Test [7:13936]

2001-07-27 Thread cisco-commando boy

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13936t=13936
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Token Ring Maus [7:13937]

2001-07-27 Thread cisco-commando boy

Hi all,

not sure if i should be posting this here, but im after token ring maus, 
(rj45) and media filters (for the old db9 plugs),

any one have any for sale (in the UK), but will consider overseas.

thanks in advance guys.


-Cisco Commando.

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13937t=13937
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13862]

2001-07-27 Thread Ajit Mohanraj

Multipoint frame-relay interfaces are by default Non Broadcast in nature -
as a result you will not be able to ping your own interface. Add a seperate
map statement for your own interface and things will be fine !!


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13935t=13862
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Backup for an RSP2 module (R4700) ? [7:13939]

2001-07-27 Thread Phil Barker

Hi Group,
If you wished to give backup to a RSP2 (R4700)
module what would be the equivalent external Router
and what would be the Processor speed ?

Regards,

Phil.


Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13939t=13939
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CFR's [7:13903]

2001-07-27 Thread Stephen Skinner

What the Hell?

CISCO...

From: hal9001 
Reply-To: hal9001 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CFR's [7:13903]
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:27:16 -0400

Hi Janice,

Do you want this order in the US or Great Britain where you message has 
been
directed to.  I'm open to offers!

Karl
- Original Message -
From: Wheeler, Janice
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:41 PM
Subject: CFR's [7:13903]


  Hi Kelly,
 
   I need to order 100 construction standards books. I will need them by
July
  31, 2001.
   Can you check to see if your company still uses UPS. They have a 3 day
  delivery service
   which will reduce my shipping cost. The last order cost me $700. Let me
  know.
 
 
Janice
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13938t=13903
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13941]

2001-07-27 Thread dovelet

Hi all,

I have a question and I hope someone can help me. As I know, Cisco router
support several switching method, e.g. process switching, fast switching
etc. In some document, it state that fast switching is when the 1st packet
goes into a router, it will go through the routing process, the other
packets with the same source and destination address will go through the
switching process. As I know, the layer 3 switching router is doing the same
job. Then, what is the different between a layer3 switching router and a
router in fast switching?

Regards,
dovelet




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13941t=13941
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The WSJ listed Extreme and Foundry as companys that had turned the corner
and were weathering this downturn nicely. My guess is both will be around.

Of course who knows.


   

   
John
Hardman To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Catalyst 6509 vs
BlackDiamond [7:13837]
Sent
by:
   
nobody@groups
   
tudy.com
   

   

   
07/27/2001
12:21
AM
   
Please
respond
to
   
John
   
Hardman
   

   





Hi

You have a point there, but I will bet Foundry will be, not too sure about
Extreme. Foundry just reported their 10th straight profitable quarter.

--
John Hardman CCNP MCSE


Perry J. Lucas  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 The big question is will Extreme and Foundry be around next year?

 Perry J. Lucas


 -Original Message-
 From: John Hardman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:18 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Catalyst 6509 vs BlackDiamond [7:13837]

 Hi

 It's true. It's also true that in similar tests with a Foundry will also
 out
 perform a Cat. But keep in mind that a lot of this works out to be FUD.
 Sales people from each company will have various reasons why you should
 choose their product over the other. The bottom line is that you have to
 choose which is right for your company based on it's business and
 technical
 needs.

 Both Extreme and Foundry are making a strong push into Cisco's
 enterprise
 switch market share. Their products are very competitive, especially at
 the
 price point. If I could get switches with Foundry's architecture,
 Extreme's
 network management software and CLI, and Cisco's end to end solutions, I
 would be a very happy engineer!

 $0.02
 --
 John Hardman CCNP MCSE


 mishaal  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  How true is this?
  Can anyone throw some light on this report from www.zdlabs.com, 70-80%
  packet loss is rather substantial..hope it's not true!
  thanks
 
  From ZDLAbs :
 
   In Layer 2 mode, the Black Diamond and Alpine switches forwarded
 100%
  of the traffic offered during the test
  without dropping a single packet. This resulted in a throughput of
 57.1
  million packets/second for the Black
  Diamond and over 38 million packets/second for the Alpine using
 64-byte
  packets. These results represent
  the maximum throughput possible, given the port configurations of the
  switches.
  The Cisco Catalyst 6509 lost over 78% of the packets offered during
 the
  Layer 2 full mesh test at the 64-byte
  packet size. According to the Catalyst 6509 documentation, the 6509
  switch fabric is capable of forwarding
  15 million packets/second. This rate is substantially less than the
 57.1
  million packets/second offered during
  our test, which explains the large packet loss.
 
  'The Black Diamond and Alpine switches successfully routed 100% of the
  packets offered (over 5.7 billion
  64-byte packets) during the test without dropping a single packet.
 This
  results in a Layer 3 throughput of
  over 95.2 million packets/second for the Black Diamond and over 47.6
  million packets/second for the
  Alpine with 64-byte packets.
  The Layer 3 full mesh results for the Cisco Catalyst 6509 were very
  similar to the Layer 2 results. The
  switch dropped a large number of packets at all block sizes (86.86%
 with
  64-byte packets). As in the
  previous tests with Catalyst 6509 we verified that the internal switch
  counters matched the results from
  the SmartFlow application and that there were no packet errors during
  the test.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13942t=13837
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]

2001-07-27 Thread Ahmed Mamoor Amimi

for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make a
connection with only encapsulation ppp

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13944t=13944
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NCP never comes UP [7:13945]

2001-07-27 Thread Ahmed Mamoor Amimi

Hi,
I have posted earlier about the DDR link...
My routers dials each other and LCP and IPCP comes up but not the NCP, and
encapsulation is failing when i try to ping.

any help

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13945t=13945
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NCP never comes UP [7:13945]

2001-07-27 Thread Scott Rolf

Encapsulation failing is usually layer2 to layer3 mapping problem.  Wanna
share a bit more about your DDR config?


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13946t=13945
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



some definations are required? [7:13947]

2001-07-27 Thread a. ahmad

what is the exact working of CSU/DSU?
what is the purpose of serial interfaces?
what is Bert?
what is the difference b/w CRC4  CRC16.
what is the working principal of NET2Phone.

thanks
ahmad


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13947t=13947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switchin [7:13941]

2001-07-27 Thread C King

Fast switching requires that each L2 frame be sent from the host, through
the L2 switch, and then inbound on the routers' interface (where it then
gets switched to the outbound interface - usually another VLAN in the same
L2 switch).  Every frame is sent to the router, rewritten, and then forwarded.

L3 switching allows the switch to do the work.  The router (usually a RSM
blade in a Catalyst) and switch to communicate as a team (MLS).  The first
frame is sent to the switch, then the router/RSM (where it gets routed to
another local VLAN), and then out the switch to the destination.  Each
subsequent frame is L3 switched by the switch from it's MLS cache (going
directly from the source's switch port to the destination's switch port,
with the frame being rewritten as if it had been processed by the router),
bypassing the router altogether.  Hence L3 switching is much faster
(wire-speed).

Hope this helps.

CK


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13948t=13941
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



DHCP and cisco catalyst [7:13949]

2001-07-27 Thread Andre Iswanto

I configured 4 VLAN on my catalyst 4000, 100 is Management's VLAN, 2,3,4 are
user's VLAN. Every user VLAN will receive ip address and gateway address
from DHCP server. But I have a problem with user use NT workstation, they
receive ip address but couldn't receive gateway address. This is working
fine on Windows 9x. I have tried to check on microsoft website, they have
explained this thing happen on NT and how to solve it is put the NT on same
subnet as DHCP server.
I was wondering any other way to solve this problem instead of put NT on
same subnet as DHCP server, anything to do with configuration on Catalyst
4000 ?

Best Regards,

Andre Iswanto.



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13949t=13949
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A (PC)

what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1
day.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13950t=13950
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Michael Wang

Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.

Regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13951t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote:
 
 Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.
 
 Regards
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13952t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Zahid Hassan

Hi,

I wouldn't rate it good.
Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics
but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover
the materials in the exam.
All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially
Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

Good luck.

Zahid






xie rootstock  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang wrote:
 
  Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.
 
  Regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13953t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



BSCI [7:13956]

2001-07-27 Thread Steven Crawford

Has anyone tried the Beta yet?



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13956t=13956
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: some definations are required? [7:13947]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How long is a piece of string?

I think a quick search of CCO, or Google, or any number of books available
on the subjects might help




   

a.
ahmad

cc:
Sent by: Subject: some definations are
required? [7:13947]
   
nobody@groups
   
tudy.com
   

   

   
07/27/2001
10:21
AM
   
Please
respond
to
a.
ahmad
   

   





what is the exact working of CSU/DSU?
what is the purpose of serial interfaces?
what is Bert?
what is the difference b/w CRC4  CRC16.
what is the working principal of NET2Phone.

thanks
ahmad




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13954t=13947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Michael Wang

Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests.
Where I can get the best?

Regards
Zahid Hassan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I wouldn't rate it good.
 Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics
 but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover
 the materials in the exam.
 All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially
 Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

 Good luck.

 Zahid






 xie rootstock  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang
wrote:
  
   Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.
  
   Regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13955t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: some definations are required? [7:13947]

2001-07-27 Thread Daniel Cotts

Normally I would just hit the delete key. Being a Networker implies the
ability to solve problems. That often entails searching for information. You
show no indication that you made the slightest effort to answer your
questions. Why should we?
Try www.cisco.com, www.itprc.com, www.google.com
Yes, it may take days of searching. You will be the stronger and better for
it. Good luck in your studies.

 -Original Message-
 From: a. ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:22 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: some definations are required? [7:13947]
 
 
 what is the exact working of CSU/DSU?
 what is the purpose of serial interfaces?
 what is Bert?
 what is the difference b/w CRC4  CRC16.
 what is the working principal of NET2Phone.
 
 thanks
 ahmad
 Report misconduct 
 and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13960t=13947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13962]

2001-07-27 Thread Stephen Skinner

Hi,

what you said is almost correct ...

Proccess/Fast/Distributed/Packet switching are all layer 2 functions..

From the CCO

Fast switching allows higher throughput by switching a packet using a cache 
created by the initial packet sent to a particular destination.
this is all done at layer 2

Destination addresses are stored in the high-speed (switching)cache to 
expedite forwarding. Routers offer better packet-transfer performance when 
fast switching is enabled. Fast switching is enabled by default on all 
interfaces that support fast switching.

layer 3 switching differs from this by having the first packet sent to the 
router (which routes the packet to the correct outgoing port ..this is a 
more efficent way of finding destinations than switching ,...switching 
envolves looking at a  singular table or flooding -leaveing out CEF on 
purpose-)
it then stores this info in the cache and all following/Same destination 
packets are switched using info in the cache...

i have read somewhere that is 4-9 times faster to switch a packet than to 
route one so this gives us an increase in throughput via intelligent 
switching-my own term

please don`t quote me on the 4-9 times bit ...but it IS defenatly faster to 
switch ..

HTH

steve
From: dovelet 
Reply-To: dovelet 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switching [7:13941]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 06:08:46 -0400

Hi all,

I have a question and I hope someone can help me. As I know, Cisco router
support several switching method, e.g. process switching, fast switching
etc. In some document, it state that fast switching is when the 1st packet
goes into a router, it will go through the routing process, the other
packets with the same source and destination address will go through the
switching process. As I know, the layer 3 switching router is doing the 
same
job. Then, what is the different between a layer3 switching router and a
router in fast switching?

Regards,
dovelet
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13962t=13962
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13961]

2001-07-27 Thread Stephen Skinner

boot into rommon mode and check conf register`s 0x2102...

CTRL+BRK within 60 seconds of router booting up

looks like it`s set wrong
Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error,

From: xie rootstock 
Reply-To: xie rootstock 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:12:53 -0400

System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A 
(PC)

what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1
day.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13961t=13961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: some definations are required? [7:13947]

2001-07-27 Thread Feargal Ledwidge

what is the exact working of CSU/DSU?

Modem on Steroids

what is the purpose of serial interfaces?

to provide an interface for Serialised data transfer

what is Bert?

Ernies Roommate (from Sesame Street)

what is the difference b/w CRC4  CRC16.

12

what is the working principal of NET2Phone.

Don't you mean principle ? If so, VoIP with softphones.


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13964t=13947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13970]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Manish Gusain  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was TC [7:13337] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Manish Gusain  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was TC [7:13337] en het werd verstuurd op

Un message venant de Manish Gusain  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait TC [7:13337] et il a ete envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995887904.17324.2031.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13970t=13970
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13974]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from brenda kerr  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van brenda kerr  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] en het werd verstuurd op

Un message venant de brenda kerr  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait SCHOLARSHIP [7:13491] et il a ete envoye
le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995978824.24458.2027.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13974t=13974
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]

2001-07-27 Thread Makarand Yerawadekar

Hi,

You may want to take a look at --

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html

Please watch the line wrap.



Matt Goodhue wrote:

 Hello,

 We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place.  Does anyone have
a
 link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together?  \

 We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb.
 Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed.  I did searches at Cisco
on
 bonding, but could not come up with anything.

 Thank you.
 Matt Goodhue




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13963t=13914
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread John Neiberger

When I first read through the guide I thought it was not in-depth enough
but it seemed to cover most of the topics.  After taking the exam, I
would judge the book a little better.  You still need to read of *lot*
of other material, but this book would be a good supplement to your
studies.

Regards,
John

 Michael Wang  7/27/01 9:27:27 AM 
Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.

Regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13959t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]

2001-07-27 Thread Bob Johnson

(I'm resending due to the trouble the list server had yesterday)

Check out bug id# CSCdm69595
There are several others but they don't show up on CCO (Cisco keeps some
bugs private)
Essentially hw compression mungs up multicast data on 2600/3600 serial
interfaces. They say it was fixed in latter releases of 12.07 so you may
want to try one of the 12.1 images...
A few other multicast issues I've learned the hard way...

Early versions of the 2621 router will not pass multicast traffic through
the on board ethernet interfaces (Bug ID CSCdm38511 ) Only fix is a router
swap. My office looked like a warehouse for a while we were shipping so many
2621s back to Cisco

Multicast fast switching (ip mroute-cache) doesn not yet work with hardware
compression (Bug ID CSCdt82560) This has not been fixed as of 12.2x. So if
you are tring to save CPU by hardware compressing the multicast data you
lose CPU by not being able to fast switch.

I recall at least one 30 hour marathon with TAC hopping from various TAC
centers worldwide. As far as I recall the 2621 hardware issue was already
known at Cisco but the problem with hardware compression (both the munging
of data and the fast switching issue) were only discovered when a customer
(unfortunately me) tried to do it.


Bob 

 -Original Message-
 From: Simon Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 2:36 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
 
 
 Hi Bob
 
 The IOS version on all the routers are 12.0(7)XK1
 
 Simon
 
 
 From: Bob Johnson 
 Reply-To: Bob Johnson 
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:36:30 -0400
 
 In my previous reply I'm refering to the (as far as I 
 know..) the OSPF
 multicast messages being mucked up...
 
 Bob (still trying to find the bug ID)
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 10:01 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
  
  
   Most likely the hardware compression is mucking up the
   multicast traffic...
   I've had many many issues with hardware compression and
   multicast (got to
   know TAC people all across the world).. I'll try to dig up
   the bug ID.
  
   What image are you using?
  
   Bob
  
  
-Original Message-
From: Simon Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problems with AIM compression on 3660/2600 [7:13742]
   
   
Hi Guys I have just installed a 3660 and 7 2600's (the 2600's
connected
to the 3660with 256k WAN links via 2 quad serial cards on
   3660). ospf
configured(all routers on area 0), I have just changed the
   compression
from software to hardware to ultilize the AIM modules
installed in both
the 3660  2600's( I set up PPP Encapsulation from HDLC  on
all routers,
and configured compress stac caim 0 on 2600's  compress stac
caim 0-3 on
3660) However as soon I made the change I was receiving the
   OSPF error
message: SPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: Bad 
 Checksum from
10.100.6.1, Serial0/0
Jul 25 03:27:15: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet:
   Bad Checksum
from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0
Jul 25 03:27:21: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet:
   Bad Checksum
from 10.100.6.1, Serial0/0 This was happening on all the
   2600's, OSPF
routes were being lost, on when I reverted to software
   compression the
problem subsided. Has anyone seen this problem before.Pls let
me know Rgrds
Simon.
   
--
--
   
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
 http://explorer.msn.com
 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at 
 http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13965t=13742
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13975]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from David Blair  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van David Blair  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] en het werd
verstuurd op

Un message venant de David Blair  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13334] et il a ete
envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995885978.14988.2067.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13975t=13975
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13980]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Eugene Kushnirskiy 
Deepak Sharma  has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The
subject was Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443]
Jayni's buss [7:13443] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Eugene Kushnirskiy 
Deepak Sharma  was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het
onderwerp was Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443]
Jayni's buss [7:13443] en het werd verstuurd op 

Un message venant de Eugene Kushnirskiy 
Deepak Sharma  a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le
sujet etait Re: Jayni's buss [7:13443]
Jayni's buss [7:13443] et il a ete envoye le 




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995952189.23925.2279.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13980t=13980
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



NSC_0152 [7:13982]

2001-07-27 Thread

Hi! How are you?

I send you this file in order to have your advice

See you later. Thanks

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed which had a
name of NSC_0152.xls.lnk]

[GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a content-type header]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13982t=13982
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13973]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Michael Snyder  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was Re: monthly satement [7:13183] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Michael Snyder  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Re: monthly satement [7:13183] en het werd
verstuurd op

Un message venant de Michael Snyder  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Re: monthly satement [7:13183] et il a
ete envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995841601.7426.2179.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13973t=13973
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:13961]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

I did, I was able to in  , then I set 0x2142 and 2102, the problem still
appeared.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13981t=13961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13983]

2001-07-27 Thread Farhan Ahmed

may be, this problem occurs  if you have just replaced your system EPROMs.

 1 Power down the system.

 2 Inspect each EPROM. Make sure each EPROM is correctly positioned in the
socket (with notches properly aligned) in the correct socket.

 3 If a pin is bent, straighten it carefully. Reinstall the EPROM and power
up the system. If a pin breaks off, the EPROM must be replaced.

 4 If an EPROM has been installed backward and power has been applied to it,
the EPROM has been damaged and must be replaced.

Best Regards

Have A Good Day!!

Farhan Ahmed
  MCSE+I, MCP Win2k, CCDA, CCNA, CSE, CCNA
Network Engineer
Mideast Data Systems Abudhabi Uae.




Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
Attachments hereto.  Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.  Opinions,
Conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
Official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
Endorsed by it.


 -Original Message-
 From: xie rootstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 7:13 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950]
 
 
 System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
 Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
 Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C 
 at 0x101772A (PC)
 
 what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router 
 for only 1
 day.

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of Farhan Ahmed.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13983t=13983
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Question about fast switching and layer 3 switchin [7:13984]

2001-07-27 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer

The original question was the difference between fast switching and L3 
switching.

The term L3 switching gets used in a variety of ways, but using the 
definition described by CK, think of L3 switching as the next-generation of 
fast-switching. Historically, that would be an accurate description of 
development at Cisco. Conceptually L3 switching and fast switching are 
similar. The new MLS RSM L3 technology was developed by Cisco based on 
technology already in use for fast switching. Fast switching happens in the 
router. With MLS, the switching job is distributed and the RSM takes over 
some of the work.

Priscilla

At 10:54 AM 7/27/01, C King wrote:
Fast switching requires that each L2 frame be sent from the host, through
the L2 switch, and then inbound on the routers' interface (where it then
gets switched to the outbound interface - usually another VLAN in the same
L2 switch).  Every frame is sent to the router, rewritten, and then
forwarded.

L3 switching allows the switch to do the work.  The router (usually a RSM
blade in a Catalyst) and switch to communicate as a team (MLS).  The first
frame is sent to the switch, then the router/RSM (where it gets routed to
another local VLAN), and then out the switch to the destination.  Each
subsequent frame is L3 switched by the switch from it's MLS cache (going
directly from the source's switch port to the destination's switch port,
with the frame being rewritten as if it had been processed by the router),
bypassing the router altogether.  Hence L3 switching is much faster
(wire-speed).

Hope this helps.

CK


Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13984t=13984
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]

2001-07-27 Thread John Neiberger

Yes, you can connect using PPP without authentication, which makes
perfect sense if you're using it for point-to-point dedicated links. 
For DDR, do you want just anyone to be able to dial in and connect to
your network?  Nope!  So, for DDR, why not use the authentication?  CHAP
is pretty effective for basic authentication in DDR networks.

Regards,
John

 Ahmed Mamoor Amimi  7/27/01 4:45:49 AM 
for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make
a
connection with only encapsulation ppp

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13986t=13944
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Test [7:13936]

2001-07-27 Thread Allen May

Fail.

;)
- Original Message -
From: cisco-commando boy 
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:19 AM
Subject: Test [7:13936]


 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13985t=13936
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13978]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Ole Drews Jensen 
William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of has been
detected as infected by the sircam virus. The subject was RE: Phil [7:13761]
RE: Phil [7:13761]
Phil [7:13761] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Ole Drews Jensen 
William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of was
geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus. Het onderwerp was RE: Phil
[7:13761]
RE: Phil [7:13761]
Phil [7:13761] en het werd verstuurd op 

Un message venant de Ole Drews Jensen 
William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of a ete
identifie comme etant infecte par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait RE: Phil
[7:13761]
RE: Phil [7:13761]
Phil [7:13761] et il a ete envoye le 




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996081724.14539.3288.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13978t=13978
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Any Information on CID 3.0 [7:13987]

2001-07-27 Thread Siggi

Hi group,

Is there anyone who already attend the CID 3.0 exam, to reach the CCDP?
Please share to me your knowledge/experience regarding that exam. I want
to
take the test next month.

THX,

Siggi

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Siegfried.Scheld.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13987t=13987
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NCP never comes UP [7:13945]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is generally an issue with layer 3 address negotiation. Turn on debug
ppp negotiation to see what's going on.

CM



-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on behalf of   Ahmed Mamoor Amimi 
Sent:   27 July 2001 11:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject:NCP never comes UP [7:13945]



 --
 From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08:24 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  NCP never comes UP [7:13945]
 Auto forwarded by a Rule
 
Hi,
I have posted earlier about the DDR link...
My routers dials each other and LCP and IPCP comes up but not the NCP, and
encapsulation is failing when i try to ping.

any help

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13988t=13945
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

PPP authentication is not a must, for DDR to work (AFAIK)

CM



-Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  on behalf of   Ahmed Mamoor Amimi 
Sent:   27 July 2001 10:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Subject:Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]



 --
 From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:45:49 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]
 Auto forwarded by a Rule
 
for a DDR connection is the PPP authentication must.. can't we make a
connection with only encapsulation ppp

-Mamoor




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13989t=13944
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: some definations are required? [7:13947]

2001-07-27 Thread Donald B Johnson jr

Na I got these
Answers inline



- Original Message -
From: Daniel Cotts 
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:14 AM
Subject: RE: some definations are required? [7:13947]


 Normally I would just hit the delete key. Being a Networker implies the
 ability to solve problems. That often entails searching for information.
You
 show no indication that you made the slightest effort to answer your
 questions. Why should we?
 Try www.cisco.com, www.itprc.com, www.google.com
 Yes, it may take days of searching. You will be the stronger and better
for
 it. Good luck in your studies.

  -Original Message-
  From: a. ahmad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:22 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: some definations are required? [7:13947]
 
 
  what is the exact working of CSU/DSU? is anythin exact? would you like
something a little off kilter
  what is the purpose of serial interfaces? dont have to get up on
saturday and feed the kids breakfast
  what is Bert? ernie should field this one
  what is the difference b/w CRC4  CRC16. -CRC12
   CRC4
- CRC16 =
- CRC12
  what is the working principal of NET2Phone. electricity
gotta go now the big guy on the fryers want me to go downstairs and get a
bucket of steam
 
  thanks
  ahmad
  Report misconduct
  and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13990t=13947
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



SWAP [7:13991]

2001-07-27 Thread Ray Smith

Guys,

Does anybody out there want to make a cable swap?  I have a T1 Octopus cable 
for a 7000 router that I would be more than willing to trade for one of 
those octopus Async cable for a 2511 Terminal Server.

Any takers

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13991t=13991
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



IBM printer question [7:13992]

2001-07-27 Thread Sites, Bob

Question for all you IBM printer gurus.  I have the following small office
connected to my hospital. 

HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM AFP
Printer. 

Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the printer is no longer
visible or pingable from the network. It seems to time out from the switch
connection. If I log into the switch and ping this printer it comes back up
and is then visible on the network again, until it times out? Any known
conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this particular printer?
Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that might take care of this?
There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to use. 

Bob Sites
System Engineer
Valley Health System, IS Dept.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confidentiality Notice: 

This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13992t=13992
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread John Neiberger

I used the practice exams from CertificationZone, along with most of
their study guides, especially the Token Ring, Bridging, and routing
guides.  I found that the questions on that site were far more difficult
than the actual exam, so if you find yourself consistently passing
those, you should do fine on the real thing.

Good luck!

John

 Michael Wang  7/27/01 10:08:25 AM 
Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice
tests.
Where I can get the best?

Regards
Zahid Hassan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I wouldn't rate it good.
 Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics
 but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it
cover
 the materials in the exam.
 All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex,
specially
 Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

 Good luck.

 Zahid






 xie rootstock  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang
wrote:
  
   Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.
  
   Regards




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13993t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IBM printer question [7:13992]

2001-07-27 Thread Thomas Crowe

You might want to check is the port is going into errordisable mode.
Usually when this happens, the switch is either set to or detecting
full-duplex, when in fact the printer is only working in half-duplex.  That
could explain the reset when you log into the switch.  I have seen this A
LOT with HP printers and Catalyst switches.

HTH

__

Thomas Crowe
Senior Systems Engineer / Architect
CTS - Atlanta
Phone: 770-664-3900
Cell: 404-277-4089
__

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sites, Bob
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IBM printer question [7:13992]


Question for all you IBM printer gurus.  I have the following small office
connected to my hospital.

HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM AFP
Printer.

Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the printer is no longer
visible or pingable from the network. It seems to time out from the switch
connection. If I log into the switch and ping this printer it comes back up
and is then visible on the network again, until it times out? Any known
conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this particular printer?
Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that might take care of this?
There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to use.

Bob Sites
System Engineer
Valley Health System, IS Dept.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Confidentiality Notice:

This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Thomas Crowe.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13994t=13992
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



EIGRP question [7:13995]

2001-07-27 Thread Scott Rolf

Got a big of a head scratcher here...Migrating from RIPv2 to EIGRP.  Added
an EIGRP process to all routers with a custom distance of 150 (greater then
RIP).  The idea is EIGRP should converge and we should be able to see all
the routes in the topology table.  Then, when we feel comfortable that all
routes exist in the topology table we can remove RIP piece by piece until
RIP is gone.  Then drop EIGRP distance back down to normal.  Well, we
brought up EIGRP and some of the remote routes show up in our central router
with FD is Inaccessible.  Anybody know what that means?  The routes have a
FD at the router that is directly connected to the network in question and
the appropriate network command exists


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13995t=13995
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Wright, Jeremy

I just finished the Caslow book and it was very good. I'm right in the
middle of Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle and so far it is the best book I've
read. I have the Sybex book also and have put it down for the time being and
concentrating on the Doyle and Halabi books. Then I will go and read the
Sybex as more of a refresher.

-Original Message-
From:   John Neiberger
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, July 27, 2001 11:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good?
[7:13951]

When I first read through the guide I thought it was not
in-depth enough
but it seemed to cover most of the topics.  After taking the
exam, I
would judge the book a little better.  You still need to
read of *lot*
of other material, but this book would be a good supplement
to your
studies.

Regards,
John

 Michael Wang  7/27/01 9:27:27 AM 
Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study
guide.

Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13996t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13967]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Matt  has been detected as infected by the sircam virus. The
subject was Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Matt  was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam virus.
Het onderwerp was Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] en het werd verstuurd op

Un message venant de Matt  a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le
virus sircam. Le sujet etait Re: ptcm0600 [7:13425] et il a ete envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995935745.12329.2263.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13967t=13967
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



smtp's virus fighter for hp-ux 11.0 [7:13997]

2001-07-27 Thread Frank Kim

Hey guys,
I know this is off the topic.  But it is network security related.  I have
an smtp server running hp-ux and I'm looking for a good virus filter
software to install on it.  Thanks for any advice.

-Frank




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13997t=13997
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13966]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Admin  has been detected as infected by the sircam virus.
The subject was Date [7:13329] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Admin  was geidentificeerd als drager van het sircam
virus. Het onderwerp was Date [7:13329] en het werd verstuurd op

Un message venant de Admin  a ete identifie comme etant infecte par le
virus sircam. Le sujet etait Date [7:13329] et il a ete envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995879303.6454.2009.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13966t=13966
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Mail

I agree. You cannot go wrong with Halabi and DoyleCaslow is also very
good. The bottom line is that there is no one book that will do it all. You
will need to read a variety of books, each with it's own merits. I would
start with Doyle/Halabi first and then move on to books such as Caslows.

-daniel

- Original Message -
From: Wright, Jeremy 
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]


 I just finished the Caslow book and it was very good. I'm right in the
 middle of Routing TCP/IP by Jeff Doyle and so far it is the best book I've
 read. I have the Sybex book also and have put it down for the time being
and
 concentrating on the Doyle and Halabi books. Then I will go and read the
 Sybex as more of a refresher.

 -Original Message-
 From: John Neiberger
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:12 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good?
 [7:13951]

 When I first read through the guide I thought it was not
 in-depth enough
 but it seemed to cover most of the topics.  After taking the
 exam, I
 would judge the book a little better.  You still need to
 read of *lot*
 of other material, but this book would be a good supplement
 to your
 studies.

 Regards,
 John

  Michael Wang  7/27/01 9:27:27 AM 
 Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study
 guide.

 Regards
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13998t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13972]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Deepak Sharma  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was Jayni's buss [7:13443] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van Deepak Sharma  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was Jayni's buss [7:13443] en het werd verstuurd
op

Un message venant de Deepak Sharma  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait Jayni's buss [7:13443] et il a ete
envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995936047.12547.2050.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13972t=13972
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Sybex Book [7:13999]

2001-07-27 Thread Wright, Jeremy

I totally agree. There is definitely no one book that will get you through
the CCIE. I have my CCNP and used all Cisco Press books to get it. I'm still
learning new things when picking up the CCIE level books so pickup whatever
you can get your hands on and don't believe these all in one CCIE books.
Just remember that all troubleshooting problems are resolved by one acronym
...PEBCAK   Problem Exists Between Chair And Keyboard 
Good luck to everybody in their certifications




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13999t=13999
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13971]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from David Blair  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] and it was sent at .

Een bericht van David Blair  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] en het werd
verstuurd op

Un message venant de David Blair  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait FRVISDAT 3301 X9T [7:13335] et il a ete
envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/995886026.15021.2067.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13971t=13971
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



sircam virus detected [7:13979]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A mail from Vinoth Kumar C  has been detected as infected by the sircam
virus. The subject was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] and it was
sent at .

Een bericht van Vinoth Kumar C  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
sircam virus. Het onderwerp was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] en
het werd verstuurd op

Un message venant de Vinoth Kumar C  a ete identifie comme etant infecte
par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839]
et il a ete envoye le




MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996132346.1447.2074.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13979t=13979
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: IBM printer question [7:13992]

2001-07-27 Thread J. Li

This is related to the printer MAC address aged out of
the CAM table due to inactivity.  We see a lot on our
servers.  What we do is creating a ping script
(traffic) on the servers to ping the gateway.  In your
case, you can do a continuous ping to the printer IP
from a workstation or server, say ping it very 3
minute or so.

Jianliang Li

--- Thomas Crowe  wrote:
 You might want to check is the port is going into
 errordisable mode.
 Usually when this happens, the switch is either set
 to or detecting
 full-duplex, when in fact the printer is only
 working in half-duplex.  That
 could explain the reset when you log into the
 switch.  I have seen this A
 LOT with HP printers and Catalyst switches.
 
 HTH
 
 __
 
 Thomas Crowe
 Senior Systems Engineer / Architect
 CTS - Atlanta
 Phone: 770-664-3900
 Cell: 404-277-4089
 __
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Sites, Bob
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 2:11 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: IBM printer question [7:13992]
 
 
 Question for all you IBM printer gurus.  I have the
 following small office
 connected to my hospital.
 

HOSPITAL-AIRONET340OFFICE-AIRONET340---C1924IBM
 AFP
 Printer.
 
 Here is the problem. After about 15-30 minutes the
 printer is no longer
 visible or pingable from the network. It seems to
 time out from the switch
 connection. If I log into the switch and ping this
 printer it comes back up
 and is then visible on the network again, until it
 times out? Any known
 conflicts with the C1900's or the Aironets and this
 particular printer?
 Anyone know of any timeout parameter changes that
 might take care of this?
 There isn't a whole lot of commands on the 1900 to
 use.
 
 Bob Sites
 System Engineer
 Valley Health System, IS Dept.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 Confidentiality Notice:
 
 This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
 for the sole use of the
 intended recipients and may contain confidential and
 privileged information.
 Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
 distribution is prohibited. If
 you are not the intended recipient, please contact
 the sender by reply
 e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
 message.
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type
 text/x-vcard which had a name
 of Thomas Crowe.vcf]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14000t=13992
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Wright, Jeremy

I have not yet completed my CCIE written so my advice may not be the best. I
can tell you what I have researched and found out though. Read all the books
you can. Do all of the questions, configuration exercises, troubleshooting,
etc.. in the books. Then I have been told (once again, I have not yet
experienced) the Boson tests are pretty good along with certification zones
test simulator. Also, find the Rossi paper on all the types of bridging.
This is all I have to offer at this point and I plan on doing more to
prepare for the written. Could someone else please add on to what I have
listed if willing? Thanks.

-Original Message-
From:   Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, July 27, 2001 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good?
[7:13951]

Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do
pratice tests.
Where I can get the best?

Regards
Zahid Hassan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I wouldn't rate it good.
 Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the
topics
 but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor
does it cover
 the materials in the exam.
 All the other books mentioned are far better than the
Sybex, specially
 Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

 Good luck.

 Zahid






 xie rootstock  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff
doyle.Michael Wang
wrote:
  
   Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study
guide.
  
   Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14001t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Kim Edward B

Boson #1, 2, 3 were really good.
Sometimes the questions are much harder than the real test.
Also make sure you study for the explanation part of the answer.
They cost like 29.99 each but they worth every penny.

Edward

CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+

-Original Message-
From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]


Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do pratice tests.
Where I can get the best?

Regards
Zahid Hassan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I wouldn't rate it good.
 Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the topics
 but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor does it cover
 the materials in the exam.
 All the other books mentioned are far better than the Sybex, specially
 Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

 Good luck.

 Zahid






 xie rootstock  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff doyle.Michael Wang
wrote:
  
   Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study guide.
  
   Regards
*
DISCLAIMER:   The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential
and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee.  Access, copying
or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other
person is not authorized.  If you are not the intended recipient please
notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14002t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]

2001-07-27 Thread Wright, Jeremy

Did you use the Boson tests to pass the CCIE written?

-Original Message-
From:   Kim Edward B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Friday, July 27, 2001 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good?
[7:13951]

Boson #1, 2, 3 were really good.
Sometimes the questions are much harder than the real test.
Also make sure you study for the explanation part of the
answer.
They cost like 29.99 each but they worth every penny.

Edward

CCNP, CCDP, MCP, CNA, A+

-Original Message-
From: Michael Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is Sybex CCIE study guide good? [7:13951]


Thanks for the advice. How about questions? If I want to do
pratice tests.
Where I can get the best?

Regards
Zahid Hassan  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 I wouldn't rate it good.
 Probably you would want to use it to just to warm-up the
topics
 but not further. The book doesn't go into any details nor
does it cover
 the materials in the exam.
 All the other books mentioned are far better than the
Sybex, specially
 Caslow's BRS for CCIE.

 Good luck.

 Zahid






 xie rootstock  wrote in message
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  ccie has many famous book, halabi, jeff
doyle.Michael Wang
wrote:
  
   Please let me know your opinion about Sybex CCIE study
guide.
  
   Regards

*
DISCLAIMER:   The information contained in this e-mail may
be confidential
and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee.
Access, copying
or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein
by any other
person is not authorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient please
notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the
originator.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14003t=13951
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Help! [7:14004]

2001-07-27 Thread Ray Smith

Does anyone know what the following statement means?  Notice it when I did a 
reload on a Cisco 7500.

AUTOBOOTVAR (BOOT) env variable isn't set. Please set it to point to a
non null string. Attempting to load the first image in disk0 or slot0.


Any takers?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14004t=14004
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BSCI [7:13956]

2001-07-27 Thread Muhammad Zahid

I have a paper towmorro ...

Kindest Regards
Muhammad Zahid

Steven Crawford wrote:

 Has anyone tried the Beta yet?

 

 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14005t=13956
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: sircam virus detected [7:13979]

2001-07-27 Thread netman

So why are we getting these?

don
- Original Message -
From: 
To: 
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: sircam virus detected [7:13979]


 A mail from Vinoth Kumar C  has been detected as infected by the
sircam
 virus. The subject was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] and it was
 sent at .

 Een bericht van Vinoth Kumar C  was geidentificeerd als drager van het
 sircam virus. Het onderwerp was =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?= [7:13839] en
 het werd verstuurd op

 Un message venant de Vinoth Kumar C  a ete identifie comme etant
infecte
 par le virus sircam. Le sujet etait =?ISO-8859-1?Q?mpls=5Fcisco?=
[7:13839]
 et il a ete envoye le




 MessageID: sircam - /var/mail/e/epessers/996132346.1447.2074.U




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14006t=13979
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Help! [7:14004]

2001-07-27 Thread Jim Dixon

I believe it refers to which image to boot from.
I believe you can set this environment variable for it to read
and then KNOW which image you want it to boot by default.

boot system
boot tftp  
etc...

-Original Message-
From: Ray Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help! [7:14004]


Does anyone know what the following statement means?  Notice it when I did a

reload on a Cisco 7500.

AUTOBOOTVAR (BOOT) env variable isn't set. Please set it to point to a
non null string. Attempting to load the first image in disk0 or slot0.


Any takers?

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14007t=14004
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]

2001-07-27 Thread Patricia Leeb-Hart

Ray,

I'm not sure what you mean when you state that if done that with a PC the
interface would not work...Let's take it to mean that you would try to ping
an address assigned to PC's network interface.  Depends on what the
interface is comprised of.  E.g, Windows 9x, NT and 2k  and Linux (hey,
it's a PC operating system too! ) all allow you to create a hosts file and
of course you always have the loopback and, if you're not using DHCP, the
local host addresses.  So if you've loaded a TCP/IP stack you can always
ping those addresses.  The fact that they're not physical interfaces or
connected to one don't matter beans to IP (Layer 3, remember?), that's not
for it to know or care about.   Now, normally you'd have a NIC installed and
the host address assigned to that so you also have Layers 2 and 1
functionality, but they're _not necessary for a ping to happen_.  See what
I'm driving at?  I'm quite ignorant of Sun hardware, but I'll bet that le0
is a virtual interface (Solaris shells don't care about layer 1 either)
representing some physical interface that may or may not be hooked up to an
actual transmission medium.  The fact is that an interface (physical or
virtual) is configured with an address and it's active is enough for PING.


Ray Smith  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  Guys,
 
  I was putting a lab together and noticed something wierd.  I configured 
my
  Sparc (Unix) station's Le0 interface with an IP address, brought it up 
and
  decided to play around with it a little.  I noticed that I could ping 
the
IP
  that I configured on the interface although it was disconnected
from/plugged
  OUT of the hub.  I asked one of the Unix guys at my job if this was
strange
  and he said NO!  He could not tell me why but only said that it will
always
  be able to ping the IP address configured on the box despite the fact 
that
  it is not connected to a Hub.
 
  What I need to know guys is WHY.  I am not just satisfied with the fact
that
  it is suppose happen unless I can know WHY it happen.  Any takers here?
  Thanks dude.
 
  Ray




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14008t=13873
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:14009]

2001-07-27 Thread Patricia Leeb-Hart

I feel your pain...unfamiliar hardware is a bitch.

Sounds like you have bad RAM or bad EPROM.   Try this link for hardware
installation / config info:

http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Hardware:2500s=Hardware_Info#Hardware_Installation_%26_Configuration

beware of line breaks

 xie rootstock  07/27/01 08:12AM 
System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C at 0x101772A (PC)

what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router for only 1
day.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14009t=14009
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:14010]

2001-07-27 Thread Daniel Cotts

I'll take a guess and say that it appears that the router can't find an IOS
image to run. I'll further guess (unless corrected) that it appears that you
have the bootstrap image so most likely have the router(boot) code.
Can I assume that you have never seen this router run? That it was in this
condition when you received it?
You might want to verify that there is Flash memory installed and that there
is an image on it. Think that you'll have to boot to router(boot) to look
around. Might want to physically reseat the Flash stick.

 -Original Message-
 From: xie rootstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 10:13 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again and a [7:13950]
 
 
 System Bootstrap, Version 11.0(10c), SOFTWARE
 Copyright (c) 1986-1996 by cisco Systems
 2500 processor with 2048 Kbytes of main memory
 Local Timeout (control reg=0x118) Error, address: 0x213202C 
 at 0x101772A (PC)
 
 what is the metter anyway!! please help, I bough this router 
 for only 1
 day.
 Report misconduct 
 and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14010t=14010
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BSCI [7:13956]

2001-07-27 Thread Michael L. Williams

Yeah... very similar to BSCN except the addition of IS-IS.  ALOT of
IS-IS!!!  Read the chapter in Doyle's TCP/IP Vol 1 and then the white
papers.  If you've done BSCN, you should be able to simply revisit
OSPF/EIGRP/BGP and be up to speed.

Sucks to have to wait 4 months to see of you passed.. (well, up to 3
months AFTER the exam closes)

HTH,
Mike W.

Steven Crawford  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Has anyone tried the Beta yet?

 

 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14011t=13956
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Cisco gears blowout sale [7:14012]

2001-07-27 Thread Frank Ofus

I know I shouldn't be posting this here.  But I hope
one of you may need some of these gears:

http://cgi6.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?MfcISAPICommand=ViewListedItemsuserid=lefonduinclude=0since=-1sort=2rows=25


cheers!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14012t=14012
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I hope I'm not out of line here [7:14014]

2001-07-27 Thread Aaron Seydlitz

However, it was suggested to me that I post a message here to let people
know about http://www.ciscolounge.homestead.com.  The forums there are
geared much in the same way that this one is . . .
  This is a non-profit site . . . so I don't think this is considered spam. 
However, if this message is deleted, I will certainly understand.

  Regards,

  BlueBaron
  The Cisco Lounge founder


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14014t=14014
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Switch problem [7:14013]

2001-07-27 Thread Jaspreet Bhatia

I am trying to telnet into a Cat 6509 switch and I get this message
about access not permitted./Closing connection .The switch is configured
for TACACS+ and I have verified that the TACACS+ config is OK .Here is
part of the config .


#tacacs+
set tacacs server 171.69.2.210 primary
set tacacs server 171.68.10.137
set tacacs attempts 3
set tacacs directedrequest disable
!
#radius
set radius deadtime 0
set radius timeout 5
set radius retransmit 2
!
#authentication
set authentication login tacacs disable console
set authentication login tacacs enable telnet primary
set authentication enable tacacs disable console
set authentication enable tacacs enable telnet primary
set authentication login radius disable console
set authentication login radius disable telnet
set authentication enable radius disable console
set authentication enable radius disable telnet
set authentication login local enable console
set authentication login local enable telnet
set authentication enable local enable console
set authentication enable local enable telnet
-

Anyone know what's happening around here ?

Jaspreet




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14013t=14013
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



access lists [7:13928]

2001-07-27 Thread Joe Morabito

How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all internet
traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out?

I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any  and the ethernet uses an
inside
addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside.

But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial
interface, people can no longer get outside.  Any ideas?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13928t=13928
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



ISDN,multy channels bundle [7:13943]

2001-07-27 Thread Winway

Hi,all

cisco 2610, 3 BRIs, I use it to connect to Internet.
I configure the interfaces like this,

Interface BRI1/0
 no ip address
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer rotary-group 0

Interface BRI1/1
 no ip address
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer rotary-group 0

Interface BRI1/2
 no ip address
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer rotary-group 0

Interface Dialer0
 ip address negotiated
 ip nat outside
 encapsulation ppp
 dialer in-band
 dialer idle-timeout 180
 dialer string xxx
 dialer load-threshold 1 either
 dialer-group 1
 ppp authentication pap callin
 ppp pap sent-username xxx password xxx

It will bring up all 6 B-channels,and I can connect to Internet via it.
But it seems only 1 channel is used because I found that the speed of the 
ftp task cannot exceed 64K bits/second.

Thinking the B-channels should be bundled up, I use ppp multilink for 
Interface Dialer0 (right?). The B-channels can still be brought up, but 
the PCs inside the E0/0 cannot connect to outside then.

Anyone can help me?
Thanks in advance.

Winway
 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=13943t=13943
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Memory upgrade [7:14015]

2001-07-27 Thread Adrian Nixon

Hello,
I have a 4000M+ in my home lab that I would like to give a main memory
upgrade.  Aside from voiding the warranty on my router, is there any reason
that I should avoid buying a standard 32 meg SIMM for $35 instead of the
standard Cisco part which costs anywhere from $80-$200?  I checked the specs
of the 8 meg Samsung part that my router came with and it seems to be a
plain old 5v, 72 pin, 70ns, parity SIMM.
I searched the archives and Google, but could not find any relevant
info.  Any input is greatly appreciated.

Thanks for your time,
Adrian Nixon



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14015t=14015
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Is ppp authentication must [7:13944]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

No, your configuration will work fine with no authentication configured at
all



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14016t=13944
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13877]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

You will need to have connectivity end to end across the pvc.  Even a local
ping will traverse the WAN (actually 4 times), so your remote router will
also need to be mapped correctly.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14017t=13877
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13877]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

Actually, I thought about it again, and I am not sure you will be able to
ping your own interface on a multipoint interface due to the fact that the
ping must transverse the WAN and it must know which pvc to route across. 
This poses a problem when there are multiple pvcs and your local ip is
assigned to all of them.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14018t=13877
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

It would follow the default route.  This is because it is not a match for
either of the other two routes.  If IP Classless were not turned on, the
packet would be dropped.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14019t=13847
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: traceroute [7:13724]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

Traceroute is simply a special ping with Time To Live (TTL) set beginning at
1.  The first router that recieves the packet will expire TTL and send an
ICMP error back to the transmitting router.  The transmitting router is
expecting this error and will log the IP address of the router sending the
error.  The transmitting router will then set TTL to 2 on the next ping
and wait for that ICMP error to return.  This continues until the Target
of the trace replies.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14020t=13724
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: BSCI [7:13956]

2001-07-27 Thread Tim Medley

I'm taking the BSCI beta on monday. I'll tell you what I can w/o
breaking NDA monday afternoon. From what the exam objectives show it's
esentially the same test as the BSCN with some IS-IS routing thrown in
for good measure.

tm


Tim Medley - CCNP+Voice
Network Architect
VoIP Group
iReadyWorld



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven Crawford
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 12:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BSCI [7:13956]


Has anyone tried the Beta yet?



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14021t=13956
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: FrameRelay Over Utilized [7:13349]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger

This is a telco problem.  Overutilization will not cause CRC's.  Your
interface resets are being caused by missing/corrupted LMI packets.  I would
be concerned about the high CRC errors for starters.  You could also look at
show frame lmi and see how quickly you seem to be loosing LMI packets.  The
interface will come down if you loose more than 3 consecutive lmi packets.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14022t=13349
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: BGP Question -Help Pease [7:13934]

2001-07-27 Thread Michael Damkot

If you want to e-mail what you have in mind I will take a look at it.  I
happen to work for one of the afore mentioned companys, in the customer
support division no less.

-Michael
Nabil Fares  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Greetings,

 Need your expertise on some BGP Design issues.  We currently have 2 T3
 connections, one to Sprint and the other to UUNet.  We're getting a 3rd T3
 (internet connection from Sprint) to a new building on campus that's going
 to be connected to the old building with existing internet connection (I
 hope that made some sense!!!).  What's the best way to design or setup BGP
 with 3 internet connections.

 Thanks for your time,

 Nabil




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14023t=13934
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Dual T1 Bonding? [7:13914]

2001-07-27 Thread Michael Damkot

Please keep in mind that just because you have 2 links to the same provider,
it does not necessarily mean that they are run to the same POP.  this can
cause some problems with load balancing 2 different links.


--
Michael Damkot
Technical Trainer
Network Support Engineer II




Makarand Yerawadekar  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hi,

 You may want to take a look at --

 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/793/access_dial/mpp_serial.html

 Please watch the line wrap.



 Matt Goodhue wrote:

  Hello,
 
  We have a Cisco2621 with two T1 going to the same place.  Does anyone
have
 a
  link to some IOS examples that would allow them to be bonded together?
\
 
  We would like the ability to download at the combined T1 speed of 3 mb.
  Currently we seem to max out at only 1 T1 speed.  I did searches at
Cisco
 on
  bonding, but could not come up with anything.
 
  Thank you.
  Matt Goodhue




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14024t=13914
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Memory upgrade [7:14015]

2001-07-27 Thread Santosh Koshy

Hey adrian,

Kingston makes RAM for the cisco series of routers, which is a lot more
inexpensive...  try this site..www.kingston.com

Santosh Koshy
WAN Administrator


Adrian Nixon  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 Hello,
 I have a 4000M+ in my home lab that I would like to give a main memory
 upgrade.  Aside from voiding the warranty on my router, is there any
reason
 that I should avoid buying a standard 32 meg SIMM for $35 instead of the
 standard Cisco part which costs anywhere from $80-$200?  I checked the
specs
 of the 8 meg Samsung part that my router came with and it seems to be a
 plain old 5v, 72 pin, 70ns, parity SIMM.
 I searched the archives and Google, but could not find any relevant
 info.  Any input is greatly appreciated.

 Thanks for your time,
 Adrian Nixon




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14025t=14015
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Passed CID second attempt - some comments: [7:14027]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Passed CID today, this was my second attempt and the only test in the long 
journey in acquiring my CCNP and now CCDP, which I had to take more than one 
time.  I will have to agree with many that this test has vague questions,
and
many of the TRIVIA type, such as which version of the IOS implemented this
or
that feature.

I had just taken Global Knowledge's classroom CID training weeklong class
and
though that I could take the test the following week.  I ordered a Boson
test
for a quick review and only had a couple of days to use it.  A day after 
taking the test and failing I received an email from Bernard, the author of 
the test warning about the difficulty of the exam, unfortunately a day late 
and $100 shot for me!

I doubt that second test included 20 per cent of the questions that I was 
presented with on the first test.  However, I now had reread the Sybex CCDP 
study guide, and reviewed the areas that I was previously weak in: SNA and 
Desktop protocols. I also read the good book by Priscilla Oppenheimer on 
network design; however, this was relevant to real-world design, the test I 
took was from another world I think!! 

Used the above mentioned items for study as well as several months of
lurking
around here on groupstudy.

Will take a week break and then on to concentrated study of the CCIE
material
in pursuit of my ultimate goal.

Note * What others have said and I experienced this is a difficult test!  It 
humbled this old man - but ultimately success, study hard for this one and 
you to can pass it. 

Thanks to ALL in the group for sharing your thoughts and questions.

Possibly Oldest CCNP/ and now CCDP on the study list

Ray




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14027t=14027
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

One question for the group: has anyone taken any of the Global Knowledge 
Advanced CCIE Preparation Courses (ACPC 1,2, and 3)?  I am considering
taking
them in prep for the CCIE lab certification.

Just passed CCDP and planning my attack plan for CCIE

TIA

Ray




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14028t=14028
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: access lists [7:13928]

2001-07-27 Thread Dennis Bailey

access-list 101 permit tcp any any established
access-list 101 deny ip any any

Joe Morabito  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all
internet
 traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out?

 I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any  and the ethernet uses an
 inside
 addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside.

 But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial
 interface, people can no longer get outside.  Any ideas?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14029t=13928
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: access lists [7:13928]

2001-07-27 Thread Santosh Koshy

Joe,

If you are implying that you dont want users / hackers /
crackers from outside your company getting access to your internal network ,
then here is what u need 2 do...

create an extended access list with an established setting pointing
inwards... and deny everything else. that should do the trick.

--
Santosh Koshy
*
WAN Administrator
Unilever Canada Inc.

Joe Morabito  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 How can you apply an access list to a serial interface to block all
internet
 traffic without disabling the inside people from getting out?

 I have a 1720 with the serial deny ip any any  and the ethernet uses an
 inside
 addressing scheme with nat to get to the outside.

 But when I apply the deny ip any any and access-group xxx in to the serial
 interface, people can no longer get outside.  Any ideas?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14026t=13928
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:14009]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

thank you very much, I bough 5 secondhand router, unfortunately, there was
one of them may has problem, I think the most likely is the RAM or EPROM had
problem, I want to instead of the broken ROM by another router, can I do
this ?



Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14030t=14009
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: NSC_0152 [7:13982]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

who are you, I received you file many times, but I am very fear the .EXE
file from internet, could it send it to me by txt?Rommell Paul wrote:
 
 Hi! How are you?
 
 I send you this file in order to have your advice
 
 See you later. Thanks
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/mixed
 which had a name of NSC_0152.xls.lnk]
 
 [GroupStudy.com removed a section which didn't have a
 content-type header]
 
 




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14031t=13982
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: when 25 booting, the message is repeat again a [7:13961]

2001-07-27 Thread xie rootstock

I did it when first time found the problem, but the problem still continue


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14032t=13961
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ciscco IDS [7:13516]

2001-07-27 Thread Larry Lamb

In article , Farhan Ahmed
 wrote:

Well the Cisco Secure IDS would sit on the inside network and have all
traffic SPANed to it.  Any unencrypted packets would easily trip an alarm
unless it was a MIMEd e-mail and then someone else would have to scan the
document.  As for IPSec, in an environment dealing with documents that
you wouldn't want out, you'd have to deny this type of traffic from
leaving since the IDS wouldn't be able to make out anything in the
encrypted payload.

 how its possible for ids to read the contents of packet for eg
 confidential doc and generate an alaram
 
 what if somebody using vpn from inside network to somewhere else to
 transfer confidential information
 
 what does it means that ipsec is ,,,
 misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


-- 
Larry Lamb, CCNP, CCDP, MSCE, MCP+I




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14033t=13516
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: QUERY ON FRAME RELAY, Can't ping to it's own i [7:13875]

2001-07-27 Thread Arthur Simplina

I am not an expert in frame relay but let me share my experience in the
classroom lab where we did this exercise on frame relay.

I have the same situation where from the local router I can't ping the
interface that is connected to the frame relay. I also cannot ping the
ethernet ip address of another router in the other frame relay connection.

I was asked that question why I can't ping the local interface with the
frame relay connection. I can't seem to find an answer but managed to say
that since the ping command is on the layer 3 and the serial interface in
encapsulated in frame relay (which is layer 2), so the ping command fails as
it cannot locate the layer 3 ip address of the serial interface that is
mapped to the dlci which is layer 2. I hope that it makes sense and you got
my point.

As to why I cannot ping the ethernet ip address of the other router, the
reason is that the ping source ip address carries the serial interface ip
address that is inversed mapped to the frame relay connection which it
cannot locate and that is why it fails. But if I do an extended ping
specifying the source ip address of the ethernet of the local router, the
ping is successful which means that I have a full connectivity across the
frame relay cloud to the other LAN segments of the other routers.

Perhaps, a frame relay expert could clarify this further.

Cheers,

Art S.


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14034t=13875
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]

2001-07-27 Thread Arthur Simplina

Maybe there are no keep-alives.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14035t=13873
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes, I think this might be the instructor(s) that might conduct the
training.
 The classes would be here in CA.  As my present position does not allow me 
the opportunity to have any in production hands-on training I am looking for 
this mentor lead classroom format.

I am also trying to assemble some equipment here at work for a lab as a 
prerequisite to the intensive classroom training.

Thanks for the input.

Ray

---

if it is the one taught by Paul Borghese or Brian Dennis, by all means take
it.

I have not taken the course, but I have had personal dealings with both, and
they are both first rate teachers

Chuck

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE lab classroom study? [7:14028]


One question for the group: has anyone taken any of the Global Knowledge
Advanced CCIE Preparation Courses (ACPC 1,2, and 3)?  I am considering
taking
them in prep for the CCIE lab certification.

Just passed CCDP and planning my attack plan for CCIE

TIA

Ray




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14036t=14028
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Passed CID second attempt - some comments: [7:14027]

2001-07-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Daniel et. al.

Thanks, for the encouragement - this Old man, will be 60 in October, needs
it
however, am sure enjoying the journey.

Had hit a glass ceiling at work here and seemed like the Network 
Certification, especially the CCIE, was a ticket to advancement and surely
an
asset if one was to wind up out on the street.

Thanks, ALL and back to the books in a week!

Oldest CCIE student on the list
CCNP/CCDP
Ray


Regarding oldest CCNP/CCDP a fellow whom I think is named William Gragido
has been making that claim. I believe that he is 56.
Congratulations on your achievement. Good luck on your quest for the CCIE
(Hockey Puck with a number).

-




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14037t=14027
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A PING - Connectivity Issue [7:13873]

2001-07-27 Thread william gannon

-Such is true, and from what I can tell you both are right.  In my
experience, a Win box will not respond to a ping if there is not layer1
connectivity, while a Solaris box will.  Why?.. I don't know.  Solaris seems
to
associate the interface with a name first and then with an IP, while Win is
the other way around.  Any protocol gurus there??,  Priscilla, any input??
(aside: I read your book to pass my CCDA two years ago, still one of my
favorites.  I've got a crush on you don't ever change I will be your groupie
if you want one xoxoxo) plus you are one of
the best contributors to this list! I don't agree that the OS does not care
about layer1, if you don't have a link on a windoze box, you will NOT be
able to ping it locally NO HOW NO WAY see.  Hmm... alright how many CCNA's
does it take to change an IP address on a PC?  

Ten, one to do it and nine to bitch that it is not their a job, a MCSE
should handle it.  Long live the acronyms.
-Patrick AADF,KDJC,KIE,KID,KMM, QWOD, KDIOE, LOD+I 
 
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:04:38 -0400, Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote:

  Ray,
  
  I'm not sure what you mean when you state that if done that with a PC
the
  interface would not work...Let's take it to mean that you would try to
ping
  an address assigned to PC's network interface.  Depends on what the
  interface is comprised of.  E.g, Windows 9x, NT and 2k  and Linux (hey,
  it's a PC operating system too! ) all allow you to create a hosts file
and
  of course you always have the loopback and, if you're not using DHCP, the
  local host addresses.  So if you've loaded a TCP/IP stack you can always
  ping those addresses.  The fact that they're not physical interfaces or
  connected to one don't matter beans to IP (Layer 3, remember?), that's
not
  for it to know or care about.   Now, normally you'd have a NIC installed
and
  the host address assigned to that so you also have Layers 2 and 1
  functionality, but they're _not necessary for a ping to happen_.  See
what
  I'm driving at?  I'm quite ignorant of Sun hardware, but I'll bet that
le0
  is a virtual interface (Solaris shells don't care about layer 1 either)
  representing some physical interface that may or may not be hooked up to
an
  actual transmission medium.  The fact is that an interface (physical or
  virtual) is configured with an address and it's active is enough for
PING.
  
  
  Ray Smith  wrote in message
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Guys,
   
I was putting a lab together and noticed something wierd.  I
configured 
  my
Sparc (Unix) station's Le0 interface with an IP address, brought it
up 
  and
decided to play around with it a little.  I noticed that I could ping

  the
  IP
that I configured on the interface although it was disconnected
  from/plugged
OUT of the hub.  I asked one of the Unix guys at my job if this was
  strange
and he said NO!  He could not tell me why but only said that it will
  always
be able to ping the IP address configured on the box despite the fact

  that
it is not connected to a Hub.
   
What I need to know guys is WHY.  I am not just satisfied with the
fact
  that
it is suppose happen unless I can know WHY it happen.  Any takers
here?
Thanks dude.
   
Ray
___
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=14039t=13873
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]