Re: frame relay config [7:61757]
Hi Julian yes u can do that by using ip unnumbered and using subinterfaces point to pint I cant get u properly from ur question what u mean but see U can have many sub interfaces and all of them can use ip unnumbered If anybody other will comenst lets wait for answers ,and if possible please mail ur question in little detail Julian P wrote: Hi guys I am wandering if it is possible to configure my cisco 2610 for seperate frame relay point to point subinterfaces with the ip terminating on the 2610,and have the 2610 frame switch some other dlci`s and terminate the ip on another frame relay device at the same time. Any advice is appreciated Thanks Julian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61759t=61757 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New to vlans...HELP [7:59655]
Hi, see the nic card should itself support itself be dot1q enabled.If it is just go into the properties and confgure it for different vlans.but this is not the optimzed sol since broadcast effectting one vlan will affect the server.this server will recive all the brodcasts,multicasts and unknown packets.so It can be reduce the performance of server too.Its best you introduce some other layer 3 device for Vlan routing. Moreover Please search on cisco site so that you may clear before hand asking for doubts,I mean to say then you can focus on the problem more by that way. Cheers Cisco Newbie wrote: Thanks for your reply. Can you or someone please give me an example of what the following would look like configured on the switch? 1. The server port be a member of 2 vlans 2. The same server port configured for tagging 3. The 2 DSLAM ethernet ports (UPLINK and MNGT) be configured as an untagged member of the vlan Thanks. Dave s vermill wrote: Me Morpheus wrote: Hello. I am new to the list and glad I found it. I am just starting out with vlans and I need some clarification. Can someone clarify the following statement: I have the following layout: I have 1 DSLAM with 2 ethernet ports (UPLINK and MNGT) that are both going into a Cisco 2650 switch. The switch is supposed to have 2 vlans, (A and B). I also have a server that is connected to this switch. The requirement that was told to me was that the port connected to the server must be a member of both VLANs and traffic sent from this port must be tagged (for both vlans). The port connected to the UPLINK port must be an untagged member of one of the VLANs. The port connected to the MGMT port must be an untagged member of the other VLAN. I am interested to know about what it means to have a port be part of an untagged vlan and what it means to have traffic coming in from a port be tagged for both vlans? Essentially you're dealing with the difference between access ports and trunk ports. An access port is what you would typically connect a PC to. No VLAN tags are appended onto or inserted into the layer 2 frames. A trunk port would typically be found between switches or between a switch and a router. VLAN tags are used to differentiate the traffic. Having said all of that, some NICs are dot1q enabled. That must be the case where your server is concerned. Can someone answer these question and preferrably post an example that would show me what it means? I can't think of any example that would be more illustrative than your own above. VLANs aren't terribly difficult once you get the basics. But keeping in mind where the traffic jumps layers will be critical when you start dealing with a lot of layer 2 / layer 3 boxes. Thanks. Dave Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59727t=59655 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem regarding redundancy of inf [7:59730]
Hi guys, Sorry if this question is too amateurish, but I am clueless on how to solve this problem. The story is like this - I have a 7204VXR router connected to a 45 Mbps satellite downlink via a HSSI interface. I have a PA-2FE-TX module on the router and currently Fa1/0 (IP: 10.1.1.254) is connected to Server A (IP: 10.1.1.1). Traffic coming in from the satellite is being routed to Server A. There is a default ip route which goes like this: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 There are access-lists implemented on Fa1/0 such that only certain ports are being permitted to be routed to Server A. The question: I would like to make use of the other FE port and implement another set of different access rules such that the traffic from the satellite will also go to Server B (IP: 10.2.2.2). The problem is traffic is only flowing to the Fa1/0 interface, and not onto the other Fa1/1 interface. How could I have two streams of data duplicated out onto the two interfaces? Some guy Ive asked mentioned something about IRB. Is this correct? Basically if this is a switch, I could think of doing a SPAN where the satellite downstream is being replicated onto 2 FE ports. How could I achieve this on a router? Thanks for any suggestions. Appreciated it. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59730t=59730 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDA/CCDP [7:59606]
Hi Sergio, Congrats on your achievment.You should head for now CCIE, the Black belt of networking. Regards, Munit Singla Sergio Silva (ZA) wrote: Hi All I would like to take this opportunity to thank our Gracious Dear Lord Jesus for guiding me and supporting me and giving me such a wonderful family to support me I have completed my Design route by completing my CCDA and in combination with my CID which Thank God I passed a couple of weeks ago I am a CCDP, I must admit that these exams are by no means a slice of cake, they are difficult and tricky, but by the grace of God I have pulled through and completed the route, thanks to everybody's help on the group I wish you all the Best for Christmas and may the new year bring you plenty of success! God Bless Merry Christmas Serg A Job Makes Something For You. A Career makes Something Of You. *** This message contains information intended solely for the addressee, which is confidential or private in nature and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or any file attached to this message. Any such unauthorised use is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile or telephone and thereafter delete the original message from your machine. Furthermore, the information contained in this message, and any attachments thereto, is for information purposes only and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of Dimension Data (South Africa) (Proprietary) Limited or its subsidiaries and associated companies (Dimension Data). Dimension Data therefore does not accept liability for any claims, loss or damages of whatsoever nature, arising as a result of the reliance on such information by anyone. Whilst all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and integrity of information transmitted electronically and to preserve the confidentiality thereof, Dimension Data accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever if information or data is, for whatsoever reason, incorrect, corrupted or does not reach its intended destination. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59608t=59606 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Fwd: RE: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481]
Hi piyush You are right but nobody is wasting time ,and from everthing we learn .see I read whole messages and discussion and learnt a lot.Moreover regarding the problem yeah whether its small or big we should answer,i think so everybody does and I also get a lot of answers for my stupid questions.So everybody please help out all those who have problems so that everyone can gain from your sols. Regards, Munit Mr piyush shah wrote: Dear friends It has been quite long that I have been hearing whether CCIE is superior or MS. I thing it is high time we should wrap the topic.I dont understand ,whether why this forum for ? It should b a purely technical. For a typically type of questioning like this, there are resposes which lasts for weeks but there are some questions for whom nobody seems to be bothered ? There was a queation which was thrown on this on TACACS ACS whether What could the issue that I am able to authenticate and not authorisation ,not a single person on this site bothered to answered ,not even Priscilla . Which sounds to be very starnge. There are so many people who r new to networking tech ,hence comes with some querry which might b stupid to some of our colleages but pls ensure that u were also like them during your initial phase ,hence try to rectify the querry rather than spending your precious time on stupid questions like ccie is superior or MS , what is the salary of CCIE ? I hope the message is clear to everybody Regards PIYUSH Note: forwarded message attached. Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV. visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via web8002.mail.in.yahoo.com; 20 Dec 2002 07:36:38 +0500 (IST) Return-Path: X-Track: 1: 100 Return-Path: Received: from groupstudy.com (66.220.63.9) by mta102.in.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 07:34:44 +0500 (IST) Received: from localhost (mail@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id CAA32069; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 02:04:32 GMT Received: by groupstudy.com (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:26:50 + Received: (from listserver@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA23691 GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:26:48 GMT Received: (from nobody@localhost) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA23686 GroupStudy Mailer; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:26:48 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:26:48 GMT From: Charlie Wehner X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a X-GroupStudy: Network Technical To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCIE Vs. BS or MS dergree [7:59481] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Charlie Wehner Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 925 What's more difficult? a) Memorizing configuration scenerios and commands on a Cisco router b) Understanding Calculus, Differential Equations, Numerical Analysis, Chemistry, Physics and Electrical Engineering well enough to create a meaningful experiment. One of my friends is working on his masters in Physics right now. What he's working on makes the CCIE look like a walk through the park. Seriously, what if the recommended reading list for the CCIE exam looked like this: Physics I and II Calculus I,II,III Differential Equations Mechanics Circuit Analysis I and II Linear Systems Thermodynamics Quantum Mechanics Optics Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59607t=59481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WAS RE: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Great Daniel, But I need clarification on this part me be if u have some documnet or some link please send me the link...Thanx for the help.anybody has comments since it seems a trivial question but not. Regards, Munit Daniel Cotts wrote: I seem to recall that the Administrative Distance of static routes that specify a local interface has differed between 0 and 1 depending on IOS version. I have a hand written note that (I think) says the value is 0 for 11.3 and 12.0; but is now 1 for newer IOS versions. If true, your results will depend on which IOS your routers are running. I'd appreciate comments for those who have more specific info. I'll see if I can find time to experiment. -Original Message- From: Munit Singla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] Hi Godswill, Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists if both the commands are used then both entries come to the route table.As per your and mine theory also only better administrative distance should come into the route table,but here both are introduced into the route table ,as it seems it has administrative distance of 1 for default gateway of its own interface(obviosly zero is preffered then one)? Why both entries in route table. As confusion is creating from different answers so please reply ,so that all confusions are over. Regards, Munit Godswill Oletu wrote: Hi, Static routes can either have the AD of 1 or 0 depending on the way you add them to your router. e.g lates RouterA interface FE0=192.168.0.1/27 and it is connected to RouterB FE1=192.168.0.2/27 FE3=10.1.0.1/24. To define route to 10.1.0.1/24 on RouterA you have two methods. 1. RouterA# IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (AD=1) 2. RouterA#IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 FE0 (AD=0) If both commands are entered option 2 will be the prefered route. So you are correct, choose the one you prefer, it also depends whether you want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc... Regards. Godswill Oletu - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] Hi all, Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our own interface have AD. of zero. Example C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the route with default gateway of FastEthernet1/0. Please do clear me where I am wrong Thanx in advance Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59630t=59533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: newbie on 3550 - some questions? [7:59633]
Can You please update about this lab.Can I also test here...Please update the new joiness of this group regarding this. Regards, Munit Cisco Nuts wrote: Hello,I've finally started studying the 3550's in my prep. for the Lab and I am very grateful to Bruce and Val for putting out a 3550 FREE lab to help us out ( NOT to forget IPExpert and NLI's). :-)Had a couple of questions on this Lab solution (if anyone has done it): 1. Vlan's 20 and 10 are part of int f0/2 and int f0/3 respectively but only int f0/3 has the switchport mode access on Switch 1. This is not the case on Switch 2.Question: Why? And when would I absolutely use the #switchport mode access cmd. on an intf? 2. Why is Switch 1's ip address configured for Vlan 20 and Switch 2's for Vlan 10? Why not the other way around? Could we possible use Vlan 30 or 40 for that matter? 3. Both the Switches are set to transparent? And both Vlans are created on both switches? Can VTP be created on one Switch and set to server mode? 4. On router R1, the #bridge irb cmd. is configured under Fe0/0 but not under Fe0/1? Should this cmd. also be configed under Fe0/1? Thank you for your help. I would appreciate any explanation as I continue to print 100's of pages from the CMD. and CONFIG guide and plough my way through it. Very soon, I hope to lay my hands on a 3550 but right nowlot's of writing, reading and diagrams!! :-) If there is anyone that will let me have a couple of hours on a 3550, please let me know. I am willing to kind of trade for a lot of router time on my rack of 10 routers at home. Sincerely,CN BTW: I have attached the solution along with this email for you to take a look at. ! version 12.1 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname Switch ! aaa new-model aaa authentication dot1x default group radius local ! ip subnet-zero ip routing ! ! ! spanning-tree extend system-id spanning-tree vlan 70 priority 24576 ! ! ! interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/2 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/3 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/4 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/5 switchport access vlan 56 switchport mode access switchport port-security switchport port-security mac-address sticky no ip address spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/6 switchport access vlan 56 switchport mode access no ip address spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/7 no switchport ip address 140.40.70.35 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet0/8 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/9 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access no ip address dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/10 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control broadcast level 78.00 storm-control multicast level 78.00 dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/11 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control broadcast level 78.00 storm-control multicast level 78.00 dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/12 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control broadcast level 78.00 storm-control multicast level 78.00 dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/13 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control broadcast level 78.00 storm-control multicast level 78.00 dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/14 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control broadcast level 78.00 storm-control multicast level 78.00 dot1x port-control force-unauthorized spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/15 switchport access vlan 999 switchport mode access switchport voice vlan 100 no ip address spanning-tree portfast spanning-tree guard root ! interface FastEthernet0/16 switchport
Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Hi all, Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our own interface have AD. of zero. Example C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the route with default gateway of FastEthernet1/0. Please do clear me where I am wrong Thanx in advance Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59533t=59533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PHD/MS OR CCIE.....OR MAYBE BOTH...IT IS UP TO YOU [7:59520]
Hi Juan Blanco, I totally agree with all your views,Yes CCIE and PHD cant be compared.Doing PHD is really great and requires hardwork and dedication but going for CCIE also we have to be very much dedicated.It doesn't matter irrespective its value in term of longivity is less but still same dedication we require here.Anything which requires hardwork and dedication should be appreciated.So definitely CCIE people should be proud of their achivement..and they should be proud of their achievement of CCIE Tiltles Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59535t=59520 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2514 serial port flipping between up and down, [7:59501]
Please send your configuration and debug o/p then only something could be thought off. Regards, MunitBrian wrote: you sourcing clock from one side of this or tried another cable? Brian - Original Message - From: Wei Zhu To: Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 6:11 PM Subject: Re: 2514 serial port flipping between up and down, [7:59501] I also tried debug serial interface, only see myseq , other side are always 0, also the show interface serial shows the number interface resets and carrier transition are increasing all the time. Thanks - Original Message - From: Wei Zhu To: Leo Song ; Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: Re: 2514 serial port flipping between up and down, hel [7:59426] Actually I am using DCE/DTE back to back connecting to another router(which is tested good), the line protocol is up and down continuously and count for interface resets is increasing all the time, does that mean the serial ports are bad? Thanks - Original Message - From: Leo Song To: 'Wei Zhu' ; Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:50 AM Subject: RE: 2514 serial port flipping between up and down, hel [7:59426] Did you try to replace the v.35 cable? Leo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Wei Zhu Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2514 serial port flipping between up and down, hel [7:59426] Just got one from eBay, the AUI is OK, but could not get the serials work, tried different speed, sometime at 56000 worked but not stable, other speed didn't work at all. Any suggestion? Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59536t=59501 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Hi Tunde, Thanx for reply but can u tell me that I know that this static route to my own interface should have AD of 0 or am i wrong.Its mentioned in all the books. can u clarify it or give me some link where its mentioned as u have written. Regards, Munit Singla Tunde Kalejaiye wrote: all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or not. all directly connected interface have an AD of 0 - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:44 PM Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] Hi all, Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our own interface have AD. of zero. Example C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the route with default gateway of FastEthernet1/0. Please do clear me where I am wrong Thanx in advance Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59538t=59533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: their network diagrams are buggy [7:59230]
what are u reffering out please be clear McAllister Paul wrote: The topology diagram given has at least 3 errors. I wasted a few hours figuring this out. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59548t=59230 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 [7:59549]
Go to the rom monitor mode and change your configuration register value. Press break key with in 60 seconds of router reboot,you will enter thier. then enter--- confreg 0x2142 sync -i(to reload) or use reset thats all bye Munit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to do a password recovery on a 2600 router. I typed a confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 and reset the router. After the router reload, I only see the weird character display on my terminal. How do I fix ? Thanks in advance. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59551t=59549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 [7:59549]
Hey what i supect is hyperterminal settings problem.Please do confirm whether u have thse settings.. Bits per sec: 9600 Data bits : 8 Parity : none Stop bits : 1 Flow control: none moreover still then try changing properties vty type/or speed if u have changed the default speed on the router earlier refer to this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/63/terminal_settings.html moreover if still not working then do write ,we will look some other method if possible. Munit Ps: do cc to group too so that some body may also look into the problem and probably suggest a better sol. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using hyperterminal. After I hit the break key, I tried to enter the command but terminal display only show me some werid character. It like the router does not understand the characte I enter. Any thought? Thanks --- Munit Singla wrote: Go to the rom monitor mode and change your configuration register value. Press break key with in 60 seconds of router reboot,you will enter thier. then enter--- confreg 0x2142 sync -i(to reload) or use reset thats all bye Munit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to do a password recovery on a 2600 router. I typed a confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 and reset the router. After the router reload, I only see the weird character display on my terminal. How do I fix ? Thanks in advance. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59554t=59549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 [7:59549]
Ted great, can u refer me doc for this settings and speed regarding this I couldn't find Regards, Munit. Ted Marinich wrote: Try changing your terminal speed to 19200 baud. 0x2132 sets the console baud rate to 19200. Ted Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59555t=59549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Howdy to All [7:59521]
I recommend the tough exams first as u all you will have the concepts so go gor routing first. Ted Marinich wrote: David, Welcome - although, I'm pretty new here too, but just the same Welcome! Switching exam is a good start. Take the Dial-up next. Save the tough ones for last! Ted Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59563t=59521 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Hi Godswill, Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists if both the commands are used then both entries come to the route table.As per your and mine theory also only better administrative distance should come into the route table,but here both are introduced into the route table ,as it seems it has administrative distance of 1 for default gateway of its own interface(obviosly zero is preffered then one)? Why both entries in route table. As confusion is creating from different answers so please reply ,so that all confusions are over. Regards, Munit Godswill Oletu wrote: Hi, Static routes can either have the AD of 1 or 0 depending on the way you add them to your router. e.g lates RouterA interface FE0=192.168.0.1/27 and it is connected to RouterB FE1=192.168.0.2/27 FE3=10.1.0.1/24. To define route to 10.1.0.1/24 on RouterA you have two methods. 1. RouterA# IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (AD=1) 2. RouterA#IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 FE0 (AD=0) If both commands are entered option 2 will be the prefered route. So you are correct, choose the one you prefer, it also depends whether you want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc... Regards. Godswill Oletu - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] Hi all, Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our own interface have AD. of zero. Example C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the route with default gateway of FastEthernet1/0. Please do clear me where I am wrong Thanx in advance Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59565t=59533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 [7:59549]
Thanx Daniel Regards, Munit Daniel Cotts wrote: Here's a doc that covers the config register by bit. Keep in mind that the bits are numbered right to left starting with zero at the rightmost. Watch the wrap. http://cco-rtp-1.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps282/products_installa tion_guide_chapter09186a008007dfd0.html So 0x2132. The 3 covers bits number 4 and 5. Four is not significant. If 5 is set then the console speed is 19200. See also (watch the wrap) http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_installation_g uide_chapter09186a008007e02e.html Tells how to change console speed settings from the rommon prompt. -Original Message- From: Munit Singla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: confreg 0x2132 instead of confreg 0x2142 [7:59549] Ted great, can u refer me doc for this settings and speed regarding this I couldn't find Regards, Munit. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59566t=59549 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533]
Hi Chris, Hi the why its showing in the rout table.I have already given my route table.Please refer it and do clear my confusion. Regards, Munit chris kane wrote: all static routes have an AD of 1...whether it is using ur interface or not. all directly connected interface have an AD of 0 Hi all, Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default network it shows with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that static routes to our own interface have AD. of zero. Example C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the route with default gateway of FastEthernet1/0. Please do clear me where I am wrong Thanx in advance Munit When using static routes: A route pointing to another IP address has an AD of 1 A route pointing to an interface has an AD of 0 -chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59568t=59533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ip routing/ixp routing command ?Dumb Ques.? [7:59564]
ip routing is by default enabled.need to enable ipx routing if we are using ipx..thats all.ospf only runs on ip so by default ip routing is enabled if u have disabled it ,u have to enable it thats all. Bye meidinger wrote: When or why does one have to enter: ip routing or ipx routing command? I noticed, that on some of my test routers, the router ospf # command doesn't take, if ip routing command hasn't been entered in first. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59570t=59564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is this Accesslist Vulnerable [7:59443]
Hi Brian, what abt the port numbers in case of rip. should that be taken care. Munit Brian wrote: I would limit source addresses and use authentication for routing uodate exchanges. Bri On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Munit Singla wrote: Hi All, Is their any type of vulnerability in this access kist access-list permit udp any any eq rip access-list permit ospf any any access-list permit eigrp any any This access list is applied to the wan iterface in the inbound direction. Or should it be according to the multicast addreses the specific routing protocol uses except Ripv1. another thing for ripv 1 2 we can specify source port instead of any .can anybody suggest me that with the above access list what could be Implications. Thanx in Advance Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59450t=59443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is this Accesslist Vulnerable [7:59443]
Thanx for the reply Brian wrote: I would limit source addresses and use authentication for routing uodate exchanges. Bri On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Munit Singla wrote: Hi All, Is their any type of vulnerability in this access kist access-list permit udp any any eq rip access-list permit ospf any any access-list permit eigrp any any This access list is applied to the wan iterface in the inbound direction. Or should it be according to the multicast addreses the specific routing protocol uses except Ripv1. another thing for ripv 1 2 we can specify source port instead of any .can anybody suggest me that with the above access list what could be Implications. Thanx in Advance Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59449t=59443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Thanx Brian, I have not experienced such a problem now as per my experience.Yesh it could be in the old version but i have never seen it on cisco site regarding this. Thanx once again for replying. Regards, Munit Brian wrote: well, although its been a few years since I touched frame relay, my memory was that if I let the cisco autodiscover frame relay mappings, traffic flowed through it more slowly than if I did a static frame relay map. Its been a few years, this was 11.2 days, so take it with a grain of salt if auto discovery has improved. Bri - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282] Hi Brian, I agree with all your comments but can you little bit elborate on this part,Traffic passes faster in such a case. Regards, Munit Brian wrote: True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. Bri On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: Always ... Always get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. I have never seen any WAN where the customer did not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59356t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem regarding naming of port numbers [7:59276]
Thanx for the reply.I have heard a lot abt you from this group.Great to meet you. Regards, Munit Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: You're assuming IOS is a modern operating system or something akin to a data dictionary or programming language. It's not. :-) If the IOS engineers include keywords in the command line interface, then you can use them. If they don't, you can't. Your idea sounds like a good one though. You could suggest it to Cisco, but I don't think they could easily accomdate such a change in philosophy. Priscilla Munit Singla wrote: Hi , There default ports given in the IOS .We can use both to refer those ports by names as well as port numbers .Can we customize it and to the defaut list ports by names not by numbers. or I want to use it use customized ports used for my applications by names in my access list. Is there any command to create customized ports by Name. See what my problem is when we make an extended access lists we can define source and destination ports.there is standard list of ports there to be used in access list that we can use by number or name.If we want to customize the port according to our default application we can add that port by number only.Is there a way to refer those ports by names in my access list.and can we add these customized TCP/UDP ports in the default list which is displayed, so that we can refer it when ever we like in our access-lists by name. Example: access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq Nortonvirus Here Nortonvirus keyword should refer to the port 5000. and this name and port mapping should get added to the default list so that i can refer later.here I am assuming nortons application is using port number 5000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59360t=59276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem regarding naming of port numbers [7:59276]
Hi Eric, Thanx for the reply. Can u tell me with which command can we assign differnt prots to same keyword. Regards, Munit Erick B. wrote: Agreed. They do have a way to map additional ports to the pre-defined services though. So for telnet for example you can add port 233, 2333, etc so when you specify 'telnet' in an ACL (or similar list) it matches port 23, 233, and 2333. Whats weird is I was looking at this yesterday, and for some ACL stuff the keyword is http and for other stuff it is www. I'm sure theres other keywords that mean the same as others but thats the one I noticed. Then again i don't port-map matches up to all the ACL keywords, I think it matches up against some other security features. I've used it for telnet in ACLs though with no problems in past. I guess consistency with port #s and service names would be a good thing. Maybe it would be nice if they didn't hardcode these in IOS but referenced a services file on the flash that could be editable like in most OS's. I think this may happen... it seems they are starting to clean up IOS and get rid of old protocols and modularize stuff so it uses similar syntax. MQC for example. --- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: You're assuming IOS is a modern operating system or something akin to a data dictionary or programming language. It's not. :-) If the IOS engineers include keywords in the command line interface, then you can use them. If they don't, you can't. Your idea sounds like a good one though. You could suggest it to Cisco, but I don't think they could easily accomdate such a change in philosophy. Priscilla Munit Singla wrote: Hi , There default ports given in the IOS .We can use both to refer those ports by names as well as port numbers .Can we customize it and to the defaut list ports by names not by numbers. or I want to use it use customized ports used for my applications by names in my access list. Is there any command to create customized ports by Name. See what my problem is when we make an extended access lists we can define source and destination ports.there is standard list of ports there to be used in access list that we can use by number or name.If we want to customize the port according to our default application we can add that port by number only.Is there a way to refer those ports by names in my access list.and can we add these customized TCP/UDP ports in the default list which is displayed, so that we can refer it when ever we like in our access-lists by name. Example: access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq Nortonvirus Here Nortonvirus keyword should refer to the port 5000. and this name and port mapping should get added to the default list so that i can refer later.here I am assuming nortons application is using port number 5000. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59361t=59276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]
Hi Steven I dont know anything abt voice but you can refer this site @!#$.com if you not gone through thier earlier. Regards, Munit Quek, Steven wrote: Hi, So far I have not heard any response, appreciate greatly if someone can share some lights on this topic. Thank you.. With regards Steven Quek HP Network Ser vices Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd. DID: 65-6374 9369 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 -Original Message- From: Quek, Steven Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274] Hi, I believe this has been posted before, I wish to pursue the Cisco IP Telephony track. Like to check which Cisco Press book must I get hold to read up for the tests. From the Cisco URL they have revised and named it as Enterprise Voice Over Data Design. Deploying QoS For Enterprise Network. These 2 tests you must passed to get Specialized. Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the tests. Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so that I can work on it. Thanks again have a Merry Christmas. With regards Steven Quek Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59374t=59274 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem regarding naming of port numbers [7:59276]
Thanx Priscilla, for the inf Regards, Munit Singla Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Munit Singla wrote: Hi Eric, Thanx for the reply. Can u tell me with which command can we assign differnt prots to same keyword. Regards, Munit Port to Application Mapping (PAM) is a feature of the Cisco IOS Firewall feature set. PAM allows you to customize TCP or UDP port numbers for network services or applications. PAM uses this information to support network environments that run services using ports that are different from the registered or well-known ports associated with an application. Using the port information, PAM establishes a table of default port-to-application mapping information at the firewall. The information in the PAM table enables Context-based Access Control (CBAC) supported services to run on nonstandard ports. Previously, CBAC was limited to inspecting traffic using only the well-known or registered ports associated with an application. Now, PAM allows network administrators to customize network access control for specific applications and services. If you aren't using CBAC, I don't know if you can do this, though. More on PAM here: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fsecur_c/ftrafwl/scfpam.htm#13687 Regarding the comment below that CBAC uses the keyword http instead of the www used in extended access lists, I agree that's strange. It almost seems like CBAC came from a Cisco acquisition perhaps. It's enough different from ordinary IOS to make one wonder. Priscilla Erick B. wrote: Agreed. They do have a way to map additional ports to the pre-defined services though. So for telnet for example you can add port 233, 2333, etc so when you specify 'telnet' in an ACL (or similar list) it matches port 23, 233, and 2333. Whats weird is I was looking at this yesterday, and for some ACL stuff the keyword is http and for other stuff it is www. I'm sure theres other keywords that mean the same as others but thats the one I noticed. Then again i don't port-map matches up to all the ACL keywords, I think it matches up against some other security features. I've used it for telnet in ACLs though with no problems in past. I guess consistency with port #s and service names would be a good thing. Maybe it would be nice if they didn't hardcode these in IOS but referenced a services file on the flash that could be editable like in most OS's. I think this may happen... it seems they are starting to clean up IOS and get rid of old protocols and modularize stuff so it uses similar syntax. MQC for example. --- Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: You're assuming IOS is a modern operating system or something akin to a data dictionary or programming language. It's not. :-) If the IOS engineers include keywords in the command line interface, then you can use them. If they don't, you can't. Your idea sounds like a good one though. You could suggest it to Cisco, but I don't think they could easily accomdate such a change in philosophy. Priscilla Munit Singla wrote: Hi , There default ports given in the IOS .We can use both to refer those ports by names as well as port numbers .Can we customize it and to the defaut list ports by names not by numbers. or I want to use it use customized ports used for my applications by names in my access list. Is there any command to create customized ports by Name. See what my problem is when we make an extended access lists we can define source and destination ports.there is standard list of ports there to be used in access list that we can use by number or name.If we want to customize the port according to our default application we can add that port by number only.Is there a way to refer those ports by names in my access list.and can we add these customized TCP/UDP ports in the default list which is displayed, so that we can refer it when ever we like in our access-lists by name. Example: access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq Nortonvirus Here Nortonvirus keyword should refer to the port 5000. and this name and port mapping should get added to the default list so that i can refer later.here I am assuming nortons application is using port number 5000. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59408t=59276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct
Re: 0 throttles [7:59407]
Hi, Throttles are a better indication of an overloaded router. They show the number of times the receiver on the port has been disabled, possibly due to buffer or processor overload. Together with high CPU utilization on an interrupt level, throttles indicate that the router is overloaded with traffic. Check ur network traffic. moreover check for cpu utilization(over all) Bye Munit Rommel wrote: Hi everybody, Anyone knows what does Throttles means in this output below when I set the sh int s0 command ? Received 10047 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles Rommel Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59412t=59407 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco IP Telephony Certification.... [7:59274]
Hi Thanx, Merry Christmas to you also and to the whole group. Regards, Munit Quek, Steven wrote: Hi Juan, Munit Binh, Appreciate very much for the information. Merry Christmas to all. With regards Steven Quek HP Network Ser vices Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd. DID: 65-6374 9369 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274] Steve, The following will be a start for your goal.. CIPT 9E0-402 Cisco IP Telephony by ciscopress - David Lovell Cisco IP Telephony Network Design Guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/network/ Cisco IP Telephony Solution Guide http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/solution_guide/index.html DQoS 9E0-601 DQoS is all QoS, pretty straight forward. Hands on experience helped quite a bit. There is a QoS book from Cisco Press, the book is a few years old and is poorly layed out. The IOS 12.2 QoS guide follows the exam blueprint pretty closely and is a great reference. Cisco AVVID QoS Guide http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ip_tele/avvidqos/index .htm Cisco IOS QoS Solutions Guide 12.2 http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos _c/ CVOICE 9E0423 Cisco Voice over Frame relay, ATM and IP by ciscopress - Steve McQuery http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/voice _c/vcprt1/index.htm Be aware that for this kind of certification you need to find as many pdfs as possible related to the topic because the technology is still going trough many changes The order of taking the test I recommend is the following: DQoS --- CVOICE --- CIPT Good luck, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Quek, Steven Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274] Hi, So far I have not heard any response, appreciate greatly if someone can share some lights on this topic. Thank you.. With regards Steven Quek HP Network Ser vices Hewlett Packard Singapore Sales (Pte.) Ltd. DID: 65-6374 9369 Mobile: 65-9797 4526 -Original Message- From: Quek, Steven Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco IP Telephony Certification [7:59274] Hi, I believe this has been posted before, I wish to pursue the Cisco IP Telephony track. Like to check which Cisco Press book must I get hold to read up for the tests. From the Cisco URL they have revised and named it as Enterprise Voice Over Data Design. Deploying QoS For Enterprise Network. These 2 tests you must passed to get Specialized. Hopefully you can let me know the passing marks and time needed for the tests. Appreciate anyone out there can provide me other valuable information so that I can work on it. Thanks again have a Merry Christmas. With regards Steven Quek Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59439t=59274 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this Accesslist Vulnerable [7:59442]
Hi All, Is their any type of vulnerability in this access kist access-list permit udp any any eq rip access-list permit ospf any any access-list permit eigrp any any This access list is applied to the wan iterface in the inbound direction. Or should it be according to the multicast addreses the specific routing protocol uses except Ripv1. another thing for ripv 1 2 we can specify source port instead of any .can anybody suggest me that with the above access list what could be Implications. Thanx in Advance Regards, Munit First of all having destination as any in the nat rule which will automatically be created by RSDM ,can we specify(in terms RSDM can) multicast addresses for specific routing protocol except rip v1 instead of allowing access to any address. and moreover do we need to specify the source port for rip instead of any port.This will work with the access-list u have mentioned but for security point of view is it safe and for proper routing updates. What I think is, OSPF , EIGR, RIP all these form the neighbor relationship only with the routers which are running the same corresponding routing protocol. So the routing updates will be sent to only those routers, which have formed the adjacencies. In this case when SDM defines the default access list, eventhough its been given any any, the routing updates can be taken only by the routers which have formed the adjacencies. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59442t=59442 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is this Accesslist Vulnerable [7:59443]
Hi All, Is their any type of vulnerability in this access kist access-list permit udp any any eq rip access-list permit ospf any any access-list permit eigrp any any This access list is applied to the wan iterface in the inbound direction. Or should it be according to the multicast addreses the specific routing protocol uses except Ripv1. another thing for ripv 1 2 we can specify source port instead of any .can anybody suggest me that with the above access list what could be Implications. Thanx in Advance Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59443t=59443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem regarding naming of port numbers [7:59276]
Hi , There default ports given in the IOS .We can use both to refer those ports by names as well as port numbers .Can we customize it and to the defaut list ports by names not by numbers. or I want to use it use customized ports used for my applications by names in my access list. Is there any command to create customized ports by Name. See what my problem is when we make an extended access lists we can define source and destination ports.there is standard list of ports there to be used in access list that we can use by number or name.If we want to customize the port according to our default application we can add that port by number only.Is there a way to refer those ports by names in my access list.and can we add these customized TCP/UDP ports in the default list which is displayed, so that we can refer it when ever we like in our access-lists by name. Example: access-list 100 permit tcp any any eq Nortonvirus Here Nortonvirus keyword should refer to the port 5000. and this name and port mapping should get added to the default list so that i can refer later.here I am assuming nortons application is using port number 5000. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59276t=59276 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Hi all, Can anybody tell me that whenever we buy a frame-relay connection from an ISP they should whether always give me the DLCI number as you know that on the multipoint interface (Main Interface) it can be autodetected also. if we dont have the hub and spoke model we dont require map commands also.The Questions is in that do ISPs always assign or there some ISPs is Market who dont assign DLCI numbers to their customers when going for frame-realy information.. Thanx in Advance. Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59282t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BR0:1 DDR: No callback negotiated [7:59277]
See John after looking at your problen can Just tell me that are u able to place a call from r5 to r2 and vice versa without cal back,You have mentioned from r2 to r5 but whart abt the reverse. More over where is the username and password command here for authentication in the configuration.Please send u full configurations and moreover do enable debug ppp authentication so that we may look into more deeply abt the problem. Munit Charlie wrote: Hi, Take a look at this: Configuring ISDN Caller ID Callback http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1828/products_configuratio n_guide_chapter09186a0080087218.html#xtocid91368 John Tafasi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have two isdn routers r2 (callback client) and r5 (callback server). without callback configuration r2 will connect to r5 successfully. With the callback configuration added, r5 will disconnect the call and will not callback r2. Can some one figure out what is wrong with my configuration? I have included configuration of both routers and the result of debug dialer on r5. It seems to me that r2 is not negotiating callback. R5-2503#show debug Dial on demand: Dial on demand events debugging is on R5-2503# 2d11h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up R5-2503# Mar 3 11:05:34.703: BR0:1 DDR: No callback negotiated Mar 3 11:05:34.703: BR0:1 DDR: disconnecting call 2d11h: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from 8358661 r2, call lasted 2 seconds 2d11h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down R5-2503# Mar 3 11:05:34.851: BR0:1 DDR: disconnecting call R5-2503# 2d11h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to up R5-2503# Mar 3 11:05:40.179: BR0:1 DDR: No callback negotiated Mar 3 11:05:40.179: BR0:1 DDR: disconnecting call 2d11h: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0:1 disconnected from 8358661 r2, call lasted 4 seconds 2d11h: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0:1, changed state to down R5-2503# Mar 3 11:05:40.331: BR0:1 DDR: disconnecting call R5-2503#show run hostname r5-2503 ! interface BRI0 ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 101 in encapsulation ppp dialer callback-secure dialer map ip 10.10.10.1 name r2 class eng broadcast 8358661 dialer-group 1 isdn switch-type basic-ni isdn spid1 0835866201 isdn spid2 0835866401 cdapi buffers regular 0 cdapi buffers raw 0 cdapi buffers large 0 ppp callback accept ppp authentication chap ppp chap hostname r5 ppp multilink ! ! map-class dialer eng dialer callback-server username - hostname r2-2516 ! interface Dialer1 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer remote-name r5 dialer string 8358662 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 ntp broadcast pulse-time 0 ppp callback request ppp chap hostname r2 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59288t=59277 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Thanx for the inf. Regards, Munit test test wrote: Always ... Always get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. I have never seen any WAN where the customer did not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59323t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem Regarding DLCI [7:59282]
Hi Brian, I agree with all your comments but can you little bit elborate on this part,Traffic passes faster in such a case. Regards, Munit Brian wrote: True, even if you discover them, a static map, in my experience, passes traffic faster. Also, typically in a cloud there are tons of customers connected, dlcis help define which customers can talk to which. Bri On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, test test wrote: Always ... Always get your DLCI numbers from the carrier/provider. I have never seen any WAN where the customer did not have them regardless of the setup technique. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59325t=59282 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hello (long response) [7:59246]
Hi Adrian, I was just wondering about these long mails and suddently I made my mind of reading it.See Really your words in the mail were hurting every cisco professional or anyone in general too.Thats true that we should try look out of our domain but we cant compare like that anything.Everyone is not expert like that in everything.See I am now preparing for CCIE just so that I have good concepts,so that I have mind to look into poblems this doesnot mean I will know everything. Ok lets break this issue and start discussing about technology for what this group was made for. Enjoy Regards, Munit Walter Rogowski wrote: Adrian, I agree that you have to know more than just RS in the current job market. I am a CCIE but also work with and embrace any other non-Cisco skill or product that suits best the needs of any of our clients. I also do a fair amount of security related work in mixed platform environments, so yes; I am a firm believer that you need to be a jack of all trades in addition to being master of one. And for all I know you are a very nice and likeable person, but your e-mail reflects a lack of some personal characteristics that define the best in members of our profession - the willingness to share knowledge with others whilst being personally humble and also respectful and considerate to others. For despite the fact that we work with technology, this is still a people business as they say. And then finally, whilst modern technology makes it easy and relatively risk free to say what we want to a vast number of people without being face to face, this also means that what we mail out is permanently recorded and may come back to haunt us, for this is truly a small world and ours is an even smaller community. -Original Message- From: Scott Polano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 December 2002 18:47 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hello (long response) Ouch ! Adrian, are you having trouble walking? Maybe Scott will use vaseline next time ! Way to go Scott, you said it better than I could have. Scott P (hoping to become a CCIE soon!) From: Scott Morris Reply-To: Scott Morris To: 'adrian jones' ,'elping' ,'Louis Young' , , CC: 'Chuck Church' Subject: RE: Hello (long response) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 13:07:07 -0500 Wow, spoken like a true person who believes they know a lot more than they really do! Elping's assessment of CheckPoint is pretty much right on there. And your response to it shows many things, including your areas of weakness beyond the marketing fluff that Checkpoint likes everyone to believe. You concede about the support though, which there's no arguing against! Shifting your point from God Save CheckPoint to CCIE's aren't all that isn't necessarily a bright thing to do in a Cisco mailing list. (WHY are you here again?) I'm happy you know how to do the nmap utility and it's features. I don't memorize that, nor would I care to. Perhaps your CCIE's were looking to gain your valuable insight on running that. Being a CCIE does not mean that you know everything. It means you can solve some complex problems, and have experience on Cisco gear. Solving problems may mean referencing the right people/items to solve a problem. Shame on them for looking to you for assistance only to get stabbed in the back by it. As a side note, you mention working for a Linux shop and being amazed by the CCIE's lack of knowledge. I assume they weren't hired for their unix-specific knowledge. How much do you know about OSPF in detail? Would you need to ask anyone for help (remember, they may fire you later because you were incompetent)? Many unix folks I know can modify the kernel to levels far beyond what I have ever cared to know, but they can't subnet to save their lives? So your four CCIEs at $130k a year were sucking your budget dry, but you at $100k a year weren't? That's pretty selective budgeting! So I'll turn your initial statement back towards yourself... Until you really know what you're talking about, do NOT make any statements regarding Cisco, CCIEs or the PIX vs. Checkpoint without knowing all the facts. It is pretty obvious that your focus (and thought-process) is single-threaded and limited in nature. Worse, you have wasted my time and bandwidth with this message. *sigh* Scott PS. Unix is a general purpose operating system as well. :) And Nokia is routinely 2-3 months behind in updates due to testing it's software configurations with its hardware. -Original Message- --- adrian jones wrote: Elping, Please do NOT make any statements regarding CheckPoint Firewall without knowing all the facts. I've been working with both Checkpoint and Pix firewalls. I even build a few franken pix firewalls so that I can learn as much as I can about Cisco Pix firewalls. The franken pix firewall actually help me
Hi problem regarding PPP HELPpppppppp [7:59184]
Hi, I am new to this group.A big Great hello to every one. Now my problem... I have leased line back to back routers.I have configured dialer interface although dialer interface is mostly used on switched ckts.But I am using here on leased line bavck to back.Now what happens after restting the interface physical It get disconnect after idle-timeout so I have made dilaer list to define interesting traffic also but still I am not able to trigger the call so dilaer interface timesout after being idle.I have used Map command Map protocol ip name broadcast ..I have not defined any string.I cannot define any string in above command as I have leased line ,no number to dial. During which the call is active i am able to transfer data but if it times out after idle time specified I am unable to activate the call. My config Configuration of router 1: router1#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1209 bytes ! version 12.2 no parser cache service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname router1 ! no logging console enable secret 5 $1$xYa1$1.YkO1.NXT1epX8oSH8KQ1 ! username router2 password 0 abc ip subnet-zero ! frame-relay de-list 3 protocol ip gt 500 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.77.152.223 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation ppp shutdown dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 30 dialer map ip 192.168.20.1 name router2 broadcast dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ppp direction callout ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.77.152.129 ip route 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.255 Dialer1 no ip http server ! access-list 100 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 100 ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 200 0 password lab login line vty 5 15 login ! no scheduler allocate end router1# similar is configuration on router 2 Debug ppp nego o/p on router 1 4:39:54: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to up 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Using configured call direction 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Treating connection as a callout 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 203 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x03B9ED37 (0x050603B9ED37) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 44 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x00FF543D (0x050600FF543D) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 44 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x00FF543D (0x050600FF543D) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 203 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x03B9ED37 (0x050603B9ED37) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: State is Open 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by both [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O CHALLENGE id 240 len 28 from router1 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I CHALLENGE id 35 len 28 from router2 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O RESPONSE id 35 len 28 from router1 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I SUCCESS id 35 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I RESPONSE id 240 len 28 from router2 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O SUCCESS id 240 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is UP [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 8 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.10.2 (0x0306C0A80A02) 4:39:54: Se0 CDPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 8 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.20.1 (0x0306C0A81401) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.20.1 (0x0306C0A81401) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 8 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.10.2 (0x0306C0A80A02) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: State is Open 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I PROTREJ [Open] id 45 len 10 protocol CDPCP (0x820701080004) 4:39:54: Se0 CDPCP: State is Closed 4:39:54: Di1 IPCP: Install route to 192.168.20.1 4:39:55: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Serial0, changed state to up router1#show dialer Di1 - dialer type = IN-BAND SYNC NO-PARITY Idle timer (30 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Number of active calls = 1 Dial String Successes Failures Last DNIS Se0 - dialer type = IN-BAND SYNC NO-PARITY Rotary group 1, priority 0 Idle timer (30 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer state is data link layer up Time until disconnect 24 secs( this is decreasing after it expires I cant ping also) Connected to (router2) Se1 - dialer type = IN-BAND SYNC NO-PARITY Rotary group 1, priority 0 Idle timer (30 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs) Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs) Dialer
T1/E1 doc help [7:59185]
Hi , Can anybody tell some good links not only on cisco site but any where about T1 and E1 concepts all including CCS and CAS. I would be very thankful for the same. Regards, Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59185t=59185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port Mapping [7:59193]
Hi Dave, Yes it could be done easily provided you redirect requests on different machines with different port numbers. According to me at the same time you can access internet also by overloading(take care that these port numbers are not used in Dynamic overload nat used for internet access).Just you need to fix clients with specific ports where request will come and configure static Nat accordingly. Refer to cisco site you will easily find a document on this regards, Munit Dave Luancing wrote: I have a router with only one registered outside address. I needs to translate to different inside addresses on different ports. I have PCAnywhere running on clients on the inside and I changed the ports that they listen on. I only have one registered IP. -Dave __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59197t=59193 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Hi problem regarding PPP HELPpppppppp [7:59184]
Hi Ronnie, thanx for the reply.see router 2 configuration is almost same.I am sorry i have just removed that test bed I have to setup again.The confguration you can ge if u just to go the link mentioned at the end of this mail ,Just same configuration I used except multilink. If u still did not get the problem I can again Explain you. Regards, munit Ronnie Higginbotham wrote: Can you please post Router 2 config Ronnie Munit Singla wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I am new to this group.A big Great hello to every one. Now my problem... I have leased line back to back routers.I have configured dialer interface although dialer interface is mostly used on switched ckts.But I am using here on leased line bavck to back.Now what happens after restting the interface physical It get disconnect after idle-timeout so I have made dilaer list to define interesting traffic also but still I am not able to trigger the call so dilaer interface timesout after being idle.I have used Map command Map protocol ip name broadcast ..I have not defined any string.I cannot define any string in above command as I have leased line ,no number to dial. During which the call is active i am able to transfer data but if it times out after idle time specified I am unable to activate the call. My config Configuration of router 1: router1#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1209 bytes ! version 12.2 no parser cache service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname router1 ! no logging console enable secret 5 $1$xYa1$1.YkO1.NXT1epX8oSH8KQ1 ! username router2 password 0 abc ip subnet-zero ! frame-relay de-list 3 protocol ip gt 500 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.77.152.223 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation ppp shutdown dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 30 dialer map ip 192.168.20.1 name router2 broadcast dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ppp direction callout ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.77.152.129 ip route 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.255 Dialer1 no ip http server ! access-list 100 permit ip any any dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 100 ! line con 0 line aux 0 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 200 0 password lab login line vty 5 15 login ! no scheduler allocate end router1# similar is configuration on router 2 Debug ppp nego o/p on router 1 4:39:54: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Serial0, changed state to up 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Using configured call direction 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Treating connection as a callout 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is ESTABLISHING, Active Open [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 203 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x03B9ED37 (0x050603B9ED37) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 44 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x00FF543D (0x050600FF543D) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 44 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x00FF543D (0x050600FF543D) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 203 len 15 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: AuthProto CHAP (0x0305C22305) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: MagicNumber 0x03B9ED37 (0x050603B9ED37) 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: State is Open 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, by both [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O CHALLENGE id 240 len 28 from router1 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I CHALLENGE id 35 len 28 from router2 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O RESPONSE id 35 len 28 from router1 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I SUCCESS id 35 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: I RESPONSE id 240 len 28 from router2 4:39:54: Se0 CHAP: O SUCCESS id 240 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 PPP: Phase is UP [0 sess, 1 load] 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 8 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.10.2 (0x0306C0A80A02) 4:39:54: Se0 CDPCP: O CONFREQ [Closed] id 8 len 4 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.20.1 (0x0306C0A81401) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: O CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.20.1 (0x0306C0A81401) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: I CONFACK [ACKsent] id 8 len 10 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: Address 192.168.10.2 (0x0306C0A80A02) 4:39:54: Se0 IPCP: State is Open 4:39:54: Se0 LCP: I PROTREJ [Open] id 45 len 10 protocol CDPCP (0x820701080004) 4:39:54: Se0 CDPCP: State is Closed 4:39:54: Di1 IPCP: Install route to 192.168.20.1
Re: Hi problem regarding PPP HELPpppppppp [7:59184]
Hi ronnie. i have checked changing Dialer list also.Actually the problem is there is one idle disconnect timer which u say I have set here 30 sec.Now if I transfer packets within 30 sec when interface was up.then this timer gets reset and working fine.Now if dont transfer anything the timer will timeout and dialer comes in IDLE state.so now if i have made access list for matching interesting traffic .In debug it show matched interesting traffic but its unable to initiate a call to serial line ,dialer doesnot come out of idle state .is it Possible that on serial lines to use such commands.or these commands are only made for BRI interfaces. I tried every combination.although this configurationis meant for Bri interfaces but i want to use here and after that want to gor load balacing using multilink on serial lines,but I am not able to make a single connection whats the use of thinking about loadbalacing. any help will be appriciated as I am totally upset abt thsi problem Regards, Munit Ronnie Higginbotham wrote: Try changing the dialer list - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Ronnie Higginbotham Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:09 PM Subject: Re: Hi problem regarding PPP HELP [7:59184] Hi Ronnie, thanx for the reply.see router 2 configuration is almost same.I am sorry i have just removed that test bed I have to setup again.The confguration you can ge if u just to go the link mentioned at the end of this mail ,Just same configuration I used except multilink. If u still did not get the problem I can again Explain you. Regards, munit Ronnie Higginbotham wrote: Try changing the dialer list - Original Message - From: Munit Singla To: Ronnie Higginbotham Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 6:09 PM Subject: Re: Hi problem regarding PPP HELP [7:59184] Hi Ronnie, thanx for the reply.see router 2 configuration is almost same.I am sorry i have just removed that test bed I have to setup again.The confguration you can ge if u just to go the link mentioned at the end of this mail ,Just same configuration I used except multilink. If u still did not get the problem I can again Explain you. Regards, munit Ronnie Higginbotham wrote: Can you please post Router 2 config Ronnie Munit Singla wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, I am new to this group.A big Great hello to every one. Now my problem... I have leased line back to back routers.I have configured dialer interface although dialer interface is mostly used on switched ckts.But I am using here on leased line bavck to back.Now what happens after restting the interface physical It get disconnect after idle-timeout so I have made dilaer list to define interesting traffic also but still I am not able to trigger the call so dilaer interface timesout after being idle.I have used Map command Map protocol ip name broadcast ..I have not defined any string.I cannot define any string in above command as I have leased line ,no number to dial. During which the call is active i am able to transfer data but if it times out after idle time specified I am unable to activate the call. My config Configuration of router 1: router1#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 1209 bytes ! version 12.2 no parser cache service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname router1 ! no logging console enable secret 5 $1$xYa1$1.YkO1.NXT1epX8oSH8KQ1 ! username router2 password 0 abc ip subnet-zero ! frame-relay de-list 3 protocol ip gt 500 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 ! interface FastEthernet0 ip address 10.77.152.223 255.255.255.0 speed auto ! interface Serial0 no ip address encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Serial1 no ip address encapsulation ppp shutdown dialer in-band dialer rotary-group 1 pulse-time 1 ! interface Dialer1 ip unnumbered Loopback0 encapsulation ppp dialer in-band dialer idle-timeout 30 dialer map ip 192.168.20.1 name router2 broadcast dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ppp direction callout !
request to help me
i am a comp engg student final year out to be in may.I have done lot of certifications like ccna 2.0,mcse 4.0,cne 5.0 etc currently i am preparing for ccnp.i am not finding out a suitable way to join a good job as my college is in remote location.i have scored in ccna 2.0 935/1000 and in tcp/ip 1000/1000. the main part of my certifications were that it was indeed my hardwork and dedication and i did on my own without joining any institute. i will be thank ful to you.so please do help me in placement. also tell me what books i should follow for ccnp thanks munit singla CURRICULUM VITAE NAME :Munit Singla DATE OF BIRTH :6th AUG , 1978 SEX:Male MARITAL STATUS :Bachelor EDUCATIONAL/PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION : EXAMINATION YEAR OF BOARD MARKS PASSING /UNIV. /CGPA 10 th 1994 CBSE73.4% 10+2 1996 PSEB62.3% Diploma1998 SLIET 73% BE 2001Punjab68.9%(currently) (computer) (may) Technical University Jalandhar. (SLIET) Certifications : - Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA 2.0) - Microsoft Certified System Engineer(MCSE 4.0) - Microsoft Certified Professional+Internet(MCP+I) - Certified Novell Engineer(CNE 5.0) - Brainbench Certified as NT,Novell Administrator - BrainBench Certified as TCP/IP Administrator - Brainbench Certified as Cisco Network Associate - Aspiring for higher Cisco Certifications(CCNP,CCIE) COMPUTER SKILLS : O.S: WINDOWS 95/98, NT 4.0,Netware 5.0,cisco IOS LANGUAGES : HTML , C , C++ ,Pascal RDBMS : Foxpro 2.6 , Dbase COMPUTER PROJECTS : - Working on Video Conferencing Project in C C++ - Networking of College Labs - Implemented RAS in Banks by Working under NELITO - Working as a part time customer support engineer under NICT - Implemented MS-Proxy Sever 2.0 on a six node NT Platform. PROFFESSIONALTRAINING : · 14 Weeks Training at Simplex Infotech Pvt.Ltd. (ISO-9002), Chandigarh. · 6 Weeks Training at Optimum Solutions Pvt.Ltd., Chandigarh in Computer Hardware and networking (windows NT). ·6 Weeks Training on IBM AS/400 and Novell NetWare EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES : - Presented Paper on "IPV-4" in Techfest 2000 - Served as a Network Administrator in Techfest 2000 - Executive Member of SLIET Computer Society - Participated in Intra hostel Cricket Tournament. - Participated in Kargil Nite. Areas of interest : - Reading computer magazines - Sports: Table Tennis, Football,Cricket - Technical: Internetworking of LANs and Wans - Network Administration,Network Programming References:- Mr. S.K Sood (MCSE,CNE,CCNA,CCNP,CCIE(written),B.Tech) Network Engg. working under NEC,Huge Japanese company of America. Address: 3215 S Parker Rd Apt 812 Aurora, CO 80014 USA Tel Res: 720 748 9786 Off: 720 875 1616 PERSONAL DETAILS : address: Munit Singla S/o Varinder Singla H.no 16949,Street no. 3b Bathinda-151001 Punjab. Ph: +91-0164-218674 E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
