Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-02 Thread Phil Anderson
Ken, great. When you are copying, are you using the K3 decoder or 
copying in your  head at 30 wpm.


Uncle Phil, W0xi...


Ken mailto:wa8...@gmail.com
Monday, December 01, 2014 6:37 PM
Yes, I’ve looked up and understand the theory of Iambic keying but 1) 
it’s been weird to try and 2) I haven’t noticed any advantage for me. 
Now maybe there is an advantage at higher speeds? But when I’ve run 
above 30 wpm, I use a keyboard ;-)


73,
Ken WA8JXM



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to aldenmcduf...@sunflower.com
Ken mailto:wa8...@gmail.com
Monday, December 01, 2014 3:00 PM


Am I missing something? Have I been doing it wrong for years? Yes I 
have an Iambic paddle and of course the K3 offers Iambic choice BUT I 
NEVER USE IT. I don’t touch both paddles at the same time, my wrist 
rocks back and forth and I never squeeze the paddle.


Seriously I am asking if I’m doing something wrong.

Thanks,
Ken WA8JXM

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to aldenmcduf...@sunflower.com
Joe Subich, W4TV mailto:li...@subich.com
Monday, December 01, 2014 8:06 AM


*IF* one must start out with paddles/keyer, learn on Iambic A.  Iambic
B was a logic error in the AccuKeyer and simply covers up sloppy (slow)
paddle operation.

There are really three Iambic modes - based on where the trailing
element decision is made:

Iambic A which makes the decision at the end of the current element.
If the other paddle is closed at the end of a dit, the keyer adds a
dah.  If the other paddle is closed at the end of a dah, the keyer
adds a dit.

Iambic B makes the decision at the *beginning* of the current element.
If both paddles are closed at the beginning of a dit, the keyer sends
dit-dah.  If both paddles are closed at the beginning of a dah, the
keyer sends dah-dit.

CMOS Super Keyer (Logikeyer) makes the decision *one dit time into*
the current character.  If the current element is a dit and both
paddles are closed at the end of the dit, the keyer adds a dah.  If
the current element is a dah and both paddles are closed 1/3 of the
way through the dah, the keyer adds a dit.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to aldenmcduf...@sunflower.com

Don Wilhelm mailto:w3...@embarqmail.com
Monday, December 01, 2014 7:46 AM
There are alternatives to Iambic keying.
One way is to use a single lever paddle which makes it impossible to 
send those alternating dit/dah sequences that I cannot work with 
correctly due to some 'finger habits' that I learned when using a bug.


Another way is to get a K1EL keyer (or Winkeyer) and try out the 
various modes he has built in.
They do have a bug mode, but I have trouble with that one because 
there is no control between the string of dits and the timing of the 
manual dashes, when used with dual lever paddles.  It would probably 
be OK with a single lever paddle, but I have not tried it that way.


With dual lever paddles, I prefer Ultimatic mode.  That mode sends a 
string of the last paddle closed, which means you can use dit or dah 
insertion as well.


If you are just starting out, you may want to learn to send with dual 
lever paddles in Iambic (A or B your choice) and learn the squeeze 
sequences as well.  That should help you when you get up to speeds 
above 30 wpm.


73,
Don W3FPR



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to aldenmcduf...@sunflower.com

Edward R Cole mailto:kl...@acsalaska.net
Monday, December 01, 2014 2:17 AM
I still have my original straight key that I bought in 1958 when I was 
practising for my Novice.  I didn't have the luxury of a code machine 
to send my practise sessions (cassettes had not been invented) so 
either I listened on my little 3-tube receiver or I spent hours 
sending to myself.  I think that resulted in a pretty good fist.  In 
the 

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Edward R Cole
I still have my original straight key that I bought in 1958 when I 
was practising for my Novice.  I didn't have the luxury of a code 
machine to send my practise sessions (cassettes had not been 
invented) so either I listened on my little 3-tube receiver or I 
spent hours sending to myself.  I think that resulted in a pretty 
good fist.  In the day I could send 18-20wpm easily with the 
straight key.  I guess I favor learning with a straight 
key.  Learning what proper sounding CW sounds like one should use 
tapes or practise programs.  Do an hour a day for a month and you 
will absorb it.


Many years later I bought a Bencher-2 but never got very good results 
as the K3 keyer only does Iambic.  I guess I am too set in my ways 
wanting to control the dots and dashes to get hang of Iambic.  I 
should say I was off CW for decades so having to get back into 
it.  My straight keying is a little rusty and not as smooth as I used 
to do, but In time it'll come back.  I wonder if there are any keyers 
that just work like a bug but using a paddle?


I tried CW skimmer and the K3 CW text decoder but I'm not too 
impressed as it takes strong, very clean signal to work well.  Brain 
works better.


For CW-eme I set up some message scripts where I fill in the other 
stations call sign and let the computer send.  Eme keeps one quite 
busy keeping the antenna pointed, tuning Doppler shift, and listening 
to extremely weak signals.  Having the transmitting time to fulfill 
these other tasks without being tied to the key helps a lot.


Of course I may still need to send a non-standard reply so the old 
straight key is right handy.  Setting the spring tension and gap for 
fast CW is required using a straight key-most beginners have too wide 
a gap setting.  Motion of the hand is in the wrist moving up/down 
with fingers lightly touching the key.  Beginners usually try taping 
the key.  I can see repetitive motion stress being a problem 
especially for us older hams.  Why I like computer keying for 
repetitive calling.


73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
Kits made by KL7UW
Dubus Mag business:
dubus...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Joel Black
Ed et al.,

My opinions usually rub someone wrong, so take them as they are - one man’s 
opinions about what he has observed in his short time as an amateur operator.

K1EL makes a kit that will let you set it up in “bug” mode. I assume his 
Winkeyer does the same.

I have been reluctant to jump in this conversation as I am a QRS op still. I 
got interested in CW about two years ago. I had learned it to upgrade to Tech 
Plus and then General 20 or so years ago and then promptly put the key away and 
I am still kicking myself. I can copy a lot of what is sent at 18 - 20 WPM, but 
I am comfortable at about 15 - 17 WPM. Not really fast enough for a long QSO. 
Once I get the call, I can copy standard exchanges pretty fast (i.e. 5NN, TU, 
73).

I do *not* like “cut” numbers like “T” for “0.” That messes with my head and I 
try to figure out what the crap “1TT means and have missed part of the 
exchange. I understand *why* it’s done. That doesn’t mean I like it or that I’m 
going to change it.

When I first got interested a couple of years ago, I think it was this group 
(Elecraft) that put me on CW Ops. I took a course during the summer of 2012. If 
I practiced an hour a day, every day, I’d have my speed up where I’d like to 
be, but I haven’t practiced. I do well enough to copy calls and 5NN from DX 
ops, but for longer contacts, my mind wanders and I stop decoding. I have tried 
typing stuff out and that helps some. CW Ops will want you to head copy and 
learn words. I like this approach, but I’m not there yet. I have a hard time 
remembering what is spoken to me in regular conversation. :)

There are CW-oriented groups around too - SKCC (Straight Key Century Club 
skccgroup.com http://skccgroup.com/) is one. Another is FISTS (fistsna.org 
http://fistsna.org/ although I’m not a member) and there’s also NAQCC (North 
American QRP CW Club naqcc.info).

There are a lot of QRS ops in SKCC. You don’t have to be a member to work one 
of the members, you just won’t have a “number” to exchange. SKCC, as the name 
implies, is a straight key club. They also allow the use of bugs and cootie 
(sideswiper) keys. Their focus is on manual sending of CW, but it would be rare 
that the regular ops in that club would shun you. I like sending with a bug - 
kind of a nostalgia thing to me. I’m not particularly great at it, but I’ve 
heard much worse.

NAQCC is another specialized club in that they want you to be QRP. Unless 
you’re an experienced op, or unless you are patient, this club might not be for 
you. It is kind of a purist club with CW only (paddles are allowed), but they 
award more points for their sprints based on different criteria. They prefer 
that you use a wire antenna. However, they have a list of QRS nets on their 
website: http://naqcc.info/cw_nets.html http://naqcc.info/cw_nets.html. Just 
tune around and listen. Their nets are *not* necessarily QRP. They want folks 
to check in and practice. My opinion is that “on-the-air” practice is good. You 
get to experience all of the conditions in real time.

I prefer a single-lever paddle to Iambic. When I *first* learned CW 20 years 
ago, everyone I knew used a set of Bencher paddles. I didn’t know any different 
and the Internet was still a dial-up connection to AOL for me. I didn’t know 
enough even to ask questions. When I got back into CW a couple of years ago, I 
started reading a lot. I read some history of CW and the progression from 
straight key to bug (or cootie) up to Iambic paddles. Along the way, the 
single-lever paddle came up. I bought one and loved it. I *never* got the hang 
of Iambic operation and *much* prefer a single-lever paddle - to each his own. 
Because of the way the single-lever mechanism works, it’s been my experience 
that you’ll pay a little more for that configuration.

I just thought of something else… CWOps will stress *accurate* keying not 
*fast* keying. If you’re a fast op who makes lots of mistakes and repeats, you 
could wind up being as slow as the QRS op who is accurate.

There’s also a book out there - I think it’s called The Art and Skill of 
Radio-Telegraphy. I originally laughed when I heard about a book on learning 
CW. Well, it’s a good read and is available for free as a PDF from many many 
places. Here is a link: http://www.tasrt.ca/TASRTVersions/TASRT.pdf 
http://www.tasrt.ca/TASRTVersions/TASRT.pdf.

73,
Joel - W4JBB

 On Dec 1, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Edward R Cole kl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
 
 I still have my original straight key that I bought in 1958 when I was 
 practising for my Novice.  I didn't have the luxury of a code machine to send 
 my practise sessions (cassettes had not been invented) so either I listened 
 on my little 3-tube receiver or I spent hours sending to myself.  I think 
 that resulted in a pretty good fist.  In the day I could send 18-20wpm 
 easily with the straight key.  I guess I favor learning with a straight key.  
 Learning what proper sounding CW sounds like one should use tapes or 

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Don Wilhelm

There are alternatives to Iambic keying.
One way is to use a single lever paddle which makes it impossible to 
send those alternating dit/dah sequences that I cannot work with 
correctly due to some 'finger habits' that I learned when using a bug.


Another way is to get a K1EL keyer (or Winkeyer) and try out the various 
modes he has built in.
They do have a bug mode, but I have trouble with that one because there 
is no control between the string of dits and the timing of the manual 
dashes, when used with dual lever paddles.  It would probably be OK with 
a single lever paddle, but I have not tried it that way.


With dual lever paddles, I prefer Ultimatic mode.  That mode sends a 
string of the last paddle closed, which means you can use dit or dah 
insertion as well.


If you are just starting out, you may want to learn to send with dual 
lever paddles in Iambic (A or B your choice) and learn the squeeze 
sequences as well.  That should help you when you get up to speeds above 
30 wpm.


73,
Don W3FPR

On 12/1/2014 3:17 AM, Edward R Cole wrote:


Many years later I bought a Bencher-2 but never got very good results 
as the K3 keyer only does Iambic.  I guess I am too set in my ways 
wanting to control the dots and dashes to get hang of Iambic.  I 
should say I was off CW for decades so having to get back into it.  My 
straight keying is a little rusty and not as smooth as I used to do, 
but In time it'll come back.  I wonder if there are any keyers that 
just work like a bug but using a paddle?




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV

On 2014-12-01 8:46 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

If you are just starting out, you may want to learn to send with
dual lever paddles in Iambic (A or B your choice) and learn the
squeeze sequences as well. That should help you when you get up to
speeds above 30 wpm.


*IF* one must start out with paddles/keyer, learn on Iambic A.  Iambic
B was a logic error in the AccuKeyer and simply covers up sloppy (slow)
paddle operation.

There are really three Iambic modes - based on where the trailing
element decision is made:

Iambic A which makes the decision at the end of the current element.
If the other paddle is closed at the end of a dit, the keyer adds a
dah.  If the other paddle is closed at the end of a dah, the keyer
adds a dit.

Iambic B makes the decision at the *beginning* of the current element.
If both paddles are closed at the beginning of a dit, the keyer sends
dit-dah.  If both paddles are closed at the beginning of a dah, the
keyer sends dah-dit.

CMOS Super Keyer (Logikeyer) makes the decision *one dit time into*
the current character.  If the current element is a dit and both
paddles are closed at the end of the dit, the keyer adds a dah.  If
the current element is a dah and both paddles are closed 1/3 of the
way through the dah, the keyer adds a dit.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Fred Jensen

On 11/30/2014 8:42 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

On Sun,11/30/2014 8:25 PM, Leroy Marion wrote:

  Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing?


Not quite.  Refer to Page 40 of the October 1949 issue of QST for the 
definitive work on spacing in International Morse code.


It's been nearly 60 years since I went through that. Paddles and keyers
did not exist -- we had bugs, but did start on straight keys.


I've been licensed for a little over 61 years [1953].  I learned on a 
straight key because that's what there was, I was 13, and couldn't 
afford a bug.  I sat for my code tests [5 WPM, 13 WPM, and 20 WPM] at 
the FCC office in downtown Los Angeles with the FCC's J-38 screwed to 
the desk, again because that's what there was.


I finally managed $5 for a war surplus J-36 bug built by Lionel of model 
train fame.  It looked like it had gone ashore with the Marines at Iwo 
Jima, but it worked and the J-38 straight key was screwed to a piece of 
plywood and migrated to the floor as a PTT foot switch.


In 1956, I and two teenage friends built keyers.  9 or 10 dual 
triodes, mine weighed about half a brick, and we used our bugs as 
paddles.  Self-completing dots and dashes, nothing else.  Iambic hadn't 
been invented yet.


Every Elecraft radio I know about has a modern, 21st century keyer built 
in.  Actually, most every modern radio has had a keyer built in for a 
dozen years or more.  Why would you not use it?



Unless you're a real straight
key pro, they're far too slow for most on air CW, so if you're going
to learn what you're going to use, I don't see the value in going
through an intermediate step.


Precisely!  You *must* start on a straight key is a litany from old 
guys who want to make Morse hard for new folks, possibly because it was 
hard for them.  The first time I ever fired a gun was in combat training 
from the same XM-177 automatic rifle I would carry thereafter.  They did 
not start us out with muzzle loading muskets and black powder. :-)


I haven't mastered Iambic, primarily because I've never tried to. 
Incidentally, I think Iambic-B originally arose as a mistake in an early 
keyer, I don't remember which one.  There are other kinds of keyers, 
Ultimatic is one, each has its following, pick one or more and begin 
enjoying another of the many facets of ham radio!  Just because I 
learned on a J-38 61+ years ago does not mean everyone has to do 
likewise today.


73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Al Gulseth
A little late to the party here, but I'll throw in my 2 cents worth. I'm sort 
of old school in favoring becoming proficient with a straight key first 
before moving to a bug or a keyer. It makes sense: to use a sports analogy, 
one needs to master the fundamentals before trying to move to fancier stuff.
(This was drilled into me by my now SK dad, who was a USCG radio op in WWII. 
If you can send smoothly enough with a straight key to make the op on the 
other end think you're using a keyer, you've accomplished something.)

That being said, as far as straight keys are concerned, in my book the 
most bang for the buck is the Nye 320 series rectangular base with a Navy 
knob (the stacked as opposed to single disk arrangement.) The 310 oval base 
model and the J-38s etc. are nice keys but just not quite as smooth IMHO as 
the 320. There are better ones but they are a lot more expensive.

Next, I'm going to differ here with what I've seen from several recommending 
the Benchers. I owned one and was never impressed - to me best bang for the 
buck in the paddle category are the Kents (SP-1 single lever, TP-1 twin.) 
Another possible group of price to performance sleepers are the keys and 
paddles from American Morse Equipment. The Begalis et al may be superior, but 
I've never had my hands on one to compare. (Note that I tend to be somewhat 
of a tightwad in going for what will get the job done properly without a 
bunch of extras in features or expense.)

73, Al

On Sun November 30 2014 11:05:34 pm Tom Blahovici wrote:
 I like the comment about going through an intermediate step... Maybe I'll
 look at a paddle instead. So what's this about iambic? What are the types
 of paddles out there?

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Terry


Well not being really old or really new to CW, I take a path of thought 
that has not been touched on, but trampled all around.  I started on a 
J-38 and I like it and us to this day, but I really prefer my keyer and 
single lever paddle.


I started with the J-38 because that is all I had and keyers were out of 
sight for me financially.  I learned CW with the J-38 but getting to 20 
WPM was hard that way.  I finally built the accu-keyer from the handbook 
and got together the money for a Vibroplex paddle.  It was single lever 
because the dual-lever stuff didn't exist at the time.


Things happened and I tried the another keyer and dual-lever and never 
seemed to get the command of CW like I had with the first keyer and 
single-lever paddle.  I tried another keyer or two loaned by others who 
left CW and had become phone only or near only ops.  I found each keyer 
did things a little differently and each time I had some relearning to 
do.  During this time I had a burglary and my single-lever was among the 
missing and the dual-lever was the in thing.  I got a new keyer and a 
dual-leveler paddle.  I tried and I tried squeeze paddles and I just had 
too many CW habits by then.  I just started using the dual-lever paddles 
as if they were single-lever ones and the world got pretty good.


I also used a variety of rigs with built in keyers and each one seemed 
to have different charismatics and different things that could be set.  
I'd have to spend time with each rig to get it to my settings.  This was 
all a pain in my sitting down spot.  So I decided to solve that problem 
once and for all.


I decided on one keyer (Super CMOS III Memory Keyer kit version) and one 
paddle (Single-lever Kent).  I just use that combo and set the rig I 
chose to use for a straight key and go to work.  There is no fooling 
around with settings and I am always in familiar territory.


The moral of the story is you tend to like what you first learn.  With 
that in mind, I'd pick one set-up I think would be around for a really 
long time or one you could maintain and go with that one.  Mine has 
become the Super CMOS keyer and the single-lever Kent.


I use it on all of my rigs.  For special events I still use the J-38 
when I play SK-night and SKCC or FISTS games, all the rest get the Super 
CMOS Keyer and Kent single-lever combo.


Regards  73,

Terry, KQ5U



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Phil Hystad
My story...

Learned CW when I was 9 years old, taught by ham uncle (also a ship radio 
operator).  I used to listen to ham radio operators CW and got my speed up a 
little bit before I ever got my Novice license so passing that code test was 
easy-as-pie.

As a novice, started with J-38 (I didn't even know that other kinds of keys 
existed).  But, I soon bought a Vibroplex Original, brand new for the cost of 
about $36 (~1966) as my speed went beyond my capable skills with the J-38.  At 
the finish of my Novice year, I was easily handling both RX/TX at 20+ wpm.

Big huge gap of 38 years between my Novice CW activity and getting licensed 
again in 2004.  I was all SSB until 2007 when the bug for CW hit me again.  
How much time to relearn CW?

It took two weeks of listening to CW traffic to get my head in gear again after 
40 years of not hearing any CW at all.  I was up to about 15 wpm after two 
weeks of one or two hours a day of listening (never used a code practice 
program).  I decided to try my first QSO.  I called CQ and got a reply.  In the 
middle of the QSO I got so flustered (using a J-38 again) that I had to abort.  
I sent my apologies to my contact via e-mail.  I just did not practice enough 
with the J-38.

So, practice-practice-practice on the J-38 for another week and I was ready.  
After a few weeks of nothing but CW contacts on the J-38 I realized that my 
operating time was limited to my hands sending at about 12 to 13 wpm on the 
J-38.  I just wasn't capable of anything faster.

I bought myself a used bencher paddle and started practicing.  I liked it right 
off that bat and my skills got better and now I am back up to about 20 to 22 
wpm.  I have tried sending at 25 wpm with the paddle but I make more mistakes 
then I am happy with so I need to spend time on that or learn better 
techniques.  Being self-taught on the paddle there are some skills I am sure 
have not been honed yet.  Oh, I never did learn to do squeeze technique on the 
paddle and I still don't know what Iambic A or B mean (yes, I have looked that 
up but I keep forgetting).

My main fault that limits my speed skills with the paddle is my limited 
operating time.  I am 90 percent CW but I don't get that much operating time on 
a daily basis.  I had planned to do a lot of activity in this weekend's CQ DX 
CW contest but missed out due to all kinds of other interruptions.

However, thinking back of experiences:  in today's world, I would recommend 
skipping any straight key and learn with a keyer and paddle right from the 
start.  I think straight keys are antiques like tube-based rigs (no flame wars 
from hollow state players).

73, phil, K7PEH

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Jim Allen
With all the keyers out there, built in and otherwise, there should be no
bad CW heard, but as anyone who listens can attest, there is, lots of it.

One thing I suggest is copying W1AW code practice, and bulletins once your
speed can handle the 18 wpm used for Bulletins.  That is perfect code,
weight, spacing etc., supposedly.  Get used to what that sounds like, and
imitate it!

Code proficiency comes from a combination of talent, effort and want to.
Some are so talented they pick it up easily with little effort.  Some make
an effort, but don't really want to do it, and that impedes progress.  Want
to overcomes a certain deficiency of talent.

73 de W6OGC  Jim Allen



On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Phil Hystad phys...@mac.com wrote:

 My story...

 Learned CW when I was 9 years old, taught by ham uncle (also a ship radio
 operator).  I used to listen to ham radio operators CW and got my speed up
 a little bit before I ever got my Novice license so passing that code test
 was easy-as-pie.

 As a novice, started with J-38 (I didn't even know that other kinds of
 keys existed).  But, I soon bought a Vibroplex Original, brand new for the
 cost of about $36 (~1966) as my speed went beyond my capable skills with
 the J-38.  At the finish of my Novice year, I was easily handling both
 RX/TX at 20+ wpm.

 Big huge gap of 38 years between my Novice CW activity and getting
 licensed again in 2004.  I was all SSB until 2007 when the bug for CW hit
 me again.  How much time to relearn CW?

 It took two weeks of listening to CW traffic to get my head in gear again
 after 40 years of not hearing any CW at all.  I was up to about 15 wpm
 after two weeks of one or two hours a day of listening (never used a code
 practice program).  I decided to try my first QSO.  I called CQ and got a
 reply.  In the middle of the QSO I got so flustered (using a J-38 again)
 that I had to abort.  I sent my apologies to my contact via e-mail.  I just
 did not practice enough with the J-38.

 So, practice-practice-practice on the J-38 for another week and I was
 ready.  After a few weeks of nothing but CW contacts on the J-38 I realized
 that my operating time was limited to my hands sending at about 12 to 13
 wpm on the J-38.  I just wasn't capable of anything faster.

 I bought myself a used bencher paddle and started practicing.  I liked it
 right off that bat and my skills got better and now I am back up to about
 20 to 22 wpm.  I have tried sending at 25 wpm with the paddle but I make
 more mistakes then I am happy with so I need to spend time on that or learn
 better techniques.  Being self-taught on the paddle there are some skills I
 am sure have not been honed yet.  Oh, I never did learn to do squeeze
 technique on the paddle and I still don't know what Iambic A or B mean
 (yes, I have looked that up but I keep forgetting).

 My main fault that limits my speed skills with the paddle is my limited
 operating time.  I am 90 percent CW but I don't get that much operating
 time on a daily basis.  I had planned to do a lot of activity in this
 weekend's CQ DX CW contest but missed out due to all kinds of other
 interruptions.

 However, thinking back of experiences:  in today's world, I would
 recommend skipping any straight key and learn with a keyer and paddle right
 from the start.  I think straight keys are antiques like tube-based rigs
 (no flame wars from hollow state players).

 73, phil, K7PEH

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to jalleninv...@gmail.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Tom Blahovici
Hi everyone. I'm the OP here and I thank everyone who replied. I've had an 
order of magnitude more mail than I received on the list. I can't answer all of 
them due to a broken elbow but I thank everyone who replied. Lots to digest, 
hopefully will be on the air soon. 
73's Tom

On Dec 1, 2014 1:16 PM, Jim Allen jalleninv...@gmail.com wrote:

 With all the keyers out there, built in and otherwise, there should be no 
 bad CW heard, but as anyone who listens can attest, there is, lots of it. 

 One thing I suggest is copying W1AW code practice, and bulletins once your 
 speed can handle the 18 wpm used for Bulletins.  That is perfect code, 
 weight, spacing etc., supposedly.  Get used to what that sounds like, and 
 imitate it! 

 Code proficiency comes from a combination of talent, effort and want to. 
 Some are so talented they pick it up easily with little effort.  Some make 
 an effort, but don't really want to do it, and that impedes progress.  Want 
 to overcomes a certain deficiency of talent. 

 73 de W6OGC  Jim Allen 



 On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Phil Hystad phys...@mac.com wrote: 

  My story... 
  
  Learned CW when I was 9 years old, taught by ham uncle (also a ship radio 
  operator).  I used to listen to ham radio operators CW and got my speed up 
  a little bit before I ever got my Novice license so passing that code test 
  was easy-as-pie. 
  
  As a novice, started with J-38 (I didn't even know that other kinds of 
  keys existed).  But, I soon bought a Vibroplex Original, brand new for the 
  cost of about $36 (~1966) as my speed went beyond my capable skills with 
  the J-38.  At the finish of my Novice year, I was easily handling both 
  RX/TX at 20+ wpm. 
  
  Big huge gap of 38 years between my Novice CW activity and getting 
  licensed again in 2004.  I was all SSB until 2007 when the bug for CW hit 
  me again.  How much time to relearn CW? 
  
  It took two weeks of listening to CW traffic to get my head in gear again 
  after 40 years of not hearing any CW at all.  I was up to about 15 wpm 
  after two weeks of one or two hours a day of listening (never used a code 
  practice program).  I decided to try my first QSO.  I called CQ and got a 
  reply.  In the middle of the QSO I got so flustered (using a J-38 again) 
  that I had to abort.  I sent my apologies to my contact via e-mail.  I just 
  did not practice enough with the J-38. 
  
  So, practice-practice-practice on the J-38 for another week and I was 
  ready.  After a few weeks of nothing but CW contacts on the J-38 I realized 
  that my operating time was limited to my hands sending at about 12 to 13 
  wpm on the J-38.  I just wasn't capable of anything faster. 
  
  I bought myself a used bencher paddle and started practicing.  I liked it 
  right off that bat and my skills got better and now I am back up to about 
  20 to 22 wpm.  I have tried sending at 25 wpm with the paddle but I make 
  more mistakes then I am happy with so I need to spend time on that or learn 
  better techniques.  Being self-taught on the paddle there are some skills I 
  am sure have not been honed yet.  Oh, I never did learn to do squeeze 
  technique on the paddle and I still don't know what Iambic A or B mean 
  (yes, I have looked that up but I keep forgetting). 
  
  My main fault that limits my speed skills with the paddle is my limited 
  operating time.  I am 90 percent CW but I don't get that much operating 
  time on a daily basis.  I had planned to do a lot of activity in this 
  weekend's CQ DX CW contest but missed out due to all kinds of other 
  interruptions. 
  
  However, thinking back of experiences:  in today's world, I would 
  recommend skipping any straight key and learn with a keyer and paddle right 
  from the start.  I think straight keys are antiques like tube-based rigs 
  (no flame wars from hollow state players). 
  
  73, phil, K7PEH 
  
  __ 
  Elecraft mailing list 
  Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
  Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
  
  This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
  Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
  Message delivered to jalleninv...@gmail.com 
  
 __ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
 Message delivered to tom...@videotron.ca 
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: 

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread EricJ
I'm sold on single-lever paddles. I have a handbuilt one from G3YUH, and 
I have a Kent single-lever that is outstanding. Very smooth to operate 
and nicely finished. It's my favorite key now. I never could get 
interested in iambic keying which is more of an affectation than 
anything useful. The single-lever paddle was a very easy transition from 
years of using dual-lever paddles.


I have two Benchers: chrome and black. The black one I used mobile every 
day for 5 years when I was active in County Hunting, and traveling every 
week to the Bay Area from So Cal. It sat on the passenger seat and I 
keyed it with my right hand (I'm left handed). I never thought to tether 
it and as a result it occasionally hit the firewall when I had to brake 
really hard. After 5 years, the only problem was the rivets on the 
plastic finger pieces loosened. The chrome one uses screws, but the 
black one has crappy rivets. It's a simple, tough design that is easy to 
set up and holds adjustment if you don't let it fly around untethered in 
a vehicle.


Starting out, the Benchers would be a good choice. They're a good choice 
even with experience, but you can find them used fairly cheap and they 
will give good service for a new CW op until they learn their own 
preferences.


Eric
KE6US


On 11/30/2014 11:18 PM, Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote:

I couldn't agree more. I'm glad I finally discovered the single-lever paddle
after more than ten years of struggling with iambic. It is so much easier to
use the single-lever and it is much more forgiving for small timing errors.

I wrote about it on my blog some time ago:
http://la3za.blogspot.no/2013/06/the-advantage-of-single-lever-paddle.html
After that I got the tiny Palm single-lever paddle.


Barry K3NDM wrote

Tom,
  As a beginner, don't get hung up on iambic.





-
Sverre, LA3ZA

K2 #2198, K3 #3391,
LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com,
LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: 
http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-CW-decoder-and-CQ-CW-contest-tp7595261p7595290.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to eric_c...@hotmail.com




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Alan

On 12/01/2014 09:36 AM, Terry wrote:


... I started on a J-38


I do think a straight key is good when you're starting out because it 
forces you to concentrate on correct timing.  One trick to get your 
timing correct is to set up your code-practice software to send a known 
text at a slow speed.  Using a code practice oscillator, send along with 
it.  You'll get immediate feedback on your timing errors and will soon 
be sending perfect code.


That will stand you in good stead when you then switch to a speed key, 
either a semi-automatic bug or a fully-automatic keyer.


Alan N1AL

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Bob
Well we all have our CW learning stories.   So here is mine and can be taken as 
a tip-suggestion-opinion.


At 13 in 1956 I signed up for a Novice class at the local radio club, Nutley 
Amateur Radio Society (Nutley, NJ).  When it came time to learn the basics of 
sending the instructor, W2TJD (SK) made us try to send with the wrong hand 
since we were learning anyway. I'm a lefty so tried right handed.  At that point 
it was equally poor with either hand.  But I learned it and over time it was a 
great advantage as the better hand was free.  I could send with one hand and log 
or do other things with the other.   Back in the old days when logs were in the 
carbon stick and dead tree format it was always interesting to watch at FD etc 
OPS that only used one hand as they chased the pencil that rolled away when they 
put it down. Sending CW is not a high dexterity thing like writing or other fine 
work.


Whether you start with a straight key or paddle this is appropriate.  Sending CW 
is a finesse rather than a force mode of doing it.  If your chasing the key or 
paddle around that is excessive force and adding more weight is not the 
solution.   Same goes for it being tiresome or generating pain and discomfort. 
To much tension and force being used.  Think about it, you need movement of only 
thousands of an inch not the key to move across the desk.  Learn to relax and 
the movement is only slight with the fingers or wrist or combination of the two.


Confession time...  I hated CW.  When my novice expired I got a 5 WPM tech and 
held it until the mid 60's.  I lived in an apartment with an indoor antenna and 
wanted to get on 10 to participate in the clubs 10 meter net.  I struggled 
through and got to 13 WPM to get a General ticket.  I made the net and called CQ 
on phone until I was blue in the face and never made a contact.   1st CQ on CW 
was replied to instantly by an SP station. That set the hook and I'd guess I'm 
75% CW since.


73,
Bob
K2TK   ex KN2TKR  K2TKR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Ron van Doremalen

Hi all,

Only read about sending CW via straight key or paddles.
To my opinion the work starts with a good reading ability.

Some tips from personal experience:
- don't start with low speed CW. It makes you think in dits and dahs instead 
of sound.

- so stay away from the 10WPM wall - start at 12 WPM or even higher.
- don't touch a key until you are able to solid copy 12-15WPM and are 
familiar with the sound.
- stay away from plain text until you are able to copy random almost 100%. 
It prevents ahead reading of what is yet to come.


Spacing between letters/wordsunless needed stay away from this all it 
might enable you to start thinking.


My CW learning cycle was starting with 8WPM which i managed quite quickly, 
but trying to get at higher speeds hit the 10WPM wall.
With help of some great HAMS with weekly execercises (tapes) and at home 
drinking too stong coffee i managed to get over the 10WPM wall, passed the 
12WPM CW exam for the A (now F) license. The great Hams fooled me as i was 
already trained at 15 WPM. Exam was easy.


Didn't use CW after passing. Stupid but too late.

Always had issues with 0-9 characters as i still didn't achieve to unprogram 
my dits/dahs decyphering.
Tried many times to get back to the old skills but my brain wants to 
decypher still.


Try the software of G4FON which lets you learn the characters per character 
and other real life situations if needed.


Ron - PA3FAT
-Original Message- 
From: Bob

Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 8:14 PM
To: elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

Well we all have our CW learning stories.   So here is mine and can be taken 
as

a tip-suggestion-opinion.

At 13 in 1956 I signed up for a Novice class at the local radio club, Nutley
Amateur Radio Society (Nutley, NJ).  When it came time to learn the basics 
of

sending the instructor, W2TJD (SK) made us try to send with the wrong hand
since we were learning anyway. I'm a lefty so tried right handed.  At that 
point
it was equally poor with either hand.  But I learned it and over time it was 
a
great advantage as the better hand was free.  I could send with one hand and 
log
or do other things with the other.   Back in the old days when logs were in 
the
carbon stick and dead tree format it was always interesting to watch at FD 
etc
OPS that only used one hand as they chased the pencil that rolled away when 
they
put it down. Sending CW is not a high dexterity thing like writing or other 
fine

work.

Whether you start with a straight key or paddle this is appropriate. 
Sending CW
is a finesse rather than a force mode of doing it.  If your chasing the key 
or

paddle around that is excessive force and adding more weight is not the
solution.   Same goes for it being tiresome or generating pain and 
discomfort.
To much tension and force being used.  Think about it, you need movement of 
only
thousands of an inch not the key to move across the desk.  Learn to relax 
and
the movement is only slight with the fingers or wrist or combination of the 
two.


Confession time...  I hated CW.  When my novice expired I got a 5 WPM tech 
and
held it until the mid 60's.  I lived in an apartment with an indoor antenna 
and

wanted to get on 10 to participate in the clubs 10 meter net.  I struggled
through and got to 13 WPM to get a General ticket.  I made the net and 
called CQ
on phone until I was blue in the face and never made a contact.   1st CQ on 
CW
was replied to instantly by an SP station. That set the hook and I'd guess 
I'm

75% CW since.

73,
Bob
K2TK   ex KN2TKR  K2TKR
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to ronvandorema...@hotmail.com 


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Ken

 On Dec 1, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Terry tmyers1...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 
 The moral of the story is you tend to like what you first learn.  


That has not been my experience, it probably depends more on what you have to 
start with.  

I started out with a Japanese J-38 clone and then later was given a WWII 
surplus Vibroplex (I still have both of them on the operating desk.)   I’m not 
sure how good I ever was with the bug but I would not subject the airwaves 
today to my current horrible fist with it!

In my case, my first “electronic” keyer was a homebrew keyer out of the 1960’s 
Handbook, a pair of 12AU7 tubes IIRC and a paddle made out of a pair of back to 
back J-38 clones.   Well I survived that for a long time and must have been 
fairly proficient since I operated high level NTS without being banned ;-)

Eventually I bought  an MFJ keyer and a real paddle (Bencher) and then the K3 
with the Bencher.  Either one is fine by me but the K3 is of course more 
convenient.  Bottom line, I would never go back to that early Handbook keyer 
and the back to back J-38s!  never!

Speaking of bad fists brings back the memories of a certain W8D**.  When you 
heard him on a traffic net, you either laughed or cried.  Laughed if someone 
else had to copy his traffic, cried if you had to copy it!   Cliff just sent 
dots and more dots, you had to figure out which ones should have been dashes 
because of the extra spacing!  

 from:  phil, K7PEH

 However, thinking back of experiences:  in today's world, I would recommend 
 skipping any straight key and learn with a keyer and paddle right from the 
 start.  I think straight keys are antiques like tube-based rigs (no flame 
 wars from hollow state players).
 
 


Would  you really suggest someone starting out at 5 wpm use a paddle and keyer? 
 

73, 
WA8JXM
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Fred Jensen
This is more common than one might think, but only for left-handers it 
seems.  I'm left-handed and my Elmer, W6RMK, was too.  He taught me to 
send with my right hand so I could write legibly in my log.  In those 
days, you logged every transmission, whether or not it resulted in a QSO.


A number of years ago, we had a little survey on this list.  A total of 
137 responded, about 22% south paws.  A little more than 50% of those 
learned to send/paddle right.  0% of the north paws sent/paddled left. 
From this and answers to some of the other questions in the survey, it 
appears that most right-handers are *really* right-handed [some even 
said so].  Left-handers seem to be somewhat more flexible, maybe because 
we live in a right-handed world.


I currently have a second paddle set up left on the WinKey-USB to the 
left of the laptop which I've started using left-handed in casual QSO's 
since it's more natural for me and I no longer have to write in my 
logbook.  I still contest with the paddle on the right since I can type 
faster with my left hand.


I'm not hearing all the poor CW others are talking about.  In CQ WW CW, 
I made a note of two: one had the weight set very high and his dots 
resembled his dashes.  Theotheroneforgottherearespacesbetweenwords. 
Quite a few of the Summits On The Air crowd are learning CW and, while 
they may make a few more mistakes, there is nothing wrong with their 
sending.  The majority of those ops are using embedded keyers in their rigs.


In the end, do what works best for you.

73,

Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org



On 12/1/2014 11:14 AM, Bob wrote:


At 13 in 1956 I signed up for a Novice class at the local radio club,
Nutley Amateur Radio Society (Nutley, NJ).  When it came time to learn
the basics of sending the instructor, W2TJD (SK) made us try to send
with the wrong hand since we were learning anyway. I'm a lefty so
tried right handed.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Ken

 On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com wrote:
 
 *IF* one must start out with paddles/keyer, learn on Iambic A.  Iambic
 B was a logic error in the AccuKeyer and simply covers up sloppy (slow)
 paddle operation.
 
 There are really three Iambic modes - based on where the trailing
 element decision is made:


Am I missing something?  Have I been doing it wrong for years?  Yes I have an 
Iambic paddle and of course the K3 offers Iambic choice BUT I  NEVER USE IT.   
I don’t touch both paddles at the same time, my wrist rocks back and forth and 
I never squeeze the paddle.  

Seriously I am asking if I’m doing something wrong.

Thanks,
Ken WA8JXM

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Richard Gillingham
You’re not alone.  My first experience with paddles was long after having used 
a ‘bug’..  Hence… … wobble wrist…  I have never gotten even remotely adept at 
‘squeeze keying’…   Still screw stuff up with iambic etc. paddles/keyers.  
Nevertheless, I prefer paddles/keyer to a straight key at anything over about 
15 wpm..


73

Gil, W1RG






From: Ken
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎December‎ ‎1‎, ‎2014 ‎4‎:‎02‎ ‎PM
To: Joe Subich, W4TV
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net






 On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com wrote:
 
 *IF* one must start out with paddles/keyer, learn on Iambic A.  Iambic
 B was a logic error in the AccuKeyer and simply covers up sloppy (slow)
 paddle operation.
 
 There are really three Iambic modes - based on where the trailing
 element decision is made:


Am I missing something?  Have I been doing it wrong for years?  Yes I have an 
Iambic paddle and of course the K3 offers Iambic choice BUT I  NEVER USE IT.   
I don’t touch both paddles at the same time, my wrist rocks back and forth and 
I never squeeze the paddle.  

Seriously I am asking if I’m doing something wrong.

Thanks,
Ken WA8JXM

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to w...@hotmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV


 Am I missing something?

No, with the mention of Iambic, I assumed squeeze technique.  If one
uses a single lever paddle or slaps dual lever paddles, Iambic A/B
or Super CMOS are all the same G.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2014-12-01 4:00 PM, Ken wrote:



On Dec 1, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV li...@subich.com wrote:

*IF* one must start out with paddles/keyer, learn on Iambic A.  Iambic
B was a logic error in the AccuKeyer and simply covers up sloppy (slow)
paddle operation.

There are really three Iambic modes - based on where the trailing
element decision is made:



Am I missing something?  Have I been doing it wrong for years?  Yes I have an 
Iambic paddle and of course the K3 offers Iambic choice BUT I  NEVER USE IT.   
I don’t touch both paddles at the same time, my wrist rocks back and forth and 
I never squeeze the paddle.

Seriously I am asking if I’m doing something wrong.

Thanks,
Ken WA8JXM



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Ken
Ah ah!   So THAT (Farnsworth) is the source of the horrible CW I hear (fast 
characters with excess spacing!)   

Sorry but I will disagree with that approach.  It teaches plain bad CW. 
(Okay, when I went to school they didn’t have to teach the alphabet with silly 
bellies and stuff either.  We learned to read the English language, not 
pictures and so we were able to progress beyond picture books and 
hieroglyphics.  Dumbing down elementary teaching has been a disaster and I 
think dumbing down CW is in the same category.)  

I learned CW by myself without any crutches.   Sorry but I never noticed a 
10wpm barrier either, it took me 4 months as a novice and 328 on the air QSOs 
to pass my General ticket (13wpm in front of an FCC examiner.)   I think it is 
totally hilarious that you mention a “conspiracy by the FCC” to prevent people 
from getting a General class ticket back when most hams had General class 
tickets!

Ken WA8JXM


 On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Fred Jensen k6...@foothill.net wrote:
 
 On 12/1/2014 12:17 PM, Ken wrote:
 
 Would  you really suggest someone starting out at 5 wpm use a paddle
 and keyer?
 
 Yes.  It's called Farnsworth and there is both a good body of empirical 
 evidence as well as explainable theory that it works better than other 
 methods.  Learning Morse has a direct parallel with how kids learn to read.  
 Initially, they learn the components of the letters.  For example, D is a 
 post with a big tummy, B is a post with two small tummies.  They very 
 shortly learn to recognize letters as whole objects by their overall shape, 
 not their components.
 
 Farnsworth uses a character speed of about 20 WPM, however the characters are 
 spaced however as much as needed for a given, slower, net speed.  20 WPM is a 
 too fast for counting dits and dahs, and one learns to recognize letters by 
 their sound shape.  For me, P sounds like crossing a low round-topped 
 hill, whereas X sounds like crossing a narrow ravine.  R is more like 
 going over a speed bump.
 
 When sending to the student, you want as precise Morse at a character speed 
 of 20 WPM as you can get, so teacher uses a keyer and paddle. When student is 
 sending, you want him to make the same sound shapes he's burning into his 
 brain on receiving.  If he needs 1 WPM spacing to recognize the sound shape 
 and say or write it, that's fine, 20 WPM characters with about 10-12 second 
 spaces is about 1 WPM.

 
 There is an almost universal plateau at about 10-11 WPM for most people 
 learning Morse.  In the later 50's, a conspiracy theory alleged the FCC set 
 the General code speed at 13 WPM on purpose because of that.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Ken
Yes, I’ve looked up and understand the theory of Iambic keying but 1) it’s been 
weird to try and 2) I haven’t noticed any advantage for me.  Now maybe there is 
an advantage at higher speeds?   But when I’ve run above 30 wpm, I use a 
keyboard ;-)

73, 
Ken WA8JXM


 On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:41 PM, G4GNX g4...@theatreorgans.co.uk wrote:
 
 In short, yes you're doing it wrong. :-)
 
 That said, if it works for you, who cares?
 
 The correct way to use a twin paddle iambic keyer is to press on paddle 
 first, fo9llowed by a squeeze action to hold both paddles on, but depending 
 on what character you're trying to send.
 
 For example. CQ (for a right handed keyer) would use the following sequence: 
 Press right paddle and immediately squeeze both paddles without letting go 
 the right paddle. Hold that squeeze until the first -.-. is sent, then let go 
 for the inter-character space. To send the 'Q' press the right paddle and 
 wait until the start of the second dash, then squeeze both paddles and 
 immediately let go of the left hand paddle whilst continuing to briefly hold 
 the right hand paddle until you're sure the entire --.- sequence has been 
 sent, then let go the right paddle.ready to send whatever you want to come 
 next.
 
 I know this sounds long winded, but once you get used to it, it's very 
 intuitive and very fast and accurate, as long as you practice it. Once you 
 get proficient in that mode, you don't even think about it any more.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Matt VK2RQ
Well, I use iambic keying (mode B, because I learned to use a paddle on an ICOM 
radio, which would only do mode B. Anyway, this was before I even knew there 
was such a thing as mode A and mode B).

The following article questions the value of iambic keying, makes for an 
interesting read:
http://www.morsex.com/pubs/iambicmyth.pdf

For the speeds I typically plod along at, around the 20wpm mark, the iambic 
keying works quite well, and feels nice.

73,
Matt VK2RQ

 On 2 Dec 2014, at 11:37 am, Ken wa8...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yes, I’ve looked up and understand the theory of Iambic keying but 1) it’s 
 been weird to try and 2) I haven’t noticed any advantage for me.  Now maybe 
 there is an advantage at higher speeds?   But when I’ve run above 30 wpm, I 
 use a keyboard ;-)
 
 73, 
 Ken WA8JXM
 
 
 On Dec 1, 2014, at 4:41 PM, G4GNX g4...@theatreorgans.co.uk wrote:
 
 In short, yes you're doing it wrong. :-)
 
 That said, if it works for you, who cares?
 
 The correct way to use a twin paddle iambic keyer is to press on paddle 
 first, fo9llowed by a squeeze action to hold both paddles on, but depending 
 on what character you're trying to send.
 
 For example. CQ (for a right handed keyer) would use the following sequence: 
 Press right paddle and immediately squeeze both paddles without letting go 
 the right paddle. Hold that squeeze until the first -.-. is sent, then let 
 go for the inter-character space. To send the 'Q' press the right paddle and 
 wait until the start of the second dash, then squeeze both paddles and 
 immediately let go of the left hand paddle whilst continuing to briefly hold 
 the right hand paddle until you're sure the entire --.- sequence has been 
 sent, then let go the right paddle.ready to send whatever you want to come 
 next.
 
 I know this sounds long winded, but once you get used to it, it's very 
 intuitive and very fast and accurate, as long as you practice it. Once you 
 get proficient in that mode, you don't even think about it any more.
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread Matt VK2RQ
I'm one of those left-handlers who learned to send on the paddle either right 
hand -- that way, no need to put down the pen :-)  When I learned the straight 
key though, in order to get my ham ticket, I learned left-handed, and still 
can't use a straight key with my right :-(

73,
Matt VK2RQ

 On 2 Dec 2014, at 7:31 am, Fred Jensen k6...@foothill.net wrote:
 
 This is more common than one might think, but only for left-handers it seems. 
  I'm left-handed and my Elmer, W6RMK, was too.  He taught me to send with my 
 right hand so I could write legibly in my log.  In those days, you logged 
 every transmission, whether or not it resulted in a QSO.
 
 A number of years ago, we had a little survey on this list.  A total of 137 
 responded, about 22% south paws.  A little more than 50% of those learned to 
 send/paddle right.  0% of the north paws sent/paddled left. From this and 
 answers to some of the other questions in the survey, it appears that most 
 right-handers are *really* right-handed [some even said so].  Left-handers 
 seem to be somewhat more flexible, maybe because we live in a right-handed 
 world.
 
 I currently have a second paddle set up left on the WinKey-USB to the left of 
 the laptop which I've started using left-handed in casual QSO's since it's 
 more natural for me and I no longer have to write in my logbook.  I still 
 contest with the paddle on the right since I can type faster with my left 
 hand.
 
 I'm not hearing all the poor CW others are talking about.  In CQ WW CW, I 
 made a note of two: one had the weight set very high and his dots resembled 
 his dashes.  Theotheroneforgottherearespacesbetweenwords. Quite a few of the 
 Summits On The Air crowd are learning CW and, while they may make a few more 
 mistakes, there is nothing wrong with their sending.  The majority of those 
 ops are using embedded keyers in their rigs.
 
 In the end, do what works best for you.
 
 73,
 
 Fred K6DGW
 - Northern California Contest Club
 - CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
 - www.cqp.org
 
 
 
 On 12/1/2014 11:14 AM, Bob wrote:
 
 At 13 in 1956 I signed up for a Novice class at the local radio club,
 Nutley Amateur Radio Society (Nutley, NJ).  When it came time to learn
 the basics of sending the instructor, W2TJD (SK) made us try to send
 with the wrong hand since we were learning anyway. I'm a lefty so
 tried right handed.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to matt.vk...@gmail.com
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-12-01 Thread WILLIS COOKE via Elecraft
Farnsworth uses a character speed of 15 WPM.  Koch (German for Cook) pronounced 
Cook, not kotch uses 25 WPM.  ARRL Code Practice uses Farnsworth for Code 
Practice for speeds below 15 WPM.  I find the Koch method difficult to copy, 
but Farnsworth not so bad and I use it for Bug sending.  when I need to slow 
down a bit.  The Koch method may be a good method for the Military or 
Commercial trainees to get up to 25 WPM fast, but I don't see a place for it in 
ham radio and the Military and Commercial do not use CW any more. Willis 
'Cookie' Cooke, TDXS DX Chairman K5EWJ  Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart
  From: Ken wa8...@gmail.com
 To: k6...@foothill.net 
Cc: elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 6:33 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW
   
Ah ah!  So THAT (Farnsworth) is the source of the horrible CW I hear (fast 
characters with excess spacing!)  

Sorry but I will disagree with that approach.  It teaches plain bad CW.    
(Okay, when I went to school they didn’t have to teach the alphabet with silly 
bellies and stuff either.  We learned to read the English language, not 
pictures and so we were able to progress beyond picture books and 
hieroglyphics.  Dumbing down elementary teaching has been a disaster and I 
think dumbing down CW is in the same category.)  

I learned CW by myself without any crutches.  Sorry but I never noticed a 10wpm 
barrier either, it took me 4 months as a novice and 328 on the air QSOs to pass 
my General ticket (13wpm in front of an FCC examiner.)  I think it is totally 
hilarious that you mention a “conspiracy by the FCC” to prevent people from 
getting a General class ticket back when most hams had General class tickets!

Ken WA8JXM


 On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Fred Jensen k6...@foothill.net wrote:
 
 On 12/1/2014 12:17 PM, Ken wrote:
 
 Would  you really suggest someone starting out at 5 wpm use a paddle
 and keyer?
 
 Yes.  It's called Farnsworth and there is both a good body of empirical 
 evidence as well as explainable theory that it works better than other 
 methods.  Learning Morse has a direct parallel with how kids learn to read.  
 Initially, they learn the components of the letters.  For example, D is a 
 post with a big tummy, B is a post with two small tummies.  They very 
 shortly learn to recognize letters as whole objects by their overall shape, 
 not their components.
 
 Farnsworth uses a character speed of about 20 WPM, however the characters are 
 spaced however as much as needed for a given, slower, net speed.  20 WPM is a 
 too fast for counting dits and dahs, and one learns to recognize letters by 
 their sound shape.  For me, P sounds like crossing a low round-topped 
 hill, whereas X sounds like crossing a narrow ravine.  R is more like 
 going over a speed bump.
 
 When sending to the student, you want as precise Morse at a character speed 
 of 20 WPM as you can get, so teacher uses a keyer and paddle. When student is 
 sending, you want him to make the same sound shapes he's burning into his 
 brain on receiving.  If he needs 1 WPM spacing to recognize the sound shape 
 and say or write it, that's fine, 20 WPM characters with about 10-12 second 
 spaces is about 1 WPM.

 
 There is an almost universal plateau at about 10-11 WPM for most people 
 learning Morse.  In the later 50's, a conspiracy theory alleged the FCC set 
 the General code speed at 13 WPM on purpose because of that.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to wrco...@yahoo.com

  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

[Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Jim Brown

On Sun,11/30/2014 8:25 PM, Leroy Marion wrote:

  Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing?


It's been nearly 60 years since I went through that. Paddles and keyers 
did not exist -- we had bugs, but did start on straight keys. But bugs 
are inherently different from the paddle/keyer combo. Perhaps one of the 
CWOps guys who are working with CW Academy can offer an opinion. Mine is 
that sending good CW is mostly a matter of training our brain and 
fingers to mimic the good CW that we hear. Unless you're a real straight 
key pro, they're far too slow for most on air CW, so if you're going 
to learn what you're going to use, I don't see the value in going 
through an intermediate step.


BTW -- if you want to get a great start on CW (or build your skills), by 
all means take advantage of CW Academy. This is the brainchild of K6RB 
and a few other CWOps members, and it's been quite successful. 
http://www.cwops.org/  I'm a proud member of CWOps, but not very active. 
It's a great group. Membership is by invitation. You don't need to be a 
member to be in CW Academy or the many on-the-air events. Check out the 
website.


73, Jim K9YC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Walter Underwood
I’m not a CW operator, but if you have any RSI issues from computer use, be 
careful about spending a lot of time with a straight key. Professional 
telegraphers got an early version of RSI called “glass arm”. It appears that 
you can avoid that with excellent technique, the same way you avoid RSI on a 
computer. But I have not heard of RSI injuries with paddles.

wunder
K6WRU
CM87wj
http://observer.wunderwood.org/

On Nov 30, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

 On Sun,11/30/2014 8:25 PM, Leroy Marion wrote:
  Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing?
 
 It's been nearly 60 years since I went through that. Paddles and keyers did 
 not exist -- we had bugs, but did start on straight keys. But bugs are 
 inherently different from the paddle/keyer combo. Perhaps one of the CWOps 
 guys who are working with CW Academy can offer an opinion. Mine is that 
 sending good CW is mostly a matter of training our brain and fingers to mimic 
 the good CW that we hear. Unless you're a real straight key pro, they're 
 far too slow for most on air CW, so if you're going to learn what you're 
 going to use, I don't see the value in going through an intermediate step.
 
 BTW -- if you want to get a great start on CW (or build your skills), by all 
 means take advantage of CW Academy. This is the brainchild of K6RB and a few 
 other CWOps members, and it's been quite successful. http://www.cwops.org/  
 I'm a proud member of CWOps, but not very active. It's a great group. 
 Membership is by invitation. You don't need to be a member to be in CW 
 Academy or the many on-the-air events. Check out the website.
 
 73, Jim K9YC
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 Message delivered to wun...@wunderwood.org

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Tom Blahovici
I like the comment about going through an intermediate step... Maybe I'll look 
at a paddle instead. 
So what's this about iambic? What are the types of paddles out there?

On Nov 30, 2014 11:42 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

 On Sun,11/30/2014 8:25 PM, Leroy Marion wrote: 
    Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing? 

 It's been nearly 60 years since I went through that. Paddles and keyers 
 did not exist -- we had bugs, but did start on straight keys. But bugs 
 are inherently different from the paddle/keyer combo. Perhaps one of the 
 CWOps guys who are working with CW Academy can offer an opinion. Mine is 
 that sending good CW is mostly a matter of training our brain and 
 fingers to mimic the good CW that we hear. Unless you're a real straight 
 key pro, they're far too slow for most on air CW, so if you're going 
 to learn what you're going to use, I don't see the value in going 
 through an intermediate step. 

 BTW -- if you want to get a great start on CW (or build your skills), by 
 all means take advantage of CW Academy. This is the brainchild of K6RB 
 and a few other CWOps members, and it's been quite successful. 
 http://www.cwops.org/  I'm a proud member of CWOps, but not very active. 
 It's a great group. Membership is by invitation. You don't need to be a 
 member to be in CW Academy or the many on-the-air events. Check out the 
 website. 

 73, Jim K9YC 

 __ 
 Elecraft mailing list 
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm 
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net 

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net 
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
 Message delivered to tom...@videotron.ca 
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Leroy Marion
I have from the Schurr Profi to home made keys.
 One of the best I have is the Norcal paddles  Kit key,.
It’s a magnetic(versus springs ) type key. I did put silver contacts on it.
It was picked up by Vibroplex and made as the Code Warrior, I think.
I don’t think Elecraft sells the magnetic paddles by Bencher 
anymore.
  Another favorite that is in use right now is the N3ZN key, also 
magnetic tension.
   Now that my hand has become partially paralyzed, I am using  
computer key board
Keying, and I like it a lot. Probably the wave of the future and the saving 
technology for CW.
Also used for PSK31 and other modes.
 
 Leroy  AB7CE


-Original Message-
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Tom 
Blahovici
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 10:06 PM
To: Jim Brown
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

I like the comment about going through an intermediate step... Maybe I'll look 
at a paddle instead. 
So what's this about iambic? What are the types of paddles out there?


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Barry LaZar

Tom,
As a beginner, don't get hung up on iambic. It's really for the 
advanced CW operator. It requires a double paddle, or squeeze key set 
and when you squeeze the paddles, you send alternating dits and dahs. 
Whether you send a dit or a dah first, is a matter if which side you 
squeezed first.


There all kinds of keys out there. As a beginner who most likely is 
not going to run high speed, almost any paddle set will work as long as 
the paddles move smoothly. The important thing is that it has a heavy 
enough base not to move around during excited sending. A Bencher is 
probably not a bad starting point. It uses a spring to make the paddle 
work and it doesn't feel all that bad. I use a good Vibroplex most of 
the time with an old Brown Brothers as my other main paddle set. I also 
have my first set which is an FYO set that Bencher copied.


 No matter what kind of paddle set you get, you are going to need 
to adjust it for you. Whether you get spring loaded or magnetic tension 
paddles, the watch word is smoothness and response. At low speed 
response is not usually an issue. The rest of it is cosmetic. If there 
is a good CW operator near you, go see him and ask to play with his 
key/paddle set and see what it feels like. And then ask him why he sets 
his paddles as he does.



73,
Barry
K3NDM




On 12/1/2014 12:05 AM, Tom Blahovici wrote:

I like the comment about going through an intermediate step... Maybe I'll look 
at a paddle instead.
So what's this about iambic? What are the types of paddles out there?

On Nov 30, 2014 11:42 PM, Jim Brown j...@audiosystemsgroup.com wrote:

On Sun,11/30/2014 8:25 PM, Leroy Marion wrote:

Does not a paddle and keyer give you perfect timing?

It's been nearly 60 years since I went through that. Paddles and keyers
did not exist -- we had bugs, but did start on straight keys. But bugs
are inherently different from the paddle/keyer combo. Perhaps one of the
CWOps guys who are working with CW Academy can offer an opinion. Mine is
that sending good CW is mostly a matter of training our brain and
fingers to mimic the good CW that we hear. Unless you're a real straight
key pro, they're far too slow for most on air CW, so if you're going
to learn what you're going to use, I don't see the value in going
through an intermediate step.

BTW -- if you want to get a great start on CW (or build your skills), by
all means take advantage of CW Academy. This is the brainchild of K6RB
and a few other CWOps members, and it's been quite successful.
http://www.cwops.org/  I'm a proud member of CWOps, but not very active.
It's a great group. Membership is by invitation. You don't need to be a
member to be in CW Academy or the many on-the-air events. Check out the
website.

73, Jim K9YC

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to tom...@videotron.ca

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to k3...@comcast.net


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


Re: [Elecraft] Getting Started With CW

2014-11-30 Thread Sverre Holm (LA3ZA)
I couldn't agree more. I'm glad I finally discovered the single-lever paddle
after more than ten years of struggling with iambic. It is so much easier to
use the single-lever and it is much more forgiving for small timing errors. 

I wrote about it on my blog some time ago:
http://la3za.blogspot.no/2013/06/the-advantage-of-single-lever-paddle.html
After that I got the tiny Palm single-lever paddle.


Barry K3NDM wrote
 Tom,
  As a beginner, don't get hung up on iambic. 





-
Sverre, LA3ZA

K2 #2198, K3 #3391,
LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com,
LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: 
http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html
--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-CW-decoder-and-CQ-CW-contest-tp7595261p7595290.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] Getting Started On CW

2005-04-06 Thread Stephen Brandt
When I started out as a Novice in 1964, I was advised to start with a straight 
key.  When I could send well at about 15 wpm, then consider changing over to 
some kind of speed key.  We didn't have iambics then.  I switched to homebrew 
solid state keyer, that I built myself, and a Vibroplex paddle, which I still 
have.  I now use an Idiom Press Super Keyer II, and an iambic paddle.  I may 
not send the greatest code in the world, I'm still learning, but I'm glad that 
I followed my Elmer's advice.

73,

Steve Brandt N7VS ex: WB6VVS, WN6QYP
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com