RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
Hello Jenny, currently the lights are blinking, but there seems to be no data-traffic. you might want to take a look at my current config. -Uche. ps: this is the only message i keep on receiving upon implementing debug isdn q921/9931 !> 00:36:15: No dialer db, manual isdn call can't dial out what does this mean please??? config--> oks>en Password: oks#sh conf Using 1662 out of 29688 bytes ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname oks ! no logging console no logging monitor enable secret 5 $1$DjGs$cxj/.CpMxoel/kKvi.Wqn1 ! ! ! ! ! memory-size iomem 15 ip subnet-zero ! isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn voice-call-failure 0 isdn tei-negotiation first-call isdn leased-line BRI1/0 128 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast duplex auto speed auto ! interface BRI0/0 description This is my domain!! ! no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/0 description l ip address 192.168.8.2 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast fair-queue 64 16 0 ! interface BRI1/1 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/2 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/3 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast shutdown isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface Dialer0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast dialer in-band no cdp enable ! interface Dialer1 ip address negotiated ip directed-broadcast dialer in-band dialer map ip 192.168.9.5 name ELSATEST 02710755 no cdp enable ! ip classless ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0 ip route 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 BRI1/0 no ip http server ! ! map-class dialer ! map-class dialer oks_cisco1 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 password ucheoma transport input none line aux 0 line vty 0 4 login ! end Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11159&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11158]
Maybe he was driving IBM crazy too and that's why he's not there anymore. Quoting Sam Sneed : > Yeah, he's driving me crazy too!!! > > > ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes- can we get rid of this guy !!! > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Allen May" > > To: > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:34 PM > > Subject: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r > wilewski@ibmpl) not > > [7:11091] > > > > > > > Does anyone else get this with every single sent > message? Can we get it > > > removed it from the list? I've been getting this > for over a week now. > > > > > > Allen > > > - Original Message - > > > From: > > > To: "Allen May" > > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM > > > Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r > wilewski@ibmpl) not listed > > in > > > public Name & Address Book > > > > > > > > > > Your message > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > > > > > > > > was not delivered to: > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > because: > > > > > > > > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed > in public Name & > Address > > > Book > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11158&t=11158 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSec question [7:10965]
Thank you for your reply. The problem was solved but I have another:) I have some static NAT translations and when I try to connect or ping host trough IPSec tunnel using its privet address NAT occurs and packet is no longer can go through tunnel. Cisco site has the article about this but there is only configuration with no explanation how loopback can help and what that config does. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/static.html Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11157&t=10965 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tracking rogue dialup users [7:11156]
On Wed, 04 Jul 2001, Jonathan M. Slivko spewed into the ether: > Most ISP's can't effectively track users like that. However, I could be > mistaken. -- Jonathan They sure can. For a dialup user, Radius makes logs available. All that the ISP has to do is check the logs (assuming they still exist when the query is made). Devdas Bhagat -- It is one thing to praise discipline, and another to submit to it. -- Cervantes Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11156&t=11156 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Resetting a Router to Factory.... [7:11152]
erase start unplug it next time it is powered on, what comes up is the initial configuration dialogue HTH Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Johnson Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 8:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Resetting a Router to Factory [7:11152] Hi All, How do I go about resetting a router back to factory conditions? Meaning, putting it back to as if I was just taking it out of the box for the first time. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11155&t=11152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
Boy, That CCIE verification tool is buggy. I put my name in 4 times before It verified me. Tried different capitalization methods untill it finially worked. Then it worked on all capitalization methods !!! Go figure I'm looking for a job right now and I hope that a prospective employeer doesn't use this thing !! Tony Medeiros CCIE #6172 (damnit ) - Original Message - From: John Hardman To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] > Hi All > > There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. > Interesting... > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html > > -- > John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11154&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Resetting a Router to Factory.... [7:11152]
I'm assuming you are talking about an ios router and not a 700 series router. From the enable prompt: erase start, answer questions, and reload. The router will reboot without a configuration. HTH Mike Nygard Network Engineer ""Richard Johnson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > > How do I go about resetting a router back to factory conditions? Meaning, > putting it back to as if I was just taking it out of the box for the first > time. > > Thanks, > > Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11153&t=11152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resetting a Router to Factory.... [7:11152]
Hi All, How do I go about resetting a router back to factory conditions? Meaning, putting it back to as if I was just taking it out of the box for the first time. Thanks, Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11152&t=11152 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping replies [7:10910] longish! [7:10910]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marty Adkins Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ping replies [7:10910] longish! [7:10910] Actually I prefer M&Ms, doesn't everyone? Sorry, chocoholic attack. :-) CL: M&M&M - my mind reels at the routing mess that would result in such a strange ping report:-> Thanks to both of you for digging and actually trying these on real gear -- it helps everyone learn much more thoroughly. CL: thanks too for your observations. goes to show - the important job for a router is to forward packets. makes sense to me. Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mentor Technologies Phone: 240-568-6526 133 National Business Pkwy WWW: http://www.mentortech.com Annapolis Junction, MD 20701Cisco CCIE #1289 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11151&t=10910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143]
Ya man- these routers are no different than the Catalyst Sup Engines, 4000, 7000, 7500, LS1010, etc., etc. You need a DB25 balun & standard console cable. Both come in the standard Cisco Console kit. Phil - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:53 PM Subject: RE: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143] > This is off the top of my head - so be warned. You should be able to use a > standard console cable with the addition of the 25 pin to RJ-45 adapter that > (used) to come with the kit. Believe that it is marked "modem". > Method #2 I seem to remember using a standard serial cable with DB-25s each > end plus a 25-pin to 9-pin adapter to connect to 4700s which also have a > 25-pin console. (For those who remember when PC serial ports were 25-pin and > then changed to 9.) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:06 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: OT: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143] > > > > > > Hey gang, I'm admittedly not much of a serial cable guru and > > this is beating > > my brains out! > > > > I have a couple of 3000 routers with DB25 console ports (the > > pinout below > > was taken from CCO). I wired this to a DB9-RJ45 plug but I'm > > not doing > > something right. For example, do I need to cross the TD and > > RD signals? > > When it says "shorted, does that mean the wire is cut going > > back to the > > other end and the 2 local wires are basically looped > > together? Do RTS and > > CTS go straight through? > > > > I could buy these for $50-something each or make them for > > $5...not much of a > > choice if I can get this to work. > > > > Any help would be really appreciated! > > > > > > Cisco 3000 series router - Console Port Pinouts (DB-25) > > > > Pin Signal Input/Output > > 1 Frame GND - > > 2 TD Input > > 3 RD Output > > 4 RTS Shorted to pin 5 > > 5 CTS Shorted to pin 4 > > 6 Shorted to pin 8 Output > > 7 GND - > > 8 CD Output > > 20 DTR Input > > > > --- > > Rik Guyler > > > > Ciscofucious say: "If you haven't checked the archives first, > > don't ask!" > > Report misconduct > > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11150&t=11143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: COLT [7:10963]
Thanks Priscilla- if E-mail's could kill... I'd be dead on the floor :o) Phil - Original Message - From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:18 PM Subject: RE: COLT [7:10963] > The COLT tests seemed to be written by someone for whom neither technology > nor English were their first language. (Of course, that sentence seems that > way too ;-), but hopefully you know what I mean.) > > Priscilla > > At 07:05 PM 7/5/01, Greg Macaulay wrote: > >Hey Phil -- > > > >I gotta tell ya' -- I heartily disagree with your in depthy assessment of > >the COLT exams. (1) They were free! (2) They were from Cisco! (3) Some of > >the questions appeared on the actual exams (thus from the same database)! > >Every study aid helps! > > > >Take care -- and have a good day (before you flame me!) > > > >Greg Macaulay > >Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth > >Lifetime Member of AARP > >Retired Attorney/Law Professor > > > >-Original Message- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > >Circusnuts > >Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:58 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: COLT [7:10963] > > > > > >Am I the only one who does not miss the Colt exams !!! > > > >I thought they sucked ??? > > > >Phil > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > >To: > >Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 5:48 AM > >Subject: COLT [7:10963] > > > > > > > Please can somebody help? > > > S.O.S > > > THANKS > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11149&t=10963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143]
This is off the top of my head - so be warned. You should be able to use a standard console cable with the addition of the 25 pin to RJ-45 adapter that (used) to come with the kit. Believe that it is marked "modem". Method #2 I seem to remember using a standard serial cable with DB-25s each end plus a 25-pin to 9-pin adapter to connect to 4700s which also have a 25-pin console. (For those who remember when PC serial ports were 25-pin and then changed to 9.) > -Original Message- > From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: OT: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143] > > > Hey gang, I'm admittedly not much of a serial cable guru and > this is beating > my brains out! > > I have a couple of 3000 routers with DB25 console ports (the > pinout below > was taken from CCO). I wired this to a DB9-RJ45 plug but I'm > not doing > something right. For example, do I need to cross the TD and > RD signals? > When it says "shorted, does that mean the wire is cut going > back to the > other end and the 2 local wires are basically looped > together? Do RTS and > CTS go straight through? > > I could buy these for $50-something each or make them for > $5...not much of a > choice if I can get this to work. > > Any help would be really appreciated! > > > Cisco 3000 series router - Console Port Pinouts (DB-25) > > Pin Signal Input/Output > 1 Frame GND - > 2 TD Input > 3 RD Output > 4 RTS Shorted to pin 5 > 5 CTS Shorted to pin 4 > 6 Shorted to pin 8Output > 7 GND - > 8 CD Output > 20DTR Input > > --- > Rik Guyler > > Ciscofucious say: "If you haven't checked the archives first, > don't ask!" > Report misconduct > and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11148&t=11143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tracking rogue dialup users [7:11147]
"Security Basics (E-mail)" Most ISP's can't effectively track users like that. However, I could be mistaken. -- Jonathan \|||/ (o o) /-ooO-(_)-Ooo\ | Jonathan M. Slivko E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | IRC Nick: optix` Backup: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | AIM/AOL: JMSNY2001 Web : http://www.jslivko.org | || | "History teaches us that days like this are best spent in bed" | \/ On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] - wrote: > Greetz. > > Just a matter of interest. > > Say there is user A, he dials up to ISP J. > User A breaks into server X. > Server X has the ip, he contacts the isp > How is the user tracked from there on... > > Do servers like CiscoSecure ACS keep track of the ip and the time connected. > The reason I am asking is in my little experience that I had with > CiscoSecure ACS and their radius, I could not find such info on the logs. > Is tacacs perhaps a little better, will it give me more info? Or will this > user just get away with this -- Doubt it though > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > Ciao Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11147&t=11147 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tracking rogue dialup users [7:11146]
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, [iso-8859-1] - wrote: > Greetz. > > Just a matter of interest. > > Say there is user A, he dials up to ISP J. User A breaks into server > X. Server X has the ip, he contacts the isp How is the user > tracked from there on... > A good Radius server should log the IP used by user A, as well as the time user A stays connected. The latter information is vital to most ISP business models as they use the length of time a user stays connected as basis for their billing. Most modern digital phone systems should have caller ID, so the phone number is also logged if Radius can get this information somehow. So if Server X was able to get the IP used by user A to connect to it, ISP J should be able to trace user A back to the phone he used to dial up into them, *provided the clock skew between ISP J's Radius server and Server X is minimal*. Which is why all people who operate major servers, and ISP's most especially, should synchronize their clocks correctly. Clock skew of any serious length can make correlating events on different servers iffy if not impossible. Skew of even one minute may make pinning down a culprit hard to prove. -- Rafael R. Sevilla+63(2) 8177746 ext. 8311 Programmer, InterdotNet Philippines +63(917) 4458925 http://dido.engr.internet.org.ph/ -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GAT d- s:- a- C UL+++ P+++ L+++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w--- O- M-- V- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+++ DI++ D+ G e++ h! r++ y+ --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11146&t=11146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tracking rogue dialup users [7:11145]
i work for an isp, and what happens is, the website will call us up, and say "a user broke into our server at xx:xx am/pm" we then look at who was logged on at that time, on that ip address, and we can tell their username, and also if they have caller ID like we do, we can tell their phone number. However, we don't give out that info without a court order, because of privacy. But we tell that to the website that was cracked. - Original Message - From: - To: Cc: Security Basics (E-mail) Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:15 AM Subject: tracking rogue dialup users > Greetz. > > Just a matter of interest. > > Say there is user A, he dials up to ISP J. > User A breaks into server X. > Server X has the ip, he contacts the isp > How is the user tracked from there on... > > Do servers like CiscoSecure ACS keep track of the ip and the time connected. > The reason I am asking is in my little experience that I had with > CiscoSecure ACS and their radius, I could not find such info on the logs. > Is tacacs perhaps a little better, will it give me more info? Or will this > user just get away with this -- Doubt it though > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > Ciao Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11145&t=11145 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
I checked out several people from the list who announced success over the past couple of months. Apparently there is a bit of a lag between the time you pass and placement into the database. #7599 verifies, but #7617 does not, for example Still - should finally put a crimp on the styles of the liars and pretenders. Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jack Nalbandian Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] I don't quite know how reliable this can be as of yet. None of the CCIEs that I know of (that even some of our corporate partners have on staff) "exist" according to this tool. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] I like the CCIE verification tool ( requires a CCO login to access ) I discovered that Bruce Caslow is not a CCIE, although Andrew Caslow is. You guys might want to check out Jeffrey Doyle. ;-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] Hi All There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. Interesting... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11144&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: 3000 Console cable help [7:11143]
Hey gang, I'm admittedly not much of a serial cable guru and this is beating my brains out! I have a couple of 3000 routers with DB25 console ports (the pinout below was taken from CCO). I wired this to a DB9-RJ45 plug but I'm not doing something right. For example, do I need to cross the TD and RD signals? When it says "shorted, does that mean the wire is cut going back to the other end and the 2 local wires are basically looped together? Do RTS and CTS go straight through? I could buy these for $50-something each or make them for $5...not much of a choice if I can get this to work. Any help would be really appreciated! Cisco 3000 series router - Console Port Pinouts (DB-25) Pin Signal Input/Output 1 Frame GND - 2 TD Input 3 RD Output 4 RTS Shorted to pin 5 5 CTS Shorted to pin 4 6 Shorted to pin 8Output 7 GND - 8 CD Output 20 DTR Input --- Rik Guyler Ciscofucious say: "If you haven't checked the archives first, don't ask!" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11143&t=11143 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HELP! PIM over GRE over IPSEC [7:11137]
post your configs -e- - Original Message - From: Matt To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 6:05 PM Subject: HELP! PIM over GRE over IPSEC [7:11137] > I want to set multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel so that I don't have to > mess with my IPSEC tunnel. In a lab I am trying just the PIM over GRE and I > can't make it work. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.. > > Matt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11142&t=11137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
I Can't find this tool :( -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Larrieu Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 8:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] I like the CCIE verification tool ( requires a CCO login to access ) I discovered that Bruce Caslow is not a CCIE, although Andrew Caslow is. You guys might want to check out Jeffrey Doyle. ;-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] Hi All There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. Interesting... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11141&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: COLT [7:10963]
The COLT tests seemed to be written by someone for whom neither technology nor English were their first language. (Of course, that sentence seems that way too ;-), but hopefully you know what I mean.) Priscilla At 07:05 PM 7/5/01, Greg Macaulay wrote: >Hey Phil -- > >I gotta tell ya' -- I heartily disagree with your in depthy assessment of >the COLT exams. (1) They were free! (2) They were from Cisco! (3) Some of >the questions appeared on the actual exams (thus from the same database)! >Every study aid helps! > >Take care -- and have a good day (before you flame me!) > >Greg Macaulay >Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth >Lifetime Member of AARP >Retired Attorney/Law Professor > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Circusnuts >Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:58 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: COLT [7:10963] > > >Am I the only one who does not miss the Colt exams !!! > >I thought they sucked ??? > >Phil > >- Original Message - >From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 5:48 AM >Subject: COLT [7:10963] > > > > Please can somebody help? > > S.O.S > > THANKS Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11140&t=10963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
It worked for my #. That is a cool tool! I'm a little disappointed that they killed the plaque thing. I thought getting that plaque in the mail was pretty sweet! :) -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 Cisco Gear: www.optsys.net ""Jack Nalbandian"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't quite know how reliable this can be as of yet. None of the CCIEs > that I know of (that even some of our corporate partners have on staff) > "exist" according to this tool. > > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] > > > I like the CCIE verification tool ( requires a CCO login to access ) > > I discovered that Bruce Caslow is not a CCIE, although Andrew Caslow is. You > guys might want to check out Jeffrey Doyle. ;-> > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] > > > Hi All > > There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. > Interesting... > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html > > -- > John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11139&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop with the Delivery Failures already!!! [7:11138]
Please stop bombarding me with all these Delivery Failure notices! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11138&t=11138 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP! PIM over GRE over IPSEC [7:11137]
I want to set multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel so that I don't have to mess with my IPSEC tunnel. In a lab I am trying just the PIM over GRE and I can't make it work. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.. Matt Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11137&t=11137 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
I don't quite know how reliable this can be as of yet. None of the CCIEs that I know of (that even some of our corporate partners have on staff) "exist" according to this tool. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] I like the CCIE verification tool ( requires a CCO login to access ) I discovered that Bruce Caslow is not a CCIE, although Andrew Caslow is. You guys might want to check out Jeffrey Doyle. ;-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] Hi All There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. Interesting... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11136&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
I like the CCIE verification tool ( requires a CCO login to access ) I discovered that Bruce Caslow is not a CCIE, although Andrew Caslow is. You guys might want to check out Jeffrey Doyle. ;-> Chuck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128] Hi All There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. Interesting... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11135&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11134]
Yes Wearily he said please remove... Karl - Original Message - From: "Jennifer Cribbs" To: Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:07 AM Subject: Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11130] > Yes, yes, yes, I get every msg. > > Jenn > > 7/5/01 5:33:24 PM, "Circusnuts" wrote: > > >Yes- can we get rid of this guy !!! > > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Allen May" > >To: > >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:34 PM > >Subject: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not > >[7:11091] > > > > > >> Does anyone else get this with every single sent message? Can we get it > >> removed it from the list? I've been getting this for over a week now. > >> > >> Allen > >> - Original Message - > >> From: > >> To: "Allen May" > >> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM > >> Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed > >in > >> public Name & Address Book > >> > >> > >> > Your message > >> > > >> > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > >> > > >> > was not delivered to: > >> > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > because: > >> > > >> > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address > >> Book > Have a great day!! > Jennifer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11134&t=11134 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105]
Thanks Jenny I'll be bearing that in mind for December 2002. Karl - Original Message - From: To: Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:15 AM Subject: Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105] > To confirm - yes, it's from the date of the LAST exam, not the first (after > all, the first exam for CCNP at least is actually usually the CCNA - it's a > prerequisite as well). > > And regarding CCDP recert - it's on CCO in the certification area. > "CCNP and CCDP have separate recertification exams tailored to each. > Questions are drawn from the multiple exams currently in use for each > certification." > The CCDP recertification exam is 640-529. The CCNP recert exam is 640-519. > > JMcL > -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 06/07/2001 > 08:44 am --- > > > "Neil Schneider" @groupstudy.com on 06/07/2001 > 05:26:02 am > > Please respond to "Neil Schneider" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > > Subject: Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105] > > > recert is three years from date of initial cert. In your example Dec 2005 > > Neil > > > ""hal9001"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > years hence when does the three years start? > > > > 1)When you take the first of the four exams or > > 2)When you take the last of the four exams. > > > > For example if I took BCRAN today July 2001 and then took the last if > the > > four say CIT in December 2002 would the clock for the three year re-take > > start in July 2001 hence be July 2004 or in December 2002 and the re-take > be > > in December 2005? > > > > Does the CCDP qualification only require you to re-take the CID exam that > is > > available at the time of the re-take three years hence. Any takers? Or > > Re-takers? > > > > Karl > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > > please notify the originator immediately. > > > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, > or > > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author > and > > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11133&t=11105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
dear nrf, you are only partially right. When you use the "dialer map" statement instead of the "dialer string" statement, the ppp authent. chap is DEFINATELY REQUIRED. However it is true that you can still use ppp auth chap with dialer strings. cheers! still me--->U. PS: Can you give me advice on my actual problem , that of the BRI interface??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11066&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
dear nrf, you are only partially right. When you use the "dialer map" statement instead of the "dialer string" statement, the ppp authent. chap is DEFINATELY REQUIRED. However it is true that you can still use ppp auth chap with dialer strings. cheers! still me--->U. PS: Can you give me advice on my actual problem , that of the BRI interface??? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11065&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Way off subject [7:9997]
can't stay up any later to see this hit the group before replying ( you used one of the forbidden words, so your post hit the moderator's queue - c'est moi in any case, I wasted to say a couple of things. 1) I'm impressed. truly. sincerely. congratulations to you in your ongoing success. 2) I am convinced that there are two types of people in the world - those who believe there are two types, and those who don't. I mean, those who are entrepreneurs, and those who are "good soldiers" entrepreneurs have no need of crutches like degrees or certifications. there are certainly many successful companies built by folks with no qualifications other than their zeal, enthusiasm, hard work. good soldiers need rifles and a backpack, certifications and degrees. both are quite necessary in our economy. both have value. both add value. one cannot thrive without the other. an interesting symbiosis 3) I've had more than one CCIE tell me they find it ironic that they end up doing more sales after becoming a CCIE than before. A lot of customer will trust the advice of a CCIE before that of a non CCIE. for whatever reason. 4) your outlook is well worth considering. 5) in the end, the ancient maxim applies - know yourself. 6) 25 with a 7 year old? you BAD boy ;-> best wishes. Chuck P.S. your e-mail return address is phony. or at least it is bounced by ask.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of NY50TT Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Way off subject [7:9997] Ok here is my 0.02. I am not a CCIE. I have only an MCSE, and am 25 years old, single father of one 7 year old daughter. I don't have a college degree. I started my own consulting firm when I was 18, and went directly to the IT field. I now have 7 solid years of IT experience under my belt, and work as a senior security network architect for IBM. This year I will pull in just 5K shy of 6 digits. I have people with college degrees working for me. Now let me tell you a story. Those first 5 years were hell. I remember spending money in books and tools instead of food. I remember long sleepless nights studying or driving across the country in search of work and the next opportunity. I remember being turned down many times for jobs solely because I didn't have the degree. I had to play the numbers and apply for I would say 7 times the number of jobs to get 1 interview, and of those interviews, 75% of them would turn me down because of the lack of degree. Today I have met people who don't have degrees or certifications and make twice as much or more than I. These people have been in networking forever and damn sure don't need certifications, and degrees are mute. I am still disoriented by what I have found in this case, here are these folks, the top experts in the networking field in the world, but they don't have nor need, any pieces of papers other than their resume and reputation to get them anywhere. I believe that any level of success and opportunity I enjoy today is largely due to a level of successful self-marketing. Opportunities became available to me not because of what cert I had, but because a company needed something done that I had already done, I was able to sell myself to them that I was the guy to do it for them, and I just kept building on that base. Like Michael, I feel that the path I have chosen has greatly accelerated my career. Most people my age coming out of college do not come out making what I make, nor are they allowed to work with the cutting edge technologies I am allowed to work with, or doing the caliber of work I do. I don't regret not having a degree, however I will not tell you that you shouldn't get it. I posted a thread here that is labeled "are Cisco certifications still worth anything?" Please read the responses I got, some from CCIE's to get a splash of reality of things could be after you get your CCIE reality is you probably won't be deploying anything, and will likely have a desk job, reviewing architectures, and designing infrastructures, and even still some CCIE's use their certs for advancing up in an organization. I agree with all the comments presented in that thread, including the parts about the different uses for certifications. The only common denominator I have been able to identify in any response is the more experience you get, the less your educational or certification level seems to matter. I'm no longer questioned about lack of certifications or degrees(but note it took 7 years). I found that I made a bigger deal about it than did employers. My employers need things to get done so that they can turn a profit, and I give them that, and they pay me for it. A good name goes a long way... work finds me now, because people don't stop talking about what I can do, because I do it to their delight and satisfaction, and do it better and faster than most. It's amazing how projects just see
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
First question - what are the actual symptoms? Are you just concerned about layer 2 showing TEI_ASSIGNED? What happens when you try to dial? When you say "the debug(q921 & q931) messages I'm receiving arent showing me anything relevant", what ARE they showing you? Anything at all? I have come across cases with basic-net3 BRIs where layer 2 doesn't show multiple_frame_established, but tei_assigned. However when a call is received or made, it works quite happily. I've never investigated the background of why this is so. If this is not the problem, and debug isdn q921 shows no chat between the router and the switch, and no lights are on and nobody's home, and you've checked with the telco that the switch-type is correct; well, ISDN services have been known to fail before. Ask your telco if it's actually working at their end :-) Your dialer string of '053' looks seriously dodgy, by the way. Is this a sanitised version, or what are you trying to achieve with that? JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 06/07/2001 08:59 am --- "Phil Barker" @groupstudy.com on 05/07/2001 09:51:21 pm Please respond to "Phil Barker" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045] Can you post a copy of 'sh isdn status' for the bri ? Phil. --- Charles Manafa wrote: > You can't ignore the "dialer map" statement, you > need it for legacy DDR. > That's what binds the remote IP address to a phone > number. > > CM > > -Original Message- > From: Uche Ishionwu > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05/07/01 11:53 > Subject: My BRI interface will not respond! > [7:11045] > > Who can help me? I am trying to get cisco2620 > modular router to route > out > of it's bri interface. can anyone help? below you > will find a copy of th > current configurationthe only significant > interface to look out for > here > is Bri1/0 ...This is the interface i am testing with > at the moment. You > can > just ignore the Dialer map / dialer interface > configurations for now. I > just > want to see the interface showing some sign of > lifeat the moment the > lights wont even flicker, even though the debug(q921 > & q931) messages > I'm > receiving arent showing me anything relevant. > I would really appreciate any form of help. Cheers > Pash! > > Config> > > > oks>en > Password: > oks#sh conf > Using 1443 out of 29688 bytes > ! > version 12.0 > service timestamps debug uptime > service timestamps log uptime > no service password-encryption > ! > hostname oks > ! > no logging console > no logging monitor > enable secret 5 $1$DjGs$cxj/.CpMxoel/kKvi.Wqn1 > ! > ! > ! > ! > ! > memory-size iomem 15 > ip subnet-zero > ! > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > isdn voice-call-failure 0 > ! > ! > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > duplex auto > speed auto > ! > interface BRI0/0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/0 > ip address 192.168.8.2 255.255.255.0 > no ip directed-broadcast > encapsulation ppp > dialer string 053 > dialer string 02710750 > dialer-group 1 > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/1 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/2 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface BRI1/3 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > shutdown > isdn switch-type basic-net3 > ! > interface Dialer0 > no ip address > no ip directed-broadcast > dialer in-band > no cdp enable > ! > ip classless > ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/0 > ip route 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 BRI1/0 > no ip http server > ! > ! > map-class dialer > ! > map-class dialer oks_cisco1 > dialer isdn speed 56 > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit > ! > line con 0 > password ucheoma > transport input none > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11132&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105]
To confirm - yes, it's from the date of the LAST exam, not the first (after all, the first exam for CCNP at least is actually usually the CCNA - it's a prerequisite as well). And regarding CCDP recert - it's on CCO in the certification area. "CCNP and CCDP have separate recertification exams tailored to each. Questions are drawn from the multiple exams currently in use for each certification." The CCDP recertification exam is 640-529. The CCNP recert exam is 640-519. JMcL -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 06/07/2001 08:44 am --- "Neil Schneider" @groupstudy.com on 06/07/2001 05:26:02 am Please respond to "Neil Schneider" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105] recert is three years from date of initial cert. In your example Dec 2005 Neil ""hal9001"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > years hence when does the three years start? > > 1)When you take the first of the four exams or > 2)When you take the last of the four exams. > > For example if I took BCRAN today July 2001 and then took the last if the > four say CIT in December 2002 would the clock for the three year re-take > start in July 2001 hence be July 2004 or in December 2002 and the re-take be > in December 2005? > > Does the CCDP qualification only require you to re-take the CID exam that is > available at the time of the re-take three years hence. Any takers? Or > Re-takers? > > Karl > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11131&t=11105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11130]
Yes, yes, yes, I get every msg. Jenn 7/5/01 5:33:24 PM, "Circusnuts" wrote: >Yes- can we get rid of this guy !!! > >- Original Message - >From: "Allen May" >To: >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:34 PM >Subject: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not >[7:11091] > > >> Does anyone else get this with every single sent message? Can we get it >> removed it from the list? I've been getting this for over a week now. >> >> Allen >> - Original Message - >> From: >> To: "Allen May" >> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM >> Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed >in >> public Name & Address Book >> >> >> > Your message >> > >> > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] >> > >> > was not delivered to: >> > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > because: >> > >> > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address >> Book Have a great day!! Jennifer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11130&t=11130 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: COLT [7:10963]
Hey Phil -- I gotta tell ya' -- I heartily disagree with your in depthy assessment of the COLT exams. (1) They were free! (2) They were from Cisco! (3) Some of the questions appeared on the actual exams (thus from the same database)! Every study aid helps! Take care -- and have a good day (before you flame me!) Greg Macaulay Oldest CCNP/CCDP on Earth Lifetime Member of AARP Retired Attorney/Law Professor -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Circusnuts Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: COLT [7:10963] Am I the only one who does not miss the Colt exams !!! I thought they sucked ??? Phil - Original Message - From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 5:48 AM Subject: COLT [7:10963] > Please can somebody help? > S.O.S > THANKS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11129&t=10963 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FYI Check out the CCIE "whats new" page. [7:11128]
Hi All There are a couple of new items on the whats new page of the CCO CCIE site. Interesting... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html -- John Hardman CCNP MCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11128&t=11128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can I Upgrade MIB in the routers ? [7:11056]
Rudy, Technically speaking, you aren't upgrading the MIB. A MIB is just a way to put recognisable names to OIDs (Object Identifiers). The support for the OIDs is built into the router's IOS. New versions of the IOS will often include support for additional or revised OIDs to account for new functions. The MIB is used by the software that queries the device via SNMP. You specify the MIB value to be extracted, the software uses the MIB to translate that to an OID. Then the software queries the device for tyhe current value associated with that OID. If you wish, you can bypass the MIB and have the software query the OID directly. You just need to know which one. HTH, Karen rudhy stiyawan wrote: > Hi all, Does anybody know how to upgrade MIB in the routers ? When we do upgrade the IOS version, does the upgrading process include MIB ugrade ? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11127&t=11056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11126]
Yeah, he's driving me crazy too!!! ""Circusnuts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yes- can we get rid of this guy !!! > > - Original Message - > From: "Allen May" > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:34 PM > Subject: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not > [7:11091] > > > > Does anyone else get this with every single sent message? Can we get it > > removed it from the list? I've been getting this for over a week now. > > > > Allen > > - Original Message - > > From: > > To: "Allen May" > > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM > > Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed > in > > public Name & Address Book > > > > > > > Your message > > > > > > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > > > > > > was not delivered to: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > because: > > > > > > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address > > Book Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11126&t=11126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11125]
Yes- can we get rid of this guy !!! - Original Message - From: "Allen May" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:34 PM Subject: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11091] > Does anyone else get this with every single sent message? Can we get it > removed it from the list? I've been getting this for over a week now. > > Allen > - Original Message - > From: > To: "Allen May" > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM > Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in > public Name & Address Book > > > > Your message > > > > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > > > > was not delivered to: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > because: > > > > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address > Book Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11125&t=11125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP/CCDP Re-Certification & More Miserable News [7:11118]
Karl - my condolences to you, that's bad news - I hope the UK 'depression' recovers quicker than 18 months for your sake. My study partner who is ex-Nortel said that they're going through another round of RIFs and that they closed their local office here (which is a plain shame) -e- - Original Message - From: hal9001 To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:30 PM Subject: CCNP/CCDP Re-Certification & More Miserable News [7:8] > Thanks for those who replied re the CCNP/CCDP re-certification question. > > However more bad news in the UK market Marconi (once GEC) are set to lose > another 1500 jobs in UK. I also hear that Lucent are almost into Ch 11. > The small company I worked for folded, I'm out. They were hooked up with > Ericsson/Nortel/Extreme/Netscreen/Sitara etc. Now with Cisco, Nortel, > Ericsson etc the telecoms industry is on the way down heavily. > > The recession is definitely here. I'm trying to spread myself now in > certifications and look toward a revived market maybe 18 to 24 months ahead > if we are lucky. I did make mention of this before and what can be done to > revive the market. But I don't think oil and fossil fuels will do it!!! > Meanwhile I'm out of networking and into escorting Criminals and disturbed > juveniles. Welcome to hell! > > Karl HUTCHINSON > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11124&t=8 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More newbie questions [7:11102]
DMZ zone which is the short form for 'Demilitazed Zone' (You can get the clue from the name itself, it presupposes that, there is a militazed zone and a Demilitazed zone, a secure zone and an unsecure zone if you would prefer it that way). It a zone in between two routers, the otherside router faces the internet while the inside router faces your internal network. The purpose of this is to place the highest possible security restrictions into your internal network without preventing people from accessing services like WWW, email server, etc. This zone is where you put your webserver, email server and firewall. The otherside router allows free unhindered access into this area for people to access these information and they can not go beyond this area except they have certain priviliges you have defined in the second router that permit access into your internal network. The aux port is just like the console port, which I believe you know about, the only different is that for the aux port you need a phone line a modem connected to it, so that you can remotely dial into the router through the aux port for the purposes of configurations, etc. Good luck. Regards. Oletu _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11121&t=11102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco+Breezecom [7:11116]
ask on. - Original Message - From: Axilleas Likotsetas To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:17 PM Subject: Cisco+Breezecom [7:6] > Hi guys, > > i'm from greece and i work in a telecommunication company > we're working with breezecom wireless products > if anyone of you has some experiance in this products > please answer to me > i have some questions to ask > > > thanks, > axilleas _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11123&t=6 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed BCRAN [7:11122]
Passed today. A very near pass I must add. This has been the hardest test for me so far. Please don't get me wrong I am not trying to intimidate anyone. Maybe I was unlucky and I got the hard test but let me say just this: don't bother showing up at the test center unless you are VERY well prepared. I got a couple of poorly worded questions and one that was not in the exam objectives. I thought I was going to do better by I was wrong. Anyway a pass is pass no matter the score (two down two to go).My method of preparing: CCNP Remote Access Exam Certification Guide by Cisco Press and for testing Boson exams.As always thank you group for your support. George Yiannibas MCSE CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11122&t=11122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599]
Remember that the mark agreement used the word 'May' so if I decide to put say CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP+voice, CCNP+security, etc I have not gone against the agreement, cos I rest on the strenght of the word 'MAY' It is true that these look redundant but many HR would prefer that to someone that just put CCNP, CCDP. The guy who did this exams want a return in terms of good jobs, etc, so putting all these will fetch him the desired job, no harm. There was a trend in this group where someone said he attended a job fair with his friend, he has his CCNP and his friend have CCNA. To follow the rules he only put CCNP in his resume. Many employers were in favour of his friend's CCNA cos, according to him, they said 'They are not doing CCNP stuffs' but have a lot to do with CCNA in their company. Out there many HR knows just two cisco certifications ie CCNA and CCIE. Until Cisco or whoever completely educate all the HRs and many others, it is better to play safe. Regards. Oletu. - Original Message - From: Dennis H To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:47 PM Subject: Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599] > Well said! > > Dennis > > > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The Cisco Career Certifications Agreement (Mark usage guidelines) states > > (among a lot of other things)... > > "You may only use the mark for the highest level of certification you have > > received". > > BUT, before you all decide that this means you should put CCIE only, the > > "career certifications" they are talking about are CCNA, CCDA, CCNP and > > CCDP. Not CCIE. > > Don't forget that the CCIE has been around a lot longer than the CCNP/DP > > etc. The CCNP/DP are not prerequisites for the CCIE, and although there > is > > an awful lot of overlap in the material, the CCIE isn't really just an > > extra step up (particularly from the CCDP). > > My opinion would be that you should NOT put "CCNA, CCNP" or "CCDA, CCDP" - > > that happens to be against the marks agreement, and anyway it's redundant > > (except perhaps for HR scanning purposes). > > But "CCIE, CCNP, CCDP"? Sure. They are different certs, and one doesn't > > imply the other. > > JMcL > > -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 04/07/2001 > > 08:59 am --- > > > > > > "Kevin Wigle" @groupstudy.com on 04/07/2001 > > 12:05:30 am > > > > Please respond to "Kevin Wigle" > > > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > cc: > > > > > > Subject: Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599] > > > > > > With the death (or extended delay) of CCIE Design, I think that the CCDP > is > > sufficiently different that it can/should be used alongside of CCIE. > > > > CCNP on the otherhand flows directly into CCIE R&S. > > > > I've had this discussion before in the NOS world, MCSE/MCP - CBE/CBS - > > CNE/CNA. > > > > and the greatest reason for using both is that HR often don't know how > > certs > > are achieved or their order. Therefore, to allow HR people to catch the > > keyword they're looking for, both junior/senior certs are often listed. > > > > Now, on a business card - I only use the senior initials, but on a > resume - > > that's HR stuff again. > > > > On an email list where supposedly everybody is clued into the cert tracks > > (imagine a name like groupstudy) then I think I would also only use the > > senior initials. > > > > But personal taste takes it in the end. Some people could presume that > > their posts on this list as a legitimate form of "advertising" their > > abilities - again a HR thing. > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dennis H" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:28 AM > > Subject: Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599] > > > > > > > I guess it's just a matter of taste... Since CCIE is supposed the end > > all > > > know all cert in Cisco world... it's seems superfluous to add any lower > > > level certs such as CCNP/DP and it might be construed to indicate an > > > infactuation with certs and letters after ones name... why not add CCNA > > to > > > the end as well, or is that one not good enough... Compare it to when > > > someone achieves a PhD... are they going to put BS after their name as > > > well... of course not... it's implied! Such is the case with CCIE... > > I'd > > > just like to see the CCIE recognition kept at the highest level and I > > think > > > putting CCNP after your CCIE designation is kind of silly... This is > the > > > first time I saw that. All the CCIE's I know wouldn't dream of doing > > that! > > > > > > BTW, I believe you're mistaken about the recertification... According to > > > Cisco's website you need to recertify every 3 years unless you achieve a > > > higher level certification during that time... > > > > > > Sorry if it seems like I'm bashing you... that's not what I'm trying to > > > do... Cheers
Re: More newbie questions [7:11102]
I can contribute to it, but not necessary improve on it :-) A Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) is referred to as a semi-protected meeting point for allowing others to access your network. Typically the DMZ is outside of your network firewall. Some other example applications a DMZ serves are vendor or partner access network, publically accessible servers (ftp and bastion hosts). It is usually distinctly separated from the actual Intenet connection (sometimes called the 'dirty net') by a filtering device (router or firewall) with some protection but also liberal access policy configured into it. The AUX port on a router is the auxilliary RS-232 port, and can be used for: connecting a modem so that the router can be accessed via a dial-up connection from a terminal, PC, or another router, connecting a terminal so that the router can be accessed via an ASCII terminal or PC running terminal emulation, connecting a modem so that the router can access another host or router for dial backup -e- - Original Message - From: hal9001 To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:09 PM Subject: Re: More newbie questions [7:11102] > A DMZ is generally an area between the router and an inner network which is > usually guarded by a firewall. In the DMZ you may find typically Web or > E-Mail Servers accessible from both the public or internet side and the > private and protected inner network. Anyone improve on that? > > Karl > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff" > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:57 PM > Subject: More newbie questions [7:11102] > > > > Can someone please explain what a DMZ is??? > > And what is the aux port on a router for??? > > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9&t=11102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco ACL's [7:11114]
I have and like these two. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1565923855/o/qid=994367527/sr=2-1/103 -4713766-7885414 http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072123354/o/qid=994367527/sr=2-3/103 -4713766-7885414 Jon -Original Message- From: Caballero, Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco ACL's [7:4] Hi, Anyone know of a good book or source of information on Cisco Access-lists. Is there any sort of book with a plethora of examples and information on the subject? Thanks, Eddie Caballero Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP/CCDP Re-Certification & More Miserable News [7:11118]
Thanks for those who replied re the CCNP/CCDP re-certification question. However more bad news in the UK market Marconi (once GEC) are set to lose another 1500 jobs in UK. I also hear that Lucent are almost into Ch 11. The small company I worked for folded, I'm out. They were hooked up with Ericsson/Nortel/Extreme/Netscreen/Sitara etc. Now with Cisco, Nortel, Ericsson etc the telecoms industry is on the way down heavily. The recession is definitely here. I'm trying to spread myself now in certifications and look toward a revived market maybe 18 to 24 months ahead if we are lucky. I did make mention of this before and what can be done to revive the market. But I don't think oil and fossil fuels will do it!!! Meanwhile I'm out of networking and into escorting Criminals and disturbed juveniles. Welcome to hell! Karl HUTCHINSON IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8&t=8 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco+Breezecom [7:11116]
Hi guys, i'm from greece and i work in a telecommunication company we're working with breezecom wireless products if anyone of you has some experiance in this products please answer to me i have some questions to ask thanks, axilleas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6&t=6 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco ACL's [7:11114]
Cisco access lists field guide by Gil Held and Kent Hundley, McGraw-Hill Technical Expert -Original Message- From: Caballero, Eddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco ACL's [7:4] Hi, Anyone know of a good book or source of information on Cisco Access-lists. Is there any sort of book with a plethora of examples and information on the subject? Thanks, Eddie Caballero Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco ACL's [7:11114]
Hi, Anyone know of a good book or source of information on Cisco Access-lists. Is there any sort of book with a plethora of examples and information on the subject? Thanks, Eddie Caballero Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4&t=4 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping replies [7:10910] longish! [7:10910]
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > By the way, I stumbled on this somewhat helpful document: > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/ping_traceroute.html > > Couldn't find it by starting with the Tech Tips pages, but the search > engine found it when I searched on something bizarre. > Great article, Priscilla -- thanks for sharing! At 09:16 PM 7/4/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >next - sending 1500-byte packets - get the big M! > > > >Router_1# > >Router_1#ping > >Protocol [ip]: > >Target IP address: 175.175.1.1 > >Repeat count [5]: > >Datagram size [100]: 1500 > >Timeout in seconds [2]: > >Extended commands [n]: y > >Source address or interface: l 0 > >Type of service [0]: > >Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: yes > >Validate reply data? [no]: > >Data pattern [0xABCD]: > >Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: > >Sweep range of sizes [n]: > >Type escape sequence to abort. > >Sending 5, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 175.175.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: > >M.M.M Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > >Router_1# > >Router_1# > > > >irritating annoyance - note the M.M.M why aren't they all M's Actually I prefer M&Ms, doesn't everyone? Sorry, chocoholic attack. :-) The router which generated the ICMP message rate-limited same to no greater than one per second per source IP. It's one way that IOS tries to prevent one errant traffic stream from impacting others. Note that as soon as the first "M" was received by Router_1, it immediately fired off the second ping. Hence the downstream router decided not to generate another ICMP message, forcing Router_1 to time out (in two seconds). Ping #3 occurred more than one second after #2, so the ICMP message was generated. And so on... The more common pattern seen is "U.U.U" for host unreachable. To explain a bit further about the rationale, remember that the downstream router would really like to spend its resources successfully forwarding packets, in a fast-switching mode (fast/CEF/optimum/whatever). This is performed in interrupt mode. It's not possible to generate new messages in interrupt mode, so all exception cases must be handled by an IOS process (IP input). Doing this is more CPU and buffer expensive and competes with successful traffic flows. So IOS throttles this activity for each source IP, in case the source is brain dead or potentially malicious (a DoS attack). In fact, the fast-switching code can silently drop the unroutable packet without even scheduling a process to run. Thanks to both of you for digging and actually trying these on real gear -- it helps everyone learn much more thoroughly. Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mentor Technologies Phone: 240-568-6526 133 National Business Pkwy WWW: http://www.mentortech.com Annapolis Junction, MD 20701Cisco CCIE #1289 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3&t=10910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Claim your Free 4-In-1 Super Pen, it's been paid for by... [7:11112]
QuestionsResponse Do you own or use any kind of PDA(Personal Digital Assistant)? no Do you own or use a digital camera or camcorder?yes Do you own or use a Sony game console such as PS1,PS2 or Gameboy? no Do you own or use a MP3 player? yes Do you own or use a DVD player? yes Group Profile: Area Code 516 Gender: Female Age Group select below 18 and below 46-60 Income select below less than 30-40k Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2&t=2 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599]
Well said! Dennis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The Cisco Career Certifications Agreement (Mark usage guidelines) states > (among a lot of other things)... > "You may only use the mark for the highest level of certification you have > received". > BUT, before you all decide that this means you should put CCIE only, the > "career certifications" they are talking about are CCNA, CCDA, CCNP and > CCDP. Not CCIE. > Don't forget that the CCIE has been around a lot longer than the CCNP/DP > etc. The CCNP/DP are not prerequisites for the CCIE, and although there is > an awful lot of overlap in the material, the CCIE isn't really just an > extra step up (particularly from the CCDP). > My opinion would be that you should NOT put "CCNA, CCNP" or "CCDA, CCDP" - > that happens to be against the marks agreement, and anyway it's redundant > (except perhaps for HR scanning purposes). > But "CCIE, CCNP, CCDP"? Sure. They are different certs, and one doesn't > imply the other. > JMcL > -- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 04/07/2001 > 08:59 am --- > > > "Kevin Wigle" @groupstudy.com on 04/07/2001 > 12:05:30 am > > Please respond to "Kevin Wigle" > > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > > > Subject: Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599] > > > With the death (or extended delay) of CCIE Design, I think that the CCDP is > sufficiently different that it can/should be used alongside of CCIE. > > CCNP on the otherhand flows directly into CCIE R&S. > > I've had this discussion before in the NOS world, MCSE/MCP - CBE/CBS - > CNE/CNA. > > and the greatest reason for using both is that HR often don't know how > certs > are achieved or their order. Therefore, to allow HR people to catch the > keyword they're looking for, both junior/senior certs are often listed. > > Now, on a business card - I only use the senior initials, but on a resume - > that's HR stuff again. > > On an email list where supposedly everybody is clued into the cert tracks > (imagine a name like groupstudy) then I think I would also only use the > senior initials. > > But personal taste takes it in the end. Some people could presume that > their posts on this list as a legitimate form of "advertising" their > abilities - again a HR thing. > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "Dennis H" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:28 AM > Subject: Re: Cisco Certifications still worth anything? [7:10599] > > > > I guess it's just a matter of taste... Since CCIE is supposed the end > all > > know all cert in Cisco world... it's seems superfluous to add any lower > > level certs such as CCNP/DP and it might be construed to indicate an > > infactuation with certs and letters after ones name... why not add CCNA > to > > the end as well, or is that one not good enough... Compare it to when > > someone achieves a PhD... are they going to put BS after their name as > > well... of course not... it's implied! Such is the case with CCIE... > I'd > > just like to see the CCIE recognition kept at the highest level and I > think > > putting CCNP after your CCIE designation is kind of silly... This is the > > first time I saw that. All the CCIE's I know wouldn't dream of doing > that! > > > > BTW, I believe you're mistaken about the recertification... According to > > Cisco's website you need to recertify every 3 years unless you achieve a > > higher level certification during that time... > > > > Sorry if it seems like I'm bashing you... that's not what I'm trying to > > do... Cheers and good luck! > > > > Dennis > > very large snip to shorten up individual posts Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1&t=10599 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More newbie questions [7:11102]
DMZs generally allow access from the outside into it. The INSIDE of the firewall generally does not allow access from the outside into it. ""hal9001"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > A DMZ is generally an area between the router and an inner network which is > usually guarded by a firewall. In the DMZ you may find typically Web or > E-Mail Servers accessible from both the public or internet side and the > private and protected inner network. Anyone improve on that? > > Karl > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff" > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:57 PM > Subject: More newbie questions [7:11102] > > > > Can someone please explain what a DMZ is??? > > And what is the aux port on a router for??? > > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=0&t=11102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105]
Not confirmed but IMHO it would be from the date that you attained the certification. -Eric V. - Original Message - From: "hal9001" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:05 PM Subject: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105] > years hence when does the three years start? > > 1)When you take the first of the four exams or > 2)When you take the last of the four exams. > > For example if I took BCRAN today July 2001 and then took the last if the > four say CIT in December 2002 would the clock for the three year re-take > start in July 2001 hence be July 2004 or in December 2002 and the re-take be > in December 2005? > > Does the CCDP qualification only require you to re-take the CID exam that is > available at the time of the re-take three years hence. Any takers? Or > Re-takers? > > Karl > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11109&t=11105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105]
recert is three years from date of initial cert. In your example Dec 2005 Neil ""hal9001"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > years hence when does the three years start? > > 1)When you take the first of the four exams or > 2)When you take the last of the four exams. > > For example if I took BCRAN today July 2001 and then took the last if the > four say CIT in December 2002 would the clock for the three year re-take > start in July 2001 hence be July 2004 or in December 2002 and the re-take be > in December 2005? > > Does the CCDP qualification only require you to re-take the CID exam that is > available at the time of the re-take three years hence. Any takers? Or > Re-takers? > > Karl > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: > This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or > organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or > confidential information. If you have received this message in error, > please notify the originator immediately. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or > disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions > expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and > are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. > Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility > for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11108&t=11105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More newbie questions [7:11102]
A DMZ is generally an area between the router and an inner network which is usually guarded by a firewall. In the DMZ you may find typically Web or E-Mail Servers accessible from both the public or internet side and the private and protected inner network. Anyone improve on that? Karl - Original Message - From: "Jeff" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:57 PM Subject: More newbie questions [7:11102] > Can someone please explain what a DMZ is??? > And what is the aux port on a router for??? > Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11106&t=11102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
650x DHCP? [7:11107]
Hello, My client is considering moving DHCP servers to 6509/6506 switches (MSFC) and get rid of NT DHCP servers. We tested it in a 500-user environment and it works pretty good. Next, we'are going to implement it worldwide. But before we do that, I'd like to hear you guys opinion. Any pros and cons? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11107&t=11107 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retaking CCNP and CCDP [7:11105]
years hence when does the three years start? 1)When you take the first of the four exams or 2)When you take the last of the four exams. For example if I took BCRAN today July 2001 and then took the last if the four say CIT in December 2002 would the clock for the three year re-take start in July 2001 hence be July 2004 or in December 2002 and the re-take be in December 2005? Does the CCDP qualification only require you to re-take the CID exam that is available at the time of the re-take three years hence. Any takers? Or Re-takers? Karl IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended solely for the use of the Individual or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not use, copy, alter, or disclose the contents of this message. All information or opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Karl or Pauline HUTCHINSON. Karl & Pauline HUTCHINSON accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from its use, including damage from virus. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11105&t=11105 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Switch to Switch Connectivity [7:11104]
Hello All, I am trying to connect two 2916 switches together using 100BaseFX. I am currently trying to do this across an underground fiber between two buildings. At one time I moved the switches to my office and connected them together using a short piece of test fiber and they worked (i could ping from one device to the next). I have since moved the switches back using the underground fiber between buildings and they don't work (i can't ping form one switch to the other). I am getting a good link light on both ends and I can see the other switch via cdp but it doesn't show the ip address??? There are no other devices connected to the switches at this time and the ip addresses assigned to the switches are in the same subnet and in vlan 1. Thanks Stan Rossetti NASA - PriSMS Advanced Technology Group IP Phone: (256) 961-7097 Voice: (256) 544-5031 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Beeper: 544-1183 pin 0112 CCDA, CCNA, CCSE Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11104&t=11104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN, firewall question [7:11103]
Hello, 1. Anyone use VPN 3002 hardware client? Is it any good? 2. I'm looking for a small hardware firewall for personal use (ideally, PCMCIA size), any recommendation? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11103&t=11103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More newbie questions [7:11102]
Can someone please explain what a DMZ is??? And what is the aux port on a router for??? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11102&t=11102 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998]
I am going to advise, the customer(when back from vacation) that if they would like to have an ISDN backup fully working, they need to add a router to separate the wireless bridges. Thanks, I will you all posted as to the solution. KM >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 09:15:37 -0700 > >I think the secondary address could work as a workaround. It would be a way >to logically place the server on its own network. > >I think that any solution of that kind is sort of a kludge, though, (no >offence). The design should be fixed. It's screwy to have a server sitting >on that link between the two sites. Logically that link between e1 on the >local router and e0 on the remote router is really a point-to-point >wide-area circuit. It just happens to be Ethernet because the Aironet >bridges use Ethernet. Placing a server on that link is like placing a >server on a WAN link, if that were possible. > >I agree that the best solution is to segment off that "WAN" LAN link >between the sites. It should be a point-to-point link with no servers. You >could add a router, but it would be cheaper to just move that server, >wouldn't it? > >If I have jumped to incorrect conclusions (based on very little data about >your actual network), I apologize. Still recovering from Independence Day! >;-) > >Thanks for bringing this interesting scenario to our attention. Please keep >us posted on the solution you decide on. > >Priscilla > >At 11:06 AM 7/5/01, KM Reynolds wrote: >>Exactly, the server is on the ethernet where the bridge is. The router at >>the remote side does have another ethernet(e1) interface, but it is being >>used, and any device connected to this e1, I am able to ping, via the ISDN >>backup link, when I disconnect the wireless. >> >>If this e1 was not being used I would have plugged the remote bridge to e1 >>and segment the wireless bridges. >> >>So, it surely looks like I need to add a router to segment the wireless >>bridges. Or I wonder, I can place a secondary IP address on the remote >>router, and segment the wireless bridges that way, this way traffic would >>get to the remote bridge, go to the remote router on the secondary ip, >>then route/arp to the server. This may work, what do you think? I know >>adding a secondary address is to be avoided and to be used for only for >>temporary situations. >> >>I am now very curious, on ways to get this to work. However, in the end, >>for scalability, support and simplicity, I think adding a router or >>another ethernet interface to the remote router and segment the bridges is >>the way to proceed. >> >>I hope the secondary IP part makes sense. >> >>KM >> >> >>>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >>>To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >>>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:00:58 -0700 >>> >>>Well, the parade is over, and now I'm _really_ tired, but, I got to >>>wondering again. What problem are you trying to solve? Why doesn't the >>>EIGRP route go away anyway, even though e1 is still up. The local router >>>should stop hearing EIGRP hellos from the remote router if the wireless >>>link between them is down. Convergence might not be fast (three hellos >>>must >>>fail) but it should still work. >>> >>>You do have a router at the remote side too, don't you? Is it running >>>EIGRP? >>> >>>Oh, I get it. The server is not on the other side of the router at the >>>remote site. It's on a switch on the Ethernet where the bridge is. Can >>>you >>>move the server to the other side of the router? >>> >>>Priscilla >>> >>>At 08:46 PM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote: >>> Oh yes, you all have a holiday. Happy 4TH of July (Everyone). I shall wait to see if any CCIEs reply. If not I think segmenting the wireless bridges is the way to go, I feel bridging is taking a step back. Thanks KM >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:12:25 -0700 > >Sitting here at Starbucks, using wireless, waiting for the 4th of July >parade My brain isn't working too well. The latte wore off hours >ago. > >But it occurs to me that Aironet is bridging, as you know. The >routed >network doesn't know when a bridged network goes down. Could you do >this >area of the network with all bridging? Could the ISDN link use bridging >also, in other words? I know bridging over ISDN is supported. > >The convergence might be so slow, however, that you could pull the e1 >interface in about the same timeframe (if you knew to do it though.) > >I can't think of any other solution (besides the one you mentioned of >adding a router). It's an interesting design question. Maybe one of the >CCIEs on the list will
RE: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ [7:11091]
Yep.. -P.kil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11100&t=11091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird VPN issue [7:11055]
mark, i know this is a dopey question but ...first things first if you can move the user files i also recommend never having user files on any DC`s( even thought this isn`t always possible) as for the problem...( not knowing much about pix) you have two choices 1.)its and access-list,permission`s problem on the pixas somone said could be a wrong subnet mask 2.) it`s a licence issue on the NT server ... i would personally move the files first and then check the pix for config typo`s ... HTH steve >From: "Mark Smith" >Reply-To: "Mark Smith" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Weird VPN issue [7:11055] >Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:08:22 -0400 > >I am using several PIX units to tunnel between locations for where I work. >The Pix to Pix tunnels works fine. >I also have users tunneling in from home/dialup/remotely however they chose >to connect. These connections work "almost" fine. They all share the same >issue. They cannot see one NT4 server on the internal network. They can't >map drives to it and they can't even ping the IP address. Unfortunately >there are user files on this box. All other internal addresses are >completely accessible through their external connection except this one. I >called Cisco TAC and they just shrugged their shoulders on this one. This >box is a domain controller, internal DHCP and WINS server and has some >users >flat files stored on it (no apps running on it) and I have a DFS share >pointing to a directory it. Don't know if that matters any. >Any ideas as to why I can access the entire 172.25.1.0 network except for >172.25.1.21? > >Thanks. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11099&t=11055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BCMSN Exam questions [7:11098]
Does anyone have a good study list for BCMSN (Switching 2.0) exam? I'm currently studying from Osbourne and have been told (albeit by someone not a CCNP) that Osbourne books aren't enough to study from. Any suggestions? -P.kil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11098&t=11098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ping replies [7:10910] longish! [7:11097]
Thanks Chuck! I'll put M back in my list. I tried it again on my network and did get it! Yeah. (My testing was flawed before.) I couldn't get & to happen either. By turning on debug ip packet detail, I could see that I was receiving a TTL exceeded, even though the ping result showed just . IP: s=172.16.20.1 (local), d=172.16.90.1 (TokenRing0), len 100, sending ICMP type=8, code=0 IP: s=172.16.40.1 (TokenRing0), d=172.16.20.1 (TokenRing0), len 78, rcvd 3 ICMP type=11, code=0. By the way, I stumbled on this somewhat helpful document: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/ping_traceroute.html Couldn't find it by starting with the Tech Tips pages, but the search engine found it when I searched on something bizarre. I hope you understand my frustration now! ;-) Thanks for your support. Priscilla At 09:16 PM 7/4/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >managed to get some rack time in this evening. some results: > >1) to answer the question about the ping response regarding MTU issues. Yes >there is an "M" response. my lab set up was quite simple - linear, with the >MTU set to 500 on one segment and using extended ping to send a 1500 byte >packet. results: > >first - sending 100-byte packets - works just fine > >Router_1# >Router_1#ping >Protocol [ip]: >Target IP address: 175.175.1.1 >Repeat count [5]: >Datagram size [100]: >Timeout in seconds [2]: >Extended commands [n]: y >Source address or interface: l 0 >Type of service [0]: >Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: yes >Validate reply data? [no]: >Data pattern [0xABCD]: >Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: >Sweep range of sizes [n]: >Type escape sequence to abort. >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 175.175.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: >! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 8/9/16 ms >Router_1# > >next - sending 1500-byte packets - get the big M! > >Router_1# >Router_1#ping >Protocol [ip]: >Target IP address: 175.175.1.1 >Repeat count [5]: >Datagram size [100]: 1500 >Timeout in seconds [2]: >Extended commands [n]: y >Source address or interface: l 0 >Type of service [0]: >Set DF bit in IP header? [no]: yes >Validate reply data? [no]: >Data pattern [0xABCD]: >Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]: >Sweep range of sizes [n]: >Type escape sequence to abort. >Sending 5, 1500-byte ICMP Echos to 175.175.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: >M.M.M Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) >Router_1# >Router_1# > >irritating annoyance - note the M.M.M why aren't they all M's > >as far as the TTL exceed ( & ) > >I can't get any such response. > >I set a routing loop and tested using the extended trace and 255 tries. I >could see the loop between the two end points. A sample of the trace is >provided. > >19 190.190.45.4 16 msec 12 msec 12 msec > 20 190.190.45.5 12 msec 12 msec 16 msec > 21 190.190.45.4 16 msec 16 msec 12 msec > 22 190.190.45.5 12 msec 16 msec 408 msec > 23 190.190.45.4 40 msec 36 msec 12 msec > 24 190.190.45.5 12 msec 16 msec 16 msec > 25 190.190.45.4 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec > 26 190.190.45.5 16 msec 16 msec 16 msec > 27 190.190.45.4 12 msec 16 msec 16 msec > >note the packets bouncing around. > >however - ping and extended ping ( setting the timeout to 10 seconds rather >than default 2 seconds ) still reveals only the . > >Router_1#ping 100.1.1.1 > >Type escape sequence to abort. >Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 100.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds: >. >Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) > >Question: why have something, document something, and not use it? I can come >up with no means of obtaining a TTL exceeded report. I wish I has a sniffer >to see what was happening to the packets. > >In answer to your question about the tech docs, there are the release notes, >obviously. > >the only other thing I can think is the TAC pages, which are no longer >public. Persistent searching there often reveals some good stuff. > > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Priscilla Oppenheimer >Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 6:53 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ping replies [7:10910] > > >At 11:07 AM 7/4/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote: > >I admire your persistence. A quick look through several IOS versions' > >command references, and the master command reference on CCO all indicate > >that only a particular subset of the commands you mention below exist. that > >suggests to me that any responses other than the documented !.U&?CI may >have > >been put there for the software and networking guys' testing purposes. > >I have figured out the confusion. The other codes are for trace, not ping. >Ping just outputs U for most errors, even when the router receives a more >detailed ICMP message. > > > >also, somewhere in the 11.x range, ping was taken from the system >management > >section to the troubleshooting section, for whatever reason. > >It is still in System Management. To find decent documentation on ping you >have to go to: > >Configuration Guides and Command References
RE: Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ [7:11091]
I second!...It's just blocking my mailbox...pls remove. Cheers! -Uche. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11096&t=11091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086]
Also, try the website formerly called Cisco in a Nutshell. http://iponeverything.net/cisco.shtml -dlb ""EA Louie"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > yes. try these sites: > http://www.fatkid.com > http://www.sitamoht.com > > Also, try the Cisco TAC - they provide some small scenarios (2-3 router) and > provide the configurations right there on the web page > http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/index.pl?i=Technologies > > You could also buy the All In One Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide book (ISBN > 0072127600) - it's cost-effective and provides a lot of good practice > scenarios > > -e- > - Original Message - > From: OALZO > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:12 AM > Subject: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086] > > > > Ladies & Gentlemen, > > > > Any other CCIE Lab resources, I checked www.ccbootcamp.com site, but it's > > very expensive. And since I am studying on my own, I cannot afford it. > > > > Please if anyone knows of any other Lab practice resources to let me know. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help. > > OMZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11095&t=11086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086]
yes. try these sites: http://www.fatkid.com http://www.sitamoht.com Also, try the Cisco TAC - they provide some small scenarios (2-3 router) and provide the configurations right there on the web page http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/index.pl?i=Technologies You could also buy the All In One Cisco CCIE Lab Study Guide book (ISBN 0072127600) - it's cost-effective and provides a lot of good practice scenarios -e- - Original Message - From: OALZO To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:12 AM Subject: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086] > Ladies & Gentlemen, > > Any other CCIE Lab resources, I checked www.ccbootcamp.com site, but it's > very expensive. And since I am studying on my own, I cannot afford it. > > Please if anyone knows of any other Lab practice resources to let me know. > > Thanks in advance for your help. > OMZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11094&t=11086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086]
If you are a CCIE candidate (passed the written) your local Cisco office might be able to get you lab scenarios as well as use of their lab. I am pretty sure that is subject to local policy, but ours will. This book has practice labs in it as well. Cisco(r) CCIE(tm) Lab Practice Kit by Michael Satterlee, Stephen Hutnik Paperback - 571 pages Bk&Cd-Rom edition (February 12, 2001) McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing; ISBN: 007212766X -Original Message- From: OALZO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086] Ladies & Gentlemen, Any other CCIE Lab resources, I checked www.ccbootcamp.com site, but it's very expensive. And since I am studying on my own, I cannot afford it. Please if anyone knows of any other Lab practice resources to let me know. Thanks in advance for your help. OMZ Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11093&t=11086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Communication between two subnets [7:10971]
This is a WINS issue. I had a similar experience at my last job, with two servers having the same windows name. Check out the WINS properties (you'll have to look them up as I don't remember them offhand), and see if you get the error "uniqueID". This may be to root of your problem. It could also be that WINS is not resolving accross your link, and you'd need to set up another server. -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11092&t=10971 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not [7:11091]
Does anyone else get this with every single sent message? Can we get it removed it from the list? I've been getting this for over a week now. Allen - Original Message - From: To: "Allen May" Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:27 AM Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address Book > Your message > > Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > > was not delivered to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > because: > > User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address Book Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11091&t=11091 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPSec question [7:10965]
Have you tried no route cache or no mroute cache to see if that could be the problem? I did that on the routers running an IPSec tunnel and I don't have any problems so far. Allen - Original Message - From: "Javier Contreras" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 9:07 AM Subject: Re: IPSec question [7:10965] > Hi! > > Which version of IOS are you using? > There are some bugs reported on fastswitching and/or CEF and IPsec > Try to remove it on all IPsec interfaces (no ip route-cache) > > Regards! > > Vyacheslav Luschinsky wrote: > > > > I have some problem with IPSec. > > When I ping addresses between LANs they reply a few times and then die. To > > make it reply againg I have to clear route cache and after some pings it > > dies againg. > > Anyone had that problem? > -- > --- > Javier Contreras Albesa > Professional Trainer > > PRO IN Training S.L. > PROfessional Information Networks > World Trade Center, Moll de Barcelona S/N > Edif Sur, Planta 4 > > Phone: (+34) 93-5088850 E-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Fax: (+34) 93-5088860 Internet: http://www.proin.com > > SHAPING THE FUTURE - BE PART OF IT! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11090&t=10965 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998]
I think the secondary address could work as a workaround. It would be a way to logically place the server on its own network. I think that any solution of that kind is sort of a kludge, though, (no offence). The design should be fixed. It's screwy to have a server sitting on that link between the two sites. Logically that link between e1 on the local router and e0 on the remote router is really a point-to-point wide-area circuit. It just happens to be Ethernet because the Aironet bridges use Ethernet. Placing a server on that link is like placing a server on a WAN link, if that were possible. I agree that the best solution is to segment off that "WAN" LAN link between the sites. It should be a point-to-point link with no servers. You could add a router, but it would be cheaper to just move that server, wouldn't it? If I have jumped to incorrect conclusions (based on very little data about your actual network), I apologize. Still recovering from Independence Day! ;-) Thanks for bringing this interesting scenario to our attention. Please keep us posted on the solution you decide on. Priscilla At 11:06 AM 7/5/01, KM Reynolds wrote: >Exactly, the server is on the ethernet where the bridge is. The router at >the remote side does have another ethernet(e1) interface, but it is being >used, and any device connected to this e1, I am able to ping, via the ISDN >backup link, when I disconnect the wireless. > >If this e1 was not being used I would have plugged the remote bridge to e1 >and segment the wireless bridges. > >So, it surely looks like I need to add a router to segment the wireless >bridges. Or I wonder, I can place a secondary IP address on the remote >router, and segment the wireless bridges that way, this way traffic would >get to the remote bridge, go to the remote router on the secondary ip, >then route/arp to the server. This may work, what do you think? I know >adding a secondary address is to be avoided and to be used for only for >temporary situations. > >I am now very curious, on ways to get this to work. However, in the end, >for scalability, support and simplicity, I think adding a router or >another ethernet interface to the remote router and segment the bridges is >the way to proceed. > >I hope the secondary IP part makes sense. > >KM > > >>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >>To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:00:58 -0700 >> >>Well, the parade is over, and now I'm _really_ tired, but, I got to >>wondering again. What problem are you trying to solve? Why doesn't the >>EIGRP route go away anyway, even though e1 is still up. The local router >>should stop hearing EIGRP hellos from the remote router if the wireless >>link between them is down. Convergence might not be fast (three hellos must >>fail) but it should still work. >> >>You do have a router at the remote side too, don't you? Is it running EIGRP? >> >>Oh, I get it. The server is not on the other side of the router at the >>remote site. It's on a switch on the Ethernet where the bridge is. Can you >>move the server to the other side of the router? >> >>Priscilla >> >>At 08:46 PM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote: >> >>>Oh yes, you all have a holiday. Happy 4TH of July (Everyone). >>>I shall wait to see if any CCIEs reply. If not I think segmenting the >>>wireless bridges is the way to go, I feel bridging is taking a step back. >>> >>>Thanks >>>KM >>> >>> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:12:25 -0700 Sitting here at Starbucks, using wireless, waiting for the 4th of July parade My brain isn't working too well. The latte wore off hours ago. But it occurs to me that Aironet is bridging, as you know. The routed network doesn't know when a bridged network goes down. Could you do this area of the network with all bridging? Could the ISDN link use bridging also, in other words? I know bridging over ISDN is supported. The convergence might be so slow, however, that you could pull the e1 interface in about the same timeframe (if you knew to do it though.) I can't think of any other solution (besides the one you mentioned of adding a router). It's an interesting design question. Maybe one of the CCIEs on the list will answer. Priscilla At 11:35 AM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >Need you help. > >I have a server that is on a remote LAN. To ping the server, the traffic >goes in the local router(gateway) e0, out e1, to a local Aironet wireless >bridge, to the remote Aironet wireless bridge, to a switch, to server. >Works great. > >Currently, there is also a link to the remote site, an ISDN, from the >local >router to a remote router. We would like to use
Re: Weird VPN issue [7:11055]
What's the subnet and gateway on each? Maybe a small typo? I've kicked myself over that before. Maybe the box is out of licenses Allen - Original Message - From: "Yonkerbonk" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:48 AM Subject: Re: Weird VPN issue [7:11055] > If all the users are having problems accessing the > same server, have you checked to see if it's an issue > with that box? > Do a route print and see what routes are set on that > box? Check the arp cache and nbtstat cache. > > --- Mark Smith wrote: > > I am using several PIX units to tunnel between > > locations for where I work. > > The Pix to Pix tunnels works fine. > > I also have users tunneling in from > > home/dialup/remotely however they chose > > to connect. These connections work "almost" fine. > > They all share the same > > issue. They cannot see one NT4 server on the > > internal network. They can't > > map drives to it and they can't even ping the IP > > address. Unfortunately > > there are user files on this box. All other internal > > addresses are > > completely accessible through their external > > connection except this one. I > > called Cisco TAC and they just shrugged their > > shoulders on this one. This > > box is a domain controller, internal DHCP and WINS > > server and has some users > > flat files stored on it (no apps running on it) and > > I have a DFS share > > pointing to a directory it. Don't know if that > > matters any. > > Any ideas as to why I can access the entire > > 172.25.1.0 network except for > > 172.25.1.21? > > > > Thanks. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11088&t=11055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Check out this CCO link [7:11029]
Hey, thanks! -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11087&t=11029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Practice Labs [7:11086]
Ladies & Gentlemen, Any other CCIE Lab resources, I checked www.ccbootcamp.com site, but it's very expensive. And since I am studying on my own, I cannot afford it. Please if anyone knows of any other Lab practice resources to let me know. Thanks in advance for your help. OMZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11086&t=11086 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070]
If you are running Linux/Unix OS, Free radius is free (www.freeradius.org). If you prefer TACACS over Radius, go to ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com and download tacacs source code. You can even implement S/KEY to work with both TACACS and Radius. Furthermore, both RADIUS and TACACS allow you to "hack" the source to customize the application to meet your need. Run it on either Linux or OpenBSD platforms and you will just love it. I can't understand why anyone would want to pay for these software especially when it is running on winblows platforms. Then again, as someone has said to me earlier "never underestimate the power of network idiots who are to willing to pay for anything as long as it is running on windows". >From: "Simionato, Joao" >Reply-To: "Simionato, Joao" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] >Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:52:54 -0400 > >Do you know about where it's possible to find these softwares for Linux ? > >-Original Message- >From: Harrison, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:12 AM >To: Simionato, Joao; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] > > >checkout www.winsite.com for shareware radius and tacacs+ software for >windows. There is nothing there for kerberos authentication (go figure) ;) > >-Original Message- >From: Simionato, Joao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:59 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] > > >Does anyone know where it's possible to find Radius, Kerberos or TACACS >software for free ? > > > >Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA >Support Trainee Analyst >Worldwide Customer Services - NCR Brazil >* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com >Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and >affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this >e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the >views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. > > > > >Message Posted at: >http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11075&t=11070 >-- >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11085&t=11070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird VPN issue [7:11055]
If all the users are having problems accessing the same server, have you checked to see if it's an issue with that box? Do a route print and see what routes are set on that box? Check the arp cache and nbtstat cache. --- Mark Smith wrote: > I am using several PIX units to tunnel between > locations for where I work. > The Pix to Pix tunnels works fine. > I also have users tunneling in from > home/dialup/remotely however they chose > to connect. These connections work "almost" fine. > They all share the same > issue. They cannot see one NT4 server on the > internal network. They can't > map drives to it and they can't even ping the IP > address. Unfortunately > there are user files on this box. All other internal > addresses are > completely accessible through their external > connection except this one. I > called Cisco TAC and they just shrugged their > shoulders on this one. This > box is a domain controller, internal DHCP and WINS > server and has some users > flat files stored on it (no apps running on it) and > I have a DFS share > pointing to a directory it. Don't know if that > matters any. > Any ideas as to why I can access the entire > 172.25.1.0 network except for > 172.25.1.21? > > Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11084&t=11055 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: O.T. BGP Problems in home lab [7:11041]
Tim, That sounds like an IOS issue. Ive had similar things happen. Try a different flavor of IOS on your 2500s. -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Learning Inc cisco hardware: www.optsys.net ""Tim Ross"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I keep having BGP problems in my home lab. I have mostly 2500's in my home > lab and recently even upgraded to 16DRAM and 16 Flash thinking that would > solve the problem. Most recently I was doing CCBootCamp's Lab-2 and a router > with 16/16 has the error below, then rebooted itself. It will reboot, run a > few minutes, then reboot again. This is on the router that is redistributing > OSPF BGP. I keep have problems when running BGP on various routers and > them rebooting. I am not running "debug" or any other processor intensive > utilities. Any work-arounds or certain IOS versions to avoid? > > SCHED: Stack for process BGP Router running low, 4/3000 > r6# > > Thanks, > Tim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11083&t=11041 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Found a good deal on FLASH memory [7:10744]
Recently I purchased some Flash that was listed as Cisco compatible that actually came from a 5200 box. Still had the IOS on it. This may be a similar situation. > -Original Message- > From: Circusnuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 10:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Found a good deal on FLASH memory [7:10744] > > > Right below the picture it states to be 2500 compatable, but > to be honest... > if the picture is true it's 2500 FLASH. In my previous job I > must have > upgraded a 100 of these boxes over the course of a year. > http://page.auctions.yahoo.com/auction/51497143 All the best !!! Phil - Original Message - From: "Matt Wehland" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 1:14 PM Subject: Re: Found a good deal on FLASH memory [7:10744] > At 11:30 PM 7/2/01 -0400, Circusnuts wrote: > >Prices are low on a lot of the Cisco stuff, but this is good extreme for > 2500 > >FLASH... > > > >http://search.auctions.yahoo.com/search/auc?p=cisco+flash&alocale=0us&acc=u s > > > >Phil > > Are you sure it's 2500 compatible flash? No where on the auction do I see > what models it's for (although I may have missed it). While this would be > a great price for flash for the 2500 series, it seems about right for flash > compatible with other models > > > Matt Wehland [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Computer Network Specialist > MCSE CCNA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11082&t=10744 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
Uche Unfortunately, I mistakenly deleted your posting of the sh isdn stat. But I noticed that layer 1 is up which shows you are connecting to your ISDN switch. I can't recall your layer 2 status but does it show multiple frame established? With the voice-call-failure you might want to enable isdn tei-negotiation first-call and then debug isdn q921 . > yes, Im in Germany.any tips? > -Uche. > ** > The information contained in this message is > confidential and > is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have > received > this message in error or there are any problems > please notify > the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, > disclosure, > copying or alteration of this message is strictly > forbidden. This > message and any attachments have been scanned for > viruses. > Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, > special, indirect or > consequential damages arising from alteration of the > contents > of this message by a third party or as a result of > any virus being > passed on. > > > www.Orbiscom.com > ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11080&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998]
Exactly, the server is on the ethernet where the bridge is. The router at the remote side does have another ethernet(e1) interface, but it is being used, and any device connected to this e1, I am able to ping, via the ISDN backup link, when I disconnect the wireless. If this e1 was not being used I would have plugged the remote bridge to e1 and segment the wireless bridges. So, it surely looks like I need to add a router to segment the wireless bridges. Or I wonder, I can place a secondary IP address on the remote router, and segment the wireless bridges that way, this way traffic would get to the remote bridge, go to the remote router on the secondary ip, then route/arp to the server. This may work, what do you think? I know adding a secondary address is to be avoided and to be used for only for temporary situations. I am now very curious, on ways to get this to work. However, in the end, for scalability, support and simplicity, I think adding a router or another ethernet interface to the remote router and segment the bridges is the way to proceed. I hope the secondary IP part makes sense. KM >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:00:58 -0700 > >Well, the parade is over, and now I'm _really_ tired, but, I got to >wondering again. What problem are you trying to solve? Why doesn't the >EIGRP route go away anyway, even though e1 is still up. The local router >should stop hearing EIGRP hellos from the remote router if the wireless >link between them is down. Convergence might not be fast (three hellos must >fail) but it should still work. > >You do have a router at the remote side too, don't you? Is it running >EIGRP? > >Oh, I get it. The server is not on the other side of the router at the >remote site. It's on a switch on the Ethernet where the bridge is. Can you >move the server to the other side of the router? > >Priscilla > >At 08:46 PM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote: > >>Oh yes, you all have a holiday. Happy 4TH of July (Everyone). >>I shall wait to see if any CCIEs reply. If not I think segmenting the >>wireless bridges is the way to go, I feel bridging is taking a step back. >> >>Thanks >>KM >> >> >>>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer >>>To: "KM Reynolds" ,[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>Subject: Re: Directly connected ethernet interface [7:10998] >>>Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:12:25 -0700 >>> >>>Sitting here at Starbucks, using wireless, waiting for the 4th of July >>>parade My brain isn't working too well. The latte wore off hours ago. >>> >>>But it occurs to me that Aironet is bridging, as you know. The routed >>>network doesn't know when a bridged network goes down. Could you do this >>>area of the network with all bridging? Could the ISDN link use bridging >>>also, in other words? I know bridging over ISDN is supported. >>> >>>The convergence might be so slow, however, that you could pull the e1 >>>interface in about the same timeframe (if you knew to do it though.) >>> >>>I can't think of any other solution (besides the one you mentioned of >>>adding a router). It's an interesting design question. Maybe one of the >>>CCIEs on the list will answer. >>> >>>Priscilla >>> >>>At 11:35 AM 7/4/01, KM Reynolds wrote: Hi Everyone, Need you help. I have a server that is on a remote LAN. To ping the server, the traffic goes in the local router(gateway) e0, out e1, to a local Aironet wireless bridge, to the remote Aironet wireless bridge, to a switch, to server. Works great. Currently, there is also a link to the remote site, an ISDN, from the local router to a remote router. We would like to use this ISDN as a backup to wireless connection. The routers are configured to use EIGRP to route between the wireless, and floating routes are set with higher administrative distance so when the EIGRP disappears out of the routing table the floating routes route via the ISDN. All works, when the ethernet (e1) is shutdown. When I disconnect the wireless at the remote, the ISDN comes up. The problem is, the route to the directly connected ethernet LAN is still in the routing table (C 192.168.30.128 255.255.255.128 is directly connected, Ethernet1). So traffic still flows out of e1, and I guess when it reaches the remote wireless bridge, it is discarded, that where the connection is down. Is there anyway around this, is there a way for the e1 to detect the path is down or is my only option to place a router and segment the wireless bridge link. Any help would be great. Thanks KM _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. >>> >>> >>>Priscilla Oppenheimer >>>http:/
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
Watch out for low flying planes !!! and dem pesky U'boats. --- Uche Ishionwu wrote: > yes, Im in Germany.any tips? > -Uche. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11079&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP switching and HSRP [7:11078]
I am preparing for CCNP Switching using Lammle and Cisco Press books. Both books dedicate a full chapter to HSRP configuration. This topic is not on the objectives for the CCNP swithcing exam listed on Cisco's site( http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam s/640-504.html) . Was it on a previous exam but not anymore ? Anyone know if its on the current exam? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11078&t=11078 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sh controller fas 0/1 output ? [7:11077]
Hi group, I have a 2621 Router and an AUI/Fibre converter on the Fa 0/1 interface. Users are experiencing problems at the remote end of the fibre link (a 1900 switch). I have checked all ports and interfaces and nothing obvious is showing up. All ports are 1/2 duplex including the uplink (fibre port) which I am about to change soon to full duplex. (I've only just started here !!!) No errors show up on 'sh int fas0/1' but the following appears on the 'sh controller fas0/1' It doesn't look healthy to me, can anyone confirm this output ? rx_framing_err=0, rx_overflow_err=0, rx_buffer_err=0 rx_bpe_err=0, rx_soft_overflow_err=0, rx_no_enp=0, rx_discard=0 tx_one_col_err=1803830, tx_more_col_err=2144704, tx_no_enp=0, tx_deferred_err=3 802838 Any help appreciated, Phil. Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11077&t=11077 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070]
checkout www.winsite.com for shareware radius and tacacs+ software for windows. There is nothing there for kerberos authentication (go figure) ;) -Original Message- From: Simionato, Joao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] Does anyone know where it's possible to find Radius, Kerberos or TACACS software for free ? Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA Support Trainee Analyst Worldwide Customer Services - NCR Brazil * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11073&t=11070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
tried changing the Isdn switch type, then got this message:---> 08:34:32: No dialer db, manual isdn call can't dial out So, it cant be that i guess. Anyhow, the service provider is Deutsche Telekomm ,so i guess they MUST already support it already I suppose! Thanx alot for the hintand keep theideas commingI'll appreciate that. :-) thx -Uche. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11074&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
HELP!, Now I'm ONLY getting this error message---> 08:34:32: No dialer db, manual isdn call can't dial out Whats wrong???I'm at my witts end! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11076&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070]
Do you know about where it's possible to find these softwares for Linux ? -Original Message- From: Harrison, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:12 AM To: Simionato, Joao; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] checkout www.winsite.com for shareware radius and tacacs+ software for windows. There is nothing there for kerberos authentication (go figure) ;) -Original Message- From: Simionato, Joao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070] Does anyone know where it's possible to find Radius, Kerberos or TACACS software for free ? Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA Support Trainee Analyst Worldwide Customer Services - NCR Brazil * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., and its subsidiary and affiliate companies are not responsible for errors or omissions in this e-mail message. Any personal comments made in this e-mail do not reflect the views of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11075&t=11070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about IGMP queries and reports [7:11062]
I don't think the router needs to be configured to be in any multicast group in order to process the membership report. A router is registered for a multicast group if it receives a membership report for that multicast group. These membership reports can be unsolicited or in response to membership query. In IGMP v1, a router will periodically multicast a membership query with the GDA set to 0.0.0.0. A host from all active multicast groups will send a report in response to the query. In version 2, a router can direct the membership query to a specific group, by setting the GDA to the group's address. The router uses membership reports to maintain its multicast table. Groups are added to the table (or refreshed) when membership reports are received, and existing groups are removed from the table, if no membership reports are received for that group. CM -Original Message- From: R.Srikanth To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05/07/01 14:39 Subject: Question about IGMP queries and reports [7:11062] Hi, I have a question about IGMP queries and reports. 1. When an IGMP querier router sends a query, this packet is sent to 224.0.0.1 address (01-00-5e-00-00-01) to which all multicast capable hosts listen. 2. When a host sends a membership report (either in reponse to the query, or an unsolicited report ) for the group in which it is a member ( say 224.1.1.1), the report is sent to the 224.1.1.1 address. This is the address specified in the 'Group address' field of the IGMP report message, as well as the destination IP address of the IP packet carrying this report. The Ethernet frame that encapsulates this packet would carry the destination Layer-2 multicast address of 01-00-5e-01-01-01. This method ensures report suppression by other hosts which are members of the same group, as they will listen to this address and suppress their reports. The querying router has to pick this frame and look into the IGMP report to know that the host is or wants to be a member of 224.1.1.1 group. Does it mean that router is also a member of this group inorder to pick this frame and process the report message ? If another host is a member of a different group 224.1.1.2 and sends report to this address, should the router listen to this address also to process the reports for this group ? How will the router to know what groups it should listen to, so that it can process the report messages to find out what groups are active ? What method does the router use, if this is not the correct one ? Thanks, Srikanth. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11072&t=11062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
According to 'sh isdn status' you are good at layers 1 and 2. Try a debug ppp and try the dialup again. Post the results if you can. Regards, Phil. --- Damien Kelly wrote: > Might want to change you ISDN switch type? > basic-1tr6 > BRI isdn switch for Germany. I know basic-net3 is > EuroISDN standard but > your provider may not support it yet > > Just a suggestion. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Uche Ishionwu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: My BRI interface will not respond! > [7:11045] > > > yes, Im in Germany.any tips? > -Uche. > ** > The information contained in this message is > confidential and > is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have > received > this message in error or there are any problems > please notify > the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, > disclosure, > copying or alteration of this message is strictly > forbidden. This > message and any attachments have been scanned for > viruses. > Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, > special, indirect or > consequential damages arising from alteration of the > contents > of this message by a third party or as a result of > any virus being > passed on. > > > www.Orbiscom.com > ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11071&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Selling CHEAP..Networkers Registration for Chicago (7/16/01) [7:11069]
If anyone is interested in going to Cisco Networkers (Chicago 7/16-7/20), please let me know immediately. I'm sure there are companies out there sending a bunch of engineers...I can help provide a discount. Unfortunately I can not go. I have 2 passes that I can sell at substantially less than the early registration. Please let me know ASAP as the conference is less than 2 weeks away. Rob -Original Message- From: Riisen, Robert (1128) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Transfer Networkers Registration for Chicago (7/16/01) at [7: 10862] Potential Networkers2001 Attendees: I can not go due to some unfortunate circumstances. I would like to transfer my Cisco Networkers Full Access Pass to some lucky buyer out there. Anyone interested in attending the July 16 - 20th Networkers in Chicago, I will sell my pass for A DISCOUNT BELOW the early registration price of US$1595 - a savings of US$400 off the full On-site registration fee of US$1995. We can setup a conference call to transfer the registration. Let me know if anyone is interested. Rob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11069&t=11069 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Radius, Kerberos and TACACS for free [7:11070]
Does anyone know where it's possible to find Radius, Kerberos or TACACS software for free ? Joco Paulo Simionato, CCNA Support Trainee Analyst Worldwide Customer Services - NCR Brazil * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit our web-site : www.ncr.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11070&t=11070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045]
Might want to change you ISDN switch type? basic-1tr6 BRI isdn switch for Germany. I know basic-net3 is EuroISDN standard but your provider may not support it yet Just a suggestion. -Original Message- From: Uche Ishionwu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: My BRI interface will not respond! [7:11045] yes, Im in Germany.any tips? -Uche. ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Orbiscom Ltd. will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on. www.Orbiscom.com ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11068&t=11045 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How can I Upgrade MIB in the routers ? [7:11056]
If you look at new features for various IOS versions on CCO, you will see what new MIBs are included. HTH Dom Stocqueler "rudhy stiyawan" cc: Sent by: Subject: How can I Upgrade MIB in the routers ? [7:11056] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/07/2001 14:14 Please respond to "rudhy stiyawan" Hi all, Does anybody know how to upgrade MIB in the routers ? When we do upgrade the IOS version, does the upgrading process include MIB ugrade ? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11064&t=11056 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question about IGMP queries and reports [7:11062]
Hi, I have a question about IGMP queries and reports. 1. When an IGMP querier router sends a query, this packet is sent to 224.0.0.1 address (01-00-5e-00-00-01) to which all multicast capable hosts listen. 2. When a host sends a membership report (either in reponse to the query, or an unsolicited report ) for the group in which it is a member ( say 224.1.1.1), the report is sent to the 224.1.1.1 address. This is the address specified in the 'Group address' field of the IGMP report message, as well as the destination IP address of the IP packet carrying this report. The Ethernet frame that encapsulates this packet would carry the destination Layer-2 multicast address of 01-00-5e-01-01-01. This method ensures report suppression by other hosts which are members of the same group, as they will listen to this address and suppress their reports. The querying router has to pick this frame and look into the IGMP report to know that the host is or wants to be a member of 224.1.1.1 group. Does it mean that router is also a member of this group inorder to pick this frame and process the report message ? If another host is a member of a different group 224.1.1.2 and sends report to this address, should the router listen to this address also to process the reports for this group ? How will the router to know what groups it should listen to, so that it can process the report messages to find out what groups are active ? What method does the router use, if this is not the correct one ? Thanks, Srikanth. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11062&t=11062 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To recognize a Routers FLash Card by a Laptop [7:11063]
Hi, Does anyone know of where can I find the software that allows my laptop to recognize a Flash Card of a Cisco Router. I appreciate the help, OMZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11063&t=11063 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ping replies [7:10910]
Priscilla, Actually, I have seen an H. The other day we were testing connectivity to a new site in Germany. The connection leaves our network via a router that's at our site and owned by another company. It traverses this other network and then arrives at the site in Germany at a router, again owned by this other company, connected to the LAN we are interested in. We were testing connectivity and when I did a ping to a server on the LAN in Germany I got back H's as a reply. I had never seen this and looked it up it in my Exam Cram Support book that was within easy reach on my bookshelf. It had no mention of an H as a result for a ping. I mentioned to a colleague that this was interesting. Had anyone ever seen this? Nobody seemed to have any knowledge of this when getting a response from a ping. Before I could mention this response to the company who's network we were traversing they sent an e-mail stating that the connectivity had been established and we should have no issues connecting. Sure enough, the next ping was successful. I was to busy the rest of the day to pursue it further and had forgotten about it until I saw your post. Unfortunately, I will never know what caused that response as contacting the other company about this would be futile. -- James Haynes Network Architect Cendant IT A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP, CQS-SNA/IP ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > As we all know, ping is really an ICMP echo. There are many possible ICMP > replies. Now, Cisco could tell the user of the Cisco IOS ping command the > actual reply received, but instead they output a character code. (Wouldn't > want to make the product intuitive, now would we?) I'm trying to get more > data on the character codes. > > This is not a newbie question. Don't send me the chart of ping reply codes. > I've already seen about 20 versions of the chart. I'm trying to figure out > what routers really display and why there are so many versions of the > chart. Putting together all versions of the chart (plus the A code that we > have all seen but is not listed in Cisco documentation, as far as I can > tell), I have developed this list: > > ! An ICMP echo reply was received. > . The sending router or switch timed out while waiting for a reply. > U A destination unreachable response was received. > N A network unreachable response was received. > H A host unreachable response was received. > P A protocol unreachable response was received. > M Fragmentation was needed and the don't fragment (DF) bit was set. > & A time-to-live exceeded message was received. > I The user interrupted the test. > A The ping was administratively prohibited (blocked by an access list > probably). > Q A source quench response was received. > ? An unknown packet was received. > C A packet was received with the congestion-experienced bit set.** > > Questions: > > Has anyone ever seen N, H, or P? It seems to me that Cisco just outputs U > if the router receives network, host, or protocol unreachable. > > Has anyone ever seen M? I couldn't get this to happen in my lab. Is M even > for real or was that an error in one of the versions of the documentation? > > Has anyone every seen &? I couldn't get that one to happen either. > > How about I? That doesn't happen on my routers. Plus one version of the > documentation said it was |, not I. > > And how about the mysterious C? I found out that it's related to RFC 2481, > an experimental protocol that adds explicit congestion notification to IP. > Maybe some internal developer asked for this. Cisco clearly favors helping > developers troubleshoot over helping customers troubleshoot. (Sorry, but > this ping research has made me angry at Cisco.) > > Thanks for your help. > > Priscilla > > > > > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11058&t=10910 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what exactly is "raw" telnet and "binary" telnet anyway? [7:11057]
Cisco terminal server materials refer to various high TCP ports to access various lines on the terminal server. For example, on a port 2000+x is the port to use for standard reverse telnet, where x is the line number, and 3000+x is the port to use to do reverse telnet to a rotary. But then there is another set of ports for "raw" telnet and "binary" telnet. Exactly what is raw telnet and binary telnet, and how do they differ from normal telnet? And when would you ever want to use these telnets as opposed to the normal telnet? Thanx for all replies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11057&t=11057 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
