Re: router hangs [7:52193]
Was the 2500 working fine then just started doing this, or is this 2500 new to you and first time using it? Turn off the router, use a electrostatic strap, and take the cover off and try reseating the memory and flash and make sure all chips are seated well on the mainboard. Power on and see if it comes up fine. Erick --- nilesh bothra wrote: > can someone help me how I can fix this. > > = > System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(9.1), SOFTWARE > Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems > 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory > > Unknown or ambiguous service arg - udp-small-servers > Illegal IP keyword - classless ANOTHER > MESSAGE HERE*** > Loading c2500-js-l_112-17.bin at 0x340, size = > 8108960 bytes [OK] > > F3: 8010312+98616+315708 at 0x360 > > Restricted Rights Legend > > Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government > is. > .. > %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console > %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- > Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software > IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version > 11.2(17), RELEASE SOFTWARE > (fc1) > Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Mon 04-Jan-99 17:27 by ashah > %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0, changed state to > administratively down > %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to > administratively down > %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TokenRing0, changed state > to administratively > down AND THE ROUTER HANGS HERE** __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52200&t=52193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
But imagine how cool it would be to be the 'FIRST' CCIE in the world. It's like being the first man on the moon! There's only one person who could say that. Of course, the subjective question would be to see who is the 'BEST' in the world! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52199&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117]
For any speed i find intefaces flapping Best Regards, Mohamed Saro Network Division Manager T.E. DATA Tel: +20-10 -1663531 Tel: +20- 2 -7494025 Ext:1102 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephane LITKOWSKI Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: DCT,DTE [7:52117] What speed did you configure ? ""Mohamed Saro"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > that was configured but the interfaces flaps up and down > > > > > Best Regards, > Mohamed Saro > Network Division Manager > T.E. DATA > Tel: +20-10 -1663531 > Tel: +20- 2 -7494025 > Ext:1102 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117] > > > On the DCE interface you have to enter the following command: > clock rate . > Rgrds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52198&t=52117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128]
Now why did the list server remove the 700-799 and 1100-1199 that I put in my original email? Forgive me, I am going to test something Testing 700-799 Testing Testing -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 16:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128] Access-list numbers defines a standard access-list based on a MAC addresses Access-List number defines extended access-lists based on MAC address's So it would be for example access-list 702 permit ed32.2342.e0df .. Where Ed32.2342.e0df (I just made it up) is the MAC address .. is the wildcard mask. I am assuming in this case, it would be like the standard access lists, where 0 is don't ignore and 1 is ignore ? Please tell me if I am wrong, Just taking a squizz here. Thanks Manish -Original Message- From: Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 14:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ref: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128] Dear All, anybody can tell how we can apply an access-list base on MAC Address INSTEAD of ip address on Cisco router 3600. Kind Regards abd quqas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52197&t=52128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: simulations exam [7:52172]
I wonder how a simulation question is graded? For example, if a question for a CCNA level exam states, that you must configure an ethernet interface, how is the answer graded. What if you do configure the interface properly, ie. ip address 172.5.5.1 255.255.255.0 but you forget to enter the no shutdown command after that? Does the system give you 50% (since you got half of it right), 0% (since you did not enter the no shutdown command), or 100% (since you entered the interface addressing correctly). Also, What happens if you realise after you've configured the interface and got out of configuration mode, that you forgot to do a no shutdown ... If you go back into interface configuration and enter the no shutdown, is the answer than deemed correct, or do you get maybe 75% for the question since you took way to many steps to do this. If I could illustrate:- Optimised Configuration steps Conf t Int e0 Ip address 172.5.5.1 255.255.255.0 No shutdown Exit wr Sh int Not-so optimised configuration steps Conf t Int e0 Ip address 172.5.5.1 255.255.255.0 Exit Sh int Conf t Int e0 No shutdown Exit wr Sh int Does anybody know how Cisco grades the questions? Is it the Cisco way or no way? :) Thanks Manish -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2002 05:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: simulations exam [7:52172] As far as I know, certain commands can be used to test your configurations. For example, you always want to do a "no shut" after configuring an interface. Then you can check the configuration with a "show interface" command and you should see an up/up status if your configuration is correct. Shawn K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52196&t=52172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: Help on Configure WCCP [7:52084]
Hello Tunji, First, I want to introduce my self. My name is Edwin from Indonesia. I work for a new company that just setup the network. I'm glad that i can get help from you. I sent an attchment of sh run and sh ip wccp. When i debug ip wccp, I already get the message like you told me. So I thing there is a communication between the router and the cache engine. The problem is, when I tried to browse the internet, there are no packets received in the cache engine. I didn't know why. Is my router config wrong or my cache config is wrong. Please review my router config, is it right or wrong. I really need input from you. Thanks a lot. Regards Edwin [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of Sh run from router.txt] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52195&t=52084 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128]
0 = must match F = ignore reason why its F?, the mask is based on hex :D Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52194&t=52128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
router hangs [7:52193]
can someone help me how I can fix this. = System Bootstrap, Version 4.14(9.1), SOFTWARE Copyright (c) 1986-1994 by cisco Systems 2500 processor with 16384 Kbytes of main memory Unknown or ambiguous service arg - udp-small-servers Illegal IP keyword - classless ANOTHER MESSAGE HERE*** Loading c2500-js-l_112-17.bin at 0x340, size = 8108960 bytes [OK] F3: 8010312+98616+315708 at 0x360 Restricted Rights Legend Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is. .. %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from memory by console %SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted -- Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-JS-L), Version 11.2(17), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc. Compiled Mon 04-Jan-99 17:27 by ashah %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial0, changed state to administratively down %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Serial1, changed state to administratively down %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface TokenRing0, changed state to administratively down AND THE ROUTER HANGS HERE** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52193&t=52193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tonight's Homily - Lessons in Complexity [7:52191]
I was able to put the finishing touches on the lab exercise I have been writing for That Study Place. I had a momentary scare, because my final topic was a particular construction that has the look, feel, and taste of a CCIE Lab topic, so I thought it important to cover it in my own work. ( Note that since no one has seen a CCIE Lab scenario containing the 3550's, I want to say everything I can prior to my going into the Lab. That way I protect myself against NDA violations by pointing out that I have actively studied and actively written about the switches prior to my ever seeing or hearing about actual scenarios that contain them. ) The construct in question is called a vlan map. Why I couldn't remember is beyond me. It has an easy pneumonic. Route-map VLAN map The two are very similar in construction. But in application they are a bit different, reflecting the nature of the task each is given to accomplish. first, the similarities. --- both use access-lists as the basis of their decision process both can be structured using a series of numbered groups, each of which refers to a different access-list, and each of which performs a different set of actions There can be multiple route-maps configured and in use on a router There can be multiple vlan filters configured and in use on a switch the differences route-maps are IP only, and use IP access-lists as the basis for operation. route-maps may use ip prefix-lists as their basis for operation vlan maps are L2 and L3 both. vlan maps can refer to L2 access-lists and L3 access-lists in the same map, although not in the same group. for L3 filtering, vlan maps use ip access-lists only - they cannot use ip prefix lists route-maps have a wealth of actions that can be taken as a result of a match to an access-list vlan maps have only two actions - forward or drop route-maps can be applied in many ways for many purposes. they can apply to policy routing of inbound ip packets, redistribution of routing protocols into eachother, information forwarded to bgp neighbors, and more vlan maps apply globally to all traffic in and out of the switch route-maps apply locally - that is, only to the process for which they have been defined and associated. A route-map applied to policy routing has no effect on routing protocol redistribution, for example vlan maps apply globally. one must be careful how one constructs a vlan map. it can effect all traffic into and out of a switch. the application of route-maps involves some use of the term "route-map" e.g. redistribute rip route-map rip-route-filter ip policy route-map bad-boys vlan map application doesn't even involve the term "map" in fact, no where in the configuration is the term "map" used except "access-map" in the following configuration sequence: vlan access-map POLICY 20 action forward match mac address QWERTY a vlan map is applied by: vlan filter POLICY vlan-list 100,150 the biggest gotcha -- one must beware of configuring vlan filters that overlap vlans. InTheZone(config)#vlan filter A vlan-list 500-599 InTheZone(config)#vlan filter B vlan-list 595-605 excerpt from "show run" vlan filter A vlan-list 500-594 vlan filter B vlan-list 595-605 note that the most recent entry rewrites the earlier entry. The point of all of this? Beats me. It's been a long day! Still waters. Cool breezes. Another few steps along a long but golden road. Goodnight. everyone -- www.chuckslongroad.info still a work in progress, but on line for your enjoyment z Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52191&t=52191 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ref: 128Kbps instead 64kbpes [7:52190]
Dear ALL, how i can make ISDN BRI to connect at 128kbps instead of 64kbps as a bundle channel of Cisco router 3600 using ppp encapsulation. Kind Regards abd quqas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52190&t=52190 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 827 & VPNs [7:52189]
Hi all, I am new to VPNs and have a situation for your suggestion(s). 4 host PCs are to be connected into a Cisco 827H router through the 4-port Ethernet interface. There is a remote site where there is 1 host (that has a DSL card in the host) which requires connectivity through a VPN to the 827. The access technology is ADSL and at this stage I don't know what OS the PCs are running, althogh I do know its Windows. At this point, its my intention to use 3DES encryption, or IPSec encryption. The problems I'm facing (these may be imagined!!) are that I'm not sure how to configure the Cisco router. All of Cisco's documentation around the DSL area seems to advocate using PPPoE in the WAN for VPNs. I've had a read of http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn_pppoe.html but I'm not sure if the remote host can talk directly over the VPN to the 827. Does this depend on the OS's encryption support (IPSec etc) and how you configure the remotes host's ADSL card? I may be asking the wrong questions, or you may be able to point me in the right direction for reading material. Any help will be appreciated. cheers, Matthew. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52189&t=52189 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: simulations exam [7:52172]
As far as I know, certain commands can be used to test your configurations. For example, you always want to do a "no shut" after configuring an interface. Then you can check the configuration with a "show interface" command and you should see an up/up status if your configuration is correct. Shawn K. > -Original Message- > From: Paulo Roque [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 6:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: simulations exam [7:52172] > > Hi, > > Do the simulations in the new CCNP exams works, so that I can test my > configurations or I can just enter the commands? > > > Eng. Paulo Roque > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52188&t=52172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
semiOT - Cisco 7000 router for sale [7:52148]
My apologies in advance if anyone if offended by my mail. For a long story made very short, I'm moving soon and I don't think there is any way I'll be able to keep my entire home lab in the small apartment I'm moving to. As such I've currently got a workhorse Cisco 7000 router with plenty of interfaces up for a short auction on Ebay. No reserve and opening bid is $1, so you might be able to get it for an -extremely- good price. I unfortunately just can't keep this router and would love to see it go to someone else's lab. I've used it in almost every lab configuration I've set up at home. Cisco 7000 (6 Ethernet, 4 Token Ring, 2 FDDI, 1 ATM OC3 Multimode ST, 8 Serial - great frame switch), SSP 2 MB, 64 MB RAM, 16 MB Flash, 16 MB PCMCIA, 1 Power Supply The auction title on Ebay is: CISCO 7000 LOADED Item # 2049209907 Cheers, Brandon Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52148&t=52148 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Term hist size 100 ?? [7:52187]
Hi, Is there a way to set the term hist size command permanently on the router? I mean this setting is not saved even though you do a wr on the router. I wonder why that is?? Any ideas? Thank you. _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52187&t=52187 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheet-Sheets.com Owner Pleads Guilty; May Face Jai [7:52184]
Interesting articles http://certcities.com/editorial/news/story.asp?EditorialsID=336 8/27/2002 -- Oregon resident Robert R. Keppel, owner of the now-defunct braindump Web sites Cheet-Sheets.com and CheetSheets.com, pleaded guilty in federal court Friday to a charge of theft of trade secrets, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1832(a)(2). The charge resulted from allegations made by Microsoft that Keppel was selling questions and answers to Microsoft certification exams. When he's sentenced on November 1, Keppel faces up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines. He also forfeited a Lexus RX300, a 1997 Ferrari Spider and $56,000 in cash as part of a plea agreement. CertCities.com attempted to reach both Keppel and his attorney for comment, but did not receive a response before this story was posted online. Assistant United States Attorney Annette Hayes, who prosecuted the case, said this is first application of the theft of trade secrets statute to procure a conviction within the realm of IT certification testing. In June, police in Bexar County, Texas seized the assets of TestKiller LTD and its owners citing the same felony charge, but criminal charges have not been filed in that case. Previously, most "braindump" cases were pursued in civil court, citing copyright and trademark violations. "The [theft of trade secrets] statute is not that old... which is probably why there hasn't been many [criminal cases of this type]. But there's nothing unique about this case," said Hayes. "We picked this statute because it was the one that applied." According to Microsoft, the case began when the company received allegations from customers that the content of Keen's CheetSheets contained live exam items. Microsoft made a criminal complaint to the Federal Bureau of Investigations during the summer of 2001, which turned the investigation over to its Computer Crimes Division. In Sept. 2001, the FBI's Computer Crimes Division issued search warrants and seized the cash and cars listed above, as well as papers and other evidence. According to the government, this evidence showed that Keppel began selling the questions some time in 1999. He began buying exam questions from a source in Pakistan in January 2001, which he then incorporated into his test materials. (The government declined CertCities.com's request for the name of the Pakistan source.) Records from a NOVA credit card merchant account, opened by Keppel in July 2000, show that the business earned at least $753,633.03 while that account was active, the government said. Hayes said that criminal charges were never filed in this case. When her office was given the case in late 2001, they initiated contact with Keppel, and eventually negotiated the guilty plea through Keppel's attorney. The government then filed a Statement of Information with the court on August 8, paving the way for Keppel to enter his plea on Friday. Hayes told CertCities.com that her office will make sentencing recommendations in late October. According to Hayes, Keppel is currently out on "pre-trial" release. "I think it's important to note that the government is pursuing these types of cases and we will continue to do so," said Hayes. Word of the plea spread over the weekend after the Seattle Post-Intelligencer published a short news story online. "I was ecstatic when I heard the news," said Craig Callaway, president of Self Test Software. "Yes, it's good for [test question] vendors like us, but this is really about the industry as a whole. There's got to be a concerted effort to protect the integrity of certification." "[This plea] will raise awareness of this problem," said Robert Pedigo, executive director of the Information Technology Certification Security Council, an industry organization that works to preserve the integrity of IT certification exams. "It is probably fair to take this as a shot across the bow of anyone who is attempting to cheat." Pedigo said that certification vendors are working on improving exam security through a variety of means, including tighter nondisclosure agreements, greater scrutiny of testing centers and legal action, but they are also looking to the certified community for help. "This is an active concern that every single person who holds a certificate should bear in mind. By becoming certified, one is a member of a professional group. And it's important that one defend the integrity of that group." The owner of one braindump site who wished to remain anonymous told CertCities.com that the plea was not that big a concern. Unlike CheetSheets.com, which commercially packaged live exam items, the source explained that most braindump sites are free collections of thousands of questions submitted by end users. "There's a big difference between looking at 150 screenshots [of actual] questions and poring through a thousand questions -- you can't memorize a thousand questions," the source said. "I think the certification pr
Re: Online Labs [7:52185]
I see lots of people selling on-line lab access at That Auction Site ( you know the one I mean ) You may also rent a rack at the following places: www.ccbootcamp.com www.fatkid.com www.ipexpert.net www.gettlabs.com HTH z ""Rasman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am in need of providers of online CCIE Labs. > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52186&t=52185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online Labs [7:52185]
I am in need of providers of online CCIE Labs. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52185&t=52185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interface In/Out stats [7:52177]
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Charles D Hammonds wrote: |->Yes. |-> |->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of |->Keith Woodworth |->Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:43 PM |-> |->Used the above, when looking at the interface stats on the 7206 is the |->input rate the data coming into the interface from the 7202? And the |->output rate the data coming out of the 7206 to the 7202? |-> |->sh int from the 7206: |->5 minute input rate 16514000 bits/sec, 3772 packets/sec |->5 minute output rate 16281000 bits/sec, 3666 packets/sec Thanks, thats what I thought. I thought maybe I had - sign in my MRTG config there to reverse the MRTG graph for that interface. In any case our user base here is sending out *waaay* more traffic to the rest of the net than they are getting. Which up until about 3 months ago it was always the other way around... I think its all the goddamn P2P crap that people are using now. Arg. Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52183&t=52177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: CCIE Lab Speculation - CCIE List [7:52182]
I was just browsing the CCIE Lab list to see what was up. Couple of things - 1) the archive needs to be updated. The most recent post was early July 2) it was interesting to see the early comments on the 3550 switch. Having done a bit of reading and a bit of practicing, and having been through the Lab twice, I thought I would offer a couple of comments. I reiterate that neither I nor anyone else has seen any real CCIE Lab scenarios. The study places and rent a rack folk may have practice labs, but at this point it is anyone's guess as to what will be tested. One should never bet anything of value on what may or may not be tested in the CCIE Lab. Those folks have a way of bushwhacking those who think they can "psych it out" 1) it will be really easy to get hung up in the mystique of L3 switching. My opinion is this would be a mistake 2) The first time through the lab ( 2 day lab ), layer 2 stuff was worth X points. The second time through ( one day lab ) the layer 2 stuff was worth Y points. Yes Y was greater than X. I believe it would be a mistake to discount layer 2 3) the one day lab, having had to come up with 26 points that were no longer there for terminal server and troubleshooting, did indeed find some interesting and challenging ways to allocate those points. I would expect to see some of that allocation moved from routers to switches, given the capability of the 3550. 4) having just completed a lab exercise for a place that sells study materials, I discovered some ways of doing things that had a kind of CCIE Lab "feel" to them. 5) while the 3550 is not explicitly capable of DLSw, I found in my study that there are other things that could be done in the CCIE Lab to screw your DLSw peering. One had better be aware of them. 6) I've become fascinated by things like 802.1q vlan tunneling, layer 2 protocol tunneling, vlan maps, all of which could make for an interesting CCIE Lab challenge. Again, not betting anything of value, but I can see where someone might want to review their understanding of how things work, how they might be able to be done in a route connected to switch situation. 7) I don't know if the CCIE Lab writers would be this sneaky, but an IP phone doesn't HAVE to have inline power to work. Actually, to test certain IP telephony related things, there doesn't even have to be a phone plugged into the switch. I don't suppose it would be too difficult to construct a scenario such that an IP phone in the Lab would be expected to contact an existing Call Manager somewhere in the Cisco campus. The question is, would they? 8) just because a command appears in the "help" menu, that doesn't mean you can use it. a good example is that of layer 2 access-lists. You can configure access-lists in the range noted below. Try to apply them! InTheZone(config)#access-list ? IP standard access list IP extended access list Extended 48-bit MAC address access list IP standard access list (expanded range) Protocol type-code access list IP extended access list (expanded range) 48-bit MAC address access list 9) this is true throughout the interface. 10) personally, I'm juiced about the 3550 in the Lab! For the first time in my CCIE prep, I believe I'm studying something relevant, and not a lot of dead end technologies and outmoded equipment. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52182&t=52182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Interface In/Out stats [7:52177]
Yes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Keith Woodworth Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Interface In/Out stats [7:52177] Small very simple question but need clarification w/regards to MRTG stuff. Have a 7206 connected to a 7202 via xover ethernet. Used the above, when looking at the interface stats on the 7206 is the input rate the data coming into the interface from the 7202? And the output rate the data coming out of the 7206 to the 7202? sh int from the 7206: 5 minute input rate 16514000 bits/sec, 3772 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 16281000 bits/sec, 3666 packets/sec Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52181&t=52177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: i`m a chinese [7:52060]
I am also a chinese,I suggest a better forum of chinese, http://forums.ultratechnology.net/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=17,a very good forum,enjoy it.my qicq is 26637380. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52180&t=52060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help! Need advice on purchasing ISDN simulator... [7:52179]
shop around,. ask advice. caveat emptor. BTW - all you folks who sell equipment - please respond directly, and do not post to the list. thanks. ""scott chapin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello all - I need to purchase an ISDN simulator and I came across this link. > > http://www.vconsole.net/simulator_isdn.html > > Should I take my chances with this cheaper product ($800.00) or should I > stay with more expensive products such as: > > B Link2 ISDN Simulator $999.99 > http://www.CheapISDN.com > > or > > Teltone's ISDN Demonstrator $1,855 > http://www.teltone.com/telecom_solutions/test_tools/test_isdn-demo_features. h > tml > > Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!! > > Scott > > --- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52179&t=52179 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help! Need advice on purchasing ISDN simulator... [7:52178]
Hello all - I need to purchase an ISDN simulator and I came across this link. http://www.vconsole.net/simulator_isdn.html Should I take my chances with this cheaper product ($800.00) or should I stay with more expensive products such as: B Link2 ISDN Simulator $999.99 http://www.CheapISDN.com or Teltone's ISDN Demonstrator $1,855 http://www.teltone.com/telecom_solutions/test_tools/test_isdn-demo_features.h tml Any advice would be greatly appreciated!!! Scott --- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52178&t=52178 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interface In/Out stats [7:52177]
Small very simple question but need clarification w/regards to MRTG stuff. Have a 7206 connected to a 7202 via xover ethernet. Used the above, when looking at the interface stats on the 7206 is the input rate the data coming into the interface from the 7202? And the output rate the data coming out of the 7206 to the 7202? sh int from the 7206: 5 minute input rate 16514000 bits/sec, 3772 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 16281000 bits/sec, 3666 packets/sec Thanks, Keith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52177&t=52177 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slatter [7:52146]
even Cisco seems to concede that the CCIE is a permanent award - kinda like judges remain "your honor" and congress slime remain "Senator" or "Congressperson" even if they were run out of office as criminals. The verification tool does note the inactive status. CCIE Verification Tool Yes, Jeffrey Doyle is CCIE number 1919. However, certification is NOT currently active. (Current status is Inactive). Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > so if a CCIE loses his/her active status, does that give him/her the right > to continue to post their CCIE # in their sig and tell everyone they are a > CCIE? I believe if they lose active status, they are NOT a CCIE anymore > (sort of like a doctor losing their credentials). what do you guys think? > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > Voice: 702-968-5100 > FAX: 702-968-5104 > > ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > according to the Cisco Verification tool: > > > > CCIE Verification Tool > > Yes, Stuart Biggs is CCIE number 1025. However, certification is NOT > > currently active. (Current status is Inactive). > > > > Chuck > > > > > > > > z > > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > > first > > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted > post > > > below he does provide a name. > > > snip > > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that > his > > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > > test > > > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > > itself > > > had > > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > > an > > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > > unsnip > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > > us took the > > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > > confusion as > > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > > some have retired, > > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > > 8031 active > > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > > tested by CCIE > > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52176&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
be careful what you wish for, Brad - you might just get it ;-> -- ""Brad Ellis"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > they need to keep the number for CCIE's less than 10,000. they should so a > "squeeze" and change everyone's #. then, when it start to get closer to > 10,000 again, we have a contest like American Idol, call it Worldwide IEdol > instead. have them program routers and solve technical problems in front of > a live audience. everyone could then go to groupstudy and vote for who they > want to kick off the show!!! > > thanks, > -Brad Ellis > CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) > Network Learning Inc > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) > Voice: 702-968-5100 > FAX: 702-968-5104 > > ""Moffett, Ryan"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Well, the online verification system says that "Stuart Biggs" is CCIE > 1025, > > though the current status is Inactive. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:22 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote > > [7:52165] > > > > > > Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) was/is > > Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. > > > > This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned as > CCIE > > #1025. > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Daniel Cotts" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote > [7:52159] > > > > > > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > > first > > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted > post > > > below he does provide a name. > > > snip > > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that > his > > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > > test > > > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > > itself > > > had > > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > > an > > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > > unsnip > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > > us took the > > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > > confusion as > > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > > some have retired, > > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > > 8031 active > > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > > tested by CCIE > > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52175&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
they need to keep the number for CCIE's less than 10,000. they should so a "squeeze" and change everyone's #. then, when it start to get closer to 10,000 again, we have a contest like American Idol, call it Worldwide IEdol instead. have them program routers and solve technical problems in front of a live audience. everyone could then go to groupstudy and vote for who they want to kick off the show!!! thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Voice: 702-968-5100 FAX: 702-968-5104 ""Moffett, Ryan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, the online verification system says that "Stuart Biggs" is CCIE 1025, > though the current status is Inactive. > > -Original Message- > From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote > [7:52165] > > > Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) was/is > Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. > > This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned as CCIE > #1025. > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Cotts" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52159] > > > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > first > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > > below he does provide a name. > > snip > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > test > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > itself > > had > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > an > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > unsnip > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > us took the > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > confusion as > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > some have retired, > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > 8031 active > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > tested by CCIE > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52171&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slatter [7:52166]
so if a CCIE loses his/her active status, does that give him/her the right to continue to post their CCIE # in their sig and tell everyone they are a CCIE? I believe if they lose active status, they are NOT a CCIE anymore (sort of like a doctor losing their credentials). what do you guys think? thanks, -Brad Ellis CCIE#5796 (R&S / Security) Network Learning Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware) Voice: 702-968-5100 FAX: 702-968-5104 ""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > according to the Cisco Verification tool: > > CCIE Verification Tool > Yes, Stuart Biggs is CCIE number 1025. However, certification is NOT > currently active. (Current status is Inactive). > > Chuck > > > > z > ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > first > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > > below he does provide a name. > > snip > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > test > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > itself > > had > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > an > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > unsnip > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > us took the > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > confusion as > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > some have retired, > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > 8031 active > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > tested by CCIE > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52166&t=52166 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Lab Swap Oct 16 in SJ For Dec Date [7:52174]
Possibly someone is looking to test before the lab changes come Nov. I'm looking to swap my R/S Oct 16th date in SJ for anytime in the month of Dec in SJ. Please contact me directly. Thanks in advance, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52174&t=52174 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52173]
with the advent of the CCIE verification tool on CCO, it is now possible to check out these rumors and bits of misinformation that have crept into the lexicon. http://tools.cisco.com/CCIE/Schedule_Lab/CCIEOnline?verify ( requires CCO login ) You do need to know the real first name and correct spelling of the last name. For example CCIE Verification Tool No, I'm sorry, Bruce Caslow is not CCIE number 3139. To receive a positive verification, you will need to enter in the CCIE's name exactly as it is in the CCIE database. For example, if the CCIE's first name is Dan, you may also want to try Daniel. Since there is a possibility that we have a different spelling of the person's name, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a last resort but CCIE Verification Tool Yes, Andrew Caslow is CCIE number 3139. Certification is currently active. Still, this is one way to stop the liars out there who are claiming they are CCIE's - Chuck -- www.chuckslongroad.info still a work in progress, but on line for your enjoyment z ""Chuck Ryan"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) was/is > Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. > > This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned as CCIE > #1025. > > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Cotts" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52159] > > > > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the > first > > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > > below he does provide a name. > > snip > > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the > test > > > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab > itself > > had > > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of > an > > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > > unsnip > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > > us took the > > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > > > Dave > > > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > > confusion as > > > well > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > > esent.html > > > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > > some have retired, > > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > > looked ) > > > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > > 8031 active > > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > > tested by CCIE > > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52173&t=52173 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
simulations exam [7:52172]
Hi, Do the simulations in the new CCNP exams works, so that I can test my configurations or I can just enter the commands? Eng. Paulo Roque [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52172&t=52172 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Paul, as a survivor of the brokerage industry, where something similar happened about four years ago, I have to offer this gentle correction. it is C10K, not C1K The Dow was approaching 10,000 for the first time in history and there was a tempest in a teapot about Dow10K system compatibility. What I do believe is that all existing CCIE's should be renumbered to reflect the five digit format. Maybe go to hex to preserve your existing assignment EG CCIE # 1025 become CCIE # A1025 the new pool become CCIE B That should keep us all happy and customers rightfully confused for decades to come. Chuck -- www.chuckslongroad.info still a work in progress, but on line for your enjoyment z ""Paul Borghese"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > This is it! The thing that will turn the industry around. Let's start > asking people if their network is C1k compatable. Explain how most networks > were designed for four digit CCIE's and they will need to hire us for a > complete overhall of the network. > > Yea sure it will cost a lot, but look at the consequences of not upgrading > your network to C1k compatability! > > Paul > > > - Original Message - > From: "MADMAN" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:56 PM > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of us took the > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > Dave > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of confusion as > > well > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, some have > retired, > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > looked ) > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were 8031 active > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was tested by CCIE > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > Chuck > > > > > > -- > > > > > > www.chuckslongroad.info > > > > > > still a work in progress, > > > but on line for your enjoyment > > > > > > z > > > ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their > > > will > > > > be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > > > > > > > > Reza > > -- > > David Madland > > CCIE# 2016 > > Sr. Network Engineer > > Qwest Communications > > 612-664-3367 > > > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > > Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52170&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52169]
Well, the online verification system says that "Stuart Biggs" is CCIE 1025, though the current status is Inactive. -Original Message- From: Chuck Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52165] Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) was/is Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned as CCIE #1025. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52159] > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the first > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > below he does provide a name. > snip > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the test > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab itself > had > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of an > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > unsnip > > > -Original Message- > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > us took the > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > Dave > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > confusion as > > well > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > esent.html > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > some have retired, > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > looked ) > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > 8031 active > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > tested by CCIE > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52169&t=52169 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132]
Hmmm, sounds like I need to do some more programming to fix it. Sorry for the bug! Paul - Original Message - From: "Mark W. Odette II" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 5:05 PM Subject: RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] > Bill- if you're pasting url's as the first line of text in the body of > the message, the news/mail server for this list strips it off... > > This is the reason why you see some users post messages with something > like the following: > > Pad pad pad pad... and more padding... > > > > that's all folks... > > etc. > > Just thought you'd like to know if you didn't before. > > > -Mark > > -Original Message- > From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] > > What the hell is going on? > - sorry for some reason URL's are being omitted from my messages... > > Configuring AUX-to-AUX Port Async Backup with Dialer Watch > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/aux-aux-watch.html > > Bill Creighton CCNP > Senior System Engineer > Motorola > iDEN CNRC Packet Data > > > -Original Message- > From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] > > Hello all ... > > I need to provide a tertiary backup for a remote site !!! I was thinking > of > using PSTN Can this be done ??? I guess I would have to buy FXO > cards > for > both routers ... or can you utilise the AUX ports ??? > > Any comments will be greatly received .. > > Regards > > Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52168&t=52132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Its been a long time coming folks. In the grand scheme of things, I'd say that the 5 digit is right about on time considering that other elite industry certs that have been around for approximately the same amount of time are either or already there or way past that. I don't think that it will hurt the value of the cert because once again at the end of the day, its the engineer/consultant/analyst et al, that makes the cert not the other way around. Will Gragido CISSP CCNP MCP Waiting in written la la land for the lab -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Borghese Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] This is it! The thing that will turn the industry around. Let's start asking people if their network is C1k compatable. Explain how most networks were designed for four digit CCIE's and they will need to hire us for a complete overhall of the network. Yea sure it will cost a lot, but look at the consequences of not upgrading your network to C1k compatability! Paul - Original Message - From: "MADMAN" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:56 PM Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of us took the > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > it difficult so as to require studying. > > Dave > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of confusion as > well > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, some have retired, > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > looked ) > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were 8031 active > > CCIE's. > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was tested by CCIE > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > Chuck > > > > -- > > > > www.chuckslongroad.info > > > > still a work in progress, > > but on line for your enjoyment > > > > z > > ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their > > will > > > be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > > > > > > Reza > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Sr. Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52167&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52165]
Actually, I thought/read/heard that CCIE #1025 (aka the first CCIE) was/is Jeff Buddemeier, technical lead for Cisco. This is the first time I ever heard the name Stewart Biggs mentioned as CCIE #1025. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Cotts" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 4:01 PM Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52159] > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the first > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > below he does provide a name. > snip > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the test > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab itself > had > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of an > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > unsnip > > > -Original Message- > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > us took the > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > Dave > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > confusion as > > well > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > esent.html > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > some have retired, > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > looked ) > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > 8031 active > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > tested by CCIE > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52165&t=52165 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
This is it! The thing that will turn the industry around. Let's start asking people if their network is C1k compatable. Explain how most networks were designed for four digit CCIE's and they will need to hire us for a complete overhall of the network. Yea sure it will cost a lot, but look at the consequences of not upgrading your network to C1k compatability! Paul - Original Message - From: "MADMAN" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 2:56 PM Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of us took the > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > it difficult so as to require studying. > > Dave > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of confusion as > well > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, some have retired, > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > looked ) > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were 8031 active > > CCIE's. > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was tested by CCIE > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > Chuck > > > > -- > > > > www.chuckslongroad.info > > > > still a work in progress, > > but on line for your enjoyment > > > > z > > ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their > > will > > > be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > > > > Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > > > > > > Reza > -- > David Madland > CCIE# 2016 > Sr. Network Engineer > Qwest Communications > 612-664-3367 > > "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston > Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52164&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Stuck in rxboot mode on 2524 [7:51780]
Rich is right. When the router boots up in boot mode, type enable, config t, then in global config, type config-register 0x2142 or 0x2102. Reload the router and you should be ok. Larkin, Richard wrote: > > We had the same problem last month on an old 4000. > The solution, from memory, was to use the config register or > boot system > command in the conf t global mode. > I remember we did o/r 0x2102 and the next boot showed the > config reg at > 0x2102, but it was still in rxboot mode. > I think the next step was within the configuration. > > Memory a bit rusty - but it may help trigger some ideas. > > Rik > > -Original Message- > From: McHugh Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 August 2002 4:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Stuck in rxboot mode on 2524 [7:51780] > > > I just attempted an upgrade on a 2524 from 11.0 to 12.2 and am > now stuck > rxboot mode. I followed the instruction to the letter and > rebooted from > 0x2101 to 0x2102 and the config register is showing that is is > now 0x2102 > but it is still in rxboot mode. My upgrade of the IOS failed > also. At the > end I got a checksum error. Right now I just want to get back > in regular > boot mode. Any suggestions appreciated. thx Randy > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52163&t=51780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132]
Bill- if you're pasting url's as the first line of text in the body of the message, the news/mail server for this list strips it off... This is the reason why you see some users post messages with something like the following: Pad pad pad pad... and more padding... that's all folks... etc. Just thought you'd like to know if you didn't before. -Mark -Original Message- From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] What the hell is going on? - sorry for some reason URL's are being omitted from my messages... Configuring AUX-to-AUX Port Async Backup with Dialer Watch http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/aux-aux-watch.html Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] Hello all ... I need to provide a tertiary backup for a remote site !!! I was thinking of using PSTN Can this be done ??? I guess I would have to buy FXO cards for both routers ... or can you utilise the AUX ports ??? Any comments will be greatly received .. Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52162&t=52132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52161]
according to the Cisco Verification tool: CCIE Verification Tool Yes, Stuart Biggs is CCIE number 1025. However, certification is NOT currently active. (Current status is Inactive). Chuck z ""Daniel Cotts"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the first > CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post > below he does provide a name. > snip > The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his > certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the test > > from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab itself > had > a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of an > inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). > unsnip > > > -Original Message- > > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > > us took the > > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > > it difficult so as to require studying. > > > > Dave > > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > > confusion as > > well > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > > esent.html > > > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > > some have retired, > > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > > looked ) > > > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > > 8031 active > > > CCIE's. > > > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > > tested by CCIE > > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52161&t=52161 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DCT,DTE [7:52117]
Try lowering the clockrate, to something like 64000, (I never had a problem at speed). Also make sure you are applying it to the correct router. You might also want to try replacing the cable with a known good one. As they say: 70% of the problems lie in the physical layer... Or was it 75%? :o) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52160&t=52117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] 2nd Terry Slattery quote [7:52159]
In my previous post I quoted a post from Terry Slattery regarding the first CCIEs. In it he did not recall the name of CCIE# 1025. In the quoted post below he does provide a name. snip The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the test from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026. The lab itself had a plaque outside the door labeling it as #1024 (a power of two - kind of an inside joke for networking/compuer jocks). unsnip > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > us took the > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > it difficult so as to require studying. > > Dave > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > confusion as > well > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > esent.html > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > some have retired, > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > looked ) > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > 8031 active > > CCIE's. > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > tested by CCIE > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52159&t=52159 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
The following is cut from a post to the list by Terry Slattery. It was in answer to a similar question. In it he does not identify CCIE# 1025. I seem to remember another post where he does provide a name for #1025. I'll continue searching for it. snip The folks here at Chesapeake forwarded the following discussion to me. The first lab was numbered 1024 as kind of a "secret handshake", by the first CCIE program administrator, whose name I remember as Scott Edwards. Scott left Cisco several years ago. The first CCIE (another Scott, but I don't recall his last name), proctored the first lab. He spent the entire weekend prior to the test preparing scenarios and cables (good and bad ones). These were the days of the AGS+, where to do a DCE device, you had to select the correct applique and set the clock jumpers on the interface card. It was an interesting exam! It was a nice mix of hardware and software tasks. Kinda fun, actually. I sent Scott running around quite a lot go gather docs that I needed (remember, no CD in those days) to identify the exact jumpers to set on some weird cards I had to use. There were no racks - everything was on the floor or on boxes in the room. I stacked the routers on the floor and cabled them together right there. All this was in August, 1993. -tcs unsnip > -Original Message- > From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 1:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his > proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our > guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. > > Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in > Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of > us took the > test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make > it difficult so as to require studying. > > Dave > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of > confusion as > well > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_pr > esent.html > > > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, > some have retired, > > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > > looked ) > > > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were > 8031 active > > CCIE's. > > > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was > tested by CCIE > > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52158&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Command [7:52157]
I am looking for some info on this command.I checked Cisco but did not find much.Anyone with a link ? session-disconnect-warning Thanks _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52157&t=52157 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
CCIE 1040 sits next to me and I asked him if Imran (sp?) was his proctor and it was. Imran designed the orgianal program and it's our guess he was the proctor for the 1st CCIE. Imran was pretty tough, I remember talking to him at networkers in Denver when the CCIE recert first came out and about 100 of us took the test and only 2 passed. He chuckled stating his intention was to make it difficult so as to require studying. Dave Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of confusion as well > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > > shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 > > The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, some have retired, > some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I > looked ) > > So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were 8031 active > CCIE's. > > As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was tested by CCIE > 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) > The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. > > No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. > > Chuck > > -- > > www.chuckslongroad.info > > still a work in progress, > but on line for your enjoyment > > z > ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their > will > > be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > > > > Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > > > > Reza -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52156&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Don't you mean there will be 1 people who have passed the test? At 05:34 PM 8/27/2002 +, Jim Brown wrote: >First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their will >be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > >-Original Message- >From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > >Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > >Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52155&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Actually no, not all the #'s are active still (people who let their certification expire) and they didn't start at 1...they started at 1024. So I have a paradox to think about, a CCIE proctors the lab, so who proctored for the first CCIE? Kinda like what came first: the CCIE or the proctor. Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52154&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Yes someone who reads this list (congrats again if you read this Ray) just passed and got a number in the mid 10030's Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Diliberto Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] I just heard from a friend who just passed the lab. Cisco is in the 5 digits now for CCIE numbers. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52153&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
this topic of fascination for many often leads to a bit of confusion as well http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html shows the number of CCIE's world wide as of 7/31/02 The first CCIE number issued was 1025. Over the years, some have retired, some have neglected to recertify ( including Jeff Doyle, last time I looked ) So according to Cisco's numbers, on July 31 2002 there were 8031 active CCIE's. As a sidebar, Terry Slattery, CCIE 1026, tells how he was tested by CCIE 1025 ( sorry, I can't remember the name ) The theory was / remains that only CCIE's should test candidates. No one seems to know who tested #1025, nor the criteria used. Chuck -- www.chuckslongroad.info still a work in progress, but on line for your enjoyment z ""Jim Brown"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their will > be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. > > -Original Message- > From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] > > > Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. > > Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52152&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
NOT including non-recert's? That would mean Cisco recycles the numbers? Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Jim Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their will be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. -Original Message- From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52151&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on Configure WCCP [7:52084]
My experience is with Cisco Cache Engines running version 1 and 2 wccp. I have never implemented a cache on squid (that should be wccp running on a unix box, right?), so I really cant help much there. But if ur router is properly configured, below is the wccp config u should have: ip wccp version 1 ip wccp web-cache ! ! interface Ethernet0/0 description link to LAN ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224 ip wccp web-cache redirect out ip route-cache same-interface full-duplex If u do a debug ip wccp and terminal monitor, u should see output like: *Mar 1 20:11:25.374: WCCP-EVNT: Built I_See_You msg body w/0 usable web caches, change # 0001 *Mar 1 20:11:39.671: WCCP-EVNT: Built I_See_You msg body w/1 usable web caches, change # 0002 *Mar 1 20:11:39.671: %WCCP-5-CACHEFOUND: Web Cache x.x.x.x acquired *Mar 1 20:11:49.659: WCCP-EVNT: Built I_See_You msg body w/1 usable web caches, change # 0003 The debug output indicates communication between ur cache and router. That ur router indicates redirected packets is good, but is ur cache recieving them? Do u have in global config, the command: ip wccp redirect-list 199 to reference ur access-list 199 permit ip 202.162.214.0 0.0.0.255 any? I will remove the access-list to see if it is denying traffic. HTH >From: ramba linknetuser >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Help on Configure WCCP [7:52084] >Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:55:49 +0700 > >Hello, > >Thanks for your reply on my message. Right now, I've already changed the >version of wccp to version 1. But now, I have another problem. > >In router (sh ip wccp), it show that there are packets that redirect to the >cache engine. But, when I checked the cache engine log, there was no >request >of http going to the squid. >I've already reconfigure the squid and the kernel, but it still the same > >Can you help me with this? Is it my access list wrong? > >My access list: access-list 199 permit ip 202.162.214.0 0.0.0.255 any > > >Regards > >ER > a cache on squid _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52150&t=52084 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
First number assigned to a candidate was 1025. When we hit 11025 their will be 10,000 candidates not including people who didn't recertify. -Original Message- From: Reza Sharifi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146] Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52149&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
Is that because there are more than 1 CCIE,s?. Reza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52147&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No longer 4 digits [7:52146]
I just heard from a friend who just passed the lab. Cisco is in the 5 digits now for CCIE numbers. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52146&t=52146 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF NSSA [7:52122]
Found question 2 answer in the RFC 1587 : "If the destination is the default route (destination = DefaultDestination) and if the originator of the LSA and the calculating router are both NSSA area border routers do nothing with this LSA and consider the next in the list." ""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For the first problem, I can see in routing table the concept of Forward > metric, if bandwidth are unequal, first route has : > > IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip route 0.0.0.0 > Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 100, candidate default path, type > NSS > A extern 2, forward metric 10 > Redistributing via ospf 1 > Last update from 193.0.0.2 on Ethernet0, 00:00:00 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 193.0.0.2, from 192.168.108.2, 00:00:00 ago, via Ethernet0 > Route metric is 100, traffic share count is 1 > > If I shut down the ethernet link, the second route goes up : > > IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip route 0.0.0.0 > Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 100, candidate default path, type > NSS > A extern 2, forward metric 64 > Redistributing via ospf 1 > Last update from 2.0.0.1 on Serial0, 00:00:00 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 2.0.0.1, from 192.168.108.4, 00:00:00 ago, via Serial0 > Route metric is 100, traffic share count is 1 > > Does the concept of forward metric influence the choose of routes for NSSA ? > > ""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > > > I have some questions about Type 7 LSA default-routes propagated by ABRs. > > Consider a NSSA with two ABRs. Each ABR propagate a default route with a > > cost of 100 (commands are : area 1 nssa default-originate & area 1 > > default-cost 100). > > On a Internal router directly connected to each ABR, I can see that only > one > > default route is in the routing table : > > > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 > > > > But the two LSA are in the database : > > > > IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip ospf database nssa-external > > > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.108.3) (Process ID 1) > > > > > > Type-7 AS External Link States (Area 1) > > > > Routing Bit Set on this LSA > > LS age: 1702 > > Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) > > LS Type: AS External Link > > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > > Advertising Router: 192.168.108.2 > > LS Seq Number: 8001 > > Checksum: 0x4F63 > > Length: 36 > > Network Mask: /0 > > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > > TOS: 0 > > Metric: 100 > > Forward Address: 193.0.0.2 > > External Route Tag: 0 > > > > LS age: 318 > > Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) > > LS Type: AS External Link > > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > > Advertising Router: 192.168.108.4 > > LS Seq Number: 8003 > > Checksum: 0xF37B > > Length: 36 > > Network Mask: /0 > > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > > TOS: 0 > > Metric: 100 > > Forward Address: 2.0.0.1 > > External Route Tag: 0 > > > > My first question is, why does the IR choose one default route and not the > > both ? With more investigation, I can see that it prefer the link with the > > highest bandwidth. If I increase the bandwidth of the other link, the > > nexthop change : > > > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 > > > > if bandwidth are equal, the both routes are introduced : > > > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 > >[110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 > > > > Why does it consider cost of the link ? > > > > My other question is, on the ABR. I can see that the 0.0.0.0 LSA are in > the > > database. The First one is not computed because selforiginated but why the > > other is not computed ? (It's a type 7 LSA , not type 3). > > > > > > Thanks for help. > > > > -- > > Stephane LITKOWSKI > > Student in a French computer science school > > EPITA Telecom & Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) > > CCNA + CCNP > > EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52145&t=52122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help on Configure WCCP [7:52084]
Your router expects wccp version 2 on ur web-cache by default. Ur web-cache is sending wccp version 1 messages, hence ur debug output. U have to do ip wccp version 1 in global config mode on the router to enable support for wccp version 1. If u dont get the version option on doing ip wccp ?, then ur router ios image simply does nt support version 1. Then u will have to change the image if u must use the cache. I found c2600-is-mz.122-4T supports version 1 and 2. Tunji >From: "bdg_tech" >Reply-To: "bdg_tech" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Help on Configure WCCP [7:52084] >Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:02:04 GMT > >Hi, > >I've some question on configure wccp on my Cisco 2600 with IOS >C2600-IK8O3S-M, Version 12.2(7b) and squid version 2.4stable7. > >When I run command on router : debug ip wccp event, I get massage of " >3d00h: WCCP-EVNT:???: Unknown msg_type 7 on FastEthernet0/1.1 from "IP >cache" " > >The show run on my router will be: > >interface FastEthernet0/1 > > no ip address > > no ip redirects > > duplex auto > > speed auto > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/1.1 > > encapsulation isl 1 > > ip address 202.162.214.193 255.255.255.248 > > ip wccp web-cache redirect out > > Actually I'm using 3 vlan on my network. But right now, I'm trying to use >only 1 network for this wccp, so the user and proxy server are in Vlan 1. >My switch is Cisco 2924 XL-EN with IOS 12.0(5.2)XU. Please send me a >message >( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) if you need more >information. I really desperate to get help from you. > >Regards > >ER _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52144&t=52084 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Policy [7:52061]
>While security policies need to be unique per organization, there are some >common elements that can be recycled. > >Just to give an example, how about the handling of passwords? Really, do >you need to re-create the piece of the policy that says passwords need to be >protected, must be of a certain length, and mixed characters? It really >doesn't matter if the policy is for Van Kamps fish sticks factory, or for >the DEA: both need to ensure that they have some baseline protection for >passwords. Password structure is too detailed for the security policy, although it's necessary in the security design. The policy should state something on the order that people must protect their passwords, whether they can or cannot change their own, etc. And things do vary even here. The DEA, for electronic controlled substance prescribing, also requires digital signatures and biometrics for some functions. > >The below book may help, the high price tag buys you a one-organization >copyright. Having a ready-made template can save some time, and enable you >to focus on the more unique aspects of the organization's requirements >without spending all your time re-inventing the wheel. > >To that end, John, the following may be useful to you. Check it on Amazon. > >Information Security Policies Made Easy Version 8 >by Charles Cresson Wood > >HTH, > >Charles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52143&t=52061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frame relay switching / 2501 question [7:52142]
Is there a way to have two 2501s directly connected on a serial interface using frame relay with multiple PVCs, but have all those PVCs route to an ethernet interface on one of the routers? I know it sounds like an awkward way of doing things, but I'm trying to set up the following scenario Eth - 2501 - PPP - 2501 - FRAME - 2501 - Eth w/ remote networks. I realize that I could add another router as a dedicated frame switch, but that would require equipment I don't currently have access to. Any help is appeciated. Jeff Jarmoc - CCSA, CCNA, MCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52142&t=52142 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to get av-pair by radius to router [7:52141]
Hi, =20 I would like to create virtual dialer downloaded only for the active = connection. After the connection the router erase this virtual dialer. =20 how to get av-pair by radius to router and what's command must i've to = get it from radius. =20 I want some attribut download by radius like ip address 10.132.200.2 255.255.255.252 ppp chap hostname "Name" ppp chap password "pwd" dialer string "string" =20 and ip route X.X.X.X X.X.X.X by ?? =20 =20 Anyone have an Idea ?? =20 =20 =20 Kind Regards. Thierry. =20 [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of getro.gif] [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of CCNP.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52141&t=52141 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132]
What the hell is going on? - sorry for some reason URL's are being omitted from my messages... Configuring AUX-to-AUX Port Async Backup with Dialer Watch http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/aux-aux-watch.html Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] Hello all ... I need to provide a tertiary backup for a remote site !!! I was thinking of using PSTN Can this be done ??? I guess I would have to buy FXO cards for both routers ... or can you utilise the AUX ports ??? Any comments will be greatly received .. Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52140&t=52132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099]
For some reason the URL I included didn't show up... Kiwi has a great syslog viewer as well as many other products for logging - kiwisyslog.com http://www.kiwisyslog.com/products.htm#logfile_viewer Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099] Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099] I have my pix logging to a syslog server can anyone recommend a utility for easily going through the logs? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52139&t=52099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 in DMZ [7:52126]
More specifically: OWA pages can be accessed through SSL channel (40-bit key, according to the USA export laws for non-financial institutions). Communication between OWA server and servers located in the intranet zone is restricted to: one BDC server TCP : 135,138 UDP : 137 Exchange servers TCP : 135, 4410, 4411 ACE servers TCP : 5500 ECHO Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Kevin O'Gilvie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 in DMZ [7:52126] Dear All, What is the correct way to set up exchange in the DMZ.. I know how to set it up in the inside interface but that is a security risk. I would like to put IMC and OWA on the DMZ. And keep the Mail Server on the inside Thanks, Kevin _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52138&t=52126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 in DMZ [7:52126]
We set up exactly what you're trying to do for a client in Chile for a Mobile Office product we deployed, use the blueprint below for starters. (watch out for word wrap) http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/exchange/exchange55/plan/ekmgem.asp Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Kevin O'Gilvie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 5.5 in DMZ [7:52126] Dear All, What is the correct way to set up exchange in the DMZ.. I know how to set it up in the inside interface but that is a security risk. I would like to put IMC and OWA on the DMZ. And keep the Mail Server on the inside Thanks, Kevin _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52137&t=52126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132]
Configuring AUX-to-AUX Port Async Backup with Dialer Watch Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132] Hello all ... I need to provide a tertiary backup for a remote site !!! I was thinking of using PSTN Can this be done ??? I guess I would have to buy FXO cards for both routers ... or can you utilise the AUX ports ??? Any comments will be greatly received .. Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52136&t=52132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099]
Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 6:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pix Firewall Logs [7:52099] I have my pix logging to a syslog server can anyone recommend a utility for easily going through the logs? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52135&t=52099 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Security Policy [7:52061]
While security policies need to be unique per organization, there are some common elements that can be recycled. Just to give an example, how about the handling of passwords? Really, do you need to re-create the piece of the policy that says passwords need to be protected, must be of a certain length, and mixed characters? It really doesn't matter if the policy is for Van Kamps fish sticks factory, or for the DEA: both need to ensure that they have some baseline protection for passwords. The below book may help, the high price tag buys you a one-organization copyright. Having a ready-made template can save some time, and enable you to focus on the more unique aspects of the organization's requirements without spending all your time re-inventing the wheel. To that end, John, the following may be useful to you. Check it on Amazon. Information Security Policies Made Easy Version 8 by Charles Cresson Wood HTH, Charles Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52134&t=52061 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128]
Access-list numbers defines a standard access-list based on a MAC addresses Access-List number defines extended access-lists based on MAC address's So it would be for example access-list 702 permit ed32.2342.e0df .. Where Ed32.2342.e0df (I just made it up) is the MAC address .. is the wildcard mask. I am assuming in this case, it would be like the standard access lists, where 0 is don't ignore and 1 is ignore ? Please tell me if I am wrong, Just taking a squizz here. Thanks Manish -Original Message- From: Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 August 2002 14:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ref: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128] Dear All, anybody can tell how we can apply an access-list base on MAC Address INSTEAD of ip address on Cisco router 3600. Kind Regards abd quqas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52133&t=52128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSTN Router to Router ... [7:52132]
Hello all ... I need to provide a tertiary backup for a remote site !!! I was thinking of using PSTN Can this be done ??? I guess I would have to buy FXO cards for both routers ... or can you utilise the AUX ports ??? Any comments will be greatly received .. Regards Paul ... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52132&t=52132 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DCT,DTE [7:52117]
What speed did you configure ? ""Mohamed Saro"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > that was configured but the interfaces flaps up and down > > > > > Best Regards, > Mohamed Saro > Network Division Manager > T.E. DATA > Tel: +20-10 -1663531 > Tel: +20- 2 -7494025 > Ext:1102 > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117] > > > On the DCE interface you have to enter the following command: > clock rate . > Rgrds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52131&t=52117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128]
If I remember correctly, look at CCO for examples of using Access-List 700-799. Good Luck, Mark -Original Message- From: Eng. ABDALLAH QUQAS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ref: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128] Dear All, anybody can tell how we can apply an access-list base on MAC Address INSTEAD of ip address on Cisco router 3600. Kind Regards abd quqas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52130&t=52128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124]
I would probably look at 12.1.16. It is GD and should be stable. IP Plus IPSec 3DES only requires 8 and 40 so you should be fine. If you are feeling brave you could load up 12.2.10b.. :) Tim CCIE 9015, CSS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Firesox Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 8:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124] Folks, I am in need of a quick help. I have 2610 doing 3DES for site-to-site VPN. It creates a tunnel successfully, but it crashes and gives me an error messgage below. *** System received a SIGTRAP exception *** signal= 0x5, code= 0xd00, context= 0x81640a98 PC = 0x80db4414, Vector = 0xd00, SP = 0x81cfb1f0 *** Unexpected Console FIFO timeout interrupt *** PC = 0xfff03fc4, Vector = 0x500, SP = 0x81641ca4 The IOS is C2600 Software (C2600-IK2S-M), Version 12.0(7)XK1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE I have 16MB flash and 48mb Dram. I am suspecting this is a bug within the IOS. If so, can someone tell me what the most bug-free IOS(3DES) is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52129&t=52124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ref: ACCESS-LIST [7:52128]
Dear All, anybody can tell how we can apply an access-list base on MAC Address INSTEAD of ip address on Cisco router 3600. Kind Regards abd quqas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52128&t=52128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 in DMZ [7:52126]
Dear All, What is the correct way to set up exchange in the DMZ.. I know how to set it up in the inside interface but that is a security risk. I would like to put IMC and OWA on the DMZ. And keep the Mail Server on the inside Thanks, Kevin _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52126&t=52126 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117]
that was configured but the interfaces flaps up and down Best Regards, Mohamed Saro Network Division Manager T.E. DATA Tel: +20-10 -1663531 Tel: +20- 2 -7494025 Ext:1102 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117] On the DCE interface you have to enter the following command: clock rate . Rgrds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52127&t=52117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Catalyst QoS [7:52125]
I have a customer who has many different kinds of catalyst switches. I am deploying VoIP for them. I am familiar with doing L2 QoS for 2900/3500XL and 2950/3550 switches, but I am not sure how I can do some kind of traffic prioritization with 1900/2800 series switches. I am trying to figure out how many output queues they have in 1900/2800 series switches. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52125&t=52125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2610 VPN with 3DES [7:52124]
Folks, I am in need of a quick help. I have 2610 doing 3DES for site-to-site VPN. It creates a tunnel successfully, but it crashes and gives me an error messgage below. *** System received a SIGTRAP exception *** signal= 0x5, code= 0xd00, context= 0x81640a98 PC = 0x80db4414, Vector = 0xd00, SP = 0x81cfb1f0 *** Unexpected Console FIFO timeout interrupt *** PC = 0xfff03fc4, Vector = 0x500, SP = 0x81641ca4 The IOS is C2600 Software (C2600-IK2S-M), Version 12.0(7)XK1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEASE I have 16MB flash and 48mb Dram. I am suspecting this is a bug within the IOS. If so, can someone tell me what the most bug-free IOS(3DES) is? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52124&t=52124 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF NSSA [7:52122]
For the first problem, I can see in routing table the concept of Forward metric, if bandwidth are unequal, first route has : IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 100, candidate default path, type NSS A extern 2, forward metric 10 Redistributing via ospf 1 Last update from 193.0.0.2 on Ethernet0, 00:00:00 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 193.0.0.2, from 192.168.108.2, 00:00:00 ago, via Ethernet0 Route metric is 100, traffic share count is 1 If I shut down the ethernet link, the second route goes up : IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip route 0.0.0.0 Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 100, candidate default path, type NSS A extern 2, forward metric 64 Redistributing via ospf 1 Last update from 2.0.0.1 on Serial0, 00:00:00 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 2.0.0.1, from 192.168.108.4, 00:00:00 ago, via Serial0 Route metric is 100, traffic share count is 1 Does the concept of forward metric influence the choose of routes for NSSA ? ""Stephane LITKOWSKI"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi all, > > I have some questions about Type 7 LSA default-routes propagated by ABRs. > Consider a NSSA with two ABRs. Each ABR propagate a default route with a > cost of 100 (commands are : area 1 nssa default-originate & area 1 > default-cost 100). > On a Internal router directly connected to each ABR, I can see that only one > default route is in the routing table : > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 > > But the two LSA are in the database : > > IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip ospf database nssa-external > >OSPF Router with ID (192.168.108.3) (Process ID 1) > > > Type-7 AS External Link States (Area 1) > > Routing Bit Set on this LSA > LS age: 1702 > Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.108.2 > LS Seq Number: 8001 > Checksum: 0x4F63 > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 100 > Forward Address: 193.0.0.2 > External Route Tag: 0 > > LS age: 318 > Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 192.168.108.4 > LS Seq Number: 8003 > Checksum: 0xF37B > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 100 > Forward Address: 2.0.0.1 > External Route Tag: 0 > > My first question is, why does the IR choose one default route and not the > both ? With more investigation, I can see that it prefer the link with the > highest bandwidth. If I increase the bandwidth of the other link, the > nexthop change : > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 > > if bandwidth are equal, the both routes are introduced : > > O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 >[110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 > > Why does it consider cost of the link ? > > My other question is, on the ABR. I can see that the 0.0.0.0 LSA are in the > database. The First one is not computed because selforiginated but why the > other is not computed ? (It's a type 7 LSA , not type 3). > > > Thanks for help. > > -- > Stephane LITKOWSKI > Student in a French computer science school > EPITA Telecom & Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) > CCNA + CCNP > EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52123&t=52122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF NSSA [7:52122]
Hi all, I have some questions about Type 7 LSA default-routes propagated by ABRs. Consider a NSSA with two ABRs. Each ABR propagate a default route with a cost of 100 (commands are : area 1 nssa default-originate & area 1 default-cost 100). On a Internal router directly connected to each ABR, I can see that only one default route is in the routing table : O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 But the two LSA are in the database : IR_AS200_AREA1#sh ip ospf database nssa-external OSPF Router with ID (192.168.108.3) (Process ID 1) Type-7 AS External Link States (Area 1) Routing Bit Set on this LSA LS age: 1702 Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.108.2 LS Seq Number: 8001 Checksum: 0x4F63 Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 100 Forward Address: 193.0.0.2 External Route Tag: 0 LS age: 318 Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) LS Type: AS External Link Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) Advertising Router: 192.168.108.4 LS Seq Number: 8003 Checksum: 0xF37B Length: 36 Network Mask: /0 Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) TOS: 0 Metric: 100 Forward Address: 2.0.0.1 External Route Tag: 0 My first question is, why does the IR choose one default route and not the both ? With more investigation, I can see that it prefer the link with the highest bandwidth. If I increase the bandwidth of the other link, the nexthop change : O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 if bandwidth are equal, the both routes are introduced : O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/100] via 193.0.0.2, Ethernet0 [110/100] via 2.0.0.1, Serial0 Why does it consider cost of the link ? My other question is, on the ABR. I can see that the 0.0.0.0 LSA are in the database. The First one is not computed because selforiginated but why the other is not computed ? (It's a type 7 LSA , not type 3). Thanks for help. -- Stephane LITKOWSKI Student in a French computer science school EPITA Telecom & Network specialization (Paris, FRANCE) CCNA + CCNP EMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52122&t=52122 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 4000 error on startup. HELP!! [7:52121]
Hi, I just got a cisco 4000(it is not a 4500 or a 4700 but a plain 4000) for my home lab. But when I start it up it gives me a error saying "Failed sizing main memory". I tried cisco's website but couldn't find anything on this error. I would appreciate any help on this. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52121&t=52121 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: i`m a chinese [7:52060]
oh,My god.I am a chinese too. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52119&t=52060 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DCT,DTE [7:52117]
On the DCE interface you have to enter the following command: clock rate . Rgrds Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52120&t=52117 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
