[Elecraft] K3 AFX problem

2018-11-25 Thread Juha - oh6os
Hello,

AFX sounds distortion with phones and at bin mode audio has almost gone.
With speakers AFX works fine, maybe some crack when change on-off and
1...5-bin. Is it broken?

juha oh6os



--
Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com


[Elecraft] k3 - AFX effectiveness

2010-12-07 Thread GW0ETF

Been having a fresh look at the AFX in view of the recent postings about
pulling out callsigns from pile-ups. It's been set to BIN for a long time
now and I remember this being quite effective at giving some spatial
separation to signals differing slightly in frequency when using stereo
headphones. However, now the effect seems to be much less noticeable than I
remember, and this with the same headphones and settings; turning AFX on and
off gives a definite change, but the spatial effect seems to much less.

I wonder how others see the effectiveness of AFX and particularly the BIN
setting. Pretty sure I haven't done anything to alter this; maybe I'll dig
out one of the much earlier firmware versions and see if it's maybe altered
over software upgrades.

73,

Stewart Rolfe, GW0ETF
(K3 #145)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/k3-AFX-effectiveness-tp5811754p5811754.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-24 Thread Brett Howard
Yet it makes so much sense with the UI.  DATA MD has no functionality
when in CW and when holding NB or NR or the Notch filter or the like it
allows you to configure the settable features of that feature.  Granted
its a slight UI breach but the product is still labeled as such on the
button.  I see this as a lesser evil to some of the press 1 while in
this menu things which would have been more intuitive and fitting of the
UI had they had their own menu item.  

But thats all just my opinion. ;)

~Brett

PS:  When I stated that I wouldn't put it past you I meant that as a
compliment.  Hopefully it was taken that way...  At times text can very
poorly portray a message.


On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 18:45 -0800, wayne burdick wrote:
 Brett Howard wrote:
 
  Many of the buttons do different stuff based on what mode you're in.
  I'd not put something like this past him in the least.
 
 Brett,
 
 I'm cautiously flexible (and hopefully, consistent) with the controls.
 
 But I would never engage in a breech of UI etiquette as flagrant as 
 making the DATA MD switch act as a shortcut to the AFX menu entry. 
 One of our field testers proposed that over a year ago, and he couldn't 
 talk me into it, either  :)
 
 You *can* use a programmable switch function (PFx/Mx) for this, though.
 
 73,
 Wayne
 N6KR
 
 ---
 
 http://www.elecraft.com
 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-23 Thread Brett Howard
I see that as a great idea that fits relatively well with the theme of
the UI!

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:17 -0500, Ed K1EP wrote:
 I don't think this has been mentioned before, I did a quick search of 
 the list.
 
 Here is my firmware request :)
 
 In order to adjust the AFX properties, you have to go into the 
 menu.  It isn't that easy in the heat of the battle.  The AFX button 
 is also the DATA MODE button if it is pressed and held.  However, in 
 SSB and CW modes, you aren't in a data mode so a N/A is 
 displayed.  Why not make this a short cut to the AFX settings 
 menu?  If you are in a non-data mode, then pressing and holding AFX 
 will allow you to change the AFX delay or BIN settings.  
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-23 Thread Bill W4ZV


Ed K1EP wrote:
 
 In order to adjust the AFX properties, you have to go into the 
 menu.  It isn't that easy in the heat of the battle.  
 

You can assign the AFX setting to one of the PF keys.  I doubt Wayne is
going to want to start making keys work different ways for different modes.

73,  Bill

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/K3%3A-AFX-Firmware-request-tp2368964p2371459.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-23 Thread Brett Howard
Many of the buttons do different stuff based on what mode you're in.
I'd not put something like this past him in the least.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Bill W4ZV btipp...@alum.mit.edu wrote:


 Ed K1EP wrote:

 In order to adjust the AFX properties, you have to go into the
 menu.  It isn't that easy in the heat of the battle.


 You can assign the AFX setting to one of the PF keys.  I doubt Wayne is
 going to want to start making keys work different ways for different modes.

 73,  Bill

 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://n2.nabble.com/K3%3A-AFX-Firmware-request-tp2368964p2371459.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-23 Thread wayne burdick
Brett Howard wrote:

 Many of the buttons do different stuff based on what mode you're in.
 I'd not put something like this past him in the least.

Brett,

I'm cautiously flexible (and hopefully, consistent) with the controls.

But I would never engage in a breech of UI etiquette as flagrant as 
making the DATA MD switch act as a shortcut to the AFX menu entry. 
One of our field testers proposed that over a year ago, and he couldn't 
talk me into it, either  :)

You *can* use a programmable switch function (PFx/Mx) for this, though.

73,
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3: AFX Firmware request

2009-02-22 Thread Ed K1EP
I don't think this has been mentioned before, I did a quick search of 
the list.

Here is my firmware request :)

In order to adjust the AFX properties, you have to go into the 
menu.  It isn't that easy in the heat of the battle.  The AFX button 
is also the DATA MODE button if it is pressed and held.  However, in 
SSB and CW modes, you aren't in a data mode so a N/A is 
displayed.  Why not make this a short cut to the AFX settings 
menu?  If you are in a non-data mode, then pressing and holding AFX 
will allow you to change the AFX delay or BIN settings.  

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


RE: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-12-01 Thread Arie Kleingeld PA3A
Tom,
 
You are right about using one speaker. 
What I was trying to say is that with the stereo headset, the rx sounds
nice with the AFX on. It seems that when the K3 is transmitting CW , the
sidetone/monitor (still using the headset) is in mono, cannot hear any
AFX effect. Would be nice if the sidetone would also have the AFX
effect.
 
73
Arie PA3A

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Tom Hammond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Verzonden: maandag 1 december 2008 1:18
Aan: Arie Kleingeld PA3A; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX


Arie:



During the CQWW CW we used my K3 at PI4D and tried out the AFX.
 
Very nice feature when the frequency is as crowded as in the CQWW. Pity
the sidetone (monitor) is normal mono. 


ONLY if you are using a single speaker.  With dual speakers, AFX works
nicely!



I suggest that if AFX is enabled the monitor audio is also in AFX-sound
so you can stay 'in flow.


73,

Tom   N0SS


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-11-30 Thread Arie Kleingeld PA3A
During the CQWW CW we used my K3 at PI4D and tried out the AFX.
 
Very nice feature when the frequency is as crowded as in the CQWW. Pity
the sidetone (monitor) is normal mono. 
 
I suggest that if AFX is enabled the monitor audio is also in AFX-sound
so you can stay 'in flow.
 
 
73
Arie PA3A
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-11-30 Thread Tom Hammond

Arie:


During the CQWW CW we used my K3 at PI4D and tried out the AFX.

Very nice feature when the frequency is as crowded as in the CQWW. 
Pity the sidetone (monitor) is normal mono.


ONLY if you are using a single speaker.  With dual speakers, AFX works nicely!

I suggest that if AFX is enabled the monitor audio is also in 
AFX-sound so you can stay 'in flow.


73,

Tom   N0SS
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation

2008-06-24 Thread John H Gibson
Hi Lyle,

Thank you for your explanation of how AFX works; I now better understand how 
AFX currently behaves. While listening to cw, I find that increasing DELAY 
shifts 
the apparent source of a cw signal further to the left, which makes me believe 
that AFX delays the right stereo channel. 

AFX does provide a nice spatial sense of the sound (albeit with sound sources 
shifted to the left of center). I know that your plate is full right now, but I 
was 
pleased to hear that you are thinking of a a future AFX with that spatially 
locates 
a sound source based on its pitch.

Best Regard and 73,
John, no8v

 Original message 
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:41:39 -0700
From: Lyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation  
To: Jeff Kinzli N6GQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 I have recently begun experimenting with my K3's AFX feature...
 This is not what I expected. What am I doing wrong?

The K3 does not provide a space based on pitch which is apparently 
what you were expecting.  That effect is on the list of things to 
consider for the future.

BIN provides a fixed phase shift between the two channels.

DLY provides a fixed (but user selectable) time delay between the two 
channels.  I use DLY 3.  Wayne prefers DLY 5.

This is *all* what we call psychoacoustics, mainly because we like to 
use 5 syllable words to impress :-)  Different listeners react in 
different ways to these settings.  There is no correct one; use what you 
prefer, including OFF.

73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation

2008-06-23 Thread John H Gibson
I have recently begun experimenting with my K3's AFX feature. My understanding 
is that AFX is supposed to spread cw signals across a virtual listening space 
in 
front of the operator (distributed according to pitch?). My experience, 
listening 
with stereo headphones and with AFX on, is that all of the sound seems to come 
from one side and slightly to the rear. With AFX off I hear a balanced sound 
from 
the headphones that seems to be in the center of my head.

This is not what I expected. What am I doing wrong?

73,
john, no8v
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation

2008-06-23 Thread Jeff Kinzli N6GQ
John, that sounds like what I have experienced with AFX:BIN. Perhaps
we need to use the stereo output on the rear of the K3 for the real
effect.

AFX:DELAY5, on the other hand, does seem to lay out signals in a
virtualized manner, spatially separated in front of the listener. In
my experience, however, this effect takes time to materialze, for
me, it was a number of hours in the seat before it happened. Don't get
me wrong, AFX:DELAY5 is very comfortable to listen to, but the
virtual spatialization seemed to take a while to happen (for me,
anyway).

I wonder what other people experience in terms of time before they
notice the spatial separation?

Jeff N6GQ

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 3:04 PM, John H Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have recently begun experimenting with my K3's AFX feature. My understanding
 is that AFX is supposed to spread cw signals across a virtual listening space 
 in
 front of the operator (distributed according to pitch?). My experience, 
 listening
 with stereo headphones and with AFX on, is that all of the sound seems to come
 from one side and slightly to the rear. With AFX off I hear a balanced sound 
 from
 the headphones that seems to be in the center of my head.

 This is not what I expected. What am I doing wrong?

 73,
 john, no8v
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation

2008-06-23 Thread Lyle Johnson

I have recently begun experimenting with my K3's AFX feature...
This is not what I expected. What am I doing wrong?


The K3 does not provide a space based on pitch which is apparently 
what you were expecting.  That effect is on the list of things to 
consider for the future.


BIN provides a fixed phase shift between the two channels.

DLY provides a fixed (but user selectable) time delay between the two 
channels.  I use DLY 3.  Wayne prefers DLY 5.


This is *all* what we call psychoacoustics, mainly because we like to 
use 5 syllable words to impress :-)  Different listeners react in 
different ways to these settings.  There is no correct one; use what you 
prefer, including OFF.


73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation

2008-06-23 Thread n4lq
I could swear that the audio was louder from the left speaker than from the 
right with AFX turned on so I got out my trusty DB meter and measured each 
one. They are identical. I think this is caused by speaker location.


Steve Ellington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: Lyle Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Jeff Kinzli N6GQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Elecraft Reflector elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] AFX operation



I have recently begun experimenting with my K3's AFX feature...
This is not what I expected. What am I doing wrong?


The K3 does not provide a space based on pitch which is apparently
what you were expecting.  That effect is on the list of things to
consider for the future.

BIN provides a fixed phase shift between the two channels.

DLY provides a fixed (but user selectable) time delay between the two
channels.  I use DLY 3.  Wayne prefers DLY 5.

This is *all* what we call psychoacoustics, mainly because we like to
use 5 syllable words to impress :-)  Different listeners react in
different ways to these settings.  There is no correct one; use what you
prefer, including OFF.

73,

Lyle KK7P

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com







No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1515 - Release Date: 6/23/2008 
7:16 PM


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3: AFX, NR, 5 khz tuning, 9 Khz Tuning, AGC SLP, et. al

2008-06-21 Thread Kenneth Waites
All of these discussions seem to point out that there is need for operator 
control and knowlege to properly operate the radio.
 
For some users, the sun may rise and set on AM, but others are using the radio 
for moon bounce, 160 m CW contesting, transverter,  etc. 
 
And when a feature is implimented just for operator convenience, it may well 
limit the radio in some other unanticipated mode of operation.  Who knows what 
the spacing of SWBC signals will be in 10 years.  Who knows what new modes of 
digital communications will exist in 10 years.  Who knows how we will be using 
radios and the internet together in 10 years.
 
I vote for giving the operator control rather than giving the software 
control.  It is part of the adventure of the hobby to own a piece of gear that 
is complex enough that it is a challenge to us to squeeze out the last ounce of 
performance.  I vote for having thousands of permutations and combinations of 
features at my control.
 
Ken K5WK


 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX, NR, 5 khz tuning, 9 Khz Tuning, AGC SLP, et. al

2008-06-21 Thread Alexandr Kobranov



I vote for giving the operator control rather than giving the software control. 
 It is part of the adventure of the hobby to own a piece of gear that is 
complex enough that it is a challenge to us to squeeze out the last ounce of 
performance.  I vote for having thousands of permutations and combinations of 
features at my control.
 
Ken K5WK


Abolutely!
This is a important part of reasons why so many operators have choosed K3.
They are no doors closed, this is my main feeling about HW and 
flexible FW developmnet.
And there is communication and service which is out of any (my) 
previous experince.


73!
L. -dst-
K3/10 #727

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX, NR, 5 khz tuning, 9 Khz Tuning, AGC SLP, et. al

2008-06-21 Thread G4ILO


Kenneth Waites wrote:
 
 I vote for giving the operator control rather than giving the software
 control.  It is part of the adventure of the hobby to own a piece of gear
 that is complex enough that it is a challenge to us to squeeze out the
 last ounce of performance.  I vote for having thousands of permutations
 and combinations of features at my control.
 
Having read the recent QST review of the Flex 5000 I can see that a lot of
people agree with you. I, personally, don't. I prefer a piece of equipment
or a software program that does its job extremely well but is simple to
operate without a lot of configuration options. I, as the user, am willing
to adapt to the program or equipment if necessary.

This ultimate configurability has been the curse of Windows software
development, and has resulted in bloatware like Microsoft Office that has so
many options that I have often seen it cited that most users only know 20%
of them. Some of the best software I ever used was DOS or early Windows
software, and I could probably still do most of what I want to with it, if
it was still possible to run it. In the same way, about the only thing wrong
with the radios of 20 years ago was their performance, not their ergonomics.

I do not want to see radios going the same way as computer software. Already
we see on this reflector people asking if it is possible to do things the K3
can already do. Most people can't remember everything they read in the
manual (even if they read it in the first place) and this is probably more
true of radio hams than computer users in general since most of us are
getting to the age when it isn't so easy to remember stuff.

Now what was the point I was making...? :)

-
Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
KComm for K2/K3: www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3%3A-AFX%2C-NR%2C-5-khz-tuning%2C-9-Khz-Tuning%2C-AGC-SLP%2C-et.-al-tp18043288p18043723.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3: AFX, NR, 5 khz tuning, 9 Khz Tuning, AGC SLP, et. al

2008-06-21 Thread Don Wilhelm

Julian,

My cynicism is showing here, but I do believe that many people want all 
the 'bells and whistles' even if they will never use them.  The result 
is that we end up with a radio or software that many complain about 
'because it is too hard to use'.  It is difficult to impossible for all 
but a certain few to learn and fully use all the functions of the K3 (or 
a complex software application), and only a very select few will ever 
have need of *all* the available functions.


Fortunately, there are defaults that will work fine for the many many 
users who are only willing to put forth the effort required to utilize 
10 or 20% of the total function - as has been stated about the MS Office 
users.  It is to the credit of the developers that they have provided 
basic functions that many people can use to advantage.  Using that other 
80% of the total function requires in-depth study, and not all are 
willing to do that. - I know I don't,  I have enough 'irons in the fire' 
that I am not willing to do that advanced study (and practice) until I 
really have a defined need for it.


DOS and early Windows were quite straightforward and rigid in what could 
be done if one was using the command line and one had to have a good 
understanding of the internal workings to be able to fully use what 
those systems provided.  In the meantime, specific applications made it 
easier for many users to interface with the computer - the operating 
system can be quite complex and difficult to learn, but the average user 
does not have to know its internal workings - they only need to know how 
to interface with the applications to do whatever work they need to have 
done.


73,
Don W3FPR

G4ILO wrote:

Having read the recent QST review of the Flex 5000 I can see that a lot of
people agree with you. I, personally, don't. I prefer a piece of equipment
or a software program that does its job extremely well but is simple to
operate without a lot of configuration options. I, as the user, am willing
to adapt to the program or equipment if necessary.

This ultimate configurability has been the curse of Windows software
development, and has resulted in bloatware like Microsoft Office that has so
many options that I have often seen it cited that most users only know 20%
of them. Some of the best software I ever used was DOS or early Windows
software, and I could probably still do most of what I want to with it, if
it was still possible to run it. In the same way, about the only thing wrong
with the radios of 20 years ago was their performance, not their ergonomics.

I do not want to see radios going the same way as computer software. Already
we see on this reflector people asking if it is possible to do things the K3
can already do. Most people can't remember everything they read in the
manual (even if they read it in the first place) and this is probably more
true of radio hams than computer users in general since most of us are
getting to the age when it isn't so easy to remember stuff.

Now what was the point I was making...? :)

-
Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
KComm for K2/K3: www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html
  




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1510 - Release Date: 6/19/2008 3:21 PM
  

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX, etc...

2008-06-20 Thread Don Rasmussen
I enjoy the flexibility of the K3 audio system. I use
the AFX stereo setup in non-stereo mode. 

Setup K3 for 2 speakers, place an MS4 or equivalent on
top of a floor mounted Sounds Sweet speaker. 

The MS4 handles the sharp CW notes, the Sounds Sweet
provides rich audio on phone modes,
and it's all automatic with no external audio
amplification. 

A little Rx-Eq is icing on the cake. 

I used to need to use amplified computer speakers to
get a similar effect, it was never
as good and always hard to keep RF out of the speaker
wires. 

Highly recommended and imo -far- exceeds the audio
coming from the K3/PCSDR setup. 
 

[Elecraft] Audio artifacts
Lyle Johnson kk7p at wavecable.com 
Fri Jun 20 17:02:20 EDT 2008 

Previous message: [Elecraft] Audio artifacts 
Next message: [Elecraft] Audio artifacts 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [
author ] 



 It's the first time I've noticed this problem.  I
assume Lyle that you are
 not suggesting that it's a by-product of using the
AFX, because I use AFX
 all the time and had not noticed it before.  I don't
have the settings for
 SPKR+PH _and_ SPKRS=1 on.

AFX provides a delay between the two channels. If the
channels are then 
summed, there will be peaks and nulls depending on the
pitch.  The same 
thing happens if you have two speakers in a room with
hard walls and no 
draperies.  It is not distortion, it is combining
signals that are no 
longer in phase due to the intentionally introduced
delay.

73,

Lyle KK7P


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX effect

2008-03-08 Thread IK4YNG

Hi all,
i'm still familiarizing with my K3. I tried AFX on all the possible
settings.
While i do appreciate very well the pseudo-stereo effect, i don't see any
real difference when i choose the IQ or bin effect. From what i has read
on QST, it should disseminate the stations across a space in front of you;
the listener then will have an easier job in discriminating them, due to the
spatial differentiation thet is easier to appreciate than the frequency
alone.
The problem is, when i switch AFX on on Bin, and there are several stations
in the passband, i don't hear any spatial dissemination. The delay 5
effect in very well appreciated, instead, so my headphones are working as
expected (and my brains too hi hi)
does anybody have some explanation for me?

73,
IK4YNG Paolo, K3#517
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-AFX-effect-tp15920231p15920231.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX effect

2008-03-08 Thread Roelof Bakker

Hello Paolo,

Though I don't own a K3, I am familiar with similar effects.
The human brain is a self learning device and it takes some time before your 
brain has learned to use the benefits offered by AFX. Someone else mentioned 
this alreay here.
In an other niche of the radio hobby I am using narrow audio filters with a 
bandwidth of 12 and 6 Hz. Yes, that is correct: a bandwidth of 6 Hz. It took 
approximately 4 hours of extensive listening before my brain had adopted to 
it.


73,
Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt
K2 # 6170 



--
Mijn Postvak In wordt beschermd door SPAMfighter.
832 spam-mails zijn er tot op heden geblokkeerd.
Download de gratis SPAMfighter via deze link: http://www.spamfighter.com/lnl


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX effect

2008-03-08 Thread Barry N1EU


IK4YNG wrote:
 
 While i do appreciate very well the pseudo-stereo effect, i don't see any
 real difference when i choose the IQ or bin effect. From what i has read
 on QST, it should disseminate the stations across a space in front of you;
 the listener then will have an easier job in discriminating them, due to
 the spatial differentiation thet is easier to appreciate than the
 frequency alone.
 The problem is, when i switch AFX on on Bin, and there are several
 stations in the passband, i don't hear any spatial dissemination. The
 delay 5 effect in very well appreciated, instead, so my headphones are
 working as expected (and my brains too hi hi)
 does anybody have some explanation for me?
 

Using a wider bandwidth setting and a higher sidetone pitch should make the
AFX BIN effect more noticeable.  You should hear lower tones displaced
toward the R headphone and higher tones displaced toward the L headphone.  

73,
Barry N1EU

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/K3-AFX-effect-tp15920231p15921520.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX problem

2008-02-09 Thread mark roz
AFX use to work fb.
Now for some reason when is engaged sounds like NOTCH
on CW and SSB. there is no normal AFX effect.
Any idea??

Thanks,
Mark  


  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Fwd: [Elecraft] K3 AFX problem-Sorry-no problem

2008-02-09 Thread mark roz
Just intermittent headphones adapter.  SORRY

--- mark roz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:21:41 -0800 (PST)
 From: mark roz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] K3  AFX problem
 
 AFX use to work fb.
 Now for some reason when is engaged sounds like
 NOTCH
 on CW and SSB. there is no normal AFX effect.
 Any idea??
 
 Thanks,
 Mark  
 
 
  


 Be a better friend, newshound, and 
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 

http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
 
 
 
 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
 
 
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-19 Thread Don Ehrlich
Thanks for the help.  I just had to press the AFX button as Matt suggested. 
Didn't even know it was there.


Don K7FJ


---

You might want to see if it makes any difference if you push the AFX
button (lower right of the keypad).  This toggles AFX on and off.

matt, W6NIA

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:38:02 -0800, you wrote:


What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I
expect to hear the special effects that others have been
noting.  It sounds like plain old fashioned stereo to me ..
no special effects.  This is while listening to CW or SSB.

I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have
tried two different sets of stereo phones and tried all of
the choices in the AFX menu (delay 1 to 5, and b in).


Set SPKR = 2.

73,
Ed - W0YK


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Don Ehrlich
What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I expect to hear 
the special effects that others have been noting.  It sounds like plain old 
fashioned stereo to me .. no special effects.  This is while listening to CW 
or SSB.


I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have tried two 
different sets of stereo phones and tried all of the choices in the AFX menu 
(delay 1 to 5, and b in).


Maybe my head is just hard wired to ignore the effects.

Don K7FJ
K3 #195 


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Ed Muns
 What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I 
 expect to hear the special effects that others have been 
 noting.  It sounds like plain old fashioned stereo to me .. 
 no special effects.  This is while listening to CW or SSB.
 
 I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have 
 tried two different sets of stereo phones and tried all of 
 the choices in the AFX menu (delay 1 to 5, and b in).

Set SPKR = 2.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K3 AFX

2008-01-18 Thread Matt Zilmer
You might want to see if it makes any difference if you push the AFX
button (lower right of the keypad).  This toggles AFX on and off.

matt, W6NIA

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:38:02 -0800, you wrote:

 What am I doing wrong.  When I plug in my stereo earphones I 
 expect to hear the special effects that others have been 
 noting.  It sounds like plain old fashioned stereo to me .. 
 no special effects.  This is while listening to CW or SSB.
 
 I have speaker set to 1.  Speaker + Phones is OFF.  I have 
 tried two different sets of stereo phones and tried all of 
 the choices in the AFX menu (delay 1 to 5, and b in).

Set SPKR = 2.

73,
Ed - W0YK

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX Feature

2007-12-10 Thread Tom Hall
Dave W7AQK wrote:

So, in case you were wondering, AFX is not just a gee whiz feature..

 

The first time I tried this I kind of thought it wasn't all that useful.
But, as you said, with certain signals it can make copy easier. I also
combine it sometimes with dual passband filtering which also helps. I've had
the K3 for a week now and I am still finding little surprises here and
there. I haven't seen a radio so cleverly thought out since the K2. What a
great radio!

 

Tom, AK2B 

 

 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K3 AFX Feature

2007-12-09 Thread Dave Yarnes

Hi All,

As most of you probably know, the K3 incorporates a feature called AFX, 
which is similar to stereo reception.  It is a DSP function, and I am 
finding it to be very beneficial.  You can read a brief description of it on 
P. 33 of the owner's manual.  As described, it does indeed make listening 
less fatiguing, or seemingly so.  But the real benefit I am finding is in 
readibility of many signals.  On SSB, many signals are definitely enhanced 
by using this feature.  It does seem to depend somewhat on just what kind of 
audio is being provided by the other station.  In other words, the benefit 
of AFX seems more pronounced on some signals as opposed to others.  The same 
occurs on CW.


If you don't have your K3 yet, but do happen to have a Heil headset with 
their phase switching feature, you can get some idea about what I am talking 
about.  But the K3's AFX feature is substanially more pronounced as to 
benefit.  AFX really seems to make some signals jump right up, and 
significantly more pleasant to listen to, besides making a signal more 
readable.  It seems particularly effective if you have any kind of noise 
level.


So, in case you were wondering, AFX is not just a gee whiz feature.  It 
truly does very good things.


Dave W7AQK


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com