, there's focus on current news and community
 activity, the material is applicable to the newest products (as opposed to
 being outdated within 6 months like so many of the books are), etc.

 ~Simon

 Simon Horwith
 CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
 Member of Team Macromedia
 Macromedia Certified Instructor
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
 Certified Flash MX Developer
 CFDJList - List Administrator
 http://www.how2cf.com/

-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 January 2004 22:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay


not a bad publication...but way too expensive for whatcha get.

I know many people who don't care, because their company pays for it.
i'm
 not in that position, unfortunately.

- Original Message -
From: Matt Robertson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: SOT: CFDJ isn't exactly kicking bootay

I got an email from sys-con today, as probably a lot of folks here
did.
 Did the CFDJ subscription reach strike anyone else as surprising?

ColdFusion Developer's Journal:3,000 copies

Bummer.Good luck to 'em, though.

--
---
Matt Robertson,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
---

--


 [Todays Threads] 
 [This Message] 
 [Subscription] 
 [Fast Unsubscribe] 
 [User Settings]




RE: CFDJ Readers Choice Awards

2002-10-02 Thread Ken Wilson

And, amazingly, the leading book seems to be one that isn't even published
yet.

Ken

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: CFDJ Readers Choice Awards

2002-10-02 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)

isnt that a surprise?.h

-Original Message-
From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2002 11:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFDJ Readers Choice Awards


And, amazingly, the leading book seems to be one that isn't even published
yet.

Ken


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: CFDJ Readers Choice Awards

2002-10-01 Thread Tilbrook, Peter

The link to CFDEV is:

http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/

Cheers!


**
The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments to it, is
intended for the use of addressee and is confidential.  If you are not 
the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, read, forward, copy or
retain any of the information.  If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please delete it and notify the sender by return e-mail or telephone.  
The Commonwealth does not warrant that any attachments are free from 
viruses or any other defects.  You assume all liability for any loss, damage, or 
other consequences which may arise from opening or using the attachments.

**
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



Re: CFDJ subscription

2002-05-01 Thread Dave Carabetta

Does anybody here know where I can subscribe to the CFDJ online.  I tried
this link:
http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/subscribe/SubscribeForm.cfm
but it's giving me a 404 error.  Anybody know where I can subscribe?
Thanks.

To be perfectly honest with you, I think that their site is one of the worst 
sites I have ever seen. For what subscribers pay annually just to CFDJ, let 
alone their other publications, you would figure that they would put 
something a big more user-friendly and less ad-intensive.

But that doesn't answer your question, I know. Sorry, just had to vent on 
that one. My suggestion would be to go to your nearest bookstore (i.e., 
Barnes and Noble) and look for a subscription insert in one of their issues. 
My boss subscribed to it for our department a few months back, and all we 
got were timeouts and 404 errors. So I just went down to BN and grabbed an 
insert.

Snail mail still has its benefits!!

Regards,
Dave.

_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

__
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: CFDJ subscription

2002-05-01 Thread Craig Thomas

1-800-513-7111

-Craig Thomas


__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: CFDJ subscription

2002-05-01 Thread BillyC

No kidding.  Slow, too many ads, broken functionality.  Kinda like
hiring a painter whose house is chipping and cracking...

---
Billy Cravens

-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ subscription

Does anybody here know where I can subscribe to the CFDJ online.  I
tried
this link:
http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/subscribe/SubscribeForm.cfm
but it's giving me a 404 error.  Anybody know where I can subscribe?
Thanks.

To be perfectly honest with you, I think that their site is one of the
worst 
sites I have ever seen. For what subscribers pay annually just to CFDJ,
let 
alone their other publications, you would figure that they would put 
something a big more user-friendly and less ad-intensive.

But that doesn't answer your question, I know. Sorry, just had to vent
on 
that one. My suggestion would be to go to your nearest bookstore (i.e., 
Barnes and Noble) and look for a subscription insert in one of their
issues. 
My boss subscribed to it for our department a few months back, and all
we 
got were timeouts and 404 errors. So I just went down to BN and grabbed
an 
insert.

Snail mail still has its benefits!!

Regards,
Dave.

_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: CFDJ Awards are out

2002-03-14 Thread Zac Belado

 I see CFDJ has published this year's Reader's Choice awards, and 
 the winners look to be a whole bunch of CF-Talk subscribers.  

The URL to the list of winners is 

http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/article.cfm?id=418




__
Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: CFDJ Awards are out

2002-03-14 Thread Kwang Suh

I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best web
development tool.  Talk about a biased audience :)

-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFDJ Awards are out


I see CFDJ has published this year's Reader's Choice awards, and the winners
look to be a whole bunch of CF-Talk subscribers.

One heck of a talent pool you have created for us all here, Michael.  Thx
again.

Congrats to everyone involved!

---
Matt Robertson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com
---



__
Get Your Own Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionb
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: CFDJ Awards are out

2002-03-14 Thread laszlo

I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best...

Does CFTREE work?
If it does, please, let me know.

laszlo

Kwang Suh wrote:

 I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best web
 development tool.  Talk about a biased audience :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:57 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFDJ Awards are out

 I see CFDJ has published this year's Reader's Choice awards, and the winners
 look to be a whole bunch of CF-Talk subscribers.

 One heck of a talent pool you have created for us all here, Michael.  Thx
 again.

 Congrats to everyone involved!

 ---
 Matt Robertson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com
 ---

 
__
Why Share?
  Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



RE: CFDJ Awards are out

2002-03-14 Thread John Wilker

Let you know and you'll vote for it? :-)

J. 
 
John Wilker
Web Applications Consultant, and Author
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
www.red-omega.com
 
more people are killed by donkeys than by airplane crashes each year


-Original Message-
From: laszlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDJ Awards are out


I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best...

Does CFTREE work?
If it does, please, let me know.

laszlo

Kwang Suh wrote:

 I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best web 
 development tool.  Talk about a biased audience :)

 -Original Message-
 From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:57 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFDJ Awards are out

 I see CFDJ has published this year's Reader's Choice awards, and the 
 winners look to be a whole bunch of CF-Talk subscribers.

 One heck of a talent pool you have created for us all here, Michael.  
 Thx again.

 Congrats to everyone involved!

 ---
 Matt Robertson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com
 ---

 

__
Dedicated Windows 2000 Server
  PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: CFDJ Awards are out

2002-03-14 Thread laszlo

John,
It's a deal!

laszlo

John Wilker wrote:

 Let you know and you'll vote for it? :-)

 J.

 John Wilker
 Web Applications Consultant, and Author
 Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
 President/Founder, Inland Empire CFUG.
 www.red-omega.com

 more people are killed by donkeys than by airplane crashes each year

 -Original Message-
 From: laszlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:05 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: CFDJ Awards are out

 I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best...

 Does CFTREE work?
 If it does, please, let me know.

 laszlo

 Kwang Suh wrote:

  I am very surprised that ColdFusion Server5 was voted the best web
  development tool.  Talk about a biased audience :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 5:57 PM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: CFDJ Awards are out
 
  I see CFDJ has published this year's Reader's Choice awards, and the
  winners look to be a whole bunch of CF-Talk subscribers.
 
  One heck of a talent pool you have created for us all here, Michael.
  Thx again.
 
  Congrats to everyone involved!
 
  ---
  Matt Robertson[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  MSB Designs, Inc., www.mysecretbase.com
  ---
 
 

 
__
Why Share?
  Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER
  Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup
  http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists



Re: CFDJ - anyone else had problems?

2000-05-02 Thread Scott_Brady



When you subscribed, did they send you previous back-issues?

I subscribed in October, and they sent me all of 1999's issues, presumably to
ensure that all subscribers renew in January.

Of course, I never got a renewal notice.  I got two issues and never got another
one (though I still get the e-mail telling me about the PDF version of the new
issue).  I tried calling them to see why I stopped getting it, but they couldn't
find me in the database.  I would need my mailing label (but since I moved
around New Year's, i haven't been able to find any issues).

A colleague of mine has stopped getting his, as well, although he did renew.
(but he keeps get Java DJ, which he doesn't want).

Basically, I've been incredibly un-impressed with sys-con as a company.

Scott





Kimberly Mayhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/02/2000 09:15:05 AM
I've had a heck of time dealing with syscon the publishers of this
magazineafter only receiving the magazine for 3 months, they began
sending me notices that my subscription was about to expire (although we had
paid for year).  I repeatedly emailed them, called them, and have done so
for the last three months - all with no response whatsoever.

Have any of you dealt with this issue, successfully or unsuccessfully?



--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.



Re: CFDJ - anyone else had problems?

2000-05-02 Thread Jennifer

At 10:07 AM 5/2/00 -0700, you wrote:


When you subscribed, did they send you previous back-issues?

I subscribed in October, and they sent me all of 1999's issues, presumably to
ensure that all subscribers renew in January.

I have a problem with that method.

Of course, I never got a renewal notice.  I got two issues and never got 
another
one (though I still get the e-mail telling me about the PDF version of the new
issue).  I tried calling them to see why I stopped getting it, but they 
couldn't
find me in the database.  I would need my mailing label (but since I moved
around New Year's, i haven't been able to find any issues).

We moved sometime about the middle of February and we haven't received any 
copies since, although we have received XML developers Journal since then 
and we were receiving three copies of CFDJ before we moved. I haven't even 
managed to find a copy of the March issue. I will be particularly unhappy 
if we find out that we need to renew and they renewed us by giving us the 
copies that I have already gone to the store and purchased.

I thought that our problem might have been with our move, even though all 
of our other magazines have been forwarding correctly. We assumed that 
might be the problem because we never received a renew notice. Maybe our 
assumption was wrong.

A colleague of mine has stopped getting his, as well, although he did renew.
(but he keeps get Java DJ, which he doesn't want).

If they sent that to us as well as what we ordered, I certainly wouldn't 
complain. I'd just stockpile them incase I ever need them. As it turns out, 
we have a client who insists on using Intershop Enfinity and we may have to 
start using Java / JSP to enable the site to do some things that Enfinity 
isn't set up to handle. It certainly wouldn't hurt to have that kind of 
stuff available even though we didn't expect to need it three months ago.
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.



Re: CFDJ - anyone else had problems?

2000-05-02 Thread Brian L. Wolfsohn

As long as we're all dumping on CFDJ (and appropriately so, it seems), 
would someone post a list of additional magazines/publications that they 
would recommend..



Brian L. Wolfsohnhttp://www.cus.com
CUS Business Systems Ft.Lauderdale,FL
Software for Auctioneers (954) 565-5600 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk
To Unsubscribe visit 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk or send a 
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.