[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3705) nightly build task for testers.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857703#action_12857703 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3705: --- I am not able to give Apache rights there is nothing in the attach file dialog. > nightly build task for testers. > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-3705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Environment: trunknightly build on a linux machine. >Reporter: BJ Freeman >Priority: Minor > Attachments: nightlybuild.sh, nightlybuild.xml > > > the will download > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ofbiz-trunk-current.zip > into the ofbiz home directory > optinally stop the running application (has to be modified buy user- is > commented out) > clean the logs > unzip the downloaded file. > optionally copies saved backup of entityengine.xml (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally copies save back of framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml > (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > deletes the download zip file > optionally changes the ownership (has to be modified buy user- is commented > out) > optionally copies the ofbiz.jar to the user name (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally starts ofbiz (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > I also include a sh file -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3705) nightly build task for testers.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3705: -- Attachment: nightlybuild.sh this is a separate sh file for linux. put in the homeofbiz folder > nightly build task for testers. > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-3705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Environment: trunknightly build on a linux machine. >Reporter: BJ Freeman >Priority: Minor > Attachments: nightlybuild.sh, nightlybuild.xml > > > the will download > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ofbiz-trunk-current.zip > into the ofbiz home directory > optinally stop the running application (has to be modified buy user- is > commented out) > clean the logs > unzip the downloaded file. > optionally copies saved backup of entityengine.xml (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally copies save back of framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml > (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > deletes the download zip file > optionally changes the ownership (has to be modified buy user- is commented > out) > optionally copies the ofbiz.jar to the user name (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally starts ofbiz (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > I also include a sh file -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3705) nightly build task for testers.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3705: -- Attachment: nightlybuild.xml you need to put this in the build file because the build.xml will be over written everyt time you unzip a new nightly build until this is put in the svn. > nightly build task for testers. > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-3705 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Environment: trunknightly build on a linux machine. >Reporter: BJ Freeman >Priority: Minor > Attachments: nightlybuild.xml > > > the will download > http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ofbiz-trunk-current.zip > into the ofbiz home directory > optinally stop the running application (has to be modified buy user- is > commented out) > clean the logs > unzip the downloaded file. > optionally copies saved backup of entityengine.xml (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally copies save back of framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml > (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > deletes the download zip file > optionally changes the ownership (has to be modified buy user- is commented > out) > optionally copies the ofbiz.jar to the user name (has to be modified buy > user- is commented out) > optionally starts ofbiz (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) > I also include a sh file -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857688#action_12857688 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3442: Hi Jacques, sry for mmy late response. Good idea with the min. modifications. I tested your patch and i see one issue. You changed the call method but not the lookups itself. Remember we set an extra decorator for the new lookups because of the different behavior (LookupLayerPopupDecorator). That causes some issus when i try to open a layer form a layer (tested in Workeffort). I think the easiest way to fix this is to make the new decorator default (rename in "LookupLayerDecorator" and the old LookupLayerDecorator in "LookupLayerWindowDecorator") then you have to do only a few changes in the decorators you want to open in the classic way. What do you think about it?? Have a nice day Sascha > Replace popup lookups by layer lookups > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-3442 replace popup lookups by layered lookups.patch > > > Following Sascha Rodekamp's work on layer lookups OFBIZ-3374 and > improvements OFBIZ-3430, I propose now to replace old the popup lookups by > layered (Ajaxified) lookups. > For that please find a patch attached. In this patch I followed a simple S/R > tactic: > * I replaced all occurences of LookupDecorator by LookupLayerPopupDecorator > in screens > * I replaced all occurences of position="center" > It's as simple as this. For the moment I decided to use as default > position="center" because it's was the easiest (sure that any lookups will be > out of the screen). I think we will refine this by removing position="center" > and use the default (position="normal") which does not move the layer from > the point it's called and will be more aesthetic. > I did not test anything in OFBIz OOTB for the moment, but I already use > layered lookups in a custom application without any issues so far. > The only drawback I found for the moment is when a lookup is called from a > lookup. If you are aware of such cases please chime in. > Of course everybody is encouraged to test this improvement as much as > possible. I really think it's a very cool feature for users, and they will > appreciate. There are still some ideas like that (see the link Sasca referred > to in OFBIZ-3374), and we will try to implement them. > There are issues to be fixed prior to a commit, see OFBIZ-3446. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3705) nightly build task for testers.
nightly build task for testers. --- Key: OFBIZ-3705 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3705 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: SVN trunk Environment: trunknightly build on a linux machine. Reporter: BJ Freeman Priority: Minor the will download http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ofbiz-trunk-current.zip into the ofbiz home directory optinally stop the running application (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) clean the logs unzip the downloaded file. optionally copies saved backup of entityengine.xml (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) optionally copies save back of framework/base/config/ofbiz-containers.xml (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) deletes the download zip file optionally changes the ownership (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) optionally copies the ofbiz.jar to the user name (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) optionally starts ofbiz (has to be modified buy user- is commented out) I also include a sh file -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: svn commit: r934506 - in /ofbiz/site: css/global.css index.html
When this change will be updated to the online web site?
2010/4/15
> Author: jleroux
> Date: Thu Apr 15 18:19:38 2010
> New Revision: 934506
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=934506&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a new Screenshoots entry in the main tab bar.
> I add to stretch things a bit (CSS), but nothing dramatic
>
> Modified:
>ofbiz/site/css/global.css
>ofbiz/site/index.html
>
> Modified: ofbiz/site/css/global.css
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/site/css/global.css?rev=934506&r1=934505&r2=934506&view=diff
>
> ==
> --- ofbiz/site/css/global.css (original)
> +++ ofbiz/site/css/global.css Thu Apr 15 18:19:38 2010
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ input.button {
> #nav ul {
> float: left;
> list-style: none;
> -width: 600px;
> +width: 650px;
> height: 34px;
> text-transform: uppercase;
> margin: 0;
> @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ input.button {
> #nav ul li a {
> float: left;
> margin: 0 5px 0 0;
> -padding: 0px 20px 0px 20px;
> +padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px;
> font: bold 12px/ 34px "Trebuchet MS", Helvetica, Arial, Geneva,
> sans-serif;
> text-transform: lowercase;
> text-decoration: none;
>
> Modified: ofbiz/site/index.html
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/site/index.html?rev=934506&r1=934505&r2=934506&view=diff
>
> ==
> --- ofbiz/site/index.html (original)
> +++ ofbiz/site/index.html Thu Apr 15 18:19:38 2010
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> Documentation
> Download
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/L4B2
> ">Community
> +http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/f4AHAQ
> ">Screenshoots
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
I will contact ASF Infra today and let you know as soon as I have more information. Thank you, Jacopo On Apr 16, 2010, at 12:11 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > There seems to be quite a bit of interest in keeping it. Which of those who > feels it is important to keep the domain will work with ASF infra to get it > transferred? > > AFAIK there are two parts to this: > > 1. transfer the domain name to whatever registrar the ASF prefers > 2. set up DNS entries for whatever DNs are desired > > For part #1, just let me know when to turn off the domain lock and I'll do it > so that the registrar can be changed (it's with register.com right now). For > #2 I'm not sure what the full list of DNS settings looks like as that has > been handled by contegix for a while, so I guess whoever takes this on will > need to research that and then send the details to the ASF to get it setup. > > -David > > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> >> My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this >> year. >> >> This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or >> let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything >> official related to the project)? >> >> There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed >> any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The >> ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the >> foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, >> while others have just let the old domain go). >> >> What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? >> >> -David >> >> >
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
I'm sure ASF-infra is up to their eyeballs in doo-doo right now thanks to the JIRA break-in. I know I've got $10 for you if you could pay to renew it and give ASF-infra some time to finish laundering their undershorts. - "David E Jones" wrote: > There seems to be quite a bit of interest in keeping it. Which of those who > feels it is important to keep the domain will work with ASF infra to get it > transferred? > AFAIK there are two parts to this: > 1. transfer the domain name to whatever registrar the ASF prefers > 2. set up DNS entries for whatever DNs are desired > For part #1, just let me know when to turn off the domain lock and I'll do it > so that the registrar can be changed (it's with register.com right now). For > #2 I'm not sure what the full list of DNS settings looks like as that has > been handled by contegix for a while, so I guess whoever takes this on will > need to research that and then send the details to the ASF to get it setup. -- Ean Schuessler
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857663#action_12857663 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3490: --- A thought occurs to me that with Multi tenant, there will be a need to let the tenant create there own theme. so this may be a mute point since that code would be in the content component. > Create theme build script > - > > Key: OFBIZ-3490 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk > Environment: ant build >Reporter: BJ Freeman >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: themebutildpatch.txt, themesbuild.txt > > > I liked the build script for a new component, so I decided to make one for > themes. > unfortunately I am not able to do a patch so included the script. > I made it so you can pick a theme as the template and copy the files over to > the new theme. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: svn commit: r930321 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
Scott Gray wrote: > On 8/04/2010, at 3:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> On 6/04/2010, at 7:48 AM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: Le 02/04/2010 18:47, doo...@apache.org a écrit : > Author: doogie > Date: Fri Apr 2 16:47:22 2010 > New Revision: 930321 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930321&view=rev > Log: > Add OrderItem relation on OrderItemGroup. > > Modified: >ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > > Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=930321&r1=930320&r2=930321&view=diff > > == > > --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) > +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Fri Apr > 2 16:47:22 2010 > @@ -760,6 +760,10 @@ under the License. > > > > + > + > + > + > rel-entity-name="OrderHeader"> > > > > > Why adding this relation as it is automatically created with this relation in OrderItem entity ? >>> rel-entity-name="OrderItemGroup"> >>> Let me check when I get back to work. Might end up removing this commit. > > Are you on an extended holiday? No, thanks for reminding me. It's still on my list.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3653) CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857623#action_12857623
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza commented on OFBIZ-3653:
--
I've added 4 new screenshots to show the effect of the patch. Those starting
with OFBIZ-3653
As can be seen in the halign example, the previous small vertical misalignment
between selects and text fields disappear.
The listform don't need comments, it is clear enough by itself.
> CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: themes
>Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>Reporter: Blas Rodriguez Somoza
>Assignee: Bruno Busco
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-3653_after2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_after2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_before2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_before2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_css.diff, pagination_select.JPG,
> tomahawk_chrome_after.jpg, tomahawk_chrome_before.jpg, tomahawk_ff_after.jpg,
> tomahawk_ff_before.jpg, tomahawk_ie_after.jpg, tomahawk_ie_before.jpg
>
>
> The css style of select tag in style.css
> uses an height which is 1.6em when the height of text input is (1.1em + 0.4em
> * 2 + 0.1em * 2) = 2.1 em
> this gives a ugly look and in IE could cut the lower part of the text.
> existing style.css:
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 1.6em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.1em;
> }
> input[type="text"],input[type="password"] {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border:0.1em solid #99;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding:0.4em 0;
> }
> The proposed css style for select is the following (height and margin
> changed, padding added)
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 2.1em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding: 0.1em;
> }
> The result in IE is not good because IE 7 don't support select styling
> correctly, but it is better than previously.
> Attached images of FF 3.5 , IE 7 and Chrome with the existing style and the
> proposed one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3653) CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3653:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3653_after2_halign.jpg
> CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: themes
>Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>Reporter: Blas Rodriguez Somoza
>Assignee: Bruno Busco
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-3653_after2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_after2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_before2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_before2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_css.diff, pagination_select.JPG,
> tomahawk_chrome_after.jpg, tomahawk_chrome_before.jpg, tomahawk_ff_after.jpg,
> tomahawk_ff_before.jpg, tomahawk_ie_after.jpg, tomahawk_ie_before.jpg
>
>
> The css style of select tag in style.css
> uses an height which is 1.6em when the height of text input is (1.1em + 0.4em
> * 2 + 0.1em * 2) = 2.1 em
> this gives a ugly look and in IE could cut the lower part of the text.
> existing style.css:
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 1.6em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.1em;
> }
> input[type="text"],input[type="password"] {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border:0.1em solid #99;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding:0.4em 0;
> }
> The proposed css style for select is the following (height and margin
> changed, padding added)
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 2.1em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding: 0.1em;
> }
> The result in IE is not good because IE 7 don't support select styling
> correctly, but it is better than previously.
> Attached images of FF 3.5 , IE 7 and Chrome with the existing style and the
> proposed one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3653) CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3653:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-3653_before2_listform.jpg
OFBIZ-3653_before2_halign.jpg
OFBIZ-3653_after2_listform.jpg
> CSS Style for select wrong in tomahawk theme
>
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3653
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: themes
>Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>Reporter: Blas Rodriguez Somoza
>Assignee: Bruno Busco
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: SVN trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-3653_after2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_after2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_before2_halign.jpg,
> OFBIZ-3653_before2_listform.jpg, OFBIZ-3653_css.diff, pagination_select.JPG,
> tomahawk_chrome_after.jpg, tomahawk_chrome_before.jpg, tomahawk_ff_after.jpg,
> tomahawk_ff_before.jpg, tomahawk_ie_after.jpg, tomahawk_ie_before.jpg
>
>
> The css style of select tag in style.css
> uses an height which is 1.6em when the height of text input is (1.1em + 0.4em
> * 2 + 0.1em * 2) = 2.1 em
> this gives a ugly look and in IE could cut the lower part of the text.
> existing style.css:
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 1.6em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.1em;
> }
> input[type="text"],input[type="password"] {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border:0.1em solid #99;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding:0.4em 0;
> }
> The proposed css style for select is the following (height and margin
> changed, padding added)
> select {
> background-color: #fffcea;
> border: #99 solid 0.1em;
> font-size: 1.1em;
> height: 2.1em; /* force ctrl to scale with text */
> margin: 0.2em;
> padding: 0.1em;
> }
> The result in IE is not good because IE 7 don't support select styling
> correctly, but it is better than previously.
> Attached images of FF 3.5 , IE 7 and Chrome with the existing style and the
> proposed one.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: svn commit: r930321 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
On 8/04/2010, at 3:26 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > On 6/04/2010, at 7:48 AM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >>> Le 02/04/2010 18:47, doo...@apache.org a écrit : Author: doogie Date: Fri Apr 2 16:47:22 2010 New Revision: 930321 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930321&view=rev Log: Add OrderItem relation on OrderItemGroup. Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=930321&r1=930320&r2=930321&view=diff == --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Fri Apr 2 16:47:22 2010 @@ -760,6 +760,10 @@ under the License. + + + + >>> rel-entity-name="OrderHeader"> >>> >>> Why adding this relation as it is automatically created with this >>> relation in OrderItem entity ? >>> >> rel-entity-name="OrderItemGroup"> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Let me check when I get back to work. Might end up removing this commit. Are you on an extended holiday? > > [ModelReader.java:386:INFO ] Entity > [org.ofbiz.order.order:OrderItemGroup] already has identical relationship to > entity [OrderItem] title []; would auto-create: type [many] and fields > [orderId,orderItemGroupSeqId] > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
I'll do it if no ones steps up in the next day or two, although I'd prefer not to have to. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/04/2010, at 10:11 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > There seems to be quite a bit of interest in keeping it. Which of those who > feels it is important to keep the domain will work with ASF infra to get it > transferred? > > AFAIK there are two parts to this: > > 1. transfer the domain name to whatever registrar the ASF prefers > 2. set up DNS entries for whatever DNs are desired > > For part #1, just let me know when to turn off the domain lock and I'll do it > so that the registrar can be changed (it's with register.com right now). For > #2 I'm not sure what the full list of DNS settings looks like as that has > been handled by contegix for a while, so I guess whoever takes this on will > need to research that and then send the details to the ASF to get it setup. > > -David > > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, David E Jones wrote: > >> >> My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this >> year. >> >> This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or >> let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything >> official related to the project)? >> >> There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed >> any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The >> ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the >> foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, >> while others have just let the old domain go). >> >> What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? >> >> -David >> >> > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
There seems to be quite a bit of interest in keeping it. Which of those who feels it is important to keep the domain will work with ASF infra to get it transferred? AFAIK there are two parts to this: 1. transfer the domain name to whatever registrar the ASF prefers 2. set up DNS entries for whatever DNs are desired For part #1, just let me know when to turn off the domain lock and I'll do it so that the registrar can be changed (it's with register.com right now). For #2 I'm not sure what the full list of DNS settings looks like as that has been handled by contegix for a while, so I guess whoever takes this on will need to research that and then send the details to the ASF to get it setup. -David On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, David E Jones wrote: > > My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this > year. > > This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let > it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything > official related to the project)? > > There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed > any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The > ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the > foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, > while others have just let the old domain go). > > What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? > > -David > >
Re: [jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3666) Errors attempting to use quantities with more than 2 decimals of precision
Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855435#action_12855435 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3666: No, the type conversion hasn't changed. The issue is there is no type to convert to. Quantity should be a type, and Money should be a type. Strong data typing would prevent applying quantity precision to a money, and money precision to a quantity. Not replying to jira just yet. I'm interested in working on typed-Foo conversion, in a generic fashion. Might need to add yet another library, maybe a Units library, time to do a google search. http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=275
Re: demo.ofbiz.org
Thanks Ruppert, much appreciated. Regards Scott On 16/04/2010, at 4:13 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > The redirects have been updated - check them out and let me know if there are > any issues. It should work from the old release branches and the trunk. > > Cheers, > Ruppert > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > >> Yep - I'll get on that straight away. >> >> Cheers, >> Ruppert >> >> On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Scott Gray wrote: >> >>> Hey Ruppert, >>> >>> Is there any way we can get the demo.ofbiz.org redirect to point to >>> demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org? It looks like it's still pointing to >>> ofbiz-vm.apache.org. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Scott >>> >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> On 15/04/2010, at 5:48 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >>> I don't know - I'm still waiting for access to actually happen ... Cheers, Ruppert -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Adam Heath wrote: > What's the story with this? It's not working at all, I get not found > errors on all backend pages. >>> >> > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Add passwordResponse to SurveyResponseAnswer
Does anyone mind if I add a new field passwordResponse to SurveyResponseAnswer with encrypted="true"? I'd like to add a little more security to SurveyQuestions of type PASSWORD. Any thoughts are welcome. Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Ruth, I disagree with you on point number 2. Ofbiz.org is not just a domain name. The name OFBiz is a product, and a brand-able, trademark-able product at that. So, while the domain may not have as much brand value as apple.com, microsoft.com, or, from an open source perspective, wordpress.com; the same principle applies. So even though WordPress is widely distributed and thousands of people make boatloads of money selling themes, customizations, implementation, etc. I think you would have a very tough trying to get anyone to sell you the wordpress.org or the wordpress.com domain. The license for OFBiz resides with Apache, so the domain should reside with them as well. The brand name, OFBiz, is intellectual property and any derivatives of that name including ofbiz.org, ofbiz.net, ofbiz.com, etc are part of the intellectual property. As far as your commercial success goes, I think you should make money. Lots and lots of money. If you spend time and effort writing good books that provide valuable information, what's wrong with making a profit on them? Most, if not all of the information contained in the 50-60 books I own on design and development could have been found combing through resources on the internet, but I bought them because the were well written, information books. I own every book that Zeldman wrote on CSS, but I don't think he ever tried to register css.org -- he can't, because it's owned by The Colorado Springs School luck bastards ;-) Ryan Foster HotWax Media 801.671.0769 ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:08 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Ruth, >> >> From: "Ruth Hoffman" >>> Hi Jacques: >>> >>> Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at least >>> juxtapose it with the "big boys" :-) >>> >>> Just to clear the air: >>> >>> 1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other commercially >>> viable entity. It is a domain name and a server running an instance of >>> OFBiz. >>> >>> 2) Like myOFBiz.com, ofbiz.org is only a domain name. Both have no >>> intellectual property or other proprietary resources that could be sold. >>> The only thing that can be sold, in either case, is the domain name. Which, >>> I have to admit for ofbiz.org has brand recognition - at least today. That >>> is why I'm interested in it. . >>> >>> 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a >>> sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. >> >> Less meaning? Why? > Because it has been superseded by the Apache brand. IMO, if the Apache brand > catches on, then the ofbiz.org brand will fade. And we all want the Apache > brand to succeed. That ofbiz.org does not (and should not) compete with > Apache is a good thing. Better to just put it to rest and be done with it. > I'm not against ASF having it, I just wanted to continue to market and push > it as a complement to the ASF brand. >>> If project committers and other OFBiz devotees wish to worship at the >>> ofbiz.org shrine, then who am I to ask "why?". It is you belief that >>> ofbiz.org has value. I'm very progressive in at least this regard: I >>> believe, "to each his/her own". >> >> "to each his/her own": a new idiom for me > How about, "live and let live". >> >>> On a related note, do you feel that there is something wrong with >>> commercial success? What I mean is, why can't OFBiz enjoy some "commercial" >>> success? Or maybe I should ask, what do you mean by "commercial"? >> >> To paraphrase a famous predecessor <> that.>> :D > Ok, fair. Sorry. I didn't mean any disrespect. >> >> Jacques >> PS: BTW I wish you all the best with myOfbiz.com. Because I know it will be >> good for OFBiz and the community at large... > Thanks. I am certainly trying to make it so! > Regards, > Ruth >> >>> Kind Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/.
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3424) Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-3424: -- Attachment: OFBIZ-3424.diff should be good with this one. > Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24 > > > Key: OFBIZ-3424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3424.diff, OFBIZ-3424.diff, > tomcat-6.0.24-annotations-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-ha.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-tribes.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-catalina.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-el-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-el.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-jdt.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jasper.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jsp-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-servlet-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-coyote.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-dbcp.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-juli.jar > > > 3 security issues have been released today for Tomcat, asking to migrate to > the latest version : > CVE-2009-2902: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion in work directory > CVE-2009-2901: Apache Tomcat insecure partial deploy after failed undeploy > CVE-2009-3548: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion and/or alteration -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Thanks Ruth. Nothing against your site but this is exactly the reason why I think the community should retain ofbiz.org even if the ASF won't take it up. Regards Scott On 15/04/2010, at 11:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Scott: > I'd eventually replace the myofbiz.com domain with ofbiz.org. Myofbiz.com > Its still all about OFBiz documentation and eventually training materials, so > clearly there is a link. FYI, I've been told that "myofbiz" is sometimes > misinterpreted (by some people) as, well, something I never thought of... > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > Scott Gray wrote: >> Hi Ruth, >> >> Out of interest, what would you do with it? >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 15/04/2010, at 11:31 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Hi David: >>> If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it. >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>> ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com >>> >>> David E Jones wrote: >>> My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -David >> >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3424) Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857505#action_12857505 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3424: --- it has some unprintable characters in it. > Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24 > > > Key: OFBIZ-3424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3424.diff, tomcat-6.0.24-annotations-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-ha.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-tribes.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-el-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-el.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-jdt.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jsp-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-servlet-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-coyote.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-dbcp.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-juli.jar > > > 3 security issues have been released today for Tomcat, asking to migrate to > the latest version : > CVE-2009-2902: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion in work directory > CVE-2009-2901: Apache Tomcat insecure partial deploy after failed undeploy > CVE-2009-3548: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion and/or alteration -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Ruth Hoffman wrote: 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. Less meaning? Why? Because it has been superseded by the Apache brand. IMO, if the Apache brand catches on, then the ofbiz.org brand will fade. And we all want the Apache brand to succeed. That ofbiz.org does not (and should not) compete with Apache is a good thing. Better to just put it to rest and be done with it. I'm not against ASF having it, I just wanted to continue to market and push it as a complement to the ASF brand. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. One thing I would like to mention (for the benefit of any newcomers) is that OFBiz joined the ASF for these reasons: http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html#why As a relatively small community it was a smart move to place ourselves under the ASF umbrella because it relieved us of the legal and financial burdens mentioned in the FAQ. I don't believe anyone in the community saw that change as a way to relinquish the OFBiz brand and replace it with Apache. On that point you are completely wrong. -Adrian
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Jacques Le Roux wrote: Ruth, From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jacques: Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at least juxtapose it with the "big boys" :-) Just to clear the air: 1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other commercially viable entity. It is a domain name and a server running an instance of OFBiz. 2) Like myOFBiz.com, ofbiz.org is only a domain name. Both have no intellectual property or other proprietary resources that could be sold. The only thing that can be sold, in either case, is the domain name. Which, I have to admit for ofbiz.org has brand recognition - at least today. That is why I'm interested in it. . 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. Less meaning? Why? Because it has been superseded by the Apache brand. IMO, if the Apache brand catches on, then the ofbiz.org brand will fade. And we all want the Apache brand to succeed. That ofbiz.org does not (and should not) compete with Apache is a good thing. Better to just put it to rest and be done with it. I'm not against ASF having it, I just wanted to continue to market and push it as a complement to the ASF brand. If project committers and other OFBiz devotees wish to worship at the ofbiz.org shrine, then who am I to ask "why?". It is you belief that ofbiz.org has value. I'm very progressive in at least this regard: I believe, "to each his/her own". "to each his/her own": a new idiom for me How about, "live and let live". On a related note, do you feel that there is something wrong with commercial success? What I mean is, why can't OFBiz enjoy some "commercial" success? Or maybe I should ask, what do you mean by "commercial"? To paraphrase a famous predecessor> :D Ok, fair. Sorry. I didn't mean any disrespect. Jacques PS: BTW I wish you all the best with myOfbiz.com. Because I know it will be good for OFBiz and the community at large... Thanks. I am certainly trying to make it so! Regards, Ruth Kind Regards, Ruth Thanks Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. My 2 cts Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3424) Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857481#action_12857481 ] Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3424: --- You may need to remove the part where the props are changed. I think that only the classpath and the CrossSubdomainSessionValve.java are necessary > Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24 > > > Key: OFBIZ-3424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3424.diff, tomcat-6.0.24-annotations-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-ha.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-tribes.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-el-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-el.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-jdt.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jsp-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-servlet-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-coyote.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-dbcp.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-juli.jar > > > 3 security issues have been released today for Tomcat, asking to migrate to > the latest version : > CVE-2009-2902: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion in work directory > CVE-2009-2901: Apache Tomcat insecure partial deploy after failed undeploy > CVE-2009-3548: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion and/or alteration -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3424) Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857479#action_12857479 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3424: --- having trouble with the diff file. what do I need to do to be able to use it? > Upgrade Tomcat version to 6.0.24 > > > Key: OFBIZ-3424 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3424 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: framework >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Erwan de FERRIERES > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3424.diff, tomcat-6.0.24-annotations-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-ha.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-catalina-tribes.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-catalina.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-el-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-el.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jasper-jdt.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-jasper.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-jsp-api.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-servlet-api.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-coyote.jar, > tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-dbcp.jar, tomcat-6.0.24-tomcat-juli.jar > > > 3 security issues have been released today for Tomcat, asking to migrate to > the latest version : > CVE-2009-2902: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion in work directory > CVE-2009-2901: Apache Tomcat insecure partial deploy after failed undeploy > CVE-2009-3548: Apache Tomcat unexpected file deletion and/or alteration -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857462#action_12857462 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3672: Done at r934506 > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3490) Create theme build script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857460#action_12857460 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3490: --- good enough for a start can always improve latter if the inclination hits me. > Create theme build script > - > > Key: OFBIZ-3490 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3490 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Affects Versions: Release Branch 9.04, SVN trunk > Environment: ant build >Reporter: BJ Freeman >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: themebutildpatch.txt, themesbuild.txt > > > I liked the build script for a new component, so I decided to make one for > themes. > unfortunately I am not able to do a patch so included the script. > I made it so you can pick a theme as the template and copy the files over to > the new theme. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857453#action_12857453 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3672: Sure, and a page for ecommerce also (hopefully with a new theme). > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857450#action_12857450 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3672: Hopefully some people will contribute some new screenshots in other themes and we could then have a page per theme... > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857447#action_12857447 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3672: I will right now, thanks Bruno! > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857443#action_12857443 ] Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-3672: I added some description also but please feel free to change them. BTW I think we should add a direct "Screenshots" link to this page in the main website page top bar. Could someone do this? > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3704) Store supplierProductId in OrderItems for Purchase Orders
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Eckard updated OFBIZ-3704: -- Attachment: supplierProductId.patch I have these changes staged in git ready for a commit, just putting a patch here for review. > Store supplierProductId in OrderItems for Purchase Orders > - > > Key: OFBIZ-3704 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3704 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: order >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Joe Eckard >Assignee: Joe Eckard >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: supplierProductId.patch > > > Store supplierProductId as a field of OrderItem for purchase orders so that > it can be retrieved later. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3704) Store supplierProductId in OrderItems for Purchase Orders
Store supplierProductId in OrderItems for Purchase Orders - Key: OFBIZ-3704 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3704 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: order Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Joe Eckard Assignee: Joe Eckard Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Store supplierProductId as a field of OrderItem for purchase orders so that it can be retrieved later. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Automatic return from theme change
Hi, Is threre a reason why we don't automatically return where we were from a template change like we do for language change? Thanks Jacques
Lookups desccriptions
Hi, At r933130 Bilgin introduced a nice feature which allows to show the related descriptions (if exist) of Ids used/rendered in lookups fields. There is also a showDescription lookup attribute to hide if needed. I wonder if we could not show them by default (Bilgin set the widget.lookup.showDescription to N in widget.properties) and hide descriptions where they will be annoying (for instance in the Catalog main/landing page left column ) Jacques
Enlarge the left column of the Product main page
Hi, By default the Product main page is the OFBiz landing page. I wonder if we could not enlarge it a bit because, since theme introduction, things are a little cramped there for some themes (and also depending on language used) Jacques
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3672) Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bruno Busco closed OFBIZ-3672. -- Assignee: Bruno Busco Resolution: Fixed A new page in the Wiki has been created: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Screenshots Here screenshots are visible as a gallery slideshow. Please fill free to add/change any screenshot you think is good to show. > Adding a screenshots section to the OFBiz web site > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3672 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3672 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature >Reporter: Bruno Busco >Assignee: Bruno Busco > Attachments: applications_menu.jpg, catalog.jpg, content.jpg, > help.jpg, language_selection.jpg, login.jpg, lookup.jpg, order_list.jpg, > order_reports.jpg, order_requests.jpg, product_features.jpg, > product_stores.jpg, project_my_tasks.jpg, theme_selection.jpg > > > Some time ago we have discussed about the creation of a "screenshots" section > in the OFBiz web site. > Now that the UI has been improved I think this section would be even more > beneficial for the project. > Please find attached to this JIRA some screenshots I have selected. I do not > know how and where these should be placed in the web site. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3555) Show lookup value descriptions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857422#action_12857422 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3555: Hi Bilgin, It seems that it works well for form lookups but not from FTL templates. It sounds weird since they use almost the same flow. Could I miss something or is it not yet implemented? To easily try you may use the OFBIZ-3442 patch and maybe the issue is actually in this patch... Thanks > Show lookup value descriptions > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3555 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3555 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: framework >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Bilgin Ibryam >Assignee: Bilgin Ibryam >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: lookup_description.patch, lookup_description.patch, > lookup_description.patch > > > I did a small extention to lookup autocompleter code and now it is able to > load description for the lookup field values. > For example when you load a form with lookup fields, currently you see only > the Id in the lookup field (which is not very descriptive). After applying > the patch, you will see also a description, next to lookup button. The > description value is the same one that appears in the autocompler and it is > specifiued for in each lookup screen. > You will see the description also when a value is returned from a lookup > screen or when a value is selected from autocompleter or when you type a > valid Id in the lookup field. > Internally it does an ajax call to get the description for the supplied value > in lookup field. > I'd like to know if you want to see this feature in ofbiz and/or if you have > any ideas to improve it. > Bilgin -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Ruth, From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jacques: Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at least juxtapose it with the "big boys" :-) Just to clear the air: 1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other commercially viable entity. It is a domain name and a server running an instance of OFBiz. 2) Like myOFBiz.com, ofbiz.org is only a domain name. Both have no intellectual property or other proprietary resources that could be sold. The only thing that can be sold, in either case, is the domain name. Which, I have to admit for ofbiz.org has brand recognition - at least today. That is why I'm interested in it. . 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. Less meaning? Why? If project committers and other OFBiz devotees wish to worship at the ofbiz.org shrine, then who am I to ask "why?". It is you belief that ofbiz.org has value. I'm very progressive in at least this regard: I believe, "to each his/her own". "to each his/her own": a new idiom for me On a related note, do you feel that there is something wrong with commercial success? What I mean is, why can't OFBiz enjoy some "commercial" success? Or maybe I should ask, what do you mean by "commercial"? To paraphrase a famous predecessor <> :D Jacques PS: BTW I wish you all the best with myOfbiz.com. Because I know it will be good for OFBiz and the community at large... Kind Regards, Ruth Thanks Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. My 2 cts Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jacopo: > I guess that clears up my confusion. Could you just clarify one thing for me? > > According to the conference submission notes, the OFBiz PMC is suppose to > handle technical/community proposal submissions. It seems as though you are > not aware of that. Would that be the case? I am aware of that note, that is why I contacted them; but they told me that they will evaluate all the proposals regardless and no action is required by the PMC. Jacopo > Regards, > Ruth > > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> My guess is that you can submit them in the same way. >> >> Jacopo >> >> On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Jacopo: >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I have >>> an email address for the business tracks. How about the technical/community >>> ones? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> >>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Erwan: > I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that > because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about > technical track proposals, that there would be none. > Even if no member of the PMC will attend the conference (and the Project will not be officially represented there) it doesn't mean that your proposals will be discarded. In fact I have contacted the Chair of the Business & Community Tracks at ApacheCon and I have been reassured that your (or anyone else) proposals will never be rejected because of lack of action from the PMC. Jacopo > I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to > present. > How do I go about submitting same? > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline >> is at the end of the month. >> >> http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> >>
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
Hi Jacopo: I guess that clears up my confusion. Could you just clarify one thing for me? According to the conference submission notes, the OFBiz PMC is suppose to handle technical/community proposal submissions. It seems as though you are not aware of that. Would that be the case? Regards, Ruth Jacopo Cappellato wrote: My guess is that you can submit them in the same way. Jacopo On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi Jacopo: Thanks. Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I have an email address for the business tracks. How about the technical/community ones? Regards, Ruth Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi Erwan: I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about technical track proposals, that there would be none. Even if no member of the PMC will attend the conference (and the Project will not be officially represented there) it doesn't mean that your proposals will be discarded. In fact I have contacted the Chair of the Business & Community Tracks at ApacheCon and I have been reassured that your (or anyone else) proposals will never be rejected because of lack of action from the PMC. Jacopo I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present. How do I go about submitting same? Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: Hi all, Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at the end of the month. http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ Cheers,
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
David E Jones wrote: > My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this > year. > > This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let > it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything > official related to the project)? > > There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed > any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The > ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the > foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, > while others have just let the old domain go). > > What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? I'd say keep it, it's easier to remember in my honest opinion.
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
My guess is that you can submit them in the same way. Jacopo On Apr 15, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jacopo: > > Thanks. > > Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I have > an email address for the business tracks. How about the technical/community > ones? > > Regards, > Ruth > > > Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> Hi Erwan: >>> I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that >>> because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about >>> technical track proposals, that there would be none. >>> >> >> Even if no member of the PMC will attend the conference (and the Project >> will not be officially represented there) it doesn't mean that your >> proposals will be discarded. >> In fact I have contacted the Chair of the Business & Community Tracks at >> ApacheCon and I have been reassured that your (or anyone else) proposals >> will never be rejected because of lack of action from the PMC. >> >> Jacopo >> >> >>> I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present. >>> How do I go about submitting same? >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>> ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com >>> >>> Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >>> Hi all, Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at the end of the month. http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ Cheers, >> >> >>
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
Hi Jacopo: Thanks. Where should I send proposals for technical/community presentations? I have an email address for the business tracks. How about the technical/community ones? Regards, Ruth Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi Erwan: I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about technical track proposals, that there would be none. Even if no member of the PMC will attend the conference (and the Project will not be officially represented there) it doesn't mean that your proposals will be discarded. In fact I have contacted the Chair of the Business & Community Tracks at ApacheCon and I have been reassured that your (or anyone else) proposals will never be rejected because of lack of action from the PMC. Jacopo I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present. How do I go about submitting same? Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: Hi all, Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at the end of the month. http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ Cheers,
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Erwan: > I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that > because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about technical > track proposals, that there would be none. Even if no member of the PMC will attend the conference (and the Project will not be officially represented there) it doesn't mean that your proposals will be discarded. In fact I have contacted the Chair of the Business & Community Tracks at ApacheCon and I have been reassured that your (or anyone else) proposals will never be rejected because of lack of action from the PMC. Jacopo > I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present. > How do I go about submitting same? > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at >> the end of the month. >> >> http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ >> >> >> Cheers, >>
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Ruth, I disagree with you on point number 2. Ofbiz.org is not just a domain name. The name OFBiz is a product, and a brand-able, trademark-able product at that. So, while the domain may not have as much brand value as apple.com, microsoft.com, or, from an open source perspective, wordpress.com; the same principle applies. So even though WordPress is widely distributed and thousands of people make boatloads of money selling themes, customizations, implementation, etc. I think you would have a very tough trying to get anyone to sell you the wordpress.org or the wordpress.com domain. The license for OFBiz resides with Apache, so the domain should reside with them as well. The brand name, OFBiz, is intellectual property and any derivatives of that name including ofbiz.org, ofbiz.net, ofbiz.com, etc are part of the intellectual property. As far as your commercial success goes, I think you should make money. Lots and lots of money. If you spend time and effort writing good books that provide valuable information, what's wrong with making a profit on them? Most, if not all of the information contained in the 50-60 books I own on design and development could have been found combing through resources on the internet, but I bought them because the were well written, information books. I know every book that Zeldman wrote on CSS, but I don't think he ever tried to register css.org -- he can't, because it's owned by The Colorado Springs School luck bastards ;-) Ryan Foster HotWax Media 801.671.0769 ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jacques: > > Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at least > juxtapose it with the "big boys" :-) > > Just to clear the air: > > 1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other commercially > viable entity. It is a domain name and a server running an instance of OFBiz. > > 2) Like myOFBiz.com, ofbiz.org is only a domain name. Both have no > intellectual property or other proprietary resources that could be sold. The > only thing that can be sold, in either case, is the domain name. Which, I > have to admit for ofbiz.org has brand recognition - at least today. That is > why I'm interested in it. . > > 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a > sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. If > project committers and other OFBiz devotees wish to worship at the ofbiz.org > shrine, then who am I to ask "why?". It is you belief that ofbiz.org has > value. I'm very progressive in at least this regard: I believe, "to each > his/her own". > > On a related note, do you feel that there is something wrong with commercial > success? What I mean is, why can't OFBiz enjoy some "commercial" success? Or > maybe I should ask, what do you mean by "commercial"? > > Kind Regards, > Ruth > > Thanks > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: >> Hi Ruth, >> >> I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition >> like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should >> remain a community name. >> >> It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But >> who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard >> to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to >> trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened >> recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty >> lost its 1st place as a language >> http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may >> also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT >> history is cluttered of such cases. >> >> Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has >> been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which >> point though) see "How to make money from open source" at >> http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. >> >> My 2 cts >> >> Jacques >> >> From: "Ruth Hoffman" >>> Hi Jeroen: >>> If this was a directed to me, then: >>> >>> 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission >>> has always been to provide high quality affordable >>> learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is >>> anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project >>> committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a >>> nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm >>> not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor >>> of love. >>> >>> 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will >>> help pay for the server and hosting, quality content >>> creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing >>> materials...and I could go on. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>>
Re: demo.ofbiz.org
The redirects have been updated - check them out and let me know if there are any issues. It should work from the old release branches and the trunk. Cheers, Ruppert On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:14 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote: > Yep - I'll get on that straight away. > > Cheers, > Ruppert > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Hey Ruppert, >> >> Is there any way we can get the demo.ofbiz.org redirect to point to >> demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org? It looks like it's still pointing to >> ofbiz-vm.apache.org. >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 15/04/2010, at 5:48 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote: >> >>> I don't know - I'm still waiting for access to actually happen ... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ruppert >>> -- >>> Tim Ruppert >>> HotWax Media >>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>> >>> o:801.649.6594 >>> f:801.649.6595 >>> >>> On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> What's the story with this? It's not working at all, I get not found errors on all backend pages. >>> >> >
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Ean: Good reason to try and get ASF to keep it. (No disrespect intended but, need I mention, underneath all this, is the "commercial" reality that your comment implies.) Regards, Ruth Ean Schuessler wrote: It would cause major damage to our Google search placement to drop all the pages in their database on the ofbiz.org domain. We should, at least, keep it for another year with permanent redirects on all URLs to the Apache equivalent. My $0.02. David E Jones wrote: My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around?
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Jeroen: I understand your position and respect your beliefs. I happen to disagree. My "love" is better expressed elsewhere. I think it was Groucho Marx who said it best, and I paraphrase: "Please accept my appologies. I don't want to belong to any club that would accept people like me as a member". Kind Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: Hi Ruth, To me it's very simple: Ofbiz Community = ofbiz.apache.org = ofbiz.org And if you want to express your love that's the place! -Jeroen On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Jacques: Wow, I'm flattered that you would compare myOFBiz.com to Java! Or at least juxtapose it with the "big boys" :-) Just to clear the air: 1) myOFBiz.com is not an organization, company or any other commercially viable entity. It is a domain name and a server running an instance of OFBiz. 2) Like myOFBiz.com, ofbiz.org is only a domain name. Both have no intellectual property or other proprietary resources that could be sold. The only thing that can be sold, in either case, is the domain name. Which, I have to admit for ofbiz.org has brand recognition - at least today. That is why I'm interested in it. . 3) I fully understand your position. IMO the ofbiz.org domain is not a sacred icon. In fact, as each day goes by, it has less and less meaning. If project committers and other OFBiz devotees wish to worship at the ofbiz.org shrine, then who am I to ask "why?". It is you belief that ofbiz.org has value. I'm very progressive in at least this regard: I believe, "to each his/her own". On a related note, do you feel that there is something wrong with commercial success? What I mean is, why can't OFBiz enjoy some "commercial" success? Or maybe I should ask, what do you mean by "commercial"? Kind Regards, Ruth Thanks Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. My 2 cts Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
It would cause major damage to our Google search placement to drop all the pages in their database on the ofbiz.org domain. We should, at least, keep it for another year with permanent redirects on all URLs to the Apache equivalent. My $0.02. David E Jones wrote: My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -- Ean Schuessler, CTO e...@brainfood.com 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi all, As a user of Ofbiz i would like the domain stay in control of the OfBiz project or ASF like it is (a redirect to http://ofbiz.apache.org/ ), Best regards, Le 4/15/10 2:27 PM, Ruth Hoffman a écrit : Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Ruth, To me it's very simple: Ofbiz Community = ofbiz.apache.org = ofbiz.org And if you want to express your love that's the place! -Jeroen On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jeroen: > If this was a directed to me, then: > > 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has > always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the > community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz > materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford > to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, > I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a > labor of love. > > 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will > help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, > professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. > > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > Jeroen van der Wal wrote: >> >> I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If >> the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in >> order to keep the domain within the community. >> >
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
For Tiobe indice, http://www.ohloh.net/languages?sort=commits seems better to follow Open source projects... Anyway all this is very rough Jacques from.: "Jacques Le Roux" Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. My 2 cts Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Ruth, I'm sorry to say that I agree with Jeroen. I'd never have made a proposition like yours: for me ofbiz.org is clearly and should remain a community name. It's not directed against you, because I believe in your faith in OFBiz. But who knows what will happen with your effort? It's hard to trust people, even when you have a good feeling, but it's even harder to trust organizations. Look for instance at what happened recently to Java now owned by Oracle (and BTW according to Tiobe recenlty lost its 1st place as a language http://www.tiobe.com/index.php/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html), MySql may also suffer for the same reason, and we know the IT history is cluttered of such cases. Also I was already dissapointed by the Opentaps experience. Even if Si has been almost clear about his intentions (not sure at which point though) see "How to make money from open source" at http://www.opensourcestrategies.org/. My 2 cts Jacques From: "Ruth Hoffman" Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3703. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks Arun for the contribution - Committed at r934389. -- Ashish Vijaywargiya > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch, OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-3703: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch, OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Jeroen: If this was a directed to me, then: 1) My enterprise is not a money making, "commercial" concern. My mission has always been to provide high quality affordable learning resources to the community at large. My view of the "community" is anyone looking for OFBiz materials, not just project committers. The only way I can possible afford to do that is charge a nominal fee for some of these books. And, believe me, I'm not making any money on this endeavor. As I've said before, it is a labor of love. 2) Want to donate money to help the cause? Buy some of my books. You will help pay for the server and hosting, quality content creation tools, professional editors, SME's time in reviewing materials...and I could go on. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Jeroen van der Wal wrote: I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community.
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
I don't like to see ofbiz.org to be used for commercial purposes. If the subscription cost is a problem I'm willing to make a donation in order to keep the domain within the community. -- Jeroen van der Wal Stromboli b.v. +31 655 874050 On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi Scott: > I'd eventually replace the myofbiz.com domain with ofbiz.org. Myofbiz.com > Its still all about OFBiz documentation and eventually training materials, > so clearly there is a link. FYI, I've been told that "myofbiz" is sometimes > misinterpreted (by some people) as, well, something I never thought of... > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > Scott Gray wrote: >> >> Hi Ruth, >> >> Out of interest, what would you do with it? >> >> Thanks >> Scott >> >> HotWax Media >> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >> >> On 15/04/2010, at 11:31 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Hi David: >>> If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it. >>> Regards, >>> Ruth >>> >>> Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" >>> ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com >>> >>> David E Jones wrote: >>> My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -David >> >> >
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Scott: I'd eventually replace the myofbiz.com domain with ofbiz.org. Myofbiz.com Its still all about OFBiz documentation and eventually training materials, so clearly there is a link. FYI, I've been told that "myofbiz" is sometimes misinterpreted (by some people) as, well, something I never thought of... Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Scott Gray wrote: Hi Ruth, Out of interest, what would you do with it? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 15/04/2010, at 11:31 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: Hi David: If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com David E Jones wrote: My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -David
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-3703: Attachment: OFBIZ-3703.patch Changed patch as per Scott's comment. Thanks Scott. > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch, OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi Ruth, Out of interest, what would you do with it? Thanks Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 15/04/2010, at 11:31 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote: > Hi David: > If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it. > Regards, > Ruth > > Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" > ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com > > David E Jones wrote: >> My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this >> year. >> >> This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or >> let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything >> official related to the project)? >> >> There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed >> any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The >> ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the >> foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, >> while others have just let the old domain go). >> >> What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? >> >> -David >> >> >> >> smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
Hi David: If you don't want to keep it up and ASF doesn't want it, I'll take it. Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com David E Jones wrote: My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -David
Re: ApacheCon and conferences
Hi Erwan: I have submitted several OFBiz business track proposals. I assumed that because no one from the OFBiz PMC responded to my early posts about technical track proposals, that there would be none. I have several technical track ideas that I would very much like to present. How do I go about submitting same? Regards, Ruth Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google keyword "myofbiz" ruth.hoff...@myofbiz.com Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: Hi all, Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at the end of the month. http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ Cheers,
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3446) Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857272#action_12857272 ] Ankit Jain commented on OFBIZ-3446: --- Hi Jacques & Sascha Jacques, I review your patch & its good & i dont think any other changes needed in it, and i also try to look in that issues... Thanks for the patch :) > Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup > > > Key: OFBIZ-3446 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: lookup.patch, lookup.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_FixCloseButton.patch, OFBIZ-3446_LayoutFix.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_LayoutFix.patch, OFBIZ-3446_Lookup_in_Lookup.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_Lookup_in_Lookup.patch > > > This issue is really a blocker else we need to duplicate a lot of things. I > began to work in this direction but after few hours on them I think I will > preferably find a real solution than mucking around. > I was not quite sure this was possible, but as Calendars are also called from > layered popups, it seems possible. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857270#action_12857270 ] Pranay Pandey commented on OFBIZ-3703: -- Thanks for the contribution Arun, I reviewed the patch and looks good to me. We should not always create a new PartyContactMech if its not changed at all. > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857269#action_12857269 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3703: --- Hi Arun, why not just move the store and create down to the existing if block directly below your new one? (it has the same condition) > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-3703: Attachment: OFBIZ-3703.patch Here is a patch for fix this issue. Thanks & Regards --- Arun Patidar > updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is > unchange. > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Arun Patidar >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: OFBIZ-3703.patch > > > updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new > record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3703) updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange.
updatePartyContactMech service creates new record while contactMechId is unchange. -- Key: OFBIZ-3703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3703 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: party, specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Arun Patidar Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk updatePartyContactMech service should not expire old record and create new record when contactMechId is unchange. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
ApacheCon and conferences
Hi all, Will anyone submit a conference for the ApacheCon this year ? Deadline is at the end of the month. http://blogs.apache.org/conferences/ Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES www.nereide.biz
Clearing All Favicons From Firefox 3 Cache
For those who have been alreadsy annoyed by this here is the right answer http://www.pcmech.com/article/clearing-all-favicons-from-firefox-3-cache-how-to/ Jacques
[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3648) german WorkeffortUiLabels translations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Geisert reassigned OFBIZ-3648: Assignee: Christian Geisert > german WorkeffortUiLabels translations > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3648 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3648 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: workeffort >Affects Versions: SVN trunk >Reporter: Mirko Vogelsmeier >Assignee: Christian Geisert >Priority: Minor > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: WorkEffortUiLabels.xml.patch > > > Some german translation for WorkEffortUiLabels.xml -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857234#action_12857234 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-3442 at 4/15/10 4:36 AM: - This is the last patch with the minium modifications needed to replace all popup lookups by layered lookup. I have already identified some cases where we want not to use layered lookups. LookupTimeDuration is one there are maybe others but I wonder at this stage if I will get enough support from this issue or I will not rather commit as is and wait returns to fix issues as it's realy easy to fix since a simple <> attribute does the trick As I said there are still some issues though, notably with # the last lookup (at bottom) of https://localhost:8443/workeffort/control/EditWorkEffort?workEffortTypeId=TASK¤tStatusId=CAL_NEEDS_ACTION : look for ProductId inside. This is something specific to layer in layer and we have already OFBIZ-3446 opened for that # same with https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey (acroform) # also https://localhost:8443/assetmaint/control/LookupWorkEffort (recursive issue: look for parent) we have already OFBIZ-3693 opened for that # The minimize/enlarge buttons (+ -) blocks the layer see OFBIZ-3692 # I saw still some problems in themes other than Tomahawk According to Ankit Jain (see OFBIZ-3446), it seems that when you use the attribute <> attribute some of these issues does not exist. I have also noticed some differences but at this stage I'm not quite sure. I will revisit this ASAP but maybe not today. I'd really appreciate more testing, thanks for you help was (Author: jacques.le.roux): This is the last patch with the minium modifications needed to replace all popup lookups by layered lookup. I have already identified some cases where we want not to use layered lookups. LookupTimeDuration is one there are maybe others but I wonder at this stage if I will get enough support from this issue or I will not rather commit as is and wait returns to fix issues as it's realy easy to fix since a simple <> attribute does the trick As I said there are still some issues though, notably with # the last lookup (at bottom) of ttps://localhost:8443/workeffort/control/EditWorkEffort?workEffortTypeId=TASK¤tStatusId=CAL_NEEDS_ACTION : look for ProductId inside. This is something specific to layer in layer and we have already OFBIZ-3446 opened for that # same with https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey (acroform) # also https://localhost:8443/assetmaint/control/LookupWorkEffort (recursive issue: look for parent) we have already OFBIZ-3693 opened for that # The minimize/enlarge buttons (+ -) blocks the layer see OFBIZ-3692 # I saw still some problems in themes other than Tomahawk According to Ankit Jain (see OFBIZ-3446), it seems that when you use the attribute <> attribute some of these issues does not exist. I have also noticed some differences but at this stage I'm not quite sure. I will revisit this ASAP but maybe not today. I'd really appreciate more testing, thanks for you help > Replace popup lookups by layer lookups > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-3442 replace popup lookups by layered lookups.patch > > > Following Sascha Rodekamp's work on layer lookups OFBIZ-3374 and > improvements OFBIZ-3430, I propose now to replace old the popup lookups by > layered (Ajaxified) lookups. > For that please find a patch attached. In this patch I followed a simple S/R > tactic: > * I replaced all occurences of LookupDecorator by LookupLayerPopupDecorator > in screens > * I replaced all occurences of position="center" > It's as simple as this. For the moment I decided to use as default > position="center" because it's was the easiest (sure that any lookups will be > out of the screen). I think we will refine this by removing position="center" > and use the default (position="normal") which does not move the layer from > the point it's called and will be more aesthetic. > I did not test anything in OFBIz OOTB for the moment, but I already use > layered lookups in a custom application without any issues so far. > The only drawback I found for the moment is when a lookup is called from a > lookup. If you are aware of such cases please chime in. > Of course everybody is encouraged to test this improvement as much as > possible. I really think it's a very cool feature for users, and they will > appreciate. There are still some ideas like that (see the link Sasca referred > to in OFBIZ-33
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3446) Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857235#action_12857235 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3446: Hi Sascah, Ankit, All, I have posted a new much more simple patch at OFBIZ-3442. As ever all testing good wills are really appreciated. Thanks > Allow to open a layer lookup from a layer lookup > > > Key: OFBIZ-3446 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3446 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > Fix For: SVN trunk > > Attachments: lookup.patch, lookup.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_FixCloseButton.patch, OFBIZ-3446_LayoutFix.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_LayoutFix.patch, OFBIZ-3446_Lookup_in_Lookup.patch, > OFBIZ-3446_Lookup_in_Lookup.patch > > > This issue is really a blocker else we need to duplicate a lot of things. I > began to work in this direction but after few hours on them I think I will > preferably find a real solution than mucking around. > I was not quite sure this was possible, but as Calendars are also called from > layered popups, it seems possible. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3442: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3442 replace popup lookups by layered lookups.patch This is the last patch with the minium modifications needed to replace all popup lookups by layered lookup. I have already identified some cases where we want not to use layered lookups. LookupTimeDuration is one there are maybe others but I wonder at this stage if I will get enough support from this issue or I will not rather commit as is and wait returns to fix issues as it's realy easy to fix since a simple <> attribute does the trick As I said there are still some issues though, notably with # the last lookup (at bottom) of ttps://localhost:8443/workeffort/control/EditWorkEffort?workEffortTypeId=TASK¤tStatusId=CAL_NEEDS_ACTION : look for ProductId inside. This is something specific to layer in layer and we have already OFBIZ-3446 opened for that # same with https://localhost:8443/content/control/FindSurvey (acroform) # also https://localhost:8443/assetmaint/control/LookupWorkEffort (recursive issue: look for parent) we have already OFBIZ-3693 opened for that # The minimize/enlarge buttons (+ -) blocks the layer see OFBIZ-3692 # I saw still some problems in themes other than Tomahawk According to Ankit Jain (see OFBIZ-3446), it seems that when you use the attribute <> attribute some of these issues does not exist. I have also noticed some differences but at this stage I'm not quite sure. I will revisit this ASAP but maybe not today. I'd really appreciate more testing, thanks for you help > Replace popup lookups by layer lookups > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-3442 replace popup lookups by layered lookups.patch > > > Following Sascha Rodekamp's work on layer lookups OFBIZ-3374 and > improvements OFBIZ-3430, I propose now to replace old the popup lookups by > layered (Ajaxified) lookups. > For that please find a patch attached. In this patch I followed a simple S/R > tactic: > * I replaced all occurences of LookupDecorator by LookupLayerPopupDecorator > in screens > * I replaced all occurences of position="center" > It's as simple as this. For the moment I decided to use as default > position="center" because it's was the easiest (sure that any lookups will be > out of the screen). I think we will refine this by removing position="center" > and use the default (position="normal") which does not move the layer from > the point it's called and will be more aesthetic. > I did not test anything in OFBIz OOTB for the moment, but I already use > layered lookups in a custom application without any issues so far. > The only drawback I found for the moment is when a lookup is called from a > lookup. If you are aware of such cases please chime in. > Of course everybody is encouraged to test this improvement as much as > possible. I really think it's a very cool feature for users, and they will > appreciate. There are still some ideas like that (see the link Sasca referred > to in OFBIZ-3374), and we will try to implement them. > There are issues to be fixed prior to a commit, see OFBIZ-3446. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
I would prefer to keep it. Most of the time I type ofbiz.org in my browser :-). -- Ashish On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:20 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this > year. > > This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let > it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything > official related to the project)? > > There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed > any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The > ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the > foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, > while others have just let the old domain go). > > What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? > > -David > > >
[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3442) Replace popup lookups by layer lookups
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-3442: --- Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3442 replace popup lookups by layered lookups.patch) > Replace popup lookups by layer lookups > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-3442 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > > Following Sascha Rodekamp's work on layer lookups OFBIZ-3374 and > improvements OFBIZ-3430, I propose now to replace old the popup lookups by > layered (Ajaxified) lookups. > For that please find a patch attached. In this patch I followed a simple S/R > tactic: > * I replaced all occurences of LookupDecorator by LookupLayerPopupDecorator > in screens > * I replaced all occurences of position="center" > It's as simple as this. For the moment I decided to use as default > position="center" because it's was the easiest (sure that any lookups will be > out of the screen). I think we will refine this by removing position="center" > and use the default (position="normal") which does not move the layer from > the point it's called and will be more aesthetic. > I did not test anything in OFBIz OOTB for the moment, but I already use > layered lookups in a custom application without any issues so far. > The only drawback I found for the moment is when a lookup is called from a > lookup. If you are aware of such cases please chime in. > Of course everybody is encouraged to test this improvement as much as > possible. I really think it's a very cool feature for users, and they will > appreciate. There are still some ideas like that (see the link Sasca referred > to in OFBIZ-3374), and we will try to implement them. > There are issues to be fixed prior to a commit, see OFBIZ-3446. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857228#action_12857228 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Thanks Hans! > provide better user help > > > Key: OFBIZ-3702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Release Candidate Branch 10.04, SVN trunk >Reporter: chris snow > Attachments: product_entitymodel.patch > > > Please see http://n4.nabble.com/Providing-users-with-help-td1840416.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857214#action_12857214 ] Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-3702: hi chris, you might want look how it is done in webtools -> entity reference there the descriptions are already shown.it is using jsp there though. Hans > provide better user help > > > Key: OFBIZ-3702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Release Candidate Branch 10.04, SVN trunk >Reporter: chris snow > Attachments: product_entitymodel.patch > > > Please see http://n4.nabble.com/Providing-users-with-help-td1840416.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857210#action_12857210 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Hans, I'm not sure how I can access the entity field descriptions in forms. Can you please point me in the right direction? Many thanks, Chris > provide better user help > > > Key: OFBIZ-3702 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Release Candidate Branch 10.04, SVN trunk >Reporter: chris snow > Attachments: product_entitymodel.patch > > > Please see http://n4.nabble.com/Providing-users-with-help-td1840416.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: The ofbiz.org domain
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" Yes, and our Java packages are still using it: org.ofbiz Looks like an interesting point, isn'it? Jacques Jacopo On Apr 15, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: I like the ofbiz.org domain! Let's try to keep it. -Adrian --- On Wed, 4/14/10, David E Jones wrote: From: David E Jones Subject: The ofbiz.org domain To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 8:50 PM My current registration of the ofbiz.org domain expires on May 13th of this year. This brings up a question: should we keep it around and keep using it, or let it go (just all of the other ofbiz.* domain names that aren't anything official related to the project)? There is certainly historical significance to it, but it really isn't needed any more now that everything is under the official apache.org domain. The ofbiz.org domain could be transferred to the ASF and maintained by the foundation if there is interest (I think some other projects have done this, while others have just let the old domain go). What does everyone think? Is it worth keeping around? -David
