[Elecraft] [Fwd: Ulrich L. Rohde]

2006-11-14 Thread David Kimbrel



 Original Message 
Subject:Ulrich L. Rohde
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:13:15 -0600
From:   David Kimbrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net



Ulrich L. Rohde's (DJ2LR/W2) name rang a bell. Look in my folder of 
antenna transmatchs and found a copy of an article from December 1974 
(page 48) written by him. The article was called "Some Ideas on Antenna 
Couplers". Basic idea was build a "L-Network" with a 4:1 autotransformer 
between the transmitter and the tuner to drop the output of the 
transmitter to less than 12.5 ohms. I was always interested in building 
that unit to see how it would work for QRP operations. Wondering if 
anyone remembers that article or how ever build a unit similar?


Dave, WB9YWE


Message: 19
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:17:23 -0800
From: "William M. Spaulding, SR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Elecraft] Text on design



Hi Doug,



When I was a younger old man, *Ulrich Rhode* (Rhode and Schwartz Instruments) and a 
collaborator wrote "Communications Receivers: DPS, Software Radios, and >>Design, 
3rd Edition".  I would recommend this book most highly for an EE.  It gets highly 
technical in spots.



Good luck,



Bill
NA7Y





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
David,

Do you read a proper frequency at TP3? Does the PLL Reference Oscillator
Range test produce the correct frequencies? (see the manual page 60).

If the answer to the above question is YES, then check the winding of T5.
Be certain the turns are correct and the leads are inserted into the correct
holes.  Check the tinning and soldering.  Check the soldering in the
vicinity of T5 and Q18.  What are the RF Voltages that you read at the gate
and source of Q18?

Check the DC Voltages (compare to chart in Appendix E) at U3.  What are the
RF Voltages at U3 pin s 3 and 6?

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
>
> I don't know. Must be asleep at the switch.
> Here's what's what so far this end.
> The probe verifies -- it did read correctly in step 3 on page 46.
> The leads are correct.
>
> I have replaced the suspect diode but the probe will not read anything
> at TP1.
>
> I have constructed the RF Probe and connected it to my DMM.
> It reads voltages at certain points, but sees nothing at TP1.
>
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] How long to build KSB2 and KPA100?

2006-11-14 Thread Darwin, Keith
I got a package from Elecraft yesterday.  Soon my K2 will be SSB capable
and generating 100 watts.
 
How long do each of these kits take to build?  I'm guessing 5 hrs for
the KSB2 and 25 for the KPA100.
 
The mini-module AF1 took me 2 hours.  My K2 took me about 50 hrs to
build if that gives you an idea of my speed (or lack there of).
 
- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411 -
 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Desoldering tool?

2006-11-14 Thread Darwin, Keith
Sometime in the past, someone posted a link to someplace where a $30
solder sucker soldering iron was being sold.  IIRC, it was a pencil iron
with a good sucking device attached.  Anyone have the link?
 
Or, can you guys recommend a good yet inexpensive tool for doing rework?
I'm not interested in spending any serious money on such a tool since I
can always use the pro vacuum gear here at work.
 
- Keith N1AS -
- K2 5411 -
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 assembly question

2006-11-14 Thread Richard Kent


1. I made the first power up and everything went just like the manual. 
However, the preamp is marked on. The manual doesn't say which way it 
should be and I thought I'd check before I got too much farther.

On mine the preamp was always on even when it did not exist yet.

2. I'm confused about soldering the RF probe. I can't seem to find a good 
way to position and solder the RG174 cable ends to the banana plugs. 
There's just a slight dimple at the end of the plugs and I can't figure a 
good mechanical way to connect them before soldering.

I cheated here. I bought a crimp on BNC for RG/174 and terminated the coax.
I already use a BNC to banana plug adaptor for my voltmeter for other
reasons. This just made the probe compatible with my system. However, this
does make for a solid connection.

Richard Kent WD8AJG K2 5296

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] OT:switching transistors

2006-11-14 Thread Steven Pituch
Hi all,
I know this is not directly related to Elecraft, but I think it is an
acceptable OT topic per the admins, and I think I remember Wayne even
talking about this subject long ago, so here goes.

I have a radio (FT8100) that I want to use with a TNC-X PIC modem.  However,
the tnc will not put the FT8100 into transmit.  The tnc uses a simple
2na switch with a 10K resistor in series with the PIC output and the
base of the 2na.

1) If I disconnect the radio cable from the tnc and ground the PKS (ground
to transmit) wire, the FT8100 goes into transmit.

2) If I connect the same cable to a new Icom IC-208H, the TNC-X works fine
and keys the radio.

John Hansen the designer of the TNC-X says that there are many hams using
the FT8100 with the TNC-X and there are no currently known problems with
using the TNC-X and FT-8100.

I am thinking that the 2na might be a little weak or have too much on
resistance.  I will be checking the 2na with my analyzer.

I think I remember Wayne, N6KR, saying how great the 2n7000 was over a
bipolar transistor for use as a switch.  Can anyone recommend a circuit
change using a 2n7000 or perhaps some other simple mod to the tnc other than
using a reed relay to let the FT8100 do its thing?  I relize that I should
probably go into the FT8100, but I am not looking forward to that.


Thanks,
Steve Pituch, W2MY
Corpus Christi

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.3/531 - Release Date: 11/12/2006
 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2 assembly question

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
Richard,

The preamp does not have to exist for the display to indicate that it is ON.
The microprocessor controls the display indication.  You should be able to
tap the PRE/ATT button and switch from the attenuator to the preamp to OFF
for both.

Sounds like you solved your RF Probe problem just fine.  Normally the shield
would be connected to a piece of wire about 3 inches long - the coax center
conductor solders to into the cup (dimple) of the red banana plug and the
black banana plug is soldered to the wire connected to the coax braid.  At
least that is the way I do it.  I also use a bit of heat shrink at the
junction of the braid and the wire just to make things neat, but whichever
way you get the connections made, it should work FB.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
>
> 1. I made the first power up and everything went just like the manual.
> However, the preamp is marked on. The manual doesn't say which way it
> should be and I thought I'd check before I got too much farther.
>
> On mine the preamp was always on even when it did not exist yet.
>
> 2. I'm confused about soldering the RF probe. I can't seem to find a good
> way to position and solder the RG174 cable ends to the banana plugs.
> There's just a slight dimple at the end of the plugs and I can't figure a
> good mechanical way to connect them before soldering.
>
> I cheated here. I bought a crimp on BNC for RG/174 and terminated
> the coax.
> I already use a BNC to banana plug adaptor for my voltmeter for other
> reasons. This just made the probe compatible with my system. However, this
> does make for a solid connection.
>
> Richard Kent WD8AJG K2 5296
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Elecraft Junk (K2 Modifications)

2006-11-14 Thread gregory . beat
Scott -

Amateurs have been modifying and expereimenting with electronic components and 
assembled radios since DeForest and Armstrong.

You obviously have not read the laundry list of modificaitons on MODS.DK

Just view MANY of these comments and suggestions -- as anything you see on TV 
shows --- DIY, Pimp my Ride, Overhaulin, etc.  Why put a 2007 fuel injected 
computer monitored crate motor in an old muscle car -- gee - maybe because it 
is more relaible and fuel efficent than the original 1960s block?   Look at the 
"Back to the Future" trilogy by Robert Zemeckis --- "Doc" Brown is constantly 
adapting vehciles -- cars, locomotives.
In fact, if you look at the automobile industry - as an analogy -- the after 
market customization is HUGE.  

As with all of these -- some are for convinence -- others are innovative -- or 
in Lyle's DSP board -- a great adaptation and anhancement -- not readily 
avaialble when K2 first introduced.  That is the beaty of technology -- and 
adaptation.

My area of "assistance" is with the soldering tools themselves -- making sure 
that the builder has a quality "operational" tool for building -- and you can 
go to BAMA and see the growing Weller doucmentaiton library for amatuers to DIY 
repair their own tools (save $$, and learn something).

Greg
w9gb

-Original Message-

I ordered my K2 before I joined this forum, and now that I did, I am
thinking maybe I shouldn't have ordered it. It hasn't been delivered
yet. 
Is everyone having trouble with them as it sounds on this froum?  Why is
it necessary for all the modifications that are being done to them?

What's all this about completely removing RFC10 from the KPA100? Did
Elecraft do a bad job of designing this thing?

I just ordered the basic unit plus the noise blanker, and was planning
on adding the kpa100, and the KSB2 ssb unit later. I had the
understanding that these two options were plug in boards, but it sounds
like a rebuild to add anything. I have always hesitated to take
components out of a circuit board because there is a good chance that
damage to the board might occur.

Will a new kit that I just ordered four days ago need modifications, and
if so, how will I know what modifications I will need to do?

Would someone please tell me why I shouldn't put this thing up for sale
on Ebay in the unopened box?

Thanks
Scott N5SM
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KPA100 Upgrade

2006-11-14 Thread Elliott Lawrence

Thanks for all of the replys.
73
Elliott WA6TLA
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Desoldering tool?

2006-11-14 Thread epalmer
It's the Solder Popper model 12-2157 from GC Tools. It runs in the $36.00
range depending upon retailer.

I've used it on my K2 kit and found by wetting the tip with solder for
good heat transfer the unit seems to work well enough. It maybe doesn't
work quite as well as the Hakko 808 but for the casual builder it should
be sufficient. I was even able to tin toroid leads with it with a little
practice. The unit comes apart easily for cleaning and/or maintenance.

Disclaimer: Your mileage may vary.

73 de Ed N0EHQ



> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Desoldering tool?

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Person
The Hakko 808 is a superb tool.  If you plan to do a lot of building and 
especially modifying - it is a worthwhile investment.  Saves a lot of 
wear and tear on the boards and greatly reduces your own stress when 
attempting to pry loose an IC.  It is expensive, but consider your 
monetary investment in the kits you build and the time you spend 
building them.  I have the Solder Popper as well. It works.  But the 
Hakko is __considerably__ better.


73, Doug -- K0DXV

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It's the Solder Popper model 12-2157 from GC Tools. It runs in the $36.00
range depending upon retailer.

I've used it on my K2 kit and found by wetting the tip with solder for
good heat transfer the unit seems to work well enough. It maybe doesn't
work quite as well as the Hakko 808 but for the casual builder it should
be sufficient. I was even able to tin toroid leads with it with a little
practice. The unit comes apart easily for cleaning and/or maintenance.

Disclaimer: Your mileage may vary.

73 de Ed N0EHQ



  

Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Desoldering tool?

2006-11-14 Thread Darwin, Keith
 
Ah, yes, that was it.  How I need to decide whether to spend $40 on a
tool or just bring the stuff here to work ...

Thanks!

- Keith N1AS -

-Original Message-

It's the Solder Popper model 12-2157 from GC Tools. It runs in the
$36.00 range depending upon retailer.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] OT:switching transistors

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
Steve,

The first thing I would do is to connect the TNC-S PIC modem to the FT8100,
command the TNC to activate transmit and then measure the voltage at the
base and collector of the 2N.

The 2N should be conducting, so there should be only a small voltage at
the collector - the base should measure about 0.7 volts.

Then with the FT8100 alone, measure the current in the circuit that you
ground for transmit.  The 2N should be able to handle up to 800 ma in
the collector, but the Hfe parameter may be limiting it.  The metal can
2Na has an Hfe of 35 or more which requires at least 1/35th of the
collector current to be driven into the base for saturation (i.e. if the
collector must stay saturated with a 35 ma collector current, you must drive
1 ma available into the base) - your TNC's 10 k resistor provides a current
limiting function for the base current - reducing the 10k value should
increase the base current and allow the collector to handle more current
without coming out of saturation.

It is possible that the 2N does not have adequate base current to sink
whatever current your FT8100 requires to activate transmit - you could
reduce that 10k resistor  in the 2N base circuit to allow a greater
current to flow in the collector.

You could swap a 2N7000 for the 2N, but that may also require an
adjustemnt of the current base resistor and may require rearrangement of the
circuit currently driving your 2N - any problems with the 2N7000
operation are likely to be with the OFF state (it may be turned on all the
time) - the real answer depends on the rest of the circuit in your TNC - in
the ON condition, the 2N7000 will conduct easily, just put a voltage on its
gate.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
>
> Hi all,
> I know this is not directly related to Elecraft, but I think it is an
> acceptable OT topic per the admins, and I think I remember Wayne even
> talking about this subject long ago, so here goes.
>
> I have a radio (FT8100) that I want to use with a TNC-X PIC
> modem.  However,
> the tnc will not put the FT8100 into transmit.  The tnc uses a simple
> 2na switch with a 10K resistor in series with the PIC output and the
> base of the 2na.
>
> 1) If I disconnect the radio cable from the tnc and ground the PKS (ground
> to transmit) wire, the FT8100 goes into transmit.
>
> 2) If I connect the same cable to a new Icom IC-208H, the TNC-X works fine
> and keys the radio.
>
> John Hansen the designer of the TNC-X says that there are many hams using
> the FT8100 with the TNC-X and there are no currently known problems with
> using the TNC-X and FT-8100.
>
> I am thinking that the 2na might be a little weak or have too much on
> resistance.  I will be checking the 2na with my analyzer.
>
> I think I remember Wayne, N6KR, saying how great the 2n7000 was over a
> bipolar transistor for use as a switch.  Can anyone recommend a circuit
> change using a 2n7000 or perhaps some other simple mod to the tnc
> other than
> using a reed relay to let the FT8100 do its thing?  I relize that I should
> probably go into the FT8100, but I am not looking forward to that.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Pituch, W2MY
> Corpus Christi
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] (very late) Elecraft CW Net Report for November 13th, 2006

2006-11-14 Thread Kevin Rock

Hi Folks,
   I finally got power again a few minutes ago.  The underground line had  
been lifted out of the ground and broken by a fir tree falling over in the  
wind.  This also cut off the 911 comms, the forestry comm link, and the  
aviation beacon at the top of the mountain.  The generator tried to kick  
in and feed all those radios but the fuel line had been broken.  So the  
911 folks cut their way up the mountain and fixed it yesterday.  I only  
lost six trees as far as I could see.  None of them are bigger than twenty  
inches DBH so just barely marketable.
   Sam and I stayed warm but it did get rather boring.  I am caught up on  
all of my reading now ;)  I made a few skeds with the Trojan T105s I've  
got for backup.  I also got to listen to the local radio stations talking  
about our wind storm.  About 80% of the electric cooperative's served area  
was out of power.  We (the folks on our mountain) were almost the first to  
be effected but since there are so few of us up here we were put on the  
tail end of the repair list.  But, I had been warned so I had food, water,  
fuel for the lights and camp stove, plenty of wood in the house, and a lot  
of reading material.
   Twenty meters was wide open today.  Before my sked I was hearing a lot  
of DX and wondered if I would find a spot to work my friend.  However  
twenty meters was not as good on Sunday.  Only seven stations checked in  
with me.  There was a lot of QRM so I must not have been getting out very  
well.  I still had power from the mains at that point so I do not know  
what was going on.  I did have to retune my antenna every few minutes due  
to the rain, snow, and wind.  By the second net on forty meters I was  
running at 50 watts from my batteries.  Only three check ins and there was  
quite a bit of QRM there too.  It is interesting logging stations by  
candle light!  Good thing the front panel is so easy to memorize because I  
did not have enough light to see everything in the area.


The lists =>

On 14050 kHz at z:
W6BK - Dave - CA - K2 - 4910
AH6RE - Curt - HI - KX1 - 464
AA7EQ - Bob - AR - K2 - 922
VE3XL - Ric - ON - Ten Tec
KL7CW - Rick - AK - KX1 - 798QNI #60!!!
K6DGW - Fred - CA - K2 - 4398
WL7BU ?-- very faint could not complete the exchange.

On 7045 kHz at 0300z:
KJ7BS - Mark - AZ - K2 - 539
W3MC - Mike - MD - K2 - ??QNI #5!  Got you but then lost you again ;)
AH6RE - Curt - HI - KX1 - 464

   I have found a problem I'd been tracking for a while.  N7NLU gave me a  
hint.  The Anderson Power Pole connectors were under tension so were  
making intermittent contact with the back of my K2.  Under the load of  
transmitting the power was folding which was causing me some  
difficulties.  Since I had plenty of quiet time the last two days I worked  
my way through the problem.  The power cable is so heavy it is causing the  
intermittent contact.  I supported the cable with some cup hooks and all  
is well again.  Simply taking the weight of the cable off the PP connector  
was enough to ensure solid contact.  Next time I need to switch to  
emergency power I'll have more consistent contact with my K2.
   I used to run both nets from battery power each week until the deep  
cycle marine battery reached old age.  I've now got two Trojan T-105s in  
series which seem to work better.  I hope to get a few more to run in  
series-parallel to provide plenty of power during my frequent power  
outages.  One day I'll get them charged from the sun (weak as it is in  
Oregon it will be sufficient).  With that much power I hope to run an  
inverter to keep my computers up and running during the black outs.

   Until next week stay warm and dry,
  73,
 Kevin.  KD5ONS  (Net Control 5th Class)

P.S.  More wind is on the way so I had better get a shower and a shave  
before that hits!

   KJR
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread David C Dawson
I read 12098.20 down to 12084.54 at TP3 in the PLL Reference Oscillator
Range test.

I checked the windings of T5 very carefully, as well as the resistances
between pads - they appear correct.

The soldering at T5 and Q18 looks good.

The RF Voltages at Q18 are all zero :-( ... Dead?

DC Voltages at U3:
Pin 6: 4.02
Pin 7: 8.02
Pin 8: 0.00

RF Voltages at U3, Pin 3 & 6 are all zero :-(

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:24:04AM -0500, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> David,
> 
> Do you read a proper frequency at TP3? Does the PLL Reference Oscillator
> Range test produce the correct frequencies? (see the manual page 60).
> 
> If the answer to the above question is YES, then check the winding of T5.
> Be certain the turns are correct and the leads are inserted into the correct
> holes.  Check the tinning and soldering.  Check the soldering in the
> vicinity of T5 and Q18.  What are the RF Voltages that you read at the gate
> and source of Q18?
> 
> Check the DC Voltages (compare to chart in Appendix E) at U3.  What are the
> RF Voltages at U3 pin s 3 and 6?
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> > -Original Message-
> >
> > I don't know. Must be asleep at the switch.
> > Here's what's what so far this end.
> > The probe verifies -- it did read correctly in step 3 on page 46.
> > The leads are correct.
> >
> > I have replaced the suspect diode but the probe will not read anything
> > at TP1.
> >
> > I have constructed the RF Probe and connected it to my DMM.
> > It reads voltages at certain points, but sees nothing at TP1.
> >
> >
> 

-- 
David Dawson
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
David,

The PLL Reference is apparently OK and your problem is in the VCO itself.
The lack of RF voltage says the circuit is not oscillating - but we cannot
declare Q18 dead just yet.

OK, next step is to check the DC voltages at Q18 - compare with the DC
Voltage chart in Appendix E.

Double check T5 against the diagram in the manual page 55 (leads 1 and 3
should come from the top of the core and the green winding must be in the
same direction as the red winding) - if one of the windings is reversed, the
oscillator will not oscillate.

Check the voltage at the drain of Q17 and compare with the DC voltage
chart - measure the gate and source while you are at it, and just for a bit
of additional information, check the DC voltages at Q16.

Tell us what you find.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
>
> I read 12098.20 down to 12084.54 at TP3 in the PLL Reference Oscillator
> Range test.
>
> I checked the windings of T5 very carefully, as well as the resistances
> between pads - they appear correct.
>
> The soldering at T5 and Q18 looks good.
>
> The RF Voltages at Q18 are all zero :-( ... Dead?
>
> DC Voltages at U3:
> Pin 6: 4.02
> Pin 7: 8.02
> Pin 8: 0.00
>
> RF Voltages at U3, Pin 3 & 6 are all zero :-(
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 07:24:04AM -0500, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Do you read a proper frequency at TP3? Does the PLL Reference Oscillator
> > Range test produce the correct frequencies? (see the manual page 60).
> >
> > If the answer to the above question is YES, then check the
> winding of T5.
> > Be certain the turns are correct and the leads are inserted
> into the correct
> > holes.  Check the tinning and soldering.  Check the soldering in the
> > vicinity of T5 and Q18.  What are the RF Voltages that you read
> at the gate
> > and source of Q18?
> >
> > Check the DC Voltages (compare to chart in Appendix E) at U3.
> What are the
> > RF Voltages at U3 pin s 3 and 6?
> >
> > 73,
> > Don W3FPR
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > >
> > > I don't know. Must be asleep at the switch.
> > > Here's what's what so far this end.
> > > The probe verifies -- it did read correctly in step 3 on page 46.
> > > The leads are correct.
> > >
> > > I have replaced the suspect diode but the probe will not read anything
> > > at TP1.
> > >
> > > I have constructed the RF Probe and connected it to my DMM.
> > > It reads voltages at certain points, but sees nothing at TP1.
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> David Dawson
> ___
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.5/533 - Release Date: 11/13/2006
>
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread David C Dawson
Thanks,
Here's the measurements.
Note: the transistors are quite close to the board, so I had to figure
out which adjacent pad to tap; I think I have measured correctly.


The DC Voltages at Q18 are:

Point   MeasuredChart
-   -
Gate:   0.00-1.0
Source: 3.192 to 3
Drain:  8.026.3

!

Q16:

Point   MeasuredChart
-   -
Emitter:0   0.0
Base:   0   0.6
Collector:  7.982.2

!!



T5 is correct according to the diagram on page 55; leads 1 and 3 come
from the top of the core and leads 2 and 4 come from the bottom, and I
think that being so, the green winding cannot be reversed.

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:56:31PM -0500, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> David,
> 
> The PLL Reference is apparently OK and your problem is in the VCO itself.
> The lack of RF voltage says the circuit is not oscillating - but we cannot
> declare Q18 dead just yet.
> 
> OK, next step is to check the DC voltages at Q18 - compare with the DC
> Voltage chart in Appendix E.
> 
> Double check T5 against the diagram in the manual page 55 (leads 1 and 3
> should come from the top of the core and the green winding must be in the
> same direction as the red winding) - if one of the windings is reversed, the
> oscillator will not oscillate.
> 
> Check the voltage at the drain of Q17 and compare with the DC voltage
> chart - measure the gate and source while you are at it, and just for a bit
> of additional information, check the DC voltages at Q16.
> 
> Tell us what you find.
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
David Dawson
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Hakko 808 tip?

2006-11-14 Thread John Reiser
Hi,

I've noticed that lots of folks on this list praise highly the Hakko 808 
desoldering tool.  My question is: which tip do you all use?

I own a Hakko 808, and find it too clumsy with the tip that comes with it to be 
much use for Elecraft and other kit boards.  For example, I believe it would be 
completely useless for doing the 80-30 mod to the KX1.  I have tried the tool, 
and don't like it.  I hardly ever use it anymore.  I have come to much prefer 
1/10" Chem-wick for any desoldering that I have had to do.

It occurs to me that maybe with a longer or thinner tip the Hakko might live up 
to its reputation.  But which one, and where does one acquire it?

Thanks and 73,

John, W2GW
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
David,

The voltage measurements at Q17 please!

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
> Thanks,
> Here's the measurements.
> Note: the transistors are quite close to the board, so I had to figure
> out which adjacent pad to tap; I think I have measured correctly.
> 
> 
> The DC Voltages at Q18 are:
> 
> Point MeasuredChart
> - -
> Gate: 0.00-1.0
> Source:   3.192 to 3
> Drain:8.026.3
> 
> !
> 
> Q16:
> 
> Point MeasuredChart
> - -
> Emitter:  0   0.0
> Base: 0   0.6
> Collector:7.982.2
> 
> !!
> 
> 
> 
> T5 is correct according to the diagram on page 55; leads 1 and 3 come
> from the top of the core and leads 2 and 4 come from the bottom, and I
> think that being so, the green winding cannot be reversed.
> 
> 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 headphone audio for sound card PSK31?

2006-11-14 Thread Cathy James


I ran some tests this evening with my K2 and my computer sound card and 
HamScope software.  80 meters was not great, but it was open and there 
were a number of QSOs going on.


The K2 was able to pick up signals and decode them quite well, and the 
narrow filters really help block QRM.  (My RTTY filter bandpasses are 
all over the place, though; I don't think I ever finished setting them 
up after getting Spectrogram going.  Have to revisit that!)


However, the audio drive from the K2 is much less than from the DX-70TH 
that I use as my primary digital mode rig.  Although the signals decoded 
well, the traces on the waterfall barely showed even at fairly high 
soundcard record volume settings.  With the DX-70TH plugged into the 
sound card instead, the same signals were brilliant yellow and easily 
found by eye.


What can I do to increase the audio output level of the K2 for sound 
card purposes?


Cathy
N5WVR

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 808 tip?

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Person

John,

There are finer tips for the Hakko 808.  The A1003 tip is much smaller 
(about half the diameter) than the standard one supplied.I have 
rarely had to pull out the role of Chem-wick to get a component out - 
but it happens occasionally.


http://www.tequipment.net/Hakko808.html#nozzles

73, Doug -- K0DXV

John Reiser wrote:

Hi,

I've noticed that lots of folks on this list praise highly the Hakko 808 
desoldering tool.  My question is: which tip do you all use?

I own a Hakko 808, and find it too clumsy with the tip that comes with it to be much 
use for Elecraft and other kit boards.  For example, I believe it would be 
completely useless for doing the 80-30 mod to the KX1.  I have tried the tool, and 
don't like it.  I hardly ever use it anymore.  I have come to much prefer 1/10" 
Chem-wick for any desoldering that I have had to do.

It occurs to me that maybe with a longer or thinner tip the Hakko might live up 
to its reputation.  But which one, and where does one acquire it?

Thanks and 73,

John, W2GW
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Hakko 808 tip?

2006-11-14 Thread Don Wilhelm
John,

The Hakko A1394 extra long 1.0mm nozzle does a good job with the close
clearances found in the KX1.  You can purchase he tips at
www.hmcelectronics.com and a variety of other places.

This long slender is not for normal use, but its long reach is necessary for
use in close quarters such as when doing the de-soldering for the KXB3080
option.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -Original Message-
>
> I've noticed that lots of folks on this list praise highly the
> Hakko 808 desoldering tool.  My question is: which tip do you all use?
>
> I own a Hakko 808, and find it too clumsy with the tip that comes
> with it to be much use for Elecraft and other kit boards.  For
> example, I believe it would be completely useless for doing the
> 80-30 mod to the KX1.  I have tried the tool, and don't like it.
> I hardly ever use it anymore.  I have come to much prefer 1/10"
> Chem-wick for any desoldering that I have had to do.
>
> It occurs to me that maybe with a longer or thinner tip the Hakko
> might live up to its reputation.  But which one, and where does
> one acquire it?
>
>

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Alignment of VCO - Problem

2006-11-14 Thread David C Dawson
Don,
OOPS!
Here are the measurements on Q17:

Point   MeasuredChart
-   -
Gate:   2.172.2
Source: -   0.0
Drain:  1.972to3
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:09:43PM -0500, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> David,
> 
> The voltage measurements at Q17 please!
> 
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > Thanks,
> > Here's the measurements.
> > Note: the transistors are quite close to the board, so I had to figure
> > out which adjacent pad to tap; I think I have measured correctly.
> > 
> > 
> > The DC Voltages at Q18 are:
> > 
> > Point   MeasuredChart
> > -   -
> > Gate:   0.00-1.0
> > Source: 3.192 to 3
> > Drain:  8.026.3
> > 
> > !
> > 
> > Q16:
> > 
> > Point   MeasuredChart
> > -   -
> > Emitter:0   0.0
> > Base:   0   0.6
> > Collector:  7.982.2
> > 
> > !!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > T5 is correct according to the diagram on page 55; leads 1 and 3 come
> > from the top of the core and leads 2 and 4 come from the bottom, and I
> > think that being so, the green winding cannot be reversed.
> > 
> > 

-- 
David Dawson

The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men
of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.
-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 808 tip?

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604
I've found the 1394 to be useful, too.

Do we have a photos area?  I could put up a picture of the base I
constructed which is just a small chassis with the stock Hakko holder
screwed to it, a lighted AC switched socket so I don't have to
actually unplug the thing, and small screws up through the chassis to
act as posts to store the extra tips.  It makes the 808 even more
convenient.

73, doug

   Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 21:21:43 -0700
   From: Doug Person <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   John,

   There are finer tips for the Hakko 808.  The A1003 tip is much smaller 
   (about half the diameter) than the standard one supplied.I have 
   rarely had to pull out the role of Chem-wick to get a component out - 
   but it happens occasionally.

   http://www.tequipment.net/Hakko808.html#nozzles

   73, Doug -- K0DXV

   John Reiser wrote:
   > Hi,
   >
   > I've noticed that lots of folks on this list praise highly the Hakko 808 
desoldering tool.  My question is: which tip do you all use?
   >
   > I own a Hakko 808, and find it too clumsy with the tip that comes with it 
to be much use for Elecraft and other kit boards.  For example, I believe it 
would be completely useless for doing the 80-30 mod to the KX1.  I have tried 
the tool, and don't like it.  I hardly ever use it anymore.  I have come to 
much prefer 1/10" Chem-wick for any desoldering that I have had to do.
   >
   > It occurs to me that maybe with a longer or thinner tip the Hakko might 
live up to its reputation.  But which one, and where does one acquire it?
   >
   > Thanks and 73,
   >
   > John, W2GW
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Hakko 808 tip?

2006-11-14 Thread Doug Person
Don - I wasn't able to find the A1394 tip at your suggested link.  I 
even used their Quick Search with no joy.  I think I could use one of 
those tips, too.


73, Doug -- K0DXV

Don Wilhelm wrote:

John,
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

The Hakko A1394 extra long 1.0mm nozzle does a good job with the close
clearances found in the KX1.  You can purchase he tips at
www.hmcelectronics.com and a variety of other places.

This long slender is not for normal use, but its long reach is necessary for
use in close quarters such as when doing the de-soldering for the KXB3080
option.

73,
Don W3FPR

  

-Original Message-

I've noticed that lots of folks on this list praise highly the
Hakko 808 desoldering tool.  My question is: which tip do you all use?

I own a Hakko 808, and find it too clumsy with the tip that comes
with it to be much use for Elecraft and other kit boards.  For
example, I believe it would be completely useless for doing the
80-30 mod to the KX1.  I have tried the tool, and don't like it.
I hardly ever use it anymore.  I have come to much prefer 1/10"
Chem-wick for any desoldering that I have had to do.

It occurs to me that maybe with a longer or thinner tip the Hakko
might live up to its reputation.  But which one, and where does
one acquire it?





___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


  


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: K2 Modifications

2006-11-14 Thread zl1aih
Hi Scott,
I have built two K2s, #767 and #3725.
The only problems I experienced were my own fault.
They were very quickly solved on this reflector by 
very experienced folk like Don W3FPR, Tom N0SS 
and many others who contribute to this list.

I'm the only one (so far) that turned TWO pages of 
the manual over at once, thus missing some very 
important steps. 

The K2 has evolved since #767 but most importantly 
both of my transceivers are right up there with latest 
serial numbers, in that I have updated via the 
Elecraft list.   They both have the KI02 interface, 
160m separate Rx antenna options, KAF2 audio 
filters and the N0SS amp keying circuit. 

My shack is presently the base for the ZM1A CW 
serious contest station.   We have two suites of 
antennas for 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 metres (quads 
and verticals) located 300' apart.

Of a selection of FT-1000xxx (with all the latest 
filters), Icom 7xxx, etc. transceivers, only the IC-780 
and K2 ( plus amps) demonstrate no interstation 
interference at the 500w level.   

>From the two most experienced CW contest ops in 
our group (ZL3CW and ZL1GO), the only complaint 
has been that "the K2 moves when you push the 
buttons".   Since then, I have secured the bail to the 
bench.

Scott, you can build your K2 with confidence 
knowing that you have support from this reflector no 
matter what problems you might encounter.
You will have a transceiver that is right up there with 
the best.

73, Ken ZL1AIH (ZM1A team in CW contests) 




 

> 
> I ordered my K2 before I joined this forum, and 
now that I did, I am
> thinking maybe I shouldn't have ordered it. It hasn't 
been delivered
> yet.
> Is everyone having trouble with them as it sounds 
on this froum?  Why
> is it necessary for all the modifications that are 
being done to them?
> 
> What's all this about completely removing RFC10 
from the KPA100? Did
> Elecraft do a bad job of designing this thing?
> 
> I just ordered the basic unit plus the noise blanker, 
and was
> planning on adding the kpa100, and the KSB2 ssb 
unit later. I had
> the understanding that these two options were 
plug in boards, but
> it sounds like a rebuild to add anything. I have 
always hesitated to
> take components out of a circuit board because 
there is a good chance
> that damage to the board might occur.
> 
> Will a new kit that I just ordered four days ago 
need modifications,
> and if so, how will I know what modifications I will 
need to do?
> 
> Would someone please tell me why I shouldn't put 
this thing up for
> sale on Ebay in the unopened box?
> 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com