Re: IGRP as proprietary? [7:57603]
> Router_10(config)#router ? > bgp Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) > egp Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) > eigrp Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) > igrp Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) > isis ISO IS-IS > > > > > > > iso-igrp IGRP for OSI networksNOTE THIS ONE > > mobileMobile routes > odr On Demand stub Routes > ospf Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) > rip Routing Information Protocol (RIP) > staticStatic routes > > I don't believe I have ever seen any documentation on this version on CCO Au contraire: (watch the wrap) http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fapo lo_c/3cfclns.htm#xtocid13 Not only is ISO-IGRP actually fairly well documented, I have actually used it several times in some old-school GOSIP networks. It's a nice little protocol, if a bit limited. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57825&t=57603 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 series DRAM ???? [7:57811]
I just upgraded my lab with 2 more 2500's and I upgraded them mem in them with this mem http://www.compgeeks.com/details.asp?invtid=4X36FPM It was only 9 bucks so I said what the hey and I got lucky it works. You can also go to kg2.com and get cisco memory garaunteed to work but a bit more expensive. -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2500 series DRAM [7:57811] binh, Heres my notes on 2500 memory... hopefully there should be some stickers or wording on the chips/pcb that help out finding out what you have. 2500 DRAM use ONLY: - 1x36 70ns(or faster) TIN SIMMS 4 meg - 4x36 70ns(or faster) TIN SIMM 16 meg PARITY, not Nx32. And they must be electronically 'single-sided'. Some simply don't work so shop/look around. --- Binh Ma wrote: > Hi to all members, > > I have old 16mb DRAM modules and would like to reuse > them on the 2500 > series routers, but I'm a little unsure if the > router will take it. Can > someone clarify will me what type of DRAM will the > 2500 series router > take, non-parity or parity DRAM modules ?? And how > can I tell if my 16mb > DRAM modules are parity or non-parity type ?? > > Thank-you members, > > rgds, > > Binh Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57824&t=57811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2500 series DRAM ???? [7:57811]
This should helo you: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2500/2500cfig/67028.htm#xtocid221108 Watch out for the text wrap though. Yeti-GBR1 of www.yeti-gbr1.co.uk Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57823&t=57811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2500 series DRAM ???? [7:57811]
binh, Heres my notes on 2500 memory... hopefully there should be some stickers or wording on the chips/pcb that help out finding out what you have. 2500 DRAM use ONLY: - 1x36 70ns(or faster) TIN SIMMS 4 meg - 4x36 70ns(or faster) TIN SIMM 16 meg PARITY, not Nx32. And they must be electronically 'single-sided'. Some simply don't work so shop/look around. --- Binh Ma wrote: > Hi to all members, > > I have old 16mb DRAM modules and would like to reuse > them on the 2500 > series routers, but I'm a little unsure if the > router will take it. Can > someone clarify will me what type of DRAM will the > 2500 series router > take, non-parity or parity DRAM modules ?? And how > can I tell if my 16mb > DRAM modules are parity or non-parity type ?? > > Thank-you members, > > rgds, > > Binh Ma [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57822&t=57811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding VLANs [7:57819]
""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a question about how to add vlans to the port-channel without > it being disruptive. When I added vlan 62,63, and 64 I started with the > interfaces 1/1 and 1/2 on 6509A then did the portchannel 1 on the 6509a then > went to the 6509b and did the same thing in the same order. By the time I > got to doing the portchannel on the 6509b, users were calling like crazy > Once I finished, all was fine again. The message I got was related to the > portchannel not having the same vlan mask on both ends. Is there an order > that I can do on future additions to the portchannel that will avoid this > unpleasantness? no disrespect intended, but perhaps this kind of thing could be scheduled for a slack time - after hours, a weekend? done remotey? > > ___ > Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com > The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57821&t=57819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Adding VLANs [7:57819]
""Azhar Teza"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a question about how to add vlans to the port-channel without > it being disruptive. When I added vlan 62,63, and 64 I started with the > interfaces 1/1 and 1/2 on 6509A then did the portchannel 1 on the 6509a then > went to the 6509b and did the same thing in the same order. By the time I > got to doing the portchannel on the 6509b, users were calling like crazy > Once I finished, all was fine again. The message I got was related to the > portchannel not having the same vlan mask on both ends. Is there an order > that I can do on future additions to the portchannel that will avoid this > unpleasantness? do al l your configs in notepad ahead of time. then do a simple quick cut and paste. no muss, little fuss. > > ___ > Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com > The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57820&t=57819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding VLANs [7:57819]
I have a question about how to add vlans to the port-channel without it being disruptive. When I added vlan 62,63, and 64 I started with the interfaces 1/1 and 1/2 on 6509A then did the portchannel 1 on the 6509a then went to the 6509b and did the same thing in the same order. By the time I got to doing the portchannel on the 6509b, users were calling like crazy Once I finished, all was fine again. The message I got was related to the portchannel not having the same vlan mask on both ends. Is there an order that I can do on future additions to the portchannel that will avoid this unpleasantness? ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57819&t=57819 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
> Our baseball season is over > unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh). Priscilla!!! How dare you, on the eve of the UMich/Ohio State game?!?! ;-) BJ (Go Blue!!) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57818&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
5 games of cricket Between Australia and England have just commenced... Australia won the first game very convincingly Australia should go a clean sweep -- Regards, Peter Kingston Telstra BigPond Direct Freecall 1800 066 594 ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well you better explain this to us Yankees. Our baseball season is over > unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh). Well we have hockey > and basketball too, I guess, and they're a litte better! :-) > > Priscilla > > Peter Kingston wrote: > > > > I just as a little bit of friendly rivalry, > > > > I believe there is more than yourself confused in London, > > naming your > > cricketers 5 zips looks like a fair chance > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Peter Kingston > > Telstra BigPond Direct > > Freecall 1800 066 594 > > wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > > > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > > network, which > > > passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from > > certain devices. > > > > > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > > > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > > > > > Any thoughts > > > Thanks > > > -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57817&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
Well you better explain this to us Yankees. Our baseball season is over unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh). Well we have hockey and basketball too, I guess, and they're a litte better! :-) Priscilla Peter Kingston wrote: > > I just as a little bit of friendly rivalry, > > I believe there is more than yourself confused in London, > naming your > cricketers 5 zips looks like a fair chance > > -- > Regards, > > Peter Kingston > Telstra BigPond Direct > Freecall 1800 066 594 > wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > network, which > > passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from > certain devices. > > > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > > > Any thoughts > > Thanks > > -P > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57816&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Confused from London [7:57780]
I just as a little bit of friendly rivalry, I believe there is more than yourself confused in London, naming your cricketers 5 zips looks like a fair chance -- Regards, Peter Kingston Telstra BigPond Direct Freecall 1800 066 594 wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different network, which > passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from certain devices. > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > Any thoughts > Thanks > -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57815&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741]
I thought the routing and the Remote access as the easiest, breezed them both in.. Switching the hardest and Troubleshooting just below the Switching -- Regards, Peter Kingston CCNP ""John McCartney"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I agree from my experience CIT is the hardest with Routing 2nd, Remote 3rd > and Swtiching last. I missed passing the CIT by 6 measly points. I'm taking > it next month again, congrats and keep on going!! Any advice on CIT please > send to my email address. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57814&t=57741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ping to directed broadcast [7:57780]
Oops. I mean to make the title say Ping to Directed Broadcast. The original title "Confused from London" wasn't meaningful, so I meant to do a good deed and change it, but changed it to the wrong thing. Hope you understand. :-) (The meta-message is a strong recommendation that we all use titles with meaning to optimize the efficiency of the thousands of people reading the numerous messages per day on the list. Thanks.) Priscilla Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > > network, which passes through a cisco router why do i get > > replies from certain devices. > > What are these "certain devices" that respond? > > Where are you running the ping from? What operating system? > What ping tool? How does the ping tool behave? Does it send a > single packet or try to be smart and send individual pings? > What is your topology? What is your config? Could there be a > misconfigured subnet mask so that devices don't agree on what > the broadcast address is? What do debug and protocol analyzer > traces show you? > > > > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet > > The router should not forward the packet onto the network in > question if you have "no ip directed-broad" configured on the > outgoing interface. I have verified that routers handle this > correctly, at least in my lab. > > However, I have seen some strange behavior with these routers > (running IOS 11.0, by the way). The routers respond to the ping > themselves! They don't forward, but they do respond, (regardles > of the configuration for directed broadcasts.) > > Here's the scenario where I've seen this: > > internetwork-e0-Cisco router-e1Ethernet LAN > > e0 > ip addr 10.10.0.2 255.255.255.0 > > e1 > ip addr 192.168.40.2 255.255.255.0 > > I ping from somewhere on the internetwork to 192.168.40.255. > With "no ip directed-broad" configured, the router doesn't > forward the packet, but it does respond to the ping. > > The reply comes from 10.10.0.2. Cisco routers accept this reply > and say that the ping succeeded. Windows 98 DOS ping does not > accept this reply (because it comes from 10.10.0.2 and not the > address that the ping was sent to). > > It is kind of strange that the router responds, so if your > scenario is similar, I can see why you ask the question. Of > course your scenario could be completely different too, and > there are probably numerous other reasons that you could be > seeing replies, depending on your config, tools, etc. > > ___ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > www.troubleshootingnetworks.com > www.priscilla.com > > > > Any thoughts > > Thanks > > -P > > > > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57813&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ARP to directed broadcast [7:57780]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Someone asked me a question which confused me:- > If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different > network, which passes through a cisco router why do i get > replies from certain devices. What are these "certain devices" that respond? Where are you running the ping from? What operating system? What ping tool? How does the ping tool behave? Does it send a single packet or try to be smart and send individual pings? What is your topology? What is your config? Could there be a misconfigured subnet mask so that devices don't agree on what the broadcast address is? What do debug and protocol analyzer traces show you? > > The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. > I thought the router would therefore drop the packet The router should not forward the packet onto the network in question if you have "no ip directed-broad" configured on the outgoing interface. I have verified that routers handle this correctly, at least in my lab. However, I have seen some strange behavior with these routers (running IOS 11.0, by the way). The routers respond to the ping themselves! They don't forward, but they do respond, (regardles of the configuration for directed broadcasts.) Here's the scenario where I've seen this: internetwork-e0-Cisco router-e1Ethernet LAN e0 ip addr 10.10.0.2 255.255.255.0 e1 ip addr 192.168.40.2 255.255.255.0 I ping from somewhere on the internetwork to 192.168.40.255. With "no ip directed-broad" configured, the router doesn't forward the packet, but it does respond to the ping. The reply comes from 10.10.0.2. Cisco routers accept this reply and say that the ping succeeded. Windows 98 DOS ping does not accept this reply (because it comes from 10.10.0.2 and not the address that the ping was sent to). It is kind of strange that the router responds, so if your scenario is similar, I can see why you ask the question. Of course your scenario could be completely different too, and there are probably numerous other reasons that you could be seeing replies, depending on your config, tools, etc. ___ Priscilla Oppenheimer www.troubleshootingnetworks.com www.priscilla.com > > Any thoughts > Thanks > -P > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57812&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: pix vpn [7:57740]
PIX will support IPSec over UDP is ver 6.3 -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Deal Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 12:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pix vpn [7:57740] Ciaron, You know, I've been impatiently waiting for the same feature. When I teach classes that are remote for Boson, we use a 3002 and a router. I need to set up a GRE tunnel and then encrypt this tunnel. And because this stuff typically goes through a firewall, I need a TCP VPN connection. It would be great if Cisco's routers supported this feature; then I could get read of the 3002 and 3005 and just use two routers as the endpoints of the connection. If anyone knows if/when Cisco has plans for adding this feature to their routers and PIXs, I'm sure quite a few people would be interested in this information. Cheers -- Richard A. Deal Visit my home page at http://home.cfl.rr.com/dealgroup/ Author of Cisco PIX Firewalls, CCNA Secrets Revealed!, CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep, CCNP Switching Exam Cram, and CCNP Cisco LAN Switch Configuration Exam Cram Cisco Test Prep author for QuizWare, providing the most comprehensive Cisco exams on the market. ""Ciaron Gogarty"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anybody know if the PIX will support the client side TCP encapsulation > of VPN traffic in the near future, or must you buy a VPN concentrator to get > this feature?? > > Thanks > > CG > > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for > the > presence of computer viruses. > > For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > phone + 353 1 4093000 > > fax + 353 1 4093001 > ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57803&t=57740 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Security rep for a mortgage company [7:57798]
I have a client mortgage company the would like to connect to the internet and provide VPN access to the sattelite offices. Is there any legal or specific requirement they need to meet in order to allow access to users over the internet. Can somebody help. Thanks J barrera Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57798&t=57798 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2500 series DRAM ???? [7:57811]
Hi to all members, I have old 16mb DRAM modules and would like to reuse them on the 2500 series routers, but I'm a little unsure if the router will take it. Can someone clarify will me what type of DRAM will the 2500 series router take, non-parity or parity DRAM modules ?? And how can I tell if my 16mb DRAM modules are parity or non-parity type ?? Thank-you members, rgds, Binh Ma Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57811&t=57811 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Home Lab Materials and Equipments [7:57810]
Hi group, I want to get it right the first time. I intend setting up my CCIE lab at home. I will appreciate if someone that have taken the lab or preparing for it, tell me what Switches, Routers, materials I need to buy. Also information about the various needed blades on the switches is important, cables, cards, modules, etc. I currently have a cable connection and also a dialup connection from home to the internet, are these enough or do I need to get a second cable connection? I curently have the following books: 1. CCIE Fundametals Network Design and Case Studies 2nd Edition by Cisco Press. 2. Routing TCP/IP, volume 1 by Cisco Press (Jeff Doyle) also 1. Cisco router 1601 2. Cisco router 2502 3. cisco router 3000 I intend buying Cisco Catalyst Switch 5000 within a few days, but I need your assistance. Please I will appreciate an answer for my big brothers & sisters CCIEs and those who are currently working towards it. Thanks in advance. Godswill Oletu CCNP, CCDP, CSS1. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57810&t=57810 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multicast question [7:57774]
Switches forward multicasts by default. Routers don't. Priscilla Hotmail Cisco wrote: > > Hi, > I have some users who want to use a multicast application > between different > vlans. > Is multicast forwarding turned on by default on 12.1 IOS? > Would'nt I need to > config > something like PIM, IGMP and CGMP on my cat's and routers to do > this > efficiently > or will the IOS just flood multicast packets out all interfaces > by default? > Thanks for any clues! > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57809&t=57774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732]
Robert, Aux could only work if you had configured the router before now to accept Aux connections. The only posible solution is for you to go through the console port. Using a PC with a Terminal emulator set its parameters to: 9600 baud rate No parity 8 data bits 1 stop bit No flow control Using the appropraite console cable, connect the router to the PC, run the terminal software and set the parameters as suggested above. Then: 1. Switch off the Router 2. Press [Enter Key] to connect to the router (do not mind, you will not see anything displayed on the screen) 3. ON the router and type in the break sequence (depending on your terminal emulaion software and the OS you are running, your break sequence could be i.Ctrl+Break ii.Ctrl+F6+Break iii.Ctrl+a+f iv.Ctrl+b v.Ctrl+End vi. Break vii.control+shift+6+b etc!!! which ever works for you.) 4. Then on Rommon> Type "confreg 0X2142" ..To boot from flash. 5. On rommon > type "Reset" This makes the router to boot from flash and ignore its configurations. 6. Type "No" after the setup question of oress Ctrl+C 7. On Router> type "Enable" 8. On Router#type "copy startup-config running-config" 9. On Router# type "Config t" 0. On Router(config-t)# type "config-register 0x2102" 1. On Router(config-t)#type end 2. On Router# type "copy running-config startup-config With these you are set. If this work for you Bill, just send me a DEER for thanksgiving day, else please feel free to ask more questions. my 0.2 cents Regards Godswill Oletu --- dayo olabisi wrote: > Bill, > > telnet won't work if the router isn't up... I think > connecting via the Aux port may be of help. > > dayo > --- Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 > wrote: > > I'm assuming you don't have VTY access - telnet, > of > > course, doesn't care > > about console port settings... > > > > Bill Creighton CCNP > > Senior System Engineer > > Motorola > > iDEN CNRC Packet Data / MPS > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Robert Massiache > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:27 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732] > > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > The problem is upon boot up I am getting only > > garbled asci characters and > > the screen appears to be frozen. It don't let me > see > > anything and type > > anything to implement your suggestion...sorrry. I > > welcome if you could tell > > me some alternative...thanks a lot! > > > > thanks > > Robert M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "miken" > > >To: "Robert Massiache" , > > >CC: , > > >Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! > > >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:52:49 -0700 > > > > > >I believe the config-register is stored in NVRAM. > > So in theory, if you > > >bypass the startup config, you may default to the > > standard > > >config-register settings. Haven't tried it though > > to know for sure. > > >Have you tried booting into rommon(control-break > > sequence) and then > > >stepping through the confreg steps? > > > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products > > >_comm > > > >and_summary_chapter09186a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127http://www.cisco.com/en > > / > > > >US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_summary_chapter0918 > > 6 > > >a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127HTH,Mike- > Original > > Message - > > >From: "Robert Massiache" > > >To: > > >Cc: ; > > >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:39 PM > > >Subject: Confreg problem...help! > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I got a mc3810 router and was running perfect. > > Sometime ago I > > > > mistakenly typed a confreg value which I do > not > > remeber exactly but > > > > I know it was > > >not > > >a > > > > relevant one. I was actually practicing with > the > > confreg entries. > > > > > > > > What happened was that after I just rebooted > the > > router I lost the > > >console > > > > screen. I tried with all sorts of console port > > values like changing > > > > the baud-rate, start stop bit etc. > > > > > > > > I found it was responding to 1200 baud speed > but > > all I could find is > > >some > > > > corrupted and garbled ascii characters on the > > Teraterm. Same is the > > > > case with hyprterm. > > > > > > > > Any helpers please... > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 > > months FREE*. > > > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > > > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site > http://webhosting.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741]
I agree from my experience CIT is the hardest with Routing 2nd, Remote 3rd and Swtiching last. I missed passing the CIT by 6 measly points. I'm taking it next month again, congrats and keep on going!! Any advice on CIT please send to my email address. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57807&t=57741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amazon routers [7:57802]
Does anyone have experience with Amazon routers from ACC? I need to put a 7206 in-line to replace a failing Amazon and the commands are difficult to match up to the Cisco world. Any help would eb appreciated. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57802&t=57802 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WLAN Exam [7:57801]
Hello group, Does anyone know of any good resources/books for the WLAN exam (9E0-576) ? Cheers, Brian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57801&t=57801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741]
I Agree with you. CIT was probably the easiest for me as well. Routing was definately the hardest. For other studying for the CCNP i reccommend taking Routing as your 3rd test. I found myself referring back to my routing book often while studying for CIT as I had forgotten some of the fram formats and such. Jarett ""Mr Joshua"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > teh hardest? really? hm... I found it the easiest and routing the > hardest. Anybody else? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57797&t=57741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 802.1q trunking [7:57772]
DON'T TRUST THE CODE ON THE 35XX SERIES SWITCHES. Sorry for yelling, but its that important. I've seen repeated situations like this: router switch 1 switch 2 With a daisy chained configuration like this I've seen multiple instances where a vlan that is done correctly on the router won't work on switch 2, even though all the links are set up for trunking. I've tried forcing this situation with allowed vlan configs and so forth, and its just a pain in the you-know-what. It seems less of a hassle with the most recent code, but I never go in and offer a design like that - its just way, way too risky. PA-FE-TX are about $500 on the aftermarket - have them buy you a couple for the 7206, run lines to the switches, and handle each one as an individual connection. Kris Waters wrote: >Everyone, > >Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago >with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons >and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on >a gradual basis. > >My building contains the following equipment: > >7206VXR router that does internal routing. I have one FastEthernet port on >this router. > >One Catalyst 4006 (Sup2, set based code) switch on the third floor. Both >these devices run the latest code. > >The first and second floors have Catalyst 3500 switches with fiber between >floors. A VTP domain is set up between the 3 switches. > >It was suggested to me to put 3 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port on >the router and then trunk them to the switch (or switches). I'm not quite >sure of the best way to go about doing this. I've read numerous tac >articles, but a little more guidance would be greatly appreciated. > >Here is a sample of the code I used on the 7206 to create the subinterfaces: >interface FastEthernet0/0.1 > encapsulation dot1Q 111 > ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.255.0 > >What do I do now? The router is plugged directly into port 4/10 on the 4006. >Do I create a VLAN 111 on the 4006? Any replies can be copies directly to me >at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as to the board. > >TIA >Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57795&t=57772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: passed cit. that's a wrap on ccnp [7:57741]
teh hardest? really? hm... I found it the easiest and routing the hardest. Anybody else? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57794&t=57741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multicast question [7:57774]
I do not think it is turned on by default. ip multicast-routing is the command to crank it up. by default, it will be sent out of all ports on your Cats. We are using igmp snooping here. It is better than cgmp. We once opened up a ticket to understand the difference. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57793&t=57774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
Boson is a good resource, especially test #1 and moreso #3 -Original Message- From: kavita geha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 1:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341] I am planning to give CCIE R&S. Can anyone please send me some question bank which can help me for the exam. Rgds Kavita Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57778&t=57341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP Question AGAIN... [7:57747]
Andrew- Without having done this, I could be wrong, but from your excerpt "You can think of the ephones with the numbers that were assigned to the ephone-dn's as FXS ports on the routers.", I would say then that all you have to do is create your dial-plan, and then define VOIP Dial-peers with the destination target being the IP address of the IP Phones. If it is that simple, then you will up and running in a heartbeat. Be sure and look at cisco's router to router (FXS to FXS) dial-peer samples to get an idea of your syntax. You may have to play around with voice quality settings though. Good luck Mark (Aspiring AVVID Engineer/Architect) :) -Original Message- From: Andrew Dorsett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VoIP Question AGAIN... [7:57747] Bruce - Actually I'm not missing any pieces. Check out this link on the CCO to see exactly what I'm trying to accomplish: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_e xample09186a00800ffdcc.shtml#background The router (3640,etc) utilizes the ITS feature set to act as the call manager for the network and create a small IP Key system without a few of the call manager features that I don't need in this case. And yes I want to use the 79xx phones behind the switch that I didn't mention is behind the router. I will use the FXO ports on the router to plug the incoming lines into. The page shows everything from how to do hold music to how to configure the phones XML interface. However it leaves out the PSTN setup section which is where I'm stuck at. I think I can do a session target to the ephone-dn but I'm not sure of the syntax. "Configuring the PSTN Connection on the Cisco ITS Router Assuming that the ITS router has voice interface cards, you will now want to configure those cards so that calls can be placed to and from the IP phones. This is not significantly different than other voice connections on a router. You can think of the ephones with the numbers that were assigned to the ephone-dn's as FXS ports on the routers." Thanks, Andrew On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Bruce Enders wrote: > Andrew, > You are asking how to set something up without all the pieces necessary > to make it work. And you are describing developing a dialplan that does > not adhere to common conventions. That part is okay, you can define how > you route calls in-to and out-of your own voice network pretty much any > way you want. > The 3640 with an analog FXO is okay to act as a gateway to the PSTN. The > same router with FXS VIC ALSO will allow you to connect and originate > calls internally. However, you state you want to place "VOIP" phones on > the network behind the 3640. What "VOIP" phones would those be? If you > mean 79XX series IP Telephones from Cisco, you also need a CallManager > Server to control those phones. > As far as the dialing rules in this network, it is up to you what you use > to direct calls out to the world. Using "9" to classify all telephone > numbers that follow it as being sent to the PSTN is a convention not a > rule. The only real rule is that you have to give the system the means to > route a call based on what the User dials. AND, if you are handing the > call off to the PSTN or any other telephone switch, you have to give that > switch the call routing information (telephone number) that it needs to > route the call. > In coming calls are a whole different topic. Try reading one of the many > VoX books that are now available. > Hope this helps, > Bruce > > Andrew Dorsett wrote: > > Second call for this one. I never received any answers to my question. I > want to know how to setup the link between the VoIP phones and the FXO's. > Basically a dialplan, but how do I route inbound calls from the PSTN to > the VoIP phones? And how do I route outbound calls from the VoIP phones > over > the FXO to the PSTN? I would like to avoid a system that uses 9 to dial > an outside line. I want to do direct dialing to the PSTN without > any special steps. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Andrew Dorsett wrote: > > Hey everyone, I'm playing with an idea. I want to get ahold of a 3640 > with FXO's and interface it to the PSTN and connect to some VOIP phones > on > a network behind it. I have done all of my research on the CCO and have > found how to configure everything for phone connection and FXO > > configuration. > > However I haven't found out how to configure dialplans to dial the > outside > world. I basically need one that would say "all 4 digit dialed calls are > VoIP phones and all other numbers are outside PSTN phone numbers." And > another question that I haven't found is how to link inbound calls from > the PSTN to my VoIP phones. Say I have 555-1221 for one line and I want > it > as line 1 on my phones, and > 555-1234 as the other line on my phones. I haven't found
Re: pix vpn [7:57740]
Ciaron, You know, I've been impatiently waiting for the same feature. When I teach classes that are remote for Boson, we use a 3002 and a router. I need to set up a GRE tunnel and then encrypt this tunnel. And because this stuff typically goes through a firewall, I need a TCP VPN connection. It would be great if Cisco's routers supported this feature; then I could get read of the 3002 and 3005 and just use two routers as the endpoints of the connection. If anyone knows if/when Cisco has plans for adding this feature to their routers and PIXs, I'm sure quite a few people would be interested in this information. Cheers -- Richard A. Deal Visit my home page at http://home.cfl.rr.com/dealgroup/ Author of Cisco PIX Firewalls, CCNA Secrets Revealed!, CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep, CCNP Switching Exam Cram, and CCNP Cisco LAN Switch Configuration Exam Cram Cisco Test Prep author for QuizWare, providing the most comprehensive Cisco exams on the market. ""Ciaron Gogarty"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anybody know if the PIX will support the client side TCP encapsulation > of VPN traffic in the near future, or must you buy a VPN concentrator to get > this feature?? > > Thanks > > CG > > > ** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for > the > presence of computer viruses. > > For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > phone + 353 1 4093000 > > fax + 353 1 4093001 > ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57786&t=57740 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
You can get practice questions from sites like boson, certificationzone etc. regards Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57763&t=57341 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732]
Dayo, Robert never stated the router was down, only that the console screen went haywire. -Original Message- From: dayo olabisi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:27 AM To: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732] Bill, telnet won't work if the router isn't up... I think connecting via the Aux port may be of help. dayo --- Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote: > I'm assuming you don't have VTY access - telnet, of > course, doesn't care > about console port settings... > > Bill Creighton CCNP > Senior System Engineer > Motorola > iDEN CNRC Packet Data / MPS > > > > -Original Message- > From: Robert Massiache > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732] > > > Thanks for the reply. > > The problem is upon boot up I am getting only > garbled asci characters and > the screen appears to be frozen. It don't let me see > anything and type > anything to implement your suggestion...sorrry. I > welcome if you could tell > me some alternative...thanks a lot! > > thanks > Robert M > > > > > > > >From: "miken" > >To: "Robert Massiache" , > >CC: , > >Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! > >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:52:49 -0700 > > > >I believe the config-register is stored in NVRAM. > So in theory, if you > >bypass the startup config, you may default to the > standard > >config-register settings. Haven't tried it though > to know for sure. > >Have you tried booting into rommon(control-break > sequence) and then > >stepping through the confreg steps? > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products > >_comm > >and_summary_chapter09186a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127http://www.cisco.co >m/en > / > >US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_summary_chapter >0918 > 6 > >a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127HTH,Mike- Original > Message - > >From: "Robert Massiache" > >To: > >Cc: ; > >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:39 PM > >Subject: Confreg problem...help! > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I got a mc3810 router and was running perfect. > Sometime ago I > > > mistakenly typed a confreg value which I do not > remeber exactly but > > > I know it was > >not > >a > > > relevant one. I was actually practicing with the > confreg entries. > > > > > > What happened was that after I just rebooted the > router I lost the > >console > > > screen. I tried with all sorts of console port > values like changing > > > the baud-rate, start stop bit etc. > > > > > > I found it was responding to 1200 baud speed but > all I could find is > >some > > > corrupted and garbled ascii characters on the > Teraterm. Same is the > > > case with hyprterm. > > > > > > Any helpers please... > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 > months FREE*. > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > > > > > > _ > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57792&t=57732 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732]
Bill, telnet won't work if the router isn't up... I think connecting via the Aux port may be of help. dayo --- Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote: > I'm assuming you don't have VTY access - telnet, of > course, doesn't care > about console port settings... > > Bill Creighton CCNP > Senior System Engineer > Motorola > iDEN CNRC Packet Data / MPS > > > > -Original Message- > From: Robert Massiache > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732] > > > Thanks for the reply. > > The problem is upon boot up I am getting only > garbled asci characters and > the screen appears to be frozen. It don't let me see > anything and type > anything to implement your suggestion...sorrry. I > welcome if you could tell > me some alternative...thanks a lot! > > thanks > Robert M > > > > > > > >From: "miken" > >To: "Robert Massiache" , > >CC: , > >Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! > >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:52:49 -0700 > > > >I believe the config-register is stored in NVRAM. > So in theory, if you > >bypass the startup config, you may default to the > standard > >config-register settings. Haven't tried it though > to know for sure. > >Have you tried booting into rommon(control-break > sequence) and then > >stepping through the confreg steps? > >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products > >_comm > >and_summary_chapter09186a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127http://www.cisco.com/en > / > >US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_summary_chapter0918 > 6 > >a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127HTH,Mike- Original > Message - > >From: "Robert Massiache" > >To: > >Cc: ; > >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:39 PM > >Subject: Confreg problem...help! > > > > > > > Hi, > > > I got a mc3810 router and was running perfect. > Sometime ago I > > > mistakenly typed a confreg value which I do not > remeber exactly but > > > I know it was > >not > >a > > > relevant one. I was actually practicing with the > confreg entries. > > > > > > What happened was that after I just rebooted the > router I lost the > >console > > > screen. I tried with all sorts of console port > values like changing > > > the baud-rate, start stop bit etc. > > > > > > I found it was responding to 1200 baud speed but > all I could find is > >some > > > corrupted and garbled ascii characters on the > Teraterm. Same is the > > > case with hyprterm. > > > > > > Any helpers please... > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 > months FREE*. > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > > > > > > _ > Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online > http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57791&t=57732 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771]
Hey, upgrade the OS on the switch to 6.3.6 / 7.2.1 or higher and you should be fine. Check out the last section of this url: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/473/62.shtml dayo --- Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote: > Can we see your running config for the HSRP group > setup? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state > [7:57771] > > > Trying to test HSRP between 2 Cat4006s running IOS > 12.1(8a)EW1. > > 'Sho standby brief' says that the vlan routing never > gets switched over to > standy router and stays in the "INIT" state. > > Rtr 1 is standby for VLAN2 > Rtr 2 is active for VLAN2 > > perform a shutdown on interface VLAN2 on rtr 2; > > 'sho stand brief' gives no ip addresses for active > and standby rtrs., but > instead both say "INIT". > > Any ideas? > > tia, > Mary [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57790&t=57771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSPF Filtering [7:57789]
In a hub and spoke WAN topology, OSPF is configured as area 0 in core and area 1 on the spoke routers. One of the spoke router is connected has two router in that area 1. I wanted to allow only two subnets to be available in the end router R4. Is this possible to control the routes filtering from interface connecting between R3 and R4? I want to allow routes for only 2 subnets to be advertised from R3 to R4. I dont want to apply any distribution list IN on R4. As I cant apply distribution list OUT on the interface connecting between R3 & R4. Is their any solution, apart from area filter list on ABR [R2] ? R1-R2--R3R4 | thanks Catch all the cricket action. Download Yahoo! Score tracker Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57789&t=57789 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Multicast [7:57773]
Yes, yes and yes but, only certain cats support igmp snooping. Timothy B. Fernandez Network Technician Sales, Trading and Wealth Management Thomson Financial [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 630-353-7013 Fax: 630-435-4960 901 Warrenville Rd Suite 15 Lisle, IL 60532 -Original Message- From: Hotmail Cisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multicast [7:57773] Hi, I have some users who want to use a multicast application between different vlans. Is multicast forwarding turned on by default on 12.1 IOS? Would'nt I need to config something like PIM, IGMP and CGMP on my cat's and routers to do this efficiently or will the IOS just flood multicast packets out all interfaces by default? Thanks for any clues! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57788&t=57773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco Secure ACS [7:57775]
There is no default username and password. What you need to do is be on the server you installed it on and point your web browser to 127.0.0.1:2002 this will put you right into the administrators screen from there you add the usernames and passwords. To add an administrator so you can administer this box from across the network go to administrator control button then add a admin. That should do it. -Original Message- From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco Secure ACS [7:57775] Does anybody know the default username and password for a vanilla install of Cisco Secure ACS for Windows version 3.0?? I'm being prompted for a username and password to login, but can't find one in the documentation. I tried the password recovery procedure, but there are no adminstrators created yet... help needed and appreciated. Thanks in advance CG ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone + 353 1 4093000 fax + 353 1 4093001 ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57787&t=57775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771]
Here's some links on CCO: pad pad pad Avoiding HSRP Instability in a Switching Environment with Various Router Platforms http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/8.shtml Understanding and Troubleshooting HSRP Problems in Catalyst Switch Networks http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/62.shtml > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:38 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771] > > > Trying to test HSRP between 2 Cat4006s running IOS 12.1(8a)EW1. > > 'Sho standby brief' says that the vlan routing never gets > switched over to > standy router and stays in the "INIT" state. > > Rtr 1 is standby for VLAN2 > Rtr 2 is active for VLAN2 > > perform a shutdown on interface VLAN2 on rtr 2; > > 'sho stand brief' gives no ip addresses for active and > standby rtrs., but > instead both say "INIT". > > Any ideas? > > tia, > Mary Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57784&t=57771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732]
I'm assuming you don't have VTY access - telnet, of course, doesn't care about console port settings... Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data / MPS -Original Message- From: Robert Massiache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! [7:57732] Thanks for the reply. The problem is upon boot up I am getting only garbled asci characters and the screen appears to be frozen. It don't let me see anything and type anything to implement your suggestion...sorrry. I welcome if you could tell me some alternative...thanks a lot! thanks Robert M >From: "miken" >To: "Robert Massiache" , >CC: , >Subject: Re: Confreg problem...help! >Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 00:52:49 -0700 > >I believe the config-register is stored in NVRAM. So in theory, if you >bypass the startup config, you may default to the standard >config-register settings. Haven't tried it though to know for sure. >Have you tried booting into rommon(control-break sequence) and then >stepping through the confreg steps? >http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products >_comm >and_summary_chapter09186a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127http://www.cisco.com/en / >US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_summary_chapter0918 6 >a0080087baf.html#xtocid43127HTH,Mike- Original Message - >From: "Robert Massiache" >To: >Cc: ; >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 7:39 PM >Subject: Confreg problem...help! > > > > Hi, > > I got a mc3810 router and was running perfect. Sometime ago I > > mistakenly typed a confreg value which I do not remeber exactly but > > I know it was >not >a > > relevant one. I was actually practicing with the confreg entries. > > > > What happened was that after I just rebooted the router I lost the >console > > screen. I tried with all sorts of console port values like changing > > the baud-rate, start stop bit etc. > > > > I found it was responding to 1200 baud speed but all I could find is >some > > corrupted and garbled ascii characters on the Teraterm. Same is the > > case with hyprterm. > > > > Any helpers please... > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _ > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail > > > > _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57783&t=57732 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.1q trunking [7:57772]
Is this all 1 flat VLAN now ? If so, read below: If so , and you just want to migrate, I would assign a secondary address to the FE port on the Router that is a 10.x.x.x scheme that you want. This will allow you to have both active and not need to worry about what port that a PC is plugged into. Otherwise, you will be changing the IP of the PC then changing its port VLAN membership on the switch. The method that you are trying will work, but it's a more work then you need to do if your just migrating from one IP name space to the other. If you assign a secondary address to the router, all you will need to do is to change the IP of the PC's and reboot. If your running DHCP, change its scope so it hands out 10.x.x.x address's and as the current leases expire, they will get a new one. Once all the old address space is gone, just go into the router and type the ip address 10.x.x.x.x command without secondary on the end. This will move this IP to the primary address and remove the old address from the router. Tada, your done. If you want to use separate subnets on each floor, then you would need to use sub-interfaces which I am sure others will cover in detail. If not, I will jump back in. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Kris Waters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 802.1q trunking [7:57772] Everyone, Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on a gradual basis. My building contains the following equipment: 7206VXR router that does internal routing. I have one FastEthernet port on this router. One Catalyst 4006 (Sup2, set based code) switch on the third floor. Both these devices run the latest code. The first and second floors have Catalyst 3500 switches with fiber between floors. A VTP domain is set up between the 3 switches. It was suggested to me to put 3 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port on the router and then trunk them to the switch (or switches). I'm not quite sure of the best way to go about doing this. I've read numerous tac articles, but a little more guidance would be greatly appreciated. Here is a sample of the code I used on the 7206 to create the subinterfaces: interface FastEthernet0/0.1 encapsulation dot1Q 111 ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.255.0 What do I do now? The router is plugged directly into port 4/10 on the 4006. Do I create a VLAN 111 on the 4006? Any replies can be copies directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as to the board. TIA Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57782&t=57772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confused from London [7:57780]
Someone asked me a question which confused me:- If i ping a network broadcast from a host on a different network, which passes through a cisco router why do i get replies from certain devices. The router has directed broadcast forwarding disabled. I thought the router would therefore drop the packet Any thoughts Thanks -P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57780&t=57780 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 828 3des Performance [7:57703]
Arni, Thanks for the kudos! Just do a search on Cisco's web site for "+router +encryption +throughput". Unfortunately, the only place I've ever seen this information brought together was Cisco's official course material (like the CSVPN coursebook). Hope this helps. Cheers! -- Richard A. Deal Visit my home page at http://home.cfl.rr.com/dealgroup/ Author of Cisco PIX Firewalls, CCNA Secrets Revealed!, CCNP Remote Access Exam Prep, CCNP Switching Exam Cram, and CCNP Cisco LAN Switch Configuration Exam Cram Cisco Test Prep author for QuizWare, providing the most comprehensive Cisco exams on the market. ""Arni V. Skarphedinsson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I just realizied who you are, and that I am reading your book "Cisco PIX > Firewalls" :) > > it4s a small networking world. > > I think it4s a great book, and has give me a lot of information about > working with the cisco PIX. > > Thanx again. > > p.s. and if anyone knows of a link to www.cisco.com, that I can see the > Ipsec throughput performance numbers for 3des on, especialy for the 800 > series routers, please let me know. > > Best regards, > Arni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57781&t=57703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VPN Connectivity using PIX [7:57764]
What version on the PIX and are you using Win98 2nd edition? Bill Creighton CCNP Senior System Engineer Motorola iDEN CNRC Packet Data / MPS -Original Message- From: Mr piyush shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VPN Connectivity using PIX [7:57764] Hi all I am trying to connect Cisco PIX 515 via PPTP using Windows98's Microsoft VPN Adaptor ,but I am unable top get though.When I am trying to ping PIX firewall ,I am able to ping,but vpn tunnel is not getting established .What could be the problem ? When I am trying to form a PPTP VPN tunnel to the same PIX using Windows 2000 machine, I am able to connect ,but using Win 98 I am not, What could be the problem.Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Piyush Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57779&t=57764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco Secure ACS [7:57775]
Does anybody know the default username and password for a vanilla install of Cisco Secure ACS for Windows version 3.0?? I'm being prompted for a username and password to login, but can't find one in the documentation. I tried the password recovery procedure, but there are no adminstrators created yet... help needed and appreciated. Thanks in advance CG ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. For more information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone + 353 1 4093000 fax + 353 1 4093001 ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57775&t=57775 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771]
Can we see your running config for the HSRP group setup? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771] Trying to test HSRP between 2 Cat4006s running IOS 12.1(8a)EW1. 'Sho standby brief' says that the vlan routing never gets switched over to standy router and stays in the "INIT" state. Rtr 1 is standby for VLAN2 Rtr 2 is active for VLAN2 perform a shutdown on interface VLAN2 on rtr 2; 'sho stand brief' gives no ip addresses for active and standby rtrs., but instead both say "INIT". Any ideas? tia, Mary Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5&t=57771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 802.1q trunking [7:57772]
""Kris Waters"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Everyone, > > Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago > with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons > and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on > a gradual basis. > > My building contains the following equipment: > > 7206VXR router that does internal routing. I have one FastEthernet port on > this router. > > One Catalyst 4006 (Sup2, set based code) switch on the third floor. Both > these devices run the latest code. > > The first and second floors have Catalyst 3500 switches with fiber between > floors. A VTP domain is set up between the 3 switches. > > It was suggested to me to put 3 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port on > the router and then trunk them to the switch (or switches). I'm not quite > sure of the best way to go about doing this. I've read numerous tac > articles, but a little more guidance would be greatly appreciated. > > Here is a sample of the code I used on the 7206 to create the subinterfaces: > interface FastEthernet0/0.1 > encapsulation dot1Q 111 > ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.255.0 > > What do I do now? The router is plugged directly into port 4/10 on the 4006. > Do I create a VLAN 111 on the 4006? Any replies can be copies directly to me > CL: the 4006 port in question should also be configured as a dot1q trunk. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as to the board. > > TIA > Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57776&t=57772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
802.1q trunking [7:57772]
Everyone, Let me explain what I am trying to do. My main building was set up years ago with a Class C address scheme. I need to change this for a number of reasons and am planning to move it to a 10.X.X.X scheme. I would like to do this on a gradual basis. My building contains the following equipment: 7206VXR router that does internal routing. I have one FastEthernet port on this router. One Catalyst 4006 (Sup2, set based code) switch on the third floor. Both these devices run the latest code. The first and second floors have Catalyst 3500 switches with fiber between floors. A VTP domain is set up between the 3 switches. It was suggested to me to put 3 subinterfaces on the fastethernet port on the router and then trunk them to the switch (or switches). I'm not quite sure of the best way to go about doing this. I've read numerous tac articles, but a little more guidance would be greatly appreciated. Here is a sample of the code I used on the 7206 to create the subinterfaces: interface FastEthernet0/0.1 encapsulation dot1Q 111 ip address 10.50.1.1 255.255.255.0 What do I do now? The router is plugged directly into port 4/10 on the 4006. Do I create a VLAN 111 on the 4006? Any replies can be copies directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as to the board. TIA Kris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57772&t=57772 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast [7:57773]
Hi, I have some users who want to use a multicast application between different vlans. Is multicast forwarding turned on by default on 12.1 IOS? Would'nt I need to config something like PIM, IGMP and CGMP on my cat's and routers to do this efficiently or will the IOS just flood multicast packets out all interfaces by default? Thanks for any clues! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57773&t=57773 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Multicast question [7:57774]
Hi, I have some users who want to use a multicast application between different vlans. Is multicast forwarding turned on by default on 12.1 IOS? Would'nt I need to config something like PIM, IGMP and CGMP on my cat's and routers to do this efficiently or will the IOS just flood multicast packets out all interfaces by default? Thanks for any clues! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57774&t=57774 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HSRP - Cat4006 stuck in INIT state [7:57771]
Trying to test HSRP between 2 Cat4006s running IOS 12.1(8a)EW1. 'Sho standby brief' says that the vlan routing never gets switched over to standy router and stays in the "INIT" state. Rtr 1 is standby for VLAN2 Rtr 2 is active for VLAN2 perform a shutdown on interface VLAN2 on rtr 2; 'sho stand brief' gives no ip addresses for active and standby rtrs., but instead both say "INIT". Any ideas? tia, Mary Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57771&t=57771 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
class vc [7:57770]
Hi, I want to configure the vc-class in one 7500 cisco series and I would if somebody have one example of this configuration. Thanks and regards, -- --- Domingo Ferrero Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. Sistemas, IdecNet S.A. c/ Guzman el Bueno 125 Madrid-Spain Tfn: +34 91 824 00 00 http://www.idecnet.com --- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57770&t=57770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Question AGAIN... [7:57747]
Bruce - Actually I'm not missing any pieces. Check out this link on the CCO to see exactly what I'm trying to accomplish: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800ffdcc.shtml#background The router (3640,etc) utilizes the ITS feature set to act as the call manager for the network and create a small IP Key system without a few of the call manager features that I don't need in this case. And yes I want to use the 79xx phones behind the switch that I didn't mention is behind the router. I will use the FXO ports on the router to plug the incoming lines into. The page shows everything from how to do hold music to how to configure the phones XML interface. However it leaves out the PSTN setup section which is where I'm stuck at. I think I can do a session target to the ephone-dn but I'm not sure of the syntax. "Configuring the PSTN Connection on the Cisco ITS Router Assuming that the ITS router has voice interface cards, you will now want to configure those cards so that calls can be placed to and from the IP phones. This is not significantly different than other voice connections on a router. You can think of the ephones with the numbers that were assigned to the ephone-dn's as FXS ports on the routers." Thanks, Andrew On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Bruce Enders wrote: > Andrew, > You are asking how to set something up without all the pieces necessary > to make it work. And you are describing developing a dialplan that does > not adhere to common conventions. That part is okay, you can define how > you route calls in-to and out-of your own voice network pretty much any > way you want. > The 3640 with an analog FXO is okay to act as a gateway to the PSTN. The > same router with FXS VIC ALSO will allow you to connect and originate > calls internally. However, you state you want to place "VOIP" phones on > the network behind the 3640. What "VOIP" phones would those be? If you > mean 79XX series IP Telephones from Cisco, you also need a CallManager > Server to control those phones. > As far as the dialing rules in this network, it is up to you what you use > to direct calls out to the world. Using "9" to classify all telephone > numbers that follow it as being sent to the PSTN is a convention not a > rule. The only real rule is that you have to give the system the means to > route a call based on what the User dials. AND, if you are handing the > call off to the PSTN or any other telephone switch, you have to give that > switch the call routing information (telephone number) that it needs to > route the call. > In coming calls are a whole different topic. Try reading one of the many > VoX books that are now available. > Hope this helps, > Bruce > > Andrew Dorsett wrote: > > Second call for this one. I never received any answers to my question. I > want to know how to setup the link between the VoIP phones and the FXO's. > Basically a dialplan, but how do I route inbound calls from the PSTN to > the VoIP phones? And how do I route outbound calls from the VoIP phones > over > the FXO to the PSTN? I would like to avoid a system that uses 9 to dial > an outside line. I want to do direct dialing to the PSTN without > any special steps. > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Andrew Dorsett wrote: > > Hey everyone, I'm playing with an idea. I want to get ahold of a 3640 > with FXO's and interface it to the PSTN and connect to some VOIP phones > on > a network behind it. I have done all of my research on the CCO and have > found how to configure everything for phone connection and FXO > > configuration. > > However I haven't found out how to configure dialplans to dial the > outside > world. I basically need one that would say "all 4 digit dialed calls are > VoIP phones and all other numbers are outside PSTN phone numbers." And > another question that I haven't found is how to link inbound calls from > the PSTN to my VoIP phones. Say I have 555-1221 for one line and I want > it > as line 1 on my phones, and > 555-1234 as the other line on my phones. I haven't found how to map the > inbound calls to a VoIP extension. > > 555-1221 -- | || | || > | 3640 ||SWITCH|-|IP Phone| > 555-1234 -- | || | || > > My primary info source has been: > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800ffdcc.shtml#ITS3660 > > Thanks, > Andrew > --- > http://www.andrewsworld.net/ICQ: 2895251 > Cisco Certified Network Associate > > "Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make > all > of them yourself." > > http://www.andrewsworld.net/ ICQ: 2895251 > Cisco Certified Network Associate > > "Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all > of them yourself." > -- > >
Caller ID Conf. How to?? [7:57768]
Hi all, I want your help to run the Caller ID feature on my Cisco 3661 access router.. Do I need to specific version of IOS?? I am running ACS2.6 as my authentication sever, and this ACS able to view the caller id.. the exchange already ran the Caller Id feature on my Dialed number which my clients dial it to access the internet... Also do I need extra conf. to make my cisco 3660 to send the caller id to my ACS2.6??? Please advice me ASAP Thanx in advance Magdy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57768&t=57768 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSSP [7:57767]
Hi, Does anyone have any info on the new SAFE exam for the cssp? Regards, DJ - Get a bigger mailbox -- choose a size that fits your needs. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57767&t=57767 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCSP [7:57713]
If you take one of the 3 specialized courses plus MCNS exam, you become a Specialist in that area eg 1. CSPFA+MCNS = Firewall Specialist 2. CSVPN+MCNS = VPN specialist 3. IDSPM+MCNS = IDS Specialsit For a Limited time more: CSPFA+CSVPN+IDSPM+MCNS = CSS1 Also CSPFA+CSVPN+IDSPM+MCNS+SAFE= CCSP >From now till 09/03 People like my humble self who already have the CSS1 designation would need take only the SAFE exam to become CCSP. I did not see any true meaning to all these. Cisco should know better. my 0.02 Regards Godswill CCNP,CCDP,CSS1 (CSPFA for Firewall, CSVPN for > VPN, and CSIDS for IDS) --- Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 wrote: > Nevermind - sometime earlier they enabled the > links... > > -Original Message- > From: Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1 > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 3:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CCSP [7:57713] > > > Good Info! > I tried following the link for those new Specialist > certs on Cisco's site, > but the link is broken - are Specialists defined now > by completing only the > individual exams? (CSPFA for Firewall, CSVPN for > VPN, and CSIDS for IDS) > > -Original Message- > From: ""Peter.Walker:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:""Peter.Walker:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CCSP [7:57713] > > > Joshua > > The CCSP is basically just a realignment of the > current Cisco Security > Specialist 1 certification into the Cisco > Professional track. It does add > one more exam to the requirements but other than > that no real change. Cisco > has even 'generously' allowed current CSS1s to take > the remaining exam to > get the cert. :-) > > As for the new specialist level certs, they are just > dumbed down > ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H more focussed variations of > the CSS1. > > I really dont think Cisco have thought this one > through as anyone who > attains CCSP (with the current versions of the > exams), will also > automatically get three specialist level certs. In > my opinion this totally > devalues the specialist level certs. They should be > something that takes > specific specialised skill and knowledge to attain, > not something you get > for free as part of the process of attaining an > intermediate level > professional qualification. > > Peter Walker > CISSP, CSS1, CITPSS, CCNP, CCIP, CCDP, etc > > (Putting flame proof clothing on) > > Joshua Green wrote: > > > > Anyone else hear about the new CCSP cert that > Cisco is offering?! > > It's about time! Although I wish some of the > other Professional level > > certs would count towards it in some way... I > also like the three new > > Specialist level certs! > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Joshua Green; MCSE, CCNA > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CityScape Communications > > 2040 Timberbrooke Drive > > Springfield, IL 62702 > > (217) 793.6238 x18 > > (217) 793.6275 fax > > (217) 306.6201 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57766&t=57713 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VoIP Question AGAIN... [7:57747]
Andrew, You are asking how to set something up without all the pieces necessary to make it work. And you are describing developing a dialplan that does not adhere to common conventions. That part is okay, you can define how you route calls in-to and out-of your own voice network pretty much any way you want. The 3640 with an analog FXO is okay to act as a gateway to the PSTN. The same router with FXS VIC ALSO will allow you to connect and originate calls internally. However, you state you want to place "VOIP" phones on the network behind the 3640. What "VOIP" phones would those be? If you mean 79XX series IP Telephones from Cisco, you also need a CallManager Server to control those phones. As far as the dialing rules in this network, it is up to you what you use to direct calls out to the world. Using "9" to classify all telephone numbers that follow it as being sent to the PSTN is a convention not a rule. The only real rule is that you have to give the system the means to route a call based on what the User dials. AND, if you are handing the call off to the PSTN or any other telephone switch, you have to give that switch the call routing information (telephone number) that it needs to route the call. In coming calls are a whole different topic. Try reading one of the many VoX books that are now available. Hope this helps, Bruce Andrew Dorsett wrote: Second call for this one. I never received any answers to my question. I want to know how to setup the link between the VoIP phones and the FXO's. Basically a dialplan, but how do I route inbound calls from the PSTN to the VoIP phones? And how do I route outbound calls from the VoIP phones over the FXO to the PSTN? I would like to avoid a system that uses 9 to dial an outside line. I want to do direct dialing to the PSTN without any special steps. Thanks, Andrew On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Andrew Dorsett wrote: Hey everyone, I'm playing with an idea. I want to get ahold of a 3640 with FXO's and interface it to the PSTN and connect to some VOIP phones on a network behind it. I have done all of my research on the CCO and have found how to configure everything for phone connection and FXO configuration. However I haven't found out how to configure dialplans to dial the outside world. I basically need one that would say "all 4 digit dialed calls are VoIP phones and all other numbers are outside PSTN phone numbers." And another question that I haven't found is how to link inbound calls from the PSTN to my VoIP phones. Say I have 555-1221 for one line and I want it as line 1 on my phones, and 555-1234 as the other line on my phones. I haven't found how to map the inbound calls to a VoIP extension. 555-1221 -- | || | || | 3640 ||SWITCH|-|IP Phone| 555-1234 -- | || | || My primary info source has been: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800ffdcc.shtml#ITS3660 Thanks, Andrew --- http://www.andrewsworld.net/ICQ: 2895251 Cisco Certified Network Associate "Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself." http://www.andrewsworld.net/ ICQ: 2895251 Cisco Certified Network Associate "Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself." -- Bruce Enders Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chesapeake NetCraftsmeno:(410)-280-6927, c:(443)-994-0678 1290 Bay Dale Drive, Suite 312 WWW: http://www.netcraftsmen.net Arnold, MD 21012-2325 Cisco CCSI# 96047 Efax 443-331-0651 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57765&t=57747 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPN Connectivity using PIX [7:57764]
Hi all I am trying to connect Cisco PIX 515 via PPTP using Windows98's Microsoft VPN Adaptor ,but I am unable top get though.When I am trying to ping PIX firewall ,I am able to ping,but vpn tunnel is not getting established .What could be the problem ? When I am trying to form a PPTP VPN tunnel to the same PIX using Windows 2000 machine, I am able to connect ,but using Win 98 I am not, What could be the problem.Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Piyush Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57764&t=57764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 828 3des Performance [7:57703]
I just realizied who you are, and that I am reading your book "Cisco PIX Firewalls" :) it´s a small networking world. I think it´s a great book, and has give me a lot of information about working with the cisco PIX. Thanx again. p.s. and if anyone knows of a link to www.cisco.com, that I can see the Ipsec throughput performance numbers for 3des on, especialy for the 800 series routers, please let me know. Best regards, Arni Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57762&t=57703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CISSP Certification [7:57757]
Johan You could try http://www.isc2.org Peter Walker Johan Bornman wrote: > > Can somebody please send me a url where I can find out more about this > certification. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57761&t=57757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CISSP Certification [7:57757]
Jay Dunn IPI*GrammTech, Ltd. www.ipi-gt.com Nunquam Facilis Est -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 1:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CISSP Certification [7:57757] Can somebody please send me a url where I can find out more about this certification. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57760&t=57757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CISSP Certification [7:57757]
-Original Message- From: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 November 2002 07:00 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CISSP Certification [7:57757] Can somebody please send me a url where I can find out more about this certification. = This email has been content filtered and subject to spam filtering. If you consider this email is unsolicited please forward the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and request that the sender's domain be blocked from sending any further emails. = Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57759&t=57757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
