Business proposal for CCIE lab

[Jim Healis]

I would love to hear comments on the proposal I am planning to

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Business Proposal for CCIE lab

[Jim Healis]

I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am 
planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying 
for my studying for the CCIE lab.
Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.

Thanks!

Jim

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[Pradeep Kumar]

Can we expect something intelligent.
The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your backside.Actually, I dont 
have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He might do it better.



-Original Message-
From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab


I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am 
planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying 
for my studying for the CCIE lab.
Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.

Thanks!

Jim

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications center.
Visto.com. Life on the Dot.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Netflow Bandwidth Manager

[Charles Nunie]

Hello,

We are using a cisco 3620 as our backbone router to the internet running 
12.1(5) IOS. We have a billing system (RODOPI) which is able to run with
Cisco's Netflow for bandwidth management.

To connect to the internet we have a WAN which uses private and public IP
addresses and we want to use the Netflow to perform bandwidth management. This
would assign a particular bandwith (eg. 64, 128kbps) to a public or private IP
address on our WAN. No matter the location of the IP address on our WAN, we
would want that assigned bandwidth to be assigned to that IP address.

Please advise on the version of IOS we need to upgrade to and the
configuration parameters for the configuration of the bandwidth manager.

Regards,

Dzilo


Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[hal9001]

OOH who is Mr Grumpy today?

K
- Original Message -
From: "Pradeep Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
might do it better.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re:

[Amjad Al-Ashqar]

Try to upgrade to 12.1(6).

Amjad

- Original Message -
From: "Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:01 PM


> Anyone have any ideas??
>
>
>
> HELP!!  I have a 7204 router with IOS 12.0(7).
>
> I have a FastEthernet interface sub-interfaced into two (Fa0/0.1 and
> Fa0/0.2).  They are set for isl 1 and isl 2 respectively.  Fa0/0.1 is
> outside nat and Fa0/0.2 is inside nat.  I am connected to a 3524 switch
> setup for VTP using ISL and divided into half for VLAN 1 and VLAN 2.
> VLAN1 is global (outside) and VLAN 2 is inside
>
> I have an access list setup to allow 192.168.250.0 from the inside and
> have setup a single global address for PAT translation.
>
> 1. This setup works fine when reaching the net on Fa0/0.1 (the
> outside).  However I cannot reach the Internet  which is out the routers
> serial ports.  From VLAN 1 which is the outside, I can reach the
> internet with no problem.
>
> 2. I can ping all devices on VLAN 1 (outside) but not past there from
> the inside (VLAN2) except when I turn Proxy-Arp OFF.
>
> Once problems 1 & 2 are resolved, I'll need to solve the initial
> problem...
>
> 3. I tried to setup static maps to 6 terminal servers on the inside so I
> can manage them.  The terminal servers are attached to phone lines and
> will recieve dial-up traffic.  I cannot reach the devices I statically
> mapped (they show up correctly in the show ip nat trans command.  I used
> the ip nat inside etc. command to map).  When I checked ARP after trying
> to ping to these devices from the outside, the switch shows that
> "Encapuslation failed" and the show arp shows an "Incomplete" where the
> MAC address should be.  I left this configuration overnight and the next
> morning, the MAC Address was in the table (actually the mac address of
> the routers ethernet interface as one would expect with NAT or
> proxy-arp) and I was able to reach the devices I statically mapped.
>
> However, when I added another, I ran into the same problem.  Is this an
> issue where the router needs to be power cycled to allow for static
> maps???  I did find a tech article on Cisco's site, CSCdp22947,
> stating that there is an issue where the router will not send the MAC
> address for statically mapped devices using nat.  However, it was with
> ios 12.0(7.1) and 12.0(7.2) and I have 12.0(7).  Who knows??
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.  I have wrestled this for several
> days.  I have viewed millions of sample configs and they are all very
> simple and straight forward.  I am beginning to think an IOS upgrade is
> in order here.  However, the rest of the router config is complicated
> and with 4 T1s and 35 sites through frame relay with STUN encapsulation
> and IP all for Internet and AS400 access.  S, I would rather not
> upgrade and risk NEW bugs causing problems with the mission critical
> stuff.  But if I gotta.
> --
> AT Bauer
> CPU Specialist
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SNMP-queries ???

[Hans Schimek]

i would like to configure SNMP on our network. but
reduce network traffic for snmp queries as far as possible.
i did this on a testrouter so far.
but debugging snmp packets - i noticed that every 2 seconds a query
is sent - i attached an extract of the log-file.
our network now has about 40-50 routers - so if i will enable
snmp on all of these devices - that would result in a heavy network load,
isn`t it-
but so far - we do need such a strictly network mangagement- for now we do
polling every 40 minutes -
but when there is an outage on one of those devices, the customer notices it
prior to our
NOC.
so i configured snmp traps - which works fine - in an acceptable time - but
THAT didn`t reduce
my snmp queries floods, either.

so please could anyone give me an advice, how i could reduce these snmp
queries.



thanx
hans


4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 426099, errstat 0, erridx 0
 ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 426099, errstat 2, erridx 1
 ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 491635, errstat 0, erridx 0
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 491635, errstat 2, erridx 1
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
 ifEntry.5.3 = 2048000
 sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 557171, errstat 0, erridx 0
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 557171, errstat 2, erridx 1
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 622707, errstat 0, erridx 0
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 622707, errstat 2, erridx 1
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98420, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98420, errstat 2, erridx 4
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 426100, errstat 0, erridx 0
 ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 426100, errstat 2, erridx 1
 ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98420, errstat 0, erridx 0
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
 sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VA

Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[Mask Of Zorro]

Kick him... That's a good idea! Let's Kick Pradeep off the list!

Z


>From: "hal9001" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "hal9001" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Pradeep Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,  
>   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him
>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:50:12 -
>
>OOH who is Mr Grumpy today?
>
>K
>- Original Message -
>From: "Pradeep Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:05 AM
>Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him
>
>
> > Can we expect something intelligent.
> > The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
>backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
>might do it better.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> > To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
> >
> >
> > I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> > planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> > for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> > Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>___
> > Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
>center.
> > Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[Eric Gunn]

Hello,

I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the 
CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things about 
their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab 
pieced together from optsys.

The books listed are:

Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi


I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first 
book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP. 
Multicasting, etc.

The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has 
read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing 
protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better 
reads one the list for that information?

Thanks,

-Eric Gunn

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[Chuck Larrieu]

According to Amazon, Doyle's volume 2 has a 6 week lead time. Has anyone
actually seen this one on the shelves yet?

Halabi is remarkably clear reading. But it never hurts to have a second way
of looking at things.

Doyle vol 1 is definitely a must. I would add Slattery / Burton Advanced IP
routing in Cisco Networks for the wealth of examples and router outputs.

One must read Caslow in the frame of mind in which it is intended. Caslow
expects that you already know the basics, and now you want to start thinking
like a CCIE. It is a book about problem solving, not a book about learning
fundamentals.

Chuck

-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Eric
Gunn
Sent:   Saturday, January 20, 2001 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

Hello,

I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the
CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things about
their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab
pieced together from optsys.

The books listed are:

Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi


I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first
book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP.
Multicasting, etc.

The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has
read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing
protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better
reads one the list for that information?

Thanks,

-Eric Gunn

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[Jason A. Diegmueller]

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your 
> backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your
> VP's mail id. He might do it better.

I don't usually step in to these little squirmishes,
but this is just plain rude.

Please, if you don't like something someone says/posts,
just pass it up.

It's not that hard.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[Craig Columbus]

I haven't read Doyle's Vol2, but if volume1 is taken as an indicator, I'm 
sure it'll be a good reference.
I've read the others that you have on your list, with the exception of the 
Rossi book, and can confirm that you should have them on your shelf.
In addition, you really should obtain a copy of Interconnections by Radia 
Perlman.

Craig

At 09:29 AM 1/20/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the
>CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things about
>their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab
>pieced together from optsys.
>
>The books listed are:
>
>Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
>CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
>Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
>Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
>Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi
>
>
>I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first
>book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP.
>Multicasting, etc.
>
>The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has
>read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing
>protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better
>reads one the list for that information?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Eric Gunn
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CEF or round robin

[Jason A. Diegmueller]

> Two T1's going to the same ISP?  Why not use PPP and make one big pipe?  I
> like simple answers.
> 
> Check your port/speed/duplex settings on the new switch.

Many times ISPs won't do PPP multilink due to the overhead it
introduces.

I've found CEF per-packet to meet my company's needs.  We
have two T1s to UUNet, and get ~350KB/sec upstream if the
other end can take it.  That's pretty close to capacity, 
and across the "public Internet", not too shabby.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[Arthur Stewart]

FYI, Halabi and Caslow have both recently published their 2nd editions.  I'm
looking forward to Doyle Vol 2

Arthur Stewart


Eric Gunn wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the
>CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things about
>their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab
>pieced together from optsys.
>
>The books listed are:
>
>Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
>CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
>Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
>Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
>Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi
>
>
>I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first
>book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP.
>Multicasting, etc.
>
>The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has
>read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing
>protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better
>reads one the list for that information?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Eric Gunn
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SNMP-queries ???

[Circusnuts]

Start with the recommendations from your SNMP Client (i.e. Open View,
NetView, Concord, Tavve).  I believe Concord NetHealth recommends 15 minute
intervals.  This really is miniscuel traffic the normal 10/ 100 LAN/ or 768
Kbps Frame/ OC3 WAN circuit.  Support information from your SNMP client
should give you the Pro's & Con's to answer these questions (even influence
growth changes).  The ratios are based on very calculated bandwidth, # of
devices, & server build stats.  I work @ a very established NOC & we value
the polling almost more than any other traffic itself.  This does represent
your eyes on the network.. while customer phone calls & RMON probes are the
ears.

All the best !!!
Phil

- Original Message -
From: "Hans Schimek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:34 AM
Subject: SNMP-queries ???


> i would like to configure SNMP on our network. but
> reduce network traffic for snmp queries as far as possible.
> i did this on a testrouter so far.
> but debugging snmp packets - i noticed that every 2 seconds a query
> is sent - i attached an extract of the log-file.
> our network now has about 40-50 routers - so if i will enable
> snmp on all of these devices - that would result in a heavy network load,
> isn`t it-
> but so far - we do need such a strictly network mangagement- for now we do
> polling every 40 minutes -
> but when there is an outage on one of those devices, the customer notices
it
> prior to our
> NOC.
> so i configured snmp traps - which works fine - in an acceptable time -
but
> THAT didn`t reduce
> my snmp queries floods, either.
>
> so please could anyone give me an advice, how i could reduce these snmp
> queries.
>
>
>
> thanx
> hans
>
>
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 426099, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 426099, errstat 2, erridx 1
>  ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 491635, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 491635, errstat 2, erridx 1
>  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
>  ifEntry.5.3 = 2048000
>  sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 557171, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 557171, errstat 2, erridx 1
>  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 622707, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 622707, errstat 2, erridx 1
>  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98420, errstat 0, erridx 0
>  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
>  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL T

RE: Cat5500 question

[Lou Nelson]

Jason,
If you have a CAT 5500 and they suggest a new SUP... they are referring to
the first board the sup engine... IT is hardware... but in a 5500 you want a
sup 3 not a sup 1...  The 5500 has 3 back plane's that are 1.2 gig each...
only the sup 3 will aggregate those into a combined 3.6 gig back plane
(Market Math).The sup 3 contains a phoenix chip that does this
aggregation.  Even with the market math there... the sup 3 is far superior
for your box and gives you it true best speed.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jason Tran
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cat5500 question


Hi Group, just have a quick question.  I have a cat 5500 currently has a
Supervisor Engine I.  If someone tells me I need Supervisor Engine II, is he
talking about software or hardware?  How am I going about changing it to
Supervisor Engine II?  Thanks.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: How to configure bind with less than a block of ip's?

[Bob Vance]

It's helpful to realize that there's really nothing different between a
"forward" zone and a "reverse" zone.

The former *generally* contains A (address records) and latter
*generally* contains PTR records, but, both zones can and do carry other
record types (SOA and NS, obviously, but CNAMEs, etc., also) -- it's
all just DNS data.

The magic is in what the DNS clients do when they request a lookup.
Viz.:

To get an IP address, when presented with a "name", a DNS client does an
"A"-record lookup on the name given, and this causes the nameserver to
look in what we call the "forward zone" for an "A" record, but it's only
because that's what the client asked for.  E.g., when a client asks for
"a.b.c.com", the server ultimately looks in his "b.c.com" zone data and
we happen to call this the "forward zone".

But, when trying to look up a *name*, when presented with an IP address,
say "a.b.c.d", (which we call "reverse" lookup)
   (e.g., an 'rlogin' server trying to find out the name of the
client machine from which the login is occurring so that he,
the 'rlogin' server, can check that name in the ".rhosts" file
   ),
the DNS client (which is the 'rlogin' server code in this example :)
requests a lookup for a "PTR" record, "d.c.b.a.in-addr.arpa." .
   (Note that the above is generally hidden in library calls, e.g.,
gethostbyname and gethostbyaddr on Unix.
   )


All of that should pretty well be known, even by a newbie.


But, two major, non-obvious-to-the-newbie things, I think, that help
clear up the non-octet-reverse delegation are:

 1. valid CNAMEs can point to records *outside* the current zone
 foo.bar.com. IN A 1.2.3.4
 fubar.bar.com. CNAME yyy.yahoo.com.

 2. PTRs can have CNAMEs as well !
 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.  IN  PTR  foo.bar.com.
 5.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.  CNAME  fandoo.bar.com.
 6.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.  CNAME  6.subxx.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
   (where fandoo.bar.com. and 6.subxx.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
would be PTR records in the bar.com and
subxx.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa zones, respectively.
   )

Your ISP is generally authoritative for the class C from which he has
parsimoniously given you a few addresses.
So he can handle the reverse PTRs for you -- if he wants to!!

If you are hosting your DNS, even though your ISP's kindly agreed to be
a secondary for your "forward" domain, he's not gonna want to be
bothered changing or adding PTR records while you can't decide on a good
name for one of your boxes.  So you really want to handle the reverse
yourself.  However, the ISP doesn't want to delegate to you the *whole*
class C in-addr.arpa domain (since there are other clients therein :).
However, he *can* delegate a *sub-domain* of the class C
in-addr.arpa to you, (since he's authoritative for the parent).

Then he can put CNAMEs in his parent pointing to the PTRs in
the sub-domain he delegated to you!

So, he is still authoritative for 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa, but has delegated
to you, say "hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa", which is a valid sub-domain of
"3.2.1.in-addr.arpa" .

Then he has
  1.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.  CNAME  1.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
 ...
  6.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.  CNAME  6.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.

(or
  1CNAME  1.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
 ...
  6CNAME  6.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
since the ORIGIN, ".hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa. " will be appended to
those non-dot-terminated names.
And, probably done with a
  $GENERATE 1-6 $  CNAME $.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
)

You are authoritative for "hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa" (since the ISP
delegated it to you) and in the zone master file for that domain, you
have:
  1.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.IN  PTR  www.bar.com.
  4.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.IN  PTR  foo.bar.com.
(or
  1IN  PTR  www.bar.com.
  4IN  PTR  foo.bar.com.
)
or whatever.
It doesn't really matter that you don't have the other records.

When a DNS client wants to do a reverse lookup on 1.2.3.4, he will
do a PTR request for 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
It will be found that the ISP is authoritative for 3.2.1.in-addr.arpa
and he will be queried for 4.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa.
But the CNAME will point to 4.hoohah.3.2.1.in-addr.arpa for which
you are authoritative and you'll be queried for it and will return
"foo.bar.com".
Voila!

Of course, the ISP will probably not call the sub-domain "hoohah", but
"0-7" or "sub-0-7" or "subnet-0" or "0/29" or something more meaningful.


I'm sure that the gurus will find and fill holes in the above, but
it should clarify things for you a bit.


-
Tks        | 
BV     | 
Sr. Technical Consultant,  SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
Vox 770-623-3430   11455 Lakefield Dr.
Fax 770-623-3429   Duluth, GA 30097-1511
=





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Alexandra
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:50

terminal server flakey

[Brian Lodwick]

hi group,
I have configured a terminal server on a 2511. It works great in the 
beginning, but then it starts to flake out on me. I'll try to report what 
happens. I notice right when everything is powered up I can connect to all 8 
of the routers connected using their hostname and it is exactly as I 
expected. The issue normally occurs after I've been reverse telnetted into a 
router for a little while then I back back out of that one and try to telnet 
to another one and I can't get to it then after I can only get to a couple 
of them. All of the connections are disconnected after I back out. It just 
appears to be a glitch or possibly a timeout? Has anyone seen anything like 
this before? The only way I can fix it is to reboot. I will outline the 
config.

This may be the kicker I am using IOS 11.1 on the term. server. I am 
planning to upgrade, but wanted to see if I was overlooking something.

All I did was on the terminal server I configured a host file for each 
router calling them r1, r2, r3... using the loopback for the ip, and 200_ 
for the port. I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout 
values, I only added transport input all for lines 0-8. Speeds are set to 
9600.

On each of the other routers I have left the console line blank not even a 
password is set.

Like I said everything works great in the beginning, but...
Thanks in advance guys!

>>>Brian


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ccie security beta results

[admin]

Did anyone pass this beta with 650 or better?? Thanks
Please only reply to this address, I am not a member anymore
P

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Specialization for CCNA (in case you're not aware of it)

[Arthur Stewart]

Well, it's interesting, but having recently completed the CCNP, I have to
say I would not let an average CCNA or some CCNPs set up a PIX or implement
VPNs if I didn't think they knew something about routing and remote access
issues.  Perhaps security is a niche market that can be adequately serviced
this way, but will anyone really get this 5 test certification (what is it
called - CCNA Security?).

Looking at the new CCNP-Security (5 ccnp and 4 security tests), I think I
would just go for the Security CCIE - fewer tests and probably a similar
study path.  Of course I haven't seen what the Security Lab will be like,
but I'll bet it's product-centric.

The missing component in all these security certifications is a good dose of
non-vendor-specific information security and network security foundations.
The intro chapter in MCNS is good but not near enough.

Anyone with a routing & switching certification - CCNA, CCNP, CCIE - knows
quite a bit about routing and switching in general, whoever's routers and
switches are involved.  The concepts have been covered.  The same can't be
said about the Cisco security certifications.  In fact, anyone who relies
primarily on the Cisco security certification process may or may not know
enough to provide a security solution that meet's a customer's needs.
Partial security solutions are not generally what customers are looking for.
Hopefully, part of the security certification process will include
mentioning that security policy, operating system security and other
security areas may need to be part of a coordinated security solution, but
are outside the scope of what Cisco security certification provides.

My $.02

Arthur Stewart CISSP, CCNP-Security(old), MCSE


Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message
<2019FB428FD3D311893700508B71EBFB54ADEC@RWR_MAIL_SVR>...
>Some of you might find this interesting:
>
>You can now take the Security Specialization if you're CCNA - you don't
need
>to be a CCNP.
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/special1/course.htm
l
>
>Happy Studying,
>
>Ole
>
>
> Ole Drews Jensen
> Systems Network Manager
> CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
> RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.CiscoKing.com
>
> NEED A JOB ???
> http://www.oledrews.com/job
>
>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

BSCN

[Mathias Kenfack-Tabakem]

Hi guys,

I need your help. I'll will be taking the BSCN sometimes in Feb. this year. 
Could you please advise me on which preparation kit to use? Has anyone used
CCNP: Routing Study Guide by Todd Lammle, Sean Odom, Kevin Wallace ISBN: 
0782127126 ?
if yes how do you rate it ?

Thanks in advance.
Mathias

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[Saif]

Indian Jerk

Pradeep Kumar wrote:

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your backside.Actually, I dont 
>have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He might do it better.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BSCN

[Seth Wilson]

I'm studying for Routing as well.  I don't have the ISBNs for these, but if
you want a good understanding of the material you should pick up Bassam
Halabi's Internet Routing Architecture, and Jeff Doyle's Routing TCP/IP.
I'm presently working my way through the Doyle book, and find the reading
both easy and informative.  I've started Halabi's book and I'm a bit lost
with all the NAP's and NSF's of the overview, but it seems to be just as
informative.  I think these are probably two very good texts to read.  I do
plan on getting the Cisco Press BSCN book just to fill in any gaps for the
exam.  Good luck.

~Seth~

- Original Message -
From: "Mathias Kenfack-Tabakem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 2:29 PM
Subject: BSCN


> Hi guys,
>
> I need your help. I'll will be taking the BSCN sometimes in Feb. this
year.
> Could you please advise me on which preparation kit to use? Has anyone
used
> CCNP: Routing Study Guide by Todd Lammle, Sean Odom, Kevin Wallace ISBN:
> 0782127126 ?
> if yes how do you rate it ?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Mathias
>
> _
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FS: 6 Cisco Books

[stan]

6 Cisco Books For Sale.

1. Routing TCP/IP, by Jeff Doyle

2. Cisco LAN Switching, by Kennedy Clark / Kevin Hamilton

3. All In One Cisco CCIE Study Guide, by Roosevelt Giles

4. Designing Cisco Networks, by Diane Teare

5. Building Cisco Remote Access Networks, by Catherine Paquet

6. Advanced Cisco Router Configuration, by Laura Chappell

$120 for all 6 books, + $10 for shipping
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: terminal server flakey

[Kevin Wigle]

"I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout"

If you didn't do anything then by default, exec will time out after 10
minutes.

So if you got all 8 lines up its pretty easy to think that a few might be
standing there unused for 10 minutes while you're playing with the
others.

So you have to give the command "exec-timeout 0 0"  which will disable
timeout completely.

from CCO - the font of all knowledge (and the first hit on my search on
exec-timeout)


Setting the EXEC Timeout Intervals
The EXEC command interpreter waits for a specified interval of time until
the user starts input. If no input is detected, the EXEC resumes the current
connection. If no connections exist, the EXEC returns the terminal to the
idle state and disconnects the incoming session.

To set this interval, use the exec-timeout line configuration subcommand.
The full syntax of the command follows.

exec-timeout minutes [seconds]
no exec-timeout
The argument minutes is the number of minutes, and the optional argument
seconds specifies additional interval time in seconds. The default interval
is ten minutes; an interval of zero specifies no time-outs.

The no exec-timeout subcommand removes the time-out definition. It is the
same as entering exec timeout 0.

Example:
This command sets an interval of 2 minutes, 30 seconds.

exec-timeout 2 30

This command sets an interval of 10 seconds:

exec-timeout 0 10


Every console (con 0) needs the command.

We just had this discussion on this list a few days ago

Kevin Wigle


> values, - Original Message -
From: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 20 January, 2001 14:13
Subject: terminal server flakey


> hi group,
> I have configured a terminal server on a 2511. It works great in the
> beginning, but then it starts to flake out on me. I'll try to report what
> happens. I notice right when everything is powered up I can connect to all
8
> of the routers connected using their hostname and it is exactly as I
> expected. The issue normally occurs after I've been reverse telnetted into
a
> router for a little while then I back back out of that one and try to
telnet
> to another one and I can't get to it then after I can only get to a couple
> of them. All of the connections are disconnected after I back out. It just
> appears to be a glitch or possibly a timeout? Has anyone seen anything
like
> this before? The only way I can fix it is to reboot. I will outline the
> config.
>
> This may be the kicker I am using IOS 11.1 on the term. server. I am
> planning to upgrade, but wanted to see if I was overlooking something.
>
> All I did was on the terminal server I configured a host file for each
> router calling them r1, r2, r3... using the loopback for the ip, and 200_
> for the port. I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout
> values, I only added transport input all for lines 0-8. Speeds are set to
> 9600.
>
> On each of the other routers I have left the console line blank not even a
> password is set.
>
> Like I said everything works great in the beginning, but...
> Thanks in advance guys!
>
> >>>Brian
>
>
> _
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BGP Reg Expressions

[Howard C. Berkowitz]

>Hello,
>
>Does anyone know how to tell the router to allow all AS's except for
>Private AS's for Ingress traffic?  I know that .* tells it to allow all
>paths, but how do I exclude 65xxx (Private AS's)?
>
>I know about the keyword "remove-private-as", but this is for Egress
>(outbound) traffic.  As far as I know it's for when your using
>confederations and such.
>
>Is this something I need to be concerned with?  I'm not sure if this is
>something I should be spending my time on or not.   Is it necessary to
>block inbound Private AS's?  Please excuse my ignorance, I'm still
>learning!
>
>Thank You,
>Andre

Interesting question, which, I must admit, I've never thought about 
or seen raised in operational forums.  The concern tends to be much 
more with the validity of prefixes than of ASN's.

If you were not a major transit provider, I don't think it would be 
too likely to be a problem.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Business Proposal for CCIE lab: kick him

[William E. Gragido]

Hey, now, lets keep everything copasetic shall we?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Saif
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Indian Jerk

Pradeep Kumar wrote:

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
might do it better.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[William E. Gragido]

I have already ordered Caslow's 2nd edition, and can't wait to get it!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Arthur Stewart
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2


FYI, Halabi and Caslow have both recently published their 2nd editions.  I'm
looking forward to Doyle Vol 2

Arthur Stewart


Eric Gunn wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the
>CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things about
>their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab
>pieced together from optsys.
>
>The books listed are:
>
>Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
>CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
>Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
>Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
>Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi
>
>
>I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first
>book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP.
>Multicasting, etc.
>
>The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has
>read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing
>protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better
>reads one the list for that information?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-Eric Gunn
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Missed by one darn point!

[perryb]

Hello all,

I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.  The
problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
approaching the very last question!

Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be
painful.

--perry

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[Priscilla Oppenheimer]

At 02:56 PM 1/20/01, perryb wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.  The
>problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
>approaching the very last question!
>
>Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
>rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be

That's not true. They don't keep track of which questions you missed. Good 
luck! I'm sure you'll pass next time.

Priscilla

>painful.
>
>--perry
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SNMP-queries ???

[Circusnuts]

Have you tried Cisco Press Performance & Fault Management  (ISBN
1578701805).  Chapters 4 thru 19 cover this topic of Performance Monitoring,
Performance Reporting, RMON (1&2), MIB's, & SNMP traps/ polling.

Phil

- Original Message -
From: "Circusnuts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hans Schimek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: SNMP-queries ???


> Start with the recommendations from your SNMP Client (i.e. Open View,
> NetView, Concord, Tavve).  I believe Concord NetHealth recommends 15
minute
> intervals.  This really is miniscuel traffic the normal 10/ 100 LAN/ or
768
> Kbps Frame/ OC3 WAN circuit.  Support information from your SNMP client
> should give you the Pro's & Con's to answer these questions (even
influence
> growth changes).  The ratios are based on very calculated bandwidth, # of
> devices, & server build stats.  I work @ a very established NOC & we value
> the polling almost more than any other traffic itself.  This does
represent
> your eyes on the network.. while customer phone calls & RMON probes are
the
> ears.
>
> All the best !!!
> Phil
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Hans Schimek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "cisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:34 AM
> Subject: SNMP-queries ???
>
>
> > i would like to configure SNMP on our network. but
> > reduce network traffic for snmp queries as far as possible.
> > i did this on a testrouter so far.
> > but debugging snmp packets - i noticed that every 2 seconds a query
> > is sent - i attached an extract of the log-file.
> > our network now has about 40-50 routers - so if i will enable
> > snmp on all of these devices - that would result in a heavy network
load,
> > isn`t it-
> > but so far - we do need such a strictly network mangagement- for now we
do
> > polling every 40 minutes -
> > but when there is an outage on one of those devices, the customer
notices
> it
> > prior to our
> > NOC.
> > so i configured snmp traps - which works fine - in an acceptable time -
> but
> > THAT didn`t reduce
> > my snmp queries floods, either.
> >
> > so please could anyone give me an advice, how i could reduce these snmp
> > queries.
> >
> >
> >
> > thanx
> > hans
> >
> >
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.10.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 426099, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 426099, errstat 2, erridx 1
> >  ifEntry.12.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 2, erridx 4
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.11.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 491635, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 491635, errstat 2, erridx 1
> >  ifEntry.13.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  sysUpTime.0 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid 98419, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
> >  ifEntry.5.3 = 2048000
> >  sysUpTime.0 = 284539442
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to 213.164.0.54
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Packet received via UDP from 213.164.0.54 on Serial0/0:0
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Get request, reqid 557171, errstat 0, erridx 0
> >  ifEntry.14.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> >  ifEntry.15.3 = NULL TYPE/VALUE
> > 4w4d: SNMP: Response, reqid

Re: terminal server flakey ~fixed

[Brian Lodwick]

Group,
I really appreciate Kevin's help I have implemented the exec-timeout 0 0 
into the lines.
I just wanted to add another note for everyone on the list reading this.
I have been using Caslow's second edition (which I am very impressed with so 
far) for my lab study. There is an additional note listed in Bruce's book 
saying "With many versions of the IOS Terminal Server configurations may 
result in lines listed as being used when they never have been used. A 
remedy to this problem is adding the "Modem host" command in line 
configuration mode in addition to the "transport input all" command.
  Along with Kevin's advice and this additional command sessions shown are 
accurate and don't timeout. It's working great. Thanks Kevin and Bruce.

>>>Brian

>From: "Kevin Wigle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: terminal server flakey
>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:04:30 -0500
>
>"I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout"
>
>If you didn't do anything then by default, exec will time out after 10
>minutes.
>
>So if you got all 8 lines up its pretty easy to think that a few might be
>standing there unused for 10 minutes while you're playing with the
>others.
>
>So you have to give the command "exec-timeout 0 0"  which will disable
>timeout completely.
>
>from CCO - the font of all knowledge (and the first hit on my search on
>exec-timeout)
>
>
>Setting the EXEC Timeout Intervals
>The EXEC command interpreter waits for a specified interval of time until
>the user starts input. If no input is detected, the EXEC resumes the 
>current
>connection. If no connections exist, the EXEC returns the terminal to the
>idle state and disconnects the incoming session.
>
>To set this interval, use the exec-timeout line configuration subcommand.
>The full syntax of the command follows.
>
>exec-timeout minutes [seconds]
>no exec-timeout
>The argument minutes is the number of minutes, and the optional argument
>seconds specifies additional interval time in seconds. The default interval
>is ten minutes; an interval of zero specifies no time-outs.
>
>The no exec-timeout subcommand removes the time-out definition. It is the
>same as entering exec timeout 0.
>
>Example:
>This command sets an interval of 2 minutes, 30 seconds.
>
>exec-timeout 2 30
>
>This command sets an interval of 10 seconds:
>
>exec-timeout 0 10
>
>
>Every console (con 0) needs the command.
>
>We just had this discussion on this list a few days ago
>
>Kevin Wigle
>
>
> > values, - Original Message -
>From: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, 20 January, 2001 14:13
>Subject: terminal server flakey
>
>
> > hi group,
> > I have configured a terminal server on a 2511. It works great in the
> > beginning, but then it starts to flake out on me. I'll try to report 
>what
> > happens. I notice right when everything is powered up I can connect to 
>all
>8
> > of the routers connected using their hostname and it is exactly as I
> > expected. The issue normally occurs after I've been reverse telnetted 
>into
>a
> > router for a little while then I back back out of that one and try to
>telnet
> > to another one and I can't get to it then after I can only get to a 
>couple
> > of them. All of the connections are disconnected after I back out. It 
>just
> > appears to be a glitch or possibly a timeout? Has anyone seen anything
>like
> > this before? The only way I can fix it is to reboot. I will outline the
> > config.
> >
> > This may be the kicker I am using IOS 11.1 on the term. server. I am
> > planning to upgrade, but wanted to see if I was overlooking something.
> >
> > All I did was on the terminal server I configured a host file for each
> > router calling them r1, r2, r3... using the loopback for the ip, and 
>200_
> > for the port. I have configured the lines with no passwords or timout
> > values, I only added transport input all for lines 0-8. Speeds are set 
>to
> > 9600.
> >
> > On each of the other routers I have left the console line blank not even 
>a
> > password is set.
> >
> > Like I said everything works great in the beginning, but...
> > Thanks in advance guys!
> >
> > >>>Brian
> >
> >
> > _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Non-contiguous subnet masks

[J. Kata]

Supposedly, non-contiguous subnet masks are
legal because the rfc's don't restrict their 
use. Are there any good resources where I can
read up on this subject? Has someone come across
their use in the real world?

And finally, can anyone answer these questions?

IP: 172.31.100.100
SM: 255.255.24.164

What subnet does this ip address belong to?
How many subnets does this mask support?
How many hosts does this mask support?
What is the broadcast address?

Thanks.

 -- Janusz Kata 

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[perryb]

Thanks, that does make me feel a little better and I do hope that you're
right.

--perry

- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perryb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Missed by one darn point!


> At 02:56 PM 1/20/01, perryb wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.
The
> >problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
> >approaching the very last question!
> >
> >Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
> >rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be
>
> That's not true. They don't keep track of which questions you missed. Good
> luck! I'm sure you'll pass next time.
>
> Priscilla
>
> >painful.
> >
> >--perry
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[Circusnuts]

If this test was the limit of your knowledge, I'd hit the books again very
hard.  I missed my last exam by less than 5 points & walked away with the
attitude "I'd been ripped-off."  The next week (having only studied what I'd
missed), I failed the exam by 50 points & got a perfect score in the area I
restudied :-0

Just my experience with the "Almost Passed"

All the best !!!
Phil

- Original Message -
From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perryb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: Missed by one darn point!


> At 02:56 PM 1/20/01, perryb wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.
The
> >problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
> >approaching the very last question!
> >
> >Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
> >rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be
>
> That's not true. They don't keep track of which questions you missed. Good
> luck! I'm sure you'll pass next time.
>
> Priscilla
>
> >painful.
> >
> >--perry
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> 
>
> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> http://www.priscilla.com
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Non-contiguous subnet masks

[Howard C. Berkowitz]

>Supposedly, non-contiguous subnet masks are
>legal because the rfc's don't restrict their
>use. Are there any good resources where I can
>read up on this subject? Has someone come across
>their use in the real world?

See RFC1812. They are illegal.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Non-contiguous subnet masks

[Chris McCoy]

J.

  Let's break this out:

172.31.100.100 - Host address

1010 1100.0001 .0110 0100.0110 0100 - in binary

255.255.24.164 - Subnet mask

 . .0001 1000.1010 0100 - in binary

We can tell this is a class B address, in the
traditional sense.  As far as non-contiguous subnet
masks go, the rules are still the same.  You count the
number of '1' bits to the right of the classful
boundry, which is 5.  So you have five bits of
subnetting.  This would equal 30 subnets or 31 subnets
if you count subnet-zero.

The subnets (not counting the first two octets) for
this mask in binary are:

.xxx0 0xxx.0x0x x0xx - 172.31.0.0 (subnet zero)
.xxx0 0xxx.0x0x x1xx - 172.31.0.4
.xxx0 0xxx.0x1x x0xx - 172.31.0.32
.xxx0 0xxx.0x1x x1xx - 172.31.0.36
.xxx0 0xxx.1x0x x0xx - 172.31.0.128
.xxx0 0xxx.1x0x x1xx - 172.31.0.132
.xxx0 0xxx.1x1x x0xx - 172.31.0.160
.xxx0 0xxx.1x1x x1xx - 172.31.0.164
.xxx0 1xxx.0x0x x0xx - 172.31.8.0
.xxx0 1xxx.0x0x x1xx - 172.31.8.4
.xxx0 1xxx.0x1x x0xx - 172.31.8.32
.xxx0 1xxx.0x1x x1xx - 172.31.8.36
.xxx0 1xxx.1x0x x0xx - 172.31.8.128
.xxx0 1xxx.1x0x x1xx - 172.31.8.132
.xxx0 1xxx.1x1x x0xx - 172.31.8.160
.xxx0 1xxx.1x1x x1xx - 172.31.8.164
.xxx1 0xxx.0x0x x0xx - 172.31.16.0
.xxx1 0xxx.0x0x x1xx - 172.31.16.4
.xxx1 0xxx.0x1x x0xx - 172.31.16.32
.xxx1 0xxx.0x1x x1xx - 172.31.16.36
.xxx1 0xxx.1x0x x0xx - 172.31.16.128
.xxx1 0xxx.1x0x x1xx - 172.31.16.132
.xxx1 0xxx.1x1x x0xx - 172.31.16.160
.xxx1 0xxx.1x1x x1xx - 172.31.16.164
.xxx1 1xxx.0x0x x0xx - 172.31.24.0
.xxx1 1xxx.0x0x x1xx - 172.31.24.4
.xxx1 1xxx.0x1x x0xx - 172.31.24.32
.xxx1 1xxx.0x1x x1xx - 172.31.24.36
.xxx1 1xxx.1x0x x0xx - 172.31.24.128
.xxx1 1xxx.1x0x x1xx - 172.31.24.132
.xxx1 1xxx.1x1x x0xx - 172.31.24.160
.xxx1 1xxx.1x1x x1xx - All ones subnet -- not used

The host bits are shown above as 'x' for clarity.  We
have 11 bits of host, so we could have up to 2046
(2048-2) host addresses.  If we do a bitwise logical
AND (a.b=?), we can tell what subnet host
172.31.100.100 is on:

1010 1100.0001 .0110 0100.0110 0100 - host
 . .0001 1000.1010 0100 - subnet mask
---
1010 1100.0001 . .0010 0100 - subnetwork

In decimal this is 172.31.0.36, the fourth subnet. 
This represents, in the imortal words of one of my
instructors, the address of the whhr (wire).  The
first host would be (dashes show network/subnet bits):

1010 1100.0001 . .0010 0101 - 172.31.0.37
   - -- -   -  
 .0010 0110 - 172.31.0.38 (second)
   - -- -   -  
 .0010 0111 - 172.31.0.39 (third)
   - -- -   -  
 .0010 1100 - 172.31.0.44 (fourth)
   - -- -   -  
 .0010 1101 - 172.31.0.45 (fifth)
   - -- -   -  

... and so on.  The broadcast address would be:

1110 0111.0111  - 172.31.231.127
   - -- -   -  
Note there are all ones in the host bits.

I think you may see by now why so many people avoid
non-contiguous subnet masks.  They're a royal pain to
use, it's next to impossible for a router to optimize
its table lookups without doing a one-for-one search, 
and its difficult to look at two addresses and tell if
they're both on the same subnetwork.

Hope this helps...

Chris M.

--- "J. Kata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Supposedly, non-contiguous subnet masks are
> legal because the rfc's don't restrict their 
> use. Are there any good resources where I can
> read up on this subject? Has someone come across
> their use in the real world?
> 
> And finally, can anyone answer these questions?
> 
> IP: 172.31.100.100
> SM: 255.255.24.164
> 
> What subnet does this ip address belong to?
> How many subnets does this mask support?
> How many hosts does this mask support?
> What is the broadcast address?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  -- Janusz Kata 
> 
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. 
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[perryb]

Thanks to all for the upbeat support. I did put my whole life on-hold these
past few weeks and I sure don't look forward to doing it again  - but I am
driven.


- Original Message -
From: "louieb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'perryb'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: Missed by one darn point!


> Don't worry about it - you'll get it next time!!
>
> (If it makes you feel any better, I failed my CCIE Lab in RTP by 1 point
> earlier this month.)
>
> Keep your chin up!!
>
> Louie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> perryb
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 6:28 PM
> To: Priscilla Oppenheimer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Missed by one darn point!
>
>
> Thanks, that does make me feel a little better and I do hope that you're
> right.
>
> --perry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "perryb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 4:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Missed by one darn point!
>
>
> > At 02:56 PM 1/20/01, perryb wrote:
> > >Hello all,
> > >
> > >I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.
> The
> > >problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I
was
> > >approaching the very last question!
> > >
> > >Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
> > >rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would
be
> >
> > That's not true. They don't keep track of which questions you missed.
Good
> > luck! I'm sure you'll pass next time.
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> > >painful.
> > >
> > >--perry
> > >
> > >_
> > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
> >
> > _
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[Eric Gunn]

Hello Perry,

Don't be discouraged. The same thing happened to me last week. I took the 
test on Wednesday and failed by one point. I retook it the next day and 
passed. Just to let you know in advance, the question pool is very large. 
On my retake I only had like 15 or so questions out of the 100 that were 
repeated on my next try.

Good Luck,

-Eric

At 02:56 PM 1/20/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.  The
>problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
>approaching the very last question!
>
>Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
>rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be
>painful.
>
>--perry
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: 
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him

[Jon Krabbenschmidt]

Now who should be kicked??!!
Racism is an ugly and intolerable thing

Jim In answer to your question, my company pays 100% for departmentally
related training. For me they paid for my Cisco and Sun training. For non
related training, (anything, any subject), they pay 80% up $4000 per year.
You may need to sign a term of employment agreement were you will be
responsible for repaying a % if you quit within the term.

Hope that helps!

Jon

-Original Message-
From: Saif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Indian Jerk

Pradeep Kumar wrote:

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
might do it better.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Missed by one darn point!

[tv]

I am from the view that you shouldn't look at these as tests.  If you learn
the material and understand the concepts, you will be able to deduce the
answer to questions you do not know.  This holds true for the lab.  Let's
face it, you can not know everything that is in the IOS.  But, if you
understand how a certain technology works, it is easy to figure out the
commands.

tv

- Original Message -
From: "Eric Gunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "perryb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: Missed by one darn point!


> Hello Perry,
>
> Don't be discouraged. The same thing happened to me last week. I took the
> test on Wednesday and failed by one point. I retook it the next day and
> passed. Just to let you know in advance, the question pool is very large.
> On my retake I only had like 15 or so questions out of the 100 that were
> repeated on my next try.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> -Eric
>
> At 02:56 PM 1/20/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I took the CCIE written today and missed passing by a single question.
The
> >problem is that I felt very good that I would easily pass, even as I was
> >approaching the very last question!
> >
> >Back to the studying...I hope they'll be kind on the retake, but it is
> >rumored that the retake zeros in on your weak areas - that sure would be
> >painful.
> >
> >--perry
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CCIE reading: TCP/IP by Doyle Vol.1 or 2

[Katson PN Yeung]

Yes, this is very true that Dr. Perlman's book should be on the shelf
Here is my list (and the reading procedure.)

1. Interconnection 2nd edition
2. Routing TCP/IP vol 1
3. IRA. 1st edition
4. Caslow's 2nd edition.
5. Cisco ATM solution
6.Integrating Voice and data networks.

I have already finished 1-3 multiple times and I really find it is helpful
for my daily job. Now I am doing 4, after reading it from cover to cover, I
will go for a written test.

One more point, personally, I think Interconnection 2nd edition should be
read and understand before anything else...



"Craig Columbus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I haven't read Doyle's Vol2, but if volume1 is taken as an indicator, I'm
> sure it'll be a good reference.
> I've read the others that you have on your list, with the exception of the
> Rossi book, and can confirm that you should have them on your shelf.
> In addition, you really should obtain a copy of Interconnections by Radia
> Perlman.
>
> Craig
>
> At 09:29 AM 1/20/2001 -0600, you wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am looking at obtaining the books that are "Required reading" for the
> >CCIE lab, according to www.ccbootcamp.com. I have heard great things
about
> >their perpetration labs and plan to buy them as soon as I can get my lab
> >pieced together from optsys.
> >
> >The books listed are:
> >
> >Internet Routing Architectures, Bassam Halabi
> >CCIE Prof. Development Routing TCP/IP Volume I, Jeff Doyle
> >Cisco Certification Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's, Caslow
> >Cisco Lan Switching (CCIE professional development)
> >Cisco Catalyst Lan Switching Louis R Rossi, Louis D. Rossi, Thomas Rossi
> >
> >
> >I noticed the TCP/IP book by Doyle has a Volume 1 and Volume 2. The first
> >book  seems to be the foundation book while the second one goes into BGP.
> >Multicasting, etc.
> >
> >The Architecture book by Halabib is a must have, from everyone that has
> >read it. It  seems to be heavy in BGP more than other exterior routing
> >protocols. Is Doyle vol 2 worth reading back to front or are their better
> >reads one the list for that information?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >-Eric Gunn
> >
> >_
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BGP Reg Expressions

[Katson PN Yeung]

I use a very very stupid method to do it. But it works I found that
all private AS path cannot be identified simply by the AS number That
is, you apply an ASpath filtering list likes "sh ip bgp reg ^65001_" will
not be able to display path beginning with 65001.

I tried serveral methods at last I found this.

"sh ip bgp reg ^.65001._".

Is this what you want?


"root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to tell the router to allow all AS's except for
> Private AS's for Ingress traffic?  I know that .* tells it to allow all
> paths, but how do I exclude 65xxx (Private AS's)?
>
> I know about the keyword "remove-private-as", but this is for Egress
> (outbound) traffic.  As far as I know it's for when your using
> confederations and such.
>
> Is this something I need to be concerned with?  I'm not sure if this is
> something I should be spending my time on or not.   Is it necessary to
> block inbound Private AS's?  Please excuse my ignorance, I'm still
> learning!
>
> Thank You,
> Andre
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

kick:The ugly Pakistani SAIF@MATIN.NET.PK

[Pradeep Kumar]

Jon,
1. You are right -Racism is ugly.The Pakistani - Saif Sahaab ( Sahaab ===> Sir ) 
deserves a kick ( on his front, like we have been doing to them always ) not Jim.

2. Jon- I agree and most do, to your point as it is a known fact.But what our friend 
Jim wants is a  plan to convince his VP to get him an aided CCIE training.

Perhaps his company does not have a policy like the one you mentioned in place.





-Original Message-
From:Jon Krabbenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:01:32 -0800
To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Now who should be kicked??!!
Racism is an ugly and intolerable thing

Jim In answer to your question, my company pays 100% for departmentally
related training. For me they paid for my Cisco and Sun training. For non
related training, (anything, any subject), they pay 80% up $4000 per year.
You may need to sign a term of employment agreement were you will be
responsible for repaying a % if you quit within the term.

Hope that helps!

Jon

-Original Message-
From: Saif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Indian Jerk

Pradeep Kumar wrote:

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
might do it better.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications center.
Visto.com. Life on the Dot.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

kick:The ugly Pakistani SAIF@MATIN.NET.PK

[Pradeep Kumar]

Jon,
1. You are right -Racism is ugly.The Pakistani - Saif Sahaab ( Sahaab ===> Sir ) 
deserves a kick ( on his front, like we have been doing to them always ) not Jim.

2. Jon- I agree and most do, to your point as it is a known fact.But what our friend 
Jim wants is a  plan to convince his VP to get him an aided CCIE training.

Perhaps his company does not have a policy like the one you mentioned in place.





-Original Message-
From:Jon Krabbenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:01:32 -0800
To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Now who should be kicked??!!
Racism is an ugly and intolerable thing

Jim In answer to your question, my company pays 100% for departmentally
related training. For me they paid for my Cisco and Sun training. For non
related training, (anything, any subject), they pay 80% up $4000 per year.
You may need to sign a term of employment agreement were you will be
responsible for repaying a % if you quit within the term.

Hope that helps!

Jon

-Original Message-
From: Saif [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Business Proposal for CCIE lab:kick him


Indian Jerk

Pradeep Kumar wrote:

> Can we expect something intelligent.
> The only thing I can give you off line is a kick on your
backside.Actually, I dont have time for it.Give me your VP's mail id. He
might do it better.
>
> -Original Message-
> From:Jim Healis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:35:42 -0800
> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Business Proposal for CCIE lab
>
> I would appreciate hearing feedback from others on the proposal I am
> planning to present to the VP of my department for the plan of paying
> for my studying for the CCIE lab.
> Anyone interested in helping me, contact me off-list.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
___
> Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications
center.
> Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications center.
Visto.com. Life on the Dot.

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]