RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs?
Stopping Spam by Schwartz Garfinkel O'Reilly ISBN: 156592388x Copyright 1998 It is dated. From the last century. Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? Alright. We do not have any content filtering software on our Exchange server at this time. As most Exchange admins are aware, content filtering software can cause just as many headaches after it's been installed prior to it being installed at all. The best way to prevent unwanted spam seems to be for users NOT to give out their email address over the web (surveys, etc.), not to sign up for newsletters, not to do online ordering, and other obvious things. I'm wondering if there's a document out there that someone has used that explains these things in detail? Basically a How to prevent unwanted email - faq or something like that that I can send out to our users... Any idea? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public free/busy time and admin rights
NT Server 4, SP 6a Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have created a new Exchange 5.5 box, transferred all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone can send mail no problems. The old box was then taken away and removed as a server within the exchange admin screen from the new server. I now have 2 problems. I cannot remotely connect to the exchange server, the error is You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I am a member of Domain Admins and can remotely use tools like Wins Admin and Server Admin Also Sometime when someone gets an email we get the error message Cannot update public free/busy time. Has anyone got any ideas for either problem? The remote admin is the least of the problems. Jason Cordingley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs?
Stopping Spam by Schwartz Garfinkel O'Reilly ISBN: 156592388x Copyright 1998 It is dated. From the last century. Jerry W. Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:59 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: best-practice document explaining how to prevent spam msgs? Alright. We do not have any content filtering software on our Exchange server at this time. As most Exchange admins are aware, content filtering software can cause just as many headaches after it's been installed prior to it being installed at all. The best way to prevent unwanted spam seems to be for users NOT to give out their email address over the web (surveys, etc.), not to sign up for newsletters, not to do online ordering, and other obvious things. I'm wondering if there's a document out there that someone has used that explains these things in detail? Basically a How to prevent unwanted email - faq or something like that that I can send out to our users... Any idea? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association
Contact me offlist then. They're all written in VB. They don't use the AcctMgmt component. Kevin -Original Message- From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 03:29 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association I would like to have a look at them. Which language are they written in? Do they make use of the same AcctMgmt component? -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association I have some routines that will do this, if you need them. You said in a previous message I came across an AcctMgmt COM component in MSDN, which does the same, but was not able to achieve the desired result -Original Message- From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 12:53 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association I do understand that I have to create an NT account before I can populate the Assoc-NT-Account and NT-Security-Descriptor fields of the LDAP entry. With reference to the discussion below: When my application is installed on machine B (domain controller, where Exchange is installed), new NT users are created and associations established properly. When my application is installed on machine C (the member server), I am not able to access machine B's User information. My application makes use of the AcctMgmt CoClass provided by Microsoft. This CoClass exposes interfaces like NTAccountCreate, NTAccountDelete, GetSidFromName etc. We chose to use this component instead of the normal Win32 APIs to retrieve the SID and Security Information, because we couldnt obtain the binary format of Security Descriptor attribute that needs to be populated for NT-Security-Descriptor of LDAP mailbox entry. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 6:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association I'm still not sure I understand what you're asking.You seem to indicate that you think an NT account is created when you create a mailbox. Simply populating the Assoc-Nt-Account DOES NOT create an NT account. You have to create the NT account first then associate it with the mailbox. Your application will access a DC to get a list of NT accounts which you can then associate with a mailbox. It doesn't really matter where the application runs. As long as you're logged into the domain you can access the DC's list of NT users. Kevin -Original Message- From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 12:14 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association Please find answers inline. -Original Message- From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:33 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association A few questions in-line: -Original Message- From: Rajalakshmi Iyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2002 08:20 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT user Exchange mailbox association I am working on a synchronization tool that will synchronize recipient entries between Exchange and any other directory server. Now, consider the case, where my tool needs to add a new mailbox into Exchange, then it also need to associate an NT user on the machine where Exchange is installed with the Exchange mailbox. Take the following scenario: a. Domain A b. Machine B (domain controller) where Exchange is installed. I assume this is the DC for Domain A? - Yes machine B is the domain controller for domain A c. Machine C (in domain A) where my tool is installed. Is this a DC also or a member server? - This is not a domain controller. It is a member server. Is it possible for me sitting on machine C, to create users in Machine B ? Create NT users or mailboxes?? Are you just asking whether you can run a program on Machine C which will be capable of associating NT accounts with mailboxes? The NT accounts will be created on the DC (not on a member server). Therefore, when you attempt to associate an NT account you will get the SID read from your DC. You can create mailboxes on any Exchange server, in any container to which you have access. - I want to create a new mailbox in Exchange. Correspondingly, I need to create an NT user who shall be associated with this mailbox by populating the assoc-nt-account and nt-security-descriptor attributes of the mailbox entry. So will my tool sitting on machine C be able to create an NT user in machine B ? Is some kind of trust relationship required to be established between Machine B and C, for C to be able to create user accounts in B. I came across an AcctMgmt COM component in MSDN, which does the same, but was not able to
RE: Public free/busy time and admin rights
Was the old server the first server in the site? If so, the system folder housing free/busy info is gone. Check Q152960 about rebuilding the site folders. Steve -Original Message-From: Jason Cordingley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public free/busy time and admin rights NT Server 4, SP 6a Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have created a new Exchange 5.5 box, transferred all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone can send mail no problems. The old box was then taken away and removed as a server within the exchange admin screen from the new server. I now have 2 problems. I cannot remotely connect to the exchange server, the error is You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I am a member of Domain Admins and can remotely use tools like Wins Admin and Server Admin Also Sometime when someone gets an email we get the error message Cannot update public free/busy time. Has anyone got any ideas for either problem? The remote admin is the least of the problems. Jason CordingleyList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Outlook : Mail prints one place, Attachments print another!
We have a user who likes to print occasionally to a printer different to his default. eg User has default of PRINTER1. Has an Outlook message with an attachment he wishes to print to PRINTER2. Selects PRINTER2 and message comes out of PRINTER2, but attachment (invoking Word) prints to default printer PRINTER1 Does anyone know how to override this so that attachments come out of the same printer as the one selected for the Outlook message (short of getting the user to change his default printer everytime!) Please respond directly to me and to the list, as this is an important client of ours and it may get ugly!!! Thanks, Tim Rodgers Systems Analyst London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this e-mail is intended for the recipient or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential information that is exempt from disclosure by law and if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any act in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete from your system. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Contact Entry List Problem
Is he by any chance running a Palm Pilot? I've seen issues where older versions of Intelli-synch (I think that's what its called) mark all of a person's contacts as Private and no one else can see them. Check a few of his contacts for the private checkbox. Its located in the very lower right-hand corner of the main contact info page. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Bryan Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Contact Entry List Problem I am experiencing a unique problem with Exchange 5.5 (SP3) and Outlook 2000. A user in our company is running Outlook 2000. He has two administrative assistants that have access (Permissions=Publishing Editor) to his mailbox. When either of the assistants creates a new Contact, after pressing Save Close, the contact immediately disappears from their view of his Contacts. However, on his (the user's) Contact list, the new contact appears. I have no idea what is happening here - any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Bryan Robison Network Administrator Landrum Brown 11279 Cornell Park Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45242 513.530.1228 513.530.1278 - fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav
Trends is always a top product. Here we use Antigen and it's super--it's an Exchange server only product and it rocks I am not sure there is an issue using two different virus products. I'd be interested to see what others have to say. JRiley - Original Message - From: Jesse Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav We currently use Symantec AntiVirus for the Enterprise on our desktop and have had good success to date. Our Exchange server currently does NOT have an Antivirus add-on installed. I would like to see some kind of scanning software on the box for additional protection. Since we already have NAV for the Enterprise, we have a copy of NAV for Exchange as well. This would not cost any additional funds to get this extra protection. However, I am under the impression it's always a good idea to put a different piece of antivirus software on the Exchange server as opposed to the desktop to minimize the amount of time to retrieve updated virus definitions. In other words, if I have both NAV and Trends installed and a virus breaks out, Trends may have the definitions before NAV so we'd be better covered than if we had NAV on our Exchange server. Unfortunately Trends costs about $5000 or so (we have 350 Exchange users). Has anyone used both of these products and can help me determine whether the additional cost is worth the piece of mind? Personally I'd like to see it happen and get Trends but I'm trying to justify the cost as opposed to an already-free solution. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE?
Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come fromit's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even thoughis on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Public free/busy time and admin rights
Any idea where I can find Guidgen.exe. I have MSDN and cant find it. Jason Cordingley -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 09:03 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Public free/busy time and admin rights Was the old server the first server in the site? If so, the system folder housing free/busy info is gone. Check Q152960 about rebuilding the site folders. Steve -Original Message- From: Jason Cordingley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public free/busy time and admin rights NT Server 4, SP 6a Exchange 5.5 SP4 I have created a new Exchange 5.5 box, transferred all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone can send mail no problems. The old box was then taken away and removed as a server within the exchange admin screen from the new server. I now have 2 problems. I cannot remotely connect to the exchange server, the error is You do not have the permissions required to complete the operation. Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS I am a member of Domain Admins and can remotely use tools like Wins Admin and Server Admin Also Sometime when someone gets an email we get the error message Cannot update public free/busy time. Has anyone got any ideas for either problem? The remote admin is the least of the problems. Jason Cordingley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav
The virus vendors have mixed success handling the latest virus. By having multiple vendors, you're hoping at least one of them has the latest def. The down side of course is having to deal with multiple vendors. -Original Message- From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav Trends is always a top product. Here we use Antigen and it's super--it's an Exchange server only product and it rocks I am not sure there is an issue using two different virus products. I'd be interested to see what others have to say. JRiley - Original Message - From: Jesse Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav We currently use Symantec AntiVirus for the Enterprise on our desktop and have had good success to date. Our Exchange server currently does NOT have an Antivirus add-on installed. I would like to see some kind of scanning software on the box for additional protection. Since we already have NAV for the Enterprise, we have a copy of NAV for Exchange as well. This would not cost any additional funds to get this extra protection. However, I am under the impression it's always a good idea to put a different piece of antivirus software on the Exchange server as opposed to the desktop to minimize the amount of time to retrieve updated virus definitions. In other words, if I have both NAV and Trends installed and a virus breaks out, Trends may have the definitions before NAV so we'd be better covered than if we had NAV on our Exchange server. Unfortunately Trends costs about $5000 or so (we have 350 Exchange users). Has anyone used both of these products and can help me determine whether the additional cost is worth the piece of mind? Personally I'd like to see it happen and get Trends but I'm trying to justify the cost as opposed to an already-free solution. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ?? -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
Brings up IIS's default website, our intranet home page. Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ?? -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
Does your browser have the Do not use Proxy setting unchecked -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? Brings up IIS's default website, our intranet home page. Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ?? -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ?
I forgot to finish the statement . for local addresses oops -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? Does your browser have the Do not use Proxy setting unchecked -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? Brings up IIS's default website, our intranet home page. Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ?? -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, vs Message Labs
Will check, going into meeting with message labs? Any comments on Message Labs service? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? Does your browser have the Do not use Proxy setting unchecked -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? Brings up IIS's default website, our intranet home page. Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? So what exactly happens when you type in http://192.168.0.1:8080 ?? -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? I've reinstalled TWICE already??? Same thing,I still go to IIS's default web site? IIS wants and needs control of that interface I know 192.168.0.1 for our intranet, But so does Nav? Can't they live together and just PLAY NICE??? Where and how does Nav for EXCH server up it's interface? Found the actual html in the program files, but it isn't live or working. Copied these files into inetpub, and created a new site, but it still isn't live. Grateful for any ideas? Thanks, Howie What doesn't kill you, just hurts alot Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com -Original Message- From: Marty Richards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE ? reinstall NAV for MSE. Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: SBS and Norton AV for Exchange, what a mess, any ideas PLEASE? Hey, Anybody have any fun trying to get NAV for Exchange running on a SBS box yet? We are actively running both Exchange and IIS off this box for our local intranet. Running 5.55, sp4, NT 4.0 sp6, Proxy 2.0, IIS4 patched. The program installs fine, but your web interface thats supposed to come from it's own webserver at 192.168.0.1:8080, won't come up? Looks like there's a conflict with IIS or MS Proxy, even though is on :8080? Anyone tame this one yet? Need to get SOMETHING going here AV wise at the server level, and have NO BUDGET. Thanks much in advance... Howie Howie Pince Network Administrator A+, MCSE 2000 Higher Dimension Research Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-256-1987 www.superfabric.com http://www.superfabric.com/ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Is it Friday, already? Damn, this New Year is certainly zipping[1] along. Kevin [1] Copyright PKWare -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 15:40 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Send E-Mail From a Public Folder
Hello, Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4, SP6a. Clients = Outlook 2000. I want to set up a Public Folder for a user, give it an SMTP address, and have the user who has permissions to that Public Folder reply to messages sent to that PF with the reply address being [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the reply coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Thanks, Pat *** Exchange Administrator Administrative Information Services Keene State College Keene, NH 03435-2615 603 358-2172 Stoop and you'll be stepped on; stand tall and you'll be shot at. --Carlos A. Urbizo List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution such as BackUp Exec or Evault. Is anyone using Evault? If so how to you like it compared to tape backups? Thanks - Laura List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Public Folder Permissions
I have MS Exchange 5.5 Server installed in multiple sites. I am attempting to create a new Public Folder under All Public Folders. When doing this from MS Outlook, I get an error indicating that I do not have sufficient permissions to perform this operation. I am currently logged onto the computer as the Domain's Administrator. I have also tried this while loged on as the Exchange Server's service account, but I get the same result. Where do I go to view or change the permissions to the All Public Folders object ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Send E-Mail From a Public Folder
Use send as from the O2K client. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax  The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message- From: Piper, Pat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Send E-Mail From a Public Folder Hello, Running Exchange 5.5, SP4 on NT4, SP6a. Clients = Outlook 2000. I want to set up a Public Folder for a user, give it an SMTP address, and have the user who has permissions to that Public Folder reply to messages sent to that PF with the reply address being [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than the reply coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Thanks, Pat *** Exchange Administrator Administrative Information Services Keene State College Keene, NH 03435-2615 603 358-2172 Stoop and you'll be stepped on; stand tall and you'll be shot at. --Carlos A. Urbizo List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Again, that's his opinion. The question was why he has that opinion. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup isn't an answer, it's an opinion. It's not based any technical or factual information. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups what happened to the other 54 times? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:06 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I got it to work 311 times in 2001. William -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I heard this backup s/w called NTBACKUP was nice... -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 17:33 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Evault vs. tape backups We're looking at replacing our ArcServe backup software with a more reliable solution
RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160
Title: Message do you have the q# off the top of your head? dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160 in -V mode optimizer hasmany many extra screens to change/alter thread settings. Grab the Qarticle on optimizing your IMS and see if that corrects your problem. Do you have logging turned on/up in the IMS? IF so, what is it set too. It should be minimum. Max will definitely cause you problems. You should only use MAX settings if your trying to debug a problem on the IMS. In so far as volume goes, if you don't have monitoring software available, the best way is to use PERFMON and use the Total Messages hook listed there. This can be set to give you a 24 hour window of message sent if you wish. Then you can x5 that for you weekly loads. How many staff do you have and how many IMS's? -Original Message-From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160 Server is a Compaq ML580 with 4 Intel Xeon processors. How do I determine the volume of internet messages? Log files? I know we disabled logging on the IMS recently because it was getting huge. We have run the performance optimizer. Is that what you mean by optimize? Or is there another utility? I have not run it with the -v switch but I plan to try and run it again tonight so I can try that if I need to. Thread settings for IMS? Where do I find this? -Original Message-From: Rick Ward - HQ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 12:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160 What kind of hardware(Server brand, CPU, # of CPU's). Is it in the HCL for WIN2K. When I've seen this in the past it generally a result of I/O threads being maxed out or to many locks open at once. Then the JET DB times out in some cases as it stops working for about 1-2 minutes and then you see this error posted in the Event Log. How much volume(total internet messages) are you pumping through the IMS? You might be hitting some limit. Have you run the OPTIMIZE(-v) in verbose mode? Can you send me your thread settings for the IMS? -Rick -Original Message- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 8:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Exchange 5.5 Event ID 1160 Exch. 5.5, SP4 on W2K Adv. Server, SP2. Server has 4GB of memory. We have had two occasions in the last 2 weeks where our IMS stops and can't be restarted. Checking the event viewer, I see lots of Event ID 1160 which says: "Database resource failure error Out of memory occurred in function JTAB_BASE::EcCreateIndex while accessing the database." Q195006 says this can happen on servers with more than 800MB of memory, but it says the problem was fixed in SP3. I checked our version of perfwiz and it is 5.5.2653.23 (SP4). Anyone else seeing this problem? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely weather we're having, eh? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Forget to change a tape? [1] [1] Hi William -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 15:09 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups No backups on Sundays. The other two... well... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:11 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault
RE: Public Folder Permissions
Go to properties on Information Store Site Configuration and choose the Top Level Folder Creation. Andrew Toon Trace Group plc andrewtracegroup.com -Original Message- From: Marc Proulx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 16:11 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Public Folder Permissions I have MS Exchange 5.5 Server installed in multiple sites. I am attempting to create a new Public Folder under All Public Folders. When doing this from MS Outlook, I get an error indicating that I do not have sufficient permissions to perform this operation. I am currently logged onto the computer as the Domain's Administrator. I have also tried this while loged on as the Exchange Server's service account, but I get the same result. Where do I go to view or change the permissions to the All Public Folders object ? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Conflict Messages
I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving these conflict messages in my Inbox. Where are these settings and how can I change them? M List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Conflict Messages
What type of conflict messages? Public folder? Synchronisation conflicts? Are you modifying messages offline in an OST then synchronising later? Need more info... Neil -Original Message- From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:02 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Conflict Messages Subject: Conflict Messages I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving these conflict messages in my Inbox. Where are these settings and how can I change them? M List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server
I have exchange 2K installed with 2 DNS servers all included in Active Directory + NT2K SP2 + EXCH-SP1 Ther is only one Domain working : abc.net and email are of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to install other domains like new.com to have other mail adresses of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do I have to do actually? : add the domain area in A.D.as a primary and secondary area and a SMTP container in the Single Exchange Server 2000? Could You explain exactly the steps to install this? Thanks a lot in advance Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Conflict Messages
Public Folder conflict messages? What sort of conflict message? Misdirected mail from someone in the USMC? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Conflict Messages I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving these conflict messages in my Inbox. Where are these settings and how can I change them? M List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server
Make sure the second domain new.com has MX records pointing to your Exchange 2000 server, and then create a recipient policy in Exchange System Manager for new.com. This new recipient policy should be configured to give your users the new.com SMTP address. Make sure you create a new recipient policy and don't modify the default one. Neil -Original Message- From: SERAFINI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 January 2002 16:35 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server Subject: several domains with 1 Exchange 2000 server I have exchange 2K installed with 2 DNS servers all included in Active Directory + NT2K SP2 + EXCH-SP1 Ther is only one Domain working : abc.net and email are of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want to install other domains like new.com to have other mail adresses of the type [EMAIL PROTECTED] What do I have to do actually? : add the domain area in A.D.as a primary and secondary area and a SMTP container in the Single Exchange Server 2000? Could You explain exactly the steps to install this? Thanks a lot in advance Sent by : [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Conflict Messages
They are multiple edits in a public folder. I just want to find the section that allows me to change who receives the email/notification. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You are so NOT supported. The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
I agree. It's a good thing that developers are always pushing the envelope, trying to find better solutions. More data is being collected, priv.edb's aren't getting smaller, disks are getting larger/faster, networks are getting faster, and disaster recovery will need to become faster and, better yet, unnecessary except in catastrophic circumstances. Can tape technology keep up? I dunno. The first 10 years of my IT career we only did disk-to-disk backups. Times and technology changes. -Original Message- From: Dal Cosby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive http://www.xdrive.com Driveway http://www.driveway.com Maxisafe http://www.maxisafe.com Managed Storage http://www.sgii.com E-store http://www.e-stor.net @Backup http://www.backup.com StoreActive http://www.storactive.net BackUpNet http://www.backupnet.com eVault.com http://www.evault.com MySpace http://www.freediskspace.com -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:20 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Okay thank you. But I was curious if anyone has any experience with Evault and how they liked/disliked it vs. tape backups. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:14 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Ahem. Lovely
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
It looks like the page thinks it is loading from the wwwroot dir and not the proper Exchange Dir. Just reinstall OWA that should fix that page work. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Evault vs. tape backups
You like my phrase ? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:09 Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You are so NOT supported. The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive http://www.freedrive.com X Drive
RE: Conflict Messages
The notification in this case is sent to Owners of the public folder. Neil -Original Message- From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:15 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Conflict Messages Subject: RE: Conflict Messages They are multiple edits in a public folder. I just want to find the section that allows me to change who receives the email/notification. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Love it! ;o) D -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Evault vs. tape backups You like my phrase ? - Original Message - From: Don Ely [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:09 Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You are so NOT supported. The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for
RE: wow
Title: Message actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
What do you have a for a firewall? I am having a very hard time getting a proper scan of your network. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
Is the error not able to login or that you can't see your images? Fred -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Conflict Messages
Any event log details? - Original Message - From: Mike Keane [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:01 Subject: Conflict Messages I am running Exchange 5.5 spk4 on an NT 4.0 Server. I keep receiving these conflict messages in my Inbox. Where are these settings and how can I change them? M List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Still doesn't answer the original question. Arcserve is a running joke on this list, and yet it follows the DR Whitepapers requirements. I used BE, with a Travan Tape drive, which sucks, but it also follows the DR Whitepaper requirements. Hopefully the DR Whitepaper will continue to be a living document. It wasn't all that long ago that Antigen wasn't exactly a recommended MS solution, and therefore not accepted by a whole bunch of Exchange experts. And now look. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You are so NOT supported. The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange
RE: wow
Title: Message Anybody knows how? -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message- From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.zip http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice. -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called Chilton Preview for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Contact Entry List Problem
Thanks for the insight. Unfortunately he is a laptop user - not running a Palm Pilot. I'll check for the Private listing. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Contact Entry List Problem Is he by any chance running a Palm Pilot? I've seen issues where older versions of Intelli-synch (I think that's what its called) mark all of a person's contacts as Private and no one else can see them. Check a few of his contacts for the private checkbox. Its located in the very lower right-hand corner of the main contact info page. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Bryan Robison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:38 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Contact Entry List Problem I am experiencing a unique problem with Exchange 5.5 (SP3) and Outlook 2000. A user in our company is running Outlook 2000. He has two administrative assistants that have access (Permissions=Publishing Editor) to his mailbox. When either of the assistants creates a new Contact, after pressing Save Close, the contact immediately disappears from their view of his Contacts. However, on his (the user's) Contact list, the new contact appears. I have no idea what is happening here - any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Bryan Robison Network Administrator Landrum Brown 11279 Cornell Park Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45242 513.530.1228 513.530.1278 - fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Conflict Messages
Gotcha.How about other notifications? I remember a screen in the Exchange Administrator possibly, that lists a bunch of alerts/notifications that you can set up to email the admin. Does this ring a bell? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
Ok, answered my own question... -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
While ArcCrap might follow the DR whitepapers, it has the problem of say... NOT WORKING ever. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Still doesn't answer the original question. Arcserve is a running joke on this list, and yet it follows the DR Whitepapers requirements. I used BE, with a Travan Tape drive, which sucks, but it also follows the DR Whitepaper requirements. Hopefully the DR Whitepaper will continue to be a living document. It wasn't all that long ago that Antigen wasn't exactly a recommended MS solution, and therefore not accepted by a whole bunch of Exchange experts. And now look. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Here is our validation... In the event something goes wrong and either of us were to call PSS (god forbid), they would most likely tell us DUDE, You are so NOT supported. The DR Whitepapers are pretty specific. There are many ways to backup an Exchange server. There are right ways and there are wrong ways. However, in order to best ensure that you are always able to recover your exchange server without losing any email, one should follow the DR steps that MS outlines and one should practice test restores. I do online backups of my exchange server with NT Backup right now. Mostly because my soon to be ex-boss uses ArcCrap to backup the network. When I migrated them from Send Mail to Exchange I specifically noted that they will NOT install ArcCrap on my Exchange server that I'll use plain old vanilla NT Backup. Do I like using NT Backup, no, not really, but I am re-evaluating our backup solution now so I can put something more reliable to me in place that backups the entire enterprise... D -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
Laura, I presume that if you're doing BLBs with the ArcServe Exchange agent you are also doing on-line Exchange backups through the same agent? If not, the first thing I would do (like now, while planning any other changes) is stop doing the BLBs and start doing the on-line backups of the Directory and Information Store. Karen (Who doesn't really understand why all the anti-ArcServe feeling: I've not had major problems with it and get consistently good backups from which I can restore files, Exchange servers, SQL databases, PDCs etc ...) -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 17:42 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups WOW! Didn't expect the debate either! It's getting fun though. I'll give a little background here: I'm responsible for a small network (6 NT4 servers and approx 100 workstations). This is my first IT job so my experience is limited to the 2 years I've been at this company. I inherited the current setup which is ArcServe 2000 on 2 servers; each server has an older model Exabyte tape drive backing up to 8mm tapes, and one server doing brick-level backups of Exchange. Yes I've been reading how bad they are and why and now have my boss convinced that we need to change our backup method which is why I'm doing research and asking questions of those with the experience. I don't want to replace our current solution with new tape drives and software if that technology is fading and giving way to something like Evault or CommVault Galaxy. And I don't want to base my decision on a recommendation from an eager salesman. Always looking for growth and knowledge wherever I can find it, there's a lot to wade through out there. Thanks again - Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout
RE: wow
Title: Message I do thats how i run our setup look thru microsoft.com or slipstick for adminpack.exe the readme shows how -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message Damn, I have not seen that program in YEARS. I didn't know it was still around.In the first versions of OL, there was no preview pane and you needed this to do preview. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
You are doing the right thing. You should question. If somebody didn't, we wouldn't have choices. -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:42 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups WOW! Didn't expect the debate either! It's getting fun though. I'll give a little background here: I'm responsible for a small network (6 NT4 servers and approx 100 workstations). This is my first IT job so my experience is limited to the 2 years I've been at this company. I inherited the current setup which is ArcServe 2000 on 2 servers; each server has an older model Exabyte tape drive backing up to 8mm tapes, and one server doing brick-level backups of Exchange. Yes I've been reading how bad they are and why and now have my boss convinced that we need to change our backup method which is why I'm doing research and asking questions of those with the experience. I don't want to replace our current solution with new tape drives and software if that technology is fading and giving way to something like Evault or CommVault Galaxy. And I don't want to base my decision on a recommendation from an eager salesman. Always looking for growth and knowledge wherever I can find it, there's a lot to wade through out there. Thanks again - Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in their original thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 7:40 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups I realize it's friday, and the caffiene levels aren't where they should be..but i'm Curious, that's a generic statement to make don't you think? you say No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. but don't go on to say as to why?... so, i guess the question I'm asking is .. why wouldn't you trust such a setup for Exchange?, but yet as one of the links you post, you post evault :o) curious minds want to know(or at least mine does) Dal -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:18 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Thank you, William! -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 5:31 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Did we digress again? No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. If you like this kind of storage, here are some others to consider: Connected http://www.connected.com FreeDrive
RE: wow
Title: Message I am right in this. You can use the service pack2 for outlook 2000 to lock down the client, add a registry key to enable security, use a public folder called "outlook security settings" and use an outlook form in that folder to specify who can open what attachments trust me it works.. i do it here. http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
/3GB switch
Hey all, I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB' switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800 users. We had a few issues with messages that got delayed in sending out to the internet, it looks like they were getting stuck in the SMTP connector. Thanks for any help! Andrew K Sharicz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q263297 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q290499 -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav
We are also using Antigen and it DEFINITELY ROCKS!!! We previously had McAfee installed on the Exchange box. Before removing McAfee we ran a complete scan and had it clean the server. We installed Antigen, ran the scan, and found 800 viruses that McAfee had missed. I think you'll be very satisfied with the product. -Original Message- From: John Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav Trends is always a top product. Here we use Antigen and it's super--it's an Exchange server only product and it rocks I am not sure there is an issue using two different virus products. I'd be interested to see what others have to say. JRiley - Original Message - From: Jesse Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:06 AM Subject: Antivirus add-ons for Exchange 5.5 - trends/nav We currently use Symantec AntiVirus for the Enterprise on our desktop and have had good success to date. Our Exchange server currently does NOT have an Antivirus add-on installed. I would like to see some kind of scanning software on the box for additional protection. Since we already have NAV for the Enterprise, we have a copy of NAV for Exchange as well. This would not cost any additional funds to get this extra protection. However, I am under the impression it's always a good idea to put a different piece of antivirus software on the Exchange server as opposed to the desktop to minimize the amount of time to retrieve updated virus definitions. In other words, if I have both NAV and Trends installed and a virus breaks out, Trends may have the definitions before NAV so we'd be better covered than if we had NAV on our Exchange server. Unfortunately Trends costs about $5000 or so (we have 350 Exchange users). Has anyone used both of these products and can help me determine whether the additional cost is worth the piece of mind? Personally I'd like to see it happen and get Trends but I'm trying to justify the cost as opposed to an already-free solution. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Conflict Messages
If you are just an OWNER, you won't get the conflict messages. You get the if you are a Folder Contact for the folder. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Believe nothing because it is written in books. Believe nothing because wise men say it is so. Believe nothing because it is religious doctrine. Believe it only because you yourself know it to be true. -- Buddha -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Conflict Messages The notification in this case is sent to Owners of the public folder. Neil -Original Message- From: Mike Keane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 11 January 2002 17:15 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Conflict Messages Subject: RE: Conflict Messages They are multiple edits in a public folder. I just want to find the section that allows me to change who receives the email/notification. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message we use NAVSME to strip the same stuff, but my point is that you can use this method as well. -Original Message-From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Yep...we do that here too. Although we still use Mail Essentials to quarantine all executable attachments, and all audio and video file types (I see the craziest stuff - but my (L)users don't! ). -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:06 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow I am right in this. You can use the service pack2 for outlook 2000 to lock down the client, add a registry key to enable security, use a public folder called "outlook security settings" and use an outlook form in that folder to specify who can open what attachments trust me it works.. i do it here. http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this
RE: wow
Title: Message Actually Michaelis correct, we have this solution already in place, no third party products. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, (i) please do not read or disclose to others, (ii) please notify the sender by reply mail, and (iii) please delete this communication from your system. Failure to follow this process may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.
RE: /3GB switch
apply sp2 -Mensaje original- De: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Viernes, 11 de Enero de 2002 03:07 p.m. Para: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Asunto: /3GB switch Hey all, I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB' switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800 users. We had a few issues with messages that got delayed in sending out to the internet, it looks like they were getting stuck in the SMTP connector. Thanks for any help! Andrew K Sharicz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: SMTP
Believe your Netscape messaging server with Netscape (or possibly other) LDAP directory should be able to do so. Llanos Carlos wrote: Greetings,Here is my situation:We have a single domain xxx.edu. We have Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 SP6a (MAIL). All the staff and faculty are in this host. We have all the students in a Iplanet (Netscacpe) 4.x on Solaris 6 (STUDENT).We are curently using Sendmail on an ALPHA (Digital UNIX) server with an ALIAS file to redirect all our emails to the related host (MAIL or STUDENT).We would like to have a SMTP host with LDAP to redirect our mail to the related host. This way we don't have to keep up with the ALIASES file. Everything will be done automatically thru LDAP.Do you guys know of any solution to accomplish this?Thanks in advance for all your responses.Carlos LlanosSystems ManagerWhittier CollegeList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 01/11/02 11:46:31 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Evault vs. tape backups
doesn't really understand why all the anti-ArcServe feeling: I've not had major problems with it and get consistently good backups from which I can restore files, Exchange servers, SQL databases, PDCs etc It's their support, IMHO. ARCserve worked fine for me, too, as recently as 6.61. Back when Cheyenne Software was independent, they had good support. Then CA bought Cheyenne, and support went downhill. Lately CA has been sounding like they are building up their support infrastructure. I hope it's working, but I'm a happy Veritas customer nowadays. - Bob -Original Message- From: Lynn Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Laura, I presume that if you're doing BLBs with the ArcServe Exchange agent you are also doing on-line Exchange backups through the same agent? If not, the first thing I would do (like now, while planning any other changes) is stop doing the BLBs and start doing the on-line backups of the Directory and Information Store. Karen (Who doesn't really understand why all the anti-ArcServe feeling: I've not had major problems with it and get consistently good backups from which I can restore files, Exchange servers, SQL databases, PDCs etc ...) -Original Message- From: Laura Swartout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 17:42 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups WOW! Didn't expect the debate either! It's getting fun though. I'll give a little background here: I'm responsible for a small network (6 NT4 servers and approx 100 workstations). This is my first IT job so my experience is limited to the 2 years I've been at this company. I inherited the current setup which is ArcServe 2000 on 2 servers; each server has an older model Exabyte tape drive backing up to 8mm tapes, and one server doing brick-level backups of Exchange. Yes I've been reading how bad they are and why and now have my boss convinced that we need to change our backup method which is why I'm doing research and asking questions of those with the experience. I don't want to replace our current solution with new tape drives and software if that technology is fading and giving way to something like Evault or CommVault Galaxy. And I don't want to base my decision on a recommendation from an eager salesman. Always looking for growth and knowledge wherever I can find it, there's a lot to wade through out there. Thanks again - Laura -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Didn't want this to get into the debate it's becoming. but: Although people's current environment is being taken care of in the most reliable manner. that's fine for right now, they've not had any problems, so they tend to become comfortable/complacent. I respect Don's and William's opinions', but every once in awhile I (as well as others i'm sure) require validation as to how they came to those opinions. and that's was the intent here. you are comfortable in your current environment, that may or may not be alright 6 months down the road. we don't know what Laura's current setup is, or what it is going to be and she asked the question. and just because the premier gurus' of the forum here, state it is or is not a good idea. I just want to know why? I'm sure it's based on a lot of experience, a Lot of luck, and proactive administration. but with anything, there's always room for growth either in knowledge or software. Thought it was a pretty simple and generic question actually -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yeah, and I'm pretty sure William mentioned that... No, I wouldn't trust such a setup for Exchange. Other file data, perhaps. NTBackup on Windows2000 backs up to disk. He then provided links to various sites. It wouldn't and shouldn't be a trusted setup. Those links give various options I would imagine. I haven't read them nor will I as I know how I backup exchange. Which is in the most reliable manner. D -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:00 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups Yabbut the question was what's wrong with the non-tape solutions. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Evault vs. tape backups He posted links to all the various vendors so one could go to each one and evaluate how their product works with exchange and see the error in
Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
I have attempted a reinstall. It seems like it is caused by the fact that it is running on Windows 2000/IIS5.0 as I cannot replicate the problem on a nt 4.0 box. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem It looks like the page thinks it is loading from the wwwroot dir and not the proper Exchange Dir. Just reinstall OWA that should fix that page work. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem
I have it running all over, on this same platform? Do you have any other odd things on the server? could you uninstall IIS, rip out the Dirs and start from a Virgin state, per say? It feels like something is wrong in the redirection of the folders to me. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:50 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem I have attempted a reinstall. It seems like it is caused by the fact that it is running on Windows 2000/IIS5.0 as I cannot replicate the problem on a nt 4.0 box. -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem It looks like the page thinks it is loading from the wwwroot dir and not the proper Exchange Dir. Just reinstall OWA that should fix that page work. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem TTT... Anyone got any ideas? Here is the actual page... Look at what it does www.legislature.state.tn.us/exchange with the / at the end everything is okie dokie -Original Message- From: Alan Osborne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: OWA Exchange 5.5 problem If the slash at the end of the address is not present the page does not work. The OWA components are running on a IIS 5.0 (2000 server). Any Ideas? Example: www.storms.com/exchange NO Workie www.storms.com/exchange/ Works It should be noted that without the / the page partially comes up without images... List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
Only if you spec it right. G -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message I just reread this posting and I now see the confusion. The original post referred to a 3rd party solution for disabling the Outlook security "Feature" that blocks user's from accessing certain types of attachments. There is a MS supported solution for disabling this "Feature" and that is what Michael referenced in his notes. We are not saying that there is a MS solution for stripping attachments. -Original Message-From: Dahl, Peter Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:29 PMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: RE: wow Actually Michaelis correct, we have this solution already in place, no third party products. -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:58 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message-From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message-From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.ziphttp://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ "This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice." -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called "Chilton Preview" for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: wow
Title: Message That is not controlled through Exchange. It is controlled via a registry setting on every client. The Public folder is merely used to contain the form that every client must download. Trust me. I have done that as well. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow I am right in this. You can use the service pack2 for outlook 2000 to lock down the client, add a registry key to enable security, use a public folder called outlook security settings and use an outlook form in that folder to specify who can open what attachments trust me it works.. i do it here. http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/esecup/admin.htm -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow No, he is wrong. You cant control attachment types in Exchange regardless of the version of it or Outlook. You need a 3rd party product such as an Exchange AV system or content filter software to block attachments at the Exchange server. -Original Message- From: Eugene Pesochin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 9:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow Anybody knows how? -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow actually, if youre running Outlook 2000 and Exchange, you can control thru exchange what attachments to open. Therefore, you can allow yourself to open exe and lnk files if you wanted to -Original Message- From: Scott Erwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: wow How about this one? http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/osp.zip http://members.tripodnet.nl/lcroft/ This patch is intended for users with MS Outlook 98 / 2000 and Service Pack 2, which includes a 'security fix' (called a security feature or enhancement by Microsoft) blocking all incoming attachments with the extensions like EXE and LNK. The problem: you can't undo the security fix, and you won't be able to open, save or forward (for example) a URL attachment after installing the service pack! Therefore, I wrote the Outlook Insecurity Patch. This patch will give you control about which file extensions will be blocked, or not. The patch will update the outllib.dll in your office folder and disable the security on specific extensions by your choice. -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:26 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: wow anyone see this? Free Email Previewer/Screener For Outlook I recently went a few rounds with Microsoft Tech Support on the Outlook 2000 security patch which disallows receiving certain types of files Their response, of course, was that there was no way to fix it, but I COULD upgrade to Office XP to get a version that allows me to change those settings. No surprise, to override a Microsoft caused issue, I just have to give them more money. HOWEVER, there is another solution. A handy utility called Chilton Preview for Outlook gives you a nifty preview screen that allows you to retrieve any enclosures that Microsoft says you cannot get. I recommend it to anyone who has applied this patch, and wants to get to their enclosures. You can find it at http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Peaks/8392/ Michael Ross Network Analyst 2 Panduit Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving isn't for you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
You should be fine without them. They wanted their Visio docs huh? -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
That's a good one as well! So, was it Visio? -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions I took the philosophy block about everything and open up what they yell about. Thanks. Cris -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions You should be fine without them. They wanted their Visio docs huh? -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Setting up a ListServer
http://www.ifla.org/I/training/listserv/lists.htm - Original Message - From: Brenda Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 17:26 Subject: Setting up a ListServer Hello: Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer or where I could go to find some information on setting one up? Thank you! BA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting up a ListServer
www.lyris.com -Original Message- From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting up a ListServer Hello: Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer or where I could go to find some information on setting one up? Thank you! BA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
All I need is a system and I mean any system that will not break with 40 users. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Setting up a ListServer
www.lyris.com. -Original Message- From: Brenda Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Setting up a ListServer Hello: Can anyone tell me how to setup a ListServer or where I could go to find some information on setting one up? Thank you! BA List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
Any system could do that. As long as it was setup correctly. I Still get calls to work on a Msmail with SMTP gateway server. That thing has been running now for since 95?, When ever I built it? Same hardware, same software. Keeps on chugging with out any problems. Has about 150+ users. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited All I need is a system and I mean any system that will not break with 40 users. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Customize over size limit message
Did you always listen to what your Dad told you ;-). You could re-eng Exchange (actually not much of it) but you would have to face the following questions: 1) Would MS support your version of Exchange. 2) Would you not be likely to blame any problems on your updated version. 3) Is it really worthit? IMHO the answer to all three questions is NO. So, a couple of years ago I looked for a different solution. For the people that really couldn't manage to deal with the standard messages, you intercept the oversize, non-deliveries, whatever and edit them to your design. This could run as a service on the Exchange server (like Antigen) or as an event script on mailboxes or as an Event-driven script. I have to say I never completed the work but we got as far as editing all oversize messages. It's actually quite easy to identify them. I'm happy to share the code if anyone wants to take this forward. Kevin -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 10 January 2002 23:17To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Customize over size limit message When I was a an awkward teenager (you know the type) my Dad would always say 'Nothing's Impossible if you set your mind to it' [1] so with that attitude you could say that reverse engineering MS Exchange is possible! [2] [1] Actually I would respond "You can't strike a match on jelly" [3] [2] Just not by me! [3] and boy did he try - he even tried freezing it - to no avail! -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 11:59 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Customize over size limit message Are you holding out? ;-) -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:00 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Customize over size limit message You're asking ME! -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 11:56 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Customize over size limit message unless you want to reverse engineer then hack the Exchange server code How might I go about that? -Original Message-From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:56 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Customize over size limit message Pay MS loadsamoney Otherwise - No - unless you want to reverse engineer then hack the Exchange server code Simon -Original Message-From: Mike Cosca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 11 January 2002 11:54 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Customize over size limit message Is anyone aware of a way to customize the over the size limit warning message. EX 5.5 sp4 Thanks, Mike CoscaList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
Wow, that is a big generalization. You can also say any system can support 1,000,000 users if set up properly. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited Any system could do that. As long as it was setup correctly. I Still get calls to work on a Msmail with SMTP gateway server. That thing has been running now for since 95?, When ever I built it? Same hardware, same software. Keeps on chugging with out any problems. Has about 150+ users. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited All I need is a system and I mean any system that will not break with 40 users. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited
If you Qualify that with something like the 1,000,000 users were only going to access the server once in the life time of the server. =] I like you, You are always picking on everyone, but you do it and make such great points. Thanks for always being here and being you. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited Wow, that is a big generalization. You can also say any system can support 1,000,000 users if set up properly. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited Any system could do that. As long as it was setup correctly. I Still get calls to work on a Msmail with SMTP gateway server. That thing has been running now for since 95?, When ever I built it? Same hardware, same software. Keeps on chugging with out any problems. Has about 150+ users. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:35 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited All I need is a system and I mean any system that will not break with 40 users. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited But, but, it is unbreakable?? And there email product can do 1,000,000 users with out problem? We all need 1,000,000 user email solutions??? Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: John Allhiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Ellison's unbreakable Email platform revisited From Vulnwatch.org: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VulnWatch] 8 NGSSoftware security advisories NGSSoftware has listed some security advisories. There are no details behind these descriptive names but given the past history of the author, David Litchfield, this should be taken as a heads up of what is soon to be released in detail. http://www.nextgenss.com/davidlitchfield.html January 2002 Remote Compromise in Oracle 9 Database Servers January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Buffer Overflow in Oracle 9iAS (Reports) January 2002 Globals.jsa access in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Source access of JSP Translation files in Oracle 9iAS (II) January 2002 Oracle 9iAS Apache Defaults January 2002 DoS in Oracle 9iAS January 2002 Microsoft's Back Office authentication by-pass List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: /3GB switch
imho, the /3GB switch causes problems on standard Win2000 servers. Someone sent me a MS doc talking about why you wouldn't want to run this switch on a production box - I could probably find it if anyone is interested. /3Gb seems to be much happier on Win2000 Advanced server though, it actually does something. Has anyone persuaded any version of Windows to use more than 3.1Gb of memory? Cheers, Marty -Original Message- From: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 5:07 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: /3GB switch Hey all, I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB' switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800 users. We had a few issues with messages that got delayed in sending out to the internet, it looks like they were getting stuck in the SMTP connector. Thanks for any help! Andrew K Sharicz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: /3GB switch
It not the /3GB switch meant for advanced servers. I do not know anyone using a standard serving but runs OK on AdvServer and E2KE. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Sharicz, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: /3GB switch Hey all, I have a simple question: Does anyone know if running without the '/3GB' switch in the boot.ini on an Exchange 2000 server with 2GB of RAM could cause message delivery problems? The Virtual memory error is showing up every hour in the event log. The Server is E2k SP1, with about 800 users. We had a few issues with messages that got delayed in sending out to the internet, it looks like they were getting stuck in the SMTP connector. Thanks for any help! Andrew K Sharicz List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
So how do you get email? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions I took the philosophy block about everything and open up what they yell about. Thanks. Cris -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:13 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions You should be fine without them. They wanted their Visio docs huh? -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
cartoon, from MAD, right ? - Original Message - From: Ellery July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 18:29 Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
I understand that - just not the context. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions cartoon, from MAD, right ? - Original Message - From: Ellery July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 18:29 Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
Yes! -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions cartoon, from MAD, right ? - Original Message - From: Ellery July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 18:29 Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions
I'm tired... -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions I understand that - just not the context. ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:45 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions cartoon, from MAD, right ? - Original Message - From: Ellery July [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 18:29 Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions OK Martin what is spy vs spy mean? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 5:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Spy vs Spy??? -Original Message- From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Why would you block vs? There are no know Virii with vs extensions and vs is not normally executable?? ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 1:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Quick input - is there any reason to block vs? extensions Mgmt just removed the block on vs? extensions in my email virus checking software. Does anybody know any reason why this is dangerous? Thanks, Cris List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly. This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week. We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. Other than that, we have nothing else running on that server. Has anyone experienced this problem? Would appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
What do you mean Dismount? What version and SP of Exchange? Any event log errors? -Original Message- From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:55 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown Subject: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly. This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week. We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. Other than that, we have nothing else running on that server. Has anyone experienced this problem? Would appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get. Thanks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
