RE: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
Hi Bob, You have a very valid point and I have weighed the option of using BGP. The question iswhy us BGP when default routes work very well and use less system resources and administration. Actually BGP will take more resources of the router and will not provide any increased functionality or efficiencies in this case. The outcome was to increase bandwidth and a redundancy in the physical wiring from the CO to us...the most likely scenario is a carrier technician messing up the wiring in the wiring cans because of poor and no documentation. This happens all the time with our carrier. Thank your for the different perspective. Scott -Original Message- From: Bob Timmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] Why not use BGP? If both lines are to the same provider, it should be a no-brainer (relatively speaking of course). Are you using these T1's for failover/backups or for expanding bandwidth? BGP should help in either case. The 2600 should be sufficient and I don't think you'd need to have the the full BGP tables on your router if you're going to the same provider. Also, you could get away with a private ASN so there wouldn't be any cost to you. Now I've never done this, I've only done the BGP with T1's to different providers, which is considerably more difficult, IMHO. Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router resources and on top of this I have about a 20 line access control list filtering traffic. =) This router is a workhorse and I'm in love it. The 2650 uses a faster memory and cpu than the 2621 but I think the 2621 would work. Hope this helps you in some way, Scott -Original Message- From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to bigger routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49195t=49039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
Hi Kevin, We were in the same scenario in which you have described. The way I choose to do is keep it simple and efficient and cost effective. We have dual PTP connections on a Cisco 2650 with CEF, default routes, and per packet load sharing. I can max out the t1's and it barely taxes the router resources and on top of this I have about a 20 line access control list filtering traffic. =) This router is a workhorse and I'm in love it. The 2650 uses a faster memory and cpu than the 2621 but I think the 2621 would work. Hope this helps you in some way, Scott -Original Message- From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039] We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively expensive in our rural area. Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static routes (i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus running MLPPP on the Serial interfaces? We're currently using a 2621 but are open to bigger routers. Kevin Hunt CCNP, MCSE, MCT, Linux+ SME Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49065t=49039 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The Case of the Clicking Router [7:45457]
Hi John, We just recently upgraded all of our 2620, 2621 and 2650 routers and every one of them and the clicks when the flash was erasing. I did this with and without cisco's and third party flash and each time I have heard the clicks. I haven't done any research on it (don't have the time) but could it be from the electrical charge being created to erase the flash? These routers have been in production for about 3 months now and I haven't heard a peep out of them. They have been working like champs. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The Case of the Clicking Router [7:45457] This is really strange. I just put some new flash memory into a brand new 2620 router. I then used tftpdnld from ROMMON to download a new IOS image. After the download the router erases flash memory. While erasing flash, a click emanates from the router near the flash stick at each sector. I tried this again in a different brand new router with more brand new flash and I got the same result. I then put the Cisco flash stick back in and it still clicks. I've never heard a router -- or anything else, for that matter -- click during flash operations. Have any of you experienced this? Should I be worried? I'm about to ship these two routers out to two new branches and I'd hate for them to die prematurely. Thanks, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45462t=45457 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers? [7:41951]
You are correct. The flash will work on the 3600 router but not the DRAM. Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers? [7:41643] Open up both boxes and compare the physical dimensions of the Flash and DRAM. If memory serves, you can swap the flash but not the DRAM. -Original Message- From: hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Can 2600 series RAM/Flash be used in 3600 series routers? [7:41638] Hi all, I have a 3620 that has 4MB RAM/16MB Flash that serves as my VOIP router with 12.0(3) IOS. I also have a few 2621's laying around doing nothing with 32MB RAM/16MB Flash. Can I take the RAM and Flash from the 2621 and put them in the 3620? TIA, Jeff Hall Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41951t=41951 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ethereal Sniffer [7:41777]
us this command in the filter field (ip.addr eq XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX and ip.addr eq XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) Replace the XXXs with the destination and source IP address. This will filter all the other traffic besides the two stations. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: group study [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 2:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethereal Sniffer [7:41777] Hi , Anybody know how to do a IP filtering with Ethereal Sniffer.I just basically want to monitor the traffic only between two stations. Also, did any body has the luck with Coloring in Ethereal sniffer.Mine is not working. Jay _ Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41781t=41777 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCDP [7:41071]
Hi Chris, The CCDA exam is a requirement to get your CCDP certification. You will have to pass the CCDA and then CID, if you are already a CCNP, to achieve CCDP status. Scott -Original Message- From: Chris Headings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCDP [7:41071] As a CCNP with out taking the CCDA exam, will taking the CID allow me get the CCDP w/out taking the CCDA? Regards, Chris Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41073t=41071 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encapsulation overhead?? [7:40343]
To the Big Study Group Brain, Quick question: Which WAN encapsulation protocol has the least amount of overhead? PPP, HDLC, FR or other? Thank you for your opinions. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40343t=40343 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Router question.. [7:39788]
-Original Message- From: Ricky Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 9:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Router question.. [7:39788] Hi all, My boss just come up and give me a senario question like this. He told me that I owned a company which uses 3 different LANs, for example, 172.27.10.x, 172.27.11.x, 172.27.12.x. But I only have one cisco 2600 series router and 2900 series switch. I can't use the serial ports from the router. Just the two ethernet ports (by default). My question is, is it possible? Please advice. Thanks Ricky Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=39797t=39788 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738]
Hello, FYI: We just purchased a workstation with XP to be a semi-network management station. I couldn't get the Cisco TFTP server to install because of an installer issue. So, I switched to SolarWinds TFTP server. This piece of software works like a champ and you can read and write to the server at the same time. I have already used it for my routers and switches to download and upload configs and IOS's. HTH Have fun, Scott P.S. Did I mention solarwinds is free from here, http://download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10101-100-5699390.html -Original Message- From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 12:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows XP and tftp [7:37738] I've done plenty of TFTP transfers in Win XP with Pumpkin with no problem. It's all I use for TFTP. Their website is www.klever.net/kin but it appears to be down at the moment. It's been awhile since I've been there... The stories they had about the programs were funny. __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37878t=37738 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Access-list Problem. [7:37336]
Hi Ivan, Neither access-list would work, because if your trying to limit telnet access for the network 200.200.200. to network 10.10. then you would have this access-list: access-list 100 permit tcp 200.200.200.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255 eq 23 This is because access-lists uses source wildcards. Scott -Original Message- From: Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Access-list Problem. [7:37336] Hi all, I have a problem, does anyone can give me a answer? Which the following access-list is right to allow only telnet? 1. access-list 100 permit tcp 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 23 2. access-list 100 permit tcp 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 eq 23 Thank you very much. Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37341t=37336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX Access-list Problem. [7:37336]
Oops Ivan, Its been a long day. I didn't see that this is for a PIX. The correct access-list would be #2. Scott -Original Message- From: Ivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Access-list Problem. [7:37336] Hi all, I have a problem, does anyone can give me a answer? Which the following access-list is right to allow only telnet? 1. access-list 100 permit tcp 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 23 2. access-list 100 permit tcp 200.200.200.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 eq 23 Thank you very much. Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37342t=37336 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Lab Rat [7:37130]
Wow I never participate in these kinds of discussions because its a waste of bandwidth and time, and most of us know we don't know everything and the more you know, the more you know you don't know! You just have to have know where and what resources to turn to when needed, and I wanted to say that sakky hit the nail right on the head. Scott -Original Message- From: sakky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: CCNP Lab Rat [7:37130] Look. There's nothing wrong with increasing your knowledge. Everybody has to start somewhere. The problem arises when guys who are certified, but have little experience, still expect to get the same pay and respect as somebody who's been doing it for awhile. Or worse, they try to fake their way around by claiming knowledge they don't have. Then they inevitably screw something up, which not only means more work for the other guys because they have to clean up the mess, but also means that hiring managers get suspicious of everybody because they don't know who's good and who isn't. The fact is, all of Cisco's cert exams, even the CCIE, can only cover a small subset of what a network engineer really needs to know. One prime example is the ability to troubleshoot layer-1 WAN problems. This topic is not covered at all in the lab, because you obviously are not going to have any layer-1 problems using back2back serial connections. But layer-1 WAN problems happen all the time in the real world. So a guy who knows all about route redistribution, but doesn't know what to do when the T-1 line goes down is not a particularly useful employee. That's just one example, but there are many others. Now, like I said, there's nothing wrong with getting a cert, as long as you are willing to admit (especially to yourself) the things you know and don't know, and that you're still willing to learn. Again, the problem comes when a guy obtains a cert and believes he is now great and doesn't need to learn more, and deserves the same stature as others with the same cert (but have been around the industry a lot longer). norco wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; i agree. that 'lab rat' bullshit has been created by cisco engineers fearful of their status/positions because nowadays anyone get reasonable proficient at cisco routing and switching - which SHOULD be the case!! I remember people (and they still do) cryin' the frickin' blues beacuse people were paper certified, and that they had no hands-on experience. Well, now that they are getting hands-on experience albeit in a lab environment (which is in some cases presents a more convoluted routing and switching environment because it allows them to set the level of complexity depending on the amount and type of lab equipment...phew - long comment) - they have the audacity to label them 'lab rats' - honestly i think these fucks expect you to be born with this knowledge!! By all means get stuck into your lab - get your CCNP, go for the CCIE and improve your standard of living - after all that's what this is all about - don't let a bunch of narrow-minded, paranoid, tall-poppy syndrome minded dicks dictate what you should or should not do. B Rudy wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hey guys, I have been looking for a job for the past 8 months. I decided to get some professional Cisco training since the market was doing so badly. I have read some message boards talking about CCIE lab rats, and how they are a disgrace.. I dont want to be looked at like that. I have purchased a year of training where I can utilize all the Cisco equipment they have on their premises. I am going to be a lab rat for a while.. Will i be able to find a job once i am a ccnp and proficcient with Cisco and their equipment?? That lab rat being a disgrace comment is totally absurd my bio: B.S in Telecommunications No experience in the field-but a lot in the labs CCDA CCNA Network+ MCSE 2k LPI 1 A+ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37206t=37130 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco and HP Procurve [7:36711]
Hi Chris, We have Cisco routers and HP 4000 switches, but we don't use VLANs. I have read and researched this information for HP 4000 before for future use. What M.C. van den Bovenkamp said about the port being assigned to both VLANs with them marked as tagged it accurate. I haven't tried this but i'm pretty sure it will work. The HP 4000 switch use the 802.1q standard for VLAN tagging. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: M.C. van den Bovenkamp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 2:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco and HP Procurve [7:36711] Chris Headings wrote: The router is setup with these sub-interfaces and the proper encapsulation. Has anybody used an HP Procurve 4000 and created trunks that pass the proper dot1q vlans to the router? The customer is way in over their head and we have never used HP switching gear. If not an answer than a link pertaining to trunking for the HP product would be greatly appreciated. Look at ftp://ftp.hp.com/pub/networking/software/59692320.pdf (the docs for the 4000M), especially page 6-62 up. Basically, they just have to assign the same port to both VLANs and make them both 'tagged'. That should work. (Note, I haven't seen a Procurve in my life. If I could find this in roughly a minute or so...) Regards, Marco. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36725t=36711 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Copying RAM to a text file [7:36671]
Hi, Notepad is simple and easy to use. I just want to mention that you can still use word but make sure you save it in a .text format. This will not put in extra formatting characters and so forth. I use it all the time. Scott -Original Message- From: Jonathan Mian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Copying RAM to a text file [7:36671] Oh yeah I forgot to say that all the config files like startup/running are ASCI-II ones so as mark said use notepad or another ASCI-II editor to be safe. Jon the Loony Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36728t=36671 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Console speed [7:36155]
Hello, I tried this on a new 2650 router and it states The -s speed option is not supported on this platform, which it sounds like it is supported on other platforms. Scott -Original Message- From: Georg Pauwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 2:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Console speed [7:36155] Hi, I am not sure if this works, but what happens if you just try rommon xmodem -y -s57600 to set the speed to 57600 ? Regards, Georg Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36234t=36155 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164]
Hi Anil, Sometimes its scaring posting to this group. =) To answer your question, if you don't the permit IP any any command, there is an implicit deny rule at the end of an access-list, which will drop all traffic that you have not allowed through the access-list. The other two deny statements are dropping netbios port 139 and something that uses port . Hope this helps. Scott -Original Message- From: Anil Gupte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 7:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access Lists are a bit mystifying [7:36164] Hi All! I watch this list occassionally (when I have time). This is my first post to this list, so be kind. :p) In the access list below: ** conf t int ethernet0/0 no ip access-list extended secure2 ip access-list extended secure2 deny tcp any any eq deny tcp any any eq 139 permit ip any any int ethernet0/0 ip access-group secure2 out ip access-group secure2 in exit wr ** Why is it that you need to deny TCP and permit IP? Or did I not do this right? Thanx, Anil Gupte Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36167t=36164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need a hyperterminal program that supports 4800 bps. [7:35875]
Phil, I found an awesome document on Cisco website about a jumper on the 2600 and 3600 routers called J3. This jumper will reset the baud rate of the console port back to 9600. I'm assuming you have physical access to the router since you can use the console port. Check this link out. I tried it out on a 2620 and it worked great. I love finding new little tips and tricks. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/59.html#console HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Phil Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I need a hyperterminal program that supports 4800 bps. [7:35861] Hi group, I posted this one earlier in the month but cannot find anything in the archives. I need to fix a router later today that has its config reg set such that bits 10/11 are switched on so as to support 4800 bps. I need to change it back to 9600 but need s/w to support this first. Some of you listed some sites for free downloads which I have but on another computer miles away. Can anyone resupply the links ? Regards, Phil. __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35875t=35875 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876]
Hello Group, Quick Question: I'm wondering if the flash SIMMs that go on the motherboard for a 2600 and 3600 routers are the same? It would be good to know for trouble shooting purposes. Thanx for the info Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35876t=35876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876]
Thank you for the input. I know the part numbers are different from Cisco but comparing the two simms from a 2600 and 3600 router they look the exact same size and contacts. I thinking about trying it out. I will let you know. =) Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] A source of Flash says yes. kg2.com I'll know by the end of the week. -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] Hello Group, Quick Question: I'm wondering if the flash SIMMs that go on the motherboard for a 2600 and 3600 routers are the same? It would be good to know for trouble shooting purposes. Thanx for the info Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35886t=35876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876]
FYI Answer: I think they are the same kind of flash SIMM for the 2600 and 3600 routers. I put a 3640 flash simm into a 2620 router and I was able to erase it and copy a 2620 IOS onto it. Unfortunately, my intention was to put a 3640 IOS onto the SIMM from a Cisco 2600 router platform for future trouble shooting purposes. Just in case I didn't have another 3600 router around to do it. I wasn't able xmodem or tftpdnld a 3640 IOS onto the SIMM. I get a error message stating ERR:File not a valid executable. I'm pretty sure its because the 2600 hardware will not recognize a 3600 IOS. Just incase your ever curious. =) Have fun. Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] Thank you for the input. I know the part numbers are different from Cisco but comparing the two simms from a 2600 and 3600 router they look the exact same size and contacts. I thinking about trying it out. I will let you know. =) Scott -Original Message- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] A source of Flash says yes. kg2.com I'll know by the end of the week. -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash SIMMs the same? [7:35876] Hello Group, Quick Question: I'm wondering if the flash SIMMs that go on the motherboard for a 2600 and 3600 routers are the same? It would be good to know for trouble shooting purposes. Thanx for the info Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35897t=35876 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the commands either. I know if you tftp a IOS from rommon you can erase the flash. Could someone help me on this one. Scott -Original Message- From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc. Rik -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35315t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Nadeem, Format is not a found command in ROMMON mode for a Cisco 2620 router. I don't know if this will work for other routers. Thanx for the input. Scott -Original Message- From: PING [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you try format disk0: command? Nadeem Scott Nawalaniec wrote: Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the commands either. I know if you tftp a IOS from rommon you can erase the flash. Could someone help me on this one. Scott -Original Message- From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc. Rik -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35362t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]
Nadeem, I know when you tftp a file into flash in rommon mode it erases it. I said that in the previous message. I don't have a problem right now, but RIK said Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. I just want to find out what command he is talking about to format the flash from ROMMON mode. And what routers and switches he is talking about for future reference and trouble shooting. Scott -Original Message- From: PING [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] I think that if you do tftpdnload, it will ask to erase flash first, erase process formats the flash. If this does not work, you might wanna format your flash by inserting it in another router slot and load image from there. Then insert it back and boot from flash by changing the conf-reg, simple! Nadeem == Scott Nawalaniec wrote: Nadeem, Format is not a found command in ROMMON mode for a Cisco 2620 router. I don't know if this will work for other routers. Thanx for the input. Scott -Original Message- From: PING [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you try format disk0: command? Nadeem Scott Nawalaniec wrote: Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the commands either. I know if you tftp a IOS from rommon you can erase the flash. Could someone help me on this one. Scott -Original Message- From: Rik Guyler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Did you format the new flash? I've had issues with corruption adding flash while existing flash is still installed. Try to boot to rommon mode and format the flash. You should be able to do this with both sticks installed without too much problem. Then install IOS, build the config, etc. Rik -Original Message- From: Wilson, Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] Begging for help once again . . . I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip. I did this by installing the second, 16 Mb chip into slot 1 of the motherboard, leaving the original 8 Mb in slot 1, for a total of 24 Mb of flash memory. I then installed 12.1, which was the reason I needed to upgrade the flash. 12.1 went on without a hitch, but when the router was reloaded, it would run for about 30 minutes and then go into rommon mode. It did this repeatedly, so I removed the 8 Mb chip, installed the 16 Mb chip into slot 0, and then used xmodem to transfer 12.1 through the console, a painstaking two hour task. Now the file is on flash, but at reload the file is unable to decompress, returning these errors: Error: Uncompression of the image failed. invalid compressed data-format violated Error: zip decompress failed ***System received a software forced crash *** signal = 0x17, code = 0x7, context = 0x0 PC = 0x80008094, cause = 0x20, Status Reg = 0x3041f003 The crc checks are the same as displayed on the software centers web page. I have downloaded a new copy of the file and it still did not work. I put the original 8 Mb chip in slot 0 and removed the 16 Mb chip, reloaded a fresh 11.3 image, and received the same errors. What have I done?? -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Chelmsford, MA 01824 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35380t=35184 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]
Webpage for common terminal programs and break sequence numbers Scott -Original Message- From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] Try several different break sequences such as CNTL-F6-BREAK. I think there is a website out there somewhere that lists different possible break sequences for various platforms. I think CNTL-F6-BREAK works with Hyperterminal as bundled with W2K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35230t=35223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223]
The last URL didn't show up for some reason in my email. Here it is again http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html#how-to If the above URL didn't show up try this onehttp://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html#how-to just copy the URL from one or if that one didn't work try this one cisco.com/warp/public/701/61.html#how-to HTH Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] Webpage for common terminal programs and break sequence numbers Scott -Original Message- From: s vermill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Tacacs Problem: Router Lockout [7:35223] Try several different break sequences such as CNTL-F6-BREAK. I think there is a website out there somewhere that lists different possible break sequences for various platforms. I think CNTL-F6-BREAK works with Hyperterminal as bundled with W2K. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=35236t=35223 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: p-t-p serial w/ diff subnet address al points [7:34741]
Mike, What kind of routers and IOS where you trying to use to bond the T1s together? I am about to try it with two PTP t1s on a 2650. Please let me know.. Scott -Original Message- From: Michael Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: p-t-p serial w/ diff subnet address al points [7:34741] I have seen the same thing. However, I've only seen it when the P-To-P link is setup using MultilinkPPP. We tried many times to configure a Multilink PPP point-to-point pipe (usually 2 or 3 T1s bonded together) with IPs in the same /30 subnet and could not get things to work. But as soon as we put IPs in different subnets on either end, it worked fine. Still don't know why Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34890t=34741 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Internet Router? [7:33639]
Hello, Thank you for all your input. I will be looking into a few different possibilities from the ideas you guys and gals came up with and had experience with installations. Thanx Scott Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33741t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Router? [7:33639]
Hello Everybody, I just want to run this by everyone for their input from experience. Scenario: I'm looking for a Cisco router that will be providing Internet connectivity running BGP and that will be able to handle the capacity of 2 PTP T1's to the Internet. I know minimum RAM will have to be 64mbs for BGP routes. I just want to know what people have tried that does and doesn't work. My choice would be a 3640 for future T1 expandability and/or a HSSI port. Thank you for the input. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33639t=33639 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NEW Posting procedures - Please read [7:33066]
Good idea, Paul. Thank you Scott -Original Message- From: Paul Borghese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NEW Posting procedures - Please read [7:33066] Due to the recent concern with SPAM I have changed the posting procedures for this group. If you post from the Discussion Board on www.groupstudy.com, this will not effect you. Those who post from the Newsfeed or Mailing list must first be authenticated before the post will be allowed. When you post a message to the list, you will receive an authentication message. You simply need to return that authentication message back to the list by hitting reply. When the server receives your authentication message, your original posting will be sent. You only need to do this once. Future postings will be allowed without authentication. If you are using an invalid e-mail address, you will no longer be able to post via the Newsfeed or Mailing List. You may still post from the discussion board. This should reduce/eliminate the generic SPAM that has started to appear on this list. Please send me any comments or bug reports. Paul Borghese Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33098t=33066 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: serial # on routers [7:33035]
Hi Eric, There was another thread concerning this a couple of weeks ago.. I think the consensus was there is no command to show chassis serial number that is on the outside of the router, but there is a command to see the serial #'s of the cards and motherboard..I think the command was show diag http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/cisco/25/msg01474.html HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Eric Drueding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: serial # on routers [7:33035] hi, is there any way to show the serial # of a router from a show command through IOS CLI? I need to get serial #'s of multiple remote WAN routers... Thanks, Erik Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33043t=33035 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
show buffers?? clearing totals........ [7:32103]
Hello everyone, I have been looking on Cisco's site for the last hour trying to find a command to clear the counters on the show buffers command. Does anyone know how to clear the totals for the hits, misses, trims, created and so forth? Background Info: I modified the small and middle buffers permanent and min fields to reduce failures which equals dropped packets. I found a few good articles on Cisco's site for explanations and possible causes. First time actually modifying the buffers. =) [OUTPUT] Admin_3662#sho buff Buffer elements: 499 in free list (500 max allowed) 293099375 hits, 0 misses, 0 created Public buffer pools: Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 100, permanent 100): 96 in free list (30 min, 150 max allowed) 314004167 hits, 11608 misses, 13038 trims, 13038 created 1671 failures (0 no memory) Middle buffers, 600 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): 48 in free list (20 min, 150 max allowed) 31006372 hits, 304 misses, 350 trims, 350 created 52 failures (0 no memory) Big buffers, 1524 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): 50 in free list (5 min, 150 max allowed) 1071944 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created 0 failures (0 no memory) VeryBig buffers, 4520 bytes (total 10, permanent 10): 10 in free list (0 min, 100 max allowed) 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created 0 failures (0 no memory) Large buffers, 5024 bytes (total 0, permanent 0): 0 in free list (0 min, 10 max allowed) 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created Thank you for any help. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32103t=32103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: show buffers?? clearing totals........ [7:32103]
Thank you for the input everyone. I knew a reload would reset the buffer totals. I thought I remembered one time resetting those totals somehow without reloading, and I thought I would propose it to the big brain.this study group...hehe Thanx again Scott -Original Message- From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: show buffers?? clearing totals [7:32103] I did as search as weel, and everyone comes to the same conclusion. reload. I even searched all the hidden command sites. R. Benjamin Kessler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I think you may have to reload the router to reset these counters. I've never seen a command to reset these counters and given what you're doing a reload might be called for anyway to avoid problems (i.e. memory fragmentation, etc.). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: show buffers?? clearing totals [7:32103] Hello everyone, I have been looking on Cisco's site for the last hour trying to find a command to clear the counters on the show buffers command. Does anyone know how to clear the totals for the hits, misses, trims, created and so forth? Background Info: I modified the small and middle buffers permanent and min fields to reduce failures which equals dropped packets. I found a few good articles on Cisco's site for explanations and possible causes. First time actually modifying the buffers. =) [OUTPUT] Admin_3662#sho buff Buffer elements: 499 in free list (500 max allowed) 293099375 hits, 0 misses, 0 created Public buffer pools: Small buffers, 104 bytes (total 100, permanent 100): 96 in free list (30 min, 150 max allowed) 314004167 hits, 11608 misses, 13038 trims, 13038 created 1671 failures (0 no memory) Middle buffers, 600 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): 48 in free list (20 min, 150 max allowed) 31006372 hits, 304 misses, 350 trims, 350 created 52 failures (0 no memory) Big buffers, 1524 bytes (total 50, permanent 50): 50 in free list (5 min, 150 max allowed) 1071944 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created 0 failures (0 no memory) VeryBig buffers, 4520 bytes (total 10, permanent 10): 10 in free list (0 min, 100 max allowed) 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created 0 failures (0 no memory) Large buffers, 5024 bytes (total 0, permanent 0): 0 in free list (0 min, 10 max allowed) 0 hits, 0 misses, 0 trims, 0 created Thank you for any help. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32122t=32103 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: TCP port 280 [7:31867]
Hi Martin, The Well Known Ports are assigned by the IANA and on most systems can only be used by system (or root) processes or by programs executed by privileged users. Bookmark this link. The best port list that I have found so far. http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers http-mgmt 280/tcphttp-mgmt http-mgmt 280/udphttp-mgmt # Adrian Pell # HTH Scott -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TCP port 280 [7:31867] google returns all kinds of hits looks like novell or something.. http://www.google.com/search?q=tcp+port+280 mirror that port and trace what each packet contains You should also be looking at the source fo the packets. workstations? servers? printers? etc... Patrick Ramsey Sr. Network Engineer WellStar Health Systems 770.956.6338 Martin Roy 01/14/02 10:55AM Can any one tell me which application is using port 280? I get several hits on my access-list from port 280 but I cannot seem to narrow the source. Thanks Martin Martin Roy Network Support Specialist Nuvo Network Management Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31884t=31867 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643]
Hi mlh, Depends on the speed. 10/100mbps full/half duplex uses two pair of the four pairs in a CAT 5 cable. 1000mbps full/half duplex uses all four pair of a CAT 5 cable. Follow the link for the explanation of full and half duplex. http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/f/full_duplex.html Theoretically in full duplex mode each machine can send and receive on a separate pair thus doubling your bandwidth. For example, 100mbps in full duplex mode could send 100mbps on one pair and receive 100mbps on the other pair at the same time which equals 200mbps. This would mean both devices are sending 100mbps. Full duplex would be a point-to-point connection and nothing in between the two devices. In half duplex mode only one machine can send at anytime. I don't know if I covered it all, please correct me if I am wrong. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] Hi, there, how many pairs of two-twisted cable are used for full-duplex Ethernet ? what is the difference between full- and half- duplex cable? Thank you in advance. Regrads, mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31646t=31643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643]
NIC lol Scott -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] I don't know why it irritates me so much...it's really crazy but I can't stand hearing people say NIC Card NIC...NICjust say it!...grin... Allen May 01/11/02 01:36PM Yep...and PIN Number, ACL List, etc. I used to bug instructors by referring to them as Network Interface Card Card's to point out what NIC Card really was ;) Allen - Original Message - From: Patrick Ramsey To: Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:54 AM Subject: RE: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] Is NIC Card kinda like a FAT Table? : p Daniel Cotts 01/11/02 12:34PM Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) uses two pair (four wires) on pins 12 and 36 of an RJ-45 plug. Whether it runs as full or half duplex is determined by the connected equipment - NIC card, Hub, Switch, router, etc. If Ethernet is running over coax cable then it is limited to half duplex. -Original Message- From: mlh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: full-duplex Ethernet cable? [7:31643] Hi, there, how many pairs of two-twisted cable are used for full-duplex Ethernet ? what is the difference between full- and half- duplex cable? Thank you in advance. Regrads, mlh Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31661t=31643 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: bcmsn [7:31537]
Hi Rick, I normally don't endorse or recommend books because everybody has different learning styles and experiences, but the Exam Cram Switching book was awesome for the bcmsn. ISBN: 1-57610-634-9 Scott -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: bcmsn [7:31537] This exam is probably the easiest of the CCNP exams. You may also want to pick up the Exam Cram Switching book from Richard Deal. It is inexpensive (I think $29.95 new, probably around $19.00 or less used at Amazon) I found this to be an excellent condensed book that covered quite a bit. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: D sam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bcmsn [7:31537] I am in the process of studying for the Switching exam can anyone tell me what I should expect. I am using the Cisco Multilayered Switched networks book from Cisco Press. rick _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31552t=31537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIR and Routing Protocols?? [7:31424]
Hello everybody, I have had a question on my mind for a very long time and have found contradicting information. Please reply with your thoughts, expertise and experience. Question: Does the CIR on a frame-relay circuit affect the routes in a routing protocol such as OSPF or other routing protocols? Thank you in advance for the posts. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31424t=31424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
Hi Erich, Looks like something is causing major CRC errors thus choking the circuit. Clear the interface counters and send data across wire and see if the CRC and input errors increase. If so, then there could be alot of different possibilities that could be causing the errors. 52061 input errors, 51262 CRC, 660 frame Scott -Original Message- From: Erich Kuehn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial Line problems [7:31426] Ive got a little problem, im hoping someone can shed some light on. I work for an isp, lately we've had a bunch of issues with some new turnups. While the circuit looks good, i.e. the pvc (frame-relay ietf) is established and standard (100 byte) pings work fine. Once we start to increase the size of the payload (to say 1500 bytes) the circuit chokes and we get dropped packets, The pvc never goes down, but performance is degraded seriously, These circuits do not have policing turned on. The statics from the interface and service module are as follows. We we question the local loop provider they say that if they can run clean to the NIU they are fine, and thus ends their responsiblilty, while this may be true, Im running the same configs on hundreds of customers with no issue, only lately have I had about a dozen of them or so do this. Has anyone seen anything similar, did you resolve it? HOW? Thanks in advance Erich Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU MTU 4000 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 171/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 112, LMI stat recvd 91, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 21/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:18:42 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1152 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 1085 packets input, 750046 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 52061 input errors, 51262 CRC, 660 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 139 abort 1177 packets output, 445635 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0.2 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU Internet address is x.x.x.170/30 MTU 4000 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 184/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF sh service-module s0 Module type is T1/fractional Hardware revision is 0.80, Software revision is 0.2, Image checksum is 0x70F47262, Protocol revision is 0.1 Receiver has no alarms. Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Current clock source is line, Fraction has 24 timeslots (64 Kbits/sec each), Net bandwidth is 1536 Kbits/sec. Last module self-test (done at startup): Passed Last clearing of alarm counters 00:22:04 loss of signal:0, loss of frame :0, AIS alarm :0, Remote alarm :0, Module access errors :0, Total Data (last 96 15 minute intervals): 24480 Line Code Violations, 24480 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 103 Fr Loss Secs, 30984 Line Err Secs, 10036 Degraded Mins 30941 Errored Secs, 22197 Bursty Err Secs, 103 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Data in current interval (714 seconds elapsed): 255 Line Code Violations, 255 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 2 Fr Loss Secs, 381 Line Err Secs, 12 Degraded Mins 380 Errored Secs, 311 Bursty Err Secs, 2 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31431t=31426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Serial Line problems [7:31426]
Erich, Check this link out.Goes through a pretty good trouble shooting table for CRC and input errors. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/ics7750/tblshoot/tsser ial.htm#58873 Table 7-3: Troubleshooting Serial Line Input Errors HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Erich Kuehn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial Line problems [7:31426] Ive got a little problem, im hoping someone can shed some light on. I work for an isp, lately we've had a bunch of issues with some new turnups. While the circuit looks good, i.e. the pvc (frame-relay ietf) is established and standard (100 byte) pings work fine. Once we start to increase the size of the payload (to say 1500 bytes) the circuit chokes and we get dropped packets, The pvc never goes down, but performance is degraded seriously, These circuits do not have policing turned on. The statics from the interface and service module are as follows. We we question the local loop provider they say that if they can run clean to the NIU they are fine, and thus ends their responsiblilty, while this may be true, Im running the same configs on hundreds of customers with no issue, only lately have I had about a dozen of them or so do this. Has anyone seen anything similar, did you resolve it? HOW? Thanks in advance Erich Serial0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU MTU 4000 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 171/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF, loopback not set Keepalive set (10 sec) LMI enq sent 112, LMI stat recvd 91, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI up LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent 0, LMI upd sent 0 LMI DLCI 0 LMI type is ANSI Annex D frame relay DTE FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 21/0, interface broadcasts 0 Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never Last clearing of show interface counters 00:18:42 Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: weighted fair Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) Conversations 0/3/256 (active/max active/max total) Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) Available Bandwidth 1152 kilobits/sec 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 1085 packets input, 750046 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 52061 input errors, 51262 CRC, 660 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 139 abort 1177 packets output, 445635 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 carrier transitions DCD=up DSR=up DTR=up RTS=up CTS=up Serial0.2 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU Internet address is x.x.x.170/30 MTU 4000 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 184/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY IETF sh service-module s0 Module type is T1/fractional Hardware revision is 0.80, Software revision is 0.2, Image checksum is 0x70F47262, Protocol revision is 0.1 Receiver has no alarms. Framing is ESF, Line Code is B8ZS, Current clock source is line, Fraction has 24 timeslots (64 Kbits/sec each), Net bandwidth is 1536 Kbits/sec. Last module self-test (done at startup): Passed Last clearing of alarm counters 00:22:04 loss of signal:0, loss of frame :0, AIS alarm :0, Remote alarm :0, Module access errors :0, Total Data (last 96 15 minute intervals): 24480 Line Code Violations, 24480 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 103 Fr Loss Secs, 30984 Line Err Secs, 10036 Degraded Mins 30941 Errored Secs, 22197 Bursty Err Secs, 103 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Data in current interval (714 seconds elapsed): 255 Line Code Violations, 255 Path Code Violations 0 Slip Secs, 2 Fr Loss Secs, 381 Line Err Secs, 12 Degraded Mins 380 Errored Secs, 311 Bursty Err Secs, 2 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31433t=31426 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIR and Routing Protocols?? [7:31424]
Thank you for the replies Ole and Steven. That is what I thought. Scott -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CIR and Routing Protocols?? [7:31424] Short Answer: NO. Long Answer: Those routing protocols that makes decisions based on the bandwidth, only looks at whay YOU have configured the bandwidth as. If you for instant assign an ISDN BRI with a bandwidth of 1.5 mbps, the routing protocols will trust you, and make their decision based on that, and not the actual speed which is max. 128 when both B channels are in use. It is up to you as the network guy to find out how fast your Frame Relay connection is in average. If the provider you're using has too many customers and too few lines, you can probably see yourself running close to the CIR most of the time. However, if your provider has plenty of lines and not many customers, you would rarely see the bandwidth drop below it's physical value, and you could probably save some money by calling them and asking for a CIR of 0 kbps if you have enough hair on your chest (or under your arms if you're a female). Therefore, you should set the bandwidth according to the speed you most often see if you have dynamic routing protocols and multiple WAN connections. I hope this makes sense. If someone does not agree with me, please speak up! Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ NEED A JOB ??? http://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 11:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CIR and Routing Protocols?? [7:31424] Hello everybody, I have had a question on my mind for a very long time and have found contradicting information. Please reply with your thoughts, expertise and experience. Question: Does the CIR on a frame-relay circuit affect the routes in a routing protocol such as OSPF or other routing protocols? Thank you in advance for the posts. Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31439t=31424 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IGRP Max Hop [7:31466]
Hi Cornelius, http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr rp_r/1rfigrp.htm#xtocid193833 Maximum hop count (in decimal). The default value is 100 hops; the maximum number of hops that can be specified is 255. For some reason I thought it was 224 or heard that somewhere before. Anywho, the maximum number of hops is 255. Scott -Original Message- From: Cornelius C. Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IGRP Max Hop [7:31466] Is the max # of hops for igrp 255 or 256 I'm receiving conflicting info? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31470t=31466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Frame Relay Question [7:31210]
Hi Matt, You are correct...The DLCI is being learned from the frame-relay switch...You don't have it configured so it will show up under the unused column when the sho fram pvc command. Did you order the pvc and haven't configured it or assigned it to an interface/sub-interface? Or the provider assigned it to a wrong dlci which I just had happened last week and the week before. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Question [7:31210] So...I am looking at some frame links that a co-worker brought up not long ago. I issue a show frame-relay pvc command and notice that there are 3 dlci's being seen by the router yet there are only 2 circuits. The 3rd unknown dlci is listed as being unused. So, I look through the config some more and confirm that the 3rd dlci is not defined anywhere in the config. I am guessing my router is learning this dlci from the providers frame switch?? But why? Feel free to correct me if I am wrong...and thanks in advance for the help. matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31214t=31210 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627]
Hi Beth, Most likely they have the protocol ICMP echo being filtered. HTH Scott -Original Message- From: beth shriver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 11:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dsn from cisco router? [7:30627] I notice that on some of my routers i can ping internet addresses like: ping www.yahoo.com and get replies but on others i dont. Can someone tell me the reason for this? __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30628t=30627 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco LRE ( Long Reach Ethernet ) [7:30553]
Thanx for the articles..interesting... and yeahwork is slow today =) Scott -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Cisco LRE ( Long Reach Ethernet ) [7:30553] Is it slow at work today or what? I was browsing CCO and ran across something called long reach ethernet http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/ts_122701.html http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/servpro/solutions/long_ethernet/ lots more. Interesting product and market. Interesting, because on the surface, it doesn't seem like it would be less expensive than re-wiring, but if one looks at someplace like a hotel, where ripping walls out to string a new wiring infrastructure would be exceedingly disruptive, it makes sense. Anyone looked into this? done it? this appears to be a very new product to Cisco. the web docs are dated within the last few weeks. Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30556t=30553 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wic1dsu (usa/euro) [7:30352]
Hi Patrick, I have wics that default to 2048. Don't know why but I change them with the bandwidth 1544 command to accurately reflect. I haven't had anytime to look into any further. HTH Scott -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wic1dsu (usa/euro) [7:30352] Hey guys/gals, anyone ever come across a wic1dsu that defaults to 2048 instead of 1544? Is this a euro version? I can get the circuit up on it but with major packet loss. Is this an E1 card instead of a T1? anybody? -Patrick Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=30362t=30352 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VoIP Bandwidth Calculation Tool [7:29531]
Thank you. Scott -Original Message- From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VoIP Bandwidth Calculation Tool [7:29531] This may have been posted before but I just ran across it yesterday. This is a very handy tool. If you're going to be doing VoIP capacity planning, bookmark this link! http://www.erlang.com/calculator/lipb/ Regards, John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29540t=29531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: forum update ?? [7:28894]
I was wondering the same thing. =) Scott -Original Message- From: richard beddow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forum update ?? [7:28894] Haven't seen a post for 24 hrs. Are we still online ?? RB. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28897t=28894 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID exam [7:28668]
Hi Michalis, I took my CID 3 about a month ago and the test exam number was 640-025. CID 3.0 #640-025 Nov 9 2001 P Scott -Original Message- From: Federico Diaz Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CID exam [7:28668] Support 640-506, replace CIT regards -Original Message- From: Michalis Palis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre de 2001 07:48 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID exam [7:28668] Hello all I am just about to take the CID exam but i dont know whixh exam to take. Cisco in the web side gives the CID 3 as the 640-025 exam, but on the tracking system 640-025 is not valid and is replaced by the 640-520. I went to my local exam center and they could not locate the 640-520 exam and they said that the only valid wxam is the 640-025 which is not valid according to the tracking system. Based on the above I dont know what to do. In case i take the 640-025, will be valid or i will need to take the 640-520? Any feedback on the above will be appreciated. __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28701t=28668 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716]
Hi Johan, Not all network modules work for both the 36x and 26x. I thought the same thing, but I have found a few modules that don't work for both. Scott -Original Message- From: Johan Hjalmarsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Does a NM-1FE1R2W= work in a Cisco 2620 router? I thought all NM's worked in both the C26xx and C36xx series, but I can't get this configuration to work. When I look in the HW/SW compability matrix only SW for the C36xx is shown for this module. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28725t=28716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cisco WAN Certifications [7:28615]
Hi Patrick, The CCNA is a requirement for your CCNP. CCNP Prerequisites Valid CCNA certification Check this website out on Cisco http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/lan/programs/ccnp.ht ml Scott -Original Message- From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco WAN Certifications [7:28615] I wasn't under the impression ccna was a pre-req...does it say that on their site? I have no plans on getting my ccna and have one test left for ccnp... -Patrick nrf 12/10/01 01:46PM But wait a minute, now. Isn't the CCNA a pre-req for the CCNP? Or did your friend happen to get the CCNP back in the really old days when I believe the CCNA was not a CCNP prereq? But yeah - the WAN certs are/were pretty useless. I think the best summation of them is this: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=group:alt.certification.cisco+CCNA+WAN+Ber niehl=enrnum=4selm=D114BCE99217DBA5.C29F159A840CE0A3.4672B0C849D9CF41%40l p.airnews.net Logan, Harold wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... It's funny, the only person I know who got the CCNA WAN Switching was a CCNP who also wanted the letters CCNA on his resume in case he ran into a headhunter who knew what a CCNA was, but had never heard of a CCNP. I've heard of stranger things, but not many... -Original Message- From: Paul Jin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 8:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco WAN Certifications [7:28615] Yup, it is retiring. First, they retired the WAN CCIE and now, they have finished off the rest. Not sure how valuable this cert really is now days. As far as replacement, not really sure if they will really come out with anything to replace it. The new C/S CCIE's written portion can be taken with the WAN switching option from what I hear. I think 50% of the test is general and is the same and the last 50% can be chosen among many different options and WAN switching is supposed to be one of them. Still, in the lab, no WAN switching equipment. just routers and lan switches. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28723t=28615 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716]
Hi Johan, Doing a little more research on cisco.com, I found probably the same information as you. The Maximum Number of NMs that can be utilized in each of the 2600/3600 families is as follows: NM-1FE1R2W 2600 3620 3640 3660 N/A 24 6 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/2600/prodlit/2636m_ds.htm http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/hw_in st/nm_inst/nm-doc/ovrnetm.htm#xtocid26851 HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Scott Nawalaniec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Hi Johan, Not all network modules work for both the 36x and 26x. I thought the same thing, but I have found a few modules that don't work for both. Scott -Original Message- From: Johan Hjalmarsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: C2620 with NM-1FE1R2W? [7:28716] Does a NM-1FE1R2W= work in a Cisco 2620 router? I thought all NM's worked in both the C26xx and C36xx series, but I can't get this configuration to work. When I look in the HW/SW compability matrix only SW for the C36xx is shown for this module. Any suggestions? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28729t=28716 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318]
Actually the beginning of November 2001 they increased the price to $125. =( I don't know the pricing on CCIE exam. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] / The cost of the exams in the U.S. is $100.USDS except for the CCIE which I think is $300.USD. I presume you are referring to the actual exams, not the Boson exams. \ Original message Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 13:18:50 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Cisco's exam prices are similar in Romania as in Brasil. Isn't something wrong with the math? As more you earn, more you can pay, not the opposite. About the salaries... here it is about 25% of what an average IT professional earns monthly. -Original Message- From: Constantin Tivig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: segunda-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2001 12:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] Well, it can be worse. We pay around 240 USD in Romania (for any CCNP exam). That is more than 2 average sallaries...and around half a sallary of an IT man. What about that, Hugo? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] US$ 125.00? Believe me, here in Brasil we pay ~ US$ 220.00 (R$ 532.00) for a Cisco exam. I'm not talking about ccie written, that one I don't know. Just to satisfy my curiosity: Guys out from USA, how much do you pay? Thanks, Hugo -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quinta-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2001 21:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] I don't know about you, but 1) I hate to lose #125 for each test, 2) The practise tests have a money back guarantee. 3) The practice tests help me to gauge my progress by how many I get wrong. 4) I am ready for the real test when I score 99% on the practise *without guessing* any answer. In other words testing is an aid to learning... Just like any tool (a knife, etc) it can be abused. -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] Tim, I disagree with you. May be I'm wrong because my lack of expecience in practice tests. I had only one experience with practice test (CSPFA exam #2) and still now I had more than 30 Sylvan exams (Novell, MS, Cisco), this was my first time that I bought a practice test. I my opinion the questions ARE NOT the same as the Cisco's exam. The CSPFA exam that I took today had NO question as the Boson practice test. Similar? May be some of them, but if you do not know answer, surely you will loose the question. I think that with a practice test you will not learn more, but it will give you what type of questions the exam MAY ask for, not the exact questions. The pactice exams will only help you how to take the test, not what answers to choose. Thanks, Hugo -Original Message- From: Tim Toole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: quinta-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2001 19:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Boson Practice Tests -- Cheating?? [7:28318] Hey Gang, Why do people use the Boson practice tests when they know that the questions are almost exactly like the real Cisco test? Do people think that it is just a coincidence that the questions are almost the exact same as the real Cisco test? It's almost like cheating. This would to me seem to devalue the Cisco certifications if I could practically buy the same test from Boson. Help me out here. I'm I off base on this one? TimT __ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28735t=28318 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: VLSM [7:28768]
Hi Guys, Ran across this webpage at cisco thought it might interesting for people. http://www.cisco.com/techtools/ip_addr.html Scott -Original Message- From: SUranjith Ariyapperuma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLSM [7:28768] Dear friends I would like to learn about VLSM, I would be grateful if any body has any pointers where I can start from ?. Suranjith Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28769t=28768 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361]
Hi Anil, To the best of my knowledge and without looking it up at www.cisco.com, I think if you put log on the end an access-list statement it will send the log to the syslog server. I don't know if that is true in all cases. I like to keep my routers streamed lined.ie unnecessary services and buffers turned off=) OUTPUT from show log: Admin_3662#sh log Syslog logging: enabled (0 messages dropped, 0 flushes, 0 overruns) Console logging: level debugging, 723 messages logged Monitor logging: level debugging, 0 messages logged Buffer logging: disabled Trap logging: level debugging, 727 message lines logged Logging to X.X.X.X, 727 message lines logged HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: anil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:58 PM To: Scott Nawalaniec Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Scott, If I add an access list with [log] at the end, can I expect to see the log by typing: show log At the moment I see nothing. I am trying to catch snmp traffic, using snmpwalk. port 161, 162. If I do debug snmp packets then I can see some logs. Many thanks -Anil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Thanx for the info and the verification. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. Bzzt. You are the weakest link. Goodbye ;-) ICMP is IP protocol 1 (TCP is 6, UDP is 17). ICMP stands for Internet Control Message Protocol, which is a bit of a hint that it might be related to IP (although hardly strong evidence). According to TCP/IP Illustrated (Stevens); ICMP is often considered part of the IP layer, so you're correct there, but ICMP messages are transmitted within IP datagrams, so your permit ip any any will permit ICMP. And anyway, I use permit ip any any to define interesting traffic on some dialup links, and I can bring up the links with a well-directed ping. So I know IP includes ICMP ;-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/11/2001 02:09 pm - Scott Nawalaniec To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Sent by: nobody@groups tudy.com 27/11/2001 11:29 am Please respond to Scott Nawalaniec Hello, Good call on the access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. So you would not need the access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) or access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) because the implicit deny at the end should take care of dropping the unwanted protocols. Please correct me if I am wrong. What about udp and tcp protocols? The implicit deny would drop all protocols at the end. Scott -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My view/guestimation only here, so anyone is welcome to pick holes in it: I would apply 101 (the outgoing access list to the ethernet port). May as well drop the rubbish before the router processes it. I would also make it: access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) access-list 101 deny icmp any any (denies all other icmp, otherwise your next line allowed everything including icmp) access-list 101 permit ip any any I would apply 102 as you have on the serial interface, with slight change. access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply (presumably as you allowed echo outgoing, you want the replies) access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) access-list 102 permit ip any any Of course this is just fictional to control icmp only. I've changed it about 4 times, so I've no doubt it could take some more changes. Regards, Gaz Matthew Tayler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok I am a little confused here, but 1. What does access-list 101 actually deny ? 2. If you permit all ip are you not also allowing all tcp udp ? Matt T Jeff wrote: Looking to block icmp-echo on my external router... just want to doublecheck that I'm putting these on the right interfaces. Please, suggestions welcome! Cheers, Jeff access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 any echo access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.55.0 0
RE: Windows Syslog servers [7:28407]
I use netal and it works awesome. It has a alot of extra features. Scott -Original Message- From: Ed Horley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows Syslog servers [7:28407] I have used Kiwi with no issues but you can try: http://www.netal.com/ or http://www.tntsoftware.com/ Better yet, use a Linux or Solaris box and run MySQL. Richard Tufaro wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Would anyone have a recommendation for a Windows Syslog server, that logs to a ODBC data source. Anything except for Kiwi, tried it and its buggy as all hell. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28505t=28407 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Access-list [7:28188]
Hey Ramesh, You actually have those flipped. 1. access-list in bound would mean packets coming inbound from other networkto your network. 2. access-list out bound would mean packets going out your router interface outbound to another network About the PIX having only in, don't know... Scott -Original Message- From: Ramesh c [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access-list [7:28188] Folx, A)I got 2 networks connected by a router.I apply access-group for both in and out of the interface. Is my assumption correct? 1)The access list for in would be processed when the packet leaves that interface to diff network? 2)The access list for out would be processed when the packet arrives from different network? But in case of Pix..why there is only in? cheers Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28199t=28188 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Telephone lines [7:28151]
Hi John, There is one pair of wires for a regular telephone(analog) and our digital phones only use one pair of wires also... Scott -Original Message- From: Mahesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Telephone lines [7:28151] For digital it is two pair -- Mahesh Chandra Tata Internet Services Limited 213-A Okhla Industrial Estates Okhla Phase III New Delhi 110020 John Tafasi wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi group, Can some one tell me how many twisted pair there are in a regular telephone line. Thanks John Tafasi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28200t=28151 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Finally CCDP too!! [7:28040]
Congrats, Buddy. Good luck on the CCIE lab. Scott -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Finally CCDP too!! [7:28040] I wanted to thank everyone who helped me focus and pass the CID exam. Specifically, Jim Walker and Scott Nawalaniec! Thanks for your encouragement and direction in the areas to zero in on. This test is a bruiser! But with perseverance you can get by it too! Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Lucent Technologies NetworkCare Professional Services http//www.lucent.com/netcare/ Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDP, CCIE TBA Northwest Region - Sacramento Office Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager (800) 467-1467 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx You always have time for things you put first - Tucker Resources Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28045t=28040 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deny trace route using ACL on Cisco router [7:28047]
Hi Sgp, access-list 100 deny icmp any any ttl-exceeded Trace route uses TTL (Time To Live), so if you block TTL-exceeded, I think this might stop the trace routes. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Sgp YH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Deny trace route using ACL on Cisco router [7:28047] Hi guys/gals Can someone share with me the experience in configuring ACL to deny trace route from the Internet to the internal network. I am wondering what ports to deny as it keeps changing. Cheers __ Do You Yahoo!? Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28086t=28047 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Network Time [7:27705]
Hi Chuck, Check this link out at Cisco. It will answer all you questions. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/ntpassoc.html Scott -Original Message- From: Mcfadden, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Time [7:27705] Does anyone know the polling interval for NTP on Cisco routers and switches? Is it adjustable? ccie1ab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27707t=27705 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: dial in [7:27703]
Hi, Sounds like you have all the right hardware. You might want to check baudrate settings and make sure they all match. I has seen mismatched baudrate settings producing garbage characters. HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: 416South [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dial in [7:27703] thanks for your patience but i'm attempting this again until another fire jumps at me. I'm able to get this modem to dial into the router just fine. Problem is still driving me nuts is that all the characters are showing up as garbage ( x ~rj45-rollover cable-modem) | | (modem rj45-rollover cable-aux of router) Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27710t=27703 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361]
I knew that didn't sound right after I read it. Thank you for correcting me. I checked it out by using a sniffer and the ICMP packet is encapsulated with IP. Thank you. Scott -Original Message- From: Kent Hundley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] TCP, UDP, ICMP and any other IP protocols all require IP to perform layer 3 related functions. In fact, any application, session, transport or other layer software that is part of the TCP/IP suite uses IP for its layer 3 functions. They are all subsets of an IP packet since they are layered on top of IP in the protocol stack. All TCP, UDP and ICMP packets are also IP packets, just like all telnet packets are also TCP packets. When you say permit IP any any that includes all TCP, UDP and ICMP packets. If you want to permit/deny TCP, UDP or ICMP packets individually, you must do so explicitly and separately as the poster did in their original acl since permit IP means permit TCP, UDP, ICMP and any other upper layer protocols that use IP like EIGRP, OSPF, etc. etc.. Bottom line, the deny icmp any any is needed because otherwise all ICMP packets would be permitted by the next acl entry permit ip any any. -Kent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Nawalaniec Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Hello, Good call on the access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. So you would not need the access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) or access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) because the implicit deny at the end should take care of dropping the unwanted protocols. Please correct me if I am wrong. What about udp and tcp protocols? The implicit deny would drop all protocols at the end. Scott -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My view/guestimation only here, so anyone is welcome to pick holes in it: I would apply 101 (the outgoing access list to the ethernet port). May as well drop the rubbish before the router processes it. I would also make it: access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) access-list 101 deny icmp any any (denies all other icmp, otherwise your next line allowed everything including icmp) access-list 101 permit ip any any I would apply 102 as you have on the serial interface, with slight change. access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply (presumably as you allowed echo outgoing, you want the replies) access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) access-list 102 permit ip any any Of course this is just fictional to control icmp only. I've changed it about 4 times, so I've no doubt it could take some more changes. Regards, Gaz Matthew Tayler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok I am a little confused here, but 1. What does access-list 101 actually deny ? 2. If you permit all ip are you not also allowing all tcp udp ? Matt T Jeff wrote: Looking to block icmp-echo on my external router... just want to doublecheck that I'm putting these on the right interfaces. Please, suggestions welcome! Cheers, Jeff access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 any echo access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 any echo *Permits internal network to ping any host access-list 101 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Need for the explicit deny access-list 102 permit icmp host x.x.x.x any echo-reply *Permits a ping reply from ISP servers for monitoring access-list 102 permit icmp any any packet-too-big *Permits Fragmentation Required ICMP packets (Used of MTU-PD) access-list 102 deny icmp any any echo-reply deny any echo reply from any other sources access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 echo access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 echo deny any echo from any other sources access-list 102 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Needed due to the explicit deny rule. Both Access-list are applied to the Serial Interfaces of the Edge router. Access list 102 is assigned to inbound traffic and Access list 101 is assigned to outbound traffic. See below.. Internet (same ISP, different BGP peers) S0/0 S0/1 \ / \/ \ / Edg
RE: CID test [7:27443]
The number of questions is 100 with allotted time of 2 hours and you need a 755 to pass. -Original Message- From: Perez, Oskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID test [7:27443] I am about to take this test, could anyone let me know the number of questions and pass mark. Cheers Oskar ** this message has been sent via the Internet. Internet communications are not secure against interception or modification. Harrods Ltd therefore can not guarantee that this message has not been modified in transit. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender and destroy your copies of the message and any attached files. Harrods Limited Registered in London Company Number 30209 Registered Office: 87-135 Brompton Road Knightsbridge London SW1X 7XL ** Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27487t=27443 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361]
Thanx for the info and the verification. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 7:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. Bzzt. You are the weakest link. Goodbye ;-) ICMP is IP protocol 1 (TCP is 6, UDP is 17). ICMP stands for Internet Control Message Protocol, which is a bit of a hint that it might be related to IP (although hardly strong evidence). According to TCP/IP Illustrated (Stevens); ICMP is often considered part of the IP layer, so you're correct there, but ICMP messages are transmitted within IP datagrams, so your permit ip any any will permit ICMP. And anyway, I use permit ip any any to define interesting traffic on some dialup links, and I can bring up the links with a well-directed ping. So I know IP includes ICMP ;-) JMcL - Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 27/11/2001 02:09 pm - Scott Nawalaniec To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Sent by: nobody@groups tudy.com 27/11/2001 11:29 am Please respond to Scott Nawalaniec Hello, Good call on the access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. So you would not need the access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) or access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) because the implicit deny at the end should take care of dropping the unwanted protocols. Please correct me if I am wrong. What about udp and tcp protocols? The implicit deny would drop all protocols at the end. Scott -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My view/guestimation only here, so anyone is welcome to pick holes in it: I would apply 101 (the outgoing access list to the ethernet port). May as well drop the rubbish before the router processes it. I would also make it: access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) access-list 101 deny icmp any any (denies all other icmp, otherwise your next line allowed everything including icmp) access-list 101 permit ip any any I would apply 102 as you have on the serial interface, with slight change. access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply (presumably as you allowed echo outgoing, you want the replies) access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) access-list 102 permit ip any any Of course this is just fictional to control icmp only. I've changed it about 4 times, so I've no doubt it could take some more changes. Regards, Gaz Matthew Tayler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok I am a little confused here, but 1. What does access-list 101 actually deny ? 2. If you permit all ip are you not also allowing all tcp udp ? Matt T Jeff wrote: Looking to block icmp-echo on my external router... just want to doublecheck that I'm putting these on the right interfaces. Please, suggestions welcome! Cheers, Jeff access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 any echo access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 any echo *Permits internal network to ping any host access-list 101 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Need for the explicit deny access-list 102 permit icmp host x.x.x.x any echo-reply *Permits a ping reply from ISP servers for monitoring access-list 102 permit icmp any any packet-too-big *Permits Fragmentation Required ICMP packets (Used of MTU-PD) access-list 102 deny icmp any any echo-reply deny any echo reply from any other sources access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 echo access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 echo deny any echo from any other sources access-list 102 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Needed due to the explicit deny rule. Both Access-list are applied to the Serial Interfaces of the Edge router. Access list 102 is assigned to inbound traffic and Access list 101 is assigned to outbound traffic. See below.. Internet (same ISP, different BGP peers) S0/0
RE: Price of a CCNP series exam. [7:27182]
It actually went up at the beginning of this month. The price is $125 per test. Scott -Original Message- From: Cisco Breaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 2:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Price of a CCNP series exam. [7:27182] 100 $ for one exam in USA Best regards, ]hsan Turkmen wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi folks..! How much do you pay for a CCNP exam in other parts of the world?. It is 180 USD + VAT here (Turkey). Your feedbacks are appreciated.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27336t=27182 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Several addresses on e0 interface [7:27328]
Hey Roy, This article will tell you show you how to add secondary IP addresses to an ethernet interface. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c /ipcprt1/1cdipadr.htm HTH, Scott -Original Message- From: Roy Chowdhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 8:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Several addresses on e0 interface [7:27328] Can someone tell me how to setup multiple IP addresses on the eo interface with a singke interface on the s0 interface. The router is a 1605 Cisco router. I wish to use the CLI to do this. If there is an article I can read that would also be appreciated Regards Roy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27338t=27328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE Study Group [7:27360]
Hello Everyone, I want start a CCIE study group in Eugene, Oregon. If anyone lives close and is starting or pursing CCIE certification, please email me. Thanx. Love this study group. Many diverse and different resources people bring to it. Scott Scott Nawalaniec CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27360t=27360 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: ACL Gurus [7:27361]
Hey Jeff, In access-list 102 I think you will have to allow echo reply from any network going to x.x.54.0 and x.x.55.0 or you will not be able to ping any host on the internet. I see that you have echo reply from access-list 102 permit icmp host x.x.x.x any echo-reply if this is the only machine you want a echo reply from then disregard previous statement. On access-list 101, you are not allowing tcp or udp going outbound? What will do you transport layer stuff? Don't know if this helps Might even confuse you more.. Scott -Original Message- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ACL Gurus [7:27361] Looking to block icmp-echo on my external router... just want to doublecheck that I'm putting these on the right interfaces. Please, suggestions welcome! Cheers, Jeff access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 any echo access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 any echo *Permits internal network to ping any host access-list 101 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Need for the explicit deny access-list 102 permit icmp host x.x.x.x any echo-reply *Permits a ping reply from ISP servers for monitoring access-list 102 permit icmp any any packet-too-big *Permits Fragmentation Required ICMP packets (Used of MTU-PD) access-list 102 deny icmp any any echo-reply deny any echo reply from any other sources access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 echo access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 echo deny any echo from any other sources access-list 102 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Needed due to the explicit deny rule. Both Access-list are applied to the Serial Interfaces of the Edge router. Access list 102 is assigned to inbound traffic and Access list 101 is assigned to outbound traffic. See below.. Internet (same ISP, different BGP peers) S0/0 S0/1 \ / \/ \ / Edge Router | E0/0 | FW | LAN x.x.54.0 and x.x.55.0 networks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27375t=27361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ACL Gurus [7:27361]
Hello, Good call on the access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) My understanding is ICMP is not a subset of IP or anything with IP protocol. ICMP and IP both work at the network layer and are separate protocols. So you would not need the access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) or access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) because the implicit deny at the end should take care of dropping the unwanted protocols. Please correct me if I am wrong. What about udp and tcp protocols? The implicit deny would drop all protocols at the end. Scott -Original Message- From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 3:56 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ACL Gurus [7:27361] My view/guestimation only here, so anyone is welcome to pick holes in it: I would apply 101 (the outgoing access list to the ethernet port). May as well drop the rubbish before the router processes it. I would also make it: access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.1.255 any echo (equivalent to your two lines) access-list 101 deny icmp any any (denies all other icmp, otherwise your next line allowed everything including icmp) access-list 101 permit ip any any I would apply 102 as you have on the serial interface, with slight change. access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo-reply (presumably as you allowed echo outgoing, you want the replies) access-list 102 deny icmp any any (may as well block all other icmp) access-list 102 permit ip any any Of course this is just fictional to control icmp only. I've changed it about 4 times, so I've no doubt it could take some more changes. Regards, Gaz Matthew Tayler wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok I am a little confused here, but 1. What does access-list 101 actually deny ? 2. If you permit all ip are you not also allowing all tcp udp ? Matt T Jeff wrote: Looking to block icmp-echo on my external router... just want to doublecheck that I'm putting these on the right interfaces. Please, suggestions welcome! Cheers, Jeff access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 any echo access-list 101 permit icmp x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 any echo *Permits internal network to ping any host access-list 101 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Need for the explicit deny access-list 102 permit icmp host x.x.x.x any echo-reply *Permits a ping reply from ISP servers for monitoring access-list 102 permit icmp any any packet-too-big *Permits Fragmentation Required ICMP packets (Used of MTU-PD) access-list 102 deny icmp any any echo-reply deny any echo reply from any other sources access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.54.0 0.0.0.255 echo access-list 102 deny icmp any x.x.55.0 0.0.0.255 echo deny any echo from any other sources access-list 102 permit ip any any *Permits any other traffic to and from the network. Needed due to the explicit deny rule. Both Access-list are applied to the Serial Interfaces of the Edge router. Access list 102 is assigned to inbound traffic and Access list 101 is assigned to outbound traffic. See below.. Internet (same ISP, different BGP peers) S0/0 S0/1 \ / \/ \ / Edge Router | E0/0 | FW | LAN x.x.54.0 and x.x.55.0 networks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27404t=27361 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: Xyplex Boot Image [7:27070]
I think you can get copies and upgrades off of www.itouch.com Scott -Original Message- From: Ken Diliberto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Off topic: Xyplex Boot Image [7:27070] I have two Xyplex terminal servers, an 800 and a 1500. I don't have any operating software for them. Does anyone have the software or know where I can get copies? Thanks. Ken Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27074t=27070 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Skybox CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080]
just use int f0/0 Scott -Original Message- From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sybex CCNA lab simulator int f0/0 [7:27080] Well, the real router don't like it either. anil wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Please can someone tell me the correct syntax.. The Sybex CCNA lab simulator does not like my syntax for #int fastethernet I can get it to work with int f0/0 Is this a simulator bug or am I doing something wrong? Thanks -Anil Router#config t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. Router(config)#hostname 2621A 2621A(config)#int fas 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0? % Unrecognized command 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f 0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int fastethernet f0/0 ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. 2621A(config)#int f0/0 2621A(config-if)# Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=27088t=27080 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Bandwidth Calculation [7:26871]
KB and kb are different. Usually network links are measured in kilo bits per second. KB is Kilo Bytes per second. To convert Bytes to Bits you need to times Bytes by 8 bits. So, 75KB times 8 = 600kilobits / sec. To convert kilobits to megabits you need to divide by 1024. So, 600kilobits / 1024 = .58megbits / sec If you have any questions, or I am incorrect.please let me know Scott Scott Nawalaniec SELCO Credit Union Telecomm Network Administrator CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ Phone: (541) 686-5379 Pager: (541) 341-0583 Fax: (541) 686-5318 -Original Message- From: Ashok Braganza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bandwidth Calculation [7:26871] Can anyone show me exactly how to calculate ISP bandwidth? When i download it gives me approximatly 75.00 KB/Sec What will be my total bandwidth? Thanks Ashok C Braganza Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26881t=26871 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850]
VoIP Guy has brought up a very good question. I wouldn't think the questions in the beginning asking for background information and so forth would affect the difficulty of test. Why would they ask you this information every time? But I think it affects the difficulty of the test. Call me crazy, but I have answered the questions sometimes falsely, to see if I get easier or harder questions and I haven't come to a conclusion. I hope it doesn't affect it, but weirder things happen. I like to say that is my 0010 cents. =) Scott Scott Nawalaniec Telecomm Network Administrator CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ -Original Message- From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: advice on CCNP exams [7:26850] Just did one to see and they are just as easy as always. Nothing changed yet. Off topic: Is it just me and my superstitions, or does any one else feel that the survey before each test on how many certs you have, experience you have, etc., changes the difficulty on the test based on how well you say you know the stuff, number of yearsd in, etc,.? Also, what would happen if you said no the the NDA before the test? Does it boot you off and send you home $125 poorer? Brian wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... For all those people who are starting CCNP, I have some advice for you. Dont be discouraged by all the people telling you they got a 990 on every exam. That was then, and this is now. I new price of 125 (Nov 11th) for test indicates that things have changed very much. I say this because Cisco states the 125 is for the cost of changing the exams. I have just heard from friends that took it and that alot of their friends are failing. I have failed CCNP Routing as well just recently. The number of CCNPs has increased this year, by 100% since the following year, I think that trend is coming to a screaching halt. How to study, it should be common sense, which i dont have much of :) Print out the study guideline from Cisco, and know everything they mention forwards and backwards. Obviously OSPF, BGP. If you have any study guides, dont really put much stock in them there not worth 2c anymore. I suggest exam cram for a basic idea of what its about, and cisco press to look up the things that are hard to understand. And maybe sybex if you want to read the entire book :) I think some of the questions on Boson go overboard, but that might be what you need. I guess it cant hurt to know too much. Boson is now only good for learning what type of questions are on the exam, not THE actual questions on the exam anymore. Brian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26910t=26850 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Please Remove Request [7:26691]
You can go to www.groupstudy.com and remove this email from the list. I have already done it. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please Remove Request [7:26691] Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your distribution lists. He is no longer an employee of Telsource Corporation. Thank you, Network Systems Telsource Corp. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26740t=26691 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CPU Usage - How Much Is Too Much? [7:26739]
A excessive sustained CPU usage around 75% to look at upgrading or reducing processes or tasks. Scott Scott Nawalaniec Network Administrator CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ -Original Message- From: Andrew Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CPU Usage - How Much Is Too Much? [7:26739] Hi everyone. Percentage-wise, what is the general consensus on excessive CPU usage on a router? Thanks in advance. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26749t=26739 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Passed CCNA!!!! [7:26759]
Great jobCongrats Scott -Original Message- From: adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passed CCNA [7:26759] Hi all Today I passed CCNA test. Thank you guys for all your advices, specially thanks to Bogdan Ungureanu who helped me a lot. The next step will be MCSE. Thanks again, Adrian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26763t=26759 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CID Exam on Wednesday 11/21/01 [7:26486]
Darren, I have to say the CID is by the hardest Cisco test I have taken to date. Boson is a great choice for a practice exam. Some areas to focus on are x.25, AppleTalk, split horizon, SNA, and IOS versions of released features. I can't get into more detail, but I hope this helps. Scott Nawalaniec Network Administrator CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ -Original Message- From: Stull, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CID Exam on Wednesday 11/21/01 [7:26486] Darren, I personally took the CID beta a while ago and I'm not sure if they made it into the new exam.. I personally thought the CID beta was harder than the CCIE written and just as encompassing. Nowhere near as bad on rif type stuff though. Cory -Original Message- From: Darren Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CID Exam on Wednesday 11/21/01 [7:26486] Hi all, I'm taking the CID exam next Wednesday. I decided to pickup one of the Boson practice exams for this test. Does anyone have suggestions on areas to focus my studying on or other tools to use? TIA Darren x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx Lucent Technologies NetworkCare Professional Services http//www.lucent.com/netcare/ Darren S. Crawford - CCNP, CCDA, CCIE Written Northwest Region - Sacramento Office Voicemail (916) 859-5200 x310 Pager (800) 467-1467 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx You always have time for things you put first - Tucker Resources Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26535t=26486 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Introduction [7:26391]
Hello fellow networkers, I just joined the study group, and I wanted to introduce myself. I hope to provide some help in our quest to Cisco certifications and likewise. I look forward to the journey. Scott Scott Nawalaniec CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26391t=26391 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's!!!!!!!!! [7:25805]
I couldn't said it better. Great job, Sal Scott -Original Message- From: Sal DiStefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Salary Expectations/CCNP's! [7:25805] I have been following this without saying anything, but I cant resist any longer. Are you saying that people should look up all their own answers? If that is the case, why have this board? Just so mean spirited people like those who answered this guy with useless answers can pounce on the newbie who asks what you consider a question which is not worthy? I think one of the great things about a group like this is I don't need to look up everything myself, I can rely on the knowledge and experience of others, and hopefully bring my experiences to some use here for others. Who should decide what others can ask? If the person comes here for an answer to a question rather that spending hours looking it up themselves, I think it shows that they know where to go for answers. I don't think traveling the hard road is the important part, I think getting the answers is. If you don't have something constructive to say don't reply to the post! If you can't say somethin' nice, Don't say nothin' at all. - Bambi Hope I haven't offended anyone. Sal = Ask yourself if what you are doing today is getting you closer to where you want to be tomorrow. - Unknown __ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26393t=25805 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Kent,
I hope I get to contribute.
Check the cable. I have seen in the past problems were the link lights on
the ethernet interface would be on but one of the pins 1,2,3,6 was cut, but
there was no communication. Also, set both the switch and router to 100/FD
if the switch can support it. Check to see if ethernet 0 has the right
encapsulation, ARPA.
line protocol is {up | down | administratively down}
Indicates whether the software processes that handle the line protocol
believe the interface is usable (that is, whether keepalives are successful)
or if it has been taken down by an administrator
If I left anything out to check, or please correct me if I am wrong.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jay Creasy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Are you using a strait-thru or cross-over cable ?
-
Jay C Creasy
Cisco Certified Network Professional + PIX
Microsoft Certified Professional
Inet Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM ID HaltItAll
Work # 713-548-3346
Home # 713-263-1939
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Kent Hawkins
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX line up protocol down [7:26349]
Hi Guys
I have a pix 520 that has 3 interfaces configured. Ethernet 1 and 2 are
normal and have line up, protocol up. Ethernet 0 is down with line up ,
protocol down. There is a link light on both the Ethernet 0 interface
and switch port. This is not a duplex issue since I have already set the
Ethernet 0 interface to auto negotiate and back to 100full.
Has anybody got any ideas??
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26399t=26349
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: help me set clock on router [7:26435]
HK, To the best of my knowledge, 25x, 26x, 36x don't have a battery, like in a computer, to keep the clock setting. When you power down the router the time is lost. You could set your routers up to use ntp (network time protocol) and run the ntp server on your computer or something. In my case, I setup one of the main routers to be a master time server, and have all of my routers pull their time from the main router. Then you just have to change the time on one router instead of all. Be aware that the NTP protocol will take some bandwidth, but I don't think it would be much. Does anybody else have any thoughts? Hope this helps, Scott -Original Message- From: hk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help me set clock on router [7:26435] Dear group Psl show me Why is ? When I set clock on rouer 2500 ,2600,3660 serial , but If I reload router . My router not save clock then return *01:41:38.137 UTC Thu Mar 4 1993 Thank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26442t=26435 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
