Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] gnome-cups-manager-0.17-1mdk
Le Sat, 19 Jul 2003 00:53:47 +0200, J.A. Magallon a écrit : On 07.18, Frederic Crozat wrote: [Contrib-RPM] --=-=-= Name: gnome-cups-manager Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 0.17 Vendor: MandrakeSoft I like it !!! A question. It has no menu entry. So I suppose it is intended to be used called from applications, through bonobo, isn't it ? Or manually, as I did. Well, it is the first release done by Dave 'Captain Printman' Camp and I think he has forgotten to put menu entry in the GNOME menu (and I forgot to put it in Mdk menu..).. I'll fix that next week. One suggestion, change the test page: take away the XIMIAN banner and put some Mandrake artwork there... ;) Ah, the frames around the page are nice. I'll try to use Till test pages instead.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] So, is someone going to file a bug against...
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 02:18, Austin wrote: Hey, at least in France it's not illegal to post a sign in English (AFAIK). Actually AFAIK it is, unless there is a translation also. But for 10 years we've traded under the name of The Avignon Institute of English and have always looked forward to someone trying to take us to court. The free publicity would be well worth it. -- Dave Cotton Directeur The Avignon Institute of English
Re: [Cooker] installation and errata
B == Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: B Maybe the syslinux boot screen should tell the user to read the B docs if anything goes wrong? Or is it wrong to expect a user to B read instructions nowadays? It's likely sufficient to mention where the docs are located and would be good ettiquette to note which of the core install docs have changed since the previous release. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com what I need is a job that doesn't interfere with my work -gary murphy
[Cooker] gftp-gtk and galaxy theme
Hi! It seems like a recent change in the Galaxy theme causes gftp-gtk to break. This is constantly reproduceable on my Linux (x86) box. Whenever I go to gftp's Edit Bookmarks menu, I get a floating point exception. Running it under gdb didn't produce much meaningful results other than this: Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x407d8c26 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so (gdb) bt #0 0x407d8c26 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so #1 0x407dcbc4 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so Thanks, Sefer. _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 install script is a booby-trap.
I kept waiting for the prompts from the old script and they never came. I had to run through the install three times to figure out where the script had been changed, and by then something had gone wrong with the boot sequence. I could boot into Linux but not Windows. I had to reinstall the Windows partition and to get rid of the linux bootstrap, lost all the settings for my Windows programs. I have once a similar kind of problems because I changed the size of one Linux partition. This changed the number of partition Windows see and prevented it from starting. The fix for me was to edit hidden system file boot.ini from the windows c-partition. It contains instruction how win2000/nt boot. For me it is something like: (The fix for me was to change the number 10 to number 9) [boot loader] timeout=30 default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(9)\WINNT [operating systems] multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(9)\WINNT=Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional /fastdetect Another useful thin is to use win2000 administration tools for changing the drive letter windows uses for it's partitions. (This list get always resetted if you change any of the partions in the harddrive) Mika
[Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:- malloc: subst.c: 3656 assertion botched malloc: block on free list clobbered INIT:PANIC: segmentation violation at 0x4009ee9a! sleeping 30 seconds Everything gcc is 3.3.1-0.5mdk Any gurus? -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] AudioCompress-1.5-1mdk
On Fri Jul 18 21:00 +0200, Levi Ramsey wrote: Name: AudioCompressRelocations: (not relocateable) Version : 1.5 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk Build Date: Fri Jul 18 18:58:40 2003 - Split command-line/esd version from xmms version Note: if you upgrade and lose the xmms plugin, urpmi AudioCompress-xmms is what you need... [Posting more for the sake of posterity than anything else] -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take due notice and govern yourselves accordingly. Currently playing: Rush - Vapor Trails - Out of the Cradle Linux 2.4.21-3mdk 05:07:01 up 1 day, 16:06, 10 users, load average: 1.44, 1.35, 1.20
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nfs-utils-1.0.4-1mdk -- rpc.mountd crashes
--=-=-= * Wed Jul 16 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.4-1mdk - remove patch5 (time.h) already included upstream. - remove patch2 no-chroot (not needed after removing patch0). - remove patch0 (drop privs) included better patch upstream. - 1.0.4. --=-=-= I just updated this package, and rpc.mountd crashes on the second request it gets: Restart the NFS services: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs stop Stopping NFS mountd:[FAILED] Stopping NFS daemon:[FAILED] Stopping NFS services: [ OK ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs start Starting NFS services: [ OK ] Starting NFS daemon:[ OK ] Starting NFS mountd:[ OK ] check to see if rpc.mountd is running: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status rpc.mountd (pid 3192) is running... nfsd (pid 3181) is running... 3180 (pid 3179) is running... 3178 (pid 3177) is running... 3174 (pid 3173) is running... 3172 (pid ) is running... on the remote system: # ls /mirrors/cooker/SRPMS check to see if rpc.mountd is still running: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status rpc.mountd (pid 3192) is running... nfsd (pid 3181) is running... 3180 (pid 3179) is running... 3178 (pid 3177) is running... 3174 (pid 3173) is running... 3172 (pid ) is running... on the remote system: # ls /mirrors/contrib/SRPMS *ls: /mirrors/contrib/SRPMS: No such file or directory* check to see if rpc.mountd is running: [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status *rpc.mountd is stopped* nfsd (pid 3181) is running... 3180 (pid 3179) is running... 3178 (pid 3177) is running... 3174 (pid 3173) is running... 3172 (pid ) is running... On my network this is reproduceable. rpc.mountd survives the first request, the second request kills it. Anybody else see this behaviour? regards, Stefan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] kile-1.5.2-1mdk
There is a phantom TODO in the %doc list, AFAICS.
[Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] texmaker-1.0-2mdk
I wonder if the menu location of Application/Sciences/Astronomy (set in the spec file is appropriate. Better places might be Applications/Publishing (as in the rather similar package Kile) or Applications/Editors (as in TeXmacs).
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nfs-utils-1.0.4-1mdk -- rpc.mountd crashes
stefan == Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --=-=-= * Wed Jul 16 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.4-1mdk - remove patch5 (time.h) already included upstream. - remove patch2 no-chroot (not needed after removing patch0). - remove patch0 (drop privs) included better patch upstream. - 1.0.4. --=-=-= stefan I just updated this package, and rpc.mountd crashes on the second stefan request it gets: Damn thing, will test here. I tested it lightly before shipping, but it looked as if it worked well. Later, Juan. stefan Restart the NFS services: stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs stop stefan Stopping NFS mountd:[FAILED] stefan Stopping NFS daemon:[FAILED] stefan Stopping NFS services: [ OK ] stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs start stefan Starting NFS services: [ OK ] stefan Starting NFS daemon:[ OK ] stefan Starting NFS mountd:[ OK ] stefan check to see if rpc.mountd is running: stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status stefan rpc.mountd (pid 3192) is running... stefan nfsd (pid 3181) is running... stefan 3180 (pid 3179) is running... stefan 3178 (pid 3177) is running... stefan 3174 (pid 3173) is running... stefan 3172 (pid ) is running... stefan on the remote system: stefan # ls /mirrors/cooker/SRPMS stefan check to see if rpc.mountd is still running: stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status stefan rpc.mountd (pid 3192) is running... stefan nfsd (pid 3181) is running... stefan 3180 (pid 3179) is running... stefan 3178 (pid 3177) is running... stefan 3174 (pid 3173) is running... stefan 3172 (pid ) is running... stefan on the remote system: stefan # ls /mirrors/contrib/SRPMS stefan *ls: /mirrors/contrib/SRPMS: No such file or directory* stefan check to see if rpc.mountd is running: stefan [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# service nfs status stefan *rpc.mountd is stopped* stefan nfsd (pid 3181) is running... stefan 3180 (pid 3179) is running... stefan 3178 (pid 3177) is running... stefan 3174 (pid 3173) is running... stefan 3172 (pid ) is running... stefan On my network this is reproduceable. rpc.mountd survives the first stefan request, the second request kills it. Anybody else see this behaviour? stefan regards, stefan Stefan -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] nfs-utils-1.0.4-1mdk -- rpc.mountd crashes
Juan Quintela wrote: stefan == Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --=-=-= * Wed Jul 16 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0.4-1mdk - remove patch5 (time.h) already included upstream. - remove patch2 no-chroot (not needed after removing patch0). - remove patch0 (drop privs) included better patch upstream. - 1.0.4. --=-=-= stefan I just updated this package, and rpc.mountd crashes on the second stefan request it gets: Damn thing, will test here. I tested it lightly before shipping, but it looked as if it worked well. No problem, these things happen. Thanks for your quick reply! If I can be of any assistance to test anything, please inform me. Stefan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
El s?, 19-07-2003 a las 10:50, Dave Cotton escribi: Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:- malloc: subst.c: 3656 assertion botched malloc: block on free list clobbered INIT:PANIC: segmentation violation at 0x4009ee9a! sleeping 30 seconds Everything gcc is 3.3.1-0.5mdk Any gurus? Fails with 2.4.22pre7 too. This problem is on Cooker GCC 3.3.1 release 1. Kernel 2.6-test1 doesn't work too.
Re: [Cooker] dhcpcd cooked
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, w9ya wrote: This is exactly what went on and was fixed immediately prior to the 9.1 release (and ifstaus -v is unchanged in either condition also). No it is not. Immediately prior to 9.1, ifplugd was working fine, but the ifup script would not set the DNS servers supplied by the dhcp server in /etc/resolv.conf if the dhcp server didn't supply a domain name (you still got an IP, and kept it - totally different behaviour). Similar behaviour to what you are seeing *might* have been present during the initial integration of ifplug, but that was a bit more than immediately prior to. In my case I am using the pcnet_cs card, so it probably isn't specific to driver. AFAIK, pcnet_cs does not support ifplugd, and since you haven't posted your ifcfg-eth0 (no, I did not want to know if it was static or dhcp), figure out yourself how to turn off ifplugd. -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. **
Re: [Cooker] curl problems with urpmi
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 02:21, Jay DeKing wrote: Don't feel bad. I don't get descriptions for them either. Not for the cooker stuff anyway. Jay been wgettin' since I first tried curl (OT: I wish I had tried curling while I still lived up north. Not much opportunity to do it in Florida. Hey ... maybe that's the whole wget/curl problem in a nutshell: it's too warm here for curling?! Does it work better in Finland and northern Quebec?) I like your theory! Here in the UK we definitely get curling weather... -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] can't make cd
Le Vendredi 18 Juillet 2003 07:16, Warly a écrit : stephlub [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I tried to build new cd from fresh update and it fails I updated and tried this twice in case the download was wrong $ i586/misc/MakeCD -t /tmp/ -a i586/ URPM object version 0.91 does not match bootstrap parameter 0.90 at i586//Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0//i386-linux-thread-multi/DynaL oader.pm line 249. Compilation failed in require at i586//misc/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/Mkcd/Tools.pm line 12. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at i586//misc/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/Mkcd/Tools.pm line 12. Compilation failed in require at i586//misc/mkcd line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at i586//misc/mkcd line 11. Yes I need to fix that, I add it into my wiki/todo It's ok now :-) Thanks
Re: [Cooker] dhcpcd cooked
On Saturday 19 July 2003 05:32 am, Buchan Milne wrote: On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, w9ya wrote: This is exactly what went on and was fixed immediately prior to the 9.1 release (and ifstaus -v is unchanged in either condition also). No it is not. Immediately prior to 9.1, ifplugd was working fine, but the ifup script would not set the DNS servers supplied by the dhcp server in /etc/resolv.conf if the dhcp server didn't supply a domain name (you still got an IP, and kept it - totally different behaviour). Similar behaviour to what you are seeing *might* have been present during the initial integration of ifplug, but that was a bit more than immediately prior to. Well, since *I* have not said it *was* ifplugd I don't doubt you might be right. Also *my* idea of immediately prior might well be different than yours, in as much as alot of pcmcia nics had problems working with the scripting across MANY versions of Mandrake, i.e. this was problem for a long time. Again, all of this I have said before in this thread. In my case I am using the pcnet_cs card, so it probably isn't specific to driver. AFAIK, pcnet_cs does not support ifplugd, and since you haven't posted your ifcfg-eth0 (no, I did not want to know if it was static or dhcp), figure out yourself how to turn off ifplugd. Well I did send it in to this list more than once, Apparently the internet is having ALOT of problems this weekend with email and you may not have seen it. I even sent it to you directly. (And my outgoing mail is just fine.) I will tell you again and specifically; DEVICE=eth0, BOOTPROTO=dhcp, NETMASK=255.255.255.0, ONBOOT=yes, NEEDHOSTNAME=yes . Um, just for the record, I am *NOT* interested in figuring this out. If that wasn't obvious, please let me be specific. This is troubleshooting info for the maintainer(s) that have been changing scripts and/or modifying packages. I was hoping that a maintainer would use the information I was turning in. Are you one of these maintainers ? If not, then please just be gracious and let me post the information I have. ANY information can be useful to a maintainer. Earlier you said this was antedotal (which is more than debatable) and of no use. I seriously doubt that. Finally if you don't want to help troubleshoot this problem, that is more than fine with me. I (again as stated in an earlier posting) can just make the need changes myself, as I did custom scripting for this before and I am content to do so again. I think unless there is something relevant to discuss further here and you are a maintainer wanting to deal with this, I would say this thread has run its course, long ago, as nothing useful has come out of it, other than my original intention to alert the relevant maintainers and some interesting input from Adam W. Sincerely and with best regards; Bob Finch
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 12:20, M. Ignacio Monge García wrote: Fails with 2.4.22pre7 too. Whoops behind on my updating of kernels. This problem is on Cooker GCC 3.3.1 release 1. Kernel 2.6-test1 doesn't work too. Really does any kernel work with 3.3.1? -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] [Bug 4210] [Bugzilla] Add a language component to each product for all supported languages
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4210 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 16:00 --- Thierry: I don't mean the i18n component. I know it exists. I mean a language component for *each individual language*. That way I could be the default assignee for all bugs with the localization-nl component. Currently there is no way I can ask bugzilla show me all bugs reported against the Dutch translation. I'm requesting that this possibility is added. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: REOPENED creation_date: description: I am the coordinator for the Dutch Mandrake translations. During the 9.1 beta period, the only way I could know about translation problems that were reported in bugzilla was to watch the Cooker list closely. This bug is a request to add a language component to each product for all supported languages. That way, translators can be appointed as the default owner of language bugs so that they are notified by e-mail when a problem is reported. Also a cc to the cooker-i18n list should be sent with a reported l10n-bug, just like all bugs are cc'ed to the regular cooker list.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] texmaker-1.0-2mdk
Le Samedi 19 Juillet 2003 11:47, David Coe a écrit : I wonder if the menu location of Application/Sciences/Astronomy (set in the spec file is appropriate. Better places might be Applications/Publishing (as in the rather similar package Kile) or Applications/Editors (as in TeXmacs). Hum :) I fix... -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL. Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/
[Cooker] [Bug 4139] [Bugzilla] epiphany component missing
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4139 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 16:20 --- Looks like it's in now. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: RESOLVED creation_date: description: I'd like to file a bug against the epiphany 0.7.3 package in Cooker but it's not in bugzilla yet.
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem. Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile plain vanilla 2.4.22-pre6 and getting less seg faults etc. during the compile, but on boot get the following:- malloc: subst.c: 3656 assertion botched malloc: block on free list clobbered INIT:PANIC: segmentation violation at 0x4009ee9a! sleeping 30 seconds Everything gcc is 3.3.1-0.5mdk Any gurus? # Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
[Cooker] [Bug 2851] [kernel] lircd does not create /dev/lirc/0
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2851 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 16:43 --- This bug is still valid with kernel-2.4.21.3mdk-1-1mdk -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: NEW creation_date: description: With the latest cooker update from 6th of March, lircd does not create /dev/lirc/0. I am taking a stab in the dark and assuming that because I run a system with devfs that the module is not creating the devfs entry. Changing /etc/sysconfig/lircd from: (this results in lircmd and crew not being able to communicate with the kernel space portion of this and hence all the problems that arrise from that) # The device node that communicates with the IR device. # with devfs enabled DEVICE=/dev/lirc/0 # without devfs #DEVICE=/dev/lirc To: # The device node that communicates with the IR device. # with devfs enabled #DEVICE=/dev/lirc/0 # without devfs DEVICE=/dev/lirc Fixes the problem and all other remaining mdk packages work as expected (tested with irw and xawtv). I've banged my head about this one for a month or so now since getting my new PV951 tuner card and just decided to have another dig at it. Hopefully this will get fixed for the final release.
[Cooker] [Bug 3537] [kernel] APCI fails on MSI 6547 system board
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3537 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-19-07 16:45 --- This bug is no longer valid with kernel-2.4.21.3mdk-1-1mdk -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. --- Reminder: --- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: UNCONFIRMED creation_date: description: Problem: Using the 2.4.21-0.13mdk kernel leads to apparent interrupt conflicts between devices installed on this system using the MSi 6547 system board. These symptoms exist when setting the BIOS to APIC revision 1.1 or 1.4. The first signs of trouble during boot are seen when the Advansys SCSI module attempts to probe the bus for devices followed later on during the boot process by the ethernet adapter, bt878 device, and USB subsystem. Solution: Disable APIC in the BIOS or pass pci=noapci via the bootloader config or the commandline. Information: lspci -vvv output can be obtained here: http://fragfest.homelinux.net:81/test/lspciout.txt dmesg output can be obtained here: http://fragfest.homelinux.net:81/test/dmesgout.txt This problem has existed and required the bootloader option since after kernel 2.4.18.8.2mdk-1-3mdk. I had just hoped things would get sorted out sooner or later as there had been quite a few bugs related to this subsystem.
[Cooker] [Bug 4218] [kernel-2.4.21.3mdk] New: missing ntfs module
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4218 Product: kernel-2.4.21.3mdk Component: kernel-2.4.21.3mdk Summary: missing ntfs module Product: kernel-2.4.21.3mdk Version: 1-1mdk Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: kernel-2.4.21.3mdk AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The NTFS module is missing from this kernel removing the ability to read (and write for the daring) Win32 NTFS partitions. -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Re: [Cooker] gftp-gtk and galaxy theme
Sefer Tov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It seems like a recent change in the Galaxy theme causes gftp-gtk to break. This is constantly reproduceable on my Linux (x86) box. Whenever I go to gftp's Edit Bookmarks menu, I get a floating point exception. Running it under gdb didn't produce much meaningful results other than this: Program received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. 0x407d8c26 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so (gdb) bt #0 0x407d8c26 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so #1 0x407dcbc4 in _init () from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.2.0/engines/libgalaxy.so please fill a bug in bugzilla
[Cooker] [Bug 4219] [zsh] New: zsh segfault
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4219 Product: zsh Component: program Summary: zsh segfault Product: zsh Version: 4.1.1-2mdk Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P4 Component: program AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] installing //home/root/mandrake/mdk/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/zsh-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...## 1:zsh## [EMAIL PROTECTED] olivier]$ zsh Segmentation fault -- Configure bugmail: http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] experimental ppp package
People using pppoatm, i'd like you to test an experimental ppp package with some patches sent to me by bewan driver developper. It should solve ppp exiting with signal 11 when line is unplugged. The package is available for 9.1 and cooker at http://zarb.org/~guillomovitch/rpm Please test and report, thanks. -- All components become obsolete. -- Murphy's Computer Laws n°8
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote: Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem. A Google Groups search on the messages I got returned nothing. Not many days ago it was said on this list, that if more people had spoken up about the major problem with Promise controllers, 9.1 may not have got out with that problem. Having just tried to install 9.1 on such a machine, I'm not to ready to keep quiet when I hit a show stopper. Dave Cotton
Re: [Cooker] So, is someone going to file a bug against...
Austin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, why is this system still in place? Why hasn't someone run for government specifically with the idea of getting rid of it? Or, just ignore the whole thing, use the wrong words without a second thought, and don't argue in front of the rest of the world lest the Quebecois will start to get the idea that they're as good as you Hey, at least in France it's not illegal to post a sign in English (AFAIK), or do business in English (AFAIK). of course it is. if you sell something where documentation is in english, you just became an out-of-the-law you just do not know that we're a country that promote the linguistical liberties and the curtural differences in the sense that everybody that come in france should speak french and only french, must give up their habits eg: when french political people speak about immigrants, they always say they must be assimilated instead of integrated/welcomed. or look for the number of poeple who want to forbid muslim weil[1] in schools or public bureaucracy whereas of course showing a catholical cross is not a problem (the idea being forbidding proselytism...) about the weil, catholic sisters often got authorized bo be weiled on their ids but now police chief is talking about forbiding it for muslums. you just only see the so called human rights country surface. eg: most french people will tell you we've the best social/assurance system of the world despite we do not live longer :-) but as every other country in the world, it has its drawbacks. france is not as opened as it seems. and it's the same for so called regional/minority languages: in 1992, our House of Representatives make a law to protect french language against the so called english language imperialism (!!!); they told us that it would never be used againts minority langugaes. but last year, the equivalent[2] of us suprem court forbid to include diwan school (that try to save britton language by using efficient[3] methods) because of that law that made them anticonstitutional. in fact, it has not the power to forbid but to advice. their argument was: they refuse because the european law[4] that protect minority languages is anticonstitutional and so has to be rejected (despite the france signed threaties saying that european laws supercede french ones) but the senate follow them rejected the law that would make all britton schools equals to other because of that. now, the senate refuse to alter the 1992 law (that should never have been against minority languages in the first place according to public declarations at that time) because we've not adopt the european law and the government refuse to adopt the european law because the 1992 law makes it anticonstitutional. no, of course they do not make fun about those who want to learn french and britton (or any other minority language) oh, i forget to tell that they reject the britton schools because they do nearly all teaching in britton [but these childrens still have better results in french language tests]) at the same time they in the same time, our state give money to schools that use the same system but to teach french in louisiana ... so if you want to save the britton language, you've to paid taxes for french public schools and schools that teach french in foreign countries *and* to pay for private schools that save it because the state refuse to do anything for britton. when your state give more rights to other countries citizens because they speak french than to you because you want to speak french and britton, it's of course not discrimination or civil rights inequailities but else we've an opened country that go fast on subjects that interest people and who cares about his citizens, ... last but not least: we've a low to discriminate music on radios and tvs not on their quality but on the language the singer used. french sings've 60% of time. others share the remaining 40%. and yet, it's of course not discrimination when sing quality is less important than the language you use nobody seems to understand this is against the free speech right :-( [1] the question of male/female equality being not the same problem as accepting foreign people habits [2] it's not so equivalent since it depends more of the government [3] efficient because despite we should officially all be able to speak one or two foreign languages, most frenc are hopelessly monolingual people [4] http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/WhatYouWant.asp?NT=148CM=8DF=19/07/03
Re: [Cooker] So, is someone going to file a bug against...
Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hey, at least in France it's not illegal to post a sign in English (AFAIK), or do business in English (AFAIK). of course it is. if you sell something where documentation is in english, you just became an out-of-the-law oh, i forget the best part of it: there was an american school in alsace that teach english: they were sued because of this (since they were not using french). no, of course it's not stupid and it prove we're opened to other cultural stuff :-( i do not rember what the judges eventually said though (it was many years ago) viva el bureaucrats !!!
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4219] [zsh] New: zsh segfault
[thauvin] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: //home/root/mandrake/mdk/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/zsh-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...## 1:zsh## [EMAIL PROTECTED] olivier]$ zsh Segmentation fault same new gcc bug :-( ?
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Dave Cotton wrote: On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote: Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem. A Google Groups search on the messages I got returned nothing. http://www.google.com/search?q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel - http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-07/msg01039.php Try using -Os instead of -O2. Regards, Buchan -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. **
Re: [Cooker] So, is someone going to file a bug against...
Le sam 19/07/2003 à 14:18, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : eg: when french political people speak about immigrants, they always say they must be assimilated instead of integrated/welcomed. or look for the number of poeple who want to forbid muslim weil[1] in schools or public bureaucracy whereas of course showing a catholical cross is not a problem (the idea being forbidding proselytism...) 1°/ at least the crux can be hidden under your shirt if you don't want to disturb people. 2°/ the crux is small, you have to be aware to noticed it most of the time. 3°/ now you should have a weil and you will see how you will feel. about the weil, catholic sisters often got authorized bo be weiled on their ids but now police chief is talking about forbiding it for muslums. 1°/ they are sisters ! like priest they are a little bit different. If muslim have sister it won't be a pb. Now for common people I found it ... 2°/ look about who wear the weil. Not the first migrants ( mothers ) but the second/third generation. To my mind it seems to be a regression. 3°/ go in the city and you will see some very interesting things conceirning girls/women status. Do you know ni putes, ni soumises association ? you just only see the so called human rights country surface. eg: most french people will tell you we've the best social/assurance system of the world despite we do not live longer :-) we live longer than americans for example. if you are not rich, try to have medicine or be heal in US/GB. Why does you have some britains that comes in some french hospital ? You have some silly things in french system, people you cheat, but at least if you are not rich you have survive well. but as every other country in the world, it has its drawbacks. sure, u're completly right france is not as opened as it seems. and it's the same for so called regional/minority languages: in 1992, our House of Representatives make a law to protect french language against the so called english language imperialism (!!!); they told us that it would never be used againts minority langugaes. The pb you see was the fact that at this time everywhere you had english words ( pub, tv, etc ... ). English was cool. I have nothing against english, but if you can't use freench words in a pub/ad, or at least translate it ( as not everybody speak english, and french are very bad concerning foreign languages ) it's a pb. no, of course they do not make fun about those who want to learn french and britton (or any other minority language) I' m willing to be able to learn creol as I'm from F.W.I ( Guadeloupe ) [1] the question of male/female equality being not the same problem as accepting foreign people habits It's not habits. If you were in Iran before the ayatollah, or in Syrie, you will see that many women where not wearing weil, or it was little. It is not habits, it's a religious things, and as it's in the laws : no religious things too visible. Have Fatma hand, or whatever you want put the weil ... And for swimming pool ? Are you going to have a discimination with this ? or are you going to separate men/women ?
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with older gcc also broken
D == Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: D Really does any kernel work with 3.3.1? I thought kernel compiling was the whole reason we still ship gcc-2.96 ... although I think other distros call it the kernel-gcc or somesuch. There is also no mention in either the /usr/share/doc/kernel-sources or the gcc-2.96 rpm documents to say we /must/ compile the kernel using gcc2 Not that it matters: gcc2 doesn't make it past cs46xx.c either :( cs46xx.c:950: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used invalidly for `off' cs46xx.c:951: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used invalidly for `val' so basically, even if you just need to add some 3rd-party source module to 9.1+, you're screwed. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com what I need is a job that doesn't interfere with my work -gary murphy
[Cooker] Re: kernel question (ATMEL wlan driver)
David Walser wrote: Has anybody put in a request to have the code at http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net/downloads.html put in our kernel? A friend of mine says it contains a fastvnet_cs module needed for his 3com 3CRSHPW696 wireless NIC card. Does anybody have any knowledge about this?
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
B == Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: B http://www.google.com/search?q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel You will get far less noise with a site-focussed search query of site:archives.mandrakelinux.com gcc-3.3.1 kernel but that query won't explain the cs46xx.c bug ;) -- Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com what I need is a job that doesn't interfere with my work -gary murphy
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with older gcc also broken
G == Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G cs46xx.c:950: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used G invalidly for `off' cs46xx.c:951: error: long, short, signed or G unsigned used invalidly for `val' Since the cooker archives contain no match for cs64xx.c u32 it seems likely the fix is not yet recorded. The fix is to replace u32 long with u32 on lines 950 and 951. [ How the heck could you have a u32 _long_?? 32 bits is 32 bits no matter how you look at it. ] -- Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com what I need is a job that doesn't interfere with my work -gary murphy
[Cooker] Mdk-rpm-howto on the wiki ( was : [CHRPM] dmapi-2.0.5-3mdk )
I got started on it, but decided to ask the list first. The conclusion of the discusion was that it is a good idea, but we (I think Dams was also involved in the thread) weren't sure how it should be done. - One big document, or split up per chapter? IMHO, split up by chapter is better. One big docuement is not pratical, because of the time evolved to transmit it over the net , to read it and so on. With one big page, we will see that all the document have been updated. With small chapter, we will see which chapter have changed. - Naming of chapters in WiKi style or not? This would be consistent to name them in a wiki-like fashion, and will favorate the linking through the pages. I do not see why we should not name them in the wiki style, but, i may be wrong. -- Mickaël Scherer
[Cooker] A other reason to split lsit ( was : So, is someone going to file a bug against... )
On Saturday 19 July 2003 19:01, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: Le sam 19/07/2003 à 14:18, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : [ .. big discussion with real part of troll insde ..] so, here is another agument about splitting list. if we split, wa can setup a list called cooker-discuss-off-topic, to send this kind of mail. Not that i am not interested in the opinions of both poster, but simply, this is not the right place. -- Mickaël Scherer
[Cooker] [Re] [CHRPM] drakxtools-9.2-0.18mdk
Le sam 19/07/2003 à 14:00, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : --=-=-= Name: drakxtools Relocations: (not relocateable) Version : 9.2 Vendor: MandrakeSoft Release : 0.18mdk Build Date: Sat Jul 19 15:29:02 2003 1°/ draksec : - in periodic check - no help - system options - /etc/issue* exist : garbage in help - system options - Authorize all services controlled by tcp_wrappers : garbage in help 2°/ still the top spacing when launching severals tools
[Cooker] Mdk cooker
Hi, How does mdk cooker work Do I need iso downloads?? Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? I have some drive space and would like to tinker. Please some pointers. Enjoy Johan . May this be a good day for learning
Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker
Ainsi parlait Johan Scheepers : Hi, How does mdk cooker work Do I need iso downloads?? Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? Install cooker directly by network, unless you already have a 9.1 running. -- Disks are always full. It is futile to try to get more disk space. Data expands to fill any void. -- Murphy's Computer Laws n°4
Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 19 July 2003 17:59, Johan Scheepers wrote: Hi, How does mdk cooker work Do I need iso downloads?? Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? I have some drive space and would like to tinker. Please some pointers. Enjoy Johan . May this be a good day for learning http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/MandrakeLinux#CookerHowTo - -- Regards, Per Øyvind Karlsen Sintrax Solutions http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061 - GPG Key: http://sintrax.net/~hawkeye/key.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/GW/ov8F7V9JOSuURApqUAKDLbPvwfNDnCyptssU2BKQwfahUfACeM1Io xxxUwpJUk71omrxEbNe1Gms= =7RD7 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 16:56, Buchan Milne wrote: http://www.google.com/search?q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel - http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-07/msg01039.php Try using -Os instead of -O2. On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote: Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem. Thanks for your help Buchan. This message is coming from a 2.4.22-pre6 kernel compiled with -Os, had to search a bit to find where to change it but that's what learning is all about. You just need someone to point you in the right direction, even if they've heard it all before. -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Graduated as a teacher 33 years ago.
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4219] [zsh] New: zsh segfault
Thierry Vignaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [thauvin] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: //home/root/mandrake/mdk/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/zsh-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm Preparing...## 1:zsh## [EMAIL PROTECTED] olivier]$ zsh Segmentation fault same new gcc bug :-( ? The strange thing is that command /bin/zsh does not segfault whether zsh does. -- Warly
[Cooker] cyrus-imapd-2.1.4-2mdk
Hi, I just uploaded to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming cyrus-imapd-2.1.14-2mdk. It's also available (as ever) at http://perso.wanadoo.es/olivetti/cyrus/ with binaries rpms for 8.2/9.0/9.1 (buchan, these are not good for you, since the 9.1 one is compiled with libdb4.0 and IIRC you're experimenting with 4.1, anyway the srpm should do, since it incorporates your changes). Florin, I noticed that in your spec file you removed the buildrequire for e2fsprogs, why? (look at the changelog: I removed it too once but readded it in 2.1.5-2mdk since it is necessary to find the headers for the system libcom_err, otherwise cyrus would compile its own replacement). This is the changelog: * Sat Jul 19 2003 Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.1.14-2mdk - merged changes from 2.1.13-1mdk, 2.1.13-2mdk and 2.1.13-3mdk missing from 2.1.14-1mdk - removed patch 8 (forcedowncase, same option included upstream) - rediffed patch 9 (munge8bit) - removed patch11 (fixes for db4.1), fixed upstream Bye -- Que les importa a las viudas, a los huérfanos, a los desvalidos si las masacres se hacen en nombre del totalitarismo o en el sagrado nombre de la libertad y la democracia. Mahatma Gandhi (1869 - 1948) pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
El s?, 19-07-2003 a las 19:06, Dave Cotton escribi: On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 16:56, Buchan Milne wrote: http://www.google.com/search?q=mandrake%20cooker%20gcc-3.3.1%20kernel - http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2003-07/msg01039.php Try using -Os instead of -O2. On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 15:04, Han Boetes wrote: Before you post a question about any problem your notice you should check if somebody else hasn't run into the same problem. Thanks for your help Buchan. This message is coming from a 2.4.22-pre6 kernel compiled with -Os, had to search a bit to find where to change it but that's what learning is all about. You just need someone to point you in the right direction, even if they've heard it all before. Have you tried with kernel 2.6? Ah, BTW, there is a kernel 2.4.22pre7 right now :).
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
While we're on the topic of cooker kernels, why _do_ we set the kernel versions switch to ON? The tux.org kernel docs recommend off. -- Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: office voice/fax: 01 519 4222723 Business Advantage through Community Software - http://teledyn.com what I need is a job that doesn't interfere with my work -gary murphy
[Cooker] Re: cyrus-imapd-2.1.4-2mdk
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Luca Olivetti wrote: I just uploaded to ftp://ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming cyrus-imapd-2.1.14-2mdk. It's also available (as ever) at http://perso.wanadoo.es/olivetti/cyrus/ with binaries rpms for 8.2/9.0/9.1 (buchan, these are not good for you, since the 9.1 one is compiled with libdb4.0 and IIRC you're experimenting with 4.1, anyway the srpm should do, since it incorporates your changes). Florin, I noticed that in your spec file you removed the buildrequire for e2fsprogs, why? (look at the changelog: I removed it too once but readded it in 2.1.5-2mdk since it is necessary to find the headers for the system libcom_err, otherwise cyrus would compile its own replacement). I think recent krb5-devel provides headers for libcom_err (actually conflicts with libext2fs2-devel IIRC). I guess ideally libcom_err should be split out? Speaking of kerberos, I see 1.3 final is out now. There are some advantages to compiling samba3 against kerberos 1.3 ... Florin, any chance you can update to it? Regards, Buchan -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. **
[Cooker] rpmsync/cooksync updated with looping capability
Ok, this is a fairly major update to the rpmsync/cooksync code. There is now a loop option where it will loop rsyncing through the sources until you're fully synced with the remote server. As always, please let me know if there are any problems. http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/rpmsync.pl - new version with command-line option support http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/cooksync.pl - old version of the script with loop option added
[Cooker] Re: rpmsync/cooksync updated with looping capability
David Walser wrote: Ok, this is a fairly major update to the rpmsync/cooksync code. There is now a loop option where it will loop rsyncing through the sources until you're fully synced with the remote server. As always, please let me know if there are any problems. http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/rpmsync.pl - new version with command-line option support http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/cooksync.pl - old version of the script with loop option added Someone just downloaded rpmsync 2 minutes ago, but I just fixed a minor bug. Whoever you are, please redownload.
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with latest gcc
On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 20:21, M. Ignacio Monge García wrote: Have you tried with kernel 2.6? That seems to have other problems. The new module system etc. Ah, BTW, there is a kernel 2.4.22pre7 right now :). OK the reason I reused 2.4.22-pre6 is because it had compiled and run before the last series of compiler updates, pre7 is also working for me now. I seem to remember all this type of optimisation thing years ago with 2.0 kernels, at that time the general advice was no optimisation. Perhaps as the compiler stabilised everyone tweaked it a bit and it worked. The cycle may be the same with this version of the compiler? -- Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] test, ignore...
-- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
[Cooker] Re: rpmsync/cooksync updated with looping capability
David Walser wrote: David Walser wrote: Ok, this is a fairly major update to the rpmsync/cooksync code. There is now a loop option where it will loop rsyncing through the sources until you're fully synced with the remote server. As always, please let me know if there are any problems. http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/rpmsync.pl - new version with command-line option support http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/cooksync.pl - old version of the script with loop option added Someone just downloaded rpmsync 2 minutes ago, but I just fixed a minor bug. Whoever you are, please redownload. I see you did. I apologize, it's still screwed up. Give me a few minutes. I'll let you know when it's fixed.
Fwd: Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with older gcc also broken
- Forwarded message from Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 21:09:38 +0200 From: Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with older gcc also broken To: Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: G == Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G cs46xx.c:950: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used G invalidly for `off' cs46xx.c:951: error: long, short, signed or G unsigned used invalidly for `val' Since the cooker archives contain no match for cs64xx.c u32 it seems likely the fix is not yet recorded. The fix is to replace u32 long with u32 on lines 950 and 951. [ How the heck could you have a u32 _long_?? 32 bits is 32 bits no matter how you look at it. ] and a search on lkml would reveal the fix :) which is (under a strange name) reported to mandrake bugzilla http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4125 (see the gcc-3.3-fixes) best, svetljo - End forwarded message - --
[Cooker] Re: rpmsync/cooksync updated with looping capability
David Walser wrote: David Walser wrote: David Walser wrote: Ok, this is a fairly major update to the rpmsync/cooksync code. There is now a loop option where it will loop rsyncing through the sources until you're fully synced with the remote server. As always, please let me know if there are any problems. http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/rpmsync.pl - new version with command-line option support http://luigiwalser.homeip.net:8080/~david/cooksync.pl - old version of the script with loop option added Someone just downloaded rpmsync 2 minutes ago, but I just fixed a minor bug. Whoever you are, please redownload. I see you did. I apologize, it's still screwed up. Give me a few minutes. I'll let you know when it's fixed. Ok, it's fixed now. Sorry about that.
[Cooker] RedHat trying to beat us at our own game?
http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=364
Re: [Cooker] Compiling kernels with older gcc also broken
On 07.19, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote: G == Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: G cs46xx.c:950: error: long, short, signed or unsigned used G invalidly for `off' cs46xx.c:951: error: long, short, signed or G unsigned used invalidly for `val' Since the cooker archives contain no match for cs64xx.c u32 it seems likely the fix is not yet recorded. The fix is to replace u32 long with u32 on lines 950 and 951. [ How the heck could you have a u32 _long_?? 32 bits is 32 bits no matter how you look at it. ] That smells _bug_. Think if you have unsigned long long i; // 64 bits !! and do a sed -e 's:unsigned long:u32:g' ?? -- J.A. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.22-pre6-jam1m (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-0.3mdk))
Re: [Cooker] A other reason to split lsit ( was : So, is someone going to file a bug against... )
On Sat Jul 19 17:13 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 19:01, FACORAT Fabrice wrote: Le sam 19/07/2003 à 14:18, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : [ .. big discussion with real part of troll insde ..] so, here is another agument about splitting list. if we split, wa can setup a list called cooker-discuss-off-topic, to send this kind of mail. Not that i am not interested in the opinions of both poster, but simply, this is not the right place. I apologize for getting Thierry off on this... :o) -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Take due notice and govern yourselves accordingly. Currently playing: Metallica - St. Anger - Some Kind of Monster Linux 2.4.21-3mdk 17:43:00 up 2 days, 4:42, 9 users, load average: 2.77, 2.66, 1.85
Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker
On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:22, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Johan Scheepers : Hi, How does mdk cooker work Do I need iso downloads?? Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? Install cooker directly by network, unless you already have a 9.1 running. If you do a network install from the internet then i would do a really minimal install without even kde because it takes a looong time.
Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker
Ainsi parlait andre : On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:22, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Johan Scheepers : Hi, How does mdk cooker work Do I need iso downloads?? Install mdk9.1 and upgrade?? Install cooker directly by network, unless you already have a 9.1 running. If you do a network install from the internet then i would do a really minimal install without even kde because it takes a looong time. Not more than downloading the full ISO containing the packages. Anyway, any install should always be minimal, with just urpmi. -- Any cool program always requires more memory than you have. -- Murphy's Computer Laws n°2
Re: [Cooker] Mdk cooker
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ainsi parlait andre : If you do a network install from the internet then i would do a really minimal install without even kde because it takes a looong time. Not more than downloading the full ISO containing the packages. Anyway, any install should always be minimal, with just urpmi. I suggested to create a mini-iso that contains only the files just to do that some time ago. Maybe I should suggest it again. Preferably one that keeps working from release to release so you can use to same iso to install 9.1 9.2 10.0 etc. # Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.html
Re: [Cooker] RedHat trying to beat us at our own game?
Le Samedi 19 Juillet 2003 22:25, David Walser a écrit : http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=364 This is the proof that we are on the good way. Mandrake is then the leader :-) Next step : RH will be a retailer of Mandrake boxes ! -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/
[Cooker] cooker
__ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: frozen-bubble, pysol need soundwrapper
David Walser wrote: David Walser wrote: Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I agree. This kind of arts/esd autodetection stuff is one thing I've been working on the past couple weeks. If you want me to look into SDL and submit a patch to that, let me know. Yes, it'd help. Please test current situation, if it's not working, I'd appreciate a patch[1] :). Ok, I'll look into it. Ok, I looked into it, and it's not currently bugged. It has code internally very similar in nature to libao, and I tested it and it works fine. If the dsp's are not available it'll try arts, esd, and nas in that order. Of course, then you could end up with the bubble using arts/esd, which you say you don't want, and is why you don't want soundwrapper on it. Of course in the situation that SDL uses arts/esd *only* in the case that arts or esd have the sound device open, it would be the appropriate thing to do. If the user was unhappy with the results, they shouldn't be trying to play music with XMMS (using arts/esd) and frozen-bubble at the same time :o) and they can wait 45 seconds until arts/esd automatically let go of the device and try again. Yeah, SDL definately does try the DSP's before going to arts, in fact it goes farther than libao does and looks for more than one DSP, which is pretty cool. I might see if we can make a similar adjustment to libao. Anyway, given that SDL does this autodetection, absolutely no SDL apps should now be using soundwrapper. Are there any that are? I found some: adontell-wastesedge egoboo supertux tuxracer Those packages, as well as any other SDL-based apps, should *not* use soundwrapper.
Re: [Cooker] sitescooper and perl-libwww-perl
Ok, the sitescooper comes with a lot of the same perl modules provided by the perl-libwww-perl package. Furthermore sitescooper stores them in site_perl, which is wrong for packages. sitescooper should just require perl-libwww-perl (or just rely on automatic perl provides) and not ship these modules. Those modules, listed in RPM provides format are: perl(File::Listing) perl(File::Listing::dosftp) perl(File::Listing::netware) perl(File::Listing::unix) perl(File::Listing::vms) perl(HTML::Form) perl(HTML::Form::IgnoreInput) perl(HTML::Form::ImageInput) perl(HTML::Form::Input) perl(HTML::Form::ListInput) perl(HTML::Form::SubmitInput) perl(HTML::Form::TextInput) perl(HTTP::Daemon::ClientConn) perl(HTTP::Headers) perl(HTTP::Headers::Auth) perl(HTTP::Headers::ETag) perl(HTTP::Status) perl(LWP::Authen::Basic) perl(LWP::Authen::Digest) perl(LWP::Debug) perl(LWP::MediaTypes) perl(LWP::MemberMixin) perl(LWP::Protocol::data) perl(LWP::Protocol::file) perl(LWP::Protocol::ftp) perl(LWP::Protocol::gopher) perl(LWP::Protocol::http) perl(LWP::Protocol::https) perl(LWP::Protocol::mailto) perl(LWP::Protocol::nntp) perl(WWW::RobotRules::InCore) --- David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Those two packages (the first from contrib and the second from main) have a lot of the same Provides. Does this look funny to anyone? __ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
