Re: OSPF question
interface loopback 0 ip ospf network point-to-point ! that'll make it push it out as a /24, not /32. On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Elaluf, Sylvia, wrote: Hello everybody I need some help with the following: Given the following loopback 0 ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 router ospf 1 network 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 sh ip route 10.10.10.1 known via connected loopback 0 distributed via ospf 1 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.255 what I want is to Advertise the loopback interface as class C and not host specific route. distributed via ospf 1 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0 How do I do that? Silvia Elaluf-Calderwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Switching 2.0
The switching exam does have multicasting in it, when I took the test it basically went right along with the material covered in the Cisco Press BCMSN book (which I highly recommend as a major study resource for this exam.) I used the Cisco Press book as my only study source and passed it with a pretty high score, as long as you make sure you understand everything covered the test really wasn't too bad. Hope this helps. Paul Schultz CCNP On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Donald Williams wrote: Have anyone taken the CCNP Switching 2.0 test? If so are ther a lot of multicasting questions on it? I'm using the Boson.com prep test and the one from Jason asks a lot of multicast questions. Thanks Don Williams CCNA, MCSE _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 7200 Series router running Ether Channel
It works on the 7206VXRs. I've got it running using 2 PA-FE-TX cards. Whatever you do don't use the 2 port fast ether cards, as they're designed more for ISL trunking from token ring networks and start getting errors after you start pushing some heavy traffic through them. just create a port-channel interface, and assign the 2 fastether interfaces to be part of that channel group. Paul On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Fessler, David wrote: Does anyone know if a Cisco 7200 Series router will support Ether channel. I only find reference to the following from Cisco: Fast Ether Channel is available on Cisco 7500 routers with Fast Ethernet Interface Processors (FEIP),---Versatile Interface Processor (VIP2) Port Adapters or any combination of the two. Does anyone currently run Ether channel on a 7200 and what IOS and port adapters are you using. David Grahame Fessler, CCNA, CCNP Principal Engineer Gilat-To-Home Latin America 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Suite 200 Sunrise, FL. 33323 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 954-331-1620 Fax: 954-858-1777 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Aeronet Comparisons
Cisco Aironet stuff works quite well, but you have to be very careful with it. Aironet uses direct sequence spread spectrum technology which doesn't scale well at all.. There's 11 possible channels to use, but only 3 of them are non-overlapping.. so basically in one given rooftop or so you're limited to only having 3 DS access points. If you need to have more coverage with more antennas you should probably look at some frequency hopping spread spectrum wireless lan gear such as breezecom. On 22 Nov 2000, Charles Nunie wrote: Hello Everyone, We are gearing up to launch the Aeronet in our local market. Can anyone tell em how well the Aeronet compare with other Wireless LAN equipment on the market. Dzilo Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OSPF NSSA problem
If i'm understanding correctly you want the routes you redistribute into the NSSA to not make it all the way through to area 0? Very simple.. let's say on the ASBR you redistribute routes that fall under 172.16.0.0/16 into the NSSA on the ABR, just put: summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 not-advertise this will ONLY work on the ABR and if the routes are redistributed into an NSSA, which sounds like your situation so it should work for you. Paul On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Simon Hope wrote: Hi guys / gals, Here is an interesting problem that I am struggling with at present Area 4 of my OSPF network is configured as NSSA and has 3 routers in it. Router 1 is the ABR that connects to the backbone, Router 2 is the ASBR that is redistributing some IGRP networks into area 4 and Router 3 is just an internal area 4 router. They are connected together over one ethernet. I would like to set the "P" bit on the type 7 LSA's that the ASBR produces to zero, so that the ABR (r1) will NOT convert these to Type 5's and NOT put them into the backbone (see Doyle, p483 if you dont know what I mean) the closest command I can come up with is the "area 4 nssa no-redistribute" , which I thought would work when I typed it in on R2 (the ASBR) - but this seems to block the production of the type 7 LSA altogether, so that R1 and R3 can no longer see the IGRP routes at all If I type the "area 4 nssa no-redistribute" on the ABR (R1) then this has no effect whatsoever, and the type 7 routes still get converted to type 5, and flooded into the backbone. Doyle says this command should be implemented on the ASBR not a seperate ABR so this doesn't surprise me too much Does anyone know how to do this? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCMSN and the Boson Test
I found the Boson BCMSN tests pretty good.. I used the Boson test + ciscopress BCMSN book + some hands on experience and didn't have much trouble passing the exam.. If you think the Boson tests are ambigous just wait for the real thing :) Paul Schultz, CCNP On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Jason Baker wrote: HI all, I am studying up for the switching exam. Have had access to the BOSON tests, and they do not seem to be as good as the CCNA test for preparation. A lot of the questions seem amibigous... How do the BOSON test compare to the real exam ? Regards, Jason Baker Network Engineer MCSE, CCNA _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pre-requisite for CCNP
CCNA is a prerequisite for getting CCNP certified, but CCNP certification is NOT a prerequisite to get CCIE. On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Nelluri Reddy wrote: I heard that as of July 2000, a CCNA certification is a pre-requisite for taking CCNP exams and a CCNP certification is a pre-requisite for taking CCIE exams. Is this true? Nelluri _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless
If you want just data, aeronet is great, if you want voice + data and you have a boatload of money to spend you should look at the wavespan wireless gear. 100mb ethernet + 2 T1 circuits. We use the 100mb for data and the 2 T1 circuits that come off the wireless radios to do voice over. They also make 10mb/sec and 20mb/sec models (both including the T1's). http://www.wavespan.com Paul On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Sites, Bob wrote: Has anyone used, or have any opinions on the Cisco Aironet 340? I'm looking into hooking up a small office in a remote bldg going bldg to bldg that is less than a mile apart. Would like to run data and voice on the same pipe, and somehow breaking the voice out at the receiving end to pipe it to my pbx and piping the data to a Catalyst switch. Bob Sites System Engineer, CCNA ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Working hour
The standard US "working week" is 40 hours/week, but that's almost never the case with people in this field. I know the younger people (like myself) are known for pulling pretty long hours. I don't know about most people, but a 55-60 hour week is about normal for me. I've done longer (hell even camped out at our office to maintain a gas generator when we had a 36 hour power outage =) Expect 55-60 hours a week, be prepared to pull 70+ when there's a lot of crap going on. On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Hubert Pun wrote: What is the normal working hour per week in each country? and what is the normal working hour per week for NETWORK ENGINEER have to work per week? I just want to know roughtly what to expect Thanks Hubert ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BCMSN Info
You're studying for the wrong exam... the coarse material changed quite a bit from CLSC to BCMSN. You're better off picking up the Cisco Press BCMSN book and study that. Paul On 31 Jul 2000, Dele Ajayi wrote: Hi guys, I'm preparing to take the BCMSN exam by Friday and I've been using the following materials: Exam Cram (CLSC) Cisco CLSC course material And recently I had access to the network study guides membership area for practice test. My concerns: Do I have a chance of passing this exam using the materials stated above? What are the differences between the CLSC and the BCMSN exams. What sorts of hardware knowledge are tested in the BCMSN exam. Somebody pls help. Thank you all. Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A boon for Cisco Engineers!
We use WhatsUp Gold. For the paging we use pagers that can accept alphanumeric email pages (like Arch). On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Nasser N Khwaja wrote: Hello Everybody, Does anyone know about any software package that monitors a network so that if any router(s) goes down the support Engineer is automatically paged. Please let me know, Thanks in advance, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VPNS/access-list question
There's two things you need to allow for MS PPTP (I assume that's what you're using.) Port 1723 tcp, and either GRE (protocol 47) for NT4 or IPSec (protocol 50) for Win2k. I know NT4 uses GRE and this setup will work, but I've heard Win2k has an option to use IPSec instead. Either way allow whichever one you decide to use on your VPN server. access-list 105 permit tcp any host X.X.X.X eq 1723 access-list 105 permit gre any host X.X.X.X (Use this if you're using PPTP with GRE) access-list 105 permit 50 any host X.X.X.X(use this for PPTP with IPSec) On Sat, 29 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have setup this acces-list going to the Internet, I have a few 2000 Server's some worksta's as well. I have VPNS setup on one of my 2000 Server and want to be able to access this network from the Internet, I have the server setup for VPN, but with this new access-list I put up I can no longer get to my VPN server no more. The server IP address is 198.168.1.10 and yes I am running NAT on my router, not PAT. What kind of access-list do I need to be able to gain access to my VPNS without showing my tcp 137-139 and udp 137-139 to my Server. Thanks Ethernet0 ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 105 out BRI0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 access-list 105 permit tcp any any established log access-list 105 deny udp any any eq 135 log access-list 105 deny udp any any eq 136 log access-list 105 deny udp any any eq netbios-ns log access-list 105 deny udp any any eq netbios-dgm log access-list 105 deny udp any any eq netbios-ss log access-list 105 permit udp any any log access-list 105 permit icmp any any log Brian Email Address [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed Switching 2.0, wooha
The 2924XL really wasn't good enough to do any testing on, we just had a spare at work that I was able to take home with me to play around on. It would probably be best to do a combination of some set based switch and a 1900, since many of the commands in the 2924XL (or atleast the latest and greatest IOS version that I keep on all my switches) GREATLY differ from those you'll find the the BCMSN course material (almost none of the spanning-tree commands they list for the 1900 match up with the 2924XL). Luckily at work I have 5 2924XLs to do the real tests on, although honestly I really didn't do that much testing anyway (just studied the hell out of the material from the book.) Only lab stuff I did with our switches was set up a few Etherchannel links and did some ISL trunking with a 7206 router. Paul On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Ole Drews Jensen wrote: Congratulations Paul, Did you find your single 2924XL sufficient hands-on for the BCMSN exam, or would it have helped you to have 1 or 2 additionals ??? I know you can't really do any STP/STA practise with just one unit, but what do you feel? Good luck with your future exams. Ole Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passed Switching 2.0, wooha Just took this test today. I heard from everyone that the switching exams are incredibly difficult so I studied the hell out of the material, after that the actual exam was a LOT easier than I expected. I found the routing 2.0 exam to be pretty diffucult and scored an 873, found switching to be still difficult, but not really as bad as I thought, 846 score. The Boson tests are a lot harder than the actual exam, I highly recommend using them as study material. My sole source of studying was the Cisco Press "Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks", a lot of CCO online documentation, and a Cisco 2924XL switch. The Cisco Press book covers the entire exam pretty well. BCRAN is next for me, then CIT to follow shortly.. Paul ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: (NAT) P.A.T. on overloaded interface..
I've done this with 1605's and 802's running 12.0 IOS.. the format is like: ip nat inside source static tcp 10.0.0.2 80 interface Serial1 80 (you can use the external "real" ip instead of the interface, either will work.) Basically this says anything coming in on the routable IP on serial 1 port 80 TCP will be forwarded to 10.0.0.2 80/tcp. This allows you to host web/mail/whatever servers behind an overloaded NAT. Hope this helps. Paul On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, David L Miller wrote: Using IOS 11.3 Enterprise on a RSM with (PAT) port address translation configured Is it possible to map an internal IP address to a PORT number on the overloaded NAT outside interface? So let's say for example that if Joe Internet user was to connect to my overloaded ip address with a tcp port number of the Cisco NAT would forward that connection to the statically mapped INSIDE IP address? Dave Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Passed Switching 2.0, wooha
Just took this test today. I heard from everyone that the switching exams are incredibly difficult so I studied the hell out of the material, after that the actual exam was a LOT easier than I expected. I found the routing 2.0 exam to be pretty diffucult and scored an 873, found switching to be still difficult, but not really as bad as I thought, 846 score. The Boson tests are a lot harder than the actual exam, I highly recommend using them as study material. My sole source of studying was the Cisco Press "Building Cisco Multilayer Switched Networks", a lot of CCO online documentation, and a Cisco 2924XL switch. The Cisco Press book covers the entire exam pretty well. BCRAN is next for me, then CIT to follow shortly.. Paul ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Totally stubby areas
You CAN make it a totally stubby area, as long as your Cisco router is the ABR. Remember a "totally stubby" setting only means that your router will only send a 0.0.0.0 default route into the OSPF area, as opposed to a 0.0.0.0 default and type 3/4 summary LSAs. As far as packet headers and that kind of stuff it will still just show as a stub. If a Cisco is set to totally stubby, and another router from another vendor is set to just stub for the area, the two routers will have no problems at all communicating with each other. Paul On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Gsantoz wrote: I think it is not possible, because the TSA (Totaly Stub Area) is Cisco proprietary and therefore can't be use on another vendor. - Original Message - From: "Omer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Cisco Groupstudy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:42 AM Subject: Totally stubby areas Hello, Suppose that I have an OSPF area that contains some non-Cisco routers, Can I still configure it as totally stuby area? Thanks Omer __ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access List Question
Actually it is possible in Cisco, for standard lists do: (config)# ip access-list standard 10 (config-std-nacl)#no permit blahblahblahblah for extended do: (config)#ip access-list extended 102 (config-ext-nacl)# no deny blahblahblah You'll probably only find this on newer IOS versions Paul On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Mohamed Abubakkar Siddiqu wrote: It is not possible in Cisco. But one stupid Idea. U just transfer the configuration into TFTP server. Edit the Configuration and transfer back. regards siddiqu .T -- T. Mohamed Abubakkar Siddiqu CCNA "Scott M. Trieste" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anyway to remove a specific line from an access list without erasing the entire thing. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Scott M. Trieste ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ FREE voicemail, email, and fax...all in one place. Sign Up Now! http://www.onebox.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Differences between ACRC 1.0 and BSCN 2.0 Exam?
ACRC covers more things, queueing, bridging, ISDN, appletalk, IPX, etc. BSCN/Routing 2.0 focuses almost all on dynamic IP routing protocols, route-maps, access-lists, and so on.. The test follows the class corriculum, so I'd suggest checking out the course outlines on the training and certification sections of cisco's web site. If you take ACRC you'll have to recertify eventually, so you might as well sit down for a really long time and get to know BGP, EIGRP, OSPF, route-maps, access-lists, etc and take the Routing 2.0 exam. the BSCN Cisco Press book will be out next month, I'd suggest you get that when it comes out. I was able to pass it without it, but I also have a fair amount of hands on experience working with many of the covered subjects which helped me out tremendously. I'm no to BCMSN right now, only about 1/3 through the book.. I'm not too sure if getting my CCNP cert by the end of september is still going to happen :) Paul On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, rtc wrote: What are the differences between the two Exams? I prepared for the ACRC 1.0 which I'll take at the end-of-the-month but some have advised taking the BSCN 2.0. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing 2.0 thoughts
Just took and passed the CCNP Routing 2.0 exam. I thought this test was pretty hard, the wording on some of the questions was just rediculous in some cases. The rumors are true, there is NO bridging/queueing/isdn/appletalk/ipx on this exam. A LOT of BGP, and I do mean a lot. Here's what I used for study material: Advanced Cisco Router Configuration / Cisco Press (ignore all the bridging/queueing/isdn/appletalk/ipx.. study the hell out of the routing protocol chapters.) Internet Routing Architectures / Cisco Press - very very good BGP book.. it seemed like half the test was BGP, so I'd definitely recommend reading this book. A lot, lot, lot of Cisco's online documentation for EIGRP, OSPF, and BGP. Know route maps and route filtering very very well. A good amount of hands on experience with BGP/OSPF. Luckily I work at an ISP so have had some very good hands on experience working with OSPF and BGP, if you don't work in an anvironment where you have access to this stuff I'd recommend setting up whatever kind of lab you can. It may be a good idea for a lot of people wanting to take this exam to wait for the Cisco Press Building Scalable Cisco Networks book to come out in august, since I sort of mixed and matched various study sources to get the material I needed to pass this exam. I'm on to BCMSN now, hope the road isn't too bumpy :) Paul ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2620 Keeps rebooting
You more than likely have an IOS image on the router that the router doesn't have enough RAM to use. This happens a lot when you put certain IOS images on 2600 routers with less than 24 megs of ram. What you need to do is hit break when it first starts to boot up and use tftpdnld to grab the appropriate IOS image so it can boot up. Had this happen to me last week when I accidentally upgraded a 2610 to a c2600-is-mz-XK1 IOS without it having enough ram (ofcourse it had to be the only router on our network with less than 24mb) Hope this helps. Paul On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Niraj Palikhey wrote: Hi, My 2620 router just freaked out and it keeps rebooting on and on and on! (It's not a production router!)There is no way to stop this-similiar to auto reboot in nt when it crashes. Can someone please advise as to what's going on? Is there a ctrl-break kind of key to stop this? Please help. Kind regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Vlan Questions
You can have the server be a part of both VLANs without having to do any routing.. Here's a config snip with an example. Everything defaults to VLAN 1, so no extra configuration on any of the ports that will be only on vlan 1. For clients on the second vlan, do this for every port that you want on VLAN 2: interface FastEthernet0/13 (or whatever port it is) switchport access vlan2 now.. for the server, who you want to be part of both VLANs do this interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport mode multi swithport multi vlan 1,2 That will give you 2 seperate VLANs both being able to connect to the server on port 1 (in this scenerio.) Be careful, in this case machines on both VLANs can connect to to the server, the server can connect to any machine on either VLAN, but clients on VLAN 1 can not connect to clients on VLAN 2 and vice versa. For this it would be beneficial to put a router in place to route between to two networks. Hope this helps! Paul Schultz On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Darren Blake wrote: Hi All, I am new to this list so sorry if this has been asked before. I am really confused about the benefits/setup of Vlans. The more reading I do on the subject, the more confused I get. Say, I have a network of 100 users who all access a file server and Internet router. How can I split them up into 2 vlans when they all need to access the file server and Internet router. I know it is possible to use a 'router on a stick' to enable communication between the vlans but can you make the file server/router members of both vlans without a separate router? Are there any performance/config issues by making them members of both vlans.? Also is there any way to assign ports to vlans other than manually configuring them. For example say I had two subnets 192.168.14.0 and 192.168.15.0 on my network. Is it possible to automatically setup two vlans so the machines on the 14 subnet are assigned to 1 vlan and the machines on the 15 subnet to the other ( I know its possible to automatically assign based on Mac address - but that still means you have to find out all the MAC addresses on your network ). Any info or pointers to further reading would be grateful. Regards, Darren ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: your mail
I usually just put dialer idle-timeout 2147483, I think this is the max number of seconds you can put on it, and have had pretty good luck with the connection not timing out. On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Nahrajieh D.Anggaon wrote: Hello, How do you disable "dialer idle-timeout" and set the DDR connection permanently? I want to permanently connect a DDR call to the isp for internet access. I read an info from CCO that say that if you use "no dialer idle-timeout", the idle timeout will default to 120 seconds. I issued show dialer on the router and I can see that the dialer 0 has idle timeout set to "120 seconds". How do I disable it? And get permanent connection. My isdn connection to the isp is not stable. So, I want that once connected using DDR, the connection will not timeout or be permanent. Any help is highly appreciated Thanks a lot. Ajie ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
