RE: RBL's
Lol! Oh, by the way, for more info on your Goatse follow the link below. But you really shouldn't have posted this to the list. You could have send it direct if you feel that strong about it. http://www.dangerz.net/gatasa/article.shtml Anyway, we all live and learn. Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: 24 October 2002 08:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Why would anyone need to win friends over the internet. Oh no my interweb feelings are hurt, oh dear god my interweb life is ruined -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1035442040/ sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance (Link wraps) Cheers Sander -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: 24 October 2002 08:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email definition"? Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the universe and everything is. You? Other than being one of the current poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is your function in the messaging universe? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > >
RE: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting
Yes, use the public folder's SMTP address. Jon -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:usofwd@;gmx.net] Sent: 22 October 2002 08:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting Hi, is it possible to allow users to send messages to a public folder only by email and not allow them to post directly into that folder (or cut/paste)? This is regarding Exchange 5.5. Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SP3
Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EXMerge
Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit (which we don't have) Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
Before you get shot down in flames by someone else ;-), sp3 is cumulative I believe so no need to install the others. Rob -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus@;intas.be] Sent: 24 October 2002 10:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SP3
thanks -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney@;tkcsales.co.uk] Sent: 24 October, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SP3 Before you get shot down in flames by someone else ;-), sp3 is cumulative I believe so no need to install the others. Rob -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus@;intas.be] Sent: 24 October 2002 10:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SP3 Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and 2 or do I have to install them first? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMerge
Ok, I've found it on ftppss.microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 24 October 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMerge Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit (which we don't have) Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viruses via email
Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to ascertain why, but we have continued to
let them operate on their own sending messages to each other until we are
ready to move everyone to the central server.
I created a mailbox on the problem server, and its been used fine. It is not
accessible from any of the other servers as the changes don't seem to have
replicated across.
Today, that server had to be rebooted, and that mailbox has disappeared. The
list of recipients on that server now resembles the list that the other
servers hold, i.e. without this new mailbox. However, the user and their
store is still listed under "Private Information Store \ Mailbox Resources"
The mailbox has been used for a couple of weeks, and so has quite a lot of
info in it. I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following error,
although it doesn allow me to select the problem mailbox;
Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v3.71.001
Start Logging:October 24, 2002 10:53:53
[10:53:53] Logging Level: None
[10:53:53] Reading settings from file 'C:\exmerge\EXMERGE.INI'.
[10:53:53] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file ''
[10:53:53] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected from
file ''
[10:53:53] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
list.
[10:54:53] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date operations.
[10:54:53] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only those
messages that do not exist in the target store.
[10:54:53] Associated folder data will be copied to the target store.
[10:54:53] Copying data from mailbox 'Employee Name' ('ENAME') on Server
'SERVERNAME' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ENAME.PST'.
[10:54:54] Error configuring message service (MSEMS) (UNKNOWN ERROR)
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[10:54:54] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted.
[10:54:54] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes
processed: 0
[10:54:54] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered.
[10:54:54] Process completion time: 00:00:00
Servers are all 5.5 sp3
Backup is not a good option for me, as Veritas seems to want to just
overwrite the existing installation, rather than let me restore the IS to
another location.
Any thoughts? Help !
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'
*error*
"I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following error, although it
doesn allow me to select the problem mailbox;"
Should read
"I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following error, although it
**does** allow me to select the problem mailbox;"
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to ascertain why, but we have continued to
let them operate on their own sending messages to each other until we are
ready to move everyone to the central server.
I created a mailbox on the problem server, and its been used fine. It is not
accessible from any of the other servers as the changes don't seem to have
replicated across.
Today, that server had to be rebooted, and that mailbox has disappeared. The
list of recipients on that server now resembles the list that the other
servers hold, i.e. without this new mailbox. However, the user and their
store is still listed under "Private Information Store \ Mailbox Resources"
The mailbox has been used for a couple of weeks, and so has quite a lot of
info in it. I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following error,
although it doesn allow me to select the problem mailbox;
Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v3.71.001
Start Logging:October 24, 2002 10:53:53
[10:53:53] Logging Level: None
[10:53:53] Reading settings from file 'C:\exmerge\EXMERGE.INI'. [10:53:53]
Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file '' [10:53:53]
Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected from file ''
[10:53:53] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
list. [10:54:53] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date
operations. [10:54:53] Merging data into target store. The program will copy
only those messages that do not exist in the target store. [10:54:53]
Associated folder data will be copied to the target store. [10:54:53]
Copying data from mailbox 'Employee Name' ('ENAME') on Server 'SERVERNAME'
to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ENAME.PST'. [10:54:54] Error configuring message
service (MSEMS) (UNKNOWN ERROR)
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[10:54:54] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted.
[10:54:54] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes
processed: 0
[10:54:54] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered. [10:54:54] Process
completion time: 00:00:00
Servers are all 5.5 sp3
Backup is not a good option for me, as Veritas seems to want to just
overwrite the existing installation, rather than let me restore the IS to
another location.
Any thoughts? Help !
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EXMerge
It's also available within the zipped tool Microsoft provided for the iloveyou virus awhile back. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: EXMerge Ok, I've found it on ftppss.microsoft.com -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange Sent: 24 October 2002 10:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EXMerge Is Exmerge for 5.5 downloadable from anywhere? Or only from the Reskit (which we don't have) Thanks Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
Heck ya! Lots. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Run the DS/IS consistency adjuster on that server. Select the first
check box at the top and select all inconsistencies at the bottom. Do
NOT touch anything to do with the public folders. This should recreate
the directory object for the mailbox listed in the information store.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk]
Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:17 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central
server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to ascertain why, but we have continued
to
let them operate on their own sending messages to each other until we
are
ready to move everyone to the central server.
I created a mailbox on the problem server, and its been used fine. It is
not
accessible from any of the other servers as the changes don't seem to
have
replicated across.
Today, that server had to be rebooted, and that mailbox has disappeared.
The
list of recipients on that server now resembles the list that the other
servers hold, i.e. without this new mailbox. However, the user and their
store is still listed under "Private Information Store \ Mailbox
Resources"
The mailbox has been used for a couple of weeks, and so has quite a lot
of
info in it. I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following
error,
although it doesn allow me to select the problem mailbox;
Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v3.71.001
Start Logging:October 24, 2002 10:53:53
[10:53:53] Logging Level: None
[10:53:53] Reading settings from file 'C:\exmerge\EXMERGE.INI'.
[10:53:53] Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from
file ''
[10:53:53] Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected
from
file ''
[10:53:53] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
list.
[10:54:53] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date
operations.
[10:54:53] Merging data into target store. The program will copy only
those
messages that do not exist in the target store.
[10:54:53] Associated folder data will be copied to the target store.
[10:54:53] Copying data from mailbox 'Employee Name' ('ENAME') on Server
'SERVERNAME' to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ENAME.PST'.
[10:54:54] Error configuring message service (MSEMS) (UNKNOWN ERROR)
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[10:54:54] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted.
[10:54:54] Number of items copied from the source store for all
mailboxes
processed: 0
[10:54:54] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered.
[10:54:54] Process completion time: 00:00:00
Servers are all 5.5 sp3
Backup is not a good option for me, as Veritas seems to want to just
overwrite the existing installation, rather than let me restore the IS
to
another location.
Any thoughts? Help !
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
Hello - [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the performance differences between the implementations. We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the performance is pretty dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software is patched and up-to-date and we've adjusted the "OpenRetryDelay" several times, to no avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some pretty big - but the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, raid 5 volume. The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is currently about 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that favoured one approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested if anyone can confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially long queue of attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? Thanks, Loftus Greig _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
I don't think this or any other tech related list is hostile towards newcomers. On Linux related lists (about 98% of all lists I'm subscribed to) it's usually enough to tell what you did to solve your problem. Explain you did search the archives, used google, searched the M$ KB (for M$ related topics) and you really did what you could to find information. Seriously, a question with detailed information and showing you did your best to solve your problem is getting a better answer then one showing you didn't do a thing. Remember.. it's mostly your problem and you search for help from other admins who don't get any payment. Nobody should feel offended if the answer is just a link to the information you're looking for. Read the following information. It's written by a guy who codes on Linux.. but this information is also interesting for others. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html I think I saw it in another reply too. Just my EUR 0,02 Bye, B. At 01:34 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute drivel (kind of like the last 10 or so). I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I simply have to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. Its almost as bad as spam to be quite honest. Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of an Exchange Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and farts Exchange Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the Knowledgebase as well as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know something that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very limited or in poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in the know and who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative and hostile toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a bother, then just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about your lives without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. I wish this post could have had some meaningful question that couldn't be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the bickering - please stop. SNIPPING a low of stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Jeff,
You're a star, and I owe you a pint
:o)
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [mailto:Jeffrey@;allfiguredout.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Run the DS/IS consistency adjuster on that server. Select the first check
box at the top and select all inconsistencies at the bottom. Do NOT touch
anything to do with the public folders. This should recreate the directory
object for the mailbox listed in the information store.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist@;partition.co.uk]
Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:17 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Subject: Mailbox 'disappeared'
Dear All,
We have an Exchange installation of a few servers, seperated by ADSL
We are currently reviewing the setup to move everyone to a central server,
and have everyone working offline
One server does not communicate with the central server at all at the
moment, and I havent been able to ascertain why, but we have continued to
let them operate on their own sending messages to each other until we are
ready to move everyone to the central server.
I created a mailbox on the problem server, and its been used fine. It is not
accessible from any of the other servers as the changes don't seem to have
replicated across.
Today, that server had to be rebooted, and that mailbox has disappeared. The
list of recipients on that server now resembles the list that the other
servers hold, i.e. without this new mailbox. However, the user and their
store is still listed under "Private Information Store \ Mailbox Resources"
The mailbox has been used for a couple of weeks, and so has quite a lot of
info in it. I've tried exmerge which fails and gives the following error,
although it doesn allow me to select the problem mailbox;
Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Merge Program, v3.71.001
Start Logging:October 24, 2002 10:53:53
[10:53:53] Logging Level: None
[10:53:53] Reading settings from file 'C:\exmerge\EXMERGE.INI'. [10:53:53]
Reading list of subjects for messages to be selected from file '' [10:53:53]
Reading list of attachment names for messages to be selected from file ''
[10:53:53] List of folders to be ignored has been read. 0 folders in the
list. [10:54:53] Using attribute 'PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME' for date
operations. [10:54:53] Merging data into target store. The program will copy
only those messages that do not exist in the target store. [10:54:53]
Associated folder data will be copied to the target store. [10:54:53]
Copying data from mailbox 'Employee Name' ('ENAME') on Server 'SERVERNAME'
to file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\ENAME.PST'. [10:54:54] Error configuring message
service (MSEMS) (UNKNOWN ERROR)
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[10:54:54] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted.
[10:54:54] Number of items copied from the source store for all mailboxes
processed: 0
[10:54:54] 0 mailboxes successfully processed. 1 mailboxes were not
successfully processed. 0 non-fatal errors encountered. [10:54:54] Process
completion time: 00:00:00
Servers are all 5.5 sp3
Backup is not a good option for me, as Veritas seems to want to just
overwrite the existing installation, rather than let me restore the IS to
another location.
Any thoughts? Help !
Nik
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook Rules
I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
Are you by chance using Norton? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:l.greig@;searchspace.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Hello - [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the performance differences between the implementations. We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the performance is pretty dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software is patched and up-to-date and we've adjusted the "OpenRetryDelay" several times, to no avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some pretty big - but the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, raid 5 volume. The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is currently about 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that favoured one approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested if anyone can confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially long queue of attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? Thanks, Loftus Greig _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
No. InoculateIT 6. Cheers, Loftus Greig. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 12:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Are you by chance using Norton? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:l.greig@;searchspace.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations Hello - [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the performance differences between the implementations. We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the performance is pretty dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software is patched and up-to-date and we've adjusted the "OpenRetryDelay" several times, to no avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some pretty big - but the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, raid 5 volume. The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is currently about 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that favoured one approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested if anyone can confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially long queue of attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? Thanks, Loftus Greig _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Rules
Is the client running? -Original Message- From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Rules I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Here we go again... About every six months someone gets on a similar rant. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague@;rmc.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute drivel (kind of like the last 10 or so). I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I simply have to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. Its almost as bad as spam to be quite honest. Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of an Exchange Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and farts Exchange Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the Knowledgebase as well as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know something that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very limited or in poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in the know and who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative and hostile toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a bother, then just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about your lives without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. I wish this post could have had some meaningful question that couldn't be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the bickering - please stop. Jeff Hague MCSE, MCT Network Manger Randolph-Macon College [EMAIL PROTECTED] (That's right Ed - I'm "from a .edu"). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Believe me on this: I very much appreciate it that you read this list. Not everyone does. For example, we get this guy who has popped in every month or so for the past five or more years to ask questions that have been hashed out dozens of times in excruciating detail. You'd think that after five years he'd have learned the basics from this list. "But Noo!", to quote John Belushi. So please understand that I very much respect those who learn something here. Learning new stuff is one of the primary reasons I stay here--that and the occasional chance to fan a flame war. (This guy's from a .edu, the one that has the domain name that my alma mater, berkeley.edu, should by all rights have. I'm not too worried about him seeing this since he obviously never reads the list except to scan for a reply to his query.) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some experienced Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of discussion lists are. A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or doesn't. I remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the road. Thanks for listening.. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins@;amr-corp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked have been answered with something like the following, which tells me there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. I myself think it is getting old.. EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: Search technet for "open relay exchange 2000", fol
RE: RBL's
More likely a combination of b) and a fundamental lack of understanding of how the RBL they have chosen works with regards to managing their black hole lists. Purusal of the archives with regards to Mr. Schwartz and Dr. Cumming about this time last year should provide some valuable insight to the issues with RBLs in general. That being said, I'm fairly impressed with the Spamcop.net RBL - they provide documentation of their blocked senders via the web, and are very quick to retest and remove if the problem has been solved. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend > its functionality? > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > RBL actually > is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide > the > functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in > phoning stupid > admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: client connection question
Yes and no. Only one mailbox can be the primary. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: client connection question Is it possible to set up Outlook to connect to two different mailboxes in different Orgs at the same time? I need to be able to switch back and forth and it is a pain to have to change the profile each timeor maybe a utility to change on the fly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook Rules
Outlook 2000. Yes it can be. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:02 AM Subject: RE: Outlook Rules > Is the client running? > > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook Rules > > > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can > manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the > rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal > contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. > When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see any > obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the > rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Mebbe its time for some remedial search engine lessons? Using "RBL" as the search. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=rbl First response is "MAPS Realtime Blackhole List", with a total of 175,000 results returned. Your little erotica stuff is 4th on the list. Now, since we're talking email, a reasonably intelligent person might make the assumption that the search term should be: "rbl email" or "rbl e-mail" The former terms take it down to 28,500 results, and within the top 5 is one called "RBL - Power Without Accountability" The latter returns 23,300 results, the first being "Mail Abuse Prevention System LLC" -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:25 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a > web page > far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers > of romance. > ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > > and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the > > movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the > > wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And > > you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or > > customer service request based on their say so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > > leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes > > more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a > > potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, > > combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be > > able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd > > be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > 3rd parties > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > join you > > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is > costing their > > > company business. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > > EMS Sales Engineer > > > MessageOne > > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > > night and the > > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sit
RE: RBL's
Good question - maybe Google customizes responses based on the relative intelligence of the person performing the query. Going on that assumption, its no surprise to me that I received the same first result as Mr. Scharff, as I've long known my intelligence level was closer to his than yours. Good call. Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why > should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the > list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before > they post a > question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes > assumptions. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. > Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. > I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched > google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding > history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you > (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my > assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot > on. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > > time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made > > especially for lovers of romance. ... > > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > www.google.com? > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > > and isn't a > > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > > rental place > > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > > report to > > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > > critical sales order or customer service request based on > their say > > > so? > > > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > > leave more > > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > > a nice to > > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > > admin who > > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level > of positive > > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > > Chris Scharff > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > > 3rd parties > > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > > join you > > > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is > > costing their > > > > company busi
RE: RBL's
And Martin knows all about relaying. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:andreacoppini@;iwg.info] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Relaying Black List I guess > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:MBlackstone@;superioraccess.com] > Sent: 24 October 2002 1:54 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > I am sick and didn't shower today. Does that mean I cant post? > > -Original Message- > From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions@;entrysecurity.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Let's keep it clean, shall we? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher > Hummert > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a > web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for > lovers of > romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > a nice to > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > admin who > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > > 3rd parties > > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > > join you > > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is > costing their > > > company business. > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > > EMS Sales Engineer > > > MessageOne > > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday > > night and the > > > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about > possibly" > > > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > > > > > Darcy > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > > >
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Well put Jeff. You hit all the points that I didn't. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague@;rmc.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute drivel (kind of like the last 10 or so). I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I simply have to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. Its almost as bad as spam to be quite honest. Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of an Exchange Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and farts Exchange Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the Knowledgebase as well as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know something that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very limited or in poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in the know and who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative and hostile toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a bother, then just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about your lives without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. I wish this post could have had some meaningful question that couldn't be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the bickering - please stop. Jeff Hague MCSE, MCT Network Manger Randolph-Macon College [EMAIL PROTECTED] (That's right Ed - I'm "from a .edu"). -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Believe me on this: I very much appreciate it that you read this list. Not everyone does. For example, we get this guy who has popped in every month or so for the past five or more years to ask questions that have been hashed out dozens of times in excruciating detail. You'd think that after five years he'd have learned the basics from this list. "But Noo!", to quote John Belushi. So please understand that I very much respect those who learn something here. Learning new stuff is one of the primary reasons I stay here--that and the occasional chance to fan a flame war. (This guy's from a .edu, the one that has the domain name that my alma mater, berkeley.edu, should by all rights have. I'm not too worried about him seeing this since he obviously never reads the list except to scan for a reply to his query.) Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Gregory Householder Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some experienced Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of discussion lists are. A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or doesn't. I remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the road. Thanks for listening.. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins@;amr-corp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked have been answered with something like the following, which tells me there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. I myself think it is getting old.. EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: Search technet for "open relay exchang
RE: RBL's
Actually, what's more important than knowning the answers off the top of your head is knowing how to find the answers. That's a big part of the reason there are a number of people on this list who answer many more questions than they ask. That being said, the best discussions that I've seen on this list over the years have come from the questions in which the basics have been tried, and failed. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Gregory Householder [mailto:ghouseholder@;bdi.cc] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:27 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Typically I just sit here and read the posts and I have to admit I've > learn a lot from the discussions. I can tell there are some > experienced > Admins here too, but there are some of us that work for smaller > companies and we don't have the time to learn everything there is to > know about Exchange administration. I consider myself a pretty good > admin. I may not know everything there is to know about Exchange > Administration, but I know where the knowledge bases and these kind of > discussion lists are. > > A lot of us are trying to learn to be good Email Admins. I admit that > there are some pretty bad questions that come across this list. > > I've said my two cents.. I don't care if anyone likes it or > doesn't. I > remember just getting into Exchange and trying to make sure I did > everything just right so it didn't cause me serious headaches down the > road. > > Thanks for listening.. > > Greg Householder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins@;amr-corp.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > Well, it has been my experience that over 35% of the questions asked > have been answered with something like the following, which tells me > there are people that REFUSE to do ANY research before posting.. > > I myself think it is getting old.. > > EXAMPLES OF ACTUAL ANSWERS: > > > Search technet for "open relay exchange 2000", follow the > directions and > make sure you aren't an open relay when you get it working. > My guess is > that your server will be an open relay after reading some of the > previous posts. > > > > I assume your talking about incoming mail. > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q324021 > > > > > You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or > install the latest Microsoft Security patch: > > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec > hnet/secur > ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:35 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Well let's all assume that we get the same results as you. Second why > should I have to show my work to you before I post a message to the > list. Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB before > they post a > question? The only one that's an idiot is the one that makes > assumptions. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:32 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > The #1 hit for me on RBL at google was this URL: mail-abuse.org/rbl/. > Seems like it might be a likely source given that it talks about mail. > I'm not a fsckign mind reader; if you want me to know you searched > google first then show your work. Otherwise, without a longstanding > history of posts I've seen to the contrary I'll assume you > (collectively) are an idiot... And based on your response below, my > assumption that you (individually) are an idiot, was more or less spot > on. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:25 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon > a time, on > > a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially > for lovers > > > of romance. ... > > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS > > ASS > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's
RE: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone
What have you done to fix it? What's changed lately? Has it always done this? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:jmorgan@;Profit-Lab.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:23 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange a little slow but not for everyone > > > Hello all, here is my issue, I have several users who are experiencing > extreme slow downs with exchange, like 20 seconds to open an > e-mail without > an attachment. > Currently everyone is running > Windows XP and Office 2000 > Server is Exchange 5.5 SP4 Running on a Windows 2000 Server with SP3 > > Its got me stumped because some people do not have any problems... > > Any Help Appreciated, > Joshua > > > > > > > > Joshua Morgan > PROFITLAB > Senior Network Engineer > Phone: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 > Cell: (864) 449-9912 > Fax: (413) 581-4936 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.profit-lab.com > http://ncontrol.info > > The greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up > every time we > fall. > -- Confucius > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New SMTP address generation in 5.5
You have a few options. First, export all users and import the new addresses in the "Secondary-proxy-addresses" field. Alternately, if all you want to do is receive, but not send, as those addresses, you could set the IMS up to reroute all mail for domainb.com to domaina.com - that is supposed to rewrite the address (much like a virtusertable in sendmail). I recall playing with it and it working, but I'm not 100% sure. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Sean Winters [mailto:sean.winters@;ibertech.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: New SMTP address generation in 5.5 > > > We are adding a new email domain to our existing 5.5 org. What is the > easiest way to automagically add the new "@newdomainname.org" to the > existing users addresses? It looks like 2K has an address > generation tool > for such things but I can't find anything for 5.5. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks! > > Sean > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
She has to be to put up^H^H^H^H^Hlive with him. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff@;messageone.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:43 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Nor could I after meeting her. What an amazing woman. > > -Original Message- > From: Martin Blackstone > To: Exchange Discussions > Sent: 10/23/2002 6:53 PM > Subject: RE: RBL's > > My wife thought so. She couldn't wipe the smile off her face after > meeting > Sharff. > > > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:10 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > His ass really is righteous. > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Because, unlike you, we're capable of quality social interaction. There is no requirement for that to be in person, however. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:57 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Why would anyone need to win friends over the internet. Oh no my > interweb feelings are hurt, oh dear god my interweb life is ruined > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van > Butzelaar > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:51 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > May I recommend the following literature by Dale Carnegie..:-) > > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671723650/qid=1 > 035442040/ > sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-6532048-4852914?v=glance > > (Link wraps) > > Cheers > > Sander > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: 24 October 2002 08:15 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it > occur to you > to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email > definition"? > Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow > muncher. See? You > want to throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of > folk that can > come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. > > For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the > universe and everything is. You? Other than being one of the current > poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is > your function in the messaging universe? > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a > web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for > lovers of > romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS ASS > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is > and isn't a > > > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie > rental place > > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who > report to > > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > > so? > > > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they > leave more > > > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than > a nice to > > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An > admin who > > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > > Chris Scharff > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > > > > 97.25% of mail
RE: Viruses via email
I have seen people in the past post that they follow that methodology. Personally, I find it foolish at best. A quick scan of the update logs for our client side AV solution shows that there are always out of date clients - generally probably on the order of 5-10%. Considering over half our workforce has laptops, that doesn't surprise me. I do find it surprising to think that people wouldn't feel uncomfortable at best relying on something as distributed as client side AV protection, when a relatively small number of boxes can be more easily managed, and more easily forced to be current. Not to say I don't run client side, but email AV belongs at the server leve. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Viruses via email > > > Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do > NOT use a virus > protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying > on desktop av? > > Cheers > > Greg Heywood > Technology Project Manager > International Power PLC > Phone +44 20 7320 8672 > Fax +44 20 7320 8725 > www.ipplc.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ** > * > Please note that neither International Power plc nor the > sender accepts any > responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this > e-mail or its > attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your > systems have adequate protection against virus infection. > > The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for > the use of the > intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been > addressed. If > the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you > are hereby > notified that you have received this document in error and > that any review, > dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is > strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by > return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then > delete it immediately from your system. > ** > * > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations
I've been very impressed with the ESE based versions of Scanmail (3.80). Rock solid, and fast as heck. Antigen performs similarly. I am, however, very impressed with Trend's new SLA for premier customers - they're guaranteeing a tested, functional pattern file within two hours of their receipt of the virus. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:l.greig@;searchspace.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:38 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 5.5 Anti-Virus implementations > > > Hello - > > [NT4 Server SP6a, Exchange enterprise 5.5 SP4] > > Has anyone used and compared Exchange anti-virus products that employ > different scanning methods, e.g. MAPI/VSAPI/ESE? I'm curious about the > performance differences between the implementations. > > We're currently using a VSAPI-based product and the > performance is pretty > dreadful - loads of archiving/synchronization errors and people with > incomplete offline mailbox replicas. The anti-virus software > is patched and > up-to-date and we've adjusted the "OpenRetryDelay" several > times, to no > avail. The server hosts about 120 active mailboxes - some > pretty big - but > the store databases have a dedicated 6-drive, ultra 160 SCSI, > raid 5 volume. > The transaction logs are on a different volume. PRIV.EDB is > currently about > 45GB in size and the problem affects every user on the server. > > I just wondered if there were any outright conclusions that > favoured one > approach or product over the others. Also, I'd be interested > if anyone can > confirm that the VSAPI interface builds a single, potentially > long queue of > attachments to be scanned, introducing a bottleneck ? > > Thanks, > > Loftus Greig > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Rules
Chances are you have automatic forwarding to the internet disabled on your IMS. That's a good thing. If it needs to go to two addresses, use a DL pointing to your mailbox and to a custom receipient with the foreign address. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:30 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook Rules > > > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. > I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. > But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my > Recepients > the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I > select > it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my > contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. > Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually > forwarding does??? > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful thing if it actually helps and folks should take some initiative on their own. I am only commenting on some of the posts that are downright rude and uncalled for - the playful banter can be kind of interesting though. Jeff -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92@;zonnet.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I don't think this or any other tech related list is hostile towards newcomers. On Linux related lists (about 98% of all lists I'm subscribed to) it's usually enough to tell what you did to solve your problem. Explain you did search the archives, used google, searched the M$ KB (for M$ related topics) and you really did what you could to find information. Seriously, a question with detailed information and showing you did your best to solve your problem is getting a better answer then one showing you didn't do a thing. Remember.. it's mostly your problem and you search for help from other admins who don't get any payment. Nobody should feel offended if the answer is just a link to the information you're looking for. Read the following information. It's written by a guy who codes on Linux.. but this information is also interesting for others. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html I think I saw it in another reply too. Just my EUR 0,02 Bye, B. At 01:34 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: >I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only >after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute drivel (kind >of like the last 10 or so). >I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am >absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I simply have >to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. Its almost >as bad as spam to be quite honest. >Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and >therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of an Exchange >Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that >every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and farts Exchange >Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love >that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of >other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. >I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the Knowledgebase as well >as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very >thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know something >that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very limited or in >poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these >lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in the know and >who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. >I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative and hostile >toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a bother, then >just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about your lives >without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. >I wish this post could have had some meaningful question that couldn't >be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had >contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the >bickering - please stop. SNIPPING a low of stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
I know of several organizations who don't use an Exchange virus scanner but they generally use some sort of "gateway" virus filtering at the perimeter. Jeff -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Viruses via email Heck ya! Lots. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
My cat's breath smells like cat food. > -Original Message- > From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague@;rmc.edu] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it > > > Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful > thing if it actually helps and folks should take some initiative on > their own. > I am only commenting on some of the posts that are downright rude and > uncalled for - the playful banter can be kind of interesting though. > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92@;zonnet.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it > > I don't think this or any other tech related list is hostile towards > newcomers. On Linux related lists (about 98% of all lists I'm > subscribed > > to) it's usually enough to tell what you did to solve your problem. > Explain > you did search the archives, used google, searched the M$ KB (for M$ > related topics) and you really did what you could to find information. > Seriously, a question with detailed information and showing > you did your > > best to solve your problem is getting a better answer then one showing > you > didn't do a thing. > Remember.. it's mostly your problem and you search for help > from other > admins who don't get any payment. > Nobody should feel offended if the answer is just a link to the > information > you're looking for. > > Read the following information. It's written by a guy who codes on > Linux.. > but this information is also interesting for others. > http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > I think I saw it in another reply too. > > Just my EUR 0,02 > > Bye, > > > > B. > > > At 01:34 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: > >I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only > >after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute > drivel (kind > >of like the last 10 or so). > >I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am > >absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I > simply have > >to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. > Its almost > >as bad as spam to be quite honest. > >Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and > >therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of > an Exchange > >Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that > >every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and > farts Exchange > >Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love > >that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of > >other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. > >I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the > Knowledgebase as well > >as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very > >thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know > something > >that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very > limited or in > >poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these > >lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in > the know and > >who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. > >I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative > and hostile > >toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a > bother, then > >just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about > your lives > >without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. > >I wish this post could have had some meaningful question > that couldn't > >be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had > >contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the > >bickering - please stop. > > SNIPPING a low of stuff. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
My dogs breath smells like a cat who's breath smells like cat food... -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:esojka@;NBME.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it My cat's breath smells like cat food. > -Original Message- > From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague@;rmc.edu] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it > > > Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful > thing if it actually helps and folks should take some initiative on > their own. I am only commenting on some of the posts that are > downright rude and uncalled for - the playful banter can be kind of > interesting though. > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92@;zonnet.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it > > I don't think this or any other tech related list is hostile towards > newcomers. On Linux related lists (about 98% of all lists I'm > subscribed > > to) it's usually enough to tell what you did to solve your problem. > Explain you did search the archives, used google, searched the M$ KB > (for M$ related topics) and you really did what you could to find > information. Seriously, a question with detailed information and > showing you did your > > best to solve your problem is getting a better answer then one showing > you didn't do a thing. > Remember.. it's mostly your problem and you search for help > from other > admins who don't get any payment. > Nobody should feel offended if the answer is just a link to the > information > you're looking for. > > Read the following information. It's written by a guy who codes on > Linux.. but this information is also interesting for others. > http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > I think I saw it in another reply too. > > Just my EUR 0,02 > > Bye, > > > > B. > > > At 01:34 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: > >I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only > >after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute > drivel (kind > >of like the last 10 or so). > >I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am > >absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I > simply have > >to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. > Its almost > >as bad as spam to be quite honest. > >Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and > >therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of > an Exchange > >Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that > >every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and > farts Exchange > >Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love > >that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of > >other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. I spend a great > >deal of time with TechNet and the > Knowledgebase as well > >as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very > >thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know > something > >that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very > limited or in > >poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these > >lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in > the know and > >who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. I > >find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative > and hostile > >toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a > bother, then > >just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about > your lives > >without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. > >I wish this post could have had some meaningful question > that couldn't > >be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had > >contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the > >bickering - please stop. > > SNIPPING a low of stuff. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exch
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
WMS Spooler? Never heard of it. Find out what that is and see if its not the problem. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem > persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With > SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, > after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the > send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no > different than the working ones. When I close outlook through > task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". > Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses > by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Message Tracking logs
Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Public Folder replication
Lee, 1. What conflicts? 2. What errors? 3. Most? As in hierarchy, or content? 4. Hierarchy or Content? 5. Are you upgrading or migrating (with or without an ADC?) 6. If you have an ADC, is the PF CA set up correctly? 7.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:38 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Public Folder replication Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Public Folder replication Did you actually replicate the content? The connection agreement doesn't do that, you have to add the replica onto the new server. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Lee Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 to 2000 Public Folder replication I am in the process of migrating our Exchange 5.5 server to Exchange 2000. All of the public folders are currently held on the 5.5 server. I have set up Public Folder replication between the two servers but after replicating once they will not replicate again. Consequently anybodires mailbox that has been moved to the new server can't see most of the public folders. Also we are getting several conflicts as well. I have set up a seperate connection agreement for Public Folders Any Ideas Lee _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: client connection question
MAPI to one, POP3 to the other one :) -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: client connection question Is it possible to set up Outlook to connect to two different mailboxes in different Orgs at the same time? I need to be able to switch back and forth and it is a pain to have to change the profile each timeor maybe a utility to change on the fly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app to do that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look. www.promodag.com - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Ah, yes. I recall that incident. If you choose to use a RBL, read very carefully what the criteria is to be placed on their lists. As Darcy said before, some of these folks block entire netblocks. There is one or two that I know of that have blocked the entire Sprintlink netblock. That's something like 2 million IP addresses. All because one or two spammers somewhere in that mess. RBL's are fine if you are running your own mail server at home. For businesses that depend on e-mail for their communication, why would you place the decision on who can send to your domain into the hands of some mail Nazi? I've found many of the people that run RBL's are not interested in stopping SPAM, they are interested in having the internet working the way they want it to. (i.e. Dr. Cummings) We even went to the point of contacting the author of the RFC to clarify the proper place to reject a mail message. The answer from the RBL'ers? We don't care. That's why I won't use them. Ever. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's More likely a combination of b) and a fundamental lack of understanding of how the RBL they have chosen works with regards to managing their black hole lists. Purusal of the archives with regards to Mr. Schwartz and Dr. Cumming about this time last year should provide some valuable insight to the issues with RBLs in general. That being said, I'm fairly impressed with the Spamcop.net RBL - they provide documentation of their blocked senders via the web, and are very quick to retest and remove if the problem has been solved. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william@;techsanctuary.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) > > Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend > its functionality? > > William > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an > RBL actually > is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide > the > functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you in > phoning stupid > admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night > > and the current stance on that is that they're "thinking > > about possibly" including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Access -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns@;sainsburys.co.uk] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Tony Thanks For your response. I did have a look at the product a few years back for Exchange 5.5. It was ok and if I recall was not cheap. I can't really justify the cost as my requirement is very short term. Thanks Regards -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app to do that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look. www.promodag.com - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Ali Have you used access to do this? Regards -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs Access -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns@;sainsburys.co.uk] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Then as Ali said use Access. Enjoy! Or if this is a one time shot. Promodag does have an eval. that works for 15 days? - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:29 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs Tony Thanks For your response. I did have a look at the product a few years back for Exchange 5.5. It was ok and if I recall was not cheap. I can't really justify the cost as my requirement is very short term. Thanks Regards -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app to do that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look. www.promodag.com - Original Message - From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
I think I saw this issue resolved in one of the service packs for office 2000, maybe you can check out the fixes, Im almost positive just not sure which service pack rich -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
use NAV for both Craig A. Mills Computer Aided Management, Inc. 371 Oak Pl., Ste. H Brea, Ca. 92821 (714) 257-0108 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-365265@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Um, no, I don't read my message tracking logs. ;) If I'm bored, I usually get a newspaper. -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns@;sainsburys.co.uk] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:31 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs Ali Have you used access to do this? Regards -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs Access -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns@;sainsburys.co.uk] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs Group Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably freeware/shareware). We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number of large messages being sent each day. Any constructive comments would be appreciated. Exchange 2000 SP2 Windows 2000 SP2 Regards Marc Mearns ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ** ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
No, Promodag charges for the eval also. >{
I would say look for reporting software rather than trying to use a db.
The reporting software will save you a lot of headaches and look
prettier when you give it to mgmt types.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:36 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Then as Ali said use Access. Enjoy! Or if this is a one time shot.
Promodag
does have an eval. that works for 15 days?
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Tony
Thanks For your response. I did have a look at the product a few years
back
for Exchange 5.5. It was ok and if I recall was not cheap. I can't
really
justify the cost as my requirement is very short term.
Thanks
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app
to do
that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look.
www.promodag.com
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM
Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Group
Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the
message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably
freeware/shareware).
We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will
be
larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am
dealing
with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for
sorting. I
basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the
number of large messages being sent each day.
Any constructive comments would be appreciated.
Exchange 2000 SP2
Windows 2000 SP2
Regards
Marc Mearns
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
J Sainsbury plc (185647 England)
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England)
Registered Offices:
33 Holborn
London
EC1N 2HT
**
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
J Sainsbury plc (185647 England)
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England)
Registered Offices:
33 Holborn
London
EC1N 2HT
**
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:l
RE: Viruses via email
Use Antigen for Exchange and NAV on the desktop. They seem very copasetic together. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Craig A. Mills [mailto:craigam@;camnetwork.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Viruses via email use NAV for both Craig A. Mills Computer Aided Management, Inc. 371 Oak Pl., Ste. H Brea, Ca. 92821 (714) 257-0108 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-365265@;ls.swynk.com]On Behalf Of Greg Heywood Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Have you checked to verify that the clients are resolving the addresses they type in? Ctrl+K? I have seen this happen (granted with Ex5.5, but with OL2k) when the client has multiple versions of the GAL in their OL Address Book and OL can't resolve the email address, so it hangs for about 5 minutes. Worth checking. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
On the server side it is win2k sp2 and exchange2k sp3. on the client, it is olk2k sp2. 1. They are all on the same subnet connected to the same switch. just abt 30 users. Overloading can be ruled out. 2. They are all pentium III/VI machines with loads of memory and disk space 3. Will be reinstalling the outlook and see if it solves the problem. 4. There is no user error. Even if they pick up somebody from the address book and send it internally thye are getting this error. Will look in to any fixes for the office 2000 post sp2 fixes. The clients are able to resolve the names with CTRL K. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.veiliginternet.nl _ Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or in
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Any errors in the client event logs or on the exchange event logs? James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator InovisTM, formerly Harbinger and Extricity -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button On the server side it is win2k sp2 and exchange2k sp3. on the client, it is olk2k sp2. 1. They are all on the same subnet connected to the same switch. just abt 30 users. Overloading can be ruled out. 2. They are all pentium III/VI machines with loads of memory and disk space 3. Will be reinstalling the outlook and see if it solves the problem. 4. There is no user error. Even if they pick up somebody from the address book and send it internally thye are getting this error. Will look in to any fixes for the office 2000 post sp2 fixes. The clients are able to resolve the names with CTRL K. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button EX2k... on Win2k server... what sp levels? What have you done to troubleshoot the clients, i.e. network connectivity, hardware, software. 1. Are they all on the same hub/segment/etc, possibly overused/failing? 2. Do the client pc's have enough resources (i.e. these are older/crappier than the others that work) 3. Have you re-installed outlook on these clients? 4. Have you ruled out all user error? etc -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Outlook Rules Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.veiliginternet.nl _ Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be li
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
WMS - Windows Messaging Service? -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Either windows messaging service or subsystem. Looked in the techent for that and it gives only one article which does not fit my problem description. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button WMS - Windows Messaging Service? -Original Message- From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Dear list, I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". Any help would be appreciated. TIA Anil Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ This inbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit: http://www.veiliginternet.nl _ Please note that the former email address with extension @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. _ This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
why bother with those crappy low info tracking logs when there are better ways? m. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Someone posted a perl script that would do something with them not too long ago. I won't repost it (because I didn't write it) but I'm sure its in the archives. I'd guess early this week, IIRC. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Marc Mearns [mailto:Marc.Mearns@;sainsburys.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs > > > Group > > Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to > import the message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of > the data (preferably freeware/shareware). > > We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of > 80mb and will be larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount > of records that I am dealing with. I tried a freeware utility > called CSVDB but was no good for sorting. I basically want to > be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the number > of large messages being sent each day. > > Any constructive comments would be appreciated. > > Exchange 2000 SP2 > Windows 2000 SP2 > > Regards > > Marc Mearns > > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error > please notify > the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). > > The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been > swept by > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) > Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) > > Registered Offices: > 33 Holborn > London > EC1N 2HT > > ** > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Or MessageOne's MessageView. Does purty reports. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:22 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs > > > Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd > party app to do > that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look. > www.promodag.com > > - Original Message - > From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM > Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs > > > Group > > Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to > import the > message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably > freeware/shareware). > > We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of > 80mb and will be > larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that > I am dealing > with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good > for sorting. I > basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially > look at the > number of large messages being sent each day. > > Any constructive comments would be appreciated. > > Exchange 2000 SP2 > Windows 2000 SP2 > > Regards > > Marc Mearns > > > ** > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). > > The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) > Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) > > Registered Offices: > 33 Holborn > London > EC1N 2HT > > ** > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem > persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With > SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, > after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the > send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no > different than the working ones. When I close outlook through > task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". > Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses > by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
- Original Message - From: "Roger Seielstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:42 AM Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe > > -- > Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE > Sr. Systems Administrator > Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity > Atlanta, GA > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > > > > Dear list, > > > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem > > persists. I have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With > > SP2 applied) at the client side. For few of the clients, > > after some time outlook stops responding when you hit the > > send buton. I have checked the network settings and it is no > > different than the working ones. When I close outlook through > > task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not reponding". > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > TIA > > > > Anil > > > > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > > __ > > ___ > > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses > > by KPN IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Although some of these replies sound a bit rude to you, I would still consider some of them to the point. Really.. how would you install/maintain the usage of RBL if you don't even know what it means.. How would you be able to decide which one to use.. At this point Chris Scharff is right.. a bit rude perhaps.. but right.. At some other points he was a bit rude too but I think he was right again.. He made me laugh.. I think you're taking it to serious to be an admin.. It's a hell of a job and humor is the only way to survive. For ppl who aren't admins some of the talk on this or any other list sounds rude.. but I guess it's not that bad at all. Or perhaps I'm just working in this field to long to know how ppl should talk to each other. If the posting has something to do about pets then I'm using the "delete" button.. So even that button has a perpose :-) Have fun, B. At 08:42 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful thing if it actually helps and folks should take some initiative on their own. I am only commenting on some of the posts that are downright rude and uncalled for - the playful banter can be kind of interesting though. Jeff -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92@;zonnet.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I don't think this or any other tech related list is hostile towards newcomers. On Linux related lists (about 98% of all lists I'm subscribed to) it's usually enough to tell what you did to solve your problem. Explain you did search the archives, used google, searched the M$ KB (for M$ related topics) and you really did what you could to find information. Seriously, a question with detailed information and showing you did your best to solve your problem is getting a better answer then one showing you didn't do a thing. Remember.. it's mostly your problem and you search for help from other admins who don't get any payment. Nobody should feel offended if the answer is just a link to the information you're looking for. Read the following information. It's written by a guy who codes on Linux.. but this information is also interesting for others. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html I think I saw it in another reply too. Just my EUR 0,02 Bye, B. At 01:34 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: >I too have enjoyed this list and have learned a lot from it but only >after deleting the several hundred posts that are absolute drivel (kind >of like the last 10 or so). >I have only been subscribed for a little over a month and I am >absolutely overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts that I simply have >to ignore before I see one that actually answers a question. Its almost >as bad as spam to be quite honest. >Many of you seem to think that every answer has been answered and >therefore every single person within a few hundred yards of an Exchange >Server should already know that answer. You also seem to assume that >every person subscribed to this list eats, breathes and farts Exchange >Server - if it didn't sound like such a boring existence I would love >that - unfortunately I also have to administer an entire network of >other servers, switches, routers, firewalls, etc. >I spend a great deal of time with TechNet and the Knowledgebase as well >as their equivalents from other companies. I also read a lot of very >thick (and very droll) books but quite often, I need to know something >that isn't necessarily in a book or is explained in very limited or in >poor detail by the vendor responsible. That is when I turn to these >lists and hope to learn something from those of you who in the know and >who are gracious enough to spend your time answering questions. >I find it very unfortunate that some of you are so negative and hostile >toward some of the questions posted here. If it is such a bother, then >just stop - you can very easily unsubscribe and go on about your lives >without having to worry about the rest of us. We will muddle through. >I wish this post could have had some meaningful question that couldn't >be answered by the great and powerful google.com or that it had >contained an answer as worthy but I'm really getting tired of the >bickering - please stop. SNIPPING a low of stuff. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login scr ipt for the Outlook Direct Booking.
Ya, that's what I heard too, that they are going to combine it with the Tech Ed conference but hasn't that rumor been going around for a long time. I do have the .reg file. I just thought that someone had a script or .bat or .cmd file that would do the appropriate checking of the registry, that they would share. john Remember 9/11 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login script for the Outlook Direct Booking. Your last, too. Why not just make a .REG file? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: 'NT 2000 Discussions' Subject: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login script for the Outlook Direct Booking. We are in the process of testing Joseph Nuebauer's Outlook Direct Booking as he outlined in the Windows and .Net magazine (Exchange & Outlook Administrator Oct 2002) article 26184 and so far we like it. Now it comes down to pushing the "FBPUBLISH" registry change to all the win98 machines that we have as I mistakenly took the default time to publish of 2 months. Rather than reinvent the wheel, does anyone have a script that will do this and be willing to share it with me. Also I really enjoyed the MEC this year as it was my first. So much to see and do and so little time. V/r john _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strange Outlook problem
I have a strange problem with Outlook 2000. Whenever I receive any message with the words "Purchase order today" in the body of the email, it automatically goes from my Inbox into my Deleted Items folder. I reviewed my rules and it didn't match any of my rules. Furthermore, I disabled all the rules and it still moves it into the Deleted Items folder. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an e-card which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says they need to install software to see the card. The user installs the software which has a EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to everyone in the user's Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do so. The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, "you have an E-Card from". -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viruses via email
RE: Comments on desktop AV - not necessarily true. We use F-Secure from DataFellows as our desktop AV; it's all managed from a central console, updates are pushed to the workstations daily, and the user doesn't have the priv level to disable or uninstall it. Maybe we have an idyllic situation but our desktop A/V has been extremely reliable thus far. That said I do agree that an Exchange-aware, server-based, A/V product is a good thing. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > -Original Message- > From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:jrwaters@;co.hanover.va.us] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Viruses via email > > > I'm sure there are a few (ok more than a few) but the > question would be why would you want to. Even in the best > managed desktop environment you can't ensure that all the > desktops are at the latest definition level, or that you user > hasn't chosen to turn off the protection, or worse yet an > admin turned it off to update a program and in a rush doesn't > turn it back on. With the e-mail you have a limited number, > can update at will, scan the mail and at least feel that you > are doing the best job possible to keep the little critters > out of your world. And the plus is you have control over the > process, and yes I am a control nut. just as an FYI we run > Trend on the server, and yes I Love It and will pay the price > increase, and we run NAV on the desktop with the OL hook, > that way the users who are also popping with the client (yes > that's another topic!) can't bring one in on the other side. > I am very pleased, the A/V along with blocking attachments > has served us very well. > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Viruses via email > > > Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do > NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? > Instead relying on desktop av? > > Cheers > > Greg Heywood > Technology Project Manager > International Power PLC > Phone +44 20 7320 8672 > Fax +44 20 7320 8725 > www.ipplc.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ** > ** > *** > Please note that neither International Power plc nor the > sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be > contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore > your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate > protection against virus infection. > > The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for > the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to > which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message > is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > you have received this document in error and that any review, > dissemination or copying of the message or associated > attachments is strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the > sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for > the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. > ** > ** > *** > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Outlook problem
Check your junk mail filters -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA@;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Outlook problem I have a strange problem with Outlook 2000. Whenever I receive any message with the words "Purchase order today" in the body of the email, it automatically goes from my Inbox into my Deleted Items folder. I reviewed my rules and it didn't match any of my rules. Furthermore, I disabled all the rules and it still moves it into the Deleted Items folder. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
I find it remarkable how often fishing lessons are met with such ire. "It's easier to stop sticking a fork in your ear than it is to try and construct some kind of electro-magnetic hat." -- Ben M. Schorr (1/25/2002) -- Chris Scharff MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Sorry about that I didn't mean Gary I meant Chris in that > previous statement > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:01 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Sorry - no. You threw the first stone when you called Chris > names. Now go away and think about it. > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:37 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yes but Gary didn't have to be a dick. In fact if he wasn't > acting like a dick in the first place then none of this would > have happened. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Okay - I generally keep my mouth shut when I see folks do > things on this list that are less than professional. Most of > it is good-natured and/or only minimally offensive. We all > have our moments, and we're all presumably grownups. > > Gary didn't play "nice", but he did not use any words that > would be considered offensive. > > You have used foul language in an attempt to directly insult > a respected member of this list [1] who did nothing more than > point out to you that you could have answered your own > question very easily. Now you've posted a link to a truly > offensive picture. I'm guessing that you were hoping to > insult Gary [2]. > > That goes over the line - not only is it unprofessional, it > is the sort of thing that clicking on can get people fired. > Stop and think about it. Nearly all of us who are on this > list are at work. We are here primarily for information, > partly for socialization. We are not here for you to inflict > your infantile notion of humor on. > > I politely answered your question and provided additional > background on > *why* RBL's should be used judiciously because I prefer to > give folks the benefit of the doubt. You have proven that > the courtesy was wasted on you. > > Darcy > > > [1] Lucky for you, Chris rarely takes offense at the behavior > of children. [2] Gary also usually ignores people who haven't > grown up yet, but he hits harder when he does decide to take > notice. Sometimes juveniles need to be spanked. > > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it > occur to you to actually run a "real" google search, such as > "rbl email definition"? Comes up on the first page you > arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to throw shit > around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on > out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. > > For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life > the universe and everything is. You? Other than being one > of the current poster children of prophylactia (along with > Precht), exactly what is your function in the messaging universe? > > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: > RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE > RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a > time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made > especially for lovers of romance. ... > Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. > Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance > www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages > > I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF > RIGHTEOUS XXX > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > www.google.com? >
RE: Viruses via email
I'm sure there are a few (ok more than a few) but the question would be why would you want to. Even in the best managed desktop environment you can't ensure that all the desktops are at the latest definition level, or that you user hasn't chosen to turn off the protection, or worse yet an admin turned it off to update a program and in a rush doesn't turn it back on. With the e-mail you have a limited number, can update at will, scan the mail and at least feel that you are doing the best job possible to keep the little critters out of your world. And the plus is you have control over the process, and yes I am a control nut. just as an FYI we run Trend on the server, and yes I Love It and will pay the price increase, and we run NAV on the desktop with the OL hook, that way the users who are also popping with the client (yes that's another topic!) can't bring one in on the other side. I am very pleased, the A/V along with blocking attachments has served us very well. Jeff -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood@;ipplc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viruses via email Just wondering if there are many companies out there that do NOT use a virus protection product that links into exchange? Instead relying on desktop av? Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's
Chris gently reiterated the policies of this list [1] in a very subtle way by providing a link to a place where you could have found the answer to your question "what is an RBL?". He did nothing rude or out of line. Your response was unreasonable - especially since a search on Google of RBL turns up the information you needed in the first three items. The one you cited is the fourth on the list. Just to prove it to you, here's a link to the results of a Google on "RBL" http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=RBL I think you were spoiling for a fight. Darcy [1] Do the research first [2] [2] Let us know what research you did and what you found -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Sorry about that I didn't mean Gary I meant Chris in that previous statement -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Sorry - no. You threw the first stone when you called Chris names. Now go away and think about it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yes but Gary didn't have to be a dick. In fact if he wasn't acting like a dick in the first place then none of this would have happened. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Okay - I generally keep my mouth shut when I see folks do things on this list that are less than professional. Most of it is good-natured and/or only minimally offensive. We all have our moments, and we're all presumably grownups. Gary didn't play "nice", but he did not use any words that would be considered offensive. You have used foul language in an attempt to directly insult a respected member of this list [1] who did nothing more than point out to you that you could have answered your own question very easily. Now you've posted a link to a truly offensive picture. I'm guessing that you were hoping to insult Gary [2]. That goes over the line - not only is it unprofessional, it is the sort of thing that clicking on can get people fired. Stop and think about it. Nearly all of us who are on this list are at work. We are here primarily for information, partly for socialization. We are not here for you to inflict your infantile notion of humor on. I politely answered your question and provided additional background on *why* RBL's should be used judiciously because I prefer to give folks the benefit of the doubt. You have proven that the courtesy was wasted on you. Darcy [1] Lucky for you, Chris rarely takes offense at the behavior of children. [2] Gary also usually ignores people who haven't grown up yet, but he hits harder when he does decide to take notice. Sometimes juveniles need to be spanked. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email definition"? Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the universe and everything is. You? Other than being one of the current poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is your function in the messaging universe? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS XXX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff S
RE: RBL's
Interpretations vary - the sense of it remains the same. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:retts@;harman.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's OOppsss I was told it was relay black list. Sorry for the misinformation. Russell -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, if you mean I convinced you that an RBL can be Really Bad (L)admininstration, yes, I'd say I answered it in depth and detail. Real-time Black List is what it actually stands for. And Chris can laugh at me if he wants - I had to ask the first time I saw it as an acronym. Darcy -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Never mind Darcy's previous message answered my question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. ===
RE: RBL's
OOppsss I was told it was relay black list. Sorry for the misinformation. Russell -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Well, if you mean I convinced you that an RBL can be Really Bad (L)admininstration, yes, I'd say I answered it in depth and detail. Real-time Black List is what it actually stands for. And Chris can laugh at me if he wants - I had to ask the first time I saw it as an acronym. Darcy -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Never mind Darcy's previous message answered my question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a critical sales order or customer service request based on their say so? An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok please explain. > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on 3rd parties > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to join you > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > company business. > > -- > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > EMS Sales Engineer > MessageOne > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:42 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Still 3rd party. I was at a meeting at MS on Monday night and the > > current stance on that is that they're "thinking about possibly" > > including RBL support in a future release. > > > > Darcy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matt Natkin [mailto:mnatkin@;natco-inc.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:50 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RBL's > > > > > > Hey does exchange 2k have a rbl feature or is this 3rd party? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: RBL's
Sorry about that I didn't mean Gary I meant Chris in that previous statement -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Sorry - no. You threw the first stone when you called Chris names. Now go away and think about it. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yes but Gary didn't have to be a dick. In fact if he wasn't acting like a dick in the first place then none of this would have happened. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Darcy Adams Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Okay - I generally keep my mouth shut when I see folks do things on this list that are less than professional. Most of it is good-natured and/or only minimally offensive. We all have our moments, and we're all presumably grownups. Gary didn't play "nice", but he did not use any words that would be considered offensive. You have used foul language in an attempt to directly insult a respected member of this list [1] who did nothing more than point out to you that you could have answered your own question very easily. Now you've posted a link to a truly offensive picture. I'm guessing that you were hoping to insult Gary [2]. That goes over the line - not only is it unprofessional, it is the sort of thing that clicking on can get people fired. Stop and think about it. Nearly all of us who are on this list are at work. We are here primarily for information, partly for socialization. We are not here for you to inflict your infantile notion of humor on. I politely answered your question and provided additional background on *why* RBL's should be used judiciously because I prefer to give folks the benefit of the doubt. You have proven that the courtesy was wasted on you. Darcy [1] Lucky for you, Chris rarely takes offense at the behavior of children. [2] Gary also usually ignores people who haven't grown up yet, but he hits harder when he does decide to take notice. Sometimes juveniles need to be spanked. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email definition"? Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the universe and everything is. You? Other than being one of the current poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is your function in the messaging universe? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS XXX -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
I am pretty sure this was stated already, try downloading the Full offline address list as well as change the RPC Binding order as follows: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider] "Rpc_Binding_Order"="ncacn_ip_tcp" Couple other questions, how many GCs do you have? Are the GCs are doing other things? Where are the GCs located in relation to the clients? Lastly, do a network trace of the conversation the client is trying to have at the time it locks up, that may tell us the problem. Joel WMS Spooler = Windows Messaging System Spooler :) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook hangs when you hit send button You said this happens only at some. What if you go to another desktop, login as troubled user, configure Outlook and try it there. Do you get the same results? - Original Message - From: "Anil A.Hangal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button no nedia server or anything. I think the wms spooler is related to windows messaging system. This message comes while I try to shutdown the machine. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button You don't have a WMS (Windows Media) server running by any chance, do you? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Great...you checked the network settings. So what? What else is different between the machines that DO work and the machines that DON'T? Is there any Warehouse Management System (WMS) software installed on the the machines that DON'T work? Search the log files on the clients that ARE having a problem and let us see what the errors look like. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I > have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the > client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops > responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network > settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close > outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not > reponding". Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN > IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __
RE: RBL's
The picture you linked is a pretty good characterization of an "RBL"...has your final question on this list been adequately answered? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Goatse doesn't even phase me anymore that's not even sick. If you really want to get sick do a search for pain4.jpg you'll enjoy it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's GAACCCK! Dude... That's just plain DISTURBING!! What's even more disturbin, is that you would know where to find a picture like that!!! -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to actually run a "real" google search, such as "rbl email definition"? Comes up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on out and party, you lobotomised little wanker. For the record - I _know_ what Scharff's contribution to life the universe and everything is. You? Other than being one of the current poster children of prophylactia (along with Precht), exactly what is your function in the messaging universe? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 17:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Yea I really didn't think we were talking about: RBL ROMANTICA HOMEPAGE RBL Romantica! ... The History of RBL Romantica. Once upon a time, on a web page far, far away, there was a place made especially for lovers of romance. ... Description: Rebel newsletters, message boards and romance links. Category: Arts > Literature > Genres > Romance www.geocities.com/Paris/Lights/3079/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages I CHECKED GOOGLE FIRST SO I ASKED. SHOVE THAT IN YOUR SELF RIGHTEOUS ASS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's www.google.com? > -Original Message- > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Ok what's an RBL. I'm not familiar with that term > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is and isn't a > spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw at the movie rental place > last week? Those are just some of the wonderful people who report to > and maintain various RBLs. And you're going to block what may be a > critical sales order or customer service request based on their say > so? > > An RBL, like communism is nice in theory. In practice, they leave more > than a little to be desired. Once e-mail becomes more than a nice to > have for a business, RBLs become a potential liability. An admin who > knows what they are doing, combined with software which doesn't > completely suck might be able to use them to some level of positive > effect, but that'd be the exception rather than the rule. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:57 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > Ok please explain. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of > Chris Scharff > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: RBL's > > > > > > 97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an RBL > > actually is/does. I for one hope they continue to rely on > 3rd parties > > to provide the functionality, otherwise I'll likely have to > join you > > in phoning stupid admins to tell them why RBL $foo is costing their > > company business. > > > > -- > > Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE > > EMS Sales Engineer > > MessageOne > > 512.652.4500 x-244 > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Darcy Adams [mailto:Darcy.Adams@;gettyimages.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 20
Mailing Lists
Hi all We send out lots of documents and emails to clients. Many of these are constructed in the form of Distribution Lists. I am want to make sure that none of the clients is aware of who else is receiving these emails at the sametime as its sent to them. Many of these clients are competitors and would rather others are not aware when they recieve there documents and so on. And so I have been sending the mail recently by just putting the DL alias name into BCC and sending messages that way. This works fine. However, I was just wodering if there is another way to do this. Another way that will allow you to have a generic message group name displayed in the TO: field when the clients receive their emails. Something like like "Billings Update" for instance. Much like what you get when you receive a message from this forum. Right now when I BCC the DL list nothing is shown in the To field. Any ideas?. Any feedback is much appreciated. Mustafa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
You said this happens only at some. What if you go to another desktop, login as troubled user, configure Outlook and try it there. Do you get the same results? - Original Message - From: "Anil A.Hangal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:50 AM Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button no nedia server or anything. I think the wms spooler is related to windows messaging system. This message comes while I try to shutdown the machine. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button You don't have a WMS (Windows Media) server running by any chance, do you? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Great...you checked the network settings. So what? What else is different between the machines that DO work and the machines that DON'T? Is there any Warehouse Management System (WMS) software installed on the the machines that DON'T work? Search the log files on the clients that ARE having a problem and let us see what the errors look like. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I > have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the > client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops > responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network > settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close > outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not > reponding". Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN > IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/searc
Re: Outlook Rules
Can be is not an option. Has to be is how it works. - Original Message - From: "David McSpadden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:07 AM Subject: Re: Outlook Rules > Outlook 2000. Yes it can be. > - Original Message - > From: "Daniel Chenault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:02 AM > Subject: RE: Outlook Rules > > > > Is the client running? > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David McSpadden [mailto:davidm@;imcu.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:30 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Outlook Rules > > > > > > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. I can > > manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. But when I set up the > > rule it does nothing. The X is in my Recepients the Y is in my personal > > contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I select it from my contacts. > > When I am setting up my rule I select it from my contacts. I don't see > any > > obvious errors but it still doesn't work. Can anyone explain to me why the > > rule wouldn't work if manually forwarding does??? > > > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RBL's - Please Get over it
Great post, Craig. That should be added to the faq. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:craig.dupler@;boeing.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it Dear Jeff, To get any value out of this list, you have to assume that massive deletes without reads is the norm. Use a rule to move everything coming in from the list to a single folder. Sort that folder by subject. Don't even try to interact with a thread without using a tripane viewer/reader. Finally, you have to accept that techies go through a number of socialization phases on their way toward becoming true experts. One of them lasts for a while after they begin to understand enough to actually start helping others. It has similarities to post adolescence. If you have ever taught classes to people in the age ranges of either middle school (12-14) or college sophomore to about 35, then you clearly understand the entertainment opportunities. But gee, in order to get to the other side of anything, one does have to pass through it. Don't worry about either offending or being offended. You will - both. It is a normal part of the journey. I get to say that, since my hair is grey and I was here before all but about three others, back when Peter first started the list to replace the original Bravehearts group, which goes back to well before Exchange was called Exchange. One other thing - it's ok to come and go. Everyone has. CD -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:jhague@;rmc.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it I am sorry that you misunderstood my rants - let me explain. First - I am not directing this at any one individual in particular - your right Generally Chris and the rest of the members of this list are correct or at least informative in many of the posts I have read. Second - I really don't care if your rude - you can all be total flaming a-holes as far as Im concerned as long as you don't work in my building it doesn't bother me a bit. Third - as stated, I enjoy the banter as well and a little humor always helps to get through the day. Fourth - the person who originally posted this message did know what the term meant and is probably quite capable of installing and using the technology. It wasn't until 6 or 7 replies in that someone asked what the term meant and from that point on the whole thread just went to hell - I don't see what good came out of it. This in itself wouldn't bother me too much but its not exactly an isolated case. Fifth - Im not even going to bother with your comment regarding my abilities as an admin because im too serious as it has no relevance to one's ability to do anything except, possibly, standup comedy. (OK, so I guess I did bother...). Finally, what really strikes me as interesting is that some of you post more replies complaining about people with stupid questions than there are posts of that nature in the first place. Add to that the humorous or off-topic posts and I think the percentage of posts that are in fact Exchange related and helpful drops to somewhere around 50% or less. Furthermore, some of you seem to think that a simple (and perhaps a stupid) question wastes your time but responding to that question in a rude manner does not - I just don't get it. What bothers me about this is that I have to pour through all of this crap looking for the wisdom of those of you who have already been there and done that which is why I subscribe to these lists in the first place. As I've stated, the fun stuff is OK too but lets at least try to keep most of this stuff relevant. Jeff -Original Message- From: B. van Ouwerkerk [mailto:ouwerkerk92@;zonnet.nl] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's - Please Get over it Although some of these replies sound a bit rude to you, I would still consider some of them to the point. Really.. how would you install/maintain the usage of RBL if you don't even know what it means.. How would you be able to decide which one to use.. At this point Chris Scharff is right.. a bit rude perhaps.. but right.. At some other points he was a bit rude too but I think he was right again.. He made me laugh.. I think you're taking it to serious to be an admin.. It's a hell of a job and humor is the only way to survive. For ppl who aren't admins some of the talk on this or any other list sounds rude.. but I guess it's not that bad at all. Or perhaps I'm just working in this field to long to know how ppl should talk to each other. If the posting has something to do about pets then I'm using the "delete" button.. So even that button has a perpose :-) Have fun, B. At 08:42 24-10-02 -0400, you wrote: >Absolutely - a reply with a link or just a single word is a wonderful >thing if it actually helps and
Multiple SMTP ports
Is it possible to make an Exchange 2000 server listen to multiple smtp ports(i.e. port 25 and 30)? One of our branch offices has there own mail server but the DSL isp block outbound 25 and I need to get around this to get mail to our server. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New SMTP address generation in 5.5
Nope. The "E-mail addresses" option changes the default reply-to address. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Ken.Powell@;clark.wa.gov] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:48 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: New SMTP address generation in 5.5 > > > The only thing that I would add (and I shutter to do so to a > message from > Ed) is that the capitalization of the "SMTP" will make that > their default > reply address. If you are just trying to give them an > additional address, > then do not capitalize "smtp". > > Ken Powell > Systems Administrator > Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS) > Vancouver, Washington > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Voice: (360) 397-6121 x4658 > Fax: (360) 759-6001 > > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:34 PM > To: Exchange 5.5 List > Subject: RE: New SMTP address generation in 5.5 > > You're right that this is not in the feature set of Exchange 5.5; it > doesn't have any automatic feature. As my fellow Jew Andy David [1] > suggests, a low-cost [2] method to do this is through > directory import. > And to help you out tonight [3] I'll tell you that the attribute you > need is "Secondary-Proxy-Addresses"; put the data in the format > "SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > [1] Wait a minute--Andy David's not Jewish. [4] > [2] Free, actually > [3] I'm in a good mood because the Giants won > [4] But I am, at least by blood > > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP > Technical Consultant > hp Services > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral > problems." > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sean Winters > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:36 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: New SMTP address generation in 5.5 > > > We are adding a new email domain to our existing 5.5 org. What is the > easiest way to automagically add the new "@newdomainname.org" to the > existing users addresses? It looks like 2K has an address generation > tool for such things but I can't find anything for 5.5. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks! > > Sean > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Rules
If the rule "doesn't do anything", then there are a number possibilities: 1. Rules don't work. Restart Outlook with a /ClearRules parameter (which doesn't exist!, but there is one similar). 2. Rules work, but nothing has arrived to cause this one to fire. Check to make sure this rule actually fires properly by matching the required input specs. 3. Rules work, this one fires, but it doesn't do what you want. Check what the rule is really doing. Also check for "auto replies to the Internet" which could cause problems. 4. Rules work, this one fires, it does what you want, but only when you are sitting watching it. This is typical with client based rules. AND you must use client based rules, as you are forwarding to an address in your contacts list. Anything else? Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:jacob.busby@;hants.gov.uk] Sent: 24 October 2002 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Rules I've always found rules in Outlook to be somewhat unreliable at best. If you're really planning on forwarding all mail sent to mailbox X to internet address Y, you can set up a custom recipient of address Y (probably hiding it from the GAL) then use Forwarding Address (under Delivery Options in Exchange General) to forward the mail on. Personally I wouldn't advise automatically forwarding mail out to the internet as you can run the risk of a mail loop. Alternatively you could have an Outlook rule file the mail into a separate folder and then from time to time manually Forward Items on the mail in that folder. > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. > I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. > But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my > Recepients > the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I > select > it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my > contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. > Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually > forwarding does??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
You don't have a WMS (Windows Media) server running by any chance, do you? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Great...you checked the network settings. So what? What else is different between the machines that DO work and the machines that DON'T? Is there any Warehouse Management System (WMS) software installed on the the machines that DON'T work? Search the log files on the clients that ARE having a problem and let us see what the errors look like. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I > have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the > client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops > responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network > settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close > outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not > reponding". Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN > IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: no clue why it happens
That is not a normal internal Exchange read receipt. Instead it looks like its a message that Exchange creates in order to inform any e-mail user that they sent in a message with a Read Receipt on it via SMTP and internet delivery. So it looks as though the message got to him via the Internet, not direct on an internal Exchange connector connected system. Cheers, Chris -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:RTener@;midship.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 16:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: no clue why it happens This is very annoying and I cant figure it out maybe you guys\gals can help. Secrectery sends a message out on behalf of my boss she checks the option for a read receipt and she gets one from the system administrator that the message has been delivered and read. Then my boss gets a read receipt in his inbox exactly like the one below. This is a receipt for the mail you sent to "SPECTRUM SHIPPING SERVICES (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 10/24/02 10:53 AM This receipt verifies that the message has been displayed on the recipient's computer at 10/24/02 10:54 AM Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Original-Message-ID: <6A849432ADB7D411B8EC00508B122E47014F1204@LOGISTICS1> Disposition: manual-action/MDN-sent-manually; displayed So from here everything looks fine to me but the one problem is the receipt that my boss receives is from one of our distribution list called Holcim (midship) [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not a clue why he gets the message from this DL when it has nothing to do with the original message that the secratery sent out. The only permissions on this DL is sendas and I checked the secretarys sent items and she did send it out on behalf of my boss. Is there any place that I can check in exchange 5.5 for receipts and see how users get them. I always thought the system adminstrator sent out receipts. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: client connection question
OWA on one and normal client on t'other? -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: client connection question MAPI to one, POP3 to the other one :) -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley@;bankofamerica.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: client connection question Is it possible to set up Outlook to connect to two different mailboxes in different Orgs at the same time? I need to be able to switch back and forth and it is a pain to have to change the profile each timeor maybe a utility to change on the fly. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook Rules
I've always found rules in Outlook to be somewhat unreliable at best. If you're really planning on forwarding all mail sent to mailbox X to internet address Y, you can set up a custom recipient of address Y (probably hiding it from the GAL) then use Forwarding Address (under Delivery Options in Exchange General) to forward the mail on. Personally I wouldn't advise automatically forwarding mail out to the internet as you can run the risk of a mail loop. Alternatively you could have an Outlook rule file the mail into a separate folder and then from time to time manually Forward Items on the mail in that folder. > I have an Exchange 5.5 sp4 w/IMS running on NT 4.0 sp6a. > My email client is Outlook 2000 on a WinXPsp1. > I am trying to set up a rule that will forward an email sent to me. > I can manually forward the incoming email from X. to Y. > But when I set up the rule it does nothing. The X is in my > Recepients > the Y is in my personal contacts. When I am manually forwarding it I > select > it from my contacts. When I am setting up my rule I select it from my > contacts. I don't see any obvious errors but it still doesn't work. > Can anyone explain to me why the rule wouldn't work if manually > forwarding does??? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install software so I was able to stop it that way -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an e-card which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says they need to install software to see the card. The user installs the software which has a EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to everyone in the user's Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do so. The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, "you have an E-Card from". -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login scr ipt for the Outlook Direct Booking.
Erik, Thanks was just what I was looking for Remember 9/11 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:esojka@;NBME.org] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login scr ipt for the Outlook Direct Booking. There's the REG command from the Resource Kit. Put REG.EXE in your logon script directory, and add the following lines into your logon script (modified for Outlook version and desired FB values): %0\..\REG ADD HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v FBPublishRange /t REG_DWORD /d 0x000c /f %0\..\REG ADD HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\9.0\Outlook\Preferences /v FBUpdateSecs /t REG_DWORD /d 0x0384 /f There is no issue nor any error generated if the registry value already exists (i.e. if the logon script is run several times). > -Original Message- > From: John Strongosky [mailto:jstrongo@;sdccd.cc.ca.us] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:58 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or > Windows login scr ipt for the Outlook Direct Booking. > > > Ya, that's what I heard too, that they are going to combine > it with the Tech > Ed conference but hasn't that rumor been going around for a > long time. I do > have the .reg file. I just thought that someone had a script > or .bat or > .cmd file that would do the appropriate checking of the > registry, that they > would share. > > john > > Remember 9/11 > > -Original Message- > From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice@;pacbell.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:15 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login > script for the Outlook Direct Booking. > > > Your last, too. > > Why not just make a .REG file? > > Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP > Technical Consultant > hp Services > "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral > problems." > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of John > Strongosky > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:39 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Cc: 'NT 2000 Discussions' > Subject: Changing the win98 registry via a Novell or Windows login > script for the Outlook Direct Booking. > > >We are in the process of testing Joseph Nuebauer's Outlook Direct > Booking as he outlined in the Windows and .Net magazine (Exchange & > Outlook Administrator Oct 2002) article 26184 and so far we > like it. Now > it comes down to pushing the "FBPUBLISH" registry change to all the > win98 machines that we have as I mistakenly took the default time to > publish of 2 months. Rather than reinvent the wheel, does > anyone have a > script that will do this and be willing to share it with me. > > Also I really enjoyed the MEC this year as it was my first. So much to > see and do and so little time. > > V/r > john > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button
no nedia server or anything. I think the wms spooler is related to windows messaging system. This message comes while I try to shutdown the machine. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button You don't have a WMS (Windows Media) server running by any chance, do you? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt@;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Great...you checked the network settings. So what? What else is different between the machines that DO work and the machines that DON'T? Is there any Warehouse Management System (WMS) software installed on the the machines that DON'T work? Search the log files on the clients that ARE having a problem and let us see what the errors look like. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad@;inovis.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button Shouldn't be. The MAPI spooler is MAPISP32.exe -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -Original Message- > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov@;innerhost.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:26 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > WMS - Windows Messaging Service? > > -Original Message- > From: Anil A.Hangal [mailto:A.Hangal@;akbank.nl] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Outlook hangs when you hit send button > > > Dear list, > > I had posted this question last week but still the problem persists. I > have a EX2k and Win2k Prof and outlook2k (With SP2 applied) at the > client side. For few of the clients, after some time outlook stops > responding when you hit the send buton. I have checked the network > settings and it is no different than the working ones. When I close > outlook through task manager, I get a message, "WMS spooler not > reponding". Any help would be appreciated. > > TIA > > Anil > > > Please note that the former email address with extension > @akbankinternational.nl has been changed to @akbank.nl. > __ > ___ > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and > may be privileged. If you have received it by mistake please > notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message > from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of > this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. > Please note that e-mails are susceptible to change. Akbank > International N.V. (including its group companies)shall not > be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the > information contained in this communication nor for any delay > in its receipt or damage to your system. Akbank International > N.V. (or its group companies)does not guarantee that the > integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that > this communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. > > This outbound message has been checked for all known viruses by KPN > IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. > > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com > Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: ma
RE: Orphaned Delegates?
I am having the same thing happen with Exchange 2k. Does cleansweep work for this also? -Original Message- From: TM [mailto:tm@;smithlyons.ca] Posted At: Friday, October 11, 2002 9:31 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Orphaned Delegates? Subject: Orphaned Delegates? Exch 5.5 w/sp4 on NT4.0 OL2000 UserA assigns UserB delegate permissions with meeting request notification, UserB decides to seek greener pastures and leaves the company, UserB's exchange account gets deleted. Now... anyone sending a meeting request to UserA gets an NDR re: cannot deliver to UserB as the recipient name is not recognized. Even though UserB is no longer a listed delegate for UserA. Seems as though Exch is orphaning delegates and perhaps I will have to actually remove Delegate rights prior to removing exch accounts. Has anyone seen this or found a nice happy way to deal with this? Thx! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
We had one user install it. The good news is that it doesn't hit the GAL, just the actual Contacts, and the user in question only had six of them. -Peter -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 13:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install software so I was able to stop it that way -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an e-card which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says they need to install software to see the card. The user installs the software which has a EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to everyone in the user's Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do so. The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, "you have an E-Card from". -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus?
What is the from address? Bill Lambert Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:DurkeeP@;LanePowell.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? We had one user install it. The good news is that it doesn't hit the GAL, just the actual Contacts, and the user in question only had six of them. -Peter -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc@;noghri.net] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 13:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? Had about 3 of them this morning. My users don't have rights to install software so I was able to stop it that way -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309@;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Durkee, Peter Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else getting this E-card semi virus? It seems to be really more of a self-replicating spam. A user gets an e-card which directs them to a web site to see the card. The site says they need to install software to see the card. The user installs the software which has a EULA allowing the software to send e-cards to everyone in the user's Contacts list. The software then proceeds to do so. The full story is at http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_99760.htm I've stopped about 15 of them today. If you can filter on words in the subject line, you might want to enter the phrase, "you have an E-Card from". -Peter __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Strange Outlook problem
Which is where these messages ended up on my system. It *is* the junk mail filter. -Original Message- From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:cvaglica@;bckpc.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Strange Outlook problem Check your junk mail filters -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:RBHATIA@;AIIM.ORG] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Strange Outlook problem I have a strange problem with Outlook 2000. Whenever I receive any message with the words "Purchase order today" in the body of the email, it automatically goes from my Inbox into my Deleted Items folder. I reviewed my rules and it didn't match any of my rules. Furthermore, I disabled all the rules and it still moves it into the Deleted Items folder. Any ideas ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Try Microdata's Melia. www.microdata.com/melia Free eval copy for 30 days I
believe.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES@;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 6:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
No, Promodag charges for the eval also. >{
I would say look for reporting software rather than trying to use a db.
The reporting software will save you a lot of headaches and look
prettier when you give it to mgmt types.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Posted At: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:36 AM
Posted To: List - Exchange Server List
Conversation: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Then as Ali said use Access. Enjoy! Or if this is a one time shot.
Promodag
does have an eval. that works for 15 days?
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Tony
Thanks For your response. I did have a look at the product a few years
back
for Exchange 5.5. It was ok and if I recall was not cheap. I can't
really
justify the cost as my requirement is very short term.
Thanks
Regards
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse@;hotmail.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 14:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Instead of jumping through all those hoops. Why not by a 3rd party app
to do
that. this one comes to mind but there are many if you look.
www.promodag.com
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Mearns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:03 AM
Subject: Exchange Message Tracking logs
Group
Can any one tell me of a utility or script that I can use to import the
message tracking logs and do minimum sorting of the data (preferably
freeware/shareware).
We can't use Excel because the files are in the region of 80mb and will
be
larger soon. Excel can not handle the amount of records that I am
dealing
with. I tried a freeware utility called CSVDB but was no good for
sorting. I
basically want to be able to manipulate the data. Especially look at the
number of large messages being sent each day.
Any constructive comments would be appreciated.
Exchange 2000 SP2
Windows 2000 SP2
Regards
Marc Mearns
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
J Sainsbury plc (185647 England)
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England)
Registered Offices:
33 Holborn
London
EC1N 2HT
**
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls.swynk.com
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ).
The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
J Sainsbury plc (185647 England)
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England)
Registered Offices:
33 Holborn
London
EC1N 2HT
**
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange@;ls
