RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
During a recent call to PSS they recommended to stop/restart the store once in a while. They said this is a better consistency/integrity check than an online backup. They scared me a little by saying that online backups don't verify consistency/integrity as well as stopping /restarting the store, as I could have had inconsistent online backups in good faith. Is this a true story? Should a 'wise' exchange admin also plan for weekly stop/restart of exchange store? Alberto -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag No, keep the hands off. Leave the server running and never logon to the console. That's what's make for a stable server. -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: only 6 Mb after online defrag Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can not add user to permissions List
Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same groups and I can add them. I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 18:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Anything different about this user? What groups are they a member of (security groups). Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can not add user to permissions List Sorry, should have said using Outlook 2000 Hi, I have Exchange 2000 SP2, and I want to add a particular user to be able to see certain elements of some mailboxes, inbox, calendar etc. Every time I go to add this user to anyones mailbox, the minute I click accept or ok they are deleted from the list of users, this only happens with one particular user. I can add any other user account and all is well, and I can set permission on his mailbox for others to see his folders. Any one have any ideas? Thanks in advance keith mitchell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this e-mail message is private and confidential. It is intended for the stated addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please inform the sender of the misdirection by return of e-mail and delete this message immediately. Please be aware that CTAD may occasionally check e-mail correspondence. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook 98 Client Text Invisible
I have a user with an Outlook 98 problem. I sent a test message in HTML, RTF and plain text. The text in the HTML one is invisible on her system. If you change it to one of the other two formats, it becomes visible. Is this an IE thing, or an Outlook thing? I suppose Outlook 2000 would be an answer, but I find this behaviour curious and would like to know what the problem is. Tim -- Tim Gowen | Tel:0208-205-2266 |[EMAIL PROTECTED] RAF Museum | Fax:0208-205-8723 | Visit the RAF Museum website: IT Dept. | Mobile: 07980-545-628 | http://www.rafmuseum.com Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should take steps to confirm that they are actually virus free. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K
More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said all that, I have to do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end topology anyway ... so I'll just get my coat :) Mylo -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 01:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K Why? What's wrong with POP/IMAP? IMAP4 over SSL for example. Why would you rather give them Hotmail? William -Original Message- From: Myles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K I'd be happier giving them a hotmail account than POP/IMAP.. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 16:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K Let's see - OWA = SSL POP/IMAP = doesn't happen on my network, but it it did, it would only be via VPN -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K How do you guys secure exchange with OWA and POP/IMAP if you don't put it in a DMZ? Matt -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K There should be a rotating tag line appended to each message; Exchange doesn't belong in the DMZ PST=BAD BLB=BAD Etc -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K Go with your instincts. Keep it out of the DMZ. There's lots of history on this in the archives of this list. Missy - Original Message - From: Myles, Damian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:47 AM Subject: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K Posted this on the ISA forums a few days ago, but thought it might be an idea to post for discussion. A while back I tested a FE/BE topology with the FE server sitting on or DMZ, opening numerous ports on our interior firewall to allow AD/GC lookups through etc. Now it comes to actual putting these fruits of labour into practice in a production environment, I'm far from convinced of the rationale of placing a FE server on a DMZ, given the security implications of doing so with regards the numerous open ports. I'm more inclined to allow to publish the front-end server (on our LAN) and allow remote users to connect through HTTPS, secured behind ISA, acknowledging there is always a risk putting Internet-accessed resources on a production LAN. Since this is a back-to-back firewall, the following ports would need to be opened Exterior Firewall - 443/TCP HTTPS 25/TCP SMTP 993/TCP IMAPS Interior Firewall - 80/TCP HTTP 143/TCP IMAP 25/TCP SMTP 389/TCP LDAP 389/UDP LDAP 3268/TCP 88/TCP KERBEROS 88/UDP KERBEROS 53/TCP DNS 53/UDP DNS 135/TCP RPC 445/TCP NETLOGON I know a lot of the above can be secured over SSL and RPC limited to a single port (rather than anything above 1024), and that I can tunnel HTTP through IPSEC or VPN. However, since I'm using SecureNAT clients with ISA, IPSEC isn't really viable. Would appreciate any feedback on this and to find out what the general consensus of opinion is? Regards Mylo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
ROFLMAO Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 23:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Tener?? -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tightly coupled store on exchange 2000
hi all has Exchange 2000 got a tightly coupled message store .. as in the manner of Exchange 5.5 ? so that if a user sends a message to another user (both of which have their mailboxes located within the same store) the actual message transfer / delivery, or whatever, is a straight database task. The message does not flow through any MTA? .. or does it pass through the SMTP MTA??? thanks for any input on this. g. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Which products? -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction Logs We have Exchange 5.4 SP4 on Windows 2000. We have just started disabling Circular Logging. After doing a backup, it doesn't look like the transaction logs are disappearing. I have tried two different backup products and did full online backups. Should the mdbdata directory empty after the backup, or does exchange simply reuse the existing logs? Thanks, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Tivoli EDP and NTBackup. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Keep your AV up to date And other than what Andy says, pretty much leave it alone. It will thank you for it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting
RE: Transaction Logs
Exchange aware? -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Tivoli EDP and NTBackup. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Yes sir. The Tivoli product is Exchange Specific and NTBackup is being ran from the console of the Exchange server with the Admin installed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
And it is after a full backup and not diff? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 13:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Yes sir. The Tivoli product is Exchange Specific and NTBackup is being ran from the console of the Exchange server with the Admin installed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Yes, all attempts have been full backups. And it is after a full backup and not diff? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events in the logs? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 13:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Yes, all attempts have been full backups. And it is after a full backup and not diff? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Everything looks normal in the logs. I receive the 104 message: MSExchangeIS (1416) The database engine has stopped the backup procedure. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events in the logs? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BLB's
Don't go holding your breath now boy. :) JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: BLB's You all hit the nail on the head there, guys. Thanks for the VERY useful links. Now the fun part... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BLB's http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BLB's Anyone got any good Q articles or pages explaining the drawbacks of doing Brick Level Backups? My memory is slightly rusty and i am looking to persuade my new site to stop doing them. The site is currently using Veritas Exchange backup. Searched TechNet with no fruitful findings. DR papers dont have much about it. Many thanks Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BLB's
Was wondering when you were going to wake up. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BLB's Don't go holding your breath now boy. :) JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: BLB's You all hit the nail on the head there, guys. Thanks for the VERY useful links. Now the fun part... Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BLB's http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: BLB's Anyone got any good Q articles or pages explaining the drawbacks of doing Brick Level Backups? My memory is slightly rusty and i am looking to persuade my new site to stop doing them. The site is currently using Veritas Exchange backup. Searched TechNet with no fruitful findings. DR papers dont have much about it. Many thanks Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction Logs We have Exchange 5.4 SP4 on Windows 2000. We have just started disabling Circular Logging. After doing a backup, it doesn't look like the transaction logs are disappearing. I have tried two different backup products and did full online backups. Should the mdbdata directory empty after the backup, or does exchange simply reuse the existing logs? Thanks, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
I've seen this once before after switching from circular logging. What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file numbers. After carefully examining the log file date / timestamps I deleted the oldest (leaving at least 2 days worth as we do daily full backups) and rebooted the server (stopping and restarting the IS service would probably have sufficed). The next morning the extraneous log files were gone, and there have been no problems since. Cheers, Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction Logs We have Exchange 5.4 SP4 on Windows 2000. We have just started disabling Circular Logging. After doing a backup, it doesn't look like the transaction logs are disappearing. I have tried two different backup products and did full online backups. Should the mdbdata directory empty after the backup, or does exchange simply reuse the existing logs? Thanks, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Andy, These are the files we are seeing. Of note, I ran the backup @ 6:42 am. 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edb.log 03/18/2002 01:46p 5,242,880 edb8.log 03/18/2002 03:03p 5,242,880 edb9.log 03/19/2002 04:10a 5,242,880 edbA.log 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edbB.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res1.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res2.log I think the res12 and edb should always be there, but I was not sure about the rest. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
Phil, I just replied to Andy with a directory listing. Does that look similar to what you were seeing? Thanks, Jim -Original Message- I've seen this once before after switching from circular logging. What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file numbers. After carefully examining the log file date / timestamps I deleted the oldest (leaving at least 2 days worth as we do daily full backups) and rebooted the server (stopping and restarting the IS service would probably have sufficed). The next morning the extraneous log files were gone, and there have been no problems since. Cheers, Phil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How Organizational Forms Work?
I hope so - I'm about to get a new manager and that will be the topic of our first meeting, as soon as I find out who it's going to be! -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How Organizational Forms Work? Make sure to pay me a Frozen Strawberry Margarita next time we'll see us :-)) Maybe at MEC this year... Each time I messed up some of my menus when testing new add-ins (usually my own) I have to delete it ;-) -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How Organizational Forms Work? Siegfried!! You rock!! Now I don't have to rebuild my test box. The one financial guy who had to get rebuilt deserved it. And much more. I swear I looked for this issue on Slipstick but couldn't find anything that day. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How Organizational Forms Work? Did you try to delete outcmd.dat? It holds all menu/toolbar customization stuff. Search your HD for it. IMHO it'll not get overwritten by a reinstall since it belongs to user data (as the signature etc). On my Win.XP machine it is at driveletter:\Documents and Settings\user\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook. YMMV Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How Organizational Forms Work? A buyout ago (The Associates) we had a chucklehead from the home office come onto my server and install a bunch of his crappy forms. If you loaded one of his forms (any one) onto your machine, you would instantly lose the ability to send mail, as the send button is now gone from the standard e-mail form. Clearing forms cache does not fix it. Removing and reinstalling Outlook does not fix it. Reimaging the entire hard drive fixes it. YMMV. -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How Organizational Forms Work? Our environment consists of Exchange 5.5/SP4 servers with OL2000 and we have approximately 25,000 users. We currently do not allow forms to be published to the Organizational Forms Library because of a fear of the impact it will have on Outlook response time if there are too many forms. Is this a legitimate fear? I can not find any Microsoft Documentation that states why we shouldn't publish forms to the Organizational Forms Library. And currently, this policy is stifling Outlook/Exchange development projects. Can anyone provide me with some advice on this issue? Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Transaction Logs
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have problems. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Andy, These are the files we are seeing. Of note, I ran the backup @ 6:42 am. 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edb.log 03/18/2002 01:46p 5,242,880 edb8.log 03/18/2002 03:03p 5,242,880 edb9.log 03/19/2002 04:10a 5,242,880 edbA.log 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edbB.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res1.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res2.log I think the res12 and edb should always be there, but I was not sure about the rest. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you.
RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server
This may be a stupid question, but after just a quick glance at the product, what advantages does this product have over NetMeeting? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server I like it quite a lot. There's a pretty decent number of customers that are using it. Conferencing sounds good for many organizations, but it's not a gimme. Workstations have to have microphones and cameras. And users have to have a reason to use it. -Original Message- From: Haris Dechapunya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:49 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server Subject: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server Hi, We are investigating Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server. Have anybody had experiences with this product? Your comment will be much appreciated. Haris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief
Hi Well, I tried that and still no joy. I've verified that the ADC is working correctly and security is correct as per Q250989. AD has all Ex 5.5 information. Any Idea why I can't enter the Service Account info in Ex2k setup when I try and introduce a new server?? Thanks Ali -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: 13 March 2002 15:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief I just ran into something like this very recently. On the 5.5 box open the Services and get properties on each Exchange service. Manually enter 'domain\username' and restart the services. Yes, I know, sounds weird. But it works. - Original Message - From: Alister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief We Only have a W2K domain. 5.5 was installed at the time because 2000 wasn't available. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant, Fred Sent: 13 March 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Have you created trusts between the W2K domain you are installing E2K in and the NT domain that 5.5 is in? If you verify the trust, is it successful? -Original Message- From: Alister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Yes this rings a nasty bell. First time I tried and install 2000 it seemed OK, however I could not access the 5.5 information store. At that time I was not 100% sure the ADC was correct. I removed Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000 and started again. Running ADC on the 5.5 box. Now I the greyed out section for the user name and domain. The password for the Service Account Information is not being excepted Have I got the wrong info in the Schema for Service Account??? I thought the Schema was only a template??? Thanks Alister -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant, Fred Sent: 12 March 2002 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief During an earlier step you would have been asked for the name of a server in 5.5. Based on that info the setup program can determine the site the server is in and hence the SA account for that site. That is what is presented in the greyed out section. You now need to provide the PW associated with that account. -Original Message- From: Alister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Hi Guys. I'm new to this forum, so if you've covered this sorry to drag it up again. When trying to install a second exchange server, with Exchange 2000 on it. Our Existing server has 5.5. I've run the ADC (I think correctly). There is Exchange stuff in the Schema, but when I run Exchange 2000 setup (on a different server), and come to the part about entering Service Account Information both the User Name and Domain and greyed out Only the password field is available for entry Anybody any thoughts??? Thanks Ali Network Engineer bango.net _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Transaction Logs
Thanks to all for the help and suggestions. I will monitor the directory to see if this becomes a problem. That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have problems. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Andy, These are the files we are seeing. Of note, I ran the backup @ 6:42 am. 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edb.log 03/18/2002 01:46p 5,242,880 edb8.log 03/18/2002 03:03p 5,242,880 edb9.log 03/19/2002 04:10a 5,242,880 edbA.log 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edbB.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res1.log 03/17/2002 08:49p 5,242,880 res2.log I think the res12 and edb should always be there, but I was not sure about the rest. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server
Makes efficient use of Multicast for multi-user sessions. (in fact it is a good business driver to get multicast enabled on your network) The administrator can control use of bandwidth rather than leaving it to local user settings on Netmeeting. Again the multicast component helps dramatically here as does the tie-in to Windows 2000 Sites for MCUs. Ties in with Outlook meeting requests rather than having to know others IP addresses and/or run an ILS server. Therefore easier for users to grasp and understand. Mark -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server This may be a stupid question, but after just a quick glance at the product, what advantages does this product have over NetMeeting? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server I like it quite a lot. There's a pretty decent number of customers that are using it. Conferencing sounds good for many organizations, but it's not a gimme. Workstations have to have microphones and cameras. And users have to have a reason to use it. -Original Message- From: Haris Dechapunya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:49 PM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server Subject: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server Hi, We are investigating Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server. Have anybody had experiences with this product? Your comment will be much appreciated. Haris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
While Lori is wearing it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
connect
Hi, When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20 messages produces an NDR, when I turn it on, another batch of mails generates an NDR... Any clues? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?
Let say your domain is @testing and you create an alias for your user that is @nottesting. You want this address to send mail to this infomation store. Is the only option in 2000 to create a new domain called nottesting. If so how would you do this. Eg: Mr x has email account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mr x has alias under this acount set to SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If anyone can give me any info it would be great. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect
Colonel Mustard, in the Organization Forms Library, with an ArcServe CD. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connect Hi, When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20 messages produces an NDR, when I turn it on, another batch of mails generates an NDR... Any clues? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address (CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:44 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: connect
Help us a bit by posting some of the NDR's. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connect Hi, When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20 messages produces an NDR, when I turn it on, another batch of mails generates an NDR... Any clues? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
Post the NDR. Is this CR on an external server to your domain? The clue may be in the NDR. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address (CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:44 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
A restriction in the system NDR usually indicates a size limit being reached somewhere. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address (CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:44 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ever seen this?
What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line: 1 11 21 1112 3112 211213 312213 212223 114213 31121314 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
At the next TechEd? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While Lori is wearing it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief
Are you able to install Exchange System Manager by itself? If so, drill down to the relevant Administrative Group and pull up the properties. In there you can reselect the Exchange 55 Service Account details that will have been stored in Active Directory the first time you tried installing Exchange 2000. If you can not install Exchange System Manager then you could test the following in a lab scenario [1]:- Run up ADSIEDIT and connect to the Configuration Container for your Forest. Drill down to Services, Microsoft Exchange, Org Name, Administrative Groups, Site Name. Right click, properties, Scroll down and check... msExchLegacyAccount msExchLegacyDomain Correct them if necessary [2] Then when running setup again you can enter in the correct password. Mark [1] I have not tested this myself so can not vouch for it at all. [2] as per [1] -Original Message- From: Alister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Hi Well, I tried that and still no joy. I've verified that the ADC is working correctly and security is correct as per Q250989. AD has all Ex 5.5 information. Any Idea why I can't enter the Service Account info in Ex2k setup when I try and introduce a new server?? Thanks Ali -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: 13 March 2002 15:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief I just ran into something like this very recently. On the 5.5 box open the Services and get properties on each Exchange service. Manually enter 'domain\username' and restart the services. Yes, I know, sounds weird. But it works. - Original Message - From: Alister [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief We Only have a W2K domain. 5.5 was installed at the time because 2000 wasn't available. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant, Fred Sent: 13 March 2002 15:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Have you created trusts between the W2K domain you are installing E2K in and the NT domain that 5.5 is in? If you verify the trust, is it successful? -Original Message- From: Alister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Yes this rings a nasty bell. First time I tried and install 2000 it seemed OK, however I could not access the 5.5 information store. At that time I was not 100% sure the ADC was correct. I removed Windows 2000 and Exchange 2000 and started again. Running ADC on the 5.5 box. Now I the greyed out section for the user name and domain. The password for the Service Account Information is not being excepted Have I got the wrong info in the Schema for Service Account??? I thought the Schema was only a template??? Thanks Alister -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant, Fred Sent: 12 March 2002 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief During an earlier step you would have been asked for the name of a server in 5.5. Based on that info the setup program can determine the site the server is in and hence the SA account for that site. That is what is presented in the greyed out section. You now need to provide the PW associated with that account. -Original Message- From: Alister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief Hi Guys. I'm new to this forum, so if you've covered this sorry to drag it up again. When trying to install a second exchange server, with Exchange 2000 on it. Our Existing server has 5.5. I've run the ADC (I think correctly). There is Exchange stuff in the Schema, but when I run Exchange 2000 setup (on a different server), and come to the part about entering Service Account Information both the User Name and Domain and greyed out Only the password field is available for entry Anybody any thoughts??? Thanks Ali Network Engineer bango.net This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further
RE: ever seen this?
41122314 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ever seen this? What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line: 1 11 21 1112 3112 211213 312213 212223 114213 31121314 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ever seen this?
30 secons with google gave me this: http://www.madras.fife.sch.uk/maths/descriptive6.html Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ever seen this? What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line: 1 11 21 1112 3112 211213 312213 212223 114213 31121314 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ever seen this?
One one 2 ones 1 one 1 two 3 ones 1 two Etc etc 41122314 Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ever seen this? What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line: 1 11 21 1112 3112 211213 312213 212223 114213 31121314 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as their content could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of its internet transmission. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Any opinions contained in this message are those of the author and are not given or endorsed by any entity or office through which this message has been sent unless otherwise clearly indicated in this message and the authority of the author to so bind Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited or any other company within its group is duly verified. Any email may be monitored in accordance with Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited's communication policy. Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited Registered Office 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ. Registered in England Number 3973777 Merrill Lynch HSBC Limited regulated by the FSA ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients
In Exchange 5.5 there is a registry entry that can do this. HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters\MaxRecipient s It is a hexadecimal value, so I have mine set to 32 which equates to a max of 50 recipients. With this setting when one of my users sends out a mass e-mail it is sent out in batches of 50. I have not had to chance to work with Exchange 2000 so I don't know if there is a similar value, but you might want to check. -Original Message- From: David Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 2:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients Hello, I have some people who want to send out one-time mailings to a few hundred recipients. They don't want to go through the effort of setting up a listserv, however. One of our main recipient domains has a limit of 100 recipients max per email. So, when we send out these mass emails, they get stuck in our queue (they're rejected by the server receiving the emails), and it clogs up the works. I've been told by some other SMTP admins that ESMTP supports splitting up an email to multiple recipients into individual messages, with one recipient per message. I realize that mailing list software does this as well, but does Exchange 2000 support this feature? Any other thoughts about how to get around this issue? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Solution Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?
Found the solution - thought I would share. To receive messages from two Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) domains in Exchange 2000: Contact the Internet Service Provider (ISP), and tell them to point both of the domain's MX records to the same Exchange 2000 computer. For additional information A and MX records, click the article number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: Q153001 XFOR: DNS MX Records and CNAMEs Start Exchange System Manager. Browse to Organization \Recipients\Recipient Policies. Right-click Default Policy , and then click Properties . Click the E-Mail Addresses tab, and then click New . Click SMTP Address , and then click OK . Verify that the This Exchange Organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address check box has been selected. In the Address box, type the new SMTP domain name (for example, companyb.com ), and then click OK . Click the E-Mail Addresses tab, and then click the new SMTP item to enable it. Click the SMTP item, and then click Set as Primary . This address is now the sender's reply SMTP address. Click OK to apply the change. You receive the following message: Address generation for [SMTP] has been enabled for all newly created Recipients. Do you want to automatically add this Address Type to all existing Recipient e-mail addresses? Click Yes if you want to generate this SMTP addresses for existing users. Otherwise, click No to give only newly created users this address. NOTE : You may not want every user to have the secondary e-mail address. If you click No , you must create another recipient policy for those specific users who need this addresses, or manually add the address for each user. From: James Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Creating alias within w2000 require new domain? Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 09:24:40 -0600 Let say your domain is @testing and you create an alias for your user that is @nottesting. You want this address to send mail to this infomation store. Is the only option in 2000 to create a new domain called nottesting. If so how would you do this. Eg: Mr x has email account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mr x has alias under this acount set to SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If anyone can give me any info it would be great. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
TechEd is for programmers. MEC is where it is at. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance At the next TechEd? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While Lori is wearing it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding
Following is the actual NDR received by the sender: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:12 AM Cc: Ramzi Chmaitilly; Billing Subject: Undeliverable: Bill closure for cycle 15 Importance: High Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject:Bill closure for cycle 15 Sent: 18/03/02 08:12 The following recipient(s) could not be reached: Ramzi Chmaitilly on 18/03/02 08:12 A restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=US;a= ;p=Syriatel;l=DAISY-020318061144Z-4071 MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:SYRIATEL:DAISY Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:37 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Post the NDR. Is this CR on an external server to your domain? The clue may be in the NDR. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address (CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:44 PM Posted To: Lyris MS Exchange Discussions Conversation: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Subject: RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery options tab). If a user inside the Exchange organization who has no right to use IMS sends a message to this person, the sender receives an NDR stating that his message did not reach the recipient because a restriction in the system prevented delivery of the message. The strange thing is that the message in question gets delivered to both locations (mailbox and SMTP custom recipient). Is there a way to prevent this false NDR? Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
I knew that. Although, has anyone asked Lori about it? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance TechEd is for programmers. MEC is where it is at. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance At the next TechEd? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While Lori is wearing it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?
Create a new recipient policy in the ESM or modify an existing one depending on your needs. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: James Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Creating alias within w2000 require new domain? Let say your domain is @testing and you create an alias for your user that is @nottesting. You want this address to send mail to this infomation store. Is the only option in 2000 to create a new domain called nottesting. If so how would you do this. Eg: Mr x has email account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mr x has alias under this acount set to SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If anyone can give me any info it would be great. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can not add user to permissions List
How'd you make a copy of the user? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same groups and I can add them. I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 18:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Anything different about this user? What groups are they a member of (security groups). Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can not add user to permissions List Sorry, should have said using Outlook 2000 Hi, I have Exchange 2000 SP2, and I want to add a particular user to be able to see certain elements of some mailboxes, inbox, calendar etc. Every time I go to add this user to anyones mailbox, the minute I click accept or ok they are deleted from the list of users, this only happens with one particular user. I can add any other user account and all is well, and I can set permission on his mailbox for others to see his folders. Any one have any ideas? Thanks in advance keith mitchell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can not add user to permissions List
Active Directory Users and Computers, wanted to see if it was a messed up SID. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List How'd you make a copy of the user? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same groups and I can add them. I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 18:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Anything different about this user? What groups are they a member of (security groups). Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can not add user to permissions List Sorry, should have said using Outlook 2000 Hi, I have Exchange 2000 SP2, and I want to add a particular user to be able to see certain elements of some mailboxes, inbox, calendar etc. Every time I go to add this user to anyones mailbox, the minute I click accept or ok they are deleted from the list of users, this only happens with one particular user. I can add any other user account and all is well, and I can set permission on his mailbox for others to see his folders. Any one have any ideas? Thanks in advance keith mitchell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this e-mail message is private and confidential. It is intended for the stated addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please inform the sender of the misdirection by return of e-mail and delete this message immediately. Please be aware that CTAD may occasionally check e-mail correspondence. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
554 Invalid data in message
I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can not add user to permissions List
So you created a new mailbox enabled user with the same attributes? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Active Directory Users and Computers, wanted to see if it was a messed up SID. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List How'd you make a copy of the user? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same groups and I can add them. I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 18:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List Anything different about this user? What groups are they a member of (security groups). Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Keith Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can not add user to permissions List Sorry, should have said using Outlook 2000 Hi, I have Exchange 2000 SP2, and I want to add a particular user to be able to see certain elements of some mailboxes, inbox, calendar etc. Every time I go to add this user to anyones mailbox, the minute I click accept or ok they are deleted from the list of users, this only happens with one particular user. I can add any other user account and all is well, and I can set permission on his mailbox for others to see his folders. Any one have any ideas? Thanks in advance keith mitchell _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- The information contained in this e-mail message is private and confidential. It is intended for the stated addressee(s) only. Unauthorised use, copying or disclosure of any of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please inform the sender of the misdirection by return of e-mail and delete this message immediately. Please be aware that CTAD may occasionally check e-mail correspondence. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange
Thanks for all the assistance, I have successfully setup two ADC connectors that are now replicating with the exchange 5.5 server. (?) Do I have to setup a connector on the 5.5 server to connect to the Exchange 2000 server or is it done just through the ADC. My apologize for the newbie questions, if someone has some good links I will certainly research it. Bob Smith -Original Message- From: Smith, Robert A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange On the exchange 5.5 Server when we try to setup a SMTP connector for email routing, and we try to connect to the Exchange 2000 server it prompts up with an error dialog box stating Insufficient access rights. Thanks Again, Bob Smith -Original Message- From: Milton R. Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange Where is it bombing. And how are you setting up a SMTP connector? Is that just for email routing? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert A. Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange We have recently setup a test AD Test environment with W2k Exchange and Exchange 5.5 we elected to choose the new environment as opposed to the join existing, we seem to be having a connection issue, we trying to create a SMTP connector from 5.5 to Win2k it keeps bombing, and complaining about rights. Any Help, Suggestions. Thanks In Advance, Robert A. Smith Systems Architect MFS Investment Management Phone: (617) 954-4975 Fax: (617) 954-7542 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 554 Invalid data in message
You'll need to turn on protocol logging to see the actual conversation and data being passed to understand why your server (rather, your firewall) is returning the error. Speaking of which, what are you running as a firewall (myfirewall.mydomain.com)? Speaking further of which: it's hard to do troubleshooting when names have been obscured. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Ahhh - Service Unavailable is the clue, not the invalid data. Sounds like the firewall doesn't like one of the commands (probably an ESMTP command). Alternately, the firewall might be configured (possibly incorrectly) to not allow relaying. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Do you have a PIX FW? Do you have the SMTP fixup protocol on? If so, turn it off. -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find out this info, we can. Just cough it up. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message Speaking further of which: it's hard to do troubleshooting when names have been obscured. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 554 Invalid data in message
telnet 207.212.40.254 25 220 wormhole.dionex.com Generic SMTP handler That ain't Exchange. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Ahhh - Service Unavailable is the clue, not the invalid data. Sounds like the firewall doesn't like one of the commands (probably an ESMTP command). Alternately, the firewall might be configured (possibly incorrectly) to not allow relaying. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Well, I'm not sure why it's difficult if the names have been obscured since the addresses are all valid and I know it's not a problem with them. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find out this info, we can. Just cough it up. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message Speaking further of which: it's hard to do troubleshooting when names have been obscured. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Support
Yes, that's what was going though my head. Thanks for clarifying. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Support Well, that's support as in creating patches for, not support as in trying to help over the phone. :) M - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Support Yes. It was yesterday. I believe MS stops supporting a product when it's two versions behind. So, when the successor to Exchange 2000 is released, Exchange 5.5 support will probably be dropped. Ah, a more accurate information is probably somewhere on www.microsoft.com Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 2:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Support Has anybody heard anything about a de-support (is that a word?) day for Exchange 5.5? Just curious as to when they might cut the cord. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Forms Assessment
I can't believe that MCS doesn't know how to backup forms. You can achieve what you want very easily. It's in Outlook, Options, Other... Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forms Assessment I was not intending to be sarcastic. I am working with MCS now, and they didn't know how to do it...I was trying to find out if any of you guys knew how before I started a very long and tedious process of manually collecting the information. -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Forms Assessment If you want a faster response, call PSS. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Forms Assessment Does no one know how to do this or was this a dumb question? -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Forms Assessment Is there a way to export all of the organizational form data and or information? At the very least I would like to be able to extract all of the names of the forms so I can go in manually and add information, but would like to be able to quickly download all of the forms for quicker access. Any help would be appreciated. I have hundreds of forms that I need to gather information on in preperation for Ex2K. thanks Ken _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 554 Invalid data in message
The only address in the NDR you posted is the domain atom. Had to work backwards from there. Since the info is already public, as I just proved by posting it, why even bother obscuring it? Doctor, I have a pain. Where? Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my neck. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:29 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Well, I'm not sure why it's difficult if the names have been obscured since the addresses are all valid and I know it's not a problem with them. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find out this info, we can. Just cough it up. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message Speaking further of which: it's hard to do troubleshooting when names have been obscured. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Journalling question
Let me get this straight. Your vendor wants you to use journaling to a CR so that his product can capture all emails? Hello? At that point his product isn't doing anything. Why do you even need that vendor? Do you really want all of your company emails archived/stored at a location outside your company? Why is a mass exodus of business data like this desirable? I must be missing something. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Journalling question I assume the CR is an internet address? It's just another SMTP message to the IMS; the message will queue up and timeout normally. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:27 PM Subject: Journalling question We are asked to set up message journalling to a custom recipient. If the custom recipient is unavailable does the email queue up on our Exchange server until it can be delivered to the recipient. I don't recall reading anything that says journalling to a custom recipient will do that. I know that to a public folder, it will simply go to the folder but this is the what the vendor is asking that we implement to use his product for capturing all emails. Anybody have any thoughts on this? Dot _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 554 Invalid data in message
It seems that Exchange Admin Advisory #7 applies: As there are no worthy recipients hosted on AOL/Hotmail, only cursory efforts shall be employed to determine causes of non-delivery. see also: SPAM nozzle / Matrix / portal-junkies / attachment Cuisinart -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message The only address in the NDR you posted is the domain atom. Had to work backwards from there. Since the info is already public, as I just proved by posting it, why even bother obscuring it? Doctor, I have a pain. Where? Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my neck. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:29 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Well, I'm not sure why it's difficult if the names have been obscured since the addresses are all valid and I know it's not a problem with them. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find out this info, we can. Just cough it up. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in message Speaking further of which: it's hard to do troubleshooting when names have been obscured. - Original Message - From: Whitlock, Teresa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:12 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account. MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mow-m25 (mow-m25.webmail.aol.com [64.12.137.2]) by air-id09.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINID94-0315173006; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:06 -0500 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The original message was received at Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:36:49 -0500 (EST) from root@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - .. while talking to myfirewall.mydomain.com.: DATA 554 Invalid data in message 554 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... Service unavailable -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 554 Invalid data in message I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to try to figure out what the heck is happening? Teresa Whitlock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OL e-mail filter type rule Q
Option 1. Put the contacts in the GAL as CRs and apply delivery restrictions to the mailbox. Option 2. Write an event script that fires for each incoming message and serches through the contacts to see if the sender matches a contact. If it doesn't, the script deletes it, otherwise it leaves the message intact and sends an email to the guy's pager that says Hey moron! You got an email that's worth of your precious eyes. Option 3. Show the user where the delete key is on the keyboard. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL e-mail filter type rule Q Has anybody had the need or done a way to say filter a users incoming e-mails based on the users Contacts in Contacts. EX. Ive got a user who ONLY wants to receive e-mails from the people in his contacts folder. So in other words if an incoming e-mail address does not match any of those in Contacts, then it's throw out. ideas? thx bill P.S. hey it's not me he asked for it Bill Mellott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 203-532-1212 x297 Fax: 203-532-1386 Mobile: SND Electronics, Inc. www.snd.com This electronic message including any attachments contains information, which may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information contained herein is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original message and all copies. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange System Manager error
We use an Win2000 Server with SP2 on this server there are Exchange 2000 with SP2 installed. In the beginning we could use Exchange System Manager to see how much every mailbox resource would use in KB and also total items in every mailbox. For some reason the Size KB and Total Items just displays Not Availible. I think that is has something to do with the security settings. How can I fix it? Regards, Roberto _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Default webpage modification
OWA 5.5 is open-source. All the ASPs are on the server as plain text. Use Notepad to change the code. Of course, you will need to modify multiple pages that are all interconnected. You know the ones that have been developed by scores of professional developers at Microsoft. Yeah, the very same ones that teams of engineers spent months troubleshooting and weeding out the problems. If it's really THAT important to you, you are free to go ahead and manipulate what is there. Keep in mind that all the changes you make will potentially be overwritten with any SP/hotfix you deploy. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Default webpage modification Hi there, does anybody know how can I modify my default web page for OWA (Exc 5.5 on IIS 4.0) to display more than 20 messages for inbox page? Many thanks in advance Maurizio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar
Amen. From the way you ask this question, I assume this is a user that goes offline quite a bit. Have him use an OST instead if that's the case. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar If you make the PST the delivery point, then where do you think appt notices will go to? I suppose you could set up a rule based on the form type. But I hate rules so I wouldn't entertain this option at all. I hate PSTs as the delivery point even more. -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar Question? Isn't there a way to make the calendar requests go to the server calendar and mail message go to personal folder? If a client is setting their delivery option to got to their personal folder. How can they make their server calendar as their primary. Thanks you inadvance! __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust (Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to do it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work
No. You've got to find out which connector is causing the incorrect routing and fix it. Then you recalculate routing, which will then eliminate your problems. That's the tool. Stop trying to pound in a nine inch nail using a jigsaw. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work Is there a way to rebuild the mta routing table, without using recalculate route? I have some wrong information in there. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work The GWART files (there are two) exist solely for human consumption. Modify them they'll be overwritten. Delete them they'll be recreated. If something is wrong in the GWART its because the engine is getting incorrect information. - Original Message - From: Mahesh Bharatsingh [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:00 AM Subject: RE: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work As i understand it, the GWART is modified according to the routing table. I deleted the gwart-file and after using recalculating route, the same gwart was generated, according to the info from the routing table. So, modifying the gwart will not work. The modifications will dissapear or is there a way to import the gwart? What i need is some way to change the routing table itself. Is there any way? -Original Message- From: Jonathan Beeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work Did you try modifying the GWART, manually? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Great idea. I've got an Electrolux with a special fitting that would work great for something like this. We could even sell the bags of metal shavings on Ebay! -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust (Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to do it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
As Ed W. has explained in another post, Exchange does a great job of maintaining itself. All you need to do is: A. Make sure your nightly full backups are successful. B. Make sure you monitor the health and performance of your server. C. Make sure you don't do any foolish administrative mistakes (like virus scanning your logfiles etc.) Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mario Fernandez Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar
Thanks all for the reply! Here is what I suggest user do: When using personal folder to accept all mail messages, there does not seem to be a way to have it update the server calendar. You would be accepting the meeting request for your local calendar. You can use one or the other but not both. You can however do it manually, by moving the meeting request to the server inbox and open it up then accept the meeting request. Or you can use an OST file for working offline. --- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amen. From the way you ask this question, I assume this is a user that goes offline quite a bit. Have him use an OST instead if that's the case. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar If you make the PST the delivery point, then where do you think appt notices will go to? I suppose you could set up a rule based on the form type. But I hate rules so I wouldn't entertain this option at all. I hate PSTs as the delivery point even more. -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar Question? Isn't there a way to make the calendar requests go to the server calendar and mail message go to personal folder? If a client is setting their delivery option to got to their personal folder. How can they make their server calendar as their primary. Thanks you inadvance! __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reminder Problems - first server?
It could be that you've downed the old server before the freebusy information completed replicating. Try running the good old /cleanfreebusy and /cleanreminders switches with Outlook. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Reminder Problems - first server? hi I have been seeing a growing number of clients whos Outlook Calendar reminder stops working for no apparent reason. Oddly enough it conensided with the removal of the first server in the site. I went throught the golden article q152959 and I also compaired against the Oriely Exchange 5.5 book. I'm pretty sure I didnt miss anything. I'm at a loss. Any advise is greatly appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar
One more thing to keep in mind is that if you use the PST calendar as primary, other people can see your free busy only when your Outlook is up. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar Thanks all for the reply! Here is what I suggest user do: When using personal folder to accept all mail messages, there does not seem to be a way to have it update the server calendar. You would be accepting the meeting request for your local calendar. You can use one or the other but not both. You can however do it manually, by moving the meeting request to the server inbox and open it up then accept the meeting request. Or you can use an OST file for working offline. --- Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amen. From the way you ask this question, I assume this is a user that goes offline quite a bit. Have him use an OST instead if that's the case. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar If you make the PST the delivery point, then where do you think appt notices will go to? I suppose you could set up a rule based on the form type. But I hate rules so I wouldn't entertain this option at all. I hate PSTs as the delivery point even more. -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar Question? Isn't there a way to make the calendar requests go to the server calendar and mail message go to personal folder? If a client is setting their delivery option to got to their personal folder. How can they make their server calendar as their primary. Thanks you inadvance! __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage http://sports.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect? -Peter -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust (Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to do it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Restore challenge
You can obviously do this, but there are a lot of concerns. First off, what would cause a corruption so bad that you need to restore? It's usually something flaky with the disk subsystem. So, if you restore to the same box, you simply are asking for trouble. Of course, you can try to diagnose and fix the hardware problem first and then perform the restore but that will be a rather lenghty outage for your clients. You've got to know what your SLAs are and devise a recovery strategy that will allow you to meet that. If it requires you to purchase additional hardware, than that's what you need to do. I really prefer to have a standby server ready to go with sufficient disk space, but YMMV. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore challenge I know this seems like a rather stupid question. Just in most environments I have worked in, they always had extra server for this. I brought the point up because our company has supplied us with a restore server. The restore server they provided is an old box that does not have enough space or enough power for us to perform a database recovery scenario. I can do a full restore of the database however, in a scenario where the database has been corrupted and you need to run utilities against the database, it usually requires double whatever your database is. We do not have the space. My co-worker stated that instead he would just try to restore/recover on the same server that has corruption. Maybe I'm thinking of this the wrong way and just need to refresh my disaster recovery memory. (I haven't had a crash in more than 4 years). I just thought I would ask opinion here... LaCretia -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Restore challenge You could restore it to the same box, another box, a PC, a Laptop, whatever. You should DL and read the MS Exchange Disaster Recovery Whitepaper. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore challenge I have another co-worker who stated that if our Exchange 5.5 server database crashes, he would simply restore everything back to the same box. Can this be done? In my years of training, I was taught that you need to have another box identical to your production box in the case that you may have a database crash. Please help me put this to rest and let me know your thoughts. Something tells me something is wrong with that plan. LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Loosers? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 14:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect? -Peter -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust (Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to do it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Restore challenge
While it is possible to run it over a network share, I have seen it cause more damage on a busy network (way back when in the Exchange 4.0 days, during an offline defrag operation). Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore challenge Que? It's a legit question. If the database were corrupt due to a hardware problem, it would be less than ideal to restore to that box or waiting n hours for new hardware to arrive. I'd ideally want my recovery server to have sufficient disk space to run database repair operations locally, but it is possible (albeit slower) to run many of those operations to a network drive. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restore challenge Yuo = Teh loser -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Restore challenge I have another co-worker who stated that if our Exchange 5.5 server database crashes, he would simply restore everything back to the same box. Can this be done? In my years of training, I was taught that you need to have another box identical to your production box in the case that you may have a database crash. Please help me put this to rest and let me know your thoughts. Something tells me something is wrong with that plan. LaCretia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Client or Server??
One clarification: if you copy to a public folder, it's client side. If you forward to the pf's email address then it's server side. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Client or Server?? If the action requires authenticating the user, or access to resources not on the server side, it will be client side. So - rules that direct to a .pst file are client side Rules that permanently delete something (skip the Deleted Items folder) will be client side Rules that direct items to a Public Folder will be client side. Probably some other circumstances, but those are the top three that users complain to me about. Darcy -Original Message- From: James Forbis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Rules Client or Server?? Can someone tell me what makes an Inbox rule forced to be on the client. I need some rules to be on the server only (without a client logged in) and I am having problems with this.. Thanks James Forbis, MCSE, CNE, CCA, CNS 4BIS.COM, Inc. 11491 Gideon Ln. Cincinnati, OH 45249 PH (513)469-7887 FAX (513)469-7877 Cell (513)200-4079 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/luser.html -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Loosers? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 14:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect? -Peter -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 13:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag The magnet won't get the metal flakes out of the carrier if you don't disassemble it. I prefer taking the disks apart regularly to dust (Pledge works best - it even leaves the server room smelling lemony fresh). We have RAID5+1, so I don't even need to take the box offline to do it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag I've been trying to find out if there's some regular maintenace that should ne performed on the Exchange server, ie. eseutil, isinteg etc. Everything I've read so far is specific, and always warn against using any of these utilities unless ther's a problem. Anyone recommend otherwise. Thanks for clearing the up the white space Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 19:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag White space = amount of unused space in your store, after defragmentation Free space = amount of unused space on your hard drive Exchange will go out and grab more free space when it needs to, up to the limit of your hard drive, as the volume of messages stored on the server grows in number. As you delete user mailboxes however, and Exchange defrags your Store, you will notice additional white space. Don't worry about it. Exchange will reuse it as more mail is stored on your server. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: only 6 Mb after online defrag After the OL defrag it says I only have 6Mb of free space. How do I increase the store size? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer http://www.datasynapse.com/legal/emailprivacy.jsp _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
Q article confirmation
I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date
I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set do not deliver before [date] or File, Properties, Send Options, Microsoft Exchange Server and set the Send this item delay time) the item is sent with the Send Date and Received Date equal to the date it was originally sent. In Exchange 5.5, the Received Date was set to the deferral date. This is causing issues with the deferred messages and users who sort their inboxes by the received date. Any suggestions about this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks... Ray Beckwith Network Administrator California Credit Union League Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ccul.org http://www.ccul.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Q article confirmation
Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking an Email Message
AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that says something like we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by agreeing to work here you also agree to this there is nothing criminal about it. Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the vendors that supply content filtering software would go out of business since the usage of their products would become illegal. But, this question is best left to the company lawyers. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message Were do you get the information that it is criminal? I certainly don't agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is who owns it. -Original Message- From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt this. Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they will take you with them. After all you are the tech that advised them this was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get dragged through court. It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier consent, or a warrant. -- Regards */Damien D Keffyn/* Senior I.T. Administrator (Australia) *Ph:*61 3 9334 5010 *Ph:*61 4 3824 3897 *Fax: *61 3 9334 5875 *Mobile:*0438 243 897 *Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Level 1, 1 Apac Drive (Aviation House) Melbourne International Airport Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria* DISCLAIMER The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the message is received and you are not the addressee, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the John Menzies plc group of companies All messages are checked for viruses, but we strongly recommend that you check for viruses using your own virus scanner. No member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will take responsibility for any damage caused as a result of virus infection. At present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Therefore no member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies Louis Joyce wrote: You might want to check with your legal department before continuing down this alley. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tracking an Email Message I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them. I know how to setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing? Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their emails. We are using Exchange 2000 SP2. Saul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Q article confirmation
Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to work in it's present form. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: promoting E2K to a DC
I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
How is your network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon trace to see at what point the problem is occurring? Joel -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Signatures and Custom Forms
Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms? We've been asked to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several levels of management within the company. We want to use digital signatures to make this a legal document. Right now, I have the form made (first draft) and can route it to different people, but it only seems to keep track of the signature of the last person to send the form. Is there a way to track multiple signatures on a custom form? We are running E2K Sp1. The certificates were issued internally by our CA. Thanks. Tara _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: promoting E2K to a DC
all that will do is /increase/ the load. before doing the promotion, why not call PSS? Could be a whole lot cheaper. Or look to the network layer of the stack - do some packet captures, look at net bottlenecks, test your switch/hub, verify hard set duplex settings, etc. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Q article confirmation
The article says it's fixed in the next sp. Since there was no sp listed at the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't have the problem. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to work in it's present form. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Q article confirmation Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Tracking an Email Message
What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer. The email thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start shooting the lawyers? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that says something like we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by agreeing to work here you also agree to this there is nothing criminal about it. Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the vendors that supply content filtering software would go out of business since the usage of their products would become illegal. But, this question is best left to the company lawyers. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Tracking an Email Message Were do you get the information that it is criminal? I certainly don't agree with it, but my understanding is that current case law (at least in my state) actually supports that if it is a business account the business is who owns it. -Original Message- From: Damien D Keffyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Tracking an Email Message I agree this could turn nasty on you, dont do it, make sure you have it in writing and signed by the management first before you even attempt this. Trust me when it goes down and you dont have it in writing they will take you with them. After all you are the tech that advised them this was possible, at least that is the way it will sound when they get dragged through court. It is a criminal offence to read someone elses email without thier consent, or a warrant. -- Regards */Damien D Keffyn/* Senior I.T. Administrator (Australia) *Ph:*61 3 9334 5010 *Ph:*61 4 3824 3897 *Fax: *61 3 9334 5875 *Mobile:*0438 243 897 *Email: *[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Level 1, 1 Apac Drive (Aviation House) Melbourne International Airport Tullamarine, 3043, Victoria* DISCLAIMER The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the message is received and you are not the addressee, you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of the John Menzies plc group of companies All messages are checked for viruses, but we strongly recommend that you check for viruses using your own virus scanner. No member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will take responsibility for any damage caused as a result of virus infection. At present the integrity of e-mail across the Internet cannot be guaranteed. Therefore no member of the John Menzies plc group of companies will accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions by or any member of the John Menzies plc group of companies Louis Joyce wrote: You might want to check with your legal department before continuing down this alley. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Exchange Newsgroups [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 March 2002 00:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Tracking an Email Message I have been asked by the management to have a copy of a users incomming and outgoing emails to be reviewed by them. I know how to setup the incomming by forwarding but how do you do that for outgoing? Also this user is in another office who uses POP3 to retrieve their emails. We are using Exchange 2000 SP2. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
