RE: NDR
How have we received mail from these people and are unable to reply? -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 21:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Re: NDR Sounds like you have the answer - what was the question? Steve Spittal wrote: Forgive me if this is an of topic posting. We use exchange 5.5 sp4 with content filter Baltimore's mail sweeper which has all mail forwarded to it from exchange. Content filtering machine has routing of *.* which should force an MX lookup through external DNS and send the mail. We have now on two recent occasions received mail that users have tried to reply to, and they receive an NDR stating smtp; 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay [EMAIL PROTECTED] this clearly means that no MX record exists for the domain. Which I have confirmed via nslookup. Can anyone serve up any clues? Thanks ** This message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Further, Pharmagene makes every effort to keep its network free from viruses including the scanning of incoming and outgoing mail. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as Pharmagene can take no responsibility for any computer virus that might be transferred by way of this e-mail. Pharmagene plc 2 Orchard Road, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 5HD, UK. Registered in England Wales under company number 03355618. ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/12/02 14:27:19 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Title: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
how do you automatically update meeting attendees.
Good morning, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 sp4 How does a person automatically read accepted/declined/tentative messages from meetings. I have a user that schedules hundreds of meeting a week and doesn't really want to open all of these messages. She still is interested in seeing how many accepted, declined or are tentative so that she can set up. This information does not seem to be updated unless the accepted/declined/tentative messages are opened. Thanks for your help. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems eMAIL Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
Title: Message I would agree with that to an extent. The problem is that you would have to block internet mail for most people to keep from getting flooded. I don't mind the 3rd party tool. It works great and is very flexible. Exchange 5.5 is just too low on extras -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:18 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange? Do you use something else to control it? thanks for your input. Nelson W. Siqueiros ADCS Inc. 858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big. PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam control Hello, What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful. thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: NDR
Because you don't need an MX record to send anything. Just receive. Try it out. Set up a IIS SMTP server or anything. It will work. If your company wants to be picky, then you can do a reverse-DNS lookup on all incoming mail. But that just means they have to have their DNS working, and be able to resolve the IP to the hostname for the mail server, they still don't need an MX record. Hope this helps. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Steve Spittal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:45 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NDR How have we received mail from these people and are unable to reply? -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 21:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Re: NDR Sounds like you have the answer - what was the question? Steve Spittal wrote: Forgive me if this is an of topic posting. We use exchange 5.5 sp4 with content filter Baltimore's mail sweeper which has all mail forwarded to it from exchange. Content filtering machine has routing of *.* which should force an MX lookup through external DNS and send the mail. We have now on two recent occasions received mail that users have tried to reply to, and they receive an NDR stating smtp; 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay [EMAIL PROTECTED] this clearly means that no MX record exists for the domain. Which I have confirmed via nslookup. Can anyone serve up any clues? Thanks ** This message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Further, Pharmagene makes every effort to keep its network free from viruses including the scanning of incoming and outgoing mail. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as Pharmagene can take no responsibility for any computer virus that might be transferred by way of this e-mail. Pharmagene plc 2 Orchard Road, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 5HD, UK. Registered in England Wales under company number 03355618. ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/12/02 14:27:19 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
Title: Message Why would you suggest NONE??? We use Praetor from CMS Connect, and have been very happy. It is great for many other uses too, including redirectors, auto responses, relay blocking, etc. www.cmsconnect.com -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:36 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big. PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message-From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: spam control Hello, What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful. thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
OWA
Can OWA on Exchange 2000 allow shared diaries and shared mailbox's? Jason Cordingley List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Reply to Address
User display name is not blank. It is set for her First name and Last name ( like Parker, Deborah). -Original Message- From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:30 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Reply to Address What does the user's Display Name say, or is it blank? It should not be blank. -Original Message- From: Fatmi, Saida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] = I have configure all users' mailbox so the reply to box will their domain email address. One of my users reply to address showing as x.400 address. . ---Original Message- From: /O=Engineering Tech Com/OU=ETO/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DEBORAHP Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:20 AM To: 'Randall Foote' Subject: RE: Lean Delivery Positions The From address should show [EMAIL PROTECTED] The have checked her mailbox and the reply to addess is set for the domain address. I just dont know how outlook is picking up that address. Can someone help me on this? Thanks in advanced!!! S This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
queues
our exchange server is seeing 900+ things "stuck" in the queues for remote exchange servers... if i sot the MTA and restart ithey do to 0, but then they creep back up to 800-900-1000... ideas? nothing within exchange has been changed.. i am the only admin and i havent changed a thing. exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Future plans 2
Title: Message I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Slowing Outlook Vbscript macro
I've got a macro (Outlook XP) that does some Sendkeys - but I need to pause between key presses. If this was a Wscript VBS I would do Sendkeys (%f) Wscript.sleep 1000 Sendkeys (o) This doesn't work within Outlook. Pointers? This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Double-take failover
Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Slowing Outlook Vbscript macro
This is something I have used in Excel. It was cut from MS help for VB applications. Don't know if it will work for what you are doing, but worth a try. ' we have to wait while the previous command runs. PauseTime = 5 ' Set duration. Start = Timer ' Set start time. Do While Timer Start + PauseTime DoEvents' Yield to other processes. Loop Steve Rosco [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Slowing Outlook Vbscript macro I've got a macro (Outlook XP) that does some Sendkeys - but I need to pause between key presses. If this was a Wscript VBS I would do Sendkeys (%f) Wscript.sleep 1000 Sendkeys (o) This doesn't work within Outlook. Pointers? This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Unable to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2 K2
Title: Message One of my guys figured out the problem. The user's busy/free data had become corrupt. We fixed the problem by starting outlook from the Run box with "outlook.exe /cleanfreebusy" and that took care of it. Hopefully recording this here will save someone else a headache! -Original Message-From: Steve Frank Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:47 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Unable to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2 K2 Correct. I cannot locate anything that would indicate she's set up differently. As a complete last ditch I suppose I can recreate her account and see if the problem goes away, but that would involve exporting her mail, resetting up Win2K permissions, and it wouldn't tell me what was done wrong with it so I could prevent it in the future. :-) -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:03 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Unable to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2 K2 When you say no other users experience this problem, are they all set up the same way this user is? -Original Message-From: Steve Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:41 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Unable to access busy/free in Exchange 2K w/Outllook 2K and 2K2 Hiya! We have a problem user on our network and she's using Outlook 2K (I'm using Outlook 2K2). Her busy/free data is not available so if I want to invite her to a meeting, her data isn't showing up. In a new calendar invite she ends up with "No information. No free/busy information could be retrieved." I'm pretty unclear about the details on how this works underneath. We're using Exchange 2000 SP1, no other users experience this problem. It's like her machine is not uploading her busy/free data, and I don't know how to make it do that. I've recreated her profile on her local machine just as a quick fix, but it has made no different. She doesn't get any error messages in her Outlook saying she cannot update the busy/free data, which is what I typically find fixes for on support.microsoft.com. Can anyone offer me some toubleshooting hints? Thanks in advance! List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Monitoring Exchange user connectivity via SNMP
http://www.wtcs.org/snmp4tpc/snmp4nt.htm Try this one. John M. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Monitoring Exchange user connectivity via SNMP Bad link? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 17:02 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Monitoring Exchange user connectivity via SNMP WWW.SNMP4NT.COM You will need to install the SNMP service on the server, load the correct MIBS (Exchange MIB/PERFMIB) to pick off the counters (you will need to compile the MIBs to generate your OID's), then build your MRTG configuration file. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: Dan Yarrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 7:22 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Monitoring Exchange user connectivity via SNMP Importance: High Hi Everyone I'm looking for some advice. I want to graph user connectivity via SNMP using MRTG (http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/) Can anyone give me any hints on how to achieve this ? Cheers Dan Yarrow NT/2000 Systems Administrator Central Queensland University Information Technology Division Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: +61 7 4923 2151 Fax +61 7 4930 9254 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Strange problem with Outlook XP and Exchange2000
Title: Message One of our users PCs decided to implode last week, so upon replacing the PC, we installed office XP as per our corporate standard. When setting up the users outlook profile we encountered the system asking for Username, Domain name and password. When you enter the correct username domain and password, outlook just pops it back up again asking for the details, irf you cancel the name and server name gets underscored, then when you try to finnish setting up the profile it asks for the username and password again. The user is logged onto the domain,you get the 3 bar logon, and login scripts run, and everything else can be accessed over the network. Any help would be appreciated, Thanks Graeme List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I concur there are no issues with using it in my test lab what so ever. The issue looks to be that the #2 server doesn't have a user account for the domain? Is the issue that when you reboot the 2nd machine and go to do an admin login? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 17:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: queues
What type of connector is between the two servers? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 16:00 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: queues our exchange server is seeing 900+ things stuck in the queues for remote exchange servers... if i sot the MTA and restart ithey do to 0, but then they creep back up to 800-900-1000... ideas? nothing within exchange has been changed.. i am the only admin and i havent changed a thing. exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
Title: RE: Double-take failover I have never even heard of it. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Slowing Outlook Vbscript macro
Thank Patrica and Steve - it's ugly but it works -Original Message- From: Steve Rosco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] This is something I have used in Excel. It was cut from MS help for VB applications. Don't know if it will work for what you are doing, but worth a try. ' we have to wait while the previous command runs. PauseTime = 5 ' Set duration. Start = Timer ' Set start time. Do While Timer Start + PauseTime DoEvents' Yield to other processes. Loop This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Title: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Not unless something has changed. Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail only. Unless someone else can think of something, I don't know of a way to accomplish this without Rules. Possibly, if a server-side rule could be configured, it would be easy enough to log in to his mailbox with another client and accomplish that, but I don't know if a server rule will be able to accomplish this. It might take a client-side rule, which he has already stated can't be done because this individual is using OWA. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox But does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail? -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193
Chris and everyone else, I have been encountering the same problem (as Chris V.) The first error we get in the Event Log is MSExchangeIS (395) Unexpected Win32 error: 0x79 The next one is...Event ID 125 MSExchangeIS (395) Unable to create the log. The drive may be read-only, out of disk space, misconfigured, or corrupted. Error -1022. Next Event error...Event ID An error occurred while writing to the database log file. Attempting to stop the Microsoft Exchange Information Store. This is a new Exchange server. We added this new exchange server in order to move all of the mailboxes off of the old one (to be retired). Our exchange db is very small and we have plenty of disc space. We have received these errors on 3 different occassions within the past 2 weeks. Upon receiving the first one, I checked this forum and implemented the suggestion to exclude the exchsrvr directories in the anti virus software (We have GroupShield and NetShield on this server). We have received this error twice since then. The last suggestion we have not tried yet is Todd Wood's posting in which he spoke to Microsoft and they recommended rebuilding the server. Anyone have any suggestions?? Thanks Robert Gagne List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Title: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In bound ONLY You would need to setup a rule to have the outbound from that user to work -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox But does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
both PDC and BDC are running nt server 4.0 SP 6 when failover occurs, I can see the #2 server lose all connections(ie red x over the 4 servers running double-take) from the PDC server manager...network path cannot be found(both #1 and #2 servers) when I try to reboot the #2 server with the #1 server off of the network, I no longer can access the domain, and the only way I have found to get back in is to remove it and re-enter the domain. Jeff -Original Message- From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover I concur there are no issues with using it in my test lab what so ever. The issue looks to be that the #2 server doesn't have a user account for the domain? Is the issue that when you reboot the 2nd machine and go to do an admin login? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 17:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
umm, ok (note to self) but since in this instance I am stuck with itanyone have any advice? Jeff -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
You should call nsi support. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover umm, ok (note to self) but since in this instance I am stuck with itanyone have any advice? Jeff -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This Email together with any attachments is confidential, intended for only the recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this Email in error, or are not the named recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email or any attachments is strictly prohibited. Please immediately notify the sender at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and delete this Email and any attachments from your computer. You should not retain, copy or use this Email or any attachments for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of the contents to any person. Thank You. Kleinberg, Kaplan, Wolff Cohen, P.C. reserves the right to monitor all Email communications through its networks. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Anti Virus MAPI hammering the store.exe process
not messy at all. Rather clean. John M. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:40 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti Virus MAPI hammering the store.exe process How messy is the uninstall for Trend (never used it) ? -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 17:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Anti Virus MAPI hammering the store.exe process There are a couple of Hot fixes available from Trend Micro that should cure the problem. Open a ticket on the website and you should get the fixes within a few hours. Also, you might try upgrading from 3.52 to ver. 3.8. It gets rid of AVAPI and does the scanning work via ESE. You won't have MAPI banging on your box anymore. Suggestion, should you update, do an UNINSTALL first, before installing the new version of TREND. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be who you are and say what you feel because those who matter don't mind, and those who mind don't matter. -Original Message- From: James Chris L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Anti Virus MAPI hammering the store.exe process We have a problems with ScanMail from TrendMicro doing something to the Store.exe process that make it run at about 75% cpu all the time. It also causes the MTA to que up many messages, and user get very slow access time. We are using version 3.52 ScanMail for Exchange with the latest patch. Exchange 5.5 sp4 Win NT 4.0 w/ sp6a Has anyone ever had this problem in the past? We have been having it for about 3 months and so far the only way to resolve it is to reboot the server. Does any one have a developer contact name from Trend? List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: queues
Are you getting any event log errors? Particularly any 9156 events? How many X.400 connectors do you have? And what SP? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 17:33 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: RE: queues x.400 -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: queues What type of connector is between the two servers? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 16:00 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: queues our exchange server is seeing 900+ things stuck in the queues for remote exchange servers... if i sot the MTA and restart ithey do to 0, but then they creep back up to 800-900-1000... ideas? nothing within exchange has been changed.. i am the only admin and i havent changed a thing. exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message as you saying they want you to send as [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example but not receive on the XYZ domain. Whereas you will continue to send and receive on abc.com -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 13 February 2002 15:21To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I had a somewhat similar problem. When the failover computer would take over, the alias would have trouble with my WINS server. If I removed the old (i.e. dead) server from WINS, and let the new (Failover) server register itself, I think it was fine (IIRC). That might not be your exact problem, but hopefully it points you toward a solution. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover both PDC and BDC are running nt server 4.0 SP 6 when failover occurs, I can see the #2 server lose all connections(ie red x over the 4 servers running double-take) from the PDC server manager...network path cannot be found(both #1 and #2 servers) when I try to reboot the #2 server with the #1 server off of the network, I no longer can access the domain, and the only way I have found to get back in is to remove it and re-enter the domain. Jeff -Original Message- From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover I concur there are no issues with using it in my test lab what so ever. The issue looks to be that the #2 server doesn't have a user account for the domain? Is the issue that when you reboot the 2nd machine and go to do an admin login? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 17:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
Re: Slowing Outlook Vbscript macro
What about the timer event? See this example: Dim PauseTime, Start, Finish, TotalTime If (MsgBox(Press Yes to pause for 5 seconds, 4)) = vbYes Then PauseTime = 5' Set duration. Start = Timer' Set start time. Do While Timer Start + PauseTime DoEvents' Yield to other processes. Loop Finish = Timer' Set end time. TotalTime = Finish - Start' Calculate total time. MsgBox Paused for TotalTime seconds Else End End If List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool
I am looking for a utility that can be used to generate statistical type reports on Exchange server usage-- numbers of internal emails, external emails (sent and received), top senders/receivers, etc... I read about Sunbelt's MELIA but it looked like over-kill for my purposes. Are there any purely reporting tools that are free or relatively inexpensive that anyone can recommend? TIA Jay Ploughe Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Network Administrator Kiwanis International List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
Do you have a dedicated PDC or is it one of the Exchange Servers? On the double-take configuration are you failing one exchange server over to another or do the exchange servers failover to a dedicated target server? I don't know if Microsoft certified double-take or not but I know it works very well. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 08:34AM Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
The only other thing I can come up with is MailSweeper, but that's a sledgehammer to crack a nut for just this one requirement. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 16:50 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Forward all activity from a mailbox Subject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Not unless something has changed. Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail only. Unless someone else can think of something, I don't know of a way to accomplish this without Rules. Possibly, if a server-side rule could be configured, it would be easy enough to log in to his mailbox with another client and accomplish that, but I don't know if a server rule will be able to accomplish this. It might take a client-side rule, which he has already stated can't be done because this individual is using OWA. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox But does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail? -Original Message- From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Problems with time Zones in Calender
Hi there, When I go to calender and I select to add a time zone - my time difference is wrong. I am selecting GMT (London - with DST) and the extra zone is EST - 5:00 (US Canada - with DST). It shows the difference as 7 hours instead of 5. My servers have the correct time for their locations. All running 5.5, SP3. No updates or patches have been installed in the past few weeks so do not understand why it is suddenly doing this. Any ideas would be appreciated !!! Thanks in advance Jacques List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: queues
Title: RE: queues x.400 -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: queues What type of connector is between the two servers? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 16:00 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: queues our exchange server is seeing 900+ things stuck in the queues for remote exchange servers... if i sot the MTA and restart ithey do to 0, but then they creep back up to 800-900-1000... ideas? nothing within exchange has been changed.. i am the only admin and i havent changed a thing. exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Strange problem with Outlook XP and Exchange2000
Is this Windows XP as well? See if the following steps help: Try the following steps (note, these steps involve making changes to the registry...make sure you have a good backup of the registry before trying these steps.) Also, these steps say they are for Outlook Express, but should also work for Outlook. 1. Quit all programs. 2. Click Start, click Run, type regedt32 in the Open box, and then click OK. 3. Locate and click the following registry key: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Protected Storage System Provider 4. On the EDIT (security menu in win 2k) menu, click Permissions. 5. Click the registry key for the user that is currently logged on and ensure that Read and Full Control are both set to Allow. 6. Click the Advanced button, ensure that user that is currently logged on is selected, that Full Control is listed in the Permissions column, and that This Key and Subkeys is listed in the Apply to column. 7. Click to select the Reset permissions on all child objects and enable propagation of inheritable permissions check box. 8. Click Apply, and then click Yes when you are prompted to continue. 9. Click OK, and then click OK. 10. Double-click the Protected Storage System Provider key to expand the key, click the user subkey folder that is directly below the Protected Storage System Provider key, click Delete on the Edit menu, and then click Yes in the warning message dialog box.The user subkey folder looks similar to the following example: S-1-5-21-124525095-708259637-1543119021-16701 NOTE: For every identity that you have, there will be a subkey under the Protected Storage System Provider key. To resolve this problem in all of your identities, you must delete all of the user subkeys folders under the Protected Storage System Provider key. 11. On the Registry menu, click Exit, and then restart your computer. How to Re-Enter Your Password: 1. Click Start, point to Settings, and then click Control Panel. 2. Double-click Mail or Mail and Fax. 3. Click to select Internet E-mail, and then click Properties. 4. On the Server tab, type your password in the Password box, and then click to select the Remember password dialog box. 5. Click OK, and then click Close. 6. Close Control Panel, and then start Outlook Express. 7. On the Tools menu, click Send and Receive to test if your password is retained. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: queues
Title: RE: queues sp4 it turns out the services account lost the rights to logon as a service act as part of the os restore files and directories back up files and directories. when i reset that they went. -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: queues Are you getting any event log errors? Particularly any 9156 events? How many X.400 connectors do you have? And what SP? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 17:33 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: RE: queues x.400 -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:27 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: queues What type of connector is between the two servers? Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: MHR(Michael Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 16:00 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: queues Subject: queues our exchange server is seeing 900+ things stuck in the queues for remote exchange servers... if i sot the MTA and restart ithey do to 0, but then they creep back up to 800-900-1000... ideas? nothing within exchange has been changed.. i am the only admin and i havent changed a thing. exchange 5.5 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool
Not sure on price, but Spotlight on Exchange is nice. Easy to setup and easy on the eyes for viewing. Brad -Original Message- From: Jay Ploughe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool I am looking for a utility that can be used to generate statistical type reports on Exchange server usage-- numbers of internal emails, external emails (sent and received), top senders/receivers, etc... I read about Sunbelt's MELIA but it looked like over-kill for my purposes. Are there any purely reporting tools that are free or relatively inexpensive that anyone can recommend? TIA Jay Ploughe Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Network Administrator Kiwanis International List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool
I've been toying with Promodag...pretty nice and not too pricey. -Original Message- From: Van Otterloo, Brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:52 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool Not sure on price, but Spotlight on Exchange is nice. Easy to setup and easy on the eyes for viewing. Brad -Original Message- From: Jay Ploughe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:17 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool I am looking for a utility that can be used to generate statistical type reports on Exchange server usage-- numbers of internal emails, external emails (sent and received), top senders/receivers, etc... I read about Sunbelt's MELIA but it looked like over-kill for my purposes. Are there any purely reporting tools that are free or relatively inexpensive that anyone can recommend? TIA Jay Ploughe Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Network Administrator Kiwanis International List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
There certainly is a spot to change the failover time! I have it set to 15 minutes on my Exchange server, that gives me time for the occasional reboot. I believe Sunbelt was also supporting Double-Take, but I would imagine that to be the case only if you purchased it through them. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I have a dedicated PDC (well exchange isn't on it anyway). and yes one exchange server fails over to another exchange sever. so it works good for you? any issues with domain login after failover? are you using WINS? Thanks, Jeff -Original Message- From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 8:58 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do you have a dedicated PDC or is it one of the Exchange Servers? On the double-take configuration are you failing one exchange server over to another or do the exchange servers failover to a dedicated target server? I don't know if Microsoft certified double-take or not but I know it works very well. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 08:34AM Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I agree with checking your WINS servers. If you have multiple WINS servers make sure both are clearing out the Source server after the failover. Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 09:26AM I had a somewhat similar problem. When the failover computer would take over, the alias would have trouble with my WINS server. If I removed the old (i.e. dead) server from WINS, and let the new (Failover) server register itself, I think it was fine (IIRC). That might not be your exact problem, but hopefully it points you toward a solution. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:18 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover both PDC and BDC are running nt server 4.0 SP 6 when failover occurs, I can see the #2 server lose all connections(ie red x over the 4 servers running double-take) from the PDC server manager...network path cannot be found(both #1 and #2 servers) when I try to reboot the #2 server with the #1 server off of the network, I no longer can access the domain, and the only way I have found to get back in is to remove it and re-enter the domain. Jeff -Original Message- From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover I concur there are no issues with using it in my test lab what so ever. The issue looks to be that the #2 server doesn't have a user account for the domain? Is the issue that when you reboot the 2nd machine and go to do an admin login? -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2002 17:00 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Double-Take works fine with Exchange 5.5, although I admit I do not know the cause of this particular problem, I don't think it is specific to Double-Take. Our list host (Sunbelt Software) sells this fine product. http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/product.cfm?id=111 and NSI includes Exchange-specific configuration details. I may be wrong, but I thought I read at one point where it had been tested with Exchange by Microsoft. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:35 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover Do not.. REPEATE DO NOT!!! use any clustering product, backup product, server mirroring product UNLESS IT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED BY MICROSOFT TO BE COMPATABLE WITH EXCHANGE!! Even Microsoft's own clustering product doesn't work infallably with Exchange. I doubt that this product has been tested with Exchange. John M. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message I am saying that they basically want the functionality of having 2 domain addresses so that they can go back and forth and send and receive mail as xyz.com OR abc.com. Another company owns the new domain, and we will just be using 10-12 mailboxes completely separate from them. -Original Message-From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:56 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 as you saying they want you to send as [EMAIL PROTECTED] for example but not receive on the XYZ domain. Whereas you will continue to send and receive on abc.com -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 13 February 2002 15:21To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PMTo: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues'Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+Network Engineer and Exchange AdministratorSARMA1801 BroadwaySan Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Title: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Since you use OWA couldn't you setup the account in Outlook on a local desktop, such as yours, and set a rule there? Even thought the user is using OWA this might work. Also, do you have this setup on the IMS to allow forwarding to the outside world? -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Not unless something has changed. Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail only. Unless someone else can think of something, I don't know of a way to accomplish this without Rules. Possibly, if a server-side rule could be configured, it would be easy enough to log in to his mailbox with another client and accomplish that, but I don't know if a server rule will be able to accomplish this. It might take a client-side rule, which he has already stated can't be done because this individual is using OWA. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox But does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Double-take failover
I am suspecting something is up with the WINS database. I am cetainly no expert and its time to RTFM on WINS. any advice on what to look for in there? my maintenance agreement (NSI) ran out long ago and its $1195 per server to reinstate them. I'll be trying to fix it on my own for now. Thanks, Jeff -Original Message- From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover There certainly is a spot to change the failover time! I have it set to 15 minutes on my Exchange server, that gives me time for the occasional reboot. I believe Sunbelt was also supporting Double-Take, but I would imagine that to be the case only if you purchased it through them. -Jim Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Engineer Advertising.com We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance. -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:37 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm *** The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Double-take failover
You can adjust the time delay from when the server fails to when it actually assumes the roll of the Target server. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 09:37AM We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
instant messaging
I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: instant messaging
Title: RE: instant messaging i connect to mine while im anywhere in the world -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
Another vote for Mail Marshal. It slices, it dices, it even makes Julienne fries - why, just look at that tomatouuuh, maybe that's the Ronco Mail-O-Matic that I'm thinking of? Sorry - I think I just had a non-maskable interrupt. Yeah, I like Mail Marshal - not particularly just for spam but also for all the other great features. I don't have anywhere near the degree of Exchange expertise that you find here on this list, so it's nice to have an easy-to-setup-and-use system in front of the Exchange server that let's me completely customize how I want to handle/forward/quarantine/kill/modify/return/notify/quantify/report/relay/bl ah blah blah... in test it has been working like a charm. Trend also gets a lot of great reviews on the list(s). Beyond spam - and regardless of what product you may choose - it can be another layer of defence. I sat a Marshal test box behind our existing SMTP relay (proxy service) for some initial testing and one day about 42 instances of my party blew right by that proxy (bug!) where it should have died, but got hammered by Mail Marshal before even touching Exchange - and at least a few got in before our client AV sigs got rolled across the site. Granted, an Exchange pro could set it up to do a lot of this right at the server as well - and maybe the 3rd party is overkill in some situations - but for me (a highly paranoid aspiring semi-pro), it's a solid, easy to use, completely customizable email pre-processing plant that adds another layer of security. As for spam itself, lots of (most?) spam is end-user self-induced. I don't know if I would push for any (possibly expensive) 3rd party solution just for the sake of spam elimination - especially given that we don't get anywhere near what others on this list have talked about in the past. A big flood of spam might change that attitude pretty quick, but fortunately the 3rd party stuff out front makes my life a lot easier if when that becomes necessary. my 2¢ (Canadian) -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: February 12, 2002 6:56 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I second that... -Original Message- From: Simon Curtiss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 18:35 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control www.marshalsoftware.com http://www.marshalsoftware.com -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 12:27 p.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: spam control Hello, What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful. thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. _ Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com http://www.marshalsoftware.com/ _ List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193
Chris and everyone else, I have been encountering the same problem (as Chris V.) The first error we get in the Event Log is MSExchangeIS (395) Unexpected Win32 error: 0x79 The next one is...Event ID 125 MSExchangeIS (395) Unable to create the log. The drive may be read-only, out of disk space, misconfigured, or corrupted. Error -1022. Next Event error...Event ID An error occurred while writing to the database log file. Attempting to stop the Microsoft Exchange Information Store. This is a new Exchange server. We added this new exchange server in order to move all of the mailboxes off of the old one (to be retired). Our exchange db is very small and we have plenty of disc space. We have received these errors on 3 different occassions within the past 2 weeks. Upon receiving the first one, I checked this forum and implemented the suggestion to exclude the exchsrvr directories in the anti virus software (We have GroupShield and NetShield on this server). We have received this error twice since then. The last suggestion we have not tried yet is Todd Wood's posting in which he spoke to Microsoft and they recommended rebuilding the server. Anyone have any suggestions?? Thanks Robert Gagne (I apologize my first posting did not include the previous replies) Any other thoughts. and ps thanks for the help so far -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 Actually, I am using Macafee's Groupshield and have gone back to them several times to see if they have anything in their database concerning these errors. For backup I am using ntbackup. So I would have to say both my backup and virus software is Exchange aware. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 1:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 Kicked up notches unknown to Exchange admins -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 10:01 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 One shouldn't be using non-exchange aware AV on the exchsrvr directories anyway. That is what we call a recipe for disaster. D Press any key to continue or any other key to quit... -Original Message- From: Todd Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:56 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 I just went through this issue. Microsoft believes it was the virus scanning software (CA) and the non-aware backups attempting to backup the database, even though the backups were not running at the time the services stopped. We configured the virus software (non-exchange aware) not to scan the exchsrvr directories. After resolving the issue, Microsoft recommended rebuilding the server due to this issue and other issues in the past. I'm not telling you to rebuild it but prevent your non-exchange aware virus software from scanning your exchange directories. Once we did that the services didn't fail, but we did rebuild it anyway due to other issues. todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/27/01 09:45AM OK, so you verified you had plenty of space on each partition/drive letter? I would keep a gig or more free, just in case. What are you using for AV? -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 9:43 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 the problem was the store stopped and I don't know why. There are no other errors. It restarted but I can't resolve the issue as to why it stopped - it seems like a phantom error. One q article related it to the virus checking software api going into a null state because it was trying to do an update when an on access scan was occuring. but that wasn't happening. Basically, I'm wondering if anyone else has had this happen and some possible causes. Cris -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:34 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 So what was the problem. You ask for help, you have to tell us what the solution was. -Original Message- From: Cris Vitsorek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 2:06 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Event ID 125 and Event ID 193 I received an Event ID 125 source ESE97. The error was MsExchange(188) unable to create the log. The drive maybe readonly, out of disk space, misconfigured, or corrupt Error -1032 This was concurrent with Event ID 193 - Database failed with error -510 hwile trying to log the commit of a transaction. The
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message I am a little confused! But if I understand you correctly! Have the administrators of xyz company create an alternate recipient for the people in your abc company. Have there main email address listed as the [EMAIL PROTECTED] on there server. Then on the Addresses tab of there server add the name they wish that user to receive mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]. When they receive an incoming request for [EMAIL PROTECTED], there server will accept it and then redirect it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Then on your servers have there reply addresses set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if necessary. Will this do what you need? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this example!! Anyone have experience with this? That is the best way to approach it. EXCH 5.5 SP4 NT4 Matthew Carpenter, MCP, CNA, A+ Network Engineer and Exchange Administrator SARMA 1801 Broadway San Antonio, TX 78215 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: spam control
I'd agree with the 3rd party - we have various internal systems (MVS, Tandem, most flavors of unix, various web servers in addition to our primary end users mail system) that can send and in many cases receive internet mail - our 3rd party system sits between all these and our internet facing sendmail relays - does virus scanning, content (including spam) filtering, attachment blocking, S/MIME proxying etc. for all of them. The only thing not handled by an external 3rd party system is cleaning up internal mailboxes should a virus get in somehow. Martin Blackstone wrote: No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange? Do you use something else to control it?thanks for your input. Nelson W. SiqueirosADCS Inc.858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big.PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: spam control Hello,What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful.thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- oftware.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-softw re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 13:49:31 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: NDR
they spoofed the from: - you can even do it with telnet. Steve Spittal wrote: How have we received mail from these people and are unable to reply? -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 February 2002 21:27 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:Re: NDR Sounds like you have the answer - what was the question? Steve Spittal wrote: Forgive me if this is an of topic posting. We use exchange 5.5 sp4 with content filter Baltimore's mail sweeper which has all mail forwarded to it from exchange. Content filtering machine has routing of *.* which should force an MX lookup through external DNS and send the mail. We have now on two recent occasions received mail that users have tried to reply to, and they receive an NDR stating smtp; 550 5.7.1 Unable to relay [EMAIL PROTECTED] this clearly means that no MX record exists for the domain. Which I have confirmed via nslookup. Can anyone serve up any clues? Thanks ** This message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Further, Pharmagene makes every effort to keep its network free from viruses including the scanning of incoming and outgoing mail. However, you do need to check this e-mail and any attachments to it for viruses as Pharmagene can take no responsibility for any computer virus that might be transferred by way of this e-mail. Pharmagene plc 2 Orchard Road, Royston, Hertfordshire, SG8 5HD, UK. Registered in England Wales under company number 03355618. ** List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/12/02 14:27:19 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 13:52:05 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox
Title: Message Ewww, That sounds HORRID! If that is your only option, I would say screw it. That is an ugly set up -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:19 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Since you use OWA couldn't you setup the account in Outlook on a local desktop, such as yours, and set a rule there? Even thought the user is using OWA this might work. Also, do you have this setup on the IMS to allow forwarding to the outside world? -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox Not unless something has changed. Alternate Recipients apply to inbound mail only. Unless someone else can think of something, I don't know of a way to accomplish this without Rules. Possibly, if a server-side rule could be configured, it would be easy enough to log in to his mailbox with another client and accomplish that, but I don't know if a server rule will be able to accomplish this. It might take a client-side rule, which he has already stated can't be done because this individual is using OWA. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:46 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox But does the alternate recipient work with outbound mail? -Original Message-From: Todd White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Forward all activity from a mailbox In the Exchange Admin Program go to the mailbox you need to have mail delivered FROM. Choose the Delivery Options tab, select Alternate Recipient, and choose the mailbox or custom recipient you want this delivered to. You have the option to deliver to both if necessary. -Original Message- From: Jean Luc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:04 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Forward all activity from a mailbox I have a business need to forward a copy of all mail (both inbound outbound) from an Exchange 5.5sp4 mailbox. A copy of all mail generated by this mailbox should go to another mailbox in the directory. The client uses OWA so client forwarding rules will not work. I am already sending all inbound mail to the mailbox and an alternate recipient, but forwarding a copy of the outbound mail has me stumped. Thank-you Jean Luc List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Future plans 2 What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so (since they are authoritative) and then accept xyz.com as inbound? I am pretty sure I missed something since I just lost myself in this
RE: instant messaging
Title: RE: instant messaging From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the failover time. It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: instant messaging
Title: Message Also, why on earth would you have support issues? I don't support nonbusiness related functions. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the "failover time". It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: instant messaging
Title: RE: instant messaging 1. Circumvents your firewall and allows users to download and run any file type that they please. 2. Circumvents your SMTP AV solution. 3. Allows Users to send any documentation to anyone; this can't be tracked, traced or monitored. 4. Circumvents any SMTP routing restrictions or blocks that you might have. I'm sure there are plenty of other better reasons. I am wrangling with this myself... -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the "failover time". It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: instant messaging
Title: Message what i always here is "Microsoft never gets it right".. so dont worry..it wont work :P just kiddin -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging Also, why on earth would you have support issues? I don't support nonbusiness related functions. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the "failover time". It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Future plans 2
Title: Message Changing the MX records on your domain will not affect mail going to them unless coming from your domain! No one will ever query your DNS Servers for there mail server? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:09 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 That is the best answer I have received, and you are right. I have no idea how to implement this without dropped mail to nonhomed recipients here OR there. I will discuss with them the different options that truly seem available: They home the mailboxes and we use OWA to use their domain there is a LEGAL partnership in which we act as connected sites, only passing THEIR address book I have not found another way around this, nor have I heard a good alternative otherwise -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 I'm just saying that you may want to consult with your legal department. Having the permission of the owner of the domain doesn't mean squat in the legal world. You are talking about basically interchanging internal company information. That, plus you don't have a plan in place how you want to accomplish this. The owner of the domain may not realize the scope of a project like this, which may not even be possible. In your given scenario below, if you were to add an MX record for their domain and accept it as inbound, you would HAVE to have a way to route the messages destined for their employees. Otherwise, mail is going to bounce. Why? Because the way that MX records work is that the server with the lowest cost gets most of the messages sent to it. There will be some messages that get sent to the other server. There isn't any way around this. That means that you will be receiving mail for possibly ANY person working at the other company. You get a message for a person at the other company, and your Exchange server doesn't know what the hell to do with it. You don't have any recipients with that name set up. Ends up being very messy. I was thinking earlier about setting up custom recipients for them, but that too would end up being messy, and I don't think it would work. They could, however, set up some mailboxes and custom recipients for you, have the mailbox deliver mail to the custom recipient and have those custom recipients forward the mail to your server. That, or setting up some mailboxes for you and you using OWA, would be by far the easiest, if not the only, solutions to what you are asking. Anything else is sounding more like a consulting gig to find a solution to your problem. If they are so insistent on you using their e-mail, why don't they provide the solution? Otherwise, tell them to go with the above-mentioned OWA, or forward your mail via CR's, and let you reply using your own addy's. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:25 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 What do you mean legally? If we have the permission of the owner of the domain, there is no issue. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Other than this type of plan, there will be nothing that will not take a large amount of time and effort to do. You may not even legally be able to do more than this. Check with your legal department. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:30 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Future plans 2 Get them to create you a few mailboxes on their system, and access them via OWA. Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 13 February 2002 15:21 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Future plans 2 Subject: Future plans 2 I am going to try this one more time. I think some of you can help me on this. TIA -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:52 PM To: 'MS-Exchange Admin Issues' Subject: Future plans We have future plans to work with another company on a few projects, and they want some of us to use THEIR email domain. ie: We are abc.com, and they want us to be able to send mail also as xyz.com without handling mail for the rest of xyz.com. Can I just add an MX record for xyz.com, as well as that company doing so
RE: instant messaging
Title: Message I could be wrong, but I believe the question was, "has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise?" although those are all very valid reasons to not allow the traffic. So has anyone successfully done so? -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging 1. Circumvents your firewall and allows users to download and run any file type that they please. 2. Circumvents your SMTP AV solution. 3. Allows Users to send any documentation to anyone; this can't be tracked, traced or monitored. 4. Circumvents any SMTP routing restrictions or blocks that you might have. I'm sure there are plenty of other better reasons. I am wrangling with this myself... -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:10 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: instant messaging From what I have seen, IM services like AIM can dynamically switch ports. The only suggestion I have is to not allow your users the ability to install software. -Original Message- From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: instant messaging I am doing my best to avoid turning this feature on, as I don't want the overhead and the user support issues. I'd welcome opinions and advice on the usage of it. Also, has anyone ever got it to work successfully outside the enterprise? John Weber Consultant Centerlogic 503-262-0490 x203 -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:37 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover We tested Double Take but never implemented it. There wasn't an option to change the "failover time". It would automatically failover after 20 seconds, didn't like that. From what I remember though, they have a tech support help desk. You may want to give them a call. Robert -Original Message- From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Double-take failover First and foremost: What is the PDC? What is the BDC? You need to provide more information about your domain if anyone is to help you. PS Get NT 4.0 SP6a on those NT4 servers asap. -Original Message- From: Jeff Pace [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:21 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Double-take failover Hello all, I have two exchange servers that are running double-take. Everything is fine and dandy until I test the failover. The #2 machine takes over the identity of the #1 machine. This works fine, what doesn't work is the login to the domain. I lose my domain login and in result cannot pass email over the network. When I try rebooting the #2 machine (now #1) the domain says the account doesn't exist. I have inherited this network and the domain was setup already. I don't know much about how the domain works. Servers = NT4.0 compaq proliant SP 4 exchange = 5.5 The odd thing about this situation is that I aslo have two other servers running double-take, although not on ecxhange, and they work fine when failed over and failed back. TIA, Jeff List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: instant messaging
Title: Message Also, why on earth would you have support issues? I don't support nonbusiness related functions. IM can also be used for business purposes. I've had online response help from Cisco in a private chat. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
I sort of agree, but I have (had) an @home.com email address and only had it because I was a cable modem subscriber. I never used this address for anything other than checking it once a month for my billing information. Guess what? I get about 8 junk emails each day on that account now. I know that I never filled out any form anywhere with it. So, I'm guessing that good old bankrupt @home sold it. I guess that probably wouldn't happen with any of our companies since we wouldn't sell the address, but it wouldn't be difficult for that address to get leaked out by someone else or through a business card or something like that. As for third-party spam-control software, we currently use nothing. I find it hard to justify the cost because not everyone receives the spam or as much as others. I typically get about 5-10 a day here myself, but I've filled out countless forms for product evaluations and such. Shift+Delete works fine for me, just a bit annoying is all. I am considering evaluating eManager to go with our ScanMail, but I'm in no hurry. In the meantime, I just keep adding domains to block when they are obviously not a company we plan on doing business with anytime soon. Em5000.net, 0mbranetworking.com, optinmembers.com, stuff like that... Martin Blackstone wrote: No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange? Do you use something else to control it?thanks for your input. Nelson W. SiqueirosADCS Inc.858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big.PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: spam control Hello,What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful.thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- oftware.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-softw re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 13:49:31 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system,
Steven
Title: Message Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message Who is Steven? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: spam control
Title: RE: spam control Well for us, the spam slammer is a very welcome side effect. We needed the app to do confirmations. We receive data attachments from clients to enter into our own database, and to verify that data, we have the app force an email to KNOWN regulatory email addresses to verify that the data is valid. The app is a great spam stomper to boot, so I am happy. -Original Message- From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I sort of agree, but I have (had) an @home.com email address and only had it because I was a cable modem subscriber. I never used this address for anything other than checking it once a month for my billing information. Guess what? I get about 8 junk emails each day on that account now. I know that I never filled out any form anywhere with it. So, I'm guessing that good old bankrupt @home sold it. I guess that probably wouldn't happen with any of our companies since we wouldn't sell the address, but it wouldn't be difficult for that address to get leaked out by someone else or through a business card or something like that. As for third-party spam-control software, we currently use nothing. I find it hard to justify the cost because not everyone receives the spam or as much as others. I typically get about 5-10 a day here myself, but I've filled out countless forms for product evaluations and such. Shift+Delete works fine for me, just a bit annoying is all. I am considering evaluating eManager to go with our ScanMail, but I'm in no hurry. In the meantime, I just keep adding domains to block when they are obviously not a company we plan on doing business with anytime soon. Em5000.net, 0mbranetworking.com, optinmembers.com, stuff like that... Martin Blackstone wrote: No, I don't. Its just a matter of preference. I don't want to have to go trudging through all the false positives for this stuff. It isn't my fault or my problem that my users put their email address in every site on the net, then wonder why they get so much spam. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 4:47 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control Why don't you recommend installing a spam control software on Exchange? Do you use something else to control it?thanks for your input. Nelson W. SiqueirosADCS Inc.858-676-9800 x 120 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:36 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: spam control I suggest you use none, but if you insist, MimeSweeper and MailMarshal are big.PS, Get to SP4. -Original Message- From: Nelson Siqueiros - ADCS Inc. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:27 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: spam control Hello, What software do you guys recommend to control spam on our Exchange 55 SP3 server? any input would be very helpful.thanks Nelson List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt- oftware.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-softw re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm This electronic message and any attachments contain information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. The information is intended solely for the individual or entity named above and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 13:49:31 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information
RE: Steven
Title: Message I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mass calendar update
There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on each calendar. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mass calendar update Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6. Is there any way to plug all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message nope -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message nope, not here Simon -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2002 11:12 a.m.To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone (call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. . This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: RE: Steven Not with a rule like this: Allow Default WAN LAN -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool
If you have other reasons to purchase it Mail Marshal will do this too. Too expensive as just a reporting tool though. Simon -Original Message- From: Jay Ploughe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2002 6:17 a.m. To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Looking Exchange server usage reporting tool I am looking for a utility that can be used to generate statistical type reports on Exchange server usage-- numbers of internal emails, external emails (sent and received), top senders/receivers, etc... I read about Sunbelt's MELIA but it looked like over-kill for my purposes. Are there any purely reporting tools that are free or relatively inexpensive that anyone can recommend? TIA Jay Ploughe Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer Network Administrator Kiwanis International List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm # Notice of Confidential information The information contained in this electronic mail is CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, intended only for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this document is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately notify us by return or telephone call collect to 07 577 6049) and destroy the original message. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal www.marshalsoftware.com # List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message must have been from one of the other lists.. I will have his head.l --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven Not with a rule like this: Allow Default WAN LAN -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: StevenWho is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Martin gets everything!! Not fair. --- Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Have you seen his Rack.. HOW Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:21 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Steven
Nope Kevin Miller wrote: you did not get this 4 times??paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And BeyondDid I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R DoggSpam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-softw re.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 15:29:59 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
Re: Steven
What was the from:? maybe our spam filters trashed it ;-) Martin Blackstone wrote: I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 15:31:48 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
See, if you guys would listen to me, you would get all the good spam. -Original Message- From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:32 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Steven What was the from:? maybe our spam filters trashed it ;-) Martin Blackstone wrote: I got it!! -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven Nope, never saw it. --- Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm WorldSecure Server safeway.com made the following annotations on 02/13/02 15:31:48 -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Safeway corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain information proprietary to Safeway and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Mass calendar update
Title: RE: Mass calendar update Any chance you know the URL? I am bad at search engines... -Original Message- From: Bibel, Laura Y. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:07 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mass calendar update There's a custom form for this on slipstick.com. Modify it with your holidays and send to your clients. The appointments get put on each calendar. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:24 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Mass calendar update Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6. Is there any way to plug all the company's holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server? mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven
Title: Message Hell $10!!! I am in!! -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:12 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven you did not get this 4 times?? paste How critical is email to your business operations today? And what, if anything, do you need to more effectively manage your email systems? Share your insight in our brief survey and get a $10 gift certificate from Amazon. Visit http://www.thisquarter.com/msurveyc to participate. But hurry. Offer ends February 28, 2002. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 1:57 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven eh? -Original Message-From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big DoggsList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer Packetshaper. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
Title: RE: Steven - Sonicwall What does Sonicwall run on. Oh nm...I can look it up -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
Title: Message linux kernel -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall What does Sonicwall run on. Oh nm...I can look it up -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: StevenWho is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
We here at the Dogg Foundation LOVE the packeteer. A very power inexpensive product. The favorite thing to do it have morphius packets redueced to 1k.. It is fun to watch people keep trying. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer Packetshaper. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
Title: RE: Steven - Sonicwall What do you mean? You can do port blocking with many firewalls. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:48 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall You need packet filtering for that. Check out a Packeteer Packetshaper. -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Steven Who is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
RE: Steven - Sonicwall
Title: Message It runs on a SonicwallIts a HW device. -Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:49 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall What does Sonicwall run on. Oh nm...I can look it up -Original Message- From: Paul Green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven - Sonicwall you like your sonic wall? what model do you have and how much did it cost you/your company? I was looking at the sonicwall pro 200... i have never used one.. can I block ports? I need to block ports like 1214 (kazaa) and other's so people don't tie up our bandwidth. .. ??? Paul -Original Message- From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:08 PM Posted To: Exchange 2000 Server Conversation: Steven Subject: RE: Steven I'm not too worried, we're behind a Sonicwall here...pretty secure. -Original Message- From: Glen Macdonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 4:05 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Steven There he is! Get him! (But seriously, Huh?) --- Steve Ens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Steven, but my servers are fine! (I think) -Original Message- From: Milton R Dogg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 3:51 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: StevenWho is for destroying this mans server? Milton R Dogg Spam this list and Get pissed on by the Big Doggs List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.323 / Virus Database: 180 - Release Date: 2/8/2002 List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
