Cisco 4500m bootflash issue [7:38405]
Folks, does anyone know where I can purchase another xbootflash simm and possibly an updated RMON EEPROM? During a flash upgrade my 4500m bootflash was corrupted, my main flash has no IOS and the version of RMON(5.1) does not provide the tftpdnld or xmodem commands to load the boot helper image via the console port. I basically have a useless router... I will be willing to reimburse someone for lending me their xbootflash simm just to get going.. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38405&t=38405 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 4500m bootflash issue [7:38405]
Thanks that is what I am trying to do, if I can find another 4500. I did not erase the boot flash. I did not even touch the furthest simm, but it is corrupted. All I did was remove the two regular flash simms to upgrade to 16mbs of flash so I can use 12.1 for the IE lab. Otherwise, if I can find another 45/700 with the bootflash simm I can borrow it, pop it into my router and be back in business according to Cisco's TAC site. Had this 4500 had a newer ROMMON I could have recovered the bootflash via the console port but that too is not the case. I even tried to load the boot image on the flash simm on another router, I got the image down but when I transferred the simm back to the 4500 the first file was still not found. I was hoping for someplace that sold the simm with a boot image and/or newer ROMMON chip. If you know of anyplace or someone willing to mail me the simm to get started I will return the simm with a check for their help.. Thanks again A Strobel /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38440&t=38405 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP masking quiz [7:39853]
I was studying and practicing and I wondered if this would benefit anyone. Have fun How do you get this route??? What mask do you configure on the interface? Gateway of last resort is not set C0.0.0.0/1 is directly connected, Serial0/0 is directly connected, Serial0/1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39853&t=39853 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco 4500m bootflash issue [7:38405]
Actually a vendor who I purchased some equipment from in the past sent me one for free to keep. He even over night it to me. It worked like a charm. For those interested in the recovery process. I was able to get my main flash running, then I removed the boot flash from the vendor, put in my corrupted one, then booted into my main flash then put a new 12.1 boot image on my original boot flash. I then tested by booting in each mode ROMMON, BOOT, then flash. All works okay with all of my original flash simms. Sometimes vendor relationships pay off Thanks for the ebay tips folks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=39856&t=38405 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Packet analyzer [7:27295]
Yes, the Agilent Advisor is an awesome tool, I own two of them. You may not necessarily need to schedule an outage on your serial link if your CSU/DSUs have external non intrusive monitoring port capabilities. If they do then all you need is a pair of bantam cables and plug one end of the pair into your T-1 module on the Advisor and plug the other ends into your CSU and away you go… You can not only sniff, but generate traffic for stimuli testing and basically use your advisor as a T berd. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27349&t=27295 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 802.x Standards [7:27552]
Try http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/ Also www.protocols.com and www.decodes.com offer some excellent reference material. /JSJon Krabbenschmidt wrote: > > lets see if I can remember: > > 802.4 Token Bus > 802.5 Token Ring > 802.6 MAN > 802.7 BroadBand > 802.8 Fiber Optic > 802.9 Integrated Voice and Data > 802.10 Network Security > 802.11 Wireless > 802.12 VGAnyLAN > > > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 802.x Standards [7:27552] > > > Does anyone have a comprehensive concise list of IEEE 802.x > standards? I've gone to the standards.ieee.org and > www.ieee802.org websites without any luck. I'm looking for > something like: > > 802.1d - Spanning Tree Protocol > 802.2 - Logic Link Control > 802.3 - CSMA/CD Specifications > etc. > > If anyone has something akin to this, I would be most > appreciative. > > Thanks, > Greg > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27590&t=27552 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Home Lab [7:69580]
do not bother with any 2500 series if you are starting out now. IOS improvements and requriements are slowly phasing them out, look into 1750, 2600, 3600 series only. 12.3 does not even run on any 4000 or 4500 series and only IP plus for 2500 series. Do not limit yourself Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69628&t=69580 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Multicast server [7:69686]
I recall on the web there is a shareware tool called MCASTER. Do a google search on it. I use it and it is quick and great. You can alos use th IOS MRM commands to generate S,Gs... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69711&t=69686 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
Well I passed the exam, ccnp recert today, it was close, man what a pain. I only studied a week and a half and mostly labbed my work. Considering I have not touched a cisco router or done much cisco work since my first ccie lab attempt last september(I was burnt out of cisco and sick of it) I guess the experience carried me on this on. This exam is a pain, the new format is cool for you have to type in configs et al. So know your command output across the board. However there was some old stuff like win95 setup for dial up and an appletalk plus a couple of x25 questions. I put in the comments that this stuff was outdated, not relelvant and appletalk was not on any of the exam topic lists. Also, you cannot mark your questions and go back later. It is all or nothing. I had 15 minutes to spare and I could not go back, so I was graded immediatly. The examples and diagrams(used for the config simulations) have text that is so small you can barley read it. Since all of my cisco exams for np/dp were v1 and back in 2000 if this is a hint of the future, the ccnp/dp will become more difficult to obtain. Much more emphasis on hands on and knowing your command output cold across the board. My test did have the mls, multicasting(ip and mac stuff) and some ISIS, so know your multicast mac addresses plus some older fr, isdn ipx, queuing subnetting stuff. The questions are tougher and more esoteric in terms of understanding them. One question was obviously an error, same answer in two choices. Lots of switching spanning-tree(theory/practical) vtp routers with isl et al. Bgp sync, hands on ospf configuration, policy routing, hands on frame relay config. So know your switchig/routing commands cold and hands on. It was just funcky old stuff but with more command output detailed asked and newer stuff with funky command output details asked. I recall it was 112 questions with 2 hours to complete I did not violate any nda just cofirming that what was in the exam objectives for all tests were in this test, even the appletalk question. I used all my ccie books and some of my older np/dp books. I used this opportunity to brush up my cisco skills but I alos spent extra time reading doyle I II for all IGP and BGP. I did not use any brain dumps or practice tests. Do not use them. Learn from experience, hands on practicing, reading and labbing. You will appreciate you skills and cert a little more, and be more confident in your real abilities. I used www.amilabs.com for all of my work. Oh well now on to recertify on the DP. I will probably sit that one on Thurs. From there I will make a decision if I should spend the next three months on my second ccie attempt. I have a lab slot schedlued in sept otherwise I will lose my written eligibility. I may pass for I have an opportunity to work on some WDM, obtain my CWNA and maybe CISSP with in the same period. I hoped this helped someone. Good luck to all Regards... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69633&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
No, from what I have heard from an older thread, here or over at cisco's forum is that you can re-take any ccnp/dp re-cert exam as many times as you need to pass before your re-cert date expires. After that you have to start all over again from ccna. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69871&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, atm aal3-4 nonsense, desktop protocol issues, lan manager, old CID design questions that did not make sense, type in questions(which is to be expected) and old hardware that is probably not even supported anymore, like 700s and 1600s. I made many comments during the exam that these questions are no longer relevant especially for a CCDP update recert. It was all old stuff. I mean old stuff that was not too relevant then, specific 1600s and 700s issues, come on now .. I studied based on the info. from the CCO site, so for Routing, Switching and Remote access for the CCNP recert., which was updated, but it was my experience that carried me on this one. I did go over my old Sybex and Cisco Press ver. 1 CID books this week just in case, so that helped too. I thought halfway through I was failing for all of the older 700/1600, desktop protocols and x25/atm crap was driving me nuts. Since I have been in computer technology since 84 I was able to pass. A lot of the questions were hands on fill in the blank types so that helped me also. Funny though, I did better on this exam(averaging in the 80% range for every topic except CID) and got in the high 800s than I did on the CCNP recert.(Considering the CCO CCNP topics matched the exam). I only studied a week and a half for both and took them two days apart. What I learned in the CCNP recert exam, that I posted earlier here, did not apply on the CCDP recert. exam to my dismay so I was bummed out during the exam. In this case my old hands on experience rules. So, for those of you fellas preparing for the CCDP recert. your old books(even version 1 CCDP stuff) is fine. Now to decide if I want to take a second stab at my ccie lab seat. Good luck to all /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69909&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDP Recertification [7:69911]
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, atm aal3-4 nonsense, desktop protocol issues, lan manager, old CID design questions that did not make sense, type in questions(which is to be expected) and old hardware that is probably not even supported anymore, like 700s and 1600s. I made many comments during the exam that these questions are no longer relevant especially for a CCDP update recert. It was all old stuff. I mean old stuff that was not too relevant then, specific 1600s and 700s issues, come on now .. I studied based on the info. from the CCO site, so for Routing, Switching and Remote access for the CCNP recert., which was updated, but it was my experience that carried me on this one. I did go over my old Sybex and Cisco Press ver. 1 CID books this week just in case, so that helped too. I thought halfway through I was failing for all of the older 700/1600, desktop protocols and x25/atm crap was driving me nuts. Since I have been in computer technology since 84 I was able to pass. A lot of the questions were hands on fill in the blank types so that helped me also. Funny though, I did better on this exam(averaging in the 80% range for every topic except CID) and got in the high 800s than I did on the CCNP recert.(Considering the CCO CCNP topics matched the exam). I only studied a week and a half for both and took them two days apart. What I learned in the CCNP recert exam, that I posted earlier here, did not apply on the CCDP recert. exam to my dismay so I was bummed out during the exam. In this case my old hands on experience rules. So, for those of you fellas preparing for the CCDP recert. your old books(even version 1 CCDP stuff) is fine. Now to decide if I want to take a second stab at my ccie lab seat. Good luck to all /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69911&t=69911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
No, from what I have heard from an older thread, here or over at cisco's forum is that you can re-take any ccnp/dp re-cert exam as many times as you need to pass before your re-cert date expires. After that you have to start all over again from ccna. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69927&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, atm aal3-4 nonsense, desktop protocol issues, lan manager, old CID design questions that did not make sense, type in questions(which is to be expected) and old hardware that is probably not even supported anymore, like 700s and 1600s. I made many comments during the exam that these questions are no longer relevant especially for a CCDP update recert. It was all old stuff. I mean old stuff that was not too relevant then, specific 1600s and 700s issues, come on now.. I studied based on the info. from the CCO site, so for Routing, Switching and Remote access for the CCNP recert., which was updated, but it was my experience that carried me on this one. I did go over my old Sybex and Cisco Press ver. 1 CID books this week just in case, so that helped too. I thought halfway through I was failing for all of the older 700/1600, desktop protocols and x25/atm crap was driving me nuts. Since I have been in computer technology since 84 I was able to pass. A lot of the questions were hands on fill in the blank types so that helped me also. Funny though, I did better on this exam(averaging in the 80% range for every topic except CID) and got in the high 800s than I did on the CCNP recert.(Considering the CCO CCNP topics matched the exam). I only studied a week and a half for both and took them two days apart. What I learned in the CCNP recert exam, that I posted earlier here, did not apply on the CCDP recert. exam to my dismay so I was bummed out during the exam. In this case my old hands on experience rules. So, for those of you fellas preparing for the CCDP recert. your old books(even version 1 CCDP stuff) is fine. Now to decide if I want to take a second stab at my ccie lab seat. Good luck to all /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69928&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCDP Recertification [7:69911]
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, atm aal3-4 nonsense, desktop protocol issues, lan manager, old CID design questions that did not make sense, type in questions(which is to be expected) and old hardware that is probably not even supported anymore, like 700s and 1600s. I made many comments during the exam that these questions are no longer relevant especially for a CCDP update recert. It was all old stuff. I mean old stuff that was not too relevant then, specific 1600s and 700s issues, come on now.. I studied based on the info. from the CCO site, so for Routing, Switching and Remote access for the CCNP recert., which was updated, but it was my experience that carried me on this one. I did go over my old Sybex and Cisco Press ver. 1 CID books this week just in case, so that helped too. I thought halfway through I was failing for all of the older 700/1600, desktop protocols and x25/atm crap was driving me nuts. Since I have been in computer technology since 84 I was able to pass. A lot of the questions were hands on fill in the blank types so that helped me also. Funny though, I did better on this exam(averaging in the 80% range for every topic except CID) and got in the high 800s than I did on the CCNP recert.(Considering the CCO CCNP topics matched the exam). I only studied a week and a half for both and took them two days apart. What I learned in the CCNP recert exam, that I posted earlier here, did not apply on the CCDP recert. exam to my dismay so I was bummed out during the exam. In this case my old hands on experience rules. So, for those of you fellas preparing for the CCDP recert. your old books(even version 1 CCDP stuff) is fine. Now to decide if I want to take a second stab at my ccie lab seat. Good luck to all /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69930&t=69911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]
Kevin Wigle wrote: > > only that you must weight 72 hours between attempts. Prometric > doesn't > count hours so 3 calendar days > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "jeff sicuranza" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:54 AM > Subject: RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > > > > No, from what I have heard from an older thread, here or over > at cisco's > > forum is that you can re-take any ccnp/dp re-cert exam as > many times as > you > > need to pass before your re-cert date expires. After that you > have to > start > > all over again from ccna. > > Yep that seems to be the case, my tests were taken on a tue and a Fri and were differnet tests, so I am wondering if the three day limit is person based not test based for I could not schedule my dp recert for the next day. I thought maybe the testing location was booked so I guess they count the day of the last test taken. What I meant in my last post is that if you fail well before the date of expiration you are not de-certified or anything, you can re-take the exam over and over again, every three days, until you pass before your expiration date. I did not even know about the three day limit. Thanks kevin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69938&t=69556 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCNP recertification question [7:69943]
Nope, only passing ccie lab will update your ccnp/dp and na/da Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69950&t=69943 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCDP Recertification [7:69911]
There was only one appletalk quesiton on the NP recert probably from one of old questions from the routing pool. As for the 700 series nothing like that on the NP recert. The NP recert exam is one of the more updated newer exams with ios simulation for hands on testing. It is the DP recert exam that has all the old junk. Good luck.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=70071&t=69911 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting VOFR experiment [7:44307]
Folks while studying for the CCIE lab I was working on the VOIP portion. I was configuring VOFR and according to Caslow 2nd edition, page 781 he states: NOTE: the configuration above will support a Voice over Frame-Relay service only. It does not support both Voice and Data over Frame-Relay. During my experimentation I was able to get both Voice and normal IP traffic over a VOFR link. I am not sure his wording meant the specific configuration in the book or that it cannot be done once VOFR is enabled on an interface. I have not checked CCO yet on this... I am running this configuration on two 2620s IOS ver. 12.1(14) with a back to back serial frame-relay connection.(no Frame-Relay switch in between). To see the doc. on back to back Frame-Relay without a switch see the following link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/125/frbacktoback_hybrid.html Nonetheless here are the relevant portions of the configs. for you enjoyment The other dial peers are so I can jump between LAN and wan VOIP testing . Just thought I would share this if anyone is interested /JS ROUTER4# voice-port 1/0/0 ! voice-port 1/0/1 connection plar 111 ! dial-peer voice 3 voip destination-pattern 333 session target ipv4:192.168.106.6 ! dial-peer voice 4 pots destination-pattern 444 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 111 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 222 codec g711ulaw session target ipv4:10.1.1.41 ! dial-peer voice 5 vofr destination-pattern 555 no vad session target Serial0/1 16 ! dial-peer voice 6 pots destination-pattern 666 port 1/0/0 !! interface Serial0/1 ip address 2.2.2.1 255.0.0.0 encapsulation frame-relay no keepalive no fair-queue clock rate 130 dce-terminal-timing-enable cdp enable frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay map ip 2.2.2.2 17 broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 16 class vofr-class vofr cisco frame-relay intf-type dce ! ROUTER5# voice-port 1/0/0 ! voice-port 1/0/1 ! ! dial-peer voice 3 voip destination-pattern 444 session target ipv4:192.168.107.7 ! dial-peer voice 4 pots destination-pattern 333 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 2 voip destination-pattern 111 codec g711ulaw session target ipv4:10.1.1.40 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots destination-pattern 222 port 1/0/0 ! dial-peer voice 5 vofr destination-pattern 666 no vad session target Serial0/1 16 ! dial-peer voice 6 pots destination-pattern 555 port 1/0/0 ! ! interface Serial0/1 ip address 2.2.2.2 255.0.0.0 encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache no keepalive no fair-queue cdp enable frame-relay traffic-shaping frame-relay map ip 2.2.2.1 17 broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 16 class vofr-class vofr cisco ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44307&t=44307 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: independent contractor [7:44568]
Everything you ever needed to know is at www.realrates.com. Post a question and/or read all the boards... /JS IC since 1995 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44569&t=44568 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP load balancing [7:44697]
Yes it does if you are doing EBGP and your router has two or more directly conneted links to your EBGP peer. The the default load balancing will work if static routes or an IGP is used for your subnets linking your neighbors. You see it is not BGP performing the load balancing but the normal behavior of load balancing across equal cost paths (if exists) regardless if you are using static or IGP routes.. EBGP multihop also does this however, you are still using the behavior of the static and IGP routes for equal cost paths but do not need to have your neighbors directly connected... Lab it you will see... Have fun Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44735&t=44697 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ISDN BRI Simulator Comparison - way to expensi [7:44770]
Try the following link... http://www.cheapisdn.com/ for $1199 that is not bad. I may pick one up this week. I will use it for my commercial lab I will be making available to potential CCNP/IE candidates in the fall. Yeah, with my luck Cisco will remove it from the lab this summer. My lab is in september... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44836&t=44770 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Wanted. [7:44940]
How about reverse H1b status? The average first-year salaries for highly trained software professionals: India $5,000 - $8,000 China $6,000 - $8,000 Russia $5,000 - $8,000 Pakistan $3,600 - $6,120 Philippines $8,000 - $10,000 Bulgaria $3,600 - $6,000 Sources: National Association Okay, a ccie in india making what? Maybe 11k.. See full article http://computerworld.com/managementtopics/management/outsourcing/story/0%2C10801%2C71292%2C00.html?nlid=PM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44994&t=44940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online Lab soon to be Available [7:46216]
Fellow net/packet heads, I will soon provide my lab online for your use in CCNA through CCIE studying. This lab also can be used for general OS, development and protocols analysis research and studying.. This lab has everything for the CCIE lab except the ATM and 3900 Token-Ring switching components. 1.0 What is AMI LABs? AMI LABS is a Data communications and general Computer Science laboratory that is available for students and professionals to study various networking and computer industry technologies. The lab consists of Cisco routers and switches, AT&T, Nortel, Agilent, IBM and other vendors networking products. The lab also contains various servers running Microsoft and Linux operating systems. The lab provides a SCRATCH PAD environment for a student or professional to learn new or sharpen existing skills plus provide a general research environment. The lab grew out of AMIs Cisco certification requirements and can be used for your CCNA through CCIE preparation. The lab can also help you prepare for Microsoft, Linux, and any other general industry certification such as a security exam. The lab also lends itself for testing hacking exploits on the operating system and protocol levels. Here is what I am providing for an 8 hour block of time at a low fee. Routers: 2501 2503 2504 2513 2509 2620 with voip and 4 serials + FA 2620 with voip 2 Serial and FA 4500 2 TR 4 serial and 2 Eth AGS+ 2 Eth 4 TR and 14 Serial All routers loaded to max memory and flash. Switches Cat 5550 with SupIII and NFFC II for MLS and Ether channeling 2924C-XL-EN 2924-XL Blink2 ISDN emulation Async routing and POTS access for POTS dial routings T-1 CSU/DSU ( I am working on access to these so you can learn how to configure AT&T CSUs) Full access via a Win2k terminal server to use applications like Cisco Works and Cisco Secure as well as hacking and development tools. This server also has the Blink management software to analyze and change the ISDN links to your hearts desire. Also, on this server is protocol analyzer(sniffer)software and a multicasting server so you can trace and generate basic multicasting traffic for your Cisco network. Also, you can originate your VOIP call via this server for full VOIP testing over the Cisco router network and sniff at the same time. The Win2k server has multiple interfaces (Token-Ring and Ethernet ) so you can test and trace the various CRB, IRB, SRB and SRTB configurations. There will be other TR based Wink2 WS(available upon request) for testing Netbios bridging scenarios.. There are other applications available on the Win2k server for your educational purpose. The server has web access so you can download IOS images and store your router configs. You can upgrade the routers and reboot remotely as well. This lab also offers full access to a Red Hat Linux 7.2 server complete with all Red applications and development tools to learn Linux. Another Red hat Linux router is also included for IP Chains and Tables testing and hacking.. TFTP/FTP servers are available on the Win and Linux boxes for your configs. Full telnet access to all servers as well as terminal service access to the Win2k server. All of this is available via a VPN tunnel access kit provided once you sign up. I will be providing this service in the Fall once I take my first CCIE lab, regardless of pass or fail, in September. I am looking for any feedback on improvements and interest in this community to see if these components are helpful. I have been beta testing the lab to some users and the response has been excellent. The speed of the VPN for the telnet and terminal access was very good. The VPN clients used are ones available from Win2k and Win98. So no additional software is requited Thanks . /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46216&t=46216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Online Lab soon to be Available [7:46216]
I am still working on the pricing to be competitive or better then the current top rack rental offerings. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46219&t=46216 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Lab Swap [7:46402]
Can you do 9/9 in RTP. November would be better for me. However, can I swap since 9/16 is past the 18 month limit for my written expire? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46404&t=46402 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE LAB EXAM CHANGES..... [7:46401]
Tell me about it. My lab is in early September, but I just picked up a 5505 with a sup III and NFFC II for $1000.00(it was an awesome deal) I got the 24 port 10/100 blade for $100.00. It is great that cisco is taking the Token-Ring and IPX stuff out but the ethernet switching does not make sense. Unless they are ultimatly moving away from the (set) based product code. The 6500s support Switching IOS in addition to the standard SET based code, so I guess this makes the platforms(the new 2950s up to 6500) more consistent up and down the product offerings. I am checking on wheather my 2924-xl-en is comaprable to a 3550 in terms of IOS functionality, without the Gbit of course. Otherwise I will see if I can trade in my pair of 2924s for a reduced priced 3550. Good luck.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46407&t=46401 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE Lab Exam Changes - Token Ring [7:46481]
I recall reading somewhere, maybe this board, that you can create virtual Token-Ring interfaces. On my 2500/2600 and 4500 series routers I can do the following: ROUTER1(config)#int virtual-TokenRing ? Virtual-TokenRing interface number Here is an example: ROUTER4(config)#int virtual-To ROUTER4(config)#int virtual-TokenRing 1 ROUTER4(config-if)#end ROUTER4#sh int v 00:10:16: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by consoleir ROUTER4#sh int virtual-TokenRing 1 Virtual-TokenRing1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Virtual-TokenRing, address is 4000..0008 (bia 4000..0008) MTU 8136 bytes, BW 16000 Kbit, DLY 5000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation SNAP, loopback not set ARP type: SNAP, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue :0/0 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 transitions ROUTER4# I forgot which IOS version this featured first appeared in. But it works in 12.1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46507&t=46481 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3550-24 Question [7:46572]
I had the same queston so I opened a TAC case to get an answer. Here is my first response for those interested... *** NOTES LOG 13-JUN-2002 16:26:43 PST, emailcio, Action Type: Action *** Technology(T1): LAN Switching Sub-Technology(T2): Cat3550 Problem Summary(T3): Upgrading Software and Working with Configuration Files Software Version: 12.1 Router Node/Name: Contract: xx Problem Description: We have just purchased a Cisco WS-C3550-24-SMI switch. Can I just go to the CCO Software center and download the following to upgrade my unit from SMI to EMI? c3550-i5q3l2-tar.121-9.EA1c.tar c3550 EMI IOS Image and CMS Files Is the above the download the CD-3550-EMI= product? What is the CD-3550-EMI= and how do I optain it, if required, to upgrade my switch to EMI? Thank you.. Please contact customer via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 516-796-9607 Urls shown to the user : http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1216ea1/3550scg/swiosfs.htm http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-center/sw-lan.shtml http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1216ea1/3550scg/swtrbl.htm *** EMAIL OUT 13-JUN-2002 16:57:09 PST, jerlim, Action Type: Email Out *** Send to: Jeff, Hi my name is TAC GUY and I'm the engineer that is working on your case C806967. I see you are interested in installing the EMI software on your 3550. While you can download it from CCO you may need to contact your SE or our Entitlement group to get approval or purchase the software. The software that you listed in the case notes would be the correct software to install. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to email or phone me. Thanks, TAC GUY *** STATUS CHANGE 13-JUN-2002 16:57:09 PST, jerlim, Action Type: *** I will follow-up with the SE to see what the deal is.. Unless in the meantime does somebody want to try the file I have listed above? Thanks... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46578&t=46572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550-24 Question [7:46572]
Thanks Radford, I saw the same thing but it was still unclear from Cisco's tac response. Is the downloadable file the CD-3550-EMI= and all you need is a valid CCO account to upgrade? Or do you have to spend x amount of $$ to purchase a special download for the CD-3550? According to the response it looks like all I have to do is just download the file, which I did, but all of this "SE or our Entitlement group to get approval" nonsense has confused me... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46611&t=46572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3550-24 Question [7:46572]
Thanks Shawn. I know this is splitting hairs but I just wanted to clarify a few things so folks on this board and myself are clear on the policy and we do not end up in Cisco jail, purchase the wrong switch options or damage the switch by loading the wrong software. So what you are saying is that the file listed on CCO is the CD-3550-EMI= upgrade? Correct? If you buy a switch with just SMI installed but do have a CCO contract, but it(the CCO account) does not cover the 3550 "entitlement" you can still download the file and install it, (it will work??)but you are doing something illegal? Correct? The above scenario also applies to someone who buys the switch used with SMI installed and "borrowed" someones CCO account, regardless of account "entitlement" status, downloads the software and upgrades their switch. This is also illegal in Cisco's eyes. Correct? If a person buys a switch with a SMI installed but has a valid CCO account with the proper 3550 EMI "entitlement" on the CCO account, then all that is needed to upgrade the switch from that point is just a download of the file and follow the install instructions? Correct? You see I was confused that the CD-3550-EMI is an actual "physical" product ordered and is received on a CD or via special download with a key or something that is required for you to upgrade from SMI to EMI. However, I see the EMI IOS on the 3550 download page. The reference to CD-3550-EMI is a "logical" reference to CCO "entitlement" privilege level. So Cisco is basically using a monitored Honor System when it comes to the downloads??? Correct? Thanks... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46620&t=46572 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cisco Lab Changes..Updated [7:46623]
I tell you this is becoming utter nonsense. As I mentioned in an older post I picked up an awesome 5505 for a song and I was expecting to use it to prepare for my first lab attempt on 9/9. Then this news comes out about the 3550. Okay no problem, if I nail the lab the first time(I wish! and will try) then the 3550 is moot for my first lab. I can still prepare with what I have. I would deal with the 3550 if I failed on my first attempt and reschedule after the lab changes came into affect. Now for my first attempt I have to get access to a 3550 or simulate as much as possible on a 2924-XL-EN. This also changes the commercial offerings of my lab, but I will offer everything so students can be well rounded with the hands on stuff. Luckily I picked up a new 3550 for under 2k this week What a pain, I am about to retire from this industry in a year or so. Why do I put myself through this? Because I love this stuff, even though this cert studying is getting boring. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46636&t=46623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Power over ethernet [7:46623]
Fellas, something interesting for rigging your own power over ethernet see link below: http://www.cablemodeminfo.com/quicktip-cabling-power-ethernet.html-ssi Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46697&t=46623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ORA 3113 [7:24637]
ORA messages are Oracle messages sent in the TNS protocol and can be decoded. If you are seeing this in a sniffer trace it refers to some oracle application or query condition. I have seen many many of these ORA type messages when analyzing Oracle application for inneffiencies and network behavior. For example you may see many ORA 1403 "no data found" in a trace of a query that did not return anything. These messages could be looked up in the oracle documentation or you can send it to your oracle support rep. The oracle TNS protocol has many different network related messages involving Oracle clients and Servers but I do not recall a 3113 being network related. Check your oracle documentation. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24703&t=24637 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Online labs [7:57480]
My online lab is now available. AMILABS online lab is now available.. Please email me for a ZIP file with a copy of the lab manual and some diagrams for your review [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57480&t=57480 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cisco 2924XL switches [7:57630]
Folks I have two 2924 switches I am selling, these are great switches for learning the basics or testing. If you do not need them for your cert needs they are workhorses for a small network. Catalyst 2924C-XL-EN22 10/100TX ports 2 10/100FX ports Catalyst 2924-XL22 10/100TX ports 2 10/100FX ports I am selling them at very good prices: You can buy both of them together for $700.00 or separately, the 2924C-XL-EN for $400.00 and the 2924-XL for just 300.00. Thanks... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57630&t=57630 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Home lab setup FRAME SWITCH [7:58204]
Elijah, you got the switch from me... How is it working??? I was wondering if you were going to use it for Cisco cert needs.. Have you seen my online lab rental yet? I can send you some information. I have an AGS + if you are interested. It has 14 serial interfaces, 4 Token-Ring and 2 Ethernet interfaces. I have the latest on in it 11.3a or something like that I have not used it since the summer... Have fun /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58217&t=58204 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCNP/DP recertification [7:58564]
Folks, I just received my 6 mos. heads up for my CCNP. My CCNP expires in May of 03 and my DP in June of 03. My second and hopefully last CCIE lab date is on for 7/30 but can be pushed out into September. Are there any re-certification books that specifically cover the recert. exam? Or, is the exam just a rehash of the same stuff with a few newer items in it? Has anyone taken these re-certifications exams yet? Any tips.. Greatly appreciated... With work and the CCIE stuff should I even bother to re-certify??? Regards... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58564&t=58564 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT low cost DS3 router [7:58916]
Fellas, this request just came in from a buddy of mine, if figured while I search I was wondering if any of you have seen or used one before. Take off your Cisco hat for second and think about this: What device would you use to terminate a DS3 to ethernet that is ultra low cost. I need to find a low cost, carrier type CPE that will take a DS3 and hand off eithernet. Low cost, low feature is the guiding word. Let me know Thanks... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58916&t=58916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT, Network Sniffer Software [7:59065]
Better yet for a low cost distributed sniffer just use VNC or WTS on older PCs and use the folowing free sniffers that are pretty damn good: www.packetyzer.comshows packets in real time http://analyzer.polito.it/ capture and post review like sniffer. Have fun /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59199&t=59065 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT low cost DS3 router [7:58916]
Thanks guys, yeah my partner only had a 10k budget. What Ted mentioned made sense and maybe he meant if you are able to get one of thoses Cells/frams modules for a 4500/3600 with integrated csu, but those are way expensive, even used. My partner does not want used so he is looking into the cisco solution, he is a cisco dealer so he might be able to get a break... Thanks again for all the responses... Regards... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59200&t=58916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking for cheap gear... [7:59768]
I am looking for gear. I know you guys have many links etc. to sites mentioned here in the past. I was wondering if any of you folks can reply with such links. I am looking for sites with surplus Cisco gear, clearing houses or auctions sites with equipment from failed companies really cheap. I am looking for deals on larger stuff like 7500, ONS, DWD gear etc Any links would be helpful Thanks and have a great and safe holiday season Happy Holidays and lets hope 2003 is a better year all around for us... /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59768&t=59768 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: wireless [7:62104]
Try http://www.80211planet.com/ Good tutorials and a great starting point. /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62232&t=62104 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CCIE written on resume? [7:48868]
>From experience speaking I put my COMPLETED certifications on the resume. On the cover email I do list some of the certs. NP/DP etc.. but I also put CCIE(lab candidate). To just show that I am pursuing it. I do not need the IE, the resume speaks for itself so when potential clients ask, I am doing if for the challenge, and it shows I continue to train and invest in myself. It is fun but somewhat boring going over the legacy stuff I havent touched in years. I will probably get my butt kicked in the lab soon but so what. My track record is all that really matters. As for the newbie or Jr./Mid level person working his/her way up listing it this way is an honest and helpful method since the recruiting agencies or HR search engines pick up(sort) your resume by buzz words. For companies willing to take on a JR level person who is at least a lab candidate you do not want to be missed. There are some job reqs. that state this CCIE or lab candidates apply especially for FT opportunities from a VAR or systems integrator. Better for them to hire someone already with the written passed and some experience and help sponsor them for the lab and potentially helping the VAR out in partner status as apposed doing this from the start. Why miss out on these potential opportunities for long term career growth if you are passed over because of a stupid buzz word search... Just be honest with yourself and you should be fine. If you get grilled by some lazy prima donna who has been in the same position forever just roll with it and learn from the experience I remember doing just this when I was a CNE ten years ago and I needed to hire staff for projects temp or perm. I stated any CNE candidates welcomed. This worked well depending on the role and I met/hired some good folks. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48935&t=48868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Labs [7:52185]
I will be offering an online lab in the next month. It will be competitive if not better then the competition listed. I am offering the following in three 7 hour blocks per day: 2 2620 for voip and multiple eth and serial interface 1 2513 1 2503 1 2504 1 2501 1 4500 1 2509 1 cat 5505 with NFFC II and SUP3 1 cat 3550 with EMI 1 cat 2924 XL en 1 cat 2924 1 blink-2 isdn simulator Async aux port, modem and CSU routing capabilities Token-Ring for those who want to learn some legacy stuff AGS + for extra charge to simulate some larger networks Windows 2k server with sniffer software and Cisco Works and Cisco Secure plus many other applications Linux 7.2 server fully loaded Linux 7.2 router And much more... This lab is not only for Cisco certification but to learn security, hacking, general Linux or Win2k concepts. I provide all access via a vpn kit and terminal services and you have remote reboot capabilities. If you are interested please send me an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be added to trial rollout list for late September. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52260&t=52185 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EIGRP default route distribution. [7:52377]
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/41024000] via 190.10.5.5, 00:00:07, Serial1 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52406&t=52377 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Tokenring interface [7:52573]
You can create a virtual token ring interface for testing rsrb and dlsw and IPX in versions 12.x and up I beleive. You can change the mac address but you cannot however add an IP address to this interface upto 12.1 though. I have not tested this in 12.2 yet. I wish I can add an IP address. (config)#int vir (config)#int virtual-To0 (config-if)# sh int 2509#sh int virtual-TokenRing 0 Virtual-TokenRing0 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is Virtual-TokenRing, address is 4000..0007 (bia 4000..0007) MTU 8136 bytes, BW 16000 Kbit, DLY 5000 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 Encapsulation SNAP, loopback not set ARP type: SNAP, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 Last input never, output never, output hang never Last clearing of "show interface" counters never Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 Queueing strategy: fifo Output queue :0/0 (size/max) 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort 0 packets output, 0 bytes, 0 underruns 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out 0 transitions Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=52685&t=52573 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CiscoWorks installation issue [7:54808]
I was wondering if any of the Microsoft experts out there can help me with this one. I am having a problem installing CiscoWorks 2000 3.2 CD one on a Win2k Advanced server. I have installed this same version on other 2k advanced servers in the past with no problem but at the beginning of the installation a dialog box appears with a title of severe and a message of cannot create install dependency file. Can anyone of the Microsoft experts out there shed some light on this. I have installed other applications like Visio2k, Visual Studio and SQL server2k to name a few before the CiscoWorks application, Is one of the other previous application installations blocking or causing this issue? I stick the CD into another Win2k box with the same apps installed and I do not get this message. This is a new server and the apps were just installed. I would hate to blow it away because of an install sequence. I tried looking up the error message for some clues on the Microsoft and Cisco sites but was only able to find this bit of information: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q178354 Any tips or suggestions would be greatly appreciated Thanks . /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54808&t=54808 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: how to monitor ciscosecure service? [7:55114]
In Cisco Secure there is a section to configure what to do if the service stops, is not responsive or hangs. Based on these conditions you can have the service restart etc. I believe the menu path is Systems Configuration then click the ACS Service Management link and you will be presented with options on checking the logging in and service handling options. In the ACS Service Management section there is a sub section with a drop down box to test the login process every x minutes. Based on the test outcome you can select the test to respond in the following ways: Restart All Restart Radius/Tacacs Reboot No action There is an event logging subsection also to add your email address and SMTP server to send you an email when issues occur. I remember using even earlier options of Cisco Secure and this option was not available. The service would hang periodically and the only way to restart it was in NT or 2k services utility. I believe Cisco added this option as a kludge to get around customer having to do it manually whenever Cisco Secure would lock up. It works. I do not know if they fixed those types of problems in 3.X or the Service Management link is still included.. /JS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55117&t=55114 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT Microsoft Server help [7:55403]
Hello all, I was wondering if any of the Microsoft experts out there can help me out with this. I have a new server running windows 2k server all service packs and critical updates installed. I have Agilent Advisor protocol analyzer software edition installed. The server has two Broadcomm gigabit Ethernet adapters. When I launch the software I can see both NDIS adapters and select them for use. My problem is as follows: This server is a terminal server running in administration mode. When a single terminal server client logs in and runs the Agilent protocol analyzer software the Broadcomm adapters do not show up. The terminal server client has administrative privileges and I also used the administrative Id as well. I also tried all of the terminal server configurations options except converting the terminal server to apps. mode. Am I missing something? Is terminal server locking up the Broadcomm NDIS adapters resources? This terminal server setup is only for one user at a time for a remote educational lab. Etherpeek has the same problem yet a public domain protocol analyzer using WINPCAP works fine. Also, if I user VNC all apps and adapters work fine. I would rather deploy terminal server for it is faster and crisper in viewing experience to the students. Any ideas are greatly appreciated. Thank Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55403&t=55403 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Network Analyzers [7:72346]
try packetyzer free www.packetyzer.com or www.networkchemistry.com realtime packet display try link ferret http://www.linkferret.ws realtime packet display also try analyzer a public domain protocol analyzer at http://analyzer.polito.it/ post capture session to view packets have fun... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72367&t=72346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new CCIE requirement/step [7:72475]
don't click on goatse.cx you were warned. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72499&t=72475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: new CCIE requirement/step [7:72475]
you must also go to cisco to check out the real updated requirments [url=http://www.goatse.cx]www.cisco.com[/url] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72498&t=72475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
