[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] New release (4.18) of MULTIPSK

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello to all,

I forgot to add, to my previous message:

"Addition of a new mode Packet (and APRS) based on BPSK31 modulation."

Now it is done.

73
Patrick

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

[H Stang]

Hi Phil,

Thanks for my first contact. 

 I couldn't believe it!  This past two weeks I have made my first 
Olivia,Contestia,Hell (I worked PSK31 for a good while 2 years ago) . I work 
the Votar contest 6 contacts  LOL.  Worked the Hell contest Saturday morning  
13 contacts.  I am moving upward.  This of course does not reflect , antenna 
building,Macro's etc. testing to dummy load by countless hours.

Now the story behind ALE 400:

I saw all the email here on ALE 400. Went to dummy load tested for the  sound.  
I never heard if before.

 I have more time in the dummy load than on the air   LOL!.  -

Being New to digital modes. 

 I am in the middle of a Olivia QSO (I have the Solomon Reed ID on plus the 
rest of them - I clicked them all) Bingo my QSO flips to ALE 400 - HEY! this is 
"neat" I am in ALE 400.  I had figured that the other ham had flipped over to 
the other mode.  I didn't know how transmitt, call, send or what to do -  LOL 
got to love it.  

That started me reading on ALE 400.  Then everybody on the reflector said Tony 
has this great article.  WHERE  I said.  Finally got my QST and NCJ magazine.  
HELLO there was the article.  Thanks Tony it was a great article.  (still 
working on "Auxillary"  HI! )  Now I am really pumped. I spent months getting 
things setup for RTTY.  AFSK/FSK /RTS /CTS/DTR  ??? . But it has worked out.

Phil, thanks for my first ALE 400 contact and your patience.  I think I hit the 
"End" button several times.  LOL/HI  and sorry I was so "liddy" .  It reminded 
me on my first CW contacts as a Novice. It was a lot of fun.

Phil,  have a great week ,  hope to work you soon, 73 and thanks again.

Hal Stang
WD4MDA
Hellschrieber #: FD 2599
wd4...@comcast.net
Jacksonville FL


  - Original Message - 
  From: Andy obrien 
  To: multi...@yahoogroups.com ; digitalradio 
  Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 12:21 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork




  "KE1AF DE WD4MDA MY NAME IS HAL QTH IS JACKSONVILLE FL NEW ON THIS MODE FIRST 
CONTACT. CALL IS WD4MDA WD4MDA KA1GMN DE N4HO go od afternoon ...name is phil 
and i am located in euless,texas. "

  Another new one...





  


--



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2879 - Release Date: 05/17/10 
02:26:00

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

[Andy obrien]

and one more...

"CQ DE WD4MDA   [FAE CQ]
[Connection done with WD4MDA]
hell name is hal in jacksonville how are you andy not sure I am doing
this right? your solid copy here. i just read the article in qst and
thoought i would try the mode.  i had two ale 400 calls during hell
field contest and got hooked. I am running about 50 watts andy..
Really thats neat.  I ran psk31 for a couple of years.  Butr i have
really gotten into these digital modes.  Tony did do a good job.  by
the way your my first contact on ALE 400  HI ."


On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Andy obrien  wrote:
> "KE1AF DE WD4MDA MY NAME IS HAL QTH IS JACKSONVILLE FL NEW ON THIS MODE
> FIRST CONTACT. CALL IS WD4MDA WD4MDA KA1GMN DE N4HO go od afternoon ...name
> is phil and i am located in euless,texas. "
>
> Another new one...
>
>
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

[Andy obrien]

*
"KE1AF DE WD4MDA MY NAME IS HAL QTH IS JACKSONVILLE FL NEW ON THIS MODE
FIRST CONTACT. CALL IS WD4MDA WD4MDA KA1GMN DE N4HO go od afternoon ...name
is phil and i am located in euless,texas. "

Another new one...


*

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ALE 400 coming out of the woodwork

[Tony]

On 5/15/2010 10:04 AM, Andy obrien wrote:


Hey folks, MULTIPLE ALE 400 QSO on 20M at same time this morning, many 
new operators thanks to Tony's great work.




Thanks Andy. Received lots of positive feedback about the article. Great 
to see all the activity on the band.


Patrick, This article could be a real boost to you very creative 
application.




I certainly hope Patrick receives some well deserved recognition for his 
work.


Tony -K2MO

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] The RS ID Weekend

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello to all,

For the ones using Multipsk, here are two manuals to use RS ID and Call ID 
(+ Prop ID) with Multipsk.

http://f6cte.free.fr/The_Call_ID_and_Prop_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc
http://f6cte.free.fr/The_RS_ID_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: "Andy obrien" 
To: "digitalradio" ; 

Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:54 PM
Subject: [multipsk] The RS ID Weekend


> This coming weekend May 15th and 16th , a few of us  will be testing
> Reed Solomon IDs... their usefulness and robustness. So, if you are
> going to be on the air this weekend, using a digital mode, please use
> your RS ID features.  Use it perhaps a bit more than you might
> normally do, so we can have some targets to detect.  Often people only
> use it at the beginning of a CQ to help ID their mode .  I would like
> to see it on all "overs" since it helps others detect you,  and you
> may be missed if you are not the one calling CQ.  If you have the Call
> ID feature, please also use that since this will also plot your actual
> Call sign.
>
> For those unfamiliar with Reed Solomon ID as implemented by Patrick
> F6CTE, RS ID causes a very brief  tone that, when detected, will allow
> others with RS-ID capable software to be informed of the mode you are
> using.  Software like Multipsk, DM780, and FLdigi then take this
> information and arrange it it tabular form so that you can review what
> ID's you have received and on what frequency.
>
> Andy K3UK
>
>
> 
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 

[digitalradio] Re: Multipsk

[obrienaj]

create a maps folder 
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jgmags2000"  wrote:
>
> Hello Group,
>   Upon starting MultiPsk, I get an error message "No sub-directory Maps!?"  
> Any way to fix error?
> 
> 73, John KJ1J
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] CQ WARC bands via ALE400

[Andy obrien]

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Hugh Mac Donald < wrote:
>
>
>
> You are starting to get me interested in it again Andy. Other than a couple 
> of chats with Bonnie in 141A I have not seen much use for ALE! I will listen 
> to 10.145 and see what I can hear.
>
>
>
>
>
> Hugh  AC7XF
>
>

Hi Hugh.  Other than an actual QSO with Bonnie , where we did switch
modes, all my  standard ALE contacts were ones where we stayed with
ALE 141A.  I think HF Link has mad a mistake by promoting  ALE as a
emcomm concept.  While it is certainly useful in Emcomm, the average
"encomm ham" ham is not likely to have the patience for ALE .  If we
magically could get about 50 hams to start scanning one freq each on
80, 40, 30,20, and 17M. and occasionally sending a "sounding" or CQ
when looking for a QSO, we would have a good cadre to build the
concept of ALE for regular QSOs.  Using Multipsk's scan selection of 2
seconds per channel,  we could more easily catch people making a
general call and not have to monitor web sites and 'sked pages" for
digital  modes QSOs.  .  PC-ALE is likely soon to have some new
features that will make switching modes an easier task.  Multipsk's
macros and RS-ID could also be used to establish some generally
accepted method of switching modes after an initial "link".   The
reason I promote ALE is that , as far as I can tell, it is the only
mode that is capable of high speed scanning and automatic pausing when
a call is detected.  I

Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Multimode Madness Hours May 3 1300-1400 and 2300-000 UTC

[Mike Blazek]

Unfortunately, I didn't have much luck. Propagation didn't cooperate at 
all for the first segment, and I wasn't able to work the second segment. 
Oh well, there's always next weekend!

73,
Mike N5UKZ


Andy obrien wrote:
>
>
> Thanks to all those that tried. Nice to hear the 20m segment busy
> with odd sounding modes. The form for results is at
>
> http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=cnRnbThrWFZvMEVwcFVjSmpwVHlGS3c6MA..
>  
> 
>
> Let me know if you have any difficulty posting your scores.
>
> The morning session was quiet but hear a few signals at the 2300 
> madness hour.
>
> RSID was fun, very helpful. MFSK16/8, Olivia and DominoEX seemed to
> be the most common and most effective for the few Qs I had. Chip 64
> and MT63 seemed to fail with people that could copy me on Dominoex or
> Olivia.
>
> I think for the next Multimode Madness, I will amend the rules to
> limit QSOs with same call sign on same band to no more than 3 modes.
> Also perhaps no more that three speed changes with a particular mode
> (e.g PSK . Dominoex, Olivia maximum of three settings per band).
>
> How did you all do ?
>
> Andy
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Andy obrien  > wrote:
> > OK  Juergen, nice to hear from you as always.  I will changed NEXT
> > Sunday to be 1300-1400 and then 2100-2200 UTC.I will keep it 2300
> > UTC for today.
> >
> >
> > Today, as I was calling CQ Multimode Madness using Multipsk, another
> > station using RSID switched me over to DominoEX.  The fun thing about
> > a Madness Hour is that using  Rx RS ID and multipsk, we can do things
> > like that!  Crazy but fun..
> >
> > Andy K3UK
> >
> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:30 AM, dl8le  > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> A good idea, Andy! I hope this will increase the activity in 
> digital modes
> >> like Olivia, MFSK etc.. There is only one proposal:
> >>
> >> 2300 UTC is extremely late in EU. Could 2100 UTC be an alternative for
> >> future activies? I would believe that May 3 should not be the first 
> and only
> >> Sunday for this activity.
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
> >> Juergen, DL8LE
> >>
> >> --- In multi...@yahoogroups.com 
> , Andy obrien  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Date and time : 1300 to 1400 UTC and 2300- UTC Each UTC Sunday
> >>>
> >>> Modes: Any digital modes EXCEPT standard RTTY , PSK31, QPSK31 , and
> >>> CW. See below for full details
> >>>
> >>> Exchange : Call sign and RST
> >>>
> >>> Bands : Any authorized digital portions of 80, 40. 20, 15, or 10 are
> >>> allowed . To foster more interaction, 14077 to 14080 and 7036-7038
> >>> are encouraged if allowed in your country. Please avoid traditional
> >>> PSK31 frequencies and ALE sounding frequencies.
> >>>
> >>> Power : 100 watts and under .
> >>>
> >>> Suggested CQ : "CQ MMH" or "CQ Multimode Madness Hour"
> >>>
> >>> Points: 5 points per QSO
> >>>
> >>> Multipliers: Modes worked.
> >>>
> >>> Scoring: Total QSO x modes worked
> >>>
> >>> e.g 10 QSO = 50 points x six different modes successfully worked = 300
> >>> points
> >>>
> >>> You may work each station once PER mode
> >>>
> >>> Other : Use of RS-ID is encouraged.
> >>>
> >>> Submit Scores to
> >>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rtgm8kXVo0EppUcJjpTyFKw 
> 
> >>>
> >>> * Modes with varying speeds, or number of tones, DO count as
> >>> different modes but "reverse" settings DO NOT. Example, Olivia
> >>> 500/16 and 500/8 would count as two different modes but
> >>> reverse/inverse MFSK16 or Olivia would not count.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> 

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Multimode Madness Hours May 3 1300-1400 and 2300-000 UTC

[Andy obrien]

Thanks to all those that tried.  Nice to hear the 20m segment busy
with odd sounding modes.  The form for results is at

http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=cnRnbThrWFZvMEVwcFVjSmpwVHlGS3c6MA..

Let me know if you have any difficulty posting your scores.

The morning session was quiet but hear a few signals at the 2300 madness hour.

RSID was fun, very helpful.  MFSK16/8, Olivia and DominoEX seemed to
be the most common and most effective for the few Qs I had.  Chip 64
and MT63 seemed to fail with people that could copy me on Dominoex or
Olivia.

I think for the next Multimode Madness, I will amend the rules to
limit QSOs with same call sign on same band to no more than 3 modes.
Also perhaps no more that three speed changes with a particular mode
(e.g PSK . Dominoex, Olivia maximum of three settings per band).

How did you all do ?

Andy

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Andy obrien  wrote:
> OK  Juergen, nice to hear from you as always.  I will changed NEXT
> Sunday to be 1300-1400 and then 2100-2200 UTC.    I will keep it 2300
> UTC for today.
>
>
> Today, as I was calling CQ Multimode Madness using Multipsk, another
> station using RSID switched me over to DominoEX.  The fun thing about
> a Madness Hour is that using  Rx RS ID and multipsk, we can do things
> like that!  Crazy but fun..
>
> Andy K3UK
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:30 AM, dl8le  wrote:
>>
>>
>> A good idea, Andy! I hope this will increase the activity in digital modes
>> like Olivia, MFSK etc.. There is only one proposal:
>>
>> 2300 UTC is extremely late in EU. Could 2100 UTC be an alternative for
>> future activies? I would believe that May 3 should not be the first and only
>> Sunday for this activity.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Juergen, DL8LE
>>
>> --- In multi...@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien  wrote:
>>>
>>> Date and time : 1300 to 1400 UTC and 2300- UTC Each UTC Sunday
>>>
>>> Modes: Any digital modes EXCEPT standard RTTY , PSK31, QPSK31 , and
>>> CW. See below for full details
>>>
>>> Exchange : Call sign and RST
>>>
>>> Bands : Any authorized digital portions of 80, 40. 20, 15, or 10 are
>>> allowed . To foster more interaction, 14077 to 14080 and 7036-7038
>>> are encouraged if allowed in your country. Please avoid traditional
>>> PSK31 frequencies and ALE sounding frequencies.
>>>
>>> Power : 100 watts and under .
>>>
>>> Suggested CQ : "CQ MMH" or "CQ Multimode Madness Hour"
>>>
>>> Points: 5 points per QSO
>>>
>>> Multipliers: Modes worked.
>>>
>>> Scoring: Total QSO x modes worked
>>>
>>> e.g 10 QSO = 50 points x six different modes successfully worked = 300
>>> points
>>>
>>> You may work each station once PER mode
>>>
>>> Other : Use of RS-ID is encouraged.
>>>
>>> Submit Scores to
>>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rtgm8kXVo0EppUcJjpTyFKw
>>>
>>> * Modes with varying speeds, or number of tones, DO count as
>>> different modes but "reverse" settings DO NOT. Example, Olivia
>>> 500/16 and 500/8 would count as two different modes but
>>> reverse/inverse MFSK16 or Olivia would not count.
>>>
>>
>> 
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Multimode Madness Hours May 3 1300-1400 and 2300-000 UTC

[Andy obrien]

OK  Juergen, nice to hear from you as always.  I will changed NEXT
Sunday to be 1300-1400 and then 2100-2200 UTC.I will keep it 2300
UTC for today.


Today, as I was calling CQ Multimode Madness using Multipsk, another
station using RSID switched me over to DominoEX.  The fun thing about
a Madness Hour is that using  Rx RS ID and multipsk, we can do things
like that!  Crazy but fun..

Andy K3UK

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 9:30 AM, dl8le  wrote:
>
>
> A good idea, Andy! I hope this will increase the activity in digital modes
> like Olivia, MFSK etc.. There is only one proposal:
>
> 2300 UTC is extremely late in EU. Could 2100 UTC be an alternative for
> future activies? I would believe that May 3 should not be the first and only
> Sunday for this activity.
>
> 73
>
> Juergen, DL8LE
>
> --- In multi...@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien  wrote:
>>
>> Date and time : 1300 to 1400 UTC and 2300- UTC Each UTC Sunday
>>
>> Modes: Any digital modes EXCEPT standard RTTY , PSK31, QPSK31 , and
>> CW. See below for full details
>>
>> Exchange : Call sign and RST
>>
>> Bands : Any authorized digital portions of 80, 40. 20, 15, or 10 are
>> allowed . To foster more interaction, 14077 to 14080 and 7036-7038
>> are encouraged if allowed in your country. Please avoid traditional
>> PSK31 frequencies and ALE sounding frequencies.
>>
>> Power : 100 watts and under .
>>
>> Suggested CQ : "CQ MMH" or "CQ Multimode Madness Hour"
>>
>> Points: 5 points per QSO
>>
>> Multipliers: Modes worked.
>>
>> Scoring: Total QSO x modes worked
>>
>> e.g 10 QSO = 50 points x six different modes successfully worked = 300
>> points
>>
>> You may work each station once PER mode
>>
>> Other : Use of RS-ID is encouraged.
>>
>> Submit Scores to
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rtgm8kXVo0EppUcJjpTyFKw
>>
>> * Modes with varying speeds, or number of tones, DO count as
>> different modes but "reverse" settings DO NOT. Example, Olivia
>> 500/16 and 500/8 would count as two different modes but
>> reverse/inverse MFSK16 or Olivia would not count.
>>
>
> 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: multipsk

[Ken Hucksoll]

we are without internet for a few days...I did read your guide but am a slw 
learner...figured out my multipsk problemappreciate the response.it 
will be next week before we have good internet.. .thank you for your helpat 
that time I will ask a few more questionsI have a Icom-703 comming to 
replace the scout 555...have a nice weekend..Ken N5LYJ/5

--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Andrew O'Brien  wrote:

From: Andrew O'Brien 
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: multipsk
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 7:15 AM












--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, "skip19755"  
wrote:

>

> can not figure out my problemusing MULTIPSK...do you have to purchase it 
> before you can xmit on JT65??? It RX greatbut can not figure out how to 
> TXworks on RTTY and PSK...I know the program has limitations for non 
> registered users...while on the other hand...using K1JT program can not RX 
> but can TXI have another radio coming but on 20 meters what I have should 
> be FB...Thank You Ken N5LYJ/5

>



No, u can use Multipsk in JT65A without a Multipsk license.  However be aware 
that the program is designed so that ur transmit begins at the top of the 
minute.  Did you read my guide to JT65A via WSJT ?



http://www.obriensw eb.com/bozoguide jt65a.htm



Andy K3UK




 

  




 

















  

[digitalradio] Re: multipsk

[Andrew O'Brien]

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "skip19755"  wrote:
>
> can not figure out my problemusing MULTIPSK...do you have to purchase it 
> before you can xmit on JT65??? It RX greatbut can not figure out how to 
> TXworks on RTTY and PSK...I know the program has limitations for non 
> registered users...while on the other hand...using K1JT program can not RX 
> but can TXI have another radio coming but on 20 meters what I have should 
> be FB...Thank You Ken N5LYJ/5
>


No, u can use Multipsk in JT65A without a Multipsk license.  However be aware 
that the program is designed so that ur transmit begins at the top of the 
minute.  Did you read my guide to JT65A via WSJT ?

http://www.obriensweb.com/bozoguidejt65a.htm

Andy K3UK

Re: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello Skip,

Not too bad this ARQ FAE QSO monitoring. In ARQ modes in general (especially 
in AMTOR ARQ),  it is a bit difficult to understand the message (due to 
retries and lack of decoding).

73
Patrick


- Original Message - 
From: "kh6ty" 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A


> John, Rick,
>
> Copied the following on 3584.5, 1631.1 Hz. It might help to specify the 
> tone
> frequency next time. Not sure I every copied John on my end.
>
>
>
> CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU VE5MU DE KV9U H H 
> ad
> to get me sound card switched back properly to mike in put from auxilary
> input. This happ to mike in put from auxilary input. This happ ens every
> time I run my contest logging progra m, n1mm. Very odd. Good to make the
> connecti on this evening. Running 20 watts at the moment . lly think that
> this mode is w ay underutilized for public ser ivice and emergency use 
> since
> it is fairly sensitive and not too wide either. I tried 40 meters first 
> but
> no thing connected and there is foreign br oadcast stations on or very 
> near
> the frequenc on the disc. AS
> DE K(V9U
> VE5MU DE KV9U Sign Sign als are just at the noise level at the moment . . 
> W
> ell on second thought, not qui te true, several s units above the noise .
> I would be surprised if 141A will work but lets try it. Why not connect 
> and
> try and send message from you to me again?
> DE KV9U
> End of QSO VE5MU DE KV9U F or some reason it will someti mes lock up and I
> can not seem to stop the current status and reset job though had to
> completely terminat e the program a few times and restart . Maybe I just
> don't know the correct procedu and it was very close to a cw station that 
> I
> could not clip off without affecting the lower tone. wish that this mode 
> was
> in the NBEMS suite , but thus far they feel that this may be beyond their
> ability to include. I thi I thi nk that Winmor, if it has a peer to peer
> mode, w ill be VERY popular since once you set it up f or one mode such as
> e-mail it can adapt to other conditions. And the nice thing is that you 
> can
> u se the narrow modes down to 200 Hz wide which should make it ham 
> friendly
> when you don't nee d the speed. The Winlink 2000 group holds it s cards 
> very
> close to the vest as they are not rea lly looking at what is good for
> amateur radio, but what is good for Winlink 2000. That is past deeds of 
> not
> being willing to open even the protocol. But maybe they will even the
> protocol. But maybe they will ve several specific frequencies I 
> understand.
> If you have listened to their sample, it is really not a pleasant sounding
> mode, and is mor e like you get with higher baud rate signals. D E 
> KV9U
> H FLink tried to go t heir own way, then tried to "interoperate " with
> Winlink 2000 which is really not ver y practical and is downright foolish
> when you Instead they put their system in line with Winli nk's servers, so
> if Winlink 2000 fails , they are likely to fail as well. They have not 
> been
> able to give me a reason why they want to use Winlink's system when they
> really don't h ave to do this. Bonnie had a real shouting match 00 site 
> and
> the next day, everything was OK an d all FB. Needless to say, she had to 
> get
> on the phone and agreed to just do whatever they wanted because she knew
> that she wou ld be frozen out otherwise.
> DE KV9u ... i , it sure is a nice setu p, but with my situatiuon, I would
> have no ohter stat ions to communicate with here in Wiscosnsin, since no 
> one
> else has it to speak of and Pactor itself, the ori ginal pactor is not 
> going
> t o be competitive with PWinmor. Even P2 will get some competition with
> Winmor exc really poor condx. I thnk I thnink the signal to noise ratioi 
> is
> getting a b it better than when we started. Y es, the tremendous advan 
> tage
> with a stand alone box that uses the computer primarily as a dumb terminal
> is that it is so much easier to get it to work. We have had the local EC
> demonstarate the VHF type of Winlink 2000 on two separate times to our
> group. Both times it failed to work even one mi le to the Telpac!!! pretty
> bad. Not sure what was causing the problem, but obviously no t a good 
> thing
> to fail if we had really needed i t. I can type fairly fast, but I can't
> keep the error rate down wit hout going back quite often and redo stuff. S
> ometimes I can get a good stream going and then e verything falls apart, 
> HI
> HI. DE KV9U
> \
> OK John great to chat a bit and try something like file transfers t

Re: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

[kh6ty]

John, Rick,

Copied the following on 3584.5, 1631.1 Hz. It might help to specify the tone 
frequency next time. Not sure I every copied John on my end.



CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU CQ KV9U>VE5MU VE5MU DE KV9U H H ad 
to get me sound card switched back properly to mike in put from auxilary 
input. This happ to mike in put from auxilary input. This happ ens every 
time I run my contest logging progra m, n1mm. Very odd. Good to make the 
connecti on this evening. Running 20 watts at the moment . lly think that 
this mode is w ay underutilized for public ser ivice and emergency use since 
it is fairly sensitive and not too wide either. I tried 40 meters first but 
no thing connected and there is foreign br oadcast stations on or very near 
the frequenc on the disc. AS
DE K(V9U
VE5MU DE KV9U Sign Sign als are just at the noise level at the moment . . W 
ell on second thought, not qui te true, several s units above the noise .
I would be surprised if 141A will work but lets try it. Why not connect and 
try and send message from you to me again?
DE KV9U
End of QSO VE5MU DE KV9U F or some reason it will someti mes lock up and I 
can not seem to stop the current status and reset job though had to 
completely terminat e the program a few times and restart . Maybe I just 
don't know the correct procedu and it was very close to a cw station that I 
could not clip off without affecting the lower tone. wish that this mode was 
in the NBEMS suite , but thus far they feel that this may be beyond their 
ability to include. I thi I thi nk that Winmor, if it has a peer to peer 
mode, w ill be VERY popular since once you set it up f or one mode such as 
e-mail it can adapt to other conditions. And the nice thing is that you can 
u se the narrow modes down to 200 Hz wide which should make it ham friendly 
when you don't nee d the speed. The Winlink 2000 group holds it s cards very 
close to the vest as they are not rea lly looking at what is good for 
amateur radio, but what is good for Winlink 2000. That is past deeds of not 
being willing to open even the protocol. But maybe they will even the 
protocol. But maybe they will ve several specific frequencies I understand. 
If you have listened to their sample, it is really not a pleasant sounding 
mode, and is mor e like you get with higher baud rate signals. D E KV9U
H FLink tried to go t heir own way, then tried to "interoperate " with 
Winlink 2000 which is really not ver y practical and is downright foolish 
when you Instead they put their system in line with Winli nk's servers, so 
if Winlink 2000 fails , they are likely to fail as well. They have not been 
able to give me a reason why they want to use Winlink's system when they 
really don't h ave to do this. Bonnie had a real shouting match 00 site and 
the next day, everything was OK an d all FB. Needless to say, she had to get 
on the phone and agreed to just do whatever they wanted because she knew 
that she wou ld be frozen out otherwise.
DE KV9u ... i , it sure is a nice setu p, but with my situatiuon, I would 
have no ohter stat ions to communicate with here in Wiscosnsin, since no one 
else has it to speak of and Pactor itself, the ori ginal pactor is not going 
t o be competitive with PWinmor. Even P2 will get some competition with 
Winmor exc really poor condx. I thnk I thnink the signal to noise ratioi is 
getting a b it better than when we started. Y es, the tremendous advan tage 
with a stand alone box that uses the computer primarily as a dumb terminal 
is that it is so much easier to get it to work. We have had the local EC 
demonstarate the VHF type of Winlink 2000 on two separate times to our 
group. Both times it failed to work even one mi le to the Telpac!!! pretty 
bad. Not sure what was causing the problem, but obviously no t a good thing 
to fail if we had really needed i t. I can type fairly fast, but I can't 
keep the error rate down wit hout going back quite often and redo stuff. S 
ometimes I can get a good stream going and then e verything falls apart, HI 
HI. DE KV9U
\
OK John great to chat a bit and try something like file transfers that 
actually work AR Q. HI. 7 7 3's for now VE5MU DE KV9U and see u later this 
has bee 3's for now VE5MU DE KV9U CLyou disco\nnect
Signals were easily visible on the waterfall, but sometimes there was no 
decoding. Fast QSB here in South Carolina. Signal from Rick were 2 S-units 
over the noise level.

73, Skip KH6TY




- Original Message - 
From: "John Bradley" 
To: ; 
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 5:27 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A


> As of 22:30 UTC  both stations are beaconing every 2 minutes using
> ALE400FAE.  Both stations are transmitting callsign and locator
>
>
>
> VE5GPM 7110.5 USB (unlicensed version)
>
>
>
> VE5MU 3584.5 USB
>
>
>
> Try a connect , or 

Re: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello to all,

The way to work (RX and TX) an ARQ FAE beacon is presented in this file: "The 
ARQ FAE beacon easy with Multipsk"

Here is the WEB address to fetch this Word file:
http://f6cte.free.fr/The_ARQ_FAE_beacon_easy_with_Multipsk.doc

73
Patrick
  - Original Message - 
  From: John Bradley 
  To: multi...@yahoogroups.com ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 11:27 PM
  Subject: [digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A


  As of 22:30 UTC  both stations are beaconing every 2 minutes using ALE400FAE. 
 Both stations are transmitting callsign and locator

   

  VE5GPM 7110.5 USB (unlicensed version)

   

  VE5MU 3584.5 USB

   

  Try a connect , or at least listen for these stations on these frequencies. 
They will operate until 0400Z

   

  John

  VE5MU

   

   

   

   

   

  From: multi...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:multi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Patrick Lindecker
  Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:04 PM
  To: multi...@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

   

  Hello John,

   

  RR for all.

   

  I don't know if you use the ARQ FAE beacon mode but I think it would be 
really simpler from everyone to locate your transmission and if, moreover, you 
add a RS ID, it will be even really easier to tune exactly to your frequency 
and to leave you a message.

   

  A beacon message every 2 minutes for example would be sufficient.

   

  73

  Patrick

   

- Original Message - 

From: John Bradley 

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; multi...@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:40 AM

Subject: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

 

In answer to your questions...

 

· did not have any luck with a connect from anyone other than local 
hams on both 141A and ALE400 , but the bands were in particularly bad shape 
over the weekend . Am in the process of installing a 800watt solid state amp at 
VE5GPM, so will try that later this week , probably running 300 W on both 
ALE400 and 141A.. will let you know where/when. GPM is located at an EOC and I 
have remote control abilities on that station.

Very interested in seeing how this works for text messaging up to 3K in 
size.

 

· Have given up on the PCALE and HFlink bunch, since there seems to 
be no interest in doing anything other than sending 1 line messages to each 
other , or simply sounding. The MARS version of PCALE might work, but the 
author is not allowing use of this software outside of the MARS side. why is 
anyone's guess. As far as I can see no progress has been made to get some sort 
of practical message handling system in place, using ALE to establish contacts.

 

· Have not talked to Dmitri for some time so have no idea where he 
is at with RFSM8000 . It is a great piece of software, requires fairly strong 
signal to operate at any speed. Still play with it from time to time.

 

· From our point of view have thrown in the towel and will likely 
go with SCS Modems using Pactor 3 for some of the longer haul stuff we do, and 
our served agencies seem ready to purchase the necessary gear. Still interested 
in a sound card messaging mode which could link to the internet when required.

 

· Am going to send Patrick a separate email about doing a striped 
down version of multipsk for emergency comms, something that would do 
PSK,MFSK,Olivia and the ALE modes, and nothing else...AND with a message 
gateway... that's all I want for next Christmas , hee hee.

 

· Am anxious to get a few folks experimenting with modes suitable 
for emergency comms, up and using them somewhere

 

 

John

VE5MU

 

 

 

 

Hi John,

Did you have any luck with either station getting a connect? I tried 
both frequencies last night but no luck. The 141A mode is not very 
sensitive compared to the more modern modes developed in the past 
decade. Have you considered the FAE400 mode for this purpose? I am not 
sure if it has the capability to do what you want in terms of 
networking, but it works very much deeper into the noise. Can the FAE 
modes do what the 141A type of mode can do? I have only used FAE400 for 
ARQ chatting, which I really liked, but almost no one else did:(

I can hear some 141A transmissions on 14.109 this morning but not able 
to decode them. Tried calling QRZ but no luck either. Based on their 
signal strength, they would decode very well with most of the sound card 
modes.

Can you update us on how things are going with the RFSM8000 product? My 
wife and I have been testing digital modes, particularly the ARQ 
messaging modes, and if nothing else, the RFSM2400 software seems to be 
the easiest messaging software available. Even though we can not use 
this on MF/HF (except maybe for image, but wh

[digitalradio] RE: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

[John Bradley]

As of 22:30 UTC  both stations are beaconing every 2 minutes using
ALE400FAE.  Both stations are transmitting callsign and locator

 

VE5GPM 7110.5 USB (unlicensed version)

 

VE5MU 3584.5 USB

 

Try a connect , or at least listen for these stations on these frequencies.
They will operate until 0400Z

 

John

VE5MU

 

 

 

 

 

From: multi...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:multi...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Patrick Lindecker
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:04 PM
To: multi...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

 

Hello John,

 

RR for all.

 

I don't know if you use the ARQ FAE beacon mode but I think it would be
really simpler from everyone to locate your transmission and if, moreover,
you add a RS ID, it will be even really easier to tune exactly to your
frequency and to leave you a message.

 

A beacon message every 2 minutes for example would be sufficient.

 

73

Patrick

 

- Original Message - 

From: John Bradley   

To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; multi...@yahoogroups.com 

Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:40 AM

Subject: [multipsk] ALE400 and 141A

 

In answer to your questions...

 

. did not have any luck with a connect from anyone other than local
hams on both 141A and ALE400 , but the bands were in particularly bad shape
over the weekend . Am in the process of installing a 800watt solid state amp
at VE5GPM, so will try that later this week , probably running 300 W on both
ALE400 and 141A.. will let you know where/when. GPM is located at an EOC and
I have remote control abilities on that station.

Very interested in seeing how this works for text messaging up to 3K in
size.

 

. Have given up on the PCALE and HFlink bunch, since there seems to
be no interest in doing anything other than sending 1 line messages to each
other , or simply sounding. The MARS version of PCALE might work, but the
author is not allowing use of this software outside of the MARS side. why is
anyone's guess. As far as I can see no progress has been made to get some
sort of practical message handling system in place, using ALE to establish
contacts.

 

. Have not talked to Dmitri for some time so have no idea where he
is at with RFSM8000 . It is a great piece of software, requires fairly
strong signal to operate at any speed. Still play with it from time to time.

 

. From our point of view have thrown in the towel and will likely go
with SCS Modems using Pactor 3 for some of the longer haul stuff we do, and
our served agencies seem ready to purchase the necessary gear. Still
interested in a sound card messaging mode which could link to the internet
when required.

 

. Am going to send Patrick a separate email about doing a striped
down version of multipsk for emergency comms, something that would do
PSK,MFSK,Olivia and the ALE modes, and nothing else...AND with a message
gateway... that's all I want for next Christmas , hee hee.

 

. Am anxious to get a few folks experimenting with modes suitable
for emergency comms, up and using them somewhere

 

 

John

VE5MU

 

 

 

 

Hi John,

Did you have any luck with either station getting a connect? I tried 
both frequencies last night but no luck. The 141A mode is not very 
sensitive compared to the more modern modes developed in the past 
decade. Have you considered the FAE400 mode for this purpose? I am not 
sure if it has the capability to do what you want in terms of 
networking, but it works very much deeper into the noise. Can the FAE 
modes do what the 141A type of mode can do? I have only used FAE400 for 
ARQ chatting, which I really liked, but almost no one else did:(

I can hear some 141A transmissions on 14.109 this morning but not able 
to decode them. Tried calling QRZ but no luck either. Based on their 
signal strength, they would decode very well with most of the sound card 
modes.

Can you update us on how things are going with the RFSM8000 product? My 
wife and I have been testing digital modes, particularly the ARQ 
messaging modes, and if nothing else, the RFSM2400 software seems to be 
the easiest messaging software available. Even though we can not use 
this on MF/HF (except maybe for image, but who knows, as the FCC won't 
even respond to requests for clarification here in the U.S.), it is 
certainly legal to use on 6 meters and up and might be a workable 
solution for some public service oriented hams.

Isn't it ironic that after all these years we still do not have any HF 
sound card messaging system that can even approach what we had with 
packet BBS systems? There is at least one HF packet group in my state 
which appears to be a casual group with similar interests, however the 
baud rate makes it difficult to get messages through and when I have 
monitored, there are mostly retry after retry. If they went to say, the 
110 baud speed, it would work a lot better. But then again, the hardware 
probably makes that impossible

[digitalradio] Re: Multipsk 4111

[dl8le]

In addition to the response by Patrick here are some following 
comments:

1. Version 4.12 of Multipsk is available now. I recommend to download 
and install it because of the excellent ID-functionality. Configure 
it to your specific requirements and conditions.

2. Install DXlab. 

3. For use with Multipsk you should have at least Commander and 
DXKeeper running, all others are optional. I recommend not to run 
WinWarbler together with Multipsk as long as you don't have some 
experience in setting up and operate the different programs.

4. Start Commander and DXKeeper (e.g. via DXLab Launcher)before you 
start Multipsk.

5. Click on the button "Transceiver" in Multipsk to receive the 
frequency information from Commander, set the button Requested, if 
you would like to preset QSL Sent and Received to R in DXKeeper. 

6. Log a qso in DXKeeper by clicking on the DXKeeper button.

I hope this will help a little bit. If necessary please send a direct 
e-mail for further information.

73

Juergen, DL8LE

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "mhz14071"  wrote:
>
> Hello 
> I am getting started with Multipsk and have the latest 4111.
> I have the following questions
> Should I  use it as is.  or should I go ahead and register the 
softwar 
> for the additional features ?. 
> I intend to log and use the features of DXLabs.
> My system is a Lsptop PC, Navigator interface, Icom Pro 3.
> Besides the documentation. Does any one have, or is there a 
simplified 
> sequential setup procedure to get this software running and cross 
over 
> to DXLabs?
> 73
> Stan N1ZX
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] 30m test of NEW QRSS mode in Multipsk

[Andrew O'Brien]

My QRSS1 transmissions were received by Bill , so it does work!

Andy

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] 30m test of NEW QRSS mode in Multipsk

[Andrew O'Brien]

OK, I will use QRSS1

Thanks


On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Patrick Lindecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy,
>
> In HF, the only possible (let's say reasonable) QRSS is QRSS1 (dot of one
> second), because the drift of XCVR will be too much for the AFC in QRSS3
> (1.5 Hz/mn max) when in QRSS1 it is easier (5 Hz/Mn) and it will be quicker
> (3 sec is really slow!).
>
> For other groups you forgot the WEB address to download:
>
> "It contains the Multipsk test version and help files:
> http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_18_07_2008.ZIP
> Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent. Download the
> file.
> Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in it and
> start C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be created
> automatically)."
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "DIGITALRADIO" ;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 2:51 PM
> Subject: [multipsk] 30m test of NEW QRSS mode in Multipsk
>
>>I will be experimenting with the new S L O W CW QRSS mode today from
>> 1500 to 1530 on 10.139 (1000 Hz AF) using the 3 second option. I will
>> also try the same at 22:00 UTC and 0100 UTC.
>>
>>
>> . --
>> Andy K3UK
>> www.obriensweb.com
>> (QSL via N2RJ)
>>
>> 
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 



-- 
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] how ?

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello David,

With Multipsk, you can send, in Video ID, the mode but also your call, name, 
QTH, locator...but not "73" specifically.
However, if you put "73" in your Locator information field, you could send "73" 
at any moment (with the  macro).

73
Patrick






  - Original Message - 
  From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 4:38 PM
  Subject: [multipsk] how ?


  yesterday looking around 30m with psk(not sure if 31 or 63), i saw, but 
  did not catch the tail end of a signal in the waterfall with a "73" 
  printed after it.

  this did not look like an video id as used by multipsk. this signal was 
  simply formed by the psk signal itself.

  anyone got an idea ?

  david/wd4kpd


   

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Test of JT65 on Multipsk / Essai du JT65 sur Multipsk

[Steinar Aanesland]

Hi Patrick!

This was great news! I am ready for testing form 160m to 10m . Calling 
on 14074 right now .

73 de LA5VNA Steinar




Patrick Lindecker skrev:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have issued a new test version of Multipsk which adds the JT65 mode 
> (RX/TX), for the ones interested by tests.
>
> This mode is interesting as it can decode very weak signals down to a 
> S/N=-25 dB (according to my measures and considering a reference noise 
> bandwidth of 3000 Hz, as for the other modes of Multipsk).
>
> A 4.8 Multipsk test version in a ZIP test package is available in my 
> site. It contains the Multipsk test version and help files + the 
> KVASD.EXE file.
> http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_02_03_2008.ZIP 
> 
>
> Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent. Download 
> the file.
> Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in it 
> and start C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be created 
> automatically).
>
> I propose a test in JT65A, 14074 KHz USB on the XCVR (AF about 1300 
> Hz) the next saturday at 11h00 UTC. I will call CQ. 
>
> __
>
> _Important_: the transmission of a JT65 frame must begin one second 
> after the minute with a tolerance on +/-1 sec on the PC clock. *So it 
> will be necessary before beginning to do JT65, to set your PC clock to 
> the right time. *
>
> For help about JT65, click on the right button of the mouse when you 
> are over any button relative to JT65. You can also look at the hints 
> on each button.
>
> If you are equipped, you can also try to do EME QSO (" Earth - Moon - 
> Earth "), in VHF and UHF.
>
> TKS to report bugs and transmissions done.
>
> 73
>
> Patrick
>
> **
>
> Here are some information about JT65
>
> __
>
> _Created by_: Joseph Taylor (K1JT) in 2004
>
> _
>
> Description :
>
> _
>
> Baud rate : 2,69 (11025/4096) or 0.372 second by 6 bits symbol
>
> Messages : a message of 46.8 seconds duration begins at t=1 sec after 
> the beginning of the UTC minute and lasts until t=47.8 sec (it is 
> necessary that the PC may be synchronised on a standard clock). It is 
> composed of 126 symbols, each one with a lenght of 4096 audio samples 
> (0.372 seconde). 63 carry a synchronization tone at 1270,5 Hz. 63 "6 
> bits symbols" carry the message (allowing the Reed-Solomon coding of 
> 72 bits).
> The 72 bits consist of (non exhaustive):
> * call 1 (28 bits) + call 2 (28 bits) + 4 characters Locator (15 bits) 
> plus the bit 72 to inform that it is a formatted message,
> * call 1 + call 2 (+ prefix or ending, example: F6CTE/P or ON/F6CTE) 
> plus the bit 72 to inform that it is a formatted message,
> * call 1 (+ prefix or suffix, example: F6CTE/P or ON/F6CTE) + call 2 
> plus the bit 72 to inform that it is a formatted message,
> * CQ + call + 4 characters Locator plus the bit 72 to inform that it 
> is a formatted message,
> * plain text: 13 characters
>
> Speed  : 72 bits (or 13 characters maximum in plain text) by 60 sec 
> period (with only one message by period) or 2,2 wpm
>
> ...
>
> 
> 
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.3/1306 - Release Date: 3/1/2008 
> 5:41 PM
>   

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK FAE 400 (formally New release of...)

[Tooner]

Belay that last request Rick, I found the answers to most of my
initial questions in a previous post you made.  Thanks again!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/25979

73. Frank

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK FAE 400 (formally New release of...)

[Tooner]

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The main reason for using Multipsk for me now has been the
> superb FAE 400 mode.

Thanks for that Rick.  I've never use FAE 400 (or any other ARQ, ALE
type modes.)  I haven't found much local interest in experimenting
with the connection-type modes, or anything people can't just jump
right into without some study.

I'll look more into FAE400 and ALE, which I'm sorely inexperienced. Is
FAE400 good for HF as well as VHF/UHF?  I'll do so more reading and
probably find that out, but in case you know any more off the top. 
Like calling frequency, if any.  etc.

>  Now if we could just get more hams to use it.

I can usually get Wisconsin from here pretty solid into Oregon if you
want to try something later.

Frank, K2NCC

Re: [digitalradio] Re: multipsk

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello Lynn,

As said by Bill, you installed the program from the desktop (which must not be 
done): Multipsk considered the desktop as the installation folder and installed 
all the files in this "folder".

To install Multipsk, read _READ_ME.TXT in the Multipsk package first.

Hereafter is the beginning of this file.

For questions about this soft, PSE, ask to the Multipsk Yahoo group.

73
Patrick

Beginning of _READ_ME.TXT 

To install the programs on your hard disk,from the WINDOWS Explorer:

  1) Unzip the MULTIPSK.ZIP file to a temporary directory, for example
"C:\TEMP".

  ATTENTION: don't unzip MULTIPSK.ZIP from the desktop. If you do this, you 
will have
  a lot of files on it (the desktop is a sort of directory)!

  2) From the temporary directory, not from MULTIPSK.ZIP, start the 
INSTAL file:
2.1) if you are installing the program for the first time, choose,
  for example, "C:\MULTIPSK". If you are updating a previuos version,
  use the actual directory name,
2.2) double-click on "Installation" if it is an original installation,
  otherwise on "Updating".
..


  - Original Message - 
  From: Bill McLaughlin 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 1:54 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: multipsk


  Hello Lynn,

  That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
  files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
  group - alot of very helpful people there, although I am sure Patrick
  monitors this group also.

  73,

  Bill N9DSJ 

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "n0alo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > Greetings
  > Am new to the list and do have a problem. I downloaded multipsk and
  was able to
  > run the program but when I shut it down, it left the desktop full of
  folders. Did miss
  > something in the installation?
  > Thanks
  > Lynn
  >



   

[digitalradio] Re: multipsk

[Bill McLaughlin]

Hello Lynn,

That is not a normal install. Perhaps you inadvertently unzipped the
files into your desk top? You might also ask on the dedicated Multipsk
group - alot of very helpful people there, although I am sure Patrick
monitors this group also.

73,

Bill N9DSJ 

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "n0alo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings
> Am new to the list and do have a problem. I downloaded multipsk and
was able to
> run the program but when I shut it down, it left the desktop full of
folders. Did miss
> something in the installation?
> Thanks
> Lynn
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] ARQ FAE - ALE400 - NBEMS dumb question

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello Bill,

It is theoritically possible.

But ARQ FAE means two things:
* a modulation: it is mainly issued from ALE (DBM),
* an ARQ protocol: it is matched to this ALE DBM modulation and is issued from 
a mix between Pax/Pax2 protocol and ALE DBM. I took the idea of ARQ memory 
(which is indispensable to limit the number of retries) from Pactor 1. However 
it is a soft memory (on each symbol) not a simple (hard) character memory.

The problem is not the modulation but the ARQ protocol which is the heart of 
the system. 
FLARQ/NBEMS could use other modulation but not other ARQ protocol...

>Is it a matter of using Multidem or Gui_serv_Multipsk to link
>to FLARQ? Sorry for the ignorant questions, but that is what I do best.
Yes it is possible to use a TCP/IP link between any program (Multidem or 
Gui_serv_Multipsk) and Multipsk (this one being a simple modem).

73
Patrick







  - Original Message - 
  From: Bill McLaughlin 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 8:44 AM
  Subject: [multipsk] ARQ FAE - ALE400 - NBEMS dumb question


  All,

  ARQ FAE in ALE400 has proven, in my limited experience, to be
  extremely robust compared to other ARQ modes and occupies reasonable
  bandwidth. How difficult would this mode be to port to FLARQ/NBEMS?
  It seems to me to be tailor-made for this application (but what do I
  know?). Is it a matter of using Multidem or Gui_serv_Multipsk to link
  to FLARQ? Sorry for the ignorant questions, but that is what I do best.

  73,

  Bill N9DSJ



   

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MultiPSK newest version

[Omar Shabsigh]

Thank you Juergen and Happy New Year. 

Maybe. Thank you for the explanation.  Take care


73

Omar YK1AO


  - Original Message - 
  From: dl8le 
  To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:16 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MultiPSK newest version


  Hello Omar,

  as far as I know the latest version of Multipsk is 4.6.

  Could it be that you have mixed this with the new DXKeeper 6.0x?

  73, HNY

  Juergen, DL8LE

  --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "o." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > Hi Group and Happy New Year;
  > 
  > I have MultiPSK Ver. 6 but lately I have noted in the group talk 
  about Ver.6 *
  > 
  > Can anybody confirm please?
  > 
  > 73
  > 
  > de
  > 
  > Omar YK1AO
  >



   

[digitalradio] Re: MultiPSK newest version

[dl8le]

Hello Omar,

as far as I know the latest version of Multipsk is 4.6.

Could it be that you have mixed this with the new DXKeeper 6.0x?

73, HNY

Juergen, DL8LE

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "o." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Group and Happy New Year;
> 
> I have MultiPSK Ver. 6 but lately I have noted in the group talk 
about Ver.6 *
> 
> Can anybody confirm please?
> 
> 73
> 
> de
> 
> Omar YK1AO
>

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Remote Access Desktop, and remote digital operation

[Jon Maguire]

John
I too use Remote Desktop on my local LAN to access my Ham gear. As far 
as access from the Internet, there could be an issue with a hardware or 
software firewall blocking inbound data. I need to try this here, as I 
have access too 2 WANs (ISPs) at home.


73... Jon W1MNK Brandon, FL USA 


John Bradley wrote:


 I have been fooling around with Windows XP remote access desktop, and 
found that I can readily access a desktop on any computer , wired or 
wireless, connected to my router.


 

Further, I found that if  I was signed in on the ham computer , and 
MultiPSK or MixW was running already, I could change modes etc and 
actually do a digital QSO from a remote computer. I also had the 
Kenwood rig control software running, so could change frequencies, 
power, etc etc .


 

Since Digital doesn't need any audio feed to the remote, or microphone 
feed, it really lends itself to remote operations.


 

Trying this from the internet though did not permit accessing  the 
computer.. according to XP documentation it's possible but didn't 
work for me. It looks like we need a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to 
do this?


 

Possible  applications include remote control of a Station located in 
an EOC, and enabling folks like Patrick


To access a station in North America to try the software personally. 
I'm not sure of the US laws, but know that


Patrick could run a station here remotely, signing himself F6CTE/VE5 , 
since there is a reciprocal agreement between Canada and France


 


Any bright ideas on how we can do this ?

 


John

VE5MU

 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Tests in ARQ FAE

[John Bradley]

Steinar;

I'll listen for you on 30m and 20M , on 10136.5 now but probably too late. 

Have heard Europe today so maybe band is improving, will sit on 14109.5 as of 
0600Z tomorrow. See if you can get my station to answer

John
VE5MU


  - Original Message - 
  From: Steinar Aanesland 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 4:57 AM
  Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Tests in ARQ FAE


  Hi Patrick,

  What about trying 10.136,500 later this evening ?
  The 30m is a lovely band free from contest qrm .

  73 de LA5VNA Steinar

  Patrick Lindecker skrev:
  >
  > Hello to all,
  > 
  > As there is a WW RTTY contest, the 14109.5 frequency is and will not
  > be free. So this ARQ FAE test will be done another day.
  > 
  > 73
  > Patrick
  > 
  >
  > - Original Message -
  > *From:* Patrick Lindecker <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
  > <mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
  > *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2007 11:21 PM
  > *Subject:* Tests in ARQ FAE
  >
  > Hello to all,
  >
  > I will be QRV for tests to-morrow saturday morning in 14109.5 KHz
  > USB at 10h00 UTC, for the ones interested. I will call CQ in ARQ
  > FAE up to 10h30 UTC.
  >
  > A 4.4.2 Multipsk test version in a ZIP test package is available
  > in my site. It contains the Multipsk test version (with ARQ FAE
  > bugs fixed).
  > http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_22_09_2007.ZIP
  > <http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_22_09_2007.ZIP>
  >
  > Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent.
  > Download the file.
  > Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in
  > it and start C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be
  > created automatically).
  >
  > 73
  >
  > Patrick
  >
  > 



   


--


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.33/1037 - Release Date: 9/29/2007 
1:32 PM

[digitalradio] Re: [multipsk] Re: Tests in ARQ FAE

[Steinar Aanesland]

Hi Patrick,

What about trying 10.136,500 later this evening ?
The 30m is a lovely band free from contest qrm .

73 de LA5VNA Steinar


Patrick Lindecker skrev:
>
> Hello to all,
>  
> As there is a WW RTTY contest, the 14109.5 frequency is and will not
> be free. So this ARQ FAE test will be done another day.
>  
> 73
> Patrick
>  
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Patrick Lindecker 
> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  ; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> 
> *Sent:* Friday, September 28, 2007 11:21 PM
> *Subject:* Tests in ARQ FAE
>
> Hello to all,
>
> I will be QRV for tests to-morrow saturday morning in 14109.5 KHz
> USB at 10h00 UTC, for the ones interested. I will call CQ in ARQ
> FAE up to 10h30 UTC.
>
> A 4.4.2 Multipsk test version in a ZIP test package is available
> in my site. It contains the Multipsk test version (with ARQ FAE
> bugs fixed).
> http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_22_09_2007.ZIP
> 
>
> Paste this adress in your Internet Explorer or equivalent.
> Download the file.
> Create a tempory folder (C:\TEST, for example), unzip the file in
> it and start C:\TEST\Multipsk.exe (the auxiliary files will be
> created automatically).
>
> 73
>
> Patrick
>
>  

[digitalradio] Re: Multipsk/Winwarbler DM780 via remote access

[Dave Bernstein]

In the remote control configuration I used, WinWarbler was running on 
my home station PC, so the audio link from PC to transceiver did not 
traverse Skype. Skype let me hear the received audio at my remote 
location, and transmit SSB.

I have not tried transporting PSK or RTTY audio between PC and 
transceiver over a network using Skype. A virtual soundcard that 
transports digital data over the network and uses the home station's 
soundcard for D/A and A/D would eliminate the raggedness you 
mentioned. I'd be surprised if someone hasn't already done this. A 
properly-packaged virtual serial port and virtual soundcard would 
enable remote control with any transceiver control and digital mode 
application.

I'm traveling a lot less than I once did and so don't often use 
remote control.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dave, I have used Winwarbler and Multipsk on the local  computer 
this
> evening, connected to my home station via Skype.  Both work well on 
the
> broadband wireless system my local PC was using.  I did a test 
transmission
> in RTTY , AFSK, and the audio sounded a little rough at the remote 
end.  I
> will have to record Skype throughput levels in the future.
> 
> I have no clue how I would send FSK RTTY when accessing my rig over 
the
> Internet, but will give that idea some more thought since it might 
be
> cleaner transmitted tones, right?  The tones would generated from 
rig to
> airwaves, no Skype involved.  Winwarbler transceiver commands 
perhaps,   I
> just changed the rig to FSK mode via Ham Radio Deluxe and sent a 
transmit
> command , I get a single tone rather than FSK RTTY tones (via 
monitoring TX
> output with my ears) .   Too tired to think right now.  The fix 
would
> involve thinking about Microham's device router , ham radio deluxe, 
an d
> more.
> 
> The ham radio deluxe is working well as the vehicle for remote 
control of
> the TS2000.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/7/07, Dave AA6YQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Was I was on Maui two years ago, I used Skype and LogMeIn to 
control my
> > home station (near Boston) and made QSOs in CW, SSB, RTTY, and 
PSK. The
> > software was WinWarbler, Commander, and DXView (antenna 
rotation). The
> > transceiver being controlled was an Icom 756. I recall no latency 
issues.
> >
> > Were I to do this again, I'd instead run these applications 
locally on my
> > laptop, and use Skype and virtual serial ports to remotely 
control the
> > transceiver and antenna rotator.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> >  Dave, AA6YQ
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > *From:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *On Behalf Of *Andrew O'Brien
> > *Sent:* Saturday, April 07, 2007 1:30 PM
> > *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> > *Subject:* [digitalradio] DM780 via remote access
> >
> >  Just tested DM780 with Ham Radio Deluxe and Skype and it worked 
in
> > receive mode very well. I connected to my home station via the
> > Internet, woke up my TS-2000, tuned to 14070 , launched DM780 in 
PSK31
> > mode and was able to decode dignals very well. All this from my
> > neighbour's house, next step is my laptop and the local coffee 
shop.
> >
> > I am assuming the latency with Skype and digital modes can cause 
some
> > issues , but did not see any on receive only. Has anyone tried
> > transmitting PSK31 via remote access? I saw W1CDO doing it with 
JT65A
> > mode last weekend but I am not sure if he was using HRD and Skype.
> >
> > If anyone wants to connect to my station, for receive only at this
> > time, feel free to contact me and I will set things up that will 
grant
> > you access. You will need Skype and Ham Radio Deluxe , both FREE. 
I
> > 'll test transmit later today.
> >
> > Andy K3UK
> >
> > 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andy K3UK
> Skype Me :  callto://andyobrien73
> www.obriensweb.com
>

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello Dave,

TKS for the Windows references.

1 ms would be sufficient for Pactor 1 100 bauds, as a bit is 10 ms long.

Now, I wonder how transceivers can switch from RX to TX and TX to RX with 
respect to the required precision (<=1 ms) under the Pactor 1 protocol:  960 
msec of TX frame and 290 msec of RX, this cyclically...a mystery but nothing 
to see with Windows...

73
Patrick





- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 3:38 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


> The claimed precision is ~1 ms; see
>
> http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?
> url=/library/en-us/Multimed/htm/_win32_about_multimedia_timers.asp
>
> I have not noticed any serious problems with software-generated CW
> up to ~40 wpm or so, though certain Windows actions are inexplicably
> pre-emptive: dragging the Task Manager window, for example.
>
> The general reference for multimedia timers is
>
> http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?
> url=/library/en-us/Multimed/htm/_win32_multimedia_timers.asp
>
> Is 1 ms precision sufficient for Pactor ARQ?
>
>   73,
>
>   Dave, AA6YQ
>
>
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> TKS Dave for the information.
>> I will see what are Windows "callbacks", as this seems to be the
> key.
>>
>> One question: do you know the precision of the event timing (as
> far as I
>> know each thread is switched 80 times/sec maximum, so the
> precision might be
>> 12,5 ms which might not be sufficient to key CW, so I must miss
>> something...). Suppose you can really start an event at a precise
> predefined
>> time (as an interruption under DOS), what would prevent to program
> Pactor1
>> ARQ under Windows (I have a doubt now)?
>>
>> 73
>> Patrick
>>
>> - Original Message - 
>> From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 4:10 AM
>> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>>
>>
>> > OK. Check out the Delphi interfaces to the Windows Multimedia
>> > Library. Assuming Delphi supports callbacks, you should find the
>> > appropriate mechanism there.
>> >
>> >   73,
>> >
>> >  Dave, AA6YQ
>> >
>> > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello Dave,
>> >>
>> >> MultiPSK is written in Pascal. I use Delphi 6 (Borland).
>> >>
>> >> 73
>> >> Patrick
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> - Original Message - 
>> >> From: "Dave" 
>> >> To: 
>> >> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 PM
>> >> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and
>> > what
>> >> > compiler
>> >> > or development environment are you using?
>> >> >
>> >> >73,
>> >> >
>> >> >   Dave, AA6YQ
>> >> >
>> >> > -Original Message-
>> >> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > On
>> >> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
>> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
>> >> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> >> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > TKS Dave,
>> >> >
>> >> > I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have
>> > the name of
>> >> > a
>> >> >
>> >> > Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first
> step
>> > in the
>> >> > search of information?
>> >> >
>> >> > 73
>> >> > Patrick
>> >> >
>> >> > - Original Message - 
>> >> > From: "Dave Bernstein" 
>> >> > To: 
>> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
>> >> > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need
> to
>> > busy-
>> >> >> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be
&

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Dave Bernstein]

The claimed precision is ~1 ms; see 

http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?
url=/library/en-us/Multimed/htm/_win32_about_multimedia_timers.asp

I have not noticed any serious problems with software-generated CW 
up to ~40 wpm or so, though certain Windows actions are inexplicably 
pre-emptive: dragging the Task Manager window, for example.

The general reference for multimedia timers is

http://windowssdk.msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?
url=/library/en-us/Multimed/htm/_win32_multimedia_timers.asp

Is 1 ms precision sufficient for Pactor ARQ?

   73,

   Dave, AA6YQ



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> TKS Dave for the information.
> I will see what are Windows "callbacks", as this seems to be the 
key.
> 
> One question: do you know the precision of the event timing (as 
far as I 
> know each thread is switched 80 times/sec maximum, so the 
precision might be 
> 12,5 ms which might not be sufficient to key CW, so I must miss 
> something...). Suppose you can really start an event at a precise 
predefined 
> time (as an interruption under DOS), what would prevent to program 
Pactor1 
> ARQ under Windows (I have a doubt now)?
> 
> 73
> Patrick
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 4:10 AM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> 
> 
> > OK. Check out the Delphi interfaces to the Windows Multimedia
> > Library. Assuming Delphi supports callbacks, you should find the
> > appropriate mechanism there.
> >
> >   73,
> >
> >  Dave, AA6YQ
> >
> > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Dave,
> >>
> >> MultiPSK is written in Pascal. I use Delphi 6 (Borland).
> >>
> >> 73
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >> - Original Message - 
> >> From: "Dave" 
> >> To: 
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 PM
> >> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> >>
> >>
> >> > In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and
> > what
> >> > compiler
> >> > or development environment are you using?
> >> >
> >> >73,
> >> >
> >> >   Dave, AA6YQ
> >> >
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > On
> >> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
> >> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> >> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > TKS Dave,
> >> >
> >> > I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have
> > the name of
> >> > a
> >> >
> >> > Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first 
step
> > in the
> >> > search of information?
> >> >
> >> > 73
> >> > Patrick
> >> >
> >> > - Original Message - 
> >> > From: "Dave Bernstein" 
> >> > To: 
> >> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
> >> > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need 
to
> > busy-
> >> >> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be 
invoked
> > on
> >> >> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval
> > expires,
> >> >> the specified code is invoked.
> >> >>
> >> >> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the 
Windows
> >> >> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in 
which
> >> >> MultiPSK is written.
> >> >>
> >> >>   73,
> >> >>
> >> >>  Dave, AA6YQ
> >> >>
> >> >> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker"
> > 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Hello Dave,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the 
sound
> >> >> card, no
> >> >>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to
> > control
> >>

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Patrick Lindecker]

TKS Dave for the information.
I will see what are Windows "callbacks", as this seems to be the key.

One question: do you know the precision of the event timing (as far as I 
know each thread is switched 80 times/sec maximum, so the precision might be 
12,5 ms which might not be sufficient to key CW, so I must miss 
something...). Suppose you can really start an event at a precise predefined 
time (as an interruption under DOS), what would prevent to program Pactor1 
ARQ under Windows (I have a doubt now)?

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 4:10 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


> OK. Check out the Delphi interfaces to the Windows Multimedia
> Library. Assuming Delphi supports callbacks, you should find the
> appropriate mechanism there.
>
>   73,
>
>  Dave, AA6YQ
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> MultiPSK is written in Pascal. I use Delphi 6 (Borland).
>>
>> 73
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message - 
>> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 PM
>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>>
>>
>> > In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and
> what
>> > compiler
>> > or development environment are you using?
>> >
>> >73,
>> >
>> >   Dave, AA6YQ
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On
>> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
>> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> > TKS Dave,
>> >
>> > I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have
> the name of
>> > a
>> >
>> > Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first step
> in the
>> > search of information?
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> > - Original Message - 
>> > From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: 
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
>> > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> >> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to
> busy-
>> >> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked
> on
>> >> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval
> expires,
>> >> the specified code is invoked.
>> >>
>> >> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows
>> >> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which
>> >> MultiPSK is written.
>> >>
>> >>   73,
>> >>
>> >>  Dave, AA6YQ
>> >>
>> >> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker"
> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Dave,
>> >>>
>> >>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound
>> >> card, no
>> >>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to
> control
>> >> the time
>> >>> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no
>> >> interruptions
>> >>> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of
> the
>> >> dot (or
>> >>> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the
>> >> Windows timer,
>> >>> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I
>> >> don't know
>> >>> an other way to do it.
>> >>> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid
> (maximum
>> >> between 20
>> >>> to 60 /sec).
>> >>>
>> >>> 73
>> >>> Patrick
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> - Original Message -
>> >>> From: "Dave" 
>> >>> To: 
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
>> >>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> >A 50% cpu load seems 

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Dave Bernstein]

OK. Check out the Delphi interfaces to the Windows Multimedia 
Library. Assuming Delphi supports callbacks, you should find the 
appropriate mechanism there. 

   73,

  Dave, AA6YQ

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hello Dave,
> 
> MultiPSK is written in Pascal. I use Delphi 6 (Borland).
> 
> 73
> Patrick
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 PM
> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> 
> 
> > In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and 
what 
> > compiler
> > or development environment are you using?
> >
> >73,
> >
> >   Dave, AA6YQ
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > On
> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> >
> >
> > TKS Dave,
> >
> > I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have 
the name of 
> > a
> >
> > Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first step 
in the
> > search of information?
> >
> > 73
> > Patrick
> >
> > - Original Message - 
> > From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
> > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
> >
> >
> >> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to 
busy-
> >> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked 
on
> >> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval 
expires,
> >> the specified code is invoked.
> >>
> >> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows
> >> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which
> >> MultiPSK is written.
> >>
> >>   73,
> >>
> >>  Dave, AA6YQ
> >>
> >> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" 

> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Dave,
> >>>
> >>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound
> >> card, no
> >>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to 
control
> >> the time
> >>> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no
> >> interruptions
> >>> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of 
the
> >> dot (or
> >>> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the
> >> Windows timer,
> >>> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I
> >> don't know
> >>> an other way to do it.
> >>> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid 
(maximum
> >> between 20
> >>> to 60 /sec).
> >>>
> >>> 73
> >>> Patrick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Dave" 
> >>> To: 
> >>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
> >>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes
> >> less than 1%
> >>> > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It 
uses
> >> ticks from
> >>> > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are 
you
> >> using?
> >>> >
> >>> >  73,
> >>> >
> >>> >  Dave, AA6YQ
> >>> >
> >>> > -Original Message-
> >>> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> > On
> >>> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> >>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM
> >>> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> >>> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Hello Bill and Paul,
> >>> >
> >>> > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this 
way).
> >> However, it
> >>> > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % 
of
> >> the
> >>> &g

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Patrick Lindecker]

Hello Dave,

MultiPSK is written in Pascal. I use Delphi 6 (Borland).

73
Patrick


- Original Message - 
From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:36 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


> In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and what 
> compiler
> or development environment are you using?
>
>73,
>
>   Dave, AA6YQ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> On
> Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>
>
> TKS Dave,
>
> I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have the name of 
> a
>
> Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first step in the
> search of information?
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW
>
>
>> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to busy-
>> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked on
>> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval expires,
>> the specified code is invoked.
>>
>> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows
>> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which
>> MultiPSK is written.
>>
>>   73,
>>
>>  Dave, AA6YQ
>>
>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Dave,
>>>
>>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound
>> card, no
>>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control
>> the time
>>> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no
>> interruptions
>>> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the
>> dot (or
>>> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the
>> Windows timer,
>>> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I
>> don't know
>>> an other way to do it.
>>> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum
>> between 20
>>> to 60 /sec).
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: 
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
>>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>>>
>>>
>>> >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes
>> less than 1%
>>> > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses
>> ticks from
>>> > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you
>> using?
>>> >
>>> >  73,
>>> >
>>> >  Dave, AA6YQ
>>> >
>>> > -Original Message-
>>> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > On
>>> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM
>>> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hello Bill and Paul,
>>> >
>>> > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way).
>> However, it
>>> > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of
>> the
>>> > computing
>>> >
>>> > power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer").
>>> >
>>> > The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB).
>>> >
>>> > 73
>>> > Patrick
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > - Original Message -
>>> > From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > To: 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM
>>> > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> That IS cw Paul.
>>> >>
>>> >> In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW
>>> >>
>>> >> By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter.
>>> >>
>>> >> When

RE: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Dave]

In what programming language is MultiPSK written, Patrick, and what compiler
or development environment are you using?

73,

   Dave, AA6YQ

-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 17:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


TKS Dave,

I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have the name of a

Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first step in the 
search of information?

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to busy- 
> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked on 
> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval expires, 
> the specified code is invoked.
>
> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows 
> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which 
> MultiPSK is written.
>
>   73,
>
>  Dave, AA6YQ
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound
> card, no
>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control
> the time
>> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no
> interruptions
>> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the
> dot (or
>> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the
> Windows timer,
>> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I
> don't know
>> an other way to do it.
>> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum
> between 20
>> to 60 /sec).
>>
>> 73
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>>
>>
>> >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes
> less than 1%
>> > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses
> ticks from
>> > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you
> using?
>> >
>> >  73,
>> >
>> >  Dave, AA6YQ
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On
>> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM
>> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello Bill and Paul,
>> >
>> > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way).
> However, it
>> > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of
> the
>> > computing
>> >
>> > power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer").
>> >
>> > The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB).
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message -
>> > From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM
>> > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> >> That IS cw Paul.
>> >>
>> >> In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW
>> >>
>> >> By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter.
>> >>
>> >> When you say won't do "regular" cw...  do you mean
>> >> keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it
>> >> to the key jack of your rig?
>> >>
>> >> 73
>> >>
>> >> Bill  KA8VIT
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> http://ka8vit.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> >>>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> >>>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >>>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 -
>> >>>
>> >>>  MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR
> CW,AT LEAST
>> >>> 

Re: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Patrick Lindecker]

TKS Dave,

I did know this (I'm an amateur in programmation). Do you have the name of a 
Windows API (or some key word) which could give me a first step in the 
search of information?

73
Patrick

- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:08 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW


> Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to busy-
> wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked on
> callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval expires,
> the specified code is invoked.
>
> I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows
> Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which
> MultiPSK is written.
>
>   73,
>
>  Dave, AA6YQ
>
> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Dave,
>>
>> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound
> card, no
>> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control
> the time
>> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no
> interruptions
>> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the
> dot (or
>> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the
> Windows timer,
>> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I
> don't know
>> an other way to do it.
>> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum
> between 20
>> to 60 /sec).
>>
>> 73
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message - 
>> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: 
>> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
>> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>>
>>
>> >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes
> less than 1%
>> > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses
> ticks from
>> > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you
> using?
>> >
>> >  73,
>> >
>> >  Dave, AA6YQ
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > On
>> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM
>> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> > Hello Bill and Paul,
>> >
>> > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way).
> However, it
>> > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of
> the
>> > computing
>> >
>> > power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer").
>> >
>> > The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB).
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Patrick
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > - Original Message - 
>> > From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM
>> > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >
>> >
>> >> That IS cw Paul.
>> >>
>> >> In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW
>> >>
>> >> By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter.
>> >>
>> >> When you say won't do "regular" cw...  do you mean
>> >> keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it
>> >> to the key jack of your rig?
>> >>
>> >> 73
>> >>
>> >> Bill  KA8VIT
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> http://ka8vit.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> >>>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>> >>>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
>> >>>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 -
>> >>>
>> >>>  MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR
> CW,AT LEAST
>> >>> I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM
>> >>>  K8PG-Paul
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to
> Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>> >>
>> >> Other areas of interest:
>> >>
>> >> The MixW Reflector :

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[Dave Bernstein]

Windows supports an eventing model that eliminates the need to busy-
wait the CPU. You specify a duration and the code to be invoked on 
callback, and then terminate the thread. When the interval expires, 
the specified code is invoked. 

I do this with TimerMM.DLL, but you may want to use the Windows  
Multimedia Library directly depending on the language in which 
MultiPSK is written.

   73,

  Dave, AA6YQ

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hello Dave,
> 
> If I transmit via the Windows buffering in a tone to the sound 
card, no 
> problem. If I transmit through the serial port, I need to control 
the time 
> ellapsed (for a dot or a dash). As under Windows there are no 
interruptions 
> (sniff), there is no way to know at which moment is the end of the 
dot (or 
> the dash). So I keep the CPU working in a loop, testing the 
Windows timer, 
> until the end of the dot. It is not a very elegant method but I 
don't know 
> an other way to do it.
> Note: the Delphi system timer is not sufficiently rapid (maximum 
between 20 
> to 60 /sec).
> 
> 73
> Patrick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message - 
> From: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:53 AM
> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> 
> 
> >A 50% cpu load seems really high, Patrick. WinWarbler consumes 
less than 1%
> > of a 1.5 ghz Pentium 4 when generating CW via software. It uses 
ticks from
> > TimerMM.dll to drive a state machine. What sort of timer are you 
using?
> >
> >  73,
> >
> >  Dave, AA6YQ
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > On
> > Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 18:27 PM
> > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> >
> >
> > Hello Bill and Paul,
> >
> > Multipsk can directly key the transceiver (I use it this way). 
However, it
> > is not advised under Windows XP because it takes about 50 % of 
the 
> > computing
> >
> > power (due to the obligation to manage a pseudo "timer").
> >
> > The most simple to do CW is to do it as PSK31 (in USB).
> >
> > 73
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> >
> > - Original Message - 
> > From: "Box SisteenHundred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:36 PM
> > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> >
> >
> >> That IS cw Paul.
> >>
> >> In reality, that's how your rig probably generates CW
> >>
> >> By injecting an audio tone into a SSB transmitter.
> >>
> >> When you say won't do "regular" cw...  do you mean
> >> keying a circuit open and closed so you can connect it
> >> to the key jack of your rig?
> >>
> >> 73
> >>
> >> Bill  KA8VIT
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://ka8vit.com
> >>
> >>
> >>>From: "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> >>>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> >>>Subject: [digitalradio] MULTIPSK CW
> >>>Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:56:36 -
> >>>
> >>>  MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR 
CW,AT LEAST
> >>> I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM
> >>>  K8PG-Paul
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
> >>
> >> Other areas of interest:
> >>
> >> The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> >> DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan 
policy
> >> discussion)
> >>
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
> >
> > Other areas of interest:
> >
> > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy
> > discussion)
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  
Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
> >
> > Other areas of interest:
> >
> > The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
> > DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan 
policy 
> > discussion)
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>







Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[digitalradio] Re: MULTIPSK CW

[kd0ca]

You will need to look at the "modes" setup button, and you can tell
the program to use only audio to the rig on CW, or you can select
audio plus PTT (keying through RTS line) or just the PTT keying alone.

If you have a transistor switch or optoisolator and switch in the RTS
circuit, it will key the rig in "real" CW.  I am so blessed to have a
Ten-Tec Argonaut V, as the PTT for the rig doubles as hard keying when
I am in CW mode.  MultiPSK works great for CW transmit and receive for me.

Most important in receiving CW via computer, is to narrow the IF and
reduce the RF gain (or use an attenuator).  If the CW is too loud and
above the threshhold of the decoding algorithm, it seems that is
copies badly in EVERY CW reception program.  And nearly all CW RXC
programs do a very good job when you "starve" them for a signal a
littel bit. :-)

CwGet is the best, bar none.  MultiPSK is very good, however.  It
seems to me MultiPSK does all things well.  (Kudos to Patrick)

73,
Jerry KDØCA
Washington, IA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  MULTI PSK ONLY XMTS CW ON USB OR LSB DOES NOT DO REGULAR CW,AT LEAST
>  I CANT GET IT TO WORK ?? BUT IS A EXCELLENT DIGITAL PROGRAM
>  K8PG-Paul
>






Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[digitalradio] Re: MultiPSK problem

[max_ve3tmt]

Rick,

There is a program on the net called "QuickMix". If you have to use
different sound card levels for different programs, this one will
allow you to save each setting for the purpose at hand. For example I
use different levels for my PSK software and RTTY software because of
the power levels involved. My DSP programs also require a different
level. Quickmix will save each one separately and only takes the click
of a mouse to load the appropriate levels.

http://www.ptpart.co.uk/quickmix/

73,
Max VE3TMT







Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to   telnet://208.15.25.196/

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

[digitalradio] Re: MultiPSK query

[Jerry]

Mel,

For your information there is a Yahoo group for Multipsk:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/multipsk/

But to keep it short, first click in the empty "Call box", then double
left click on the call sign in the receive pane, the call sign wiil be
shown in the "call box",  same for name, click on the empty "Name box"
then double click on the name in the receive pane to copy that to the
log.  The log can be ported to "DXKeeper" if you have that software.

HTH,

Jerry  -  K0HZI 


--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 Hello everyone,
 
 I've been having a look at MultiPSK today, ploughing through the help 
 pages, and then filling in all the required details. Then came the 
 confusion. How do I enter the call and name of the other station ?
 
 I've tried highlighting and dragging and double clicking and I can't 
 think of anything else except typing the details in. But surely not !
 friendly help pages has already addled my brain !
 
 Kind regards,  Mel G0GQK







 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/ELTolB/TM
~-> 

Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to   telnet://208.15.25.196/

Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/

Looking for digital mode software?  Check the quick commerical free link below
http://www.obriensweb.com/digimodes.html
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/