RE: list quiet

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



It's 
Friday. Everyone's mind is on fine beer and fish 
tacos.



mit 
freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange 
Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:59 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: list 
  quiet
  either our emails 
  are comming in, or this list is very quiet..List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: list quiet

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Only 
if you leave them at school in your locker over the weekend. 
;o)



mit 
freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange 
Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 
  11:14 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: list 
  quiet
  Yes, it has been fairly quiet all 
  week.
  
  I finished my move (except removing original 
  server) so I am chilling with a cigar and a couple o Guinness. Now they are 
  harping about putting in some type of proxy. Oh well, back to 
  work!!!
  
  FISH TACOS?? Eww. Are they stinky?
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
MHR(Michael Ross) 

To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:58 
AM
Subject: list quiet

either our 
emails are comming in, or this list is very quiet..List 
Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange Administration logons

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Are you running a MAPI AV?  Is Administrator the service account?

 mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),

 Steve Ropiak

 ZF Group NAO

 CERT, Exchange Administrator

 (207) 989-9115 voice

 (207) 989-8722 fax

 (513) 314-0197 cell

 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange Administration logons


Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT 4.0 sp6

I am wondering why the Administrator logs on to most but not all mailboxes,
some mailboxes have not been logged into by the Administrator last.  I'm
looking in Exchange Admin/Connections/Server/Mailbox Resources.  You can see
the NT account that last logged into the mailbox there.  I don't know how
reliable that is, therefore my question   As far as I know your account
gets logged even if you simply check someone's calendar.  I know there are
utils that run on the database each night, could that be one of the reasons
the Administrator is the last logon to most accounts?  

Any information is appreciated.   

Desiree



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E2K Cluster

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Have you actually done this or is this theory?  I'm concerned about the
constant IS corruption reported in the earlier post.  Our standalone Exch
5.5 servers now NEVER give us a problem, I think my boss is just a bit
paranoid.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Purviance, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:52 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: E2K Cluster


I have many working nicely but would agree whole heartedly. If you must have
99.999 then this is the way to go on very good fiber equipment.

BUT, using the Compaq approach of multiple identical servers attached with
Fiber and no local storage (boot from the SAN) with an extra server online
and hot. Allows you to quickly (under 5 mins) move the Server (all LUNS) to
the online box and get the server back up.

Just my $20 ... opps 2 cents

Chad Purviance


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: E2K Cluster

Hardware is key.  Top quality only.

Active/Active clusters are excessively annoying and limited (1900 users per
node supported).  Active/Passive clusters in my opinion are the better way
to go if faced with clustering.  Overall, they are unneccessary, expensive,
harder to recover in the event of a disaster (the nodes share the database,
unlike a *real* cluster), and lower your ROI.

Just my thoughts.

William


-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E2K Cluster


We are planning our AD  E2K rollout and were considering running E2K for
our site (2500 users) on a cluster.  Any one out there running on a cluster?
Active active or active passive? # of users?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...

-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'll take your word on it's existence.
That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm




--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received

E2K Cluster

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

We are planning our AD  E2K rollout and were considering running E2K for
our site (2500 users) on a cluster.  Any one out there running on a cluster?
Active active or active passive? # of users?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:54 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'm not the one with the Velcro gloves...

-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck DNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


I'll take your word on it's existence.
That you checked that it exists concerns me.  ;)

-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


That you even know that newsgroup exists worries me.

-Original Message-
From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


BUWAHAHAHAHAH... you subbed your manager to that list as well?  I subbed
mine to...

alt.sheep.stories.crossdressing.romance

-Original Message-
From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Does that tool cc: my manager if I send as my manager and subscribe him to
a sheep discussions mailing list using telnet?

-Original Message-
From: Crouthamel, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 10:13 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


http://www.intellireach.com/

Used to be microdata

-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Solution: Fire said employee or hire better managers.


-Original Message-
From: Cosner, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re-routing Outgoing mail


Basic Info:  Exchange 5.5 SP3 and Outlook 2000

Desired result:  Any outgoing email destined for the internet from a
specific user should be quarantined.  Management wishes to review the emails
before they are sent.

TIA.

Jeff Coz Cosner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.


==


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm





*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
for the listed recipient(s).  If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to official company business
shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by Datavision-Prologix.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Death to the evil PST

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Death to the evil PST

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Been 
there, done that once. Hence my reference to the Enterprise 
upgrade.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 
  2002 9:32 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Death to the evil PST
  The first gotcha is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit. It is 16G 
  not 16T. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:28 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Death to 
  the evil PST 
  Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the 
  use of PST's (and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the 
  mailbox. We are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a. There 
  are about 2,000 users in our site. I'm curious how large some of your 
  databases are and any difficulties associated with handling large Exchange 
  databases. I am trying to "retrain" our management here to think in 
  terms of limiting mailbox sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., 
  etc. But, in case we don't get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are 
  there any other "gotchas" out there waiting for me?
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
  CERT, Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax 
  (513) 314-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Death to the evil PST

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation.
If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us
immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from
your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure,
modification, distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is
strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Death to the evil PST

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Thanks, we looked at Mail Keeper as well.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST



As well as the other tips, why not consider www.kvsplc.com as a solution to
keeping messages, but not necessarily in the store.  It's got a wonderful
PST import wizard (that also can delete them after the import!)

Neil

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 11 June 2002 14:28
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Death to the evil PST
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


*
This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view 
or opinions presented are solely those of the 
author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Silversands, or any of its subsidiary companies. 

If you have received this email in error, please  
contact our Support Desk immediately on 
01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Death to the evil PST

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I was thinking that if we do go with Enterprise, we'd keep the db's on the
SANS where we have about a TB and a half free.  One of our servers that blew
the 16 GB limit was a JV and they had a 16 GB database on a 20 GB partition.
We had to plug in a couple more drives before we could even massage any free
space into the database.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


you'll be sorry if you dont get them to listed, my store is 15.7gb, which is
bad enough, and there's 100mb left on the drive.. lol.. 
not much I can do about it though..

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


That was my first thought, too.  But management is still in the give the
users enough rope to hang themselves frame of mind.  As I said, we are
attempting to retrain our management.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Death to the evil PST


Place a max mailbox size on every user is my tip.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Death to the evil PST


Based on numerous posts here, we have decided to eliminate the use of PST's
(and light beer) in our company and go with info stores in the mailbox.  We
are running Exch 5.5 Standard SP 4 on NT4 SP6a.  There are about 2,000 users
in our site.  I'm curious how large some of your databases are and any
difficulties associated with handling large Exchange databases.  I am trying
to retrain our management here to think in terms of limiting mailbox
sizes, establishing a retention policy, etc., etc.  But, in case we don't
get there, other than the 16 TB limit, are there any other gotchas out
there waiting for me?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website - WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written confirmation of its contents.   Accordingly,  United Co-op disclaims
all responsibility and accept no liability (including  in negligence) for
the consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please
notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the
message from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
E-mail message is strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees 
and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful
supervision as United Coop 
deem necessary in order to protect its information, its interest and its
reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent its information systems
from being used to view, 
store or forward sexually explicit, racist, sexist, sectarian, violent or
otherwise offensive or 
discriminatory material. If this message contains such material please
report it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**



This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com

RE: evil pst dilemma

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Try Right click, Properties, Advanced in folder view to change name.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 1:22 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: evil pst dilemma


That's one of my problems, I'm too even tempered and people-pleasing at
times.  Thanks I know I need to be a little more forceful with my
suggestions at times.  

Does anyone know how to have Personal Folders named anything but just that
in the Outlook View?  Whenever I setup a Personal Folder, I call it
something that makes sense, but in Outlook View these new folders are all
Personal Folders.  I've never really looked into why this is, but thought
perhaps someone may know.  Thanks again.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: evil pst dilemma


I had a guy who had a bunch of PST's. He set them up by year. 2000Mail,
2001Mail, Etc. Worked well.

As for his impatiance, tell him he did it to himself, and if he can do
better than you fixing it, then go for it.

-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: evil pst dilemma


Yeah, I had created two new Personal Folders for him to start moving his
files into about two months ago, when his file was more like 1.3 GB.  He's
now going to start moving the files once I get into them...  And, he's being
quite impatient.  It's difficult to explain the problems well enough for
some users to understand that truly if they did some of the things I always
suggest to my users that these issues may not come up.  I'll be satisfied if
I can at least get into the file for him.  I'm searching for the PST19UPG,
thanks.


Why can't people part with mail, especially attachments and the like.  I
have tried and tried to convince users to take attachments and save them
elsewhere.  Why do so many people use Sent Items as a Filing system...
Users, users, users  I'm not bitter though.

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: evil pst dilemma


I would run the PST19UPG (search google), then run Scanpst.exe about 3 or so
times. Also he is dangerously close to the 2GB limit. I would urge the user
to stop copying to it and create a new one. Just use the old one to
reference.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Peden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: evil pst dilemma


I think a repair needs to be done on the PST file.

Thanks,
-Chris-
IT Director
Sundowner Interiors


-Original Message-
From: Desiree Herrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: evil pst dilemma


I have a user with a 1.8 GB pst file, Personal Folders, he moves all items
from the server to his workstation(because I finally stuck to the limits for
all users in Exchange, 100MB mailboxes), gets backed up once a week.  I have
already had to break into the pst because he forgot the password.  Now, a
strange situation, he was in the middle of moving a file to a Personal
Folder when the power to the building went down, a brown out, including his
workstation, rebooted.  Servers fine, UPS.  So, once booted back up the
Outlook client locks or won't complete a move, copy, anything all the way
through in his Personal Folders that he was working with.  I am attempting
to play with the pst file on a separate PC so as not to mess with what's on
his system.  I was successful in copying the file to another workstation,
but can't open it Personal Folder in his account, it prompts me for a
password.  Do I need to try to break into the folder again, or is it
possibly that I'm logged into the machine as Administrator, and his mailbox
as his username.  Do I need to log on as him?

Exchange 5.5 SP4
Outlook 2000 



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Symantec or McAfee

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Why switch from Antigen?  IMHO, it is better than NAV or McAfee.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 6:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Symantec or McAfee


If you were force to go with one of those 2 company for an antivurus
solution (exchange ), wich one is not too bad ?

I'm used to antigen and Ihave bad very experiences with NAVMSE.  For that
contract the customer must go with one of those solution.

I never had to sue the MacAfee Ex  AV.  So wich one you think is not too bad
? MacAfee is working well ?

JF
Do you know if MacAfee is a god AV for server and stations ? (the customer
have 1500 users to protect. Server, stations and Exchange )


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

It's written in their training manual.  Hold P.O.'s for critical technology
upgrades until right after a major failure that the purchase would have
prevented.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


Man, is that just typical for the execs? 

-Original Message-
From:   Jay Personette [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Monday, June 03, 2002 2:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: 16 GB Limit?

It did at a company I used to work for...They approved a P.O. for
Enterprise
that that they had been sitting on for 3 months right away :)

Jay Personette


-Original Message-
From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:21 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?

Sorry to bring this up again, but this is to make sure I understand
before
a 3 PM meeting today with my CTO about Exchange, if the priv.edb on
Exchange 5.5 Standard edition hits 16GB, Exchange will come to a
screeching halt?  Yes or no?

Thanks,
Sherry


I'm not sure what you are asking, Dan.

 There is a hardcoded 16GB database limit to each of the private
 information store and public information store in the Exchange
Standard
 version.


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:20 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


 MSExchangeIS Private?  Storage Limits?

 Dan Munley



 -Original Message-
 From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:45 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


 GB, not MB.

 There is a separate 16GB limit on each of the priv.edb and
pub.edb. 

 The online maintenance that runs each night will report the
database
 information to the application event log.

 William

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 7:34 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


 It is agreed that the limit is 16MB.  How is that determined?
Through
 the aggregate size of the mailboxes and private folders? Or the
size of
 the Priv and Pub?

 Dan Munley



 -Original Message-
 From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:56 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: 16 GB Limit?


 Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on regular 5.5,
but all
 the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to differencate
between
 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the impression that
regualar
 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid of it.

 Am I right?
 If not what is the limit in regualr 5.5?


 John Majetic

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook XP

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Any 
Exchange CAL (5.5 or 2000) Provides legal license for any version of Outlook up 
to and including Outlook 2002 (XP). But, no word on how you can install it 
other than to install it from an Office XP CD.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Salvador Manzo 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 
  12:25 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
  XP
  A CD 
  containing the Outlook client (2000 SR-1 at the time) came with my Exchange 
  2000 media set. Of course, I got my licenses via our campus Open 
  License, and order the media set via Worldwide 
  Fulfillment...
  
-Original Message-From: MHR(Michael Ross) 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 
09:14To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook 
XP
Good question!! 
-Original Message- From: 
Robert D. Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:07 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Outlook XP 
My understanding is that (only since SP1?) Ex2000 comes with 
OlXP as an available client, and that your CALs can be used to run OlXP, 
even without a copy of Office XP. My questions are:
Where do you get the copy of OlXP? Does it require "activation" like the whole Office XP suite does? 
I've avoided XP because we change the machines so much I don't want to have 
to re-activate the sucker every time. Has anybody used OlXP with the rest of 
the suite remaining Office 2000? What problems are there?
Thanks, 
- Robert 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Using Outook to Schedule a resouce

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Public folder holding a calendar?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Bill Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Using Outook to Schedule a resouce




 I am relatively new to the exchange world. I have a user( a real pain in
the butt user) that is wanting to provide a schedule of when a conference
room is planning to be used and when it is not. Below is what she sent me.
What do you guys think. Is there any reason I should not do this or should
not. Will it eat up a license in exchange? Is there another simpler way to
do it?

  Thanks


I have been asked by the Focus Group to setup a schedule for both the
upstairs and downstairs conference rooms.  I have read about resource
scheduling in Outlook.  This is what I have found.

 

Outlook 2000 returns to the old Schedule+ way of directly book resources
without the need for a script or delegate. Create a mailbox for the
resource, then use Outlook 2000 (not an earlier version!) to log directly
into the resource mailbox and set the Resource Scheduling options in Tools |
Options | Calendar Options. Create a single item in the calendar to make
sure that something shows up in its free/busy time for you to check. Also
grant the Author role on the Calendar folder to everyone you want to be able
to book the resource. The easiest way to do this is with a distribution list
in the Global Address List.  

The clients must do all booking through Outlook 2000. On the Attendee
Availability tab of a meeting request, click Invite Others to add one or
more resources to the Resources box.  Make sure you add them as resources.
If you add them as required or optional attendees, the resources will not be
automatically booked. 

TIP: Using your Exchange Server administration tool, set the mailbox to not
accept messages from anyone. (A distribution list or group is good for
this.) That way, if users forget and add the resource as a required or
optional attendee, the request will bounce back to them from the resource
mailbox. 

If you choose more than one resource -- such two comparable conference rooms
-- you can click AutoPick and have it find the next available time for
either resource.

Could you please look into to this and let me know if this or any other way
is possible?  For all I know we already have something like this setup...

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Multiple Servers

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



That'll teach him to ask this list a serious question on a 
Monday.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Paul Green 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 2:49 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Multiple 
  Servers
  i 
  think i have heard this one before... but I think the user was serious 
  haha
  
-Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Posted At: Monday, May 13, 
2002 11:30 AMPosted To: Exchange 2000 
ServerConversation: Multiple ServersSubject: RE: 
Multiple Servers
Yes, I can 
be.

I want to add 
more things to my thingamajig. Sometimes when I click on this doo dad, this 
message pops up and tells me its bad. So instead I push the button on the 
widget which in turn makes my screen turn this weird color with a message on 
it.

  
  -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 
  11:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Multiple Servers
  can you bit more vague?? what do you want to 
  accomplish with more then one server? how many users do you have? how much 
  hardware? bla bla.
  --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyondhttp://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics 
  and WebDesign, GO here!
  

-Original Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 
2002 11:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
Multiple Servers

What is the best set up for 
multiple servers in a single site?

Any pointers to docs is 
great. TIA

List Charter and 
FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
---Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by 
AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.361 / Virus 
Database: 199 - Release Date: 5/7/2002List Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by 
  AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.361 / Virus 
  Database: 199 - Release Date: 5/7/2002
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Can someone settle this....

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



I 
think the info box is new to OXP. O2K was just a slow over a dial up, but no 
info box to let you know.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Garland Mac 
  Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 
  1:08 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Can someone 
  settle this
  
  Exchange 5.5 SP4 on NT4 
  SP6
  Outlook XP and Outlook 
  2000.
  
  My coworker and I are trying to 
  determine how Outlook really works. We have noticed that when we are dialed up 
  on our laptops and connected to our network via an IPSEC VPN connection (same 
  with PPTP), when we connect to Exchange via Outlook XP there are times we get 
  a message that it is requesting information from the server and has a status 
  bar. Under Outlook 2000 there was no information box like that. 
  
  
  My argument is that under XP, it 
  is telling you that is requesting information and this is normal operation, 
  given that it's working on a dialup. I should clarify, that we get this box 
  when we are trying to open email or change folders. He says this is some kind 
  of error that needs to be resolved.
  
  Can some one shed some light on 
  this. If you need more information please let me 
  know. 
  
  Garland Mac 
  Neill
  Systems 
  Administrator
  Solbourne
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Go 
ahead, rub it in. As a recently inducted Weight Watcher life time member I 
have been behaviorally altered to no longer crave doughnuts. Pour me some 
o' that Kona coffee into the Ethernet cable, though.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:55 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: It's 
  Friday!!
  Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme 
  doughnuts (including a few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have 
  Monday off. Three day weekend, yippee! 
  It's going to be a GOOD day!! 
  Sherry Abercrombie 
  Data Center Administration 
  Team Information 
  Technology "With 
  sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

OK, Martin's got a lovely new daughter who will be dating before he knows
it.  Let's not add to his stress level here ;-)

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!


Good thing she looks like your wife.

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!

http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:27 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!
I don't get it
 
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!
 
I have a baby
-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: It's Friday!!
Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a
few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day
weekend, yippee!  
It's going to be a GOOD day!! 
Sherry Abercrombie 
Data Center Administration Team 
Information Technology 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: It's Friday!!

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I didn't know G. Gordon Liddy posted to this list.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!


Don't have to actually use it, just take it and clean it. That get s the
point across very quickly.

Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: It's Friday!!

True, Martin, learn to use that shotgun now.I'm glad I have boys!! 
-Original Message- 
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:03 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 

Yes, we definitely don't want to discuss how she will meet someone JUST LIKE
HIM some day. 
LOL - - - - 
Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message-

From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:01 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
OK, Martin's got a lovely new daughter who will be dating before he knows
it.  Let's not add to his stress level here ;-) mit freundlichen
Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message- 
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:59 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 

Good thing she looks like your wife. 
Steve Clark 
Clark Systems Support, LLC 
AVIEN Charter Member 
Who's watching your network? 
www.clarksupport.com 
  301-610-9584 voice 
  240-465-0323 Efax 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC. -Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:49 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
http://216.39.101.68/martin/index.htm 
-Original Message- 
From: Matthew Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 6:27 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
I don't get it 
  
-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 8:23 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: It's Friday!! 
  
I have a baby 
-Original Message- 
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:55 AM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: It's Friday!! 
Whoo Hoo, it's Friday, I have lots of Krispy Kreme doughnuts (including a
few crullers), Kona Special Blend coffee, and I have Monday off.  Three day
weekend, yippee!  
It's going to be a GOOD day!! 
Sherry Abercrombie 
Data Center Administration Team 
Information Technology 
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Man 
(woman) does not live by e-mail alone. On the 7th day, God rested and 
looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost 
perfect. Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the world 
was perfect.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Rose, Adrian 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 
  12:37 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  
  Have I joined the wrong 
  list or something??
  Is this an MS Exchange 
  Issues list or what?
  What's all this Krispy 
  Kreme business?
  
  :@/
  List Charter 
  and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  This message and its attachments may contain 
  legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the 
  named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or 
  responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or 
  deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should 
  permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the 
  sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which 
  does not relate to the official business of News Limited or its subsidiaries 
  must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by any of them. No warranty is 
  made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other 
  defect.
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

A viable alternative for those of us stranded up in the Northeast.  Coffee's
pretty good too.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Ryan Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?


What about dunkindonuts (although I like that Krisky can spell doughnuts
correctly).

-Original Message-
From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 


M, they melt in your mouth, especially when you walk into a store and
they have someone handing out samples of freshly made, still warm,
donuts...



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service
is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Why bother eating it.  I just stick it under my belt.  That's where it ends
up anyway.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit?



Eat one doughnut and the taste will stay with you all day.  The power of
preservatives.

~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
One man's ceiling is another man's floor


 

  Jeremiah Watson

  jwatson@composidTo:   MS-Exchange Admin
Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  ie.com  cc:

   Subject:  RE: 16 GB Limit?

  05/02/02 07:27 AM

  Please respond to

  MS-Exchange

  Admin Issues

 

 






They're a famous donut company in the US.  I believe they started  down
south and migrating up north.. -Original Message-
From: Stuart Tonge  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002  7:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB  Limit?


okay, i have to ask... what or who is 'Krispy Kreme'

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence  Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002  11:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB  Limit?


Man  (woman) does not live by e-mail alone.  On the 7th day, God rested and
looked back on what he (she) had done and saw that the world was almost
perfect.  Then Krispy Kreme sprang up next door to Starbucks and the  world
was perfect.




mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT,  Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197  cell


[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Rose, Adrian  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002  12:37 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: 16 GB  Limit?



Have I joined the wrong  list or something??

Is this an MS Exchange  Issues list or what?

What's all this Krispy  Kremebusiness?



:@/


List  Charter and FAQ  at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


This message and its attachments may  contain legally privileged or
confidential information. It is intended  solely for the named addressee. If
you are not the addressee indicated in  this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to the addressee),  you may not copy or deliver this
message or its attachments to anyone.  Rather, you should permanently delete
this message and its attachments and  kindly notify the sender by reply
e-mail. Any content of this message and  its attachments which does not
relate to the official business of News  Limited or its subsidiaries must be
taken not to have been sent or endorsed  by any of them. No warranty is made
that the e-mail or attachment(s) are  free from computer virus or other
defect. List  Charter and FAQ  at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


This  email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service.  For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the  clock, around the globe, visit  http://www.messagelabs.com



**

Website  -  WWW.COOP.CO.UK


This  document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
and is  not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
written  confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, United Co-op disclaims
all  responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for
the  consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
confirmation. If you have received this E-mail message in error, please
notify us immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the
message  from your computer. Any form of reproduction, dissemination,
copying,  disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this
E-mail  message is strictly prohibited.

United Coop has the right lawfully to  record, monitor and inspect messages
between its employees and any third  party. Your messages shall be subject
to such lawful supervision as United  Coop deem necessary in order to
protect its information, its interest and  its reputation.

United Coop prohibits and takes steps to prevent

RE: Help Needed !

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Yeah, 
it wouldn't let me sign up 'cause it couldn't trace me back through my corporate 
firewall, hence no where to charge the $10 to. I wondered how it enforces 
that $10 deal? Are we supposed to be on the honor 
system?



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Matthew 
  Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 
  2002 5:52 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Help Needed !
  Nice. I have been looking for this for awhile too since 
  hotmail became a pain in the a*s and yahoo did it's recent pay 
  change.
  $10 per email? Man I had think twice before checking that box. 
  Lol 
  If you don't get that one, check out the site 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:29 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help 
  Needed ! 
  www.myrealbox.com They also offer IMAP 
  support. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  harshang shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:44 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help 
  Needed ! 
  Hi All, 
  Can anybody help me out to subscribe to a free mail 
  service like yahoo , which offers atleast 6 to 7 mb 
  mailbox size with pop3  smtp support anything . 
  Previously I used to have all the mails of this list 
  coming to my yahoo account which I download at home pc 
  and then go through them when I have the time .Since 
  yahoo has started charging for the same I can't 
  continue with it . 
  I'm looking for a reply from the people outhere as I 
  really like this list and don't wanna discontinue it .
  
  Thanks  Regards, 
  Harshang Shah (MCSE,CCNA) 
  __ 
  Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your 
  guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Help Needed !

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



That's 
the penalty if you violate the user agreement.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Joe Irvine 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:07 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help Needed 
  !
  where do you get $10.00 per e-mail from?? its $10.00 per year for pop 
  access I use it as my only mail account at home and love 
  it!
  
-Original Message-From: Matthew Carpenter 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:52 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Help Needed 
!
Nice. I have been looking for this for awhile too since 
hotmail became a pain in the a*s and yahoo did it's recent pay 
change.
$10 per email? Man I had think twice before checking that 
box. Lol 
If you don't get that one, check out the site 
-Original Message- From: 
Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:29 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Help Needed ! 
www.myrealbox.com They also offer 
IMAP support. 
-Original Message- From: 
harshang shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:44 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Help Needed ! 
Hi All, 
Can anybody help me out to subscribe to a free mail 
service like yahoo , which offers atleast 6 to 7 mb 
mailbox size with pop3  smtp support anything . 
Previously I used to have all the mails of this list 
coming to my yahoo account which I download at home 
pc and then go through them when I have the time 
.Since yahoo has started charging for the same I 
can't continue with it . 
I'm looking for a reply from the people outhere as I 
really like this list and don't wanna discontinue it 
. 
Thanks  Regards, 
Harshang Shah (MCSE,CCNA) 

__ 
Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your 
guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com 
List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 

List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Sizing second server in a site

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

It's a no brainer in 5.5.  You install the IMC for the site on a server in
the site and all mailboxes in the site, regardless of which server they
reside on, can utilize this connector.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:25 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site


Thanks for your assistance so far.

Have you seen a technote or anything on MS about the process to achive this
on Exch 5.5 ?

cheers

-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 17:52
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site


You'll have to allow relaying from the second server on the first server's
IMC.  Also, depending on your network topology, you may want to try adding
an LMHOST entry for the other server on each Exchange machine.  It
_shouldn't_ be necessary, esp. if using WINS, but it could be worth a look.

Also, have you allowed sufficient time for replication to occur, or forced a
Directory Synch?

-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 09:46
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site


Opps wanted to add that I've not installed IMS on the second server as I
wish to use the 1st servers IMS.

cheers

-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 17:43
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site


Ok that's great,

I've got a server built to that spec with NT4/exchange installed patched and
Joined to the existing site now.

If I now use the Mailbox move function within exchange admin I can move a
mailbox (mine) to the new server, connect using outlook and all looks well.
I can send an email to somebody homed on the 1st server in the site BUT he
can't send back to me!! Nor do I get email from the internet

I installed the second server in the site using the default exchange 5.5
install join site options

Are there any changes I need to make to the 1st server to allow email to
flow to the second server?

Thanks for any help offered (including URL links to doing this with Exchange
5.5).

-Original Message-
From: Salvador Manzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 April 2002 17:30
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Sizing second server in a site


Each server requires it's own DB and logs.  IMS can be shared out of a
single server.

IIRC, the preferred configuration (if you have the disks) is Mirrored Logs
and OS partition and Raid 5 Database partition.  However, a straight RAID 5
wil work (might not be optimal, but it will work)

-Original Message-
From: Steve Wyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 02:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Sizing second server in a site



I have an Ex5.5 SP4 server running on a NT4.0 SP6 server to the following
spec

Dual PIII 800 processors
2GB RAM

O/S  Raid 1
Logs Raid 1
Databases Raid 5

750 users

For many reasons I now need to add a second server to the site to carry some
additional mailbox's

My question is with the second server can I run a single Raid 5 array with
O/S and databases on it with the logs and IMS etc remaining on the 1st
server or does the second server in a site need the logs etc.

regards


Steve

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: NAV for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I beg to differ, but NAV 2.5 was an Exchange 5.5 release.  At least it was
running on ours (maybe that's why it didn't perform well G)

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


NAVMSE 2.5 run only on E2K.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 19:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange

NAV 2.5 (up to and including 5.5 SP4) was dual mode MAPI and/or AVAPI and
still sieve-like when it came to stopping viri.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


NAV for Exchange hasn't been MAPI based in quite a while, like 2.0 and pre
5.5 SP4.  for Exchange 2000 it uses VSAPI 2.0

 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
 understand this format, some or all of this message may not be 
 legible.

 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/plain;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 With MAPI based AV (like NAV) there is a timing gotcha.  If Outlook = 
 goes to grab mail at or around the same time it hits the mailbox, NAV 
 may not = get a chance to look at it or clean it before Outlook drags 
 it down to the = PST.  I
 have seen it (during a couple of our virus attacks) let virused files
 through to the client totally untouched.  It did catch 99.9% of them, =
 but
 all it took was one virused attachment getting through to an =
 unsuspecting
 user . . .
 =20
 =20
 mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen,(Best Regards),=20
 Steve Ropiak =20
 ZF Group NAO=20
 CERT, Exchange Administrator=20
 (207) 989-9115 voice=20
 (207) 989-8722 fax=20
 (513) 314-0197 cell=20
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: NAV for Exchange


 =20
 Anyone having this problem, the nav for exchange detected the virus = 
 email and said was deleted. But it still send the infected emails to 
 the recipient. =20
 Subject of the message:  Let's be friends
 One or more attachments were deleted.
   Attachment Status.bat was Deleted for the following reasons:
 Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was found.
 =20
 Please help
 =20
 =20
 Ben Ong
 Thanks
 =20
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


 ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be 
 CONFIDENTIAL = and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity 
 named above. If you = are not the intended recipient, please be 
 notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail 
 is strictly prohibited. If you = have
 received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender
 immediately. Thank you.=20

 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/html;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTML 
 xmlns=3Dhttp://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40; xmlns:o =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office xmlns:w =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:wordHEAD
 META HTTP-EQUIV=3DContent-Type CONTENT=3Dtext/html; = 
 charset=3Diso-8859-1 TITLEMessage/TITLE

 META content=3DWord.Document name=3DProgId
 META content=3DMSHTML 6.00.2715.400 name=3DGENERATOR META 
 content=3DMicrosoft Word 9 name=3DOriginatorLINK=20 
 href=3Dcid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; rel=3DFile-List!--[if 
 gte = mso 9]xml  o:OfficeDocumentSettings
   o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/
  /o:OfficeDocumentSettings
 /xml![endif]--!--[if gte mso 9]xml
  w:WordDocument
   w:ViewNormal/w:View
   w:Zoom0/w:Zoom
   w:DocumentKindDocumentEmail/w:DocumentKind
   w:EnvelopeVis/
   w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing5 pt/w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing
   = 
 w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery2/w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGrid
 Ev=
 ery
   = 
 w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery2/w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEver
 y=

   w:Compatibility
w:UseFELayout/
   /w:Compatibility
  /w:WordDocument
 /xml![endif]--
 STYLE@font-face {
   font-family: SimSun;
 }
 @font-face {
   font-family: @SimSun;
 }
 @page Section1 {size: 595.45pt 841.7pt; margin: 72.0pt 66.95pt 72.0pt 
 = 89.85pt; mso-header-margin: 36.0pt; mso-footer-margin: 36.0pt; =
 mso-paper-source: 0; }
 P.MsoNormal {
   FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; =
 mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-style-parent: ; mso

RE: NAV for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Maybe it's my memory.  It's been a while since we ran that product, add in
old age, Monday morning, a freak April snow storm, lack of a local
Starbucks, and things get a bit fuzzy.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:09 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


I believe if you check Norton's website you will find that the information
given was correct. Nav 2.1x is release supported on Ex5.5

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


I beg to differ, but NAV 2.5 was an Exchange 5.5 release.  At least it was
running on ours (maybe that's why it didn't perform well G)

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:44 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


NAVMSE 2.5 run only on E2K.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 19:57
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange

NAV 2.5 (up to and including 5.5 SP4) was dual mode MAPI and/or AVAPI and
still sieve-like when it came to stopping viri.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 314-0197 cell

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


NAV for Exchange hasn't been MAPI based in quite a while, like 2.0 and pre
5.5 SP4.  for Exchange 2000 it uses VSAPI 2.0

 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not
 understand this format, some or all of this message may not be 
 legible.

 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/plain;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 With MAPI based AV (like NAV) there is a timing gotcha.  If Outlook =
 goes to grab mail at or around the same time it hits the mailbox, NAV 
 may not = get a chance to look at it or clean it before Outlook drags 
 it down to the = PST.  I
 have seen it (during a couple of our virus attacks) let virused files
 through to the client totally untouched.  It did catch 99.9% of them, =
 but
 all it took was one virused attachment getting through to an =
 unsuspecting
 user . . .
 =20
 =20
 mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen,(Best Regards),=20
 Steve Ropiak =20
 ZF Group NAO=20
 CERT, Exchange Administrator=20
 (207) 989-9115 voice=20
 (207) 989-8722 fax=20
 (513) 314-0197 cell=20
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: NAV for Exchange


 =20
 Anyone having this problem, the nav for exchange detected the virus =
 email and said was deleted. But it still send the infected emails to 
 the recipient. =20
 Subject of the message:  Let's be friends
 One or more attachments were deleted.
   Attachment Status.bat was Deleted for the following reasons:
 Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was found.
 =20
 Please help
 =20
 =20
 Ben Ong
 Thanks
 =20
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


 ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be
 CONFIDENTIAL = and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity 
 named above. If you = are not the intended recipient, please be 
 notified that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail 
 is strictly prohibited. If you = have
 received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender
 immediately. Thank you.=20

 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/html;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTML
 xmlns=3Dhttp://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40; xmlns:o =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office xmlns:w =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:wordHEAD
 META HTTP-EQUIV=3DContent-Type CONTENT=3Dtext/html; = 
 charset=3Diso-8859-1 TITLEMessage/TITLE

 META content=3DWord.Document name=3DProgId
 META content=3DMSHTML 6.00.2715.400 name=3DGENERATOR META
 content=3DMicrosoft Word 9 name=3DOriginatorLINK=20 
 href=3Dcid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; rel=3DFile-List!--[if 
 gte = mso 9]xml  o:OfficeDocumentSettings
   o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/
  /o:OfficeDocumentSettings
 /xml![endif

RE: 16 GB Limit?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



We 
could hold Weight Watcher meetings there after hours, too.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, 
  Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 
  12:44 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  We 
  think a great franchise combo that would make lots of $$$ would be a 
  StarBucks/Krispy Kreme Donuts
  

-Original Message-From: Precht, David 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 
4:15 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
Limit?
You had to mention that... I could really go for a KKreme right about 
now... B*tch of a week.

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, 
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the original message.

  -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 16:25 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 GB 
  Limit?
  Actually, I'm going to eat the last Krispy Kreme donut 
   hit the road. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:10 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: 16 GB Limit? 
  You are correct.. Have a cookie and take the rest of the 
  day off. That is where I am headed. 
  --Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ 
  For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 12:56 PM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 16 GB Limit? 
  Ok everyone here is talking about the 16GB limit on 
  regular 5.5, but all the docs I can find from Microsoft don't seem to 
  differencate between 5.5 and 5.5 enterprise. I was always under the 
  impression that regualar 5.5 had the 16GB limit, and Eneterprise got rid 
  of it. 
  Am I right? If not what is the 
  limit in regualr 5.5? 
  John Majetic 
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Sounds like DNS or WINS.  Worse case, put an entry in HOSTS or LMHOSTS.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 7:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


No, I can't Carol. That is pointing toward DNS isn't it?

-Original Message-
From: Carol Fee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 12:18
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Can you ping the Exchange server by Netbios name?


Carol Fee  MCSE
Network Administrator
Artisoft, Inc.
5 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
617-354-0600 X118
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 6:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


Yes to all the questions. I connect and authenticate to the network domain
before launching Outlook, can ping the very Exchange Server I cannot connect
to, Offline folder is set, I cannot think of any reason. May I add that
thelaptop is running Win2K Advanced server even though I don't see why this
should matter.

Frank

-Original Message-
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:44
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN


The question is lacking in details.  How are you authenticating?  Is your
dial-up authentication also authenticating you into the domain? If not have
you set your Outlook profile to prompt you for authentication when you
connect to Exchange?  Assuming you are actually connected and TCP/IP is good
(can you ping the Exchange server?) then this is your next place to look.

Walt

 -Original Message-
 From: Frank Labule [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 5:28 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 They seem right. The IP address assigned to the NIC is
 different from that
 assigned to DUN. What exactly are you suggesting if I missed it?
 
 Frank
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Papageorgakis Nikos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 26 April 2002 11:24
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Re: MS Exchange Server Not Available during DUN
 
 
 TCP / IP properties
 
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 __
 __
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet: 
 http://www.star.net.uk The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 
 __
 __
 
 __
 _
 This message is intended only for the use of the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
 information that is private, confidential and may also be 
 legally privileged . If you are not the intended recipient or 
 employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to 
 the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
 dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
 and its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
 received this communication in error, please notify us by 
 telephoning on 
 +44 (0)207 459-3600.
 
 When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
 contained in this email are for their use only and are  
 subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the 
 governing Durlacher client engagement letter.  Durlacher is a 
 member of the London Stock Exchange and is regulated by the FSA.
 
 This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star
 Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs.
 __
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet:
http://www.star.net.uk 
The service is powered by MessageLabs.



___
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is private,
confidential and may also be legally privileged . If you are not the
intended recipient or employee or agent responsible for delivering the
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this 

RE: NAV for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

NAV 2.5 (up to and including 5.5 SP4) was dual mode MAPI and/or AVAPI and
still sieve-like when it came to stopping viri.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Patrick Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 5:30 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NAV for Exchange


NAV for Exchange hasn't been MAPI based in quite a while, like 2.0 and pre
5.5 SP4.  for Exchange 2000 it uses VSAPI 2.0

 This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not 
 understand this format, some or all of this message may not be 
 legible.
 
 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/plain;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 With MAPI based AV (like NAV) there is a timing gotcha.  If Outlook = 
 goes to grab mail at or around the same time it hits the mailbox, NAV 
 may not = get a
 chance to look at it or clean it before Outlook drags it down to the =
 PST.  I
 have seen it (during a couple of our virus attacks) let virused files
 through to the client totally untouched.  It did catch 99.9% of them, =
 but
 all it took was one virused attachment getting through to an =
 unsuspecting
 user . . .
 =20
 =20
 mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen,(Best Regards),=20
 Steve Ropiak =20
 ZF Group NAO=20
 CERT, Exchange Administrator=20
 (207) 989-9115 voice=20
 (207) 989-8722 fax=20
 (513) 314-0197 cell=20
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
 Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: NAV for Exchange
 
 
 =20
 Anyone having this problem, the nav for exchange detected the virus = 
 email and said was deleted.
 But it still send the infected emails to the recipient.
 =20
 Subject of the message:  Let's be friends
 One or more attachments were deleted.
   Attachment Status.bat was Deleted for the following reasons:
 Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was found.
 =20
 Please help
 =20
 =20
 Ben Ong
 Thanks
 =20
 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 
 ATTENTION! The information contained in this E-mail may be 
 CONFIDENTIAL = and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or entity 
 named above. If you = are
 not the intended recipient, please be notified that any use, review,
 distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. If you =
 have
 received this E-mail by error, please delete it and notify the sender
 immediately. Thank you.=20
 
 --_=_NextPart_001_01C1EC45.4CB08560
 Content-Type: text/html;
   charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTML 
 xmlns=3Dhttp://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40; xmlns:o =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office xmlns:w =3D=20 
 urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:wordHEAD
 META HTTP-EQUIV=3DContent-Type CONTENT=3Dtext/html; = 
 charset=3Diso-8859-1 TITLEMessage/TITLE
 
 META content=3DWord.Document name=3DProgId
 META content=3DMSHTML 6.00.2715.400 name=3DGENERATOR META 
 content=3DMicrosoft Word 9 name=3DOriginatorLINK=20 
 href=3Dcid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; rel=3DFile-List!--[if 
 gte = mso 9]xml  o:OfficeDocumentSettings
   o:DoNotRelyOnCSS/
  /o:OfficeDocumentSettings
 /xml![endif]--!--[if gte mso 9]xml
  w:WordDocument
   w:ViewNormal/w:View
   w:Zoom0/w:Zoom
   w:DocumentKindDocumentEmail/w:DocumentKind
   w:EnvelopeVis/
   w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing5 pt/w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing
   =
 w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery2/w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEv=
 ery
   = 
 w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery2/w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEver
 y=
 
   w:Compatibility
w:UseFELayout/
   /w:Compatibility
  /w:WordDocument
 /xml![endif]--
 STYLE@font-face {
   font-family: SimSun;
 }
 @font-face {
   font-family: @SimSun;
 }
 @page Section1 {size: 595.45pt 841.7pt; margin: 72.0pt 66.95pt 72.0pt 
 = 89.85pt; mso-header-margin: 36.0pt; mso-footer-margin: 36.0pt; =
 mso-paper-source: 0; }
 P.MsoNormal {
   FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; =
 mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-style-parent: ; mso-pagination: = 
 widow-orphan; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: = 
 SimSun; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN }
 LI.MsoNormal {
   FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; =
 mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-style-parent: ; mso-pagination: =
 widow-orphan; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: =
 SimSun; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN
 }
 DIV.MsoNormal {
   FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; =
 mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-style-parent: ; mso-pagination: =
 widow-orphan; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: =
 SimSun; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN
 }
 P.MsoAutoSig {
   FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 

RE: NAV for Exchange

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



With 
MAPI based AV (like NAV) there is a timing gotcha. If Outlook goes to grab 
mail at or around the same time it hits the mailbox, NAV may not get a chance to 
look at it or clean it before Outlook drags it down to the PST. I have 
seen it (during a couple of our virus attacks) let virused files through to the 
client totally untouched. It did catch 99.9% of them, but all it took was 
one virused attachment getting through to an unsuspecting user . . 
.



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Ben Ong 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:14 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: NAV for 
  Exchange
  
  
  Anyone having this problem, the nav for 
  exchange detected the virus email and said was 
  deleted.
  But it still send the infected emails to 
  the recipient.
  
  Subject 
  of the message: Let's be 
  friends
  One 
  or more attachments were deleted.
   Attachment Status.bat was Deleted for 
  the following reasons:
   Virus W32.Klez.gen@mm was 
  found.
  
  Please 
  help
  
  
  Ben 
  Ong
  Thanks
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  ATTENTION! The information contained in this 
  E-mail may be CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. It is intended for individual or 
  entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please be notified 
  that any use, review, distribution or copying of this E-mail is strictly 
  prohibited. If you have received this E-mail by error, please delete it and 
  notify the sender immediately. Thank you. 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Ditto.  We've had it installed here for a couple of months now.  It is light
years ahead of the NAV we were using on our Exchange servers.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Palmer, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 8:28 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Antigen


www.sybari.com

They provide wonderful tech support and after you install the evaluation
copy, an engineer will walk you through the installation.  However, it is
not difficult.  They are a wonderful company to work with.

Karen Palmer

*

Hi all,
Where can I find Antigen and how to set it up on my Exchage server? Thanks.
--
Matina


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: E-mail filtering

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Antigen 6.5 does include file / content filtering features you may find
useful.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Nelson Aguillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 6:14 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: E-mail filtering


Hello gang,

I'm using Exchange Server 5.5 on an NT server 4.0 with sp6
The Outlook client on my desktop is 2000

I have unwanted messages reaching my InBox on a daily basis. Spam and
sexually explicit solicitations. I keep sending stuff to the Junk folders
but new ones just keep coming.

What is everyone using to control this at the Server level?

Thanks in advance,


Nelson Aguillon


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Ports

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Our parent office in Germany is all hot on sticking our OWA box in the DMZ.
Can anyone point me to a White paper saying this is NOT a good idea? We are
currently running it with SSL.  Thanks.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 314-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:24 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA Ports


this debate pops up a lot.  I had OWA in the DMZ once.  On the last upgrade
(NT to win2K) it went back into the trusted.  It only ever ran SSL.  I heard
more arguments for keeping it inside than for putting it in the DMZ.  I
think that punching all the requisite holes in the DMZ to accomodate OWA
makes the entire DMZ pretty flaky.  I'd like to put some kind of IDS on it
(like secureIIS) but I've heard some bad things about the MS lockdown tool
and URLscan.  

Let me throw in a twist - what if the DMZ can be dedicated solely to OWA?  I
ask because that's happening here now.  We're contracting out whatever
Intranet services we had in the DMZ and the wire may be empty.  If this is
the case, is in not maybe safer back out there?  There are literally no
other DMZ systems that can be hacked and used to take advantage of the open
OWA ports.  Of course OWA can be hacked itself, but that same probablility
exists in the internal lan, where it can see everything full-bore.

Is my logic twisted or does this (rare) circumstance of OWA-only make any
difference in the approach?  Or am I thinking too much about this again?

 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Kelsay [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:31 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: OWA Ports
 
 Move your OWA server to your protected net.  Implement SSL and open up 
 port TCP/443 to the server.  Block port TCP/80 and force everyone to 
 use SSL. I
 believe this is the safest way.  I am sure someone here will let me know
 if
 I am wrong.
 
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:54 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: OWA Ports
 
 Exchange keeps reassigning the port numbers.  We were using 1062 and 
 1074.
 
 Yes, the DWORD value was set to Decimal.
 
 For some reason, our registry entries don't seem to matter. Maybe I 
 shouldn't even worry about them since the OWA server is on the DMZ?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:57 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: OWA Ports
 
 
 Which port numbers are you assigning?  Also, did you make sure that 
 the DWORD value is set to Decimal, NOT Hexadecimal?  I don't know if 
 there is a specified range that you are supposed to use, but we have 
 always used the same port numbers.
 
 Ben Winzenz, MCSE
 Network/Systems Administrator
 Peregrine Systems
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:41 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: OWA Ports
 
 Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0.
 
 OK.  We are using OWA.  Apparently, each time the Exchange Server is 
 rebooted, it randomly assigns ports for the directory and information 
 store by default, therefore, the ports that the client will use must
 be statically mapped.  Following the OWA instructions, I made the
 following
 registry entry to TRY and
 accomplish the static mapping.
 
 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MS Exchange
 ServerDS\Parameters:
 
 From here, I selected EDIT - NEW - DWORD VALUE.  I then typed in 
 TCP/IP port for the ENTRY and
 typed the port number in under VALUE.  I also did the same for
 
 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MS Exchange
 ServerIS\ParametersSystem:
 
 However, each time I reboot, a new port number is assigned.  Has 
 anybody else had this problem?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Robert
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new server

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Ed's 
the man on moving servers.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm




mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:57 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Replacing 
  Exchange 5.5 server with new server
  Who's Ed Crowley? What's a server move 
method?
  
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
April 15, 2002 11:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new 
server
Is there some 
specific reason why you have to keep the name?
If you could 
change the name, you could use the Ed Crowley method and save yourself hours 
of headaches

  
  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:55 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Replacing 
  Exchange 5.5 server with new server
  
  
  
  Hi 
  Everyone,
  
  We have just bought a new server 
  that we want to use to host our one and only Exchange 5.5 server SP4. 
  I have run several DR tests 
  on our Exchange DR server so I have everything I need to successfully get 
  the Exchange Directory and IS services to start on the new server. The new server will have the exact 
  same specs, including the computer name as the current exchange server. 
  I just wanted to 
  confirm something before we begin the move to the new server. Do I need to 
  first remove the current Exchange server from the domain and then add the 
  new server and connect that to the domain? Im pretty 
  sure I do but just wanted to double check. Also anything else I should prep 
  for before moving to the new server?
  
  OS = Windows 2000 
  SP2.
  
  Thanks,List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  Disclaimer Notice : Note 
  this is a disclaimer List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new server

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



OK, 
it's Monday, I just got stung by the IRS for a major tax bill, my guard was down 
;-(



mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 12:24 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Replacing 
  Exchange 5.5 server with new server
  And 
  Don is a major smart a$$ asking a dumb question to which he already knew the 
  answer. ;o)
  
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 
April 15, 2002 12:26 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new 
server
Ed's the man on moving servers.

http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxa.htm




mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO 
CERT, 
Exchange Administrator (207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax (513) 314-0197 
cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 
  11:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new server
  Who's Ed Crowley? What's a server move 
  method?
  
  
  Don 
  ElyNetwork EngineerTripath Imaging, Inc.(336) 290-8293 - 
  Direct(336) 516-4519 - Mobile[EMAIL PROTECTED] - emailhttp://www.tripathimaging.com
  

-Original Message-From: Martin 
Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 
Monday, April 15, 2002 11:54 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new 
server
Is there 
some specific reason why you have to keep the name?
If you 
could change the name, you could use the Ed Crowley method and save 
yourself hours of headaches

  
  -Original Message-From: Sethi, Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 
  8:55 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Replacing Exchange 5.5 server with new server
  
  
  
  Hi 
  Everyone,
  
  We have just bought 
  a new server that we want to use to host our one and only Exchange 5.5 
  server SP4. I have run 
  several DR tests on our Exchange DR server so I have everything I need 
  to successfully get the Exchange Directory and IS services to start on 
  the new server. The new 
  server will have the exact same specs, including the computer name as 
  the current exchange server. I just wanted to confirm 
  something before we begin the move to the new server. Do I need to 
  first remove the current Exchange server from the domain and then add 
  the new server and connect that to the domain? Im 
  pretty sure I do but just wanted to double check. Also anything else I should 
  prep for before moving to the new server?
  
  OS = Windows 2000 
  SP2.
  
  Thanks,List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  Disclaimer Notice : 
  Note this is a disclaimer List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving users from server A to Server B

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Yes, take a peek at the often imitated, but never duplicated Q152959 - XADM
How to Remove the First Exchange Server in a Site

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Donna Benefield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 8:51 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Moving users from server A to Server B


If Server A is the 'first server' in the site, I think there are some very
specific steps you have to make to change that over to Server B before you
can remove Server A from the site.

 -Original Message-
 From: Stuart Pittwood [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 3:05 AM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
 
 I was hoping you'd say something like that.
  
 Thanks
  
 Stu
   -Original Message-
   From: Preston Jeffares [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 11 April 2002 20:46
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
   Subject: RE: Moving users from server A to Server B
   
   
   Well... if you bring the 2nd server up in the site... and leave the 
 the 1st server up.  Exchange will automatically update the user's mapi 
 profile.  Some users may have to open, close, and then reopen their client
 to reconnect to the proper server.   Once everyone is over you can drop
 the first server.
   -Original Message-
   From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:17 PM
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
   Subject: Moving users from server A to Server B
   
   
   Hi all,

   We're in the process of relocating users from one server to
another.  
 Is there an easy way to change the server the users connect to within 
 outlook for 150 users? Can this be done from a logon script.

   Most of the clients are Win95, The Exchange servers are
Exchange 
 2000 SP2.

   Any advice appreciated

   Stu


   List Charter and FAQ at:
   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
   
   List Charter and FAQ at:
   http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
   
 List Charter and FAQ at: 
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I missed the beginnings of this thread, but if Free/busy is totally hosed
you can run GUIDGEN.EXE to recreate the site folders on a 5.5 server.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder


Is this just a case of adding a replica of the public folder?

Thanks

Stu

A full list of partners in Amery Parkes is available for inspection at all
of our offices.

Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
addressee only, and is confidential and may be the subject of Legal
Professional Privilege.  Any dissemination, distribution, copying or use
this communication without prior permission of the addressee is strictly
prohibited.

The contents of an attachment to this email may contain software viruses
which could damage your own computer system.  Whilst Amery-Parkes has taken
every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we do not accept
liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses.
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment to
this email.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Q152959 - XADM How to Remove the First Exchange Server in a Site is the one
written for 5.5.  Don't know of any one who's tried this on Exch2K.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder


There is a Q article for removing the first Exchange server in a site. It
was written for Exchange 5.5, don't know if it was updated for E2K. You
could look it up through support.microsoft.com.


John Matteson; Exchange Manager 
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards 
(404) 239 - 2981
Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been
accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and
its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal.
Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path
leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder


Let me elaborate.

I need to decomission the first exchange 2000 server which was installed and
according to Q252486 I need to rehome the offline address book and the
schedule+ free/busy folder is this just a case of replecating these 
schedule+ folders
to another server?

Thanks

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 April 2002 14:45
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder


I missed the beginnings of this thread, but if Free/busy is totally hosed
you can run GUIDGEN.EXE to recreate the site folders on a 5.5 server.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak  
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:34 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Rehome the Schedule+ Free/Busy folder


Is this just a case of adding a replica of the public folder?

Thanks

Stu

A full list of partners in Amery Parkes is available for inspection at all
of our offices.

Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the
addressee only, and is confidential and may be the subject of Legal
Professional Privilege.  Any dissemination, distribution, copying or use
this communication without prior permission of the addressee is strictly
prohibited.

The contents of an attachment to this email may contain software viruses
which could damage your own computer system.  Whilst Amery-Parkes has taken
every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we do not accept
liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses.
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening any attachment to
this email.


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox problems

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Does it happen 2o seconds or so after Outlook opens?  We had similar issues
at a small site and it turned out to be a dns issue.  Are all the users
affected or just a small pool?  Have you checked the possibility of name
resolution issues? dns, WINS?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Cross, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 2:28 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Cc: Lloyd-Hughes, Gareth
Subject: Mailbox problems


5.5 SP4 / NT4 sp6a / Various Outlook flavors

  We have a site that is reporting that when about 20 users open their
mailboxes in Outlook, it stops repsonding.  The admin had the user's try
other machines to access their mail and they still freeze.  He accesses
their mail with the same result.  Other than the 20 mailboxes, everyone else
is working fine.  No messages in the event viewer.  I'm trying to avoid a
eseutil due to the amount of downtime involved with a 15 GB database.  They
had to do this about a year ago due to the same symptoms and the ese fixed
it.  

Any ideas?

Tom Cross
Viasystems

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange server reboot simple q

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

True, true.

-Original Message-
From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q


me: I'm going to reboot my Exchange server...
list: Don't give me that, you snotty-faced heap of parrot droppings!
me: What?
list: Shut your festering gob, you tit! Your type really makes me puke, you
vacuous, coffee-nosed, maloderous, pervert!!!
me: Look, I CAME HERE FOR AN ARGUMENT, I'm not going to just stand...!!
list: OH, oh I'm sorry, but this is Abuse...
me: Oh, I see, well, that explains it.
list: Ah yes, you want the Exchange List, Just along the corridor

 -Original Message-
 From: Dawn R. Ashford [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:20 PM
 To:   MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject:  RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 I agree with you 100%, some of the folks here are an excellent source 
 of support. And most days I can just read along without typing.. but.. 
 well.. today I really needed to laugh..
 
 Now, maybe having pointed out the ridiculous path things have taken 
 here the last few days.. maybe we can get back to being professionals 
 who are sharing
 valuable information.. instead of bashing one another for issues we don't
 totally agree on.
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 11:27 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 Most excellent Dawn!!!  Just remember that this list does have some 
 outstanding people, and they essentially donate their time.  A thick 
 skin is sometimes required, and repeat the mantra Your Mileage May 
 Vary.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dawn R. Ashford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:11 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 Ray.. I'm sorry.. I just can't sit on my hands any more.. you just 
 need to go buy more memory.  We all have been informed that not 
 purchasing new hardware to fill our own need for speed is unacceptable 
 behavior.
 
 Just because we know the quirks of our own servers, and how to keep 
 them running means nothing.  You have to go buy the memory.  Today.  
 That's it. No more rebooting, no more eseutil. No matter what 
 Microsoft Tech support tells you to do.. you must NOT reboot.
 
 ROFL.. I'm sorry Ray.. you're just catching it for days of reading 
 this insanity, and I can't take it anymore.  We have all been informed 
 of the rules here. No legitimate questions that were asked last month 
 can be asked again this month, because it bores the folks who have 
 nothing to do but sit
 in their office and answer this email.. after all.. we have all been
 informed that they have perfect hardware, and perfect operating systems,
 and
 they don't need any type of maintenance.. oh.. wait.. they do install
 service packs and patches if they get bored with this list..
 
 Ray, you're living in reality with us poor slobs who actually work in 
 smallbusinessville and have to live within our budgets.. there are 
 those of us that have mixed neighborhoods and even have to have Mac 
 machines on our NT networks.. and some of us are so downright low to 
 the ground that we only
 have one server.. can you even imagine that? We do what it takes to keep
 our
 less than perfect environment going.. and.. I'm s ashamed.. we reboot
 when it cleans up the mess.
 
 There are some days you just have to laugh and walk away.. I'm 
 laughing.. but dang!  I just couldn't make myself not type!
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 1:56 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 I know if I didn't reboot periodically my memory poor little servers 
 would lock up after a couple months.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 12:24 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 Do you have proof that is does anything?
 
 --Kevinm CHFR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ 
 For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Beasley, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:23 AM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 We reboot to clear memory on a biweekly basis..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 2:12 PM
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: RE: Exchange server reboot simple q
 
 
 
 I don't reboot unless I absolutely have to.  This includes network 
 equipment as well as servers.  If you have to reboot things on a 
 monthly basis for network stability, there is an underlying problem 
 that should be addressed.
 
 

RE: Mailbox resources in an empty Mailbox??

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



No 
sent items?Deleted items folder is empty? No contacts or 
appointments? They all suck up space.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: Steve Jacobson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:39 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Mailbox resources 
  in an empty Mailbox??
  I 
  hope one of you mavens out there can answer this question. 
  
  
  I am 
  running Exchange 5.5 (SP4) with OWA. When I open the administrator 
  console and look at the Private Information Store-Mailbox resources, I see 
  mailboxes with items in them, but when I try to retrieve the mail in those 
  mailboxes (either through OWA or standard POP), the mailboxes appear to be 
  empty. For example, one mailbox shows 4 items and 14K total resources, 
  but when I try to read the mail from that mailbox, it shows as 
  empty.
  
  What 
  is happening here? Is there any way (as the administrator) to examine 
  those mailboxes and the supposed mail items?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Steve Jacobson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mailbox resources in an empty Mailbox??

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



How 
about opening mailbox, right click, properties, folder size 
button?

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: Steve Jacobson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:51 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mailbox 
  resources in an empty Mailbox??
  Nope. All items, (deleted items, contacts, appointments, sent 
  items are all stored in the local .pst file in Outlook.
  
  Steve
  
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, 
March 25, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Mailbox resources in an empty 
Mailbox??
No 
sent items?Deleted items folder is empty? No contacts or 
appointments? They all suck up space.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: Steve 
  Jacobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 
  25, 2002 8:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Mailbox resources in an empty Mailbox??
  I hope one of you mavens out there can answer 
  this question. 
  
  I am running Exchange 5.5 (SP4) with OWA. 
  When I open the administrator console and look at the Private Information 
  Store-Mailbox resources, I see mailboxes with items in them, but when I 
  try to retrieve the mail in those mailboxes (either through OWA or 
  standard POP), the mailboxes appear to be empty. For example, one 
  mailbox shows 4 items and 14K total resources, but when I try to read the 
  mail from that mailbox, it shows as empty.
  
  What is happening here? Is there any way 
  (as the administrator) to examine those mailboxes and the supposed mail 
  items?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  Steve Jacobson
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Registry for maintain Logon information

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I forget exactly where, but if you search the reg for Exchange on a
machine that retains it, you'll see it on the first or second hit.  10 of
snow last night in Maine.  Nothing at all cool about it.  We're ready for
Spring.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 12:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Registry for maintain Logon information


Good morning.  Outlook 98.  Exchange 5.5 SP4

Does anyone know where the registry is keep for the pop up logon window that
asks for User ID, Domain and Password.  We have a user that reports this
information is not retained when coming and going from Outlook.

Have a great day.

First full day of spring and it is snowing in Indiana.  How cool is that?

Regards,

Mike Mitchell
Systems eMAIL Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2002

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

You could uninstall OL2002 and replace it with an earlier less secure
version, like 2000 or 98 or shudder 97.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:31 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2002


What does the Outlook forum say?

-Original Message-
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2002


Does anybody know how to disable the function on Outlook 2002 where it
request permissions if another program tries to send thru it? I know this
function is to protect against virii but I am using it on a server running
backupexec 8.6 and I have been having problems sending job notifications. I
can send the notification via SMTP but it doesn't include the job log so it
isn't an option. I can send notifications on a per job basis but it comes up
with the Outlook dialog box warning that another app is trying to send email
and if I want to allow it. When I try to send on a global basis nothing
happens, nothing is sent. i am wondering if it has to do with this new
feature in Outlook2K2. i can stick to sending the notifications on a per job
basis but it isn't going to send anything because it will be stuck on that
box asking what to do? Any ideas on how to disable this thing or maybe
specify which apps can send thru Outlook? TIA!!
.+-

@A鳫a※0z[lpjo㨱Z \ฅzm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Not 
since I stopped taking all those drugs G. Seriously, though it 
seems like your workstation is a little short on RAM or CPU 
power.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:22 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Outlook
  Anyone ever see it 
  when youre typing in Outlook , and the application isnt keeping up with you, 
  and then suddenly fills in all the words you just typed?
  
  Im looking for a 
  solution\workaround for this if possible.List Charter and 
  FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Apparently not enough to drive around for 3 days with a homeless guy 
sticking out of my windshield, but we did have fun.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: John Matteson 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 9:10 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Outlook
  And 
  just what sort of recreational pharmaceuticals were you 
  using?
  
  John Matteson; Exchange 
  ManagerGeac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and 
  Standards(404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, 
  it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer 
  teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
  
-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 
March 15, 2002 8:31 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: Outlook
Not since I stopped taking all those drugs G. 
Seriously, though it seems like your workstation is a little short on RAM or 
CPU power.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: MHR(Michael 
  Ross) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 
  8:22 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  Outlook
  Anyone ever 
  see it when youre typing in Outlook , and the application isnt keeping up 
  with you, and then suddenly fills in all the words you just 
  typed?
  
  Im looking for 
  a solution\workaround for this if possible.List 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

And that real men drink whiskey and light beer is only to be consumed in
commercials where people are getting paid to drink it.
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly


He hasn't been around here long I guess.
There are two things here you should always remember. Everything is
Groupshields fault, and fish tacos rule.

-Original Message-
From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:56 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly


Actually this is a documented problem with Groupshield.
 
Steve Clark
Clark Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN Charter Member
Who's watching your network?
www.clarksupport.com
  301-610-9584 voice
  240-465-0323 Efax
 
The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark
Systems Support, LLC., to contain proprietary and privileged information and
shall not be disclosed or used for the benefit of others without the prior
written permission of Clark Systems Support, LLC.
 
-Original Message-
From: Kent, Larry SYNETICS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:49 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly
 
Stop blaming the software.  That's like saying just because you are hsving
trouble shifting a manual transmission car, there is someting wrong with the
car and you should go out and buy a different one... -Original
Message- 
From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:54 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly 
 
We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. 
We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. 
We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. 
We are using GroupShield anti-virus software. 
This is your problem. I have heard of two other systems using Groupshield 
doing the same thing. Get Trend or Antigen.  
Walt 
-Original Message- 
From: Sonny Meza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 6:55 PM 
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
Cc: Michael Hoelscher; Dan Reed; John Moreland; Bill Brown 
Subject: Exchange store dismounts unexpectedly 
 
We've had problems with our Exchange store dismounting unexpectedly. 
This happens quite often - sometimes two or three times a week.  We are 
using GroupShield anti-virus software.  Other than that, we have nothing 
else running on that server.  Has anyone experienced this problem? 
Would appreciate any thoughts or ideas we could get.  Thanks. 
 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: How can I regain Disk Space

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

White space in the databases.  You need to run an offline defrag to actually
reclaim disk space but you need at least as much free space as the size of
your db.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Nick Symiakakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: How can I regain Disk Space


Hello Everyone,
  Once again I need some advice from the Exchange Gurus. I am running
Exchange 5.5, and I am running dangerously low on disk space on the Exchange
Server. I had everyone in our organization clean out their Inbox, Sent
Items, and Deleted Items yesterday. When I looked at the disk space today,
it was actually lower than yesterday. I do not understand this. If the
mailboxes are getting smaller, why is the database not shrinking? Is there
any other way to regain disk space? I preformed a full backup of the
Information Store, and Directory yesterday.

I appreciate any advice on this matter,

Nick Symiakakis
Noble Hospital
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Antigen

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Ditto 
here. The only minor annoyance is that it's automatic updating won't 
authenticate through our proxy server so we had to manually configurea 
place to pick up the updates. We manually drop them there and all our 
servers pick them up. Otherwise, excellent product.

Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: Gary Gregg 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 10:00 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Antigen
  
  We love it here too 
  no probs at all just install and let it get on with 
  it!!!
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Karen 
  Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:00 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Antigen
  
  
  I love 
  Antigen. It is the best anti-virus product we have every 
  used.
  
  
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: John Riley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 9:58 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Re: 
  Antigen
  
  I installed Antigen on my 
  MSExchange server in December and haven't given it a second thought. It 
  updates and maintains itself quite well.
  

- Original Message - 


From: Martin Blackstone 


To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 

Sent: 
Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:06 PM

Subject: RE: 
Antigen



Really? I have 
found Antigens interface to be very poor. That has been my complaint 
throughout the entire eval process.
-Original 
  Message-From: Ellery 
  July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:51 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Antigen
  
  I 
  use Antigen because it is easier (for me) to setup but also think that 
  Trend works well.
  
  
  
  
  ellery 
  july phone 
  - 651-225-3895  
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Stephen J. Norton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:54 
PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
Antigen

  
  Ladies and 
  Gentlemen;
  
  Been away 
  from the list for a few months. I'm SURE this has been addressed and 
  beat to death in my absence but I need to pose the 
  question:
  
  Is Antigen 
  still the choice for Exchange box virus protection? Still running 
  InnoculateIT :-(. I finally got budget approval and would appreciate 
  an opinion update. Thanks.
  
  Steve
List Charter 
and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Cannot move item from mailbox to personal folder

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Are you using a MAPI - based AV product on the server?  I can't put my
finger on the article, but do remember that MAPI based products will cause
this type of behavior.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: cslee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Cannot move item from mailbox to personal folder


When I try to move message with attachment file (although the attachment is
only 2/3 K), I get this message very often.

Microsoft Outlook
Can't move the items. Some items could not be moved. They were either
already moved or deleted, or access was denied.

Can somebody advise what is wrong? After I retry a few times, or just move
to others folder, then it's work. So, I don't think it should be permission
problem.

My xChange Server configuration as below:
MS Exchange Server 5.5 Enterprise SP4, NT Server SP 6a

Client Software : Outlook 98

 Regards,
 Lee Choon Sim
 IT Department
 Tel: +604-6321000 ext 1760
 DID Tel: +604-6321760
 Fax: +604-6321034
 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook 2k Exchange sp4

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Detect and Repair is in OL2002
Steve

-Original Message-
From: Miller Bonnie L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook 2k Exchange sp4


Can the user log on to Outlook with another system?  If so, have you tried
detect and repair from the Outlook Help menu to repair the installation on
that machine?  We use 2K, so not sure if it's there in 2002.  If not, you
might also be able to choose add/remove programs and repair/reinstall from
there.

-Original Message-
From: Fatmi, Saida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:15 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook 2k Exchange sp4

One of my users' win2k system crashed. He had to fix his system using repair
disk. Everything works but his outlook 2002 is not working. It gives him
error like  system cannot log you in. It was working just fine before. I
don't see any error log in the server. I tried to re-create his profile but
nothing happen. I also made sure rpc locater startup is set to manual. That
did not made any different. Please help.

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

We have a bunch of users homed in a trusted domain that access our servers.
Exchange doesn't care where the users are.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: ARAE NETWORKS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to another Domain


We would like to setup another Domain (NT 4.0) and move the Exchange 5.5
Store to a new Server while still allowing the users from the current NT 4.0
Domain access to their mailboxes via a trust.  Can this be done?  I have
only been succesful moving an Information Store within the same Domain. Once
I build a new Exchange Server into the new Domain, even if I import the
individual mailboxes, how would the users access the mailboxes?  Could you
set the primary account to another Domain?

JR



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Net Folders

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Keep all your stuff in your mailbox, delegate permission to the other user?

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Le Fevre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Net Folders


Does anyone have any possible solutions for Outlook's Net Folders for MS
Office XP as support for this feature isn't carried over from Outlook 2000.

Many thanks. 

Stuart Le Fevre BSc 
Technical Support Engineer 
c/o Visual Sciences 
Tel. 01382 422120/422100 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
http://www.vissci.com/ 
The above e-mail(s) content is intended for the named addressee(s) only. Its
contents and any subsequent attachment(s) are private and confidential and
should not be read, copied, transmitted or disclosed by or to any other
individual without the written prior permission of Visual Sciences Ltd.



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Exchange 5.5 Question....

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

What about a free web mail account like Yahoo or Hotmail?

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Majetic, John RAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 Question


Does anyone know of a bouncer mailbox on the internet that I can use to test
my sending and recieving. I used to know of one, but now it seems as if it
takes hours to reply to my test message, not really a good thing.
 
Thanks 
John Majetic


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: PST Files

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Outlook has a search capability.  That doesn't do it for you?

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Swan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:46 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: PST Files



 At present we have are using Windows NT 4 (sp6a) with Exchange 5.5 
 (sp4). We have to keep email for 7 years and currently we are planning 
 on archiving all old emails to pst files. If we need to find an old 
 email this would be a long job does anyone know of a third party tool 
 that can scan pst files with a query for a certain email.
 
 Thanks in Advance
 
 Chris

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Wait while data is transferring

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Wait while data is transferring





Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP6. 4 servers in our site. Users on the Batavia server, when they hit the Send / Receive Button in Outlook will get a message saying that they are retrieving data from another server in the site. The process makes mail retrieval excruciatingly slow. The users in question have nothing on the other server. Any ideas where to poke with my sharp stick?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Wait while data is transferring

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



They're a WAN link away from the other server (T-1, 128 KB CIR), but in 
the same building as the server they are on (100 MB Switched). Our 
question is why is it transferring data from the other 
server?

  
  -Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 
  2002 12:48 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Wait while data is transferring
  
  Network. Are 
  these users in the same office as your Exchange servers? How are they 
  connecting? By that, I mean, is it a WAN link, or LAN?
  
  
  Ben Winzenz, 
  MCSE
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator
  Peregrine 
  Systems
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Ropiak 
  Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:26 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: Wait while 
  data is transferring
  
  Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP6. 4 
  servers in our site. Users on the Batavia server, when they hit the Send 
  / Receive Button in Outlook will get a message saying that they are retrieving 
  data from another server in the site. The process makes mail retrieval 
  excruciatingly slow. The users in question have nothing on the other 
  server. Any ideas where to poke with my sharp stick?
  mit 
  freundlichen Grüßen,(Best 
  Regards),Steve 
  RopiakZF Group 
  NAOCERT, Exchange 
  Administrator(207) 989-9115 
  voice(207) 989-8722 
  fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Is it worth the extra expense?

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Agreed, RAM cram will hurt you down more than disk.  Save the money. Load
the server with RAM.  Go out and toast yourselves with expensive single malt
with the difference.

-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 1:51 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Is it worth the extra expense?


I dont think so.
Put the money in RAM. 512 is OK, but not alot!
jlc
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Dickinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: Is it worth the extra expense?


We are looking to purchase a Compaq Proliant ML370 1.2GHz, 512mb Ram with 3
x 36.4GB Hard drives in a raid 5 for our new Exchange Server. Is it worth
the extra Expense to go for the 15,000rpm hard drives over the 10,000 rpm
hard drives? The extra cost would be about £950 that's $1345. Would we see
much extra performance?

We are only a small company at the moment with 50 users.

Your thoughts would be very welcome

Kevan Dickinson
Network Engineer
Oxford Natural Products Plc
The Stable Block
Cornbury Park
Charlbury
Oxfordshire
OX7 3EH

Tel:  +44 1608 813300
Dir:  +44 1608 81
Fax: +44 1608 813301

www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com
Company No: 3554809



*
This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper Service
*


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: 16 gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove m essa ges

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



As in 
eseutil?
Steve

  
  -Original Message-From: Dan Bartley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 
  2002 2:02 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 16 
  gig limit - how can I get it IS to start so I can remove messa 
  ges
  
  Defrag 
  it.
  
  
  Best 
  Regards,Dan BartleySenior 
  MIS ManagerNetCarrier Inc.
  -Original 
  Message-From: Zangara, 
  Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 
  27, 2002 13:32To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 16 gig limit - how can I get it 
  IS to start so I can remove messa ges
  
  
  Folks -
  
  
  
  One of my outer offices is running 
  Exch 5.5 sp 4 STANDARD. I have requested the tech there to upgrade to 
  Enterprise but that is another story. 
  
  
  
  He is out today and I started 
  getting calls from his users not being able to connect. I checked and 
  sure enough he passed the 16 gig limit.
  
  
  
  I have never had to deal with 
  this. How can I reduce the size of the IS without it being 
  started?
  
  
  
  I have been searching technet but 
  have not found anything yet.
  
  
  
  Any links greatly 
  appreciated!
  
  
  
  Thanks.
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
  ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A 
  Division of Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  
  I want 
  to get a tatoo of myself on my entire body, only 2" taller. -- Steven Wright 
  
  
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: spam question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

OutL2000 never asked about sending read receipts, but OutL2002 does.

Steve

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 10:54 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: spam question


I wouldn't think so, unless the spammers are coming from your own Exchange
Server.  All I know is that whenever someone from the outside world requests
a read receipt, I'm usually asked if I want to send it or not.  Of course,
that is with Outlook (Internet Mail Only) and Outlook Express at home.  I'm
not so sure I've ever seen it with the Corporate/Workgroup setting...

 -Original Message-
From:   Eldridge, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, February 26, 2002 9:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:spam question

I try to lecture my lusers all the time about not unscribing to spam mail
that they are sending their legitimate address back to whomever. I tell them
to just delete it. Now internally when I send a read receipt to someone it
will tell me that it was not read. Is this what happens when you delete
spam? Are they (spammers) still getting a notification that it's a real
address?

dave

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Counting mailboxes

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



I know 
we've been through this before, but I thought Exch 2K was 1 CAL-1 
Mailbox, Exch 5.5 was 1 CAL - 1 Connected computer or other 
device?

  
  -Original Message-From: Drewski 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
  2002 11:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Counting mailboxes
  It's 
  easier to delete the few than count the many.
  
  However, I believe that Bill's right -- it's by 
  users, not by mailboxes. Now, if you only have 1 user per 
  mailbox...
  -- DrewVisit 
  http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"To announce that there must 
  be no criticism of the President or that we are to stand by the President 
  right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is mortally 
  treasonable to the American Public." Theodore Roosevelt 
  
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
2002 10:42 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Counting mailboxes
Will that actually give me a valid figure, I wonder. For instance, I 
see mailboxes for "System Attendant", Free/Busy Connector", IMS, etc. Do I 
need licenses for those accounts? I know I'll need one for Administrator, 
and for NAV (our anti-virus). What about those system-created 
accounts?

--

Michael Leone, Systems 
Administrator
Philadelphia Contributionship
210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA 
19106
mailto: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 215-627-1752 x1282
F: 215-627-5354

  -Original Message-From: Drewski 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
  2002 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Counting mailboxes
  export the mailbox list to Excel, see how many rows are taken 
  up.
  -- DrewVisit 
  http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Strange things are afoot 
  at the Circle-K..." Ted "Theodore" Logan 
  
-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 
21, 2002 10:25 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: Counting mailboxes
I'm reviewing my Exchange license counts. Is there an 
easy way to get a count of the number of mailboxes I have to get a 
license for? Some quick utility, rather than laboriously counting by 
hand?
--  
Michael Leone, Systems Administrator Philadelphia Contributionship 210 S. 4th 
Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106 mailto: 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
V: 215-627-1752 x1282 F: 
215-627-5354 List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Counting mailboxes

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



One 
for work, one for wife, one for girlfriend, etc., etc. Adds up after a 
while.

  
  -Original Message-From: Martin 
  Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 
  February 21, 2002 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: Counting mailboxes
  Not always. 
  Many people may have multiple mailboxes. I have run an exchange server for 80 
  users with over 500 mailboxes.
  

-Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
Counting mailboxes

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 21, 
  2002 11:27 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: Counting mailboxes
  Exchange is not licensed by mailbox.
  
  It is licenesed by the number of users that 
  will connect to the Exchange server.
  
  Yes, but - usually - you have 1 user, with 1 
  mailbox. And a number of other accounts - NAV, etc. So it's a good 
  ballpark figure.
  
  So, since there's no user for "System Attendent" 
  (as an example), I don't need a license for 
  it?
  List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

We've been before . . . PST cracking

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: We've been before . . . PST cracking





We have an employee who was requested to leave, now they want into his password protected PST. What was the link to the util that would let us in?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Multiple IMS in Exchange 5.5

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4.  Right now, Exchange points to a Linux box running
sendmail as our method of sending / receiving Internet mail.  The networking
guys want to add a second Linux box (with it's own MX record) and a higher
cost so that if the first box goes down mail would automatically flow to the
second box.  I'm not sure how to do this on the Exchange side.  If I add a
second IMS connector in Exchange how do I control which one is actively
used?  The goal is to have this roll over automatically.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook Form Radio Buttons

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Sams Teach Yourself Outlook 2000 Programming in 24 Hours
by Sue Mosher.  
Everything your Mama never told you about Outlook forms.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 8:48 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook Form Radio Buttons


I know it might not be the same here but 

in VB say you have two groups of two radio buttons then each group must be
encased in a frame otherwise it is treated as one large group of options.

HTH

Stu

-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 February 2002 13:42
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook Form Radio Buttons


Ok, I am creating an Outlook Form that has quite a few radio buttons, but it
will only let me choose one on the whole page.  I have different categories,
and I need to choose one for each category, how do I get this broken up so
that I can choose more than one radio button on the form?

Chris

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: My recent $*#($#@($#

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: Message



Awe. 
come on, it's Friday. Give the guy a break. It's not like he invited 
us all over andserved lite beer.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 
voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Ely, Don 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 
  2:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: My 
  recent $*#($#@($#
  Yeah, I know, but damn... First time in my career I've used the 
  stupid thing and I just wanted the company to know I was gone. Instead, 
  I let the entire world know. Ah well, it won't happen again and there's 
  an exchange admin still looking for his tail as we speak... 
  ;o)
  
  
  
  
  Don Ely Network Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. (336) 290-8293 - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email 
  http://www.tripathimaging.com 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Ben Winzenz 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 
2002 1:39 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
My recent $*#($#@($#

If you don't know 
what he's referring to, I wouldn't worry about it. Some of us though, 
had a little grin when it happened J

Don't worry Don, it 
happens at least once to the best of us.


Ben Winzenz, 
MCSE
Network/Systems 
Administrator
Peregrine 
Systems

-Original 
Message-From: Matthew 
Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:36 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: My 
recent $*#($#@($#


What are you 
referring to? You didn't include it in your reply
-Original 
  Message-From: Ely, 
  Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:27 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: My recent 
  $*#($#@($#
  Sorry all, I don't manage the 
  exchange servers and didn't know they allowed this kind of crap. 
  They don't now! 
  Don Ely 
  Network 
  Engineer Tripath Imaging, Inc. 
  (336) 290-8293 
  - Direct (336) 516-4519 - Mobile 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 
  email http://www.tripathimaging.com 
  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Pub background cleanup

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a.

The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 
1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub.  I searched the KB on the
ID's and found nothing descriptive.  Can anyone enlighten me?  

Thanks
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Current NAV release for Exchange is 2.5 with a 3.x release on the horizon.
Wasn't aware that there ever was a CE version for Exchange.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
E xchange v7.6


yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE
version numbers.  I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for
Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version
is 7.6.
Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the web
interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often.  

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
E xchange v7.6


That is retarded.  I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now.  I
would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that.  That is a SERIOUS
flaw.  Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange?

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6

Yep.  NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per
month (uggh).  
I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product.

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication.
Advertising.com -- Superior Technology. Superior Performance.


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
E xchange v7.6


??? I have never heard of that.  We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't
use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night.  I wasn't aware
that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6

WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great.  All web administered and
easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection.  The only downfall is that in
the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a
month.

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6


I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they
think it had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so
as well! I really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I
played with the exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but.
jlc

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6

NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for
Exchange server.  That is what I am using.

Antigen:  http://www.sybari.com/home/


Mark

-Original Message-
From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6


Has anyone had any experience with this product?
Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000.

Any comments appreciated


Michael Jacob
PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118
139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118
Ph  (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771
Mobile  0418 840005 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Pub background cleanup

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

My thought, too.  I check it out.  Thx.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


I suspect then, that you've got some diagnostics logging settings turned up
for the public store.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:47
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Pub background cleanup
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


Informational, the detail of the event says stuff like:  
39 of 39 attachment(s) were deleted during a background cleanup.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


What are they, errors, warnings or informational?  What do the events
actually say?

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Pub background cleanup
Subject: Pub background cleanup


Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a.

The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 
1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub.  I searched the KB on the
ID's and found nothing descriptive.  Can anyone enlighten me?  

Thanks
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Pub background cleanup

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Score!!!  Checked the pub's properties on that server and background cleanup
(whatever that is) logging was set to maximum.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


I suspect then, that you've got some diagnostics logging settings turned up
for the public store.

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:47
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Pub background cleanup
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


Informational, the detail of the event says stuff like:  
39 of 39 attachment(s) were deleted during a background cleanup.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:40 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Pub background cleanup


What are they, errors, warnings or informational?  What do the events
actually say?

Neil Hobson

Silversands
http://www.silversands.co.uk
Microsoft Gold Certified Partner
For Enterprise Systems
For Collaborative Solutions

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: 14 February 2002 14:24
Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List
Conversation: Pub background cleanup
Subject: Pub background cleanup


Exchange 5.5 SP3+ on NT4 SP 6a.

The application event log on one of my servers is inundated with ID 1103 
1106 relating to a background cleanup of the pub.  I searched the KB on the
ID's and found nothing descriptive.  Can anyone enlighten me?  

Thanks
mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or
opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of Silversands, or any of its 
subsidiary companies.
If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support 
Desk immediately by telephone on 01202-36 or via email at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Same here.  I manually update the servers every morning to get the latest
updates.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:29 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
E xchange v7.6


I guess there are just different options between NAV CE and NAV for Exchange
then.  We currently have 7.5, and we also update daily, but he is saying
that the Exchange portion allows him to update 10x/month.  STOOPID!

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems

-Original Message-
From: Candee Vaglica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 10:05 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6

No, you can schedule the server in NAV CE to update daily.

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:31 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6


yep...same deal...actually NAV for Exchange does not follow the NAV CE
version numbers.  I believe I am using something around version 2.11 for
Exchange, which is the latest (I think) for Exchange 5.5, but my CE version
is 7.6. Also - I seem to recall that it uses a simple AT command behind the
web interface, so you can adjust it manually to run live update more often.


-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com --
Superior Technology. Superior Performance.


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6


That is retarded.  I'm even more glad that we use Trend Scanmail now.  I
would complain long and hard to your NAV rep about that.  That is a SERIOUS
flaw.  Do you know if this was also the case with NAV CE 7.5 for Exchange?

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems


-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:57 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6

Yep.  NAV for Exchange 5.5 can only be set to automatically update 10x per
month (uggh).  
I believe this is changed in their Exchange 2000 product.

-Jim

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Engineer
Advertising.com

We bring innovation to interactive communication. Advertising.com --
Superior Technology. Superior Performance.


-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 8:50 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6


??? I have never heard of that.  We use NAV CE as well, and while we don't
use the Exchange portion, we update def files EVERY night.  I wasn't aware
that there were different versions on NAV CE with different capabilities.

Ben Winzenz, MCSE
Network/Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems

-Original Message-
From: Jason Dwyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:17 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E
xchange v7.6

WE use Nav CE for exchange and I think its great.  All web administered and
easy to use. Uses mapi/vapi virus detection.  The only downfall is that in
the version I have, it can only automatically update virus defs 10 times a
month.

Regards,

Jason Dwyer



-Original Message-
From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2002 4:43 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6


I just did a roll out of 7.6, and really like it! Someone said they think it
had a smaller footprint then other av software, and I think so as well! I
really like it. As for exchange these guys are right, I played with the
exchange client, and it blows. Trend/Sybari kick but. jlc

-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6

NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange
server.  That is what I am using.

Antigen:  http://www.sybari.com/home/


Mark

-Original Message-
From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Title: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)



You 
can. The issue is if the server you are removing is / was the first server 
in the site as it typically homes the public folders and site folders for public 
free / busy data and the offline address book. In that case also study 
Q152959.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange Administrator(207) 989-9115 
voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Robbins, Geoff. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 14, 
  2002 12:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Moving Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server (solution)
  Is 
  it not possible to add the server to the organisation and site as another 
  server then use Move Mailbox to the new server? I've spoken to Microsoft 
  who told me that you can add another Exchange server to the 
  site.
  
  Or 
  am I just being naive?
  
  Geoff Robbins
  -Original Message-From: Micciche, Robert 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 14 February 2002 
  16:09To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Moving 
  Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server 
  (solution)*PLEASE 
  NOTE:This email has originated from outside the confines of the 
  Lincolnshire Police Network. This message and any attachments have been 
  scanned for viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as 
  new viruses (and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. 
  Be particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.Please make 
  sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office 
  Applications.If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on 
  ext. 8765, BEFORE opening the attachments. *
  1. Search Google for "Ed Crowley Server Move 
  Method". Print it. 2. Print the MS KB 
  articles Ed mentions. 3. Carefully, very 
  carefully, perform the move exactly how Ed describes. 
  After it is done, quietly wonder to yourself what an 
  incredible piece of IT work you just accomplished- and how little it will be 
  appreciated by the organization.
  -Original Message- From: Kevan 
  Dickinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 9:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Moving 
  Exchange 5.5 off of a NT 4.5 SBS Server 
  Does any one have any experience of moving Exchange 5.5 off of 
  a server running SBS 4.5 onto another server. 
  
  I would like to move it to a Win 2000 server in the same 
  Domain. 
  I would then like to make the SBS Server into full NT 4 server 
  before eventually migrating fully to a win 2000 
  domain. 
  Currently the SBS Server is only running Exchange and file and 
  print services. 
  Thank you in advance for ant help. 
  Kevan Dickinson Network 
  Engineer Oxford Natural Products Plc The Stable Block Cornbury Park Charlbury Oxfordshire OX7 3EH 
  Tel: +44 1608 813300 Dir: 
  +44 1608 81 Fax: +44 1608 813301 
  www.oxfordnaturalproducts.com Company 
  No: 3554809 
  * 
  This email has been checked by the altohiway e-Sweeper 
  Service * 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm*PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base 
  version is 95 (v7). Please make sure that files you send can be read in this 
  format.The information contained in this email is confidential and is 
  intended for the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain 
  information from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The 
  copyright in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property 
  of Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is 
  contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 
  1988.If you have received this message in error or there are any 
  problems, please notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, 
  disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly 
  forbidden.Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of 
  this message. Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their 
  user ID and their compliance with the law.This message and any 
  attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire Police will not be 
  liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental damages arising from 
  alteration of the contents of this message or as a result of any virus being 
  passed on.*List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: outlook license

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

The word from Corpsoft (who handles our licensing) is that your Exchange CAL
provides you with licensing for ANY version of Outlook up to and including
2002.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Patrick Smallwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 5:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: outlook licence


Hello All,

OK, maybe its just me, but I was unable to locate a good URL in the
archives regarding Outlook Licencing. The previous URL I had bookmarked
also no longer is valid. Does anyone have a Q article stating which version
of outlook can be used with Exchange? Thought it was mentioned here that
the answer is in the EULA...checked that, but (again, must be me!) I cannot
derive an answer.

From E2k EULA:
Client Software. You may install the Client Software on any Device for
which you have acquired an Exchange 2000 Server Client Access License.
This EULA supersedes any end-user license agreement which may accompany the
Client Software and sets forth your exclusive rights with respect to the
Client Software.
EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 SOFTWARE MAY ACCOMPANY THE SERVER SOFTWARE.  IN THE
EVENT IT DOES, YOU MAY INSTALL ONE COPY OF THE EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 SOFTWARE
ON THE SAME SERVER ON WHICH YOU INSTALL THE SERVER SOFTWARE SOLELY FOR THE
PURPOSE OF ENABLING THE FUNCTIONING OF THE SERVER SOFTWARE.  THIS EULA
SUPERSEDES ANY ONLINE END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT CONTAINED IN THE EXCHANGE
SERVER 5.5 SOFTWARE AND SETS FORTH YOUR EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO
THE EXCHANGE SERVER 5.5 SOFTWARE.


Thanks,
Patrick




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS E xchange v7.6

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

I agree.  We use NAV for Exchange and are moving to Antigen.  Like any MAPI
/ AVAPI based AV products, it lets too many things slip by and also doesn't
include any sort of filtering (without a registry hack).

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kelsay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:02 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6


NAV on the desktop and servers is fine, but I would use Antigen for Exchange
server.  That is what I am using.

Antigen:  http://www.sybari.com/home/


Mark

-Original Message-
From: Michael Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 1:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Norton Antivirus Corp Ed for Small Business with NAV for MS
Exchange v7.6


Has anyone had any experience with this product?
Its supposed to be a good fit for MS Small Business Server 2000.

Any comments appreciated


Michael Jacob
PO Box 992 Gawler SA 5118
139a Murray Street Gawler SA 5118
Ph  (08) 8522 2027 Fax (08) 8523 1771
Mobile  0418 840005 

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook sharing problem.

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Are both users on the same Exchange server?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook sharing problem.


I have come across a problem with a user sharing their calendar.  The user
that was trusted with modifying the calendar has had her machine changed
(from W98 to W2K).  When opening the other users calendar, I get a cannot
open calendar error.

We are using Exchange 5.5, SP3.  The Outlook client is 2000.

I have gone to the sharers machine, removed and reapplied the permissions,
but without change.  There is another user trusted with sharing the calendar
and she still has access.

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Geoff Robbins


*
PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7).
Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.

The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for
the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information
from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright
in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of
Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is
contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please
notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying
or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.

Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message.
Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and
their compliance with the law.

This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire
Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental
damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a
result of any virus being passed on.
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Outlook sharing problem.

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Just a SWAG, but maybe a replication issue of some sort?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:59 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook sharing problem.


No.  They are on different servers on the same site.

Geoff

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 February 2002 12:50
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Outlook sharing problem.


*
PLEASE NOTE:
This email has originated from outside the confines of the Lincolnshire
Police Network. This message and any attachments have been scanned for
viruses. However please be cautious when opening attachments, as new viruses
(and methods for their execution) are being created all the time. Be
particularly cautious of attachments ending with .EXE.

Please make sure Macro Virus Detection is enabled in your Microsoft Office
Applications.

If in doubt, please seek advise from the IT Helpdesk on ext. 8765, BEFORE
opening the attachments. 
*

Are both users on the same Exchange server?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Robbins, Geoff. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:45 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Outlook sharing problem.


I have come across a problem with a user sharing their calendar.  The user
that was trusted with modifying the calendar has had her machine changed
(from W98 to W2K).  When opening the other users calendar, I get a cannot
open calendar error.

We are using Exchange 5.5, SP3.  The Outlook client is 2000.

I have gone to the sharers machine, removed and reapplied the permissions,
but without change.  There is another user trusted with sharing the calendar
and she still has access.

Any advice would be gratefully received.

Geoff Robbins


*
PLEASE NOTE: We are a Microsoft Office Site, our base version is 95 (v7).
Please make sure that files you send can be read in this format.

The information contained in this email is confidential and is intended for
the addressee(s) only. Any attachments to this message contain information
from Lincolnshire Police, which is confidential or privileged. The copyright
in the contents of this message and any attachments is the property of
Lincolnshire Police, and any unauthorised reproduction or disclosure is
contrary to the provisions of the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

If you have received this message in error or there are any problems, please
notify the originator immediately. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying
or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden.

Lincolnshire Police is not responsible for the content of this message.
Individuals are responsible for messages transmitted under their user ID and
their compliance with the law.

This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses. Lincolnshire
Police will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequental
damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message or as a
result of any virus being passed on.
*

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Mass calendar update

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6.  Is there any way to plug all the company's
holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Mass calendar update

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

SP4?  No reason really.  Offered up the public folder option, they're
thinking it over.  Was wondering why they feel the need to remind all their
employees about a day when the DON'T have to work.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:14 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Mass calendar update


Why no SP4 ?
Do you use public folders ?

- Original Message -
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 09:23
Subject: Mass calendar update


Exchange 5.5 SP3 on ?NT4 SP6.  Is there any way to plug all the company's
holidays into everyone's calendar in their mailbox on the server?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: PST files

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office IT]

If it was marked RO, it shouldn't have opened at all.  My vote is white
space.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:22 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST files


Is the file marked as read only ?

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 03:20
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PST files


Other than PSTs suck.. No.  You could try scanpst.exe.

-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: PST files


Exchange 5.5 SP4, Outlook 98, NT 4.0 SP6.  We have a user who recently
left the company.  He has a PST file on his home drive.  A user who has
taken over his responsibilities wants to add the PST folder to their
Outlook box.  If you right click on the PST  file and check properties,
it says that the file is 186 MB, but when you open the folder, there's
nothing in it.  Originally, we received a message that the file was in
use and could not be accessed. That's when I had the current user take
ownership of the file and try again. No success.  The file can now be
accessed, but it shows up as 0 bytes. Anybody know why?

Thanks.

Robert

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yup, 
as long as you all are in the same site. (Maybe even if you aren't, but 
mine all are).

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Jamie Domingue 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 
  12:30 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OWA 
  Question
  
  I am going to add a new Exchange 
  5.5 server to house users' mailboxes. 
  Is it possible for users with mailboxes housed on different Exchange 
  servers to access their mail via OWA from a single server running 
  OWA?
  
  Thanks in 
  advance.
  
  Jamie 
  Domingue
  Systems Integrator 
  II
  Global Data 
  Systems
  337-291-6535
  List Charter 
  and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replication

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: Replication



Wow, 
you MUST be sure if you bet an entire dozen.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 
  4:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  No. 
  All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA itself. 
  It does not need a full install of exchange to function - just connectivity to 
  exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your WINS is good or put a hosts 
  file. If your current server is running out of room I bet a dozen Krispy 
  Kremes that it is the IIS log files getting unruly.
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT Manager 
  Special Projects Engineer Premiere 
  Radio Networks A Division of Clear Channel 
  Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: 
  (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
   -Original Message-  
  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
So I don't need the 
  message transfer agent running on the OWA server?  
   -Original Message-  From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 AM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: 
  RE: Replication   Owa 
  doesn't replicate...the owa itself only passes through  web requests to the exchange server. thanks,   Fred Valdez  Network Administrator  -Original 
  Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
Oppps, I guess I 
  should have mentioned that OWA is on it's  own 
  server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating.   -Original 
  Message-  From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
   OWA just connects to your server - it does not 
  hold any  information from there.   I bet your problem is the IIS 
  log files.Jim Zangara, MCSE+I 
   IT Manager  Special 
  Projects Engineer  Premiere Radio Networks 
   A Division of Clear Channel Communications 
   15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403  Direct: (818) 
  461-8620  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   -Original  
  Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: OWA: Replication  Hello 
  Everyone,   
  Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine.   I have an issue with my OWA 
  server. It would appear that I  have run out of 
  disk space and thus causes the server crash.  Big 
  surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA  server have to have room for replication between itself and 
   the main Exchange server? Do I have to have the 
  same amount  of disk space on both servers? 
  Or can I find a way just to  pull the info from 
  the main server without any replication?  
   TIA  
   Garland Mac Neill  
  Sys Admin  Solbourne  
  ] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
   List Charter and FAQ  
  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
 List Charter and  FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ at: 
   http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Replication

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



They 
are also on Weight Watcher's 10 most deadly places to eat list, but who can 
resist when they're fresh out of the fat :)
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 
  4:37 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  They just opened near 
  here - it is taking over as the IT department's preferred form 
  ofbribery :)
  
  
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT ManagerSpecial Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of 
  Clear Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500 Sherman 
  Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:38 PMTo: MS-Exchange 
Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Replication
Wow, you MUST be sure if you bet an entire dozen.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 28, 
  2002 4:24 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  Replication
  No. 
  All OWA needs is IIS properly configured and OWA 
  itself. It does not need a full install of exchange to function - 
  just connectivity to exchange - it uses NetBIOS names so make sure your 
  WINS is good or put a hosts file. If your current server is running 
  out of room I bet a dozen Krispy Kremes that it is the IIS log files 
  getting unruly.
  Jim Zangara, MCSE+I IT 
  Manager Special Projects Engineer Premiere Radio Networks A Division of Clear 
  Channel Communications 15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 
  500 Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Direct: (818) 461-8620 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
   -Original Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 1:06 PM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
So I don't need 
  the message transfer agent running on the OWA server?   -Original Message- 
   From: Fred Valdez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:22 
  AM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
   Subject: RE: Replication   Owa doesn't replicate...the owa 
  itself only passes through  web requests to 
  the exchange server. thanks,   Fred Valdez  Network 
  Administrator  -Original 
  Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:59 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: Replication  
Oppps, I guess I 
  should have mentioned that OWA is on it's  own 
  server and that I'm pretty sure it's replicating.   -Original 
  Message-  From: Zangara, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:43 
  AM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
   Subject: RE: Replication   OWA just connects to your 
  server - it does not hold any  information 
  from there.   I bet your problem is the IIS log files.Jim Zangara, MCSE+I  IT 
  Manager  Special Projects Engineer 
   Premiere Radio Networks  A Division of Clear Channel Communications  15260 Ventura Blvd Suite 500  
  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403  Direct: (818) 461-8620 
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   -Original  
  Message-  From: Garland Mac Neill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 8:20 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: OWA: Replication  Hello 
  Everyone,   
  Hopefully your Monday is going better than mine.   I have an issue with my OWA 
  server. It would appear that I  have run out 
  of disk space and thus causes the server crash.  Big surprise huh? Anyway, my question is this, does the OWA 
   server have to have room for replication 
  between itself and  the main Exchange server? 
  Do I have to have the same amount  of disk 
  space on both servers? Or can I find a way just to  pull the info from the main server without any 
  replication?   TIA   Garland Mac Neill  Sys 
  Admin  Solbourne  
  ] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
   List Charter and FAQ  at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
   List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
 List Charter and  FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt- 
  software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm  
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



Well, 
that makes sense. If a user's primary computer at work has a CAL and he 
pops into OWA once in a while from home, the CAL at work covers him (or 
her).

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 6:22 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Let's begin here by saying that IANAL and that this is not to be taken 
  as legal advice ( ask your Microsoft Licensing rep and get it in writing) 
  but...
  The 
  following is an extract from the Open Licensing Agreement that I dug out 
  yesterday when talking to Microsoft to get hold of a copy of Outlook 
  2000.
  
  "Client Access. Licensee must acquire a separate 
  CAL for MS Exch svr in order to use Microsoft Client Software 
  to Access or otherwise utilize Microsoft Exchange Server and/or 
  to access or otherwise utilize the services of any other electronic mail 
  server software. {the following is the relevant part} Licensee may also 
  use that same CAL for any other digital electronic device that Licensee uses 
  less than 20% of Licensee's total connection time. 
  
  It 
  goes on to define total connection time but that isn't 
  relevant.
  
  The 
  important part here is that you only need CALs for the number of mailboxes 
  that you have configured that are actually accessed by clients logging in and 
  authenticating. If a user uses OWA to access their mailbox all the time, 
  you would require a CAL for that user, but not necessarily a CAL for every 
  computer that they login from. 
  
  As I 
  said "I am not a Lawyer", but I don't think Microsoft really intended that you 
  should have to have a license for every possible workstation that your users 
  could connect from, only for the number of mailboxes that you have configured 
  on the server that are accessed by your users. However I bet hey wish 
  they could require a license for every machine you login from 
  ;-)
  
  
  
  cheers 
  
  Wayne Hanks Systems 
  Administrator 
  Paterson Ord Minnett Ph 08 9263 1114 
  fax 08 9325 1086 
  "Don't Panic" 
  -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
  
  
  
    -----Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 
3:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
I 
believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many software 
vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA 
users do need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get away with buying no 
CAL's by just having everyone use the web interface.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 
  2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me. 
   From Dell: 
  You don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if 
  the user has a machine that they are pulling data 
  down to their Outlook directly off of the server 
  then they would need a CAL. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage 
  This is my major complaint is that I have people who 
  travel and they like going into a local library of 
  internet café and getting their emails, fax, and voice mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year 
  he must have used 8 different 
  machines. The way I got around it is that I only 
  give a CAL to a machine while it is in use. Once it is no 
  longer in use and not located on a laptop or on 
  site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At least that is what is says in my exchange procedure manual and DR plan. 
  
  Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS 
  local office person told me that what I am doing 
  is within the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a 
  written procedure. 
  ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 
   
  -Original Message----- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OWA usage 
  Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers 
  they use to OWA into your system you licen

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



Thanks, I did forward your post to the folks at CorpSoft for their 
comments. Their task is to keep us on the correct side of Microsoft 
licensing.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Woodrick, Ed 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 7:58 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  The 
  real answer is that it depends on your licensing. Not all licenses are written 
  the same. I know that some licenses require a CAL for each machine. Some 
  probably require a CAL per user. I believe that the standard commercial 
  license is per machine.
  
  AND 
  don't forget that this is an authenticated user, so if you are running on a 
  W2K AD, then you will probably also need a W2K CAL also.
  
  
  But 
  most importantly, the answer is to read the license yourself and then consult 
  your lawyer for any interpretations.
  
  
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:30 AMPosted To: 
Exchange SunbeltConversation: OWA usageSubject: RE: 
OWA usage
Well, that makes sense. If a user's primary computer at work 
has a CAL and he pops into OWA once in a while from home, the CAL at work 
covers him (or her).

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 
fax(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Wayne Hanks 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 
  6:22 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Let's begin here by saying that IANAL and that this is not to be 
  taken as legal advice ( ask your Microsoft Licensing rep and get it in 
  writing) but...
  The following is an extract from the Open Licensing Agreement that 
  I dug out yesterday when talking to Microsoft to get hold of a copy of 
  Outlook 2000.
  
  "Client Access. Licensee must acquire a 
  separate CAL for MS Exch svr in order to use Microsoft Client 
  Software to Access or otherwise utilize Microsoft Exchange 
  Server and/or to access or otherwise utilize the services of any other 
  electronic mail server software. {the following is the relevant 
  part} Licensee may also use that same CAL for any other digital electronic 
  device that Licensee uses less than 20% of Licensee's total connection 
  time. 
  
  It goes on to define total connection time but that isn't 
  relevant.
  
  The important part here is that you only need CALs for the number 
  of mailboxes that you have configured that are actually accessed by 
  clients logging in and authenticating. If a user uses OWA to access 
  their mailbox all the time, you would require a CAL for that user, but not 
  necessarily a CAL for every computer that they login from. 
  
  
  As I said "I am not a Lawyer", but I don't think Microsoft really 
  intended that you should have to have a license for every possible 
  workstation that your users could connect from, only for the number of 
  mailboxes that you have configured on the server that are accessed by your 
  users. However I bet hey wish they could require a license for every 
  machine you login from ;-)
  
  
  
  cheers 
  Wayne Hanks Systems 
  Administrator 
  Paterson Ord Minnett Ph 08 9263 
  1114 fax 08 9325 1086 
  "Don't Panic" 
  -Douglas Adams "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" 
  
  
  
    -----Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - NAO 
Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, 25 January 2002 
3:16To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
I believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many 
software vendors who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the 
time that OWA users do need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get 
away with buying no CAL's by just having everyone use the web 
interface.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve 
RopiakZF Group NAOCERT, Exchange and 
Bar Code Administrator(207) 989-9115 
voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 
  2002 2:07 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: OWA usage
  Below is

RE: 5.5 resource kit

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yeah, 
had to buy the Back Office Resource Kit to get mine.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: David N. Precht 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:24 
  AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: 5.5 resource 
  kit
  Isn't the Res Kit a "pay to play" deal 
  ?
  http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/4355.asp
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Karen Palmer 
To: MS-Exchange Admin 
Issues 
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:13 

Subject: 5.5 resource kit

Does anyone know of any links to the Exchange 5.5 resource kit? 
We can't find it on the MS site and are looking for the mailbox migration 
tool.

Thanks,

Karen PalmerList Charter and FAQ at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



I 
believe your Dell guy is wrong. I've heard from too many software vendors 
who deal with Microsoft products and licensing all the time that OWA users do 
need a CAL. If they didn't, you could get away with buying no CAL's by 
just having everyone use the web interface.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Andy Cottrell 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 2:07 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  Below is what my Dell Licensing guy told me.  From Dell: You 
  don't need a CAL for the remote OWA access, though if the user has 
  a machine that they are pulling data down to their 
  Outlook directly off of the server then they would 
  need a CAL. 
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 8:20 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage 
  This is my major complaint is that I have people who travel 
  and they like going into a local library of internet 
  café and getting their emails, fax, and voice 
  mails via the net. When my boss was in Europe last year he must 
  have used 8 different machines. The way I got 
  around it is that I only give a CAL to a machine while 
  it is in use. Once it is no longer in use and not 
  located on a laptop or on site for 24 hours the CAL is revoked. At 
  least that is what is says in my exchange procedure 
  manual and DR plan. 
  Do not quote me and I am not a lawyer but a senior MS local 
  office person told me that what I am doing is within 
  the scope of the CAL. As long as it is a written 
  procedure. 
  ellery july phone - 651-225-3895 
   
  -Original Message- From: 
  Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:00 AM 
  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage 
  Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they 
  use to OWA into your system you licensing is still out 
  of control. What I was thinking I'd need is some 
  way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC 
  address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many 
  computers are accessing OWA when the guys with the big 
  red "M" on their chest show up at my door. 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 
  989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  -Original Message- From: 
  Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: OWA 
  usage 
  We have a global OWAUsers group and only members of that group can access their email via OWA. Since the number of OWA users is less than the number of Non-OWA users this is not too hard to maintain. 
  -- Jeff Eggleston == 
  "Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist... 
  OK, got the bad news from Microsoft. Every 
  home user who accesses OWA from their 
  home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 
  OWA. Problem is, how can I stop those folks that 
  we don't have a CAL for from getting in? In 
  theory, everyone who has a home computer could 
  use it, but probably few do. Any one 
  got any ideas on how to monitor / control it? 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator (207) 
  989-9115 voice (207) 989-8722 fax (513) 317-0197 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  
  List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



I did 
speak with Vendor, it'sone CAL for each computer. If the user is 
going home to OWA into work he needs a CAL. 
And 
the rich get richer . . . .

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Benjamin Winzenz 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 
  4:21 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  
  There has to be some 
  type of consideration given to OWA users. As others have mentioned, I 
  always "thought" that you did not need a separate CAL for OWA if you 
  already had one for that users work machine/mailbox. You may want to 
  speak to your vendor again and bring up that exact scenario that Neils 
  mentions. It really does sound silly how they are explaining their 
  licensing.
  
  Ben 
  Winzenz, MCSE 
  Network/Systems 
  Administrator 
  Peregrine 
  Systems 
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: Niels 
  Christiansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 4:18 
  PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
  IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
  
  
  That would only fix 
  half of the problem. 
  
  A single OWA-enabled 
  user can access his OWA accountfrom any Internet-connected PC in the 
  world!
  
  
  
  I'd *hate* to pay MS 
  for that many CALs... :-)
  
  
  
  /\/iels
  
  
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:48 
PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage

Create a group 
called NOOWA and deny local login rights to the OWA server to its 
members. Just a thought.



There are many 
other means, like restricting HTTP.




-Original 
Message-From: Leone, 
Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:48 
AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
usage
 If 
they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.  Its as simple as 
that. 
I think 
his question is "How does I stop the folks who *do* have a mailbox, but for 
whom I don't have an OWA CAL? Other than trusting them not 
to?".

 
 
-Original Message-  From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office 
Exchange and Bar Code Admn.  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 
Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues 
 Subject: OWA 
usage  
 
 OK, got 
the bad news from Microsoft. Every home user who 
 accesses 
OWA from  
their home PC needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem 
 is, how 
can I  stop 
those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting 
 in? 
In theory,  
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably 
 few 
do. Any one  got any ideas on how to monitor / control 
it?  
 mit 
freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),  Steve Ropiak  ZF Group NAO 
 CERT, 
Exchange and Bar Code Administrator  (207) 989-9115 voice  (207) 989-8722 fax 
 (513) 
317-0197 cell  [EMAIL PROTECTED]List Charter and FAQ 
at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
  List Charter and FAQ 
at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
 
List Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
  List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Yes, but if each of those users has multiple computers they use to OWA into
your system you licensing is still out of control.  What I was thinking I'd
need is some way to monitor (or perhaps lock out) usage by IP address or MAC
address so I'd have some way of demonstrating how many computers are
accessing OWA when the guys with the big red M on their chest show up at
my door.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Jeffegg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 6:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: OWA usage


We have a global OWAUsers group and only
members of that group can access their email
via OWA.  Since the number of OWA users is
less than the number of Non-OWA users this is
not too hard to maintain.

--
Jeff Eggleston
==

Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange
and Bar Code Admn. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote in message news:221397@exchangelist...

OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every
home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange
5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for
from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use
it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),
Steve Ropiak
ZF Group NAO
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator
(207) 989-9115 voice
(207) 989-8722 fax
(513) 317-0197 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Is that the Microsoft solution?  Just buy two CAL's for every user, one for
work, one for home?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA usage


OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

We had this discussion with Corpsoft shortly before a threatened audit by
Microsoft and their position on Exchange licensing is that you don't need a
CAL for every user, but every computer that accesses 5.5 Exchange.  Hence,
if 3 people share one computer, only 1 CAL required.  That being the case,
if this guy accesses Exchange from work, then goes home and does OWA at
night he should need 2 CAL's as there are 2 computers accessing the system.
Am I more confused?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:33 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain them correctly.

You need a CAL for every person that is accessing the Exchange server. That
CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or OWA.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


Is that the Microsoft solution?  Just buy two CAL's for every user, one for
work, one for home?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: OWA usage


If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get in.
Its as simple as that.

-Original Message-
From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: OWA usage


OK, got the bad news from Microsoft.  Every home user who accesses OWA from
their home PC  needs a CAL for my Exchange 5.5 OWA.  Problem is, how can I
stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for from getting in?  In theory,
everyone who has a home computer could use it, but probably few do.  Any one
got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: OWA usage

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: RE: OWA usage



That 
is my understanding. I emailed Corpsoft for clarification. They 
handle our licensing issues.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),Steve RopiakZF Group 
NAOCERT, Exchange and Bar Code 
Administrator(207) 989-9115 voice(207) 989-8722 fax(513) 317-0197 
cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  -Original Message-From: Leone, Michael 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 
  1:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OWA 
  usage
   I think you have things misunderstood or didn't explain 
  them  correctly.  
   You need a CAL for every person that is accessing 
  the  Exchange server. That  CAL encompasses, regular old connections, POP, IMAP, or 
  OWA. 
  Not every person; every computer. If I access at work, and 
  again at home/on the road using OWA, I need 2 licenses. I think.
-Original 
  Message-  From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence 
  Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:33 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: RE: OWA usage  
Is that the 
  Microsoft solution? Just buy two CAL's for every  user, one for  work, one for 
  home?   mit 
  freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards),  Steve Ropiak 
   ZF Group NAO  CERT, 
  Exchange and Bar Code Administrator  (207) 
  989-9115 voice  (207) 989-8722 fax 
   (513) 317-0197 cell  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
   -Original Message-  From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:27 PM  To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: 
  RE: OWA usage   
   If they don't have a mailbox, they cant get 
  in.  Its as simple as that.   -Original Message- 
   From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and 
  Bar Code Admn.  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
   Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:26 AM 
   To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues  Subject: OWA usageOK, got the bad news from 
  Microsoft. Every home user who  accesses OWA 
  from  their home PC needs a CAL for my 
  Exchange 5.5 OWA. Problem  is, how can 
  I  stop those folks that we don't have a CAL for 
  from getting  in? In theory, 
   everyone who has a home computer could use it, but 
  probably  few do. Any one  got any ideas on how to monitor / control it?   mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best 
  Regards),  Steve Ropiak  ZF Group NAO  CERT, Exchange and Bar 
  Code Administrator  (207) 989-9115 voice 
   (207) 989-8722 fax  
  (513) 317-0197 cell  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 List Charter and FAQ at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
List Charter and FAQ 
  at:  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm 
   List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



I beg 
to differ, but Exchange 5.5 users do not need an NT4 CAL UNLESS they use file or 
print services (plain old mail users use neither).
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL. When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
  
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home? Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5. It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
  
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
  
  There was some academicvolume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation. Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under. 
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
  
  Jacqueline
  
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advicebut I will ask the question anyway. Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox? From the MS web it appears 
per user. 

Exchange 5.5 

Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.

Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: License Question

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Title: Message



See 
Q168633.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 
  2002 11:30 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  License Question
  Don't forget the NT4.0/Win2K CAL for those home users too. When 
  they authenticate, they require a CAL. When you license per seat, it 
  doesn't matter if the seat is at the office or at home.
  
  Jacqueline
  

-Original Message-From: Ropiak Steve - 
NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:55 AMTo: 
MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: License 
Question
Exchange CAL for everyone who OWA's in from home? Say it ain't 
so, Bill.

  -Original Message-From: Moody, Jacqueline 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  16, 2002 8:45 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: License Question
  It is per workstation for version 5.5. It looks like they 
  changed it to per user for Exchange 2000, but that may or may not apply to 
  volume licensing.
  
  So - you need a Win2K/NT4.0 CAL per user or per workstation (per 
  server or per seat mode), then you need an Exchange 5.5 CAL per 
  workstation (including home machines if they use OWA to 
  authenticate).
  
  There was some academicvolume licensing in 5.5 where they 
  licensed Exchange per user instead of per workstation. Your best bet 
  is to check out the license agreement your purchased under. 
  Microsoft doesn't do a one size fits all for 
licensing.
  
  Jacqueline
  
  

-Original Message-From: Hotchkiss, 
Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 
January 16, 2002 8:23 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin 
IssuesSubject: License Question
I know nobody here can give legal 
advicebut I will ask the question anyway. Are Exchange CAL's 
based on user, workstation, or mailbox? From the MS web it appears 
per user. 

Exchange 5.5 

Any links to MS web sites also 
appreciated.

Pete HotchkissList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic 
mail transmission is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential information 
belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client 
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of 
any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original 
message.List Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
Charter and FAQ 
at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htmList 
  Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Public free/busy time and admin rights

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Was 
the old server the first server in the site? If so, the system folder 
housing free/busy info is gone. Check Q152960 about rebuilding the site 
folders.
Steve

  -Original Message-From: Jason Cordingley 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 
  3:48 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Public 
  free/busy time and admin rights
  
  NT Server 4, SP 
  6a
  Exchange 5.5 
  SP4
  
  I have created a new Exchange 5.5 
  box, transferred all our users from the old box to the new box, and everyone 
  can send mail no problems. The old box was then taken away and removed as a 
  server within the exchange admin screen from the new 
  server.
  
  I now have 2 
  problems.
  
  I cannot remotely connect to the 
  exchange server, the error is 
  
  You do not have the permissions 
  required to complete the operation.
  Microsoft Exchange 
  Directory
  ID no: 
  DS_E_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS
  
  I am a member of Domain Admins and can remotely use tools like Wins Admin and 
  Server Admin
  
  Also
  
  Sometime when someone gets an 
  email we get the error message
  
  Cannot update public free/busy 
  time.
  
  Has anyone got any ideas for 
  either problem? The remote admin is the least of the 
  problems.
  
  Jason 
  CordingleyList Charter and FAQ 
  at:http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

No room at the Inn

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

When I try to create a server based rule, Outlook always comes back and says
there's not enough room on the server.  Is this a rights issue or am I
missing something?  

Exchange 5.5 SP3 on NT4 SP6.

Thanks

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:10 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem


This is what I'm doing here, except we are on Exchange 5.5.

-Original Message-
From: Brent Hudson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:32 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem

If you open the SMTP server properties, Access tab and click relay
restrictions, then check the Allow all computers which successfully
authenticate ... bla, bla, bla ... then in Outlook/ Oexpress you can
indicate that the mail client MUST authenticate to send via the server ..
you should be ok... works for me...

B

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 03 January 2002 08:05
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Relaying problem


Depending on their connection type, specify an IP range under the relay tab
of your Virtual SMTP Server(s).

-Original Message-
From: Greg Kerr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:39 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Relaying problem


Hi

I appear to be having a problem with some remote users attaching to my
exchange server using Outlook Express.  The issue is that if I allow
relaying all remote users are able to send and receive email.  However if I
have it this way I am susceptible to spammers. (already happened once, never
again)  When I stop it from allowing relaying no remote users are able to
send email.  Instead they receive an NDR saying that relaying is not
allowed.

I am using exchange 2000 with the latest service pack and Outlook Express
for the clients.  I suspect that I need to alter the way I have it setup.
Is there a step by step guide to seting up Exchange for pop3/smtp clients?

Regards... Greg
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Forwarding mail to an external account

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

Can happen if the external account gets full and starts sending nastygrams
back to the Exchange account (We got AOL very mad at us for something
similar) but it's up to the user to properly manage the other account.

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:00 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Forwarding mail to an external account


Is not a way to also start a mail loop ?

- Original Message -
From: Snook, Kevin S (ITD) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 08:41
Subject: RE: Forwarding mail to an external account


 Create an Alternate Recipient (Delivery Options) on the Mailbox in
Exchange
 Admin (you will need to create a custom recipient first) or create a rule
on
 the mailbox. You should look at the security implications of EVERYTHING
from
 his Inbox going to an external address. Most orgs. don't allow this type
of
 thing.

 Kevin

 -Original Message-
 From: Bob Couchman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 02 January 2002 12:54
 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
 Subject: Forwarding mail to an external account


 One of my users has retired and wished to have any mail sent to him here
 forwarded to an external account. It there any way to do this in exchange?
 I'm running MS Exchange 5.5.

 Ptl. Bob Couchman
 Unit 57
 Network Administrator
 Madisonville Police Department
 99 East Center Street
 Madisonville, KY 42431
 (270) 821-1720
 (270) 824-2115 (fax)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Visit the Madisonville Police Department on the internet at
 http://www.madisonvillepd.com http://www.madisonvillepd.com/

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

 List Charter and FAQ at:
 http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm



_

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

RE: Calendar

[Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.]

How about public folder?

mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), 
Steve Ropiak 
ZF Group NAO 
CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator 
(207) 989-9115 voice 
(207) 989-8722 fax 
(513) 317-0197 cell 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Calendar


I have NO idea if what I'm trying to accomplish will work or not, so
I've come to the experts.  What we want to do is share a calendar that
will be used by the entire department for scheduling appointments in
the Conference Room.  This way, users can use the Calendar to see when
the Conference Room is available.  A mailbox has been created called
Conference Room.  Usually, when you schedule an appointment, the Calendar is
not marked until that appointment is accepted.  However, we don't want to
have to have someone manually go in and accept every one of these messages
in the Conference Room mailbox.  Is this making any sense, and if so, is
there anyway to setup an account to automatically accept a meeting when it
is requested?

Thanks.

Robert


*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ***

This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail
message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and
may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information.  It is
intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s).
If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in
reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this electronic mail message in
error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system.

*** The Dayton Power  Light Company. ***

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm